From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 00:17:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FF516A46C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5789613C4B8 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-105-193.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.105.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406EDEBC78; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:17:40 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" Message-Id: <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:17:42 -0000 "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" wrote: > > I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am > therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD. You shouldn't use FreeBSD, then. It's written by hackers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker If you're trying to protect yourself from Internet criminals, though, you'll find FreeBSD very useful. > What is your association with Open BSD? with Linux? There have got to be a jillion explanations of this on the WWW. Are you familiar with google?: http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/history.html Those are just two that I found quickly. > Are there copyright or other related issues involved? Sure. Although I don't really know what you mean by that. > It appears that FreeBSD is the most closely associated with the original > Berkeley programmers. Depends on who you ask. > I was told that OpenBSD provided the best security. But I also note > that changes have occurred at OBSD, and wonder if this is still true. What changes are those? OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and motivating factors than any other OS I know. Whether or not that actually causes it to be more secure or not is a subject of some debate, although the general consensus seems to be that they are largely successful. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 00:26:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A48B16A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:26:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@inf.ed.ac.uk) Received: from nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1607B13C45B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@inf.ed.ac.uk) Received: from macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk (macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.164.231]) by nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l530Qbvk004309; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:26:38 +0100 Received: by macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 26013) id 9507B215D70; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:26:35 +0100 (BST) From: Richard Tobin To: Sam Lawrance , Richard Tobin In-Reply-To: Sam Lawrance's message of Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:34:42 +1000 Organization: just say no X-Mailer: Ream 5.1.51-richard-mac Message-Id: <20070603002635.9507B215D70@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:26:35 +0100 (BST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Apple Mac Mini? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:26:46 -0000 > > Does FreeBSD run well on the Mac Mini (x86)? I'm considering getting > > one to use for both MacOS and FreeBSD (booting from an external disk, > > if that's reasonable). > Yep, it works fine. I used boot camp to create a small boot > partition on the internal drive, and it loads everything else from an > external USB drive. Thanks. A few more questions: - Any reason to prefer USB over Firewire? - Do you have to use a boot partition on the internal disk? Can FreeBSD boot from external USB or Firewire? - Which release of FreeBSD are you using? Thanks, Richard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 00:34:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE34216A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozanenginoglu@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B96A13C4B9 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozanenginoglu@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so543631uge for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=N1N5ZWa0CuYHPm6w2/ZK6Vf4CXg2KNaGTZ00NrD9sEzd8zKkTypjr/rwt5Jsfs9mb8BTgtuD9UYc/1p29r77AHpmSA7t9h7mU/20eA0520VFdzaXbyW3OmOVnunsiFKv+jSS4VQThfQi8C6sjZQfM6Q/E5n8m6JsjG3SZynEdDI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Bd7NU73NrXj7IioYxwqO0Usc9Qmm+1qo0gakqZYIlDyNzFq3HSVBl2IqIlV+tOw+DyjhfVAKqUDGlPiPllsbbDu00L6pOVEKj0YW1g2LRtCe1Lsq/wtsr7o53E7vKnJfMjQ/YBO3v/ucCldcLM4bZow1QkxyLFCSOJkbm2L8OOE= Received: by 10.66.220.12 with SMTP id s12mr1931952ugg.1180830857170; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.4? ( [81.215.237.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 30sm1411528ugf.2007.06.02.17.34.15; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:34:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Ozan Enginoglu To: Nikola Lecic In-Reply-To: <4660e5a8.7bf67e34.6d34.6a57@mx.google.com> References: <1180738844.1116.9.camel@laptop> <200706020001.l5201mKS004494@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> <1180746840.13173.5.camel@laptop> <200706020235.l522Zv7p002571@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> <4660e5a8.7bf67e34.6d34.6a57@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:30:58 +0300 Message-Id: <1180830658.3178.15.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:34:18 -0000 On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 05:36 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200 > Nikola Lecic wrote: > > > On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300 > > Ozan Enginoglu wrote: > > [...] > > > And is there any way to play flash files without using > > > "nspluginwrapper"? > > > > Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...). There is no > > way to use linux flashplugin in native browsers without a wrapper. > > Actually, yes, depends on what you need. You can use graphics/libflash > with www/flashplugin-mozilla (supports flash files up to version 4) and > graphics/gnash (GNU flash player, which is not actually a plugin; AFAIK > still can't handle YouTube, but it will in the near future). At this > moment, if you want to cover the most demanding flash sites, you have > no choice but to use linux-flashplugin (with a wrapper), as described in > the mail I've just sent. > > Nikola Lečić Ok, here are my computer properties: evo n800v compaq laptop with 1.8 ghz and 512 ram. oenginoglu@laptop[0]:~$ nspluginwrapper -a -v -i Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Install plugin /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so ... already installed system-wide, skipping Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux Install plugin /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) as a user i get the same core dumped error. Now i can play any flash in firefox but inspide of that i got "pid 4909 (npconfig), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)" error. I changed the depth from 16 to 32 but i still got these errors. And when i open 3 web sites with flash plugins the cpu usage is approx. (and stable) 45%. Is this normal? See ya! -- Ozan Enginoğlu Mechanical Engineer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 01:10:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7A316A46E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd2mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A3513C500 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.215]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJ100J6VCM4XP60@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:10:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.145]) by pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJ10077RCM47SY0@pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:10:53 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0JJ1005MRCM3UK22@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:10:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: (qmail 14763 invoked from network); Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:10:28 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hexahedron.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:10:28 +0000 Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Bill Moran Message-id: <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070511) Cc: "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:10:51 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and > motivating factors than any other OS I know. I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly the same place -- at the top of the list. I think the distinction to draw is that FreeBSD has a longer (albeit unwritten) list of project goals, with the effect that a smaller proportion of the development being done on FreeBSD is security-related; this may make it look like we care less about security, but it's really just a sign that FreeBSD is a larger project. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 01:45:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1A616A468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEEB13C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1742965pyi for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hYqsxQjcCCtLdhHx8j8ChcvG4zndo/vF5cq0wjxvLko1D3hsr2xQdAJGx3uFxQ2MpocOeU83k6WqHsrsiP6zkS4V8hlWv0SvNtpIXx1dqPaPkiU6JpCNKf0bS4ycXbUXBDfFhqVGK0giKzMv+7fmrWSbjKD56FtZZDC65q9cf/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BgSZWUCUuBkOEo/czJ0reGdjVTIdrbs9MAXeCFYz6TQVT3wutot2VpQ8F9MYQT3rlKf01WZ2mL3KXNyHSiBNdQquEmHhrMFMZM6fbXOVqPACOUkMPkmDIJ5qgObzyYnP9axLEj6whyshm3hskS9Uv1KFnWsIXC9nadH8Dkdm3dE= Received: by 10.142.77.11 with SMTP id z11mr155796wfa.1180835138660; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.254.1 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <26ddd1750706021845m56b29a47l6b06ff2a6a8e2559@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:45:38 -0400 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200706021532.09429.lacoste@miage.univ-paris12.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <26ddd1750706011227g224eaa1dh93233400c704595e@mail.gmail.com> <1d3ed48c0706011603k5948510ctb49e399aa2ace22f@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750706011635s285860c1p57c360af69596ecc@mail.gmail.com> <200706021532.09429.lacoste@miage.univ-paris12.fr> Subject: Re: Recommendations for config file revision control X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:45:40 -0000 On 6/2/07, Thierry Lacoste wrote: > > I did just think of another thing I could do. What if I create a new > > directory on the server, and move all configuration files from their > > original location to this directory. I then make then make it into an > > svn working directory, and in place of the original files put symlinks > > that point to the corresponding file in the working directory. This > > would mean that I no longer have .svn directories all over the file > > system, there is just one working directory that is separate from > > everything else. Instead of an export operation I could have the hook > > script do an update, and this would also give me a rather simple way > > of editing the files locally on the server (plus it has the advantage > > of quick access to all important files without having to constantly > > move from /etc to /usr/local/etc). > > > > Does this seem like a decent idea to try and do? Might some software > > have a problem with its configuration file being a symlink to some > > other location? > Sorry for my previous top-posting. > Will a chrooted named work if you make files in /var/named/etc/namedb/ > symlinks to the working directory ? > > Regards, > Thierry. I'm not sure I understand your question. A symlink will work if you can get to the target inside the chrooted environment. You can't symlink to a file that's outside of the root. Here's an update on what I ended up going with. I decided to go with my idea of moving all configuration files to a common directory, but with a bit of a change. I created /config and under it base/ and user/. Everything in base/ comes from /etc and /boot, and the rest goes under user/. I didn't want to mix the two. So then I created a new subversion repository, but I set permissions such that only root can read or write to it. Basically I decided to forbid anyone on the outside from getting their hands on the repository contents, since it will be storing things like master.passwd and other sensitive data. Once all this was in place I moved all configuration files to their appropriate locations in /config and created symlinks in their original location. Everything under /config was then imported into the subversion repository using the file:// method. Since I forbid anyone from doing a check-out of the repository to some external location, I don't need to worry about file updates except when they are updated in /config. This simplifies things. What I did to keep the repository up to date was create a simple sh script that is run by cron every 10 minutes. The script simply issues 'svn ci --non-interactive --message "Automatic commit"' command in the /config directory. So any changes made to the configuration files are automatically recorded every 10 minutes. This works well, but does have a few flaws. First of all, when I edit files from sftp I have no way to add a meaningful message to the commit. Not a big deal, and I can always do a manual commit if I had to. The other thing is that this script will not auto-add files to the repository. Any new configuration file that I'd like to have monitored first gets moved to /config, then has a link created in the original place, then is added to the repository via 'svn add'. A bit more work, but I think it's fine. Technically I can automate the process of adding and removing files from the repository by using svn status output, but at this point the extra work isn't worth it. The bigger problem is the fact that subversion does not store owner and permission settings. That means that if I ever want to delete the /config directory and recreate it, I lose all permissions on things like master.passwd. What I did was add chown and chmod commands to the monitor script for all files that had non-standard permissions. So those get run along with the svn ci command every 10 minutes. The alternative was to use subversion properties, have the script parse those and apply the appropriate settings. However, since the permissions have to be set manually anyway there is no advantage to this over the monitor script, which is also versioned. So that's my solution to this problem, for anyone else who is interested. I took a look at all the recommended version control systems, including the list on wikipedia. A few looked interesting, but I decided against them for one reason or another. I think this subversion solution is a good compromise, but I'm always open to better ideas if you have any. - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 01:54:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A6116A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D81F13C468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l531rxB4078954; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:54:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <46621F30.4080804@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:53:52 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> In-Reply-To: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:54:02 -0000 Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote: Hello. Hope it's not too "tongue-in-chic", but it's practically irresistable. > I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am > therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD. > What is your association with Open BSD? Hmm, three letters, and, long, long ago in a galaxy far away (1993, California), the same codebase. These days, it's possible that some developers work on both the FreeBSD and OpenBSD projects (I don't know for sure), and, once in a great while, when somebody "over here" says something, um, wrong(?), Theo De Raadt drops by to Set Us Straight(TM). [I can only assume that some of "us" go over there first to invite combat. Indeed, I might be doing it now. Generally, I respect the OpenBSD team's outlook on life in general, etc., and I download _all_ the songs.] You might wish to also read about and/or consider "NetBSD" and "DragonFlyBSD". Also, "PCBSD" and "Desktop BSD" are relatively new projects that are based on the work of the FreeBSD Project, with an eye to being, maybe, more "user friendly" in regard to installation in particular and configuration in general. Lastly, you might want to consider obtaining "FreesBIE", a "Live CD" system based on FreeBSD. You can boot a computer from CDROM into FreeBSD and 1 of a few different types of "user environments", maybe get a feel for it, test your hardware, read the manpages, read /COPYRIGHT, perhaps other read documentation, courtesy of some hard-working Italian "hackers" (and some from some other places). > with Linux? What's that? If you are familiar with Linux, search at Google with the string "BSD Linux Matthew Fuller rant". It's a fairly well thought-through tirade on some of the differences Linux users perceive when they look at (Free)BSD. If you _aren't_ familiar with Linux, let's just say that FreeBSD is to Linux as Ferrari is to Pontiac (or, maybe vice-versa, depending on whom you read --- of course, many people these days are pathological liars and can't be trusted, right?), and then leave it dead somewhere near there. Both are computer operating systems with several similarities, enough that if you can "drive" one, you can probably "get around" in the other. They just aren't the *same*. > Are there copyright or other related issues involved? You will need to be more specific. *-BSD systems are under the "BSD Copyright", which I'm sure you can find with a web search. Some software on FreeBSD (and by extension PCBSD and 'Desktop BSD') may also be under the FSF's "GPL". The compiler comes to mind, for starters. I believe that one of the goals of many BSD developers is to ultimately be rid of GPL'ed software; but, then again, one of many humans' goals it to ultimately build a Utopian society without many of the societal ills we face. It's not so likely to happen very soon at all. > It appears that FreeBSD is the most closely associated with the original > Berkeley programmers. Maybe. NetBSD and FreeBSD were both originally based heavily on UC Berkley work, most notably 4.3BSD/Net 2, and then 4.4BSD after it became "unencumbered". Speaking of "Copyright" above, and, if you are referring to issues such as the SCO/Linux court battle or the recent Microsoft claim that Linux infringes on $n of their patents, as far as we know, no one has any commercial "copyright", per se, in the FreeBSD source code. The lawsuit on that one was settled in 1993, out of court IIRC. The contestants were BSDI (and, to some extent, by extension, U. Cal), and AT&T's "Unix Systems Laboratories". > I was told that OpenBSD provided the best security. But I also note > that changes have occurred at OBSD, and wonder if this is still true. Actually, OpenBSD does have an excellent security track record. They might also welcome a large monetary donation, should you be so endowed and inclined. OTOH, it's totally "Free", also, in rather the same way as FreeBSD. OpenBSD "forked" from NetBSD many years ago for some reason or another that I'm sure you can read up on with resources on the WWW (or, maybe the aforementioned Mr. De Raadt will Set Me Straight(TM)). Let me encourage you to read appropriate sections of, or even all of the FreeBSD handbook (www.freebsd.org/handbook). It is probably the best open-source operating system documentation in existence (and perhaps better than any proprietary OS docs, also). Bah, too many words. Good luck with your search for security! Kevin Kinsey -- The devil finds work for idle glands. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 02:23:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED9B16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D5B13C45A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l532JEjJ062245; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:19:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l532JECa062244; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:19:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:19:14 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" Message-ID: <20070603021914.GA62205@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 02:23:44 -0000 On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:18:33PM -0700, Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote: > I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am > therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD. > What is your association with Open BSD? with Linux? > Are there copyright or other related issues involved? You can read the copyright information on the web site. It will give you better information than repeating it hear. > It appears that FreeBSD is the most closely associated with the original > Berkeley programmers. Essentially true. > I was told that OpenBSD provided the best security. But I also note > that changes have occurred at OBSD, and wonder if this is still true. Well, OpenBSd has made a point of being security conscious, but FreeBSD fixes any problems that come up in it as well. For real work situations I think the differences are quite small nowdays insofar as security is concerned. But, I am sure someone would enjoy splitting bits over that. ////jerry > > Blake Finley > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 03:01:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0C316A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaj@hcl-club.lu) Received: from 0b10111.de (hcl-club.lu [62.75.155.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125CC13C45B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaj@hcl-club.lu) Received: from localhost (4be54-4-82-234-154-189.fbx.proxad.net [82.234.154.189]) by 0b10111.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C81872C442; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:33:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:33:01 +0200 From: Jona Joachim To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> In-Reply-To: <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" , Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:01:56 -0000 On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700 Colin Percival wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and > > motivating factors than any other OS I know. > > I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly > the same place -- at the top of the list. Sorry but I have to disagree here. FreeBSD ships with closed source software including following drivers: ath, nve, oltr, rr232x, hptmv. Closed source software implies potential insecurity. If security is at the top of the list then I see a clear contradiction here. Jona -- "I am chaos. I am the substance from which your artists and scientists build rhythms. I am the spirit with which your children and clowns laugh in happy anarchy. I am chaos. I am alive, and tell you that you are free." Eris, Goddess Of Chaos, Discord & Confusion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 03:10:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9014A16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C89F13C448 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-88-131-35.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.88.131.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3856311432B for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:12:52 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:10:08 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <933DCFF2293A4ED344379171@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========F1130D425763CA9E2D97==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:10:10 -0000 --==========F1130D425763CA9E2D97========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On June 3, 2007 4:33:01 AM +0200 Jona Joachim wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700 > Colin Percival wrote: > >> Bill Moran wrote: >> > OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and >> > motivating factors than any other OS I know. >> >> I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly >> the same place -- at the top of the list. > > Sorry but I have to disagree here. > FreeBSD ships with closed source software including following drivers: > ath, nve, oltr, rr232x, hptmv. > Closed source software implies potential insecurity. If security is at > the top of the list then I see a clear contradiction here. > Sorry, but that's an incredibly naive statement. *All* software implies=20 potential insecurity. It's the nature of software. If it were untrue, there would be no security patches for open source=20 software. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========F1130D425763CA9E2D97==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 03:18:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6999216A468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F83513C448 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id AE0AB4AD4E; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDFE4AC9D; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:18:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20070601202518.GA57768@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20070602231823.J30921@saturn.atopia.net> References: <20070601155423.Y73725@saturn.atopia.net> <20070601202518.GA57768@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:18:39 -0000 saturn# make describe On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in make.conf. On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE. *** Error code 1 I guess I need to set a variable in make.conf. odd though, I have WITHOUT_X11 set in make.conf On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:55:14PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> While running portsdb -uU, I'm getting the following: >> >> This is with no refuse files, nothing ignored, and a full up-to-date ports >> collection. Any ideas? >> >> saturn# portsdb -uU >> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..===> >> arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed >> *** Error code 1 >> ===> accessibility/at-poke failed >> *** Error code 1 >> 2 errors > > What happens when you run make describe in those directories? > > Kris > > > !DSPAM:466080b0780589774317175! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 04:09:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DA616A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81BA13C458 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 30FBE508B0; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070603041004.30FBE508B0@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-05-13 - 2007-06-02 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:09:15 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 05:44:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450FF16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2974413C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 80166 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 05:41:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 05:41:26 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l535iVDW063474 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:44:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l535iUde063473 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:44:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:44:30 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070603054430.GA63366@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <46621F30.4080804@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46621F30.4080804@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:44:36 -0000 On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:53:52PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote: > > If you are familiar with Linux, search at Google with the string "BSD Linux > Matthew Fuller rant". It's a fairly well thought-through tirade on some of > the > differences Linux users perceive when they look at (Free)BSD. If you > _aren't_ > familiar with Linux, let's just say that FreeBSD is to Linux as Ferrari is > to Pontiac (or, maybe vice-versa, depending on whom you read --- of course, > many > people these days are pathological liars and can't be trusted, right?), and > then leave it dead somewhere near there. Both are computer operating > systems with several similarities, enough that if you can "drive" one, you > can probably > "get around" in the other. They just aren't the *same*. I'd say it's probably more like Linux is a two-rail snow sled with an Exocet rocket motor bolted to it while FreeBSD is a racing snowmobile. At least, that's how they feel in comparison with one another, to someone who made the switch from Debian to FreeBSD starting in November of last year (that's me). I prefer the snowmobile, but some people just like an out-of-control ride at 315m/s. Go figure. > > You will need to be more specific. *-BSD systems are under the "BSD > Copyright", > which I'm sure you can find with a web search. Some software on FreeBSD > (and > by extension PCBSD and 'Desktop BSD') may also be under the FSF's "GPL". > The > compiler comes to mind, for starters. I believe that one of the goals of > many > BSD developers is to ultimately be rid of GPL'ed software; but, then again, > one > of many humans' goals it to ultimately build a Utopian society without many > of > the societal ills we face. It's not so likely to happen very soon at all. That's something I've been wondering about. Do you (or anyone else here) happen to know if there's an ongoing project/effort to replace gcc for the *BSDs? > > Actually, OpenBSD does have an excellent security track record. They > might also welcome a large monetary donation, should you be so endowed and > inclined. > > OTOH, it's totally "Free", also, in rather the same way as FreeBSD. OpenBSD > "forked" from NetBSD many years ago for some reason or another that I'm > sure you can read up on with resources on the WWW (or, maybe the > aforementioned > Mr. De Raadt will Set Me Straight(TM)). Totally free except the format of the official installer, that is. It may seem like a minor matter, but for perfect accuracy it should probably be mentioned at least in passing. > > Let me encourage you to read appropriate sections of, or even all of > the FreeBSD handbook (www.freebsd.org/handbook). It is probably the best > open-source operating system documentation in existence (and perhaps better > than any proprietary OS docs, also). Judging by my experience with proprietary OSes, they tend to be worse than pretty much all of the major Linux distros, which puts FreeBSD even further ahead of proprietary OS documentation. YMMV. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Paul Graham: "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to build programs out of the wrong concepts." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 05:52:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9301616A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72CA613C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 98407 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 05:49:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 05:49:39 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l535qiAj063510 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:52:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l535qhRe063509 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:52:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:52:43 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070603055243.GB63366@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:52:47 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:33:01AM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700 > Colin Percival wrote: > > > Bill Moran wrote: > > > OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and > > > motivating factors than any other OS I know. > > > > I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly > > the same place -- at the top of the list. > > Sorry but I have to disagree here. > FreeBSD ships with closed source software including following drivers: > ath, nve, oltr, rr232x, hptmv. > Closed source software implies potential insecurity. If security is at > the top of the list then I see a clear contradiction here. More accurately, I'd say that the closed source drivers only imply priorities contradictory to security if they're installed and active in default configuration. If it's just a binary lump that never executes, on the other hand, or is on a server or CD somewhere waiting to be installed if you want it, that doesn't imply insecurity in the system -- only in the configuration of a system where someone chooses to use the closed source software. Hopefully that made some sense. While I tend to agree with the OpenBSD approach to closed source software in general, I don't think that specifically making it effectively impossible to use without rewriting key parts of the OS yourself is a security-oriented decision. Security involves not using closed source software, not telling everyone else that they can't use it either. I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only if it was installed and operational by default would that really be the case. Obviously, I'm assuming it's not installed by default. From what I've read so far, it's not -- please correct me if I'm wrong. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Amazon.com interview candidate: "When C++ is your hammer, everything starts to look like your thumb." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 05:56:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CBC16A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E22A13C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so1353453wag for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:56:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=toaVqniWXHJccKhYrDhX7Qhx7yQ6HpXxZSVyUCg0iC4KllN9brOlA1Nd2E7jzbI4ON5DuYZJDuGbwPtH8K05FQVqQcga5fRgHG2STCr+IjcngLEJLlx7d3KS/8E8k8ZRBVa5iw/e3E5DfMNDvzkCXzcf474idk38Ce3wspIFocc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k4WydJxtED5xGFAQzzdQeQ2ev3i/BX11v6P/3eLXblMuclYI27yJdmtOL5QF79kZvqLAkphoRsmz2+U918yNoWtW9Exp9wg51G5qwK0UA4hSMww2vBswEWF1jDetGTieKrstx1O/HaD7xMVTHJpZQ0sEXZqcslkXZBK1fBhxEjw= Received: by 10.115.61.1 with SMTP id o1mr3520205wak.1180850173705; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.79.6 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:56:13 -0400 From: "Spiros Papadopoulos" To: RW , "Steve Bertrand" , "Ted Mittelstaedt" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070601132317.214026bc@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd mailing list Subject: Fwd: Squid and IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:56:19 -0000 Sorry, forgot to add the list... Hi again, On 01/06/07, RW wrote: > > > Are you really sure you want to do that way? I am sure about me wanting to use FreeBSD and i am sure about me liking IPFW. *I am not sure* if it is the best way of doing this, but i believe that if you know how to setup the system and IPFW appropriately, then it can be a very good firewall solution. I am also sure that if you setup sth like this from scratch and you are not an expert, it would need time before it becomes strong enough. I am not an expert and unfortunately my time is being shared between multiple things at the moment, even though I would like to concentrate only on this... Squid wont be able to > control access to https or ftp. And what about http on non-standard > ports, e.g. http://easynews.com:81 These are consequent questions. What would you recommend on this? As i mentioned I sent this post quite in advance. Before i start setting up. > without setting this on each workstation? > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringBrowsers has some options It is not for a home network. I wouldn't want to have to set each workstation' s browser settings. Especially since there is another way of doing this. On 02/06/07, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > > > The people that are smart enough to get around this kind of a block > > in an organization are generally not the problem. It is the morons that > > have no concept of appropriate use of the Internet in the workplace > > who are the problems, and they will be effectively stopped. :o) I agree with Ted here. It's the innapropriate web surfers who are the > main problem, however, traffic filters will catch people using odd > ports, and firewall rules are there to fix this. I know from experience and is a fact, that traffic/packet filters can be used effectively to strengthen the firewall rules. > I use much the same setup for my 8 year old son. He only gets Internet > > access to websites that we have approved and added to the squid list. > > May I make a recommendation for DansGuardian for home users. I have used > it for a few years now, and instead of maintaining just a single list of > allowed sites, it does a fantastic job of filtering the actual content, > images, url's and a bunch of other things. > > Of course physical observance is the best approach, but the > Squid/Dansguardian approach works exceptionally well when you have to > walk away. (I have 4 kids ranging from 5 to 13). Kids feel "at home" when they are at home. They wouldn't hesitate to type i.e sex.com or do anything else on *their* browser! Most employers (especially those morons that don't know what they do) would hesitate, for many obvious reasons that don't need to be mentioned here. ..I am not disregarding or commenting on Dansguardian here, which i haven't personally used. Spiros -- Spiros P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 05:59:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B31E16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A78F13C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 14584 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 05:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 05:55:56 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l535x15O063551 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:59:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l535x03V063550 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:59:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:59:00 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070603055900.GC63366@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> <933DCFF2293A4ED344379171@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <933DCFF2293A4ED344379171@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:59:02 -0000 On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:10:08PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On June 3, 2007 4:33:01 AM +0200 Jona Joachim wrote: > >> > >>I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly > >>the same place -- at the top of the list. > > > >Sorry but I have to disagree here. > >FreeBSD ships with closed source software including following drivers: > >ath, nve, oltr, rr232x, hptmv. > >Closed source software implies potential insecurity. If security is at > >the top of the list then I see a clear contradiction here. > > > Sorry, but that's an incredibly naive statement. *All* software implies > potential insecurity. It's the nature of software. > > If it were untrue, there would be no security patches for open source > software. Discovery of vulnerabilities in need of patching is not the same as an unsecured system. The key to the above statement that closed source software implies a lack of security is that with closed source software there is an unavoidable and necessary assumption that the vendor has your best security interests at heart and will achieve the same security success that you would, in addition to any success it might itself achieve. The facts have shown that not only are proprietary, closed source software vendors prone to ignoring or hiding vulnerabilities dismayingly often rather than fixing them, but they also (even more dismayingly, but hopefully less often) intentionally include functionality that we the end users would consider security vulnerabilities, and pretend such back doors, rootkits, and spyware do not exist. In short -- software is not trustworthy, which is why double-checking it (in the form of peer review and personal source code access) is so important to security. When peer review and personal source code access are not available, your only option is trust, which is a losing proposition by definition when dealing with software. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2); From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 06:15:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FB616A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 06:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9C813C45B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 06:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-317246.home.otenet.gr [85.72.94.220]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l536FUbN012875 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:15:31 +0300 Message-ID: <46625C7A.2060604@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:15:22 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> <20070603055243.GB63366@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603055243.GB63366@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:15:34 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying > that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a > claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only if > it was installed and operational by default would that really be the > case. > > Obviously, I'm assuming it's not installed by default. From what I've > read so far, it's not -- please correct me if I'm wrong. > > Actually to set the record straight, the ath driver is installed by default in 6.2 RELEASE. Installed by default meaning the card is recognized during FreeBSD setup and the user is able to configure it immediately from sysinstall. The ath driver was also present in 6.1 RELEASE (and maybe earlier?) although it had to be manually activated as a kernel module and it was not immediately obvious it was supported since it was not present in sysinstall during setup. Although the whole security issue is of course highly debatable, don't forget how much more secure FreeBSD (or other open source OSes) are compared to proprietary systems. I've been (and still am) a competent Windows 200X server admin for years and have seen oh so many holes. Mind you, most of them actually get exploited. It is nowhere near this in FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 07:20:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7C216A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF8F013C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 21148 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 07:17:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 07:17:21 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l537KQMd063832 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:20:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l537KPpT063831 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:20:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:20:25 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070603072025.GA63806@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> <20070603055243.GB63366@demeter.hydra> <46625C7A.2060604@otenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46625C7A.2060604@otenet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:20:28 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: > > I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying > > that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a > > claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only if > > it was installed and operational by default would that really be the > > case. > > > > Obviously, I'm assuming it's not installed by default. From what I've > > read so far, it's not -- please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > > Actually to set the record straight, the ath driver is installed by > default in 6.2 RELEASE. > Installed by default meaning the card is recognized during FreeBSD setup > and the user is able to configure it immediately from sysinstall. > The ath driver was also present in 6.1 RELEASE (and maybe earlier?) > although it had to be manually activated as a kernel module and it was > not immediately obvious it was supported since it was not present in > sysinstall during setup. That still sounds like it's not "installed by default" in the sense that I meant it. By "installed by default", I mean you install the system and, without even knowing it (or making a decision), you discover you have a closed-source driver in your system. > Although the whole security issue is of course highly debatable, don't > forget how much more secure FreeBSD (or other open source OSes) are > compared to proprietary systems. I've been (and still am) a competent > Windows 200X server admin for years and have seen oh so many holes. Mind > you, most of them actually get exploited. It is nowhere near this in > FreeBSD. One of the keys for this is the fact that they're open source software, of course. To the extent that something like the ath driver is part of your system whether you want it or not, that additional security benefit is reduced. I'm just trying to differentiate between closed source software that affects system security and closed source software that doesn't -- because anything that isn't actually running doesn't affect security (all else being equal). -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Leon Festinger: "A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts and figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 07:42:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FAF16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C81213C457 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-317246.home.otenet.gr [85.72.94.220]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l537gfcG015920 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:42:41 +0300 Message-ID: <466270E9.3060809@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:42:33 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> <20070603055243.GB63366@demeter.hydra> <46625C7A.2060604@otenet.gr> <20070603072025.GA63806@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603072025.GA63806@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:42:44 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> Chad Perrin wrote: >> >>> I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying >>> that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a >>> claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only if >>> it was installed and operational by default would that really be the >>> case. >>> >>> Obviously, I'm assuming it's not installed by default. From what I've >>> read so far, it's not -- please correct me if I'm wrong. >>> >>> >>> >> Actually to set the record straight, the ath driver is installed by >> default in 6.2 RELEASE. >> Installed by default meaning the card is recognized during FreeBSD setup >> and the user is able to configure it immediately from sysinstall. >> The ath driver was also present in 6.1 RELEASE (and maybe earlier?) >> although it had to be manually activated as a kernel module and it was >> not immediately obvious it was supported since it was not present in >> sysinstall during setup. >> > > That still sounds like it's not "installed by default" in the sense that > I meant it. By "installed by default", I mean you install the system > and, without even knowing it (or making a decision), you discover you > have a closed-source driver in your system. > > I see your point, bear in mind however that someone who is installing a system that he believes consist of only free software may easily overlook the fact one of the drivers is not, esp. if it is silently recognized and configured with little intervention during setup. A security-conscious admin would of course research both the OS and the market and choose his hardware wisely. This leaves this kind of "vulnerability" to smaller systems (maybe home systems) where the OS is installed to existing hardware that was previously used with proprietary OSes and where the user / admin is not experienced or knowledgeable enough to care. In fact it would be better if proprietary drivers were clearly marked as such (or a relevant message shown in FreeBSD setup). It's been quite some time since I setup my atheros in FreeBSD but I cannot recall seeing any warning or indication about the ath driver. >> Although the whole security issue is of course highly debatable, don't >> forget how much more secure FreeBSD (or other open source OSes) are >> compared to proprietary systems. I've been (and still am) a competent >> Windows 200X server admin for years and have seen oh so many holes. Mind >> you, most of them actually get exploited. It is nowhere near this in >> FreeBSD. >> > > One of the keys for this is the fact that they're open source software, > of course. To the extent that something like the ath driver is part of > your system whether you want it or not, that additional security benefit > is reduced. I'm just trying to differentiate between closed source > software that affects system security and closed source software that > doesn't -- because anything that isn't actually running doesn't affect > security (all else being equal). > > Agree with you completely on this, binary-only drivers can cause trouble even if well written. If nothing else, the company which writes them has limited resources or even incentive to support them and had they been open source fixes - security or other - would be implemented in a timely manner. I do prefer total open source on my server for security and peace of mind. The desktop is however a different thing, I can live with the occasional atheros or nvidia driver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 07:50:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2345F16A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roman.grachev@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B14B13C46A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roman.grachev@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so572922uge for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:50:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=orxuBbaS16YONCDcgFi3pWhqel5kZY/aizxxlbrJT7nWrnIZdlxZ/1UqM47HhllvwrK+vvxlm5s06w3oQ6JZuB/qdPmC9vEozSdfBql8nxrcV3PSrGR/5N1E4mchs6UiiRIZAquUAErXtCylJLU/SB0C9Ou0XgGQbz0rzgyGUb4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=RfYW+3XmnQbp3zcWkpI4et++SJtNRtK00/8gijH6sIRBE0dbWgbMQPL/85WrRU/esXry6KvXAz/eRahs0iJOI11j9RYtsmpmXBs9bSCgHHdi6ZqrzRCKDeoHYpVHFNliHoXpYpiGWZYKAv5zU0arpULR76AZwugf0JgLTL6pnjs= Received: by 10.78.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr1693698hud.1180855571513; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.178.11 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 00:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:26:11 +0000 From: "Roman Grachev" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: gnome 2.18.2 crashed on getting out of lock screen + when activating keyboard switching applet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:50:42 -0000 Hi everyone, I have just build gnome 2.18.2 from scratch on my system and everything is working fine except for two things: 1) when i press "lock screen" in gnome the screen fades to black, but when i press a button to get out of it, i get the dialog for typing in my password and the dialogs theme constantly changes from ClearLooks to default and eventually stays that way with an error that gnome-settings-daemon has crashed 2) a similar thing happens when i put keyboard switching applet to the top applet, the theme changes a few times and then i get the same error message. uname -a: FreeBSD ... 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Thu May 31 19:52:17 UTC 2007 root@...:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 I am using Xorg 7.2 if that matters. I would be grateful if anyone can point me in the direction of solving these problems. Regards, Roman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 08:01:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5A516A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjudd2k@yahoo.com) Received: from web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.75.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6232C13C4C6 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjudd2k@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 55095 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2007 08:01:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=dqLVNLYUB7TyC4jLbqxfOjBukgtqhg6CX78D+dv7GSBt44+z1HU+0lIoU+Qjvtt/sxCSj0wW3iF2bjqltP/so3wnoDaHBkLsz8sEiEuLD+3j6EoINVBbZcJAGe/yHRJIhzHZfz6Or2EwiWcvO9gtweQFviaAPdC6iZSoct8fnFE=; X-YMail-OSG: rpq0K8wVM1kqt4r4IG5pjIA2Sr3kOVXGL0hP94Eaic4FGpSx2Opizh9DTyLKaJBs1TY5duaS7Zlv788E0L_XC02Q1UB5hgBz1zIKSZJu0o9WUl8spblShULlPbNf_dQCl9ClnWgqEIPcc.Q- Received: from [68.35.59.3] by web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:01:38 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:01:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Judd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <778301.53413.qm@web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Subject: COM1 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:01:39 -0000 I'm subscribed to the digest, everyone -- send CC me on every reply please... Hi there, new installation, 6.2-STABLE. I have a Belkin UPS on COM1 and sysutils/nut is trying to talk with it. I know it talks with it, because it has in the past. The problem I'm getting is that NUT is just filling the screen with errors, tty overflows, and various problems related to communication on that port with the UPS. Looking at NUT's website, they say the UPS communicates at 2400 baud 8N1 and I'd like to believe that. I tested without specifying a speed: # tip com1 and didn't get anything.. waited 30 seconds or so. After reading NUT's website, I tried: # tip -2400 com1 and got binary data (not readable information, but data none-the-less). The kernel reports the port as sio0, but sio0 doesn't exist in /dev the only serial port I see is cuad0{,.init,.lock} and that seems to be hard-coded by some init script (but I don't know where). cuad* also is said to be a dialout line, not a generic com device. /etc/remote does indicate it is a generic device in the sense it will just pass input/output... How can I configure /dev/cuad0 to be 2400 baud fixed? thanks for any tips and pointers....it's been a while since I've dealt with serial ports. --Tim. If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door. "I can" is a way of life. More and Bigger is not always Better. The road to success is always uphill. ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 08:12:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D4516A51D for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC2913C45A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l538C0Hr028304; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:12:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6C821B820; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:12:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:12:00 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Tim Judd Message-ID: <20070603081200.GA49781@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Tim Judd , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <778301.53413.qm@web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <778301.53413.qm@web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COM1 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:12:02 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:01:38AM -0700, Tim Judd wrote: > I'm subscribed to the digest, everyone -- send CC me on every reply > please... >=20 > Hi there, new installation, 6.2-STABLE. >=20 > I have a Belkin UPS on COM1 and sysutils/nut is trying to talk with it. > I know it talks with it, because it has in the past. The problem I'm > getting is that NUT is just filling the screen with errors, tty > overflows, and various problems related to communication on that port > with the UPS. >=20 > Looking at NUT's website, they say the UPS communicates at 2400 baud > 8N1 and I'd like to believe that. I tested without specifying a speed: > # tip com1 > and didn't get anything.. waited 30 seconds or so. After reading > NUT's website, I tried: > # tip -2400 com1 > and got binary data (not readable information, but data none-the-less). >=20 > The kernel reports the port as sio0, but sio0 doesn't exist in /dev > the only serial port I see is cuad0{,.init,.lock} and that seems to be > hard-coded by some init script (but I don't know where). cuad* also is > said to be a dialout line, not a generic com device. /etc/remote does > indicate it is a generic device in the sense it will just pass > input/output... Look at sio(8), under FILES; the callin ports at /dev/ttyd?. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGYnfQEnfvsMMhpyURAtjSAJ4pXLCuXh6kvgjyY76aq3NneGlFIQCgsB4j 4Nb30H7HFCXR6zEHGpeRKuE= =ljLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 08:33:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF9C16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767A613C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so1391914wag for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:33:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=s9UYzh/OqQklF9SItVLP8E9fKdXj+0vQSn2jZCnlMd6cH5hZZO0y3ibPEMKkaM1jJ04NsF0fgsN9wZqEuNaPYC0K1Y2R9zEdm9FtJeRXCPrfBtSU575hWP0zIspgrCz+1VIdtkS5BeDF10cHM/7++1L1OiSvMDI48gYty7G/ybY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Eheral4v0O6xdgF0DhrTuHSPPjSUVAk9R1q/guBU6cZ4vGeQet80R28AAMMGNRVAWSuorqDboQ0lGoErVQkTdtiBjcaq/ZVhk3K2yRejNAq9kqDuyGWlm9AuuPVP6wFnY6T5swA9LZNzqyYtx+wJJFg9FOu0xGlqitzGIAoQ21k= Received: by 10.115.77.1 with SMTP id e1mr3603663wal.1180859618455; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.79.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:33:38 -0400 From: "Spiros Papadopoulos" To: "Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2" In-Reply-To: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:33:39 -0000 Hi Blake, On 02/06/07, Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote: > > I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am > therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD. Are you trying to secure a network with a secure gateway? To have a secure PC? What is your goal exactly? What is your association with Open BSD? with Linux? They are both BSDs...I am not developing any of both, but i don't see any reason why not adding a very good piece of code from the Free to the Open BSD or the opposite. I am 99.9% sure that the association between them is not competition. What do you mean by "Linux"? Do you have any distro in mind? anyway... FreeBSD is what it claims to be *clearly* on top of the page: http://www.freebsd.org and Linux is what it claims to be on http://www.linux.org (you need to read a little more than the top of the page here though, to see what it is). Also check this link: http://www.linux.org/dist/list.html (*press "go"*) Are there copyright or other related issues involved? It appears that FreeBSD is the most closely associated with the original > Berkeley programmers. (1) I was told that OpenBSD provided the best security. But I also note > that changes have occurred at OBSD, and wonder if this is still true. It would have been better if the above questions were posted in other, separate posts... :) These are irrelevant ((1) - see below) "to security from internet hacking" Are you trying to decide if BSD is more secure than a Linux distro? It seems to me that you place random questions/information here and this way you can only get random replies and information that will remain information and won't help you being "secured" (considering that you said that primarily you are concerned about security) If you know/learn how to setup a system and keep it up to date and monitor it appropriately and spend a lot of time on it and many other things, then it will be as much "secured" as possible from attacks. ...Supposedly, you decide that any of the OSs in question is the "most secure": You spend 3 days setting it up and you do nothing else for the next 2 years. Your system won't be secure, no programmers will be responsible for this and the copyrights usually claim/provide the software "AS IS", whatever its name is. (1)Programmers try to give you as much functionality and options ( obviously along with security) possible. You are responsible to disable functionality that you don't need, to install the patches/updates they implement when vulnerabilities are found, etc. If for example they exclude things (i.e a driver) from the OS, for security, you would have an OS with limitations. Their goal is to write nice, neat, secure code. Not preventing people from attacking you nor you from not installing security updates to your computer. It would be like asking the hardware vendor not to put a network card in your computer, for security from "internet hacking". The answer you want though is this: "FreeBSD is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX(r) developed at the University of California, Berkeley" which is BY FAR more impressive **in my opinion* *than this: http://www.slackware.com/~msimons/slackware/grfx/ :P Regards Spiros From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 08:42:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1252C16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6E613C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so1393951wag for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:42:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dJefKeSo/cJ4CCzyDzG0z6ojkGxiG/Sr33BM++Ayl4oLe0Hj6XCu1QkbRlzAdVJewjLHHfpOUXXRZlaQgegyMTZeOQ0QiICK55LDuLf30BGc4h/OfWXYHtWNxdI/jAFjkGpGekCSYLLpG77hoZH8g8ArliUmiCEB1GDsFjdepHU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JgFJ1+6UQ5PfHBoU9hnEpP13wJgRG31OWfHJhnUHkwvK4XNBIcO5rpgLlEgWLoQh/lwqx/EwBbCACUJNUB2uPGtDh8M0JOD1lCqsDJC/F3KiNKTIQmd7n9p1TeFP8vzrflXa2NRDuvH4WeK2ZMKEGvbKzP66VAsO5iW5K1GpBFM= Received: by 10.115.58.1 with SMTP id l1mr3589698wak.1180860135099; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.95.7 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0706030142l1fd30d74yc443e132337daf37@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:42:15 +0200 From: VeeJay To: "Kevin Hunter" In-Reply-To: <4661B6E0.803@earlham.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0706020638g48b7ac7fn946c6e3caddc0663@mail.gmail.com> <466199E5.3040005@vindaloo.com> <4661B6E0.803@earlham.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: sac , FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How to disable command prompt history? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:42:16 -0000 Thank you guys, Actually, it was for the security reason that if somebody breaks in the server then he/she doesn't see what commands are being executed, etc, etc.... and I am using /bin/sh any more comments? thanks, VJ On 6/2/07, Kevin Hunter wrote: > > At 1:56p -0400 on 02 Jun 2007, sac wrote: > > On 6/2/07, Christopher Hilton wrote: > >> VeeJay wrote: > >>> Could someone would like to describe that how we can disable to show > >>> last executed commands by pressing Up Arrow? > >>> > >> > >> That would depend on which shell you are running. Can you run the > >> following command and post the results here? > >> > >> echo $SHELL > > > > By default most of the shells like bash, zsh, ksh have history option. > > But you can avoid writing the history of the current session to the > > history file by unsetting the HISTFILE environment variable. > > So next time when you login the history of the previous session will > > not be shown. > > I'd be curious as to the underlying "why?". Having a history of what > you've done is generally a Good Thing. The only reason that I > personally have ever come across to necessitate not storing my actions > is when I'm playing a prank on one of my friends. Other than that, > having the ability to go see what commands I was executing three years > ago comes in awful handy. I /could/ recreate that arcane command > sequence for that one-off job I needed 1,237 days ago, or I could do a > > history | grep 'substring I remember in command' | less > > And, if you're worried about the space it takes to store the history, > don't. It's extremely negligible. > > Kevin > -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 09:15:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C84C16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D98713C45B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:15:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so1055708mue for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mXUsWMIvHDWHqL8elqCJnmA4RCIOWHoI65tlL+Y87pJlkcuHrQcfbrbjvVEwW5KfrraAsO+l44UDgIvXxDoEYJLziImmXuXgXBnEfly0XMUUWY+SlNGAhMsnA0MkL2RzorKGAs4IqstgRyLNFNhwRyq/x1k2oAr4c8rnv7NIYbk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NNII1FHGe2M+qeXp9wdKKNxgwXfNyp1tEW/6gNAosJTUBymE9y7Nll9KWih8awEny04/f7EQstdikfFY4cRgnTDUeTqzW08z+aSiUIUw/T8pkxim7+FdLLo14fJbaHxzdFuDDr6QzPN0pZtevv8rElHMuUnw+HW3LrqnVj/ZjPU= Received: by 10.82.123.16 with SMTP id v16mr4318176buc.1180862149376; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.16 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:15:49 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0706030142l1fd30d74yc443e132337daf37@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0706020638g48b7ac7fn946c6e3caddc0663@mail.gmail.com> <466199E5.3040005@vindaloo.com> <4661B6E0.803@earlham.edu> <2cd0a0da0706030142l1fd30d74yc443e132337daf37@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How to disable command prompt history? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:15:52 -0000 On 03/06/07, VeeJay wrote: > Thank you guys, > > Actually, it was for the security reason that if somebody breaks in the > server then he/she doesn't see what commands are being executed, etc, > etc.... > > and I am using /bin/sh > > any more comments? > I would not have (honestly!) thought that /bin/sh _when called as such_ would save a history*. Glancing at man sh cured me of that notion. * I mean, it's a primitive piece of crap, in its own special way, but that's how /bin/sh is supposed to respond, AFIK? Syntax confu- sing is, never the same person twice, fnord? -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 09:45:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE3716A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from el_tonio@fastmail.fm) Received: from smtp.telkom.net (smtp.telkom.net [125.160.6.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0EB13C45D for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from el_tonio@fastmail.fm) Received: from [125.162.129.90] (helo=[192.168.2.2]) by smtp.telkom.net 250 with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HumGk-0007v4-7j; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:23:12 +0700 Message-ID: <466287B2.3010009@fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:19:46 +0800 From: Toni Stanton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org Subject: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:45:19 -0000 >>I cannot install php5-extensions, nor xorg nor xorg-libraries. I am lost as to what to do. Many thanks in advance! >>Zbigniew Szalbot I presume you did read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2 Its a pain, sure. What worked for me was to update the ports tree to get the xorg 7.2 files, remove the 6.9 version, setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes, cd to the xorg ports directory, make && make install I also found portmaster to be much less of a headache than portupgrade on the way. hope this helps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 09:48:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BB016A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from el_tonio@fastmail.fm) Received: from smtp.telkom.net (smtp.telkom.net [125.160.6.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4221D13C45E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from el_tonio@fastmail.fm) Received: from [125.162.129.90] (helo=[192.168.2.2]) by smtp.telkom.net 250 with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HumIa-000806-KN; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:25:06 +0700 Message-ID: <46628823.6050204@fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:21:39 +0800 From: Toni Stanton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org Subject: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:48:09 -0000 >>I cannot install php5-extensions, nor xorg nor xorg-libraries. I am lost as to what to do. Many thanks in advance! >>Zbigniew Szalbot I presume you did read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2 Its a pain, sure. What worked for me was to update the ports tree to get the xorg 7.2 files, remove the 6.9 version, setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes, cd to the xorg ports directory, make && make install I also found portmaster to be much less of a headache than portupgrade on the way. hope this helps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 09:56:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9336D16A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from el_tonio@fastmail.fm) Received: from smtp.telkom.net (smtp.telkom.net [125.160.6.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB2B13C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from el_tonio@fastmail.fm) Received: from [125.162.129.90] (helo=[192.168.2.2]) by smtp.telkom.net 250 with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HumKU-00085B-LW; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:27:04 +0700 Message-ID: <46628899.8070203@fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:23:37 +0800 From: Toni Stanton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org Subject: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:56:29 -0000 >>I cannot install php5-extensions, nor xorg nor xorg-libraries. I am lost as to what to do. Many thanks in advance! >>Zbigniew Szalbot I presume you did read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2 Its a pain, sure. What worked for me was to update the ports tree to get the xorg 7.2 files, remove the 6.9 version, setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes, cd to the xorg ports directory, make && make install I also found portmaster to be much less of a headache than portupgrade on the way. hope this helps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 10:02:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6CB16A468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from pecan.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7996913C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from 28.201.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.201.28] helo=[192.168.100.148]) by pecan.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Humul-0005uv-0v; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:02:23 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20070603002635.9507B215D70@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> References: <20070603002635.9507B215D70@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Lawrance Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:02:07 +1000 To: Richard Tobin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Apple Mac Mini? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:02:26 -0000 On 03/06/2007, at 10:26 AM, Richard Tobin wrote: >>> Does FreeBSD run well on the Mac Mini (x86)? I'm considering >>> getting >>> one to use for both MacOS and FreeBSD (booting from an external >>> disk, >>> if that's reasonable). > >> Yep, it works fine. I used boot camp to create a small boot >> partition on the internal drive, and it loads everything else from an >> external USB drive. > > Thanks. A few more questions: > > - Any reason to prefer USB over Firewire? No, it's just what I had. > - Do you have to use a boot partition on the internal disk? Can > FreeBSD boot from external USB or Firewire? I am not sure. From what I understand, intel macs can boot from either USB or Firewire provided that they are partition using GPT. I used a boot partition on the external disk because I couldn't get it to work, and didn't care to spend much time on it. > - Which release of FreeBSD are you using? 6.2-STABLE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 10:33:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9B116A47E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4920C13C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 84257 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2007 10:26:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=oFcCyEdAFBtqHR4+/nmZ0rjXSczDNJ/bnmK+ws8QeTLEJZmHRM0eijVRVBD085Cr/Cx+N7kEY3hzV+nwFvS0fEe931IT5Zq1Bb/E3X2PSGMfTki2WeUeJT19uIgNGNhZI47EkKNvHD9StckXnf0dzPG9ECX/Fc6HgwV9IKVyR4o=; X-YMail-OSG: 8JN8dJQVM1mI0IfusnkUXP3o6IueTcO_ZOkHGBfJvLQnJ4GNpKOXXQgGCE__IsWdFsw4cQfPhJCmU9ZnMunuem8JZPlrdLd8TNgmKDGWBGq2MEhzz0h4W5oFJshnklhgHLnlb_8jjGUre35KamTHzCakWw-- Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:26:37 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:26:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <97764.82804.qm@web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: multimedia/gstreamer-plugins80 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:33:21 -0000 After I upgraded xorg, I had troubles upgrading this port. Can anyone help me with this because I get the following error message on my system (amd64, running freebsd 6.2) ../../gst-libs -I../../gst-libs -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include/gstreamer-0.8 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -DGST_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -Wall -I/usr/local/include/ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -MT libgstcacasink_la-gstcacasink.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libgstcacasink_la-gstcacasink.Tpo -c gstcacasink.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libgstcacasink_la-gstcacasink.o gstcacasink.c: In function `gst_cacasink_sinkconnect': gstcacasink.c:280: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_free_bitmap' gstcacasink.c:283: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_create_bitmap' gstcacasink.c:287: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast gstcacasink.c: In function `gst_cacasink_chain': gstcacasink.c:339: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_clear' gstcacasink.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_draw_bitmap' gstcacasink.c:342: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_refresh' gstcacasink.c: In function `gst_cacasink_set_property': gstcacasink.c:361: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_set_dithering' gstcacasink.c:361: error: `CACA_DITHERING_NONE' undeclared (first use in this function) gstcacasink.c:361: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once gstcacasink.c:361: error: for each function it appears in.) gstcacasink.c:367: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_set_feature' gstcacasink.c:367: error: `CACA_ANTIALIASING_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) gstcacasink.c:371: error: `CACA_ANTIALIASING_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function) gstcacasink.c: In function `gst_cacasink_open': gstcacasink.c:419: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_init' gstcacasink.c:421: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_get_width' gstcacasink.c:422: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_get_height' gstcacasink.c:424: error: `CACA_ANTIALIASING_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) gstcacasink.c:426: error: `CACA_DITHERING_NONE' undeclared (first use in this function) gstcacasink.c: In function `gst_cacasink_close': gstcacasink.c:443: warning: implicit declaration of function `caca_end' gmake[3]: *** [libgstcacasink_la-gstcacasink.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins80/work/gst-plugins-0.8.12/ext/libcaca' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins80/work/gst-plugins-0.8.12/ext' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins80/work/gst-plugins-0.8.12' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins80. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.98993.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=gstreamer-plugins80-0.8.12_2,1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=0.8.12_2,1 make WITH_FAM_SYSTEM=fam ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! multimedia/gstreamer-plugins80 (gstreamer-plugins80-0.8.12_2,1) (compiler error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed Does anyone know what to do next? --------------------------------- Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 10:46:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952F216A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 452A813C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 81493 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2007 10:19:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=u0GaVt7cFdjx6xuvl49UxIcwkY42Qx+ndAbFeZ4q3SMfPOHuUvbYuZy2sY6b/uLtyQhOyIRvYIZzP4lAEO9jCr51ykP+baayLMCojMnqJuYi78iI6HdDR/bJJN5FAanSmaHgypJgB+/o0MsNmqqeZsCyWuDMGTpnSChb4qCFciI=; X-YMail-OSG: HSYmK6cVM1lGZmxxXlv.7E3GYo1_4.QmJBBkACzMXa4y88p17jpzryAd0BYHC.hNgXqDMh5C_kyWFP2iBFzB7zVD2jrFnr0gNi4SPLiCGzIVEMrsMOM- Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:19:32 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:19:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <883054.81487.qm@web51105.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: portupgrade -o print/ghostscript-gpl ghostscript-gnu doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:46:14 -0000 Hi peeps, on my amd64 system which I just upgraded to 6.2 (from 6.1) I wanted to upgrade my ports ass well. Looking into the /usr/ports/UPDATING file I saw the following announcement: 20070405: AFFECTS: users of print/ghostscript-* AUTHOR: rafan@FreeBSD.org The default ghostscript port is changed from ghostscript-gnu to ghostscript-gpl. To upgrade portupgrade -o print/ghostscript-gpl ghostscript-gnu portmaster -o print/ghostscript-gpl ghostscript-gnu If you want to use the ghostscript-gnu as default, put WITH_GHOSTSCRIPT_GNU=yes in your make.conf. I tried to upgrade this port with the recommended command: portupgrade -o print/ghostscript-gpl ghostscript-gnu But the result is that nothing happens and my ghostscript-gnu port is still installed: $ pkg_info | grep ghost ggv-2.12.0_1 GNOME 2 ghostscript viewer ghostscript-gnu-7.07_16 GNU Postscript interpreter What did I miss? Thnaks in advanced --------------------------------- Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 10:47:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294D716A468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:47:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.39.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72C3A13C4AD for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 3477 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2007 10:47:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=bcpSC/H0Gc8SUK4DOCAXot4TP9jGaXtLiMnkcp3WzFDtKg42jeTb6ToEKe4JojYtKkPf5BjP2y4BAfGtJJCt/AzW1PYFTuXe+EO7rYtGoqK1V/Ozf/En6gJmpiLib5xHuR4xPeuD9Ti/uRPpZ7D81TwrFUtvtbxVdpu4Ace1GVY=; X-YMail-OSG: up25qGMVM1mObPe27kRwrXUMbkpBWRS64B541WTn42LBFiZuj4.kQwHQ7PqGpbkjI1vHloYHZ.U110Ep1TAflndR8uTY_PJ8KMa_5xcqLSClT_TvF48- Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:47:50 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:47:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <721991.3338.qm@web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: random xorg crashes after xorg upgrade to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:47:52 -0000 Hi peeps, now that I've succesfully upgraded my xorg to 7.2 I'm experiencing random problems. Sometimes closing a firefox tab causes xorg to crash or changing the screen resolution in gnome to a lower value. When it crashes, I'm thrown into the command line where I can only reboot. I really don't know where to look. I have the xorg-upgrade script in my possession and pkg_info | grep xorg gives: xorg-7.2 X.Org complete distribution metaport xorg-apps-7.2 X.org apps meta-port xorg-cf-files-1.0.2_2 X.org cf files for use with imake builds xorg-docs-1.3,1 X.org documentation files xorg-drivers-7.2 X.org drivers meta-port xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.2 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-7.2 X.org fonts meta-port xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.2 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-7.2 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.2 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-7.2 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-7.2 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-libraries-7.2_1 X.org libraries meta-port xorg-nestserver-1.2.0,1 Nesting X server from X.Org xorg-printserver-1.2.0,1 X Print server from X.Org xorg-protos-7.2 X.org protos meta-port xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1 X.Org X server and related programs xorg-vfbserver-1.2.0,1 X virtual framebuffer server from X.Org My (unchanged) xorg conf looks like: Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "dri" Load "dbe" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "type1" Load "freetype" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" EndSection Section "Monitor" #DisplaySize 340 270 # mm Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "HWP" ModelName "hp L1720" ### Uncomment if you don't want to default to DDC: HorizSync 31.0 - 80.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "HWcursor" # [] #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "ShadowFB" # [] #Option "UseFBDev" # [] #Option "Rotate" # [] #Option "VideoKey" # #Option "FlatPanel" # [] #Option "FPDither" # [] #Option "CrtcNumber" # #Option "FPScale" # [] #Option "FPTweak" # Identifier "Card0" Driver "vesa" #VendorName "nVidia Corporation" BoardName "Unknown Board" BusID "PCI:5:0:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 1 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 4 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 8 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 15 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" EndSubSection EndSection And the Xorg error log shows : X Window System Version 7.2.0 Release Date: 22 January 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p16 amd64 Current Operating System: FreeBSD zouk.tiscali.nl 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #14: Sun Jun 3 10:40:42 CEST 2007 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 Build Date: 28 May 2007 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Jun 3 12:27:31 2007 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" (==) ServerLayout "X.org Configured" (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" (**) | |-->Device "Card0" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (**) FontPath set to: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/, /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/ (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" (II) Loader magic: 0x66d5e0 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 X.Org Video Driver: 1.1 X.Org XInput driver : 0.7 X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 (II) Loader running on freebsd (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libpcidata.so (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.1 (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 134217730.0) (++) using VT number 9 (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B] [1] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] (II) OS-reported resource ranges: [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] (II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI: [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] (II) All system resource ranges: [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] (II) LoadModule: "extmod" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libextmod.so (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: X.Org Server Extension ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 (II) Loading extension SHAPE (II) Loading extension MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD (II) Loading extension BIG-REQUESTS (II) Loading extension SYNC (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER (II) Loading extension XC-MISC (II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension (II) Loading extension XFree86-Misc (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA (II) Loading extension DPMS (II) Loading extension TOG-CUP (II) Loading extension Extended-Visual-Information (II) Loading extension XVideo (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation (II) Loading extension X-Resource (II) LoadModule: "glx" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 (==) AIGLX disabled (II) Loading extension GLX (II) LoadModule: "dri" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdri.so (II) Module dri: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) LoadModule: "dbe" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdbe.so (II) Module dbe: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: X.Org Server Extension ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 (II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER (II) LoadModule: "record" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//librecord.so (II) Module record: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.13.0 Module class: X.Org Server Extension ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 (II) Loading extension RECORD (II) LoadModule: "xtrap" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libxtrap.so (II) Module xtrap: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: X.Org Server Extension ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 (II) Loading extension DEC-XTRAP (II) LoadModule: "type1" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/fonts//libtype1.so (II) Module type1: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.2 Module class: X.Org Font Renderer ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5 (II) Loading font Type1 (II) LoadModule: "freetype" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/fonts//libfreetype.so (II) Module freetype: vendor="X.Org Foundation & the After X-TT Project" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 2.1.0 Module class: X.Org Font Renderer ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5 (II) Loading font FreeType (II) LoadModule: "vesa" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//vesa_drv.so (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.3.0 Module class: X.Org Video Driver ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.1 (II) LoadModule: "mouse" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input//mouse_drv.so (II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.1.1 Module class: X.Org XInput Driver ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.7 (II) LoadModule: "kbd" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input//kbd_drv.so (II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.1.0 Module class: X.Org XInput Driver ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.7 (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa (WW) xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O(EE) No devices detected. Fatal server error: no screens found What is happening here? Why does it crash so often? Am I missing anything? Brgds Dino --------------------------------- Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 10:51:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620C816A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s26.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s26.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA4313C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.36]) by bay0-omc1-s26.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:39:38 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:39:38 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:39:36 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.150.205.194] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com From: "Marwan Sultan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:39:36 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2007 10:39:38.0522 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C4577A0:01C7A5CB] Subject: advice for cache server, X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:51:37 -0000 Hello everyone, Im On FreeBSD 6.2R, I run radius and chillispot, sure my fbsd is the gateway. The internet start to be slow due the increase of the users on my lan. I was thinking to install a cache server, that would be easy and simple, even for my users, is the squid proxy server enough for this mission? any other recommendations? does it require my users to change thier browser configuration to "proxy.domain.com" or it will auto detect? One more thing, what is the best way to limit the bandwidth download ? some users are sucking the connection by using softwares such as imesh and many others.. Thank you. Marwan _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:01:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C9B16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@laws.ms) Received: from mail2.worria.com (mail2.worria.com [205.234.133.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E185313C468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@laws.ms) Received: (qmail 16849 invoked by uid 399); 3 Jun 2007 11:01:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.77.121.249?) (sales@worria.com@219.77.121.249) by mail2.worria.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 11:01:25 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 219.77.121.249 Message-ID: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:01:18 +0800 From: Pang User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:01:26 -0000 Hello, I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=b inet 172.16.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 172.16.0.1 ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) status: active Thanks Pang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:21:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088A416A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE913C45A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from lux.student.utwente.nl (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.170.81]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l53BLiLr017574; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:21:45 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:21:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> In-Reply-To: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706031321.44524.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Pang Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:21:52 -0000 On Sunday 03 June 2007, Pang wrote: > Hello, > I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to > half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? > > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet 172.16.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 172.16.0.1 > ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) > status: active > > Thanks > Pang According to ifconfig(8) and em(4): # ifconfig em0 mediaopt full-duplex HTH, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:22:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CE616A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from host.omnisec.de (host.omnisec.de [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9582F13C45D for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from tek.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (tek.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [172.21.2.3]) by host.omnisec.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l53BMdHL005428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:22:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from titan.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (titan.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [IPv6:fec0::1:0:0:1:1]) by tek.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l53BMdTt042957; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:22:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: by titan.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l53BMcmT001311; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:22:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniSEC To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd@schlossadler.net Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:22:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200706022343.l52Nhmgm003006@cheyenne.sixcompanies.com> <61960777607a3b56b759d78fac57836a@mail.schlossadler.net> In-Reply-To: <61960777607a3b56b759d78fac57836a@mail.schlossadler.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706031322.38599.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> Cc: Subject: Re: SMP System but only CPU#0 being used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:22:47 -0000 Am Sonntag, 3. Juni 2007 schrieb Alex R: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:43:52 -0500, JD Bronson [...] > to 0, i will try setting it to 1 and see what happens. The CPU is a LGA775 > Pentium-M with EMT64 I think, I remember the CPU box saying dual core on = it > (not core duo though). Pentium 4 was socket 478 from memory or did Intel = do > a Pentium 4 in LGA775 too? Yes, they had P4 in LGA775 for quiet some time. I'm quiet sure that a 3GHz CPU is NetBurst architecture, pentium-m never=20 reached that clock. But regardless of the architecture, therre were relad=20 Dula Core Pentium 4 (xxxD) and the old hyperthreaded. If it was a Dual Core CPU FreeBSD wouldn't report "Logical CPUs per core"=20 but "Cores per package" =2DHarry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 OmniSEC - UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher Harald Schmalzbauer =46lintsbacher Str. 3 80686 M=C3=BCnchen +49 (0) 89 18947781 +49 (0) 160 93860101 USt-IdNr.: DE253184753 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:25:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960FD16A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B40513C45E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup196.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.196]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l53BMntT031084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:22:59 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l53BMev1002301; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:22:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l53BMbf4002296; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:22:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:22:36 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Maxim Khitrov Message-ID: <20070603112236.GA2210@kobe.laptop> References: <26ddd1750706011227g224eaa1dh93233400c704595e@mail.gmail.com> <1d3ed48c0706011603k5948510ctb49e399aa2ace22f@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750706011635s285860c1p57c360af69596ecc@mail.gmail.com> <200706021532.09429.lacoste@miage.univ-paris12.fr> <26ddd1750706021845m56b29a47l6b06ff2a6a8e2559@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750706021845m56b29a47l6b06ff2a6a8e2559@mail.gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.696, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.50, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendations for config file revision control X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:25:23 -0000 On 2007-06-02 21:45, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > Here's an update on what I ended up going with. I decided to go > with my idea of moving all configuration files to a common > directory, but with a bit of a change. I created /config and > under it base/ and user/. Everything in base/ comes from /etc > and /boot, and the rest goes under user/. I didn't want to mix > the two. So then I created a new subversion repository, but I > set permissions such that only root can read or write to > it. Basically I decided to forbid anyone on the outside from > getting their hands on the repository contents, since it will > be storing things like master.passwd and other sensitive data. > > Once all this was in place I moved all configuration files to > their appropriate locations in /config and created symlinks in > their original location. Everything under /config was then > imported into the subversion repository using the file:// > method. Since I forbid anyone from doing a check-out of the > repository to some external location, I don't need to worry > about file updates except when they are updated in > /config. This simplifies things. What I did to keep the > repository up to date was create a simple sh script that is run > by cron every 10 minutes. The script simply issues 'svn ci > --non-interactive --message "Automatic commit"' command in the > /config directory. So any changes made to the configuration > files are automatically recorded every 10 minutes. > > This works well, but does have a few flaws. First of all, when > I edit files from sftp I have no way to add a meaningful > message to the commit. Not a big deal, and I can always do a > manual commit if I had to. The other thing is that this script > will not auto-add files to the repository. Any new > configuration file that I'd like to have monitored first gets > moved to /config, then has a link created in the original > place, then is added to the repository via 'svn add'. A bit > more work, but I think it's fine. Technically I can automate > the process of adding and removing files from the repository by > using svn status output, but at this point the extra work isn't > worth it. The bigger problem is the fact that subversion does > not store owner and permission settings. That means that if I > ever want to delete the /config directory and recreate it, I > lose all permissions on things like master.passwd. What I did > was add chown and chmod commands to the monitor script for all > files that had non-standard permissions. So those get run along > with the svn ci command every 10 minutes. The alternative was > to use subversion properties, have the script parse those and > apply the appropriate settings. However, since the permissions > have to be set manually anyway there is no advantage to this > over the monitor script, which is also versioned. The permission and ownership problem is also one of the issues which Subversion (or other SCMs) do not solve for base-system binaries too. See for example the thread: Using Subversion for binary distribution? which was recently present in `freebsd-current'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:38:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5196516A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idiotbg@gmail.com) Received: from smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.143.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ACC13C447 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idiotbg@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044C625D for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:21:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at studnetz-ul Received: from smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cqp8BjLTvwAb for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:21:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from a144026.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (a144026.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.144.26]) by smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCFD25C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:21:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Momchil Ivanov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:21:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1531241.N9DB6b3fvr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706031321.39280.idiotbg@gmail.com> Subject: what should I set for CPUTYPE in make.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:38:49 -0000 --nextPart1531241.N9DB6b3fvr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi guys, I have IBM T40 with dmesg showing the processor as CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1500MHz (1495.16-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x695 Stepping =3D 5 =20 =46eatures=3D0xa7e9f9bf =46eatures2=3D0x180 What sould I set for CPUTYPE in my make.conf pentium4m, pentium-m or someth= ing=20 else? Thanks, Momchil =2D-=20 PGP KeyID: 0x3118168B Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint BB50 2983 0714 36DC D02E =C2=A0158A E03D 56DA 3118 168B =20 --nextPart1531241.N9DB6b3fvr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGYqQ/4D1W2jEYFosRAtE0AKCa0BjN/6DI+enSl+K8AuhL8zGvBwCaAlH0 +vf2tAGFc4a2qmqucjWDpRk= =JdMv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1531241.N9DB6b3fvr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:41:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509E516A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gelsemap@superhero.nl) Received: from superman.superhero.nl (superhero.nl [213.84.142.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1D713C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gelsemap@superhero.nl) Received: (qmail 12961 invoked by uid 80); 3 Jun 2007 11:14:34 -0000 Received: from robin.ad.superhero.nl ([10.202.77.103]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user gelsemap) by webmail.superhero.nl with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:14:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <2451.10.202.77.103.1180869274.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> In-Reply-To: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:14:34 +0200 (CEST) From: "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\)" To: "Pang" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:41:08 -0000 On Sun, June 3, 2007 13:01, Pang wrote: > Hello, > I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to > half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? man ifconfig -> how to use the ifconfig tool man em -> available options to the em(4) driver. ifconfig em0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex Rgds, Patrick > > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet 172.16.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 172.16.0.1 > ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) > status: active > > Thanks > Pang > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:47:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51E116A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbird-contact@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net (eastrmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.240.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5552613C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbird-contact@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070603114750.SZIF4413.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:47:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([72.198.194.118]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 6znq1X0022ZkRdC0000000; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:47:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4662AA8C.7030108@cox.net> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:48:28 -0500 From: "Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3)" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "illoai@gmail.com" References: <466009A5.8070808@cox.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Multiple issues (FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:47:51 -0000 I will try reflashing the BIOS with the latest ROMpaq. illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 01/06/07, Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3) > wrote: > >> Hardware: Compaq Presario 1200-XL118 >> AMD K6-2 500MHz >> 64MB of RAM >> Trident CyberBlade i7 video with 4MB shared RAM >> 6GB ATA66 HD >> Linksys 10/100 PCCard Ethernet (using ed driver) >> >> OS: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE using GENERIC kernel >> >> Issues: >> 1) The machine will not turn off when I try to soft-off it (ACPI S5 >> state, shutdown -r or -p). How do I fix this? > > > In my experience most of the stuff built around the > AMD k6 junk (circa 1998) had horrible ACPI support, > nonstandard and incomplete, where possible. I have > a lurking suspicion that they advertised these things > as only working correctly under winders (Optimised > for Windows 98! Now with nearly intel compliant MMX!). > A bios upgrade _might_ solve it. > A lot of those older machines (supposedly) support apm, > so fiddling with apm(8) might give some answers. > You might have to load the module or uncomment the > device apm line and recompile your kernel. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 11:49:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E86116A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbird-contact@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net (eastrmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.240.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C6513C4C4 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbird-contact@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070603114946.GZTP7021.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:49:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([72.198.194.118]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 6zpl1X00H2ZkRdC0000000; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:49:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4662AB00.7090109@cox.net> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:50:24 -0500 From: "Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3)" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: magikman References: <466009A5.8070808@cox.net> <4660280C.6040604@dvterry.com> <46603591.1000803@cox.net> <46604F9F.1080608@dvterry.com> In-Reply-To: <46604F9F.1080608@dvterry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Multiple issues (FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:49:47 -0000 Well, turning securelevel completely off in /etc/rc.conf fixed X, or sort of. X will start up in 800x600 (which is the LCD's native resolution) using the vesa driver; but, when I try the trident driver, it refuses to run at 800x600 and tries 640x480 instead, which the LCD doesn't like. Results: a black screen. Any idea on how to fix this one? magikman wrote: > Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3) wrote: > >> Securelevel == 1 and thanks for the answer to the fourth question >> >> magikman wrote: >> >>> Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3) wrote: >>> >>>> Hardware: Compaq Presario 1200-XL118 >>>> AMD K6-2 500MHz >>>> 64MB of RAM >>>> Trident CyberBlade i7 video with 4MB shared RAM >>>> 6GB ATA66 HD >>>> Linksys 10/100 PCCard Ethernet (using ed driver) >>>> >>>> OS: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE using GENERIC kernel >>>> >>>> Issues: >>>> 1) The machine will not turn off when I try to soft-off it (ACPI S5 >>>> state, shutdown -r or -p). How do I fix this? >>>> 2) X gives me errors about not being able to open /dev/mem and >>>> /dev/io such as "Operation not allowed". This occurs both when X >>>> is started directly as root and from xdm run from /etc/ttys. >>>> Again, how do I fix this? >>>> 3) Does anyone know if this machine supports S4BIOS? It lists S4 >>>> as a supported sleep state, but the hw.acpi.s4bios sysctl prints as 0. >>>> 4) How do you set sysctl tunables at boot time? >>>> >>>> Please CC me, as I am not subscribed to the list. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> 1) I am not sure. >>> 2) What secure you need to check your secure level. >>> 3) I am not sure. >>> 4) /etc/sysctl.conf >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Drop the level down to 0. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 12:01:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B7516A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB30013C484 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E415CB4; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:01:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4662AD92.8080106@vindaloo.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:01:22 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Lacoste References: <200705312221.23108.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> In-Reply-To: <200705312221.23108.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deleting old mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:01:26 -0000 Thierry Lacoste wrote: > I'm running a postfix server on FreeBSD 6.1 and I'd like to have > a cronjob which deletes old mails from mboxes in /var/mail. > > I tried mail/archivemail but it cannot create it's lock file > in /var/mail because it runs as the user owning the mailbox > on which it operates. > > I also tried mail/archmbox but I'm wondering if it is safe > to use it while postfix is running. Quoting the manual: > > A few words about locking. There has been a discussion about archmbox > handles file locking. The answer is simple: no mailbox is ever locked. > The reason behind this behavior is that I want archmbox to be as least > invasive as possible, so other kind of checks are performed to ensure > that no data is lost (mailbox has changed/mailbox is in use by another > program). I will surely add some locking mechanism in the future. > > Any help would be appreciated. > Have you consider using Maildir/ format instead? A switch to Maildir/ format would allow you to use the "find" program to weed out your mailbox and locking is not an issue. -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 12:30:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8701116A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pecan.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF6B13C458 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 28.201.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.201.28] helo=[192.168.100.148]) by pecan.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HumyH-0006Ai-2K; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:06:01 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <20070603002635.9507B215D70@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Lawrance Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:05:45 +1000 To: Sam Lawrance X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: Richard Tobin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Apple Mac Mini? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:30:50 -0000 On 03/06/2007, at 8:02 PM, Sam Lawrance wrote: > > On 03/06/2007, at 10:26 AM, Richard Tobin wrote: > >>>> Does FreeBSD run well on the Mac Mini (x86)? I'm considering >>>> getting >>>> one to use for both MacOS and FreeBSD (booting from an external >>>> disk, >>>> if that's reasonable). >> >>> Yep, it works fine. I used boot camp to create a small boot >>> partition on the internal drive, and it loads everything else >>> from an >>> external USB drive. >> >> Thanks. A few more questions: >> >> - Any reason to prefer USB over Firewire? > > No, it's just what I had. > >> - Do you have to use a boot partition on the internal disk? Can >> FreeBSD boot from external USB or Firewire? > > I am not sure. From what I understand, intel macs can boot from > either USB or Firewire provided that they are partition using GPT. > I used a boot partition on the external disk because I couldn't get > it to work, and didn't care to spend much time on it. s/external/internal/ above :-) >> - Which release of FreeBSD are you using? > > 6.2-STABLE. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 12:47:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37FB16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFE113C448 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1164685mue for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:47:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=j9VCcNbj4XP0Lp3IDlqwFlXY7W1Uf3HuF1B47C1DDweBOf1lGQPvVZV/fOi9Lwrq8CbOIjP3MeRweZ8WQ1Z7bMLNFSAaF18DOl16KJYKB+V4C36Rm4MmbxQQ+GEVFYmsFZiwb2e2BQeDqp/GfJm1dSeL6uHzffwLIvp4Wkw/2c0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uR7/mzrFlTN+ipPjjztDiHmu1kE0k3626Gfr0AJ7Zlt1cSMmwDJAQRGFYizzTdPE6d7tGsw2zX0ZCDaWwvZObp+t7KGQYgENw+dph2FmL7TJIlr94/LMaVEnK1TqSeizef6amxe+bVnAizdrkUig60lraiOksEkwWGo/xZHS0og= Received: by 10.82.120.15 with SMTP id s15mr4623634buc.1180874838387; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.191.11 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:47:18 +1000 From: "Paul Fraser" To: "FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: isc-dhcp3-server in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:47:20 -0000 Hi all, I'm playing around a bit with jails here, and have decided to try and set one up to run simply the "essential" network services - namely bind and dhcpd. I've managed to get bind working fine within the jail I've set up, but damned if I can get dhcpd to. Here's what's happening: I've build dhcpd with support for sockets, as required to run in a jail. I've then specified in rc.conf I want dhcpd to start and to listen on interface re0 (the Realtek Gig-E card in the jail host). I start dhcpd (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd start;) and get the following: Starting dhcpd. Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server V3.0.5 Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ Wrote 0 deleted host decls to leases file. Wrote 0 new dynamic host decls to leases file. Wrote 0 leases to leases file. Listening on Socket/re0/192.168.72/24 Sending on Socket/re0/192.168.72/24 Now that does appear to be the correct network, but when I try and obtain a lease on any client machines on this network, I fail. Can anybody offer any insight into this? -- Regards, Paul Fraser http://furyc0de.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 13:06:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7213316A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacoste@univ-paris12.fr) Received: from smtp23.orange.fr (smtp23.orange.fr [193.252.22.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3782D13C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacoste@univ-paris12.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2323.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DC5997000096; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:06:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.24] (ASte-Genev-Bois-151-1-84-181.w86-212.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.212.169.181]) by mwinf2323.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AFC837000094; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:06:18 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070603130618720.AFC837000094@mwinf2323.orange.fr From: Thierry Lacoste To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:05:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200705312221.23108.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> <4662AD92.8080106@vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <4662AD92.8080106@vindaloo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706031505.04290.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> Cc: Christopher Hilton Subject: Re: deleting old mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:06:20 -0000 On Sunday 03 June 2007 14:01, Christopher Hilton wrote: > Thierry Lacoste wrote: > > I'm running a postfix server on FreeBSD 6.1 and I'd like to have > > a cronjob which deletes old mails from mboxes in /var/mail. > > > > I tried mail/archivemail but it cannot create it's lock file > > in /var/mail because it runs as the user owning the mailbox > > on which it operates. > > > > I also tried mail/archmbox but I'm wondering if it is safe > > to use it while postfix is running. Quoting the manual: > > > > A few words about locking. There has been a discussion about > > archmbox handles file locking. The answer is simple: no mailbox is ever > > locked. The reason behind this behavior is that I want archmbox to be as > > least invasive as possible, so other kind of checks are performed to > > ensure that no data is lost (mailbox has changed/mailbox is in use by > > another program). I will surely add some locking mechanism in the future. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Have you consider using Maildir/ format instead? A switch to Maildir/ > format would allow you to use the "find" program to weed out your > mailbox and locking is not an issue. AFAICS the Maildir/ format implies that mails are delivered to the home directory of the users. On the mail server the home diretory is NFS-mounted read-only just to be able to see the .forward files. Users are required to use only pops to read their mail (qpopper is on the mail server) and I wanted to avoid unnecessary network traffic: from the mail server to the NFS server upon mail receipt and in the other way when readind mail with pops. Regards, Thierry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 13:08:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EB116A468 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17913C46C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so325328anc for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:08:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Xo9f+lDNP9g1JHX055Cl9CNA1MeVz1h7oOQbffsmWTkxEWHtfXPJflS8NfsHHHv7ilyyZS163EhKgDM8byTXp5c1JRF8KZXRd9A5Uu3GhlKqzBW5FNHu5bY/gR5UL5MPCzRb1StIEa+w/vU+cXfN6r9cKg/V5NHy/Vc6RbBLtyc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mc0m0FsLPLTKHvv310uG3hZ/Ur1k5Ym6ZYKt7Q8yn+8hbo1jFqCVCwXBIgqXQchp39jNY9nZQlisAKXcR/A5A0gJCX86Er4k+uQ0fBGtF+fZ0932dIH/QYAgkPnu4qUj1sPssD9IuZPK5eNuD3bmYqWcCFD8VZhxeRqKUY95Kzg= Received: by 10.100.78.19 with SMTP id a19mr2038656anb.1180876118417; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 06:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706030608l4124eeb7x5db2304225f83fd1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:08:38 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Momchil Ivanov" In-Reply-To: <200706031321.39280.idiotbg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706031321.39280.idiotbg@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what should I set for CPUTYPE in make.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:08:39 -0000 On 6/3/07, Momchil Ivanov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have IBM T40 with dmesg showing the processor as > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1500MHz (1495.16-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x695 Stepping = 5 > > Features=0xa7e9f9bf > Features2=0x180 > > What sould I set for CPUTYPE in my make.conf pentium4m, pentium-m or something > else? > > Thanks, > Momchil > pentium-m or pentium3 ;) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 13:28:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0C216A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8972913C4BD for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so325871anc for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jw9XjptM1GBHRSIcnEQxhQDgP7sqEOsi4wey14vdQoVk3oZYVx0r/mMQ7F2e+mFd3NijVO82ZoLEeGWivLpm8+JUC7tmGdjBwIu8UP60eazqqQm6o7bM2EN2g2xTQJI+0fZBBFW0atbscPPcRmzM6V528KjGFRozU6ZvvHXxvV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pwXK/0Ov6AGz8J1wYZndVBsr9BKBgkxf/cPDuZtmHY/o/UxFvfu23wuqm7xq0YJ1V5UuQvFwbI26/huDyZ8/7Ibka45J+u47zBvmVuU1AwUlYXh5tDMcdZRyM7Oih+Izq9/X5p+mWUxdQdW30kDo7u8ghP0eq6ThZ1ZIZtaJlfY= Received: by 10.100.141.13 with SMTP id o13mr2075390and.1180877279016; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 06:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706030627r1eb1596ame08d2ee302e2a517@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:27:58 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Oliver Herold" In-Reply-To: <20070603132409.GB77981@asgard.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706031321.39280.idiotbg@gmail.com> <499c70c0706030608l4124eeb7x5db2304225f83fd1@mail.gmail.com> <20070603132409.GB77981@asgard.home> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: what should I set for CPUTYPE in make.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:28:00 -0000 On 6/3/07, Oliver Herold wrote: > Nothing at all in my humble opinion. You'll have maybe more problems than > advantages because of changing this option. > > Cheers, > > Oliver Herold > > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:08:38PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > On 6/3/07, Momchil Ivanov wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I have IBM T40 with dmesg showing the processor as > > > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1500MHz (1495.16-MHz 686-class CPU) > > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x695 Stepping = 5 > > > > > > Features=0xa7e9f9bf > > > Features2=0x180 > > > > > > What sould I set for CPUTYPE in my make.conf pentium4m, pentium-m or > > > something > > > else? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Momchil > > > > > pentium-m or pentium3 ;) > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > > Arab Portal > > http://www.WeArab.Net/ > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Honorable, adj.: > Afflicted with an impediment in one's reach. In legislative > bodies, it is customary to mention all members as honorable; as, "the > honorable gentleman is a scurvy cur." > -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" > Oliver is more expert than I, but _IF_ we will get troubles why do we have this option in the first place? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 13:29:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1871F16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C921113C45E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.30] by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Huq9b-000Fpc-CQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:29:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4662C21E.6030504@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:29:02 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <466287B2.3010009@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <466287B2.3010009@fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Feedback: 1Huq9b-000Fpc-CQ Subject: Re: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:29:57 -0000 Hello, > >>I cannot install php5-extensions, nor xorg nor xorg-libraries. I am > lost as to what to do. Many thanks in advance! > > > I presume you did read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade > or install xorg 7.2 The thing is that I do not need xorg and would happily skip it. All I want is php5-extensions and due to some errors with xorg I cannot get them installed. Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 13:33:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F7D16A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:33:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (smtpclu-6.eunet.yu [194.247.192.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FA113C489 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-229-172.eunet.yu [213.198.229.172]) by smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53DXgpA016392; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:33:42 GMT Message-Id: <200706031333.l53DXgpA016392@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:33:30 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Ozan Enginoglu In-Reply-To: <1180830658.3178.15.camel@laptop> References: <1180738844.1116.9.camel@laptop> <200706020001.l5201mKS004494@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> <1180746840.13173.5.camel@laptop> <200706020235.l522Zv7p002571@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> <4660e5a8.7bf67e34.6d34.6a57@mx.google.com> <1180830658.3178.15.camel@laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_50,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 0.0 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:33:48 -0000 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:30:58 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu wrote: > Ok, here are my computer properties: evo n800v compaq laptop with 1.8 > ghz and 512 ram.=20 >=20 > oenginoglu@laptop[0]:~$ nspluginwrapper -a -v -i > Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins > Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins > Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins > Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins > Auto-install plugins > from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Looking for plugins > in /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Install > plugin /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so > ... already installed system-wide, skipping > Auto-install plugins > from /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux > Looking for plugins > in /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux > Install > plugin /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) >=20 > as a user i get the same core dumped error. Now i can play any flash > in firefox but inspide of that i got "pid 4909 (npconfig), uid 1001: > exited on signal 11 (core dumped)" error. I changed the depth from 16 > to 32 but i still got these errors. As I wrote (scroll down this thread), if you have three files installed in ~/.mozilla/plugins, and if all plugins work, I guess you don't have to worry. > And when i open 3 web sites with flash plugins the cpu usage is > approx. (and stable) 45%. Is this normal? It is very hard to say, depends on what sites you opened, etc. Seems ok to me. I'm aware of cpu issues in version 7 in full screen mode /only/ and of those related to hibernation, all fixed in version 9). You can of course try www/linux-flashplugin-9.0r31_1 instead (first uninstall version 7). I personally wasn't very happy with it. Ver. 7 has always been working flawlessly for me. If you are not sure and want to pursue the matter, you may start a new thread about flashplugin cpu usage. You can also consider asking on freebsd-multimedia@. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 14:25:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C5C16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slogster@gmail.com) Received: from smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.143.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F3713C455 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slogster@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB3224F; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:00:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at studnetz-ul Received: from smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JkahF-CLwDbB; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from a144026.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (a144026.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.144.26]) by smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F34424D; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:00:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Momchil Ivanov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:00:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200706031321.39280.idiotbg@gmail.com> <20070603132409.GB77981@asgard.home> <499c70c0706030627r1eb1596ame08d2ee302e2a517@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706030627r1eb1596ame08d2ee302e2a517@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706031600.28235.slogster@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Herold Subject: Re: what should I set for CPUTYPE in make.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:25:30 -0000 --nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 03 June 2007 15:27:58 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 6/3/07, Oliver Herold wrote: > > Nothing at all in my humble opinion. You'll have maybe more problems th= an > > advantages because of changing this option. Can you explain this one, please? What kind of problems am I going to=20 encounter? > > Oliver is more expert than I, but _IF_ we will get troubles why do we > have this option in the first place? =2D-=20 PGP KeyID: 0x3118168B Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint BB50 2983 0714 36DC D02E =C2=A0158A E03D 56DA 3118 168B =20 --nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGYsl34D1W2jEYFosRAgaMAKDExyivO2UO16X+lTU0kIIIXooncACgqXm8 WoILAw8vWS4F7+hw3ySLxrU= =ZVch -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 14:28:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A735216A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from n6a.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com (n6a.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AFE713C458 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.230.29] by n6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2007 14:28:42 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.131] by t2.bullet.re2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2007 14:28:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2007 14:28:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 29092.98218.bm@rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 99912 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2007 14:28:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=DLtRQ4yLN6G5sr8xqMI0QNlWjAm0/wFhk8ebeQmkzs0i/4vL+/CYnAPM5l4c7sBILXQE4+1vWAreU4/AzdrIxlqWg0V25Ocwg4x3HeeCOTtIy2AE0d3aouaS1D/ek7IoELESMwGL8KY0zQm8XC88wfyFRiUV/lg36jGlo/J4iTU=; X-YMail-OSG: 5rodQF8VM1k_uh5aVoKrxUqa0XXdOPBV5b7oS9jPORn_FEUytF4q1S6gcyybglMB65xfrIkkT1J0gp.9yQDNGs_OiASJxVhVlCTL Received: from [212.42.236.140] by web57405.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:28:41 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:28:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Davidson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <948346.97779.qm@web57405.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Subject: GRUB / boot easy problems w / USB stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:28:42 -0000 >Some thoughts: >1. bsdlabel -Brw /dev/da0s1 >- What is the option "r"? >- bsdlabel is supposed to create standard label >which probably >means creating da0s1a partition (can you call >"bsdlabel /dev/da0s1" to >see what was created?) So your next command should be >"newfs >/dev/da0s1a" rather than "newfs /dev/da0s1". And >commands after that >will need to be adjusted as well. >2. boot0cfg -B -s 1 -t -v 182 /dev/da0 >It should be "-v -t 182" rather than "-t -v 182". >Not sure if it >matters though. >Hope this helps. >Andrey Thanks Andrey, great news! placing newfs on /dev/da0s1a instead of /dev/da0s1 really helped. Now GRUB recognizes the filesystem on my usb partition. Here's what's new. #I placed 1 UFS2 partition on my USB key at #/dev/da0s1a. mount /dev/da0s1a /usb mkdir -p /usb/boot/grub #copied all files from /boot to /usb/boot and all files #from /boot/grub to /usb/boot/grub (I know I can make #it smaller but just copying all for now). Next I #invoked the grub shell and did the following: grub> root (hd1,0,a) Filesystem type is ufs2, partition type is 0xa5. grub> setup (hd1) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/ufs2_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/ufs2_stage1_5 (hd1)"... 16 sectors are embedded. Succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd1) (hd1)1+16 p (hd1,0,a)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/menu.lst"... Succeeded Done. #I reboot, and am excited to see the grub menu I've set #up. Here is my menu.lst: default=0 timeout=30 title NewOS root (hd0,0,a) kernel /boot/loader #You might notice I made root hd0. This is actually #helpful for anyone setting GRUB up for the first time. #You see when setting up grub from the shell within #your computer, your first hard drive is always hd0, #and your usb stick can be anything after that (in my #case hd1). You can test this by placing an oddly #named text file in each of your grub directories (1 in #hard drive, 1 in usb stick), then using find from the #grub shell to indicate where that oddly named file is #located: grub> find /boot/grub/weirdfile (hd0,0,a) #The main point is that when you reboot to your USB #key, because it's now the first drive, it's probably #going to be hd0, instead of hdx, thus my menu.lst. # Anyway, back to the menu selection. When I choose the 'NewOS', this is what I get: Booting 'NewOS' root (hd0,0,a) Filesystem type is ufs2, partition type is 0xa5 kernel /boot/loader [FreeBSD-a.out, loadaddr=0x200000, text=0x1000, data=0x32000, bss=0x0, entry=0x200000] BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive C: is disk0 BIOS drive D: is disk1 BIOS 631kB/980480kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root @barney.msu.edu, Sun May 8 03:20:03 UTC 2006) #This is the last line, and if I wait about five #minutes it prints these additional lines: can't load 'kernel' Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK _ #Again I'm pretty sure I must have the right 'hd' #addressing. I tested this by changing the root #location to (hd1,0,a) which found the boot loader off #of my hard drive and booted. I tested this by moving #the loader from my hard drive out of /boot, and #rebooting, where upon it couldn't find loader anymore. Alright I'll leave it there. (Starving for that little morsel of knowledge out there that will unlock this!) -Fred (p.s. I'm new to the mailing lists, and can't find the charter for any of the groups, anyone have a link? :) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 14:30:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3373716A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F0413C483 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id AAA25375; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:30:41 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:30:40 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Tim Judd In-Reply-To: <20070603083347.5913B16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Roland Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COM1 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:30:50 -0000 On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Tim Judd wrote: > Hi there, new installation, 6.2-STABLE. > > I have a Belkin UPS on COM1 and sysutils/nut is trying to talk with it. > I know it talks with it, because it has in the past. The problem I'm > getting is that NUT is just filling the screen with errors, tty > overflows, and various problems related to communication on that port > with the UPS. If this goes unresolved, try pasting some real error messages? > Looking at NUT's website, they say the UPS communicates at 2400 baud > 8N1 and I'd like to believe that. I tested without specifying a speed: > # tip com1 > and didn't get anything.. waited 30 seconds or so. After reading > NUT's website, I tried: > # tip -2400 com1 > and got binary data (not readable information, but data none-the-less). Quite likely symptomatic of baudrate mismatch then (without seeing any..) > The kernel reports the port as sio0, but sio0 doesn't exist in /dev > the only serial port I see is cuad0{,.init,.lock} and that seems to be > hard-coded by some init script (but I don't know where). cuad* also is > said to be a dialout line, not a generic com device. /etc/remote does > indicate it is a generic device in the sense it will just pass > input/output... You want cuaa0, which will likely appear when you open it. cuad0 (once ttyd0) might appear if you've got some getty running on it .. make sure /etc/ttys has this set to 'off' - unless of course nut claims it there? tip or anything should be able to open cuaa0 anyway, assuming nothing's actually locking (ie also using) that dialup (not 'dialout') device. > How can I configure /dev/cuad0 to be 2400 baud fixed? 'tip -2400 com1' will use /dev/cuaa0 at 2400, but I suspect that's not the baudrate your UPS is talking. Perhaps 2400 is only a default, and your UPS is set to something else? From within tip: ~? help ~v show variables ~s ba? show baudrate ~s ba=1200 set baudrate .. till traffic looks like ascii .. > thanks for any tips and pointers....it's been a while since I've dealt > with serial ports. I don't know your UPS (nor which model) but a little googling is a dangerous thing; from 'nut belkin upd freebsd' this smelled useful: http://www.networkupstools.org/doc/2.0.1/INSTALL.html Um, does it use a regular or cross-over cable? CTS/RTS used? Carrier asserted, or needs setting up as a hardwired line? (as in /etc/remote) As Roland said: >> Look at sio(8), under FILES; the callin ports at /dev/ttyd?. and maybe the para before FILES too. Don't worry about the locking stuff, though if curious, 'serial' has moved from /etc/ to /etc/rc.d/ but I've not played with that since FreeBSD 2.2.6 dialups years ago. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 14:36:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B6316A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4126B13C480 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (aphax.nl [82.92.29.227]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l53Ea6TF046383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:36:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <4662D1CE.5080509@xs4all.nl> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:35:58 +0200 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070424) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Error updating php5-simplexml-5.2.0 to 5.2.2, missing ext/spl/spl_sxe.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:36:10 -0000 I'm trying to update one of my FreeBSD machines, but it is failing on php5-simplexml: > ===> Building for php5-simplexml-5.2.2 > /bin/sh /usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/libtool --mode=compile cc -I. -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/include -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/main -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/php/ext/date/lib -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O -pipe -c /usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/simplexml.c -o simplexml.lo > mkdir .libs > cc -I. -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/include -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/main -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/php/ext/date/lib -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O -pipe -c /usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/simplexml.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/simplexml.o > /usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml/simplexml.c:38:29: ext/spl/spl_sxe.h: No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml/work/php-5.2.2/ext/simplexml. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/php5-simplexml. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.26157.27 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=php5-simplexml-5.2.0 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=5.2.0 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ---> Skipping 'devel/php5-spl' (php5-spl-5.2.2) because a requisite package 'php5-simplexml-5.2.0' (textproc/php5-simplexml) failed (specify -k to force) > ---> Skipping 'textproc/php5-dom' (php5-dom-5.2.2) because a requisite package 'php5-spl-5.2.2' (devel/php5-spl) failed (specify -k to force) > ---> Skipping 'databases/php5-mysqli' (php5-mysqli-5.2.2) because a requisite package 'php5-spl-5.2.2' (devel/php5-spl) failed (specify -k to force) > ---> Skipping 'lang/php5-extensions' (php5-extensions-1.1) because a requisite package 'php5-dom-5.2.2' (textproc/php5-dom) failed (specify -k to force) > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! textproc/php5-simplexml (php5-simplexml-5.2.0) (missing header) > * devel/php5-spl (php5-spl-5.2.2) > * textproc/php5-dom (php5-dom-5.2.2) > * databases/php5-mysqli (php5-mysqli-5.2.2) > * lang/php5-extensions (php5-extensions-1.1) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 81 ignored, 4 skipped and 1 failed Other misc info: > root@winona:~# uname -a > FreeBSD winona.lan 6.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 #0: Sun Aug 6 22:43:09 CEST 2006 root@winona.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WINONA i386 > # portversion -v > apache-2.0.59 = up-to-date with port > autoconf-2.53_3 = up-to-date with port > autoconf-2.59_2 = up-to-date with port > automake-1.5_3,1 = up-to-date with port > bash-3.1.17 = up-to-date with port > cclient-2004g,1 = up-to-date with port > csup-20060318 = up-to-date with port > cups-base-1.2.10 = up-to-date with port > expat-2.0.0_1 = up-to-date with port > fontconfig-2.4.2_2,1 = up-to-date with port > freetype2-2.2.1_2 = up-to-date with port > gettext-0.16.1_3 = up-to-date with port > gmake-3.81_2 = up-to-date with port > gnutls-1.6.2 = up-to-date with port > help2man-1.36.4_1 = up-to-date with port > jpeg-6b_4 = up-to-date with port > ldconfig_compat-1.0_8 = up-to-date with port > libdrm-2.3.0 = up-to-date with port > libgcrypt-1.2.4_1 = up-to-date with port > libgpg-error-1.4_1 = up-to-date with port > libiconv-1.9.2_2 = up-to-date with port > libltdl-1.5.22_2 = up-to-date with port > libmcrypt-2.5.8 = up-to-date with port > libtool-1.5.22_4 = up-to-date with port > libxml2-2.6.27 = up-to-date with port > m4-1.4.9 = up-to-date with port > mysql-client-4.1.22 = up-to-date with port > mysql-server-4.1.22 = up-to-date with port > net-snmp-5.3.1_3 = up-to-date with port > openldap-client-2.3.35 = up-to-date with port > p5-gettext-1.05_1 = up-to-date with port > pcre-7.1 = up-to-date with port > pecl-filter-0.11.0 = up-to-date with port > pecl-hash-1.3 = up-to-date with port > pecl-json-1.2.1 = up-to-date with port > pecl-zip-1.9.0 = up-to-date with port > perl-5.8.8 = up-to-date with port > php5-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-bz2-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-calendar-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-ctype-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-dom-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-extensions-1.1 = up-to-date with port > php5-ftp-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-gd-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-iconv-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-imap-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-mbstring-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-mcrypt-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-mysql-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-mysqli-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-openssl-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-pcre-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-pdo-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-pdo_sqlite-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-pgsql-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-posix-5.2.2_3 = up-to-date with port > php5-readline-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-session-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-simplexml-5.2.0 < needs updating (port has 5.2.2) > php5-snmp-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-sockets-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-spl-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-tidy-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-tokenizer-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-xml-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-xmlwriter-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > php5-zlib-5.2.2 = up-to-date with port > pkg-config-0.21 = up-to-date with port > pkg_rmleaves-20050922 = up-to-date with port > png-1.2.18 = up-to-date with port > popt-1.7_4 = up-to-date with port > portaudit-0.5.11 = up-to-date with port > portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 = up-to-date with port > postgresql-client-7.4.17 = up-to-date with port > python24-2.4.4 = up-to-date with port > ruby-1.8.6,1 = up-to-date with port > ruby18-bdb1-0.2.3 = up-to-date with port > samba-3.0.25,1 = up-to-date with port > screen-4.0.3 = up-to-date with port > sudo-1.6.8.12_2 = up-to-date with port > t1lib-5.1.1_1,1 = up-to-date with port > tidy-lib-070211.c = up-to-date with port > tiff-3.8.2_1 = up-to-date with port > vim-7.0.224_1 = up-to-date with port > zziplib-0.13.49 = up-to-date with port Does anyone know how this can be fixed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 14:45:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F8216A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FDE513C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 96771 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2007 14:18:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Hfkys9diHML+zjBh20L3lza0Tbs1zH4XY/omI2iKz3i7WdWDDMrXxwxHZWKTSzD97wftpwPyVUy5vDnXmtUv5pBwL6WZu2qtXV3ZWqhQACOKHUfO0XLD0jKRQBywBZ7iVO7vzhdTciTkHWboeMDeUYtfFVEUHMZ4+Grj+Uq0WXs=; X-YMail-OSG: WCfiu8QVM1lXFjYsIb4bvjjtccLsAHqkpYL5g_SlOGQ9YXey5uLCEVhsGWcTBqFXehruUTYug1dBxtzykbKBXvZ557ss8qzxgaaVN11ZGil379vaDPbQhIAEX9EayWXIekhNVZkyr1f4cMg- Received: from [216.142.36.2] by web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:18:47 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 07:18:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <201397.96752.qm@web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: ath0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:45:28 -0000 Recently cvsup'd. This is new and I'm not sure I understand it. dmesg... ... ath0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface ... The full atheros stuff is: ... ath0: mem 0xc0200000-0xc020ffff irq 20 at device 4.0 on pci2 ath0: [ITHREAD] ath0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface ath0: Ethernet address: [numbers] ath0: mac 7.8 phy 4.5 radio 5.6 ath0: link state changed to UP ... By the way, my little built-in wireless atheros device is working better than it ever has on this machine. -N ====== Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise and extol and honor the King of heaven, for all his works are truth, and his ways are justice; and he is able to bring low those who walk in pride. Daniel 4:37 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 15:20:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC3116A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A835913C45A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1952673pyi for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=MKHqzTvCYp2yCaBPcdKzjZo68uvhv98QIK5IZtW9Ogqeap79j6dGmV/vEjJwAXaoEYYjnB8BFLpE50eFi+lj0+My/Do1eTzpv5TWIaXzx7A0UMz8fdedXk3n9UOCcLagAcs9jd+zaZCgv/hD3SxX2B6htJUFUW1o3Z6xZvCyJHI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=B0990rlfOpXcOSADlB/2GOx/uwNnZ2kwWZtfMuenWZMgnuZfvxxpcEqxXlGBb5gz9cYwKyzZqORuUR2j7AZZdbL8p8eaQnjq1/MyS/JEDZBnXMrIpeXc4s1QRB0U8B0TEN6olY1YKfhvPm5RXHAwW1d2CoM8IEpn0e6FtKqNzjM= Received: by 10.35.99.14 with SMTP id b14mr6594032pym.1180884035984; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [209.240.66.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v15sm2617646pyh.2007.06.03.08.20.35; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200706031505.04290.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> References: <200705312221.23108.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> <4662AD92.8080106@vindaloo.com> <200706031505.04290.lacoste@univ-paris12.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:20:32 -0500 To: Thierry Lacoste X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deleting old mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:20:37 -0000 On Jun 3, 2007, at 8:05 AMJun 3, 2007, Thierry Lacoste wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 14:01, Christopher Hilton wrote: >> Thierry Lacoste wrote: >>> I'm running a postfix server on FreeBSD 6.1 and I'd like to have >>> a cronjob which deletes old mails from mboxes in /var/mail. >>> >>> I tried mail/archivemail but it cannot create it's lock file >>> in /var/mail because it runs as the user owning the mailbox >>> on which it operates. >>> >>> I also tried mail/archmbox but I'm wondering if it is safe >>> to use it while postfix is running. Quoting the manual: >>> >>> A few words about locking. There has been a discussion about >>> archmbox handles file locking. The answer is simple: no mailbox >>> is ever >>> locked. The reason behind this behavior is that I want archmbox >>> to be as >>> least invasive as possible, so other kind of checks are >>> performed to >>> ensure that no data is lost (mailbox has changed/mailbox is in >>> use by >>> another program). I will surely add some locking mechanism in the >>> future. >>> >>> Any help would be appreciated. >> >> Have you consider using Maildir/ format instead? A switch to Maildir/ >> format would allow you to use the "find" program to weed out your >> mailbox and locking is not an issue. > > AFAICS the Maildir/ format implies that mails are delivered to the > home > directory of the users. > On the mail server the home diretory is NFS-mounted read-only just to > be able to see the .forward files. > Users are required to use only pops to read their mail (qpopper is > on the > mail server) and I wanted to avoid unnecessary network traffic: > from the > mail server to the NFS server upon mail receipt and in the other > way when > readind mail with pops. > That's not true. My particular mail system saves to a mail-specific directory, under /usr/local. Not in the user's home directory. If you're worried about disk space, try enabling quotas in your postfix configuration. There's a great postfix how to at www.purplehat.org to help you set all this up. Personally, I don't try to tell users what email they can have, I just limit their space - they'll decide what's important and what's not. However, maildir is the way to go if you want to search for delete certain mail. HTH. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 15:23:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C8C16A46D for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1F313C489 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) Received: from rocher.urgle.com ([80.177.40.50]) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1Hurv9-0002IN-3S for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:23:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4662DCDA.6080903@urgle.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:23:06 +0100 From: Mike Bristow User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> <200706031321.44524.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <200706031321.44524.pieter@degoeje.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:23:08 -0000 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007, Pang wrote: > >> Hello, >> I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to >> half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? >> >> em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=b >> inet 172.16.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 172.16.0.1 >> ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) >> status: active >> >> Thanks >> Pang >> > According to ifconfig(8) and em(4): > # ifconfig em0 mediaopt full-duplex > And if that works, you may want to add it to /etc/rc.conf by changing the line with setting ifconfig_em0 to something like ifconfig_em0=" mediaopt full-duplex" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 15:46:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA2716A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBBC13C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm66aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070603154601.YOLH21446.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm66aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:46:01 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm66aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070603154600.KZHN19701.ibm66aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:46:00 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20070603114119.01dd8288@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:46:15 -0400 To: Pang From: r17fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:46:02 -0000 At 07:01 AM 6/3/2007, you wrote: > I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to > half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) You should be more concerned that it is only at 10Mb. I'm not sure if the old 10bT protocol even supported full duplex. You definitely need a switch rather than hub to run full duplex, and 100Mb or better may also be required. Once you have that it should auto-detect and enable full duplex, if your other hardware is capable. -RW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 16:19:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F75616A46C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmatulis@sympatico.ca) Received: from bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E34913C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmatulis@sympatico.ca) Received: from BAYC1-PASMTP05.CEZ.ICE ([65.54.191.165]) by bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:07:34 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.65.56.69] X-Originating-Email: [pmatulis@sympatico.ca] Received: from tantra ([76.65.56.69]) by BAYC1-PASMTP05.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:07:33 -0700 From: Juan Miscara To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:08:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706031208.10948.pmatulis@sympatico.ca> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2007 16:07:33.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BB91910:01C7A5F9] Subject: reinstalling a port with new compile option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:19:34 -0000 I have net/samba3 installed on my FreeBSD 6.2 box. I now want to have ACL_SUPPORT compiled in. Without updating my sources, what is the safest way to achieve this? Thank you, Juan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 16:47:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F1916A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk (scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk [62.84.188.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C181A13C457 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597DF398F8; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:28:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk Received: from scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uc6GEY7s5r-d; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:27:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.10.230] (unknown [78.86.5.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2D0398F7; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:27:54 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4662EBC2.3090802@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:26:42 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juan Miscara References: <200706031208.10948.pmatulis@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <200706031208.10948.pmatulis@sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reinstalling a port with new compile option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:47:06 -0000 Juan Miscara wrote: > I have net/samba3 installed on my FreeBSD 6.2 box. I now want to have > ACL_SUPPORT compiled in. Without updating my sources, what is the safest way > to achieve this? > > Thank you, > > Juan > _______________________________________________ cd /usr/ports/net/samba3 make deinstall clean make WITH_ACL_SUPPORT=yes install clean HTH, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 16:59:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B80D16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF1D13C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so702309nzn for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:59:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DGQh3rNsxpABq66zZcnG9m9t5ELfDBCPtLvHkNs6axHp30yuXyhSo7EkwP8Al+AL1eUcAqZV3lRGe+/8hpnL0OV8XSWJfEXUKun1fwwEzBXFDMQbeAebtxUCMJsRAikPp00KO8Tgg2w15D8brrn0vdfwOi5103wYf4Xs4Oc3m3g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Gc4YOgRT1z2MA8fg3ve57TXbWUWt68B/gUnHseUbvtNnmwafd57SaVqmZ1s95nMme+r2jTFOvT2xKlYvgDNREX98TYcmwor9UMHElYVWIWRX/GwN2c/Zgtdou5zRoI7C6KbEXazZVasGdsg+I1OHBlGuA8kptnYH/Tvnd/KxWwY= Received: by 10.143.15.14 with SMTP id s14mr176190wfi.1180889994663; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.254.1 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <26ddd1750706030959i2d1f9bc2m12d4cdaf5d656d39@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:59:54 -0400 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070603112236.GA2210@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <26ddd1750706011227g224eaa1dh93233400c704595e@mail.gmail.com> <1d3ed48c0706011603k5948510ctb49e399aa2ace22f@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750706011635s285860c1p57c360af69596ecc@mail.gmail.com> <200706021532.09429.lacoste@miage.univ-paris12.fr> <26ddd1750706021845m56b29a47l6b06ff2a6a8e2559@mail.gmail.com> <20070603112236.GA2210@kobe.laptop> Subject: Re: Recommendations for config file revision control X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:59:56 -0000 On 6/3/07, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-06-02 21:45, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > Here's an update on what I ended up going with. I decided to go > > with my idea of moving all configuration files to a common > > directory, but with a bit of a change. I created /config and > > under it base/ and user/. Everything in base/ comes from /etc > > and /boot, and the rest goes under user/. I didn't want to mix > > the two. So then I created a new subversion repository, but I > > set permissions such that only root can read or write to > > it. Basically I decided to forbid anyone on the outside from > > getting their hands on the repository contents, since it will > > be storing things like master.passwd and other sensitive data. > > > > Once all this was in place I moved all configuration files to > > their appropriate locations in /config and created symlinks in > > their original location. Everything under /config was then > > imported into the subversion repository using the file:// > > method. Since I forbid anyone from doing a check-out of the > > repository to some external location, I don't need to worry > > about file updates except when they are updated in > > /config. This simplifies things. What I did to keep the > > repository up to date was create a simple sh script that is run > > by cron every 10 minutes. The script simply issues 'svn ci > > --non-interactive --message "Automatic commit"' command in the > > /config directory. So any changes made to the configuration > > files are automatically recorded every 10 minutes. > > > > This works well, but does have a few flaws. First of all, when > > I edit files from sftp I have no way to add a meaningful > > message to the commit. Not a big deal, and I can always do a > > manual commit if I had to. The other thing is that this script > > will not auto-add files to the repository. Any new > > configuration file that I'd like to have monitored first gets > > moved to /config, then has a link created in the original > > place, then is added to the repository via 'svn add'. A bit > > more work, but I think it's fine. Technically I can automate > > the process of adding and removing files from the repository by > > using svn status output, but at this point the extra work isn't > > worth it. The bigger problem is the fact that subversion does > > not store owner and permission settings. That means that if I > > ever want to delete the /config directory and recreate it, I > > lose all permissions on things like master.passwd. What I did > > was add chown and chmod commands to the monitor script for all > > files that had non-standard permissions. So those get run along > > with the svn ci command every 10 minutes. The alternative was > > to use subversion properties, have the script parse those and > > apply the appropriate settings. However, since the permissions > > have to be set manually anyway there is no advantage to this > > over the monitor script, which is also versioned. > > The permission and ownership problem is also one of the issues > which Subversion (or other SCMs) do not solve for base-system > binaries too. > > See for example the thread: > > Using Subversion for binary distribution? > > which was recently present in `freebsd-current'. > > Hm... I wish I found that thread earlier on, because I actually missed the reference to Mercurial on wikipedia. I've been playing around with it over the past few hours and so far I think it might actually be a better solution than svn. It keeps just one .hg directory in the root of your project, which means that I don't need a separate storage location to isolate the versioned files. In addition to this, I can add an ignore pattern of .* (all files), which means that hg will only worry about the files that have been manually added to the repository. I'm rather intrigued by this system, but I'm going to play around with it a bit more in my test environment. Has anyone ever heard of corruption issues with hg? I guess it still suffers from the same problems with setting file permissions, but the hooks are there, so I'm not worried about that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 17:02:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FBA16A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255D513C45A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l53H2YTY029802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:02:34 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l53H2Xgg002031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:02:34 -0700 Message-ID: <4662F428.8070104@u.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:02:32 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Holden References: <200706031208.10948.pmatulis@sympatico.ca> <4662EBC2.3090802@joeholden.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4662EBC2.3090802@joeholden.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.3.94933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Juan Miscara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reinstalling a port with new compile option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:02:35 -0000 Joe Holden wrote: > Juan Miscara wrote: >> I have net/samba3 installed on my FreeBSD 6.2 box. I now want to >> have ACL_SUPPORT compiled in. Without updating my sources, what is >> the safest way to achieve this? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Juan > cd /usr/ports/net/samba3 > make deinstall clean > make WITH_ACL_SUPPORT=yes install clean > > HTH, > Joe cd /usr/ports/{something} && make config. Most unilateral solution and works a lot of the time (whenever configuration's an option). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 17:23:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E051816A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B68913C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from shire.nagual.nl (shire.nagual.nl [192.168.11.31]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l53HOdNv015048 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:24:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by shire.nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id l53HOdAu015047 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:24:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:24:39 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20070603172439.GA14934@shire.nagual.nl> References: <7cf39bb60705311641y29cec38bxec5e1d2794072856@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7cf39bb60705311641y29cec38bxec5e1d2794072856@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: mounting Solaris 10 NFS share X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:23:03 -0000 On 31 May Matthew Herzog wrote: > share -F nfs -o rw=spark -d "generic" /export/home/mush > 192.168.0.26:/export/home/mush /mnt/share nfs 0 0 As said it's a uid/gid mismatch. Check your "spark" group on both ends and make sure the uid/gid's are the same. Quick check: -o rw (without the spark) ; "svcadm restart net/nfs" on the solaris box and check. > In fact I can't even cd into /mnt/share as root on FreeBSD. That's normal. I can't on solaris too. Root has no access and that's a good thing. If you want access as root you can add 'root' to the group that has access. But a "su user" is better and safer. > Changinf the dir's permissions to 0777 on Solaris does "fix" the > problem but . . . it's not a solution. It's not done. So don't ;-) You don't have to change the NFS version though. v4 is OK. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ | Solaris 10 11/06 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 17:44:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A68216A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from skywagon.kjsl.com (skywagon.kjsl.com [69.36.240.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD0F13C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from w6vms.kjsl.com (cpe-066-057-025-092.nc.res.rr.com [66.57.25.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by skywagon.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637C42A68DD; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:44:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:43:57 -0400 From: Javier Henderson To: r17fbsd@xxiii.com Message-ID: <20070603134357748623.3304f32a@kjsl.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20070603114119.01dd8288@mailsvr.xxiii.com> References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> <6.2.3.4.2.20070603114119.01dd8288@mailsvr.xxiii.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.5 Cc: Pang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:44:03 -0000 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:46:15 -0400, r17fbsd@xxiii.com wrote: > At 07:01 AM 6/3/2007, you wrote: >> I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to >> half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to >> full-duplex? >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) > > You should be more concerned that it is only at 10Mb. I'm not sure > if the old 10bT protocol even supported full duplex. You definitely > need a switch rather than hub to run full duplex, and 100Mb or better > may also be required. Once you have that it should auto-detect and > enable full duplex, if your other hardware is capable. Auto-negotiation will work only if the other end (ie, the switch) is set to auto-negotiate. Otherwise the FreeBSD host will set itself to half duplex. -jav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 18:24:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3313916A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA98813C45A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l53I85M6023736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:08:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:08:02 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:24:54 -0000 (Originally asked on -hardware and -smp but no one seemed to have any ideas. Repeating here to the larger group in hopes of some answers. TIA.) System: Intel D946GZIS MOBO w/ICH7 SATA-II support WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 250G Hard Drive that claims to do 3G/s Pentium D @ 3.2GHz In addition to the on-board peripherals, the two available PCI slots have an Adaptec 2940 U/UW SCSI controller and a 3Com 3C901 card in them respectively. Running FBSD 6.2-STABLE as of yesterday. Kernel is SMP. I've run into a problem that makes no sense to me and I suspect is related to how SMP works (or, then again, maybe not): 1) When booting FBSD 6.2, right after the second CPU is started the system hangs for about 45 seconds and then proceeds normally. This happens with GENERIC-Release, SMP-Stable, and SMP-Release kernels. During this wait, the floppy goes active for some reason. It's as if the system is "hunting" for something. Other strange anomalies I've noted: 2) If I try to boot the 4.11-Release CD, it gets partway through the boot and then spits out: RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80 I've replaced the RTC battery and still get the same error. I get no such error with 6.2 3) Both the MOBO and drive are SATA-300 rated, but 6.2 insists that the drive is running at SATA-150. I have verified that the drive has no jumper forcing it into this mode. 4) I *cannot* get xorg 7.2 to work with the onboard video. If I configure it as a VESA video system, all is well. If I try to tell it that I am using i810 video, I get this: X Window System Version 7.2.0 Release Date: 22 January 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD troll.tundraware.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #5: Sun Jun 3 00:42:36 CDT 2007 toor@troll.tundraware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 Build Date: 30 May 2007 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Jun 3 13:05:01 2007 (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new" (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) (EE) I810(0): Failed to allocate framebuffer. Is your VideoRAM set too low ?? Fatal server error: AddScreen/ScreenInit failed for driver 0 This makes no sense given that I have allocated 128M for video memory. Anyone have ideas on what is going on here? (I've DAGS and found nothing like this in the archives.) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 18:34:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B13A16A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BD0A13C43E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 6870 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 18:30:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 18:30:54 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53IY0KI066990 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:34:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l53IY02o066989 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:34:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:33:59 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20070603183359.GB66889@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <4661FAC9.9010806@transpacific.net> <20070602201740.202e768a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46621503.5030303@freebsd.org> <20070603043301.28d9bef2@localhost> <20070603055243.GB63366@demeter.hydra> <46625C7A.2060604@otenet.gr> <20070603072025.GA63806@demeter.hydra> <466270E9.3060809@otenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466270E9.3060809@otenet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: BSD derivatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:34:02 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:42:33AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > > > >> Chad Perrin wrote: > >> > >>> I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying > >>> that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a > >>> claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only if > >>> it was installed and operational by default would that really be the > >>> case. > >>> > >>> Obviously, I'm assuming it's not installed by default. From what I've > >>> read so far, it's not -- please correct me if I'm wrong. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Actually to set the record straight, the ath driver is installed by > >> default in 6.2 RELEASE. > >> Installed by default meaning the card is recognized during FreeBSD setup > >> and the user is able to configure it immediately from sysinstall. > >> The ath driver was also present in 6.1 RELEASE (and maybe earlier?) > >> although it had to be manually activated as a kernel module and it was > >> not immediately obvious it was supported since it was not present in > >> sysinstall during setup. > >> > > > > That still sounds like it's not "installed by default" in the sense that > > I meant it. By "installed by default", I mean you install the system > > and, without even knowing it (or making a decision), you discover you > > have a closed-source driver in your system. > > > > > I see your point, bear in mind however that someone who is installing a > system that he believes consist of only free software may easily > overlook the fact one of the drivers is not, esp. if it is silently > recognized and configured with little intervention during setup. A > security-conscious admin would of course research both the OS and the > market and choose his hardware wisely. This leaves this kind of > "vulnerability" to smaller systems (maybe home systems) where the OS is > installed to existing hardware that was previously used with proprietary > OSes and where the user / admin is not experienced or knowledgeable > enough to care. > In fact it would be better if proprietary drivers were clearly marked as > such (or a relevant message shown in FreeBSD setup). It's been quite > some time since I setup my atheros in FreeBSD but I cannot recall seeing > any warning or indication about the ath driver. I agree with that idea -- that any proprietary software should be clearly and unavoidably marked as such. In fact, I'd be happier if every pkg-descr file in the ports tree included a mention of the license terms under which the software is distributed. > >> Although the whole security issue is of course highly debatable, don't > >> forget how much more secure FreeBSD (or other open source OSes) are > >> compared to proprietary systems. I've been (and still am) a competent > >> Windows 200X server admin for years and have seen oh so many holes. Mind > >> you, most of them actually get exploited. It is nowhere near this in > >> FreeBSD. > > > > One of the keys for this is the fact that they're open source software, > > of course. To the extent that something like the ath driver is part of > > your system whether you want it or not, that additional security benefit > > is reduced. I'm just trying to differentiate between closed source > > software that affects system security and closed source software that > > doesn't -- because anything that isn't actually running doesn't affect > > security (all else being equal). > > > > > Agree with you completely on this, binary-only drivers can cause trouble > even if well written. If nothing else, the company which writes them has > limited resources or even incentive to support them and had they been > open source fixes - security or other - would be implemented in a timely > manner. I do prefer total open source on my server for security and > peace of mind. The desktop is however a different thing, I can live with > the occasional atheros or nvidia driver. Until such time as there are high quality laptops that provide the functionality I want/need and also do not use any hardware that requires closed source drivers for full functionality, I'll be "forced" to use closed source drivers for my primary system. Actually, at present I'm not using any closed source drivers for my primary system, but only because the closed source drivers don't bloody well work. Because of this, I have to maintain an entire closed source operating system on another partition. It may eventually be replaced with a Linux partition so I can use the drivers I need, but something seems strange and wrong about dual-booting Linux with FreeBSD. It's a personal hang-up, I guess. Uh . . . so my point is simply that I, too, prefer no closed source software, but make exceptions for "desktop" systems sometimes. I wish I didn't have to. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Dr. Ron Paul: "Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 19:17:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F0416A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6746F13C480 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 47707 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:13:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:13:54 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53JH09l067171 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:17:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l53JH0Wn067170 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:17:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:17:00 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: repear a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:17:02 -0000 Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] MacUser, Nov. 1990: "There comes a time in the history of any project when it becomes necessary to shoot the engineers and begin production." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 19:34:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC1C16A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C54E13C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l53JY83v006246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:34:08 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l53JY8k2010850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:34:08 -0700 Message-ID: <466317AE.6020402@u.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:34:06 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.3.121509 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: repear a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:34:09 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a > triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already > present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the > installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at > all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. > > Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing > the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing > the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things > back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Go to gag.sf.net, get and install the bootloader, boot up FreeBSD, login as root, run boot0cfg -B /dev/{drive_node} and reboot. Fixed (as long as the user didn't seriously hose the system). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 19:34:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3041316A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D9A13C4C3 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l53JYYbe086729 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:34:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:34:28 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: repear a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:34:37 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a > triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already > present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the > installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at > all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. > > Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing > the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing > the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things > back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. What exactly is broken in the FBSD installation? Just won't find enough bootstrap stuff to boot? Some fairly recent threads on this list that might help: "Dual Boot Problems", March 1st, Sam Jones, Jerry McAllister, Beech Rintoul "Changing Boot Loader", March 3rd, Tom Marchand, "Vince", Thomas Sparrevohn, Kevin Kinsey "Skipping F1 FreeBSD prompt on boot", May 12-15th, David Landgren, Matthew Seaman, Sam Lawrence, Pieter de Goeje HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- When there is an old maid in the house, a watch dog is unnecessary. -- Balzac From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 19:40:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA98F16A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABA0413C447 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 90524 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:37:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:37:34 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53JeefI067272 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:40:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l53Jee0n067271 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:40:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:40:39 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070603194039.GD66889@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repear a FreeBSD install (s/repear/repair/ -- wow, I can't spell) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:40:42 -0000 Sorry about the typo in the title of this thread. I don't know how that happened. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Larry Wall: "A script is what you give the actors. A program is what you give the audience." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 19:41:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F0016A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AED513C46E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 91191 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:38:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:38:41 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53Jfmtj067288 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:41:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l53JfmeI067287 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:41:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:41:48 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070603194148.GE66889@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317AE.6020402@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466317AE.6020402@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:41:50 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 12:34:06PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: > >Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a > >triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already > >present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the > >installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at > >all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. > > > >Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing > >the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing > >the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things > >back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. > Go to gag.sf.net, get and install the bootloader, boot up FreeBSD, login > as root, run boot0cfg -B /dev/{drive_node} and reboot. Fixed (as long as > the user didn't seriously hose the system). Thanks. We'll give it a whirl. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Dr. Ron Paul: "Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 19:45:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276F516A421 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:45:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 084F113C4BA for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 94381 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:42:12 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53JjHYl067327 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:45:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l53JjHbN067326 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:45:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:45:16 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repear a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:45:21 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:34:28PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: > >Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a > >triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already > >present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the > >installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at > >all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. > > > >Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing > >the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing > >the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things > >back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. > > What exactly is broken in the FBSD installation? Just won't > find enough bootstrap stuff to boot? Shortly after the aborted Slackware install, the FreeBSD bootloader still loaded, but chosing the FreeBSD option would just cause it to hang rather than booting up the OS. Since then, Debian has been installed in the free space on the drive, with GRUB installed as the new bootloader, and it doesn't list the FreeBSD option as existing at all. > > Some fairly recent threads on this list that might help: > > "Dual Boot Problems", March 1st, Sam Jones, Jerry McAllister, > Beech Rintoul > "Changing Boot Loader", March 3rd, Tom Marchand, "Vince", > Thomas Sparrevohn, Kevin Kinsey > "Skipping F1 FreeBSD prompt on boot", May 12-15th, David > Landgren, Matthew Seaman, Sam Lawrence, Pieter de Goeje I doubt the "Changing Boot Loader" thread would be much help, and I don't think "Skipping F1 FreeBSD prompt on boot" sound relevant either. I'll give them all a look, though. Thanks for the suggestions. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] McCloctnick the Lucid: "The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 20:10:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBCF16A46C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A6F13C45E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l53KAV9i086982 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:10:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <46632030.5030102@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:10:24 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: repear a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:10:33 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:34:28PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >> Chad Perrin wrote: >>> Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a >>> triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already >>> present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the >>> installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at >>> all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. >>> >> What exactly is broken in the FBSD installation? Just won't >> find enough bootstrap stuff to boot? > > Shortly after the aborted Slackware install, the FreeBSD bootloader > still loaded, but chosing the FreeBSD option would just cause it to hang > rather than booting up the OS. Since then, Debian has been installed in > the free space on the drive, with GRUB installed as the new bootloader, > and it doesn't list the FreeBSD option as existing at all. >> "Dual Boot Problems", March 1st, Sam Jones, Jerry McAllister, >> Beech Rintoul >> "Changing Boot Loader", March 3rd, Tom Marchand, "Vince", >> Thomas Sparrevohn, Kevin Kinsey >> "Skipping F1 FreeBSD prompt on boot", May 12-15th, David >> Landgren, Matthew Seaman, Sam Lawrence, Pieter de Goeje > > I doubt the "Changing Boot Loader" thread would be much help, and I > don't think "Skipping F1 FreeBSD prompt on boot" sound relevant either. > I'll give them all a look, though. Thanks for the suggestions. Well, I didn't read 'em either, but grep found refs to "boot0cfg" in these threads, which is what Garrett also pointed you toward. I'm pretty sure that will get you going again. That said, I recently used GAG to solve a related issue, as well, and it's now the permanent resident on one FBSD server I have.... KDK -- Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 20:19:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC0716A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2AC13C48C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-317246.home.otenet.gr [85.72.94.220]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l53KJpaj005879 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:19:51 +0300 Message-ID: <4663225B.6070905@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:19:39 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:19:54 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:34:28PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > >> Chad Perrin wrote: >> >>> Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a >>> triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already >>> present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the >>> installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at >>> all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. >>> >>> Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing >>> the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing >>> the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things >>> back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. >>> >> What exactly is broken in the FBSD installation? Just won't >> find enough bootstrap stuff to boot? >> > > Shortly after the aborted Slackware install, the FreeBSD bootloader > still loaded, but chosing the FreeBSD option would just cause it to hang > rather than booting up the OS. Since then, Debian has been installed in > the free space on the drive, with GRUB installed as the new bootloader, > and it doesn't list the FreeBSD option as existing at all. > > > You can use the grub bootloader to load freebsd (assuming that nothing is damaged in the freebsd slice itself, and I believe it is intact in your case) It's been some time since I've done this myself (I am no longer dual booting FreeBSD on this machine), but I'll try to be as accurate as possible. Start your system, when it gets to the grub loader press "c" to get to the grub command line. Do you know what your freebsd slice is? Even if you don't, you can get this info from fdisk -l from debian. Or you could try searching in the command line. Type something like: root (hd0,2,a) that is assuming your freebsd slice is hda3 (or sda3) - grub numbering starts from 0 If you are not sure about the number try others like root (hd0,3,a) and so on. You will know when you hit the correct partition, since it will say: Filesystem type is UFS, partition type ... (something similar) Then type kernel /boot/loader and then type boot If you get into freebsd successfully, you can then add all the above instructions in the grub configuration file (normally in /boot/grub/menu.lst in your linux system) Hope this helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 20:50:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A24016A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@schlossadler.net) Received: from fallbackmx03.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2FF13C48A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@schlossadler.net) Received: from mail34.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail34.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.218]) by fallbackmx03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l52D6VQn015069 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:06:31 +1000 Received: from localhost (c220-239-31-2.rivrw7.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.31.2]) by mail34.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l52D6Tjd025512 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:06:29 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:08:46 +1000 From: Alex R To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0dda798d4af6656062c0f72a9ce751c0@mail.schlossadler.net> X-Sender: freebsd@schlossadler.net User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: SMP System but only CPU#0 being used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@schlossadler.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:50:34 -0000 Hi All, Just wondering about something here. First of all, I am running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and the CPU stats (parts of dmesg) CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (2992.52-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf49 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x641d> AMD Features=0x20100000 AMD Features2=0x1 Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1065287680 (1015 MB) avail memory = 1033314304 (985 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Now some processes: last pid: 1420; load averages: 0.02, 0.09, 0.15 up 0+02:03:03 23:04:35 69 processes: 1 running, 68 sleeping CPU states: 3.8% user, 0.0% nice, 2.6% system, 0.8% interrupt, 92.9% idle Mem: 116M Active, 115M Inact, 172M Wired, 140K Cache, 110M Buf, 585M Free Swap: 2007M Total, 2007M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 658 alex 1 96 0 288M 33708K select 0 1:43 0.88% Xorg 815 alex 4 20 0 47640K 30416K kserel 0 3:49 0.00% vlc 998 alex 1 96 0 21660K 17372K select 0 0:21 0.00% xchat 1389 alex 5 20 0 62768K 54436K kserel 0 0:16 0.00% firefox-bin 729 alex 1 96 0 31572K 27840K select 0 0:16 0.00% kdeinit 601 root 1 96 0 1344K 796K select 0 0:09 0.00% moused 717 alex 1 96 0 30360K 25588K select 0 0:06 0.00% kdeinit 1106 alex 1 96 0 30560K 24052K select 0 0:06 0.00% kdeinit 727 alex 1 96 0 32772K 29300K select 0 0:06 0.00% kdeinit 725 alex 1 96 0 26108K 21288K select 0 0:05 0.00% kdeinit 735 alex 1 60 -36 10452K 7448K select 0 0:04 0.00% artsd 693 alex 1 96 0 3612K 2380K select 0 0:02 0.00% gam_server 1412 alex 5 20 0 23520K 17816K kserel 0 0:01 0.00% gnome-terminal 740 alex 1 96 0 25124K 20228K select 0 0:01 0.00% kdeinit 743 alex 1 96 0 26780K 21600K select 0 0:00 0.00% korgac 1391 alex 1 96 0 5852K 4536K select 0 0:00 0.00% gconfd-2 712 alex 1 96 0 23032K 17016K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit 737 alex 1 96 0 24580K 19284K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit 708 alex 1 96 0 23436K 17612K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit 1414 alex 5 20 0 6168K 4060K kserel 0 0:00 0.00% bonobo-activation-s 1140 alex 1 96 0 26668K 22264K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit 715 alex 1 96 0 25080K 19584K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit 722 alex 1 8 0 1392K 860K nanslp 0 0:00 0.00% kwrapper 574 root 1 96 0 3528K 2808K select 0 0:00 0.00% sendmail 724 alex 1 96 0 24600K 19248K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit 1415 alex 1 4 0 3092K 1576K sbwait 0 0:00 0.00% gnome-pty-helper 1416 alex 1 8 0 3200K 2156K wait 0 0:00 0.00% bash 1420 alex 1 96 0 2420K 1624K CPU0 0 0:00 0.00 All of them are using CPU #0 though? What am i missing here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 20:56:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884BD16A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6825D13C46E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 82963 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 20:53:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 20:53:02 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l53Ku9bq067607 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:56:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l53Ku8ou067606 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:56:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:56:08 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070603205608.GA67502@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> <4663225B.6070905@otenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4663225B.6070905@otenet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:56:11 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:19:39PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > You can use the grub bootloader to load freebsd (assuming that nothing > is damaged in the freebsd slice itself, and I believe it is intact in > your case) > It's been some time since I've done this myself (I am no longer dual > booting FreeBSD on this machine), but I'll try to be as accurate as > possible. > Start your system, when it gets to the grub loader press "c" to get to > the grub command line. > Do you know what your freebsd slice is? Even if you don't, you can get > this info from fdisk -l from debian. Or you could try searching in the > command line. > Type something like: > > root (hd0,2,a) GRUB doesn't recognize the partition type for some reason. There's pretty clearly something wrong with the partition, I think. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] McCloctnick the Lucid: "The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 20:57:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2192616A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C014113C457 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so907696wxd for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:57:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RG131WeglNiBks1SSmJW42PJ2z6XeDnFY+k5Pox+CNvZMZQdAz7czrPazWEikJZzbCAJE5Pf+JQ4GXLdHIFuIRSH5SzH5uPhKIeA/wZeRLwiFdglPzTbzhzFrnbLKIKeemgDWKsYPt8+dgJGJ2Su5dTTtI6zVmslQ4j4pCT4huk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mM9C2La1F7SaDxez2sPFgtGz+8WbY1RyQBED66eWyNLCwFiPED92bySNK3/8KNWOvezYdEzhwLGMG0ij5n4n21nZGOm9U2eUDp8k5T/EJP0pZu1nXjFrHLr5Vim8xbS7SYWAzwXIhYrwaAU6Nk29RzAz36VNcvvzleqonMkzsNI= Received: by 10.70.16.6 with SMTP id 6mr6138553wxp.1180904246250; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.8 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51d7a5160706031357o61feff77obfa7cb4548480f2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:57:24 -0700 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51d7a5160705281422i106691d5n55a14e85af4ccb35@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how many data can i write to my tape, how to tested? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:57:32 -0000 On 6/2/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > On 28/05/07, perikillo wrote: > > I'm running bacula 1.38.11 with one tape storage-works 232 200Gb. > . . . > > Them, he says that my tape is full, but calculating all clients, is > > about 181GB, them why hi say that my tape is full? > > For raw capacity multiply the advertised number > by 0.5. > As we get more and more precompressed data > (think ogg, png, mp3) those sunny marketing > numbers will mean less and less. > > -- > -- > Thanks guys, i understand your point. I was thinking wrong about my tape. Now i need to clean my servers. Thanks!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 21:03:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BF616A469 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD0813C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-105-193.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.105.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0A7EBC78; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:03:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:03:26 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd@schlossadler.net Message-Id: <20070603170326.01d58fdd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <0dda798d4af6656062c0f72a9ce751c0@mail.schlossadler.net> References: <0dda798d4af6656062c0f72a9ce751c0@mail.schlossadler.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP System but only CPU#0 being used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:03:28 -0000 Alex R wrote: > > Hi All, > > Just wondering about something here. > > First of all, I am running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE > > and the CPU stats (parts of dmesg) > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (2992.52-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf49 Stepping = 9 > Features=0xbfebfbff > Features2=0x641d> > AMD Features=0x20100000 > AMD Features2=0x1 > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > real memory = 1065287680 (1015 MB) > avail memory = 1033314304 (985 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > Now some processes: > > last pid: 1420; load averages: 0.02, 0.09, 0.15 up 0+02:03:03 23:04:35 > 69 processes: 1 running, 68 sleeping > CPU states: 3.8% user, 0.0% nice, 2.6% system, 0.8% interrupt, 92.9% idle > Mem: 116M Active, 115M Inact, 172M Wired, 140K Cache, 110M Buf, 585M Free > Swap: 2007M Total, 2007M Free > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 658 alex 1 96 0 288M 33708K select 0 1:43 0.88% Xorg > 815 alex 4 20 0 47640K 30416K kserel 0 3:49 0.00% vlc > 998 alex 1 96 0 21660K 17372K select 0 0:21 0.00% xchat > 1389 alex 5 20 0 62768K 54436K kserel 0 0:16 0.00% firefox-bin > 729 alex 1 96 0 31572K 27840K select 0 0:16 0.00% kdeinit > 601 root 1 96 0 1344K 796K select 0 0:09 0.00% moused > 717 alex 1 96 0 30360K 25588K select 0 0:06 0.00% kdeinit > 1106 alex 1 96 0 30560K 24052K select 0 0:06 0.00% kdeinit > 727 alex 1 96 0 32772K 29300K select 0 0:06 0.00% kdeinit > 725 alex 1 96 0 26108K 21288K select 0 0:05 0.00% kdeinit > 735 alex 1 60 -36 10452K 7448K select 0 0:04 0.00% artsd > 693 alex 1 96 0 3612K 2380K select 0 0:02 0.00% gam_server > 1412 alex 5 20 0 23520K 17816K kserel 0 0:01 0.00% gnome-terminal > 740 alex 1 96 0 25124K 20228K select 0 0:01 0.00% kdeinit > 743 alex 1 96 0 26780K 21600K select 0 0:00 0.00% korgac > 1391 alex 1 96 0 5852K 4536K select 0 0:00 0.00% gconfd-2 > 712 alex 1 96 0 23032K 17016K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit > 737 alex 1 96 0 24580K 19284K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit > 708 alex 1 96 0 23436K 17612K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit > 1414 alex 5 20 0 6168K 4060K kserel 0 0:00 0.00% bonobo-activation-s > 1140 alex 1 96 0 26668K 22264K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit > 715 alex 1 96 0 25080K 19584K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit > 722 alex 1 8 0 1392K 860K nanslp 0 0:00 0.00% kwrapper > 574 root 1 96 0 3528K 2808K select 0 0:00 0.00% sendmail > 724 alex 1 96 0 24600K 19248K select 0 0:00 0.00% kdeinit > 1415 alex 1 4 0 3092K 1576K sbwait 0 0:00 0.00% gnome-pty-helper > 1416 alex 1 8 0 3200K 2156K wait 0 0:00 0.00% bash > 1420 alex 1 96 0 2420K 1624K CPU0 0 0:00 0.00 > > > All of them are using CPU #0 though? > > What am i missing here? Is this system truly multiprocessor, or hyperthreaded? Hyperthreading is disabled by default, due to security concerns. Check the value of the sysctl machdep.hypterhtreading_enabled. If you turn it on and the second CPU starts being used, then you have an HT system, and not a multiprocessor system. Then you can decide whether you're willing to accept the potential security risk of enabling hyperthreading. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 21:11:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C8016A47A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB4613C447 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-317246.home.otenet.gr [85.72.94.220]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l53LBF0Y027240 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:11:15 +0300 Message-ID: <46632E67.8020405@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:11:03 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> <4663225B.6070905@otenet.gr> <20070603205608.GA67502@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070603205608.GA67502@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:11:17 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:19:39PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> You can use the grub bootloader to load freebsd (assuming that nothing >> is damaged in the freebsd slice itself, and I believe it is intact in >> your case) >> It's been some time since I've done this myself (I am no longer dual >> booting FreeBSD on this machine), but I'll try to be as accurate as >> possible. >> Start your system, when it gets to the grub loader press "c" to get to >> the grub command line. >> Do you know what your freebsd slice is? Even if you don't, you can get >> this info from fdisk -l from debian. Or you could try searching in the >> command line. >> Type something like: >> >> root (hd0,2,a) >> > > GRUB doesn't recognize the partition type for some reason. There's > pretty clearly something wrong with the partition, I think. > > Is it possible that somehow the partition type was changed? Try as root an fdisk -l from your debian installation. Your freebsd should show up as partition type a5 (BSD/386) Otherwise you could use fdisk to fix this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 21:50:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EC716A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C0913C44C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l53LoNKc012818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:50:24 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l53LoNo8017612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:50:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4663379D.3080803@u.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:50:21 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> <4663225B.6070905@otenet.gr> <20070603205608.GA67502@demeter.hydra> <46632E67.8020405@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <46632E67.8020405@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.3.143237 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:50:24 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:19:39PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> >> >>> You can use the grub bootloader to load freebsd (assuming that nothing >>> is damaged in the freebsd slice itself, and I believe it is intact in >>> your case) >>> It's been some time since I've done this myself (I am no longer dual >>> booting FreeBSD on this machine), but I'll try to be as accurate as >>> possible. >>> Start your system, when it gets to the grub loader press "c" to get to >>> the grub command line. >>> Do you know what your freebsd slice is? Even if you don't, you can get >>> this info from fdisk -l from debian. Or you could try searching in the >>> command line. >>> Type something like: >>> >>> root (hd0,2,a) >>> >>> >> GRUB doesn't recognize the partition type for some reason. There's >> pretty clearly something wrong with the partition, I think. >> >> >> > Is it possible that somehow the partition type was changed? > Try as root an fdisk -l from your debian installation. > Your freebsd should show up as partition type a5 (BSD/386) > Otherwise you could use fdisk to fix this. And for that you need a fixit floppy / LiveCD :). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 22:32:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D91216A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76DB13C448 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l53MVBd0006129; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:31:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070603172948.02398cb0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:30:42 -0500 To: Tim Judd , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <778301.53413.qm@web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <778301.53413.qm@web62412.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: COM1 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:32:16 -0000 At 03:01 AM 6/3/2007, Tim Judd wrote: >I'm subscribed to the digest, everyone -- send CC me on every reply >please... > >Hi there, new installation, 6.2-STABLE. > >I have a Belkin UPS on COM1 and sysutils/nut is trying to talk with it. > I know it talks with it, because it has in the past. The problem I'm >getting is that NUT is just filling the screen with errors, tty >overflows, and various problems related to communication on that port >with the UPS. > >Looking at NUT's website, they say the UPS communicates at 2400 baud >8N1 and I'd like to believe that. I tested without specifying a speed: ># tip com1 >and didn't get anything.. waited 30 seconds or so. After reading >NUT's website, I tried: ># tip -2400 com1 >and got binary data (not readable information, but data none-the-less). > >The kernel reports the port as sio0, but sio0 doesn't exist in /dev >the only serial port I see is cuad0{,.init,.lock} and that seems to be >hard-coded by some init script (but I don't know where). cuad* also is >said to be a dialout line, not a generic com device. /etc/remote does >indicate it is a generic device in the sense it will just pass >input/output... > >How can I configure /dev/cuad0 to be 2400 baud fixed? > >thanks for any tips and pointers....it's been a while since I've dealt >with serial ports. I have a similar setup with no issues. You do need to be sure you have the correct nut driver for your UPS, and the cable tight. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 22:56:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A95116A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F6D13C46C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Huyzq-0005bK-51 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:56:26 +0200 Received: from r5j156.net.upc.cz ([86.49.9.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:56:26 +0200 Received: from gamato by r5j156.net.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:56:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:56:09 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: <46634709.1030501@users.sf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j156.net.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070531 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 Sender: news Subject: mounting fusefs via /etc/fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:56:55 -0000 Hallo, At the bottom of there's an example of using FUSE via /etc/fstab. It is for Linux. I wonder whether the same thing can be achieved on FreeBSD somehow as it would be very useful. With regards, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 23:57:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AA216A400 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bufo333@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F913C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bufo333@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so745216nzn for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:57:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=f9tFwnEaYP6jIdc6BXyCR36qnh+HLSFJ4jsxHVZSGbCVdJhCgVdgjgANP3KRH6NT0r6mhB8PATBUMK4nRTcuRRhgbE1X0ezjvqwI+zSzPiXYDTJue8oEXA3VprB4juSXmXVcCQMqRDK1AknV+BHr2kyqBK+7ECTmcnWXzMu6s5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rue8twGPOSkMD1/5zw5s+LiRk2udA2Aj7FCG87cv/Lyii09Pl31mggJaakQAFzghtAtLedrZALloi1pAdWr/SkLwWRXnUGzi4TR2PHCcIBFYx8qfFP1ZMZCBe6OPgDGvtx/Mp3c6+1jyss00Xs4lFWRI5Ga7Zh7F8TlEC0GmoJg= Received: by 10.65.98.12 with SMTP id a12mr5947315qbm.1180913361702; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.73.6 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <248cad280706031629y7371677ch711b8eb05229659b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:29:21 -0400 From: "John Burns" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 6.2 make release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:57:11 -0000 I am trying to make a custom release. My goal is to make a custom bsd cd that will install the system to my specification without asking the user any question. My problem is the follwoing: I tried to compile the release without any modifications just to see if it works. I checkout the cvs tree with cvsup and the cvs-supfile in the examples directory. I used the following commands: cd /usr/src make buildworld cd /usr/src/release make release CHROOTDIR=/usr/exile BUILDNAME=EXILE SECURITY \ CVSROOT=/home/ncvs I get the following error error missing kernel configuration file(s) (SMP) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:15:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB8A16A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F2413C469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.114.64.62] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1HuqAr-0008Ua-2k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:31:13 +0100 Message-ID: <4662C2A1.3070702@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:31:13 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Synaptics trackpad problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:15:31 -0000 I'm trying to get XORG setup on my acer laptop with 6.2 release. Things are fine except I cannot get the trackpad to work; x starts, but the mouse is frozen. I have had pcbsd on the same machine and the mouse worked there, but not as a trackpad. Any help appreciated Xorg.0.log (**) Option "CorePointer" (**) Synaptics_Touchpad: Core Pointer (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Synaptics_Touchpad" (type: MOUSE) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keyboard0" (type: KEYBOARD) Synaptics DeviceInit called SynapticsCtrl called. Synaptics DeviceOn called (--) Synaptics_Touchpad synaptics touchpad found (--) Synaptics Touchpad, model: 0 (--) Firmware: 6.2 (--) Sensor: 18 (--) new absolute packet format (--) Touchpad has extended capability bits (--) -> multifinger detection (--) -> palm detection (WW) fcntl(8, O_ASYNC): Inappropriate ioctl for device Synaptics DeviceOff called the corrsponding sections in the xorg.conf are Section "ServerLayout" ...... InputDevice "Synaptics_Touchpad" "CorePointer" EndSection Section "Module" Load "synaptics" ..... EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Synaptics_Touchpad" Driver "synaptics" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" Option "Protocol" "psm" Option "LeftEdge" "1700" Option "RightEdge" "5300" Option "TopEdge" "1700" Option "BottomEdge" "4200" Option "FingerLow" "25" Option "FingerHigh" "30" Option "MaxTapTime" "180" Option "MaxTapMove" "220" Option "VertScrollDelta" "100" Option "HorizScrollDelta" "100" Option "MinSpeed" "0.06" Option "MaxSpeed" "0.06" Option "AccelFactor" "0.0010" Option "ScrollButtonRepeat" "100" Option "UpDownScrolling" "on" Option "UpDownRepeat" "on" Option "LeftRightScrolling" "on" Option "LeftRightRepeat" "on" # "SHMConfig on" seems good works with synclient(1). But this # options is insecure. I recommended "off" as default. Option "SHMConfig" "off" # If you use circular touchpad, uncomment them. # Option "CircularPad" "on" # Option "CircularScrolling" "on" # Option "CircScrollDelta" "0.5" EndSection and certainly dmesg | grep Synaptics psm0: model Synaptics Touchpad, device ID 0 as /boot/loader.conf has hw.psm.synaptics_support="1" -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:31:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B1516A46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8417D13C484 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1317102mue for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YummgD8pDFfI/6HimY/LSJ1TRNt5v2Ta6MMvdV6RHA8kpl8rTzOB971qjh3cHkMjLRcoluseAX5vYBstZ1aZaMsXppfG/2YCED3uy0jJn+n/dZkPNRFiSwoid5GedKO2iX5RE08mWqtLuu+OJeNotf9ddFx0akK1MMDQzHIJm7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V/+z3HNnZKfaSc9todRN3Ydkkzyxxg5zqSWaJfYMu1VMJqjwH/E7Zm6pI7fTMh/TScnivRJvaykl1/g7VP3mINtoGdNmUb7GavBm8yQ/Izp2qe3yMdoWUUliPdvKLvmHc5js8TB6cMpsHv9mNJuH5Q96NuxGFW9gm3dABbNlIN0= Received: by 10.82.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr6080599bub.1180920660575; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.191.11 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:31:00 +1000 From: "Paul Fraser" To: "Robin Becker" In-Reply-To: <4662C2A1.3070702@jessikat.plus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4662C2A1.3070702@jessikat.plus.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Synaptics trackpad problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:31:03 -0000 On 6/3/07, Robin Becker wrote: > Any help appreciated Hi Robin, I know this isn't going to be much of a comfort - but I've had great difficulty trying to get Xorg to work nicely with - surprise - the Synaptics touchpad on my Acer notebook as well. I posted to the list almost a week ago reporting that while Xorg worked brilliantly one day - suddenly it stopped working. I did blow the installation away and started again (unrelated issue) the other day and the touchpad is working much as it was before. I don't have my specific Xorg config in front of me as the missus has stolen the laptop today unfortunately, however I've flagged this thread so I'll attach it and send it over to you tonight. Hope it's of some use to you. Cheers, Paul. -- Regards, Paul Fraser http://furyc0de.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:39:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA4616A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D4F13C455 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 24575 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 11:39:41 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 11:39:40 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:39:36 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Message-ID: <20070604113936.35fe561d@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RSA SecurID soft tokens under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:39:41 -0000 On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:15:22 -0400 wrote: > I'm > interested in monitoring RSA SecureID using Nagios. Hi Mark, what do you mean by "monitoring" SecureID ? you mean, to monitor auth failures / successess? performance of the related services? I would say it's a matter of knowing how the information is presented by RSA's software, and then having Nagios monitor that... _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it." Robert A. Heinlein I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:40:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C429416A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B32013C44B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l541ZafC066099 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:35:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l541Zat3066098 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:35:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:35:36 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070604013536.GB66002@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repear a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:40:09 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:17:00PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a > triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already > present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the > installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at > all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. > > Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing > the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing > the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things > back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Well, you don't say very much about just what you did and where, so it leaves only wild guesses. But one guess is that your other install wiped out the MBR on the disk. To fix that, you can boot up the install CD and select running the fixit. From the fixit use fdisk to install the FreeBSD MBR or I think it also has boot0config. Then try rebooting. If that doesn't help, then we'll have to have some more detailed inf0 -- like the slices and their layout, what order you installed things and maybe some other stuff. ////jerry > > -- > CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] > MacUser, Nov. 1990: "There comes a time in the history of any project when > it becomes necessary to shoot the engineers and begin production." > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:43:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC85516A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6062613C447 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 24985 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 11:43:56 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 11:43:56 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:43:51 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: freebsd@schlossadler.net Message-ID: <20070604114351.3df9b5b3@localhost> In-Reply-To: <05c72d5684132cc1d65b1cfb1846c669@mail.schlossadler.net> References: <20070601131600.16d9cb11@localhost> <05c72d5684132cc1d65b1cfb1846c669@mail.schlossadler.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2/i386 X/DRI issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:43:56 -0000 On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:11:26 +1000 Alex R wrote: > > it's in the archives of the list - you need to install the mesa-demos > > port. > > Installed it. > > [alex@desktop ~]$ glxinfo > Error: unable to open display > > But thats because I am ssh'd into the box from work, I dare say it will work when I get home and test from within X. ( X forwarding over ssh to your local display ..? I am just not sure whether glxinfo calculations would be based on your remote display or your local one....) > You are a champion :-) Thank you! nw :) btw, the Xorg.0.log snippet you sent previously looks good. Usually, when X tries to enable DRI and it fails to, you'll see a line like "DRI Disabled" (after all the other DRI info). B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." Robert Woodruff I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:48:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3678816A560 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7C113C45D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l541hgMp066126 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:43:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l541hgvW066125 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:43:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:43:42 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070604014342.GC66002@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <466317C4.7060404@daleco.biz> <20070603194516.GF66889@demeter.hydra> <4663225B.6070905@otenet.gr> <20070603205608.GA67502@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070603205608.GA67502@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:48:16 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:56:08PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:19:39PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > > You can use the grub bootloader to load freebsd (assuming that nothing > > is damaged in the freebsd slice itself, and I believe it is intact in > > your case) > > It's been some time since I've done this myself (I am no longer dual > > booting FreeBSD on this machine), but I'll try to be as accurate as > > possible. > > Start your system, when it gets to the grub loader press "c" to get to > > the grub command line. > > Do you know what your freebsd slice is? Even if you don't, you can get > > this info from fdisk -l from debian. Or you could try searching in the > > command line. > > Type something like: > > > > root (hd0,2,a) > > GRUB doesn't recognize the partition type for some reason. There's > pretty clearly something wrong with the partition, I think. Do you mean partition or slice? The slice needs to be marked as bootable. You can check this from the fixit boot using fdisk - 'fdisk ad0' or 'fdisk da0' presuming this is disk 0 and depending on IDE or SCSI. Then, if that looks OK, use bsdlabel on that slice (something like 'bsdlabel ad0s3' or 'bsdlabel da0s3' depending on IDE or SCSI and presuming FreeBSD is on slice 3) from the fixit to see what you can learn from it. Just doing bsdlabel with no other command flag will print out information. ////jerry > > -- > CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] > McCloctnick the Lucid: "The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your > time waving your hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do." > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:49:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876EC16A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A45413C45D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 25528 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 11:49:54 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 11:49:53 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:49:47 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070604114947.07078c3f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <92bcbda50705300300g1edba3acg5517aa737be53c5b@mail.gmail.com> References: <465B86F9.3000001@voidmain.net> <465BFD6F.5090507@netfence.it> <92bcbda50705290356g70381411m185d9067fa1c3c60@mail.gmail.com> <20070529192433.GC38336@demeter.hydra> <92bcbda50705300300g1edba3acg5517aa737be53c5b@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Java on the BSD Desktop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:49:54 -0000 On Wed, 30 May 2007 12:00:53 +0200 "n j" wrote: > I completely agree that Sun's licence is a hassle. Fortunately, in a > year or two, we're going to have an open source Java platform meaning > there will be no hassle with manual download while installing JRE/JDK. > Combined with the great API, object-oriented nature of the language, > free IDE for serious development (Eclipse and specifically Netbeans > with a very capable Swing GUI visual editor) - this combination > strikes me as something only Microsoft can compete with. yeah, agreed - jdk is a hassle first time, but then it just chugs along. Eclipse is quite good to work with - I've just found it easier / better? to upgrade/install eclipse plugins via it's own install mechanism (help menu i think) rather than ports (lots missing / old). The fact that all those plugins work just fine shows that Java **is** a good solution for **my** desktop ;). anyway, once JRE installed, all kinds of good apps are available, so the initial hassle is worth it, IMHO. anyway, my 0.02... _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The greater danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it. But that it is too low... and we reach it." Michelangelo (1475-1564) I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 01:54:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D435916A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C8513C468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 25935 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 11:54:04 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 11:54:03 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:53:58 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20070604115358.6df8f4de@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4661FE29.4010802@szalbot.homedns.org> References: <4661FE29.4010802@szalbot.homedns.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:54:03 -0000 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:32:57 +0200 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > I will appreciate any help. When trying to install php5-extensions, I > get the following error: > > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for php5-gd-5.2.2 > ===> php5-gd-5.2.2 depends on executable in : phpize - found > ===> php5-gd-5.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found > ===> php5-gd-5.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries > - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries in > /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries > Read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2. [....] > > I cannot install php5-extensions, nor xorg nor xorg-libraries. I am lost > as to what to do. Many thanks in advance! Hi Zbigniew, yeah...one of those nits that I dont think it's properly explained. From my own experience and discussion in ports@ : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-May/041207.html 1)Bypass the dependency altogether: php5-gd itself is not the problem, but rather libgd, with XPM support enabled (I haven't confirmed it , but it makes perfect sense). 2) Let the ports tree know you are ready to use 7.2 (even if you never had 6.9 and (my) common sense says it should install 7.2 anyway) : As per /usr/ports/UPDATING, set XORG_UPGRADE , and follow the upgrade steps, including the rebase.sh script. clean xorg-libraries and install that by itself first (make sure XORG_UPGRADE is set in that session's env). B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Two things have come out of Berkeley, Unix and LSD. It is uncertain which caused the other. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 02:38:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606DF16A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 02:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunteke@earlham.edu) Received: from sipala.earlham.edu (sipala.earlham.edu [159.28.1.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAFA13C469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 02:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunteke@earlham.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (adsl-76-214-114-198.dsl.ipltin.sbcglobal.net [76.214.114.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sipala.earlham.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l542c0TK010098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:38:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: sipala.earlham.edu: Host adsl-76-214-114-198.dsl.ipltin.sbcglobal.net [76.214.114.198] claimed to be [192.168.1.107] Message-ID: <46637B07.6050705@earlham.edu> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:37:59 -0400 From: Kevin Hunter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0706020638g48b7ac7fn946c6e3caddc0663@mail.gmail.com> <466199E5.3040005@vindaloo.com> <4661B6E0.803@earlham.edu> <2cd0a0da0706030142l1fd30d74yc443e132337daf37@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0706030142l1fd30d74yc443e132337daf37@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How to disable command prompt history? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:38:06 -0000 At 4:42a -0400 on 03 Jun 2007, VeeJay wrote: > Actually, it was for the security reason that if somebody breaks in the > server then he/she doesn't see what commands are being executed, etc, > etc.... > > and I am using /bin/sh > > any more comments? I don't use /bin/sh on a regular basis (bash, for better or worse) so I can't help you. >From a security standpoint, I'm more wondering what makes you so worried that someone will break in? Would some suggestions from the community about securing your system be helpful? (I'm no security guru so don't ask me . . . 8-< ) Also, why are you worried about them seeing what commands you've been running? My first thought is that at the point a malicious someone has broken into your system, you have (much) bigger things to worry about. But, to dumbly answer your question, see if sh looks for ~/.logout. If it does, have it remove ~/.history and clear the screen. Or, if the order of that doesn't work (if .logout is read /before/ .history is written), 'chmod 000 .history'. Best of luck, Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 03:31:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D4916A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 03:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9605113C45E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 03:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070604033132.JYUA7379.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:31:32 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070604033132.WDMA22414.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:31:32 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20070603232531.03dffe40@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:31:46 -0400 To: tundra@tundraware.com,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: r17fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:31:34 -0000 At 02:08 PM 6/3/2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >3) Both the MOBO and drive are SATA-300 rated, but 6.2 insists that > the drive is running at SATA-150. I have verified that the drive > has no jumper forcing it into this mode. Don't know about the other issues, but I have a Dell with similar Intel components, and it did the same SATA thing when I put a new drive in it yesterday: atapci1: port 0xfe00-0xfe07,0xfe10-0xfe13,0xfe20-0xfe27,0xfe30-0xfe33,0xfea0-0xfeaf irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 ad4: 76293MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 The ad6 drive is supposed to do SATA-300, but realistically, other bottlenecks dictate it's not going to get anywhere near the '150 speed, so I'm not terribly worried about it. cp'ing a 4GB file to /dev/null yielded 57MB/sec. -RW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 04:02:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C3A16A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3D613C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from sam-lefflers-powerbook-g4-15.local (sam@[10.0.0.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l543pOEf015799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jun 2007 20:51:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <46638C3D.10800@errno.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:51:25 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Short References: <201397.96752.qm@web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <201397.96752.qm@web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:02:09 -0000 Neil Short wrote: > Recently cvsup'd. > This is new and I'm not sure I understand it. > dmesg... > > ... > ath0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface ignore it; it's just a reminder added when people decided to deprecate the api Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 04:16:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B2C16A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8BC13C458 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 7665 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 14:16:10 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 14:16:10 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:16:05 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: tundra@tundraware.com Message-ID: <20070604141605.3f56e3e3@localhost> In-Reply-To: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:16:10 -0000 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:08:02 -0500 Tim Daneliuk wrote: > (Originally asked on -hardware and -smp but no one seemed to have any > ideas. Repeating here to the larger group in hopes of some answers. TIA.) > > System: > > Intel D946GZIS MOBO w/ICH7 SATA-II support > WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 250G Hard Drive that claims to do 3G/s > Pentium D @ 3.2GHz > > In addition to the on-board peripherals, the two available > PCI slots have an Adaptec 2940 U/UW SCSI controller and > a 3Com 3C901 card in them respectively. > > Running FBSD 6.2-STABLE as of yesterday. Kernel is SMP. > > I've run into a problem that makes no sense to me and I suspect > is related to how SMP works (or, then again, maybe not): > > 1) When booting FBSD 6.2, right after the second CPU is started > the system hangs for about 45 seconds and then proceeds normally. > This happens with GENERIC-Release, SMP-Stable, and SMP-Release kernels. > During this wait, the floppy goes active for some reason. It's > as if the system is "hunting" for something. > Maybe unrelated - I had a similar problem yesterday on a small box @ home - it was stopping for about 2 minutes or so just before showing the line about ad0. It turned out one of the PCI cards (TV card) had become a bit lose and was obvioulsy causing problems. Once this was solved, it booted fine with no problem. > 4) I *cannot* get xorg 7.2 to work with the onboard video. > If I configure it as a VESA video system, all is well. > If I try to tell it that I am using i810 video, I get this: > > X Window System Version 7.2.0 > Release Date: 22 January 2007 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 > Current Operating System: FreeBSD troll.tundraware.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #5: Sun Jun 3 00:42:36 CDT 2007 toor@troll.tundraware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > Build Date: 30 May 2007 > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Module Loader present > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Jun 3 13:05:01 2007 > (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new" > (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) > (EE) I810(0): Failed to allocate framebuffer. Is your VideoRAM set too low ?? > > Fatal server error: > AddScreen/ScreenInit failed for driver 0 > > This makes no sense given that I have allocated 128M for video memory. do you have AGP support in your kernel ? _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Do not take away the camels hump, you may be stopping him from being a camel. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 04:20:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DF616A47C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D332113C43E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 7997 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 14:20:42 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 14:20:42 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:20:37 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Kevin Hunter Message-ID: <20070604142037.0884d59f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <46637B07.6050705@earlham.edu> References: <2cd0a0da0706020638g48b7ac7fn946c6e3caddc0663@mail.gmail.com> <466199E5.3040005@vindaloo.com> <4661B6E0.803@earlham.edu> <2cd0a0da0706030142l1fd30d74yc443e132337daf37@mail.gmail.com> <46637B07.6050705@earlham.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , VeeJay Subject: Re: How to disable command prompt history? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:20:43 -0000 On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:37:59 -0400 Kevin Hunter wrote: > Also, why are you worried about them seeing what commands you've been > running? My first thought is that at the point a malicious someone has > broken into your system, you have (much) bigger things to worry about. good point. I do have this done in my laptop, only because I can :D (and a bit harder for someone to know what u're supposed to do to mount the encrypted drives.... big deal :D ) anyway, I just linked ~/.bash_history to /dev/null - history works within the current shell, but not once I've exited. Anyway, having multiple shells writing to the same history file is always problematic - it never keeps the one you really need :-S _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts ... for support rather than illumination." Andrew Lang (1844-1912) I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 05:00:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF3816A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CBC13C455 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 11983 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 15:00:03 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 15:00:03 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:59:59 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20070604145959.48e4be17@localhost> In-Reply-To: <46615BA9.2070907@szalbot.homedns.org> References: <46615BA9.2070907@szalbot.homedns.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: downgrading from php5 to php4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:00:11 -0000 On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:59:37 +0200 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > I am looking for advice how to best downgrade to php4. Is it ok to use > "make uninstall" for php5 and php5-extensions followed by make install > for php4? that's about it - if anything links to php (i doubt it) you may have to rebuild it. If you have webapps that work in either, you shouldn't really need to reinstall them (unless they install different files depending on what version of PHP you are running) - just do force in the php4 install and then run pkgdb -F to fix all the pkgs dependencies. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Imagination is more important than knowledge." Albert Einstein, On Science I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 05:02:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C02D16A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B7D13C480 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 12353 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 15:02:20 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 15:02:20 +1000 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:02:16 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "SethuRaman Krishnasamy" Message-ID: <20070604150216.217bfd64@localhost> In-Reply-To: <594285890706010550v1e83b931j6e42d434b22f6bf4@mail.gmail.com> References: <594285890706010550v1e83b931j6e42d434b22f6bf4@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPSec-NAT setup using racoon2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:02:21 -0000 On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:20:01 +0530 "SethuRaman Krishnasamy" wrote: > I would like to know if IPSec-NATT setup can > be made using racoon2 and the procedure for the same. I'm using > racoon2 version racoon2-20061228a AFAIK, you need IPSEC_NATT support in the kernel. search the archives of this list and -net@ for info on the patch for -STABLE (and -CURRENT, i think) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Tell a person you're the Metatron and they stare at you blankly. Mention something out of a Charleton Heston movie and suddenly everyone's a Theology scholar!" Dogma I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 05:09:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF94A16A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0FB413C45E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 91074 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 05:06:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 05:06:22 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5459UuD069161 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:09:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5459Twg069160 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:09:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:09:29 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070604050929.GA68979@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070603191700.GC66889@demeter.hydra> <20070604013536.GB66002@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070604013536.GB66002@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: repair a FreeBSD install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:09:32 -0000 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:35:36PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:17:00PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > Someone I know tried installing Slackware on a Thinkpad R52 to create a > > triple-boot system (MS Windows and FreeBSD 6.2 as the other two, already > > present on the system). The Slackware install didn't get very far (the > > installer is less than helpful -- wouldn't recognize a swap partition at > > all), but apparently it got far enough to break the FreeBSD install. > > > > Any tips, hints, and suggestions about how exactly to go about fixing > > the FreeBSD install (without overwriting the home partition and losing > > the installed system configuration to minimize time lost getting things > > back to "normal") would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. > > Well, you don't say very much about just what you did and where, > so it leaves only wild guesses. But one guess is that your other > install wiped out the MBR on the disk. > > To fix that, you can boot up the install CD and select running > the fixit. From the fixit use fdisk to install the FreeBSD MBR > or I think it also has boot0config. Then try rebooting. If that > doesn't help, then we'll have to have some more detailed inf0 -- > like the slices and their layout, what order you installed things > and maybe some other stuff. After talking more with the person who owns the laptop and doing some more investigation, I've come to the conclusion that the actual source of the problem was QtParted. The system was booted with a Slackware installer and an attempt was made to create a swap partition using fdisk from there, but the Slackware installer didn't recognize it (yes, after rebooting). It was attempted again by booting from a Knoppix CD, using QtParted. Once that was done the Slackware installer was booted again, and still did not recognize the existence of a Linux swap partition. After that, booting into FreeBSD was attempted, and it hung after selecting F3 (the option for FreeBSD), thus bringing us to the point where a problem was noticed. We used QtParted to check out the partition setup, after re-identifying the FreeBSD slice as such using fdisk from a Knoppix root shell. It appears that QtParted automatically classifies the FreeBSD partition (or "slice" if you prefer -- QtParted calls it a partition) as a Linux swap partition, and thus thinks there are *two* Linux swap partitions on the drive. I think that writing a new partition table to disk after telling it to add a new swap partition for Slackware caused it to also change the identification of the FreeBSD partition to a swap partition. Having already changed its label to identify it as a FreeBSD partition, I guess the next step is to make it bootable -- not using QtParted, of course. I'm frankly stunned that it supports NTFS but not UFS. Am I the only one that thinks that's just not right, somehow? -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Rudy Giuliani: "You have free speech so I can be heard." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 05:58:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7E316A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mats.lindberg@se.transport.bombardier.com) Received: from smtp1.transport.bombardier.com (smtp1.transport.bombardier.com [20.133.32.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FA413C45D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mats.lindberg@se.transport.bombardier.com) Received: from BBTSRVFDH74.cone.bombardier.com (bbtsrvfdh74.cone.bombardier.com [20.133.32.5]) by smtp1.transport.bombardier.com (Switch-3.1.9/Switch-3.1.9) with ESMTP id l545w5cU014458 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:58:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from emea-ml02.atle.bombardier.com (HELO EMEAML02.UK.BOMBARDIER.TRANSPORT.COM) ([10.157.248.22]) by BBTSRVFDH74.cone.bombardier.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2007 07:58:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200706011431.48560.jonathan@hst.org.za> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0 September 26, 2002 From: mats.lindberg@se.transport.bombardier.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:57:53 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMEA-ML02/Server/Transport/Bombardier(Release 6.5.5FP2|October 04, 2006) at 06/04/2007 06:57:56, Serialize complete at 06/04/2007 06:57:56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Steve Bertrand , Jonathan McKeown Subject: Re: purging old mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:58:20 -0000 Jonathan McKeown wrote on 2007-06-01 14:31:48: > On Friday 01 June 2007 14:11, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > mats.lindberg@se.transport.bombardier.com wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm setting up a FreeBSD 5.4 system that need to run unattended for=20 a > > > year or more. > > > I've noticed that the /var/mail/root file grows a bit over time. > > > > > > Do I need to configure the system in some way to prevent this file=20 from > > > growing indefinately, filling up the /var partition? > > > > Are you actually interested in reading root mail? > > > > Are you running sendmail? > > > > If so, in the /etc/mail/aliases file, change the root alias to an=20 email > > address that someone actually POP's. > > > > If you don't want to read the email at all, change the root alias to > > point to /dev/null. >=20 > What I've been caught by a couple of times is the periodic(8) routines,=20 which=20 > quickly fill roots mailbox with daily, weekly and monthly status=20 reports. >=20 > If you're not going to forward these to a real user but still want to=20 keep=20 > (some of) them available, put >=20 > daily=5Foutput=3D"/var/log/daily.log" > weekly=5Foutput=3D"/var/log/weekly.log" > monthly=5Foutput=3D"/var/log/monthly.log" >=20 > in /etc/periodic.conf. The relevant reports will be logged into the=20 > respective=20 > files, and newsyslog already knows to rotate these if they exist, so=20 they=20 > won't grow endlessly (by default, /etc/newsyslog.conf keeps a week of=20 dailys,=20 > 5 weeks of weeklys and a year of monthlys). >=20 > Jonathan Thanks guys This was really usefuk =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=20 This e-mail communication (and any attachment/s) may contain confidential=20 or privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) or=20 entity named above and to others who have been specifically authorized to=20 receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,=20 copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please = notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error by reply=20 e-mail, and delete the e-mail subsequently. Please note that in order to=20 protect the security of our information systems an AntiSPAM solution is in = use and will browse through incoming emails.=20 Thank you.=20 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=20 Ce message (ainsi que le(s) fichier/s), transmis par courriel, peut=20 contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou prot=E9g=E9s et est destin=E9 = =E0=20 l?usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est par=20 les pr=E9sentes avis=E9e qu?il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, le = distribuer ou le reproduire. Si vous l?avez re=E7u par inadvertance,=20 veuillez nous en aviser et d=E9truire ce message. Veuillez prendre note=20 qu'une solution antipollupostage (AntiSPAM) est utilis=E9e afin d'assurer l= a=20 s=E9curit=E9 de nos systems d'information et qu'elle fur=E8tera les courrie= ls=20 entrant. Merci.=20 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 06:02:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D01316A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028AE13C487 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.11] by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Hv5eV-000AkC-J5; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:02:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4663AAD7.6070507@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:01:59 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <4661FE29.4010802@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070604115358.6df8f4de@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070604115358.6df8f4de@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Feedback: 1Hv5eV-000AkC-J5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:02:56 -0000 Hello, Norberto Meijome pisze: > On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:32:57 +0200 > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I will appreciate any help. When trying to install php5-extensions, I >> get the following error: >> >> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for php5-gd-5.2.2 >> ===> php5-gd-5.2.2 depends on executable in : phpize - found >> ===> php5-gd-5.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found >> ===> php5-gd-5.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries >> - not found >> ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries in >> /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries >> Read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2. > [....] > >> >> I cannot install php5-extensions, nor xorg nor xorg-libraries. I am lost >> as to what to do. Many thanks in advance! > > Hi Zbigniew, > yeah...one of those nits that I dont think it's properly explained. From my own > experience and discussion in ports@ : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-May/041207.html > > 1)Bypass the dependency altogether: php5-gd itself is not the problem, but > rather libgd, with XPM support enabled (I haven't confirmed it , but it makes > perfect sense). I would love to choose this route as I have a headless installation and need no X11 whatsoever. I do not think I need XPM but how can I bypass this dependency? In Makefile for php4-extensions (as actually I want to install php4 and its extensions but I tried with php5 wrongly assuming php4 was the problem) I have GD "GD library support" off \ Could you please advise how to disable the dependency? Many thanks in advance! zbigniew szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 06:05:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0305C16A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A198C13C44B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5465ibe036021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:05:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4663ABB6.1070804@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:05:42 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> <20070604141605.3f56e3e3@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070604141605.3f56e3e3@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:05:53 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > > Maybe unrelated - I had a similar problem yesterday on a small box @ home - it > was stopping for about 2 minutes or so just before showing the line about ad0. > It turned out one of the PCI cards (TV card) had become a bit lose and was > obvioulsy causing problems. Once this was solved, it booted fine with no > problem. I'll look into this. When this happened, did the floppy light up as well? > >> 4) I *cannot* get xorg 7.2 to work with the onboard video. >> If I configure it as a VESA video system, all is well. >> If I try to tell it that I am using i810 video, I get this: >> >> X Window System Version 7.2.0 >> Release Date: 22 January 2007 > > do you have AGP support in your kernel ? I am using the stock SMP kernel config that includes GENERIC, which does have 'device agp' in it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 06:16:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E20D16A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from n21b.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n21b.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043A013C45D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from [216.252.122.217] by n21.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2007 06:16:49 -0000 Received: from [68.142.237.87] by t2.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2007 06:16:49 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.131] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2007 06:16:49 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2007 06:16:49 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 777243.63769.bm@rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 79022 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Jun 2007 06:16:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=nz9vqLDUUMxqqXOXJO8P0vxD0EDU1QVjPNDkqgofc7vEfC9SeaIUxmtP0JQzwECgvib3PrSPpSv2vmUS1t1uKvSyJaGaUCni+GrzsRhcrIdqxhq3KvIc2rum++g61nMY0euiVAnc6pfnLPZZT6fsZk8wBbYsDAgegzickBieTFM=; X-YMail-OSG: 4bDGwkAVM1mzZpZlO4h7O9nmrD_uGsogeLZttpkc8kgweag.zzy7JvSo02JW3.jEJG0RUpVXZ6MIEisB_jMlu4G.zw-- Received: from [62.194.166.79] by web57402.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:16:49 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:16:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Davidson To: Andrey Shuvikov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <24393ae80706030809u23e037eo165abeb3889d7205@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <604643.78169.qm@web57402.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: GRUB / boot easy problems w / USB stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:16:50 -0000 --- Andrey Shuvikov wrote: > Did you copy it recursively (with sub-directories)? > If yes then you > didn't need to copy > /boot/grub separately. If no, you'll probably need > to copy at least > /boot/defaults . > And /boot/kernel as well if you really want to > boot... > > Andrey # In /boot I did cp -Rpv * /usb/boot #I'm not sure why it can get as far as the BTX loader #info, but can't manage to load the kernel. It clearly #can read the ufs2 now. I don't really know much about #the specifics of the startup process, but I thought #as soon as the loader was invoked, the first thing it #tries to do is load the kernel into memory. I just #double checked and the kernel is located on the stick #at USB/boot/kernel/kernel. This must have happened to #someone else before. -Fred p.s. just a shot in the dark, but does anyone think grub might not be able to load the kernel because it runs out of some kind of internal allotment of memory? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 06:20:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9596216A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsenthil@adventnet.com) Received: from alps.manageengine.org (tapti.adventnet.co.in [203.199.211.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F4F13C44B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsenthil@adventnet.com) Received: from smtp.india.adventnet.com (smtp.india.adventnet.com [192.168.4.41]) by alps.manageengine.org (8.13.8/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l546KPof029787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:50:25 +0530 Received: from [192.168.111.179] (bsenthil.india.adventnet.com [192.168.111.179]) by smtp.india.adventnet.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l546JBUZ009283 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:49:12 +0530 Message-ID: <4663AE7D.2090607@adventnet.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:47:33 +0530 From: bsenthil User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-6mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.1/3347/Mon Jun 4 04:30:51 2007 on mail-hub.india.adventnet.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Configure ipaddress and route entries in /etc/rc.conf file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:20:38 -0000 I am trying to configure ipaddress and route entries. so that i added below the entries in /etc/rc.conf file. vi /etc/rc.conf inetd_enable="YES" hostname="test.abc.com" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.110.14 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.110.2" hostname="test.abc.com" static_routes="net1 net2" route_net1="-net 192.168.1.1/24 192.168.110.2" route_net2="-net 192.168.2.1/24 192.168.110.2" and then i restated the network services "netif restart" The below entries are listed in router table ... $ netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 192.168.110 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 Problem :: Default router entries and net1 & net2 entries are not added in router table... Please advice me anything i want to configue more in rc.conf file.... I can able to add default router by executing " route add -net 0.0.0.0 192.168.110.2" Thanks, Senthilkumar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 06:23:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F086D16A473 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8653D13C4CB for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l546NA9c036208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:23:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4663AFCC.6080508@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:23:08 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: r17fbsd@xxiii.com References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20070603232531.03dffe40@mailsvr.xxiii.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20070603232531.03dffe40@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:23:22 -0000 r17fbsd@xxiii.com wrote: > At 02:08 PM 6/3/2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> 3) Both the MOBO and drive are SATA-300 rated, but 6.2 insists that >> the drive is running at SATA-150. I have verified that the drive >> has no jumper forcing it into this mode. > > Don't know about the other issues, but I have a Dell with similar Intel > components, and it did the same SATA thing when I put a new drive in it > yesterday: > > atapci1: port > 0xfe00-0xfe07,0xfe10-0xfe13,0xfe20-0xfe27,0xfe30-0xfe33,0xfea0-0xfeaf > irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 > ad4: 76293MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > The ad6 drive is supposed to do SATA-300, but realistically, other > bottlenecks dictate it's not going to get anywhere near the '150 speed, Could you comment a bit more on why you think this is so. I would think that with modern processors and buses, a machine with light load ought to be able to drive SATA-300, but I've never actuall tested for it myself. > so I'm not terribly worried about it. cp'ing a 4GB file to /dev/null > yielded 57MB/sec. > > -RW I get around 50MB/sec or so with about 2G file, so we're in the same ballpark. In round numbers, this is 1/3 the theoretical throughput of a SATA-150 or 1/6 that of SATA-300. Now, I *am* curious on what the bottlenecks are. 50MB/sec isn't a whole lot different that what I'd expect out of a modern PATA drive. So, noting the better cabling and the wide availability of on-board RAID, it sure looks to me like there is no compelling argument to be made for SATA in non-RAIDed environments. I'm guessing the drives are the same ones as their PATA counterparts, just with different interface electronics, so we're not going to see SCSI-like reliability and/or performance under load. I can understand some overhead due to system dispatching and multitasking, but in a lightly loaded machine (as mine was when I did the test) with 2G of memory and dual 3.2G processors, it seems very strange that the drive should run at 1/3 or less the stated interface speed. What am I missing here, I wonder... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 06:54:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83D316A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (kazi.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710C313C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l546sAHf033045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:54:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.14.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l546sAmx033042; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:54:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) X-Authentication-Warning: kazi.fit.vutbr.cz: cejkar set sender to cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz using -f Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:54:10 +0200 From: Rudolf Cejka To: Pang Message-ID: <20070604065410.GA31491@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 147.229.8.12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:54:12 -0000 Pang wrote (2007/06/03): > I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to > half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet 172.16.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 172.16.0.1 > ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) > status: active Hello, so I was right? ;o) I assume, that you have more capable device on the other side, atleast 100 Mb/s full-duplex. In that case, you should check, what connection type is "seen" on the other side (switches with management!). Then you can check auto-negotiation settings on the other side, try to change ethernet cable - it would be faulty and auto-neg would not work correctly, then look, which chipset do you have - the driver would not work with too new chips, I have here some ICH8 machines, which do work just 100 Mb/s instead of 1 Gb/s (I expect that -current should work now). Regards. PS: Another very good command is ifconfig -m em0, where you can see all allowed media/mediaopt combinations. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 07:24:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8AB16A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5734513C458 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so1875468waf for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c39Vq1O9ezAh86AVoy8ygQVp9zIqY/oe+pke3ur4DrLdAcSNOj8GCFxNNoT+zxFdP06SYD2d93Khj9EEYEJovUSRWUmBOUpidqKVx3Tt5KQ1ioIR8OZHd/WQKWO6a85otoAgYpaPcRCC9k/+NH6j/d1yrRkWEn2AB6sWu5IA8Po= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YDu9YAdIfDfH4ZdakD3TwjvA3SbWQ/14g34P3IMQzLEfNw0ghmLbCKMo+DvDCyZsXAGp49qZKA6XP1ZahMDnX2H+/d+FF+ty2kImfAWKusarkTbdJ3Qhnuz1OZyUn84tfdBHq/Al/vSoVT6Q/VNSQnzO/rDCFXNGeJpz8Jmtjes= Received: by 10.114.12.9 with SMTP id 9mr4479213wal.1180940335497; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.130.15 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:58:55 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: tundra@tundraware.com In-Reply-To: <4663AFCC.6080508@tundraware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20070603232531.03dffe40@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <4663AFCC.6080508@tundraware.com> Cc: r17fbsd@xxiii.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:24:49 -0000 On 6/4/07, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I get around 50MB/sec or so with about 2G file, so we're in the same > ballpark. In round numbers, this is 1/3 the theoretical throughput > of a SATA-150 or 1/6 that of SATA-300. Now, I *am* curious on what > the bottlenecks are. 50MB/sec isn't a whole lot different that what > I'd expect out of a modern PATA drive. I'm getting 50-55Mbyte/s as well, on an ICH7-equipped board and SATA-150 hard drive. Seems to fall within expectations. The maximum theoretical interface speed isn't the same as what you get from the device connected to it, unfortunately. It's pretty fast still considering the price of the hardware, and if you want more, use RAID. > So, noting the better cabling > and the wide availability of on-board RAID, it sure looks to me like there > is no compelling argument to be made for SATA in non-RAIDed environments. > I'm guessing the drives are the same ones as their PATA counterparts, just > with different interface electronics, so we're not going to see SCSI-like > reliability and/or performance under load. Not entirely correct. SATA is hot-swappable, and you can get drives with command queuing for improved performance. No master/slave jumper fiddling either, which is nice. It's a technology not to be spat at, basically, and it's much cheaper than SCSI. -- Juha http://www.geekzone.co.nz/juha From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 07:46:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF2B16A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D045E13C480 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_910__2007_06_04_09_46_01 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (5.2.1); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:46:01 +0200 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:46:00 +0200 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.oekb.co.at [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l547k0q9003604 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:46:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l547k0Oi003603 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:46:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:46:00 +0200 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2007 07:46:00.0954 (UTC) FILETIME=[65547DA0:01C7A67C] Subject: New (blade) server - stick with FreeBSD 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:46:03 -0000 Hi, I'm about to set up a new server that should run basically network-monitoring (MRTG, Cacti etc.). Hardware will be HP C-class blade based on AMD Opterons. Should I stick with FreeBS 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7 (see http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html - "June 2007 Start FreeBSD 7.0 Release Process). The question basically is: Will FreeBSD7 be "current" or "stable"? Thanks much in advance for any hint, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 08:51:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8730216A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6501F13C45B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l548pWQH011751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:51:32 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l548pVr9010979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:51:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4663D293.1000602@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:51:31 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juha Saarinen References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20070603232531.03dffe40@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <4663AFCC.6080508@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.4.12932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_1 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: tundra@tundraware.com, r17fbsd@xxiii.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:51:33 -0000 Juha Saarinen wrote: > On 6/4/07, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> I get around 50MB/sec or so with about 2G file, so we're in the same >> ballpark. In round numbers, this is 1/3 the theoretical throughput >> of a SATA-150 or 1/6 that of SATA-300. Now, I *am* curious on what >> the bottlenecks are. 50MB/sec isn't a whole lot different that what >> I'd expect out of a modern PATA drive. > > I'm getting 50-55Mbyte/s as well, on an ICH7-equipped board and > SATA-150 hard drive. Seems to fall within expectations. The maximum > theoretical interface speed isn't the same as what you get from the > device connected to it, unfortunately. It's pretty fast still > considering the price of the hardware, and if you want more, use RAID. Yes, there is software overhead to consider, and the speeds are most likely burst speeds. >> So, noting the better cabling >> and the wide availability of on-board RAID, it sure looks to me like >> there >> is no compelling argument to be made for SATA in non-RAIDed >> environments. >> I'm guessing the drives are the same ones as their PATA counterparts, >> just >> with different interface electronics, so we're not going to see >> SCSI-like >> reliability and/or performance under load. > > Not entirely correct. SATA is hot-swappable, and you can get drives > with command queuing for improved performance. No master/slave jumper > fiddling either, which is nice. It's a technology not to be spat at, > basically, and it's much cheaper than SCSI. Agreed. SATA is a nice technology, and the price is right. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 08:56:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1B216A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491DD13C43E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128891A3C19; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0BA5125A; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:56:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 308BFC204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:56:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 04:56:27 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ewald Jenisch Message-ID: <20070604085627.GA22626@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New (blade) server - stick with FreeBSD 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:56:28 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:46:00AM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm about to set up a new server that should run basically > network-monitoring (MRTG, Cacti etc.). Hardware will be HP C-class > blade based on AMD Opterons. > > Should I stick with FreeBS 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7 (see > http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html - "June 2007 Start FreeBSD > 7.0 Release Process). Note "start". The release is still many months away, so presumably you do not wish to wait until then to install your server :) You should definitely keep an eye on it though, there is a lot of good stuff coming up in 7.0. > The question basically is: Will FreeBSD7 be "current" or "stable"? It will be the start of a new stable branch. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 09:08:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7BD16A46E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B2513C465 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from royal64.emp.zapto.org (195.198.193.104) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 46245DE100C2E84E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:58:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:58:34 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A61A1773@royal64.emp.zapto.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7235.2 In-Reply-To: <20070604115358.6df8f4de@localhost> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: php5-extensions and xorg libraries Thread-Index: AcemTGKvqtw0VeNfQqWRAvzWGTeefQAJBzyg References: <4661FE29.4010802@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070604115358.6df8f4de@localhost> From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Subject: RE: php5-extensions and xorg libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:08:36 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > I will appreciate any help. When trying to install php5-extensions, I=20 > get the following error: If you really don't need the xorg-libraries (true for most web servers for example) then there's an easy way to avoid them: 1. install all your ports with "make -DWITHOUT_X11 install clean" 2. add "'*' =3D> 'WITHOUT_X11=3D1'," to the make args in pkgtools.conf = (or whatever the format is in the file) to prevent portupgrade from adding the xorg-libraries in the future This works just fine for a typical webserver (analog, webalizer, php with the gd extension, ...). I just installed a new webserver with multiple jails to keep the different sites compartmentalized, and avoiding the xorg-libs saved me a ton of space and compile time. /Daniel Eriksson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 09:10:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1316516A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88C413C46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:10:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so370639anc for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:10:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DPL3w0fu8fsMejebGPVjvGwzVAPSa24IaxaS+18s+b+MxMvmL7xL9jNZLhFt1w278TD3n2E83GRRtKnwauyouoNW5KueI72cbhBIWTYHnrSKWmF6MY1k3juKlo8oJhAicLB0JrdbLogx1AlxQyaJlRlksCKMUTU6J09lU11uzAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DM98U6a4IPQYW/dtz3sfvdPp2OSJFbMjEhhUYwkeyZQBwRX+w1B5MYwTyzjv9ihJOSnJ4O0Cau7u4mab2Z4toJRdZvmTwc9e4uX2UHd6K9X4TNHBhTGXZe39U5vqU9b3R4/j/PfJAE9Z2kQxzN40zByOHqnQ8i1y92xHQPZlt/E= Received: by 10.100.250.7 with SMTP id x7mr2456299anh.1180948253104; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 02:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706040210g318f9fcfi91b9cdcb056cfabc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:10:53 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Ewald Jenisch" In-Reply-To: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New (blade) server - stick with FreeBSD 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:10:54 -0000 On 6/4/07, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm about to set up a new server that should run basically > network-monitoring (MRTG, Cacti etc.). Hardware will be HP C-class > blade based on AMD Opterons. > > Should I stick with FreeBS 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7 (see > http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html - "June 2007 Start FreeBSD > 7.0 Release Process). > > The question basically is: Will FreeBSD7 be "current" or "stable"? > > Thanks much in advance for any hint, > -ewald > > Currently there are some bugs in the tcp, my server always crash with a kernel msg "tcp syncache_expand: segment failed syncookie authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) So wait till they fix this serious bug, other than that it runs faster than RELENG_6 with ULE 2.0, and libthr. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 09:30:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A370416A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2CC13C469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2AA1A4D84; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 02:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8257512A6; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:30:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C7DA5C204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:30:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:30:28 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Message-ID: <20070604093028.GA22814@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> <499c70c0706040210g318f9fcfi91b9cdcb056cfabc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706040210g318f9fcfi91b9cdcb056cfabc@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Ewald Jenisch , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New (blade) server - stick with FreeBSD 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:30:29 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:10:53PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 6/4/07, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I'm about to set up a new server that should run basically > >network-monitoring (MRTG, Cacti etc.). Hardware will be HP C-class > >blade based on AMD Opterons. > > > >Should I stick with FreeBS 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7 (see > >http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html - "June 2007 Start FreeBSD > >7.0 Release Process). > > > >The question basically is: Will FreeBSD7 be "current" or "stable"? > > > >Thanks much in advance for any hint, > >-ewald > > > > > > Currently there are some bugs in the tcp, my server always crash with > a kernel msg > > "tcp syncache_expand: segment failed syncookie authentication, segment > rejected (probably spoofed) Uh, that's not a "crash", it's a warning message that does not interrupt kernel operation. > So wait till they fix this serious bug, other than that it runs faster > than RELENG_6 with ULE 2.0, and libthr. libthr is available in 6.x too, of course. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 09:30:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EFB16A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D14113C458 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Message-ID: <4663DBBD.9020506@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:30:37 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070523) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20070604085627.GA22626@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070604085627.GA22626@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ewald Jenisch , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New (blade) server - stick with FreeBSD 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:30:42 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:46:00AM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm about to set up a new server that should run basically >> network-monitoring (MRTG, Cacti etc.). Hardware will be HP C-class >> blade based on AMD Opterons. >> >> Should I stick with FreeBS 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7 (see >> http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html - "June 2007 Start FreeBSD >> 7.0 Release Process). > > Note "start". The release is still many months away, so presumably > you do not wish to wait until then to install your server :) You > should definitely keep an eye on it though, there is a lot of good > stuff coming up in 7.0. > >> The question basically is: Will FreeBSD7 be "current" or "stable"? We are running several non-critical (including this T42 laptop) and one critical (SMTP) machine with -CURRENT and so far it's been a matter of getting the source from a good moment in time, mostly the snapshots. So far very few problems. You need a testbed to try stuff out on though. Per olof From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 09:35:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18F816A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ABF13C44C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so814241uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr6004781buf.1180948186315; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? ( [217.196.247.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d24sm690101nfh.2007.06.04.02.09.45; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4663D6D8.5020808@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:09:44 +0100 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Fraser References: <4662C2A1.3070702@jessikat.plus.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Synaptics trackpad problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:35:07 -0000 Paul Fraser wrote: > On 6/3/07, Robin Becker wrote: >> Any help appreciated > > Hi Robin, > > I know this isn't going to be much of a comfort - but I've had great > difficulty trying to get Xorg to work nicely with - surprise - the > Synaptics touchpad on my Acer notebook as well. I posted to the list > almost a week ago reporting that while Xorg worked brilliantly one day > - suddenly it stopped working. > > I did blow the installation away and started again (unrelated issue) > the other day and the touchpad is working much as it was before. I > don't have my specific Xorg config in front of me as the missus has > stolen the laptop today unfortunately, however I've flagged this > thread so I'll attach it and send it over to you tonight. > Thanks I appreciate it. With my machine I can get the 1280x800 mode using 915resolution hack and I do have a mouse if I drop the touchpad entirely (from loader.conf and xorg.conf) and use moused_enable="YES" in rc.conf. For whatever reason the synaptics stuff is a bit flaky on my machine as I have had a couple of forced reboots with hw.psm.synaptics_support=1. If all else fails I will try and do the new 7.2 Xorg build from scratch. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 10:06:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C72D16A400; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (storm.uk.FreeBSD.org [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E674C13C458; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from store.lan.Awfulhak.org (store.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.35]) by storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l54A6QWr025120; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:06:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from store.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id F1B641957C76; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:06:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.Awfulhak.org (gw.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.1]) by store.lan.Awfulhak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97B61957C73; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:06:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dev.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.5]) by gw.Awfulhak.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l54A6IAX012518; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 03:06:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 03:06:17 -0700 From: Brian Somers To: Pang Message-ID: <20070604030617.2973e3c8@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <465ED66F.30902@laws.ms> References: <465ED66F.30902@laws.ms> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Download speed and TCPIP window sizing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:06:29 -0000 On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800 Pang wrote: > Could anyone tell me whether my understanding on Window sizing > correct? Also, is there any way to alter the window sizing in freebsd or > apache? AFAIK you can't increase the window size unless you use the tcp wscale option (it's a 2-byte value). This wasn't possible 'till recently in -current: andre 2007-02-01 17:39:19 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c tcp_usrreq.c Log: Change the way the advertized TCP window scaling is computed. Instead of upper-bounding it to the size of the initial socket buffer lower-bound it to the smallest MSS we accept. Ideally we'd use the actual MSS information here but it is not available yet. For socket buffer auto sizing to be effective we need room to grow the receive window. The window scale shift is determined at connection setup and can't be changed afterwards. The previous, original, method effectively just did a power of two roundup of the socket buffer size at connection setup severely limiting the headroom for larger socket buffers. Tested by: many (as part of the socket buffer auto sizing patch) MFC after: 1 month Revision Changes Path 1.104 +8 -2 src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c 1.143 +7 -2 src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c This may not be MFC'd (I think I'd object if it was) as there are several old OpenBSD/pf setups that have issues with wscale > 4. Hopefully these setups will be fixed by the time 7.0 is released, as windows/vista and linux/debian now set wscale > 4 too. The patch is pretty small though, so you may want to try applying it to your box to see if it helps. HTH. -- Brian Somers Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 10:30:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DDC16A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from electro@ya.com) Received: from rfallback.ya.com (rfallback.ya.com [62.151.4.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C270813C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from electro@ya.com) Received: from [192.168.1.192] (helo=smtpauth.ya.com) by rfallback.ya.com with esmtp id 1HuAwl-0002xt-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:29:55 +0200 Received: from [84.79.146.193] (helo=[192.168.0.108]) by smtpauth.ya.com with asmtp id 1HuAwj-00065W-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:29:53 +0200 From: electro To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:30:01 +0200 Message-Id: <1180719001.6887.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: new in the list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:30:38 -0000 Hello everybody Im new in the list.. Sorry but i will start asking for help Im new to freebsd and i find a little bit hard to find information about specific issues My problem is that i can not get a Conceptronic c54ru version 2 working in freebsd 6.2... after reading some mailing list it is not clear to me if this card is supported dev.ugen.0.%desc: Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 dev.ugen.0.%driver: ugen dev.ugen.0.%location: port=0 dev.ugen.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x14b2 product=0x3c22 devclass=0x00 devsubclass=0x00 release=0x0001 sernum="" dev.ugen.0.%parent: uhub0 The other problem is with a Conceptronic c54c and wpa_supplicant ath0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x3a941186 chip=0x0013168c rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' device = 'AR5212, AR5213 802.11a/b/g Wireless Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet it associates with the ap but then fails with WPA: drop TX EAPOL in non-IEEE 802.11x mode type=1 len=0 wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=0 and in the logs ath0: link state changed to UP ath0: link state changed to DOWN ath0: link state changed to UP ath0: link state changed to DOWN ..... wpa_supplicant.conf ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant ctrl_interface_group=0 ap_scan=1 network={ ssid="missid" psk="mipsk" scan_ssid=1 proto=WPA key_mgmt=WPA-PSK pairwise=TKIP } i've tried with other options but this should work as it does with the same machine, same card, same ap, but other OS. Thanks for your help From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 10:35:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A1616A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@laws.ms) Received: from mail2.worria.com (mail2.worria.com [205.234.133.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3191813C447 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@laws.ms) Received: (qmail 7642 invoked by uid 399); 4 Jun 2007 10:35:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?203.218.149.28?) (sales@worria.com@203.218.149.28) by mail2.worria.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 10:35:15 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 203.218.149.28 Message-ID: <4663EAD8.3040100@laws.ms> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:35:04 +0800 From: Pang User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rudolf Cejka References: <46629F7E.4040405@laws.ms> <20070604065410.GA31491@fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070604065410.GA31491@fit.vutbr.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching between half-duplex and full duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:35:16 -0000 Rudolf Cejka wrote: > Pang wrote (2007/06/03): > >> I have just installed FreeBSD and found that the nic em0 is set to >> half-duplex only. Could anyone tell me how I can switch it to full-duplex? >> em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=b >> inet 172.16.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 172.16.0.1 >> ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) >> status: active >> > > Hello, so I was right? ;o) I assume, that you have more capable device > on the other side, atleast 100 Mb/s full-duplex. In that case, you should > check, what connection type is "seen" on the other side (switches with > management!). Then you can check auto-negotiation settings on the other > side, try to change ethernet cable - it would be faulty and auto-neg would > not work correctly, then look, which chipset do you have - the driver would > not work with too new chips, I have here some ICH8 machines, which do work > just 100 Mb/s instead of 1 Gb/s (I expect that -current should work now). > > Regards. > > PS: Another very good command is ifconfig -m em0, where you can see all > allowed media/mediaopt combinations. > > Hello, The auto-negotiation doesn't work properly. (it goes to half-duplex automatically). But, it works when I switched it back full-duplex manually. However, the switch doesn't seem to support 100baseTX or better. Thanks Pang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 11:39:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B739116A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-questions@schottelius.org) Received: from denkbrett.schottelius.org (natgw.netstream.ch [62.65.128.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908613C483 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-questions@schottelius.org) Received: by denkbrett.schottelius.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D5C6138BF; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:39:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:39:45 +0200 From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius To: Paul Fraser Message-ID: <20070604113945.GA15154@schottelius.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 X-Unix-Info: http://unix.schottelius.org/ X-Netzseite: http://nico.schottelius.org/ X-System-Info: denkbrett running Linux 2.6.21.3-denkbrett on i686 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: isc-dhcp3-server in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:39:30 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Fraser [Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:47:18PM +1000]: > [...] > Here's what's happening: > [...] >=20 > Starting dhcpd. > Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server V3.0.5 > Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. > All rights reserved. > For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ > Wrote 0 deleted host decls to leases file. > Wrote 0 new dynamic host decls to leases file. > Wrote 0 leases to leases file. > Listening on Socket/re0/192.168.72/24 > Sending on Socket/re0/192.168.72/24 What's the IP-number in your jail and what's it outside? I am not sure, whether broadcasts are delivered to the jails or not. Nico --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGY/oBuL75KpiFGIwRAkjIAKDb/9FgKq+fcKVRAZbAf69rG7wCUgCfUM4S AflWM6Ikh8DbTcvg/NNtIwM= =hj0D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 12:32:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE97616A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2E913C465 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22349 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 12:32:37 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jun 2007 12:32:37 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A108D2843A; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:32:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 479441CF78; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:32:33 -0400 (EDT) To: "Anton Galitch" References: <7c80322b0706020956m202c9cc1s4902d5699a5a7d3@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:32:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7c80322b0706020956m202c9cc1s4902d5699a5a7d3@mail.gmail.com> (Anton Galitch's message of "Sat\, 2 Jun 2007 13\:56\:34 -0300") Message-ID: <443b17c333.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:32:39 -0000 "Anton Galitch" writes: > Hi > Because I wanted to upgrade my xorg package to 7.2, I read > /usr/ports/UPDATING. but the description is only for portupgrade, and I dont > use it because it works bad on my system, I use portmanager insteed. > I couldnt upgrade xorg with portmanager so I just deinstalled it, and "make > install" again. > > Thats the message that throws make install: > > > configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other > OpenGL packag > e is installed > See `config.log' for more details. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > But when I cd ed to /usr/ports/graphics/mesagl && make install, it throws > another message: > > > ===> Mesa-5.0.2 is unnecessary because libGL and libGLU come with > XFree86 4.0 a > nd higher. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/mesagl. > > > So what should I do?? > Is there any way of installing xorg 7.2 just with make install ?? You need to have XORG_UPGRADE set to "yes". See UPDATING... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 12:36:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF37C16A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8CE13C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20050 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 12:36:10 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jun 2007 12:36:10 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69252843A; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:36:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 496E11CF78; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:36:07 -0400 (EDT) To: Dino Vliet References: <721991.3338.qm@web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:36:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <721991.3338.qm@web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (Dino Vliet's message of "Sun\, 3 Jun 2007 03\:47\:50 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: <44y7izaoco.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: random xorg crashes after xorg upgrade to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:36:11 -0000 Dino Vliet writes: > My (unchanged) xorg conf looks like: How about changing xorg.conf to point the paths at /usr/local? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 12:37:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F301816A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06913C4B0 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93191C99E8; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:37:13 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:37:09 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706041537.11883.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: "Michael P. Soulier" Subject: Re: debugging pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:37:19 -0000 On Tuesday 29 May 2007 20:38, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > I've turned logging up to All for ppp, for my DSL connection, and I've > been disappointed to find that when it can't connect, ppp offers no > help whatsoever as to why. > > I'm going to try rp-pppoe from ports, since on Linux it's actually > quite helpful in full debug, but I'm surprised at how little BSD's ppp > tells me when logging is turned right up. > > Any other suggestions? ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a decision made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly interactively. You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 13:16:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B28516A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7F813C458 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F1AA0635; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:16:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46641095.2090401@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:16:05 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Worster References: <47012.192.168.1.35.1180778422.webmail@192.168.1.35> In-Reply-To: <47012.192.168.1.35.1180778422.webmail@192.168.1.35> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netstat -i output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:16:11 -0000 Written by Tom Worster on 06/02/07 05:00>> > i'm confused by the output from netstat -i: > > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Ibytes Opkts Oerrs Obytes Coll > bge0 1500 00:30:48:5e:56:8a 7.4M 1.2K 4.9G 2.9M 0 2.6G 0 > bge0 1500 65.39.221/24 www1 2.9M - 414M 3.0M - 2.5G - > > it lists the same interface twice. what is the difference between these two? > > this is a web server so wny so much more input bytes than output? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The first is the ethernet address family, the other is ipv4. If you notice, your ipv4 statistics show 414Mb in ang 2.5 Gb out, with roughly a 1:1 ratio of input and output packets. This would seem logical, since http is a request:response protocol. Remember that IP is a network layer protocol, which is mainly facilitated by the ethernet data link layer protocol, but ethernet is not simply relegated to servicing IP communications, many other services and protocols use ethernet. For instance, many blade/rack systems these days use some sort of network console over ethernet, which I would assume generates far less input bytes than output bytes on the machines. This is just one example, there's far more things that use ethernet than I can be aware of. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 13:32:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC0816A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@earth.parts-unknown.org) Received: from earth.parts-unknown.org (earth.parts-unknown.org [66.93.170.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43CAD13C44B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@earth.parts-unknown.org) Received: (qmail 99211 invoked by uid 501); 4 Jun 2007 13:32:26 -0000 DomainKey-Status: no signature Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:32:25 -0700 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070604133225.GA61722@parts-unknown.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <721991.3338.qm@web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <44y7izaoco.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44y7izaoco.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> X-gnupg-public-key: http://www.parts-unknown.org/gnupg/export-0DD1D1E3 "From: David Benfell " X-stardate: [-29]7692.80 X-moon: The Moon is Waning Gibbous (88% of Full) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: random xorg crashes after xorg upgrade to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:32:35 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:36:07 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Dino Vliet writes: >=20 > > My (unchanged) xorg conf looks like: >=20 > How about changing xorg.conf to point the paths at /usr/local? I noticed this too, but if the mergebase.sh script sets a symbolic link from /usr/local/ to /usr/X11R6/, why does it make a difference? --=20 David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ NOTE: I sign all messages with GnuPG (0DD1D1E3). --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGZBRpUd+dMw3R0eMRAj6CAJ9qXelfgR7zHmgV8+bSl2WiBWU1wACdG1+N C0CkgzX/WcuJA2Gb6RNg2xQ= =FOvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 13:35:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4005816A46D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2232513C4B0 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CA3A0635; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:35:08 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4664150A.2000709@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:35:06 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <20070601131600.16d9cb11@localhost> <05c72d5684132cc1d65b1cfb1846c669@mail.schlossadler.net> <20070604114351.3df9b5b3@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070604114351.3df9b5b3@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@schlossadler.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2/i386 X/DRI issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:35:09 -0000 Written by Norberto Meijome on 06/03/07 20:43>> > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:11:26 +1000 > Alex R wrote: > >>> it's in the archives of the list - you need to install the mesa-demos >>> port. >> Installed it. >> >> [alex@desktop ~]$ glxinfo >> Error: unable to open display >> >> But thats because I am ssh'd into the box from work, I dare say it will work when I get home and test from within X. > > ( X forwarding over ssh to your local display ..? I am just not sure whether glxinfo calculations would be based on your remote display or your local one....) > glxinfo over X-forward will report on the display the client is drawing on - X clients are not aware of any other displays unless explicitly instructed (e.g. glxinfo -display localhost:0), and even then you'll have to fight xauth. Incidentally, you can never do direct rendering over remote X connection because the client (which is executed on a remote system) does not have direct access to the memory of the display. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 13:40:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA57A16A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBB313C44C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EE9A063E; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:40:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46641657.4000906@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:40:39 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsenthil References: <4663AE7D.2090607@adventnet.com> In-Reply-To: <4663AE7D.2090607@adventnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configure ipaddress and route entries in /etc/rc.conf file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:40:41 -0000 Written by bsenthil on 06/04/07 01:17>> > I am trying to configure ipaddress and route entries. so that i added > below the entries in /etc/rc.conf file. > > vi /etc/rc.conf > > inetd_enable="YES" > hostname="test.abc.com" > ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.110.14 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="192.168.110.2" > hostname="test.abc.com" > static_routes="net1 net2" > route_net1="-net 192.168.1.1/24 192.168.110.2" > route_net2="-net 192.168.2.1/24 192.168.110.2" > > and then i restated the network services "netif restart" > > The below entries are listed in router table ... > $ netstat -nr > > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 > 192.168.110 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 > > > Problem :: Default router entries and net1 & net2 entries are not added > in router table... > > Please advice me anything i want to configue more in rc.conf file.... > I can able to add default router by executing " route add -net 0.0.0.0 > 192.168.110.2" > > Thanks, > Senthilkumar. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Wrong rc script. Try "/etc/rc.d/routing restart". routing requires netif, but netif does not imply routing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 14:30:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B22016A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A6313C44C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l54EUic5074770; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:30:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:30:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <37f72b1f0706021126g3347c683u37a87d3145e6e571@mail.gmail.com> <4661CC79.1020608@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <4661CC79.1020608@daleco.biz> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706041030.52444.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Jim Capozzoli Subject: Re: X11 & console setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:30:50 -0000 On Saturday 02 June 2007 04:00:57 pm Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Jim Capozzoli wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I have 3 monitors and 3 video cards. However, one videocard and > > monitor isn't very "X11 friendly." (X11 barely starts on it). I was > > wondering if it would be possible to have X11 running on two of the > > monitors, and then have a full screen console (like a ttyv0) on the > > third monitor (so I could constantly leave top or something sweet > > running on there :D). This is all with FreeBSD 6.2/i386 and Xorg 6.9 > > or 7.2. Any suggestions? Thanks. > > It should do "do-able", perhaps somewhat easily. > /usr/ports/x11-servers/x2x is what comes to mind --- IIRC, Greg "groggy" > Lehey of "The Complete FreeBSD" fame uses this for several displays, and > has notes on his setup in her personal pages at www.lemis.com. That link is here: http://www.lemis.com/grog/hardware.html However, I'm not sure x2x is relevant to the OP--It can be used to allow one mouse and keyboard to be used on multiple X servers, but doesn't have anything to do with console mode. I don't know if the setup the OP wants is possible or not, but here are some notes: The FreeBSD console always runs on the "primary" display as determined by the BIOS. Most systems give you a choice between using AGP or PCI as the primary display. If you have multiple PCI cards it is usually the first one on the bus (physically this is often the one closest to the CPU). Not sure how ISA figures in. You will want to make your "bad" videocard and monitor the primary display. Once you have that, I'd just run an "Xorg -configure" to get started. If X comes up at all using the config generated from that then it will be a good starting point. Try commenting out the device and screen sections (and possibly also a line under ServerLayout) for your "bad" display and see if X comes up on the other two. By default it expects to be running on the console so I'm not sure what will happen here. You also want it to grab the keyboard and mouse unless you have a second keyboard. Some trial and error and further research are probably required. Play with startx vs xdm, see what happens when you press ctrl-alt-f1, etc. I'm assuming you'll want to use Xinerama to join the two X displays and allow window-dragging between them, etc. If you don't get acceptable results using your original plan, you can always hack together your own "console" to run on the weakest display under X (using the vesa driver if necessary). If possible (not sure it is), don't make it part of your Xinerama display. Then don't run a window manager on it. Use xsetroot as part of your X init script to control what's on the background. This will apply to your entire display but the WM will probably take over once it starts on the "good" screens. You could make one or more scripts to run things on your "bad" screen by doing something like this: #!/bin/sh DISPLAY=:0.1 #might also be :0.2 or :0.0 export DISPLAY xterm -r -geometry 120x60 /usr/bin/top Experiment with the geometry settings to see what fills your screen appropriately. You might also want to get a nice bitmap font to give the xterm more of a terminal "feel". I have one I stole from bochs or somewhere that's not bad (I use it for Nethack). E-mail me off-list if you want it. That should just about do it. Do write back to the list to tell us what you learn and what works the best. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 14:40:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD8816A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158D13C468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l54EeHc5080030; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <340a29540706021415w2b8055edp4c82b346d8d48010@mail.gmail.com> <20070602224846.GB35067@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070602224846.GB35067@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706041040.25283.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Roland Smith , Andrew Falanga Subject: Re: Flatbed scanners for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:40:19 -0000 On Saturday 02 June 2007 06:48:46 pm Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:15:22PM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > What scanners are best used with FreeBSD? I'm hoping for one that I > > can use in both Windoze and FreeBSD. Preferably, one that is USB. > > I've never configured a scanner for FreeBSD before and would like > > recommendations on hardware before purchasing. > > Look at the website for the SANE (acanner access now easy) project. If > it is listed there, it will probably work; > > http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#SCANNERS > > I've had good experiences with Epson scanners, but mine is several years > old, and you can't buy them anymore. > > If you have a specific model in mind, google for it's name in > combination with SANE, to see if it comes up on the SANE mailing > list. E.g. they've gotten the cheap Epson Perfection V10 working recently; > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-November/017993.ht >ml Also keep in mind that SANE can use libusb for scanner access even if said scanner is not supported by FreeBSD's uscanner. I have an Epson CX4800 scanner/printer/cardreader. If I don't have ulpt or umass in the kernel, the scanner works fine via libusb. I assume for a standalone scanner the multifunction strangeness wouldn't be an issue. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:11:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C912816A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AEA13C455 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1094360wxd for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=oCA5Ts2Ktg6DRKhNoyzxEyulbgQJgM//EV6aLEZusyIN1wpAoU3uRd7ksrT/RjK+zSyReTiWwCejlww/LLQeKSaLiLksx8z8nXyGDEEdsvfkYeQET0p0sLTaR7tS8wqFUU9VvIoWoc3IPS6s2DCRIKMRmQF+ggCj12hD4eV64Vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=g2CaxpIluz2/AQz0i/8oBBiMpTn/7gTnLu0Pm8umkY/bG8KdZeaXfc5Z7lj05/oatneCg+vkmlBexVSoy4Wnx0jnrgH9HREijwWmSR3DuyjK2gp7pQVUrhZTLur7cM4PZTyV0ucQECststAnuQx2h8Q+xpxoPsT172EsTMn3DiA= Received: by 10.70.84.6 with SMTP id h6mr7451895wxb.1180968141572; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.32.161? ( [201.47.3.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i34sm562852wxd.2007.06.04.07.42.20; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:42:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Sergio Lenzi To: questions In-Reply-To: <0dda798d4af6656062c0f72a9ce751c0@mail.schlossadler.net> References: <0dda798d4af6656062c0f72a9ce751c0@mail.schlossadler.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:42:16 -0300 Message-Id: <1180968136.1066.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: SMP System but only CPU#0 being used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:11:32 -0000 from the smp man page..... 1) make sure you have options SMP in your kernel and is built and compiled OK. 2)put the lines in the /boot/loader.conf and reboot the system.... ==================== machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=0 machdep.hlt_cpus=0 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus=0 machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1 ========================== should work... my cpus are pentiuns HT or pentius 4 dual core Lenzi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:30:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461016A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E8413C4B9 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2448069pyi for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:30:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DJzUTnVuwVIEVcgGIb70g1ZghhEOgZ03KPh/FcNieTMioTc7JlC5MYoXo/rvQmbVoxQ1v97LJWCTNFQNV/4BlYAxpGpXVTM+pj3jKRvQ4JljrUvYKkg/aPdQKHwFdirQD4YNHdBzLKQbf+2819pYEGC3Jp5ufIvG6V2SV90PrpY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uWUQv01TON7Cq3UETy6c2pYm43SLeQ4vU2NiabPZyBxzxt4SLlpoCoG5AedU+mfQNOEaRulfJioPFTowgHmf4DM73yv9Aeo0j/R9XiJHcHb1j46V2JRpJz8Dha4569l3tiFUkJ3mkmQoqj5kH4oU38E1wnOtH7kYntcxa8m8x8g= Received: by 10.65.43.5 with SMTP id v5mr7106857qbj.1180971003473; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.76.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37f72b1f0706040830g3f3414cet30ea686e0a325c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:30:03 -0400 From: "Jim Capozzoli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706040829l338c4c7fr5229e8807705daed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <37f72b1f0706021126g3347c683u37a87d3145e6e571@mail.gmail.com> <4661CC79.1020608@daleco.biz> <200706041030.52444.lists@jnielsen.net> <37f72b1f0706040829l338c4c7fr5229e8807705daed@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: X11 & console setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:30:05 -0000 On 6/4/07, John Nielsen wrote: > On Saturday 02 June 2007 04:00:57 pm Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > Jim Capozzoli wrote: > > > Hello list, > > > > > > I have 3 monitors and 3 video cards. However, one videocard and > > > monitor isn't very "X11 friendly." (X11 barely starts on it). I was > > > wondering if it would be possible to have X11 running on two of the > > > monitors, and then have a full screen console (like a ttyv0) on the > > > third monitor (so I could constantly leave top or something sweet > > > running on there :D). This is all with FreeBSD 6.2/i386 and Xorg 6.9 > > > or 7.2. Any suggestions? Thanks. > > > > It should do "do-able", perhaps somewhat easily. > > /usr/ports/x11-servers/x2x is what comes to mind --- IIRC, Greg "groggy" > > Lehey of "The Complete FreeBSD" fame uses this for several displays, and > > has notes on his setup in her personal pages at www.lemis.com. > > That link is here: http://www.lemis.com/grog/hardware.html > > However, I'm not sure x2x is relevant to the OP--It can be used to allow one > mouse and keyboard to be used on multiple X servers, but doesn't have > anything to do with console mode. > > I don't know if the setup the OP wants is possible or not, but here are some > notes: > > The FreeBSD console always runs on the "primary" display as determined by the > BIOS. Most systems give you a choice between using AGP or PCI as the primary > display. If you have multiple PCI cards it is usually the first one on the > bus (physically this is often the one closest to the CPU). Not sure how ISA > figures in. You will want to make your "bad" videocard and monitor the > primary display. > > Once you have that, I'd just run an "Xorg -configure" to get started. If X > comes up at all using the config generated from that then it will be a good > starting point. Try commenting out the device and screen sections (and > possibly also a line under ServerLayout) for your "bad" display and see if X > comes up on the other two. By default it expects to be running on the console > so I'm not sure what will happen here. You also want it to grab the keyboard > and mouse unless you have a second keyboard. Some trial and error and further > research are probably required. Play with startx vs xdm, see what happens > when you press ctrl-alt-f1, etc. I'm assuming you'll want to use Xinerama to > join the two X displays and allow window-dragging between them, etc. > > If you don't get acceptable results using your original plan, you can always > hack together your own "console" to run on the weakest display under X (using > the vesa driver if necessary). If possible (not sure it is), don't make it > part of your Xinerama display. Then don't run a window manager on it. Use > xsetroot as part of your X init script to control what's on the background. > This will apply to your entire display but the WM will probably take over > once it starts on the "good" screens. You could make one or more scripts to > run things on your "bad" screen by doing something like this: > > #!/bin/sh > DISPLAY=:0.1 #might also be :0.2 or :0.0 > export DISPLAY > xterm -r -geometry 120x60 /usr/bin/top > > Experiment with the geometry settings to see what fills your screen > appropriately. You might also want to get a nice bitmap font to give the > xterm more of a terminal "feel". I have one I stole from bochs or somewhere > that's not bad (I use it for Nethack). E-mail me off-list if you want it. > > That should just about do it. Do write back to the list to tell us what you > learn and what works the best. > > JN > I like the not making it a part of the Xinerama display..that would be interesting, because I'm sure a very basic X11 background with a xterm would work on there. If X starts on there, then yeah great but the problem is I don't ever recall getting it to work properly. What I had in mind however, is say having the weak monitor/card as the 'default' display that the BIOS picks up, and then leaving a console on there BUT having X11 on the two other monitors. Then I'd run top on it or something, so I"d have a command like... $ startxfce4 & top -s 1 And then on the 'default' BIOS chosen display, you would see top running in console mode, and then pretty xfce with nice 1280x1024 ver monitor resolution on the other two (using Xinerama). I wouldn't need to have keyboard/mouse control on the 'default' console then, I'd just look at it to see which process is eating the machine, load averages, etc. Thanks for the ideas so far guys. -- Jim Capozzoli D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:30:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53FD16A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB2C13C465 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.20.30.108] (dsl-63-249-108-169.cruzio.com [63.249.108.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l54FIIYx027556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:18:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:18:07 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Cc: Subject: Short HOWTO on reading a core to determine why my server is rebooting? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:30:34 -0000 Hi again. I have a server running 6.0 that has been spontaneously rebooting every few weeks. Is there a short HOWTO that tells me how to read the files in /var/crash to at least find out what the kernel thinks the issue is? There is nothing in /var/log/messages of interest before the crash, nothing in 'dmesg -a' in coming up that says anything interesting, and there's plenty of room on the drives. --Paul Hoffman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:44:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9A516A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E37413C468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2456145pyi for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:44:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dS/ZMSUWcP60/loya6hyEm3gn2D4WDbqNrAfIDuQGFw8IvwL6w0NkvNjoEuLqaFmfdC26BclamTd6NS1oAVmjBqVcLdi8vso+VhleYTjv18AWVcczQWbxEXi11L9pUMPpHzKSCJRxBnra7w/h0a3ZhOkak+g2XJ/nehIiD9nF/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bgj03rWmYLNuSuf8HJzuJuD+xvxtVDBp705ECyWwnYliN1U8knBC+P3pwJ9Ykmtl3QIS3YvaUVqpKk9SwR+dxpcucCPFxbifqfuzDNI6s9Hxcp0kc8DQYGA0jRLpRuHL2/YX6no9Drng0//waDt51qtbIRec4nEmI+6Bvga+7tI= Received: by 10.65.98.12 with SMTP id a12mr7161352qbm.1180971866730; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.76.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37f72b1f0706040844r4a4e6076mc2ff15f1019704cd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:44:26 -0400 From: "Jim Capozzoli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1180719001.6887.13.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1180719001.6887.13.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: new in the list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:44:29 -0000 On 6/1/07, electro wrote: > Hello everybody > Im new in the list.. > Sorry but i will start asking for help > Im new to freebsd and i find a little bit hard to find information about > specific issues > > My problem is that i can not get a Conceptronic c54ru version 2 working > in freebsd 6.2... after reading some mailing list it is not clear to me > if this card is supported > > dev.ugen.0.%desc: Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 > dev.ugen.0.%driver: ugen > dev.ugen.0.%location: port=0 > dev.ugen.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x14b2 product=0x3c22 devclass=0x00 > devsubclass=0x00 release=0x0001 sernum="" > dev.ugen.0.%parent: uhub0 > > The other problem is with a Conceptronic c54c and wpa_supplicant > > ath0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x3a941186 chip=0x0013168c rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' > device = 'AR5212, AR5213 802.11a/b/g Wireless Adapter' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > it associates with the ap but then fails with > WPA: drop TX EAPOL in non-IEEE 802.11x mode type=1 len=0 > wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=0 > > and in the logs > > ath0: link state changed to UP > ath0: link state changed to DOWN > ath0: link state changed to UP > ath0: link state changed to DOWN > ..... > > wpa_supplicant.conf > ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant > ctrl_interface_group=0 > ap_scan=1 > > network={ > ssid="missid" > psk="mipsk" > scan_ssid=1 > proto=WPA > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > pairwise=TKIP > } > i've tried with other options but this should work as it does with the > same machine, same card, same ap, but other OS. > > Thanks for your help > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Give us a dmesg output of your card `dmesg | grep ath`. But from what you've given it says your card is based off the AR5212 chip, which the ath man page says should be supported. What I'd do to try it is find an unencrypted wifi network, and then try connecting to that. do a `dhclient ath0` around an unencrypted wifi network with dhcp on it, and if you can connect, I guess your card is supported. :D hope this helps ps, a better subject line would have been 'ath Conceptronic c54ru version 2 troubles' or something ;) -- Jim Capozzoli D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:47:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B53B16A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DA213C465 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B022D98E; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:47:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:47:26 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: GmO3f4+7GL7RS7AAHQv/5LhI7yIaXQr/VHLh8uiI3rfK 1180972046 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF5937C69; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:47:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706040801t786d6409pf8687ac3f31c43ee@mail.gmail.com> References: <70f41ba20706040801t786d6409pf8687ac3f31c43ee@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:47:25 -0500 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: exim PORT -- when to use? when to 'go manual'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:47:27 -0000 On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:01 AM, snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > i've just installed exim on a "small" freebsd-based router -- via > PORTS install -- as a sendmail replacement. no probs, either. > > now, I want to "upgrade" exim on that router to add 'just' > DNSBL-filtering on the router, and have it function as a transparent > gateway to another lan-based, exim router. Does that "upgrade" involve a different version of the exim tarball than the one used in ports, or is the change that you need somewhere else? > do folks recommend still using the PORT install? It depends. > > iiuc, general advice for PORTS is "use the port, don't touch the > port" ... true? > > if so, how/where do I configure exim if not mod'ing the port's > MAKEFILE? Make your own patch of the port and keep that some place that won't be over written by portsnap or whatever you use to keep your ports tree up to date. Then have a script that patches your port tree after you do such an update. Of course you should submit your patch to the port to the port maintainer. Cheers, -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:50:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D0216A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com (a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com [64.72.68.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9A913C44C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from mail.bsdwebsolutions.com ([64.72.68.15]) by a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD Web Solutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1HvEF7-000MFu-9K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:13:13 -0400 Received: from [64.72.66.117] (helo=mail.poughkeepsieschools.org) by mail.bsdwebsolutions.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1HvEF7-00058U-1W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:13:13 -0400 Received: from [10.20.0.10] (port=55767 helo=macpro-pcsd.local) by mail.poughkeepsieschools.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1HvEF6-0005Ks-Sl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (authenticated as bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:13:12 -0400 X-BSD-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.90.2/3348 on mail.poughkeepsieschools.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:13:12 -0400 Message-ID: <46642C17.60404@poughkeepsieschools.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:13:27 -0400 From: "B. Cook" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Thin client question.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:50:36 -0000 Hello all, I was wondering if anyone had an OS-less thin client that does RDP and X11. Sound is also a requirement. Anyone ever seen something like this before? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:10:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B894B16A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C96B13C469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.30] by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HvF8M-00055I-N7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:09:18 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Feedback: 1HvF8M-00055I-N7 Subject: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:10:13 -0000 Dear all, Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful information. Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. It is possible that the freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive mounted via mount_nfs option. FreeBSD lists.lc-words.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan 22 12:52:41 CET 2007 root@192.168.11.51:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS i386 Many thanks in advance! Zbyszek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:15:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4AE16A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2364113C4AD for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id B3AED4AD0E; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:16:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FED4AD0C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:16:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:16:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Remote Server FSCK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:15:01 -0000 Hi all, I have a dedicated box with a hosting company. The power supply failed in the box this morning, and the company replaced it and brought the box back up. In my logs, I have: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted /usr: mount pending error: blocks 80 files 1 WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var/tmp was not properly dismounted In my opinion, this calls for an fsck in single user mode. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the box. Is htis something I should have them do? It seems /usr is affected, and the /var/log/messages shows a few other errors as well. What's the best way to go about fixing this. Should I ask them to `fsck -y` from console in single user mode since I can't be there to look at the prompts? Thanks, Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:20:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CCB16A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C945313C480 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.30] by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HvFI6-0005Ii-UK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:20:22 +0200 Message-ID: <46643B8A.6060200@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:19:22 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Feedback: 1HvFI6-0005Ii-UK Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:20:17 -0000 Hello, One correction to the below information. The network drive is mount via mount_smbfs. ZS Zbigniew Szalbot pisze: > Dear all, > > Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It > occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was > unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I > was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. > > dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). > > pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful > information. > > Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my > mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. It is possible that the > freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive > mounted via mount_nfs option. > > FreeBSD lists.lc-words.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan > 22 12:52:41 CET 2007 root@192.168.11.51:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS i386 > > Many thanks in advance! > > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:23:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267C716A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47EC13C45D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l54GIfW4068952; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:18:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l54GIfBs068951; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:18:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:18:41 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Matt Juszczak Message-ID: <20070604161841.GA68919@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote Server FSCK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:23:17 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:16:16PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a dedicated box with a hosting company. The power supply failed in > the box this morning, and the company replaced it and brought the box back > up. > > In my logs, I have: > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted > /usr: mount pending error: blocks 80 files 1 > WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /var/tmp was not properly dismounted > > In my opinion, this calls for an fsck in single user mode. Unfortunately, > I don't have access to the box. > > Is htis something I should have them do? It seems /usr is affected, and > the /var/log/messages shows a few other errors as well. > > What's the best way to go about fixing this. Should I ask them to `fsck > -y` from console in single user mode since I can't be there to look at the > prompts? Well, did it run the fsck? Those messages look pretty routine and should be handled by the regular fsck done on a normal boot. Usually the regular fsck will run and clean up most simple stuff. Try rebooting the machine again and see if it still has the same messages. If so, then see if they will do the single-user fsck for you. But, I am guessing that it actually already cleaned up for you. ////jerry > > Thanks, > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:26:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6995116A46E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from cartman.xxiii.com (cartman.xxiii.com [208.62.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1488A13C46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from [172.23.23.190] (lan23.xxiii.com [208.62.177.50]) by cartman.xxiii.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54EIYJ3040947; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:18:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Message-ID: <46641F40.8030508@xxiii.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:18:40 -0400 From: Rob User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <46630382.8010901@tundraware.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20070603232531.03dffe40@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <4663AFCC.6080508@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <4663AFCC.6080508@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tundra@tundraware.com Subject: Re: Strange Intel Mobo Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:26:27 -0000 Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> The ad6 drive is supposed to do SATA-300, but realistically, other >> bottlenecks dictate it's not going to get anywhere near the '150 speed, > > Could you comment a bit more on why you think this is so. I would > think that with modern processors and buses, a machine with light load > ought to be able to drive SATA-300, but I've never actuall tested for I was off on my initial assumptions. I thought the "150" was 150 Giga-bit/sec, or approx 15 Giga-byte, or 15000 MB/sec. Which is well above the PCI and other bus speeds it needs to travel through to get to the processor. But reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA it's 150 Mega-byte/sec. I think older ATA chipsets are part of the PCI bus, which at 32 bits * 33MHz, which is about a 132MB/sec bottleneck. I don't know enough about PCI-X, PCI-E and newer chipsets to know speeds & bottlenecks, so I'll just shut up now ;) But seems like > 100MBs should be within reach. -RW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:55:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DB816A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C19C13C469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HvFq2-0005C0-R9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:55:26 -0700 Message-ID: <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT) From: gmoniey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: gmoniey@gmail.com References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:55:27 -0000 Hi, so i tried the script you mentioned, and it doesnt seem as if it is being called on startup. Here is my script (rails.sh): #!/bin/sh case "$1" in start) kldload accf_http mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb start ;; stop) mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb stop ;; *) echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 exit 64 ;; esac Also, I double checked that the permissions were correct (I made it the same as the other scripts in the rc.d directory). Here is the directory listing: -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 179 Jun 3 17:26 000.apache2libs.sh -rwxr-x--- 1 root wheel 181 May 2 02:19 000.mysql-client.sh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3524 Jun 3 12:07 apache2.sh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1689 May 2 02:30 mysql-server.sh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 651 Jan 15 19:31 proftpd.sh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 445 Jun 3 17:26 rails.sh While looking through the other files in the rc.d directory, I noticed that 000.apache2libs.sh has the similar structure as the file you suggested, so I attempted to put my commands in there, but it seems as if they are not being called either (i.e. after reboot, when i do a ps aux, i dont see the commands i expect to be started)... I also tried adding rails_enable = "YES" in the rc.conf file, and that didn't work (although I didn't expect it to work, as I didn't assign a name in my script). any ideas? Jerry McAllister-2 wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:17PM -0700, gmoniey wrote: > >> >> Hi Noberto, >> >> I actually looked at the apache one, and it seemed so complicated, there >> were 2 files for it, one of which was relatively short and the other was >> significantly long. >> >> Now dont get me wrong, they aren't beyond comprehension, but i simply >> dont >> have the time right now to figure them out. >> >> I dont quite see how something as simple as "apachectl start" is expanded >> into so many lines. > > It is because those scripts take in to consideration so many > possible different conditions. In addition, lines like: > > # PROVIDE: apache22 > # REQUIRE: NETWORKING SERVERS > # BEFORE: DAEMON > # KEYWORD: shutdown > > Deal with ordering of execution and integrating with other things. > They could be meaningful, but are probably not needed in a simple > routine like you seem to want. > > The basic scheme is that the system calls the scripts in rc.d > one at a time. During startup it calls them with an argument > of 'start' and when it is shutting down, it calls them with > an argument of 'stop'. So, all you script has to do is look > for a first argument (past the script name) and check for start > or stop and possibly error if it is anything else. > > Presuming you have one routine to run at startup > called /usr/local/bin/mystartuproutine > and one routine to run at shutdown > called /usr/local/bin/myshutdownroutine > and these two files have execute permission, > then something as simple as this would work. > > Put this little script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ with > a name something like mystuff.sh and give it execute permission. > > > #!/bin/sh > case "$1" in > start) > /usr/local/bin/mystartuproutine > ;; > stop) > /usr/local/bin/myshutdownroutine > ;; > *) > echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 > exit 64 > ;; > esac > > > You might want to add some other checks and conditions such > as checking if those files exist and some niceties such as > making variables of your routine names later. > > ////jerry > >> >> maybe i will get some time in the near future to understand it... >> >> >> Norberto Meijome-2 wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 31 May 2007 14:06:45 -0700 (PDT) >> > gmoniey wrote: >> > >> >> I was wondering if there is a simple way to create 1 script that will >> be >> >> called during startup and shutdown. Basically, I am looking for >> something >> >> like this: >> > >> > the easiest way (for me) is to grab the rc script of anything that you >> > know >> > well (for example, apache) and modify it for your needs. anyway, at >> least >> > you >> > can learn from the one that is already made, without having to start >> from >> > scratch. >> > >> > B >> > >> > _________________________ >> > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome >> > >> > "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought >> > which >> > they avoid. " Soren Aabye Kierkegaard >> > >> > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when >> > wet. >> > Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have >> > been >> > Warned. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10906324 >> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10953687 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:55:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5F116A46D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A0313C45B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54GtQHP003564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:55:30 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466443FD.9040702@webanoide.org> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:55:25 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Juszczak References: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote Server FSCK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:55:44 -0000 Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a dedicated box with a hosting company. The power supply failed in > the box this morning, and the company replaced it and brought the box back > up. > > In my logs, I have: > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted > /usr: mount pending error: blocks 80 files 1 > WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /var/tmp was not properly dismounted > > In my opinion, this calls for an fsck in single user mode. Unfortunately, > I don't have access to the box. > > Is htis something I should have them do? It seems /usr is affected, and > the /var/log/messages shows a few other errors as well. > > What's the best way to go about fixing this. Should I ask them to `fsck > -y` from console in single user mode since I can't be there to look at the > prompts? It all depends on the severity of the situation. Next boot may fix your problem or it may not. It is a good idea to do it in single user mode but if you don't have console/physical access to the box then maybe this could help you: fsck_y_enable="YES" Just add that into the /etc/rc.conf, reboot and wait awhile. After the machine is up and running, fsck it and see if it throws any errors. Let us know how it goes. Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:28:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFA416A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E49113C46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l54HOMhP069143; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:24:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l54HOM5f069142; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:24:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:24:22 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: gmoniey Message-ID: <20070604172422.GA69110@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:28:57 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:55:26AM -0700, gmoniey wrote: > > Hi, > > so i tried the script you mentioned, and it doesnt seem as if it is being > called on startup. Here is my script (rails.sh): > > #!/bin/sh > case "$1" in > start) > kldload accf_http > mongrel_rails cluster::start -C > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb start > ;; > stop) > mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb stop > ;; > *) > echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 > exit 64 > ;; > esac > try making it write to a file at the beginning and end of the start and stop sections. Something like: echo "RAILS found start" >> /tmp/railstest ... other stuff ... echo "RAILS finishing start" >> /tmp/railstest or whatever makes sense to you. Maybe your script is crashing for some other reason. ////jerry > > Also, I double checked that the permissions were correct (I made it the same > as the other scripts in the rc.d directory). Here is the directory listing: > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 179 Jun 3 17:26 000.apache2libs.sh > -rwxr-x--- 1 root wheel 181 May 2 02:19 000.mysql-client.sh > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3524 Jun 3 12:07 apache2.sh > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1689 May 2 02:30 mysql-server.sh > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 651 Jan 15 19:31 proftpd.sh > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 445 Jun 3 17:26 rails.sh > > > While looking through the other files in the rc.d directory, I noticed that > 000.apache2libs.sh has the similar structure as the file you suggested, so I > attempted to put my commands in there, but it seems as if they are not being > called either (i.e. after reboot, when i do a ps aux, i dont see the > commands i expect to be started)... > > I also tried adding rails_enable = "YES" in the rc.conf file, and that > didn't work (although I didn't expect it to work, as I didn't assign a name > in my script). > > any ideas? > > > Jerry McAllister-2 wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:17PM -0700, gmoniey wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi Noberto, > >> > >> I actually looked at the apache one, and it seemed so complicated, there > >> were 2 files for it, one of which was relatively short and the other was > >> significantly long. > >> > >> Now dont get me wrong, they aren't beyond comprehension, but i simply > >> dont > >> have the time right now to figure them out. > >> > >> I dont quite see how something as simple as "apachectl start" is expanded > >> into so many lines. > > > > It is because those scripts take in to consideration so many > > possible different conditions. In addition, lines like: > > > > # PROVIDE: apache22 > > # REQUIRE: NETWORKING SERVERS > > # BEFORE: DAEMON > > # KEYWORD: shutdown > > > > Deal with ordering of execution and integrating with other things. > > They could be meaningful, but are probably not needed in a simple > > routine like you seem to want. > > > > The basic scheme is that the system calls the scripts in rc.d > > one at a time. During startup it calls them with an argument > > of 'start' and when it is shutting down, it calls them with > > an argument of 'stop'. So, all you script has to do is look > > for a first argument (past the script name) and check for start > > or stop and possibly error if it is anything else. > > > > Presuming you have one routine to run at startup > > called /usr/local/bin/mystartuproutine > > and one routine to run at shutdown > > called /usr/local/bin/myshutdownroutine > > and these two files have execute permission, > > then something as simple as this would work. > > > > Put this little script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ with > > a name something like mystuff.sh and give it execute permission. > > > > > > #!/bin/sh > > case "$1" in > > start) > > /usr/local/bin/mystartuproutine > > ;; > > stop) > > /usr/local/bin/myshutdownroutine > > ;; > > *) > > echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 > > exit 64 > > ;; > > esac > > > > > > You might want to add some other checks and conditions such > > as checking if those files exist and some niceties such as > > making variables of your routine names later. > > > > ////jerry > > > >> > >> maybe i will get some time in the near future to understand it... > >> > >> > >> Norberto Meijome-2 wrote: > >> > > >> > On Thu, 31 May 2007 14:06:45 -0700 (PDT) > >> > gmoniey wrote: > >> > > >> >> I was wondering if there is a simple way to create 1 script that will > >> be > >> >> called during startup and shutdown. Basically, I am looking for > >> something > >> >> like this: > >> > > >> > the easiest way (for me) is to grab the rc script of anything that you > >> > know > >> > well (for example, apache) and modify it for your needs. anyway, at > >> least > >> > you > >> > can learn from the one that is already made, without having to start > >> from > >> > scratch. > >> > > >> > B > >> > > >> > _________________________ > >> > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome > >> > > >> > "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought > >> > which > >> > they avoid. " Soren Aabye Kierkegaard > >> > > >> > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when > >> > wet. > >> > Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have > >> > been > >> > Warned. > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10906324 > >> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10953687 > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:31:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD5116A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (smtpclu-6.eunet.yu [194.247.192.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2CB13C4B0 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-213-253.eunet.yu [213.198.213.253]) by smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l54HUxOC006254; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:31:00 GMT Message-Id: <200706041731.l54HUxOC006254@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:30:58 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Dino Vliet In-Reply-To: <721991.3338.qm@web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <721991.3338.qm@web51112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_60,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 1.0 X-AVAS-Spam-Level: xx Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Benfell Subject: Re: random xorg crashes after xorg upgrade to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:31:26 -0000 Hello, On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Dino Vliet wrote: > [...] > I really don't know where to look. > My (unchanged) xorg conf looks like: >=20 > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > EndSection > [...] > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > DefaultDepth 24 > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 1 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 4 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 8 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 15 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" > EndSubSection > EndSection > [...] This seems to be a (semi-)automatically generated xorg.conf, i.e. there isn't very much customisation you would like to save. So, please run Xorg without xorg.conf and see what will happen; then send here a new Xorg log. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:36:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D102C16A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B95013C48C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.1] (helo=[192.168.11.30]) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HvGTU-00060K-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:36:12 +0200 Message-ID: <46644D4F.2060406@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:35:11 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Feedback: 1HvGTU-00060K-00 Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:36:06 -0000 Hello, Zbigniew Szalbot pisze: > Dear all, > > Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It > occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was > unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I > was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. > > dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). > > pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful > information. > > Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my > mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. It is possible that the > freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive > mounted via mount_nfs option. Could the dump operation (a very likely reason for the crash) freeze the system. I am thinking of the following scenario. The dump operation to a network share is underway. For some reason, the LAN network connection is unavailable for a short time. Dump freezes and never recovers as it cannot continue its operation. I went back to the box two hours after the dump operation had started but the box (FBSD machine) did not respond to physically connected keyboard and screen. The dump file on the network is shown to have 0 KB. Thanks for any info! > > FreeBSD lists.lc-words.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan > 22 12:52:41 CET 2007 root@192.168.11.51:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS i386 > > Many thanks in advance! > > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:49:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F3016A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@butlerpress.com) Received: from ljcqs129.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA21413C4B7 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@butlerpress.com) Received: from ljcqs129.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs129.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A527CF4115 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.50.240.149] (cnfdcx-131-slb-02-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.132]) by ljcqs129.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC7AF407C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20070529232621.GB1575@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070529232621.GB1575@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Scott Willson Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:49:45 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Panic With Large Network Copy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:49:51 -0000 On May 29, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:36:49PM -0700, Scott Willson wrote: >> I am seeing hard (often no core dump) crashes on a new AMD64 box >> running 6.2 RELEASE. When I try to rsync 10+ GB of backup files to >> the new box, I can reliably crash it after about 20 minutes; often >> quicker if I do something else intensive at the same time, like >> compile MySQL. Here are the box specs: >> ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard >> AMD A64 3800+ 2.4G CPU >> ... >> Most times, I don't even get a core dump. Here's one I did get: >> panic: double fault >> ... >> #9 0xffffffff804371f0 in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:303 >> #10 0xffffffff80634125 in nve_ospackettx (ctx=0xffffff00798aac00, >> id=0xffffffffb19ea6d0, success=0) at /usr/src/sys/dev/nve/if_nve.c: >> 1551 > > This looks like a nve driver bug to me. You may wish to try the > nfe driver. > > Kris OK, my box is running nicely now. The nfe driver was indeed a good idea, thanks! Here are the details if anyone else has similar problems. 10baseT hub + nve = kernal panics under high load This is the default FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE configuration. 10baseT hub + nfe + e100phy patch = errors under high load (tx v2 error 0x6204, watchdog timeout) http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html This is a replacement driver + recommended path for my hardware. No panics, but many errors. 10baseT hub + nfe with no patches = errors under high load (tx v2 error 0x6204, watchdog timeout) 10/100/1000baseT switch + nfe + e100phy patch = errors under high load (tx v2 error 0x6204, watchdog timeout) 10/100/1000baseT switch + nfe = No errors! This is a new switch and the nfe driver with no patch. In dmesg, I see 'ukphy0' when I boot. So, as you may have surmised, my motherboard + an old 10baseT hub doesn't work right with any driver. I replaced my very old hub with a new switch, and I am now running the nfe driver with ukphy0. This combination works great. Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:54:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A188516A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF0A13C455 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54HsJc1051377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:54:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:54:18 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:54:27 -0000 In the course of trying to work through some problems with a new MOBO, I did some speed test which I found sort of surprising: Old System ---------- Dual PIII 600Mhz w/768K Mem and Mylex RAID 5 with old 9G SCSI drived FBSD 4.11-Stable Writing a 1G file to /dev/null with dd reports about 26MB/sec New System ---------- Pentium D 3.2GHz w/2G Mem and SATA Drive reported running at SATA-150 FBSD 6.2-STABLE Writing a 2G file to /dev/null with dd reports about 50MB/sec So ... the new system should be much faster all the way around, right? Hmmmm, not necessarily so. 'buildworld' is only about 17% faster on the new machine v. the old. I would think that with way faster processors and twice the disk bandwidth I would have seen far reduced buildworld times. So, I decided to check a known fast machine. The results: Procs Mem dd Read OS buildworld Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP 50-60 min New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP 40-50 min Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP 8 min So, now I'm confused. These are all lightly loaded systems but the buildworld time does not scale even approximately by either CPU or I/O performance. What the heck is going on, I wonder? It is possible, I suppose that the "New" machine does not have SMP running properly on it, though 'top' shows two CPUs working away. Is the difference in speed attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? Unfortunately, I cannot get 4.11 to boot on the "New" machine - it does not like the hardware for some reason claiming: RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80 Even after I change the RTC battery on the mobo. Strange ... any input appreciated. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:57:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E9016A46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (echo.calarts.edu [198.182.157.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5EA13C4DA for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 93578101E3DA for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:47:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by echo.calarts.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED731018EC8 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:47:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [198.182.157.179] (dhcp7179.calarts.edu [198.182.157.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l54HvYeQ000254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:57:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:57:34 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:57:35 -0000 How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:59:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726AB16A46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EBA13C46E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l54HtIAS069261; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:55:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l54HtIuT069260; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:55:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:55:18 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20070604175518.GC69110@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> <46644D4F.2060406@szalbot.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46644D4F.2060406@szalbot.homedns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:59:53 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:35:11PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > Zbigniew Szalbot pisze: > > >Dear all, > > > >Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It > >occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was > >unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I > >was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. > > > >dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). > > > >pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > > >This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful > >information. > > > >Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my > >mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. It is possible that the > >freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive > >mounted via mount_nfs option. > > > Could the dump operation (a very likely reason for the crash) freeze the > system. I am thinking of the following scenario. The dump operation to a > network share is underway. For some reason, the LAN network connection > is unavailable for a short time. Dump freezes and never recovers as it > cannot continue its operation. I went back to the box two hours after > the dump operation had started but the box (FBSD machine) did not > respond to physically connected keyboard and screen. The dump file on > the network is shown to have 0 KB. Thanks for any info! If it thinks it ran out of media space (maybe doe to some network error, I don't know), it could be waiting for a response at the console or whatever terminal it was running from. It will "hang" there until it gets some input it knows how to handle. ////jerry > > > > >FreeBSD lists.lc-words.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan > >22 12:52:41 CET 2007 root@192.168.11.51:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS > >i386 > > > >Many thanks in advance! > > > >Zbyszek > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:05:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F8616A473 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9175013C4C2 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.1] (helo=[192.168.11.30]) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HvGw5-0006Uo-Mt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:05:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4664543C.5050109@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:04:44 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> <46644D4F.2060406@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070604175518.GC69110@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070604175518.GC69110@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Feedback: 1HvGw5-0006Uo-Mt Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:05:40 -0000 Hello, Jerry McAllister pisze: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:35:11PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Zbigniew Szalbot pisze: >> >> >Dear all, >> > >> >Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It >> >occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was >> >unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I >> >was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. >> > >> >dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). >> > >> >pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) >> > >> >This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful >> >information. >> > >> >Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my >> >mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. It is possible that the >> >freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive >> >mounted via mount_nfs option. >> >> >> Could the dump operation (a very likely reason for the crash) freeze the >> system. I am thinking of the following scenario. The dump operation to a >> network share is underway. For some reason, the LAN network connection >> is unavailable for a short time. Dump freezes and never recovers as it >> cannot continue its operation. I went back to the box two hours after >> the dump operation had started but the box (FBSD machine) did not >> respond to physically connected keyboard and screen. The dump file on >> the network is shown to have 0 KB. Thanks for any info! > > If it thinks it ran out of media space (maybe doe to some network error, > I don't know), it could be waiting for a response at the console or > whatever terminal it was running from. It will "hang" there until it > gets some input it knows how to handle. > In that case I will probably be much better of using another HD physically connected to the box rather than shared network drive, wouldn't I? Lack of free space could not have been the reason - the network share can handle about 750GB of data so it must have been temporary network error. Thanks Jerry! ZS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:11:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E6016A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C8213C45E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l54IBAc5083438; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:11:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:11:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070604074600.GA3542@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20070604085627.GA22626@rot13.obsecurity.org> <4663DBBD.9020506@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <4663DBBD.9020506@intersonic.se> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706041411.19043.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Ewald Jenisch Subject: Re: New (blade) server - stick with FreeBSD 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:11:13 -0000 On Monday 04 June 2007 05:30:37 am Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:46:00AM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm about to set up a new server that should run basically > >> network-monitoring (MRTG, Cacti etc.). Hardware will be HP C-class > >> blade based on AMD Opterons. > >> > >> Should I stick with FreeBS 6.x or wait for FreeBSD 7 (see > >> http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html - "June 2007 Start FreeBSD > >> 7.0 Release Process). > > > > Note "start". The release is still many months away, so presumably > > you do not wish to wait until then to install your server :) You > > should definitely keep an eye on it though, there is a lot of good > > stuff coming up in 7.0. > > > >> The question basically is: Will FreeBSD7 be "current" or "stable"? > > We are running several non-critical (including this T42 laptop) and one > critical (SMTP) machine with -CURRENT and so far it's been a matter of > getting the source from a good moment in time, mostly the snapshots. So > far very few problems. You need a testbed to try stuff out on though. Note that the bge adapters in the HP c-class blades require SerDes support, which IIRC was not present in 6.2-RELEASE but has (hopefully? maybe?) been MFC'ed since then. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:12:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1A416A46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAB313C4B7 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64591A3C19; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDAE511B4; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:12:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A2DF7C204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:12:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:12:54 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20070604181254.GA28548@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:12:55 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:09:18PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, > > Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It > occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was > unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I > was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. > > dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). > > pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful > information. > > Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my > mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. > > It is possible that the > freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive > mounted via mount_nfs option. > > FreeBSD lists.lc-words.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan > 22 12:52:41 CET 2007 root@192.168.11.51:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS i386 > > Many thanks in advance! See the developers handbook chapter on kernel debugging From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:16:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F8516A46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A395813C448 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88BC1A3C19; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28DC511B4; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:16:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D164DC204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:16:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:16:04 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <20070604181604.GB28548@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:16:05 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:54:18PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > In the course of trying to work through some problems with a new MOBO, > I did some speed test which I found sort of surprising: > > Old System > ---------- > > Dual PIII 600Mhz w/768K Mem and Mylex RAID 5 with old 9G SCSI drived > FBSD 4.11-Stable > Writing a 1G file to /dev/null with dd reports about 26MB/sec > > New System > ---------- > > Pentium D 3.2GHz w/2G Mem and SATA Drive reported running at SATA-150 > FBSD 6.2-STABLE > Writing a 2G file to /dev/null with dd reports about 50MB/sec > > > So ... the new system should be much faster all the way around, right? > Hmmmm, not necessarily so. 'buildworld' is only about 17% faster on the > new machine v. the old. I would think that with way faster processors > and twice the disk bandwidth I would have seen far reduced buildworld > times. So, I decided to check a known fast machine. The results: > > Procs Mem dd Read OS > buildworld > > > Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP 50-60 > min > New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP 40-50 > min > Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP 8 > min > > > So, now I'm confused. These are all lightly loaded systems but the > buildworld time does not scale even approximately by either CPU or > I/O performance. What the heck is going on, I wonder? It is possible, > I suppose that the "New" machine does not have SMP running properly on it, > though 'top' shows two CPUs working away. Is the difference in speed > attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? Unfortunately, I cannot > get 4.11 to boot on the "New" machine - it does not like the hardware > for some reason claiming: > > RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80 > > Even after I change the RTC battery on the mobo. > > Strange ... any input appreciated. This comparison is 100% bogus. 4.11 and 6.2 are vastly different (the latter builds all sorts of different code, and uses a *different compiler* that is slower in compiling the code). When trying to compare something, you have to compare the *same* thing, or it's meaningless. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:16:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D55F16A47C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC313C4C1 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l54IBuJo069384; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:11:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l54IBsbX069383; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:11:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:11:54 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20070604181154.GA69350@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> <46644D4F.2060406@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070604175518.GC69110@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4664543C.5050109@szalbot.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4664543C.5050109@szalbot.homedns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:16:36 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > Jerry McAllister pisze: > > >On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:35:11PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > > >>Hello, > >> > >>Zbigniew Szalbot pisze: > >> > >>>Dear all, > >>> > >>>Today - for the first time ever - I have a total system freeze. It > >>>occured after 105 days of uninterrupted work. The freeze was > >>>unrecoverable because even though I attached a screen to the machine, I > >>>was not able to do anything with it. I had to hard-reboot it. > >>> > >>>dmesg.today has just one line (and dmesg.yestarday is empty). > >>> > >>>pid 25536 (portmanager), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > >>> > >>>This file was modified at night so it does not contain any useful > >>>information. > >>> > >>>Where can I look for more information? The only thing that comes to my > >>>mind is that today I installed denyhosts-2.6. It is possible that the > >>>freeze occured during dump operation which is done to a network drive > >>>mounted via mount_nfs option. > >> > >> > >>Could the dump operation (a very likely reason for the crash) freeze the > >>system. I am thinking of the following scenario. The dump operation to a > >>network share is underway. For some reason, the LAN network connection > >>is unavailable for a short time. Dump freezes and never recovers as it > >>cannot continue its operation. I went back to the box two hours after > >>the dump operation had started but the box (FBSD machine) did not > >>respond to physically connected keyboard and screen. The dump file on > >>the network is shown to have 0 KB. Thanks for any info! > > > >If it thinks it ran out of media space (maybe doe to some network error, > >I don't know), it could be waiting for a response at the console or > >whatever terminal it was running from. It will "hang" there until it > >gets some input it knows how to handle. > > > > In that case I will probably be much better of using another HD > physically connected to the box rather than shared network drive, > wouldn't I? Lack of free space could not have been the reason - the > network share can handle about 750GB of data so it must have been > temporary network error. No guarantee that is what is happening, but it seems like it could be a possibility - at least one to eliminate. ////jerry > > > Thanks Jerry! > > ZS > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:17:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7878016A46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5588713C45A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr1so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.177]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJ4004IBITG8PF0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:17:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml6so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.150]) by pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJ400C9EITELO11@pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:17:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0JJ40015AITECQE0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:17:38 -0600 (MDT) Received: (qmail 55402 invoked from network); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:17:15 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hexahedron.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:17:15 +0000 Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:17:14 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> To: Tim Daneliuk Message-id: <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070511) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:17:44 -0000 Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > 50-60 min > New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP > 40-50 min > Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > 8 min > > Is the difference in speed > attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes 2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a result of "working harder" to find optimizations). FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except compiling itself. :-) Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:24:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3315016A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E1213C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l54IOSc5088931; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:24:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:24:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <37f72b1f0706021126g3347c683u37a87d3145e6e571@mail.gmail.com> <37f72b1f0706040829l338c4c7fr5229e8807705daed@mail.gmail.com> <37f72b1f0706040830g3f3414cet30ea686e0a325c9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706040830g3f3414cet30ea686e0a325c9@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706041424.37437.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Jim Capozzoli Subject: Re: Fwd: X11 & console setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:24:30 -0000 On Monday 04 June 2007 11:30:03 am Jim Capozzoli wrote: > On 6/4/07, John Nielsen wrote: > > On Saturday 02 June 2007 04:00:57 pm Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > > Jim Capozzoli wrote: > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > I have 3 monitors and 3 video cards. However, one videocard and > > > > monitor isn't very "X11 friendly." (X11 barely starts on it). I was > > > > wondering if it would be possible to have X11 running on two of the > > > > monitors, and then have a full screen console (like a ttyv0) on the > > > > third monitor (so I could constantly leave top or something sweet > > > > running on there :D). This is all with FreeBSD 6.2/i386 and Xorg 6.9 > > > > or 7.2. Any suggestions? Thanks. > > > > > > It should do "do-able", perhaps somewhat easily. > > > /usr/ports/x11-servers/x2x is what comes to mind --- IIRC, Greg > > > "groggy" Lehey of "The Complete FreeBSD" fame uses this for several > > > displays, and has notes on his setup in her personal pages at > > > www.lemis.com. > > > > That link is here: http://www.lemis.com/grog/hardware.html > > > > However, I'm not sure x2x is relevant to the OP--It can be used to allow > > one mouse and keyboard to be used on multiple X servers, but doesn't have > > anything to do with console mode. > > > > I don't know if the setup the OP wants is possible or not, but here are > > some notes: > > > > The FreeBSD console always runs on the "primary" display as determined by > > the BIOS. Most systems give you a choice between using AGP or PCI as the > > primary display. If you have multiple PCI cards it is usually the first > > one on the bus (physically this is often the one closest to the CPU). Not > > sure how ISA figures in. You will want to make your "bad" videocard and > > monitor the primary display. > > > > Once you have that, I'd just run an "Xorg -configure" to get started. If > > X comes up at all using the config generated from that then it will be a > > good starting point. Try commenting out the device and screen sections > > (and possibly also a line under ServerLayout) for your "bad" display and > > see if X comes up on the other two. By default it expects to be running > > on the console so I'm not sure what will happen here. You also want it to > > grab the keyboard and mouse unless you have a second keyboard. Some trial > > and error and further research are probably required. Play with startx vs > > xdm, see what happens when you press ctrl-alt-f1, etc. I'm assuming > > you'll want to use Xinerama to join the two X displays and allow > > window-dragging between them, etc. > > > > If you don't get acceptable results using your original plan, you can > > always hack together your own "console" to run on the weakest display > > under X (using the vesa driver if necessary). If possible (not sure it > > is), don't make it part of your Xinerama display. Then don't run a window > > manager on it. Use xsetroot as part of your X init script to control > > what's on the background. This will apply to your entire display but the > > WM will probably take over once it starts on the "good" screens. You > > could make one or more scripts to run things on your "bad" screen by > > doing something like this: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > DISPLAY=:0.1 #might also be :0.2 or :0.0 > > export DISPLAY > > xterm -r -geometry 120x60 /usr/bin/top > > > > Experiment with the geometry settings to see what fills your screen > > appropriately. You might also want to get a nice bitmap font to give the > > xterm more of a terminal "feel". I have one I stole from bochs or > > somewhere that's not bad (I use it for Nethack). E-mail me off-list if > > you want it. > > > > That should just about do it. Do write back to the list to tell us what > > you learn and what works the best. > > > > JN > > I like the not making it a part of the Xinerama display..that would be > interesting, because I'm sure a very basic X11 background with a xterm > would work on there. If X starts on there, then yeah great but the > problem is I don't ever recall getting it to work properly. If the card functions at all then I'm sure you could get the vesa driver running at 800x600x8 at least.. > What I had in mind however, is say having the weak monitor/card as the > 'default' display that the BIOS picks up, and then leaving a console > on there BUT having X11 on the two other monitors. Then I'd run top > on it or something, so I"d have a command like... > > $ startxfce4 & top -s 1 > > And then on the 'default' BIOS chosen display, you would see top > running in console mode, and then pretty xfce with nice 1280x1024 ver > monitor resolution on the other two (using Xinerama). I wouldn't need > to have keyboard/mouse control on the 'default' console then, I'd just > look at it to see which process is eating the machine, load averages, > etc. My suggestion for running the weak display under X was conditional on not getting results you liked with your original idea. Re-read the first part of my first reply. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:31:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E473C16A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@nerdshack.com) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C915B13C4AD for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@nerdshack.com) Received: from dispatchd.nerdshack.com (jean.lavabit.com [72.249.41.30]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C072EC83E9 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:02:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from endeavour.lordofunix.org (84.79.187.101) by mail.nerdshack.com with ESMTP Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:02:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:02:18 +0200 From: Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070604200218.6c0b1062.jlalarcon@nerdshack.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Xorg 7.2 and portmanager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:31:30 -0000 Hi Folks. I'm just reading /urs/ports/UPDATING, but i always use portmanager for keep my system up to date. My question is, can i use portmsanager for change to the new version of Xorg?. Thanks very much, in advance. Regards. Jose. -- http://www.lordofunix.org/ Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. Registered BSD User 51101. Registered Linux User #213309. Memories..... You are talking about memories. Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:45:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0298016A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3EE13C45B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 45F194AC90; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:46:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451914AC8B; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:46:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:46:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20070604161841.GA68919@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: <20070604144623.F19336@saturn.atopia.net> References: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> <20070604161841.GA68919@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote Server FSCK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:45:35 -0000 > Well, did it run the fsck? > Those messages look pretty routine and should be handled > by the regular fsck done on a normal boot. Usually the > regular fsck will run and clean up most simple stuff. > Try rebooting the machine again and see if it still has the > same messages. If so, then see if they will do the single-user > fsck for you. But, I am guessing that it actually already > cleaned up for you. Rebooted and no more errors.... so I guess it did fix them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:51:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E38316A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2B313C48A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54IosRT052338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:50:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46645F0D.7020904@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:50:53 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <20070604181604.GB28548@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070604181604.GB28548@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:51:01 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > This comparison is 100% bogus. > > 4.11 and 6.2 are vastly different (the latter builds all sorts of > different code, and uses a *different compiler* that is slower in > compiling the code). When trying to compare something, you have to > compare the *same* thing, or it's meaningless. > I figured it had to be something like that. For the record, I wasn't complaining, merely curious... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:53:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0710516A46D; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:53:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59DF13C484; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54IrPWm052398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:53:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46645FA3.2000003@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:53:23 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:53:32 -0000 Colin Percival wrote: > Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP >> 50-60 min >> New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP >> 40-50 min >> Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP >> 8 min >> >> Is the difference in speed >> attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? > > Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being > faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and > between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 > to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes > 2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a > result of "working harder" to find optimizations). > > FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except > compiling itself. :-) > > Colin Percival > So ... if I ran compute bound tests like SPECmark or some kind of I/O intensive tests, I should expect better runtime performance from 6.2 than 4.11... I can live with that :) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:53:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1216A4CB for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB0413C48A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) id l54Ir3qb090433; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:53:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:53:02 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Sean Murphy Message-ID: <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:53:35 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said: > How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID? /usr/bin/gcore -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:54:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6808716A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0CB13C448 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id A7E984AC73; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11DA4AC6C; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:55:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: Mikhail Goriachev In-Reply-To: <466443FD.9040702@webanoide.org> Message-ID: <20070604145507.I1470@saturn.atopia.net> References: <20070604121447.D5399@saturn.atopia.net> <466443FD.9040702@webanoide.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote Server FSCK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:54:11 -0000 > fsck_y_enable="YES" > > Just add that into the /etc/rc.conf, reboot and wait awhile. > > After the machine is up and running, fsck it and see if it throws any errors. > > > Let us know how it goes. Worked great. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 18:59:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062C616A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03DC13C448 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1152972wxd for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.21.8 with SMTP id 8mr7710709wxu.1180983549929; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h9sm553303wxd.2007.06.04.11.59.08; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:59:19 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20070604200218.6c0b1062.jlalarcon@nerdshack.com> References: <20070604200218.6c0b1062.jlalarcon@nerdshack.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070604144837.A574.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re: Xorg 7.2 and portmanager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:59:11 -0000 On Monday June 04, 2007 at 02:02:18 (PM) Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez wrote: > I'm just reading /urs/ports/UPDATING, but i always use > portmanager for keep my system up to date. >=20 > My question is, can i use portmsanager for change to the > new version of Xorg?. >=20 > Thanks very much, in advance. I used the prescribed method in the 'UPDATING' file when I first attempted to update to Xorg-7.2 on my system.=20 There is this notation in the 'UPDATING' file: If your machine does NOT have any gstreamer ports installed, you can then run: # portupgrade -a However, if you DO have gstreamer ports installed, you must run: # portupgrade -a -x 'gstreamer*' Followed by: # portupgrade -Rr 'gstreamer*' Well, I do have it installed, so I followed the directions exactly. When it completed, the log file that was created showed that 'gstreamer' totally failed to update. I ran the script indicated in the 'UPDATING' file as well as deleting the 'man' pages as specified. I then simply reboot to insure that everything would start correctly. I then used portsnap to update the ports tree and finally used portmanager as thus: portmanager -u -p -l That updated over 400 ports (took awhile) but after that everything works fine. I guess I would recommend using the 'portupgrade' method as shown in the 'UPDATING' file; however, after going that route, you might want to run portmanager to insure that all of the ports were actually updated correctly. Just my 2=A2. --=20 Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 19:38:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B716A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (echo.calarts.edu [198.182.157.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBFA13C465 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E64C7101E412; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:28:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by echo.calarts.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138181018B64; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:28:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [198.182.157.179] (dhcp7179.calarts.edu [198.182.157.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l54JcQ6J006700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:38:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:38:25 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) To: Dan Nelson References: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:38:40 -0000 I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong? # gcore 581 gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory # cd /proc # ls -la total 4 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 8 2005 . drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Apr 3 17:03 .. Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said: How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID? /usr/bin/gcore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 19:45:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289B616A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:45:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83EA13C45B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.114.75.95] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1HvIUu-0003et-Fb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:45:48 +0100 Message-ID: <46646BEC.2090603@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:45:48 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Is it better to just rebuild Xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:45:50 -0000 I've just installed 6.2R and have just about got Xorg going. Is it better for me to just remove all my X related packages and try and build from the xorg-7.2 meta package or to go through the pain of trying to update? In either case I need to sync the ports tree etc. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 19:51:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF7516A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bondka@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E079C13C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bondka@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so2142546waf for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:51:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ByibB/UWm3n5ZVNWyNuxHGsL/lh4tFaJAjFupv8NLLY340rX7uWV0Ie0D6EtZY5REFrqE5PgiaGno0KqL8fOHBq2pKY8PTMEJZLVDX5ExKtzTR/vRhKgJZY3ePpVQwT7p5W9kJIDDu71T7uCWKoY7vfS/KgW9WniTSUa6LfqQeE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=P50jPsHpq9D7rzShZY2ywlEsCIS4cwcMz5mMKvPLIpEDss2/L/g0jj9StZcQrIdIp2IkgCnmzMgDL1VnF8WOpIatPBCq25Bv6iqx+SIEz7aJLEEuaDDm4/UCFVAB6BhJmfyMXcROSOA7RcXPL2F5wr524XFvt+UtNRomzG7IqGM= Received: by 10.114.36.1 with SMTP id j1mr5206542waj.1180984976166; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.73.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:22:56 -0400 From: "Kenneth Bond" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Disable CTRL+ALT+DELETE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:51:19 -0000 Hello, I have a quick question regarding disabling the CTRL+ALT+DELETE keystroke sequence used to reboot a system. I understand that you are able to add the following option to the kernel config file and rebuild the kernel: options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT What I'd like to confirm is whether or not using a keymap file and changing the "boot" entries to "nop", and then loading it on each boot through /etc/rc.conf (KEYMAP = "/usr/share/syscons/keymap/keymap.kbd") is a viable, secure alternative for disabling the CTRL+ALT+DELETE keystroke sequence. I know it was commonly used with older FreeBSD releases, but I'm not sure whether it is recommended with newer releases. Please advise. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 19:54:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE1916A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEDA13C46C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so991870uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:54:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p3DeTh5s5Y8fZv5WqdAjLbzKcV5gI+TYtADbrUhptYg8BgtBiT+ePHT4Lmcbb4XBxgqDOl/rLCZ24oWbff3i+lcjVpQ7y8tl7yvtj7+7VPnxaYYYIy0VfWVBNbNqEEsc4bd/h+Ih/noprGsA7JJ00+c0V6X4JOprOf0sVAM1uxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qeVFiHEgypB2NC4xE1mK8FuhGorLeCk+zX2VPXg9Pkb16rbFuhoAHErXJVt8d6F9Xvid0ZtODJFwQFTC7gzdv1DvqWp8FN97RRlSJyj+slbt7C+Wgb4BvVhp+of8woplGxBIsIy8PYJZWZNvuCZs6gv5+3vImbqx8kC2l+uj+fo= Received: by 10.66.221.19 with SMTP id t19mr3346914ugg.1180986891092; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.24.16 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:54:50 +0100 From: Chris To: "Colin Percival" In-Reply-To: <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> Cc: Tim Daneliuk , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:54:55 -0000 On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: > Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > > 50-60 min > > New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP > > 40-50 min > > Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > > 8 min > > > > Is the difference in speed > > attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? > > Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being > faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and > between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 > to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes > 2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a > result of "working harder" to find optimizations). > > FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except > compiling itself. :-) > > Colin Percival > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > What about all the following observations? slower network performance in 6.x especially worse under DDOS conditions. slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true would be wrong. My observation of 6.x is that whilst it can exceed 4.11 performance this is only because of more more powerful hardware and in particular on SMP systems where 4.11 isnt optimised but for UP and most older hardware the worst performance of post 4.11 is highlighted greatly. In thoery shouldnt eg. a 6.2 system using a 3ghz core 2 duo be multiple times faster then a pentium 3 500 running freebsd 4.11 due to the more powerful hardware? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 20:02:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83C416A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828B413C484 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54K2L2N054054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:02:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:02:20 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:02:29 -0000 Chris wrote: > On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: >> Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> > Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP >> > 50-60 min >> > New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP >> > 40-50 min >> > Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP >> > 8 min >> > >> > Is the difference in speed >> > attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? >> >> Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being >> faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and >> between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 >> to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes >> 2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a >> result of "working harder" to find optimizations). >> >> FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except >> compiling itself. :-) >> >> Colin Percival >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > What about all the following observations? > > slower network performance in 6.x especially worse under DDOS conditions. > slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. > > both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people > so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true > would be wrong. My observation of 6.x is that whilst it can exceed > 4.11 performance this is only because of more more powerful hardware > and in particular on SMP systems where 4.11 isnt optimised but for UP > and most older hardware the worst performance of post 4.11 is > highlighted greatly. > > In thoery shouldnt eg. a 6.2 system using a 3ghz core 2 duo be > multiple times faster then a pentium 3 500 running freebsd 4.11 due to > the more powerful hardware? > > Chris It will be of academic interest to me to see how people respond to this. Unfortunately - as documented in my original post - the 4.11 CD will not even boot on this new motherboard for some reason. Given that, and that 4.x is no longer actively developed, I am forced to move to 6.x for my next server ... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 20:08:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC2716A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30ED13C44B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1168706wxd for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:08:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=CakbffGEOGi09hA/BucyBM3Hs4YN6RbnKgsjzDAR6qvNCgxb+GO/I4wTaDdx/U5d2Su46soMcGMZOEYoxB3cV8U9QhGpKmwejLwnMAqHfmpG09pxbGv8vMB0W7kJAlwqzOvGmMzE4n2w9OLuYPkmt3bmWIHmetvwKDv4pJCVo+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jAWjVapUH+t8TzFvBGKfqL3VMetzRmXyDSJYTVZWGQDPxjCYrCoad/KxXAQSRhkmqoq5eWfosjhAki7IPr4AtB0KqT2aNQDi5TxzjzvIWYs5VWsia+0BNJ75+k5HJjTWZLREhSajiox54qHBEZilZZKK6l8J19aimOT+0kgZC2Y= Received: by 10.70.16.6 with SMTP id 6mr7742935wxp.1180985971250; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.20.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6293ba970706041239ufdd41f0m45964e8d4930249c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:39:31 -0400 From: Steve To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Wake-on-LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:08:20 -0000 I need some help getting WOL working. I have two boxes with Freebsd 6.2 and WOL doesn't work on either one. Both have capable Intel NICs (pro/100 and pro/1000) and capable PC BIOS (with WOL and PME enabled). When the boxes are shutdown I don't have any link lights, which I believe is an indication of a problem. I'm wondering if this is an ACPI issue where the PCI bus has no power after shutdown, or perhaps an em driver issue? Any ideas on this? Thanks. S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 20:15:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7C816A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB77C13C487 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) id l54KEqaO062955; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:14:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:14:52 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Sean Murphy Message-ID: <20070604201452.GC52959@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:15:24 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said: > I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong? > # gcore 581 > gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory > # cd /proc > # ls -la > total 4 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 8 2005 . > drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Apr 3 17:03 .. > Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said: > > How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID? > > /usr/bin/gcore gcore is one of the few programs left that still requires procfs. You'll need to mount it: mount -t procfs /proc /proc -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 20:16:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB4716A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FD813C465 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6155 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 20:16:17 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jun 2007 20:16:17 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 01AAF28440; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:16:16 -0400 (EDT) To: Sean Murphy References: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:16:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> (Sean Murphy's message of "Mon\, 04 Jun 2007 12\:38\:25 -0700") Message-ID: <44wsyj79ww.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:16:18 -0000 Don't top-post, please. Sean Murphy writes: > I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong? > # gcore 581 > gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory > # cd /proc > # ls -la > total 4 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 8 2005 . > drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Apr 3 17:03 .. You need to mount a procfs(5). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 20:37:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA2B16A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1DD13C487 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1004114uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:37:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=iyXTWUYtuiGkPlHKnlcOnqUQDUaWggv/+qlN7kVNKIHfid5Z9TdN6InvtUD2qn2Na+imszXTF7V34p5JKxGJij+joNq0UIQZ9iCiXrtPyqHbsGPPpji8WsWQ5Zcrxn1dvm6przgKb57u7jWoq8Z/O7foOMCvDkgmsuDWQJc3c9M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=JRP22HDzZyeLrPAE1WP3XXVT1J0RWSnOc9liKNZv09rMCiWh4jXE8Wd7PLfGW7cz4OrEsUpEHTfeJI1/KCpBFNxpTfJjL/e7rKi6GhwflVXmIVURXQW98QDGA0Ju3w8xSlRiIq/DzrZKub55yKLNd6Y3ZdKf9/MbneaJubWV3C8= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr2165352huf.1180987780013; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.194.12 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:09:39 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Registering installation for... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:37:34 -0000 Hello, "Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes (at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barracuda SATA drive. It looks "a little" too long to me... Is it OK that pkg_create takes so long so much of CPU? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:00:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AC116A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yahoo@pcbsd.homeunix.com) Received: from outgoing.holservices.gr (outgoing.holservices.gr [62.38.2.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A2D113C48A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yahoo@pcbsd.homeunix.com) Received: (qmail 21583 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 20:29:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO deliver.mail.dc.hol.net) (192.168.20.70) by arete.mail.dc.hol.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 20:29:43 -0000 Received: from auth-smtp.hol.gr (takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net [192.168.20.71]) by deliver.hol.gr (8.12.11/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l54KXPxG011096 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified OK); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:33:25 +0300 Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp155-152.dsl.hol.gr [89.210.155.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.hol.gr (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l54KXOi7005772; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:33:25 +0300 Message-ID: <4664771D.5020408@pcbsd.homeunix.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:33:33 +0300 From: Thanos Rizoulis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Barner References: <20070602092916.GA1231@dose.local.invalid> In-Reply-To: <20070602092916.GA1231@dose.local.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90/3349/Mon Jun 4 17:32:21 2007 on takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: enable fetchmail system-wide mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: apatewna@hol.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:00:11 -0000 O/H Simon Barner : > Hello Gerard, > > >> I had to slightly modify it to work the way I wanted on my system. I >> would suggest that you do that 'AFTER' you have gotten it to relatively >> the way you want it to. >> > > Are these changes useful for other users, too? If so, please send me > a diff, so I can modify the port. > > This is a little guide to setting up fetchmail 6.3.8 cd /usr/ports/mail/fetchmail make install clean echo 'fetchmail_enable="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf echo 'fetchmail_polling_interval="60"'>>/etc/rc.conf The above two are mentioned in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail ee /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc (initially it is nearly empty) set invisible set no bouncemail set no spambounce set postmaster postmaster@yourdomain.xyz set syslog poll pop.mail.yahoo.com timeout 40 proto pop3 user "username" pass "password" is user@yourdomain.xyz fastuidl 1 fetchlimit 0 limit 0 keep forcecr The above options are for a client who wishes to keep messages stored in remote POP3 mailboxes. *man fetchmail* for specifics, especially at the end where it gives a nice table of availiable commands and fetchmailrc options. The MTA handling the local domain is qmail, hence the required "forcecr" option. The timings (60sec per POP3 access) may seem agressive but I contacted the ISP and they have no problem with that and the client is happy to have nearly "email-chat" sessions. Users or abusers, as long as they pay the bucks.... chmod 0700 /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc chown fetchmail:fetchmail /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc (the permissions are already set anyway) /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail start Also there is a new option I haven't seen before. Suppose that fetchmail is sleeping and you want to wake it up *right now* to receive new messages: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail awaken Watch /var/log/maillog for fetchmail activity. -- RTFM and STFW before anything bad happens _________________________________________ Thanos Rizoulis Electronic Computing Systems Engineer Larissa, Greece FreeBSD/PCBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:01:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B716A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from p28.ich-19.com (fa.ea.5646.static.theplanet.com [70.86.234.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F7D13C483 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.122.136.234] (helo=Unknown-00-16-36-ae-62-05.lan) by p28.ich-19.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HvJfw-0005Qu-RR; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:01:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:00:55 +0300 From: Ghirai X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.3) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1042282770.20070605000055@ghirai.com> To: "Vlad GURDIGA" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - p28.ich-19.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com Cc: Subject: Re: Registering installation for... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ghirai List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:01:20 -0000 Hello Vlad, Monday, June 4, 2007, 11:09:39 PM, you wrote: > Hello, > "Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes > (at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my > Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barracuda SATA drive. > It looks "a little" too long to me... As far as i know mplayer comes with quite a handful of plugins/libs/decoders/etc, which might explain why libtool took so long. -- Best regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:01:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840C816A41F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.smartterra.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443AB13C4C3 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64435-02 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:27:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from home.alpha-tierchen.de (port-212-202-170-5.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.170.5]) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEE615D8EE for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:27:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.alpha-tierchen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.alpha-tierchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AC045046 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:27:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb (SquirrelMail authenticated user bkoenig) by webmail.alpha-tierchen.de with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:27:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59830.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1180988866.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:27:46 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.smartterra.de Cc: Subject: How to bootstrap a world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:01:33 -0000 Hello, how can I bootstrap a world? If I compile libc I get the message ld: cannot find -lgcc and if I compile libgcc I get ld: cannot find -lc This looks like a chicken-egg-problem. I try to build a world for a different architecture. Regards Bjrn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:03:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C218B16A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E81913C4B7 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1181517wxd for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=mtypoeLc39R8oaX+Us0P861lPcB17lAET1aTgaY/us2prUpD4GQlu7lefp4BgMBMq86P8qFRSauGoHnJHV/BqpcUp8wJtddJZo5J4KTwSKn/945H8ew1UkEppW+YKlc7Jj6pyVzSzdCel8GtlGPedQa+m69Fi9ccqfPWh+GzgkA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=bVjd+x6lGUlhA3U969CaRKv4a8s8AdgxlYL4Ci+y7oU2M5hrV+byFXQDPfIr2Cey9FiXduOFb4uegJhZrQw5A5vOzN2cFb3pcc6+thkNcEnJTsw0JD525y+pF4BrJyLFVJ64SfwASg1cWoYkIk889uJx27XlQvqncRsN92oTEF0= Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr4286124agb.1180991000202; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:03:20 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 639eb2303a4c032f Cc: Subject: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:03:21 -0000 hi, i've fbsd 6.2R/p5, with pf compiled into a custom kernel. on boot, pf is, apparently, not starting. but, if i exec /etc/rc.d/pf start immediately after boot to prompt is done, then all's OK. the only related (?) messages -- error or otherwise -- i've found are on startup. any ideas/suggestions as to what might be the prob? and/or how to troubleshoot? thanks! for reference, from console output @ startup, ---------------------------------------- ... sis0: link state changed to UP sis1: link state changed to UP lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 sscopeid 0x5 inet6 ::1 prefisxlen 128 inet2 127.0.0.1 netma:sk 0xff000000 sis0: flags=8843l mtu 149k2 options=48s inet 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xfafffff00 broadcastt 10.0.0.255 ether 00:00:12:d4:15:88 media:t Ethernet autoseolect (100baseTX ) status: active sis1: flags=8843 mtu 1492 options=48 ether 00:00:12:d4:15:89 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active Starting pflog. pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled Enabling pf. Jun 4 13:38:11 pflogd[479]: [priv]: msg PRIV_OPEN_LOG received pfctl: DIOCSETSTATUSIF pf enabled Starting ppp. add net default: gateway 10.0.0.10 Additional routing options:. Starting devd. Mounting NFS file systems:. ... ---------------------------------------- and, further, % cat /etc/rc.conf ---------------------------------------- ifconfig_sis1="mtu 1492 polling" ifconfig_sis0="inet 10.0.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 polling" hostname="router.mydomain.com" defaultrouter="10.0.0.10" # PPP ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="NO" ppp_profile="ppp`" # PF pf_enable="YES" pf_flags="" pf_rules="/usr/local/etc/pf/pf.conf" pflog_enable="YES" pflog_flags="" pflog_logfile="/var/log/pflog" # SPAMD obspamd_enable="YES" obspamd_flags="-v -l 127.0.0.1 -h mail.mydomain.com -n GATEWAY" obspamlogd_enable="YES" obspamlogd_flags="" # MISC inetd_enable="YES" firewall_enable="NO" nfs_client_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" snmpd_enable="NO" webmin_enable="NO" pcscd_enable="NO" sshd_enable="NO" ntpdate_enable="NO" ntpd_enable="YES" # BIND9 named_enable="YES" named_chrootdir="/var/chroot/named" named_flags="-c /etc/named.conf" named_pidfile="/var/run/named.pid" named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" named_uid="bind" # RBLDNSd rbldnsd_enable="YES" rbldnsd_flags=${rbldnsd_flags:-"-4 -u rbldns:rbldns -r /var/chroot/rbldnsd -b 127.0.0.1/530 -t 900 my.dnsbl:ip4set:dnsbl/mx_local_black.txt"} # SENDMAIL mta_start_script="/etc/rc.sendmail" sendmail_enable="YES" sendmail_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m" sendmail_pidfile="/var/run/sendmail.pid" sendmail_procname="/usr/sbin/mailwrapper" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" sendmail_msp_queue_flags="-L sm-msp-queue -Ac -q30m" sendmail_outbound_enable="YES" sendmail_outbound_flags="-L sm-queue -q30m" sendmail_submit_enable="YES" sendmail_submit_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost" # DHCP Services dhcpd_enable="YES" dhcpd_chroot_enable="YES" dhcpd_chuser_enable="YES" dhcpd_devfs_enable="YES" dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" dhcpd_flags="-q -early_chroot" dhcpd_ifaces="sis0" dhcpd_jail_enable="YES" dhcpd_rootdir="/var/chroot/dhcpd" dhcpd_withgroup="dhcpd" dhcpd_withumask="022" dhcpd_withuser="dhcpd" ---------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:08:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1938C16A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859713C484 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54L81Nn096456; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:08:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CF10AB8FD; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:08:00 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Vlad GURDIGA Message-ID: <20070604210800.GA91356@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Vlad GURDIGA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Registering installation for... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:08:03 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:09:39PM +0300, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > Hello, >=20 > "Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes > (at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my > Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barracuda SATA drive. > It looks "a little" too long to me... >=20 > Is it OK that pkg_create takes so long so much of CPU? This is probably due to the new structure of xorg. On my system, mplayer now depenws on 104 other ports (pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep Dependency:|wc -l= ). I've seen the same with other ports that depend on X. And 'make clean' in said ports also takes a while. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGZH8wEnfvsMMhpyURAuOoAJ4qSSIK5cnF/g9pzNHmUIG7pdNGLgCfeoij NRfltlyVATgpVy23O3pbrY4= =RGhd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:18:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF5A16A41F; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from frontmail.ipactive.de (frontmail.maindns.de [85.214.95.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757AD13C447; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from mail.vtec.ipme.de (Q7d86.q.ppp-pool.de [89.53.125.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by frontmail.ipactive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384F1128846; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cesar.sz.vwsoft.com (unknown [192.168.18.3]) by mail.vtec.ipme.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DAB3F9E5; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:17:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:17:38 +0200 From: Volker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070528) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VWSoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com X-ipactive-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ipactive-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ipactive-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com Cc: freebsd-pf Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:18:28 -0000 On 06/04/07 23:03, snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > hi, > > i've fbsd 6.2R/p5, with pf compiled into a custom kernel. > > on boot, pf is, apparently, not starting. > > but, if i exec > > /etc/rc.d/pf start > > immediately after boot to prompt is done, then all's OK. > > the only related (?) messages -- error or otherwise -- i've found are > on startup. > > any ideas/suggestions as to what might be the prob? and/or how to > troubleshoot? > > thanks! > > for reference, from console output @ startup, > > ---------------------------------------- > ... > sis0: link state changed to UP > sis1: link state changed to UP > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 sscopeid 0x5 > inet6 ::1 prefisxlen 128 > inet2 127.0.0.1 netma:sk 0xff000000 > sis0: flags=8843l mtu 149k2 > options=48s > inet 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xfafffff00 broadcastt 10.0.0.255 > ether 00:00:12:d4:15:88 > media:t Ethernet autoseolect (100baseTX ) > status: active > sis1: flags=8843 mtu 1492 > options=48 > ether 00:00:12:d4:15:89 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > Starting pflog. > pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled > Enabling pf. > Jun 4 13:38:11 pflogd[479]: [priv]: msg PRIV_OPEN_LOG received > pfctl: DIOCSETSTATUSIF > pf enabled ... snow, without seeing your pf.conf ruleset, I guess you're using a ppp connection to your upstream provider and firewalling on the tunX interface (using tun0 as $ext_if). As FreeBSD boots up, this interface does not yet exist when pf is loaded. As soon as ppp is loaded and interface tun0 has been created, pf will happily load your ruleset. The solution is to either have pf rules loaded late (later than ppp is started) or use anchors and load ext rules into the anchor when the ppp interface is up. The easier is to have the rules loading late (check using rcorder) but this may also fail if something goes wrong with ppp. HTH Volker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 21:25:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF9816A46E for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B1A13C455 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54LPU5x007122 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:25:33 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <46648349.7080608@webanoide.org> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:25:29 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-pf Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:25:36 -0000 snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > hi, > > i've fbsd 6.2R/p5, with pf compiled into a custom kernel. > > on boot, pf is, apparently, not starting. > > but, if i exec > > /etc/rc.d/pf start > > immediately after boot to prompt is done, then all's OK. > > the only related (?) messages -- error or otherwise -- i've found are > on startup. > > any ideas/suggestions as to what might be the prob? and/or how to troubleshoot? Just a shot in the dark. You are probably putting hostnames in your pf.conf instead of IPs. PF starts before Bind. So it can't resolve hostnames in the rules and hence doesn't start. Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:02:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A072A16A421 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789C113C4B0 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0543222F311; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:02:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:02:06 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: B213pZRENi9LwhtF8W3LYBgLStwrFD+jjR6sKYX65wCO 1180994525 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D8F1CC99; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:02:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070604210800.GA91356@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20070604210800.GA91356@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:02:03 -0500 To: Roland Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Vlad GURDIGA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Registering installation for... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:02:06 -0000 On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Roland Smith wrote: > This is probably due to the new structure of xorg. On my system, > mplayer > now depenws on 104 other ports (pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep > Dependency:|wc -l). Some dependencies will be counted multiple times that way, try pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep Dependency:| sort | uniq | wc -l to get a more reasonable number. I don't have mplayer on my system so I can't check that particular one, but here's another example $ pkg_info -rx docproj | grep '^Depend' | wc -l 143 $ pkg_info -rx docproj | grep '^Depend' | sort | uniq | wc -l 57 I really have no idea of how the pkg database works so I don't know whether it treats those duplications wisely. > I've seen the same with other ports that depend on X. And 'make clean' > in said ports also takes a while. I believe that I've seen what seems like needless repetitions of "cleaning for FOO". Cheers, -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:04:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F38216A468 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominique.goncalves@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4F913C480 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominique.goncalves@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1027273uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:04:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mgTtxUeNXE4qBLdthaTqlpCwusCt5czPRbVVNRRX6OtZ1CY8p9Kd8rsUnY6Jwn3mHxG/o5/xzyFUdE/g/ti8Obn/WCA3204M71eB10EtJkbQxBovIEKGdLFS50YrmMs6vqpK5Z6/831un2yFdmy4cRKrpE80P1xzoHk6adx12tI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Gu8vQmPAycfNUyxVY0pQptZx3+3Q2MAfZJS7qldqilrb/Uwg+1CiPD/WJe66aCN7vF8nB9Hbxcdybdt3dlbcGETt8w2gVoz4/NP5HDNN+L9Y7wo/fYUlyDGun7PWEsINlGosYbLOWK5fwLU1Hs9LFjCoPl6UB1N9Dxsbptrobd0= Received: by 10.67.28.9 with SMTP id f9mr3370069ugj.1180993023872; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.225.10 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7daacbbe0706041437m1439900ft81dbcd698544ddad@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:37:03 +0200 From: "Dominique Goncalves" To: "Kenneth Bond" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disable CTRL+ALT+DELETE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:04:26 -0000 Hi, On 6/4/07, Kenneth Bond wrote: > Hello, > > I have a quick question regarding disabling the CTRL+ALT+DELETE > keystroke sequence used to reboot a system. > > I understand that you are able to add the following option to the > kernel config file and rebuild the kernel: > > options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT > > What I'd like to confirm is whether or not using a keymap file and > changing the "boot" entries to "nop", and then loading it on each boot > through /etc/rc.conf (KEYMAP = "/usr/share/syscons/keymap/keymap.kbd") > is a viable, secure alternative for disabling the CTRL+ALT+DELETE > keystroke sequence. > > I know it was commonly used with older FreeBSD releases, but I'm not > sure whether it is recommended with newer releases. > > Please advise. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If you are using FreeBSD >=6.2, there is a sysctl knob for disabling CTRL+ALT+DELETE, sysctl hw.syscons.kbd_reboot=0 Take a look at syscons(4) and sysctl(8) for more information. Hope this helps. Regards. -- There's this old saying: "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for life." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:11:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AD516A400 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D2213C455 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so437141anc for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:11:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IAV6denlcrcGCcst8ReA1hoSTvF0Wn2sFqsS/qx66xDkuWYGdUeQXRxp1L5YSWHJOZEuBHKlSc3CMinxfALR68Z54lELvNsLbVvgodJI/y/iSXHbEoiIeXCt3XJDgbLExN9Ci6dOxx5EYTHe+oBqmPmE3/7C8SQPDJZI19Gqtuw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pZDHemRvgEXfsZ9cCa4/kWdSJoYQy7kwXedPW8ppYztTAJUBbYY7iWn6Z/iyFeyUQmHPTGLgLFvyWM6sAZt4hxuBxV+xTz4EAFMKIpucKiZuqknxIM0q9Ni2MkSbeIHg18/7jOoNotLJwsYK+Jl1ImL0q7suNYEKtxk+DW8kItA= Received: by 10.100.152.9 with SMTP id z9mr2854452and.1180995063511; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706041511t7f60c335gb3fb6f52e25953e9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:11:03 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: tundra@tundraware.com In-Reply-To: <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> Cc: Chris , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:11:04 -0000 On 6/4/07, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Chris wrote: > > On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: > >> Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> > Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > >> > 50-60 min > >> > New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP > >> > 40-50 min > >> > Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > >> > 8 min > >> > > >> > Is the difference in speed > >> > attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? > >> > >> Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being > >> faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and > >> between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 > >> to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes > >> 2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a > >> result of "working harder" to find optimizations). > >> > >> FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except > >> compiling itself. :-) > >> > >> Colin Percival > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > What about all the following observations? > > > > slower network performance in 6.x especially worse under DDOS conditions. > > slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. > > > > both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people > > so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true > > would be wrong. My observation of 6.x is that whilst it can exceed > > 4.11 performance this is only because of more more powerful hardware > > and in particular on SMP systems where 4.11 isnt optimised but for UP > > and most older hardware the worst performance of post 4.11 is > > highlighted greatly. > > > > In thoery shouldnt eg. a 6.2 system using a 3ghz core 2 duo be > > multiple times faster then a pentium 3 500 running freebsd 4.11 due to > > the more powerful hardware? > > > > Chris > > It will be of academic interest to me to see how people respond to this. > Unfortunately - as documented in my original post - the 4.11 CD will > not even boot on this new motherboard for some reason. Given that, and > that 4.x is no longer actively developed, I am forced to move to 6.x for > my next server ... > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com You will not regret it, and wait FreeBSD 7.0 real powerful SMPing which done on it. I run heavily MySQL 5.0.41 app on itm and it's way faster than running it in 6.2-STABLE with C2D 6600 and 2 GB of ram. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:19:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937C516A46F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F266913C489 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1030654uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:19:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R4rXUymTk3avasj47Mr3IDBDhibuHh97mozDnJ6agLCDjpeuV6evk1aoM04r8B4jIk4/3GdwoXquQXB5hiuNMkwBz7kVNuWEwGN4G6gtm4Z2DSv0CsC36AcRLp5bXbI8m80nolnkGiEu/+t9v9kJvnK/cFCLDLO3R0ihAxPZzTI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Wtir0azvFlQYTjSwriA5Wc5EVlxButyuIOmtEK7PJAGH8JRt2pHbnBTFzcpVL0p5fOFIPOSGo+tuHRCi5QlMxFc5BrH1E1gwMwa1VXaNtsKTm9pdlHnpwIzXJBNEiFC1E/MReFWjiMPLPKMiQ+RRSOFzSru3D7ldC3Yt8RZsMhY= Received: by 10.82.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr7416308buf.1180995554372; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.191.11 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:19:14 +1000 From: "Paul Fraser" To: "Nico -telmich- Schottelius" In-Reply-To: <20070604113945.GA15154@schottelius.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070604113945.GA15154@schottelius.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: isc-dhcp3-server in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:19:17 -0000 On 6/4/07, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote: > What's the IP-number in your jail and what's it outside? > > I am not sure, whether broadcasts are delivered to the jails or not. > > Nico Hi Nico, The IP assigned to the host system is 192.168.72.250, with an alias for 192.168.72.251. The jail is configured with the IP 192.168.72.251. -- Regards, Paul Fraser http://furyc0de.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:30:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB58416A421; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C2D13C458; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2262E1A3C19; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E873D5144F; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:30:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D5EB4C204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:30:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:30:21 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chris Message-ID: <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Tim Daneliuk , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Percival Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:30:22 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: > >Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > >> 50-60 min > >> New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP > >> 40-50 min > >> Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > >> 8 min > >> > >> Is the difference in speed > >> attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? > > > >Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being > >faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and > >between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 > >to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes > >2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a > >result of "working harder" to find optimizations). > > > >FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except > >compiling itself. :-) > > > >Colin Percival > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > What about all the following observations? > > slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. s/especially//, unless you have further evidence I don't know about. > both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people > so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true > would be wrong. My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am aware of contradicts your claim: 6.x equals or outperforms 4.x on disk I/O (depends on driver) and filesystem I/O. The only true part of it is the "under QUOTA" part, which as you know from past discussions, is still under Giant in 6.x. As you also know, there is a patch to address this which is awaiting user testing. Have you tested it yet? Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:37:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C74116A478 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252E713C480 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so855553wra for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:37:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cj9Ko9PpBVr9m/wJRGgL7ND23G1mDF+TBc7RLWWn1srkCvaSm5dZABuvxmQCseqitvKyq9Elkht0tvkGlw5Kiyqo6Nr+oHHIdUKR+wMWpixnq4Pn5PleXm1Y4roLG/azYOm2prSGAW0tfO0A24P9H5pUBL6wSZmNka0JohwDV8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=aAKoIjt9FJRzxtCKE4RoRRZgPUAIpxxEmX2DNL0f7i5o21ilJmyVJlDyP/vxFwBOz6JfZ/KggpP+J2xKifDjTFRL0RDsy84KiO265STxOhwYgBp6BkwkM17JVl6O43/a41NO85W7ve3fmAcaRwZqemkTrNm3mWzfp3nZxJgXsOs= Received: by 10.90.99.20 with SMTP id w20mr4345822agb.1180996645449; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706041537laba6223v8c879e344d799052@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:37:25 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: mikhailg@webanoide.org, volker@vwsoft.com In-Reply-To: <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4fa25d414a177163 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:37:26 -0000 On 6/4/07, Volker wrote: > without seeing your pf.conf ruleset, happy to send/post if required/helpful ... > I guess you're using a ppp > connection to your upstream provider and firewalling on the tunX > interface (using tun0 as $ext_if). you're absolutely correct here. > As FreeBSD boots up, this interface does not yet exist when pf is > loaded. clear. > As soon as ppp is loaded and interface tun0 has been created, > pf will happily load your ruleset. aha. does that suggest that i'm simply not waiting long enough? your following comments suggest otherwise, iiuc, that i need to proactively _do_ something different ... > The solution is to either have pf rules loaded late (later than ppp is > started) clearly, simply including pf-related items in rc.conf after pppoe-related items is not sufficient. i'll take a look at "rcorder" ... which i wasn't aware of at all. thanks! > or use anchors and load ext rules into the anchor when the > ppp interface is up. i hadn't thought of using anchors in this fashion. i'm off to google, but any good examples you can reference? > The easier is to have the rules loading late > (check using rcorder) but this may also fail if something goes wrong > with ppp. i /thought/ i'd dealt with the intfc/ppo/pf ordering issue, configuring, cat /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup ------------------------------------ ppp1: ! sh -c "/sbin/pfctl -ef /usr/local/etc/pf/pf.conf" !bg sh -c "echo `/bin/date` `/etc/bin/ip` ppp.linkup >> /etc/ppp/log" ------------------------------------ cat /etc/ppp/ppp.linkdown ------------------------------------ ppp1: !bg route delete HISADDR ppp1 !bg pfctl -F all -d ------------------------------------ cat /etc/ppp/ppp.conf ------------------------------------ default: set device PPPoE:sis1: set speed sync set ctsrts off set dial set login set cd 10 set timeout 0 set redial 0 0 enable lqr set lqrperiod 20 set log Phase tun command add default HISADDR enable tcpmssfixup disable dns ppp1: set authname me@myisp.com set authkey ############ set MRU 1492 set MTU 1492 ------------------------------------ are these NOT supposed to address/solve the problem? or are the configs wrong? Mikhail Goriachev > Just a shot in the dark. You are probably putting hostnames in your > pf.conf instead of IPs. PF starts before Bind. So it can't resolve > hostnames in the rules and hence doesn't start. heh. a good call, but, i'd already made THAT mistake a month or so ago. ;-) thanks though! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:54:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBDD16A500 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenoternullo@virgilio.it) Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it (vsmtp14.tin.it [212.216.176.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9422D13C44C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenoternullo@virgilio.it) Received: from host46-163-dynamic.20-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it (87.20.163.46) by vsmtp14.tin.it (7.3.122) id 4641E06D0195ACF6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:19 +0200 From: Sereno Ternullo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706050054.32377.serenoternullo@virgilio.it> Subject: Making a new libmap.conf for linux emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: serenoternullo@virgilio.it List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:54:20 -0000 Hi all, I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now I'm having problems with my "linux sub system". If I have linux.ko loaded into the kernel, ldconfig fails like this: [root@FreeBSD /etc]# ldconfig Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) With linux.ko loaded into the kernel, if I try to start /compat/linux/bin/bash bash works fine, but if I try to start skype, this is what I get [sereno@FreeBSD /usr/home/sereno]$ skype_bin skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /lib/libGL.so.1: ELF file OS ABI invalid Can anyone tell me the lines I'm missing on my libmap.conf ? Thank you in advance, Sereno Ternullo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 23:07:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A33F16A469 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ECA13C45A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54N7WI9057621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:07:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46649B33.6040107@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:07:31 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:07:40 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: >> On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: >> both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people >> so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true >> would be wrong. > > My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am > aware of contradicts your claim: 6.x equals or outperforms 4.x on disk > I/O (depends on driver) and filesystem I/O. The only true part of it > is the "under QUOTA" part, which as you know from past discussions, is > still under Giant in 6.x. As you also know, there is a patch to > address this which is awaiting user testing. Have you tested it yet? > > Kris Kris - It's been awhile since I tracked -current, so forgive me if this is a stupid question but ... Is it the case that the 6.x drivers are all now SMP-safe or do some still live under GIANT? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 23:27:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE94416A46D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB6313C44B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED011A3C19; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DE1512C2; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F125C204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:27:37 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <20070604232737.GA32602@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> <46649B33.6040107@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46649B33.6040107@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:27:38 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:07:31PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: > >>On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: > > >>both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people > >>so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true > >>would be wrong. > > > >My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am > >aware of contradicts your claim: 6.x equals or outperforms 4.x on disk > >I/O (depends on driver) and filesystem I/O. The only true part of it > >is the "under QUOTA" part, which as you know from past discussions, is > >still under Giant in 6.x. As you also know, there is a patch to > >address this which is awaiting user testing. Have you tested it yet? > > > >Kris > > Kris - > > It's been awhile since I tracked -current, so forgive me if this is > a stupid question but ... Is it the case that the 6.x drivers are > all now SMP-safe or do some still live under GIANT? There are still some storage drivers in 6.x that are giant-locked. Note that in most cases this doesn't really matter, since typically there is very little else on the system that uses Giant, so there is little contention with other systems and performance is good. One situation where it would hurt on 6.x is if you have quotas enabled. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 00:07:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C92D16A561 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: from web34503.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34503.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34D5313C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 97765 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Jun 2007 23:40:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=RVkU6DXttxrtusrwcBxhMoSGb4r4T1mvC1glXQ56fb0Cumqa+QYot1YSuAKkHQnqtDJG4pPv7B0wmQFOi2yDB87t1vqw/GJyR/cb2QqsySrgDPULlL885A0ktVfaB/2cwAWIzX1QrjhVOAT14uO9UEjjoYMEnXELwx2hfTkmjyc=; X-YMail-OSG: g_P6jwkVM1kaDL_LZeW3jZYutxUh3BkpjNJeNHAUcQivQxlVeayv1yfRjljM8uWBVcx0AXH20w-- Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web34503.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:40:56 PDT Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:40:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicole Harrington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <661463.95597.qm@web34503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:07:39 -0000 Hello I have several systems that are used as squid caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI disks and some that use SATA disks. They are identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI drives. At random times, the sata based systems seem to be freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but you cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during that time. I figure it mist be something to do with the disks, but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to be little rhyme or reason. It does not happen necessarily during busy times. It can happen in the middle of the night. Any pointers in how to track down the cause would be much appreciated. Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. Thanks! Nicole From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 00:08:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E093416A515 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (echo.calarts.edu [198.182.157.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C630213C4E9 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 88AEF101E425; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:57:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by echo.calarts.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1981018EF3; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:57:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [198.182.157.179] (dhcp7179.calarts.edu [198.182.157.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l55083sW024070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:08:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <4664A962.1050907@calarts.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:08:02 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" , freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org References: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> <44wsyj79ww.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44wsyj79ww.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:08:06 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: Don't top-post, please. Sean Murphy [1] writes: I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong? # gcore 581 gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory # cd /proc # ls -la total 4 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 8 2005 . drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Apr 3 17:03 .. You need to mount a procfs(5). _______________________________________________ [2]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list [3]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [4]"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry about top posting I forgot to switch my prefs. Why is procfs removed by default from FreeBSD? I can track it to being available and turned on in 4.x but removed in later versions. Thanks References 1. mailto:smurphy@calarts.edu 2. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 3. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions 4. mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 00:13:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F364316A469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bufo333@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611EB13C457 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bufo333@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2692462pyi for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:13:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=V8ja25+iabdysDCY59hZ2wUcjXihUSQWxRPy54uZKzh34nrCGZeg9Gf2Vyy7v/CY+2liu6vUkFVx2LOVreDX1WE1AuwlT3jwTPQWq9iYN0L7qYBDR09fUyAI8GEx+TXXaAdGZQgPeM0Eui/5qWiwOQ/UTbGJxDQLIIptpZbP+YU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qXOUg3tS1C0DYIKeS6anlT66B2G3L+7axcR56yoWsEPIMUG7LlZ5sEvpM8/28jR1MrVrtrP2q9ILmzi41VoisnLr5G/tL/h+y0EeFNzKUavSq3HT2UZhaX3XAUkJaGEETBidjWNlsjsVDBNm5GkUXVX0AoY5gpkaQGmy7HfrlaI= Received: by 10.65.113.17 with SMTP id q17mr7967793qbm.1181002394934; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.73.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <248cad280706041713v3d00287ele7f04c3487e1cb53@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:13:14 -0400 From: "John Burns" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: MKodify freebsd 6.2 release iso 1 for automated install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:13:17 -0000 I have modified the freebsd 6.2 release cd1 iso image to allow me to deploy freebsd automatically. The cd works fine, it boots up automatically partitions the disk and start installing my selected distributions. The problem is I want it to install a custom package file after install. I have added the package to the packages/all directory of the cd however, I am unsure how to modify the INDEX file in the packages directory. Any help would be appreciated. None of the packages at the end of the file install. The only package that is on cd1 by default is the perl5.8.8 file which installs fine, but when it gets to the next file it says Please insert disc 0, or package not found. Even though I have already copied all of these packages to the packages/all directory. install.cfg contents # This is the installation configuration file for our rackmounted FreeBSD # cluster machines # Turn on extra debugging. debug=YES # Ok, this ought to turn off ALL prompting, don't complain to me that you # lost a machine because you netbooted it on the same subnet as this # box nonInteractive=YES noWarn=YES tryDHCP=no ################################ # My host specific data hostname=PROTOTYPE domainname=EXILETECHNOLOGIES.NET nameserver=10.0.0.3 defaultrouter=10.0.0.254 ipaddr=10.0.0.250 netmask=255.255.255.0 ################################ ################################ # Which installation device to use mediaSetCDROM ################################ ################################ # Select which distributions we want. dists= base kernels GENERIC bin doc manpages catpages info compat1x compat20 compat21 compat22 compat3x distSetCustom ################################ ################################ # Now set the parameters for the partition editor on sd0. disk=ad0 partition=all bootManager=standard diskPartitionEditor ################################ ################################ # All sizes are expressed in 512 byte blocks! # # A 512MB root partition, followed by a 0.15G swap partition, followed by # a 512G /var, and a /usr using all the remaining space on the disk # ad0s1-1=ufs 1048576 / ad0s1-2=swap 307200 none ad0s1-3=ufs 2516582 /var ad0s1-4=ufs 1048576 /tmp ad0s1-5=ufs 0 /usr # Let's do it! diskLabelEditor #diskLabelCommit # OK, everything is set. Do it! installCommit package=perl-5.8.8 packageAdd package=squid-2.6.3 packageAdd package=squidGuard-1.2.0_1 packageAdd package=imake-6.9.0 packageAdd package=p5-gettext-1.05_1 packageAdd package=help2man-1.36.4_1 packageAdd package=autoconf-2.59_2 packageAdd package=apache-2.2.3 packageAdd package=php5-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-bz2-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-ctype-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-dom-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-iconv-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-mysql-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-pcre-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-zlib-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=pecl-PDO-1.0.3 packageAdd package=php5-posix-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-session-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-simplexml-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=net-snmp-5.2.3_3 packageAdd package=php5-snmp-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-sockets-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-sqlite-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-tokenizer-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-xml-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-xmlreader-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-xmlwriter-5.1.6_3 packageAdd package=php5-extensions-1.0 packageAdd package=phpSysInfo-2.5.1 packageAdd # # this last package is special. It is used to configure the machine. # it installs several files (like /root/.rhosts) and its installation # script tweaks several options in /etc/rc.conf # package=exile-1.0 packageAdd shutdown Any help would be greatly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 00:17:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79F416A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456713C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAB51A4D84; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9385511B4; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B402FC204; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:17:55 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sean Murphy Message-ID: <20070605001755.GA33457@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <4664528E.8080400@calarts.edu> <20070604185302.GB52959@dan.emsphone.com> <46646A31.1070702@calarts.edu> <44wsyj79ww.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4664A962.1050907@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4664A962.1050907@calarts.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Force Memory Dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:17:56 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:08:02PM -0700, Sean Murphy wrote: > > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Don't top-post, please. > > Sean Murphy [1] writes: > > > > I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong? > # gcore 581 > gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory > # cd /proc > # ls -la > total 4 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 8 2005 . > drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Apr 3 17:03 .. > > > You need to mount a procfs(5). > _______________________________________________ > [2]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > [3]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to [4]"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Sorry about top posting I forgot to switch my prefs. Why is procfs > removed by default from FreeBSD? I can track it to being available > and turned on in 4.x but removed in later versions. History of security problems. You are free to mount it on your own systems if you choose - it's trivial to do so. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 00:46:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECE716A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5355013C448 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 26159 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 10:46:52 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 10:46:52 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:46:46 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Reid Linnemann Message-ID: <20070605104646.3321473e@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4664150A.2000709@cs.okstate.edu> References: <20070601131600.16d9cb11@localhost> <05c72d5684132cc1d65b1cfb1846c669@mail.schlossadler.net> <20070604114351.3df9b5b3@localhost> <4664150A.2000709@cs.okstate.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@schlossadler.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2/i386 X/DRI issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:46:52 -0000 On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:35:06 -0500 Reid Linnemann wrote: > Incidentally, you can never do direct rendering over remote X connection > because the client (which is executed on a remote system) does not have > direct access to the memory of the display. yes,i imagined that was the case... cheers _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Imagination is more important than knowledge." Albert Einstein, On Science I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 00:54:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA87C16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8054713C45D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 26682 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 10:54:56 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 10:54:56 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:54:51 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: serenoternullo@virgilio.it Message-ID: <20070605105451.76ef095f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200706050054.32377.serenoternullo@virgilio.it> References: <200706050054.32377.serenoternullo@virgilio.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a new libmap.conf for linux emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:54:56 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0200 Sereno Ternullo wrote: > Hi all, > I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now > I'm having problems with my "linux sub system". why do you think you have to do that for? > > If I have linux.ko loaded into the kernel, ldconfig fails like this: > > [root@FreeBSD /etc]# ldconfig > Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) > > With linux.ko loaded into the kernel, > if I try to start /compat/linux/bin/bash > > bash works fine, but if I try to start skype, this is what I get > > [sereno@FreeBSD /usr/home/sereno]$ skype_bin > skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /lib/libGL.so.1: ELF file OS > ABI invalid I've been using linux compat + skype for a long while (since 6.0-RELEASE) and I have never had to touch libmap.conf clean it up and try again. > > Can anyone tell me the lines I'm missing on my libmap.conf ? Not really - we don't know what lines you do have in your file :) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Either you are incompetent - or you are lying to me." Nigel Grange I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 01:19:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B47D16A46D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anton.galitch@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1DD13C44C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anton.galitch@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so32594uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:19:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PhcjU7l6wQgavhBc7P24OQPoo8yFOSYsQyDKp2B501tTX0Xsy/IzMiAQLRP2x1uYddeCkaffHNjH7hyCa3omnGDs5l9ox5Ao6n3XomWS2wX1f0aB2ng6gV7749pGwvewsy9XxrlJAaD6VIVbLkTCtsfzHxS7NQIJk99mMW3UHW4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=E+wq52Cx1FVSIFIWeIosnLbyarr0tkJJIrI3ZJQxyHKQcFSJZyl3+VcPW5eyOo+Xf68esTtUU7Aebgwke2Z6QWRKaF8NjlyRjQzoSzXaMBpuhK8O9yRHqY6dNF5SGnJh+iwXPA8qUm7iOQSHzlP0PLGaMc3LaUZZFa5IA2X8K50= Received: by 10.82.183.19 with SMTP id g19mr7583948buf.1181006358212; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.3 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7c80322b0706041819k3645c68cwf25fc217492537ac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:18 -0300 From: "Anton Galitch" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7c80322b0706041228i44c8e91eo4aae31b515d665e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_15990_28747912.1181006358141" References: <7c80322b0706041228i44c8e91eo4aae31b515d665e@mail.gmail.com> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: problem compiling xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:19:20 -0000 ------=_Part_15990_28747912.1181006358141 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello. I have a problem when I compile /usr/ports/x11/xorg, when I make install it shows the following error: configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other OpenGL package is installed See `config.log' for more details. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. I have installed libGL and libGLU but it shows the same error. I attach my config.log file and the output of ls /var/db/pkg Thanks for any help ------=_Part_15990_28747912.1181006358141 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=db.pkg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_f2jc5f52 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="db.pkg" R3JhcGhpY3NNYWdpY2stMS4xLjcKSW1hZ2VNYWdpY2stNi4zLjMuNQpPUkJpdC0wLjUuMTdfMwpP UkJpdDItMi4xNC43XzEKT3BlbkVYUi0xLjQuMAphYWxpYi0xLjQucjVfMgpha29kZS0yLjAuMSwx CmFrb2RlLXBsdWdpbnMtbXBjLTIuMC4xLDEKYWtvZGUtcGx1Z2lucy1tcGVnLTIuMC4xLDEKYWtv ZGUtcGx1Z2lucy1vc3MtMi4wLjEsMQpha29kZS1wbHVnaW5zLXJlc2FtcGxlci0yLjAuMSwxCmFr b2RlLXBsdWdpbnMteGlwaC0yLjAuMSwxCmFtc3BzZm50LTEuMF80CmFwYWNoZS0yLjIuNF8yCmFw YWNoZS1hbnQtMS43LjAKYXBwcmVzLTEuMC4xCmFwci1nZGJtLWRiNDItMS4yLjdfMQphcnRzLTEu NS42XzEsMQphcnRzd3JhcHBlci0xLjUuMwphc2NpaWRvYy04LjAuMAphc3BlbGwtMC42MC41XzIK YXRrLTEuMTguMF8xCmF1dG9jb25mLTIuMTMuMDAwMjI3XzUKYXV0b2NvbmYtMi41M18zCmF1dG9j b25mLTIuNTlfMgphdXRvbWFrZS0xLjQuNl8yCmF1dG9tYWtlLTEuNV8zLDEKYXV0b21ha2UtMS45 LjZfMQphdmFoaS0wLjYuMTgKYmFzaC0zLjEuMTcKYmRmdG9wY2YtMS4wLjAKYmVmb3JlbGlnaHQt MS4wLjIKYmlncmVxc3Byb3RvLTEuMC4yCmJpc29uLTEuNzVfMiwxCmJpdG1hcC0xLjAuMwpiaXRz dHJlYW0tdmVyYS0xLjEwXzQKYm9ub2JvLTEuMC4yMl8zCmJvb3N0LXB5dGhvbi0xLjMzLjFfMgpj YWlyby0xLjQuNgpjZHBhcmFub2lhLTMuOS44XzgKY2RydG9vbHMtMi4wMV82CmNtcHNmb250LTEu MF81CmNvbXBhdDV4LWkzODYtNS40LjAuOF84CmNvbXBvc2l0ZXByb3RvLTAuMy4xCmNvcmV1dGls cy02LjcKY3Vwcy1iYXNlLTEuMi4xMApjdXBzLXBzdG9yYXN0ZXItOC4xNS40CmN1cmwtNy4xNi4x CmN2c3BzLWRldmVsLTIuMQpjeXJ1cy1zYXNsLTIuMS4yMgpkYW1hZ2Vwcm90by0xLjEuMF8yCmRi NC00LjAuMTRfMSwxCmRiNDItNC4yLjUyXzUKZGJ1cy0xLjAuMl8xCmRidXMtZ2xpYi0wLjczCmRi dXMtcXQzLTAuNzAKZGVza3RvcC1maWxlLXV0aWxzLTAuMTJfMQpkaWFibG8tamRrLTEuNS4wLjA3 LjAxXzMKZGlybW5nci0wLjkuN18yCmRqYmZmdC0wLjc2XzIKZG1pZGVjb2RlLTIuOApkbXhwcm90 by0yLjIuMgpkb2Nib29rLXNrLTQuMS4yXzQKZG9jYm9vay14bWwtNC4yXzEKZG9jYm9vay14c2wt MS43MS4xXzIKZHJpLTYuNS4zXzEsMgpkdmQrcnctdG9vbHMtNy4wCmVkaXRyZXMtMS4wLjMKZW5j b2RpbmdzLTEuMC4yLDEKZXNvdW5kLTAuMi4zN18yCmV2aWVleHQtMS4wLjIKZXhwYXQtMi4wLjBf MQpmZnR3My0zLjEuMgpmaWxlemlsbGEtMy4wLjAuYjcKZmlyZWZveC0yLjAuMC4zLDEKZml4ZXNw cm90by00LjAKZmxhYy0xLjEuMl8xCmZvbnQtYWRvYmUtMTAwZHBpLTEuMC4wXzEKZm9udC1hZG9i ZS03NWRwaS0xLjAuMApmb250LWFkb2JlLXV0b3BpYS0xMDBkcGktMS4wLjEKZm9udC1hZG9iZS11 dG9waWEtNzVkcGktMS4wLjEKZm9udC1hZG9iZS11dG9waWEtdHlwZTEtMS4wLjEKZm9udC1hcmFi aWMtbWlzYy0xLjAuMApmb250LWJoLTEwMGRwaS0xLjAuMApmb250LWJoLTc1ZHBpLTEuMC4wCmZv bnQtYmgtbHVjaWRhdHlwZXdyaXRlci0xMDBkcGktMS4wLjAKZm9udC1iaC1sdWNpZGF0eXBld3Jp dGVyLTc1ZHBpLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtYmgtdHRmLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtYmgtdHlwZTEtMS4wLjAKZm9u dC1iaXRzdHJlYW0tMTAwZHBpLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtYml0c3RyZWFtLTc1ZHBpLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQt Yml0c3RyZWFtLXR5cGUxLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtY3Jvbnl4LWN5cmlsbGljLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtY3Vy c29yLW1pc2MtMS4wLjAKZm9udC1kYWV3b28tbWlzYy0xLjAuMApmb250LWRlYy1taXNjLTEuMC4w CmZvbnQtaWJtLXR5cGUxLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtaXNhcy1taXNjLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtamlzLW1pc2Mt MS4wLjAKZm9udC1taWNyby1taXNjLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtbWlzYy1jeXJpbGxpYy0xLjAuMApmb250 LW1pc2MtZXRoaW9waWMtMS4wLjAKZm9udC1taXNjLW1lbHRoby0xLjAuMF8xCmZvbnQtbWlzYy1t aXNjLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtbXV0dC1taXNjLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtc2NodW1hY2hlci1taXNjLTEuMC4w CmZvbnQtc2NyZWVuLWN5cmlsbGljLTEuMC4xCmZvbnQtc29ueS1taXNjLTEuMC4wCmZvbnQtc3Vu LW1pc2MtMS4wLjAKZm9udC11dGlsLTEuMC4xCmZvbnQtd2luaXR6a2ktY3lyaWxsaWMtMS4wLjAK Zm9udC14ZnJlZTg2LXR5cGUxLTEuMC4wCmZvbnRjYWNoZXByb3RvLTAuMS4yCmZvbnRjb25maWct Mi40LjJfMiwxCmZvbnRmb3JnZS0yMDA2MDgyMgpmb250c3Byb3RvLTIuMC4yCmZvbnR0b3NmbnQt MS4wLjMKZnBjLTIuMC40XzEKZnBjLWZjbC0yLjAuNF8yCmZwYy1mdi0yLjAuNApmcGMtZ2RiaW50 LTIuMC40CmZwYy1ncmFwaC0yLjAuNApmcGMtaGFzaC0yLjAuNApmcGMtaWJhc2UtMi4wLjRfMQpm cGMtaWRlLTIuMC40CmZwYy1saWJhc3luYy0yLjAuNApmcGMtbXlzcWwtMi4wLjRfMQpmcGMtbmV0 ZGItMi4wLjQKZnBjLW9kYmMtMi4wLjRfMQpmcGMtb3JhY2xlLTIuMC40XzEKZnBjLXBhc2pwZWct Mi4wLjQKZnBjLXBhc3psaWItMi4wLjQKZnBjLXBvc3RncmVzLTIuMC40XzEKZnBjLXB0aHJlYWRz LTIuMC40CmZwYy1yZWdleHByLTIuMC40CmZwYy1zcWxpdGUtMi4wLjRfMQpmcGMtdXRpbHMtMi4w LjQKZnJlZXR5cGUyLTIuMi4xXzIKZnJpYmlkaS0wLjEwLjcKZnNsc2ZvbnRzLTEuMC4xCmZzdG9i ZGYtMS4wLjIKZ2FpbC0xLjE4LjAKZ2FsLTAuMjRfMgpnYW1pbi0wLjEuOF8xCmdjYy1vb28tMy40 LjFfMgpnY2NtYWtlZGVwLTEuMC4yCmdjb25mLTEuMC45XzkKZ2NvbmYyLTIuMTguMC4xCmdkLTIu MC4zNCwxCmdkYm0tMS44LjNfMwpnZGstcGl4YnVmLTAuMjIuMF81CmdldG9wdC0xLjEuNApnZXR0 ZXh0LTAuMTYuMV8zCmdob3N0c2NyaXB0LWdwbC04LjU2XzMKZ2ltcC0yLjIsMgpnaW1wLWFwcC0y LjIuMTQsMQpnaW1wLWd1dGVucHJpbnQtNS4xLjAKZ2l0LTEuNC40LjQKZ2xpYi0xLjIuMTBfMTIK Z2xpYi0yLjEyLjEyXzIKZ2xpYnd3dy0wLjJfNApnbHByb3RvLTEuNC44CmdtYWtlLTMuODFfMgpn bm9tZS1kYi0wLjIuOTZfNgpnbm9tZS1saWJzLTEuNC4yXzYKZ25vbWUtbWltZS1kYXRhLTIuMTgu MApnbm9tZS1wcmludC0wLjM3XzMKZ25vbWUtdmZzLTEuMC41XzgKZ25vbWUtdmZzLTIuMTguMQpn bm9tZV9zdWJyLTEuMApnbm9tZWNhbnZhcy0wLjIyLjBfNQpnbm9tZWhpZXItMi4yXzIKZ251LWF1 dG9jb25mLTIuNjEKZ251LWF1dG9tYWtlLTEuMTAKZ251cGctMi4wLjMKZ251dGxzLTEuNi4yCmdw YWMtbGliZ3BhYy0wLjQuMi5yMiwxCmdwZ21lLTEuMS4zXzMKZ3JhcGh2aXotMi4xMl8xCmdzZm9u dHMtOC4xMV80CmdzdHJlYW1lci0wLjEwLjEyCmdzdHJlYW1lci1mZm1wZWctMC4xMC4yCmdzdHJl YW1lci1wbHVnaW5zLTAuMTAuMTIsMwpnc3RyZWFtZXItcGx1Z2lucy1hNTJkZWMtMC4xMC41XzEs Mwpnc3RyZWFtZXItcGx1Z2lucy1iYWQtMC4xMC40LDMKZ3N0cmVhbWVyLXBsdWdpbnMtY29yZS0w LjEwXzcKZ3N0cmVhbWVyLXBsdWdpbnMtZHRzLTAuMTAuNF8xLDMKZ3N0cmVhbWVyLXBsdWdpbnMt ZHZkLTAuMTAuNSwzCmdzdHJlYW1lci1wbHVnaW5zLWdvb2QtMC4xMC41LDMKZ3N0cmVhbWVyLXBs dWdpbnMtbGlicG5nLTAuMTAuNV8xLDMKZ3N0cmVhbWVyLXBsdWdpbnMtbWFkLTAuMTAuNV8yLDMK Z3N0cmVhbWVyLXBsdWdpbnMtb2dnLTAuMTAuMTJfMSwzCmdzdHJlYW1lci1wbHVnaW5zLXBhbmdv LTAuMTAuMTJfMSwzCmdzdHJlYW1lci1wbHVnaW5zLXRoZW9yYS0wLjEwLjEyXzIsMwpnc3RyZWFt ZXItcGx1Z2lucy11Z2x5LTAuMTAuNV8yLDMKZ3N0cmVhbWVyLXBsdWdpbnMtdm9yYmlzLTAuMTAu MTJfMSwzCmdzdHJlYW1lci1wbHVnaW5zLXh2aWQtMC4xMC40LDMKZ3Rhci0xLjE2LjEKZ3RrLTEu Mi4xMF8xNwpndGstMi4xMC4xMgpndGstZW5naW5lczItMi4xMC4xCmd0a2h0bWwtMS4xLjEwXzYK Z3VpbGUtMS42LjhfMwpndXRlbnByaW50LTUuMV8xCmd1dGVucHJpbnQtYmFzZS01LjEuMF8xCmd1 dGVucHJpbnQtY3Vwcy01LjEuMF8xCmd1dGVucHJpbnQtaWpzLTUuMS4wCmhhbC0wLjUuOC4yMDA3 MDQwM18xCmhlbHAybWFuLTEuMzYuNF8xCmhpY29sb3ItaWNvbi10aGVtZS0wLjEwXzIKaWNlYXV0 aC0xLjAuMQppY28tMS4wLjEKaWxiYy1yMzk1MQppbWFrZS0xLjAuMl80LDEKaW1saWItMS45LjE1 XzQKaW1saWIyLTIwMDcwMjIzLDEKaW5wdXRwcm90by0xLjMuMgppbnRsdG9vbC0wLjM1LjVfMgpp c28tY29kZXMtMC41OF8yCmphY2tpdC0wLjEwMy4wCmphc3Blci0xLjkwMC4xCmphdmF2bXdyYXBw ZXItMi4zCmpiaWdraXQtMS42CmpwZWctNmJfNAprYXJhbWJhLTAuMTdfNQprYnByb3RvLTEuMC4z CmtkZS0zLjUuNgprZGUteGRnLWVudi0xLjBfMiwxCmtkZWFjY2Vzc2liaWxpdHktMy41LjYKa2Rl YWRtaW4tMy41LjYKa2RlYXJ0d29yay0zLjUuNl8xCmtkZWJhc2UtMy41LjZfMgprZGViYXNlLWtv bXBtZ3ItMy41LjYKa2RlZWR1LTMuNS42CmtkZWdhbWVzLTMuNS42CmtkZWdyYXBoaWNzLTMuNS42 CmtkZWdyYXBoaWNzLWthbWVyYS0zLjUuNgprZGVncmFwaGljcy1rdWlja3Nob3ctMy41LjYKa2Rl aGllci0xLjBfMTEKa2RlbGlicy0zLjUuNl8yCmtkZW11bHRpbWVkaWEtMy41LjYKa2RlbXVsdGlt ZWRpYS1tcGVnbGliX2FydHNwbHVnLTMuNS42CmtkZW5ldHdvcmstMy41LjYKa2RlcGltLTMuNS42 XzMKa2Rlc2RrLTMuNS42CmtkZXRveXMtMy41LjYKa2RldXRpbHMtMy41LjYKa2RldmVsb3AtMy40 LjBfMgprZGV3ZWJkZXYtMy41LjYsMgprbWVzcy0xLjUucC4xCmttcGxheWVyLTAuOS4zXzEsMgpr b2ZmaWNlLTEuNi4yLDIKbGFtZS0zLjk3XzEKbGNtcy0xLjE2XzEsMQpsaWJGUy0xLjAuMApsaWJH TC02LjUuM18yCmxpYkdMVS02LjUuMwpsaWJJQ0UtMS4wLjMsMQpsaWJJREwtMC44LjgKbGliU00t MS4wLjIsMQpsaWJYMTEtMS4xLjFfMiwxCmxpYlhTY3JuU2F2ZXItMS4xLjIKbGliWFRyYXAtMS4w LjAKbGliWGF1LTEuMC4zXzIKbGliWGF3LTEuMC4yLDEKbGliWGNvbXBvc2l0ZS0wLjMuMSwxCmxp YlhjdXJzb3ItMS4xLjhfMQpsaWJYZGFtYWdlLTEuMS4xCmxpYlhkbWNwLTEuMC4yCmxpYlhldmll LTEuMC4yCmxpYlhleHQtMS4wLjMsMQpsaWJYZml4ZXMtNC4wLjMKbGliWGZvbnQtMS4yLjgsMQps aWJYZm9udGNhY2hlLTEuMC40CmxpYlhmdC0yLjEuMTIKbGliWGktMS4wLjIsMQpsaWJYaW5lcmFt YS0xLjAuMSwxCmxpYlhtdS0xLjAuMywxCmxpYlhwLTEuMC4wLDEKbGliWHBtLTMuNS42CmxpYlhw cmludEFwcFV0aWwtMS4wLjEKbGliWHByaW50VXRpbC0xLjAuMQpsaWJYcmFuZHItMS4yLjEKbGli WHJlbmRlci0wLjkuMgpsaWJYcmVzLTEuMC4zCmxpYlh0LTEuMC41CmxpYlh0c3QtMS4wLjEKbGli WHYtMS4wLjMsMQpsaWJYdk1DLTEuMC40CmxpYlh4Zjg2ZGdhLTEuMC4xCmxpYlh4Zjg2bWlzYy0x LjAuMQpsaWJYeGY4NnZtLTEuMC4xCmxpYmE1Mi0wLjcuNF8xCmxpYmFydF9sZ3BsLTIuMy4xOSwx CmxpYmFzc3Vhbi0xLjAuMQpsaWJhdWRpb2ZpbGUtMC4yLjYKbGliYm9ub2JvLTIuMTguMApsaWJj YXBwbGV0LTEuNC4wLjVfNwpsaWJjZGRiLTEuMy4wCmxpYmNkaW8tMC43N18yCmxpYmNyb2NvLTAu Ni4xCmxpYmRhZW1vbi0wLjEwXzEKbGliZGNhLTAuMC41CmxpYmRteC0xLjAuMgpsaWJkcm0tMi4z LjAKbGliZHZicHNpLTAuMS41XzEKbGliZHZkY3NzLTEuMi45XzIKbGliZHZkbmF2LTAuMS4xMF8y CmxpYmR2ZHJlYWQtMC45LjdfMgpsaWJleGlmLTAuNi4xMwpsaWJmYW1lLTAuOS4xXzIKbGliZm9u dGVuYy0xLjAuNApsaWJmcHgtMS4yLjAuMTIKbGliZ2NyeXB0LTEuMi40XzEKbGliZ2RhLTAuMi45 Nl82CmxpYmdodHRwLTEuMC45XzEKbGliZ2xhZGUtMC4xN181CmxpYmdsYWRlMi0yLjYuMF8yCmxp YmdsdXQtNi40LjIKbGliZ21wLTQuMi4xXzIKbGliZ25vbWVjYW52YXMtMi4xNC4wXzIKbGliZ3Bn LWVycm9yLTEuNF8xCmxpYmdwaG90bzItMi4zLjEKbGliZ3NmLTEuMTQuMwpsaWJndGtodG1sLTIu MTEuMF8yCmxpYmljb252LTEuOS4yXzIKbGliaWQzdGFnLTAuMTUuMWIKbGliaWRuLTAuNi4xMAps aWJpanMtMC4zNV8xCmxpYmtzYmEtMS4wLjFfMQpsaWJsdGRsLTEuNS4yMl8yCmxpYm1hZC0wLjE1 LjFiXzIKbGlibWFsLTAuNDJfMQpsaWJtY3J5cHQtMi41LjgKbGlibWlrbW9kLWVzb3VuZC0zLjEu MTFfMgpsaWJtbmctMS4wLjkKbGlibW9kcGx1Zy0wLjguNApsaWJtcGVnMi0wLjQuMQpsaWJtc3Bh Y2stMC4wLjIwMDQwMzA4XzMKbGlib2dnLTEuMS4zLDMKbGlib2lsLTAuMy4xMQpsaWJvbGRYLTEu MC4xCmxpYnBhcGVyLTEuMS4yMV8zCmxpYnJzdmcyLTIuMTYuMQpsaWJzYW1wbGVyYXRlLTAuMS4y XzIKbGlic25kZmlsZS0xLjAuMTcKbGlidGhhaS0wLjEuNV8xCmxpYnRoZW9yYS0xLjAuYTcKbGli dG9vbC0xLjUuMjJfNApsaWJ1bmdpZi00LjEuNF8yCmxpYnVuaWNvZGUtMC40XzYKbGlidW5pbmFt ZXNsaXN0LTIwMDUwNzEyCmxpYnVzYi0wLjEuMTJfMQpsaWJ2b2x1bWVfaWQtMC43NS4wCmxpYnZv cmJpcy0xLjEuMiwzCmxpYndtZi0wLjIuOC40CmxpYndwZC0wLjguOQpsaWJ3d3ctNS40LjBfNAps aWJ4aW5lLTEuMS40XzQKbGlieGtiZmlsZS0xLjAuNApsaWJ4a2J1aS0xLjAuMgpsaWJ4bWwtMS44 LjE3XzQKbGlieG1sMi0yLjYuMjcKbGlieHNsdC0xLjEuMjAKbGluYy0xLjAuM182CmxpbmtzLTIu MS5wMjEsMQpsaW51eC1hdGstMS45LjEKbGludXgtZXhwYXQtMS45NS44CmxpbnV4LWZpcmVmb3gt Mi4wLjAuMwpsaW51eC1mbGFzaHBsdWdpbi05LjByMzFfMQpsaW51eC1mb250Y29uZmlnLTIuMi4z XzYKbGludXgtZ2xpYjItMi42LjYKbGludXgtZ3RrMi0yLjYuMTAKbGludXgtaGljb2xvci1pY29u LXRoZW1lLTAuNV8xCmxpbnV4LWpwZWctNmIuMzQKbGludXgtb3BlbnNzbC0wLjkuN2YKbGludXgt cGFuZ28tMS44LjEKbGludXgtcG5nLTEuMi44XzIKbGludXgtdGlmZi0zLjcuMQpsaW51eF9iYXNl LWZjLTRfOQpsaW51eHBsdWdpbndyYXBwZXItMjAwNTExMTNfNwpsaXN0cmVzLTEuMC4xCmxvY2Fs ZWRhdGEtNS40Cmx1aXQtMS4wLjJfMQptNC0xLjQuOQptRE5TUmVzcG9uZGVyLTEwOAptYWtlZGVw ZW5kLTEuMC4wLDEKbWtjb21wb3NlY2FjaGUtMS4yXzEKbWtmb250ZGlyLTEuMC4yCm1rZm9udHNj YWxlLTEuMC4zCm1wZWcyY29kZWMtMS4yXzEKbXBsYXllci0wLjk5LjEwXzcKbXBsYXllci1za2lu cy0xLjEuMl82Cm10b29scy0zLjkuMTAKbXlzcWwtY2xpZW50LTUuMS4xNwpteXNxbC1zZXJ2ZXIt NS4xLjE3Cm5hbm8tMi4wLjYKbmFzLTEuOApuYXNtLTAuOTguMzksMQpuZW9uLTAuMjYuMwpuZXQt c25tcC01LjMuMV8zCm5zcHItNC42LjYKbnNzLTMuMTEuNQpudmlkaWEtZHJpdmVyLTEuMC45NzQ2 Cm52aWRpYS1zZXR0aW5ncy0xLjBfMTAKbnZpZGlhLXhjb25maWctMS4wXzEKb2FmLTAuNi4xMF80 Cm9jbG9jay0xLjAuMQpvcGVubGRhcC1jbGllbnQtMi4zLjM1Cm9wZW5vZmZpY2Uub3JnLTIuMC40 Cm9wZW5zbHAtMS4yLjFfMgpvcnRwLTAuMTMuMApwNS1BcmNoaXZlLVppcC0xLjE4CnA1LUNvbXBy ZXNzLVJhdy1abGliLTIuMDA0CnA1LUNvbXByZXNzLVpsaWItMi4wMDQKcDUtRXJyb3ItMC4xNy4w MDgKcDUtRmlsZS1UZW1wLTAuMTgKcDUtRmlsZS1XaGljaC0wLjA1CnA1LUlPLUNvbXByZXNzLUJh c2UtMi4wMDQKcDUtSU8tQ29tcHJlc3MtWmxpYi0yLjAwNApwNS1QYXRoVG9vbHMtMy4yNApwNS1T Y2FsYXItTGlzdC1VdGlscy0xLjE5LDEKcDUtWE1MLVBhcnNlci0yLjM0XzIKcDUtZ2V0dGV4dC0x LjA1XzEKcDUtdHlwZTFpbnN0LTAuNi4xXzIKcGFuZ28tMS4xNi40CnBhdGNoLTIuNS40CnBjaWlk cy0yMDA3MDQyNQpwY3JlLTcuMQpwZGZsaWItNy4wLjBwMwpwZWNsLXBkZmxpYi0yLjEuMwpwZXJs LTUuOC44CnBocDUtNS4yLjFfMwpwaHA1LWJ6Mi01LjIuMV8zCnBocDUtY3R5cGUtNS4yLjFfMwpw aHA1LWdkLTUuMi4xXzMKcGhwNS1tYnN0cmluZy01LjIuMV8zCnBocDUtbWNyeXB0LTUuMi4xXzMK cGhwNS1teXNxbC01LjIuMV8zCnBocDUtb3BlbnNzbC01LjIuMV8zCnBocDUtcGNyZS01LjIuMV81 CnBocDUtc2Vzc2lvbi01LjIuMV8zCnBocDUtemxpYi01LjIuMV8zCnBocE15QWRtaW4tMi4xMC4x CnBpbG90LWxpbmstMC4xMi4xXzEsMQpwa2ctY29uZmlnLTAuMjEKcGtnZGIuZGIKcG5nLTEuMi4x OApwb2xpY3lraXQtMC4xLjIwMDYwNTE0XzMKcG9wcGxlci0wLjUuNF8yCnBvcHBsZXItZGF0YS0w LjEKcG9wcGxlci1xdC0wLjUuNApwb3B0LTEuN180CnBvcnRhdWRpby0xOC4xXzIKcG9ydG1hbmFn ZXItMC40LjFfOQpwb3J0dXBncmFkZS0yLjEuMy4zXzEsMgpwb3N0Z3Jlc3FsLWNsaWVudC03LjQu MTcKcG9zdGdyZXNxbC1saWJwcXh4LTIuNi45CnByaW50cHJvdG8tMS4wLjMKcHRoLTIuMC43CnB5 MjQtcXQtMy4xNy4yLDEKcHkyNC1zaXAtNC42LDEKcHkyNC14bWwtMC44LjQKcHl0aG9uMjQtMi40 LjQKcWNhLXRscy0xLjBfMQpxbWFrZS0zLjMuOF8xCnFzY2ludGlsbGEtMS43LjEKcXQtMy4zLjhf MgpyYW5kcnByb3RvLTEuMi4xCnJhci0zLjcwYjFfMiwxCnJlY29yZHByb3RvLTEuMTMuMgpyZW5k ZXJwcm90by0wLjkuMgpyZXNvdXJjZXByb3RvLTEuMC4yCnJnYi0xLjAuMQpycG0tMy4wLjZfMTMK cnBtMmNwaW8tMS4yXzIKcnN0YXJ0LTEuMC4yCnJ1YnktMS44LjYsMQpydWJ5MTgtYmRiLTAuNi4w CnNhbWJhLWxpYnNtYmNsaWVudC0zLjAuMjQKc2NyaXB0cy0xLjAuMQpzY3Juc2F2ZXJwcm90by0x LjEuMApzY3JvbGxrZWVwZXItMC4zLjE0XzcsMQpzZGwtMS4yLjExLDIKc2RvY2Jvb2steG1sLTEu MSwxCnNlc3NyZWctMS4wLjIKc2V0eGtibWFwLTEuMC4zCnNoYXJlZC1taW1lLWluZm8tMC4yMV8z CnNob3dmb250LTEuMC4xCnNtcHJveHktMS4wLjIKc291cC0wLjcuMTFfMgpzcGVleC0xLjIuYjFf MSwxCnN1YnZlcnNpb24tMS40LjNfMgpzdWRvLTEuNi44LjEyXzIKc3ZnYWxpYi0xLjQuM181CnQx bGliLTUuMS4xLDEKdGFnbGliLTEuNF8yCnRjbC04LjQuMTRfNCwxCnRlVGVYLWJhc2UtMy4wXzEw CnRlVGVYLXRleG1mLTMuMF81CnRleC10ZXhtZmxvY2FsLTEuOQp0ZXhpMmh0bWwtMS43Nl8xLDEK dGlkeS0yMDAwMDgwNF8yCnRpZmYtMy44LjJfMQp0ay04LjQuMTRfNSwyCnRyYXBwcm90by0zLjQu Mwp0d20tMS4wLjNfMwp1bml4T0RCQy0yLjIuMTJfMQp1bnJhci0zLjcwLmI3LDQKdW56aXAtNS41 Ml8zCnY0bF9jb21wYXQtMS4wLjIwMDYwODAxCnZjZGltYWdlci0wLjcuMjNfMwp2aWRlb3Byb3Rv LTIuMi4yCnZpZXdyZXMtMS4wLjEKd2luMzItY29kZWNzLTMuMS4wLnIxLDEKd2luZS0wLjkuMzYs MQp3djItMC4yLjMKd3hndGsyLTIuOC4wCnd4Z3RrMi1jb21tb24tMi44LjAKeDExcGVyZi0xLjQu MQp4YXV0aC0xLjAuMgp4YmlmZi0xLjAuMQp4Yml0bWFwcy0xLjAuMQp4Y2FsYy0xLjAuMQp4Y2xp cGJvYXJkLTEuMC4xCnhjbG9jay0xLjAuMgp4Y21pc2Nwcm90by0xLjEuMgp4Y21zZGItMS4wLjEK eGNvbnNvbGUtMS4wLjIKeGN1cnNvci10aGVtZXMtMS4wLjFfMQp4Y3Vyc29yZ2VuLTEuMC4xCnhk YmVkaXp6eS0xLjAuMgp4ZGl0dmlldy0xLjAuMQp4ZG0tMS4xLjRfMQp4ZHB5aW5mby0xLjAuMQp4 ZWRpdC0xLjAuMgp4ZXYtMS4wLjIKeGV4dHByb3RvLTcuMC4yCnhleWVzLTEuMC4xCnhmODZiaWdm b250cHJvdG8tMS4xLjIKeGY4NmRnYS0xLjAuMgp4Zjg2ZGdhcHJvdG8tMi4wLjIKeGY4NmRyaXBy b3RvLTIuMC4zCnhmODZtaXNjcHJvdG8tMC45LjIKeGY4NnZpZG1vZGVwcm90by0yLjIuMgp4ZmQt MS4wLjEKeGZvbnRzZWwtMS4wLjIKeGZzLTEuMC40XzMsMQp4ZnNpbmZvLTEuMC4xCnhnYW1tYS0x LjAuMQp4Z2MtMS4wLjEKeGhvc3QtMS4wLjEKeGluZXJhbWFwcm90by0xLjEuMgp4aW5pdC0xLjAu Mwp4a2Jjb21wLTEuMC4zCnhrYmV2ZC0xLjAuMgp4a2JwcmludC0xLjAuMQp4a2J1dGlscy0xLjAu MQp4a2V5Ym9hcmQtY29uZmlnLTAuOV8yCnhraWxsLTEuMC4xCnhsb2FkLTEuMC4xCnhsb2dvLTEu MC4xCnhsc2F0b21zLTEuMC4xCnhsc2NsaWVudHMtMS4wLjEKeGxzZm9udHMtMS4wLjIKeG1hZy0x LjAuMQp4bWFuLTEuMC4yCnhtZXNzYWdlLTEuMC4xCnhtaC0xLjAuMQp4bWxjYXRtZ3ItMi4yCnht bHRvLTAuMC4xOF8xCnhtbXMtMS4yLjEwXzcKeG1vZG1hcC0xLjAuMgp4bW9yZS0xLjAuMQp4b3Jn LWNmLWZpbGVzLTEuMC4yXzIKeG9yZy1kb2NzLTEuMywxCnhvcmctZm9udHMtMTAwZHBpLTcuMgp4 b3JnLWZvbnRzLTc1ZHBpLTcuMgp4b3JnLWZvbnRzLWN5cmlsbGljLTcuMgp4b3JnLWZvbnRzLW1p c2NiaXRtYXBzLTcuMgp4b3JnLWZvbnRzLXRydWV0eXBlLTcuMgp4b3JnLWZvbnRzLXR5cGUxLTcu Mgp4b3JnLWxpYnJhcmllcy02LjkuMF8xCnhvcmctbGlicmFyaWVzLTcuMl8xCnhvcmctbmVzdHNl cnZlci0xLjIuMCwxCnhvcmctcHJpbnRzZXJ2ZXItMS4yLjAsMQp4b3JnLXNlcnZlci0xLjIuMF8y LDEKeG9yZy12ZmJzZXJ2ZXItMS4yLjAsMQp4cGhlbGxvd29ybGQtMS4wLjEKeHBsc3ByaW50ZXJz LTEuMC4xCnhwci0xLjAuMgp4cHJlaGFzaHByaW50ZXJsaXN0LTEuMC4xCnhwcm9wLTEuMC4yCnhw cm90by03LjAuMTAKeHJhbmRyLTEuMi4wCnhyZGItMS4wLjMKeHJlZnJlc2gtMS4wLjIKeHNldC0x LjAuMgp4c2V0bW9kZS0xLjAuMAp4c2V0cG9pbnRlci0xLjAuMAp4c20tMS4wLjEKeHN0ZGNtYXAt MS4wLjEKeHRlcm0tMjI1Cnh0cmFucy0xLjAuMwp4dHJhcC0xLjAuMgp4dmlkLTEuMS4yLDEKeHZp ZHR1bmUtMS4wLjEKeHZpbmZvLTEuMC4xCnh3ZC0xLjAuMQp4d2luaW5mby0xLjAuMgp4d3VkLTEu MC4xCnppcC0yLjMyCg== ------=_Part_15990_28747912.1181006358141 Content-Type: text/plain; name=config.log; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_f2jc5fna Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="config.log" VGhpcyBmaWxlIGNvbnRhaW5zIGFueSBtZXNzYWdlcyBwcm9kdWNlZCBieSBjb21waWxlcnMgd2hp bGUKcnVubmluZyBjb25maWd1cmUsIHRvIGFpZCBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgaWYgY29uZmlndXJlIG1ha2Vz IGEgbWlzdGFrZS4KCkl0IHdhcyBjcmVhdGVkIGJ5IHhkcmlpbmZvIGNvbmZpZ3VyZSAxLjAuMSwg d2hpY2ggd2FzCmdlbmVyYXRlZCBieSBHTlUgQXV0b2NvbmYgMi41OS4gIEludm9jYXRpb24gY29t bWFuZCBsaW5lIHdhcwoKICAkIC4vY29uZmlndXJlIC0tbWFuZGlyPS91c3IvbG9jYWwvbWFuLyAt LXByZWZpeD0vdXNyL2xvY2FsIGkzODYtcG9ydGJsZC1mcmVlYnNkNi4yCgojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0g IyMKIyMgUGxhdGZvcm0uICMjCiMjIC0tLS0tLS0tLSAjIwoKaG9zdG5hbWUgPSBmZXVkYWx0aW1l cwp1bmFtZSAtbSA9IGkzODYKdW5hbWUgLXIgPSA2LjItU1RBQkxFCnVuYW1lIC1zID0gRnJlZUJT RAp1bmFtZSAtdiA9IEZyZWVCU0QgNi4yLVNUQUJMRSAjMDogU3VuIE1heSAyNyAyMjo0MDo1MCBB UlQgMjAwNyAgICAgcm9vdEBmZXVkYWx0aW1lczovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9NWUtFUk5F TCAKCi91c3IvYmluL3VuYW1lIC1wID0gaTM4NgovYmluL3VuYW1lIC1YICAgICA9IHVua25vd24K Ci9iaW4vYXJjaCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgPSB1bmtub3duCi91c3IvYmluL2FyY2ggLWsgICAgICAg PSB1bmtub3duCi91c3IvY29udmV4L2dldHN5c2luZm8gPSB1bmtub3duCmhvc3RpbmZvICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgPSB1bmtub3duCi9iaW4vbWFjaGluZSAgICAgICAgICAgPSB1bmtub3duCi91c3Iv YmluL29zbGV2ZWwgICAgICAgPSB1bmtub3duCi9iaW4vdW5pdmVyc2UgICAgICAgICAgPSB1bmtu b3duCgpQQVRIOiAvc2JpbgpQQVRIOiAvYmluClBBVEg6IC91c3Ivc2JpbgpQQVRIOiAvdXNyL2Jp bgpQQVRIOiAvdXNyL2dhbWVzClBBVEg6IC91c3IvbG9jYWwvc2JpbgpQQVRIOiAvdXNyL2xvY2Fs L2JpbgpQQVRIOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2L2JpbgpQQVRIOiAvcm9vdC9iaW4KCgojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0t LSAjIwojIyBDb3JlIHRlc3RzLiAjIwojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAjIwoKY29uZmlndXJlOjEzMzg6 IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBhIEJTRC1jb21wYXRpYmxlIGluc3RhbGwKY29uZmlndXJlOjEzOTM6IHJl c3VsdDogL3Vzci9iaW4vaW5zdGFsbCAtYyAtbyByb290IC1nIHdoZWVsCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToxNDA0 OiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIGJ1aWxkIGVudmlyb25tZW50IGlzIHNhbmUKY29uZmlndXJlOjE0 NDc6IHJlc3VsdDogeWVzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToxNTEyOiBjaGVja2luZyBmb3IgZ2F3awpjb25maWd1 cmU6MTU0MTogcmVzdWx0OiBubwpjb25maWd1cmU6MTUxMjogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIG1hd2sKY29u ZmlndXJlOjE1NDE6IHJlc3VsdDogbm8KY29uZmlndXJlOjE1MTI6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBuYXdr CmNvbmZpZ3VyZToxNTI4OiBmb3VuZCAvdXNyL2Jpbi9uYXdrCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToxNTM4OiByZXN1 bHQ6IG5hd2sKY29uZmlndXJlOjE1NDg6IGNoZWNraW5nIHdoZXRoZXIgbWFrZSBzZXRzICQoTUFL RSkKY29uZmlndXJlOjE1Njg6IHJlc3VsdDogeWVzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToxNzM2OiBjaGVja2luZyB3 aGV0aGVyIHRvIGVuYWJsZSBtYWludGFpbmVyLXNwZWNpZmljIHBvcnRpb25zIG9mIE1ha2VmaWxl cwpjb25maWd1cmU6MTc0NTogcmVzdWx0OiBubwpjb25maWd1cmU6MTc3MjogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9y IGkzODYtcG9ydGJsZC1mcmVlYnNkNi4yLWdjYwpjb25maWd1cmU6MTc5ODogcmVzdWx0OiBjYwpj b25maWd1cmU6MjA4MDogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIEMgY29tcGlsZXIgdmVyc2lvbgpjb25maWd1cmU6 MjA4MzogY2MgLS12ZXJzaW9uIDwvZGV2L251bGwgPiY1CmNjIChHQ0MpIDMuNC42IFtGcmVlQlNE XSAyMDA2MDMwNQpDb3B5cmlnaHQgKEMpIDIwMDYgRnJlZSBTb2Z0d2FyZSBGb3VuZGF0aW9uLCBJ bmMuClRoaXMgaXMgZnJlZSBzb2Z0d2FyZTsgc2VlIHRoZSBzb3VyY2UgZm9yIGNvcHlpbmcgY29u ZGl0aW9ucy4gIFRoZXJlIGlzIE5PCndhcnJhbnR5OyBub3QgZXZlbiBmb3IgTUVSQ0hBTlRBQklM SVRZIG9yIEZJVE5FU1MgRk9SIEEgUEFSVElDVUxBUiBQVVJQT1NFLgoKY29uZmlndXJlOjIwODY6 ICQ/ID0gMApjb25maWd1cmU6MjA4ODogY2MgLXYgPC9kZXYvbnVsbCA+JjUKVXNpbmcgYnVpbHQt aW4gc3BlY3MuCkNvbmZpZ3VyZWQgd2l0aDogRnJlZUJTRC9pMzg2IHN5c3RlbSBjb21waWxlcgpU aHJlYWQgbW9kZWw6IHBvc2l4CmdjYyB2ZXJzaW9uIDMuNC42IFtGcmVlQlNEXSAyMDA2MDMwNQpj b25maWd1cmU6MjA5MTogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMDkzOiBjYyAtViA8L2Rldi9udWxsID4m NQpjYzogYC1WJyBvcHRpb24gbXVzdCBoYXZlIGFyZ3VtZW50CmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMDk2OiAkPyA9 IDEKY29uZmlndXJlOjIxMTk6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBDIGNvbXBpbGVyIGRlZmF1bHQgb3V0cHV0 IGZpbGUgbmFtZQpjb25maWd1cmU6MjEyMjogY2MgLU8yIC1mbm8tc3RyaWN0LWFsaWFzaW5nIC1w aXBlICAgIGNvbmZ0ZXN0LmMgID4mNQpjb25maWd1cmU6MjEyNTogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToy MTcxOiByZXN1bHQ6IGEub3V0CmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMTc2OiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIHRoZSBD IGNvbXBpbGVyIHdvcmtzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMTgyOiAuL2Eub3V0CmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMTg1OiAk PyA9IDAKY29uZmlndXJlOjIyMDI6IHJlc3VsdDogeWVzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMjA5OiBjaGVja2lu ZyB3aGV0aGVyIHdlIGFyZSBjcm9zcyBjb21waWxpbmcKY29uZmlndXJlOjIyMTE6IHJlc3VsdDog bm8KY29uZmlndXJlOjIyMTQ6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBzdWZmaXggb2YgZXhlY3V0YWJsZXMKY29u ZmlndXJlOjIyMTY6IGNjIC1vIGNvbmZ0ZXN0IC1PMiAtZm5vLXN0cmljdC1hbGlhc2luZyAtcGlw ZSAgICBjb25mdGVzdC5jICA+JjUKY29uZmlndXJlOjIyMTk6ICQ/ID0gMApjb25maWd1cmU6MjI0 NDogcmVzdWx0OiAKY29uZmlndXJlOjIyNTA6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBzdWZmaXggb2Ygb2JqZWN0 IGZpbGVzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMjcxOiBjYyAtYyAtTzIgLWZuby1zdHJpY3QtYWxpYXNpbmcgLXBp cGUgICBjb25mdGVzdC5jID4mNQpjb25maWd1cmU6MjI3NDogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMjk2 OiByZXN1bHQ6IG8KY29uZmlndXJlOjIzMDA6IGNoZWNraW5nIHdoZXRoZXIgd2UgYXJlIHVzaW5n IHRoZSBHTlUgQyBjb21waWxlcgpjb25maWd1cmU6MjMyNDogY2MgLWMgLU8yIC1mbm8tc3RyaWN0 LWFsaWFzaW5nIC1waXBlICAgY29uZnRlc3QuYyA+JjUKY29uZmlndXJlOjIzMzA6ICQ/ID0gMApj b25maWd1cmU6MjMzNDogdGVzdCAteiAKCQkJIHx8IHRlc3QgISAtcyBjb25mdGVzdC5lcnIKY29u ZmlndXJlOjIzMzc6ICQ/ID0gMApjb25maWd1cmU6MjM0MDogdGVzdCAtcyBjb25mdGVzdC5vCmNv bmZpZ3VyZToyMzQzOiAkPyA9IDAKY29uZmlndXJlOjIzNTY6IHJlc3VsdDogeWVzCmNvbmZpZ3Vy ZToyMzYyOiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIGNjIGFjY2VwdHMgLWcKY29uZmlndXJlOjIzODM6IGNj IC1jIC1nICBjb25mdGVzdC5jID4mNQpjb25maWd1cmU6MjM4OTogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToy MzkzOiB0ZXN0IC16IAoJCQkgfHwgdGVzdCAhIC1zIGNvbmZ0ZXN0LmVycgpjb25maWd1cmU6MjM5 NjogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMzk5OiB0ZXN0IC1zIGNvbmZ0ZXN0Lm8KY29uZmlndXJlOjI0 MDI6ICQ/ID0gMApjb25maWd1cmU6MjQxMzogcmVzdWx0OiB5ZXMKY29uZmlndXJlOjI0MzA6IGNo ZWNraW5nIGZvciBjYyBvcHRpb24gdG8gYWNjZXB0IEFOU0kgQwpjb25maWd1cmU6MjUwMDogY2Mg IC1jIC1PMiAtZm5vLXN0cmljdC1hbGlhc2luZyAtcGlwZSAgIGNvbmZ0ZXN0LmMgPiY1CmNvbmZp Z3VyZToyNTA2OiAkPyA9IDAKY29uZmlndXJlOjI1MTA6IHRlc3QgLXogCgkJCSB8fCB0ZXN0ICEg LXMgY29uZnRlc3QuZXJyCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyNTEzOiAkPyA9IDAKY29uZmlndXJlOjI1MTY6IHRl c3QgLXMgY29uZnRlc3Qubwpjb25maWd1cmU6MjUxOTogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyNTM3OiBy ZXN1bHQ6IG5vbmUgbmVlZGVkCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyNTU1OiBjYyAtYyAtTzIgLWZuby1zdHJpY3Qt YWxpYXNpbmcgLXBpcGUgICBjb25mdGVzdC5jID4mNQpjb25mdGVzdC5jOjI6IGVycm9yOiBzeW50 YXggZXJyb3IgYmVmb3JlICJtZSIKY29uZmlndXJlOjI1NjE6ICQ/ID0gMQpjb25maWd1cmU6IGZh aWxlZCBwcm9ncmFtIHdhczoKfCAjaWZuZGVmIF9fY3BsdXNwbHVzCnwgICBjaG9rZSBtZQp8ICNl bmRpZgpjb25maWd1cmU6MjcwNTogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIHN0eWxlIG9mIGluY2x1ZGUgdXNlZCBi eSBtYWtlCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyNzMzOiByZXN1bHQ6IEdOVQpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjc2MTogY2hlY2tp bmcgZGVwZW5kZW5jeSBzdHlsZSBvZiBjYwpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjg1MTogcmVzdWx0OiBnY2MzCmNv bmZpZ3VyZToyODgxOiBjaGVja2luZyBmb3IgYSBCU0QtY29tcGF0aWJsZSBpbnN0YWxsCmNvbmZp Z3VyZToyOTM2OiByZXN1bHQ6IC91c3IvYmluL2luc3RhbGwgLWMgLW8gcm9vdCAtZyB3aGVlbApj b25maWd1cmU6Mjk0OTogY2hlY2tpbmcgcmV0dXJuIHR5cGUgb2Ygc2lnbmFsIGhhbmRsZXJzCmNv bmZpZ3VyZToyOTgwOiBjYyAtYyAtTzIgLWZuby1zdHJpY3QtYWxpYXNpbmcgLXBpcGUgICBjb25m dGVzdC5jID4mNQpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjk4NjogJD8gPSAwCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyOTkwOiB0ZXN0IC16 IAoJCQkgfHwgdGVzdCAhIC1zIGNvbmZ0ZXN0LmVycgpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjk5MzogJD8gPSAwCmNv bmZpZ3VyZToyOTk2OiB0ZXN0IC1zIGNvbmZ0ZXN0Lm8KY29uZmlndXJlOjI5OTk6ICQ/ID0gMApj b25maWd1cmU6MzAxMDogcmVzdWx0OiB2b2lkCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMDI2OiBjaGVja2luZyBmb3Ig aTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q2LjItcGtnLWNvbmZpZwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzA1OTogcmVzdWx0 OiBubwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzA2ODogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIHBrZy1jb25maWcKY29uZmlndXJlOjMw ODY6IGZvdW5kIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvYmluL3BrZy1jb25maWcKY29uZmlndXJlOjMwOTg6IHJlc3Vs dDogL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9iaW4vcGtnLWNvbmZpZwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzExMzogY2hlY2tpbmcgcGtn LWNvbmZpZyBpcyBhdCBsZWFzdCB2ZXJzaW9uIDAuOS4wCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMTE2OiByZXN1bHQ6 IHllcwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzEyNzogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIFhEUklJTkZPCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMTM1 OiAkUEtHX0NPTkZJRyAtLWV4aXN0cyAtLXByaW50LWVycm9ycyAieDExIGdscHJvdG8iCmNvbmZp Z3VyZTozMTM4OiAkPyA9IDAKY29uZmlndXJlOjMxNTM6ICRQS0dfQ09ORklHIC0tZXhpc3RzIC0t cHJpbnQtZXJyb3JzICJ4MTEgZ2xwcm90byIKY29uZmlndXJlOjMxNTY6ICQ/ID0gMApjb25maWd1 cmU6MzIzMjogcmVzdWx0OiB5ZXMKY29uZmlndXJlOjMyNDA6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBsaWJyYXJ5 IGNvbnRhaW5pbmcgZ2xYR2V0UHJvY0FkZHJlc3NBUkIKY29uZmlndXJlOjMyNzA6IGNjIC1vIGNv bmZ0ZXN0IC1PMiAtZm5vLXN0cmljdC1hbGlhc2luZyAtcGlwZSAgICBjb25mdGVzdC5jICA+JjUK L3Zhci90bXAvL2NjTmZuUm9CLm8oLnRleHQrMHhkKTogSW4gZnVuY3Rpb24gYG1haW4nOgo6IHVu ZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYGdsWEdldFByb2NBZGRyZXNzQVJCJwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzI3 NjogJD8gPSAxCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTogZmFpbGVkIHByb2dyYW0gd2FzOgp8IC8qIGNvbmZkZWZzLmgu ICAqLwp8IAp8ICNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FHRV9OQU1FICJ4ZHJpaW5mbyIKfCAjZGVmaW5lIFBBQ0tB R0VfVEFSTkFNRSAieGRyaWluZm8iCnwgI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX1ZFUlNJT04gIjEuMC4xIgp8 ICNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FHRV9TVFJJTkcgInhkcmlpbmZvIDEuMC4xIgp8ICNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FH RV9CVUdSRVBPUlQgImh0dHBzOi8vYnVncy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvZW50ZXJfYnVnLmNnaT9w cm9kdWN0PXhvcmciCnwgI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFICJ4ZHJpaW5mbyIKfCAjZGVmaW5lIFZFUlNJ T04gIjEuMC4xIgp8ICNkZWZpbmUgUkVUU0lHVFlQRSB2b2lkCnwgLyogZW5kIGNvbmZkZWZzLmgu ICAqLwp8IAp8IC8qIE92ZXJyaWRlIGFueSBnY2MyIGludGVybmFsIHByb3RvdHlwZSB0byBhdm9p ZCBhbiBlcnJvci4gICovCnwgI2lmZGVmIF9fY3BsdXNwbHVzCnwgZXh0ZXJuICJDIgp8ICNlbmRp Zgp8IC8qIFdlIHVzZSBjaGFyIGJlY2F1c2UgaW50IG1pZ2h0IG1hdGNoIHRoZSByZXR1cm4gdHlw ZSBvZiBhIGdjYzIKfCAgICBidWlsdGluIGFuZCB0aGVuIGl0cyBhcmd1bWVudCBwcm90b3R5cGUg d291bGQgc3RpbGwgYXBwbHkuICAqLwp8IGNoYXIgZ2xYR2V0UHJvY0FkZHJlc3NBUkIgKCk7Cnwg aW50CnwgbWFpbiAoKQp8IHsKfCBnbFhHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzc0FSQiAoKTsKfCAgIDsKfCAgIHJl dHVybiAwOwp8IH0KY29uZmlndXJlOjMzMjU6IGNjIC1vIGNvbmZ0ZXN0IC1PMiAtZm5vLXN0cmlj dC1hbGlhc2luZyAtcGlwZSAgICBjb25mdGVzdC5jIC1sR0wgLUwvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYiAtbFgx MSAgICA+JjUKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGliR0wuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8g YFhEYW1hZ2VBZGQnCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMzMxOiAkPyA9IDEKY29uZmlndXJlOiBmYWlsZWQgcHJv Z3JhbSB3YXM6CnwgLyogY29uZmRlZnMuaC4gICovCnwgCnwgI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX05BTUUg InhkcmlpbmZvIgp8ICNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FHRV9UQVJOQU1FICJ4ZHJpaW5mbyIKfCAjZGVmaW5l IFBBQ0tBR0VfVkVSU0lPTiAiMS4wLjEiCnwgI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX1NUUklORyAieGRyaWlu Zm8gMS4wLjEiCnwgI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX0JVR1JFUE9SVCAiaHR0cHM6Ly9idWdzLmZyZWVk ZXNrdG9wLm9yZy9lbnRlcl9idWcuY2dpP3Byb2R1Y3Q9eG9yZyIKfCAjZGVmaW5lIFBBQ0tBR0Ug InhkcmlpbmZvIgp8ICNkZWZpbmUgVkVSU0lPTiAiMS4wLjEiCnwgI2RlZmluZSBSRVRTSUdUWVBF IHZvaWQKfCAvKiBlbmQgY29uZmRlZnMuaC4gICovCnwgCnwgLyogT3ZlcnJpZGUgYW55IGdjYzIg aW50ZXJuYWwgcHJvdG90eXBlIHRvIGF2b2lkIGFuIGVycm9yLiAgKi8KfCAjaWZkZWYgX19jcGx1 c3BsdXMKfCBleHRlcm4gIkMiCnwgI2VuZGlmCnwgLyogV2UgdXNlIGNoYXIgYmVjYXVzZSBpbnQg bWlnaHQgbWF0Y2ggdGhlIHJldHVybiB0eXBlIG9mIGEgZ2NjMgp8ICAgIGJ1aWx0aW4gYW5kIHRo ZW4gaXRzIGFyZ3VtZW50IHByb3RvdHlwZSB3b3VsZCBzdGlsbCBhcHBseS4gICovCnwgY2hhciBn bFhHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzc0FSQiAoKTsKfCBpbnQKfCBtYWluICgpCnwgewp8IGdsWEdldFByb2NB ZGRyZXNzQVJCICgpOwp8ICAgOwp8ICAgcmV0dXJuIDA7CnwgfQpjb25maWd1cmU6MzM1OTogcmVz dWx0OiBubwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzM2NTogZXJyb3I6IGNhbm5vdCBmaW5kIEdMIGxpYnJhcnkgLSBt YWtlIHN1cmUgTWVzYSBvciBvdGhlciBPcGVuR0wgcGFja2FnZSBpcyBpbnN0YWxsZWQKU2VlIGBj b25maWcubG9nJyBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzLgoKIyMgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAjIwojIyBD YWNoZSB2YXJpYWJsZXMuICMjCiMjIC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMKCmFjX2N2X2NfY29tcGls ZXJfZ251PXllcwphY19jdl9lbnZfQ0Nfc2V0PXNldAphY19jdl9lbnZfQ0NfdmFsdWU9Y2MKYWNf Y3ZfZW52X0NGTEFHU19zZXQ9c2V0CmFjX2N2X2Vudl9DRkxBR1NfdmFsdWU9Jy1PMiAtZm5vLXN0 cmljdC1hbGlhc2luZyAtcGlwZSAnCmFjX2N2X2Vudl9DUFBGTEFHU19zZXQ9JycKYWNfY3ZfZW52 X0NQUEZMQUdTX3ZhbHVlPScnCmFjX2N2X2Vudl9MREZMQUdTX3NldD0nJwphY19jdl9lbnZfTERG TEFHU192YWx1ZT0nJwphY19jdl9lbnZfUEtHX0NPTkZJR19zZXQ9JycKYWNfY3ZfZW52X1BLR19D T05GSUdfdmFsdWU9JycKYWNfY3ZfZW52X1hEUklJTkZPX0NGTEFHU19zZXQ9JycKYWNfY3ZfZW52 X1hEUklJTkZPX0NGTEFHU192YWx1ZT0nJwphY19jdl9lbnZfWERSSUlORk9fTElCU19zZXQ9JycK YWNfY3ZfZW52X1hEUklJTkZPX0xJQlNfdmFsdWU9JycKYWNfY3ZfZW52X2J1aWxkX2FsaWFzX3Nl dD1zZXQKYWNfY3ZfZW52X2J1aWxkX2FsaWFzX3ZhbHVlPWkzODYtcG9ydGJsZC1mcmVlYnNkNi4y CmFjX2N2X2Vudl9ob3N0X2FsaWFzX3NldD1zZXQKYWNfY3ZfZW52X2hvc3RfYWxpYXNfdmFsdWU9 aTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q2LjIKYWNfY3ZfZW52X3RhcmdldF9hbGlhc19zZXQ9c2V0CmFj X2N2X2Vudl90YXJnZXRfYWxpYXNfdmFsdWU9aTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q2LjIKYWNfY3Zf ZXhlZXh0PScnCmFjX2N2X29iamV4dD1vCmFjX2N2X3BhdGhfYWNfcHRfUEtHX0NPTkZJRz0vdXNy L2xvY2FsL2Jpbi9wa2ctY29uZmlnCmFjX2N2X3Byb2dfQVdLPW5hd2sKYWNfY3ZfcHJvZ19DQz1j YwphY19jdl9wcm9nX2NjX2c9eWVzCmFjX2N2X3Byb2dfY2Nfc3RkYz0nJwphY19jdl9wcm9nX21h a2VfbWFrZV9zZXQ9eWVzCmFjX2N2X3NlYXJjaF9nbFhHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzc0FSQj1ubwphY19j dl90eXBlX3NpZ25hbD12b2lkCmFtX2N2X0NDX2RlcGVuZGVuY2llc19jb21waWxlcl90eXBlPWdj YzMKbHRfY3Zfc3lzX21heF9jbWRfbGVuPTI2MjE0NApwa2dfY3ZfWERSSUlORk9fQ0ZMQUdTPSct RF9USFJFQURfU0FGRSAtSS91c3IvbG9jYWwvaW5jbHVkZSAgJwpwa2dfY3ZfWERSSUlORk9fTElC Uz0nLUwvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYiAtbFgxMSAgJwoKIyMgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMKIyMg T3V0cHV0IHZhcmlhYmxlcy4gIyMKIyMgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMKCkFDTE9DQUw9JyR7 U0hFTEx9IC91c3IvcG9ydHMveDExL3hkcmlpbmZvL3dvcmsveGRyaWluZm8tMS4wLjEvbWlzc2lu ZyAtLXJ1biBhY2xvY2FsLTEuOScKQURNSU5fTUFOX0RJUj0nJwpBRE1JTl9NQU5fU1VGRklYPScn CkFNREVQQkFDS1NMQVNIPSdcJwpBTURFUF9GQUxTRT0nIycKQU1ERVBfVFJVRT0nJwpBTVRBUj0n JHtTSEVMTH0gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy94MTEveGRyaWluZm8vd29yay94ZHJpaW5mby0xLjAuMS9taXNz aW5nIC0tcnVuIHRhcicKQVBQX01BTl9ESVI9JycKQVBQX01BTl9TVUZGSVg9JycKQVVUT0NPTkY9 JyR7U0hFTEx9IC91c3IvcG9ydHMveDExL3hkcmlpbmZvL3dvcmsveGRyaWluZm8tMS4wLjEvbWlz c2luZyAtLXJ1biBhdXRvY29uZicKQVVUT0hFQURFUj0nJHtTSEVMTH0gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy94MTEv eGRyaWluZm8vd29yay94ZHJpaW5mby0xLjAuMS9taXNzaW5nIC0tcnVuIGF1dG9oZWFkZXInCkFV VE9NQUtFPScke1NIRUxMfSAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3gxMS94ZHJpaW5mby93b3JrL3hkcmlpbmZvLTEu MC4xL21pc3NpbmcgLS1ydW4gYXV0b21ha2UtMS45JwpBV0s9J25hd2snCkNDPSdjYycKQ0NERVBN T0RFPSdkZXBtb2RlPWdjYzMnCkNGTEFHUz0nLU8yIC1mbm8tc3RyaWN0LWFsaWFzaW5nIC1waXBl ICcKQ1BQRkxBR1M9JycKQ1lHUEFUSF9XPSdlY2hvJwpERUZTPScnCkRFUERJUj0nLmRlcHMnCkRS SVZFUl9NQU5fRElSPScnCkRSSVZFUl9NQU5fU1VGRklYPScnCkVDSE9fQz0nJwpFQ0hPX049Jy1u JwpFQ0hPX1Q9JycKRVhFRVhUPScnCkZJTEVfTUFOX0RJUj0nJwpGSUxFX01BTl9TVUZGSVg9JycK SU5TVEFMTF9EQVRBPSdpbnN0YWxsICAtbyByb290IC1nIHdoZWVsIC1tIDQ0NCcKSU5TVEFMTF9Q Uk9HUkFNPSdpbnN0YWxsICAtcyAtbyByb290IC1nIHdoZWVsIC1tIDU1NScKSU5TVEFMTF9TQ1JJ UFQ9J2luc3RhbGwgIC1vIHJvb3QgLWcgd2hlZWwgLW0gNTU1JwpJTlNUQUxMX1NUUklQX1BST0dS QU09JyR7U0hFTEx9ICQoaW5zdGFsbF9zaCkgLWMgLXMnCkxERkxBR1M9JycKTElCT0JKUz0nJwpM SUJTPScnCkxJQl9NQU5fRElSPScnCkxJQl9NQU5fU1VGRklYPScnCkxUTElCT0JKUz0nJwpNQUlO VD0nIycKTUFJTlRBSU5FUl9NT0RFX0ZBTFNFPScnCk1BSU5UQUlORVJfTU9ERV9UUlVFPScjJwpN QUtFSU5GTz0nJHtTSEVMTH0gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy94MTEveGRyaWluZm8vd29yay94ZHJpaW5mby0x LjAuMS9taXNzaW5nIC0tcnVuIG1ha2VpbmZvJwpNSVNDX01BTl9ESVI9JycKTUlTQ19NQU5fU1VG RklYPScnCk9CSkVYVD0nbycKUEFDS0FHRT0neGRyaWluZm8nClBBQ0tBR0VfQlVHUkVQT1JUPSdo dHRwczovL2J1Z3MuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL2VudGVyX2J1Zy5jZ2k/cHJvZHVjdD14b3JnJwpQ QUNLQUdFX05BTUU9J3hkcmlpbmZvJwpQQUNLQUdFX1NUUklORz0neGRyaWluZm8gMS4wLjEnClBB Q0tBR0VfVEFSTkFNRT0neGRyaWluZm8nClBBQ0tBR0VfVkVSU0lPTj0nMS4wLjEnClBBVEhfU0VQ QVJBVE9SPSc6JwpQS0dfQ09ORklHPScvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2Jpbi9wa2ctY29uZmlnJwpTRVRfTUFL RT0nJwpTSEVMTD0nL2Jpbi9zaCcKU1RSSVA9JycKVkVSU0lPTj0nMS4wLjEnClhEUklJTkZPX0NG TEFHUz0nLURfVEhSRUFEX1NBRkUgLUkvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2luY2x1ZGUgICcKWERSSUlORk9fTElC Uz0nLUwvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYiAtbFgxMSAgJwphY19jdF9DQz0nJwphY19jdF9TVFJJUD0nJwph Y19wdF9QS0dfQ09ORklHPScvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2Jpbi9wa2ctY29uZmlnJwphbV9fZmFzdGRlcEND X0ZBTFNFPScjJwphbV9fZmFzdGRlcENDX1RSVUU9JycKYW1fX2luY2x1ZGU9J2luY2x1ZGUnCmFt X19sZWFkaW5nX2RvdD0nLicKYW1fX3F1b3RlPScnCmFtX190YXI9JyR7QU1UQVJ9IGNob2YgLSAi JCR0YXJkaXIiJwphbV9fdW50YXI9JyR7QU1UQVJ9IHhmIC0nCmJpbmRpcj0nJHtleGVjX3ByZWZp eH0vYmluJwpidWlsZD0naTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q2LjInCmJ1aWxkX2FsaWFzPSdpMzg2 LXBvcnRibGQtZnJlZWJzZDYuMicKYnVpbGRfY3B1PScnCmJ1aWxkX29zPScnCmJ1aWxkX3ZlbmRv cj0nJwpkYXRhZGlyPScke3ByZWZpeH0vc2hhcmUnCmV4ZWNfcHJlZml4PSdOT05FJwpob3N0PSdp Mzg2LXBvcnRibGQtZnJlZWJzZDYuMicKaG9zdF9hbGlhcz0naTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q2 LjInCmhvc3RfY3B1PScnCmhvc3Rfb3M9JycKaG9zdF92ZW5kb3I9JycKaW5jbHVkZWRpcj0nJHtw cmVmaXh9L2luY2x1ZGUnCmluZm9kaXI9JyR7cHJlZml4fS9pbmZvJwppbnN0YWxsX3NoPScvdXNy L3BvcnRzL3gxMS94ZHJpaW5mby93b3JrL3hkcmlpbmZvLTEuMC4xL2luc3RhbGwtc2gnCmxpYmRp cj0nJHtleGVjX3ByZWZpeH0vbGliJwpsaWJleGVjZGlyPScke2V4ZWNfcHJlZml4fS9saWJleGVj Jwpsb2NhbHN0YXRlZGlyPScke3ByZWZpeH0vdmFyJwptYW5kaXI9Jy91c3IvbG9jYWwvbWFuLycK bWtkaXJfcD0nJChpbnN0YWxsX3NoKSAtZCcKb2xkaW5jbHVkZWRpcj0nL3Vzci9pbmNsdWRlJwpw cmVmaXg9Jy91c3IvbG9jYWwnCnByb2dyYW1fdHJhbnNmb3JtX25hbWU9J3MseCx4LCcKc2JpbmRp cj0nJHtleGVjX3ByZWZpeH0vc2JpbicKc2hhcmVkc3RhdGVkaXI9JyR7cHJlZml4fS9jb20nCnN5 c2NvbmZkaXI9JyR7cHJlZml4fS9ldGMnCnRhcmdldF9hbGlhcz0naTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVi c2Q2LjInCgojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAjIwojIyBjb25mZGVmcy5oLiAjIwojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0t LSAjIwoKI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFICJ4ZHJpaW5mbyIKI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX0JVR1JFUE9S VCAiaHR0cHM6Ly9idWdzLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZy9lbnRlcl9idWcuY2dpP3Byb2R1Y3Q9eG9y ZyIKI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX05BTUUgInhkcmlpbmZvIgojZGVmaW5lIFBBQ0tBR0VfU1RSSU5H ICJ4ZHJpaW5mbyAxLjAuMSIKI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX1RBUk5BTUUgInhkcmlpbmZvIgojZGVm aW5lIFBBQ0tBR0VfVkVSU0lPTiAiMS4wLjEiCiNkZWZpbmUgUkVUU0lHVFlQRSB2b2lkCiNkZWZp bmUgVkVSU0lPTiAiMS4wLjEiCgpjb25maWd1cmU6IGV4aXQgMQo= ------=_Part_15990_28747912.1181006358141-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 01:19:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2CA16A469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC3E13C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 28979 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 11:19:37 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 11:19:37 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:19:32 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20070605111932.475078f9@localhost> In-Reply-To: <59830.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1180988866.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> References: <59830.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1180988866.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to bootstrap a world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:19:37 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:27:46 +0200 (CEST) Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > Hello, >=20 > how can I bootstrap a world? If I compile libc I get the message >=20 > ld: cannot find -lgcc >=20 > and if I compile libgcc I get >=20 > ld: cannot find -lc >=20 > This looks like a chicken-egg-problem. I try to build a world for a > different architecture. >=20 Google for "freebsd cross-compiling architecture" _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork." Mae West I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet= . Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have b= een Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:08:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004EA16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C185713C43E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5528bH8066878 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:08:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:08:36 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <6293ba970706041239ufdd41f0m45964e8d4930249c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6293ba970706041239ufdd41f0m45964e8d4930249c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706042108.36889.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Wake-on-LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:08:40 -0000 On Monday 04 June 2007 14:39:31 Steve wrote: > I need some help getting WOL working. > > I have two boxes with Freebsd 6.2 and WOL doesn't work on either one. > Both have capable Intel NICs (pro/100 and pro/1000) and capable PC > BIOS (with WOL and PME enabled). When the boxes are shutdown I don't > have any link lights, which I believe is an indication of a problem. > I'm wondering if this is an ACPI issue where the PCI bus has no power > after shutdown, or perhaps an em driver issue? Any ideas on this? > Thanks. > > S. > _______________________________________________ you definatly have to correct the link-light issue when the system is off, otherwise i dont think youll ever get it working. are there any ACPI standby modes in the power section (thats where mine are) in the bios? S3 seems to be the best option. in freebsd, my into pro100s work without any other intervention (aside from setting S3 in the bios, IBM machines), but i have one IBM with a dual port pro1000, and its not waking properly right now (but i havent troubleshot that one any, as its my server and never turns off anyway). cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:12:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AD816A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB10713C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730CF5193D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:12:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:12:24 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:12:29 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT) gmoniey wrote: > > Hi, > > so i tried the script you mentioned, and it doesnt seem as if it is > being called on startup. Here is my script (rails.sh): >... > While looking through the other files in the rc.d directory, I > noticed that 000.apache2libs.sh has the similar structure as the file > you suggested, so I attempted to put my commands in there, but it > seems as if they are not being called either (i.e. after reboot, when > i do a ps aux, i dont see the commands i expect to be started)... what happens if you just type "./rails.sh start manually? If it works, but not during start-up, it may needs some other service to start first. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:20:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB0316A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15E113C44C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 1832 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 12:20:35 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 12:20:35 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:20:30 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Anton Galitch" Message-ID: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> In-Reply-To: <7c80322b0706041819k3645c68cwf25fc217492537ac@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c80322b0706041228i44c8e91eo4aae31b515d665e@mail.gmail.com> <7c80322b0706041819k3645c68cwf25fc217492537ac@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem compiling xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:20:36 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:18 -0300 "Anton Galitch" wrote: > Hello. > > I have a problem when I compile /usr/ports/x11/xorg, when I make install it > shows the following error: > > > configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other > OpenGL package is installed > See `config.log' for more details. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > I have installed libGL and libGLU but it shows the same error. > > I attach my config.log file and the output of ls /var/db/pkg > > Thanks for any help Hi Anton, are you upgrading xorg or installing xorg for the first time in this machine? you have to follow the steps in /usr/ports/UPDATING, even if not upgrading. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are wrong. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:25:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A8616A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5753413C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id MAA21697; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:25:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:25:05 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: snowcrash+freebsd In-Reply-To: <20070604223030.594E116A49A@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:25:18 -0000 On 4 Jun 2007 14:03:20 -0700 snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > on boot, pf is, apparently, not starting. > > but, if i exec > > /etc/rc.d/pf start > > immediately after boot to prompt is done, then all's OK. > > the only related (?) messages -- error or otherwise -- i've found are > on startup. I really don't know whether this might be related to your problem, but my proofreading eye was distracted by this in your rc.conf: > # PPP > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_nat="NO" > ppp_profile="ppp`" What rc would make of that backtick inside quotes, I know not .. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:26:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363E216A469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252013C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l552LtZs071264; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:21:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l552LsNH071263; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:21:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:21:54 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: RW Message-ID: <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:26:31 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:12:24AM +0100, RW wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT) > gmoniey wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > so i tried the script you mentioned, and it doesnt seem as if it is > > being called on startup. Here is my script (rails.sh): > >... > > While looking through the other files in the rc.d directory, I > > noticed that 000.apache2libs.sh has the similar structure as the file > > you suggested, so I attempted to put my commands in there, but it > > seems as if they are not being called either (i.e. after reboot, when > > i do a ps aux, i dont see the commands i expect to be started)... > > what happens if you just type "./rails.sh start > manually? > > If it works, but not during start-up, it may needs some other > service to start first. Good idea. I usually do that to test my own scripts, so am surprised I didn't think of it when posting. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:40:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9424216A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E56213C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECE551927 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:40:06 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070605034006.030f188f@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:40:10 -0000 On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:17:38 +0200 Volker wrote: > without seeing your pf.conf ruleset, I guess you're using a ppp > connection to your upstream provider and firewalling on the tunX > interface (using tun0 as $ext_if). > > As FreeBSD boots up, this interface does not yet exist when pf is > loaded. As soon as ppp is loaded and interface tun0 has been created, > pf will happily load your ruleset. > > The solution is to either have pf rules loaded late (later than ppp is > started) or use anchors and load ext rules into the anchor when the > ppp interface is up. The easier is to have the rules loading late > (check using rcorder) but this may also fail if something goes wrong > with ppp. The ppp rc.d script resyncs pf and ipfilter, to pick-up new interfaces, so that shouldn't be needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:42:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1307C16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CEA13C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so896441wra for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:42:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oOgyZqc9/hyMwRsHhmMGXaiuYFR3WXwxRmvTXA+Xg/MmeUJI5NpYr32KDID+yc6JB+4TIB2r4QSleHovvBRuUOwgk65SkpOIBGZsoaDaY3Q5jqJbUJ/cgQo5YndlGmiIPl7O9WMzp3OiUIsBUdtViDt+jvu11c7McFDotL2+B1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tFDI6+Ulfs69n1I6rxKqQBkUt4sTSdyMCGA/j7ruqOaOfhEZVITC+5AJ5mhWTvFPTCKLXlya4riYJQG3BRJpzjQrS48O00lFn2JxH8xaTBXhcyMU5fL2FijJxCmwnuedkbvBk1xE2W0jF/u79tcITu6EwRkWXSgAl3Ql8nDAlck= Received: by 10.90.72.10 with SMTP id u10mr4414450aga.1181011323867; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.120.10 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4d7dd86f0706041942o4397a46en4d2f1cb9e01ef27a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:42:03 +1000 From: "David N" To: "FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070604113945.GA15154@schottelius.org> Subject: Re: isc-dhcp3-server in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:42:05 -0000 On 05/06/07, Paul Fraser wrote: > On 6/4/07, Nico -telmich- Schottelius > wrote: > > What's the IP-number in your jail and what's it outside? > > > > I am not sure, whether broadcasts are delivered to the jails or not. > > > > Nico > > Hi Nico, > > The IP assigned to the host system is 192.168.72.250, with an alias > for 192.168.72.251. The jail is configured with the IP 192.168.72.251. > > -- > Regards, > > Paul Fraser > http://furyc0de.net/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > To get isc-dhcpd in a jail you need to give the jail access to /dev/bpf0 so you have to edit /etc/defaults/devfs.rules add to the end the unhide rules for bpf eg. [devfsrules_unhide_bpf=5] add path bpf0 unhide [devfsrules_dhcp_jail=6] add include $devfsrules_hide_all add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic add include $devfsrules_unhide_login add include $devfsrules_unhide_bpf then in your /etc/rc.conf add jail__defs_ruleset="devfsrules_dhcp_jail" and restart the jail. modify the configuration accordingly though =) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:45:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D612B16A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B6613C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l552jG3L020528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:45:17 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l552jGX1007106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:45:16 -0700 Message-ID: <4664CE3C.4010108@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:45:16 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tundra@tundraware.com References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.4.192932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_SUBJ_9 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Chris , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:45:19 -0000 Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Chris wrote: >> On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: >>> Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>> > Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP >>> > 50-60 min >>> > New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP >>> > 40-50 min >>> > Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP >>> > 8 min >>> > >>> > Is the difference in speed >>> > attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? >>> >>> Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being >>> faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and >>> between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 >>> to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes >>> 2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a >>> result of "working harder" to find optimizations). >>> >>> FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except >>> compiling itself. :-) >>> >>> Colin Percival >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> What about all the following observations? >> >> slower network performance in 6.x especially worse under DDOS >> conditions. >> slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. >> >> both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people >> so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true >> would be wrong. My observation of 6.x is that whilst it can exceed >> 4.11 performance this is only because of more more powerful hardware >> and in particular on SMP systems where 4.11 isnt optimised but for UP >> and most older hardware the worst performance of post 4.11 is >> highlighted greatly. >> >> In thoery shouldnt eg. a 6.2 system using a 3ghz core 2 duo be >> multiple times faster then a pentium 3 500 running freebsd 4.11 due to >> the more powerful hardware? >> >> Chris > > It will be of academic interest to me to see how people respond to this. > Unfortunately - as documented in my original post - the 4.11 CD will > not even boot on this new motherboard for some reason. Given that, and > that 4.x is no longer actively developed, I am forced to move to 6.x for > my next server ... Most likely because of the evolution of the FreeBSD kernel and increased hardware support over time. A lot of CDs won't boot on my C2D system, but that's because the HW is too new to run with older CDs, similar to issues seen with other OSes like Linux and Windoze. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 02:46:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5429916A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D2213C48A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l552kvD6021867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:46:57 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l552kuvG007190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:46:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4664CEA2.4060109@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:58 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ghirai References: <1042282770.20070605000055@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <1042282770.20070605000055@ghirai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.4.192932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Vlad GURDIGA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Registering installation for... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:46:58 -0000 Ghirai wrote: > Hello Vlad, > > Monday, June 4, 2007, 11:09:39 PM, you wrote: > > >> Hello, >> > > >> "Registering installation for mplayer-0.99.10_9" took about 8 minutes >> (at 97% CPU-core load) of CPU time on one of the two cores on my >> Pentium D 820 on a system with 1 GiB of RAM and Barracuda SATA drive. >> It looks "a little" too long to me... >> > > As far as i know mplayer comes with quite a handful of > plugins/libs/decoders/etc, which might explain why > libtool took so long. This has been addressed and discussed to a large extent on the hackers@ and ports lists because of the Xorg 7.2 upgrade move, and some solutions have been brought forth with successful results or mixed results. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:13:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F31316A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: from web34509.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34509.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51A7B13C468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 51834 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 02:46:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ZcTjYC/UCxCGWJaX908uI5sfg7NkmBWczI5dCbS0p/0Rn5iqaVF76JFOp+CYFWdVVuXbVrbYKebybCmsL7VbiWfFQhGTRz9u2vhPQ/b7jHOuTvTSE2Erq+kcNguEnfEyrmcX4C0xdQNb2j1lH15NZYnOftglYrlyGBxMpTvhaoA=; X-YMail-OSG: I1pPqWkVM1lCqNnKqrCiCAw6wqGozDSSzfAI0PnnSbd9QtvvUOXYhDvtgF3jnocs4w-- Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web34509.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:30 PDT Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:46:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "N. Harrington" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <854718.51541.qm@web34509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:13:13 -0000 Hello I have several systems that are used as squid caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI disks and some that use SATA disks. They are identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI drives. At random times, the sata based systems seem to be freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but you cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during that time. I figure it mist be something to do with the disks, but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to be little rhyme or reason. It does not happen necessarily during busy times. It can happen in the middle of the night. Any pointers in how to track down the cause would be much appreciated. Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives FreeBSD amd64 6.2-STABLE. Thanks! Nicole From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:34:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D85616A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA0713C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l553YI1S029186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:34:19 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l553YImT016058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:34:18 -0700 Message-ID: <4664D9BB.6040707@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:34:19 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "N. Harrington" References: <854718.51541.qm@web34509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <854718.51541.qm@web34509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.4.201438 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:34:19 -0000 N. Harrington wrote: > Hello > I have several systems that are used as squid > caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI > disks and some that use SATA disks. They are > identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI > drives. > > At random times, the sata based systems seem to be > freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but you > cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during that > time. > > I figure it mist be something to do with the disks, > but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to be > little rhyme or reason. It does not happen necessarily > during busy times. It can happen in the middle of the > night. > > Any pointers in how to track down the cause would be > much appreciated. > > Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem > Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives > FreeBSD amd64 6.2-STABLE. > > Thanks! > > Nicole > Nicole, What's the driver in use for the SATA and the SCSI drives? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:37:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F087516A474 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8C413C457 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2753028pyi for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:37:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UQi4Sm3obmIdu17p2G1Xg3ChgLXyEgeS/oKsHbqFSKuZ6obiVh0u3F4twVUbsR1jO7YJAsN06kk0KfwW2lgGe54GcQaoiRI/7QlTjlSX4IakOjVBUTHqb8Iuy1WtcIw+HflWX9eqMlMxlsCi61WDI83NqAAmf/uJygdH7pMrv5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TXrth26pejJl2vEKgeADw7SKM2tEA0ZmOjK8JOUAi2UISxxj+8FKq+rKO6m3NDIIjX9H9ER4jiZmoiVl/WXRHHaRbh1tpwdv/WZ44FvNcwg5ZWnXBHzCddut4fTHBN2M7zy0cq1Lma4+P8XghSxevSglSgmcuaT+LzFcy3kIXOg= Received: by 10.65.95.12 with SMTP id x12mr8105716qbl.1181014621469; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.76.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37f72b1f0706042037y6b84ff5drfe74ede445ab22f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:37:01 -0400 From: "Jim Capozzoli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706042036n43340d1cid0e121af137ae410@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <37f72b1f0706021126g3347c683u37a87d3145e6e571@mail.gmail.com> <37f72b1f0706040829l338c4c7fr5229e8807705daed@mail.gmail.com> <37f72b1f0706040830g3f3414cet30ea686e0a325c9@mail.gmail.com> <200706041424.37437.lists@jnielsen.net> <37f72b1f0706042036n43340d1cid0e121af137ae410@mail.gmail.com> Subject: re: X11 & console setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:37:03 -0000 On 6/4/07, John Nielsen wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 11:30:03 am Jim Capozzoli wrote: > > On 6/4/07, John Nielsen wrote: > > > On Saturday 02 June 2007 04:00:57 pm Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > > > Jim Capozzoli wrote: > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > I have 3 monitors and 3 video cards. However, one videocard and > > > > > monitor isn't very "X11 friendly." (X11 barely starts on it). I was > > > > > wondering if it would be possible to have X11 running on two of the > > > > > monitors, and then have a full screen console (like a ttyv0) on the > > > > > third monitor (so I could constantly leave top or something sweet > > > > > running on there :D). This is all with FreeBSD 6.2/i386 and Xorg 6.9 > > > > > or 7.2. Any suggestions? Thanks. > > > > > > > > It should do "do-able", perhaps somewhat easily. > > > > /usr/ports/x11-servers/x2x is what comes to mind --- IIRC, Greg > > > > "groggy" Lehey of "The Complete FreeBSD" fame uses this for several > > > > displays, and has notes on his setup in her personal pages at > > > > www.lemis.com. > > > > > > That link is here: http://www.lemis.com/grog/hardware.html > > > > > > However, I'm not sure x2x is relevant to the OP--It can be used to allow > > > one mouse and keyboard to be used on multiple X servers, but doesn't have > > > anything to do with console mode. > > > > > > I don't know if the setup the OP wants is possible or not, but here are > > > some notes: > > > > > > The FreeBSD console always runs on the "primary" display as determined by > > > the BIOS. Most systems give you a choice between using AGP or PCI as the > > > primary display. If you have multiple PCI cards it is usually the first > > > one on the bus (physically this is often the one closest to the CPU). Not > > > sure how ISA figures in. You will want to make your "bad" videocard and > > > monitor the primary display. > > > > > > Once you have that, I'd just run an "Xorg -configure" to get started. If > > > X comes up at all using the config generated from that then it will be a > > > good starting point. Try commenting out the device and screen sections > > > (and possibly also a line under ServerLayout) for your "bad" display and > > > see if X comes up on the other two. By default it expects to be running > > > on the console so I'm not sure what will happen here. You also want it to > > > grab the keyboard and mouse unless you have a second keyboard. Some trial > > > and error and further research are probably required. Play with startx vs > > > xdm, see what happens when you press ctrl-alt-f1, etc. I'm assuming > > > you'll want to use Xinerama to join the two X displays and allow > > > window-dragging between them, etc. > > > > > > If you don't get acceptable results using your original plan, you can > > > always hack together your own "console" to run on the weakest display > > > under X (using the vesa driver if necessary). If possible (not sure it > > > is), don't make it part of your Xinerama display. Then don't run a window > > > manager on it. Use xsetroot as part of your X init script to control > > > what's on the background. This will apply to your entire display but the > > > WM will probably take over once it starts on the "good" screens. You > > > could make one or more scripts to run things on your "bad" screen by > > > doing something like this: > > > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > DISPLAY=:0.1 #might also be :0.2 or :0.0 > > > export DISPLAY > > > xterm -r -geometry 120x60 /usr/bin/top > > > > > > Experiment with the geometry settings to see what fills your screen > > > appropriately. You might also want to get a nice bitmap font to give the > > > xterm more of a terminal "feel". I have one I stole from bochs or > > > somewhere that's not bad (I use it for Nethack). E-mail me off-list if > > > you want it. > > > > > > That should just about do it. Do write back to the list to tell us what > > > you learn and what works the best. > > > > > > JN > > > > I like the not making it a part of the Xinerama display..that would be > > interesting, because I'm sure a very basic X11 background with a xterm > > would work on there. If X starts on there, then yeah great but the > > problem is I don't ever recall getting it to work properly. > > If the card functions at all then I'm sure you could get the vesa driver > running at 800x600x8 at least.. > > > What I had in mind however, is say having the weak monitor/card as the > > 'default' display that the BIOS picks up, and then leaving a console > > on there BUT having X11 on the two other monitors. Then I'd run top > > on it or something, so I"d have a command like... > > > > $ startxfce4 & top -s 1 > > > > And then on the 'default' BIOS chosen display, you would see top > > running in console mode, and then pretty xfce with nice 1280x1024 ver > > monitor resolution on the other two (using Xinerama). I wouldn't need > > to have keyboard/mouse control on the 'default' console then, I'd just > > look at it to see which process is eating the machine, load averages, > > etc. > > My suggestion for running the weak display under X was conditional on not > getting results you liked with your original idea. Re-read the first part of > my first reply. > > JN > Ah yes you're right, it managed to start what looks like 640x480...of course the only problem now is I lost 24 bit color but I can live without that. :P Thanks for all the help guys. -- Jim Capozzoli D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:37:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A777A16A4E5 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:37:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C8813C487 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:37:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l553b31B062564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:37:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4664DA5E.9000403@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:37:02 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> <4664CE3C.4010108@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4664CE3C.4010108@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:37:10 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> It will be of academic interest to me to see how people respond to this. >> Unfortunately - as documented in my original post - the 4.11 CD will >> not even boot on this new motherboard for some reason. Given that, and >> that 4.x is no longer actively developed, I am forced to move to 6.x for >> my next server ... > Most likely because of the evolution of the FreeBSD kernel and increased > hardware support over time. A lot of CDs won't boot on my C2D system, > but that's because the HW is too new to run with older CDs, similar to > issues seen with other OSes like Linux and Windoze. > -Garrett This is, of course, the normal order of technology progress. It just seems odd to me that the 4.11 CD is blowing up claiming an RTC error on a new mobo. I'd understand if it failed because it could not recognize the processor, or the Northbridge/Southbridge hardware, but I'm guessing that not a lot has changed with RTC hardware. Then again, this error could be an artifact of some other silent problem. In any case, I am working on recreating my (rather complex) standard server configuration on 6.2 ... it was time anyway. I will miss 4.x, however. It has been rock solid with nary a blip for many years now (as was 2.x and 3.x before it). Maybe I'm just getting old ;) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:47:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF90116A582 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF59013C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,383,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="138880795" Received: from ppp154-213.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([150.101.154.213]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2007 13:16:54 +0930 Message-ID: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:46:51 +1000 From: Ivan Carey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How to understand partition sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ivan@careytech.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:47:07 -0000 Hello, After installing a new system on a 500Gb HDD the partition size I allocated at install does no match the size after complete system installation Disc size comes up as 476937MB At install I partitioned the disc: / 2048Mb /swap 4096Mb /var 2048Mb /server 440Gb /usr 13065Mb After install and checking the partition sizes with KDiskFree the partitions are: / 1.9Gb /var 1.9Gb /server 431.0Gb /usr 12.4Gb The /server is 9Gb smaller than I partitioned and the actual free space without any files in the partition is shown as 396.5Gb which is another 34.5Gb smaller. Am I actually seeing what is really happening or am I really loosing 43.5Gb of space on the /server partition Thanks, Ivan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:49:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911CB16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: from web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A62B13C4AD for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 3945 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 03:49:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=QLtfSwjzj2lUKCdb15hUR2fbTs/URnQcTga2h7sLwI3Ds0iGBEXOCnRdNQlNwAWRnbBydzPLd/uw29ZWiuVIv7Fnlh+OldakJqgJ8AJLMquCMQErjXHGaLxV3bvUDOw59S9j7oNwm1ES8o07SEE/ZEP3RY+CuunTmDtdZtH70o4=; X-YMail-OSG: _cF0jjgVM1nP.OikMSyCQS5S9qeUQVE.nfqjpSw0YEfoW4rg09oQ0g_96B00SouJ1nKuiJu6bw-- Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:49:41 PDT Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:49:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "N. Harrington" To: Garrett Cooper , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4664D9BB.6040707@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <798114.3933.qm@web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:49:42 -0000 --- Garrett Cooper wrote: > N. Harrington wrote: > > Hello > > I have several systems that are used as squid > > caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI > > disks and some that use SATA disks. They are > > identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI > > drives. > > > > At random times, the sata based systems seem to > be > > freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but > you > > cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during > that > > time. > > > > I figure it mist be something to do with the > disks, > > but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to > be > > little rhyme or reason. It does not happen > necessarily > > during busy times. It can happen in the middle of > the > > night. > > > > Any pointers in how to track down the cause would > be > > much appreciated. > > > > Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem > > Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives > > FreeBSD amd64 6.2-STABLE. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Nicole > > > Nicole, > What's the driver in use for the SATA and the > SCSI drives? > -Garrett Hi Garret Here is the driver info. -- SATA atapci0: port 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa80f mem 0xfeafec00-0xfeafefff irq 17 at device 5.0 on pci3 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 ata4: on atapci0 ata5: on atapci0 pci3: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata1: on atapci1 pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 -- SCSI ahd0: port 0x8000-0x80ff,0x7800-0x78ff mem 0xfc89c000-0xfc89dfff irq 24 at device 10.0 on pci2 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: port 0x8800-0x88ff,0x8400-0x84ff mem 0xfc89e000-0xfc89ffff irq 25 at device 10.1 on pci2 ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib3 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) Thanks! Nicole From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 03:58:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076EC16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC14113C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:58:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 23976 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 03:55:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 03:55:36 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l553wlkL074821 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:58:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l553wkLU074820 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:58:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:58:46 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070605035846.GA74795@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <46646FCC.9060908@tundraware.com> <4664CE3C.4010108@u.washington.edu> <4664DA5E.9000403@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4664DA5E.9000403@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:58:49 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:37:02PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > Maybe I'm just getting old ;) I think that goes without saying. We're *all* getting old, at exactly the same rate. Some of us got a head start, though. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Thomas McCauley: "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 04:06:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF7816A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAC413C45D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1249913wxd for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GqIogQfaBau7oI5tQ1Tc3Ll4lEjh79PzWM1q0k1BhM4hcXyS41YAVEIxNplCwbPuZjdbt/yRJoGXxk6SHyAURHTrugGOgIs3Aveh4VUNJfBHYVgcTE2z7nw6LtD9bK25TOFlXxtYRvkcdaHJtwap1I7oa8r1ur5x5h920XBSa3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=G8IrzMRx4wdw02lynRtEoExzKdtdyaZlYVrPX+GwgpunblpEUBtyIwyYZwQJGl4SYafSNK2G+ynesD/1qwyCtuRP15nEZy+laGyxzcaBeak37KEItQh4YEtMPL7hQ3dCZ1QIX9k4dBJmlQp1YFOU2SUk8zvx4+cFIhFeVfDtEDw= Received: by 10.90.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr4463848aga.1181016394576; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706042106x5add7a8cya5609dea9a9b130a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:06:34 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: "Ian Smith" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070604223030.594E116A49A@hub.freebsd.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e52c5de5c23615bf Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:06:36 -0000 hi, > I really don't know whether this might be related to your problem, but > my proofreading eye was distracted by this in your rc.conf: > > > # PPP > > ppp_enable="YES" > > ppp_mode="ddial" > > ppp_nat="NO" > > ppp_profile="ppp`" > > What rc would make of that backtick inside quotes, I know not .. wow! good eye. checked, and that's some cp-n-paste weirdness, or my fat thumbs. the line actually is, > ppp_profile="ppp1" thanks for the check! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 04:11:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D659616A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9177B13C458 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1250577wxd for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FhMAuphuhMx4GepBFajxt7wVmq0XwFw5nttGQOwyXi92PsIfB91l1s/4gqrdHEaLFPfSPDTj4SdVkAoCClON36Pb52qErYcT8QFewm7Mh3cUx+iud3/jxKoViWN4VEwnnq9shsv2FDJImCLFfNUzhsFDWckhFirYRLBF1wsXliw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DJwV+DR+Fbk8J/8OZfmGWAgg2OnCY8PYblhpr4r0ThH6ceER6quWCmG7sCe2MN5MFkmBXwfn3AIbfXU4eLwdOhsUmVIWrh8g79DDUPxBREL6A/Pnd3azSQstU/eMogielSR09TqLO0C5UdOOOeOzp9lyk/21uug7EknqWd/uC6c= Received: by 10.90.49.19 with SMTP id w19mr4459309agw.1181016687978; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706042111t73b75c90ka227c63fafce9c08@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:11:27 -0700 From: snowcrash To: RW In-Reply-To: <20070605034006.030f188f@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> <20070605034006.030f188f@gumby.homeunix.com.> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: schneecrash@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:11:28 -0000 hi, > The ppp rc.d script resyncs pf and ipfilter, to pick-up new interfaces, > so that shouldn't be needed. as i'm not entirely clear on the order/function of all yet, you're saying that's /not/ related to the not-starting-up-on-boot problem i'm seeing, and thus i shouldn't bother with the rcoder/anchor options mentioned? thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 04:16:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC81B16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AD513C44C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l554FspK027814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:15:54 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l554FsDj008294; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:15:54 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:15:54 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706050415.l554FsDj008294@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: ivan@careytech.com.au In-reply-to: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> (message from Ivan Carey on Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:46:51 +1000) References: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to understand partition sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:16:07 -0000 > The /server is 9Gb smaller than I partitioned and the actual free space > without any files in the partition is shown as 396.5Gb which is another > 34.5Gb smaller. The number of disk sectors/blocks allocated to a partition at install is reduced by the amount of space taken by the system to put file system information (table of inodes, etc.) plus some percentage of space kept for security reason (so the operating system can fill up your partition by more than 100% in case of emergency). Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 04:46:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6116A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577D513C45D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.98]) by bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:46:57 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:46:56 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:46:52 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:46:52 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2007 04:46:56.0732 (UTC) FILETIME=[8BB011C0:01C7A72C] Subject: problem in installing OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:46:57 -0000 Hi everybody , I tried to install Openoffice in my FreeBSD 6.0 Intel p4 desktop gnome2.18 But I am getting errors as follows don# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2 don# ls Makefile files pkg-plist distinfo pkg-descr work don# make config ===> No options to configure don# make install clean ===> openoffice.org-2.2.0_1 depends on file: /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15 ===> diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4 : Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution manually. Please access http://www.FreeBSDFoundation.org/cgi-bin/download?download=diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 with a web browser and "Accept" the End User License Agreement for "Caffe Diablo 1.5.0". Please place the downloaded diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 in /usr/ports/distfiles. Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" to obtain the time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip. .*** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2. SO I FOLLOWED LIKE THIS don# cp /home/dhanesh/Desktop/diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/ don# pwd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2 don# make install clean ===> openoffice.org-2.2.0_1 depends on file: /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15 ===> diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4 : Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution manually. Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" to obtain the time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip. .*** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2. don# NOW it Showing ERROR about this as above "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" So what the things I made wrong , if so please give me the right direction ( the steps ) I have to follow to install openoffice perfectly .. Thanks in advance Dhanesh _________________________________________________________________ Career Aptitude Test. Based on the most scientific MBT Test. http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=64 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 05:00:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B18716A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F7B13C468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so71426uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:00:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HyRMEEHq/YW99nMIjbUKLbq4BfNvrLvblyBijr3ooaFOv0a9TAD3wjTHttBHhgrNaoicXGH4kt2d6Gq0T/ez0YrQB/e2fEQRoyaDb3rpIgcpaYDkXzAHosst9Yi8uS/cgeI31A6dwbvVu1TJEsk+PBoFNjg8VGtsoN3WllCSD+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qlZpy2iSErAMNBh8nrS4Lxbg1X9APP0D8nHKGO2xPch1HY1taBBSJIyUl/ahOA/95anDu09TfrcYvxvkZKK86Zu09lQOre11IyzEyoTT/QFmOmpmX0y/kdZyfZT38L7oOznV3q4/ASiOJPw5IymjW9haLjlEHmF3qGI1DipoBc8= Received: by 10.82.126.5 with SMTP id y5mr7931185buc.1181019634569; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.191.11 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:00:34 +1000 From: "Paul Fraser" To: "David N" , "FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <4d7dd86f0706041940w21dfb3f9xaf19d629a75ad023@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070604113945.GA15154@schottelius.org> <4d7dd86f0706041940w21dfb3f9xaf19d629a75ad023@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: isc-dhcp3-server in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:00:36 -0000 On 6/5/07, David N wrote: > To get isc-dhcpd in a jail you need to give the jail access to /dev/bpf0 > > so you have to edit /etc/defaults/devfs.rules > add to the end the unhide rules for bpf eg. > [devfsrules_unhide_bpf=5] > add path bpf0 unhide > > [devfsrules_dhcp_jail=6] > add include $devfsrules_hide_all > add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic > add include $devfsrules_unhide_login > add include $devfsrules_unhide_bpf > > then in your /etc/rc.conf add > jail__defs_ruleset="devfsrules_dhcp_jail" > > and restart the jail. Thank you very much David, that's done the trick! I much prefer having dhcpd sitting in a jail along with a few other network services. Cheers, P. -- Regards, Paul Fraser http://furyc0de.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 05:01:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF7616A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1842813C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so71515uge for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:01:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bVDnbG1oVMkr/irLiIozWwJ7CMDR3bPgVEZHy6awjh3FwJj0I0VDaghHHoSbfz45qsEyhA8YuQiA2VF6tqSZJs8e7m1BXRLEWDWr+31MvA7yt+r4OGjgSumJdL2egF8Ag5hUu7aNMaj3Vrs+DjUijFgZGcjI0OUT+ZWGilyEKB8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IssDMeuqrmRVCh2+cx3f5gzxGS3I9hDxq6k5qCrrRF/zLhSqFquyMEwTcGkjHpSfOEVaJy5S7mb6PrIRMDv/cBhjZyFPyXPi3Q3WFoxPZ0dPtipJgNT+5IeU8pQxY2dj7bIEJmOW5CkIYEm3RCcjA+FrwKwErIYN6dwLjP+4Wx0= Received: by 10.82.174.20 with SMTP id w20mr7949358bue.1181019675945; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.16 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:01:15 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Olivier Nicole" In-Reply-To: <200706050415.l554FsDj008294@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> <200706050415.l554FsDj008294@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ivan@careytech.com.au Subject: Re: How to understand partition sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:01:17 -0000 On 04/06/07, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > The /server is 9Gb smaller than I partitioned and the actual free space > > without any files in the partition is shown as 396.5Gb which is another > > 34.5Gb smaller. > > The number of disk sectors/blocks allocated to a partition at install > is reduced by the amount of space taken by the system to put file > system information (table of inodes, etc.) plus some percentage of > space kept for security reason (so the operating system can fill up > your partition by more than 100% in case of emergency). There is also the fact that your "500GB" drive is not actually 500GB. I think there is even a FAQ entry about this. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 05:52:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C940A16A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF5813C45E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HvRyF-0005Vm-VV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:52:43 -0700 Message-ID: <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:52:43 -0700 (PDT) From: gmoniey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: gmoniey@gmail.com References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:52:49 -0000 thanks for the ideas, i tried both of your suggestions...i manually ran the rails.sh file, and everything worked as expected...so i dumped the output to file...my .sh file looks as such: #!/bin/sh case "$1" in start) echo "RAILS found start" >> /tmp/test.file kldload accf_http >> /tmp/test.file mongrel_rails cluster::start -v -C /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb start ;; stop) echo "RAILS found stop" >> /tmp/test.file mongrel_rails cluster::stop -v -C /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb stop ;; *) echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 exit 64 ;; esac and the test.file ended up with this after the reboot: $cat /tmp/test.file RAILS found start the weird part is that the Rails found stop never printed...and im not sure why the mongrel_rails fails (im assuming that the kldload works fine as it doesn't print out any error messages if it is successfull) i guess i will just keep playing with it... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10963533 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 05:58:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5067816A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsenthil@adventnet.com) Received: from alps.manageengine.org (tapti.adventnet.co.in [203.199.211.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB57113C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsenthil@adventnet.com) Received: from smtp.india.adventnet.com (smtp.india.adventnet.com [192.168.4.41]) by alps.manageengine.org (8.13.8/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l555vfI8014391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:27:42 +0530 Received: from [192.168.111.179] (bsenthil.india.adventnet.com [192.168.111.179]) by smtp.india.adventnet.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l555uLBU017621; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:26:23 +0530 Message-ID: <4664FAAA.70608@adventnet.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:24:50 +0530 From: bsenthil User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-6mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reid Linnemann , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4663AE7D.2090607@adventnet.com> <46641657.4000906@cs.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <46641657.4000906@cs.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.1/3360/Tue Jun 5 10:02:46 2007 on mail-hub.india.adventnet.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Configure ipaddress and route entries in /etc/rc.conf file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:58:04 -0000 Yes, It working fine.. Thanks for your help.. inetd_enable="YES" hostname="test.abc.com" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.110.14 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_fxp1="inet 192.168.111.14 netmask 255.255.255.0" hostname="test.abc.com" static_routes="net1 net2" route_net1="-net 10.1.1.1/24 *fxp0*" (Error ...) I am not configure any default router entries . But i want to redirect all 10.1.1.1/24 packets through fxp0. Help me , how to configure/specify fxp0 dev in router entries... Thanks, Senthilkumar. Reid Linnemann wrote: > Written by bsenthil on 06/04/07 01:17>> > >> I am trying to configure ipaddress and route entries. so that i added >> below the entries in /etc/rc.conf file. >> >> vi /etc/rc.conf >> >> inetd_enable="YES" >> hostname="test.abc.com" >> ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.110.14 netmask 255.255.255.0" >> defaultrouter="192.168.110.2" >> hostname="test.abc.com" >> static_routes="net1 net2" >> route_net1="-net 192.168.1.1/24 192.168.110.2" >> route_net2="-net 192.168.2.1/24 192.168.110.2" >> >> and then i restated the network services "netif restart" >> >> The below entries are listed in router table ... >> $ netstat -nr >> >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif >> Expire >> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 >> 192.168.110 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 >> >> >> Problem :: Default router entries and net1 & net2 entries are not >> added in router table... >> >> Please advice me anything i want to configue more in rc.conf file.... >> I can able to add default router by executing " route add -net >> 0.0.0.0 192.168.110.2" >> >> Thanks, >> Senthilkumar. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Wrong rc script. Try "/etc/rc.d/routing restart". routing requires > netif, but netif does not imply routing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 06:19:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED9E16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5305F13C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 21998 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 16:19:14 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 16:19:14 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:19:07 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "dhaneshk k" Message-ID: <20070605161907.729b75cd@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem in installing OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:19:15 -0000 On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:46:52 +0000 "dhaneshk k" wrote: > Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp > in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for > "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" to obtain the > time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip. Do you have this file? [betom@ayiin] [Tue Jun 5 16:18:22 2007] /usr/home/betom $ ls -l /usr/ports/distfiles/tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip -rw-r--r-- 1 betom betom 480534 Mar 15 23:43 /usr/ports/distfiles/tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip if not, you need to download it :) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 06:22:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0539116A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2C813C483 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 22295 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 16:22:50 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 16:22:49 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:22:46 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Robin Becker Message-ID: <20070605162246.757b9765@localhost> In-Reply-To: <46646BEC.2090603@jessikat.plus.net> References: <46646BEC.2090603@jessikat.plus.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Is it better to just rebuild Xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:22:51 -0000 On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:45:48 +0000 Robin Becker wrote: > I've just installed 6.2R and have just about got Xorg going. Is it > better for me to just remove all my X related packages and try and build > from the xorg-7.2 meta package or to go through the pain of trying to > update? I think it'll be the same. Upgrade was the only option for me as I had a fully functionally X setup in my laptop - it went pretty smoothly (for the amount of changes done to the system). Make sure you follow the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING to the letter. > In either case I need to sync the ports tree etc. well, if u dont upgrade your tree, you may be able to install xorg 6.9 from packages (MUCH faster) ; get it working; then sync the ports after this and upgrade. There is nothing particularly wrong with 6.9, specially if you have a clean machine and you plan to do the whole upgrade path. just dont go overkill with setting up KDE / Gnome and other things that depend on X. twm would do for now ;) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end... liberty is the only object which benefits all alike, and provokes no sincere opposition... The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to to govern. Every class is unfit to govern... Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 07:31:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FC016A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A73613C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l557Voa8002807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:31:54 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <46651165.1040909@webanoide.org> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:31:49 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gmoniey References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:31:57 -0000 gmoniey wrote: > thanks for the ideas, i tried both of your suggestions...i manually ran the > rails.sh file, and everything worked as expected...so i dumped the output to > file...my .sh file looks as such: [ trim ] > the weird part is that the Rails found stop never printed...and im not sure > why the mongrel_rails fails (im assuming that the kldload works fine as it > doesn't print out any error messages if it is successfull) > > i guess i will just keep playing with it... Let's try a different approach. The following is a working script of your rails: --------------------------- #!/bin/sh # PROVIDE: rails # KEYWORD: nojail shutdown . /etc/rc.subr name="rails" start_cmd="${name} start" stop_cmd="${name} stop" rails() { case ${rc_arg} in start) echo -n "Starting ${name}: " echo -n "1 " echo -n "2 " echo "3" ;; stop) echo -n "Stopping ${name}: " echo -n "3 " echo -n "2 " echo "1" ;; *) echo "dddzzzzz" esac } load_rc_config ${name} run_rc_command "${1}" --------------------------- It looks different, but this is the new way how the OS fires things up. Place this script as "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/rails". Don't add the extension to it (.sh). The use of extensions is old school. Chmod it to 555 (or 755). Now give it a spin: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rails start # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rails stop # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rails restart # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rails blah See what happens and then boot your machine. You'll see how it starts and stops. Once you're satisfied, tweak it to your needs. If you want to control all aspects of the thing then you should read: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-starting-services.html Also read the rc.d(8) and all of its rc.* related man pages. You can get lots of good examples in "/etc/rc.d/". For instance "/etc/rc.d/usbd" is the simplest of them all. Let us know how it goes. Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 09:32:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC9B16A46F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozanenginoglu@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D982513C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozanenginoglu@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so127070uge for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=Xv9c7dV27VI3ENSwllbohwnw6JYyxfXymiOutMi5ymBrG5cOW5d3rnLDjPLwjBFZ3qZO3EXi5DSZ3ScdgqruUid903pS/6J6oLMTgeC/iXq5m1upK/uR0Ep0L9Mth7E+vLdHeRH8ShrN5mzzhtITctdhDehnOXLnbSYZ1iLwjdE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=DSOrF0o90yWsKmmJJ/AeGj5dKReblKtmG4jiO+cIgyP1pSrX3w7+I9Wq/BUasfhNssaxD/Hj4ATLMMPQGWhbYHnZFgV1yKrTJ0JOfnktqLG1yKBFLznTAce1t68/w3YpiNn4uidz27OFxyzWF46rKjPuWYwnrq226q2Sz+atiJQ= Received: by 10.66.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr351049ugg.1181035930750; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.4? ( [81.215.237.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p32sm706801ugc.2007.06.05.02.32.07; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Ozan Enginoglu To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-i3Nbtrf4I0m+3XNMXmwM" Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:28:47 +0300 Message-Id: <1181035727.97579.6.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Window reseizing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:32:12 -0000 --=-i3Nbtrf4I0m+3XNMXmwM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I use fluxbox and i have a weird problem. I cant reseise windows. For example aterm terminal window or mercury chat windows. All the windows have borders and they look very normal. But i cant see resize cursor when i move the cursor over the corner of the window. At the beginning it was not a big problem but now it disturbs me. I dont know if i did something wrong but i dont remember at all. If you have any opinion pls let me know... Thanks, --=20 Ozan Engino=F0lu Mechanical Engineer GPG / PGP Fingerprint: 247C EE12 7AF9 5181 B6E5 A70F 0D5C 77FB B350 D715 --=-i3Nbtrf4I0m+3XNMXmwM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGZSzJDVx3+7NQ1xURAqrVAJsHUZJGcXjr9Di8dq/xjBVJUQjbwACePFEH mluner1X3owF2LQJQ8DbsVo= =uw/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-i3Nbtrf4I0m+3XNMXmwM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 09:47:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D82D16A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from n21b.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n21b.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4114713C487 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from [216.252.122.218] by n21.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 09:47:10 -0000 Received: from [68.142.237.87] by t3.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 09:47:10 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.133] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 09:47:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr4.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 09:47:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 973091.35270.bm@rrr4.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 84748 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 09:47:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=lqbKQEEAmVSqHQ6DPl+8VzpMNEjx6sypOxtu/c/fStBrg0bWcaUetrcuLO4HNO3cKFgJupLpLqIBlp/8O7B4YGeRQdUbg/oi/eC++LGXH5642xSzxHQA6eEOjDO/CzXEZCIw0iiefUa65dgClS/TnvNVp541I1RD9hEZ2Ulf374=; X-YMail-OSG: fpNvFfsVM1lpVkHhW3Sc99uEzRd9XtLHdQu_e7DeeSa0wkMhLX9vJdzEKdo7fuBj4A2Kua1h5IeyXcTqqoyCoiWjTaxy3.2wXbP5 Received: from [166.70.207.2] by web57415.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:47:09 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:47:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Davidson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <876339.84554.qm@web57415.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: GRUB / boot easy problems w / USB stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:47:10 -0000 >Some thoughts: >1. bsdlabel -Brw /dev/da0s1 >- What is the option "r"? >- bsdlabel is supposed to create standard label >which probably >means creating da0s1a partition (can you call >"bsdlabel /dev/da0s1" to >see what was created?) So your next command should be >"newfs >/dev/da0s1a" rather than "newfs /dev/da0s1". And >commands after that >will need to be adjusted as well. >2. boot0cfg -B -s 1 -t -v 182 /dev/da0 >It should be "-v -t 182" rather than "-t -v 182". >Not sure if it >matters though. >Hope this helps. >Andrey Thanks Andrey, great news! placing newfs on /dev/da0s1a instead of /dev/da0s1 really helped. Now GRUB recognizes the filesystem on my usb partition. Here's what's new. #I placed 1 UFS2 partition on my USB key at #/dev/da0s1a. mount /dev/da0s1a /usb mkdir -p /usb/boot/grub #copied all files from /boot to /usb/boot and all files #from /boot/grub to /usb/boot/grub (I know I can make #it smaller but just copying all for now). Next I #invoked the grub shell and did the following: grub> root (hd1,0,a) Filesystem type is ufs2, partition type is 0xa5. grub> setup (hd1) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/ufs2_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/ufs2_stage1_5 (hd1)"... 16 sectors are embedded. Succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd1) (hd1)1+16 p (hd1,0,a)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/menu.lst"... Succeeded Done. #I reboot, and am excited to see the grub menu I've set #up. Here is my menu.lst: default=0 timeout=30 title NewOS root (hd0,0,a) kernel /boot/loader #You might notice I made root hd0. This is actually #helpful for anyone setting GRUB up for the first time. #You see when setting up grub from the shell within #your computer, your first hard drive is always hd0, #and your usb stick can be anything after that (in my #case hd1). You can test this by placing an oddly #named text file in each of your grub directories (1 in #hard drive, 1 in usb stick), then using find from the #grub shell to indicate where that oddly named file is #located: grub> find /boot/grub/weirdfile (hd0,0,a) #The main point is that when you reboot to your USB #key, because it's now the first drive, it's probably #going to be hd0, instead of hdx, thus my menu.lst. # Anyway, back to the menu selection. When I choose the 'NewOS', this is what I get: Booting 'NewOS' root (hd0,0,a) Filesystem type is ufs2, partition type is 0xa5 kernel /boot/loader [FreeBSD-a.out, loadaddr=0x200000, text=0x1000, data=0x32000, bss=0x0, entry=0x200000] BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive C: is disk0 BIOS drive D: is disk1 BIOS 631kB/980480kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root @barney.msu.edu, Sun May 8 03:20:03 UTC 2006) #This is the last line, and if I wait about five #minutes it prints these additional lines: can't load 'kernel' Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK _ #Again I'm pretty sure I must have the right 'hd' #addressing. I tested this by changing the root #location to (hd1,0,a) which found the boot loader off #of my hard drive and booted. I tested this by moving #the loader from my hard drive out of /boot, and #rebooting, where upon it couldn't find loader anymore. Alright I'll leave it there. (Starving for that little morsel of knowledge out there that will unlock this!) -Fred (p.s. I'm new to the mailing lists, and can't find the charter for any of the groups, anyone have a link? :) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 09:50:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7E516A469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE0113C46C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so1153497nzn for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:50:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Pn8dQxaay2QCmKX0PxBQ5eEtiCVcUIQv0l+AqjMo0VpnnYIlyKCEIwEyXt4Xs6Q0A/p47P1uSRUO75F+JoiPn1zoEzTZYFwdVlgjdiVfFmO299lTopqE9gyji3c+t9doDqDmwz49WacLzf7NmjlH8x0F4fFzTsAY2xBuFqE9i8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LXHdFUE6Tf4GXNnHe8mYUw/2GuZjHkc4NOhm4BWivvjYdDzeCaFWXR/E11YcB87ERT54oy4hjc+iQt834SEFhjd4GoCUjwzzlkoDfI9wU7W8TYsb14k6LHLYdTcFI4uBjkMXy+uLNG+/Z+oHkQUuByAlQnWvB54Xtwhx4+oZZE4= Received: by 10.64.180.20 with SMTP id c20mr8736818qbf.1181037040215; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.76.14 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37f72b1f0706050250o480ff02ah438b26d93f158b9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:50:40 -0400 From: "Jim Capozzoli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> Subject: Re: problem in installing OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:50:41 -0000 On 6/5/07, dhaneshk k wrote: > Hi everybody , > > > I tried to install Openoffice in my FreeBSD 6.0 Intel p4 desktop > gnome2.18 > > But I am getting errors as follows > > > don# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2 > don# ls > Makefile files pkg-plist > distinfo pkg-descr work > don# make config > ===> No options to configure > don# make install clean > ===> openoffice.org-2.2.0_1 depends on file: > /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java in > /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15 > ===> diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4 : > Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution > manually. > > Please access > > http://www.FreeBSDFoundation.org/cgi-bin/download?download=diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 > > with a web browser and "Accept" the End User License Agreement for > "Caffe Diablo 1.5.0". Please place the downloaded > diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 in /usr/ports/distfiles. > > Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp > in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for > "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" to obtain the > time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip. > > .*** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2. > > SO I FOLLOWED LIKE THIS > > > don# cp > /home/dhanesh/Desktop/diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/ > don# pwd > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2 > don# make install clean > ===> openoffice.org-2.2.0_1 depends on file: > /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java in > /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15 > ===> diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_4 : > Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution > manually. > > Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp > in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for > "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" to obtain the > time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip. > > .*** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2. > don# > > NOW it Showing ERROR about this as above > > "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" > > > > So what the things I made wrong , if so please give me the right direction > ( the steps ) I have to follow to install openoffice perfectly .. > > > Thanks in advance > Dhanesh > > _________________________________________________________________ > Career Aptitude Test. Based on the most scientific MBT Test. > http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=64 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Can't you just download the java jre/jdk from the foundation's website and pkg_add it by hand? That's what I've always done and never had any real problems...you need to pkg_add -r javavmwrapper as well though. Or is this some other strange java that openoffice requires... -- Jim Capozzoli D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 10:23:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6156A16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A25413C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so960990wra for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:23:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gLNBIfkCakNt8f37ldbX23+Ny10dfBUV03ddVbqmgS2LXMxxWFkNW9qbZ7Oh7NAfWHTYDZnXP4PZGJlV/UkcwL79tMG+Izs8u003LUGMAJlPEhkpfAb4XQbpEbJSMQCyM3AUhAQzm+k9nNFlpo0YQOcD7PzwuFnXPJqNZAkAZA8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UeDvZ2Vu1WEKiOKOzNLKPOF9aZhcJ7LQL9ySg6Zn/4JIps1K1wPRV69+OEh/McWuIa9cLFLuDORA0jQYY2VHynYNICP+LEFfBJ3EXWMAtb+JRSFhWWm+IpsFz7IgQedMvIqzfTIXoMbe7ThVF41yYDEnjtFihzScyBjMotefXDo= Received: by 10.90.71.3 with SMTP id t3mr4600621aga.1181038993045; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.120.10 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4d7dd86f0706050323u51ae9576wbff4fe51810e2267@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:23:13 +1000 From: "David N" To: "Paul Fraser" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070604113945.GA15154@schottelius.org> <4d7dd86f0706041940w21dfb3f9xaf19d629a75ad023@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: isc-dhcp3-server in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:23:14 -0000 On 05/06/07, Paul Fraser wrote: > On 6/5/07, David N wrote: > > To get isc-dhcpd in a jail you need to give the jail access to /dev/bpf0 > > > > so you have to edit /etc/defaults/devfs.rules > > add to the end the unhide rules for bpf eg. > > [devfsrules_unhide_bpf=5] > > add path bpf0 unhide > > > > [devfsrules_dhcp_jail=6] > > add include $devfsrules_hide_all > > add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic > > add include $devfsrules_unhide_login > > add include $devfsrules_unhide_bpf > > > > then in your /etc/rc.conf add > > jail__defs_ruleset="devfsrules_dhcp_jail" > > > > and restart the jail. > > Thank you very much David, that's done the trick! I much prefer having > dhcpd sitting in a jail along with a few other network services. > > Cheers, > > P. > > -- > Regards, > > Paul Fraser > http://furyc0de.net/ > np, for the life of me i couldn't get isc-dhcpd working in jails at all without the bpf0. I tried all the jail patches and everything. Its the only way i found it to work. But it does mean that if the dhcpd gets compromised, they'll have control of the bpf0, not really sure what it does though =) I'm glad it worked out though Cheers David N From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 10:27:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6EA16A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsenthil@adventnet.com) Received: from alps.manageengine.org (tapti.adventnet.co.in [203.199.211.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2059613C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsenthil@adventnet.com) Received: from smtp.india.adventnet.com (smtp.india.adventnet.com [192.168.4.41]) by alps.manageengine.org (8.13.8/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l55AQo4d010861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:56:50 +0530 Received: from [192.168.111.179] (bsenthil.india.adventnet.com [192.168.111.179]) by smtp.india.adventnet.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l55APTR3026987 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:55:30 +0530 Message-ID: <466539C0.1050000@adventnet.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:54:00 +0530 From: bsenthil User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-6mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.1/3360/Tue Jun 5 10:02:46 2007 on mail-hub.india.adventnet.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: what ifa / ifp ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:27:08 -0000 route add -net 10.1.1.1/24 0.0.0.0 -ifp fxp0 route add -net 10.1.1.1/24 0.0.0.0 -ifa fxp0 (Error ..ifa) $ > man route.... In a change or add command where the destination and gateway are not suf- ficient to specify the route (as in the ISO case where several interfaces may have the same address), the -ifp or -ifa modifiers may be used to determine the interface or interface address. Coule you please explain what -ifp or ifa modifiers mention... Thanks, Senthilkumar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 10:47:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9249616A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8EE13C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.140] (helo=anti-virus02-07) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HvWZC-0002dp-V3; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:47:11 +0100 Received: from [62.31.10.181] (helo=[192.168.23.2]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HvWZ7-00041Y-BF; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:47:05 +0100 Message-ID: <46653F29.9030800@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:47:05 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <4664392E.1030409@szalbot.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: total system freeze - where to look for more information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:47:12 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > It is possible that the freeze occured during dump operation which is > done to a network drive mounted via mount_smbfs option. One problem we've encountered with dumping to an SMBFS file system is virus checking on the Windows host causing all kinds of problems, but these (for us under 5.4) manifest as: timeouts (i.e dump stops, but it's piping to gzip so maybe that makes a difference). Inability to rename files. Operation times out and 30 seconds later the file *is* renamed. Haven't had an opportunity to try with NFS yet, but given that this is related to WIndows file system semantics, that probably wouldn't help. If your virus checker can be set to ignore the folder where you dump to, that might help. You could test by just turning any virus checker off for a while. Also, have you confirmed that you can create files at all on the samba share? I found dd to be the easiest test tool. e.g. dd if=/dev/zero of=/samba/file count=1000000 bs=64k and see if dd finishes correctly or not. Start with a small count and keep adding a 0 until bored :-) Also you can monitor file growth with say "clear; ls -lsak /samba; sleep 1" in your favourite shell loop. On a working samba folder I see smooth file growth, on a non-working it's obviously erratic until it times out. > In that case I will probably be much better of using another HD > physically connected to the box rather than shared network drive, > wouldn't I? Lack of free space could not have been the reason - the > network share can handle about 750GB of data so it must have been > temporary network error. Or just dump to a non-Windows machine :-) I have no problems using gzip/ssh to keep backups on a different host. NFS ought to be fine too. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 10:48:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A6416A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54A0F13C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.230.28] by n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 10:35:42 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.131] by t1.bullet.re2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 10:35:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 10:35:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 169612.40944.bm@rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 97286 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 10:35:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=lC3EgUhskQ/H/92yL21JcLLa4E++9B9omM4qVltzSLrdK6Y/OFJQO/zxHyv04ooDoxqchXckh8Zz4TjRy4f3fHrboR66wernkuYKHuUw/Sg+kjCXoMYajkT18Ir7ZZhSFok/0+TLhd6X7XaDRT5rwyXRLsm/fnmDpj4KdZpT+vg=; X-YMail-OSG: 8y2U_c8VM1kd5EGKdScucpOdmsKbkuSJQncIdx_3HWC30YBBSOn5Ba.TWnx8TVlv6CqJTtooGejcrTQxeli32kOzawE_gBCnZokccP5QBJi39TLhLBNCXl9RYkyIG62h Received: from [64.157.15.26] by web57402.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:35:42 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:35:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Davidson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <91802.95952.qm@web57402.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: GRUB / boot easy problems w / USB stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:48:40 -0000 It seems like this thread isn't getting updated when I post for some reason. This will be the last one I try until I figure out what's wrong. #I've done some more tests. In my last post I had booted # from the usb key. the results of lsdev from the boot #loader prompt were: OK lsdev cd devices: disk devices: disk0: BIOS drive C: disk1: BIOS drive D: disk1s1a: FFS disk1s1b: swap disk1s1d: FFS # If I booted from the hard drive first I got: cd devices: disk devices: disk0: BIOS Drive C: disk0s1a: FFS disk0s1b: swap disk1s1d: FFS disk1L BIOS Drive D: #So it's clear that which ever drive is booted from #first between the hard drive and the usb key drive is #going to show up as "disk0: BIOS Drive C," but I was #wondering why the disk slices/partition letters for #the USB key don't #show up when I boot from it. Or #even when I boot from the HD and use the loader #prompt? # Again just to quickly restate the problem, when # booting from the USB key, the BTX loader hangs, and # after about 5 minutes I get the loader prompt. The # loader apparently can't find the kernel. When #booting normally I have double checked that the #bsdlabels, filesystems, and required files are at #least present on the key. # I'll keep learning the intimate details of various #config files, and loader commands, and post back if I #find a solution. Thanks again for any bits of know #how you send my way. -Fred ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 10:55:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C47116A52D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E344A13C45B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,385,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="139109795" Received: from ppp154-213.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([150.101.154.213]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2007 20:25:07 +0930 Message-ID: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:55:05 +1000 From: Ivan Carey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ivan@careytech.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:55:09 -0000 Hello I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's I have set them up in rc.conf as follows defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" The question, is this the correct configuration? If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that in the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. Any ideas would help. Thanks, Ivan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 10:57:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09B316A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7115413C448 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so146054uge for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.170.2 with SMTP id s2mr8364312bue.1181039033225; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? ( [217.196.247.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2sm1216037nfv.2007.06.05.03.23.51; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466539B7.3000004@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:23:51 +0100 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: complete static link X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:57:25 -0000 I'm trying to get a particular utility compiled statically so I can embed it in a distribution package. It's just a part of lib tiff. I tried various things with ./configure --disable-shared --enable-static, but couldn't eliminate the dynamic dependencies. In the end I tried this gcc -O2 -Wall -W -o tiffcp tiffcp.o ../libtiff/.libs/libtiff.a ../port/.libs/libport.a /usr/lib/libz.a /usr/lib/libm.a /usr/lib/libc.a and although the libz/libm dependencies are gone I still depend on libc.so.6 (or 4). Is there some esy way to do this? Also I get warnings about f_prealloc anyone know what that means? -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 11:09:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE0A16A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from psmtp.com (s200aob13.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0335713C43E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([217.206.187.80]) by eu1sys200aob013.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:08:52 UTC Received: from [10.0.0.89] (bill.mintel.co.uk [10.0.0.89]) by rodney.mintel.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A6F18141B; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:08:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <46654401.4030302@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:07:45 +0100 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ivan@careytech.com.au References: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> In-Reply-To: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:09:05 -0000 Ivan Carey wrote: > Hello > I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's > I have set them up in rc.conf as follows > > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" > ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > The question, is this the correct configuration? > > If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 and > 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 > > If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 > > If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. > > What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that in > the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. > > Any ideas would help. > Thanks, > Ivan You may want to take a look at if_lacc. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:01:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227BC16A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBF613C487 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,385,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="139132459" Received: from ppp154-213.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([150.101.154.213]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2007 21:31:51 +0930 Message-ID: <466550AE.1010209@careytech.com.au> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:01:50 +1000 From: Ivan Carey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Judge References: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> <46654401.4030302@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <46654401.4030302@tomjudge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ivan@careytech.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:01:54 -0000 Tom Judge wrote: > Ivan Carey wrote: >> Hello >> I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's >> I have set them up in rc.conf as follows >> >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >> network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" >> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" >> ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" >> >> The question, is this the correct configuration? >> >> If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 >> and 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 >> >> If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 >> >> If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. >> >> What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that >> in the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. >> >> Any ideas would help. >> Thanks, >> Ivan > > > You may want to take a look at if_lacc. > > Tom > > What is if_lacc ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:21:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CD816A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3A913C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so167377uge for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:21:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=M9Ql24IZBSnJfuPS/um8vYIgxVL7o9baEIju2bIH1syn6tYRP+Ds+01eDy97DDTqnLP2obaxKqSH8H1EhIKqCdoeNsu50ZxxT3UIuLR70rDNrslK8//D2F5OJVYVMBfyzcjNbNjMJAWjdE2bYpvewlySSvjCFUPFMr1xhXYeVvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qRbFFbK5ul68G8FWHDiXYis9WZwT+bnUpTAOE6iN9caA45DL5HOWvg7M2Gkx+cgV8g5AgjsKKYZwzLFnB/aQ9RmelSCv+ULKN5hh43hsYKFB1uUf0H9BqF54rve58zlzIGSR2XvzIjK0Md6C8Na9yejw+vBjHuQ3/dY2Nb//ydc= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr8655065buc.1181044649845; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.9.8? ( [91.135.49.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h6sm542190nfh.2007.06.05.04.57.28; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46654F9E.9050401@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:57:18 +0200 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Reading temperature on DELL PE2850? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:21:50 -0000 I'm contemplating setting "sysctl machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=0" on my 4 core PE2850, but i am concerned that without HLT-ing would increase the temperature levels to dangerous levels. Are there any ways for me to read temperatures from FreeBSD/DRAC4 ? -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:23:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE0516A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from s200aog11.obsmtp.com (s200aog11.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D48AC13C44C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([217.206.187.80]) by eu1sys200aob011.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:22:52 UTC Received: from [10.0.0.89] (bill.mintel.co.uk [10.0.0.89]) by rodney.mintel.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF9218141C; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:22:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <46655559.2030408@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:21:45 +0100 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ivan@careytech.com.au References: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> <46654401.4030302@tomjudge.com> <466550AE.1010209@careytech.com.au> In-Reply-To: <466550AE.1010209@careytech.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:23:04 -0000 Ivan Carey wrote: > Tom Judge wrote: >> Ivan Carey wrote: >>> Hello >>> I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's >>> I have set them up in rc.conf as follows >>> >>> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >>> network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" >>> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" >>> ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" >>> >>> The question, is this the correct configuration? >>> >>> If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 >>> and 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 >>> >>> If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 >>> >>> If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. >>> >>> What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that >>> in the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. >>> >>> Any ideas would help. >>> Thanks, >>> Ivan >> >> >> You may want to take a look at if_lacc. >> >> Tom >> >> > What is if_lacc ? My bad, sorry should be if_lagg. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:24:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDC716A476 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from s200aog10.obsmtp.com (s200aog10.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB46F13C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([217.206.187.80]) by eu1sys200aob010.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:24:14 UTC Received: from [10.0.0.89] (bill.mintel.co.uk [10.0.0.89]) by rodney.mintel.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ED618141E; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:24:14 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <466555AB.1010405@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:23:07 +0100 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sten Daniel Soersdal References: <46654F9E.9050401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46654F9E.9050401@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reading temperature on DELL PE2850? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:24:17 -0000 Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > I'm contemplating setting "sysctl machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=0" on my 4 core > PE2850, but i am concerned that without HLT-ing would increase the > temperature levels to dangerous levels. > Are there any ways for me to read temperatures from FreeBSD/DRAC4 ? > Have you tries using IPMI using the onboard base management controller? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:41:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E29C16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CAF13C465 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070605124139.IUNK16681.mta13.adelphia.net@laptop>; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:41:39 -0400 From: "Bob" To: , Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:41:38 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: RE: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:41:40 -0000 The most common configuration for using two nic's is one nic is used for your dsl or cable modem connection to your ISP and the second nic services your local LAN. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ivan Carey Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:55 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How to correctly use 2 on board nics Hello I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's I have set them up in rc.conf as follows defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" The question, is this the correct configuration? If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that in the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. Any ideas would help. Thanks, Ivan _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:45:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0574816A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshuafruge@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2EB13C448 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshuafruge@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so174073uge for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:45:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ML1pP1RTy4YXdmuhGIsp9LlffSNeL7xESyYUUXQGYRbNl9LM1C+fsJUiXkdJn/PwefqV0aQmxpDssjlZHDx3f5MPlTCE4H9hK9V75aIXbnyjrxBMrqyeFrOLzeXr2HEWKMgNbVTKKtLSjzALvNgZVpdatNpsZzs6xq2MzZY68Rw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=BNYxeosoYls2TCPpHEB4ZnVi+B/7X1ihp7O+uxiNdvPE8H76eB+02uaCHSnBzJ7MG6otYEQ9h2MjU0T6kXFMlUIHhhWiU7qaFEtmHqtU0UmUdIQdB1SKT5ZTZ1XWJXxUDPtYPsxhpxHiNviLaUa8OT0Ccj3z4s7XSlwieSDm3+w= Received: by 10.78.181.13 with SMTP id d13mr2421841huf.1181045970087; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.197.19 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2f33bdd20706050519h6cc209f4y74370f892114c810@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:19:30 -0500 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Joshua_Frug=E9?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: usb keyboard on dell precision 690 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:45:27 -0000 Trying to install freebsd6.2 using a usb keyboard on a dell precision 690. When I get into sysinstall the keyboard no longer works. Did some googling... there is no option in the bios for legacy usb keyboard or anything like that, unplugging and replugging/rearranging usb devices did not work, and entering set hint.atkbd.0.disabled="1" in the loader prompt does not work. I believe the issue to be that a false non usb keyboard is detected, as the loading messages display an at keyboard device. Any idea on how I can install freebsd 6.2(amd64) with a usb keyboard? Thanks, Joshua From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:48:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B77316A46E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing.lists@dvterry.com) Received: from mail.dvterry.com (mail.dvterry.com [64.34.163.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2620213C4B7 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing.lists@dvterry.com) Received: from [10.24.65.11] (user1.coxfiber.net [216.54.27.211]) by mail.dvterry.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FF9338050; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:48:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46655B80.8040504@dvterry.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:48:00 -0400 From: magikman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bob@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:48:01 -0000 Bob wrote: > The most common configuration for using two nic's is one nic is used for > your dsl or cable modem connection to your ISP and the second nic services > your local LAN. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ivan Carey > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:55 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: How to correctly use 2 on board nics > > Hello > I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's > I have set them up in rc.conf as follows > > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" > ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > The question, is this the correct configuration? > > If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 and > 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 > > If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 > > If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. > > What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that in > the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. > > Any ideas would help. > Thanks, > Ivan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I guess the 'correct' way of using two NICs is really dependent upon what your goal of using two NICs is. Do you want to be able to serve two networks out of the NICs, one from each interface? Do you want to create a gateway of some sort? What is it, exactly, you are trying to accomplish by doing this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 12:53:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F0416A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3580413C457 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 22343 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 22:53:36 +1000 Received: from 203-214-138-113.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.138.113) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 22:53:36 +1000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:53:32 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Jim Capozzoli" Message-ID: <20070605225332.4ec5c924@localhost> In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706050250o480ff02ah438b26d93f158b9e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> <37f72b1f0706050250o480ff02ah438b26d93f158b9e@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem in installing OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:53:37 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:50:40 -0400 "Jim Capozzoli" wrote: > Can't you just download the java jre/jdk from the foundation's website > and pkg_add it by hand? That's what I've always done and never had > any real problems...you need to pkg_add -r javavmwrapper as well > though. Or is this some other strange java that openoffice > requires... this should work just fine - i have OO2.2 (from package) using diablo-jdk (from package) with no problem at all. (and, for what is worth, linux-jdk-blackdown for linux-firefox No conflicts between them at all). B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The distinction between past, present and future is only an illusion, even if a stubborn one" Albert Einstein I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 13:34:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96B916A46D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF76D13C469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23880 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 13:34:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Jun 2007 13:34:00 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F702843A; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:33:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 47ADC1CCA9; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:33:56 -0400 (EDT) To: Paul Hoffman References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:33:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Paul Hoffman's message of "Mon\, 4 Jun 2007 08\:18\:07 -0700") Message-ID: <44y7iyr0e3.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Short HOWTO on reading a core to determine why my server is rebooting? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:34:01 -0000 Paul Hoffman writes: > Hi again. I have a server running 6.0 that has been spontaneously > rebooting every few weeks. Is there a short HOWTO that tells me how to > read the files in /var/crash to at least find out what the kernel > thinks the issue is? There is nothing in /var/log/messages of interest > before the crash, nothing in 'dmesg -a' in coming up that says > anything interesting, and there's plenty of room on the drives. There is some information in developers' handbook. The FAQ entry about looking at kernel panics might help also. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 13:38:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000B916A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EBB13C487 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 14325 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 13:38:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Jun 2007 13:38:25 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE28F2843A; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:38:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3C3471CF46; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:38:20 -0400 (EDT) To: ivan@careytech.com.au References: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:38:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> (Ivan Carey's message of "Tue\, 05 Jun 2007 13\:46\:51 +1000") Message-ID: <44tztmr06r.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to understand partition sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:38:26 -0000 Ivan Carey writes: > Am I actually seeing what is really happening or am I really loosing > 43.5Gb of space on the /server partition http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#MANUFACTURER-DISK-SIZE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 13:57:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1959316A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anton.galitch@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F60A13C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anton.galitch@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1839066mue for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:57:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ALs5Cy5tZOuJfSxMLQOm4uHCK4sP2OUWEsE1Wky7k7tN9G6QbJuafgx8FN/NrJF2taBuooTeO15JjUZgnkPHTGauEF/joxkbbXKQs+1n2enB+XhdQ08vo52ZirpiGqigekXpgmuno7C/iOlfI91o7PB/qOMRPxdn16aOgRWvapI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=EgjxJdJUsNL78sGKxF0VLQgJoLcBZy2W41n5hH573Kk8J7nOR1TlcHTYyRt0wgiPoFAgd4lXbZP7J1q2siL9eFnIo8W9L6Mcwk0SZcCwZ2BM41kjGlYbe7fkabcovA8KoeXJCMmTZiG8bqOUqBGZEF8izEc/KD6az4uxHaNnWfA= Received: by 10.82.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr8827162bue.1181051873344; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.3 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7c80322b0706050657w3d7faef5yab779e11d1d5a2ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:57:53 -0300 From: "Anton Galitch" To: "Norberto Meijome" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c80322b0706041228i44c8e91eo4aae31b515d665e@mail.gmail.com> <7c80322b0706041819k3645c68cwf25fc217492537ac@mail.gmail.com> <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: problem compiling xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:57:56 -0000 Hi. The situation is following: I had xorg 6.9 installed, after trying to upgrade it with portupgrade I deinstalled it and now want to install it from scratch. My portmanager program works strange thats why I cant install it usin /usr/ports/UPDATING. Do you know any other way of installing it using another tools?? On 6/4/07, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:18 -0300 > "Anton Galitch" wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > I have a problem when I compile /usr/ports/x11/xorg, when I make install > it > > shows the following error: > > > > > > configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other > > OpenGL package is installed > > See `config.log' for more details. > > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > > I have installed libGL and libGLU but it shows the same error. > > > > I attach my config.log file and the output of ls /var/db/pkg > > > > Thanks for any help > > Hi Anton, > are you upgrading xorg or installing xorg for the first time in this > machine? > > you have to follow the steps in /usr/ports/UPDATING, even if not > upgrading. > > _________________________ > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome > > Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are > wrong. > > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when > wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have > been Warned. > -- http://feudaltimes.com.ar - Webmaster, designer and programmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:01:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D466716A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7017D13C46C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [80.171.116.153] (helo=janh.freebsd) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1HvZOd0V3g-0002tM; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:48:27 +0200 Message-ID: <466569A8.2030108@janh.de> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:48:24 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070513) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/IagIY4qpWGZKIi7KYlAAsyOqkQENTST4SRMk G3GSHNrSX51uzxb28MIjd84dRFpa5uTo704Ns/uJohmWbhtH/u HFQ4pfV9RBXpKbET3xmLg== Subject: 'pkg_create -b iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_2' failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:01:06 -0000 I produced packages of all installed ports with 'pkg_create -b' to transfer them to another machine. iwi-firmware-kmod failed: janh# pkg_create -b iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_2 tar: Removing leading '/' from member names janh# pkg_delete iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_2 janh# pkg_add iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_2.tbz tar: /boot/modules/iwi_bss.ko: Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or format pkg_add: extract_plist: can not invoke 77 byte tar pipeline: /usr/bin/tar cf - /boot/modules/iwi\_bss.ko|/usr/bin/tar --unlink -xpf - -C / I see that the port has: NO_PACKAGE= "this is a modified version of a restricted firmware" Anyhow, every other port that may not have a public package succeeded to pkg_create just fine. Should package creation work on NO_PACKAGE ports or not? Should I report to the maintainer? Thanks Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:05:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6D716A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wo_shi_big_stomach@yahoo.com) Received: from web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28DA313C458 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wo_shi_big_stomach@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 41149 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 13:38:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=jvViHTws2SpbLrOCFDnLGlIGu+468QOjm/MVZjYDZkCgqHaMkywh+BkRdWqqujOHXHcvlEIvth8MHzA5zcQycTol+RkOnX7PH0Wlj3gVgcRgK6AYiBhI9tmS4aR5L/DpTd1dURoLVdNaDZ2n8tsiJm85Op1yT3JcoS+3RSEXKkg=; X-YMail-OSG: DsRnXq8VM1n56Jkh9Tycpjdz.Z6TR_r5FMmUAUXdKw0cc5RGxoZJ3TXgqbacd9nKcfxkCKA6geUAGM_oivluZLhNVk4VN3p1eGF8WpHGdHHG7.z8x_A- Received: from [209.191.119.123] by web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:38:26 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/651.23.1 YahooMailWebService/0.7.41.14 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:38:26 -0700 (PDT) From: wo_shi_big_stomach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Message-ID: <419419.40105.qm@web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: using CVS to upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:05:07 -0000 Got a question about upgrading using cvsup. I've been following Richard Bejtlich's excellent howto for keeping FreeBSD boxes up to date: http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_up-to-date.html The instructions say to create a supfile with a line like this: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_1 and if you want to upgrade to the next version, to use this instead: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE My question: Is it OK to skip the "_RELEASE" part and instead use the following: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 Many thanks /wsbs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:05:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE8B16A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F17713C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id AAA09903; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:05:01 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:04:59 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: snowcrash+freebsd In-Reply-To: <20070605033710.7C27816A4DD@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:05:12 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:37:25 -0700 snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > cat /etc/ppp/ppp.conf > ------------------------------------ > default: > set device PPPoE:sis1: > set speed sync > set ctsrts off > set dial > set login > set cd 10 > set timeout 0 > set redial 0 0 > enable lqr > set lqrperiod 20 > set log Phase tun command > > add default HISADDR > enable tcpmssfixup > disable dns > > ppp1: > set authname me@myisp.com > set authkey ############ > set MRU 1492 > set MTU 1492 > ------------------------------------ > > are these NOT supposed to address/solve the problem? or are the > configs wrong? Hello, it's your niggly proofreader (and fellow Stephenson fan) again. If you really have that blank line before 'add default HISADDR' above, then it marks the end of your default section. The 'add default' and the two lines following will not be executed. I expect you'll want the 'add default' line as the last in your ppp1: section anyway; the other two could go in either, but I'd opt for the default block myself. I'm again unsure whether it's related to your pf problem, rusted-on ipfw here, but my connections tend to work better with a default route .. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:10:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B24716A469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED40513C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1362291wxd for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:10:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mGLpCOzHuhpFs2nZ1MgL9njGdK3rVs1OOUhW6EQl+kMAG0u2dbXYslwm6WMzZ6Y+pthHk9h89RKBm/4sXHg7sdDK8Kj9KZBlfFJNXPb03D/C+zgeLlw5bwCOl45qFfwkk3nqs/2MWzQOX9afrRT9VHmcxLG0VdLbx2BnSdUBz5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YrbWBOxmFewppCWqStcKhdsZoLLUWBmD2yGFQ2V2v7fwy9LuBmjKiEak/fmBTBzhTNAouz5P/yjfP2ck7BaHnypDgSMd0TH8j9kUQZ3QQPibFMcFFOKnhWBs9qF8jnF4R335iHArM/uPTRYl8hJCVESxaj3e12tg3fRnxj2ywxI= Received: by 10.70.65.5 with SMTP id n5mr9222374wxa.1181052640103; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.20.2 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6293ba970706050710q4101b2cu5184f63d8ce5f366@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:10:40 -0400 From: Steve To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200706042108.36889.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6293ba970706041239ufdd41f0m45964e8d4930249c@mail.gmail.com> <200706042108.36889.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Subject: Re: Wake-on-LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:10:43 -0000 On 6/4/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > you definatly have to correct the link-light issue when the system is off, > otherwise i dont think youll ever get it working. are there any ACPI standby > modes in the power section (thats where mine are) in the bios? S3 seems to > be the best option. > > in freebsd, my into pro100s work without any other intervention (aside from > setting S3 in the bios, IBM machines), but i have one IBM with a dual port > pro1000, and its not waking properly right now (but i havent troubleshot that > one any, as its my server and never turns off anyway). I'll take a look at my PC BIOS settings. What I would like is the S5 (soft off) state where the NIC is still active and can WOL, not S3 (suspend to RAM). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:28:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894DF16A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F86113C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b14so1705777qbc for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:28:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ScoG3Pb/h5QiPV6h2yoUaKigXTHMt9lJFS6tdRD+vMkOSuoDjdzaVhcdQElq/IjaPqEiGeoV8dqlP8WfSgElpOfKQdmuV2Ty42vZ7v754OzKsfsVISHQMuJdrqm4xobGxv5TgCJgsnYueVl8OvyuxpuyRDc5mOMI3BzIBNE6gjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CqRpWY8pyJxJoE2/m4wJ3rxicYC/Yk1S2NCZZFW5Q8/9dhKE8XJv3oiqZsG0a1Z1HxaDnisIHxqLEZhMAUHYdFVMAUklF8Veo36R48ZLBCRQHNTTlEGUuTdukIpxjwfshh2K5k88J2memuOVFT51j2XWiZohC+nlbVLYbwZoPiA= Received: by 10.100.92.17 with SMTP id p17mr3287177anb.1181053697017; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706050728w46938d21r9477ef9402197a6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:28:16 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: wo_shi_big_stomach In-Reply-To: <419419.40105.qm@web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <419419.40105.qm@web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using CVS to upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:28:19 -0000 On 6/5/07, wo_shi_big_stomach wrote: > Got a question about upgrading using cvsup. > > > > I've been following Richard Bejtlich's excellent howto for keeping FreeBSD boxes up to date: > > > http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_up-to-date.html > > > > The instructions say to create a supfile with a line like this: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_1 > > > > and if you want to upgrade to the next version, to use this instead: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE > > > > My question: Is it OK to skip the "_RELEASE" part and instead use the > > following: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 > > > > Many thanks > > > > /wsbs Sure, go ahead :) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:29:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E025C16A479 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920A913C489 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A1C1C9530; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:29:04 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:29:03 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <419419.40105.qm@web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <419419.40105.qm@web35209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706051729.04111.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: wo_shi_big_stomach Subject: Re: using CVS to upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:29:06 -0000 On Tuesday 05 June 2007 16:38, wo_shi_big_stomach wrote: > Got a question about upgrading using cvsup. > > > > I've been following Richard Bejtlich's excellent howto for keeping > FreeBSD boxes up to date: > > > http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_up-to-date.html > > > > The instructions say to create a supfile with a line like this: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_1 > > > > and if you want to upgrade to the next version, to use this instead: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE > > > > My question: Is it OK to skip the "_RELEASE" part and instead use the > > following: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 > > The *_RELEASE tags are points_in_time tags, you'll get a FreeBSD-something-RELEASE, the same thing that's on the released CDs. RELENG_a_b is RELENG_a_b_0_RELEASE + security patches, the code is very similar to RELENG_a_b_0_RELEASE. You'll be safe - actually safer - using RELENG_6_2 instead of RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE. more here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:39:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4562916A469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0569013C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HvZxR-0002pY-6S for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:24:26 +0100 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HvZwR-000471-NR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:23:24 +0100 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l55EDU8s008198 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:13:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from shterenl@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l55EDU9P008197 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:13:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: shterenl set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:13:30 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070605141330.GA7864@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: minimal xorg installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:39:30 -0000 For an old laptop with a small disk is there an alternative to a full x11/xorg installation? Previously (version 6.9) I used to get a working set by installing the components individually. Can I do this with 7.2. In particular, I cannot find anythig like xorg-clients port. If not in detail, perhaps in principal what must I have. I alredy have the following: ===>>> xorg-cf-files-1.0.2_2 ===>>> xorg-apps-7.2 ===>>> xorg-fonts-truetype-7.2 ===>>> xorg-libraries-7.2_1 ===>>> xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1 thanks a lot anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:45:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF91216A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (thenetnow.com [69.90.69.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A491113C448 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANT) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HvZ4b-0004Og-No; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:27:45 -0400 Message-ID: <00eb01c7a775$4d5e0cd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: "Sten Daniel Soersdal" , References: <46654F9E.9050401@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:27:44 -0400 Organization: The Net Now MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Reading temperature on DELL PE2850? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:45:02 -0000 I use racadm on my local machine and have found that the linux version = will run on FreeBSD.=20 There are commands in the racadm utility to read temps and voltages etc = etc, a little cumbersome, but possible. Too bad DRAC IIIs are so unreliable because the interface includes all = that. racadm is better used from a windows machine to remotely read the drac = though. -GRant ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal=20 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:57 AM Subject: Reading temperature on DELL PE2850? I'm contemplating setting "sysctl machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=3D0" on my 4 = core=20 PE2850, but i am concerned that without HLT-ing would increase the=20 temperature levels to dangerous levels. Are there any ways for me to read temperatures from FreeBSD/DRAC4 ? --=20 Sten Daniel Soersdal _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Total Control Panel Login =20 To: gpeel@thenetnow.com Block messages from this sender = (blacklist) =20 From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Remove this sender = from my whitelist =20 =20 You received this message because the sender is on your = whitelist. =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:50:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095A116A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB5613C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l55EjLcw073481; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:45:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l55EjLCx073480; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:45:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:45:21 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: gmoniey Message-ID: <20070605144521.GA73434@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:50:00 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:52:43PM -0700, gmoniey wrote: > > thanks for the ideas, i tried both of your suggestions...i manually ran the > rails.sh file, and everything worked as expected...so i dumped the output to > file...my .sh file looks as such: > > #!/bin/sh > case "$1" in > start) > echo "RAILS found start" >> /tmp/test.file > kldload accf_http >> /tmp/test.file > mongrel_rails cluster::start -v -C > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb start > ;; > stop) > echo "RAILS found stop" >> /tmp/test.file > mongrel_rails cluster::stop -v -C > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb stop > ;; > *) > echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 > exit 64 > ;; > esac > > > and the test.file ended up with this after the reboot: > > $cat /tmp/test.file > RAILS found start > > > the weird part is that the Rails found stop never printed...and im not sure > why the mongrel_rails fails (im assuming that the kldload works fine as it > doesn't print out any error messages if it is successfull) Well, it looks like something after the case-start echo did not work and things just died there and nothing else ran. I would also put an echo just before the start and the stop sections of the rc.d script end eg, just before the ';;' in each.. What is the '/usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file' supposed to accomplish? ////jerry > > i guess i will just keep playing with it... > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10963533 > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:55:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B77E16A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2F313C465 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l55EoSec073506; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:50:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l55EoSWg073505; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:50:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:50:28 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Ivan Carey Message-ID: <20070605145028.GB73434@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4664DCAB.8050107@careytech.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to understand partition sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:55:10 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:46:51PM +1000, Ivan Carey wrote: > Hello, > After installing a new system on a 500Gb HDD the partition size I > allocated at install does no match the size after complete system > installation This is well covered in the FAQ and in numerous posts to this list. Check the archives. ////jerry > Disc size comes up as 476937MB > > At install I partitioned the disc: > / 2048Mb > /swap 4096Mb > /var 2048Mb > /server 440Gb > /usr 13065Mb > > After install and checking the partition sizes with KDiskFree the > partitions are: > / 1.9Gb > /var 1.9Gb > /server 431.0Gb > /usr 12.4Gb > > The /server is 9Gb smaller than I partitioned and the actual free space > without any files in the partition is shown as 396.5Gb which is another > 34.5Gb smaller. > > Am I actually seeing what is really happening or am I really loosing > 43.5Gb of space on the /server partition > > Thanks, > Ivan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 15:02:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D7B16A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbuzzard@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18D613C4C7 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbuzzard@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so3023836pyi for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AoyywD23VBT/+XqIuK/oNA9PDUPB8PTXsp9hHqzBF0pvIAkmt/xrofaVp5ScuPBaxuXCtRxG07QS1DEmVZGRGUwvULivMd5Jb9LJJQrnsIe0Ba8wpUY3SE/3heoeYa/SV2wUenmfLWcDyPeQgG81fPJCzV19QA9tKMf+LAOh8AM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=sOEivuLyBvvc9LbdADrrbDvP88cJKI1QLBlzcNF3UPkfX1Pomyb9uxDjF4f4fEXsYdY3XJcH3aJ3WQuY8zBesBxTUFPJFUyBT3YA2tn8T87Zs1cOh9a0FBUW11Jr9gGA/KtKMZmuQBoZLup9ZnJhWupFJ+M4Oo9QFjB1F+dAo+A= Received: by 10.35.110.13 with SMTP id n13mr10461874pym.1181055769205; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.84.13 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <716841580706050802u171606aew2cd37f0479f67f19@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:02:49 -0600 From: "Oscar Chavarria" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Absolute Newbie - USB Keyboard not recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:02:52 -0000 I have used the latest tip in the mailing list archives, to move the cable to another USB physical port, but still the keyboard will not work at the BSD prompt.. The purpose is to boot as single user. Thanks is advance for any help. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regards Oscar Chavarria Mobile: +506 814-0247 --- The more I know people the more I love my FreeBSD --- --- In a world without boundaries, we don't need Windows or Gates --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 15:03:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A3E16A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB2113C484 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b14so1719799qbc for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.21.8 with SMTP id 8mr9265658wxu.1181055813011; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10sm1434019wxd.2007.06.05.08.03.31; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:03:43 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <7c80322b0706050657w3d7faef5yab779e11d1d5a2ba@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070605122030.74364802@localhost> <7c80322b0706050657w3d7faef5yab779e11d1d5a2ba@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070605104323.3868.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re: problem compiling xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:03:40 -0000 On Tuesday June 05, 2007 at 09:57:53 (AM) Anton Galitch wrote: > On 6/4/07, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:18 -0300 > > "Anton Galitch" wrote: > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > I have a problem when I compile /usr/ports/x11/xorg, when I make install > > it > > > shows the following error: > > > > > > > > > configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other > > > OpenGL package is installed > > > See `config.log' for more details. > > > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > > > > I have installed libGL and libGLU but it shows the same error. > > > > > > I attach my config.log file and the output of ls /var/db/pkg > > > > > > Thanks for any help > > > > Hi Anton, > > are you upgrading xorg or installing xorg for the first time in this > > machine? > > > > you have to follow the steps in /usr/ports/UPDATING, even if not > > upgrading. > Hi. > The situation is following: > I had xorg 6.9 installed, after trying to upgrade it with portupgrade I > deinstalled it and now want to install it from scratch. > My portmanager program works strange thats why I cant install it usin > /usr/ports/UPDATING. > Do you know any other way of installing it using another tools?? Please don't top post. If you don't know what that means, please take the time to Google for it. I have reformatted this post so that it might be more readily deciphered. Now, onto your problem. Unfortunately, my crystal ball is out for repairs today. Since you did not bother to include any specific information or a copy of the log file that was created as specified in the 'UPDATING' file when you attempted to update 'xorg', I cannot assist you. However, now that you have deinstalled it, you should be able to start fresh -- I think. You probably need to follow these instructions: It is necessary to set the XORG_UPGRADE environment variable while updating from xorg 6.9 to 7.2. Once the upgrade is complete this is no longer be required. For users of csh-like shells: # setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes For users of sh-like shells: # export XORG_UPGRADE=yes I am assuming that you have the portupgrade-devel port installed. If not, it would probably behoove you to do so first as described in the 'UPDATING' file. You could also probably go this route via portmanager. First, make sure you have an up-to-date ports tree. Next, run: pkgdb -Ffuv This should make sure that all of the dependencies are listed correctly. Now, run: portmanager x11/xorg -l -f That should get xorg installed along with its dependencies. -- Gerard DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate... ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 15:23:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E8F16A46D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149BC13C45D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55FNVdZ028347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:23:31 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55FNUaJ013519 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:23:31 -0700 Message-ID: <46657FF3.50705@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:23:31 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oscar Chavarria References: <716841580706050802u171606aew2cd37f0479f67f19@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <716841580706050802u171606aew2cd37f0479f67f19@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.80538 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Absolute Newbie - USB Keyboard not recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:23:32 -0000 Oscar Chavarria wrote: > I have used the latest tip in the mailing list archives, to move the > cable > to another USB physical port, but still the keyboard will not work at the > BSD prompt.. > > The purpose is to boot as single user. > > Thanks is advance for any help. What version do you have installed and what's your motherboard maker? Did you also remember to put (proper) usb support in the kernel? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 15:24:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6770B16A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4661613C465 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E1CA06A0; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:24:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4665802D.30807@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:24:29 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oscar Chavarria References: <716841580706050802u171606aew2cd37f0479f67f19@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <716841580706050802u171606aew2cd37f0479f67f19@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Absolute Newbie - USB Keyboard not recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Written by Oscar Chavarria on 06/05/07 10:02>> > I have used the latest tip in the mailing list archives, to move the cable > to another USB physical port, but still the keyboard will not work at the > BSD prompt.. > > The purpose is to boot as single user. > > Thanks is advance for any help. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Regards > > Oscar Chavarria > Mobile: +506 814-0247 > > --- The more I know people the more I love my FreeBSD --- > > --- In a world without boundaries, we don't need Windows or Gates --- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" At the loader prompt, set hints.atkbd0.disabled="1". This should allow your usb keyboard to work in single user mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 15:35:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B778C16A47A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678BF13C4BC for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55FZMWb012161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:35:22 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-166-149-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.166.149.71]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55FZLIO007930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:35:22 -0700 Message-ID: <466582BA.5070500@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:35:22 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "N. Harrington" References: <798114.3933.qm@web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <798114.3933.qm@web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.81534 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__C230066_P2 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:35:23 -0000 N. Harrington wrote: > --- Garrett Cooper wrote: > > >> N. Harrington wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> I have several systems that are used as squid >>> caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI >>> disks and some that use SATA disks. They are >>> identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI >>> drives. >>> >>> At random times, the sata based systems seem to >>> >> be >> >>> freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but >>> >> you >> >>> cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during >>> >> that >> >>> time. >>> >>> I figure it mist be something to do with the >>> >> disks, >> >>> but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to >>> >> be >> >>> little rhyme or reason. It does not happen >>> >> necessarily >> >>> during busy times. It can happen in the middle of >>> >> the >> >>> night. >>> >>> Any pointers in how to track down the cause would >>> >> be >> >>> much appreciated. >>> >>> Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem >>> Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives >>> FreeBSD amd64 6.2-STABLE. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Nicole >>> >>> >> Nicole, >> What's the driver in use for the SATA and the >> SCSI drives? >> -Garrett >> > > Hi Garret > Here is the driver info. > > -- SATA > > atapci0: port > 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa80f > > mem > 0xfeafec00-0xfeafefff irq 17 at device 5.0 on pci3 > ata2: on atapci0 > ata3: on atapci0 > ata4: on atapci0 > ata5: on atapci0 > pci3: at device 6.0 (no driver > attached) > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci1: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at > device 7.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci1 > ata1: on atapci1 > pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver > attached) > pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) > pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib2 > > -- SCSI > > ahd0: port > 0x8000-0x80ff,0x7800-0x78ff > mem 0xfc89c000-0xfc89dfff irq 24 at device 10.0 on > pci2 > ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X > 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs > ahd1: port > 0x8800-0x88ff,0x8400-0x84ff > mem 0xfc89e000-0xfc89ffff irq 25 at device 10.1 on > pci2 > ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X > 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs > pci0: at > device 10.1 (no driver attached) > pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib3 > pci0: at > device 11.1 (no driver attached) > > > > Thanks! > > Nicole Ok, so it's an AMD 8111 northbridge versus an Adaptec onboard SCSI controller. 1. What release / version of FreeBSD are you using? You should upgrade to 6.2 STABLE because there have been a variety of issues worked out in previous releases. 2. Do you have any logs for activity during the hours when it locks up (in particular anything interesting / fishy popping up)? 3. What scheduler are you using? 4BSD, ULE? 4. Does your machine (using the SATA controllers) lock up under heavy load? If so, you may have a northbridge cooling issue that you need to put a fan on. For instance, the motherboard that I was using for a while (ASUS P5N-E SLI) was really close to my CPU heatsink, and there was a lot of heat transfer between my northbridge and CPU heatsink, which was raising the onboard temperatures 5~10 degrees C. The new motherboard (ASUS P5B DLX) doesn't do that though. Cheers, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 16:06:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1E516A46C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (smtpclu-6.eunet.yu [194.247.192.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24E813C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-213-253.eunet.yu [213.198.213.253]) by smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l55G6gQI023168; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:06:43 GMT Message-Id: <200706051606.l55G6gQI023168@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:06:49 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20070605141330.GA7864@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20070605141330.GA7864@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_60,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 1.0 X-AVAS-Spam-Level: xx Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: minimal xorg installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:06:54 -0000 Hello, On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:13:30 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > For an old laptop with a small disk is there an alternative to > a full x11/xorg installation? Previously (version 6.9) I used to get > a working set by installing the components individually. Can I do this > with 7.2. In particular, I cannot find anythig like xorg-clients port. > If not in detail, perhaps in principal what must I have. I alredy > have the following: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> xorg-cf-files-1.0.2_2 > =3D=3D=3D>>> xorg-apps-7.2 > =3D=3D=3D>>> xorg-fonts-truetype-7.2 > =3D=3D=3D>>> xorg-libraries-7.2_1 > =3D=3D=3D>>> xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1 You must have xorg-7.2 meta-port installed. If you worry about the disk space or speed of the new Xorg (on an older machine), I confirm that Xorg-7.2 is _amazingly_ faster than 6.9; and this is especially visible on older hardware. In general, startup time of GTK applications in up to 30-50% shorter, and things like video playback are incredibly improved. So, you don't need to cut anything. Just update your working system according to /usr/ports/UPDATING. If you want to save disk space (during compilling), use 'portupgrade -aP'.=20 Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 16:27:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE09616A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D8A13C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1346F5CBC; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46658EF8.5080704@vindaloo.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:27:36 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: misc@openbsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Isakmpd setup question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:27:38 -0000 Hi, I would like to set up isakmpd so I can connect my roaming laptop to my NATed LAN behind an OpenBSD firewall on a cable modem. I have an ISAKMPD configuration which allows me to do this but to build it I have setup the Phase 1 Identifiers to be the IP Addresses that I get. While the Cable modem side of the connection is reasonably static the laptop side is anything but. My laptop runs FreeBSD and I have built the isakmpd port. My laptop also has a constant FQDN via dyndns.org. I would like to know how to convert my current configuration from relying on IP addresses to relying on FWDN on both sides. I grabbed my initial configurations from the OpenBSD examples and tweaked them until they worked for me but I need to go those few extra steps. Here's /etc/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf from my OpenBSD firewall/router: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # $OpenBSD: VPN-east.conf,v 1.12 2002/06/09 08:13:07 todd Exp $ # $EOM: VPN-east.conf,v 1.12 2000/10/09 22:08:30 angelos Exp $ # A configuration sample for the isakmpd ISAKMP/Oakley (aka IKE) daemon. # # The network topology of the example net is like this: # # 192.168.11.0/24 - west [.11] - 10.1.0.0/24 - [.12] east - #192.168.12.0/24 # # "west" and "east" are the respective secrity gateways (aka VPN-nodes). ## We are east. [General] Listen-on= 192.168.132.1 [Phase 1] 172.17.0.1= ISAKMP-peer-west [Phase 2] Passive-Connections= IPsec-east-west [ISAKMP-peer-west] Phase= 1 Transport= udp Address= 172.17.0.1 Configuration= Default-aggressive-mode Authentication= *** not my real password *** [IPsec-east-west] Phase= 2 ISAKMP-peer= ISAKMP-peer-west Configuration= Default-quick-mode Local-ID= Net-east Remote-ID= Net-west [Net-west] ID-type= IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET Network= 172.17.0.1 Netmask= 255.255.255.255 [Net-east] ID-type= IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET Network= 10.0.0.0 Netmask= 255.255.255.0 [Default-main-mode] DOI= IPSEC EXCHANGE_TYPE= ID_PROT Transforms= 3DES-SHA [Default-aggressive-mode] DOI= IPSEC EXCHANGE_TYPE= AGGRESSIVE Transforms= 3DES-SHA [Default-quick-mode] DOI= IPSEC EXCHANGE_TYPE= QUICK_MODE Suites= QM-ESP-AES-SHA-PFS-SUITE # End of file And here's the corresponding /etc/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf from my laptop: --------------------------------------------------------------------- ### We are "west" here [General] # Listen-on= 172.17.100.1 [Phase 1] 192.168.132.1= ISAKMP-peer-west [Phase 2] Connections= IPsec-east-west [ISAKMP-peer-west] Phase= 1 Transport= udp Address= 192.168.132.1 Configuration= Default-aggressive-mode Authentication= *** not my real password *** [IPsec-east-west] Phase= 2 ISAKMP-peer= ISAKMP-peer-west Configuration= Default-quick-mode Local-ID= Net-west Remote-ID= Net-east [Net-west] ID-type= IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET Network= 172.17.0.1 Netmask= 255.255.255.255 [Net-east] ID-type= IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET Network= 10.0.0.0 Netmask= 255.255.255.0 [Default-main-mode] DOI= IPSEC EXCHANGE_TYPE= ID_PROT Transforms= 3DES-SHA [Default-aggressive-mode] DOI= IPSEC EXCHANGE_TYPE= AGGRESSIVE Transforms= 3DES-SHA [Default-quick-mode] DOI= IPSEC EXCHANGE_TYPE= QUICK_MODE Suites= QM-ESP-AES-SHA-PFS-SUITE ## End of file I appreciate any help that someone could provide. I'm especially interested in developing a better understanding of how isakmpd works with uses these configurations. Thank you -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 16:43:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0715716A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8775A13C48A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l55GgpP8038302; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:42:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4E361B8FD; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:42:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:42:51 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Jeffrey Goldberg Message-ID: <20070605164251.GA19848@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Jeffrey Goldberg , Vlad GURDIGA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070604210800.GA91356@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Vlad GURDIGA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Registering installation for... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:43:07 -0000 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Roland Smith wrote: >=20 > > This is probably due to the new structure of xorg. On my system, mplayer > > now depenws on 104 other ports (pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep Dependency:|w= c=20 > > -l). >=20 > Some dependencies will be counted multiple times that way, try >=20 > pkg_info -rx mplayer|grep Dependency:| sort | uniq | wc -l I still get 104. > I don't have mplayer on my system so I can't check that particular one, = but=20 > here's another example >=20 > $ pkg_info -rx docproj | grep '^Depend' | wc -l > 143 > $ pkg_info -rx docproj | grep '^Depend' | sort | uniq | wc -l > 57 Don't have that one. But mozilla gives 100 dependencies both ways. > I really have no idea of how the pkg database works so I don't know whet= her=20 > it treats those duplications wisely. I think your database has old dependencies lying around. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGZZKLEnfvsMMhpyURAlTNAJ9d59hnvEM3c56HbV4nnW0B095dkwCfQVWI TTfh7UvZ45yKyCvig/JbqZY= =2mRx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 16:54:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EA216A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF0413C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HvcIQ-0005ln-Hi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:54:14 -0700 Message-ID: <10973422.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT) From: gmoniey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: gmoniey@gmail.com References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:54:15 -0000 thanks guys...i will try the new script tonight (unfortunately i cant work on this during the day...) also, Jerry...the line: '/usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file' is only the second half of the mongrel_rails line (i think the forum just formatted it to come out to 2 lines...but it is really 1) gmoniey wrote: > > thanks for the ideas, i tried both of your suggestions...i manually ran > the rails.sh file, and everything worked as expected...so i dumped the > output to file...my .sh file looks as such: > > #!/bin/sh > case "$1" in > start) > echo "RAILS found start" >> /tmp/test.file > kldload accf_http >> /tmp/test.file > mongrel_rails cluster::start -v -C > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb start > ;; > stop) > echo "RAILS found stop" >> /tmp/test.file > mongrel_rails cluster::stop -v -C > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb stop > ;; > *) > echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 > exit 64 > ;; > esac > > > and the test.file ended up with this after the reboot: > > $cat /tmp/test.file > RAILS found start > > > the weird part is that the Rails found stop never printed...and im not > sure why the mongrel_rails fails (im assuming that the kldload works fine > as it doesn't print out any error messages if it is successfull) > > i guess i will just keep playing with it... > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10973422 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 16:18:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF19516A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C57B13C4BD for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fredbsdavidson@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.237.87] by n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 16:18:01 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.132] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 16:18:01 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2007 16:18:01 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 806802.25977.bm@rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 35418 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 16:16:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=0c1g0Hok+/Q+rWXrhT5r5jPd/CyqMsxJ5x2ldUjvsuVI/qEbRLtfac4CKG6apbr1D4K/qE4QD6zoYNrTxAvLIz/lweozJ3G/XTY/eQkU+wN4kC9GPxPKfxtGjH3hZVrsIBdD2VRhn+5hgCo4c5UBAg5/2jxKqsc+0ekzW/2RcsQ=; X-YMail-OSG: kBxnNjcVM1my4GgwXEdaCrdBqjmXYP19L48dsoDfzWRbK6CzqDeF18Rf_IKArTnyzN.5l365rABFOicamKsGOW2nNw-- Received: from [85.214.63.253] by web57407.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:16:35 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:16:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Davidson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <744501.34996.qm@web57407.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:57:15 +0000 Subject: Loader can't read USB drive @ boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:18:02 -0000 Well I was having this problem with GRUB which someone helped me with. Now Grub will boot my USB key and load loader. The problem? loader hangs, and eventually says it can't find the kernel. when I lsdev it always gives the right description of my hard disk partitions on the hard drive, but prints nothing for the USB disk. So... Is this a problem of FreeBSD not being able to read from the USB stick this early? Is this a problem of the BIOS being fishy with FreeBSD and refusing to give up the details of the USB stick? Is this (like a read in another post) just a problem of the specific USB stick I'm using, and that there's something different about different sticks? Do these little sticks really have firmware? You ponder that, I'm gonna go drop some cash on a new USB stick, hope that's it. -Fred ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:01:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9BF16A46E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BF013C4AE for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l55GubIN074132; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:56:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l55GubTx074131; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:56:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:56:37 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: gmoniey Message-ID: <20070605165637.GA74099@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <10902043.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601131230.380039e8@localhost> <10906324.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070601154223.GC43330@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10953687.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070605031224.188cacc8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070605022154.GB71220@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <10963533.post@talk.nabble.com> <10973422.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10973422.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup / shutdown script (rc.d) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:01:16 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:54:14AM -0700, gmoniey wrote: > > thanks guys...i will try the new script tonight (unfortunately i cant work on > this during the day...) > > also, Jerry...the line: > > '/usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file' > > is only the second half of the mongrel_rails line (i think the forum just > formatted it to come out to 2 lines...but it is really 1) OK. Mostly I was wondering if you really expected it to write anything to that /tmp/test.file. I don't know what output it might create. ////jerry > > > gmoniey wrote: > > > > thanks for the ideas, i tried both of your suggestions...i manually ran > > the rails.sh file, and everything worked as expected...so i dumped the > > output to file...my .sh file looks as such: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > case "$1" in > > start) > > echo "RAILS found start" >> /tmp/test.file > > kldload accf_http >> /tmp/test.file > > mongrel_rails cluster::start -v -C > > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file > > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb start > > ;; > > stop) > > echo "RAILS found stop" >> /tmp/test.file > > mongrel_rails cluster::stop -v -C > > /usr/local/www/app/config/mongrel_cluster.yml >> /tmp/test.file > > /usr/local/www/app/script/backgroundrb stop > > ;; > > *) > > echo "Usage: `basename $0` {start|stop}" >&2 > > exit 64 > > ;; > > esac > > > > > > and the test.file ended up with this after the reboot: > > > > $cat /tmp/test.file > > RAILS found start > > > > > > the weird part is that the Rails found stop never printed...and im not > > sure why the mongrel_rails fails (im assuming that the kldload works fine > > as it doesn't print out any error messages if it is successfull) > > > > i guess i will just keep playing with it... > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/startup---shutdown-script-%28rc.d%29-tf3848895.html#a10973422 > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:02:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3A516A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3592013C455 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 55960 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 17:02:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp8.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.38) by 0 with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 17:02:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 80641 invoked by uid 98); 5 Jun 2007 17:02:49 -0000 Received: from 202.79.32.77 by smtp8.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1004) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.7/3343. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.77):. Processed in 0.136747 secs); 05 Jun 2007 17:02:49 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp8.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.77):. Processed in 0.136747 secs) Received: from smtp2.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.77) by smtp8.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 17:02:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 28520 invoked by uid 516); 5 Jun 2007 17:02:48 -0000 Received: from [202.79.38.83] (HELO [202.79.38.83]) by smtp2.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 05 Jun 2007 17:02:46 -0000 (Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:47:46 +0545) Message-ID: <46659748.3030001@wlink.com.np> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:48:04 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pieter de Goeje References: <87f7f4170706020423x6f67e84bv366cc765d21529a6@mail.gmail.com> <200706021346.05267.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <200706021346.05267.pieter@degoeje.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp2.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.3 / 7.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 Cc: Jeremy Gransden , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: See output of local xterm session on remote ssh session. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:02:54 -0000 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > On Saturday 02 June 2007, Jeremy Gransden wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have been searching Google for a few days for this but have not been >> coming up with the correct answer. Then again maybe I am asking the wrong >> question... If I start a process, i.e. compile a kernel, on my desktop, how >> can I then connect to it from my laptop and see the output of that process >> via the ssh session? >> >> thanks, >> Jeremy > screen(1) is the tool for this. You can find it in the ports collection > (sysutils/screen). > > For example: > $ screen > $ cd /usr/src; sudo make buildworld > (now press CTRL+A D) > > On the other machine, ssh into the desktop > $ screen -r > (press CTRL+A D if you've seen enough) > > Also, this will protect the running job from accidental (or purposefully) > closure of the terminal. Wow, always thought of learning how to learn this "magic". Thanks for sharing this wonderful tip! Thanking you... FreeBSD Rocks! > > HTH, > Pieter de Goeje > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:17:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FBF16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853E313C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l55HCVaJ074272; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:12:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l55HCVkx074271; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:12:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:12:31 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Fred Davidson Message-ID: <20070605171231.GC74099@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <744501.34996.qm@web57407.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <744501.34996.qm@web57407.mail.re1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loader can't read USB drive @ boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:17:09 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:16:35AM -0700, Fred Davidson wrote: > Well I was having this problem with GRUB which someone > helped me with. Now Grub will boot my USB key and > load loader. The problem? loader hangs, and > eventually says it can't find the kernel. when I > lsdev it always gives the right description of my hard > disk partitions on the hard drive, but prints nothing > for the USB disk. So... When the FreeBSD loader can't find the kernel, it often means that it is looking in the wrong place. Is your Grub MBR pointing it to the right place? What is actually on that stick? Is there a DDsNa partition for it to boot from? DD being device and N being a slice number, 1..4. ////jerry > > Is this a problem of FreeBSD not being able to read > from the USB stick this early? > > Is this a problem of the BIOS being fishy with FreeBSD > and refusing to give up the details of the USB stick? > > > Is this (like a read in another post) just a problem > of the specific USB stick I'm using, and that there's > something different about different sticks? Do these > little sticks really have firmware? > > You ponder that, I'm gonna go drop some cash on a new > USB stick, hope that's it. > > -Fred > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. > Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. > http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:17:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FDF16A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB7313C4B0 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320C77F6B96; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 8689929C006; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:00:21 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-9f821bb000000a23-38-466596a5ea49 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 7295630400D; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:00:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <798114.3933.qm@web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <798114.3933.qm@web34504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8229DFF3-1298-4692-A6CC-886EC2E97730@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:00:20 -0700 To: N. Harrington X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:17:51 -0000 On Jun 4, 2007, at 8:49 PM, N. Harrington wrote: > Hi Garret > Here is the driver info. > > -- SATA > > atapci0: port > 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa80f Ah-- regrettably, the Silicon Image 3112 & 3114 chips have some significant hardware defects, which tend to show up more frequently when you put the disk system under significant load (especially RAID). It's likely to be the case that switching to a better SATA controller would resolve the problems you are seeing with your SATA- based machines. If you have a chance, perhaps see whether building a kernel with the following patch does anything to help the "disk lockups" you've seen: --- sys/dev/ataata-chipset.c~ Wed Jun 1 14:24:26 2005 +++ sys/dev/ataata-chipset.c Tue Jun 5 12:54:58 2007 @@ -2240,7 +2240,7 @@ struct ata_pci_controller *ctlr = device_get_softc(dev); struct ata_chip_id *idx; static struct ata_chip_id ids[] = - {{ ATA_SII3114, 0x00, SIIMEMIO, SII4CH, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3114" }, + {{ ATA_SII3114, 0x00, SIIMEMIO, (SII4CH|SIIBUG), ATA_SA150, "SiI 3114" }, { ATA_SII3512, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3512" }, { ATA_SII3112, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3112" }, { ATA_SII3112_1, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3112" }, The effect of this change is to limit the SilI controller into doing DMA transfers which are smaller than 8KB, which seems to mitigate the most significant problems with the chipset, at the cost of some performance. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:26:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA56816A46C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA6713C45D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1410062wxd for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=R8bVetnkdfLOBoEcOvQ3jwH2CrCeKUvkfQolUpX0ZuSX3J8tiordhsviecW0/CSToO7iBktTI0Xd6UMq2uW+4vnNnA+QKY0o6iYDbQ7DD4ry3Hx+I2/h9khfcaR7TNA6fCmjp99KmvEETCoGux2DxTHOf/PWljV6XpxWF2pPptg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=D4byRfsW6Ch55VXABwf9lAQG9Y/ULKizrtMmu/oUaY3j3kbpT67+g4LbdQLJyvIVxsuMnAb6QqbV8FiOXNFvBR+39Zb6JzyRFOOPBEPnQEgbTfG+60gm2a2iWMh/l1Kz2faoVGUh+AH1MTi+4W56Y0ubYd31DVZuYBPp6G6P3To= Received: by 10.70.70.7 with SMTP id s7mr9468676wxa.1181064395149; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.8 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51d7a5160706051026s442b2cb8r6ee3ace7cf1cc521@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:26:35 -0700 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Problems installing asterisk-addons over FreeBSD 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:26:37 -0000 Hi people. Im trying to setup my first PBX system with asterisk from ports, my ports are updated, i install asterisk 1.4.4, gastaman, zaptel driver, but went i try to install asterisk-addons i receive this error: asteriskbsd# make install clean ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 => MD5 Checksum OK for asterisk-addons-1.2.3.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for asterisk-addons-1.2.3.tar.gz. ===> Patching for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 ===> asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 depends on executable in : asterisk - found ===> asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 depends on executable in : gmake - found ===> asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.15 - found ===> Configuring for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 ===> Building for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 ./mkdep -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include/mysql `ls *.c` gmake -C format_mp3 all gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons/work/asterisk- addons-1.2.3/format_mp3' gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o common.o common.c gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o dct64_i386.o dct64_i386.c gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o decode_ntom.o decode_ntom.c gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o layer3.o layer3.c gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o tabinit.o tabinit.c gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o interface.o interface.c gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o format_mp3.o format_mp3.c format_mp3.c:46: error: redefinition of `struct ast_filestream' format_mp3.c:325: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype format_mp3.c:336:25: macro "ast_format_register" passed 12 arguments, but takes just 1 format_mp3.c: In function `load_module': format_mp3.c:327: error: `ast_format_register' undeclared (first use in this function) format_mp3.c:327: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once format_mp3.c:327: error: for each function it appears in.) format_mp3.c: At top level: format_mp3.c:342: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype format_mp3.c:347: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype format_mp3.c:359: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype format_mp3.c:365: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype format_mp3.c:76: warning: 'exts' defined but not used format_mp3.c:107: warning: 'mp3_open' defined but not used format_mp3.c:135: warning: 'mp3_close' defined but not used format_mp3.c:219: warning: 'mp3_read' defined but not used format_mp3.c:267: warning: 'mp3_write' defined but not used format_mp3.c:275: warning: 'mp3_seek' defined but not used format_mp3.c:302: warning: 'mp3_rewrite' defined but not used format_mp3.c:308: warning: 'mp3_trunc' defined but not used format_mp3.c:315: warning: 'mp3_tell' defined but not used format_mp3.c:320: warning: 'mp3_getcomment' defined but not used gmake[1]: *** [format_mp3.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons/work/asterisk- addons-1.2.3/format_mp3' gmake: *** [format_mp3/format_mp3.so] Error 2 *** Error code 2 I want to test FreePBX to, but i need this port. Some knows how to fix this error? Thanks all for your time!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:45:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FD516A46C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: from web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DB2313C46E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36961 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 17:45:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=C9FHJvtr9dMU7ZWSSZbaeOqf7Ekzb173D5dHJxJ0GxGG9p22QUQOuLewoRiCIwwwgvw8ccByvpc4fvCmcV/2Pxe7OlphVX1FnXyFYmQV0pOjpiHW+3VLWMIKWQP1P6bvn+To1qi2bKbieMvKQbyGMHpX04KX5myw0QnRpv3OhtQ=; X-YMail-OSG: to3AgQ8VM1n7jRL95pq4LniSOXNktP5bsEeJYwThcLrOb4DALuoE5Yd9XDKxbrZRcA-- Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:45:54 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:45:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "N. Harrington" To: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: <466582BA.5070500@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <362995.35822.qm@web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:45:55 -0000 --- Garrett Cooper wrote: > N. Harrington wrote: > > --- Garrett Cooper > wrote: > > > > > >> N. Harrington wrote: > >> > >>> Hello > >>> I have several systems that are used as squid > >>> caching servers. I have some systems that use > SCSI > >>> disks and some that use SATA disks. They are > >>> identical in everyway except for the sata vs > SCSI > >>> drives. > >>> > >>> At random times, the sata based systems seem to > >>> > >> be > >> > >>> freezing. You can ping them and they respond, > but > >>> > >> you > >> > >>> cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during > >>> > >> that > >> > >>> time. > >>> > >>> I figure it mist be something to do with the > >>> > >> disks, > >> > >>> but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems > to > >>> > >> be > >> > >>> little rhyme or reason. It does not happen > >>> > >> necessarily > >> > >>> during busy times. It can happen in the middle > of > >>> > >> the > >> > >>> night. > >>> > >>> Any pointers in how to track down the cause > would > >>> > >> be > >> > >>> much appreciated. > >>> > >>> Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem > >>> Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives > >>> FreeBSD amd64 6.2-STABLE. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Nicole > >>> > >>> > >> Nicole, > >> What's the driver in use for the SATA and the > >> SCSI drives? > >> -Garrett > >> > > > > Hi Garret > > Here is the driver info. > > > > -- SATA > > > > atapci0: port > > > 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa80f > > > > mem > > 0xfeafec00-0xfeafefff irq 17 at device 5.0 on pci3 > > ata2: on atapci0 > > ata3: on atapci0 > > ata4: on atapci0 > > ata5: on atapci0 > > pci3: at device 6.0 (no driver > > attached) > > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > > isa0: on isab0 > > atapci1: port > > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf > at > > device 7.1 on pci0 > > ata0: on atapci1 > > ata1: on atapci1 > > pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver > > attached) > > pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) > > pcib2: at device 10.0 on > pci0 > > pci2: on pcib2 > > > > -- SCSI > > > > ahd0: port > > > 0x8000-0x80ff,0x7800-0x78ff > > mem 0xfc89c000-0xfc89dfff irq 24 at device 10.0 on > > pci2 > > ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X > > 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs > > ahd1: port > > > 0x8800-0x88ff,0x8400-0x84ff > > mem 0xfc89e000-0xfc89ffff irq 25 at device 10.1 on > > pci2 > > ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X > > 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs > > pci0: at > > device 10.1 (no driver attached) > > pcib3: at device 11.0 on > pci0 > > pci1: on pcib3 > > pci0: at > > device 11.1 (no driver attached) > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Nicole > Ok, so it's an AMD 8111 northbridge versus an > Adaptec onboard SCSI > controller. > > 1. What release / version of FreeBSD are you using? > You should upgrade > to 6.2 STABLE because there have been a variety of > issues worked out in previous releases. I have a range of Versions from 6.1-Pre to 6.2-STABLE as of a few months ago. > 2. Do you have any logs for activity during the > hours when it locks up > (in particular anything interesting / fishy popping > up)? Nope. That would make it too easy :) They commit suicide without a note. > 3. What scheduler are you using? 4BSD, ULE? 4BSD > 4. Does your machine (using the SATA controllers) > lock up under heavy > load? If so, you may have a northbridge cooling > issue that you need to > put a fan on. For instance, the motherboard that I > was using for a while > (ASUS P5N-E SLI) was really close to my CPU > heatsink, and there was a > lot of heat transfer between my northbridge and CPU > heatsink, which was > raising the onboard temperatures 5~10 degrees C. The > new motherboard > (ASUS P5B DLX) doesn't do that though. The lockups seem rather random. I have healthd running and they never seem to show very warm. The room is cold and the servers have great fans. Altho healthd can seem wonky as the cpu temp has actually gone below the minimum. Also the -2Volt line seems very low. But some servers runs forever that way. At least with SCSI, since it seems to manage itself as another layer away from the system, you get some error messages. Sort of like windows 3.1 dropping to dos. Verses sata issues where it's just blue screen of death but without even some debugging code. I am going to try the patch chuck Swiger sent me and see how that effects things. Also try a few replacement sata cards. Altho that is always fun especially in 1U servers. As well as seeing if using SAS drives may help if I can find some cheap enough. Do you think that using the ULE scheduler could really help? Thanks Nicole > Cheers, > -Garrett > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 17:57:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC42716A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA4E13C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l55HvYc5089284; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:57:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id l55HvXAY089283; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:57:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.jnielsen.net: www set sender to lists@jnielsen.net using -f Received: from 70.150.196.243 ([70.150.196.243]) by newwebmail.jnielsen.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:57:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20070605135733.bju5l1fioc40c00c@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:57:33 -0400 From: John Nielsen To: ivan@careytech.com.au References: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> In-Reply-To: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) / FreeBSD-4.9 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:57:36 -0000 Quoting Ivan Carey : > I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's > I have set them up in rc.conf as follows > > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" > ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > The question, is this the correct configuration? Manually specifying network_interfaces is deprecated (take that line out). Putting both NIC's on the same subnet and segment but with different IP's like this may not be too useful.. > If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 > and 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 > > If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 > > If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. That is because the route to 192.168.1.1 is associated with em0 at this point. > What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that > in the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. For that to be most useful you'll want to set something up so they can share the same IP. The lagg(4) (link aggregation) virtual interface has already been mentioned, but I believe it is still only available in -CURRENT. Other possibilities might include attaching ifconfig scripts to link up/down events or [lack of] ping responses on one or both interfaces. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 18:38:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACEC16A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79EB113C45E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: (qmail 12845 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 18:38:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (thomasjudge@btinternet.com@217.44.143.76 with plain) by smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 18:38:05 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: N.fUT9oVM1mn.YXjtSxys44dbzUD2Ww.xV33BYdsZPrxG9GT Message-ID: <4665AE60.7080908@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:41:36 +0100 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen References: <46654109.8070507@careytech.com.au> <20070605135733.bju5l1fioc40c00c@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <20070605135733.bju5l1fioc40c00c@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ivan@careytech.com.au Subject: Re: How to correctly use 2 on board nics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:38:08 -0000 John Nielsen wrote: > Quoting Ivan Carey : >> I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's >> I have set them up in rc.conf as follows >> >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >> network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0" >> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" >> ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" >> >> The question, is this the correct configuration? > > Manually specifying network_interfaces is deprecated (take that line > out). Putting both NIC's on the same subnet and segment but with > different IP's like this may not be too useful.. > >> If I have both nic's connected to the switch I can ping 192.168.1.1 >> and 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4 >> >> If I have only em0 connected I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.3 >> >> If I have only em1 connected I can ping 192.168.1.3. > > That is because the route to 192.168.1.1 is associated with em0 at this > point. > >> What could the 2 onboard nic's be best used for. I was thinking that >> in the event on was to fail then the other would still be ok. > > For that to be most useful you'll want to set something up so they can > share the same IP. The lagg(4) (link aggregation) virtual interface has > already been mentioned, but I believe it is still only available in > -CURRENT. Other possibilities might include attaching ifconfig scripts > to link up/down events or [lack of] ping responses on one or both > interfaces. > > JN I thought I saw if_lagg MFC'd to RELENG_6 a few weeks back on cvs-src@... After checking cvsweb it is available in RELENG_6. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 18:40:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0433F16A46F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66A613C48C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8381C1A4D84; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9CB511D0; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:40:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2C59AC207; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:40:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:40:04 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Nicole Harrington Message-ID: <20070605184004.GA45595@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <661463.95597.qm@web34503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <661463.95597.qm@web34503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:40:05 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:40:56PM -0700, Nicole Harrington wrote: > Hello > I have several systems that are used as squid > caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI > disks and some that use SATA disks. They are > identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI > drives. > > At random times, the sata based systems seem to be > freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but you > cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during that > time. > > I figure it mist be something to do with the disks, > but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to be > little rhyme or reason. It does not happen necessarily > during busy times. It can happen in the middle of the > night. > > Any pointers in how to track down the cause would be > much appreciated. See the email I sent yesterday to a similar question. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 19:22:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B2916A49A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from designaproduct.biz (135-shost.hostoffice.hu [195.228.74.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B3013C44C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [172.16.0.43] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by designaproduct.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923731DD420 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4665B011.2020603@shopzeus.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:48:49 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: rdesktop: segmentation fault under xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:22:46 -0000 Hello All, I have just upgraded my FreeBSD ports. uname -a output: FreeBSD cassiopeia.ronet 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #4: Sat Feb 17 16:56:53 CET 2007 gandalf@cassiopeia.ronet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CASSIOPEIA i386 The ports tree was updated about three days ago. The newly updated rdesktop application exits with "segmentation fault (core dumped)". I also tried to install an older version from source (rdesktop 1.4.1) and had the same result. Finally, I tried to run rdesktop but send its output to a different machine (Ubuntu Feisty). It worked perfectly. So I believe that the problem is with the new xorg version, not rdesktop. I'm not 100% sure. Do you have the same problem? Is there a solution for this? BTW, as a workaround, I'm using an open source java based RDP implementation and it works. Best, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 19:43:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040516A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from lon-mail-1.gradwell.net (lon-mail-1.gradwell.net [193.111.201.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1998A13C45A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from lon-mail-1.gradwell.net ([193.111.201.125] helo=webmaker country=GB ident=dave#pop3*dgmm*net) by lon-mail-1.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.243) id 4665b341.11deb.1cb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:02:25 +0100 (envelope-sender ) From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:02:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705311852.OAA06017@login024.unx.sas.com> In-Reply-To: <200705311852.OAA06017@login024.unx.sas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706052002.25404.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:43:12 -0000 On Thursday 31 May 2007, Tom Wilson wrote: > I always liked one of the messages from an old version of the VMS (4 or 5?) > C compiler(may not be exactly it, but this was included): > > Bad Code Or the Level I BASIC error messages on a TRS-80. What? How? Sorry? And that's all folks. The entire repertoire of error reporting on Level I Basic :-) Of course, fitting a BASIC interpretor and OS into only 4K of ROM was quite an achievement in itself. I doubt there were many spare bytes for more informative error reports. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 19:46:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0AC16A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B6513C448 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l55JkNO9025213 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:46:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200706051946.l55JkNO9025213@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:46:23 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Can a Cisco Device use RSA authentication for SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:46:25 -0000 A person in our group is trying to scp files from a Cisco IOS device to a FreeBSD work station. The Cisco box uses an RSA key and sshd on the FreeBSD system won't recognize the algorithm. The error message on the Cisco side of things looks like: 000039: Jun 5 14:13:59.623 CDT: SSH2 0: hostkey algo not supported: client ssh-rsa, server ssh-dss Is there a safe way to make this work? Thank you. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 20:00:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D4B16A421; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from frontmail.ipactive.de (frontmail.maindns.de [85.214.95.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB2013C447; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from mail.vtec.ipme.de (Q7dbe.q.ppp-pool.de [89.53.125.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by frontmail.ipactive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3746A12881E; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:59:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cesar.sz.vwsoft.com (unknown [192.168.18.3]) by mail.vtec.ipme.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030B3F9E5; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:59:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4665C091.90808@vwsoft.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:59:13 +0200 From: Volker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070528) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> <70f41ba20706041537laba6223v8c879e344d799052@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706041537laba6223v8c879e344d799052@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VWSoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com X-ipactive-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ipactive-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ipactive-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com Cc: mikhailg@webanoide.org, freebsd-pf Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:00:04 -0000 Hi snow, On 06/05/07 00:37, snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > On 6/4/07, Volker wrote: >> without seeing your pf.conf ruleset, > > happy to send/post if required/helpful ... I don't think it's required for now. >> I guess you're using a ppp >> connection to your upstream provider and firewalling on the tunX >> interface (using tun0 as $ext_if). > > you're absolutely correct here. > >> As FreeBSD boots up, this interface does not yet exist when pf is >> loaded. > > clear. > >> As soon as ppp is loaded and interface tun0 has been created, >> pf will happily load your ruleset. > > aha. does that suggest that i'm simply not waiting long enough? your > following comments suggest otherwise, iiuc, that i need to proactively > _do_ something different ... It's not _you_ aren't waiting too long. It's at the time pf is being loaded, the interface pf want's to filter on does not yet exist. See it as a wrong load order. The only thing you could do is only using interfaces which do exist at boot-up time. tun, ppp and ng interfaces are created a bit later (by default). You could avoid using dynamic interfaces in your ruleset (which is not always possible). For example you could filter on the interface group 'pass out on tun from any to any port http keep state' should happily be parsed and loaded at boot time, even while no tun interface does exist. As soon as you're trying to get the IP address of such interface (rdr rules most likely), pf will fail with a 'device not configured' error message (or the like). >> The solution is to either have pf rules loaded late (later than ppp is >> started) > > clearly, simply including pf-related items in rc.conf after > pppoe-related items is not sufficient. > > i'll take a look at "rcorder" ... which i wasn't aware of at all. thanks! The clearest solution is to have a pf ruleset without any dynamic interfaces included but having anchors included to later fill the rules as soon as the dynamic interfaces are created. As that is one thing on my 2do list for a long time, I don't have any good examples for that. The OpenBSD pf FAQ does contain a bit about this. If you want to avoid using anchors, you can use a very quick and dirty solution by just symlinking /etc/rc.d/pf to /usr/local/etc/rc.d. A bit better (just a bit) is to create a new rc file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d which may contain something like: file: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pf-late #!/bin/sh # PROVIDE: pf-late # REQUIRE: NETWORKING DAEMON /etc/rc.d/pf ${1} #EOF This script will run after all networking parts and all daemon processes have been loaded and will load pf rules. Using that, pf rules will be loaded twice: the first (regular) time will fail and the 2nd time will most likely succeed. Keep in mind this is just a quick and dirty workaround. > >> or use anchors and load ext rules into the anchor when the >> ppp interface is up. > > i hadn't thought of using anchors in this fashion. > > i'm off to google, but any good examples you can reference? > >> The easier is to have the rules loading late >> (check using rcorder) but this may also fail if something goes wrong >> with ppp. > > i /thought/ i'd dealt with the intfc/ppo/pf ordering issue, configuring, > > cat /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup > ------------------------------------ > ppp1: > ! sh -c "/sbin/pfctl -ef /usr/local/etc/pf/pf.conf" That might work but I would try to have it running in the background (!bg) as while forking a foreground process, ppp will be blocked for that time. > !bg sh -c "echo `/bin/date` `/etc/bin/ip` ppp.linkup >> > /etc/ppp/log" > ------------------------------------ > > cat /etc/ppp/ppp.linkdown > ------------------------------------ > ppp1: > !bg route delete HISADDR ppp1 > !bg pfctl -F all -d > ------------------------------------ > > cat /etc/ppp/ppp.conf > ------------------------------------ > default: > set device PPPoE:sis1: > set speed sync > set ctsrts off > set dial > set login > set cd 10 > set timeout 0 > set redial 0 0 > enable lqr > set lqrperiod 20 > set log Phase tun command > > add default HISADDR > enable tcpmssfixup > disable dns > > ppp1: > set authname me@myisp.com > set authkey ############ > set MRU 1492 > set MTU 1492 > ------------------------------------ > > are these NOT supposed to address/solve the problem? or are the configs > wrong? Other then the bg issue, I don't have an idea why your current config does not work. You may check (just a guess) if pf does see that interface at the time the linkup script is executed by inserting `pfctl -sI' and check the output. If running that (pf) script in the background does not solve your problem, you may go the quick workaround by using a 'pf-late' script. If you really want to have it clear and well designed (and can afford the time on hacking and testing this), anchors are the way to go. Within your ppp.linkup script you would then need to load the rules into the anchors for the tun interface. HTH Volker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 20:07:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36CC16A474 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF5A13C489 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [80.171.116.153] (helo=janh.freebsd) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1HvfJD0PJE-0006Li; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:07:16 +0200 Message-ID: <4665C268.2040707@janh.de> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:07:04 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070513) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/jcrLy4vP2MI50nbPAr92GMShFMKp0L87GwUn rlfrpbdHVnXFcBobpk5g78BFRN3rq2gf0+NZw5gYLvc9wbN2Rn ngUXqPTHW7GzdU45Dk0iQ== Cc: gandalf@shopzeus.com Subject: Re: rdesktop: segmentation fault under xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:07:26 -0000 For me, rdesktop works -- I have all my ports upgraded... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 20:49:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31AD16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084713C45B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7379582549B; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay6.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 5EBE21004D; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:49:40 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807124-9fec6bb000000801-2b-4665cc64fc9c Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 4538510071; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:49:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200706051946.l55JkNO9025213@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <200706051946.l55JkNO9025213@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:49:39 -0700 To: Martin McCormick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can a Cisco Device use RSA authentication for SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:49:40 -0000 On Jun 5, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: > A person in our group is trying to scp files from a Cisco IOS > device to a FreeBSD work station. The Cisco box uses an RSA key > and sshd on the FreeBSD system won't recognize the algorithm. > The error message on the Cisco side of things looks like: > > 000039: Jun 5 14:13:59.623 CDT: SSH2 0: hostkey algo not > supported: > client ssh-rsa, server ssh-dss > > Is there a safe way to make this work? I'd imagine that you can use ssh-keygen to generate a replacement RSA1 or RSA2 host key rather than a DSA key: /usr/bin/ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -b 1024 -f /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key -N '' ...or "-t rsa" for a protocol-2 RSA key, if the Cisco can deal with those. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 21:12:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DA116A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 232C613C465 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 84505 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jun 2007 20:45:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ofYZtuj6RI/FS+oDuoSKAma0Xjv/81muA0wIXIfI+nT6nJsX/5yV69DkGMMZj/Dmfr7MLB7JzZc+UEkXPyQDZLXF+Vh/25Ce/5fV/mfuHvI4z9udcqj4YaadciXcMKoPaGCVua93X6iySZcMi3cXiyDEUdcmBShYy9CxU0PHH4o=; X-YMail-OSG: HzzsLJkVM1mdQqDtXeGMF1cj2X06PhS2KpKpc9by9IJnvkukBnuCwSd6UagodaEJWoIpsAmhwg-- Received: from [75.41.234.82] by web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:45:22 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Busby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <67807.82649.qm@web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: eGroupWare-egw-pear X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:12:05 -0000 I notice that the new version of egroupware 1.4.001 requires eGroupWare-egw-pear. Does anyone have a successful install?? I tried an upgrade 1.2.106 but something about php5 was broken, and dropped back to php4. I forget what part of php5 would not build, it was several months ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 21:23:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49B716A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A675B13C43E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 4DAF47FCE3 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at webtent.net Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (esmtp.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLE3836HiMQc for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id E4EF97FC94 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:50:45 -0400 Message-Id: <1181076645.4012.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ports system gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:23:45 -0000 How can I restore my ports system? I have no idea what happened. I have a server I setup over the weekend to start testing Maia Mailguard, installed many packages over the last few days (postfix+amavisd+SA+related). I can't remember the last package installed via the ports system, I updated it to src-all and back to ports-all once to compile my kernel. Now, today I go to install a package and practically everything is gone...this is all I have left... mx1# ls /usr/ports INDEX-6 INDEX-6.db dns security INDEX-6.bz2 distfiles net mx1# ls /usr/ports/dns bind9-dlz mx1# ls /usr/ports/security/ vscan mx1# ls /usr/ports/net/ openldap23-client At this point I want to assume I mistakenly did a rm sometime, what else could cause something like this? Can't find any issues in the logs and no other issues with any services running on the box. Can't find anything else missing. If I try to run my ports update my ports, it just hangs here... mx1# cd /usr/ports mx1# /usr/local/bin/cvsup /root/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup9.us.FreeBSD.org Updating collection ports-all/cvs -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 21:29:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D2816A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C7F13C468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 26030 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 21:29:29 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Jun 2007 21:29:29 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D066D28440; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:29:27 -0400 (EDT) To: Robert Fitzpatrick References: <1181076645.4012.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:29:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1181076645.4012.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org> (Robert Fitzpatrick's message of "Tue\, 05 Jun 2007 16\:50\:45 -0400") Message-ID: <44tztm3xag.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Ports system gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:29:30 -0000 Robert Fitzpatrick writes: > How can I restore my ports system? > > I have no idea what happened. I have a server I setup over the weekend > to start testing Maia Mailguard, installed many packages over the last > few days (postfix+amavisd+SA+related). I can't remember the last package > installed via the ports system, I updated it to src-all and back to > ports-all once to compile my kernel. Now, today I go to install a > package and practically everything is gone...this is all I have left... > > mx1# ls /usr/ports > INDEX-6 INDEX-6.db dns security > INDEX-6.bz2 distfiles net > mx1# ls /usr/ports/dns > bind9-dlz > mx1# ls /usr/ports/security/ > vscan > mx1# ls /usr/ports/net/ > openldap23-client > > At this point I want to assume I mistakenly did a rm sometime, what else > could cause something like this? Can't find any issues in the logs and > no other issues with any services running on the box. Can't find > anything else missing. If I try to run my ports update my ports, it just > hangs here... > > mx1# cd /usr/ports > mx1# /usr/local/bin/cvsup /root/ports-supfile > Connected to cvsup9.us.FreeBSD.org > Updating collection ports-all/cvs On one of your cvsup runs, you probably used a tag (or branch name) that doesn't exist in the ports tree. Always use HEAD ("tag=.") for ports. It could be something else, but my bet would be to check your ports supfile. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 21:30:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CCB16A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDC713C489 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l55LUsc5093115; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:30:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id l55LUsTP093114; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:30:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.jnielsen.net: www set sender to lists@jnielsen.net using -f Received: from 70.150.196.243 ([70.150.196.243]) by newwebmail.jnielsen.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:30:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20070605173054.cqun7p5geocgs8o4@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:30:54 -0400 From: John Nielsen To: Robert Fitzpatrick References: <1181076645.4012.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org> In-Reply-To: <1181076645.4012.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) / FreeBSD-4.9 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Ports system gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:30:55 -0000 Quoting Robert Fitzpatrick : > How can I restore my ports system? Use a valid tag in your ports-supfile (probably ".") and try again. > I have no idea what happened. I have a server I setup over the weekend > to start testing Maia Mailguard, installed many packages over the last > few days (postfix+amavisd+SA+related). I can't remember the last package > installed via the ports system, I updated it to src-all and back to > ports-all once to compile my kernel. Now, today I go to install a > package and practically everything is gone...this is all I have left... > > mx1# ls /usr/ports > INDEX-6 INDEX-6.db dns security > INDEX-6.bz2 distfiles net > mx1# ls /usr/ports/dns > bind9-dlz > mx1# ls /usr/ports/security/ > vscan > mx1# ls /usr/ports/net/ > openldap23-client > > At this point I want to assume I mistakenly did a rm sometime, what else > could cause something like this? Can't find any issues in the logs and > no other issues with any services running on the box. Can't find > anything else missing. If I try to run my ports update my ports, it just > hangs here... > > mx1# cd /usr/ports > mx1# /usr/local/bin/cvsup /root/ports-supfile > Connected to cvsup9.us.FreeBSD.org > Updating collection ports-all/cvs JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 21:49:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201EF16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from resmaa04.ono.com (smtp.ono.com [62.42.230.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12CE13C448 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from sol.retena.com (83.173.187.121) by resmaa04.ono.com (7.3.118.8) (authenticated as nec556@retena.com) id 46656DD20002DB52 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:38:44 +0200 Message-ID: <46656DD20002DB52@> (added by postmaster@resmaa04.ono.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:39:00 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <18014.49617.224340.697794@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <4e3998c7e72.465ed931@broadpark.no> <18014.49617.224340.697794@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:49:31 -0000 At 14:38 31/05/2007, Robert Huff wrote: >=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes: > > > It has to be the worst written error message in history. > > Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD: > > Software Guru > Meditation Number > And the " Need 0KB more memory to manage memory " from MacOS system7? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:06:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78B016A46D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1179913C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so340251uge for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:06:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Fp5dBjeRfiuAW7w7HVPZS+//kXTNfGoXAM9wQL8nAAKC+ZWizFvLiy+5onwiaCPzs4dcfgD4DwWuPTXJHj0JSLSjIw9s8bQyLvmISw8P/QkJjeXdcaI4G5zvtqo/gmSGk02X4xL8GNj4McL3mhiNRMALjCT/L1/jPorjEf7U7wU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zb267QeWnk8D+8v3O+AenVf8sad+ElGREhfWYRgUEXVTJzMBgzAKIvl+wuUIbObCEoeWYvkvIsVdOC+C6mwE+6r2/1W8/8MCt+ndsWdbn5lNJi3cMkB3L+1ozLMlaEF1zstHITfc3IYjTK35a5A8S3a20CV8fKEURV5HBgco8zo= Received: by 10.67.30.6 with SMTP id h6mr762678ugj.1181081212969; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.241.12 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0706051506l57903b0ev4eb12ded2e5a9cec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:06:52 +0100 From: Chris To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> Cc: Tim Daneliuk , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Percival Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:06:55 -0000 On 04/06/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: > > >Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > >> Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > > >> 50-60 min > > >> New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP > > >> 40-50 min > > >> Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > > >> 8 min > > >> > > >> Is the difference in speed > > >> attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? > > > > > >Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being > > >faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and > > >between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 > > >to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes > > >2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a > > >result of "working harder" to find optimizations). > > > > > >FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except > > >compiling itself. :-) > > > > > >Colin Percival > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > What about all the following observations? > > > > slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. > > s/especially//, unless you have further evidence I don't know about. > > > both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people > > so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true > > would be wrong. > > My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am > aware of contradicts your claim: 6.x equals or outperforms 4.x on disk > I/O (depends on driver) and filesystem I/O. The only true part of it > is the "under QUOTA" part, which as you know from past discussions, is > still under Giant in 6.x. As you also know, there is a patch to > address this which is awaiting user testing. Have you tested it yet? > > Kris > Having some hardware coming this week when thats all setup I will have a box available for testing patches. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:12:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192C816A41F; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0978613C48A; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C309F1A3C19; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BD5513AE; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:12:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2F7ADC207; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:12:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:12:30 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chris Message-ID: <20070605221230.GA48140@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <466451CA.6020108@tundraware.com> <4664572A.4060003@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0706041254r257e1480g872faa6e504df6dc@mail.gmail.com> <20070604223021.GA31853@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0706051506l57903b0ev4eb12ded2e5a9cec@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0706051506l57903b0ev4eb12ded2e5a9cec@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Tim Daneliuk , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Percival , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New != Faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:12:31 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:06:52PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 04/06/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: > >> On 04/06/07, Colin Percival wrote: > >> >Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> >> Old 2 PIII @600Mhz 768K 26M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > >> >> 50-60 min > >> >> New Pent D (2 core)@3.2GHz 2G 50M/sec 6.2-stable/SMP > >> >> 40-50 min > >> >> Fast 2 Xeon @3GHz 3G 130M/sec 4.11-stable/SMP > >> >> 8 min > >> >> > >> >> Is the difference in speed > >> >> attributable to 4.11 being faster than 6.2? > >> > > >> >Close. The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being > >> >faster than the compiler in 6.2. FreeBSD uses the gcc compiler, and > >> >between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 > >> >to 3.4. The general trend each time gcc is upgraded is that it takes > >> >2x longer to compile code, but produces code which is 5% faster (as a > >> >result of "working harder" to find optimizations). > >> > > >> >FreeBSD 6.2 is faster than FreeBSD 4.11 for almost everything except > >> >compiling itself. :-) > >> > > >> >Colin Percival > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > >> > >> What about all the following observations? > >> > >> slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. > > > >s/especially//, unless you have further evidence I don't know about. > > > >> both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people > >> so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true > >> would be wrong. > > > >My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am > >aware of contradicts your claim: 6.x equals or outperforms 4.x on disk > >I/O (depends on driver) and filesystem I/O. The only true part of it > >is the "under QUOTA" part, which as you know from past discussions, is > >still under Giant in 6.x. As you also know, there is a patch to > >address this which is awaiting user testing. Have you tested it yet? > > > >Kris > > > Having some hardware coming this week when thats all setup I will have > a box available for testing patches. Glad to hear it. It is kind of irritating that you keep loudly complaining about how terrible QUOTA performance is but have so far avoided participating in the solution to that problem. So, just to confirm, you do not in fact have evidence of poor disk performance apart from this? Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:14:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048BA16A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFBA13C468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55MEpH5018652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:14:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55MEppp028658; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:14:51 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:14:51 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:14:51 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <716841580706051018n27a7d9audc7a085d71f7848b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.145233 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: Oscar Chavarria Subject: Re: Absolute Newbie - USB Keyboard not recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:14:52 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Oscar Chavarria wrote: > On 6/5/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> Oscar Chavarria wrote: >> > I have used the latest tip in the mailing list archives, to move the >> > cable >> > to another USB physical port, but still the keyboard will not work at >> the >> > BSD prompt.. >> > >> > The purpose is to boot as single user. >> > >> > Thanks is advance for any help. >> What version do you have installed and what's your motherboard maker? >> Did you also remember to put (proper) usb support in the kernel? >> -Garrett >> > > Version: FreeBSD 6.1 > > Motherboard: VIA. I ran dmesg > file and went through it but couldn't make > out the model. > > USB should be supported because I succesfully mounted a USB external HDD on > /home. I used this last physical port to attach the keyboard to make sure I > had a working port, but to no avail. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Regards > > Oscar Chavarria > Mobile: +506 814-0247 > > --- The more I know people the more I love my FreeBSD --- > > --- In a world without boundaries, we don't need Windows or Gates --- > ukbd and uhid compiled into the kernel, or is this kernel GENERIC? Also, please make sure to CC the list next time ;). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:25:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D604816A46E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F1213C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 35so1325880aga for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.125.11 with SMTP id x11mr9873197wxc.1181082348826; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25sm1972974wra.2007.06.05.15.25.47; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:25:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerard To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070605181626.W1031@scorpio.seibercom.net> Organization: Seibercom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Failed to load module "pcidata" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:25:51 -0000 I believe this problem has been reported recently; however, I am unable to locate it. I just finished updating to 'Xorg-7.2'. I followed the directions in the UPDATING file to the letter (I think). Now when I attempt to run 'startx', this error message is displayed. X Window System Version 7.2.0 Release Date: 22 January 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu May 24 12:27:57 EDT 2007 gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO i386 Build Date: 01 June 2007 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 5 18:16:09 2007 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" (EE) Failed to load module "pcidata" (module does not exist, 0) Fatal server error: Unable to load required base modules, Exiting... X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). ***** This is the contents of the /var/log/Xorg.0.log ***** X Window System Version 7.2.0 Release Date: 22 January 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu May 24 12:27:57 EDT 2007 gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO i386 Build Date: 01 June 2007 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 5 18:16:09 2007 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" (==) ServerLayout "X.org Configured" (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" (**) | |-->Device "Card0" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/URW" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/urwfonts-ttf" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (**) FontPath set to: /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/ (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (II) Loader magic: 0x81c0280 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 X.Org Video Driver: 1.1 X.Org XInput driver : 0.7 X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 (II) Loader running on freebsd (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (WW) Warning, couldn't open module pcidata (II) UnloadModule: "pcidata" (EE) Failed to load module "pcidata" (module does not exist, 0) Fatal server error: Unable to load required base modules, Exiting... What is the best way to remedy this problem? Thanks! -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:30:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA91616A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenoternullo@virgilio.it) Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it (vsmtp14.tin.it [212.216.176.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766D213C489 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenoternullo@virgilio.it) Received: from [87.16.171.164] (87.16.171.164) by vsmtp14.tin.it (7.3.122) id 4641E06D01A63D78; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:30:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4665E3A6.60309@virgilio.it> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:28:54 +0200 From: Sereno Ternullo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <200706050054.32377.serenoternullo@virgilio.it> <20070605105451.76ef095f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070605105451.76ef095f@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a new libmap.conf for linux emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:30:42 -0000 Norberto Meijome ha scritto: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0200 > Sereno Ternullo wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now >> I'm having problems with my "linux sub system". >> > > why do you think you have to do that for? > I'm slowing understanding the source of my disaster. Watching to my /compat/linux/ dir, and recognizing it as a Fedora Core 4 base system, I had the insane idea of installing an entire Fedora core 4 system by unpacking all the RMPs found on the first ISO image of the linux distribution. # mount /dev/md0 /mnt/FedoraISO # cd /mnt/FedoraISO # for rpm in *.rmp > do > rpm --ignore-os -i --root-install /compat/linux ${rpm} > done After these commands I had my problem with ldconfig and the linux emulation. Now the strangest thing: my /etc/libmap.conf file disappeared. * I didn't have to install any rpms ? * I was sleeping and issued rm libmap.conf ? * someone logged into my system hacking my password by ssh ? --> I will check my logs I don't know. However, my libmap.conf was missing. I tried to adjust it by hand, but I'm not that expert, and everything I do about it is useless. Can anyone of you post me his own libmap.conf file with basic linux emulation ? I'm running FreeBSD 6.2 , GENERIC, the linux base installed system is Fedora Core 4. Thank you all, Sereno. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:35:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4450D16A46E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB70113C48A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1474450wxd for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:35:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uCmJt9XRE7yJVbOGCQN7BBz49dmfzwedDe1cAMWoG7AVosMDHRuDzkTaU4erNIUT+O3hMUDVWjIrWAL9IaBibwayemVozBwQBd0JbsPJ0xcm0Htb59pdQcuYctBbmtMvqaDTDf4YSv6JdMweJm2wIudG+upEBZyyp2/NIg5IsdI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HQY/M1corpdjfN2Bf5/xwTqI473KyTrdUb/H8u88r2zw4VFON2uox56SPxauaZv56YR5C4AE/DRDhiseUMK9Vng9DPvb0iAXSDkqTWplMk7oiPDKx2KbZSnG2VnIzXUKlld+Ia8lIAknPTm7D2nwAz45Bcg698YVNuH/Idy8SoY= Received: by 10.90.101.19 with SMTP id y19mr5713160agb.1181082915813; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706051535xcd7aff2qb7f8b959280803f7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:35:15 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: "Ian Smith" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070605033710.7C27816A4DD@hub.freebsd.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 74304aa8d471ea6d Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:35:17 -0000 hi, > Hello, it's your niggly proofreader :-D > (and fellow Stephenson fan) !! > If you really have that blank line before 'add default HISADDR' above, > then it marks the end of your default section. The 'add default' and > the two lines following will not be executed. > > I expect you'll want the 'add default' line as the last in your ppp1: > section anyway; the other two could go in either, but I'd opt for the > default block myself. i had not realized that blank lines were 'read for real'. it's now been removed ... and i've moved the 'add default' to the connection ... > I'm again unsure whether it's related to your pf problem, rusted-on ipfw > here, but my connections tend to work better with a default route .. recently converted to pf, and been pretty pleased/impressed with it so far. a few gotchas, mainly due to not (yet) having read the /right/ man page, bu i'm makin progress! now, to clean up a bit more, and see if all's better ... thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:38:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F198116A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FE613C46E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55McqPD012469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:38:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55McqWw030984; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:38:52 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:38:51 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:38:51 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: "N. Harrington" In-Reply-To: <362995.35822.qm@web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.151733 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P2 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to solve mysterious system lockups? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:38:53 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, N. Harrington wrote: > > --- Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> N. Harrington wrote: >>> --- Garrett Cooper >> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> N. Harrington wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello >>>>> I have several systems that are used as squid >>>>> caching servers. I have some systems that use >> SCSI >>>>> disks and some that use SATA disks. They are >>>>> identical in everyway except for the sata vs >> SCSI >>>>> drives. >>>>> >>>>> At random times, the sata based systems seem to >>>>> >>>> be >>>> >>>>> freezing. You can ping them and they respond, >> but >>>>> >>>> you >>>> >>>>> cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during >>>>> >>>> that >>>> >>>>> time. >>>>> >>>>> I figure it mist be something to do with the >>>>> >>>> disks, >>>> >>>>> but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems >> to >>>>> >>>> be >>>> >>>>> little rhyme or reason. It does not happen >>>>> >>>> necessarily >>>> >>>>> during busy times. It can happen in the middle >> of >>>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>>> night. >>>>> >>>>> Any pointers in how to track down the cause >> would >>>>> >>>> be >>>> >>>>> much appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem >>>>> Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives >>>>> FreeBSD amd64 6.2-STABLE. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Nicole >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Nicole, >>>> What's the driver in use for the SATA and the >>>> SCSI drives? >>>> -Garrett >>>> >>> >>> Hi Garret >>> Here is the driver info. >>> >>> -- SATA >>> >>> atapci0: port >>> >> > 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa80f >>> >>> mem >>> 0xfeafec00-0xfeafefff irq 17 at device 5.0 on pci3 >>> ata2: on atapci0 >>> ata3: on atapci0 >>> ata4: on atapci0 >>> ata5: on atapci0 >>> pci3: at device 6.0 (no driver >>> attached) >>> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>> isa0: on isab0 >>> atapci1: port >>> 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf >> at >>> device 7.1 on pci0 >>> ata0: on atapci1 >>> ata1: on atapci1 >>> pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver >>> attached) >>> pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) >>> pcib2: at device 10.0 on >> pci0 >>> pci2: on pcib2 >>> >>> -- SCSI >>> >>> ahd0: port >> >>> 0x8000-0x80ff,0x7800-0x78ff >>> mem 0xfc89c000-0xfc89dfff irq 24 at device 10.0 on >>> pci2 >>> ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X >>> 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs >>> ahd1: port >> >>> 0x8800-0x88ff,0x8400-0x84ff >>> mem 0xfc89e000-0xfc89ffff irq 25 at device 10.1 on >>> pci2 >>> ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X >>> 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs >>> pci0: at >>> device 10.1 (no driver attached) >>> pcib3: at device 11.0 on >> pci0 >>> pci1: on pcib3 >>> pci0: at >>> device 11.1 (no driver attached) >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Nicole >> Ok, so it's an AMD 8111 northbridge versus an >> Adaptec onboard SCSI >> controller. >> >> 1. What release / version of FreeBSD are you using? >> You should upgrade >> to 6.2 STABLE because there have been a variety of >> issues worked out in previous releases. > > I have a range of Versions from 6.1-Pre to 6.2-STABLE > as of a few months ago. > >> 2. Do you have any logs for activity during the >> hours when it locks up >> (in particular anything interesting / fishy popping >> up)? > > Nope. That would make it too easy :) > They commit suicide without a note. > >> 3. What scheduler are you using? 4BSD, ULE? > > 4BSD > >> 4. Does your machine (using the SATA controllers) >> lock up under heavy >> load? If so, you may have a northbridge cooling >> issue that you need to >> put a fan on. For instance, the motherboard that I >> was using for a while >> (ASUS P5N-E SLI) was really close to my CPU >> heatsink, and there was a >> lot of heat transfer between my northbridge and CPU >> heatsink, which was >> raising the onboard temperatures 5~10 degrees C. The >> new motherboard >> (ASUS P5B DLX) doesn't do that though. > > The lockups seem rather random. I have healthd > running and they never seem to show very warm. The > room is cold and the servers have great fans. Altho > healthd can seem wonky as the cpu temp has actually > gone below the minimum. Also the -2Volt line seems > very low. But some servers runs forever that way. > > At least with SCSI, since it seems to manage itself > as another layer away from the system, you get some > error messages. Sort of like windows 3.1 dropping to > dos. Verses sata issues where it's just blue screen of > death but without even some debugging code. > > I am going to try the patch chuck Swiger sent me and > see how that effects things. Also try a few > replacement sata cards. Altho that is always fun > especially in 1U servers. As well as seeing if using > SAS drives may help if I can find some cheap enough. > Do you think that using the ULE scheduler could > really help? Don't try it in 6.x. It's not stable by any means. 7-CURRENT's getting a lot closer though, especially as of late (past week).. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:42:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA4E16A46F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9F013C480 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55Mg6Ln013702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:42:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55Mg6mj003724; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:42:06 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:42:06 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:42:06 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: Jan Henrik Sylvester In-Reply-To: <4665C268.2040707@janh.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.151733 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rdesktop: segmentation fault under xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:42:07 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > For me, rdesktop works -- I have all my ports upgraded... ldd `which rdesktop` says? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:44:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2426616A421 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D936013C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1146769wra for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:44:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Tf7NkSQU+uaLW9Kpi/UbPNVn1C32c4WiM1M4gTiYdhXgc/SGZpEi9L4BxO+S3zWDbUHk7gy/Z7Vm9sysY01T5lUVzGn2EWd7RhZYQ6PLe+6+EkZYeDQp1pFuY/NXrCEx39zjdmlCaGjaS4l6aNQFkPupbHdfCduagCaDr2u13bE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Fs577tEqeCszpC9ppXu0AC/27ufGLMWZoYTpENEN9hN6QJErM65ldAa2Vm98dYt790A+OkunetjWPZUair74Pd9MGEO8lZtbtZmKMYoAtwGuQlAelMmrIpSPNTgXteSERbHNflvUDPf9e2mtizngvGFCZi+25NCcbrl5IFrIxeQ= Received: by 10.90.105.19 with SMTP id d19mr5739728agc.1181083452292; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706051544x52107d28uc9d6f063bf898e81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:44:12 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: "Ian Smith" In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706051535xcd7aff2qb7f8b959280803f7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070605033710.7C27816A4DD@hub.freebsd.org> <70f41ba20706051535xcd7aff2qb7f8b959280803f7@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 63e212ae51740015 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:44:13 -0000 well, per Ian's catch/suggestion, removing the 'blank line' from my "ppp.conf", and moving, add default HISADDR to the "ppp1:" connection stanza seems to have done the trick! pf loads properly on reboot. swithc it back, and it does not. so, guessing, it's the lack of a default root as a result of the blank line. the "gotcha" here was that, according to my notes, i *HAD* checked/ensure that my default routes were correctly initialized (with "netstat -nr"), but, apparently, BEFORE i'd naively/mistakenly added that blank line. woohoo! and, thanks all for the add'l comments -- good pointers on anchors and pf operation in general. archiving this thread! :-) cheers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:44:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8622716A474 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E1013C458 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55MiqIn014727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:44:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55MiqgA007207; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:44:52 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:44:52 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:44:52 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: Tek Bahadur Limbu In-Reply-To: <46659748.3030001@wlink.com.np> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.152632 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: See output of local xterm session on remote ssh session. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:44:53 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > Pieter de Goeje wrote: >> On Saturday 02 June 2007, Jeremy Gransden wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have been searching Google for a few days for this but have not been >>> coming up with the correct answer. Then again maybe I am asking the wrong >>> question... If I start a process, i.e. compile a kernel, on my desktop, >>> how >>> can I then connect to it from my laptop and see the output of that process >>> via the ssh session? >>> >>> thanks, >>> Jeremy >> screen(1) is the tool for this. You can find it in the ports collection >> (sysutils/screen). >> >> For example: >> $ screen >> $ cd /usr/src; sudo make buildworld >> (now press CTRL+A D) >> >> On the other machine, ssh into the desktop >> $ screen -r >> (press CTRL+A D if you've seen enough) >> >> Also, this will protect the running job from accidental (or purposefully) >> closure of the terminal. > > Wow, always thought of learning how to learn this "magic". Thanks for sharing > this wonderful tip! > > > Thanking you... > > FreeBSD Rocks! > >> >> HTH, >> Pieter de Goeje Don't forget to run screen -wipe from time to time to get rid of leftover screen sockets though. Doesn't happen often, but if screen dies or the machine reboots spontaneously, this will happen.. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:46:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA13A16A46C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp2.utdallas.edu (smtp2.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28DD13C43E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp2.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD5D5C3E9; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:46:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:46:27 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: gerard@seibercom.net, FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <49A722442BB485233CDE0C43@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070605181626.W1031@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <20070605181626.W1031@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========61603FE1546A4379607B==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Failed to load module "pcidata" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:46:27 -0000 --==========61603FE1546A4379607B========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, June 05, 2007 18:25:42 -0400 Gerard =20 wrote: > I believe this problem has been reported recently; however, I am unable > to locate it. > > I just finished updating to 'Xorg-7.2'. I followed the directions in the > UPDATING file to the letter (I think). Now when I attempt to run > 'startx', this error message is displayed. > > X Window System Version 7.2.0 > Release Date: 22 January 2007 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 Current Operating > System: FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD > 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu May 24 12:27:57 EDT 2007 > gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO i386 > Build Date: 01 June 2007 > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Module Loader present > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (=3D=3D) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > (=3D=3D) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 5 18:16:09 2007 > (=3D=3D) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" > (EE) Failed to load module "pcidata" (module does not exist, 0) > > Fatal server error: > Unable to load required base modules, Exiting... > > X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). > > > ***** This is the contents of the /var/log/Xorg.0.log ***** > > > > X Window System Version 7.2.0 > Release Date: 22 January 2007 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 Current Operating > System: FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD > 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu May 24 12:27:57 EDT 2007 > gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO i386 > Build Date: 01 June 2007 > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Module Loader present > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (=3D=3D) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > (=3D=3D) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 5 18:16:09 2007 > (=3D=3D) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" > (=3D=3D) ServerLayout "X.org Configured" > (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) > (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" > (**) | |-->Device "Card0" > (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" > (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/URW" does not exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/urwfonts-ttf" does not = exist. > Entry deleted from font path. > (**) FontPath set to: > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/ > (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > (II) Loader magic: 0x81c0280 > (II) Module ABI versions: > X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 > X.Org Video Driver: 1.1 > X.Org XInput driver : 0.7 > X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 > X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 > (II) Loader running on freebsd > (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" > (WW) Warning, couldn't open module pcidata > (II) UnloadModule: "pcidata" > (EE) Failed to load module "pcidata" (module does not exist, 0) > > Fatal server error: > Unable to load required base modules, Exiting... > > > > What is the best way to remedy this problem? > Install the xorg metaport: /usr/ports/x11/xorg/ --=20 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========61603FE1546A4379607B==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:46:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F49016A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A50F13C483 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55MkcNt015422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:46:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55Mkccn010280; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:46:38 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:46:38 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: perikillo In-Reply-To: <51d7a5160706051026s442b2cb8r6ee3ace7cf1cc521@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.152632 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Problems installing asterisk-addons over FreeBSD 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:46:39 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, perikillo wrote: > Hi people. > > Im trying to setup my first PBX system with asterisk from ports, my ports > are updated, i install asterisk 1.4.4, gastaman, zaptel driver, but went i > try to install asterisk-addons i receive this error: > > asteriskbsd# make install clean > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Extracting for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 > => MD5 Checksum OK for asterisk-addons-1.2.3.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for asterisk-addons-1.2.3.tar.gz. > ===> Patching for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 > ===> asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 depends on executable in : asterisk - found > ===> asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 depends on executable in : gmake - found > ===> asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.15 - > found > ===> Configuring for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 > ===> Building for asterisk-addons-1.2.3_1 > ./mkdep -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -D_GNU_SOURCE > -I/usr/local/include/mysql `ls *.c` > gmake -C format_mp3 all > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons/work/asterisk- > addons-1.2.3/format_mp3' > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o common.o common.c > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o dct64_i386.o dct64_i386.c > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o decode_ntom.o decode_ntom.c > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o layer3.o layer3.c > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o tabinit.o tabinit.c > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o interface.o interface.c > gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_THREAD_SAFE -O6 -c -o format_mp3.o format_mp3.c > format_mp3.c:46: error: redefinition of `struct ast_filestream' > format_mp3.c:325: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > format_mp3.c:336:25: macro "ast_format_register" passed 12 arguments, but > takes just 1 > format_mp3.c: In function `load_module': > format_mp3.c:327: error: `ast_format_register' undeclared (first use in this > function) > format_mp3.c:327: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > format_mp3.c:327: error: for each function it appears in.) > format_mp3.c: At top level: > format_mp3.c:342: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > format_mp3.c:347: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > format_mp3.c:359: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > format_mp3.c:365: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > format_mp3.c:76: warning: 'exts' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:107: warning: 'mp3_open' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:135: warning: 'mp3_close' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:219: warning: 'mp3_read' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:267: warning: 'mp3_write' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:275: warning: 'mp3_seek' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:302: warning: 'mp3_rewrite' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:308: warning: 'mp3_trunc' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:315: warning: 'mp3_tell' defined but not used > format_mp3.c:320: warning: 'mp3_getcomment' defined but not used > gmake[1]: *** [format_mp3.o] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons/work/asterisk- > addons-1.2.3/format_mp3' > gmake: *** [format_mp3/format_mp3.so] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > I want to test FreePBX to, but i need this port. > > Some knows how to fix this error? > > Thanks all for your time!!! You should talk to the port maintainer about this. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 22:50:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CCA16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D25B13C465 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l55MofGS016876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:50:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l55MofL0015280; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:50:41 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:50:41 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: <49A722442BB485233CDE0C43@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.5.153037 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CP_MEDIA_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failed to load module "pcidata" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:50:42 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Tuesday, June 05, 2007 18:25:42 -0400 Gerard wrote: > >> I believe this problem has been reported recently; however, I am unable >> to locate it. >> >> I just finished updating to 'Xorg-7.2'. I followed the directions in the >> UPDATING file to the letter (I think). Now when I attempt to run >> 'startx', this error message is displayed. >> >> X Window System Version 7.2.0 >> Release Date: 22 January 2007 >> X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 >> Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 Current Operating >> System: FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD >> 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu May 24 12:27:57 EDT 2007 >> gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO i386 >> Build Date: 01 June 2007 >> Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org >> to make sure that you have the latest version. >> Module Loader present >> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, >> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, >> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. >> (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 5 18:16:09 2007 >> (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" >> (EE) Failed to load module "pcidata" (module does not exist, 0) >> >> Fatal server error: >> Unable to load required base modules, Exiting... >> >> X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). >> >> >> ***** This is the contents of the /var/log/Xorg.0.log ***** >> >> >> >> X Window System Version 7.2.0 >> Release Date: 22 January 2007 >> X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2 >> Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 i386 Current Operating >> System: FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD >> 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu May 24 12:27:57 EDT 2007 >> gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO i386 >> Build Date: 01 June 2007 >> Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org >> to make sure that you have the latest version. >> Module Loader present >> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, >> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, >> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. >> (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 5 18:16:09 2007 >> (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" >> (==) ServerLayout "X.org Configured" >> (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) >> (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" >> (**) | |-->Device "Card0" >> (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" >> (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/URW" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (WW) The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/urwfonts-ttf" does not exist. >> Entry deleted from font path. >> (**) FontPath set to: >> /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/ >> (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" >> (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" >> (II) Loader magic: 0x81c0280 >> (II) Module ABI versions: >> X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 >> X.Org Video Driver: 1.1 >> X.Org XInput driver : 0.7 >> X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 >> X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 >> (II) Loader running on freebsd >> (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" >> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module pcidata >> (II) UnloadModule: "pcidata" >> (EE) Failed to load module "pcidata" (module does not exist, 0) >> >> Fatal server error: >> Unable to load required base modules, Exiting... >> >> >> >> What is the best way to remedy this problem? >> > Install the xorg metaport: /usr/ports/x11/xorg/ > > -- > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > Just do some hunting around the ports tree and search for something like 'pcidata' in the x11* folders. Everything's modular now, so to avoid having a large X11 distro laying around, it's just better to build the necessary components. Besides, compiling x11/xorg will take more time and will be slower with 7.2 than with 6.8 (unless major performance enhancements were made between then and now), because of the shared lib loading and compiling / installing the components one by one.. The only catch is that it will take a little bit of time to find components if stuff is missing, but after you get all of the necessary parts installed for X.org 7.2, everything should be smooth sailing. Cheers, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 23:11:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DCA16A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3422E13C4BA for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HviBQ-00078f-5W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:11:24 -0700 Message-ID: <10979516.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:11:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pluta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070521200212.GA95817@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: peter@placidpublishing.net References: <10724342.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070521144544.09ec771b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <10724835.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070521200212.GA95817@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: Security Run Output Setuid Differences X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:11:26 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:59:33AM -0700, PeterPluta wrote: > >> > Looks like you were portupgrading around with postfix, screen and >> xterm. >> > >> > The output is diff(1). See the man page for details, but it's >> basically >> > showing you the difference between last night's directory listing, and >> > that >> > of the previous day. >> > >> > For more gory details, see the scripts in /etc/periodic/security, which >> > are >> > run every night from cron. Some of the ports you changed resulted in >> > changes to setuid/setgid programs installed on the system. As a >> security- >> > concious administrator, you should be interested in the programs on >> your >> > system that have elevated privilidges, so this script is provided to >> give >> > you a daily report on that. >> >> I see, so basically after reinstalling the default uid/gid of some >> programs >> changed? Is that a problem or anything? > > It's not a problem. It's just something that you should be aware of from > a security standpoint. > > In this case you caused it because you upgraded some ports, which is OK. > > But if the size, date, ownership or permissions of a binary change > without any apparent cause, it _could_ be the work of an intruder or > rootkit trying to backdoor your system. That's why the system checks it. > > In /etc/defaults/periodic.conf you see which settings there are > concerning security, and what the defaults are. If you want to disable > some of them, put the settings in /etc/periodic.conf with a "NO" value > instead of "YES". But I would recommend to leave them as they are. > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) > > > mail.***********.net setuid diffs: --- /var/log/setuid.today Mon May 21 03:02:30 2007 +++ /tmp/security.wq6BsVcr Sun Jun 3 03:01:48 2007 @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ 377398 -r-sr-xr-x 2 root wheel 5828 Jul 30 16:19:57 2006 /usr/bin/yppasswd 71112 -rwsr-xr-x 1 root wheel 285580 May 20 18:23:48 2007 /usr/local/bin/screen 70971 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root kmem 112708 May 20 18:23:03 2007 /usr/local/sbin/lsof -73170 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root maildrop 142559 May 17 14:41:47 2007 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop -73204 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root maildrop 152477 May 17 14:41:47 2007 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue +71432 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root maildrop 142559 Jun 2 15:47:54 2007 /usr/local/sbin/postdrop +71433 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root maildrop 152477 Jun 2 15:47:54 2007 /usr/local/sbin/postqueue 923168 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 5236 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006 /usr/sbin/mailwrapper 923264 -r-sr-x--- 1 root network 11636 Jul 30 16:20:07 2006 /usr/sbin/sliplogin I have some more, I'm starting to understand it a bit better. Basically the user:group id number has changed and the security run is letting me know. Good deal, but im still confused as to what the @@ -20,7 + 20,7 @@ and + - mean. Can anyone explain those? I'm curious, also why would yppasswd change to userid 2? I changed roots name yesterday, could that be the cause of it? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Security-Run-Output-Setuid-Differences-tf3792025.html#a10979516 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 23:22:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601FC16A41F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE4A13C4BF for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1482076wxd for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.57.8 with SMTP id f8mr394769wxa.1181085723479; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i12sm1943765wxd.2007.06.05.16.22.02; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:22:15 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <49A722442BB485233CDE0C43@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <20070605181626.W1031@scorpio.seibercom.net> <49A722442BB485233CDE0C43@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070605192046.83AC.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re: Failed to load module "pcidata" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:22:04 -0000 On Tuesday June 05, 2007 at 06:46:27 (PM) Paul Schmehl wrote: {snip} > Install the xorg metaport: /usr/ports/x11/xorg/ Strange, I had the Xorg-6.9 meta port installed when I did the original update. Oh well, I will try your suggest. Thanks! -- Gerard "I choose to ignore, of course, the fact that self-Googling is perhaps the most narcissistic thing a person can do that doesn't involve actually humping a mirror." Dan Kois From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 23:31:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E34A16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0EC13C44B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458105193D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:31:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:31:43 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070606003143.6087bdfa@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <4665C091.90808@vwsoft.com> References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> <70f41ba20706041537laba6223v8c879e344d799052@mail.gmail.com> <4665C091.90808@vwsoft.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:31:54 -0000 On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:59:13 +0200 Volker wrote: > Hi snow, > > aha. does that suggest that i'm simply not waiting long enough? > > your following comments suggest otherwise, iiuc, that i need to > > proactively _do_ something different ... > > It's not _you_ aren't waiting too long. It's at the time pf is being > loaded, the interface pf want's to filter on does not yet exist. See > it as a wrong load order. Have you any particular reason to think that this is really a problem? Given that /etc/rc.d/ppp automatically reloads the pf rules after the tun device is created. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 00:06:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.