From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 04:02:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395C716A401; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD8D13C457; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from neutrino.centtech.com (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3M42EaS022170; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:02:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <462ADE46.3080304@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:02:14 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bakul Shah , Eric Anderson , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070420195955.GA19042@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20070420204102.331595B2E@mail.bitblocks.com> <20070420233524.GA23954@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20070420233524.GA23954@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3146/Sat Apr 21 14:39:19 2007 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh2.centtech.com Cc: Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:02:20 -0000 On 04/20/07 18:35, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:41:01PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: >>>>> Or, did something in your kernel change maybe that necessitates >>>>> a rebuild of the kqemu kld? >>>> Evidently that was it - after rebuilding/reinstalling the kqemu module, >>>> all is well. Nothing else changed to make it work. Woohoo! Thanks - >>>> not sure why I didn't think of that.. :) >> For this reason I have >> >> PORTS_MODULES=emulators/kqemu-kmod >> >> in /etc/make.conf so that it gets rebuilt when I rebuild the kernel. >> >>> Right, qemu doesn't come with one (I haven't played with pxe booting >>> yet so I didn't even notice.) >> Actually it does. See /usr/local/share/qemu/pxe-* but due to >> at lease one bug it doesn't work. > > Not for the eepro100 (fxp) varietys. >>>> I >>>> tried to make one, but it still didn't like it. I'm not sure which >>>> selection to pick from the rom-o-matic site. >> I found and fixed one bug in src/core/osloader.c (in >> etherboot-5.4.3 code) which allows me to get a little bit >> further. If anyone wants to play with this more, I can send >> them my changes. > > You may want to post those on the qemu list... > > Juergen On this list too, since I'm not subscribed to the qemu list (nor are many people on this list I'm guessing). Eric