From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 03:52:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62B416A401 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 03:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E39A13C4A8 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 03:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1657490nfc for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:52:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=GR1Dji5Ci46tiOmKud26ZDGSCAfEyVsuKNPiu64jPPIEzKNhfklaPRBQahkAdyfz2GrYpoQHUuk/H8k+VZdkLHZPVpoCtX8HUIJiTFiZhQNU5+9hWPPo+dWWXF7idcNr5qSm4Le7zGsnGI7eB5wYzVNidbFhIUy6azZiaLpg9e4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=PhrhBMqI/4ZyxTieFcnxUt1qiFcVQwJlIgwiEBM3EGfGY837oUYVswWQxeTNhsPIyfzI4TjsraJZsKezl6JgrSHXti2aWj5iH1ddTb2DORnwfFXRhjOkUC6ppAzo8Q0P9CuwJS855qCZU8CPTIcy3/BHU3KKkdJzBvUEs6merzc= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr3163831buc.1172978635600; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.139.19 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:23:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:23:55 -0500 From: frzburn To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:52:16 -0000 Hi everyone, I'm a new FreeBSD user, but a veteran Linux user ;) I'm using FreeBSD 6, and I was wondering while I gave a try to rebuilding ``world'' how to properly synchronize my source. Here's what I mean: After my successful installation of FreeBSD, I looked on www.bsdguides.orgfor some tips and... guides. So I learned how to properly keep my port tree updated with portsnap, with the help of this guide: http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/portsnap.php. It says that portsnap is the ``new'' method to keep your ports tree up to date. After that, I looked for how to update FreeBSD with the latest packages from the STABLE branch. So I looked at the handbook, in the section 21. The section 21.3 ( http://www.ca.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html) tells us how to ``synchronize my source''. But it only talks about cvsup (and others), not about portsnap. But cvsup is considered obsolete by BSDGuides.org... So here come my questions: Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I use cvsup? If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my source? In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with the latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. Thanks a lot!! =) frzburn From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 04:02:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5F16A401 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk [87.106.72.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD8113C481 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42452DE37; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:02:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ArP2mhMyMqrA; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:02:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.10.147] (dsl172-67.as6911.net [62.84.172.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D332DE2A; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:02:40 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45EA44E7.1070907@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:02:47 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frzburn References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:02:47 -0000 frzburn wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm a new FreeBSD user, but a veteran Linux user ;) > I'm using FreeBSD 6, and I was wondering while I gave a try to rebuilding > ``world'' how to properly synchronize my source. Here's what I mean: > > After my successful installation of FreeBSD, I looked on > www.bsdguides.orgfor some tips and... guides. So I learned how to > properly keep my port tree > updated with portsnap, with the help of this guide: > http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/portsnap.php. It says > that > portsnap is the ``new'' method to keep your ports tree up to date. > > After that, I looked for how to update FreeBSD with the latest packages > from > the STABLE branch. So I looked at the handbook, in the section 21. The > section 21.3 ( > http://www.ca.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html) > tells us how to ``synchronize my source''. But it only talks about cvsup > (and others), not about portsnap. But cvsup is considered obsolete by > BSDGuides.org... > > So here come my questions: > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I > use cvsup? > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my > source? > > > In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct > technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with the > latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. > > Thanks a lot!! =) > > frzburn Portsnap is only for ports, and as far as I am aware, there are no plans to add source functionality. Either method does the job, what you choose is up to you. Thanks, J From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 04:19:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCC016A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk [87.106.72.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBD813C461 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8D42DE37; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:19:16 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2pjbodox9K3; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:19:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.10.147] (dsl172-67.as6911.net [62.84.172.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7E12DE2A; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:19:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45EA48C8.1040507@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:19:20 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frzburn References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <45EA44E7.1070907@joeholden.co.uk> <2942dae0703032013u621343ecy72caddf11520ca4b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703032013u621343ecy72caddf11520ca4b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:19:17 -0000 frzburn wrote: > > > On 3/3/07, *Joe Holden* > wrote: > > Thanks for the reply! > So if I understand well, i must use CVSup (or csup) to ``synchronize my > source''. > > But if I use CVSup, will it update my ports tree also? Then portsnap > really becomes useless, unless I only want to update my ports tree, right? > > Thanks! =) > > frzburn > You can update both using cvsup, once you've installed the cvsup client, and decided what to checkout(sync), you can use the examples in /usr/share/examples/cvsup to sync exactly what you want. ie; for just syncing your source, you might want to use: *default host=cvsup.uk.freebsd.org (or a closer mirror) *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=$TAG (where $tag is RELENG_6 for 6.x -STABLE/RELENG_6_2 for 6.2+Security/. for -CURRENT) *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Thanks, J P.S: please use "Reply all" so that your responses also get sent to the mailing list From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 04:29:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C7916A400 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222BE13C471 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from [10.9.204.128] (dsl093-061-215.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.61.215]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C3529C; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:57:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:57:02 -0500 To: frzburn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:29:27 -0000 On Mar 3, 2007, at 22:23 , frzburn wrote: > So here come my questions: > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or > must I > use cvsup? > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for > synchronizing my > source? It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence portsnap). -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 04:30:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2403B16A400 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4C113C4A6 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1227800muf for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:30:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=D1OGWQxE2B+92SgvQ9dcBx2Hh4o4qda2SN9OJgItBrXys1Yvh05EE+y7n2uYlI2wXTXgp4FeMXqbbpnUekkb4B8dDH0ebACYcUtjs7BxaiZvjI0Olv8ySiZs59IFPuwq/REixsoc/qDs4hQH4nO/CvIsAfO3NiE6NtyguF7iS+M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=d+O0DPDKN4nzz0sN5fQ5CBBhokh4Pqy1+WuWDZCZwi2NkN2Nebo81BJAX6wc4MKFWqH8CHShoPJYAgnJenOPGt+Hdm/RNtbFV1pIO1qdJebqsfTVmLjYh5aMOK/Vsk1Cuaq2gUBsO1K2z6hPYMTWXF4DUe5xWX+oi5kmkL1UsXM= Received: by 10.82.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr3171170bud.1172982611772; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.139.19 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:30:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2942dae0703032030x623ae18aha7722a3aadaf9d2f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:30:11 -0500 From: frzburn To: "Michael Belz" In-Reply-To: <1172982223.21F0D8AD@fc6.dngr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <45EA48C8.1040507@joeholden.co.uk> <1172982223.21F0D8AD@fc6.dngr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Joe Holden , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:30:14 -0000 On 3/3/07, Michael W. Belz wrote: > > Exactly there is a source and ports example files in > usr/share/examples/cvsup dir perform each individually ggood reply sir! > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 8:21 pm, Joe Holden wrote: > > frzburn wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 3/3/07, *Joe Holden* >> > wrote: > > > >> > >> Thanks for the reply! > >> So if I understand well, i must use CVSup (or csup) to ``synchronize > >> my > >> source''. > >> > >> But if I use CVSup, will it update my ports tree also? Then portsnap > >> really becomes useless, unless I only want to update my ports tree, > >> right? > >> > >> Thanks! =) > >> > >> frzburn > >> > > > > You can update both using cvsup, once you've installed the cvsup > > client, and decided what to checkout(sync), you can use the examples in > > /usr/share/examples/cvsup to sync exactly what you want. > > > > ie; for just syncing your source, you might want to use: > > > > *default host=cvsup.uk.freebsd.org (or a closer mirror) > > *default base=/var/db > > *default prefix=/usr > > *default release=cvs tag=$TAG (where $tag is RELENG_6 for 6.x > > -STABLE/RELENG_6_2 for 6.2+Security/. for -CURRENT) > > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > *default compress > > > > src-all > > > > Thanks, > > J > > > > P.S: please use "Reply all" so that your responses also get sent to the > > mailing list > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Michael Belz > System Administrator > Sky River Management > 702.336.9418 > Sent from Sidekick 2 Good! Thanks you all of you! =D frzburn From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 04:37:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2A516A401 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbelz@sky-river.com) Received: from mfe5.prod.danger.com (mta5.prod1.dngr.net [216.220.209.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A41413C46B for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbelz@sky-river.com) Received: from [10.253.33.100] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by mfe5.prod.danger.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 157382478; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:37:13 -0800 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:37:07 -0800 X-Mailer: Danger Service X-Danger-Send-Id: AAAwBkXqTPkAAYaq Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" , frzburn Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> From: "Michael W. Belz" Message-Id: <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Belz List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:37:13 -0000 Stick with what has been posted, documented and tried and tested more importantly your having issues finding solid docs to support your task...using cvsup you have handbook docs and freebsd diary to use don't reinvent the wheel On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 8:30 pm, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2007, at 22:23 , frzburn wrote: > >> So here come my questions: >> Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or >> must I >> use cvsup? >> If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing >> my >> source? > > It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in > the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence > portsnap). > > -- > brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] > allbery@kf8nh.com > system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] > allbery@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university > KF8NH > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Michael Belz System Administrator Sky River Management 702.336.9418 Sent from Sidekick 2 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 04:39:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D7116A405 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B8913C474 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from [10.9.204.128] (dsl093-061-215.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.61.215]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5666280; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:39:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org> References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:39:33 -0500 To: Michael Belz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, frzburn Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:39:37 -0000 On Mar 3, 2007, at 23:37 , Michael W. Belz wrote: > Stick with what has been posted, documented and tried and tested > more importantly your having issues finding solid docs to support > your task...using cvsup you have handbook docs and freebsd diary to > use don't reinvent the wheel Probably a good idea; I'm not planning to switch my installed systems from cvsup any time soon. I hope portsnap and csup will be better documented in the future, though; that whole "cvsup wants modula-3" thing is just a little annoying :) -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 05:11:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684AC16A401 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vistua@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from mail7.sea.safepages.com (mail7.sea.safepages.com [216.127.148.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6A913C441 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vistua@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: by mail7.sea.safepages.com (Postfix, from userid 1012) id E5D5DFBCD5; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:51:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.isp.com (216-8-44-161.dialup.ziplink.net [216.8.44.161]) by mail7.sea.safepages.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0ECAFBC0D for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:51:24 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:51:26 -0500 From: John Walthall To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070303235126.195a57cf@jhengis.vistua.com> In-Reply-To: <20070303205101.GA10383@soaustin.net> References: <20070303120026.41B2016A4CC@hub.freebsd.org> <20070303130716.6d3e4b54@jhengis.vistua.com> <20070303205101.GA10383@soaustin.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problem with portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: johnzw@vistua.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:11:13 -0000 On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:51:01 -0600 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > I know we don't support the INDEX concept if the language categories > aren't there. Does adding them back affect your problem? Unfortunately no. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 05:18:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EC216A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk [87.106.72.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBFC13C48E for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45F32DE37; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:18:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFcBItyEIshQ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:18:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.10.147] (dsl172-67.as6911.net [62.84.172.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriella.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A0B2DE2A; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:18:35 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45EA56B2.7070508@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:18:42 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Michael Belz , frzburn Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:18:39 -0000 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2007, at 23:37 , Michael W. Belz wrote: > >> Stick with what has been posted, documented and tried and tested more >> importantly your having issues finding solid docs to support your >> task...using cvsup you have handbook docs and freebsd diary to use >> don't reinvent the wheel > > Probably a good idea; I'm not planning to switch my installed systems > from cvsup any time soon. I hope portsnap and csup will be better > documented in the future, though; that whole "cvsup wants modula-3" > thing is just a little annoying :) > > --brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com > system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH > Which is where csup comes in ;) Ta, J From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 05:23:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFBC16A400 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbelz@sky-river.com) Received: from mfe1.prod.danger.com (mta1.prod1.dngr.net [216.220.209.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B04213C428 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbelz@sky-river.com) Received: from [10.253.33.100] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by mfe1.prod.danger.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 1055879856; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:23:43 -0800 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:23:36 -0800 X-Mailer: Danger Service X-Danger-Send-Id: AAAvl0XqSc8AAYaq Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <45EA48C8.1040507@joeholden.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Joe Holden , frzburn Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <45EA48C8.1040507@joeholden.co.uk> From: "Michael W. Belz" Message-Id: <1172982223.21F0D8AD@fc6.dngr.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Belz List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:23:43 -0000 Exactly there is a source and ports example files in usr/share/examples/cvsup dir perform each individually ggood reply sir! On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 8:21 pm, Joe Holden wrote: > frzburn wrote: >> >> >> On 3/3/07, *Joe Holden* > > wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the reply! >> So if I understand well, i must use CVSup (or csup) to ``synchronize >> my >> source''. >> >> But if I use CVSup, will it update my ports tree also? Then portsnap >> really becomes useless, unless I only want to update my ports tree, >> right? >> >> Thanks! =) >> >> frzburn >> > > You can update both using cvsup, once you've installed the cvsup > client, and decided what to checkout(sync), you can use the examples in > /usr/share/examples/cvsup to sync exactly what you want. > > ie; for just syncing your source, you might want to use: > > *default host=cvsup.uk.freebsd.org (or a closer mirror) > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=$TAG (where $tag is RELENG_6 for 6.x > -STABLE/RELENG_6_2 for 6.2+Security/. for -CURRENT) > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > > src-all > > Thanks, > J > > P.S: please use "Reply all" so that your responses also get sent to the > mailing list > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Michael Belz System Administrator Sky River Management 702.336.9418 Sent from Sidekick 2 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 06:14:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F7816A401 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 06:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAAC213C48D for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 06:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 4842 invoked by uid 399); 4 Mar 2007 06:14:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2007 06:14:30 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45EA63C4.8010703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:14:28 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, frzburn Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 06:14:33 -0000 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in > the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence > portsnap). That last bit is not actually correct. csup will update anything cvsup can in checkout mode, so you can check out a src tree, a ports tree, a doc tree, etc. with csup. The only thing you can't do is mirror a repository in cvs mode. So far only cvsup can do that. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 08:27:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F7916A400 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 08:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FCE13C474 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 08:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l247xlL5047809; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:59:47 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l247xkcg047808; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:59:46 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:59:46 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20070304075946.GH40430@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <200702271603.30481@aldan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702271603.30481@aldan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:27:58 -0000 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote: > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety is > = > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)... > = Bad default. > > Filing a PR. Keep in mind that changing the default can break existing setups. Such setups are likely to be broken anyway, but... E.g., if we drop the -M flag, it will break systems with tons of RAM but little swap using tmpmfs. OTOH, if we add '-o reserve', that will break systems with a too large but mostly unused tmpmfs. A sort of a loud announcement will be needed. By the way, I seem to be the one responsible for the paragraph in rc.conf(5) advocating -M "for maximum performance and system stability at low memory conditions". When I wrote it, I thought as follows: were the system low on memory, additional swap activity due to mfs would just make the system start thrashing sooner, while malloc'd mfs would just report ENOSPC. I was unaware of the panic back then. Perhaps it was a misconception, either. I haven't heard of any real pitfalls in swap-backed mfs, and getting ENOSPC on /tmp early is no good. > = > Creation of a 2Gb malloc-based md should've failed on a machine with > = > 768Mb of RAM, shouldn't it have? > = Only if you set '-o reserve'. Memory for malloc-based md was allocated > = dynamically. > > But malloc can only allocate from RAM, right? So the amount of RAM is the hard > limit, which a malloc-based md can not exceed even in theory. This means, > md-creation should've failed... > > In fact, the limit should, of course, be even lower -- and mdmfs should be > smart enough to substract the sizes of other kernel memory chunks from the > maximum. > > Since even that would still not be a guarantee against running out, the system > should be able to recover gracefully instead of panicing. Do you agree? FWIW, some discussion of the panic is in the audit trail of kern/87255. Irrespective of tmpmfs defaults, this is a way to panic the system with stock tools and without doing something totally stupid like writing junk to /dev/mem. -- Yar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 08:47:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1505616A403 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 08:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from istc.kiev.ua (wolf.istc.kiev.ua [193.108.236.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDBE13C491 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 08:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ravenloft.kiev.ua) by istc.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HNmMy-0007UL-FW; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:47:04 +0200 Received: from kozlov by ravenloft.kiev.ua with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HNmLw-0000qa-Qx; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:46:00 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:46:00 +0200 From: Alex Kozlov To: Yar Tikhiy Message-ID: <20070304084600.GA3152@ravenloft.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: Alex Kozlov X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Content analysis detailz: (0.0 points, 10.0 required) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:47:07 -0000 On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote: > > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety is > > = > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)... > > = Bad default. > > > > Filing a PR. > > Keep in mind that changing the default can break existing setups. > Such setups are likely to be broken anyway, but... E.g., if we > drop the -M flag, it will break systems with tons of RAM but little > swap using tmpmfs. OTOH, if we add '-o reserve', that will break > systems with a too large but mostly unused tmpmfs. A sort of a loud > announcement will be needed. #sudo swapoff /dev/ad4s2b #swapinfo Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity #mdconfig -d -u 666 && \ mdconfig -a -t swap -s10000M -u 666 && \ bsdlabel -w /dev/md666 auto && \ newfs -U -f 512 -b 4096 -i 512 -m 0 /dev/md666a && \ mkdir /tmp/mdtest && \ mount /dev/md666a /tmp/mdtest $dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/mdtest #df /tmp/mdtest Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/md666a 3561822 3561622 200 100% /tmp/mdtest #dmesg Mar 4 10:20:35 ravenloft kernel: pid 97529 (firefox-bin), uid 1001, was killed: out of swap space Mar 4 10:20:39 ravenloft kernel: pid 79658 (Xorg), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space Mar 4 10:20:40 ravenloft kernel: pid 519 (thunderbird-bin), uid 1001, was killed: out of swap space Ouch, but this is still better than panic. > By the way, I seem to be the one responsible for the paragraph in > rc.conf(5) advocating -M "for maximum performance and system stability > at low memory conditions". When I wrote it, I thought as follows: > were the system low on memory, additional swap activity due to mfs > would just make the system start thrashing sooner, while malloc'd > mfs would just report ENOSPC. I was unaware of the panic back then. > Perhaps it was a misconception, either. I haven't heard of any real > pitfalls in swap-backed mfs, and getting ENOSPC on /tmp early is no > good. > > > = > Creation of a 2Gb malloc-based md should've failed on a machine with > > = > 768Mb of RAM, shouldn't it have? > > = Only if you set '-o reserve'. Memory for malloc-based md was allocated > > = dynamically. > > > > But malloc can only allocate from RAM, right? So the amount of RAM is the hard > > limit, which a malloc-based md can not exceed even in theory. This means, > > md-creation should've failed... > > > > In fact, the limit should, of course, be even lower -- and mdmfs should be > > smart enough to substract the sizes of other kernel memory chunks from the > > maximum. > > > > Since even that would still not be a guarantee against running out, the system > > should be able to recover gracefully instead of panicing. Do you agree? > > FWIW, some discussion of the panic is in the audit trail of kern/87255. > Irrespective of tmpmfs defaults, this is a way to panic the system > with stock tools and without doing something totally stupid like > writing junk to /dev/mem. -- Adios From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 09:21:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CBA16A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from a5.virtuaal.com (a5.virtuaal.com [195.222.15.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7420F13C4AC for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from pc109.host50.starman.ee ([62.65.242.109] helo=[192.168.2.100]) by a5.virtuaal.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HNmuG-0005Ip-9R for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:21:29 +0200 From: Andrei Kolu To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:21:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <45EA44E7.1070907@joeholden.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <45EA44E7.1070907@joeholden.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703041121.31799.antik@bsd.ee> X-Virtuaalcom-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Virtuaalcom-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-Virtuaalcom-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-Virtuaalcom-MailScanner-From: antik@bsd.ee X-Spam-Status: No X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a5.virtuaal.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bsd.ee X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:21:42 -0000 On Sunday 04 March 2007 06:02, Joe Holden wrote: > frzburn wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm a new FreeBSD user, but a veteran Linux user ;) > > I'm using FreeBSD 6, and I was wondering while I gave a try to rebuilding > > ``world'' how to properly synchronize my source. Here's what I mean: > > Create file: fastest_source.sh ------------------------------------------------------- #/bin/sh csup -h $(fastest_cvsup -q -c us,de,uk,se,no,et,ru ) /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile ------------------------------------------------------- Now run it: # sh fastest_source.sh -=(oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo)=(cvsup7.ru.freebsd.org)=- Connected to 195.14.50.21 Updating collection ports-all/cvs ...... Change ports-supfile to standard-supfile if you want to update system source from fastest cvs server. You can run this script from cron if you want. Andrei From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 10:34:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6060416A400 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE5B13C4AC for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l24AXlAH044383; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:33:48 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <45EAA084.6050900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:33:40 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5ECB2CF72E22A89DC84DF5C8" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:34:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90/2713/Sat Mar 3 15:57:58 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, frzburn Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:34:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5ECB2CF72E22A89DC84DF5C8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: >=20 > On Mar 3, 2007, at 22:23 , frzburn wrote: >=20 >> So here come my questions: >> Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or mus= t I >> use cvsup? >> If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing m= y >> source? There's more than one way to do it. Which alternative you choose is largely a matter of personal taste, convenience and if it supports the particular features you need. portsnap and csup are only the latest additions to the whole shebang. Before that there was sup -- but support for that has entirely gone now I believe; ctm which was (still is?) a means of receiving CVS deltas via e-mail, as well as such things as anon-cvs and rsync, bittorrent and plain old HTTP or FTP. =20 > It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in > the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence > portsnap). Uh, no. csup will let you grab ports, docs, www or whatever else is available through any of the cvsup collections. Or any other cvsup collections you might choose to create yourself. So long as the output is a checked out tree of stuff, csup operates practically identically to cvsup. The difference comes if you want to replicate an entire cvs repository, for which you still need the original modula-3 based cvsup. Or if you want to serve any sort of cvsup collection -- csup is client side only. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5ECB2CF72E22A89DC84DF5C8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF6qCL8Mjk52CukIwRCJq5AJ47NJeDNR5HDLc1EngzSak5t0r3VQCdE/w8 HN6uaqxk4AlM6rzY/kt3I+A= =9/3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5ECB2CF72E22A89DC84DF5C8-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 11:45:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B81016A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl (smtp-out2.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1185A13C47E for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from [82.171.39.195] (helo=guido.klop.ws) by smtp-out2.tiscali.nl with smtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl) id 1HNor7-0006VO-OY for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:26:21 +0100 Received: (qmail 1057 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2007 10:59:39 -0000 Received: from localhost.thuis.klop.ws (HELO guido.klop.ws) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.thuis.klop.ws with SMTP; 4 Mar 2007 10:59:39 -0000 Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:59:38 +0100 To: frzburn , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Ronald Klop" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (FreeBSD) Cc: Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:45:10 -0000 On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:23:55 +0100, frzburn wrote: > Hi everyone, [cut some text] > So here come my questions: > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I > use cvsup? > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my > source? > > In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct > technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with the > latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. Read this. It tells you why portsnap is invented. And why cvsup/csup is still better for other things then ports. http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 13:05:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967B116A404 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2012113C46B for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1323928muf for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:05:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=WIRrmSc3YQpZavL3H4+ann7eqMQS1ny5Ve4vu8UpeiFGVFIoVCfvQyVTDDKlqjlA1yjQrDQ4jGofI85T5WD/ipbeUREEJQ1wtJ/SOW5LcLKCMQUCAX6L9bRja8gnBe2n50dnxDuI6sfRHxjT/KDMS1V1R1tOSylA+XvLt3FFCRE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=C7GtTMapzOXm1WrUCGKCyLfclCfCTPs/bl5rsxUIzwa/IbTLN6m2ViAeL0MZfpvZnKU247JltuHXMHbavqYas2JHh4ndVNanIsaR8Ymf0u/N5cvtOh2Zt/YAP0UUUIWSbQqxCpdKKJvbBB6I+mz4CIN/CzyzRpzWzfckERQRS0Q= Received: by 10.82.136.4 with SMTP id j4mr3382920bud.1173011913238; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from roadrunner.q.local ( [85.180.132.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j9sm10020918mue.2007.03.04.04.38.31; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from roadrunner.q.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l23G51Cn002773; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:05:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: (from q@localhost) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l23G4UaS002760; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:04:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:04:30 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20070303160430.GC1530@roadrunner.q.local> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Antony Mawer , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <5F9C60E2708CB953C06B21EA@ganymede.hub.org> <45E60761.8050101@mawer.org> <3AF45A659F5D4E8DD7260AA1@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3AF45A659F5D4E8DD7260AA1@ganymede.hub.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some days, it doesn't pay to upgrade ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:05:53 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I don't know how critical this is, but I just thought about it ... this is my > only system running gmirror ... everything seems fine according ot gmirror > status, but maybe something iswron gthere I'm not seeing: You should tell us, in which state those processes hung. It might also be good to use DDB and showalllocks to see if it is a deadlock. I for one had several deadlocks with gmirror on an SMP machine. Ulrich Spoerlein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 13:28:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E568116A401 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B48413C494 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1708764nfc for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:28:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YyrjITIL5D5VUQ0gtvuytBYuLCJuvdCo+jCsqfxnRqZLgdCT0/f6oegPklRSggVRytuj1UYS3PLup1KXHpyViCfv12ygncl3rv6UqOEKIEjVwNgIW3ea2ePQyk9ougXHO6K5NhuoWwXHncxUWSYFO9WBteisVnyG8C6BWJlGmn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MMakXmVmcw5YCRsKLMV/Ilobs3Dp/vPm+rNb+QbOaOhEnvRuEpTVQK7j5AHYKQ4wcEAdUHCd0g85kIIfmbiuIPwOzZiUVmE14w5BvNXgTfh/AO3WnZL29mvYI964n4Q7SpJ7gtvBFYxxgvjN4kRzkeF7DQRyeDDxie/AO1QnHR8= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr3484177bud.1173014931454; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:28:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.15 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:28:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0703040528n688b2a50x76118889e3906814@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:28:51 +0000 From: Chris To: "Renato Botelho" In-Reply-To: <20070301222944.GA1084@freebsdbrasil.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301222944.GA1084@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Cc: Marko Lerota , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen , Martin Blapp , Anton Karpov , Alexander Shikoff Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:28:54 -0000 On 01/03/07, Renato Botelho wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:04:18PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > > > >Hi All, > > > > > >On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > >>On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>>Hi, > > >>> > > >>>Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason. > > >>>You definitly need to use libthr (which is still CPU hungry, but > > >>>works better). > > >> > > >>I don't think it is a problem with libpthread. > > > > > >FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 > > > > I have no idea what this bug report says. This link and > > any other link I can find to clamav bug reports is not > > working or down. > > clamav's configure was wrong, using -lpthread -lc_r in freebsd, now it's > fixed on development version. > > Anyway, I change it to ${PTHREAD_LIBS} on ports, to respect this var. Before > my last change, REINPLACE_CMD was changing openbsd entry, and it was causing > the problem. > > -- > Renato Botelho > > GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc > > Peterson's Admonition: > When you think you're going down for the third time -- > just remember that you may have counted wrong. > so now the latest version of the port has same cpu utilisation as 0.88.7? Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 15:52:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB8C16A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2042313C48E for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1733811nfc for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:52:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=T0mCX7i3yceLgZXlsXDFA31nmeEb2LIKvu14oiRA4bkziD9CGBz8eZpyXWJYY0JBdJJMJKhfOjxiQtbIPVsPCje5ckmntTak4AApTDYW6iqMXjt5OJXViP5dvf2FI8lh6uwjVR7AYFSmqqkilhebi/eGB1ugzEAYlsL5ILE4oT8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=T8+exVskiuDheyMcXwAwENAIfIXaFQ+LRqm8ukoRuNfvG4x4RBsrxS/cB1SwOihqabb0S0VVUY4wHYO0Px1o5S2PxZQedRdMYT9EIVuoe0LQyc1bgqvhBUz6zgpqbcMvdYmWvDryO0BaGcKgOorFE1tIMOeJ2dHMEHkCNiPektw= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr3745714buc.1173023559437; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.139.19 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:52:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2942dae0703040752w3e9d61e1v34b7f4ca97abac49@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:52:39 -0500 From: frzburn To: "Ronald Klop" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:52:41 -0000 Well, again, thanks for all your replies! =) After all you told me, I guess this guides describes the right tools to use and the right way for rebuilding world. http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/update_freebsd.php Thanks! frzburn On 3/4/07, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:23:55 +0100, frzburn wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > [cut some text] > > So here come my questions: > > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must > I > > use cvsup? > > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my > > source? > > > > In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct > > technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with > the > > latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. > > Read this. It tells you why portsnap is invented. And why cvsup/csup is > still better for other things then ports. > http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > > Ronald. > -- > Ronald Klop > Amsterdam, The Netherlands > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 21:16:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BEF16A402; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8271313C461; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from dan.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l24LGghQ032623; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:16:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:16:42 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: ClamAV Development In-Reply-To: <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> Message-ID: <20070304214255.O18301@godot.imp.ch> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:16:46 -0000 Hi all, After adding some debug stuff to clamd running with freebsd libpthread.so I found that: looking at the output value of 'ps -auxH | grep clamd | grep -v grep | wc -l' is always staying at 6 threads, but the number of threadpool->thr_alive is going higher and higher. So threadpool->thr_alive isn't decreased and is completly incorrect. In my tests the number of threads with libpthread.so is never going higher than 6 threads. That explains, why a higher load is going to delay all scan operations more and more. With libthr.so the value of threadpool->thr_alive is equal with the output of the ps. It can go very high, but always goes back if no more work is there to do. After the maxthreads limit is reached, clamd becomes completly unresponsive with libpthreads.so. SIGKILL and SIGSTOP don't work because some (unexisting) worker threads block on pthread_cond_timedwait(). Only kill -9 helps. Of course, the counter threadpool->thr_alive is wrong and may cause this problem. Maybe someone with more threads knowledge can help here. I'll now add some debug stuff to see where threadpool->thr_alive is going to be increased and where it is decreased. The strange thing is that this works fine with libthr.so. Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 22:17:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304A116A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@cyberwang.net) Received: from spunkymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-202.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDE113C441 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@cyberwang.net) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (68-184-120-224.dhcp.smyr.ga.charter.com [68.184.120.224]) by spunkymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354D3207BD; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:17:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45EB4584.1030008@cyberwang.net> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:17:40 -0500 From: Sean Bryant User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frzburn References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703040752w3e9d61e1v34b7f4ca97abac49@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703040752w3e9d61e1v34b7f4ca97abac49@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:17:56 -0000 frzburn wrote: > Well, again, thanks for all your replies! =) > After all you told me, I guess this guides describes the right tools to use > and the right way for rebuilding world. > > http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/update_freebsd.php > > Thanks! > > > frzburn > > > On 3/4/07, Ronald Klop wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:23:55 +0100, frzburn wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> [cut some text] >> > So here come my questions: >> > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must >> I >> > use cvsup? >> > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my >> > source? >> > >> > In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct >> > technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with >> the >> > latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. >> >> Read this. It tells you why portsnap is invented. And why cvsup/csup is >> still better for other things then ports. >> http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ >> >> Ronald. >> -- >> Ronald Klop >> Amsterdam, The Netherlands >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It might be worth noting you can set KERNCONF in your make.conf and you can just do make kernel instead of make buildkernel && make installkernel. it just runs both for you. There's no difference it is just a shorter path (not much though). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 23:06:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB4416A400; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322513C48D; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from dan.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l24N6YYl073629; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:06:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:06:34 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: ClamAV Development In-Reply-To: <20070304214255.O18301@godot.imp.ch> Message-ID: <20070305000334.E18301@godot.imp.ch> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070304214255.O18301@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:06:37 -0000 Hi, > looking at the output value of 'ps -auxH | grep clamd | grep -v grep | wc -l' > is always staying at 6 threads, but the number of threadpool->thr_alive is > going higher and higher. So threadpool->thr_alive isn't decreased and > is completly incorrect. After setting IdleTimeout very low to 5 seconds, the threadpool->thr_alive gets decreased correctly. There are still always 6 threads running, but further threads get cleaned up correctly. IMHO the whole clamd thread management is somehow broken. -- Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 23:43:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1B516A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AFA13C478 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.14.0/8.14.0/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l24NhhJj004275; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:43:44 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:43:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:43:43 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Martin Blapp In-Reply-To: <20070304214255.O18301@godot.imp.ch> Message-ID: References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070304214255.O18301@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ClamAV Development , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:43:46 -0000 On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi all, > > After adding some debug stuff to clamd running with freebsd > libpthread.so I found that: > > looking at the output value of 'ps -auxH | grep clamd | grep -v grep | wc -l' > is always staying at 6 threads, but the number of threadpool->thr_alive is > going higher and higher. So threadpool->thr_alive isn't decreased and > is completly incorrect. > > In my tests the number of threads with libpthread.so is never going higher > than 6 threads. That explains, why a higher load is going to delay all scan > operations more and more. > > With libthr.so the value of threadpool->thr_alive is equal with the output of > the ps. It can go very high, but always goes back if no more > work is there to do. > > After the maxthreads limit is reached, clamd becomes completly unresponsive > with libpthreads.so. > > SIGKILL and SIGSTOP don't work because some (unexisting) worker threads block > on pthread_cond_timedwait(). Only kill -9 helps. Of course, the counter > threadpool->thr_alive is wrong and may cause this problem. > > Maybe someone with more threads knowledge can help here. I'll now add some > debug > stuff to see where threadpool->thr_alive is going to be increased and where > it > is decreased. The strange thing is that this works fine with libthr.so. Make sure clamd is checking the return value of pthread_create() for errors. You can also set LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE=yes or LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE=yes in your environment to force process scope or system scope threads (libpthread only) for clamd. -- DE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 00:02:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2187916A410; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6E913C478; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from dan.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l25026mK033958; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:02:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:02:06 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Daniel Eischen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070305005855.X18301@godot.imp.ch> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070304214255.O18301@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ClamAV Development , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:02:10 -0000 Hi, > Make sure clamd is checking the return value of pthread_create() > for errors. You can also set LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE=yes or > LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE=yes in your environment to force process > scope or system scope threads (libpthread only) for clamd. Yes, it does check the return value. And setting system or process scope doesn't make any difference. As I said, increasing the thread count works, decreading doesn't. -- Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 00:09:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F3F16A400 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E53D13C48D for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1822733nfc for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:09:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=TVuC65NaeMDOCRHz2pDZo3hi+hW8nsB5mVSOO6wZgrFZbxqCOe+Z8Z+sEb9jwry1O34Mzlkew9cSZi2vRHwvm1CSpLXHPRs7U6ixFNi7LjCwwlx6BHhbn6TLzdHvyvA0A1CG9sKzm76uDsPxIhJi0mHTfOn5VQw9AFCB9g3Yjls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=VNYm3H9JmRpRLjP+Wb+I8La+jcMPxBKf4nG+uF4yf2UNDiyOG09zOXd3+ViOVE9U6retALLZsNYefjVNqgZ0RRiPjDnlVYSlx62Y+kn9eteCxBDA5XY1WJwc5k4l2DMMsNXDcWNE5G8bAx+4hqcS903ai1t5OTGKxaMi2b0blK0= Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr4325346buc.1173053368258; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.139.19 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:09:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:09:28 -0500 From: frzburn To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:09:29 -0000 Hi! I'm unable to get my sound card working =( I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was no ``installed device'' in /dev/sndstat. So I tried kldload snd_driver, as suggested by the handbook, and I didn't get any result. I also loaded sound.ko before loading snd_driver, without success. I got a Dell Inspiron 6400 (e1505). Here's my uname -a: FreeBSD FronzenMind.FrozenLabs 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar 3 13:48:11 EST 2007 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 And my pciconf -l -v (truncated): none0@pci0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0x01bd1028 chip=0x27d88086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio' class = multimedia Thanks! =) frzburn From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 01:06:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8751D16A402 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE1313C4B2 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2516hxX055019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:36:44 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Peter Jeremy Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:36:41 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200703011149.02601.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20070301064442.GG837@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200703011735.37614.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200703011735.37614.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart13641778.VWCKfe0CRQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.189 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fork wedging (I think) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:06:49 -0000 --nextPart13641778.VWCKfe0CRQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 01 March 2007 17:35, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > in /rescue and use './sysctl' (and other commands in rescue). I think > > you will still be able to execute static executables in the current > > directory vis a relative path even if the FS is deadlocked. (As long > > as your shell isn't trying to write command history to a file). > > hmm.. I will see if I can maintain an open shell.. Going to be a PITA giv= en > the length of time between failures. I just logged in OK as it's done it again. Unfortunately it has a version of ATARAID which doesn't support crash dumps. Argh. I was incrementally dumping sysctl trees and when I got to vm it hung.. eureka:~>sysctl vm load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k load: 0.05 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k I tried to reboot in another window but.. eureka:~>reboot load: 0.06 cmd: csh 71159 [allproc] 0.03u 0.00s 0% 4652k I am pondering an update to at least the ATA sub system so I can generate a= =20 crash dump though. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart13641778.VWCKfe0CRQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF620i5ZPcIHs/zowRAnrzAJ48SMH6CqNx4z8hzkWWDO+b+2hBZgCfTa9I E1OxVogHGmKKrgI6oNNuD1Q= =7dYT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart13641778.VWCKfe0CRQ-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 01:14:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14AC16A400 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914CB13C46B for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so1200561ana for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:14:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IfYVJCZJlZnNfFfyHaXeFC7PXBqfNx9QLKWZIMGQ5gODaOZxwmqc1QDAfpYtsk2Egv8a/VnvlPYx0jV6S/BvjsdIL2uZDoVNNQ38l8tLN+eH7YP4KaXKROvpDHaCXam0FYcVQ2TZeVAlSytQsVcWCxywWTzSBxk6BpagmiU52uU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aE/TuY0Iffhr9znezrKcU0jbP6uh7DeO9bvy7zZLnM5CIIpbcAfxgWKIUpR0R7e3BSwa3Kh3FHpWAOh93qdcf9fFTf9XRt27ROXOmi5Vwnk1oA28x4WEL8+NSopl0tzgABb9VaFVt8ogRPmZy0BexvQb8NVKtjYRtriUSvuHs1o= Received: by 10.100.48.7 with SMTP id v7mr1988248anv.1173055675981; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:47:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.11.20 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:47:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:47:55 +0300 From: pluknet To: frzburn In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:14:36 -0000 On 05/03/07, frzburn wrote: > Hi! > I'm unable to get my sound card working =( > > I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was no > ``installed device'' in /dev/sndstat. > So I tried kldload snd_driver, as suggested by the handbook, and I didn't > get any result. > I also loaded sound.ko before loading snd_driver, without success. > > I got a Dell Inspiron 6400 (e1505). > > Here's my uname -a: > FreeBSD FronzenMind.FrozenLabs 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar > 3 13:48:11 EST 2007 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 > > And my pciconf -l -v (truncated): > none0@pci0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0x01bd1028 chip=0x27d88086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio' > class = multimedia > Intel 82801G is an Intel High Definition Audio (HDA) soundcard. There is no driver for HDA in 6.2. See snd_hda(4) in CURRENT for details. wbr, pluknet > Thanks! =) > > frzburn From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 01:29:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E018E16A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E28E13C471 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l251Tt0p056608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:59:55 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Peter Jeremy Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:59:49 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200703011149.02601.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200703011735.37614.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2679798.Z22dKauqW8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703051159.50878.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.194 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fork wedging (I think) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:29:58 -0000 --nextPart2679798.Z22dKauqW8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 05 March 2007 11:36, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I tried to reboot in another window but.. > eureka:~>reboot > load: 0.06 cmd: csh 71159 [allproc] 0.03u 0.00s 0% 4652k Interestingly this process did eventually finish. The system hasn't reboote= d=20 yet but perhaps it will eventually. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2679798.Z22dKauqW8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF63KO5ZPcIHs/zowRAhIRAJ4sNrMxiuqYNCZrhbEX3pxBV369zgCfaiVr HsEmps4E6z0jUhT50vF+S8k= =GKd1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2679798.Z22dKauqW8-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 02:31:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B083116A404 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342D413C4B2 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1470556muf for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:31:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=AExZAGLNORj32YkBmbIazO24buKSvtWJk4WS24O/nOAPArfDJpfFEJ/0+g5uz3uCyxnwzmbDm9S26okLMSmy4lXgZDDuiR9vvz+N3CQHb0Pvp7+9uzThQb0zmX+cjpgqrefNNdvV3ECHoVn9gkzsWC7Tpoq9OGFi4z1vG9UFXzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lKvSBTDdnvrGpkprXLuc31oZcszzdsyP2WymVhCLt5Ye7PNyaRoj0snQcAQeopIKPAk4QOqgcgpqWSFpbx87UGtiSsELtG+v85yJ7QIeHMGkyGkUF/SEm3lKLu7ez+9JhtJ5K/wyvCRzC2pbpWXVXPUhrD7N47gRSEsnGDT1FBk= Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr4349516bue.1173061885733; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.139.19 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:31:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:31:25 -0500 From: frzburn To: pluknet In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:31:27 -0000 This works! =D Thank you very much! =) frzburn On 3/4/07, pluknet wrote: > > On 05/03/07, frzburn wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm unable to get my sound card working =( > > > > I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was > no > > ``installed device'' in /dev/sndstat. > > So I tried kldload snd_driver, as suggested by the handbook, and I > didn't > > get any result. > > I also loaded sound.ko before loading snd_driver, without success. > > > > I got a Dell Inspiron 6400 (e1505). > > > > Here's my uname -a: > > FreeBSD FronzenMind.FrozenLabs 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sat > Mar > > 3 13:48:11 EST 2007 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 > > > > And my pciconf -l -v (truncated): > > none0@pci0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0x01bd1028 chip=0x27d88086 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio' > > class = multimedia > > > Intel 82801G is an Intel High Definition Audio (HDA) soundcard. There > is no driver for HDA in 6.2. See snd_hda(4) in CURRENT for details. > > wbr, > pluknet > > > Thanks! =) > > > > frzburn > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 03:59:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE3116A406 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A8113C428 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA641A4D9D; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:59:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 415B2513E9; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:59:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:59:46 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Yar Tikhiy Message-ID: <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <200702271603.30481@aldan> <20070304075946.GH40430@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070304075946.GH40430@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov , Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:59:47 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote: > > =3D > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based v= ariety is=20 > > =3D > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)... > > =3D Bad default. > >=20 > > Filing a PR. >=20 > Keep in mind that changing the default can break existing setups. > Such setups are likely to be broken anyway, but... E.g., if we > drop the -M flag, it will break systems with tons of RAM but little > swap using tmpmfs. How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing will panic. Kris --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF65WxWry0BWjoQKURAuITAJ9wBrTFahsWSQJu+WgTByF46aq3uQCg+qkA yoeu3s4iju7hHWKy7BEx/0A= =y8Ta -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 06:10:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADE016A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from FS.denninger.net (wsip-70-169-168-7.pn.at.cox.net [70.169.168.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FBA13C441 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.8/8.13.1) with SMTP id l255XNQp067503 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:33:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net [127.0.0.1] by Spamblock-sys (LOCAL); Sun Mar 4 23:33:23 2007 Received: (from karl@localhost) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l255XLtZ067500 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:33:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:33:21 -0600 From: Karl Denninger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070305053321.GA67466@FS.denninger.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers cheerfully broiled for supper and served with ketchup! X-SPAMBLOCK-MATCH: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:10:02 -0000 Is there any intent to backport that into -STABLE? How ugly would that be to do? -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:31:25PM -0500, frzburn wrote: > This works! =D > > Thank you very much! =) > > frzburn > > > On 3/4/07, pluknet wrote: > > > >On 05/03/07, frzburn wrote: > >> Hi! > >> I'm unable to get my sound card working =( > >> > >> I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was > >no > >> ``installed device'' in /dev/sndstat. > >> So I tried kldload snd_driver, as suggested by the handbook, and I > >didn't > >> get any result. > >> I also loaded sound.ko before loading snd_driver, without success. > >> > >> I got a Dell Inspiron 6400 (e1505). > >> > >> Here's my uname -a: > >> FreeBSD FronzenMind.FrozenLabs 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sat > >Mar > >> 3 13:48:11 EST 2007 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 > >> > >> And my pciconf -l -v (truncated): > >> none0@pci0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0x01bd1028 chip=0x27d88086 > >> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > >> device = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio' > >> class = multimedia > >> > >Intel 82801G is an Intel High Definition Audio (HDA) soundcard. There > >is no driver for HDA in 6.2. See snd_hda(4) in CURRENT for details. > > > >wbr, > >pluknet > > > >> Thanks! =) > >> > >> frzburn > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 06:49:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D552816A400 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CE513C471 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from ame9.swcp.com (ame9.swcp.com [216.184.2.164]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id l256U9tJ017697 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:30:09 -0700 Received: from same.swcp.com (same.swcp.com [216.184.2.4]) by ame9.swcp.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l256U7jW012665 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:30:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: (from cheeks@localhost) by same.swcp.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id GAA19750 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:30:07 GMT Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:30:07 -0700 From: Mark Costlow To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame9.swcp.com [216.184.2.164]); Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:30:08 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2723/Sun Mar 4 13:50:33 2007 on ame9.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ame9.swcp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Subject: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:49:50 -0000 The Machine: I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) cpu0: on acpi0 em0: port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 The machine has 4G RAM and a 3ware 9000 series RAID controller with 2 drives. pciconf -l says: em0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 em1@pci4:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 The symptom: The machine boots OK, but can only intermittently make netork connections. Eventually determined that it seems to only see a few ARP packets, so it's falling out of other machines' ARP tables, and is often unable to see the replies to its own ARP requests. It does see SOME ARPs though. When it is able to communicate with another machine, it does not appear to drop any packets between them (e.g. I scp'd a 500M file at 300Mbps to this machine). When I run "tcpdump -n arp" I see a few ARPs, but not many. In a 1-minute period, I saw 3 ARP who-has/reply packets. On a different machine on the same ethernet switch, I saw 225 who-has/reply packets in the same 1-minute period. I've tried different cables, and a different switch. I started with 6.2-RELEASE, and then went to 6.2-STABLE on 3/3/07 to get the latest em driver fixes. I've used SMP and GENERIC kernels. I get the same results in all cases. There are no firewall rules installed. I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter (realtek), and it works straight away. "tcpdump -n arp" sees the same noise as other machines on that LAN. I read through the recent threads on the em driver, but didn't see any reported symptoms like this. Has anyone seen anything like this? Got any hints for me? Am I doing something stupid? Did I leave out any useful information about my configuration? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 07:37:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BE716A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841F013C471 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so2174413wri for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:37:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l5LgJLVAoARsflIRumrM1tgz3sCh0id08VQU89Lqy3X9BxPULWi157HXbNQa1Qq+WLfsB5XzAgokpnbXLvb5O+NEM15yjkF/4SwrmY2HDSuRAjCHUs3yeK2woXob/wT1UZawZUasJbttYBZRScuPoUmK6m4CeAQgk9OFYFcbjxw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H9WNCxLoS2sS4iOFJoyKfMhb6Vee/ShA6/VnGGtO3rFo/1WJ7nnD8pKARczL5By4vtn+/p8jl1nuGGePEA7fRX91F/yL2XzE5n+EMC628N3XokWUYwR0iEJ8FTYE8Tf2+hoGfmdYuZNLyZnyj4S6CyD59TehTC6nN3Dfn+BU+lw= Received: by 10.114.56.1 with SMTP id e1mr1129260waa.1173080221424; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:37:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703042337r588a2173yb38bb80d33d64ce7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 23:37:01 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Mark Costlow" In-Reply-To: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:37:02 -0000 On 3/4/07, Mark Costlow wrote: > The Machine: > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) > cpu0: on acpi0 > em0: port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > The machine has 4G RAM and a 3ware 9000 series RAID controller with 2 drives. > > pciconf -l says: > > em0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > em1@pci4:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > The symptom: > > The machine boots OK, but can only intermittently make netork connections. > Eventually determined that it seems to only see a few ARP packets, so > it's falling out of other machines' ARP tables, and is often unable to > see the replies to its own ARP requests. It does see SOME ARPs > though. When it is able to communicate with another machine, it > does not appear to drop any packets between them (e.g. I scp'd a 500M file > at 300Mbps to this machine). > > When I run "tcpdump -n arp" I see a few ARPs, but not many. In a 1-minute > period, I saw 3 ARP who-has/reply packets. On a different machine on > the same ethernet switch, I saw 225 who-has/reply packets in the same > 1-minute period. > > I've tried different cables, and a different switch. I started with > 6.2-RELEASE, and then went to 6.2-STABLE on 3/3/07 to get the latest > em driver fixes. I've used SMP and GENERIC kernels. I get the same > results in all cases. > > There are no firewall rules installed. > > I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter (realtek), and it works straight away. > "tcpdump -n arp" sees the same noise as other machines on that LAN. > > I read through the recent threads on the em driver, but didn't see any > reported symptoms like this. Has anyone seen anything like this? Got > any hints for me? Am I doing something stupid? Did I leave out any > useful information about my configuration? These are one of our latest NICs, I have had no trouble with these but I'm used to using them on an Intel design, not SuperMicro. First question, do you get the same behavior on both ports? My first guess is that this is a BIOS/management problem. Double check SM website and see if there's any support updates to firmware for the system. I will check at work tomorrow morning to see if anyone else has heard of this. Cheers, Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 07:58:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4516A404 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@dwlabs.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E83C13C46B for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@dwlabs.ca) Received: from ip02.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.10]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JEF0080G63MHAC1@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:28:34 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO dwpc.dwlabs.ca) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip02.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:28:49 -0400 Received: from dwpc.dwlabs.ca (ftp.dwlabs.ca [192.168.0.10]) by dwpc.dwlabs.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l257PaUo006867; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:25:42 -0400 (AST envelope-from duane@dwpc.dwlabs.ca) Received: (from duane@localhost) by dwpc.dwlabs.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l257PZt9006866; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:25:35 -0400 (AST envelope-from duane) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:25:35 -0400 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> To: Mark Costlow Message-id: <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAMZV60UY4MfmdGdsb2JhbACPKgE X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,247,1170648000"; d="scan'208"; a="109416114:sNHT33023898" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2723/Sun Mar 4 16:50:33 2007 on dwpc.dwlabs.ca X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on dwpc.dwlabs.ca References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Duane Whitty List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:58:51 -0000 On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: > The Machine: > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) > cpu0: on acpi0 > em0: port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > The machine has 4G RAM and a 3ware 9000 series RAID controller with 2 drives. > > pciconf -l says: > > em0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > em1@pci4:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > The symptom: > > The machine boots OK, but can only intermittently make netork connections. > Eventually determined that it seems to only see a few ARP packets, so > it's falling out of other machines' ARP tables, and is often unable to > see the replies to its own ARP requests. It does see SOME ARPs > though. When it is able to communicate with another machine, it > does not appear to drop any packets between them (e.g. I scp'd a 500M file > at 300Mbps to this machine). > > When I run "tcpdump -n arp" I see a few ARPs, but not many. In a 1-minute > period, I saw 3 ARP who-has/reply packets. On a different machine on > the same ethernet switch, I saw 225 who-has/reply packets in the same > 1-minute period. > > I've tried different cables, and a different switch. I started with > 6.2-RELEASE, and then went to 6.2-STABLE on 3/3/07 to get the latest > em driver fixes. I've used SMP and GENERIC kernels. I get the same > results in all cases. > > There are no firewall rules installed. > > I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter (realtek), and it works straight away. > "tcpdump -n arp" sees the same noise as other machines on that LAN. > Sounds like it could be bad hardware. Can you swap nics? > I read through the recent threads on the em driver, but didn't see any > reported symptoms like this. Has anyone seen anything like this? Got > any hints for me? Am I doing something stupid? Did I leave out any > useful information about my configuration? > Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues that perhaps others could help diagnose --Duane > Thanks, > > Mark > -- > Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 > cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 > > abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM > Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 08:05:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3574C16A400 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plosher@plosh.net) Received: from mx.isc.org (mx.isc.org [204.152.184.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C56813C428 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plosher@plosh.net) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "farside.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EE411401C; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plosher@plosh.net) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::37] (tardis.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14351E60DB; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plosher@plosh.net) Message-ID: <45EBCF4C.9000901@plosh.net> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:05:32 -0800 From: Peter Losher User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE1B0A997E152816C0B418D08" Subject: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:05:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE1B0A997E152816C0B418D08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from 5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics with the below message: -=3D- TPTE at 0xffff8000040028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000 panic: bad pte cpuid =3D 2 KDB: stack backtrace: panic() at 0xffffffff803fdd03 =3D panic+0x253 pmap_remove_pages() at 0xffffffff806072a3 =3D pmap_remove_pages+0x283 exec_new_vmspace() at 0xffffffff803e18e6 =3D exec_new_vmspace+0x216 exec_elf64_imgact() at 0xffffffff803cbb73 =3D exec_elf64_imgact+0x273 kern_execve() at 0xffffffff803e2107 =3D kern_execve+0x457 execve() at 0xffffffff803e2bed =3D execve+0x5d syscall() at 0xffffffff8060d141 =3D syscall+0x4d1 Xfast_syscall() at 0xffffffff805f8128 =3D Xfast_syscall+0xa8 --- syscall (59, FreeBSD ELF64, execve), rip =3D 0x80069838c, rsp =3D 0x7fffffffe7c8, rbp =3D 0x7fffffffecd0 --- Uptime: 4d16h55m46s -=3D- I do have a dump, and can make that available if need be. Has anyone encountered this recently and can shed any light on what might be causing this? Best Wishes - Peter --------------enigE1B0A997E152816C0B418D08 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF689MuffIhmkXw7kRAiOYAKCjN1/oVIMrdZ344abmI7sK+MA0HgCgmPMB dIKofqSncYku7nHR9gEes4g= =x5Xo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE1B0A997E152816C0B418D08-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 08:37:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FC816A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from klein.pean.org (pean.org [195.24.165.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F200B13C474 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [192.168.12.13] (trusted.jajja.com [217.118.217.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by klein.pean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88229DE8D9E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:12:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45EBD134.8090600@pean.org> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:13:40 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Sata controller Sil 3512 - Kernel Panic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:37:02 -0000 Hi, I've recently installed a new sata-controller on a fresh installed FreeBSD 6.2. I gave the manual ata(4) a quick look before I bought the controller and it tells me this chip should be supported. But the machine panics every few minutes when I have a disk connected to it. Is there a way to fix this? heh. kernel: atapci0: port 0xdff0-0xdff7,0xdfe4-0xdfe7,0xdfa8-0xdfaf,0xdfe0-0xdfe3,0xdf90-0xdf9f mem 0xfe5ffc00-0xfe5ffdff irq 22 at device 11.0 on pci1 kernel: ad6: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=244892063 fee kernel: fee kernel: kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode kernel: fault virtual address = 0x28 kernel: fault code = supervisor read, page not present kernel: instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0685de4 kernel: stack pointer = 0x28:0xcbeeac28 kernel: frame pointer = 0x28:0xcbeeac30 kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 kernel: current process = 6 (thread taskq) kernel: trap number = 12 kernel: panic: page fault kernel: Uptime: 33m38s kernel: Cannot dump. No dump device defined. kernel: Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort kernel: Rebooting... From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 10:02:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4574216A400 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25CE13C481 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOA1k-000MnL-Ru for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:02:49 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l25A2cc6062450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:02:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25A2c6B080080; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:02:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l25A2cO6080079; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:02:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:02:37 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Peter Losher Message-ID: <20070305100237.GI10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <45EBCF4C.9000901@plosh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bpVaumkpfGNUagdU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EBCF4C.9000901@plosh.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 1118cf21f7425d415ed61e91afc5cb63 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 832 [Mar 02 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:02:52 -0000 --bpVaumkpfGNUagdU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from > 5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics > with the below message: >=20 > -=3D- > TPTE at 0xffff8000040028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000 > panic: bad pte > cpuid =3D 2 > KDB: stack backtrace: > panic() at 0xffffffff803fdd03 =3D panic+0x253 > pmap_remove_pages() at 0xffffffff806072a3 =3D pmap_remove_pages+0x283 > exec_new_vmspace() at 0xffffffff803e18e6 =3D exec_new_vmspace+0x216 > exec_elf64_imgact() at 0xffffffff803cbb73 =3D exec_elf64_imgact+0x273 > kern_execve() at 0xffffffff803e2107 =3D kern_execve+0x457 > execve() at 0xffffffff803e2bed =3D execve+0x5d > syscall() at 0xffffffff8060d141 =3D syscall+0x4d1 > Xfast_syscall() at 0xffffffff805f8128 =3D Xfast_syscall+0xa8 > --- syscall (59, FreeBSD ELF64, execve), rip =3D 0x80069838c, rsp =3D > 0x7fffffffe7c8, rbp =3D 0x7fffffffecd0 --- > Uptime: 4d16h55m46s > -=3D- >=20 > I do have a dump, and can make that available if need be. Has anyone > encountered this recently and can shed any light on what might be > causing this? Did rev. 1.516.2.9 of sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c changed (or even fixed) the problem ? (This is the same patch I already sent you). --bpVaumkpfGNUagdU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF6+q9C3+MBN1Mb4gRAmHvAJ0S78ULyXqmhExDG0xu4QotAIe5KQCeIwLL u+phzUrUe8EFILFXqeVzeHA= =mIup -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bpVaumkpfGNUagdU-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 12:05:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8161516A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AC113C494 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.217] ([192.168.10.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25C5DF6066780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:05:13 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45EC077E.4040404@unsane.co.uk> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:05:18 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> <20070305053321.GA67466@FS.denninger.net> In-Reply-To: <20070305053321.GA67466@FS.denninger.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:05:20 -0000 Karl Denninger wrote: > Is there any intent to backport that into -STABLE? > > How ugly would that be to do? > > -- Almost certainly I hope :) if not the patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/snd_RELENG_6_20070305_148_lowlatency.diff.gz doesnt look too ugly for me, and worked well too. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 13:23:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632DA16A400 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefane.toma@gmail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4D513C46B for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefane.toma@gmail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 38so1584593huc for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:23:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Q0kTXKf17KGBZMie6eGP8IDbSDjJkjVAQYIRRKecZjDWYTGNspD2vlMh9hiWM7GsQ40br7sUaKcrP86wJeIYhMQu8xWt3rqGbxGdxWQOQ3sZ7mauaNvrBAEMTTvmPmMvyq9dj0P7HcMtd0QzypDBoL0Fy90ZRCRw6QyLrs8zF5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=NaD4ALS696Bnacowv21WuP3wSv2JPsJ6vuS5ibtQTpKno5nn04nl8kvdY4kudWWmNXgjFX0HFDdJMQYhGTeLoxMC90W5I4+e64oZKZbMIuEdnYhMi8b9mcvJ9FpFgfqrwvflZddpQluTNOvXBzNtsKKNv0llXVIG8EvrNFwd+qM= Received: by 10.114.13.1 with SMTP id 1mr1203161wam.1173099350184; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 04:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.61.2 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 04:55:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:50 +0100 From: "Stephane Thomas" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Portaudit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:23:37 -0000 Hello, I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudit_fixed= lines in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf but as the vulnerabilities aren't really fixed I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. I read portaudit's man and freebsd handbook but I can't figure out the good method. Thx in advance. Stef From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 13:24:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A63016A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BF013C461 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l25DO766066659; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:24:07 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l25DNomt066647; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:23:50 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:23:50 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <200702271603.30481@aldan> <20070304075946.GH40430@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov , Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:24:28 -0000 On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote: > > > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety is > > > = > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)... > > > = Bad default. > > > > > > Filing a PR. > > > > Keep in mind that changing the default can break existing setups. > > Such setups are likely to be broken anyway, but... E.g., if we > > drop the -M flag, it will break systems with tons of RAM but little > > swap using tmpmfs. > > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > will panic. I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its consumers. Then removing the -M flag and making swap backing the default is a very sound choice. Thank you for correcting me. -- Yar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 14:00:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644D716A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quetzal@zone3000.net) Received: from mx1.sitevalley.com (sitevalley.com [209.67.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F53E13C471 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quetzal@zone3000.net) Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (217.144.69.37) by 209.67.61.254 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2007 13:33:42 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:33:15 +0200 From: Nikolay Pavlov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070305133315.GA1687@zone3000.net> Mail-Followup-To: Nikolay Pavlov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 Subject: panic on FreeBSD 6.2 (dump included) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:00:25 -0000 Hi, folks. I have a panic on FreeBSD 6.2: kgdb /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/kernel.debug vmcore.3 kgdb: kvm_nlist(_stopped_cpus): kgdb: kvm_nlist(_stoppcbs): [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd". Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xc096f0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc096f120 stack pointer = 0x28:0xf5becbf0 frame pointer = 0x28:0x0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 755 (httpd) trap number = 12 panic: page fault Uptime: 3h16m4s Dumping 2046 MB (2 chunks) chunk 0: 1MB (159 pages) ... ok chunk 1: 2046MB (523760 pages) 2030 2014 1998 1982 1966 1950 1934 1918 1902 1886 1870 1854 1838 1822 1806 1790 1774 1758 1742 1726 1710 1694 1678 1662 1646 1630 1614 1598 1582 1566 1550 1534 1518 1502 1486 1470 1454 1438 1422 1406 1390 1374 1358 1342 1326 1310 1294 1278 1262 1246 1230 1214 1198 1182 1166 1150 1134 1118 1102 1086 1070 1054 1038 1022 1006 990 974 958 942 926 910 894 878 862 846 830 814 798 782 766 750 734 718 702 686 670 654 638 622 606 590 574 558 542 526 510 494 478 462 446 430 414 398 382 366 350 334 318 302 286 270 254 238 222 206 190 174 158 142 126 110 94 78 62 46 30 14 #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. in pcpu.h (kgdb) bt #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 #1 0xc0672afe in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:409 #2 0xc0672d94 in panic (fmt=0xc08db5c1 "%s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:565 #3 0xc0885a04 in trap_fatal (frame=0xf5becbb0, eva=12621552) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:837 #4 0xc088576b in trap_pfault (frame=0xf5becbb0, usermode=0, eva=12621552) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:745 #5 0xc08853a9 in trap (frame= {tf_fs = -944504824, tf_es = 40, tf_ds = -172097496, tf_edi = -1066957550, tf_esi = -172045336, tf_ebp = 0, tf_isp = -172045348, tf_ebx = 0, tf_edx = -944490096, tf_ecx = -944478804, tf_eax = -172045200, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1063849696, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 66118, tf_esp = -172045332, tf_ss = 0}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:435 #6 0xc0873a7a in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139 #7 0xc096f120 in M_SELECT_uninit_sys_uninit () -- ====================================================================== - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. <<<----------------------------------- ====================================================================== From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 14:06:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1136C16A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938C713C471 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1152257ugh for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:06:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=Nqjbg153voC8WKssC8/c17JG1s1gGdXxoKmnj8/oF6A5de7QqGWqNVCa6UQQEU9M/22xGrQ61+m2ikNQn4nzE9t4pDxy8bNrM00mxkYFpy9aPymnKO/I/f8zdVUInJwMlpkMMv4IG31gQ4HyewGNovlb4Lw1/1C8prOSWP++Fnw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=H3biY8OsBcq4GHkdVSFJ9DKIg6RmZnC0w5Bxg7sfjbS4kcWMP8IlDZ4eZZuT5gJP9ofqtR4MO0PfRA4lBwPkjNsEOsyWJvS8PpF53mUEAaEYxx4sya6xH1lkV/mJpjg+WcyFkkzsXPiZt3wNW4r83Y3QfdUoHJdPbf1cq6u/ER4= Received: by 10.67.121.15 with SMTP id y15mr10680349ugm.1173101912465; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [84.10.174.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e34sm6856403ugd.2007.03.05.05.38.31; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:38:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45EC1D48.9010800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:38:16 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephane Thomas References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF3D75F5F8B941DDBEF9E16E3" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portaudit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:06:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF3D75F5F8B941DDBEF9E16E3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stephane Thomas wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore > because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even = if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? After 'man 7 ports': % ENVIRONMENT % [...] % DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES % If defined, disable check for security vulnerabilities % using portaudit(1) (ports/security/portaudit) when % installing new ports. Cheers, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 --------------enigF3D75F5F8B941DDBEF9E16E3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7B1PezeoPAwGIYsRCKQBAJ9uMiwpKj1vFGuWGOCTMjnnzETYQACff2u2 oWDFn/w0Iu4+Z3qirKiEN60= =l33M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF3D75F5F8B941DDBEF9E16E3-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 14:10:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318FA16A405 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from fall-lakeland.atl.sa.earthlink.net (fall-lakeland.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B68C13C48E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from pop-siberian.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.71]) by fall-lakeland.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HODf4-0006Hc-Qs for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:55:34 -0500 Received: from fl-71-54-28-212.dhcp.embarqhsd.net ([71.54.28.212] helo=kt.weeeble.com) by pop-siberian.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1HODf3-0006Hr-00; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:55:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:55:32 -0500 From: Randy Pratt To: "Stephane Thomas" Message-Id: <20070305085532.ec79a7e4.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portaudit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:10:32 -0000 On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:50 +0100 "Stephane Thomas" wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudit_fixed= > lines in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf but as the vulnerabilities aren't > really fixed I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. > > I read portaudit's man and freebsd handbook but I can't figure out the good > method. Thx in advance. If you're sure you want to override portaudit you can use make DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes followed by any other arguments for building a port (see man 7 ports). If you want to disable portaudit for portupgrade, use something like: portupgrade -m "DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes" followed by any other arguments needed. HTH, Randy -- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 14:25:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9398116A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A9D13C47E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from dan.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l25EPDW4034912; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:25:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:25:13 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: ClamAV Development Message-ID: <20070305152453.H18301@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:25:30 -0000 After further analyzing I think that pthread_cond_timedwait() in libpthread.so.2 has some issues. While the default clamd worker timeout of 30 seconds is reached with libc_r.so.6 and libthr.so.2 and pthread_cond_timedwait() returns ETIMEDOUT there, libpthread.so doesn't get any ETIMEDOUT errors back at all, and the code can never reach the part where the worker thread gets detached and the thread count gets decreased. With libpthread.so.2 pthread_cond_timedwait() returns always 0. The manpage tells me: > The pthread_cond_timedwait() function atomically blocks the current > thread waiting on the condition variable specified by cond, and unblocks > the mutex specified by mutex. The waiting thread unblocks only after > another thread calls pthread_cond_signal(3), or pthread_cond_broadcast(3) > with the same condition variable, or if the system time reaches the time > specified in abstime, and the current thread reacquires the lock on > mutex. That doesn't seem to work with libpthread.so.2. Any hints ? -- Martin Martin Blapp, ------------------------------------------------------------------ ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP: PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E ------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 16:41:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EED916A405 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C33313C48E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1198610ugh for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:41:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZN9LVp5+U7gyUx0RIQE1UzIQPkvGE8LtficD3VyC/i3dw4bSdj8A9cHm6p66AWaMY+WR6tt1S5RSnWHBvui+8lPgy33S0iAARJpp7le+k+pPNxZ7Ou5l1cz9JQEvGNAlZVVC+KZexf0GbwFJzxBHbERqp7C815Ey7h3kBOPG1bU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WzYdvldlI9BLe6uyuRlw6vIV91hbHHXa/m2FQXugIlyyJQojl/4OFaTTJFmxF7ubCEAbh/m35ff1cEIVCU1pZGzlZ/MQJNuD6kLZsE0JLlI+17JQNMsSbwRJ7zXvblq5KZCL8Ss4XNGPWYBkY7az2X1WRWtXoCIWUEVYY8JuXiE= Received: by 10.115.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr1213118wal.1173112861996; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:41:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:41:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703050841ub56c513y1504ebe0af8052de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:41:01 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Duane Whitty" In-Reply-To: <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Costlow Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:41:04 -0000 On 3/4/07, Duane Whitty wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: > > The Machine: > > > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > em0: port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > > > The machine has 4G RAM and a 3ware 9000 series RAID controller with 2 drives. > > > > pciconf -l says: > > > > em0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > em1@pci4:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > > > > The symptom: > > > > The machine boots OK, but can only intermittently make netork connections. > > Eventually determined that it seems to only see a few ARP packets, so > > it's falling out of other machines' ARP tables, and is often unable to > > see the replies to its own ARP requests. It does see SOME ARPs > > though. When it is able to communicate with another machine, it > > does not appear to drop any packets between them (e.g. I scp'd a 500M file > > at 300Mbps to this machine). > > > > When I run "tcpdump -n arp" I see a few ARPs, but not many. In a 1-minute > > period, I saw 3 ARP who-has/reply packets. On a different machine on > > the same ethernet switch, I saw 225 who-has/reply packets in the same > > 1-minute period. > > > > I've tried different cables, and a different switch. I started with > > 6.2-RELEASE, and then went to 6.2-STABLE on 3/3/07 to get the latest > > em driver fixes. I've used SMP and GENERIC kernels. I get the same > > results in all cases. > > > > There are no firewall rules installed. > > > > I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter (realtek), and it works straight away. > > "tcpdump -n arp" sees the same noise as other machines on that LAN. > > > > Sounds like it could be bad hardware. Can you swap nics? No he can't these are LOMs (on the motherboard). > > I read through the recent threads on the em driver, but didn't see any > > reported symptoms like this. Has anyone seen anything like this? Got > > any hints for me? Am I doing something stupid? Did I leave out any > > useful information about my configuration? > > > > Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > that perhaps others could help diagnose Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 17:17:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F2416A402 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E3D13C471 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from ame8.swcp.com (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id l25HHqn0006220; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:17:52 -0700 Received: from same.swcp.com (same.swcp.com [216.184.2.4]) by ame8.swcp.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l25HHnAc086250; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:17:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: (from cheeks@localhost) by same.swcp.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA08034; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:17:48 GMT Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:17:47 -0700 From: Mark Costlow To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20070305171747.GA7936@same.swcp.com> References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> <2a41acea0703042337r588a2173yb38bb80d33d64ce7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0703042337r588a2173yb38bb80d33d64ce7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:17:50 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2735/Mon Mar 5 08:23:59 2007 on ame8.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ame8.swcp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Costlow Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:17:53 -0000 On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:37:01PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > These are one of our latest NICs, I have had no trouble with these > but I'm used to using them on an Intel design, not SuperMicro. > > First question, do you get the same behavior on both ports? > My first guess is that this is a BIOS/management problem. > > Double check SM website and see if there's any support updates > to firmware for the system. I left out a couple of things. Yes, it does the same thing on both em0 and em1. And, the inhouse linux advocate loaded debian on the box and that worked as expected. I'll check SM's web site for BIOS updates today. Mark -- Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 17:22:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8805316A408 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BA013C478 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from ame8.swcp.com (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id l25HM7BK024550; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:07 -0700 Received: from same.swcp.com (same.swcp.com [216.184.2.4]) by ame8.swcp.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l25HM3tw088761; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: (from cheeks@localhost) by same.swcp.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA08082; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:22:01 GMT Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:01 -0700 From: Mark Costlow To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20070305172201.GB7936@same.swcp.com> References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <2a41acea0703050841ub56c513y1504ebe0af8052de@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0703050841ub56c513y1504ebe0af8052de@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:22:05 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2735/Mon Mar 5 08:23:59 2007 on ame8.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ame8.swcp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Duane Whitty , Mark Costlow Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:22:08 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. Here's the full dmesg. Thanks for looking at this. ---------------------------- Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 4 22:40:38 MST 2007 root@ame4.swcp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x4e33d,CX16,,,> AMD Features=0x20000000 AMD Features2=0x1 Cores per package: 2 real memory = 3489005568 (3327 MB) avail memory = 3414384640 (3256 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 pcib4: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2 pci4: on pcib4 em0: port 0x2000-0x201f m em 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:54 em1: port 0x2020-0x203f m em 0xda020000-0xda03ffff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci4 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:55 pcib5: at device 0.3 on pci1 pci5: on pcib5 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.02.012 twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xd8000000-0 xd9ffffff,0xda100000-0xda100fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci5 twa0: [GIANT-LOCKED] twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9550SX-4LP, 4 ports, Firm ware FE9X 3.04.01.011, BIOS BE9X 3.04.00.002 pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 17 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0x1860-0x187f irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xda600000-0xda6003ff irq 17 at d evice 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 pci7: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177, 0x376,0x1880-0x188f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 3 on ac pi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 rue0: USBKR100 USB 10/100 LAN, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 miibus0: on rue0 ruephy0: on miibus0 ruephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rue0: Ethernet address: 00:10:60:dd:ed:e9 rue0: if_start running deferred for Giant Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2000078406 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 100.000MB/s transfers da1: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a em0: link state changed to UP em0: promiscuous mode enabled em0: promiscuous mode disabled twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0029): Verify started: unit=0 twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x002B): Verify completed: unit=0 ---------------------------- This is while booting GENERIC. I can boot SMP and send that too if you suggest. Here's vmstat -i: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 2 0 irq6: fdc0 3 0 irq14: ata0 47 0 irq16: uhci3 14836 0 irq17: uhci0 ehci0 25 0 irq18: em0 uhci2 91850 2 irq24: twa0 14828 0 cpu0: timer 79015190 1999 Total 79136781 2003 Is the fact that em0 and uhci2 are sharing an interrupt significant? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 17:28:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE59116A405 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from FS.denninger.net (wsip-70-169-168-7.pn.at.cox.net [70.169.168.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6692C13C442 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.8/8.13.1) with SMTP id l25HS2im090438 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:28:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net [127.0.0.1] by Spamblock-sys (LOCAL); Mon Mar 5 11:28:02 2007 Received: (from karl@localhost) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l25HS2tw090435 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:28:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:28:02 -0600 From: Karl Denninger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070305172802.GA90417@FS.denninger.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> <20070305053321.GA67466@FS.denninger.net> <45EC077E.4040404@unsane.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EC077E.4040404@unsane.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers cheerfully broiled for supper and served with ketchup! X-SPAMBLOCK-MATCH: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:28:04 -0000 Tried to apply that, and got a mess. Did you put that on RELENG_6 cleanly? It drops a bunch of files in the top level SRC directory (NOT under /sys!) if applied against /usr/src; it appears to apply cleanly but a kernel build subsequent to that fails. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:18PM +0000, Vince wrote: > Karl Denninger wrote: > > Is there any intent to backport that into -STABLE? > > > > How ugly would that be to do? > > > > -- > Almost certainly I hope :) if not the patch is available at > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/snd_RELENG_6_20070305_148_lowlatency.diff.gz > doesnt look too ugly for me, and worked well too. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 17:29:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D433E16A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BE213C49D for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so1887679nza for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:29:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IXC7foLZN0VhEq+rq1iveCUIdmSfoZPt8tud3hCFa8H1Yctw4OqLTZsopU387ZOqOJFFT56dgQ53BzOoVIuHUGo/xiERNpfAVgU6AoO4w94fMAfW/Xske0TQU2rzrjkElClwllPKPmmsD0YmfPLykkanIozvePKI0hEVRG1vViY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PiXX+O8wvfYqfc5DjC87gd+CkJPPIzS8pukhBdyfALl/I30nJfhV6Oey52f9n7d41oShSCIjHRO8xvLOleyh1+68wtTZjevnwFEtTof7Lg+OD/HsJNkQg9/7ETpLZ24pVRYlNTVBuGE7oG71KYQMFqyeLhdrEIyE9GEk1BbO4EM= Received: by 10.115.32.1 with SMTP id k1mr1372854waj.1173115779291; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:29:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703050929s7ebb7er2b8b206bd19be5a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:29:39 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Mark Costlow" In-Reply-To: <20070305172201.GB7936@same.swcp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <2a41acea0703050841ub56c513y1504ebe0af8052de@mail.gmail.com> <20070305172201.GB7936@same.swcp.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Duane Whitty Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:29:41 -0000 On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > > > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > > > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. > > Here's the full dmesg. Thanks for looking at this. > > ---------------------------- > Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 4 22:40:38 MST 2007 > root@ame4.swcp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > ACPI APIC Table: > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 > Features=0xbfebfbff MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x4e33d,CX16,,,> > AMD Features=0x20000000 > AMD Features2=0x1 > Cores per package: 2 > real memory = 3489005568 (3327 MB) > avail memory = 3414384640 (3256 MB) > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pcib2: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > pci2: on pcib2 > pcib3: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > pci3: on pcib3 > pcib4: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2 > pci4: on pcib4 > em0: port 0x2000-0x201f m > em 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:54 > em1: port 0x2020-0x203f m > em 0xda020000-0xda03ffff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci4 > em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:55 > pcib5: at device 0.3 on pci1 > pci5: on pcib5 > 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.02.012 > twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xd8000000-0 > xd9ffffff,0xda100000-0xda100fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci5 > twa0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9550SX-4LP, 4 ports, Firm > ware FE9X 3.04.01.011, BIOS BE9X 3.04.00.002 > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 > pci6: on pcib6 > uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 17 at device 29.0 > on pci0 > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 19 at device 29.1 > on pci0 > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 18 at device 29.2 > on pci0 > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: on uhci2 > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci3: port 0x1860-0x187f irq 16 at device 29.3 > on pci0 > uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb3: on uhci3 > usb3: USB revision 1.0 > uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ehci0: mem 0xda600000-0xda6003ff irq 17 at d > evice 29.7 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb4: EHCI version 1.0 > usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 > usb4: on ehci0 > usb4: USB revision 2.0 > uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered > pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci7: on pcib7 > pci7: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177, > 0x376,0x1880-0x188f at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > sio1: type 16550A > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 > fdc0: [FAST] > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 3 on ac > pi0 > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold > ppbus0: on ppc0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > rue0: USBKR100 USB 10/100 LAN, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 > miibus0: on rue0 > ruephy0: on miibus0 > ruephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > rue0: Ethernet address: 00:10:60:dd:ed:e9 > rue0: if_start running deferred for Giant > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2000078406 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 > da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > da0: 100.000MB/s transfers > da0: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > da1: 100.000MB/s transfers > da1: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > em0: link state changed to UP > em0: promiscuous mode enabled > em0: promiscuous mode disabled > twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0029): Verify started: unit=0 > twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x002B): Verify completed: unit=0 > ---------------------------- > > This is while booting GENERIC. I can boot SMP and send that too if you > suggest. > > Here's vmstat -i: > > interrupt total rate > irq1: atkbd0 2 0 > irq6: fdc0 3 0 > irq14: ata0 47 0 > irq16: uhci3 14836 0 > irq17: uhci0 ehci0 25 0 > irq18: em0 uhci2 91850 2 > irq24: twa0 14828 0 > cpu0: timer 79015190 1999 > Total 79136781 2003 > > Is the fact that em0 and uhci2 are sharing an interrupt significant? Possibly, but it should work. Could you try a kernel with that defined out? Secondly, would it be possible to load the latest snapshot of CURRENT to see how it behaves, it uses MSI and would indicate if this is an interrupt thing, I still doubt this however. Look over your docs and see if there's some means to disable system management, I still think its interfering. I have a group meeting in 10 mins, I'll check on any known issues with this. Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 17:37:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A173316A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04B313C4A6 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frzburn@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so2056131nfc for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:37:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dBjxcGv9Bn26bAYa68DmpsvZMG+kCkhgqccf/ycP6U1W8lTa+4JYmYwazny/AGY/f87466xtpglp4YsHWrXHrEmYDlXOad+W7cKn+4hprqWMdgwOFzMgxJl/rudF9q0Z1u1wRvmJdp8vQQmVjBoV6FanLL6oBITTywXaD3GvxaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DUD1sUI0qbpkXU4s71bvlrpuXRt7T9l5BQLjDKlHj/OL9NuDfjdTFwCyTbtmvzp2SkHXAn+Hd6tQTgaVHL+PPPyXpVQaIj29u2tYYD/Qmq1g+1vKwYIFCj0o+E3UVsgP/qlUvVqSIiF2N1jYimQ8rS1w1bdoCnawDQCEwNJFia0= Received: by 10.82.187.16 with SMTP id k16mr5469078buf.1173116261812; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:37:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.139.19 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:37:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2942dae0703050937q77604976yce2d20b77cc6e2e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:37:41 -0500 From: frzburn To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070305172802.GA90417@FS.denninger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> <20070305053321.GA67466@FS.denninger.net> <45EC077E.4040404@unsane.co.uk> <20070305172802.GA90417@FS.denninger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:37:43 -0000 Well, here's what I did: I got the files: - sndkld_releng6_amd64_lowlatency.tar.gz (since I use FreeBSD amd64) - soundcard.h - README from http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/lowlatency/ . Then just follow the README! =) frzburn On 3/5/07, Karl Denninger wrote: > > Tried to apply that, and got a mess. > > Did you put that on RELENG_6 cleanly? It drops a bunch of files in the > top > level SRC directory (NOT under /sys!) if applied against /usr/src; it > appears to apply cleanly but a kernel build subsequent to that fails. > > -- > -- > Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights > Activist > http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I > do! > http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about > DIVING! > http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:18PM +0000, Vince wrote: > > Karl Denninger wrote: > > > Is there any intent to backport that into -STABLE? > > > > > > How ugly would that be to do? > > > > > > -- > > Almost certainly I hope :) if not the patch is available at > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/snd_RELENG_6_20070305_148_lowlatency.diff.gz > > doesnt look too ugly for me, and worked well too. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > > > > > %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok > > > %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 18:02:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA65516A478 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B513C494 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1222755ugh for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:02:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ox1givyOhhy06Cu4LpJ9vahdDUQJtnFKfBxi8rbZwPNRYitZrNl0JzCDtIDh4XY5nqBebATRr3Z6j1LDF3igzyCXUn4udytkZobzJ5P0NThpIcbvgK/M3jTfK0top3So4VPvoA2hdUVQOwzOo6YamfPOeIvGGpOttw5m5Uk8oTY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gtVGXHT+Rgpcs6hOfaak3nf03sgOTnBpUByfIahwj//76cyB8c4Xy2I0c5RjaB4FD1mnYEirsKoVC1uQt2m3F5FLKmHdKfiO56Mzr6hOVrINiSagnEuhcpKhulNJAqtyfIewjs/llgiCnTWoeQzO+g6xeampjqYZb/Z4wtAGlNw= Received: by 10.114.151.13 with SMTP id y13mr1372158wad.1173117746356; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:02:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:02:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703051002y2c721921wed7ff312dbb6dddd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:02:26 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Mark Costlow" In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0703050929s7ebb7er2b8b206bd19be5a7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <2a41acea0703050841ub56c513y1504ebe0af8052de@mail.gmail.com> <20070305172201.GB7936@same.swcp.com> <2a41acea0703050929s7ebb7er2b8b206bd19be5a7@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:02:31 -0000 On 3/5/07, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > > > > > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > > > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > > > > > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. > > > > Here's the full dmesg. Thanks for looking at this. > > > > ---------------------------- > > Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 4 22:40:38 MST 2007 > > root@ame4.swcp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > ACPI APIC Table: > > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 > > Features=0xbfebfbff > MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > Features2=0x4e33d,CX16,,,> > > AMD Features=0x20000000 > > AMD Features2=0x1 > > Cores per package: 2 > > real memory = 3489005568 (3327 MB) > > avail memory = 3414384640 (3256 MB) > > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) > > acpi0: on motherboard > > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > pci0: on pcib0 > > pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 > > pci1: on pcib1 > > pcib2: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > > pci2: on pcib2 > > pcib3: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > > pci3: on pcib3 > > pcib4: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2 > > pci4: on pcib4 > > em0: port 0x2000-0x201f m > > em 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:54 > > em1: port 0x2020-0x203f m > > em 0xda020000-0xda03ffff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci4 > > em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:55 > > pcib5: at device 0.3 on pci1 > > pci5: on pcib5 > > 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.02.012 > > twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xd8000000-0 > > xd9ffffff,0xda100000-0xda100fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci5 > > twa0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9550SX-4LP, 4 ports, Firm > > ware FE9X 3.04.01.011, BIOS BE9X 3.04.00.002 > > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > > pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 > > pci6: on pcib6 > > uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 17 at device 29.0 > > on pci0 > > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb0: on uhci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 19 at device 29.1 > > on pci0 > > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb1: on uhci1 > > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 18 at device 29.2 > > on pci0 > > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb2: on uhci2 > > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > uhci3: port 0x1860-0x187f irq 16 at device 29.3 > > on pci0 > > uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb3: on uhci3 > > usb3: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > ehci0: mem 0xda600000-0xda6003ff irq 17 at d > > evice 29.7 on pci0 > > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb4: EHCI version 1.0 > > usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 > > usb4: on ehci0 > > usb4: USB revision 2.0 > > uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered > > pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 > > pci7: on pcib7 > > pci7: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) > > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > > isa0: on isab0 > > atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177, > > 0x376,0x1880-0x188f at device 31.1 on pci0 > > ata0: on atapci0 > > ata1: on atapci0 > > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > kbd0 at atkbd0 > > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > > sio0: type 16550A > > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > > sio1: type 16550A > > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 > > fdc0: [FAST] > > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 3 on ac > > pi0 > > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold > > ppbus0: on ppc0 > > plip0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > pmtimer0 on isa0 > > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 > > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > > rue0: USBKR100 USB 10/100 LAN, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 > > miibus0: on rue0 > > ruephy0: on miibus0 > > ruephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > rue0: Ethernet address: 00:10:60:dd:ed:e9 > > rue0: if_start running deferred for Giant > > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2000078406 Hz quality 800 > > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 > > da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > > da0: 100.000MB/s transfers > > da0: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > > da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > > da1: 100.000MB/s transfers > > da1: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > > em0: link state changed to UP > > em0: promiscuous mode enabled > > em0: promiscuous mode disabled > > twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0029): Verify started: unit=0 > > twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x002B): Verify completed: unit=0 > > ---------------------------- > > > > This is while booting GENERIC. I can boot SMP and send that too if you > > suggest. > > > > Here's vmstat -i: > > > > interrupt total rate > > irq1: atkbd0 2 0 > > irq6: fdc0 3 0 > > irq14: ata0 47 0 > > irq16: uhci3 14836 0 > > irq17: uhci0 ehci0 25 0 > > irq18: em0 uhci2 91850 2 > > irq24: twa0 14828 0 > > cpu0: timer 79015190 1999 > > Total 79136781 2003 > > > > Is the fact that em0 and uhci2 are sharing an interrupt significant? > > Possibly, but it should work. Could you try a kernel with that defined out? > Secondly, would it be possible to load the latest snapshot of CURRENT > to see how it behaves, it uses MSI and would indicate if this is an > interrupt thing, I still doubt this however. > > Look over your docs and see if there's some means to disable system > management, I still think its interfering. I have a group meeting in 10 mins, > I'll check on any known issues with this. Don't bother installing CURRENT, just got out of my meeting and I found out what the problem is. There is indeed an issue with management, and its something our test group isnt set up to test. I will send a patch to try sometime before end of day. Jack PS Duane's email keeps bouncing on me. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 18:07:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8041916A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74A313C4C2 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.217] ([192.168.10.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25I6uMB071268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:06:56 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45EC5C45.8010604@unsane.co.uk> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:07:01 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <2942dae0703041609k5d95c53cqf8b75826fd50cf87@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703041831l7c9a291etf5ed9fa30651688d@mail.gmail.com> <20070305053321.GA67466@FS.denninger.net> <45EC077E.4040404@unsane.co.uk> <20070305172802.GA90417@FS.denninger.net> In-Reply-To: <20070305172802.GA90417@FS.denninger.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can't get sound to work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:07:04 -0000 Karl Denninger wrote: > Tried to apply that, and got a mess. > > Did you put that on RELENG_6 cleanly? It drops a bunch of files in the top > level SRC directory (NOT under /sys!) if applied against /usr/src; it > appears to apply cleanly but a kernel build subsequent to that fails. > > -- Actually i just checked properly and thats a newer patch than the one i had been using (i switched to current on a whim and havent switched back yet) The command i was using to apply the previous version was "patch -d /usr/src -p0 < /root/src/snd_RELENG_6_20070111_139_lowlatency.diff" (excuse line wrap) which worked fine against a clean cvsup of -STABLE until at least the end of January. My guess is you didnt patch with the -p0 option to create missing directories. The README at http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/README gives Ariffs instructions for applying. The other option is the binaries in http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/lowlatency/ again read the README Vince From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 18:34:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F52116A402 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-3-125.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.3.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB3313C481 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25IYSEB003466; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:34:28 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l25IYQbT003465; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:34:26 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:34:26 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: "Daniel O'Connor" Message-ID: <20070305183426.GD853@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <200703011149.02601.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20070301064442.GG837@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200703011735.37614.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fork wedging (I think) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:34:32 -0000 --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Mar-05 11:36:41 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrot= e: >I was incrementally dumping sysctl trees and when I got to vm it hung.. > >eureka:~>sysctl vm >load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k >load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k >load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k >load: 0.05 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k > >I tried to reboot in another window but.. >eureka:~>reboot >load: 0.06 cmd: csh 71159 [allproc] 0.03u 0.00s 0% 4652k The fact that reboot eventually came back shows that the system is not deadlocked. "user map" and "allproc" refer to the wait channel names. "user map" is not very helpful to me (it's the lock associated with a class of vm maps and tracking where it's waited on is not easy). "allproc" refers to allproc_lock. The output from "vmstat -i" would be interesting, though it may not respond... How difficult would it be to build a test system somewhere where the console was accessible? I don't think you are going to make progress without console access. --=20 Peter Jeremy --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7GKy/opHv/APuIcRAtmSAJ0bJ6Fd6OJWgWdAK0AADjHKJqZNfACfVni4 DO3EZwt9RFxtgAzB9AAmNAU= =hBCj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 18:41:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96CA16A414 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8837113C467 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 22450 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2007 18:14:35 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 5 Mar 2007 18:14:35 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25IEXRV084182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:14:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l25IETCT084181; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:14:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Yar Tikhiy Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:14:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:41:18 -0000 On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: = > How will it break them?  swap backing only touches swap if there is = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing = > will panic. = = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its = consumers.  Then removing the -M flag and making swap backing the = default is a very sound choice.  Thank you for correcting me. Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? Someone still needs to look into the panic... Who would that be? -mi From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 18:59:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5070F16A469 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (mail-gw1.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471C13C491 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from mail-gw6.york.ac.uk (mail-gw6.york.ac.uk [144.32.129.26]) by mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l25ISZ9K008191; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:28:35 GMT Received: from ury.york.ac.uk ([144.32.108.81]) by mail-gw6.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HOHvH-0006EO-CP; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:28:35 +0000 Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25ISZsX036780; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:28:35 GMT (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l25ISUfV036741; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:28:30 GMT (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:28:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20070305100237.GI10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: <20070305182522.P21692@ury.york.ac.uk> References: <45EBCF4C.9000901@plosh.net> <20070305100237.GI10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk Cc: Peter Losher , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:59:07 -0000 On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote: >> We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from >> 5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics >> with the below message: >> >> -=- >> TPTE at 0xffff8000040028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000 >> panic: bad pte >> cpuid = 2 >> KDB: stack backtrace: >> panic() at 0xffffffff803fdd03 = panic+0x253 >> pmap_remove_pages() at 0xffffffff806072a3 = pmap_remove_pages+0x283 >> exec_new_vmspace() at 0xffffffff803e18e6 = exec_new_vmspace+0x216 >> exec_elf64_imgact() at 0xffffffff803cbb73 = exec_elf64_imgact+0x273 >> kern_execve() at 0xffffffff803e2107 = kern_execve+0x457 >> execve() at 0xffffffff803e2bed = execve+0x5d >> syscall() at 0xffffffff8060d141 = syscall+0x4d1 >> Xfast_syscall() at 0xffffffff805f8128 = Xfast_syscall+0xa8 >> --- syscall (59, FreeBSD ELF64, execve), rip = 0x80069838c, rsp = >> 0x7fffffffe7c8, rbp = 0x7fffffffecd0 --- >> Uptime: 4d16h55m46s >> -=- >> >> I do have a dump, and can make that available if need be. Has anyone >> encountered this recently and can shed any light on what might be >> causing this? > > Did rev. 1.516.2.9 of sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c changed (or even fixed) the > problem ? (This is the same patch I already sent you). Do you know if this patch is likely to fix the other "bad pte" panics that have been seen (usually during process exit())? e.g. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1148482556.35287.18.camel http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/034909.html I have a couple of amd64 machines I'm reluctant to make live until this is sorted... I'll cvsup in the next day or two to see, although it wasn't consistantly reproduceable. Thanks, Gavin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 18:59:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4699916A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC4513C4A3 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from ame7.swcp.com (ame7.swcp.com [216.184.2.70]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id l25Ix9NX023490; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:59:09 -0700 Received: from same.swcp.com (same.swcp.com [216.184.2.4]) by ame7.swcp.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l25Ix3S9009757; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:59:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: (from cheeks@localhost) by same.swcp.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id SAA09044; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:59:03 GMT Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:59:03 -0700 From: Mark Costlow To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20070305185903.GA9008@same.swcp.com> References: <20070305063006.GA17079@same.swcp.com> <20070305072535.GA6589@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <2a41acea0703050841ub56c513y1504ebe0af8052de@mail.gmail.com> <20070305172201.GB7936@same.swcp.com> <2a41acea0703050929s7ebb7er2b8b206bd19be5a7@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0703051002y2c721921wed7ff312dbb6dddd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0703051002y2c721921wed7ff312dbb6dddd@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame7.swcp.com [216.184.2.70]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:59:04 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.6, clamav-milter version 0.88.6 on ame7.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ame7.swcp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Costlow Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:59:11 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:02:26AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 3/5/07, Jack Vogel wrote: > >On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> > > > >> > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > >> > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > >> > > >> > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. > >> > >> Here's the full dmesg. Thanks for looking at this. > >> > >> ---------------------------- > >> Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > >> FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > >> FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 4 22:40:38 MST 2007 > >> root@ame4.swcp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > >> ACPI APIC Table: > >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz > >686-class CPU) > >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 > >> > >Features=0xbfebfbff >> MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > >> > >Features2=0x4e33d,CX16,,,> > >> AMD Features=0x20000000 > >> AMD Features2=0x1 > >> Cores per package: 2 > >> real memory = 3489005568 (3327 MB) > >> avail memory = 3414384640 (3256 MB) > >> ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > >> ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > >> kbd1 at kbdmux0 > >> ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, > >RF5413) > >> acpi0: on motherboard > >> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > >> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > >> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > >> cpu0: on acpi0 > >> acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > >> pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > >> pci0: on pcib0 > >> pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 > >> pci1: on pcib1 > >> pcib2: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > >> pci2: on pcib2 > >> pcib3: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > >> pci3: on pcib3 > >> pcib4: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2 > >> pci4: on pcib4 > >> em0: port > >0x2000-0x201f m > >> em 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > >> em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:54 > >> em1: port > >0x2020-0x203f m > >> em 0xda020000-0xda03ffff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci4 > >> em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:55 > >> pcib5: at device 0.3 on pci1 > >> pci5: on pcib5 > >> 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: > >3.60.02.012 > >> twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x303f mem > >0xd8000000-0 > >> xd9ffffff,0xda100000-0xda100fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci5 > >> twa0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9550SX-4LP, 4 > >ports, Firm > >> ware FE9X 3.04.01.011, BIOS BE9X 3.04.00.002 > >> pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > >> pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 > >> pci6: on pcib6 > >> uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 17 at > >device 29.0 > >> on pci0 > >> uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb0: on uhci0 > >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 19 at > >device 29.1 > >> on pci0 > >> uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb1: on uhci1 > >> usb1: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 18 at > >device 29.2 > >> on pci0 > >> uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb2: on uhci2 > >> usb2: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> uhci3: port 0x1860-0x187f irq 16 at > >device 29.3 > >> on pci0 > >> uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb3: on uhci3 > >> usb3: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> ehci0: mem 0xda600000-0xda6003ff irq > >17 at d > >> evice 29.7 on pci0 > >> ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb4: EHCI version 1.0 > >> usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 > >> usb4: on ehci0 > >> usb4: USB revision 2.0 > >> uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered > >> pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 > >> pci7: on pcib7 > >> pci7: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) > >> isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > >> isa0: on isab0 > >> atapci0: port > >0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177, > >> 0x376,0x1880-0x188f at device 31.1 on pci0 > >> ata0: on atapci0 > >> ata1: on atapci0 > >> pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > >> acpi_button0: on acpi0 > >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >> kbd0 at atkbd0 > >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > >> sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > >acpi0 > >> sio0: type 16550A > >> sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > >> sio1: type 16550A > >> fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > >acpi0 > >> fdc0: [FAST] > >> ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq > >3 on ac > >> pi0 > >> ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > >> ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold > >> ppbus0: on ppc0 > >> plip0: on ppbus0 > >> lpt0: on ppbus0 > >> lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > >> ppi0: on ppbus0 > >> pmtimer0 on isa0 > >> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 > >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > >> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > >> rue0: USBKR100 USB 10/100 LAN, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 > >> miibus0: on rue0 > >> ruephy0: on miibus0 > >> ruephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > >> rue0: Ethernet address: 00:10:60:dd:ed:e9 > >> rue0: if_start running deferred for Giant > >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2000078406 Hz quality 800 > >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > >> acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 > >> da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > >> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > >> da0: 100.000MB/s transfers > >> da0: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > >> da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > >> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > >> da1: 100.000MB/s transfers > >> da1: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > >> em0: link state changed to UP > >> em0: promiscuous mode enabled > >> em0: promiscuous mode disabled > >> twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0029): Verify started: unit=0 > >> twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x002B): Verify completed: unit=0 > >> ---------------------------- > >> > >> This is while booting GENERIC. I can boot SMP and send that too if you > >> suggest. > >> > >> Here's vmstat -i: > >> > >> interrupt total rate > >> irq1: atkbd0 2 0 > >> irq6: fdc0 3 0 > >> irq14: ata0 47 0 > >> irq16: uhci3 14836 0 > >> irq17: uhci0 ehci0 25 0 > >> irq18: em0 uhci2 91850 2 > >> irq24: twa0 14828 0 > >> cpu0: timer 79015190 1999 > >> Total 79136781 2003 > >> > >> Is the fact that em0 and uhci2 are sharing an interrupt significant? > > > >Possibly, but it should work. Could you try a kernel with that defined out? > >Secondly, would it be possible to load the latest snapshot of CURRENT > >to see how it behaves, it uses MSI and would indicate if this is an > >interrupt thing, I still doubt this however. > > > >Look over your docs and see if there's some means to disable system > >management, I still think its interfering. I have a group meeting in 10 > >mins, > >I'll check on any known issues with this. > > Don't bother installing CURRENT, just got out of my meeting and I found > out what the problem is. There is indeed an issue with management, and > its something our test group isnt set up to test. I will send a patch to > try sometime before end of day. Ok, thanks. Just FYI, I did remove the USB and FDC support. No shared IRQs now, but same results. I'll save my CURRENT cd for another day, and await your patch. Thank you! > PS Duane's email keeps bouncing on me. Me too... Mark -- Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 19:17:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14D316A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E9013C4A7 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l25JHFDQ072191; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:17:15 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l25JHEqh072190; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:17:15 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:17:14 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200703051314.29902@aldan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:17:34 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > = > How will it break them? šswap backing only touches swap if there is > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > = > will panic. > = > = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its > = consumers. šThen removing the -M flag and making swap backing the > = default is a very sound choice. šThank you for correcting me. > > Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? Yes, I'll be glad to if no objections arise until I finish updating my CURRENT machine, i.e., tomorrow. :-) > Someone still needs to look into the panic... Who would that be? Obviously, Mr(s). Someone. :-) The md case exposes a quite tangled nature of the problem. Funnily enough, kernel malloc() cannot just fail in the case because it must not fail if called with M_WAITOK. This means that the system has quite a rough choice: - put the requesting thread to sleep forever; - grow kmem_map, eventually sacrifice all RAM to the greedy thread and die sooner or later; - panic immediately. If all malloc() callers in the kernel were ready to deal with allocation failure, the system could just tell the greedy thread to buzz off. But too many kernel parts depend on malloc(M_WAITOK) never failing. Perhaps it's the root of the problem. -- Yar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 19:18:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA69716A404 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=f8feaae2996a03cecfdd4ed334fdebf46624e9b7=265=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF0013C494 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=f8feaae2996a03cecfdd4ed334fdebf46624e9b7=265=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id KWK27555; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:05:55 -0800 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 22F354508C; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:05:55 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Alexander Shikoff , wangyi6854@sohu.com In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:45:03 +0100." <200702220945.l1M9j3Tj031803@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1173121555_18113P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:05:55 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20070305190555.22F354508C@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Very slow umass in 6.2-RC2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:18:22 -0000 --==_Exmh_1173121555_18113P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:45:03 +0100 (CET) > From: Oliver Fromme > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > > > Wang Yi wrote: > > > > > Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > > > > > I have Apacer Flash: > > > > > > > > > > > > umass0: vendor 0x1005 USB FLASH DRIVE, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 > > > > > > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > > > > > da0: < USB FLASH DRIVE 34CH> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device > > > > > > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > > > > > > da0: 3936MB (8060928 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 501C) > > > > > > > > > > > > Writing to this device is very slooooow. > > > > > > > > > > > > Time taken to copy file of 1,4G is near 30 min. > > > > > > > > > > Did you try it under Windows? How time does it spend? > > > > > > > > You may laugh but I have no Windows-based boxes with USB 2.0... :) > > > > Whatever it seems that this Apacer flash drive under Windows and USB 1.0 > > > > is faster than under FreeBSD and USB 2.0... > > > > > > > > Soon I will have a possibility to compare Apacer 4GB with Transcend > > > > flash. I'll report detailed results here. > > > > > > Are you sure that your USB device supports hi-speed? > > http://www.apacer.com/en/products/Handy_Steno_AH320_features.htm > > And is it connected to your ehci device (not ohci/uhci)? > (To find out you have to look at "dmesg" an "sysctl dev".) > > E.g. I have this one: > > umass0: vendor 0x090c Cn Memory, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 2 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: < Cn Memory 1100> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 1935MB (3963904 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 246C) > > dev.umass.0.%parent: uhub4 > dev.uhub.4.%parent: usb4 > > usb4: EHCI version 1.0 > usb4: on ehci0 > uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > ehci0: mem 0xb0040000-0xb00403ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 > > i.e. umass0 is connected to uhub4 which is a child of usb4 > which belongs to ehci0. > > That stick has about 20 Mbit/s write and 30 Mbit/s read > speed. That's not terribly fast either, but definitely > beyond the 12 Mbit/s limit of full-speed devices. I can > fill that 2 GB stick up in about 15 minutes. The system > CPU is 95% during that, so I assume it's the USB stick > that's the limiting factor. > > However, it would be interesting to test the performance > with HPS' new USB code. Well, I have learned a bit more about the performance I have been seeing. Whether it is common to Alexander's problem, I can't say, but I am suspicious. First, my devices that were running so slow are formatted as FAT32. This is most common for such devices, but I am not sure if that is the case for all reported systems. After batting against a wall for a time I tried running fsck_msdosfs on the slice. After running it my transfer rate went from about .2 MB/sec to about 17 MB/sec. It moved the drive from useless for files of any size to at least reasonable to use. Oddly, fsck_msdosfs reported no errors. Also, oddly, the writes before running fsck were all successful and the drive worked fine. Under Windows, the drive was fine before the fsck, so something was seriously upsetting FreeBSD that did not impact Windows. In any case, my drive is happy again. USB drives are often disconnected while mounted and so this may turn out to be a very common issue. Since FAT drives are not "marked" as unclean like FFS systems, this is easy to over-look. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1173121555_18113P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFF7GoTkn3rs5h7N1ERAq33AJ0Y62o+b4dUWNlEzCB4OrtPaP2CWQCfUH+w AagSKtNF04IaJSIL3VDZV6E= =70Mj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1173121555_18113P-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 19:20:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D9B16A405 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0266313C4A3 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOIjd-0009hM-2a for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:20:39 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l25JKF6n083491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:20:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25JKF99013315; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:20:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l25JKF9s013314; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:20:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:20:15 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Gavin Atkinson Message-ID: <20070305192015.GL10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <45EBCF4C.9000901@plosh.net> <20070305100237.GI10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20070305182522.P21692@ury.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070305182522.P21692@ury.york.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: b565934a9b6505813531773f2f5625c7 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 837 [Mar 05 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: Peter Losher , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:20:41 -0000 --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:28:30PM +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote: >=20 > >On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > >>We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from > >>5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics > >>with the below message: > >> > >>-=3D- > >>TPTE at 0xffff8000040028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000 > >>panic: bad pte > >>cpuid =3D 2 > >>KDB: stack backtrace: > >>panic() at 0xffffffff803fdd03 =3D panic+0x253 > >>pmap_remove_pages() at 0xffffffff806072a3 =3D pmap_remove_pages+0x283 > >>exec_new_vmspace() at 0xffffffff803e18e6 =3D exec_new_vmspace+0x216 > >>exec_elf64_imgact() at 0xffffffff803cbb73 =3D exec_elf64_imgact+0x273 > >>kern_execve() at 0xffffffff803e2107 =3D kern_execve+0x457 > >>execve() at 0xffffffff803e2bed =3D execve+0x5d > >>syscall() at 0xffffffff8060d141 =3D syscall+0x4d1 > >>Xfast_syscall() at 0xffffffff805f8128 =3D Xfast_syscall+0xa8 > >>--- syscall (59, FreeBSD ELF64, execve), rip =3D 0x80069838c, rsp =3D > >>0x7fffffffe7c8, rbp =3D 0x7fffffffecd0 --- > >>Uptime: 4d16h55m46s > >>-=3D- > >> > >>I do have a dump, and can make that available if need be. Has anyone > >>encountered this recently and can shed any light on what might be > >>causing this? > > > >Did rev. 1.516.2.9 of sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c changed (or even fixed) the > >problem ? (This is the same patch I already sent you). >=20 > Do you know if this patch is likely to fix the other "bad pte" panics tha= t=20 > have been seen (usually during process exit())? e.g. >=20 > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1148482556.35287.18.camel > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/034909.html Yes, the problem there seems to be fixed by Tor' commit into the i386/pmap.c at the 2006/02/16. My commit is MFi386 of the fix to the amd64. > I have a couple of amd64 machines I'm reluctant to make live until this i= s=20 > sorted... I'll cvsup in the next day or two to see, although it wasn't= =20 > consistantly reproduceable. I am interested in testing results. --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7G1uC3+MBN1Mb4gRAgk4AKCKcxq22dasjej4bnzdCodwv0L1JQCeIPoJ aji59nYt++5hjT4YFomDx+M= =e+/8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 20:00:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACB016A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8B513C4AC for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOItK-000OWZ-Bj for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:30:46 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l25JUMan083803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:30:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25JUM3C013567; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:30:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l25JUM8J013566; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:30:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:30:22 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Yar Tikhiy Message-ID: <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cy9Nn4fUvYST66Pl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 96b5a640d20a32298b7e0b1f479135d9 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 837 [Mar 05 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:00:24 -0000 --cy9Nn4fUvYST66Pl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > =3D > How will it break them? =9Aswap backing only touches swap if ther= e is > > =3D > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc bac= king > > =3D > will panic. > > =3D=20 > > =3D I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its > > =3D consumers. =9AThen removing the -M flag and making swap backing the > > =3D default is a very sound choice. =9AThank you for correcting me. > >=20 > > Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? >=20 > Yes, I'll be glad to if no objections arise until I finish updating > my CURRENT machine, i.e., tomorrow. :-) >=20 > > Someone still needs to look into the panic... Who would that be? >=20 > Obviously, Mr(s). Someone. :-) >=20 > The md case exposes a quite tangled nature of the problem. Funnily > enough, kernel malloc() cannot just fail in the case because it > must not fail if called with M_WAITOK. This means that the system > has quite a rough choice: >=20 > - put the requesting thread to sleep forever; > - grow kmem_map, eventually sacrifice all RAM to the greedy thread > and die sooner or later; > - panic immediately. >=20 > If all malloc() callers in the kernel were ready to deal with > allocation failure, the system could just tell the greedy thread > to buzz off. But too many kernel parts depend on malloc(M_WAITOK) > never failing. Perhaps it's the root of the problem. Mark callers that are ready for M_WAITOK failure with some additional flag, like M_FAILOK (feel free to propose meaningful name there). At least malloc()-based md could then use it. --cy9Nn4fUvYST66Pl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7G/NC3+MBN1Mb4gRAuFeAJ4m4uHlhOSDkMNTNnVPKD2M+AOZwQCfZyZU tHPAxGJ5DdwTafK6NLCKTLo= =IWVy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cy9Nn4fUvYST66Pl-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 20:13:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEB016A405 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6877F13C48D for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l25KDYOi072712; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:13:34 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l25KDXo7072711; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:13:33 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:13:32 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Kostik Belousov Message-ID: <20070305201332.GH57253@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:13:38 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > = > How will it break them? šswap backing only touches swap if there is > > > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > > > = > will panic. > > > = > > > = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its > > > = consumers. šThen removing the -M flag and making swap backing the > > > = default is a very sound choice. šThank you for correcting me. > > > > > > Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? > > > > Yes, I'll be glad to if no objections arise until I finish updating > > my CURRENT machine, i.e., tomorrow. :-) > > > > > Someone still needs to look into the panic... Who would that be? > > > > Obviously, Mr(s). Someone. :-) > > > > The md case exposes a quite tangled nature of the problem. Funnily > > enough, kernel malloc() cannot just fail in the case because it > > must not fail if called with M_WAITOK. This means that the system > > has quite a rough choice: > > > > - put the requesting thread to sleep forever; > > - grow kmem_map, eventually sacrifice all RAM to the greedy thread > > and die sooner or later; > > - panic immediately. > > > > If all malloc() callers in the kernel were ready to deal with > > allocation failure, the system could just tell the greedy thread > > to buzz off. But too many kernel parts depend on malloc(M_WAITOK) > > never failing. Perhaps it's the root of the problem. > > Mark callers that are ready for M_WAITOK failure with some additional > flag, like M_FAILOK (feel free to propose meaningful name there). > At least malloc()-based md could then use it. The problem isn't that we don't have such a flag yet. It's that some parts of the kernel would rather we didn't have it. :-) Of course, introducing the flag or changing semantics of malloc() in a similar way is a necessary start. -- Yar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 21:14:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D2E16A404 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7610513C481 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l25Kbua6024070; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:38:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <45EC7F91.5070106@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:37:37 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:38:03 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Yar Tikhiy , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:14:01 -0000 Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >>> On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: >>> = > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is >>> = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing >>> = > will panic. >>> = >>> = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its >>> = consumers. Then removing the -M flag and making swap backing the >>> = default is a very sound choice. Thank you for correcting me. >>> >>> Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? >> Yes, I'll be glad to if no objections arise until I finish updating >> my CURRENT machine, i.e., tomorrow. :-) >> >>> Someone still needs to look into the panic... Who would that be? >> Obviously, Mr(s). Someone. :-) >> >> The md case exposes a quite tangled nature of the problem. Funnily >> enough, kernel malloc() cannot just fail in the case because it >> must not fail if called with M_WAITOK. This means that the system >> has quite a rough choice: >> >> - put the requesting thread to sleep forever; >> - grow kmem_map, eventually sacrifice all RAM to the greedy thread >> and die sooner or later; >> - panic immediately. >> >> If all malloc() callers in the kernel were ready to deal with >> allocation failure, the system could just tell the greedy thread >> to buzz off. But too many kernel parts depend on malloc(M_WAITOK) >> never failing. Perhaps it's the root of the problem. > > Mark callers that are ready for M_WAITOK failure with some additional > flag, like M_FAILOK (feel free to propose meaningful name there). > At least malloc()-based md could then use it. The panic is a chronic problem that really needs to be fixed in general. However, the md code should probably be modified to reject any malloc-backed size larger than some trivial (and arbitrary) value, like say 1MB. It's really inferior to being swap-backed, and it only encourages foot-shooting and these unclear panics. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 21:43:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB5916A402 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D9F913C467 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 82966 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 00:15:15 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 00:15:15 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 179994, updated: 5.03.2007] Message-ID: <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua><20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org><20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su><200703051314.29902@aldan><20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:15:04 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:43:21 -0000 Hello! I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. However, i tried it and did not see any boot prompt over SOL connection. As i understand it does not use bios for input/output and therefore data is not sent/received over SOL connection. Thisis a pitty because of boot prompt would work over SOL then remote source upgrade would be much plainless and less risky than now. For example, i could just book old kernel if something goes wrong. Is there a way to make boot prompt work over SOL? The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 22:13:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DD816A402 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EF513C47E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1289348ugh for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:13:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hHwNQdko3mXR56FhPY98XaChNuJoYSV+LTnlaQoKpB2ufJDggqb0sJ/KzAKXaMcwBGasXWE7lJ8jeXNbIq/oA2R6x4UVANkeed52AiCvKC2oEEJWq9LPAZtIYK0sc1x90OnWaQHEBJzWw0CXTddIMe+FGV8jirVY927l4YpypP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LoV1deUh/jcHR3FRuPffoW59LPafAcoAunk91ZzQFO28WbDEuLp1AM3kEYzvAKuP5NschNWjGllFM6/pPeDdjcXg4pLwR0OmP7RciaUuxkkUyseIRUHJCDBaIh3E+ec9G5YPOOQnNmsYYTcTVvV6a81afEfTcamGvi6mvE9BCZs= Received: by 10.114.183.1 with SMTP id g1mr1487505waf.1173132816074; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:13:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703051413r938a715m777a89b5cf30191c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:13:36 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Mark Costlow" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: PATCH : ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:13:45 -0000 On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:02:26AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 3/5/07, Jack Vogel wrote: > > >On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow wrote: > > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > > >> > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > >> > > > >> > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. > > >> > > >> Here's the full dmesg. Thanks for looking at this. > > >> > > >> ---------------------------- > > >> Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > > >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > > >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > >> FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > >> FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 4 22:40:38 MST 2007 > > >> root@ame4.swcp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > >> ACPI APIC Table: > > >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz > > >686-class CPU) > > >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 > > >> > > >Features=0xbfebfbff > >> MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > >> > > >Features2=0x4e33d,CX16,,,> > > >> AMD Features=0x20000000 > > >> AMD Features2=0x1 > > >> Cores per package: 2 > > >> real memory = 3489005568 (3327 MB) > > >> avail memory = 3414384640 (3256 MB) > > >> ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > > >> ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > > >> kbd1 at kbdmux0 > > >> ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, > > >RF5413) > > >> acpi0: on motherboard > > >> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > >> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > > >> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > > >> cpu0: on acpi0 > > >> acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > > >> pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > >> pci0: on pcib0 > > >> pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 > > >> pci1: on pcib1 > > >> pcib2: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > > >> pci2: on pcib2 > > >> pcib3: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > > >> pci3: on pcib3 > > >> pcib4: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2 > > >> pci4: on pcib4 > > >> em0: port > > >0x2000-0x201f m > > >> em 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > >> em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:54 > > >> em1: port > > >0x2020-0x203f m > > >> em 0xda020000-0xda03ffff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci4 > > >> em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:8c:71:55 > > >> pcib5: at device 0.3 on pci1 > > >> pci5: on pcib5 > > >> 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: > > >3.60.02.012 > > >> twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x303f mem > > >0xd8000000-0 > > >> xd9ffffff,0xda100000-0xda100fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci5 > > >> twa0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9550SX-4LP, 4 > > >ports, Firm > > >> ware FE9X 3.04.01.011, BIOS BE9X 3.04.00.002 > > >> pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > > >> pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 > > >> pci6: on pcib6 > > >> uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 17 at > > >device 29.0 > > >> on pci0 > > >> uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> usb0: on uhci0 > > >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > >> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > >> uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 19 at > > >device 29.1 > > >> on pci0 > > >> uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> usb1: on uhci1 > > >> usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > >> uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > >> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > >> uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 18 at > > >device 29.2 > > >> on pci0 > > >> uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> usb2: on uhci2 > > >> usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > >> uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > >> uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > >> uhci3: port 0x1860-0x187f irq 16 at > > >device 29.3 > > >> on pci0 > > >> uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> usb3: on uhci3 > > >> usb3: USB revision 1.0 > > >> uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > >> uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > >> ehci0: mem 0xda600000-0xda6003ff irq > > >17 at d > > >> evice 29.7 on pci0 > > >> ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> usb4: EHCI version 1.0 > > >> usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 > > >> usb4: on ehci0 > > >> usb4: USB revision 2.0 > > >> uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > > >> uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered > > >> pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 > > >> pci7: on pcib7 > > >> pci7: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) > > >> isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > > >> isa0: on isab0 > > >> atapci0: port > > >0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177, > > >> 0x376,0x1880-0x188f at device 31.1 on pci0 > > >> ata0: on atapci0 > > >> ata1: on atapci0 > > >> pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > > >> acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > > >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > >> kbd0 at atkbd0 > > >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > > >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > >> psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > > >> sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > > >acpi0 > > >> sio0: type 16550A > > >> sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > > >> sio1: type 16550A > > >> fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > > >acpi0 > > >> fdc0: [FAST] > > >> ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq > > >3 on ac > > >> pi0 > > >> ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > > >> ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold > > >> ppbus0: on ppc0 > > >> plip0: on ppbus0 > > >> lpt0: on ppbus0 > > >> lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > >> ppi0: on ppbus0 > > >> pmtimer0 on isa0 > > >> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 > > >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > >> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > > >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > > >> rue0: USBKR100 USB 10/100 LAN, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 > > >> miibus0: on rue0 > > >> ruephy0: on miibus0 > > >> ruephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > >> rue0: Ethernet address: 00:10:60:dd:ed:e9 > > >> rue0: if_start running deferred for Giant > > >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2000078406 Hz quality 800 > > >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > >> acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 > > >> da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > >> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > > >> da0: 100.000MB/s transfers > > >> da0: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > > >> da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > > >> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > > >> da1: 100.000MB/s transfers > > >> da1: 238408MB (488259584 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30392C) > > >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > > >> em0: link state changed to UP > > >> em0: promiscuous mode enabled > > >> em0: promiscuous mode disabled > > >> twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0029): Verify started: unit=0 > > >> twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x002B): Verify completed: unit=0 > > >> ---------------------------- > > >> > > >> This is while booting GENERIC. I can boot SMP and send that too if you > > >> suggest. > > >> > > >> Here's vmstat -i: > > >> > > >> interrupt total rate > > >> irq1: atkbd0 2 0 > > >> irq6: fdc0 3 0 > > >> irq14: ata0 47 0 > > >> irq16: uhci3 14836 0 > > >> irq17: uhci0 ehci0 25 0 > > >> irq18: em0 uhci2 91850 2 > > >> irq24: twa0 14828 0 > > >> cpu0: timer 79015190 1999 > > >> Total 79136781 2003 > > >> > > >> Is the fact that em0 and uhci2 are sharing an interrupt significant? > > > > > >Possibly, but it should work. Could you try a kernel with that defined out? > > >Secondly, would it be possible to load the latest snapshot of CURRENT > > >to see how it behaves, it uses MSI and would indicate if this is an > > >interrupt thing, I still doubt this however. > > > > > >Look over your docs and see if there's some means to disable system > > >management, I still think its interfering. I have a group meeting in 10 > > >mins, > > >I'll check on any known issues with this. > > > > Don't bother installing CURRENT, just got out of my meeting and I found > > out what the problem is. There is indeed an issue with management, and > > its something our test group isnt set up to test. I will send a patch to > > try sometime before end of day. OK, here is the patch, this should fix it... Cheers, Jack --- dist/if_em.c Sun Jan 21 04:13:37 2007 +++ ./if_em.c Tue Mar 6 05:13:07 2007 @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ static void em_set_promisc(struct adapter *); static void em_disable_promisc(struct adapter *); static void em_set_multi(struct adapter *); +static void em_setup_manageability(struct adapter *); +static void em_release_manageability(struct adapter *); static void em_print_hw_stats(struct adapter *); static void em_update_link_status(struct adapter *); static int em_get_buf(int i, struct adapter *, struct mbuf *); @@ -511,6 +513,9 @@ /* Initialize eeprom parameters */ em_init_eeprom_params(&adapter->hw); + /* Determine if we have hardware managability */ + adapter->em_mng_passthru = em_enable_mng_pass_thru(&adapter->hw); + tsize = roundup2(adapter->num_tx_desc * sizeof(struct em_tx_desc), EM_DBA_ALIGN); @@ -1101,6 +1106,9 @@ #endif } + /* Configure for OS presence */ + em_setup_manageability(adapter); + /* Prepare transmit descriptors and buffers */ em_setup_transmit_structures(adapter); em_initialize_transmit_unit(adapter); @@ -2105,6 +2113,10 @@ /* Tell the stack that the interface is no longer active */ ifp->if_drv_flags &= ~(IFF_DRV_RUNNING | IFF_DRV_OACTIVE); + + /* Enable HW manageability if available */ + em_release_manageability(adapter); + em_reset_hw(&adapter->hw); } @@ -4163,3 +4175,46 @@ SYSCTL_CHILDREN(device_get_sysctl_tree(adapter->dev)), OID_AUTO, name, CTLTYPE_INT|CTLFLAG_RW, limit, value, description); } + +#define E1000_82542_MANC2H E1000_MANC2H // A shared code workaround + +static void +em_setup_manageability(struct adapter *adapter) +{ + if (adapter->em_mng_passthru) { + int manc2h = E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, MANC2H); + int manc = E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, MANC); + + /* disable hardware interception of ARP */ + manc &= ~(E1000_MANC_ARP_EN); + + /* enable receiving management packets to the host */ + if (adapter->hw.mac_type >= em_82571) { + manc |= E1000_MANC_EN_MNG2HOST; +#define E1000_MNG2HOST_PORT_623 (1 << 5) +#define E1000_MNG2HOST_PORT_664 (1 << 6) + manc2h |= E1000_MNG2HOST_PORT_623; + manc2h |= E1000_MNG2HOST_PORT_664; + E1000_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, MANC2H, manc2h); + } + + E1000_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, MANC, manc); + } +} + +static void +em_release_manageability(struct adapter *adapter) +{ + if (adapter->em_mng_passthru) { + int manc = E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, MANC); + + /* re-enable hardware interception of ARP */ + manc |= E1000_MANC_ARP_EN; + + if (adapter->hw.mac_type >= em_82571) + manc &= ~E1000_MANC_EN_MNG2HOST; + + E1000_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, MANC, manc); + } +} + --- dist/if_em.h Sun Jan 21 04:13:36 2007 +++ ./if_em.h Tue Mar 6 03:05:15 2007 @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ int if_flags; struct mtx mtx; int em_insert_vlan_header; + int em_mng_passthru; #ifdef EM_FAST_INTR struct task link_task; From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 22:21:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C437816A403 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2496D13C46B for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:21:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1291201ugh for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FaHOBd05AnxUZGiZ2EVZahWtze8NeY6Dy55qcM01DrKVW3Bk4T6z03WojVpW/Yi+QYSNZm/Wtjqs8mhsyV4y9a7et4+zGvnOPRWFKlOc6y8WGsA5d0G8zX1rJhf1yxNzzQIkol2zeKvGPvuzsnBUEGmB+bn0M152PsJEJXrktsc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T+8x2ErhQz5LXsMm4WkbZL2/YNbIJa30XGk1Q9L8UHMnE/iAmfmgyaruSOijjF3h+aG+BTi/5tbnR1HUQw7ZJEDs2NLLuu8wu9S+e4sWi0QD+knJOPqy5RCg++qWE3RYhAR42T3BVTikoT/PLF54XQUhyaRi5P+x5BW00Hq+WYc= Received: by 10.114.205.1 with SMTP id c1mr1489542wag.1173131704106; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:55:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:04 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Artem Kuchin" In-Reply-To: <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:21:40 -0000 On 3/5/07, Artem Kuchin wrote: > Hello! > > I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because > the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. > > Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really > 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine > and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) > However, i tried it and did not see any boot prompt over SOL connection. > As i understand it does not use bios for input/output and therefore data is > not sent/received over SOL connection. Thisis a pitty because of boot prompt > would work over SOL then remote source upgrade would be much plainless > and less risky than now. For example, i could just book old kernel if something > goes wrong. > > Is there a way to make boot prompt work over SOL? > > The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? It doesnt work the way you think it works, its not just some serial port that spits ASCII characters, rather I believe it requires you to speak IPMI to it. Of course, if you happen to have an IBM Bladecenter, then it does just look like a serial port on the blade, but you still have to deal with the management controller stuff on the incoming side. After you deal with all this stuff for a while you will LONG for the good old days of a simple UART :) Cheers, Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 22:26:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC2916A408 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F24813C4A7 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on core6.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.7 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v9.5.4) with ESMTP id md50003585770.msg for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:09:43 +0000 Message-ID: <002701c75f72$f0c5bdf0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Artem Kuchin" , References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua><20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org><20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su><200703051314.29902@aldan><20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su><20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:09:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: stable@freebsd.org X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:09:44 +0000 X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:09:44 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:26:54 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: > I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because > the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. ... > The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? You might want to checkout the IPMI modules from Supermicro. Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 00:07:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A78916A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net (alnrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.225.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5403E13C471 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from icarus.home.lan (c-71-198-0-135.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[71.198.0.135]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070305235547b1100a5feke>; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:55:47 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E33E81FA03D; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:55:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:55:35 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Artem Kuchin Message-ID: <20070305235535.GA23583@icarus.home.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Artem Kuchin , stable@freebsd.org References: <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-PGP-Key: http://jdc.parodius.com/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:07:40 -0000 On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:15:04AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: > The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? Yes, Supermicro makes IPMI add-on cards (they require IPMI capability on the mainboard, however). Be warned about these cards, however. A friend of mine at Yahoo! has encountered a major BIOS/IPMI oversight, where in the case that the IPMI event log becomes full, the system BIOS upon boot will _require_ someone hit F1 to continue on the console, until the IPMI history is cleared. Ultimately this requires someone to go to the datacenter and manually hit F1 on the console, clear the IPMI log, and let the machine boot up. Wonderful oversight. Yes, there are IPMI management utilities for some OSes, but many of them are closed-source, only work on certain versions of the OS, or for the open-source ones do not let you control/monitor as much as you would under the native utility from the vendor. Now it seems more and more problems are coming to light with vendor IPMI implementations (Broadcom's pseudo-iLO causes ARP storms because there is no dedicated NIC for iLO and the NIC technically has two MAC addresses, Supermicro's IPMI and the event log problem, yadda yadda.) Seems to me the only vendors who got this right were 1) HP/Compaq with their true iLO/iLO2, and 2) Sun. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 02:23:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2654216A400 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EC213C494 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: by ion.gank.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 10FD410A03; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:08:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:08:27 -0600 From: Craig Boston To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: umass media size off-by-one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:23:56 -0000 Hi all, I ran into this while trying to use geli to encrypt an external usb-2 hard drive. It appears that sometimes the media size reported by umass is one sector too big. For example: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 171705MB (351651889 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 21889C) # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 oseek=351651888 count=1 dd: /dev/da0: Input/output error 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.002951 secs (0 bytes/sec) # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 oseek=351651887 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes transferred in 0.000982 secs (521360 bytes/sec) This is with a "high speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Mass Storage Device(0x3507), Prolific Technology Inc.(0x067b), rev 1.00" enclosure. I tested with two USB flash memory devices and those seem to report the correct size. I'm currently rebuilding a kernel with USB_DEBUG to see if it's specific to a certain protocol and try to figure out if it's a bug in one of them or if the enclosure is lying. Has anyone run into this before? Craig From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 02:32:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A977C16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:32:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C9E13C48E for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:32:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from ame8.swcp.com (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id l262Whq0015527; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:32:43 -0700 Received: from same.swcp.com (same.swcp.com [216.184.2.4]) by ame8.swcp.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l262Wgur001060; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:32:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: (from cheeks@localhost) by same.swcp.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id CAA21039; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:32:42 GMT Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:32:41 -0700 From: Mark Costlow To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20070306023241.GA20802@same.swcp.com> References: <2a41acea0703051413r938a715m777a89b5cf30191c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0703051413r938a715m777a89b5cf30191c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:32:42 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2739/Mon Mar 5 17:08:16 2007 on ame8.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ame8.swcp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH : ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:32:44 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:13:36PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: [...snip...] > >> > >> Don't bother installing CURRENT, just got out of my meeting and I found > >> out what the problem is. There is indeed an issue with management, and > >> its something our test group isnt set up to test. I will send a patch to > >> try sometime before end of day. > > OK, here is the patch, this should fix it... Hi Jack, the patch didn't seem to have any effect. When I run "tcpdump -n arp" after rebooting with this patch, I still see 2-3 ARPs per minute instead of 100-200 per minute. I was patching against: /*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.65.2.22 2007/03/01 17:32:27 csjp Exp $*/ Is that correct? I tried both SMP and non-SMP kernels, with same results. Is there anything I can do to gather some additional debug information from the system while it's running? I neglected to mention before the specific motherboard model: Supermicro X7DVL-E. There is no IPMI card installed, and no IPMI setting in the BIOS. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 03:15:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393D916A405 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 03:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF91C13C471 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 03:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: (qmail 31143 invoked by uid 0); 6 Mar 2007 02:47:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com) (216.220.116.154) by smtp.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 02:47:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:46:45 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Sprickman X-X-Sender: spork@hotlap.local To: Jeremy Chadwick In-Reply-To: <20070305235535.GA23583@icarus.home.lan> Message-ID: References: <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070305235535.GA23583@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:15:06 -0000 On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:15:04AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: >> The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? > > Yes, Supermicro makes IPMI add-on cards (they require IPMI capability on > the mainboard, however). > > Be warned about these cards, however. A friend of mine at Yahoo! has > encountered a major BIOS/IPMI oversight, where in the case that the IPMI > event log becomes full, the system BIOS upon boot will _require_ someone > hit F1 to continue on the console, until the IPMI history is cleared. > Ultimately this requires someone to go to the datacenter and manually > hit F1 on the console, clear the IPMI log, and let the machine boot up. > Wonderful oversight. I might also add that we tried that on a few Supermicro boxes and found the whole mess to be not as reliable as you'd like an OOB management tool to be. The java client is spotty at best, really wants to be run in Windows, and basically falls apart when doing simple console redirection in the client. Never really saw it work well. > Now it seems more and more problems are coming to light with vendor IPMI > implementations (Broadcom's pseudo-iLO causes ARP storms because there > is no dedicated NIC for iLO and the NIC technically has two MAC > addresses, Supermicro's IPMI and the event log problem, yadda yadda.) Yeah, I was a little disappointed in this - when I read about IPMI I thought that it was something of a standard and that I'd be able to pick and choose clients that run natively on FreeBSD or OS-X. That does not seem to be the case at all. > Seems to me the only vendors who got this right were 1) HP/Compaq with > their true iLO/iLO2, and 2) Sun. Which is a shame as the Supermicro cards were sub-$100... Charles > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 03:55:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA38616A400 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 03:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serg@tmn.ru) Received: from sbtx.tmn.ru (sbtx.tmn.ru [212.76.160.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2B613C428 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 03:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serg@tmn.ru) Received: from sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru (sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru [10.76.160.59]) by sbtx.tmn.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l263tE4G008385; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:55:18 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from serg@tmn.ru) Received: from sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru (localhost.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru [127.0.0.1]) by sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l263tEi4098017; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:55:14 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from serg@sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru) Received: (from serg@localhost) by sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l263tED1098016; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:55:14 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from serg) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:55:14 +0500 From: "Sergey N. Voronkov" To: Stephane Thomas Message-ID: <20070306035514.GA97974@tmn.ru> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90, clamav-milter version devel-120207 on sbtx.tmn.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portaudit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:55:21 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Stephane Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudit_fixed= > lines in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf but as the vulnerabilities aren't > really fixed I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. > > I read portaudit's man and freebsd handbook but I can't figure out the good > method. Thx in advance. Try to build seamonkey - it is mozilla replacement... Serg. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 04:16:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8DB16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378AA13C491 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l264GuIv053980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:46:57 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Peter Jeremy Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:46:50 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200703011149.02601.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20070305183426.GD853@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20070305183426.GD853@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1222547.W3MyDIFlWf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703061446.52461.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.215 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fork wedging (I think) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 04:16:59 -0000 --nextPart1222547.W3MyDIFlWf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:04, Peter Jeremy wrote: > How difficult would it be to build a test system somewhere where the > console was accessible? I don't think you are going to make progress > without console access. Not possible, I can't move the system as it is very remote and there are no= =20 (clueful) local people. We may be going up their on other business but Murphy dictates the problem= =20 wouldn't surface while we were :) I haven't been able to replicate the problem here either. Would a crash dump be useful? I think I will be able to update the ataraid= =20 stuff to allow a dump onto the array. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1222547.W3MyDIFlWf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF7Os05ZPcIHs/zowRAvPkAKCgYLt2386J2f9fmhi6GlfPlm7NMwCeMcYp PVFj9A8llvJlQlAyFSw26cg= =KVk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1222547.W3MyDIFlWf-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 04:38:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3032516A402 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE18413C471 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l264bs0T026198; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:37:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:37:33 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Boston , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:37:59 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Subject: Re: umass media size off-by-one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 04:38:05 -0000 Craig Boston wrote: > Hi all, I ran into this while trying to use geli to encrypt an external > usb-2 hard drive. It appears that sometimes the media size reported by > umass is one sector too big. For example: > > umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 171705MB (351651889 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 21889C) > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 oseek=351651888 count=1 > dd: /dev/da0: Input/output error > 1+0 records in > 0+0 records out > 0 bytes transferred in 0.002951 secs (0 bytes/sec) > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 oseek=351651887 count=1 > 1+0 records in > 1+0 records out > 512 bytes transferred in 0.000982 secs (521360 bytes/sec) > > This is with a "high speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Mass Storage > Device(0x3507), Prolific Technology Inc.(0x067b), rev 1.00" enclosure. > I tested with two USB flash memory devices and those seem to report the > correct size. > > I'm currently rebuilding a kernel with USB_DEBUG to see if it's specific > to a certain protocol and try to figure out if it's a bug in one of them > or if the enclosure is lying. Has anyone run into this before? > > Craig Fixed in 7-CURRENT. Contact Warner Losh to make sure that your device is quirked appropriately. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 05:03:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C44716A402 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DA313C481 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: by ion.gank.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C91F711A81; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:03:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:03:12 -0600 From: Craig Boston To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston , Scott Long , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umass media size off-by-one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:03:18 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:37:33PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Fixed in 7-CURRENT. Contact Warner Losh to make sure that your device > is quirked appropriately. Ah, thanks! I see the commit now. Looks like it should be simple to backport to RELENG_6. Fortunately all 3 of the machines I intend to use this drive with have their own local svk branches of the src tree ;) I'll mail Warner with the vendor and product IDs for my enclosure. Craig From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 08:48:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3FC16A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 404B413C4B6 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 5751 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 11:48:03 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 11:48:03 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180009, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Jack Vogel" References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:47:51 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:48:06 -0000 >> I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because >> the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. >> >> Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really >> 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine >> and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. > > well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running over IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run over IP eventually. Isn't it? Anyway, nobody said anothing about getting freebsd boot prompt over SOL. My guess, that this is THE MOST usefull usage of SOL for remote upgrades. I understand that this is not as simple as sending data to UART. THis is must be done explicitely in the boot loader, i thinks. But why no do it? -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 08:48:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA9016A404 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 402FA13C4B4 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 5750 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 11:48:03 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 11:48:03 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180009, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:40:34 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:48:06 -0000 I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and compare results with machine cost. Hope this will be usefull for someone. BENCHMARKS: OMNI3 (current cost 2400$): Intel entry server mainboard, intel 1U case, 20 2HDD MIRROR, 2GB ECC 533Mhz, Pentium D 3.4Ghz Built-in LSI MegaRAID RAID controller on the mainbopard. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE /bin/sh: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped /dev/ar0s1e 289385582 2514874 263719862 1% /usr Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10588607.7 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1293.5 MWIPS (10.6 secs, 10 samples) System Call Overhead 494540.4 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe Throughput 597906.5 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 34342.0 lps (12.3 secs, 10 samples) Process Creation 3009.9 lps (38.8 secs, 3 samples) Execl Throughput no measured results File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 464078.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 110822.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 110268.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 124661.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86272.0 KBps ( File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 50327.0 KBps ( File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1394205.0 KBps File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 67200.0 KBps ( File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 64455.0 KBps ( Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3212.6 lpm ( Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 579.2 lpm ( Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 293.2 lpm ( Arithmetic Test (type = short) 892425.3 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = int) 954128.2 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = long) 298186.4 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = float) 1035063.3 lps Arithmetic Test (type = double) 516773.0 lps ( Arithoh 17328248.7 lps C Compiler Throughput 1815.1 lpm ( Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places 73558.8 lpm ( Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi 141070.4 lps ( INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 1058 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 11 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 59 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 3 Process Creation 126.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 49 OMNI2 (current cost approx 4000$): Supermicro mainboard, supermicro case. 360 3HDD RAID-5, 4GB ECC 400Mhz, DUal Xeon 2.67Ghz 3WARE 8xxxx with 4 PORTS FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE /bin/sh: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), for FreeBSD 5.4-CURRENT (rev 2), dynamically linked ( uses shared libs), stripped /dev/twed0s1e 10154158 5684520 3657306 61% /usr Dhrystone 2 using register variables 3979893.5 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 837.4 MWIPS (10.3 secs, 10 samples) System Call Overhead 218348.2 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe Throughput 236742.1 lps (10.1 secs, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 56205.9 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Process Creation 2662.7 lps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) Execl Throughput 719.6 lps (29.6 secs, 3 samples) File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 250541.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 11986.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 12850.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 71142.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 10535.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 10247.0 KBps ( File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 617670.0 KBps ( File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 26746.0 KBps ( File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 21936.0 KBps ( Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1285.4 lpm ( Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 163.4 lpm ( Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 133.2 lpm ( Arithmetic Test (type = short) 630290.8 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = int) 601545.1 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = long) 627739.3 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = float) 670343.5 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = double) 664330.5 lps ( Arithoh 13388181.7 lps C Compiler Throughput 1159.6 lpm ( Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places 74973.1 lpm ( Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi 46712.1 lps ( INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 397 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 23 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 5 Process Creation 126.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 21 OSIRIS (current cost: hm.. probably about 700$ beacuse of 3ware controller and HHDs) Self assembled, gigabyte mainboard, cheap medium tower case + 100$ PSU. 240 3 HDD RAID-5, 756MB ECC SRAM 133Mhz, Dual Pentium 3 550Mhz 3ware 7xxxx series for 4 ports. FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE /bin/sh: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped /dev/twed0s1e 20308398 10469660 8214068 56% /usr Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1230939.8 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 332.7 MWIPS (10.1 secs, 10 samples) System Call Overhead 149582.4 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe Throughput 158045.2 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 19863.0 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Process Creation 938.3 lps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) Execl Throughput 321.9 lps (29.7 secs, 3 samples) File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 106492.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 9555.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 10572.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 35077.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 7663.0 KBps ( File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 8480.0 KBps ( File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 236555.0 KBps ( File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 12886.0 KBps ( File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 10266.0 KBps ( Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 770.2 lpm ( Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 128.2 lpm ( Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 64.0 lpm ( Arithmetic Test (type = short) 137979.8 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = int) 138354.4 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = long) 138406.5 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = float) 172898.2 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = double) 172916.2 lps ( Arithoh 2551887.3 lps C Compiler Throughput 332.0 lpm ( Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places 23695.0 lpm ( Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi 20153.3 lps ( INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 123 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 15 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1 Process Creation 126.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 14 -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 09:06:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9798116A402; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:06:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@FreeBSD.org) Received: from soc90.bluepex.com (ns1.bluepex.com.br [201.28.114.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21E913C442; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@FreeBSD.org) Received: from soc90.bluepex.com (soc90.bluepex.com [127.0.0.1]) by soc90.bluepex.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l21Fu5pm016843; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:56:05 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from garga@freebsd.org) Received: (from garga@localhost) by soc90.bluepex.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l21FtvOL016842; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:55:57 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from garga@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: soc90.bluepex.com: garga set sender to garga@freebsd.org using -f Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:55:57 -0300 From: Renato Botelho To: Alexander Shikoff Message-ID: <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Marko Lerota , Chris , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Daniel Eischen , Martin Blapp , Anton Karpov Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:06:41 -0000 On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > Hi All, > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason. > > >You definitly need to use libthr (which is still CPU hungry, but > > >works better). > > > > I don't think it is a problem with libpthread. > > FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Thanks for all. -- Renato Botelho GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc Love at first sight is one of the greatest labor-saving devices the world has ever seen. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 10:10:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23B816A480 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:10:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from s200aog11.obsmtp.com (s200aog11.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 961E313C4A6 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([217.206.187.80]) by eu1sys200aob011.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:10:07 UTC Received: from [10.0.0.79] (bwb.mintel.co.uk [10.0.0.79]) by rodney.mintel.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84200181421; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:39:26 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:35:46 +0000 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artem Kuchin References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:10:14 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: >>> I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because >>> the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. >>> >>> Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is >>> really >>> 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine >>> and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. >> >> well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) > > Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running > over > IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access > the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run > over IP > eventually. Isn't it? > > Anyway, nobody said anothing about getting freebsd boot prompt over SOL. > My guess, that this is THE MOST usefull usage of SOL for remote upgrades. > I understand that this is not as simple as sending data to UART. THis is > must > be done explicitely in the boot loader, i thinks. But why no do it? > We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, on the system. Tom From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 10:31:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D035D16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFEC13C481 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 13756 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 10:05:16 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 6 Mar 2007 10:05:15 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l26A58xZ002040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:05:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l26A58NU002039 for stable@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:05:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: "Mikhail T." Message-Id: <200703061005.l26A58NU002039@aldan.algebra.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:05:08 -0500 (EST) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:31:56 -0000 I was ripping one CD (SCSI CD-drive) and inserting another CD into an ATA CD-DRIVE. Suddenly the machine paniced... Although I have the crash dump, it seems corrupted -- kgdb can't print out the stack. The panic is: "vinvalbuf: dirty bufs". Please, advise. Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 10:49:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9620416A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A97813C4AC for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so136405ugh for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:49:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=YhC07Ew3i2GYb5SdivnVK5YTI/RrvI+SjV5F030BtJoPFyUR+Vt/pfiMgsOcgCBVOKp1r+fsLoOUQiyIN2p8VR/Ks0ihK+P5T4OuEcHfW2BwPgYwvZqGZwFmfz/rkFIYmlKLcSB6Ld0KQtyA5nn5r+eGI2AkjlToM+EFDZeA4CU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=s0MSu5ZEfDMLuiLxlsteI/w0tyAD4TpVtc1v8EJoAGSXerqPUHL+GJWnU4AQRCcAJ2d8K8b8OXKECMmX/Hjq74Kq+YUna6hiSLI7GrbgkIt6LJWIFRB1bhu4ChJrZxvMPYA5zt1zwQSOpUezC0+bPwX3klV38+SjdfRiUs11BE0= Received: by 10.66.232.9 with SMTP id e9mr1344061ugh.1173176686986; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:24:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.30.15 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:24:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:24:46 +0000 From: "Chris Rees" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:49:39 -0000 On 3/4/07, Duane Whitty wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: > > The Machine: > > > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > em0: port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xda000000-0xda01ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > > > The machine has 4G RAM and a 3ware 9000 series RAID controller with 2 drives. > > > > pciconf -l says: > > > > em0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > em1@pci4:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > >> I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter (realtek), and it works straight away. > >> "tcpdump -n arp" sees the same noise as other machines on that LAN. >> > > >> Sounds like it could be bad hardware. Can you swap nics? >No he can't these are LOMs (on the motherboard). > >> I read through the recent threads on the em driver, but didn't see any > >> reported symptoms like this. Has anyone seen anything like this? Got > >> any hints for me? Am I doing something stupid? Did I leave out any > >> useful information about my configuration? >> > >> >> Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues >> that perhaps others could help diagnose >Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. >Jack If your NIC is knackered, where are you from? I can post you one I'm not using, instead of you buying one. It's a Realtek PCI 8139 10/100 Mb/s. Let me know if you're interested. Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 10:54:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0759316A404 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FA8613C461 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 8437 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 13:54:02 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 13:54:02 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180018, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <00b501c75fdd$bab195c0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Tom Judge" References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com><008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:53:50 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:54:05 -0000 > Artem Kuchin wrote: >>>> I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because >>>> the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. >>>> >>>> Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is >>>> really >>>> 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine >>>> and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. >>> >>> well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) >> >> Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running >> over >> IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access >> the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run >> over IP >> eventually. Isn't it? >> >> Anyway, nobody said anothing about getting freebsd boot prompt over SOL. >> My guess, that this is THE MOST usefull usage of SOL for remote upgrades. >> I understand that this is not as simple as sending data to UART. THis is >> must >> be done explicitely in the boot loader, i thinks. But why no do it? >> > > We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built > in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone > (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that > the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, which we select > in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints so that the freebsd > console is set to use the same port. We use the open source ipmitool to > access the ipmi controller, and serial port, on the system. Aha! This is something already. When our system boot it says: Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: port may not be enabled Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: type 16550A Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled My guess is that sio0 is the real port and sio1 is the IPMI port of Intel AMT. But what does this message really say? What must i do to enable the port? The other question, do i need to include device ipmi in the kernel config? And how do i tell the boot loader to redirect its output to serial port? Sorry, working with freebsd for 10 years now but never touched this issue. -- Regads, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 11:08:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB4416A402 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from s200aog10.obsmtp.com (s200aog10.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2438513C4A5 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:08:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([217.206.187.80]) by eu1sys200aob010.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:08:29 UTC Received: from [10.0.0.79] (bwb.mintel.co.uk [10.0.0.79]) by rodney.mintel.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05FB181421; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:08:28 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45ED4ACF.1030003@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:04:47 +0000 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artem Kuchin References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com><008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> <00b501c75fdd$bab195c0$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <00b501c75fdd$bab195c0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:08:32 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: >> Artem Kuchin wrote: >> We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built >> in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN >> backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have >> found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, >> which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints >> so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the >> open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, >> on the system. > > Aha! This is something already. > > When our system boot it says: > Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of > probed irqs 0 > Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: port may not be enabled > Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port > 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: type 16550A > Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of > probed irqs 0 > Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled > > My guess is that sio0 is the real port and sio1 is the IPMI port of > Intel AMT. But what does this message > really say? What must i do to enable the port? > The other question, do i need to include > device ipmi > > in the kernel config? And how do i tell the boot loader to redirect its > output to serial port? Sorry, > working with freebsd for 10 years now but never touched this issue. > This is the dmesg from our servers (sio1 is the ipmi SOL port): sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A, console As far as I know it is not required to have ipmi in the kernel (we dont have it in our kernels) to use the SOL port. This page should help you setup the serial console: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html Tom From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 11:25:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925E916A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3F9C13C442 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 9136 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 14:25:02 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 14:25:02 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180035, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com><008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:06:18 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:25:04 -0000 Hi! I just setup a new machine and while it is supposed to be full SATA II i still see these lines in at kernel init: Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB at ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB at ata5-master SATA150 As you see, it says SATA150 , while the drives are SATA II (which is, as i understand, SATA 300). Both drives are connected to RAID controller and form a mirror raid: Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: 305108MB status: READY Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad8 at ata4-master Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad10 at ata5-master Any idea how to make it work as SATA II? -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 11:41:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2997F16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd-stable@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D0A13C4B9 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd-stable@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l26BA03H055713 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:10:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fbsd-stable@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l26BA0XE055708 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:10:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fbsd-stable@bzerk.org) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:10:00 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070306111000.GA55026@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:10:03 +0100 (CET) Subject: sunlabel trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:41:08 -0000 Hi, This is on 6.2-STABLE, updated last week. I've added a new ~250 GB disc to my netra X1. It's working OK but somehow sunlabel is unwilling to install the bootstrap code on the disc because of some sizing issue with the c partition (whole disk). Even though sysinstall let me partition the disc just fine for some reason it has made the c partition way too small, causing the sunlabel -B command to error out. Any tips? ad1: 238475MB at ata3-master UDMA66 # sunlabel -nB ad1 sunlabel: partition f extends past end of disk sunlabel: invalid label # # sunlabel ad1 # /dev/ad1: text: FreeBSD233G cyl 25767 alt 2 hd 16 sec 63 bytes/sector: 512 sectors/cylinder: 1008 sectors/unit: 25973136 8 partitions: # # Size is in sectors. # Offset is in cylinders. # size offset # ---------- ---------- a: 1049328 0 b: 4195296 1041 c: 25973136 0 d: 4195296 5203 e: 1049328 9365 f: 16778160 10406 g: 461127744 27051 cheers, Ruben From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 13:16:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612EA16A404 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DB313C48E for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l26DGNKi088517; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:16:23 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l26DGLgI088507; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:16:21 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:16:20 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20070306131620.GA88463@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200703051314.29902@aldan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:16:32 -0000 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > = > How will it break them? šswap backing only touches swap if there is > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > = > will panic. > = > = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its > = consumers. šThen removing the -M flag and making swap backing the > = default is a very sound choice. šThank you for correcting me. > > Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? Done in CURRENT. I'll MFC it in a week. -- Yar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 13:26:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709BC16A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B622E13C4A7 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 11826 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 16:26:10 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 16:26:10 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180046, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <018f01c75ff2$fb86fa80$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Tom Judge" References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com><008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> <00b501c75fdd$bab195c0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45ED4ACF.1030003@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:25:59 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT (serial port redirection on Intel AMT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:26:13 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Judge" To: "Artem Kuchin" Cc: ; "Jack Vogel" Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:04 PM Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT > Artem Kuchin wrote: >>> Artem Kuchin wrote: > >>> We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built >>> in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN >>> backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have >>> found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, >>> which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints >>> so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the >>> open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, >>> on the system. >> >> Aha! This is something already. >> >> When our system boot it says: >> Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of >> probed irqs 0 >> Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: port may not be enabled >> Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port >> 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 >> Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: type 16550A >> Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of >> probed irqs 0 >> Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled >> >> My guess is that sio0 is the real port and sio1 is the IPMI port of >> Intel AMT. But what does this message >> really say? What must i do to enable the port? >> The other question, do i need to include >> device ipmi >> >> in the kernel config? And how do i tell the boot loader to redirect its >> output to serial port? Sorry, >> working with freebsd for 10 years now but never touched this issue. >> > > This is the dmesg from our servers (sio1 is the ipmi SOL port): > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on > acpi0 > sio1: type 16550A, console > > As far as I know it is not required to have ipmi in the kernel (we dont > have it in our kernels) to use the SOL port. > > This page should help you setup the serial console: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html Hmm. i am stuck now. I have setup everything as described but still see nothing in SOL terminal when system boots (still can see BIOS). I can turn on video redirection to serial port COM1 in the BIOS and then i can see boot prompt and boot menu, but i cannot do anything there because keyboard is not working at all. Now i have the floowing questions: 1) What port is redirected over SOL in intel ? It is not COM1. 2) Can it do serial redirection at all? 3) Did anybody ever managed to set this thing up on Intel Server with AMT? My server is ENtry level SE7230ONH1-E -- Regards Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 15:41:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0E716A405 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3AB13C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA0D85C8C2 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:10:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16920-03 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:10:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816CF85BC20 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:10:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EFC5FF3E for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:10:53 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:10:45 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:41:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built "Fri Feb 23 07:47:20 AST 2007", and the interface is an fxp0 device ... # ps auxl | grep ping root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 70555 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:05AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 73863 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:33AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 75857 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:49AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 76676 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:53AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 77048 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:54AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 80071 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 80198 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 5 j 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81210 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81212 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81841 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:25AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 88041 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D 10:11AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 88418 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D 10:13AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 89800 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D 10:24AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 90774 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D 10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 91118 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D 10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 91635 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D 11:04AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7YR94QvfyHIvDvMRAqo7AKCsPVLSXhtMD4pFd/ho2hoX3CL5cgCfcQmy HkV4+EgX4ue/gxVZzyuXE+U= =8YX2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 15:41:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D5916A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0513C4AA for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19F085C8DC for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:19:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17681-03 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:19:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED6A85C8DB for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:19:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D746006B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:19:21 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:19:21 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <88AF4F4573E6B334542D15A5@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> References: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:41:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 vmstat 1 shows: # vmstat 1 procs memory page disks faults cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr da0 da1 in sy cs us sy id 0 1577 0 7813112 657312 1553 9 1 1 1325 68 0 0 569 4774 2359 7 10 83 0 1578 0 7815368 656600 199 59 0 0 64 0 0 2 226 679 616 0 6 93 0 1578 0 7815368 656564 1120 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 208 638 608 1 8 91 0 1578 0 7815368 656564 5 0 0 0 314 0 0 9 343 890 974 1 8 91 0 1578 0 7815368 656564 804 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 233 469 633 1 9 90 Normally I'd look for any mysql processes using alot of CPU, but I'm not finding anything using alot of CPU (this system is the only one we have using gmirror, if that helps any) ... - --On Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:10:53 -0400 "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... > this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built "Fri Feb > 23 07:47:20 AST 2007", and the interface is an fxp0 device ... > ># ps auxl | grep ping > root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 70555 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:05AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 73863 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:33AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 75857 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:49AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 76676 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:53AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 77048 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:54AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 80071 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 80198 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 5 j 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 81210 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 81212 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 81841 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:25AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 88041 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D 10:11AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 88418 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D 10:13AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 89800 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D 10:24AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 90774 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D 10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 91118 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D 10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > root 91635 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D 11:04AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t > 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > > > - ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFF7YR94QvfyHIvDvMRAqo7AKCsPVLSXhtMD4pFd/ho2hoX3CL5cgCfcQmy > HkV4+EgX4ue/gxVZzyuXE+U= > =8YX2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7YZ54QvfyHIvDvMRAp2SAKCnpJJLgxI1SnkfE83L+xH05/981QCfYQBQ NUqCavoRoH8lo6ZPdXLyBFg= =Ww+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 15:48:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F39B16A405 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E39613C467 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: from ame8.swcp.com (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id l26Fmm4g016662; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:48 -0700 Received: from same.swcp.com (same.swcp.com [216.184.2.4]) by ame8.swcp.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l26FmfAx085620; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cheeks@swcp.com) Received: (from cheeks@localhost) by same.swcp.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id PAA09743; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:48:41 GMT Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:48:41 -0700 From: Mark Costlow To: utisoft@gmail.com Message-ID: <20070306154841.GA9699@same.swcp.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame8.swcp.com [216.184.2.163]); Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:48:42 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2745/Tue Mar 6 06:59:40 2007 on ame8.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ame8.swcp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:48:50 -0000 On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:24:46AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > > If your NIC is knackered, where are you from? I can post you one I'm > not using, instead of you buying one. It's a Realtek PCI 8139 10/100 > Mb/s. Let me know if you're interested. Thank you very much for the offer! However, I have tried another NIC in the machine (a Realtek USB adaptor) and it worked normally. At that point I would suspect the hardware except that when this machine had linux loaded on it, it worked normally. The box is in a 1U case with no spare PCI slots, so I need the motherboard NIC to work for it to be useful long-term. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Costlow | Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 cheeks@swcp.com | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 15:59:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D05816A404 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin@citrin.ru) Received: from mail.classis.ru (classis.ru [213.248.60.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D4913C4B4 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin@citrin.ru) Received: from citrin (unknown [81.19.65.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: citrin.citrin.ru) by mail.classis.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750F1122788E; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:59:54 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:59:04 +0300 From: Anton Yuzhaninov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional Organization: Rambler X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1716234605.20070306185904@citrin.ru> To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> References: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:59:56 -0000 Hello Marc, You wrote on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 6:10:45 PM: MGF> Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... MGF> this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built "Fri Feb MGF> 23 07:47:20 AST 2007", and the interface is an fxp0 device ... MGF> # ps auxl | grep ping MGF> root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t MGF> 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli This is know problem: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/errata.html There are some different cases when zonelimit livelock is possible. Send vmstat -z output (when processes lock in zonelimit state). -- Anton Yuzhaninov. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 16:05:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC0516A406 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from obh.snafu.de (obh.snafu.de [213.73.92.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26F613C428 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 4.64 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HObkm-000Eek-3j for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:39:04 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:39:04 +0100 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070306153904.GK31435@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <45E71276.2050708@FreeBSD.org> <32c25d140703020619i67ac96e6y24175f73a70c76c7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32c25d140703020619i67ac96e6y24175f73a70c76c7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:05:46 -0000 Hi, On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:40AM -0300, Carlos Horowicz wrote: > Anybody tried this additionally in /etc/libmap.conf ? > > [/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1] > libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 > > clamav-0.90_2 reduced CPU consumption for me on 6.2-Stable since I > added the two sections in libmap.conf Apart from already running with libthr for clamav for a long time, I just changed my exim config: While having big CPU usage problems in the last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir plus the complete e-mail. That way clamd need to examine every single part and also checked the whole e-mail unpacking the structure by itself. When using the TCP socket the mail is just sent as a stream and clamd handles it completely. For us this was anyhow just the first step before moving clamd to a loadbalanced set of servers, so that a failing clamd does not affect exim anymore. - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 16:11:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795E016A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF5D13C461 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l26GAlMW075239; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:10:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l26GAl0Q081903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:10:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200703061610.l26GAl0Q081903@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:11:12 -0500 To: Oliver Brandmueller , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20070306153904.GK31435@e-Gitt.NET> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <45E71276.2050708@FreeBSD.org> <32c25d140703020619i67ac96e6y24175f73a70c76c7@mail.gmail.com> <20070306153904.GK31435@e-Gitt.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90, clamav-milter version devel-120207 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:11:10 -0000 At 10:39 AM 3/6/2007, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: >last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim >now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before Perhaps this is why we were not seeing the high CPU usage post our upgrade, as we have the milters on our sendmail boxes talking back via TCP to a number of boxes running clamd. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 16:25:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95BA16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47AC13C481 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920BF85C8C6; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:25:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36581-09; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:25:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C70385C8C2; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:25:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B235FE32; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:25:56 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:25:55 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: <89195AF9AC5F52A135C6E1BC@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <1716234605.20070306185904@citrin.ru> References: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> <1716234605.20070306185904@citrin.ru> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:25:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, March 06, 2007 18:59:04 +0300 Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > Hello Marc, > > You wrote on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 6:10:45 PM: > > MGF> Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 > ... MGF> this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built > "Fri Feb MGF> 23 07:47:20 AST 2007", and the interface is an fxp0 device ... > > MGF> # ps auxl | grep ping > MGF> root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c > 1 -t MGF> 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli > > This is know problem: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/errata.html > > There are some different cases when zonelimit livelock is possible. > Send vmstat -z output (when processes lock in zonelimit state). Great, thanks ... just read the errata on zonelimit, and it seems to imply that it was fixed on the 12th of February, but (of course) it doesn't indicate which files ... I just did a new cvsup since my last one, and all that has changed is: Updating collection src-all/cvs Edit src/lib/libarchive/archive_read_extract.c Edit src/share/man/man4/tap.4 Edit src/share/man/man4/tun.4 Edit src/sys/amd64/conf/SMP Edit src/sys/dev/wi/if_wi_pccard.c Edit src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c Edit src/sys/net/if_tap.c Edit src/sys/net/if_tun.c Edit src/sys/netgraph/ng_ksocket.c Edit src/sys/netinet/ip_mroute.c Edit src/sys/netinet/tcp.h Finished successfully Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or if I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? Thanks ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7ZYU4QvfyHIvDvMRAhr6AKDQqpDNoCvq1UJYLbS4ayjcfZ2tSgCfawZX WNM499ARzFVvxW6ubUJtYDo= =ImQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 16:44:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0029D16A408 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3A413C4B3 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93572EB80FD; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:44:38 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([210.51.165.229]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eyF3foeApmka; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:44:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (unknown [221.216.128.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACBDEB80ED; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:44:27 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=pa9tLd/Bc5mtQ9Bnau2SNjz8fAaqHOZDyWn3vrI418kcGyuE9BQL7SszHvBOPiemU yhMtpN1JGBr9x1+H/BwnA== Message-ID: <45ED9A69.60404@delphij.net> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:44:25 +0800 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3F=3F/LI_Xin?= Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> <1716234605.20070306185904@citrin.ru> <89195AF9AC5F52A135C6E1BC@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <89195AF9AC5F52A135C6E1BC@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig59E270BF299453764191E921" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Anton Yuzhaninov Subject: Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:44:40 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig59E270BF299453764191E921 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] > Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsu= p, or if=20 > I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? I think so. Try patching your system with: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.18 and perhaps also: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.293. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig59E270BF299453764191E921 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7ZppOfuToMruuMARCmiEAJwIKjUL6gRUAMm+zyAp+bnD6xpBZgCcCHPY scxj2yjpiAoux7FH7xPTOlE= =tPs7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig59E270BF299453764191E921-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 16:45:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3661A16A40B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F0C13C494 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HOcnE-0002Li-7X; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:45:40 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HOcnB-0002wE-Vw; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:45:37 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ob@e-Gitt.NET In-Reply-To: <20070306153904.GK31435@e-Gitt.NET> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:45:37 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:45:42 -0000 > last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim > now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before > clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim > was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir Interesting, am trying this now - have changed clamd to work via a socket, but do you still have the 'demime = *' in your config where the message is scanned ? Is this necessary anymore ? -pcf. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 17:03:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C8516A468 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from obh.snafu.de (obh.snafu.de [213.73.92.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EA413C4B9 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 4.64 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HOd4c-0006aV-LS; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:03:38 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:03:38 +0100 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: Pete French Message-ID: <20070306170338.GN31435@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: Pete French , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070306153904.GK31435@e-Gitt.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nqkreNcslJAfgyzk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:03:42 -0000 --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:45:37PM +0000, Pete French wrote: > > last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim=20 > > now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before= =20 > > clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exi= m=20 > > was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir= =20 >=20 > Interesting, am trying this now - have changed clamd to work via a socket, > but do you still have the 'demime =3D *' in your config where the > message is scanned ? Is this necessary anymore ? Actually, the message gets unpacked by exim even without this option for=20 the malware acl. It's removed, but doesn't give any difference. I don't=20 know if it would have worked before, since it was already unpacked when=20 the scanner was called. - Olli --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7Z7qiqtMdzjafykRAnzGAJ9K5dyy/JciLEwmTWzyVty4lLexqACgqyIe athNltDqYGDKErFkIyzJoVM= =OttX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 17:19:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E45116A400 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB0013C478 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635A285C8DB; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:19:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58244-02; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:19:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99B885C8C7; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:19:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1345FD28; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:19:17 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:19:17 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "??/LI Xin" Message-ID: <6515610907FF5AD2223A1B4E@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <45ED9A69.60404@delphij.net> References: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> <1716234605.20070306185904@citrin.ru> <89195AF9AC5F52A135C6E1BC@ganymede.hub.org> <45ED9A69.60404@delphij.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Anton Yuzhaninov Subject: Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:19:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, March 07, 2007 00:44:25 +0800 "??/LI Xin" wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > [...] >> Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or >> if I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? > > I think so. Try patching your system with: > > src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 > src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 > src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 > src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 > src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.18 > > and perhaps also: > > src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.293. Here's what I have right now: __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 2007/02/11 03:31:18 mohans Exp $"); * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $"); __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $"); __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.242.2.8 2007/02/03 04:01:22 bms Exp $"); The only one that looks off is uipc_socket.c ... do I need to copy that from HEAD? Are there any compatibility issues with doing that? - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7aKV4QvfyHIvDvMRAloYAKCsA0x+THahW+MZjW/8MjDZwsJDrgCcD4Qw WbA/0nXgvv4xwEDtBxirLlo= =Ro3T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 17:52:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB8116A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@rakupottery.org.uk) Received: from jet.blackcatnetworks.co.uk (jet.blackcatnetworks.co.uk [193.201.200.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3E513C441 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@rakupottery.org.uk) Received: from raku.bcnadsl.com ([217.147.80.10] helo=[192.168.0.88]) by jet.blackcatnetworks.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HOdPR-0005CW-Hd for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:25:13 +0000 Message-ID: <45EDA3F5.6070102@rakupottery.org.uk> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:25:09 +0000 From: Bill Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20070122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <45E45AD4.7040005@lumeta.com> <20070227124644.U34426@n.cwu.edu> <45E58C52.3090001@lumeta.com> In-Reply-To: <45E58C52.3090001@lumeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -2.4 Subject: Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:52:57 -0000 Sam Baskinger wrote: > Juergen Nickelsen wrote: >> On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote: >> >>> Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs >>> mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4 >>> which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs. >>> >>> linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 >> >> Hm. I cannot imagine how this could lead to the problems I saw, but >> another thing to try. Thanks! > > Linux systems store tons of need-to-know data in the /proc file system. > If you've ever installed a chrooted Linux environment you must 'mount -o > bind' the /proc file system from the running system to the chroot for > many OS functions to work correctly. > > I suspect that Java was looking for some process information in > linprocfs and since it wasn't mounted, it blew up. :) Hope this clears > up the "why" question. :) > I have been having problems with this as well, I have the linprocfs mounted, but the buil is dying with the following error: ../../../src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1186 : warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for las t parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning return (IOException)ctr.newInstance(args); ^ ../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/StandardMetaDataImpl.java:637 : warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for las t parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning result = meth.invoke(instance,null); ^ ../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/MBeanInstantiatorImpl.java:16 2: warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for la st parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning moi= cons.newInstance(null); ^ Note: * uses or overrides a deprecated API. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. 21 errors 12 warnings gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. any offers? -- Bill From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 17:56:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D925216A404 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9385813C461 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOdth-0007US-4T for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:56:25 +0100 Received: from 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.110.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:56:25 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:56:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:56:09 +0100 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:56:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: > I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines o= f > different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self= and > compare results with machine cost. > Hope this will be usefull for someone. Several things: a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles" of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you copied it through Excel? b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now. c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare results :) --------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7as5ldnAQVacBcgRAlTnAKCk+AjUaZy2GqpjIuStTNnTepBfSACg9QZb ICfIVxb5AZdiqx0jB7ie/No= =rRjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 18:04:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2BF16A409 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C4C13C4AC for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so257514ugh for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:04:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uUEvvIdxbE8bcuv51gLTxs/lptKXhjm4CED+ImIwBOYfSAJ3OoLd3lxr5obh8eTmIcQy4FR8S68KFQqyDtze73mSlRF0RJ4Z0PMyG9YcHMroylkF87OatOaK7Vaj4EWnrwtigupGtmvcCggjC7cp53tDaWKja+h849QC0p5q4qY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HODRw+vjBfHeNdQRJTheWt3iau5bGQn8NadP2rx2b2HjjQu32c3XhJ+ySyWFS8pQE+KEXlSwfP2o5JER+oUVEvIjDwNxq1Gc0nggBnzkBUQzwYEjxsJY7yGxMHtIoLXT5SKJjWI1iicMseaYYycVFMpthKxkp76g4yO4+3QJ5uU= Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr1849228waf.1173204283802; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:04:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:04:43 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Artem Kuchin" In-Reply-To: <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:04:46 -0000 On 3/6/07, Artem Kuchin wrote: > >> I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because > >> the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. > >> > >> Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really > >> 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine > >> and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. > > > > well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) > > Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running over > IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access > the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run over IP > eventually. Isn't it? Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about the whole apparatus however :) Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 18:29:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A23F16A406 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8AE13C4A3 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 30651 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 21:29:34 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 21:29:34 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180081, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: , "Ivan Voras" References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:27:16 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:29:37 -0000 >Artem Kuchin wrote: >> I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of >> different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and >> compare results with machine cost. >> Hope this will be usefull for someone. > >Several things: > >a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles" >of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you >copied it through Excel? Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing. Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it. >b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on >amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now. oh! that's good. will retest. >c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could >install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, >Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare >results :) I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it. Which one is easier to install? -- Regards Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 19:02:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3D016A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FFE413C442 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 24527 invoked by uid 0); 6 Mar 2007 15:42:04 -0300 Received: from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(201.58.80.234):. Processed in 2.375958 secs); 06 Mar 2007 18:42:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.69.69.69?) (201.58.80.234) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 15:42:01 -0300 Message-ID: <45EDB465.3060406@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:35:17 -0300 From: Patrick Tracanelli Organization: FreeBSD Brasil LTDA User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070306153904.GK31435@e-Gitt.NET> <20070306170338.GN31435@e-Gitt.NET> In-Reply-To: <20070306170338.GN31435@e-Gitt.NET> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:02:11 -0000 Had a similar behavior here, but with other MTA (qmail, clamdscan getting used from simscan). After raising MaxThreads from 10 (default) to 40 CPU usage got back to its normal consuming level. No idea if this info can help, but that was my recent experience. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 20:16:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66CB16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au) Received: from baysidegrp.com.au (gateway.baysidegrp.com.au [61.88.141.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 136DE13C428 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au) Received: (qmail 40159 invoked by uid 0); 7 Mar 2007 07:16:47 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 40154, pid: 40155, t: 0.0254s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88.7/m:42/d:2723 spam: 3.1.8 Received: from unknown (HELO dimuthu) (192.168.1.216) by baysidegrp with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 07:16:47 +1100 From: "Dimuthu Parussalla" To: "'Renato Botelho'" Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:16:09 +1100 Message-ID: <001101c7602c$479d7f00$d801a8c0@dimuthu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:16:30 -0000 Hi, I am running latest CVSUP branch today. Still having the same problem. Only way to reduce cpu usage is to increase maxthreads as others mentioned. What version it is fixed? is it not submitted through ports yet? Regards Dimi -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Renato Botelho Sent: Friday, 2 March 2007 2:56 AM To: Alexander Shikoff Cc: Marko Lerota; Chris; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Daniel Eischen; Martin Blapp; Anton Karpov Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > Hi All, > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason. > > >You definitly need to use libthr (which is still CPU hungry, but > > >works better). > > > > I don't think it is a problem with libpthread. > > FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Thanks for all. -- Renato Botelho GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc Love at first sight is one of the greatest labor-saving devices the world has ever seen. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 20:17:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E4B16A403 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E691313C4A7 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E780B80A for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:54:25 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-11--517347678; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:54:24 -0500 To: stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:11 -0000 --Apple-Mail-11--517347678 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, > I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about > the whole apparatus however :) :-) Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they do boot an embedded linux, and the command set is, shall we say, confusing... It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's connected to the public wires. --Apple-Mail-11--517347678-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 20:52:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BED916A400 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870C013C48E for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOge7-0004Pg-GU for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:52:31 +0100 Received: from 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.110.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:52:31 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:52:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:52:24 +0100 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig642086B283C6CB7F89AC71C7" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:52:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig642086B283C6CB7F89AC71C7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: >> a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangle= s" >> of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you= >> copied it through Excel? >=20 > Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing. > Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it. See here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html >> c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could >> install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, >> Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare >> results :) >=20 > I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it. > Which one > is easier to install? Both CentOS (aka "repacked RedHat Enterprise Server") and SuSE (actually, openSuSE which is free) are easy to install. But I think you'll have to compile unixbench for them. --------------enig642086B283C6CB7F89AC71C7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7dSIldnAQVacBcgRAlO7AKDaRcmd9MuFqKIXcxjHwphqtKVwsACggt0S iikIU1sFE0UpfgxOWzpHaRw= =Vk2v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig642086B283C6CB7F89AC71C7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 21:00:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6B916A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C5813C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l26L05vI098254; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:00:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l26KvOgk083114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:57:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200703062057.l26KvOgk083114@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:58:33 -0500 To: Renato Botelho From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Marko Lerota , Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen , Martin Blapp , Anton Karpov Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:00:07 -0000 At 10:55 AM 3/1/2007, Renato Botelho wrote: > > > > FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 > >I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure >scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. > >It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db update) ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 21:09:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667E816A402 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D93F13C46B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so2711431wri for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eGWSuiK9/6AWtTyQCrmlprBqXKU8l1b5BYVO7vMQUxWt8Jm2ptBxnjFAzxllvOfodB3UD+IA69ssu53zj+fWXG0Lz87AmqnrtaXVB5BfIjpEyS2op6UnaIcEH7ll9bY0viDzKxCZw3yfZAT+Fzb3pzYjXa9NTFM6m3uvTZzEHRE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n9EfVfg/FWEtBnCzt8trlfw9tVWypq7mVGtQCXnHDaHnr22ptZpG81cMcBFCqYVHD/zLRAHwLmhQCfaZ4i33Yz6e2Y7wU6Lm6TOHraOQjK/ugtFGdH2fmylPhWgJeLC1EfBJUdiIoH6+qNe43BJw3vkOWX/6yT3J1khh7mkprfI= Received: by 10.114.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr1875256wab.1173215354227; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.103.15 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0703061309p4b7fbacfwbcbf703486a7155a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Vivek Khera" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:09:25 -0000 On 3/6/07, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, > > I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about > > the whole apparatus however :) > > :-) > > Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they > do boot an embedded linux, and the command set is, shall we say, > confusing... > > It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's > connected to the public wires. Yes, this was a concern while i was at IBM as well, they were talking about configurations that would have the 'management' net seperated out from the public. That seems very expensive on infrastructure to me. Course when you have server farms with thousands of systems I suppose its complicated anyway. Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 21:56:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E549516A40A for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2358D13C474 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 42502 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 00:56:42 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 00:56:42 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180120, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: , "Ivan Voras" References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:55:58 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:56:46 -0000 >See here: >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty terminal originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis are there. -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 22:19:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4E916A40E for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2033C13C49D for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-58-223.51-151.net24.it [151.51.223.58]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l26LqpmB035867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:52:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l26LikpR052911; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:44:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <45EDE0C5.1010305@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:44:37 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kostikbel@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: LOR #193 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:19:14 -0000 Hello. I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running gmirror and SMP if that matters). With reference to your question on http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/031048.html: > What application you run that triggers the LOR ? Bacula, I guess. I'm taking filesystem snapshots, running the backup job and deleting the snapshots. In fact I've always seen some problems with some files in the snapshots not being accessible to bacula-fd. In a previous (quite old) thread it was in fact suggested I might be seeing some LOR, but only recently I activated all the debugging stuff. What's the risk of running the suggested patch on a (quite critical) production server? BTW: Sometimes, upon reboot, delayed fscks start and say that the filesystem cannot be fixed with -p and I should run a full fsck. If I reboot in single user mode and run a full fsck, it will find no errors. Also, I have a couple of other boxes on which I run bacula this way and I never experienced this problem: they are respectively i386/gmirror/UP and amd64/hardware RAID/SMP; so, might the combination of amd64/gmirror or gmirror/SMP be in the way? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 22:19:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7571D16A482 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E78C13C494 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOi09-00042b-1o for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:21 +0100 Received: from 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.110.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:21 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:12 +0100 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-110-81.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:19:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: >> See here: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.ht= ml >=20 > Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty > terminal > originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis > are there. The block under the header: " INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE " is important - it summarises the results and your post is missing the summaries :) --------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7ejgldnAQVacBcgRAsV+AKDRwiEpvg88/KaxX/zTYyFM1DuutgCeNYrR fb89KqniFtYgYc5Q8/CawJU= =EW+P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 00:16:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5063616A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDF013C471 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JEI00EHLBFBJU80@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:16:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.212]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0JEI00B0HBFAOL20@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:16:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:16:22 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <2a41acea0703061309p4b7fbacfwbcbf703486a7155a@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070307011622.070afa26.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0703061309p4b7fbacfwbcbf703486a7155a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:16:24 -0000 On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, this was a concern while i was at IBM as well, they were > talking about configurations that would have the 'management' > net seperated out from the public. That seems very expensive > on infrastructure to me. Course when you have server farms > with thousands of systems I suppose its complicated anyway. If your infrastructure supports VLANs (and which one doesn't today) it's not so complicated. The company I work for have a separate management network. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen also an (ex) IBM'er From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 02:39:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A4116A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@vsi.ru) Received: from serv4.vsi.ru (serv4.vsi.ru [80.82.32.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF12013C461 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@vsi.ru) Received: from NOTEBOOK (ws2.oood.vsi.ru [80.82.33.59]) by serv4.vsi.ru (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with SMTP id l272OX4p013976 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:24:33 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <007d01c7605f$79fa60c0$3b215250@NOTEBOOK> From: "Oleg Derevenetz" To: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:22:38 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Processes get stuck in "ufs" state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:39:46 -0000 Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that interacts with disk gets stuck in "ufs" state, but in my case SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. uname -a output: FreeBSD serv2.vsi.ru 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 oleg@serv2.vsi.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 i386 dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 oleg@serv2.vsi.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850 (2389.26-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20f51 Stepping = 1 Features=0x78bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800 AMD Features2=0x1 real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB) avail memory = 8350457856 (7963 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard ioapic3 irqs 32-35 on motherboard ioapic4 irqs 36-39 on motherboard ioapic5 irqs 40-43 on motherboard ioapic6 irqs 44-47 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xf008-0xf00b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0xf000-0xf07f,0xf080-0xf0ff iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ohci0: mem 0xfc900000-0xfc900fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfc901000-0xfc901fff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci1: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1000-0x100f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xfe010000-0xfe01ffff,0xfe000000-0xfe00ffff irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:00 bge1: mem 0xfe030000-0xfe03ffff,0xfe020000-0xfe02ffff irq 26 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:01 mpt0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xfe050000-0xfe05ffff,0xfe040000-0xfe04ffff irq 27 at device 4.0 on pci2 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.15.0 mpt0: Capabilities: ( RAID-1E RAID-1 SAFTE ) mpt0: 0 Active Volumes (1 Max) mpt0: 0 Hidden Drive Members (6 Max) pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) pcib4: iomem 0xfe301000-0xfe301fff,0xfe303000-0xfe303fff,0xfe305000-0xfe305fff,0xfe307000-0xfe307fff on acpi0 pci32: on pcib4 pcib5: mem 0xfe300000-0xfe300fff irq 32 at device 1.0 on pci32 pci33: on pcib5 pci32: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) pcib6: mem 0xfe302000-0xfe302fff irq 36 at device 2.0 on pci32 pci34: on pcib6 pci32: at device 2.1 (no driver attached) pcib7: mem 0xfe304000-0xfe304fff irq 40 at device 3.0 on pci32 pci35: on pcib7 pci32: at device 3.1 (no driver attached) pcib8: mem 0xfe306000-0xfe306fff irq 44 at device 4.0 on pci32 pci36: on pcib8 pci32: at device 4.1 (no driver attached) atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc97ff,0xc9800-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcefff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec IP Filter: v4.1.13 initialized. Default = block all, Logging = enabled Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle acd0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 ses0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 ses0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device ses0: 3.300MB/s transfers ses0: SAF-TE Compliant Device SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 35003MB (71687372 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4462C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Accounting enabled Recently I posted followup to this PR with description of the problem. Any ideas on how to debug this ? -- Oleg Derevenetz OOD3-RIPE Phone: +7 4732 539880 Fax: +7 4732 531415 http://www.vsi.ru CenterTelecom Voronezh ISP http://isp.vsi.ru From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 02:41:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122A116A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@vsi.ru) Received: from serv4.vsi.ru (serv4.vsi.ru [80.82.32.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9980213C467 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@vsi.ru) Received: from NOTEBOOK (ws2.oood.vsi.ru [80.82.33.59]) by serv4.vsi.ru (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with SMTP id l272fCEh002202 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:41:12 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <016701c76061$cd2d70f0$3b215250@NOTEBOOK> From: "Oleg Derevenetz" To: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:39:17 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Processes get stuck in "ufs" state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:41:14 -0000 Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that interacts with disk gets stuck in "ufs" state, but in my case SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. uname -a output: FreeBSD serv2.vsi.ru 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 oleg@serv2.vsi.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 i386 dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 oleg@serv2.vsi.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850 (2389.26-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20f51 Stepping = 1 Features=0x78bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800 AMD Features2=0x1 real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB) avail memory = 8350457856 (7963 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard ioapic3 irqs 32-35 on motherboard ioapic4 irqs 36-39 on motherboard ioapic5 irqs 40-43 on motherboard ioapic6 irqs 44-47 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xf008-0xf00b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0xf000-0xf07f,0xf080-0xf0ff iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ohci0: mem 0xfc900000-0xfc900fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfc901000-0xfc901fff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci1: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1000-0x100f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xfe010000-0xfe01ffff,0xfe000000-0xfe00ffff irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:00 bge1: mem 0xfe030000-0xfe03ffff,0xfe020000-0xfe02ffff irq 26 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:01 mpt0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xfe050000-0xfe05ffff,0xfe040000-0xfe04ffff irq 27 at device 4.0 on pci2 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.15.0 mpt0: Capabilities: ( RAID-1E RAID-1 SAFTE ) mpt0: 0 Active Volumes (1 Max) mpt0: 0 Hidden Drive Members (6 Max) pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) pcib4: iomem 0xfe301000-0xfe301fff,0xfe303000-0xfe303fff,0xfe305000-0xfe305fff,0xfe307000-0xfe307fff on acpi0 pci32: on pcib4 pcib5: mem 0xfe300000-0xfe300fff irq 32 at device 1.0 on pci32 pci33: on pcib5 pci32: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) pcib6: mem 0xfe302000-0xfe302fff irq 36 at device 2.0 on pci32 pci34: on pcib6 pci32: at device 2.1 (no driver attached) pcib7: mem 0xfe304000-0xfe304fff irq 40 at device 3.0 on pci32 pci35: on pcib7 pci32: at device 3.1 (no driver attached) pcib8: mem 0xfe306000-0xfe306fff irq 44 at device 4.0 on pci32 pci36: on pcib8 pci32: at device 4.1 (no driver attached) atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc97ff,0xc9800-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcefff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec IP Filter: v4.1.13 initialized. Default = block all, Logging = enabled Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle acd0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 ses0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 ses0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device ses0: 3.300MB/s transfers ses0: SAF-TE Compliant Device SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 35003MB (71687372 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4462C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Accounting enabled Recently I posted followup to this PR with description of the problem. Any ideas on how to debug this ? -- Oleg Derevenetz OOD3-RIPE Phone: +7 4732 539880 Fax: +7 4732 531415 http://www.vsi.ru CenterTelecom Voronezh ISP http://isp.vsi.ru From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 03:02:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E1516A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B895513C46B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOmQ3-000J9S-1h for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:02:31 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2732Jas040761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2732JDs005840 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2732IUx005839 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:18 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070307030218.GP10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <45EDE0C5.1010305@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EDE0C5.1010305@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 6dc4245230f22f3abb357b69a6da667e X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 843 [Mar 06 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Subject: Re: LOR #193 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:02:33 -0000 --LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. >=20 > I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running=20 > gmirror and SMP if that matters). >=20 > With reference to your question on=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/031048.ht= ml: >=20 > >What application you run that triggers the LOR ?=20 >=20 > Bacula, I guess. > I'm taking filesystem snapshots, running the backup job and deleting the= =20 > snapshots. > In fact I've always seen some problems with some files in the snapshots= =20 > not being accessible to bacula-fd. >=20 > In a previous (quite old) thread it was in fact suggested I might be=20 > seeing some LOR, but only recently I activated all the debugging stuff. The (usual) consequence of the LOR is lock up. >=20 > What's the risk of running the suggested patch on a (quite critical)=20 > production server? It shall be safe unless you run filesystems compiled as modules, that where not built against patched kernel (patch changes the kernel binary interface). >=20 > BTW: Sometimes, upon reboot, delayed fscks start and say that the=20 > filesystem cannot be fixed with -p and I should run a full fsck. If I=20 > reboot in single user mode and run a full fsck, it will find no errors. >=20 > Also, I have a couple of other boxes on which I run bacula this way and= =20 > I never experienced this problem: they are respectively i386/gmirror/UP= =20 > and amd64/hardware RAID/SMP; so, might the combination of amd64/gmirror= =20 > or gmirror/SMP be in the way? I doubt that gmirror could affect this. --LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7is5C3+MBN1Mb4gRAg/VAJ4qVA+YIxdjjtQMkQb0vYY0JC4bygCfSJA+ 52CqP1chn1sFmd6pNoEMfrU= =P9Y4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 03:05:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E1E16A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3F013C478 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOmSS-000JPI-AK for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:05:00 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2734ndK040773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:04:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2734mvH006003; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:04:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2734mdl006002; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:04:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:04:48 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Oleg Derevenetz Message-ID: <20070307030448.GQ10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <007d01c7605f$79fa60c0$3b215250@NOTEBOOK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8zN2sh9fO5jmbe4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007d01c7605f$79fa60c0$3b215250@NOTEBOOK> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 7b1a4900bea4ee3727a65c989d5962bc X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 843 [Mar 06 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Processes get stuck in "ufs" state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:05:02 -0000 --K8zN2sh9fO5jmbe4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: > Hi ! >=20 > Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same=20 > symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(t= m)=20 > Processor 850: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D104406&cat=3D >=20 > Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that= =20 > interacts with disk gets stuck in "ufs" state, but in my case=20 > SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. See developer handbook, Deadlock Debugging chapter for instruction what information shall be gathered to debug the problem. --K8zN2sh9fO5jmbe4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7ivPC3+MBN1Mb4gRAiTmAJ9u5s20pSytx9bAIOGyBKqZzp8pmwCeJG58 ZLE776S3XJsXCFZRjfX6SWo= =RPeG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K8zN2sh9fO5jmbe4-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 06:39:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA1216A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 06:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E5A13C461 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 06:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01861EB811B; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:39:20 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([210.51.165.229]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDfaPksg5BY4; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:39:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.217.12.91] (sina152-194.staff.sina.com.cn [61.135.152.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E53EB8380; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:39:04 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=cAAEImVbWPJaE9ThNhmfeMEMiM99SWsLa1yvjpNehs06Zmhoas8Stu92CdUCM/n7K uyiUIB/6OwH+GabM8Vy1w== Message-ID: <45EE5E02.8040509@delphij.net> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:38:58 +0800 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3F=3F/LI_Xin?= Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <803EC80AD97D2E6CA27368FF@ganymede.hub.org> <1716234605.20070306185904@citrin.ru> <89195AF9AC5F52A135C6E1BC@ganymede.hub.org> <45ED9A69.60404@delphij.net> <6515610907FF5AD2223A1B4E@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <6515610907FF5AD2223A1B4E@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig60A9B267150F4E09CA183181" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Anton Yuzhaninov Subject: Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:39:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig60A9B267150F4E09CA183181 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] > Here's what I have right now: >=20 > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 2007/02/11 03:31= :18=20 > mohans Exp $"); > * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans = Exp $ > * $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp= $ > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31= :19=20 > mohans Exp $"); > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31= :19=20 > mohans Exp $"); > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.242.2.8 2007/02/03 0= 4:01:22=20 > bms Exp $"); >=20 > The only one that looks off is uipc_socket.c ... do I need to copy that= from=20 > HEAD? Are there any compatibility issues with doing that? No, you can not simply copy the file. Try patching your system with: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c.diff?r1=3D= 1.292&r2=3D1.293 You can just ignore the first hunk. Please note that you may also need to modify uipc_socket2.c just in the way that this file is changed. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig60A9B267150F4E09CA183181 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7l4DOfuToMruuMARCqCBAJ4kC2eX1bdsL0dP8tKCR12lcdhtEQCffxzu 8WavtvUQ1pr+NqclpgqvRAw= =GLzK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig60A9B267150F4E09CA183181-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 07:09:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A3216A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@samplonius.org) Received: from ly.sdf.com (ly.sdf.com [216.113.193.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C35E13C48E for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@samplonius.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ly.sdf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CA0114447; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:12:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -3.995 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.995 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.404, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from ly.sdf.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ly.sdf.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63oQnUdKIYcJ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ly.sdf.com (ly.sdf.com [216.113.193.83]) by ly.sdf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024FF114446; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:12:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17636875.541173251534927.JavaMail.root@ly.sdf.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:12:14 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Juergen Nickelsen In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [216.113.193.85] Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:09:52 -0000 ----- "Juergen Nickelsen" wrote: ... > But indeed I was ignorant of the diablo port. What is the relation > between these two ports anyway? I do not really get the difference, > in spite of . ... There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is distributation. The port, is just source, and does not require testing. A binary built from the port may or may not pass, depending on the current state of development. There can be regressions as things change in the OS, and linked in packages. The jdk has a fair number of dependencies, so it is pretty easy to blow-up a jdk build. Some of the developers on the FreeBSD java list have the TCK, and can tell if you if the port would pass the TCK. And you should really be asking about this on the FreeBSD java list, as they are constantly making changes to the port, and dependencies. Tom From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 07:36:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301D616A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910113C46B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1HOqFW-0006Yv-Hj; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:07:46 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Vivek Khera In-reply-to: References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Vivek Khera message dated "Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:54:24 -0500." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:07:46 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:36:37 -0000 > On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, > > I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about > > the whole apparatus however :) > > :-) > > Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they > do boot an embedded linux, and the command set is, shall we say, > confusing... > > It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's > connected to the public wires. ah, you don't believe in firewalls, i see :-) danny From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 07:47:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A922616A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ni@jnickelsen.de) Received: from w21.org (w21.org [217.173.146.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEB613C478 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ni@jnickelsen.de) Received: from [10.0.1.14] (wittduen-wl.ni.w21.org [10.0.1.14]) by w21.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EAE11620; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:13:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <17636875.541173251534927.JavaMail.root@ly.sdf.com> References: <17636875.541173251534927.JavaMail.root@ly.sdf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Juergen Nickelsen Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:13:45 +0100 To: Tom Samplonius X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:47:02 -0000 On 07. Mrz 2007, at 8:12, Tom Samplonius wrote: > There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk > binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass > Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is > distributation. The port, is just source, and does not require > testing. A binary built from the port may or may not pass, > depending on the current state of development. There can be > regressions as things change in the OS, and linked in packages. > The jdk has a fair number of dependencies, so it is pretty easy to > blow-up a jdk build. I see. Thanks for the clarification! Regards, Juergen. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 08:47:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C4916A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A101513C471 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-58-223.51-151.net24.it [151.51.223.58]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l278sduw020243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:54:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l278kYBT076928; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:46:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <45EE7BDE.70300@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:46:22 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <45EDE0C5.1010305@netfence.it> <20070307030218.GP10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20070307030218.GP10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR #193 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:47:04 -0000 Kostik Belousov wrote: >> In a previous (quite old) thread it was in fact suggested I might be >> seeing some LOR, but only recently I activated all the debugging stuff. > The (usual) consequence of the LOR is lock up. Mhh, yes, that's right. But I stopped having locks during file system snapshooting after I upgraded from 5.x to 6.x. >> What's the risk of running the suggested patch on a (quite critical) >> production server? > It shall be safe unless you run filesystems compiled as modules, that where > not built against patched kernel (patch changes the kernel binary > interface). Ok, that's not my case. I'll try the patch, but probabily not so soon. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 09:24:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EAF16A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net (alnrmhc11.comcast.net [206.18.177.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4FC13C474 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from icarus.home.lan (c-71-198-0-135.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[71.198.0.135]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070307092424b11009v7kre>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:24:24 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18F7B1FA03D; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:24:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:24:24 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Danny Braniss Message-ID: <20070307092424.GA63433@icarus.home.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Danny Braniss , Vivek Khera , stable@freebsd.org References: <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan> <20070305191714.GF57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070305193022.GM10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <000b01c75f6b$594c23d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703051355n5148d19cp36bc425ecd054add@mail.gmail.com> <008201c75fcc$21302940$0c00a8c0@Artem> <2a41acea0703061004n62eb213fsec9904e263669ac5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://jdc.parodius.com/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Vivek Khera , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:24:25 -0000 On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:07:46AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > > It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's > > connected to the public wires. > > ah, you don't believe in firewalls, i see :-) I don't trust firewalls for something that can -- and should -- be done at layer 1. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 11:25:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E96416A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@freebsd.org) Received: from soc90.bluepex.com (ns1.bluepex.com.br [201.28.114.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B3713C478 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@freebsd.org) Received: from soc90.bluepex.com (soc90.bluepex.com [127.0.0.1]) by soc90.bluepex.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27BOncG016023; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:24:49 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from garga@freebsd.org) Received: (from garga@localhost) by soc90.bluepex.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l27BOgZG016022; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:24:42 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from garga@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: soc90.bluepex.com: garga set sender to garga@freebsd.org using -f Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:24:42 -0300 From: Renato Botelho To: Mike Tancsa Message-ID: <20070307112441.GA16000@bluepex.com> References: <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> <200703062057.l26KvOgk083114@lava.sentex.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703062057.l26KvOgk083114@lava.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: Marko Lerota , Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen , Martin Blapp , Anton Karpov Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:25:02 -0000 On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:58:33PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 10:55 AM 3/1/2007, Renato Botelho wrote: > >> > >> FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 > > > >I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on > >configure > >scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. > > > >It's fixed now on 0.90_3. > > Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of > bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db > update) I'm working on this, but since this version bumped libclamav version, i need to test and fix all clamav dependant ports. -- Renato Botelho GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc Conquering the world on horseback is easy; it is dismounting and governing that is hard. -- Chinggis (Genghis) Khan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 11:32:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5C516A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7D313C48D for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOuNE-00018J-FZ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:32:00 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:32:00 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:32:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:31:44 +0100 Lines: 36 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig917A5239FFF9E3667A155265" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: USB problem - how to disable an umass device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:32:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig917A5239FFF9E3667A155265 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to install 6.2-release on an IBM blade center blade (AMD Opteron), but the boot process hangs while accessing an embedded USB storage device umass1. Since I don't think I'll ever need it, and I need the blade, is there any way to disable probing or usage of umass1? I think the problems arrive when FreeBSD tries to attach "da" device to it.= Alternatively, I can try disabling parts of the USB "chain", since umass1 is connected to uhub1 which is connected to usb2, but how? (I cannot disable USB in general because internal keyboard is attached to it= ) I tried using loader hint hint.usb.2.disabled=3D"1" but it doesn't work. --------------enig917A5239FFF9E3667A155265 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7qKgldnAQVacBcgRAg4tAKCb7rIH8DrJLyTBFDh6URp1VwuhHwCfYhlA ENxm5I+t32jEAEa6BnJn3V0= =SBtQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig917A5239FFF9E3667A155265-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 12:28:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7C16A407 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4C013C48E for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so145291nfc for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:28:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HFycJJYTu3B48d9hVS9ja/hfXYj3/BhqGY+kL8Z8NdRQ/u5c7tnhB7+0VvPLlQCNOYC+BYDzXyuHLl92UqtMfeEogBw/V4SxUkiQUheEzV1D1xOXv0B3VssX20OnAr110GSJjGHHuoK7vzntOYVjPAF/p5N6edmAZHwDepPzInE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hciPCp8QUb81/5jGw6Mnuot6J8rRLQsFFhb1uuQChR6Dz3Qq4UKzRSZMytg/eEnACelFdFmVcja71mqalLWtrjLai+fOkEhczvs3A4tYpJr1qNgw66jXjn5S1JLEIKvBKLqw1QoqOcVyci+84A+gzj17gsQ5NCRMNVHy1ye7XnE= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr9162897buc.1173270500870; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.15 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:28:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0703070428v1a3619fam7722c9394e5659e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:28:20 +0000 From: Chris To: "Mike Tancsa" In-Reply-To: <200703062057.l26KvOgk083114@lava.sentex.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> <200703062057.l26KvOgk083114@lava.sentex.ca> Cc: Marko Lerota , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Renato Botelho , Daniel Eischen , Martin Blapp , Anton Karpov Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:28:23 -0000 On 06/03/07, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 10:55 AM 3/1/2007, Renato Botelho wrote: > > > > > > FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 > > > >I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure > >scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. > > > >It's fixed now on 0.90_3. > > Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of > bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db update) > > ---Mike > > What configuration in exim is needed to make it use tcp instead of sockets? thanks Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 12:35:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4576716A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078EA13C4A5 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HOvM6-000Esf-FK; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:34:54 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HOvM6-0008FQ-Do; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:34:54 +0000 To: chrcoluk@gmail.com, mike@sentex.net In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0703070428v1a3619fam7722c9394e5659e@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:34:54 +0000 Cc: mlerota@iskon.hr, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, garga@freebsd.org, deischen@freebsd.org, mb@imp.ch, toxa@toxahost.ru Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:35:03 -0000 > What configuration in exim is needed to make it use tcp instead of sockets? av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310 instead of av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd and then in clamd.conf, comment out 'LocalSocket' and uncomment the 'TCPSocket' and 'TCPAddr' settings so it looks like this: #LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamd TCPSocket 3310 TCPAddr 127.0.0.1 -pcf From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 12:52:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B1716A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E81A813C461 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: (qmail 72282 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 12:25:47 -0000 Received: from midgard.transactionware.com (192.168.1.55) by dm.transactionware.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 12:25:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 85413 invoked by uid 907); 7 Mar 2007 12:25:24 -0000 Received: from midgard.transactionware.com (HELO JMLAPTOP) (192.168.1.55) by midgard.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:24 +1100 From: "Jan Mikkelsen" To: "'Danny Braniss'" , "'Vivek Khera'" Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:25:24 +1100 Organization: Transactionware Message-ID: <00ba01c760b3$af691360$0204a8c0@transactionware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: Acdgi370o6qWB1w1Q+mzYLupBCZ++QAJ1bUA In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Boot prompt for Intel AMT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:52:08 -0000 Danny Braniss wrote: > > It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's > > connected to the public wires. > > ah, you don't believe in firewalls, i see :-) Firewalls are sometimes just the crunchy shell around the soft, chewy centre. You need defense in depth ... Regards, Jan. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 12:54:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B728C16A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405E113C474 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so152885nfc for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:54:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Tx5JZA7kf2+i1RopkKgQ9qpqMur9x8N0o8E/nfTDiitGGpT+AZDB+3Qrh1gW5JGNx+7rVMLwOUQKbdM3Uz30QDFZClkrdktMd1SslgSZacZSUz6Sel2CZED9/w6/sqmrfcqdRBZWgoZ5jfR42BbEE7aMS5cos2uRYBx9+QuoD/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DnTEaOeMhNrL4vQACCBVHiAqYZzAJCGvaZR1jEThW/U7e9y94iYDzp7Dqs2jwjSXq06fLiQMLwqV58k30KhrDG/DzPL86n6s/JmFfzpK+nh0J+lGc4b2HWZuS4nh3ILBwzpNk99FfHkaUlqUyFzzht1vhJakpR7UFTobaqBd65I= Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr9202149bue.1173272059140; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.15 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:54:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0703070454o538fd19dp32c6f53b9b8f88a2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:54:19 +0000 From: Chris To: "Pete French" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3aaaa3a0703070428v1a3619fam7722c9394e5659e@mail.gmail.com> Cc: mlerota@iskon.hr, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, garga@freebsd.org, deischen@freebsd.org, mb@imp.ch, toxa@toxahost.ru Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:54:20 -0000 On 07/03/07, Pete French wrote: > > What configuration in exim is needed to make it use tcp instead of sockets? > > av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310 > > instead of > > av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd > > and then in clamd.conf, comment out 'LocalSocket' and uncomment the > 'TCPSocket' and 'TCPAddr' settings so it looks like this: > > #LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamd > TCPSocket 3310 > TCPAddr 127.0.0.1 > > -pcf > many thanks seems to be working Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 13:09:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0994016A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D13E13C441 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (ozohwn@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l27D9SjF016320; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:09:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l27D9RpK016319; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:09:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:09:27 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200703071309.l27D9RpK016319@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ivoras@fer.hr In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:09:33 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: USB problem - how to disable an umass device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ivoras@fer.hr List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:09:41 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > I'm trying to install 6.2-release on an IBM blade center blade (AMD > Opteron), but the boot process hangs while accessing an embedded USB > storage device umass1. Since I don't think I'll ever need it, and I need > the blade, is there any way to disable probing or usage of umass1? I > think the problems arrive when FreeBSD tries to attach "da" device to it. I'm afraid the only way is to compile a custom kernel that does not have "device umass". You might also have to make sure there's no umass.ko in /boot/kernel (I'm not sure, but it's possible that some mechanism like devd tries to load umass.ko automatically). Of course, a better way to solve the problem would be to find out _why_ it is hanging in the first place. :-) The first step would be to enter the kernel debugger and take a stack trace, in order to find out where it is stuck. It might be a good idea to take this issue to the freebsd- usb mailing list. > I tried using loader hint hint.usb.2.disabled="1" but it doesn't work. Unfortunately, hints cannot be used to disable devices in general (which would be a desirable feature). That only works for legacy devices (i.e. ISA) and some others. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd (On the statement print "42 monkeys" + "1 snake":) By the way, both perl and Python get this wrong. Perl gives 43 and Python gives "42 monkeys1 snake", when the answer is clearly "41 monkeys and 1 fat snake". -- Jim Fulton From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 14:35:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C673216A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C4513C441 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOxEI-0002gD-P7 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:34:58 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:34:58 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:34:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:34:54 +0100 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <200703071309.l27D9RpK016319@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigADDE43EF9B6A80AF9C86765A" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: <200703071309.l27D9RpK016319@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: USB problem - how to disable an umass device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:35:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigADDE43EF9B6A80AF9C86765A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oliver Fromme wrote: > Of course, a better way to solve the problem would be to > find out _why_ it is hanging in the first place. :-) > The first step would be to enter the kernel debugger and > take a stack trace, in order to find out where it is stuck. >=20 > It might be a good idea to take this issue to the freebsd- > usb mailing list. Actually, it resolved to be a very large timeout, on the order of 5 minutes per step, before something gives up and the boot process continue= s. > > I tried using loader hint hint.usb.2.disabled=3D"1" but it doesn't w= ork. >=20 > Unfortunately, hints cannot be used to disable devices in > general (which would be a desirable feature). That only > works for legacy devices (i.e. ISA) and some others. I'd argue that this is actually a bad thing - I'm sure there are situations where it would be useful to disable (almost) arbitrary nodes in the device tree, even down to specific pci busses. --------------enigADDE43EF9B6A80AF9C86765A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7s2OldnAQVacBcgRArS7AKCLR9y1H03+vWDIAMl65wO9a1plHQCgqIgo 7WKBEPH50MZQaOLZmJP7UmI= =3yt5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigADDE43EF9B6A80AF9C86765A-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 14:53:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F209616A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25F213C49D for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOxWL-00076Q-BG for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:53:37 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:53:37 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:53:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:53:10 +0100 Lines: 444 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0BCB13133CBA8DB2E0342808" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:53:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0BCB13133CBA8DB2E0342808 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. Booting without ACPI on the other hand doesn't find all the CPU's :( Here's sysctl output: > sysctl -a | grep smp kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 kern.smp.cpus: 1 kern.smp.disabled: 0 kern.smp.active: 0 kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 Here's the mptable -dmesg output: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D MPTable -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: EBDA physical address: 0x0009d140 signature: '_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0xfe mode: Virtual Wire -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x0009e9b0 signature: 'PCMP' base table length: 388 version: 1.4 checksum: 0x77 OEM ID: 'IBM ENSW' Product ID: 'LEWIS SMP ' OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 OEM table size: 0 entry count: 37 local APIC address: 0xfee00000 extended table length: 408 extended table checksum: 159 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 0 0x10 BSP, usable 15 1 2 0x0301 2 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 0x0301 1 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 0x0301 3 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 0x0301 -- Bus: Bus ID Type 0 PCI 1 PCI 2 PCI 3 PCI 4 PCI 5 PCI 6 PCI 7 PCI 8 PCI 9 ISA -- I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address 14 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 13 0x11 usable 0xfec02000 -- I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID P= IN# INT conforms conforms 9 1 14 = 1 INT conforms conforms 9 0 14 = 2 INT conforms conforms 9 4 14 = 4 INT conforms conforms 9 6 14 = 6 INT active-hi edge 9 8 14 = 8 INT conforms conforms 9 11 14 = 11 INT conforms conforms 9 12 14 = 12 INT conforms conforms 9 13 14 = 13 INT conforms conforms 9 14 14 = 14 INT conforms conforms 9 15 14 = 15 INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 = 3 INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 = 3 INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 = 3 INT conforms conforms 0 5:A 13 = 0 INT conforms conforms 2 4:A 13 = 1 INT conforms conforms 2 5:A 13 = 2 INT conforms conforms 3 4:A 13 = 3 INT conforms conforms 3 5:A 13 = 4 INT conforms conforms 3 5:B 13 = 5 -- Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID P= IN# NMI conforms conforms 9 0 255 = 1 ExtINT conforms conforms 9 0 255 = 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ MP Config Extended Table Entries: -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xa0000 address range: 0x20000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xf8000000 address range: 0x2000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: prefetch address address base: 0xf0000000 address range: 0x8000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xea000000 address range: 0x6000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xe7000000 address range: 0x1100000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xe5000000 address range: 0x1000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xe4000000 address range: 0x1000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xe3000000 address range: 0x1000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xe2000000 address range: 0x1000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xe1000000 address range: 0x1000000 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x0 address range: 0x3b0 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x3b0 address range: 0xc -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x3bc address range: 0x4 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x3c0 address range: 0x20 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x3e0 address range: 0x3c20 -- System Address Space bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x4000 address range: 0x1000 -- -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 1 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 2 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 1 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 3 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 4 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 5 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 6 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 7 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 8 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 -- Bus Heirarchy bus ID: 9 bus info: 0x01 parent bus ID: 0 -- Compatibility Bus Address bus ID: 0 address modifier: add predefined range: 0x00000000 -- Compatibility Bus Address bus ID: 0 address modifier: add predefined range: 0x00000001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.= FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 7 15:08:28 CET 2007 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz K8-class CP= U) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x40f12 Stepping =3D 2 Features=3D0x178bfbff Features2=3D0x2001 AMD Features=3D0xea500800 AMD Features2=3D0x1f Cores per package: 2 real memory =3D 4815060992 (4592 MB) avail memory =3D 4130750464 (3939 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413= ) cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 bce0: mem 0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz miibus0: on bce0 gentbi0: on miibus0 gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 bce1: mem 0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz miibus1: on bce1 gentbi1: on miibus1 gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem 0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 uhub3: multiple transaction translators uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub4: Cypress Semiconductor 4 Port Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 3= uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered umass0: TEAC TEAC FD-05PUB, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 4 umass1: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr = 5 umass1: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci3 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=3D1.5.12.0 mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). pci3: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci3: at device 5.1 (no driver attached) pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci8: on pcib8 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0= ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd2 at ukbd0 ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a stray irq7 bce0: link state changed to DOWN vlan0: link state changed to DOWN bce0: link state changed to UP vlan0: link state changed to UP stray irq7 too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 129 --------------enig0BCB13133CBA8DB2E0342808 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7tHWldnAQVacBcgRArc4AKDZg7Q3iDq9DKhwHVp3Gg/HGoNgVACcCeSd yjUWSn0TwZh3TO72CoKMBOQ= =8Pt8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0BCB13133CBA8DB2E0342808-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 15:46:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E216D16A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB6113C4A3 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so210663nfc for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i33ah0aThFAGY5pTOe5usqgIAdagsolNS/aFrLWW5j07wai4od0jtEvm3BoRaZ3qroigf3kK2s+AQNVf4uZe6Gh97C3TIVksTXIvfS7Img28zqKl+wu89H+0KVWuFBeW/2EJg/XHs5nOimsMrNdn7aZbt8syCTvTGOBCfko2qzQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pwvqJVEWeEMvUAOBWdJf/zTwVd8uSLDGKhMoiJI3a8tcU7n1l59s6RnKJ8jI3Tvurxci/W9+C6RYEkkXoiehtgvF74LyvIzBrQxzU/I3O/DL9x0o0+BnaYrc2XGKrYE/77GllEiGXSCepY0eHatGKOWpcojLnlLQTL0gsYi3SUs= Received: by 10.82.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr9533027bud.1173282410258; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.155.14 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:46:50 -0300 From: "Eduardo Meyer" To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070125194420.GJ822@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070125194420.GJ822@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Bridging problems on IP address conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:52 -0000 On 1/25/07, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-Jan-25 12:01:46 -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > >bridge0: flags=8043 mtu 1500 > > ether ac:de:48:df:0d:8c > > priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 > > member: fxp0 flags=3 > > member: em0 flags=3 > > > >bridge1: flags=8043 mtu 1500 > > ether ac:de:48:fe:cd:41 > > priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 > > member: xl1 flags=3 > > member: xl0 flags=3 > > > >And my system constantly reports: > > > >arp: 00:13:20:1c:33:22 is using my IP address XX.YY.ZZ.KK! > > > >several (thoundsands of) times. In fact this ARP is my own fxp0 > >interface, and this is the only interface that has this IP. What > >should I do? Ass IP on the bridge0 interface instead of the fxp0 > >bridge member? Or anything else? > > You don't say what version of FreeBSD you are running (there were some > bridge(4) fixes between 6.1 and 6.2) or what ifconfig shows for the > bridge members. > > This may be indicative of a loop in your switch network - is there any > way that packets leaving fxp0 can re-appear on em0, xl0 or xl1? > > Based on a previous thread, you probably should put the IP address > on the bridge device, though that should not be related to your problem. > > -- > Peter Jeremy > > 5.5-STABLE system. The topology: - em0 and xl0 crossover (straight from router) to freebsd bridge - fxp0 and xl1 on a common switch (maybe causing a loop?) Added the IP on the bridge device and the loop is gone. 10x -- =========== Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 15:51:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E2F16A404 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shannon@widomaker.com) Received: from wilma.widomaker.com (wilma.widomaker.com [204.17.220.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACB313C4A8 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shannon@widomaker.com) Received: from [69.72.100.1] (helo=escape.goid.lan) by wilma.widomaker.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1HOyQc-000MEJ-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:51:46 -0500 Received: from daydream.goid.lan (IDENT:1000@daydream.goid.lan [192.168.1.10]) by escape.goid.lan (8.13.5.20060614/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l27FpiL2008821 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:51:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:51:44 -0500 From: Charles Shannon Hendrix To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> Organization: Big Endian X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:51:48 -0000 On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:12 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > Artem Kuchin wrote: > >> See here: > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html > > > > Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty > > terminal > > originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis > > are there. > > The block under the header: > > " > INDEX VALUES > TEST BASELINE > " > > is important - it summarises the results and your post is missing the > summaries :) Yep. It should look something like this output, from my dual-core Opteron running Linux 2.6.19-ck2: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) System -- Linux daydream 2.6.19-ck2 #5 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 20 12:23:54 EST 2007 i686 athlon-4 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/mapper/vg-u2 10321208 6610764 3710444 65% /u2 Start Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 7 01:34:36 EST 2007 01:34:36 up 53 min, 3 users, load average: 0.24, 0.18, 0.14 End Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 7 01:45:33 EST 2007 01:45:33 up 1:04, 3 users, load average: 12.80, 5.64, 2.63 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 15270277.2 405.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 2674.2 321.8 Execl Throughput 188.3 5084.7 270.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 96128.0 359.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 27395.0 254.4 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 690188.0 448.7 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 827153.0 74.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 352671.5 228.3 Process Creation 569.3 16337.0 287.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 849.9 189.7 System Call Overhead 114433.5 2451595.0 214.2 ========= FINAL SCORE 254.1 -- The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure. -- Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 16:12:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F419716A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB1E13C491 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOykB-0006ZM-Oo for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:59 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:59 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig902A17E38488F8536226B7C3" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:12:34 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig902A17E38488F8536226B7C3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >=20 > BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different baselines and results from the "normal" version? --------------enig902A17E38488F8536226B7C3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7uQsldnAQVacBcgRAoMOAKDLvO95qf+pFPaoNx3zxGsI1vEyqgCfZBmA B43dP/5j5m4GUormtskcotE= =CUD2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig902A17E38488F8536226B7C3-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 16:12:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F9A16A404 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbaskinger@lumeta.com) Received: from MAIL.corp.lumeta.com (zeus.lumeta.com [65.246.245.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D922113C4A5 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbaskinger@lumeta.com) Received: from [65.246.246.82] ([65.246.246.82]) by MAIL.corp.lumeta.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:12:44 -0500 Message-ID: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:10:49 -0500 From: Sam Baskinger Organization: Lumeta Corporation User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2007 16:12:44.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[709F1BF0:01C760D3] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:12:46 -0000 Adding a datapoint: Dell 1950s exhibit similar behaviour but have 2 cores in a single physical CPU. Hope this helps the discussion along. Sam Baskinger Software Engineer Lumeta - Securing the Network in the Face of Change Ivan Voras wrote: > Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module > enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the > installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus > is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after > this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I > left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. > > Booting without ACPI on the other hand doesn't find all the CPU's :( > > Here's sysctl output: > >> sysctl -a | grep smp > kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 > kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 > kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 > kern.smp.cpus: 1 > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > kern.smp.active: 0 > kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 > > > Here's the mptable -dmesg output: > > > > =============================================================================== > > MPTable > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Floating Pointer Structure: > > location: EBDA > physical address: 0x0009d140 > signature: '_MP_' > length: 16 bytes > version: 1.4 > checksum: 0xfe > mode: Virtual Wire > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Config Table Header: > > physical address: 0x0009e9b0 > signature: 'PCMP' > base table length: 388 > version: 1.4 > checksum: 0x77 > OEM ID: 'IBM ENSW' > Product ID: 'LEWIS SMP ' > OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 > OEM table size: 0 > entry count: 37 > local APIC address: 0xfee00000 > extended table length: 408 > extended table checksum: 159 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Config Base Table Entries: > > -- > Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step > Flags > 0 0x10 BSP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > 2 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > 1 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > 3 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > -- > Bus: Bus ID Type > 0 PCI > 1 PCI > 2 PCI > 3 PCI > 4 PCI > 5 PCI > 6 PCI > 7 PCI > 8 PCI > 9 ISA > -- > I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address > 14 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 > 13 0x11 usable 0xfec02000 > -- > I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID PIN# > INT conforms conforms 9 1 14 1 > INT conforms conforms 9 0 14 2 > INT conforms conforms 9 4 14 4 > INT conforms conforms 9 6 14 6 > INT active-hi edge 9 8 14 8 > INT conforms conforms 9 11 14 11 > INT conforms conforms 9 12 14 12 > INT conforms conforms 9 13 14 13 > INT conforms conforms 9 14 14 14 > INT conforms conforms 9 15 14 15 > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 3 > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 3 > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 3 > INT conforms conforms 0 5:A 13 0 > INT conforms conforms 2 4:A 13 1 > INT conforms conforms 2 5:A 13 2 > INT conforms conforms 3 4:A 13 3 > INT conforms conforms 3 5:A 13 4 > INT conforms conforms 3 5:B 13 5 > -- > Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID PIN# > NMI conforms conforms 9 0 255 1 > ExtINT conforms conforms 9 0 255 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Config Extended Table Entries: > > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xa0000 > address range: 0x20000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xf8000000 > address range: 0x2000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: prefetch address > address base: 0xf0000000 > address range: 0x8000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xea000000 > address range: 0x6000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe7000000 > address range: 0x1100000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe5000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe4000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe3000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe2000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe1000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x0 > address range: 0x3b0 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3b0 > address range: 0xc > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3bc > address range: 0x4 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3c0 > address range: 0x20 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3e0 > address range: 0x3c20 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x4000 > address range: 0x1000 > -- > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 1 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 2 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 1 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 3 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 4 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 5 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 6 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 7 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 8 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 9 bus info: 0x01 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Compatibility Bus Address > bus ID: 0 address modifier: add > predefined range: 0x00000000 > -- > Compatibility Bus Address > bus ID: 0 address modifier: add > predefined range: 0x00000001 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > dmesg output: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 7 15:08:28 CET 2007 > root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz K8-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40f12 Stepping = 2 > > Features=0x178bfbff > Features2=0x2001 > AMD Features=0xea500800 > AMD Features2=0x1f > Cores per package: 2 > real memory = 4815060992 (4592 MB) > avail memory = 4130750464 (3939 MB) > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) > cpu0 on motherboard > pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 > pci2: on pcib2 > bce0: mem > 0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 > bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz > miibus0: on bce0 > gentbi0: on miibus0 > gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 > bce1: mem > 0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 > bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz > miibus1: on bce1 > gentbi1: on miibus1 > gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 > isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem > 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb0: on ohci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem > 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 > ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb1: on ohci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem > 0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: EHCI version 1.0 > usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 > usb2: on ehci0 > usb2: USB revision 2.0 > uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 > uhub3: multiple transaction translators > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub4: Cypress Semiconductor 4 Port Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 3 > uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > umass0: TEAC TEAC FD-05PUB, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 4 > umass1: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 5 > umass1: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) > pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 > pci3: on pcib3 > mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem > 0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci3 > mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > pci3: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) > pci3: at device 5.1 (no driver attached) > pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 > pci4: on pcib4 > pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 > pci5: on pcib5 > pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 > pci6: on pcib6 > pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 > pci7: on pcib7 > pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 > pci8: on pcib8 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > kbd2 at ukbd0 > ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled > da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) > cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a > stray irq7 > bce0: link state changed to DOWN > vlan0: link state changed to DOWN > bce0: link state changed to UP > vlan0: link state changed to UP > stray irq7 > too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore > mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 129 > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 16:23:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FB416A40B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shannon@widomaker.com) Received: from wilma.widomaker.com (wilma.widomaker.com [204.17.220.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1A113C4BD for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shannon@widomaker.com) Received: from [69.72.100.1] (helo=escape.goid.lan) by wilma.widomaker.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1HOyv0-0001c6-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:23:10 -0500 Received: from daydream.goid.lan (IDENT:1000@daydream.goid.lan [192.168.1.10]) by escape.goid.lan (8.13.5.20060614/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l27GN91h008058 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:23:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:23:08 -0500 From: Charles Shannon Hendrix To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> Organization: Big Endian X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:23:11 -0000 On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: > > > > > BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) > > Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the > nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now > most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different > baselines and results from the "normal" version? It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. -- shannon / There is a limit to how stupid people really are, just as there's -------' a limit to the amount of hydrogen in the Universe. There's a lot, but there's a limit. -- Dave C. Barber on a.f.c. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 16:26:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B9616A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) Received: from ibm.leadmon.net (ibm.leadmon.net [207.114.24.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CDE13C4AA for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) Received: from HDLDesktop (hdl-desktop.leadmon.net [207.114.24.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by ibm.leadmon.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/LNSG+SCOP+NJABL+SBL+DSBL+SORBS+CBL+RHSBL) with ESMTP id l27G6CaR001772 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:06:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v0.5.2 ibm.leadmon.net l27G6CaR001772 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=leadmon.net; s=default; t=1173283576; bh=c5PBjz9zHU3EXTgmXlO3MA3ar3s=; h=X-DomainKeys: DomainKey-Signature:Authentication-Results:X-SenderID:From:To: Subject:Date:Organization:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=osMz5/ bffzvrWLnCdxuiBP6t5vlaFFRcraLIViM+Kdn3koCXGbooO+CMu/iALM0KIxdOMgJjz JEe8qhvru8nFmbdZvIE32uHrQuoLm9Xzi+HR55UOTUsjrcrnRXKMdI5p+oJWIgxxm4U Npa9BSQbXkmyhSvCPOFaUC3589KG/TA= X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v0.4.1 ibm.leadmon.net l27G6CaR001772 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=leadmon.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=authentication-results:x-senderid:from:to:subject:date: organization:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=igXNStnlW7u7YoEXKvdWi0G5pJlYZuyVakjnpmrHeOsNqfVlOwjMFLFYGmsin6gO2 cDaQP9rChjgjNmkFas07AtrDAGXNDpqhjoC2ae8cfAX3IXebUihrGQNDllfEEs93CjT ykIEle6S2AP508XeuWx1YEdQDge6QljVwxJo3c4= Authentication-Results: ibm.leadmon.net from=howard@leadmon.net; sender-id=pass; spf=pass X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 ibm.leadmon.net l27G6CaR001772 From: "Howard Leadmon" To: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:06:07 -0500 Organization: Leadmon Networking Message-ID: <001501c760d2$872a6650$081872cf@Leadmon.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: Acdg0oN8IwnEXolnS/CKrjJ1tPLnDA== X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90/2763/Wed Mar 7 08:14:49 2007 on ibm.leadmon.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: DNS/Bind Error Help under FBSD 6.2 using Sendmail.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:26:17 -0000 I am seeing an issue with some eMail moving from the server here is one such example: l25F3FJW082596 96337 Mon Mar 5 10:03 (Deferred: Name server: mail.jingmei.com.: host name lookup f) OK, so I did a lookup of it's MX, and get: jingmei.com mail is handled by 10 mail.jingmei.com So then I looked up mail.jingmei.com: mail.jingmei.com has address 220.112.41.223 Host mail.jingmei.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL) I see I am getting a returned IP address which can be connected to, but also a SERVFAIL error. Now I am aware of the AAAA IPv6 issue, and have the needed setting in my sendmail.cf file: O ResolverOptions=WorkAroundBrokenAAAA So I would have hoped this would have worked around the issue and permitted mail flow, yet apparently not for some reason. I have googled and looked around, and maybe just not found the right info yet, but if anyone has any idea how to track this down, or resolve the issue it would sure be most appreciated. Most of my mail moves fine, but I have a couple domains I am guessing have something wrong, so I can't seem to get mail out to them... --- Howard http://www.leadmon.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 16:27:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9512D16A408 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266F613C4BE for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOyyg-0001gf-6D for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:26:58 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:26:58 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:26:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:26:36 +0100 Lines: 71 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAB0CD369EFC0EC69D35E0A7D" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:27:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAB0CD369EFC0EC69D35E0A7D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem > 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support To add more info: SMP+ACPI kernel hangs here ^^^^^^^^ > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb0: on ohci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem > 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 > ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] But I must use USB for this: > ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > kbd2 at ukbd0 > ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. (Blade center's management console) > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec And the big timeout (which I think relates to an umass device, referred to in a previous post) happens here ^^^^, with or without SMP and ACPI. > da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled > da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) > cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present= > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a --------------enigAB0CD369EFC0EC69D35E0A7D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7ue8ldnAQVacBcgRAq8WAKDPLoj662QMSN4qTCaAPNSFqwQk6gCgsB9m 8Mc/pB9oNoW3lPMKYlqjuL4= =DfHE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAB0CD369EFC0EC69D35E0A7D-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 16:35:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0B616A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E1313C461 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HOz6U-0003lL-Nb for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:35:02 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:35:02 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:35:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEE7112F02D52FD718714F8EB" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:35:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEE7112F02D52FD718714F8EB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 > Ivan Voras wrote: >=20 >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> >>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) >> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the >> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but n= ow >> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different= >> baselines and results from the "normal" version? >=20 > It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. >=20 > It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit platforms. --------------enigEE7112F02D52FD718714F8EB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7uiVldnAQVacBcgRAjd6AJ9BVLgDQeBfsi4fqzUv/AfijBmE7wCgy8FK ca8rC/Hyx97aXPXr7e00aUw= =aJj/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEE7112F02D52FD718714F8EB-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 17:59:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E5616A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B525913C4B2 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 69986 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 20:59:34 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 20:59:34 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" , References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:59:10 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:59:37 -0000 > Yep. It should look something like this output, from my dual-core > Opteron running Linux 2.6.19-ck2: > > BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) > System -- Linux daydream 2.6.19-ck2 #5 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 20 > 12:23:54 EST 2007 i686 athlon-4 i386 GNU/Linux > /dev/mapper/vg-u2 10321208 6610764 3710444 65% /u2 > > Start Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 7 01:34:36 EST 2007 > 01:34:36 up 53 min, 3 users, load average: 0.24, 0.18, 0.14 > > End Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 7 01:45:33 EST 2007 > 01:45:33 up 1:04, 3 users, load average: 12.80, 5.64, 2.63 > > ========= FINAL SCORE > 254.1 Here is mine retested and patched to work on AMD64 (Pentium D 3.4Ghz) BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0) System -- aaa.itlegion.ru Start Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 7 14:03:27 MSK 2007 1 interactive users. 2:03PM up 6 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.09, 0.06 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 131328 Mar 5 23:55 /bin/sh /bin/sh: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped /dev/ar0s1e 289385582 2746558 263488178 1% /usr Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10486183.3 lps (10.1 secs, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1289.1 MWIPS (10.7 secs, 10 samples) System Call Overhead 494962.3 lps (10.1 secs, 10 samples) Pipe Throughput 603048.3 lps (10.1 secs, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 34302.9 lps (12.8 secs, 10 samples) Process Creation 3011.8 lps (38.6 secs, 3 samples) Execl Throughput 1229.4 lps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 467804.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 109705.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 109313.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 126505.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86216.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 50229.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1399150.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 67555.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 64288.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3222.7 lpm (62.7 secs, 3 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 579.8 lpm (60.2 secs, 3 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 293.5 lpm (60.1 secs, 3 samples) Arithmetic Test (type = short) 891421.9 lps (10.1 secs, 3 samples) Arithmetic Test (type = int) 951512.1 lps (10.1 secs, 3 samples) Arithmetic Test (type = long) 298204.3 lps (10.2 secs, 3 samples) Arithmetic Test (type = float) 1033235.9 lps (10.1 secs, 3 samples) Arithmetic Test (type = double) 516114.2 lps (10.1 secs, 3 samples) Arithoh 17357328.1 lps (10.2 secs, 3 samples) C Compiler Throughput 1801.4 lpm (61.4 secs, 3 samples) Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places 73671.7 lpm (37.9 secs, 3 samples) Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi 142907.4 lps (20.3 secs, 3 samples) INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10486183.3 898.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1289.1 234.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 1229.4 285.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 109313.0 276.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 50229.0 303.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 64288.0 110.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 603048.3 484.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 34302.9 85.8 Process Creation 126.0 3011.8 239.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 579.8 966.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 494962.3 330.0 ========= FINAL SCORE 300.0 As you see, baselines a TOTALLY diffrent, this sucks. I trying to install Debian today w no luck. CD=ROM just will not boot. I'll try to install CentOS x32-AMD64 on friday and try to compile the source code of unixbench from freebsd port to get the same baselines. -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 18:07:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1928E16A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8F13C4B3 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (szcdsd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l27I7Iqs060995; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:07:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l27I7ItU060994; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:07:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:07:18 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200703071807.l27I7ItU060994@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dudu.meyer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:07:23 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Bridging problems on IP address conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dudu.meyer@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:07:26 -0000 Eduardo Meyer wrote: > Peter Jeremy wrote: > > Eduardo Meyer wrote: > > > bridge0: flags=8043 mtu 1500 > > > ether ac:de:48:df:0d:8c > > > priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 > > > member: fxp0 flags=3 > > > member: em0 flags=3 > > > > > > bridge1: flags=8043 mtu 1500 > > > ether ac:de:48:fe:cd:41 > > > priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 > > > member: xl1 flags=3 > > > member: xl0 flags=3 > > > > > > And my system constantly reports: > > > > > > arp: 00:13:20:1c:33:22 is using my IP address XX.YY.ZZ.KK! > > > > > > several (thoundsands of) times. In fact this ARP is my own fxp0 > > > interface, and this is the only interface that has this IP. What > > > should I do? Ass IP on the bridge0 interface instead of the fxp0 > > > bridge member? Or anything else? > > [...] > > This may be indicative of a loop in your switch network - is there any > > way that packets leaving fxp0 can re-appear on em0, xl0 or xl1? > > 5.5-STABLE system. The topology: > > - em0 and xl0 crossover (straight from router) to freebsd bridge > - fxp0 and xl1 on a common switch (maybe causing a loop?) Yes, that's a loop. Packets leaving fxp0 can be sent back by the switch to your xl1. You should fix your topology. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs." -- Robert Firth From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 18:16:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA03A16A409 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5620813C4B9 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (uhktgb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l27IFsQe061557; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:15:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l27IFrnb061556; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:15:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:15:53 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200703071815.l27IFrnb061556@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ivoras@fer.hr In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:15:59 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: USB problem - how to disable an umass device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ivoras@fer.hr List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:16:02 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Of course, a better way to solve the problem would be to > > find out _why_ it is hanging in the first place. :-) > > The first step would be to enter the kernel debugger and > > take a stack trace, in order to find out where it is stuck. > > > > It might be a good idea to take this issue to the freebsd- > > usb mailing list. > > Actually, it resolved to be a very large timeout, on the order of > 5 minutes per step, before something gives up and the boot process > continues. That sounds like a bug where a loop counter isn't initialized correctly, so a loop wraps around and has to go through the whole range of a 32 bit int until it terminates, i.e. 2^32 which is 4 billion interations. Depending on what the loop actually contains, that could very well take 5 minutes. There have been bugs like that in the past. If you enter the Debugger during the hang and print a stack trace, you should be able to see where that loop is. Maybe it's easy to spot the incorrect loop counter and fix it. > > > I tried using loader hint hint.usb.2.disabled="1" but it doesn't > > > work. > > > > Unfortunately, hints cannot be used to disable devices in > > general (which would be a desirable feature). That only > > works for legacy devices (i.e. ISA) and some others. > > I'd argue that this is actually a bad thing - I'm sure there are > situations where it would be useful to disable (almost) arbitrary > nodes in the device tree, even down to specific pci busses. Yes, that's what I mean. I'm sure it could be useful. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "A language that doesn't have everything is actually easier to program in than some that do." -- Dennis M. Ritchie From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 18:20:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A93B16A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAD713C428 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HP0jx-0006KG-DW for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:19:53 +0100 Received: from 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.34.24]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:19:53 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:19:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:19:29 +0100 Lines: 92 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA5728358705356B901C4D9F2" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:20:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA5728358705356B901C4D9F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: > TEST BASELINE RESULT IN= DEX >=20 > Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10486183.3 89= 8.6 > Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1289.1 23= 4.4 > Execl Throughput 43.0 1229.4 28= 5.9 > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 109313.0 27= 6.0 > File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 50229.0 30= 3.5 > File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 64288.0 11= 0.8 > Pipe Throughput 12440.0 603048.3 48= 4.8 > Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 34302.9 8= 5.8 > Process Creation 126.0 3011.8 23= 9.0 > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 579.8 96= 6.3 > System Call Overhead 15000.0 494962.3 33= 0.0 > =3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > FINAL SCORE 300= =2E0 >=20 > As you see, baselines a TOTALLY diffrent, this sucks. Yeah. Well, as long as we're posting results, here's from Xeon 5110 (the slowest Xeon from the Woodcrest family, 1.6 GHz, dual core): INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDE= X Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9983979.3 855.= 5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1456.5 264.= 8 Execl Throughput 43.0 1423.1 331.= 0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 159513.0 402.= 8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 52679.0 318.= 3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 76063.0 131.= 1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 627988.0 504.= 8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 71798.2 179.= 5 Process Creation 126.0 5569.4 442.= 0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 503.0 838.= 3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 487202.2 324.= 8 =3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D FINAL SCORE 361.= 4 --------------enigA5728358705356B901C4D9F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7wI5ldnAQVacBcgRAl/9AJ0eeLOe/5Tkp+BJyvtkiH1CrgiTSgCghPtq iTB3YAjKP5KZNAdVOHBxO4s= =1ojF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA5728358705356B901C4D9F2-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 18:29:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70CE16A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5D6513C4A7 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 70646 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 21:29:56 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 21:29:56 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: , "Ivan Voras" References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:29:53 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:29:58 -0000 Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using? My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M How much do you get on this? -- Regards Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 18:39:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4C016A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from FS.denninger.net (wsip-70-169-168-7.pn.at.cox.net [70.169.168.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A3613C4BD for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.8/8.13.1) with SMTP id l27IdCEP073302 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:39:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net [127.0.0.1] by Spamblock-sys (LOCAL); Wed Mar 7 12:39:12 2007 Received: (from karl@localhost) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l27IdChv073299 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:39:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:39:11 -0600 From: Karl Denninger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070307183911.GA73241@FS.denninger.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers cheerfully broiled for supper and served with ketchup! X-SPAMBLOCK-MATCH: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:39:13 -0000 Hmmmm.... I have a Dual-core (one physical package) Intel motherboard machine here that's working fine (6.2-STABLE) FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #3: Wed Feb 28 16:11:56 CST 2007 karl@FS.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 kern.smp.active: 1 kern.smp.disabled: 0 kern.smp.cpus: 2 kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 I beat it up pretty hard too; its got a fairly active Postgres database on it, multiple RAID spindles under Gmirror, runs web services, firewall functions, multiple serial ports on USB adapters, etc. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:10:49AM -0500, Sam Baskinger wrote: > Adding a datapoint: Dell 1950s exhibit similar behaviour but have 2 > cores in a single physical CPU. > > Hope this helps the discussion along. > > Sam Baskinger > Software Engineer > > Lumeta - Securing the Network in the Face of Change > > > Ivan Voras wrote: > >Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module > >enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the > >installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus > >is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after > >this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I > >left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. > > > >Booting without ACPI on the other hand doesn't find all the CPU's :( > > > >Here's sysctl output: > > > >>sysctl -a | grep smp > >kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 > >kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 > >kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 > >kern.smp.cpus: 1 > >kern.smp.disabled: 0 > >kern.smp.active: 0 > >kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 > > > > > >Here's the mptable -dmesg output: > > > > > > > >=============================================================================== > > > >MPTable > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >MP Floating Pointer Structure: > > > > location: EBDA > > physical address: 0x0009d140 > > signature: '_MP_' > > length: 16 bytes > > version: 1.4 > > checksum: 0xfe > > mode: Virtual Wire > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >MP Config Table Header: > > > > physical address: 0x0009e9b0 > > signature: 'PCMP' > > base table length: 388 > > version: 1.4 > > checksum: 0x77 > > OEM ID: 'IBM ENSW' > > Product ID: 'LEWIS SMP ' > > OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 > > OEM table size: 0 > > entry count: 37 > > local APIC address: 0xfee00000 > > extended table length: 408 > > extended table checksum: 159 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >MP Config Base Table Entries: > > > >-- > >Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step > >Flags > > 0 0x10 BSP, usable 15 1 2 > > 0x0301 > > 2 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > > 0x0301 > > 1 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > > 0x0301 > > 3 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > > 0x0301 > >-- > >Bus: Bus ID Type > > 0 PCI > > 1 PCI > > 2 PCI > > 3 PCI > > 4 PCI > > 5 PCI > > 6 PCI > > 7 PCI > > 8 PCI > > 9 ISA > >-- > >I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address > > 14 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 > > 13 0x11 usable 0xfec02000 > >-- > >I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID > >PIN# > > INT conforms conforms 9 1 14 > > 1 > > INT conforms conforms 9 0 14 > > 2 > > INT conforms conforms 9 4 14 > > 4 > > INT conforms conforms 9 6 14 > > 6 > > INT active-hi edge 9 8 14 > > 8 > > INT conforms conforms 9 11 14 > > 11 > > INT conforms conforms 9 12 14 > > 12 > > INT conforms conforms 9 13 14 > > 13 > > INT conforms conforms 9 14 14 > > 14 > > INT conforms conforms 9 15 14 > > 15 > > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 > > 3 > > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 > > 3 > > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 > > 3 > > INT conforms conforms 0 5:A 13 > > 0 > > INT conforms conforms 2 4:A 13 > > 1 > > INT conforms conforms 2 5:A 13 > > 2 > > INT conforms conforms 3 4:A 13 > > 3 > > INT conforms conforms 3 5:A 13 > > 4 > > INT conforms conforms 3 5:B 13 > > 5 > >-- > >Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID > >PIN# > > NMI conforms conforms 9 0 255 > > 1 > > ExtINT conforms conforms 9 0 255 > > 0 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >MP Config Extended Table Entries: > > > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xa0000 > > address range: 0x20000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xf8000000 > > address range: 0x2000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: prefetch address > > address base: 0xf0000000 > > address range: 0x8000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xea000000 > > address range: 0x6000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xe7000000 > > address range: 0x1100000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xe5000000 > > address range: 0x1000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xe4000000 > > address range: 0x1000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xe3000000 > > address range: 0x1000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xe2000000 > > address range: 0x1000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > > address base: 0xe1000000 > > address range: 0x1000000 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > > address base: 0x0 > > address range: 0x3b0 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > > address base: 0x3b0 > > address range: 0xc > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > > address base: 0x3bc > > address range: 0x4 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > > address base: 0x3c0 > > address range: 0x20 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > > address base: 0x3e0 > > address range: 0x3c20 > >-- > >System Address Space > > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > > address base: 0x4000 > > address range: 0x1000 > >-- > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 1 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 2 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 1 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 3 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 4 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 5 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 6 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 7 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 8 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Bus Heirarchy > > bus ID: 9 bus info: 0x01 parent bus ID: 0 > >-- > >Compatibility Bus Address > > bus ID: 0 address modifier: add > > predefined range: 0x00000000 > >-- > >Compatibility Bus Address > > bus ID: 0 address modifier: add > > predefined range: 0x00000001 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >dmesg output: > > > >Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > >FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > >FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 7 15:08:28 CET 2007 > > root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP > >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > >CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz K8-class CPU) > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40f12 Stepping = 2 > > > >Features=0x178bfbff > > Features2=0x2001 > > AMD Features=0xea500800 > > AMD Features2=0x1f > > Cores per package: 2 > >real memory = 4815060992 (4592 MB) > >avail memory = 4130750464 (3939 MB) > >kbd1 at kbdmux0 > >ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) > >cpu0 on motherboard > >pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard > >pci0: on pcib0 > >pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > >pci1: on pcib1 > >pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 > >pci2: on pcib2 > >bce0: mem > >0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 > >bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz > >miibus0: on bce0 > >gentbi0: on miibus0 > >gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > >bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 > >bce1: mem > >0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 > >bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz > >miibus1: on bce1 > >gentbi1: on miibus1 > >gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > >bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 > >isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 > >isa0: on isab0 > >ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem > >0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 > >ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > >usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > >usb0: on ohci0 > >usb0: USB revision 1.0 > >uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem > >0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 > >ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > >usb1: on ohci1 > >usb1: USB revision 1.0 > >uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem > >0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 > >ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >usb2: EHCI version 1.0 > >usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 > >usb2: on ehci0 > >usb2: USB revision 2.0 > >uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > >uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > >uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 > >uhub3: multiple transaction translators > >uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >uhub4: Cypress Semiconductor 4 Port Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 3 > >uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > >umass0: TEAC TEAC FD-05PUB, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 4 > >umass1: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 5 > >umass1: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > >pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) > >pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 > >pci3: on pcib3 > >mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem > >0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci3 > >mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 > >mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > >mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > >mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 > >mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). > >mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > >mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > >pci3: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) > >pci3: at device 5.1 (no driver attached) > >pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 > >pci4: on pcib4 > >pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 > >pci5: on pcib5 > >pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 > >pci6: on pcib6 > >pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 > >pci7: on pcib7 > >pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 > >pci8: on pcib8 > >orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 > >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >kbd0 at atkbd0 > >atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range > >sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > >sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > >sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > >sio0: type 16550A > >sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > >sio1: port may not be enabled > >vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > >ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > >kbd2 at ukbd0 > >ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > >ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > >Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 > >Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > >da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > >da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > >da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled > >da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) > >cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 > >cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > >cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers > >cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 > >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device > >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry > >Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a > >stray irq7 > >bce0: link state changed to DOWN > >vlan0: link state changed to DOWN > >bce0: link state changed to UP > >vlan0: link state changed to UP > >stray irq7 > >too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore > >mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 129 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [@freebsd.org+], message ok From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 18:49:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216CC16A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shannon@widomaker.com) Received: from wilma.widomaker.com (wilma.widomaker.com [204.17.220.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B3113C461 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shannon@widomaker.com) Received: from [69.72.100.1] (helo=escape.goid.lan) by wilma.widomaker.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1HP1CS-000OFv-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:49:20 -0500 Received: from daydream.goid.lan (IDENT:1000@daydream.goid.lan [192.168.1.10]) by escape.goid.lan (8.13.5.20060614/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l27InIvD028833 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:49:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:49:18 -0500 From: Charles Shannon Hendrix To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070307134918.2ec68ebd@daydream.goid.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> Organization: Big Endian X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:49:22 -0000 On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 > > Ivan Voras wrote: > > > >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: > >> > >>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) > >> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the > >> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now > >> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different > >> baselines and results from the "normal" version? > > > > It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. > > > > It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. > > Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see > the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit > platform. Or maybe they just don't care? It seems to me they use the software a lot and it serves their purposes. It's just a standardized version and run script that they use to evaluate web servers. -- shannon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Star Wars Moral Number 17: Teddy | ...but a planet of wookies would still bears are dangerous in herds. | have been a lot better. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:03:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C0C16A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90B913C4A7 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27J3DgI052198; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:03:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <45EF0C5A.9060404@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:02:50 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:03:20 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:03:27 -0000 Do you not have 'device apic' in your config? Scott Ivan Voras wrote: > Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module > enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the > installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus > is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after > this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I > left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. > > Booting without ACPI on the other hand doesn't find all the CPU's :( > > Here's sysctl output: > >> sysctl -a | grep smp > kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 > kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 > kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 > kern.smp.cpus: 1 > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > kern.smp.active: 0 > kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 > > > Here's the mptable -dmesg output: > > > > =============================================================================== > > MPTable > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Floating Pointer Structure: > > location: EBDA > physical address: 0x0009d140 > signature: '_MP_' > length: 16 bytes > version: 1.4 > checksum: 0xfe > mode: Virtual Wire > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Config Table Header: > > physical address: 0x0009e9b0 > signature: 'PCMP' > base table length: 388 > version: 1.4 > checksum: 0x77 > OEM ID: 'IBM ENSW' > Product ID: 'LEWIS SMP ' > OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 > OEM table size: 0 > entry count: 37 > local APIC address: 0xfee00000 > extended table length: 408 > extended table checksum: 159 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Config Base Table Entries: > > -- > Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step > Flags > 0 0x10 BSP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > 2 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > 1 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > 3 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 > 0x0301 > -- > Bus: Bus ID Type > 0 PCI > 1 PCI > 2 PCI > 3 PCI > 4 PCI > 5 PCI > 6 PCI > 7 PCI > 8 PCI > 9 ISA > -- > I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address > 14 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 > 13 0x11 usable 0xfec02000 > -- > I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID PIN# > INT conforms conforms 9 1 14 1 > INT conforms conforms 9 0 14 2 > INT conforms conforms 9 4 14 4 > INT conforms conforms 9 6 14 6 > INT active-hi edge 9 8 14 8 > INT conforms conforms 9 11 14 11 > INT conforms conforms 9 12 14 12 > INT conforms conforms 9 13 14 13 > INT conforms conforms 9 14 14 14 > INT conforms conforms 9 15 14 15 > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 3 > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 3 > INT conforms conforms 0 3:A 14 3 > INT conforms conforms 0 5:A 13 0 > INT conforms conforms 2 4:A 13 1 > INT conforms conforms 2 5:A 13 2 > INT conforms conforms 3 4:A 13 3 > INT conforms conforms 3 5:A 13 4 > INT conforms conforms 3 5:B 13 5 > -- > Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID PIN# > NMI conforms conforms 9 0 255 1 > ExtINT conforms conforms 9 0 255 0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MP Config Extended Table Entries: > > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xa0000 > address range: 0x20000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xf8000000 > address range: 0x2000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: prefetch address > address base: 0xf0000000 > address range: 0x8000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xea000000 > address range: 0x6000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe7000000 > address range: 0x1100000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe5000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe4000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe3000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe2000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: memory address > address base: 0xe1000000 > address range: 0x1000000 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x0 > address range: 0x3b0 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3b0 > address range: 0xc > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3bc > address range: 0x4 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3c0 > address range: 0x20 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x3e0 > address range: 0x3c20 > -- > System Address Space > bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address > address base: 0x4000 > address range: 0x1000 > -- > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 1 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 2 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 1 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 3 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 4 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 5 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 6 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 7 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 8 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Bus Heirarchy > bus ID: 9 bus info: 0x01 parent bus ID: 0 > -- > Compatibility Bus Address > bus ID: 0 address modifier: add > predefined range: 0x00000000 > -- > Compatibility Bus Address > bus ID: 0 address modifier: add > predefined range: 0x00000001 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > dmesg output: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 7 15:08:28 CET 2007 > root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz K8-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40f12 Stepping = 2 > > Features=0x178bfbff > Features2=0x2001 > AMD Features=0xea500800 > AMD Features2=0x1f > Cores per package: 2 > real memory = 4815060992 (4592 MB) > avail memory = 4130750464 (3939 MB) > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) > cpu0 on motherboard > pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 > pci2: on pcib2 > bce0: mem > 0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 > bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz > miibus0: on bce0 > gentbi0: on miibus0 > gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 > bce1: mem > 0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 > bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz > miibus1: on bce1 > gentbi1: on miibus1 > gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 > isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem > 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb0: on ohci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem > 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 > ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb1: on ohci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem > 0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: EHCI version 1.0 > usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 > usb2: on ehci0 > usb2: USB revision 2.0 > uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 > uhub3: multiple transaction translators > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub4: Cypress Semiconductor 4 Port Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 3 > uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > umass0: TEAC TEAC FD-05PUB, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 4 > umass1: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 5 > umass1: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) > pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 > pci3: on pcib3 > mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem > 0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci3 > mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > pci3: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) > pci3: at device 5.1 (no driver attached) > pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 > pci4: on pcib4 > pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 > pci5: on pcib5 > pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 > pci6: on pcib6 > pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 > pci7: on pcib7 > pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 > pci8: on pcib8 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > kbd2 at ukbd0 > ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled > da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) > cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a > stray irq7 > bce0: link state changed to DOWN > vlan0: link state changed to DOWN > bce0: link state changed to UP > vlan0: link state changed to UP > stray irq7 > too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore > mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 129 > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:04:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B9316A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5262613C461 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27J4UZX052210; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:04:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <45EF0CA7.5020007@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:04:07 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Baskinger References: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> In-Reply-To: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:04:36 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:04:42 -0000 I've had no problem getting FreeBSD 6 to boot on Dell 1950 and 2950 machines. Where does it hang for you, and what changes have you made to your kernel config? Scott Sam Baskinger wrote: > Adding a datapoint: Dell 1950s exhibit similar behaviour but have 2 > cores in a single physical CPU. > > Hope this helps the discussion along. > > Sam Baskinger > Software Engineer > > Lumeta - Securing the Network in the Face of Change > > > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module >> enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the >> installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus >> is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after >> this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I >> left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. >> >> Booting without ACPI on the other hand doesn't find all the CPU's :( >> >> Here's sysctl output: >> >>> sysctl -a | grep smp >> kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 >> kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 >> kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 >> kern.smp.cpus: 1 >> kern.smp.disabled: 0 >> kern.smp.active: 0 >> kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 >> >> >> Here's the mptable -dmesg output: >> >> >> >> =============================================================================== >> >> >> MPTable >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> MP Floating Pointer Structure: >> >> location: EBDA >> physical address: 0x0009d140 >> signature: '_MP_' >> length: 16 bytes >> version: 1.4 >> checksum: 0xfe >> mode: Virtual Wire >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> MP Config Table Header: >> >> physical address: 0x0009e9b0 >> signature: 'PCMP' >> base table length: 388 >> version: 1.4 >> checksum: 0x77 >> OEM ID: 'IBM ENSW' >> Product ID: 'LEWIS SMP ' >> OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 >> OEM table size: 0 >> entry count: 37 >> local APIC address: 0xfee00000 >> extended table length: 408 >> extended table checksum: 159 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> MP Config Base Table Entries: >> >> -- >> Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step >> Flags >> 0 0x10 BSP, usable 15 1 2 >> 0x0301 >> 2 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 >> 0x0301 >> 1 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 >> 0x0301 >> 3 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 >> 0x0301 >> -- >> Bus: Bus ID Type >> 0 PCI >> 1 PCI >> 2 PCI >> 3 PCI >> 4 PCI >> 5 PCI >> 6 PCI >> 7 PCI >> 8 PCI >> 9 ISA >> -- >> I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address >> 14 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 >> 13 0x11 usable 0xfec02000 >> -- >> I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC >> ID PIN# >> INT conforms conforms 9 1 >> 14 1 >> INT conforms conforms 9 0 >> 14 2 >> INT conforms conforms 9 4 >> 14 4 >> INT conforms conforms 9 6 >> 14 6 >> INT active-hi edge 9 8 >> 14 8 >> INT conforms conforms 9 11 >> 14 11 >> INT conforms conforms 9 12 >> 14 12 >> INT conforms conforms 9 13 >> 14 13 >> INT conforms conforms 9 14 >> 14 14 >> INT conforms conforms 9 15 >> 14 15 >> INT conforms conforms 0 3:A >> 14 3 >> INT conforms conforms 0 3:A >> 14 3 >> INT conforms conforms 0 3:A >> 14 3 >> INT conforms conforms 0 5:A >> 13 0 >> INT conforms conforms 2 4:A >> 13 1 >> INT conforms conforms 2 5:A >> 13 2 >> INT conforms conforms 3 4:A >> 13 3 >> INT conforms conforms 3 5:A >> 13 4 >> INT conforms conforms 3 5:B >> 13 5 >> -- >> Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC >> ID PIN# >> NMI conforms conforms 9 0 >> 255 1 >> ExtINT conforms conforms 9 0 >> 255 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> MP Config Extended Table Entries: >> >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xa0000 >> address range: 0x20000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xf8000000 >> address range: 0x2000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: prefetch address >> address base: 0xf0000000 >> address range: 0x8000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xea000000 >> address range: 0x6000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xe7000000 >> address range: 0x1100000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xe5000000 >> address range: 0x1000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xe4000000 >> address range: 0x1000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xe3000000 >> address range: 0x1000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xe2000000 >> address range: 0x1000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >> address base: 0xe1000000 >> address range: 0x1000000 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >> address base: 0x0 >> address range: 0x3b0 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >> address base: 0x3b0 >> address range: 0xc >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >> address base: 0x3bc >> address range: 0x4 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >> address base: 0x3c0 >> address range: 0x20 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >> address base: 0x3e0 >> address range: 0x3c20 >> -- >> System Address Space >> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >> address base: 0x4000 >> address range: 0x1000 >> -- >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 1 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 2 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 1 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 3 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 4 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 5 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 6 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 7 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 8 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Bus Heirarchy >> bus ID: 9 bus info: 0x01 parent bus ID: 0 >> -- >> Compatibility Bus Address >> bus ID: 0 address modifier: add >> predefined range: 0x00000000 >> -- >> Compatibility Bus Address >> bus ID: 0 address modifier: add >> predefined range: 0x00000001 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> dmesg output: >> >> Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >> FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >> FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 7 15:08:28 CET 2007 >> root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 >> CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz K8-class >> CPU) >> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40f12 Stepping = 2 >> >> Features=0x178bfbff >> >> Features2=0x2001 >> AMD Features=0xea500800 >> AMD Features2=0x1f >> Cores per package: 2 >> real memory = 4815060992 (4592 MB) >> avail memory = 4130750464 (3939 MB) >> kbd1 at kbdmux0 >> ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, >> RF5413) >> cpu0 on motherboard >> pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard >> pci0: on pcib0 >> pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 >> pci1: on pcib1 >> pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 >> pci2: on pcib2 >> bce0: mem >> 0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 >> bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz >> miibus0: on bce0 >> gentbi0: on miibus0 >> gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto >> bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 >> bce1: mem >> 0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 >> bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz >> miibus1: on bce1 >> gentbi1: on miibus1 >> gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto >> bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 >> isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 >> isa0: on isab0 >> ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem >> 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 >> ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support >> usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting >> usb0: on ohci0 >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >> uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >> ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem >> 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 >> ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support >> usb1: on ohci1 >> usb1: USB revision 1.0 >> uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >> ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem >> 0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 >> ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> usb2: EHCI version 1.0 >> usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 >> usb2: on ehci0 >> usb2: USB revision 2.0 >> uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 >> uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered >> uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 >> uhub3: multiple transaction translators >> uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >> uhub4: Cypress Semiconductor 4 Port Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 3 >> uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered >> umass0: TEAC TEAC FD-05PUB, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 4 >> umass1: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, >> addr 5 >> umass1: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) >> pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) >> pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 >> pci3: on pcib3 >> mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem >> 0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci3 >> mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 >> mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 >> mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). >> mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 >> mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). >> mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 >> mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). >> pci3: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) >> pci3: at device 5.1 (no driver attached) >> pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 >> pci4: on pcib4 >> pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 >> pci5: on pcib5 >> pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 >> pci6: on pcib6 >> pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 >> pci7: on pcib7 >> pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 >> pci8: on pcib8 >> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 >> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> kbd0 at atkbd0 >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 >> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> >> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >> sio0: type 16550A >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >> sio1: port may not be enabled >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 >> ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 >> kbd2 at ukbd0 >> ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 >> ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec >> da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 >> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device >> da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled >> da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) >> cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 >> cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device >> cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers >> cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present >> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 >> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device >> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device >> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a >> stray irq7 >> bce0: link state changed to DOWN >> vlan0: link state changed to DOWN >> bce0: link state changed to UP >> vlan0: link state changed to UP >> stray irq7 >> too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore >> mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 129 >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:13:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821A416A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD4D13C478 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HP1Zj-000765-1p for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:13:23 +0100 Received: from 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.34.24]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:13:23 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:13:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:13:09 +0100 Lines: 94 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4D33CC9435532B7BB57A0350" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:13:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4D33CC9435532B7BB57A0350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: > Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using? > My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard > LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing > dd if=3D/dev/ar0 of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1M >=20 > How much do you get on this? geom_mirror on 2 desktop SATA drives, but the results of dd are pretty lo= w: # dd if=3D/dev/mirror/data of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 17.817686 secs (58850290 bytes/sec) As you can see, results with a single drive are better: # dd if=3D/dev/ad4 of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 16.219518 secs (64649023 bytes/sec) The mirror algorithm is "split": # gmirror list Geom name: data State: COMPLETE Components: 2 Balance: split Slice: 16384 Flags: NONE GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 1455065622 Providers: 1. Name: mirror/data Mediasize: 249999999488 (233G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r7w7e8 Consumers: 1. Name: ad4 Mediasize: 250000000000 (233G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 2273811345 2. Name: ad6 Mediasize: 250000000000 (233G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 926967552 Setting the algorithm back to "load" gives the performance similar to that of a single drive: # dd if=3D/dev/mirror/data of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 16.551914 secs (63350740 bytes/sec) It's really unusual that geom_mirror cannot benefit from splitting reques= ts. --------------enig4D33CC9435532B7BB57A0350 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7w7FldnAQVacBcgRAt/PAJ4w/yfGDX74ZsAPpW7CvMbtr2TOjwCgw3Fe WMTd/zsuDoIdwU23na/gw5g= =DtQB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4D33CC9435532B7BB57A0350-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:16:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FB916A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbaskinger@lumeta.com) Received: from MAIL.corp.lumeta.com (zeus.lumeta.com [65.246.245.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F8313C478 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbaskinger@lumeta.com) Received: from [65.246.246.82] ([65.246.246.82]) by MAIL.corp.lumeta.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:15:58 -0500 Message-ID: <45EF0EFA.6060100@lumeta.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:14:02 -0500 From: Sam Baskinger Organization: Lumeta Corporation User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> <45EF0CA7.5020007@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <45EF0CA7.5020007@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2007 19:15:58.0506 (UTC) FILETIME=[096DE0A0:01C760ED] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:16:00 -0000 The 1950s that I have (IIRC as I installed them a few months ago) hang at about the same location when ACPI is enabled. I'll see if I can't pull one down and recreate the behavior. I should note that I'm running something after 6.2-RELEASE. Again, I'll try to recreate and get some data from the machines. Sam Scott Long wrote: > I've had no problem getting FreeBSD 6 to boot on Dell 1950 and 2950 > machines. Where does it hang for you, and what changes have you made > to your kernel config? > > Scott > > > Sam Baskinger wrote: >> Adding a datapoint: Dell 1950s exhibit similar behaviour but have 2 >> cores in a single physical CPU. >> >> Hope this helps the discussion along. >> >> Sam Baskinger >> Software Engineer >> >> Lumeta - Securing the Network in the Face of Change >> >> >> Ivan Voras wrote: >>> Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module >>> enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the >>> installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus >>> is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after >>> this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I >>> left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. >>> >>> Booting without ACPI on the other hand doesn't find all the CPU's :( >>> >>> Here's sysctl output: >>> >>>> sysctl -a | grep smp >>> kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 >>> kern.smp.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1 >>> kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 >>> kern.smp.cpus: 1 >>> kern.smp.disabled: 0 >>> kern.smp.active: 0 >>> kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 >>> >>> >>> Here's the mptable -dmesg output: >>> >>> >>> >>> =============================================================================== >>> >>> >>> MPTable >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> MP Floating Pointer Structure: >>> >>> location: EBDA >>> physical address: 0x0009d140 >>> signature: '_MP_' >>> length: 16 bytes >>> version: 1.4 >>> checksum: 0xfe >>> mode: Virtual Wire >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> MP Config Table Header: >>> >>> physical address: 0x0009e9b0 >>> signature: 'PCMP' >>> base table length: 388 >>> version: 1.4 >>> checksum: 0x77 >>> OEM ID: 'IBM ENSW' >>> Product ID: 'LEWIS SMP ' >>> OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 >>> OEM table size: 0 >>> entry count: 37 >>> local APIC address: 0xfee00000 >>> extended table length: 408 >>> extended table checksum: 159 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> MP Config Base Table Entries: >>> >>> -- >>> Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step >>> Flags >>> 0 0x10 BSP, usable 15 1 2 >>> 0x0301 >>> 2 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 >>> 0x0301 >>> 1 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 >>> 0x0301 >>> 3 0x10 AP, usable 15 1 2 >>> 0x0301 >>> -- >>> Bus: Bus ID Type >>> 0 PCI >>> 1 PCI >>> 2 PCI >>> 3 PCI >>> 4 PCI >>> 5 PCI >>> 6 PCI >>> 7 PCI >>> 8 PCI >>> 9 ISA >>> -- >>> I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address >>> 14 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 >>> 13 0x11 usable 0xfec02000 >>> -- >>> I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC >>> ID PIN# >>> INT conforms conforms 9 1 >>> 14 1 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 0 >>> 14 2 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 4 >>> 14 4 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 6 >>> 14 6 >>> INT active-hi edge 9 8 >>> 14 8 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 11 >>> 14 11 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 12 >>> 14 12 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 13 >>> 14 13 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 14 >>> 14 14 >>> INT conforms conforms 9 15 >>> 14 15 >>> INT conforms conforms 0 3:A >>> 14 3 >>> INT conforms conforms 0 3:A >>> 14 3 >>> INT conforms conforms 0 3:A >>> 14 3 >>> INT conforms conforms 0 5:A >>> 13 0 >>> INT conforms conforms 2 4:A >>> 13 1 >>> INT conforms conforms 2 5:A >>> 13 2 >>> INT conforms conforms 3 4:A >>> 13 3 >>> INT conforms conforms 3 5:A >>> 13 4 >>> INT conforms conforms 3 5:B >>> 13 5 >>> -- >>> Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC >>> ID PIN# >>> NMI conforms conforms 9 0 >>> 255 1 >>> ExtINT conforms conforms 9 0 >>> 255 0 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> MP Config Extended Table Entries: >>> >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xa0000 >>> address range: 0x20000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xf8000000 >>> address range: 0x2000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: prefetch address >>> address base: 0xf0000000 >>> address range: 0x8000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xea000000 >>> address range: 0x6000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xe7000000 >>> address range: 0x1100000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xe5000000 >>> address range: 0x1000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xe4000000 >>> address range: 0x1000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xe3000000 >>> address range: 0x1000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xe2000000 >>> address range: 0x1000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: memory address >>> address base: 0xe1000000 >>> address range: 0x1000000 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >>> address base: 0x0 >>> address range: 0x3b0 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >>> address base: 0x3b0 >>> address range: 0xc >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >>> address base: 0x3bc >>> address range: 0x4 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >>> address base: 0x3c0 >>> address range: 0x20 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >>> address base: 0x3e0 >>> address range: 0x3c20 >>> -- >>> System Address Space >>> bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address >>> address base: 0x4000 >>> address range: 0x1000 >>> -- >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 1 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 2 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 1 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 3 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 4 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 5 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 6 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 7 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 8 bus info: 0x00 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Bus Heirarchy >>> bus ID: 9 bus info: 0x01 parent bus ID: 0 >>> -- >>> Compatibility Bus Address >>> bus ID: 0 address modifier: add >>> predefined range: 0x00000000 >>> -- >>> Compatibility Bus Address >>> bus ID: 0 address modifier: add >>> predefined range: 0x00000001 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> dmesg output: >>> >>> Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. >>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights >>> reserved. >>> FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >>> FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 7 15:08:28 CET 2007 >>> root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP >>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 >>> CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz >>> K8-class CPU) >>> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40f12 Stepping = 2 >>> >>> Features=0x178bfbff >>> >>> Features2=0x2001 >>> AMD >>> Features=0xea500800 >>> AMD Features2=0x1f >>> Cores per package: 2 >>> real memory = 4815060992 (4592 MB) >>> avail memory = 4130750464 (3939 MB) >>> kbd1 at kbdmux0 >>> ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, >>> RF5413) >>> cpu0 on motherboard >>> pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard >>> pci0: on pcib0 >>> pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 >>> pci1: on pcib1 >>> pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 >>> pci2: on pcib2 >>> bce0: mem >>> 0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 >>> bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz >>> miibus0: on bce0 >>> gentbi0: on miibus0 >>> gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto >>> bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 >>> bce1: mem >>> 0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 >>> bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz >>> miibus1: on bce1 >>> gentbi1: on miibus1 >>> gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto >>> bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 >>> isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 >>> isa0: on isab0 >>> ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem >>> 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 >>> ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support >>> usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting >>> usb0: on ohci0 >>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>> uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>> ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem >>> 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 >>> ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support >>> usb1: on ohci1 >>> usb1: USB revision 1.0 >>> uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>> ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem >>> 0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 >>> ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> usb2: EHCI version 1.0 >>> usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 >>> usb2: on ehci0 >>> usb2: USB revision 2.0 >>> uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 >>> uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered >>> uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 >>> uhub3: multiple transaction translators >>> uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>> uhub4: Cypress Semiconductor 4 Port Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.01, >>> addr 3 >>> uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered >>> umass0: TEAC TEAC FD-05PUB, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 4 >>> umass1: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, >>> addr 5 >>> umass1: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) >>> pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) >>> pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 >>> pci3: on pcib3 >>> mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem >>> 0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci3 >>> mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 >>> mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 >>> mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). >>> mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 >>> mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). >>> mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 >>> mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). >>> pci3: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) >>> pci3: at device 5.1 (no driver attached) >>> pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>> pci4: on pcib4 >>> pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 >>> pci5: on pcib5 >>> pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 >>> pci6: on pcib6 >>> pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 >>> pci7: on pcib7 >>> pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 >>> pci8: on pcib8 >>> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 >>> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >>> kbd0 at atkbd0 >>> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>> ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range >>> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 >>> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> >>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>> sio0: type 16550A >>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>> sio1: port may not be enabled >>> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on >>> isa0 >>> ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 >>> kbd2 at ukbd0 >>> ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 >>> ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. >>> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400100239 Hz quality 800 >>> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec >>> da1 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 >>> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device >>> da1: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled >>> da1: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) >>> cd0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 >>> cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device >>> cd0: 1.000MB/s transfers >>> cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present >>> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): got CAM status 0x4 >>> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device >>> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device >>> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry >>> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a >>> stray irq7 >>> bce0: link state changed to DOWN >>> vlan0: link state changed to DOWN >>> bce0: link state changed to UP >>> vlan0: link state changed to UP >>> stray irq7 >>> too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore >>> mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 129 >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Sam Baskinger Software Engineer Lumeta - Securing the Network in the Face of Change From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:20:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AE216A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B832A13C442 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HP1gZ-0008C1-Pf for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:20:27 +0100 Received: from 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.34.24]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:20:27 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:20:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:20:14 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <45EF0C5A.9060404@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5E47855106875855BE59340A" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <45EF0C5A.9060404@samsco.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:20:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5E47855106875855BE59340A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott Long wrote: > Do you not have 'device apic' in your config? Hmm, no. This is the generic "SMP" kernel (amd64) and grepping the sys/amd64/conf directory for "apic" doesn't give any useful results, not even in the NOTES file. --------------enig5E47855106875855BE59340A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7xBuldnAQVacBcgRAvuPAKDdzhwRvOOTKp/Xcg97aa4nz2KtfwCdHk8V LqoolhogUxriOTFhZjhTOt4= =niBL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5E47855106875855BE59340A-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:29:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EFD16A403 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ACC213C441 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 71984 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 22:29:48 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 22:29:48 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: , "Ivan Voras" References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:29:42 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:29:51 -0000 >>Artem Kuchin wrote: >> Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using? >> My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard >> LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing >> dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M >> >> How much do you get on this? > >geom_mirror on 2 desktop SATA drives, but the results of dd are pretty low: > ># dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >1000+0 records in >1000+0 records out >1048576000 bytes transferred in 17.817686 secs (58850290 bytes/sec) > >As you can see, results with a single drive are better: > ># dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >1000+0 records in >1000+0 records out >1048576000 bytes transferred in 16.219518 secs (64649023 bytes/sec) Now i am lost. i get 81MB/sec on dd but still you get File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 159513.0 402.8 and i get File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 109313.0 276.0 The drives i use are Seagate 7200.10 (320Gb, SATA II, 16MB cache with perpendicular heads) How is it possible that you get 2x file copy perfomance ? What's the matter?! -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:32:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B7616A404 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B0BF13C46B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 72694 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 22:32:39 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 22:32:39 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" , References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> <20070307134918.2ec68ebd@daydream.goid.lan> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:32:36 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:32:41 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:49 PM Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100 > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 >> > Ivan Voras wrote: >> > >> >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> >> >> >>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) >> >> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the >> >> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now >> >> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different >> >> baselines and results from the "normal" version? >> > >> > It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. >> > >> > It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. >> >> Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see >> the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit >> platform. > > Or maybe they just don't care? > > It seems to me they use the software a lot and it serves their purposes. > It's just a standardized version and run script that they use to evaluate web > servers. Hmm. if the whole world uses wht version of unixbench maybe someone should update freebsd ports version to this wht version, because otherwise we cannot compare anything else than freebsd. Not good. -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:57:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6293816A407 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CABC13C481 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JEJ007FOU3XRC60@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:57:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.212]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0JEJ00CMCU3WSP00@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:57:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:57:30 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070307205730.f0f4f723.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> <20070307134918.2ec68ebd@daydream.goid.lan> <000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:57:36 -0000 On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:32:36 +0300 Artem Kuchin wrote: > Hmm. if the whole world uses wht version of unixbench maybe someone > should update freebsd ports version to this wht version, because > otherwise we cannot compare anything else than freebsd. Not good. Does it really matter? Benchmarks are like statistics; if you don't find one that fits your purpose, you just tweak / change an existing one until you get the results you want. Just my 0.02 euros. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 20:13:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831AD16A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C691313C442 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 73774 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 23:13:46 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 23:13:46 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <002701c760f5$1bc9c310$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" , References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem><20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan><20070307134918.2ec68ebd@daydream.goid.lan><000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307205730.f0f4f723.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:13:42 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:13:48 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:57 PM Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:32:36 +0300 > Artem Kuchin wrote: > >> Hmm. if the whole world uses wht version of unixbench maybe someone >> should update freebsd ports version to this wht version, because >> otherwise we cannot compare anything else than freebsd. Not good. > > Does it really matter? > Benchmarks are like statistics; if you don't find one that fits your > purpose, you just tweak / change an existing one until you get the > results you want. Not agreed. Benchmarks is a mean of comparing thing for figure out what is best for you or where is area with problems. If baselines are different then you cannot compare and then you cannot choose or determine problematic area and cannon improve what you already have. just my 0.02 russian federation roubles :) -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 20:33:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E146916A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FD713C46B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AF21447F0; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:10:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id E1E8FD5004A; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:10:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id D41CAD50047; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:10:03 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rNvWAEgfdzd4XqIsQcPMPts6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.34.24]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id 720A35E010F; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:10:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45EF1C1A.5080200@fer.hr> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:10:02 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2E17CBD0124FBC77F078356D" Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:33:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2E17CBD0124FBC77F078356D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: > Now i am lost. i get 81MB/sec on dd but still you get >=20 > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 159513.0 40= 2.8 >=20 > and i get >=20 > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 109313.0 27= 6.0 >=20 > The drives i use are Seagate 7200.10 (320Gb, SATA II, 16MB cache > with perpendicular heads) >=20 > How is it possible that you get 2x file copy perfomance ? What's the > matter?! I don't know - what are your seek times? # diskinfo -t /dev/mirror/data /dev/mirror/data 512 # sectorsize 249999999488 # mediasize in bytes (233G) 488281249 # mediasize in sectors Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.591444 sec =3D 6.366 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.468315 sec =3D 5.873 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 2.828050 sec =3D 5.656 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 2.958083 sec =3D 7.395 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 2.465687 sec =3D 6.164 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.337428 sec =3D 0.165 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.384791 sec =3D 0.188 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 1.737217 sec =3D 58945 kbyte= s/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 1.811793 sec =3D 56519 kbyte= s/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.938688 sec =3D 34845 kbyte= s/sec drives: ad4: 238418MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 238418MB at ata3-master SATA150 --------------enig2E17CBD0124FBC77F078356D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7xwaldnAQVacBcgRAj2wAJ9xRLIzPvUoLN9vINk5dmKyzcBdbACfQYrM 0Q+eBpUlFJiWTLQ7qX6n+1I= =O4a7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2E17CBD0124FBC77F078356D-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 20:49:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9666616A406; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1231913C478; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BE8145C2B; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:49:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id E83D2D50051; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:49:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id D2573D5004A; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:49:06 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rNvWAEgfdzd4XqIsQcPMPts6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (89-172-34-24.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.34.24]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id 5FD0A5E00DC; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:49:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:48:59 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB56D8EB93F8A41C3F7218428" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:49:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB56D8EB93F8A41C3F7218428 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fluffles wrote: > If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no > read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower ST= R > read than the second: >=20 > no read-ahead: > dd if=3D/dev/mirror/data of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 > read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: > dd if=3D/mounted/mirror/volume of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 I'd agree in theory, but bonnie++ gives WORSE results than raw device: Version 1.93c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP xxxx.xxxx.xx 1G 305 99 59135 15 21350 7 501 99 57480 11 478.5 13 Latency 27325us 63238us 535ms 45347us 68125us 2393ms And pumping vfs.read_max to an obscene value doesn't really help: # sysctl vfs.read_max=3D256 vfs.read_max: 16 -> 256 Version 1.93c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP xxxx.xxxx.xx 1G 305 99 57718 15 18758 6 500 99 60900 13 467.8 13 Latency 27325us 89977us 99594us 36706us 71907us 90021us I've experimented with increasing MAXPHYS (to 256K) before and it also doesn't help. --------------enigB56D8EB93F8A41C3F7218428 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7yU7ldnAQVacBcgRAtu3AKCbXdt2Wizg7zkdpFjRBGQRImK0lgCghUGA VL+Q3UlKjcYpkfNl1Q9Hq+M= =u4zO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB56D8EB93F8A41C3F7218428-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 20:52:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C26416A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6F313C491 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BF9B80F for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:52:08 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <45EF0EFA.6060100@lumeta.com> References: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> <45EF0CA7.5020007@samsco.org> <45EF0EFA.6060100@lumeta.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--427484576; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <6C6A2EC8-CA19-4465-AD1D-58FD796092D1@khera.org> From: Vivek Khera Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:52:07 -0500 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:52:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail-4--427484576 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Sam Baskinger wrote: > The 1950s that I have (IIRC as I installed them a few months ago) > hang at about the same location when ACPI is enabled. I'll see if I > can't pull one down and recreate the behavior. I should note that > I'm running something after 6.2-RELEASE. Again, I'll try to > recreate and get some data from the machines. Try this one: debug.acpi.disabled="timer" in your /boot/loader.conf or at the boot loader prompt type "set" followed by the above all in one line, then continue the boot. My Dell PE800 won't boot without that... hangs at the raid card probe (aac). --Apple-Mail-4--427484576-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 20:53:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB10616A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B04513C48D for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from destiny ([10.0.0.21]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HP2sG-000AGg-Tm; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:36:36 +0100 Message-ID: <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:36:34 +0100 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:53:47 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: >>> Artem Kuchin wrote: >>> Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using? >>> My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard >>> LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing >>> dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M >>> >>> How much do you get on this? >> >> geom_mirror on 2 desktop SATA drives, but the results of dd are >> pretty low: >> >> # dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >> 1000+0 records in >> 1000+0 records out >> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 17.817686 secs (58850290 bytes/sec) >> >> As you can see, results with a single drive are better: >> >> # dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >> 1000+0 records in >> 1000+0 records out >> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 16.219518 secs (64649023 bytes/sec) > > How is it possible that you get 2x file copy perfomance ? What's the > matter?! If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR read than the second: no read-ahead: dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: dd if=/mounted/mirror/volume of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 You can test read STR best with bonnie (see /usr/ports/benchmarks/bonnie); or just with DD on a mounted volume. You should mount with -o noatime to avoid useless writes during reading, or use soft updates to prevent meta data from taking it's toll on I/O performance. - Veronica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 21:06:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA9916A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DADE13C4B2 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 74983 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2007 00:06:17 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2007 00:06:17 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <007901c760fc$71e708a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Fluffles" References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2215.2080402@fluffles.net> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 00:06:14 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:06:20 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fluffles" To: "Artem Kuchin" Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:35 PM Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed > Artem Kuchin wrote: >>>> Artem Kuchin wrote: >>>> Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using? >>>> My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard >>>> LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing >>>> dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M >>>> >>>> How much do you get on this? >>> >>> geom_mirror on 2 desktop SATA drives, but the results of dd are >>> pretty low: >>> >>> # dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >>> 1000+0 records in >>> 1000+0 records out >>> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 17.817686 secs (58850290 bytes/sec) >>> >>> As you can see, results with a single drive are better: >>> >>> # dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >>> 1000+0 records in >>> 1000+0 records out >>> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 16.219518 secs (64649023 bytes/sec) >> >> How is it possible that you get 2x file copy perfomance ? What's the >> matter?! > > If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no > read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR > read than the second: > > no read-ahead: > dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 > read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: > dd if=/mounted/mirror/volume of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 > > You can test read STR best with bonnie (see > /usr/ports/benchmarks/bonnie); or just with DD on a mounted volume. You > should mount with -o noatime to avoid useless writes during reading, or > use soft updates to prevent meta data from taking it's toll on I/O > performance. > Totall disagree. On the following reasons: 1) Read ahead is simply useless when stream-reading (sequential) 1GB of data 2) atime is NOT updated when using dd on any device, atime is related to file/inode operations which are not performed by dd 3) soft update are also useless (no bad, no good) for long sequential read basically, long sequatial reads/write ignore anything but real drive speed (plate on the spindle) if they are performed long enough. I think that 2 times differences is reallty related to seek times. But on the other hand i am sure my HDD have very good seek times. I'll have a chance to check it all on friday. -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 21:40:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B7C16A401; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from queue03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (queue03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6120713C4A3; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307212644.IJUD3103.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:44 +0000 Received: from cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com ([86.20.31.72]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307212644.JWWP219.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:44 +0000 Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12]) by cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27LQekV001744; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:40 GMT (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) From: ian j hart To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:40 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin Subject: Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:40:19 -0000 On Tuesday 06 March 2007 11:06, Artem Kuchin wrote: > Hi! > > I just setup a new machine and while it is supposed to be full SATA II i > still see these lines in at kernel init: > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB at > ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB ST3320620AS 3.AAE> at ata5-master SATA150 IIRC those drives ship jumpered down to SATA150. Worth checking. > > As you see, it says SATA150 , while the drives are SATA II (which is, as i > understand, SATA 300). > > Both drives are connected to RAID controller and form a mirror raid: > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: 305108MB > status: READY Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk0 READY (master) using > ad8 at ata4-master Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) > using ad10 at ata5-master > > Any idea how to make it work as SATA II? > > -- > Regards, > Artem > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ian j hart From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 21:40:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B7C16A401; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from queue03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (queue03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6120713C4A3; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307212644.IJUD3103.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:44 +0000 Received: from cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com ([86.20.31.72]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307212644.JWWP219.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:44 +0000 Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12]) by cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27LQekV001744; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:40 GMT (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) From: ian j hart To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:26:40 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin Subject: Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:40:19 -0000 On Tuesday 06 March 2007 11:06, Artem Kuchin wrote: > Hi! > > I just setup a new machine and while it is supposed to be full SATA II i > still see these lines in at kernel init: > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB at > ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB ST3320620AS 3.AAE> at ata5-master SATA150 IIRC those drives ship jumpered down to SATA150. Worth checking. > > As you see, it says SATA150 , while the drives are SATA II (which is, as i > understand, SATA 300). > > Both drives are connected to RAID controller and form a mirror raid: > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: 305108MB > status: READY Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk0 READY (master) using > ad8 at ata4-master Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) > using ad10 at ata5-master > > Any idea how to make it work as SATA II? > > -- > Regards, > Artem > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ian j hart From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 22:05:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E9316A400; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from mx1.parodius.com (mx1.parodius.com [64.62.145.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E85613C4B4; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from icarus.home.lan (c-71-198-0-135.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.0.135]) by mx1.parodius.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D635D08; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDD861FA03D; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:45:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:45:59 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: ian j hart Message-ID: <20070307214559.GA77796@icarus.home.lan> Mail-Followup-To: ian j hart , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> X-PGP-Key: http://jdc.parodius.com/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:05:25 -0000 On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:26:40PM +0000, ian j hart wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 11:06, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB at > > ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB > ST3320620AS 3.AAE> at ata5-master SATA150 > > IIRC those drives ship jumpered down to SATA150. Worth checking. That's correct. There's an incredibly tiny jumper on the jumper block which limits the transfer speed to 1.5gbit/sec (SATA150). Remove the jumper and you've got SATA300. The official product manual for this drive: http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/manuals/Desktop/Barracuda%207200.10/100402371e.pdf -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 22:05:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E9316A400; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from mx1.parodius.com (mx1.parodius.com [64.62.145.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E85613C4B4; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from icarus.home.lan (c-71-198-0-135.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.0.135]) by mx1.parodius.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D635D08; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDD861FA03D; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:45:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:45:59 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: ian j hart Message-ID: <20070307214559.GA77796@icarus.home.lan> Mail-Followup-To: ian j hart , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <45ED35F2.9080505@tomjudge.com> <00e001c75fe2$0f3f4200$0c00a8c0@Artem> <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> X-PGP-Key: http://jdc.parodius.com/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:05:25 -0000 On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:26:40PM +0000, ian j hart wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 11:06, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB at > > ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB > ST3320620AS 3.AAE> at ata5-master SATA150 > > IIRC those drives ship jumpered down to SATA150. Worth checking. That's correct. There's an incredibly tiny jumper on the jumper block which limits the transfer speed to 1.5gbit/sec (SATA150). Remove the jumper and you've got SATA300. The official product manual for this drive: http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/manuals/Desktop/Barracuda%207200.10/100402371e.pdf -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 22:05:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB64916A400 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from mx.isc.org (mx.isc.org [204.152.184.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0710413C428 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "farside.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C46611401B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost.isc.org [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885E2E60D9 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:24:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27LO7On013727; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:24:08 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <200703072124.l27LO7On013727@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: "Howard Leadmon" From: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:06:07 CDT." <001501c760d2$872a6650$081872cf@Leadmon.local> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:24:07 +1100 Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, jingmei1992@yahoo.com.cn Subject: Re: DNS/Bind Error Help under FBSD 6.2 using Sendmail.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:05:36 -0000 > > I am seeing an issue with some eMail moving from the server here is one such > example: > > l25F3FJW082596 96337 Mon Mar 5 10:03 > (Deferred: Name server: mail.jingmei.com.: host name lookup > f) > > > > > OK, so I did a lookup of it's MX, and get: > > jingmei.com mail is handled by 10 mail.jingmei.com > > > So then I looked up mail.jingmei.com: > > mail.jingmei.com has address 220.112.41.223 > Host mail.jingmei.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > > I see I am getting a returned IP address which can be connected to, but also > a > SERVFAIL error. > > Now I am aware of the AAAA IPv6 issue, and have the needed setting in my > sendmail.cf file: > > O ResolverOptions=WorkAroundBrokenAAAA > > So I would have hoped this would have worked around the issue and permitted > mail flow, yet apparently not for some reason. > > I have googled and looked around, and maybe just not found the right info yet > , > but if anyone has any idea how to track this down, or resolve the issue it > would sure be most appreciated. > > Most of my mail moves fine, but I have a couple domains I am guessing have > something wrong, so I can't seem to get mail out to them... mail.jingmei.com is delegated to lp.jingmei.com. lp.jingmei.com doesn't serve mail.jingmei.com for AAAA queries. Note the SOA record is wrong here. lp.jingmei.com says there are no NS, SOA or just about any other records for mail.jingmei.com. The AAAA queries appear to be going through to another box which is configured to serve jingmei.com not mail.jingmei.com. I base this conclusion on the fact that there are different types of negative responses based on the query type and the flags differ. Note that the authorative answer for the A query is not right either. RD is not returned in the answer. ; <<>> DiG 9.3.3 <<>> mail.jingmei.com @lp.jingmei.com aaaa ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29814 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;mail.jingmei.com. IN AAAA ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: jingmei.com. 86400 IN SOA jingmei.com. administrator.jingmei.com. 998545544 28800 7200 604800 86400 ;; Query time: 416 msec ;; SERVER: 203.86.7.130#53(203.86.7.130) ;; WHEN: Thu Mar 8 07:52:23 2007 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 120 ; <<>> DiG 9.3.3 <<>> mail.jingmei.com @lp.jingmei.com a ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 35135 ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;mail.jingmei.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: mail.jingmei.com. 30 IN A 220.112.41.223 ;; Query time: 323 msec ;; SERVER: 220.112.41.194#53(220.112.41.194) ;; WHEN: Thu Mar 8 08:22:54 2007 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 50 > --- > Howard > http://www.leadmon.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 22:50:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A004E16A402; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BEE13C4AC; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307225022.IGWI1468.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:22 +0000 Received: from cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com ([86.20.31.72]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307225021.LICK219.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:21 +0000 Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12]) by cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27Mngds002000; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:49:43 GMT (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) From: ian j hart To: Jeremy Chadwick Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:49:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> <20070307214559.GA77796@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20070307214559.GA77796@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703072249.42635.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:50:24 -0000 On Wednesday 07 March 2007 21:45, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:26:40PM +0000, ian j hart wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 11:06, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB > > > at ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB > > > at ata5-master SATA150 > > > > IIRC those drives ship jumpered down to SATA150. Worth checking. > > That's correct. There's an incredibly tiny jumper on the jumper > block which limits the transfer speed to 1.5gbit/sec (SATA150). > Remove the jumper and you've got SATA300. > > The official product manual for this drive: > > http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/manuals/Desktop/Barracuda%207200.10/100 >402371e.pdf 1. You might want to save the jumper. If you ever put the drive on a SATA150 controller, you'll need it. 2. Be gentle it's easy to damage the plastic surrounding the jumper (been there, done that). I'm not sure how fussy Seagate are, but "case damage" may invalidate your warranty. -- ian j hart From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 22:50:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A004E16A402; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BEE13C4AC; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307225022.IGWI1468.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:22 +0000 Received: from cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com ([86.20.31.72]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070307225021.LICK219.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:50:21 +0000 Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12]) by cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l27Mngds002000; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:49:43 GMT (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) From: ian j hart To: Jeremy Chadwick Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:49:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <200703072126.40143.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> <20070307214559.GA77796@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20070307214559.GA77796@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703072249.42635.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cpc1-cove3-0-0-cust839.sol2.cable.ntl.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:50:24 -0000 On Wednesday 07 March 2007 21:45, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:26:40PM +0000, ian j hart wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 11:06, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > > Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB > > > at ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB > > > at ata5-master SATA150 > > > > IIRC those drives ship jumpered down to SATA150. Worth checking. > > That's correct. There's an incredibly tiny jumper on the jumper > block which limits the transfer speed to 1.5gbit/sec (SATA150). > Remove the jumper and you've got SATA300. > > The official product manual for this drive: > > http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/manuals/Desktop/Barracuda%207200.10/100 >402371e.pdf 1. You might want to save the jumper. If you ever put the drive on a SATA150 controller, you'll need it. 2. Be gentle it's easy to damage the plastic surrounding the jumper (been there, done that). I'm not sure how fussy Seagate are, but "case damage" may invalidate your warranty. -- ian j hart From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 23:15:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9F916A402 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: from dev.null.cz (dev.null.cz [89.185.226.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0722C13C428 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: from dev.null.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dev.null.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l27MeQee068980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:40:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: (from buki@localhost) by dev.null.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l27MePmb068979; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:40:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from buki) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:40:25 +0100 From: Buki To: Mark Andrews Message-ID: <20070307224025.GC378@dev.null.cz> References: <001501c760d2$872a6650$081872cf@Leadmon.local> <200703072124.l27LO7On013727@drugs.dv.isc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703072124.l27LO7On013727@drugs.dv.isc.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2772/Wed Mar 7 21:41:03 2007 on dev.null.cz X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: jingmei1992@yahoo.com.cn, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Howard Leadmon Subject: Re: DNS/Bind Error Help under FBSD 6.2 using Sendmail.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:15:15 -0000 --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:24:07AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > I am seeing an issue with some eMail moving from the server here is one= such > > example: > >=20 > > l25F3FJW082596 96337 Mon Mar 5 10:03 > > (Deferred: Name server: mail.jingmei.com.: host name l= ookup > > f) > > > > > >=20 > >=20 > > OK, so I did a lookup of it's MX, and get:=20 > >=20 > > jingmei.com mail is handled by 10 mail.jingmei.com > >=20 > >=20 > > So then I looked up mail.jingmei.com: > >=20 > > mail.jingmei.com has address 220.112.41.223 > > Host mail.jingmei.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > >=20 > > I see I am getting a returned IP address which can be connected to, but= also=20 > > a > > SERVFAIL error. =20 > >=20 > > Now I am aware of the AAAA IPv6 issue, and have the needed setting in my > > sendmail.cf file: > >=20 > > O ResolverOptions=3DWorkAroundBrokenAAAA > >=20 > > So I would have hoped this would have worked around the issue and permi= tted > > mail flow, yet apparently not for some reason. > >=20 > > I have googled and looked around, and maybe just not found the right in= fo yet > > , > > but if anyone has any idea how to track this down, or resolve the issue= it > > would sure be most appreciated. =20 > >=20 > > Most of my mail moves fine, but I have a couple domains I am guessing h= ave > > something wrong, so I can't seem to get mail out to them... Hi, I'm seeing the same error even on older versions of FreeBSD (thus sendmail). I also tracked the issue to SERVFAIL response to AAAA request. According to sendmail docs, the WorkAroundBrokenAAAA option should work as a workaround, but clearly doesn't. Compiling sendmail with NO_INET6=3Dyes d= oes. Setting mailertable entry for (broken) destination domain to relevant IPv4 address should also work (athough not tested). I haven't searched sendmail archives, but since it's mentioned in the docs = =2E.. Buki --=20 PGP public key: http://dev.null.cz/buki.asc /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML & Outlook Mail / \ http://www.thebackrow.net --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7z9ZPzhIkpLLm08RAre3AKCjBVsz79aHnXalhkaVYBXXhh73HwCfcvKQ VYI4LZiUW0IQKZkfgfQPlCw= =IQgy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 23:55:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894EB16A402; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D34F13C48D; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l27NYAjE029186; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:34:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <45EF4BEC.5060705@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:34:04 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <00cb01c75c5b$4205e390$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <45E82660.4030107@freebsd.org> <008101c75cd1$42a4df10$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <45E830A8.8020104@freebsd.org> <20070302144409.GA4431@icarus.home.lan> <00eb01c75ce0$b0430380$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20070302162042.GA6019@icarus.home.lan> <017901c75cec$4a20f6a0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20070302212506.GA9990@icarus.home.lan> <003c01c75d1c$972fd3f0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <003c01c75d1c$972fd3f0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall creates corrupt filesystems after repartitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:55:01 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > ... >> Is there something I'm missing? > > I can't see anything missing there from the reproduction steps. > > Was ad0s1g also ok? The slight differences I did here where > the following but I cant seem them being significant: > 1. dump -a0uL -C 32 -f /nfs/usr.dmp /usr > 2. restore rf usr.dmp > 3. fstab entry: /nfs/usr -maproot=root testbox > > Other differences which spring to mind: > 1. machines where both using areca controllers on RAID6 arrays. > 2. This was a real machine and not a VM > > One other thing of note when I first repaired this I booted from > Install Disk #1 and used the same procedure for the sysinstall > part from fixit and no corruption occured. > Pardon me showing up on hackers@ (I ain't one), but I have to ask .... So, when you do this, you are using /stand/sysinstall, or **/usr**/sbin/sysinstall? Kevin Kinsey -- God made the integers; all else is the work of Man. -- Kronecker From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 00:08:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB5B16A401; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 00:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BAB13C428; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 00:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on core6.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.7 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v9.5.4) with ESMTP id md50003593209.msg; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:03:08 +0000 Message-ID: <000c01c76115$210c2500$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Kevin Kinsey" References: <00cb01c75c5b$4205e390$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <45E82660.4030107@freebsd.org> <008101c75cd1$42a4df10$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <45E830A8.8020104@freebsd.org> <20070302144409.GA4431@icarus.home.lan> <00eb01c75ce0$b0430380$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20070302162042.GA6019@icarus.home.lan> <017901c75cec$4a20f6a0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20070302212506.GA9990@icarus.home.lan><003c01c75d1c$972fd3f0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <45EF4BEC.5060705@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 00:02:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:03:09 +0000 X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:03:10 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall creates corrupt filesystems after repartitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:08:02 -0000 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Pardon me showing up on hackers@ (I ain't one), but I have > to ask .... > > So, when you do this, you are using /stand/sysinstall, or > **/usr**/sbin/sysinstall? /usr/sbin/sysinstall as /stand doesnt exist on recent versions of FreeBSD. Although I see where you are going and that's already been covered by the discussion about /data Besides the bin is in memory by that time so shouldn't be affected by the "loss" of /usr anyway. Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 04:41:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F27D16A401; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA22A13C47E; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from destiny ([10.0.0.21]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPARC-000Ltj-WE; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:41:11 +0100 Message-ID: <45EF93E5.50804@fluffles.net> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:41:09 +0100 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artem Kuchin References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2215.2080402@fluffles.net> <007901c760fc$71e708a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <007901c760fc$71e708a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:41:13 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fluffles" >> If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no >> read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR >> read than the second: >> >> no read-ahead: >> dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >> read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: >> dd if=/mounted/mirror/volume of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >> >> You can test read STR best with bonnie (see >> /usr/ports/benchmarks/bonnie); or just with DD on a mounted volume. You >> should mount with -o noatime to avoid useless writes during reading, or >> use soft updates to prevent meta data from taking it's toll on I/O >> performance. >> > > Totall disagree. On the following reasons: > 1) Read ahead is simply useless when stream-reading (sequential) 1GB > of data I happen to have run a great number of benchmarks with various geom layers (such as: gstripe, gmirror, graid3, graid5) and as far as i recall the read speeds i got with DD (1GB transfer) were always lower than a bonnie benchmark on a mounted (thus UFS/VFS) volume. Since im no dev i cannot explain this with absolute certainty, but i would guess this is due to the lack of read-ahead and an I/O queue of only 1 when using DD. This did not occur on a plain disk though, without any geom layers attached to it. Some benchmark output: gstripe (4 disks on nVidia controller [Embedded], 128KB stripesize, Test System 1) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- DD benchmark(1GB) Results in MB/s avg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 4k READ 47.1 46.9 46.8 46.9 WRITE 40.9 40.9 41.0 40.9 16k READ 92.7 92.8 92.6 92.7 WRITE 76.3 76.1 76.2 76.2 64k READ 120.8 120.6 120.6 120.6 WRITE 96.1 96.2 96.1 96.1 128k READ 123.0 122.8 122.8 122.8 WRITE 96.3 96.4 96.2 96.3 1m READ 122.7 122.9 122.6 122.7 WRITE 89.4 89.4 89.4 89.4 -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 4096 104288 90.4 237690 74.4 71008 22.0 87837 91.9 250858 44.6 114.8 0.7 analysis: geom_stripe performs worse in a raw-disk situation; but when UFS optimizations come along the performance is more than doubled. geom_raid5 with 8 SATA disks (128KB stripe, graid5-tng, Test System 2) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- DD benchmark(1GB) Results in MB/s avg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 4k READ 58.1 58.7 59.0 58.6 WRITE 155.5 155.8 154.3 155.2 16k READ 130.0 125.6 129.5 128.3 WRITE 308.5 306.3 306.9 307.2 64k READ 183.8 183.9 188.9 185.5 WRITE 416.9 416.7 415.8 416.4 128k READ 197.3 194.4 197.6 196.4 WRITE 421.0 426.2 399.7 415.6 1m READ 193.0 196.8 198.1 195.9 WRITE 327.6 330.3 331.0 329.6 -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 4096 137897 96.7 310917 76.7 65233 16.0 101410 95.8 407013 45.5 475.5 3.0 Analysis: as you can see, read performance by DD is ~200MB/s while bonnie gives us some ~400MB/s. The writes are again. This is due to the fact that geom_raid5 uses write I/O request combining in order to avoid the 'raid5 write hole' and is thus able to get *write* speeds of 400MB/s, which is quite remarkable for software RAID5. Adding the higher I/O queue of UFS (7) and the fact that UFS does not write sequentially on the medium (maximum number of blocks per cylinder), this gives the combining-algoritm more work, which leads to some decreased write performance from 400MB/s to ~300MB/s; still very good. CPU was bottleneck. > 2) atime is NOT updated when using dd on any device, atime is related > to file/inode > operations which are not performed by dd Well i did gave one DD command on a mounted volume, then it is related to a file/inode, like this: dd if=/mounted/mirror/volume of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 Then you are working on UFS/VFS level, not? > 3) soft update are also useless (no bad, no good) for long sequential > read I agree, but due to the fact the volume is mounted and the normal mount utility does not use the noatime option (prevents access time metaupdates), each file read would result in an update of the UFS metadata (the access time), although it may only update once every while. Soft Updates can help in this scenario if there are a lot of metadata updates; by collecting them and applying them once every 28-30 seconds (default). Other than the metadata, SU does not help, agreed. > basically, long sequatial reads/write ignore anything but real drive > speed (plate on > the spindle) if they are performed long enough. For parity RAID this is probably not true (when writing anyway), but for simple levels or a plain disk, yes. - Veronica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 05:14:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD2816A403; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA0913C442; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from destiny ([10.0.0.21]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPAwr-000MZn-Sb; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:13:53 +0100 Message-ID: <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:13:51 +0100 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:14:00 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Fluffles wrote: > > >> If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no >> read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR >> read than the second: >> >> no read-ahead: >> dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >> read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: >> dd if=/mounted/mirror/volume of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >> > > I'd agree in theory, but bonnie++ gives WORSE results than raw device: > On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID? The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU; maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern systems should get 100MB/s+ in per-char bonnie benchmark, even a Sempron 2600+ 1.6GHz 128KB cache which costs about $39. Then it might be logical DD gets higher results since this is more 'easy' to handle by the CPU. The VFS/UFS layer adds potential for nice performance-increases but it does take it's toll in the form of cputime overhead. If your CPU is very slow, i can imagine these optimizations having a detrimental effect instead. Just guessing here. Also, checkout my benchmark results i posted in response to Andrei Kolu in particular the geom_raid5 benchmark; there the UFS/VFS layer causes 25% lower write performance; due to cpu bottlenecks (and some UFS inefficiency with regard to max blocks per cylinder). So for all i know it may be just your CPU which is limiting sequential performance somewhat. Regards, - Veronica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 05:36:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD50616A403; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794AC13C4B2; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.42.21] (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l285a8A9058992; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:36:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:36:06 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fluffles References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2774/Wed Mar 7 18:57:23 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:36:20 -0000 On 03/07/07 23:13, Fluffles wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Fluffles wrote: >> >> >>> If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no >>> read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR >>> read than the second: >>> >>> no read-ahead: >>> dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >>> read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: >>> dd if=/mounted/mirror/volume of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 >>> >> I'd agree in theory, but bonnie++ gives WORSE results than raw device: >> > > On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID? > > The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU; > maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern systems should get 100MB/s+ in > per-char bonnie benchmark, even a Sempron 2600+ 1.6GHz 128KB cache which > costs about $39. Then it might be logical DD gets higher results since > this is more 'easy' to handle by the CPU. The VFS/UFS layer adds > potential for nice performance-increases but it does take it's toll in > the form of cputime overhead. If your CPU is very slow, i can imagine > these optimizations having a detrimental effect instead. Just guessing here. Before making speculative claims about slow CPU's and putting the VIA C3 in with that pile, please at least refer to what makes you believe that it is an issue. Comparing the VIA C3 to 'some old pentium' isn't exactly fair or accurate, and inferring it isn't a modern system isn't true either. Forgive me though, I'm biased. Eric From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 10:39:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5674E16A403 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D266613C441 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPG26-0001pU-9a for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:39:38 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:39:38 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:39:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:39:26 +0100 Lines: 63 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2251A9A09E3C144AAB0CBD78" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:39:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2251A9A09E3C144AAB0CBD78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fluffles wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Fluffles wrote: >> >> =20 >>> If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no >>> read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower = STR >>> read than the second: >>> >>> no read-ahead: >>> dd if=3D/dev/mirror/data of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 >>> read-ahead and multiple I/O queue depth: >>> dd if=3D/mounted/mirror/volume of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D1000 >>> =20 >> I'd agree in theory, but bonnie++ gives WORSE results than raw device:= >> =20 >=20 > On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID? Xeon 5110, 1.6 GHz, see benchmark results on stable mailing list (It's a pretty fast dual-core CPU, core2-based). It's using geom_mirror and the results are with "split" read algorithm. > The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU;= > maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern systems should get 100MB/s+ in= > per-char bonnie benchmark, even a Sempron 2600+ 1.6GHz 128KB cache whic= h > costs about $39. Then it might be logical DD gets higher results since Maybe on Linux, definitely not on FreeBSD. I've never seen per-char bonnie++ results on FreeBSD that give more than 1 MB/s. And before anyone starts debugging my setup, I'm not the only one with such results :) I recall there were reports before which show geom_mirror doesn't achieve better performance with split reads. --------------enig2251A9A09E3C144AAB0CBD78 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7+fkldnAQVacBcgRAox7AKCQZfktHhPE9lcJzzfNYCov6pbhwQCfftX6 kB8u/WW0v2XfvtK8LuI08F8= =diaD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2251A9A09E3C144AAB0CBD78-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 10:49:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BE416A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C26C13C428 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPGBW-0002fo-Po for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:49:22 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:49:22 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:49:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:49:11 +0100 Lines: 70 Message-ID: References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2215.2080402@fluffles.net> <007901c760fc$71e708a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF93E5.50804@fluffles.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig30E3ABF62547DEBAD4BF1128" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: <45EF93E5.50804@fluffles.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:49:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig30E3ABF62547DEBAD4BF1128 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fluffles wrote: > gstripe (4 disks on nVidia controller [Embedded], 128KB stripesize, Tes= t > System 1) > -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D= -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > DD benchmark(1GB) Results in MB/s avg > -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D= -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > 4k READ 47.1 46.9 46.8 46.9 > WRITE 40.9 40.9 41.0 40.9 > 16k READ 92.7 92.8 92.6 92.7 > WRITE 76.3 76.1 76.2 76.2 > 64k READ 120.8 120.6 120.6 120.6 > WRITE 96.1 96.2 96.1 96.1 > 128k READ 123.0 122.8 122.8 122.8 > WRITE 96.3 96.4 96.2 96.3 > 1m READ 122.7 122.9 122.6 122.7 > WRITE 89.4 89.4 89.4 89.4 So, writing to a striped set is 37% faster than reading... > geom_raid5 with 8 SATA disks (128KB stripe, graid5-tng, Test System 2) > -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D= -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > DD benchmark(1GB) Results in MB/s avg > -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D= -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > 4k READ 58.1 58.7 59.0 58.6 > WRITE 155.5 155.8 154.3 155.2 > 16k READ 130.0 125.6 129.5 128.3 > WRITE 308.5 306.3 306.9 307.2 > 64k READ 183.8 183.9 188.9 185.5 > WRITE 416.9 416.7 415.8 416.4 > 128k READ 197.3 194.4 197.6 196.4 > WRITE 421.0 426.2 399.7 415.6 > 1m READ 193.0 196.8 198.1 195.9 > WRITE 327.6 330.3 331.0 329.6 >=20 Similar here: 69% faster, even though writing to RAID5 involves block ECC (XOR probably) calculations and writing to at least two disks, and reading doesn't. Interesting. Any ideas why? (anybody?) --------------enig30E3ABF62547DEBAD4BF1128 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7+onldnAQVacBcgRAo17AKDxNLugrzTtYMEZiUF/NucvxTcR2QCglwkg tJ7KMLP6zXJj0SVPtLZBYLA= =Tw7/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig30E3ABF62547DEBAD4BF1128-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 11:24:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F0A16A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF7313C467 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPGjp-00079U-Lw for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:24:50 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:24:49 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:24:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:24:45 +0100 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <45EEE409.6070106@lumeta.com> <45EF0CA7.5020007@samsco.org> <45EF0EFA.6060100@lumeta.com> <6C6A2EC8-CA19-4465-AD1D-58FD796092D1@khera.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD70CF93EDB34E9FA6FAAD3E5" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: <6C6A2EC8-CA19-4465-AD1D-58FD796092D1@khera.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:24:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD70CF93EDB34E9FA6FAAD3E5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vivek Khera wrote: >=20 > On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Sam Baskinger wrote: >=20 >> The 1950s that I have (IIRC as I installed them a few months ago) hang= >> at about the same location when ACPI is enabled. I'll see if I can't >> pull one down and recreate the behavior. I should note that I'm >> running something after 6.2-RELEASE. Again, I'll try to recreate and >> get some data from the machines. >=20 > Try this one: >=20 > debug.acpi.disabled=3D"timer" No luck, same as before. --------------enigD70CF93EDB34E9FA6FAAD3E5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7/J9ldnAQVacBcgRAobJAJwKPY/pmbM8k/3WAVKobuQT/rOsTgCggZzs 9roJVFlLg84i+4p/xrYzYy0= =gqWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD70CF93EDB34E9FA6FAAD3E5-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 11:44:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D75E16A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2619113C467 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPH2b-0000zq-8j for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:13 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:13 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:07 +0100 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <45EF0C5A.9060404@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBF913BF848095B399D97063B" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:44:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBF913BF848095B399D97063B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ivan Voras wrote: > Scott Long wrote: >> Do you not have 'device apic' in your config? >=20 > Hmm, no. This is the generic "SMP" kernel (amd64) and grepping the > sys/amd64/conf directory for "apic" doesn't give any useful results, no= t > even in the NOTES file. apic device is unknown on amd64. I see the device acpi is included in the kernel instead of as a module - is this an amd64 quirk? --------------enigBF913BF848095B399D97063B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7/cHldnAQVacBcgRAr5IAKCAuRH85RDUibFv/32rbLTby0xieACgvWlr 2Eyz2WxfxyGwOlfhoOqflXk= =u1M2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBF913BF848095B399D97063B-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 12:45:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF3616A404 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EA013C491 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPI0B-0000E5-FI for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:45:47 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:45:47 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:45:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:45:34 +0100 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8F8234672A03DFFCE0DF29BB" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:45:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8F8234672A03DFFCE0DF29BB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ivan Voras wrote: > Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module > enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the > installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus > is found (booting verbose doesn't show any new lines before or after > this step). It appears to be a real hang instead of a timeout because I= > left it 30 minutes and it didn't continue. I've managed to narrow it down. I went on to try 7-CURRENT but accidentally booted the i386 version, which booted without a glitch and recognized all processors, then switched to amd64 version which hanged with or without ACPI, at different places. Since I need it in production, I'll try i386 6.2-release+PAE... --------------enig8F8234672A03DFFCE0DF29BB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8AV0ldnAQVacBcgRAkK9AKCjh3/um9V9hKgZ1nuUrqGWvv7fCACgme4/ jVhX6azU3ixLV24NAzZeJlw= =SdZB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8F8234672A03DFFCE0DF29BB-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 13:20:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2FB16A402 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthomas@nerim.net) Received: from kellthuzad.dmz.nerim.net (smtp-dmz-234-thursday.dmz.nerim.net [195.5.254.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2070813C4B3 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthomas@nerim.net) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net [62.4.16.104]) by kellthuzad.dmz.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A2F22BD6 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:03:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.nerim.net (archimonde.nerim.net [62.4.16.97]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C9941088 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:03:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from 194.69.32.50 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sthomas) by webmail.nerim.net with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:03:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:03:24 +0100 (CET) From: sthomas@nerim.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:20:45 -0000 Hello, I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve my goal ? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 13:23:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D9316A402 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (grnl-static-02-0046.dsl.iowatelecom.net [69.66.56.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914E713C461 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l28DNUub063661; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:23:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l28DNT5m063659; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:23:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:23:29 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: sthomas@nerim.net Message-ID: <20070308132329.GA63469@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:23:30 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:23:31 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:03:24PM +0100, sthomas@nerim.net wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. >=20 > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. >=20 > But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to > "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the > program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the > moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. >=20 > In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can > no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve > my goal ? I believe what you are looking for is nohup(1). -- Brooks --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8A5QXY6L6fI4GtQRAit/AJ9sxyhKIJMzL3gfD4m4LGdJNUAPkQCgyEJo uUEQw1kSvHADrZvHTpjh2qc= =MpvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 13:31:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F3C16A405 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from mx1.parodius.com (mx1.parodius.com [64.62.145.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E97113C481 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from icarus.home.lan (c-71-198-0-135.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.0.135]) by mx1.parodius.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315CF5D02; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:31:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2DE51FA03D; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:31:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:31:57 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: sthomas@nerim.net Message-ID: <20070308133157.GA96143@icarus.home.lan> Mail-Followup-To: sthomas@nerim.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> X-PGP-Key: http://jdc.parodius.com/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:31:59 -0000 On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:03:24PM +0100, sthomas@nerim.net wrote: > Hello, > > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. > > But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to > "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the > program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the > moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. > > In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can > no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve > my goal ? The program you're using obviously needs a tty/pty open for it to function. Possibly it's trying to output to stdout or stderr and cannot due to tty/pty being taken out underneathe it. Other *IX people here can give you some alternate advice, but I'd recommend these options: 1) Under sh/bash: myprogram 1>/dev/null 2>&1 & (or replace /dev/null with a logfile of your choice) 2) Use dtach (ports/misc/dtach) and detach your program. http://dtach.sourceforge.net/ 3) Use GNU screen (ports/sysutils/screen) and run your program within that. http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/ -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 13:58:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095F816A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A8C13C441 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A844C5C57; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:30:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:30:52 -0500 From: Wesley Shields To: sthomas@nerim.net Message-ID: <20070308133052.GA75313@atarininja.org> References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:38 -0000 On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:03:24PM +0100, sthomas@nerim.net wrote: > Hello, > > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. > > But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to > "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the > program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the > moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. > > In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can > no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve > my goal ? Install ports/sysutils/screen. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 14:18:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D83916A404 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.lerota@claresco.hr) Received: from zid.claresco.hr (zid.claresco.hr [85.114.42.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D90613C4B3 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.lerota@claresco.hr) Received: (qmail 43043 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Mar 2007 14:18:21 -0000 To: Renato Botelho Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWgnbRLVpRNVY9jMRPh s21jSlEyNVX45Mv4zI+sbUclFAtMVpT8V0lFAAACZ0lEQVR4nG3Tv2vbQBQHcFMogWyeNeVK BLXGl5j6xnABOaNTuXFGmWpwtw519yj4soW6AatT4GKD3+aDZrl/rt/Tr9qlGiz7Pn7v3bsf HVc/NrIiSfElqH53GgijcCqzk/+AmBF5cN0DsFlIRGMh/oHuqxkTM6VlzB4EoZEs2aSZOASb EQJYZpweQshE697GTDndBXtgp9LIT9+OpDGHEfb9knk+nx+jfN1JCVZMCl6XwFm0a2EXztZD 3s4fj47ZbKI2VeBmJImeEfGLJ+M9sDPilX7IB5rN6sdfcGhuoHU+LC4nxfnI7YOJtdb95Gb+ fbgJ2uJ2ZgaA++f5ZzBqNCCYfMTd5q0BfBVNqm7I8gUjQ+YtXotRW6PH9AEj+dKs/KuNQAl5 o/NY+QkonW8aQAl0oXMYPvRiXIM4pRJifbXytnhTA8alBx/jefG2ar3DBlt34/PXz9M+nMVN iNaPUdCApJc2ItejOmLGoK1qQLV9pJmXBnL10DYoBA5aHNfj8ZNwZa5O4CzgTJeilKJmrQJs IHIt1/7/Sg2p3iq/Hz0/5W05rq4M9aN2B5FLohUP4ylVyfxhEIjAs8J4PhIJ9U+CEroogib5 BXAf7bB4vkfAzgPFt1tM9sJZAOH+lCexhwswuNtim4QTZdokqo4o89LkH7V6iFxICeqfp+Wh fmUuGPunLj2Meti6Cn4DjJ/UReROqR+aqawAi/JkfgKE64rrfkhjU8MtT8ivR4S5n6Yo08A7 HvgAlHDWRSGlNSDxwK9HtXy4FS2I60EdUIJM+Ut9OZNJG4CpbEQW1VBQoQoPuBw2EVa4P0u0 TgzQF+VoAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> (Renato Botelho's message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:55:57 -0300") References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> Organization: *BSD Users - Fanatics Dept. From: Marko Lerota Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:18:21 +0100 Message-ID: <863b4fkedu.fsf@sparrow.local> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen , Martin Blapp , Anton Karpov , Alexander Shikoff Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:18:19 -0000 Renato Botelho writes: > I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure > scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. > > It's fixed now on 0.90_3. No, It's not. Today I added a new server with fresh clamav-0.90_3 package. Sockstat again started to jump to the sky. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 14:22:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84D816A403 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F6313C474 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [80.171.116.42] (helo=[192.168.178.27]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwpI-1HPJVT3I20-0004HP; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:22:16 +0100 Message-ID: <45F01C0F.9090501@janh.de> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:22:07 +0100 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:d7781a442c21a226569d6437949909a2 X-Provags-ID2: V01U2FsdGVkX19y3NyXGErkmTjpWo4kR5EOTOZZTm+vOkBrOex R3ItZNZVv9jGQuaU7h1fI+829oGzNsO6pL0PhBwi6DjFJRU4K4 KDvoPA1Jj/ur2nReN/u2g== Cc: fjoe@samodelkin.net Subject: RT2561 does not work (was: [CALL FOR TESTERS] (was: ral(4) and second/third gen devices)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:22:27 -0000 Hi! I have got a RT2561 based card (not deliberately, wanted RT2500): ral0: mem 0xd8000000-0xd8007fff irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0 ral0: MAC/BBP RT 2661B, RF RT2527 ral0: Ethernet address: 00:80:5a:38:XX:XX Some searching led me to: http://samodelkin.net/~fjoe/if_ral.diff -- which compiles on 6.2-RELEASE and, loaded as module, makes the card available. At first, I could not see (ifconfig ral0 up scan) any APs. After many tries I tried on a Linux system installed parallel with the vendor supplied RT61 driver -- the AP showed up (iwlist ra0 scanning). (Connecting was not possible due to unrelated wpa_supplicant problems on Linux.) Rebooting to FreeBSD (directly after seeing the AP on Linux), the AP showed up and I was able to associate to it using wpa_supplicant. With the appropriate configuration, this link was reestablished automatically on the next few reboots. Anyhow, it did not run totally satisfactorily as I was only able to scp with 150KB/s (for comparison I plugged in a ural device and got 1.5MB/s). Later I could not see the AP, again. After kldunloading and kldloading if_ral it reappeared (downing and upping with ifconfig did not help). A few days later (the computer was unplugged), the AP does not show up anymore no matter what I try, but it is visible from Linux. Any ideas? Is it possible that some state is kept in the card on reboot (from Linux to FreeBSD) or is it totally unrelated that I first saw the AP directly after seeing it on Linux? Is it possible that the driver does not correctly initialize the card? Is there any newer driver available? Do you want any other tests or information? Any chance that I get that running reliable? (The connection speed problem is not that important. I hoped to replace an unreliable Debian Sarge/zyd(USB-ZD1211) system with FreeBSD/ral(PCI-RT2500), what did not work out quite as expected...) Thanks Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 14:30:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C96D16A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from attos.janus@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC18113C4B2 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from attos.janus@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so905272ugh for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:30:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HeSNdAOGomFeylKJQIBARNgFH0bCoPb8h7OanPvCYFJkmclHl5tB9/H26xG7ld4W4VrvRDcN9Noy/aNwJ0PwZCUg5m7VUDEtTJzzfMsQeeDGAOg3nciR1MjGSw8FWa5bBzA8NYHAavFfIBDOm3Msn8d18/Uqze/hcOtYs7PvXaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S9g8wKMjy0nicstEe/nRpB1GW/z0ePVAtvoTpNWgTcB6zigCyZeAHRxv5i7nZ7jxnrk3KmflWvuclMG75eNsoayVwsDyzv+eSrVB55DBHFEsk2H4hPNUuaZo9y3hdi7fmeRt0yF2T/489ThqEj3FUCE7rsQoa7HCQRGUPpS8NYY= Received: by 10.114.78.1 with SMTP id a1mr159585wab.1173362634242; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.59.4 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 06:03:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5297d6fd0703080603j5170c508raa64d08204d8d0c0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:03:54 -0500 From: Attos To: sthomas@nerim.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070308133157.GA96143@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> <20070308133157.GA96143@icarus.home.lan> Cc: Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:30:12 -0000 Look into sysutils/screen There are several tutorial on how to use it. On 3/8/07, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:03:24PM +0100, sthomas@nerim.net wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > > > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. > > > > But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to > > "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the > > program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the > > moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. > > > > In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can > > no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve > > my goal ? > > The program you're using obviously needs a tty/pty open for it to > function. Possibly it's trying to output to stdout or stderr and > cannot due to tty/pty being taken out underneathe it. > > Other *IX people here can give you some alternate advice, but I'd > recommend these options: > > 1) Under sh/bash: myprogram 1>/dev/null 2>&1 & > (or replace /dev/null with a logfile of your choice) > > 2) Use dtach (ports/misc/dtach) and detach your program. > http://dtach.sourceforge.net/ > > 3) Use GNU screen (ports/sysutils/screen) and run your program > within that. > http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/ > > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Attos Janus From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 15:58:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9F316A402; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE2A13C442; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from destiny ([10.0.0.21]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPL11-000B1A-2p; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:58:51 +0100 Message-ID: <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:58:49 +0100 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Anderson References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:58:54 -0000 Eric Anderson wrote: > On 03/07/07 23:13, Fluffles wrote: >> >> On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID? >> >> The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU; >> maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern systems should get 100MB/s+ in >> per-char bonnie benchmark, even a Sempron 2600+ 1.6GHz 128KB cache which >> costs about $39. Then it might be logical DD gets higher results since >> this is more 'easy' to handle by the CPU. The VFS/UFS layer adds >> potential for nice performance-increases but it does take it's toll in >> the form of cputime overhead. If your CPU is very slow, i can imagine >> these optimizations having a detrimental effect instead. Just >> guessing here. > > > Before making speculative claims about slow CPU's and putting the VIA > C3 in with that pile, please at least refer to what makes you believe > that it is an issue. Comparing the VIA C3 to 'some old pentium' isn't > exactly fair or accurate, and inferring it isn't a modern system isn't > true either. I'm sorry if i offended you. But it is well-known that C3 Nehemiah has a much lower IPC than processors from AMD and Intel. For general purpose comparisons, i would guess a 400MHz Athlon 64 to outperform the 1GHz C3 Nehemiah; just guessing here! Not to talk about Core2Duo who has even higher IPC. Though Nehemiah does have some fancy MPEG/AES hardware acceleration stuff built-in, which makes it a suitable platform for a Media Center or anything like that. Personally i think a budget AMD processor to be a better option; they have the same power consumption under standby mode (thanks to Cool'N'Quiet) but can deliver much higher performance when needed (such as HighDef 1080p video?). The bonnie Per Char-benchmark is often bottlenecked by the CPU since it requires either a lot of cpu power or a lot of memory activity; both which puts demands on the cpu. If i see only 0.5MB in the Per Char-benchmark, i would suspect a slow CPU. Slow is a relative term though; C3 can be powerful enough for the task you bought it, so i don't want to discredit it. - Veronica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 16:39:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C23516A405 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@argosteve.com) Received: from ArgosTeVe.com (dsl-200-67-153-142.prod-empresarial.com.mx [200.67.153.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28D913C49D for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@argosteve.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80) by ArgosTeVe.com with local; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:59:16 -0600 id 0063E809.45F032D4.00007F9B Received: from dsl-189-129-2-116.prod-infinitum.com.mx (dsl-189-129-2-116.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.129.2.116]) by correo.argosteve.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:59:16 -0600 Message-ID: <20070308095916.k48ggnnj4kk8koo4@correo.argosteve.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:59:16 -0600 From: "eculp@argosteve.com" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> In-Reply-To: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.2-cvs) Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:39:20 -0000 Quoting sthomas@nerim.net: > Hello, > > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. > nohup ? ed > But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to > "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the > program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the > moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. > > In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can > no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve > my goal ? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 16:54:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9EE16A40B; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A6F13C494; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6543C1449D4; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 63121D50051; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 4D024D50047; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:24 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rJ2fXJNyfDs4rYUjXEWgzRA6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (89-172-38-112.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.38.112]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id CE2BC5E00DC; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F03FB9.5000602@fer.hr> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:54:17 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:54:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fluffles wrote: > The bonnie Per Char-benchmark is often bottlenecked by the CPU since it= > requires either a lot of cpu power or a lot of memory activity; both > which puts demands on the cpu. If i see only 0.5MB in the Per > Char-benchmark, i would suspect a slow CPU. Slow is a relative term > though; C3 can be powerful enough for the task you bought it, so i don'= t > want to discredit it. I'm really puzzled by your high per-char results in bonnie++. Can you run it on a single disk? I've run it many times, both on hardware and software RAIDs and have never seen results > 1 MB/s on FreeBSD (Linux is a different matter...) --------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8D++ldnAQVacBcgRAt/oAJwPeq4ygH/5IJQZz4L4a1aZhaJZ0gCfb/Bf LAlq4ZlutRED4hnDfiK72+8= =2woq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 17:00:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295CE16A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [217.18.249.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64D513C471 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F121B10F0E; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:00:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.3.125] (hater.cmotd.com [192.168.3.125]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFAC1B10F0B; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:00:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F04145.2090103@sun-fish.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:00:53 +0200 From: Stefan Lambrev User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sthomas@nerim.net References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> In-Reply-To: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on BLAH Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:00:55 -0000 Hi, sthomas@nerim.net wrote: > Hello, > > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. > > But when I do that, I can see with ps that my process go from "TT" "p0" to > "TT" "p0-" and the application doesn't work anymore. For information, the > program I want to be able to run via ssh then close the ssh session is the > moinmoin wiki which is a wiki written in python. > > In man ps I can see that the trailing "-" after "p0" means my process can > no longer reach the controlling terminal... But what can I do to achieve > my goal ? > Did you try "disown" before closing ssh ? Anyway if you want to be able to restore (on foreground) your application then you need screen from ports. But if you just want to start something as daemon this work for me: ./app ^Z bg disown exit :) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 17:07:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF8416A403; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B5C13C4A7; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from godot.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l28H7jUA084231; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:07:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:07:45 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Marko Lerota In-Reply-To: <863b4fkedu.fsf@sparrow.local> Message-ID: <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> <863b4fkedu.fsf@sparrow.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Renato Botelho , Daniel Eischen , Anton Karpov , Alexander Shikoff Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:07:49 -0000 Hi, > No, It's not. Today I added a new server with fresh clamav-0.90_3 > package. Sockstat again started to jump to the sky. Clamd with libpthread.so is still broken. Please use libthr.so. I'm currently investigating why libpthreads.so has problems with clamd, and it looks to me like a library bug. -- Martin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 17:22:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F0416A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from mail12.simplicato.com (mail12.simplicato.com [207.99.47.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E294E13C48E for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from mail12.simplicato.com (localhost [207.99.47.64]) by mail12.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C092E76D for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:00:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from uws1.starlofashions.com (unknown [12.44.50.124]) by mail12.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13E8E6E6 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:00:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by uws1.starlofashions.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:00:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:00:54 -0500 From: Scott Robbins To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070308170054.GA44051@uws1.starlofashions.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> <20070308095916.k48ggnnj4kk8koo4@correo.argosteve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070308095916.k48ggnnj4kk8koo4@correo.argosteve.com> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:22:31 -0000 On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:59:16AM -0600, eculp@argosteve.com wrote: > Quoting sthomas@nerim.net: > > >Hello, > > > >I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > >workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > >session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > > >So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. > > > > nohup ? > > ed > There is always the screen program /usr/ports/sysutils/screen which is ideal for things like this. Although it's not a builtin like nohup, it is (imho) more flexible. (To be honest, I've used screen for so long, if I had to use nohup I'd have to look up the syntax) I think it's something like nohup sh -c $(your_command) & but I could be wrong. -- Scott GPG KeyID EB3467D6 ( 1B848 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Giles: But this is why I think we should all keep a level head in this. Willow: And I happen to think mine is the level head and yours is the one things would roll off of. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 17:34:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A880516A404; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5455913C4A6; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from destiny ([10.0.0.21]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPMVX-000D2n-MB; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:34:27 +0100 Message-ID: <45F04921.8020801@fluffles.net> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:34:25 +0100 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> <45F03FB9.5000602@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <45F03FB9.5000602@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:34:29 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Fluffles wrote: > > >> The bonnie Per Char-benchmark is often bottlenecked by the CPU since it >> requires either a lot of cpu power or a lot of memory activity; both >> which puts demands on the cpu. If i see only 0.5MB in the Per >> Char-benchmark, i would suspect a slow CPU. Slow is a relative term >> though; C3 can be powerful enough for the task you bought it, so i don't >> want to discredit it. >> > > I'm really puzzled by your high per-char results in bonnie++. Can you > run it on a single disk? I've run it many times, both on hardware and > software RAIDs and have never seen results > 1 MB/s on FreeBSD (Linux is > a different matter...) > Sure: single drive (ad6, Maxtor MaxLine III 250GB SATA/150) -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 20480 56395 42.7 55904 12.8 21497 5.9 56846 54.3 58328 8.2 81.2 0.3 Here the CPU is not the bottleneck but the disk itself. CPU is AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (dualcore, 2.0GHz, 2x512KB cache, S939, 2x1GB DDR/400). Maybe you are running a patched bonnie? By the way i'm not using bonnie++ but the 'original' bonnie. Maybe that changes things a bit? >From all the benchmarks i've seen and all that i've performed myself, i've never seen that low per char scores like you. I cannot explain it except maybe a *very* slow CPU or some other obscure software issue. - Veronica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 17:56:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88C016A405; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C4013C4AC; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AE7145039; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:56:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 3AB19D5004A; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:56:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 1EB2AD50047; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:56:28 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rJ2fXJNyfDs4rYUjXEWgzRA6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (89-172-38-112.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.38.112]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id AF5D55E00C8; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:56:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F04E4A.8040803@fer.hr> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:56:26 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> <45F03FB9.5000602@fer.hr> <45F04921.8020801@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: <45F04921.8020801@fluffles.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig76744A0BED0BD4BC2B969C69" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:56:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig76744A0BED0BD4BC2B969C69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fluffles wrote: > single drive (ad6, Maxtor MaxLine III 250GB SATA/150) > -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- > --Random-- > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- > --Seeks--- > Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU=20 > /sec %CPU > 20480 56395 42.7 55904 12.8 21497 5.9 56846 54.3 58328 8.2=20 > 81.2 0.3 >=20 > Here the CPU is not the bottleneck but the disk itself. CPU is AMD > Athlon 64 3800+ (dualcore, 2.0GHz, 2x512KB cache, S939, 2x1GB DDR/400).= > Maybe you are running a patched bonnie? By the way i'm not using > bonnie++ but the 'original' bonnie. Maybe that changes things a bit? Yup, that the thing. The difference is that bonnie++ goes to the kernel for every character read or written (in the per-char benchmark) while the old bonnie allows for buffering in libc. At least that's the theory. While on FreeBSD bonnie++ can get around 500 KB/s on per-chr benchmark, on Linux it can get upto 20 MB/s: http://fsbench.netnation.com/new_hardware/2.6.0-test9/scsi/bonnie.html >> Fromall the benchmarks i've seen and all that i've performed myself, > i've never seen that low per char scores like you. I cannot explain it > except maybe a *very* slow CPU or some other obscure software issue. Any post-Pentium 1 CPU should be fast enough to saturate disk IO in DMA mode. The question if kernel latency is a different issue :) Here are my "bonnie" results on the same machine (gmirror "split" balance, 2xSATA 7.5kRPM, more than fast enough Xeon CPU): -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 4096 56456 53.2 55344 13.4 19436 6.5 60606 46.3 61417 10.4 203.0 0.8 --------------enig76744A0BED0BD4BC2B969C69 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8E5KldnAQVacBcgRAnioAKD1dmLUq5B2oYXklKKh+vI5AYVM0gCeJbww a2hjvMv+7rYZA5nAi9ojSbU= =sjr/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig76744A0BED0BD4BC2B969C69-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 18:37:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC30A16A405 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D26113C478 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JEL00371L1XZXA0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:37:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.212]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0JEL00N61L1W0RF0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:37:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:37:08 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070308193708.4f63bffd.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Curious error messages when building ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:37:12 -0000 Hello, I hav seen this on FreeBSD 6-stable recently. Here is an example, from a machine running tingo@kg-work$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-work.kg4.no 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Jan 20 17:26:43 CET 2007 root@kg-work.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SS51G i386 I cd into /usr/ports/audio/gxmms2 and issue the command 'make'. Before it actually starts to build, I get lots of lines like these on screen: grep: writing output: Broken pipe grep: writing output: Broken pipe grep: writing output: Broken pipe grep: writing output: Broken pipe grep: writing output: Broken pipe Anyone know what's causing this? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 19:10:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBE216A411 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BA813C442 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C661F6439; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:10:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:10:24 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: +Fy1ZAvfCgGA4BybMEtdBtAUFcw82wjfktPRX58aPymY 1173381024 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCBC141C5; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:10:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45F05F9D.7010703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:10:21 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Henrik Sylvester References: <45F01C0F.9090501@janh.de> In-Reply-To: <45F01C0F.9090501@janh.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, fjoe@samodelkin.net Subject: Re: RT2561 does not work (was: [CALL FOR TESTERS] (was: ral(4) and second/third gen devices)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:10:25 -0000 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > > Some searching led me to: http://samodelkin.net/~fjoe/if_ral.diff -- > which compiles on 6.2-RELEASE and, loaded as module, makes the card > available. I was under the impression this code had been merged to -STABLE already. Sorry to hear about the problems you're having. I myself have an rt2661and have not seen such problems. ral is currently not on the critical path for anything I'm doing otherwise I'd look at it just now; I would suggest filing a PR with this information. Thanks, BMS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 20:19:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8535B16A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au) Received: from bs.bayside-group.com.au (gateway.baysidegrp.com.au [61.88.141.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74C9E13C471 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au) Received: (qmail 51475 invoked by uid 85); 8 Mar 2007 20:21:26 -0000 Received: from dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au by bs.bayside-group.com.au by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.216):. Processed in 0.06075 secs); 08 Mar 2007 20:21:26 -0000 Received: from dimi.bayside-group.com.au (HELO dimuthu) (192.168.1.216) by lan.bayside-group.com.au with SMTP; 8 Mar 2007 20:21:26 -0000 From: "Dimuthu Parussalla" To: "'Martin Blapp'" , "'Marko Lerota'" Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:19:04 +1100 Message-ID: <001f01c761bf$051f3e90$d801a8c0@dimuthu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> Importance: Normal Cc: 'Chris' , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, 'Renato Botelho' , 'Daniel Eischen' , 'Anton Karpov' , 'Alexander Shikoff' Subject: RE: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:19:36 -0000 How do I tell clamd to use libthr.so ? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Martin Blapp Sent: Friday, 9 March 2007 4:08 AM To: Marko Lerota Cc: Chris; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Renato Botelho; Daniel Eischen; Anton Karpov; Alexander Shikoff Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 Hi, > No, It's not. Today I added a new server with fresh clamav-0.90_3 > package. Sockstat again started to jump to the sky. Clamd with libpthread.so is still broken. Please use libthr.so. I'm currently investigating why libpthreads.so has problems with clamd, and it looks to me like a library bug. -- Martin _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 20:27:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F7416A402 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F47313C4B7 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l28KQm0N052860; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:26:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l28KQmBQ094917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:26:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200703082026.l28KQmBQ094917@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:28:55 -0500 To: dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <001f01c761bf$051f3e90$d801a8c0@dimuthu> References: <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> <001f01c761bf$051f3e90$d801a8c0@dimuthu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90, clamav-milter version devel-120207 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:27:03 -0000 At 03:19 PM 3/8/2007, Dimuthu Parussalla wrote: >How do I tell clamd to use libthr.so ? Create the file /etc/libmap.conf with the contents [clamd] libc_r.so.5 libthr.so.2 libc_r.so.6 libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 libpthread.so.1 libthr.so.2 libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 ---Mike >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Martin Blapp >Sent: Friday, 9 March 2007 4:08 AM >To: Marko Lerota >Cc: Chris; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Renato Botelho; Daniel Eischen; >Anton Karpov; Alexander Shikoff >Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 > > > >Hi, > > > No, It's not. Today I added a new server with fresh clamav-0.90_3 > > package. Sockstat again started to jump to the sky. > >Clamd with libpthread.so is still broken. Please use libthr.so. I'm >currently >investigating why libpthreads.so has problems with clamd, and it looks to me >like a library bug. > >-- >Martin >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 20:38:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF28216A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2BC13C478 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JEL0064SQNUWL90@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:38:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.212]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0JEL003QFQNUQG00@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:38:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:38:18 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <45E39552.2020607@root.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070308213818.d909595e.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <45E39552.2020607@root.org> Subject: Re: PATCH: new acpi embedded controller I/O model X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:38:19 -0000 On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:20:02 -0800 Nate Lawson wrote: > If you are having EC timeout problems as in the below PR, please try > the latest EC code. I just committed it in rev 1.69 of acpi_ec.c to > -current. Attached is the patch for 6-stable. FWIW, my Acer Aspire AS5672 laptop didn't have EC timeout problems, but I tested this patch anyway. It didn't make a practical difference that I could notice. Here is the dmesg output after the patch: http://tingox.googlepages.com/kg-home-dmesg-6.2-stable-20070308.txt and output of 'sysctl hw.acpi': http://tingox.googlepages.com/sysctl_hw.acpi_20070308.txt dmesg output before the patch: http://tingox.googlepages.com/as5672-dmesg-6.2-stable-20070121.txt More about the laptop and its' problems with FreeBSD here: http://tingox.googlepages.com/aceraspireas5672andfreebsd -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 21:35:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B643116A40A for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691D813C481 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB864B80F for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:35:49 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: FreeBSD Stable Message-Id: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-5--338462832; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:35:48 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:35:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail-5--338462832 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Has anyone successfully booted FreeBSD 6 on the new "M2" variants of sun's X2100 or X4100 boxes? I have three X4100 original versions that works stunningly well (but I don't use the internal disks) with FreeBSD 6.1. I was just curious how the new ones work, and the X2100 seems to fit the bill for what I currently need. Also, if anyone knows which ethernet ports they put in that'd be helpful. I'd avoid them if they had broadcom chips :-( --Apple-Mail-5--338462832-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 21:43:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB6116A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE6CF13C471 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 29953 invoked by uid 399); 8 Mar 2007 21:43:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Mar 2007 21:43:56 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45F0839A.9010702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:43:54 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> <001f01c761bf$051f3e90$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200703082026.l28KQmBQ094917@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <200703082026.l28KQmBQ094917@lava.sentex.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:43:57 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > Create the file /etc/libmap.conf with the contents > > [clamd] > libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 I don't know why that error keeps cropping up, but it should be noted that this isn't necessary, or desirable. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 21:44:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DC116A402 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1281213C4AC for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DBAB816 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:44:49 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: FreeBSD Stable Message-Id: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--337922886; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:44:48 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fibre channel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:44:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail-6--337922886 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I see on the supported hardware list (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ 6.2R/hardware-amd64.html) there are 4 LSI fibre channel cards supported by the mpt(4) driver. However, over on LSI's web site (http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/host_bus_adapters/ index.html) the fibre cards they are currently selling have rather different looking part numbers. Are the supported cards no longer made? Or did they just rename them? Are there any other fibre channel cards supported on FreeBSD? What card would one recommend to connect to an external RAID array for running a fairly busy database (several million inserts/selects/ updates per day)? Thanks! --Apple-Mail-6--337922886-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 21:54:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EFF16A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrej@antiszoc.hu) Received: from mail.webmedia.hu (webmedia.hu [195.70.37.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78E113C461 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrej@antiszoc.hu) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at webmedia.hu Received: from [192.168.1.5] (catv-506346c6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.70.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.webmedia.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4FA1EDE716 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:54:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F08631.2030204@antiszoc.hu> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:54:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andras_G=F3t?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:54:57 -0000 Hi, We'are using an x2100m2 with FreeBSD6.2. On the ethernet side, the x2100m2 has two bge iface. On the original x2100 the bge iface works fine for me. On the M2 x2100 try ONLY FreeBSD 6.2, because 6.1 will be terribly slow. The x2100m2 has two sata2 disk bays, where you can insert almost any normal sata2 hdd-s. I had very big problems, with the orig x2100 satahalfhwraid on freebsd, i suggest you shoud avoid that. The hdd-s work fine without the hwraid (ataraid) and gmirror does the job nicely. Regards, Andras Vivek Khera wrote: > Has anyone successfully booted FreeBSD 6 on the new "M2" variants of > sun's X2100 or X4100 boxes? I have three X4100 original versions that > works stunningly well (but I don't use the internal disks) with > FreeBSD 6.1. I was just curious how the new ones work, and the X2100 > seems to fit the bill for what I currently need. > > Also, if anyone knows which ethernet ports they put in that'd be > helpful. I'd avoid them if they had broadcom chips :-( > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 21:55:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8626B16A498 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC6913C442 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l28LsZqJ089124; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:54:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l28LsYFh095273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:54:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200703082154.l28LsYFh095273@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:56:41 -0500 To: Doug Barton From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <45F0839A.9010702@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> <001f01c761bf$051f3e90$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200703082026.l28KQmBQ094917@lava.sentex.ca> <45F0839A.9010702@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:55:07 -0000 At 04:43 PM 3/8/2007, Doug Barton wrote: >Mike Tancsa wrote: >>Create the file /etc/libmap.conf with the contents >>[clamd] > >>libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 > >I don't know why that error keeps cropping up, but it should be >noted that this isn't necessary, or desirable. Thanks, It was just a typo (too many yy p no doubt...) ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 22:00:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248A116A403 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB45213C4A8 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7F7B80A for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:00:43 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--336969144; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <6E68A770-39B8-49BF-AA79-B216A9030374@khera.org> From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:00:42 -0500 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:00:44 -0000 --Apple-Mail-8--336969144 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Jens Fallesen wrote: > Another funny thing is that the embedded management software works > under MSIE only. Not exactly what I would expect from Sun. :-) ew gross. the description of the LOM on the X2100 claims the functionality is the same as the ILOM on the 4100, so that's very surprising to me. i'll probably splurge for the X4100 again, then. the ILOM on these is nothing short of spectacular. Thanks! --Apple-Mail-8--336969144-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 22:03:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073BA16A402 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE71313C478 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BACEB80A for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:03:18 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-9--336814753; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:03:16 -0500 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:03:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail-9--336814753 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Jens Fallesen wrote: > One issue I have is that the embedded management software can run > on NIC 1 only. And once FreeBSD detects this, the embedded > management software is disabled. Does anyone know of a way to make > FreeBSD detect NIC 0 only? what about something similar to this, how I disable atkbd on my sun boxes: hint.atkbdc.0.disabled=1 perhaps hint.bge.1.disabled=1 might work. you can test by breaking into the boot loader and typing "set hint..." then continue the normal boot. if it works, just plop that line (without set) into /boot/loader.conf. --Apple-Mail-9--336814753-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 22:03:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABD516A41B for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E37613C491 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (obsolete.xs4all.nl [82.95.250.254]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l28M3R7s043341; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:03:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l28M3Qdj077520; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:03:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l28M3QPx077519; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:03:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:03:26 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Vivek Khera Message-ID: <20070308220326.GA77506@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: fibre channel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:03:29 -0000 On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:44:48PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote.. > I see on the supported hardware list (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ > 6.2R/hardware-amd64.html) there are 4 LSI fibre channel cards > supported by the mpt(4) driver. However, over on LSI's web site > (http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/host_bus_adapters/ > index.html) the fibre cards they are currently selling have rather > different looking part numbers. > > Are the supported cards no longer made? Or did they just rename them? > > Are there any other fibre channel cards supported on FreeBSD? Yes, from Qlogic. See isp(4) -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 22:17:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CD416A400 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jens@fallesen.dk) Received: from phb.avic.dk (phb.avic.dk [89.233.8.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6AF13C4AC for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jens@fallesen.dk) Received: from [10.10.10.40] (dilbert.avic.dk [89.233.8.66]) by phb.avic.dk (8.14.0/8.14.0/PHB/J2c) with ESMTP id l28LjCSE026596; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:45:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:45:15 +0100 From: Jens Fallesen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Not-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 89.233.8.68 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:17:20 -0000 Vivek Khera wrote: > Has anyone successfully booted FreeBSD 6 on the new "M2" variants of > sun's X2100 or X4100 boxes? I have 6.2 running smoothly on three X2100 M2 units. The primary NICs are Broadcom, the secondary ones are Nvidia as part of the chipset (FreeBSD does not recognise those). One issue I have is that the embedded management software can run on NIC 1 only. And once FreeBSD detects this, the embedded management software is disabled. Does anyone know of a way to make FreeBSD detect NIC 0 only? Another funny thing is that the embedded management software works under MSIE only. Not exactly what I would expect from Sun. :-) Apart from the issues above, I have no problems whatsoever. -- Jens From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 00:10:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD316A403 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [213.225.74.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0AD13C478 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from [212.62.248.147] (helo=[192.168.2.10]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPSHL-000CDD-W4 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:44:14 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3FCD4E86-40CA-4E27-AF97-DFB94F02077C@anduin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: stable@freebsd.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:44:03 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Subject: Panic: spin lock smp rendezvous ... held too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:10:42 -0000 Hi all, I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID controller. It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being giant-locked, is very inefficient) for a little while, but as I was extracting a bunch of tarballs it paniced like so: spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc9d54600 for > 5 seconds panic: spin lock held too long cpuid = 0 I don't have a dump device (though I'm setting that up for the next reboot). However, I have tried turning off HT, to see if that might help. Does this look familiar to anyone? Or do I need to produce more data if it happens again? Thanks, /Eirik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 00:14:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12EA16A409 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 736E613C441 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 31455 invoked by uid 399); 9 Mar 2007 00:14:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 00:14:25 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45F0A6DE.4090604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:14:22 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sthomas@nerim.net References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> In-Reply-To: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:14:26 -0000 sthomas@nerim.net wrote: > Hello, > > I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP > workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh > session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. > > So I run my process like this : # myprogram &, then I exit the shell. screen is serious overkill in this scenario, although it's advocates tend to see it as the solution for every problem. :) No one has offered what I think is the most sensible option, which is to check the documentation for your program to see if it has a command line option to background itself properly. I'm not familiar with moinmoin, but I have a hard time believing that it doesn't have this capability. Failing that, if you need to preserve anything that is emitted from the program, nohup is probably your best bet. If it isn't going to spit anything out on the terminal, take a look at daemon(8), which you probably will want to run with the -f option. Good luck, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 00:30:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF2E16A403 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17E413C4A7 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l290IeWr080602; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:18:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:18:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <20070308220326.GA77506@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070308220326.GA77506@freebie.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703081918.39351.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2780/Thu Mar 8 13:30:21 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Wilko Bulte , Vivek Khera Subject: Re: fibre channel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:30:19 -0000 On Thursday 08 March 2007 05:03 pm, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:44:48PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote.. > > > I see on the supported hardware list > > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ 6.2R/hardware-amd64.html) there > > are 4 LSI fibre channel cards supported by the mpt(4) driver. > > However, over on LSI's web site > > (http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/host_bus_adapters/ > > index.html) the fibre cards they are currently selling have > > rather different looking part numbers. > > > > Are the supported cards no longer made? Or did they just rename > > them? > > > > Are there any other fibre channel cards supported on FreeBSD? > > Yes, from Qlogic. See isp(4) And from LSI-Logic. See mpt(4). Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 00:30:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B527F16A404 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2E113C491 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l290KSlK080672; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:20:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:20:25 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <20070308220326.GA77506@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200703081918.39351.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200703081918.39351.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703081920.27071.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2780/Thu Mar 8 13:30:21 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Wilko Bulte , Vivek Khera Subject: Re: fibre channel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:30:19 -0000 On Thursday 08 March 2007 07:18 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 08 March 2007 05:03 pm, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:44:48PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote.. > > > > > I see on the supported hardware list > > > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ 6.2R/hardware-amd64.html) > > > there are 4 LSI fibre channel cards supported by the mpt(4) > > > driver. However, over on LSI's web site > > > (http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/host_bus_adapter > > >s/ index.html) the fibre cards they are currently selling have > > > rather different looking part numbers. > > > > > > Are the supported cards no longer made? Or did they just > > > rename them? > > > > > > Are there any other fibre channel cards supported on FreeBSD? > > > > Yes, from Qlogic. See isp(4) > > And from LSI-Logic. See mpt(4). Duh, I meant newer cards should be supported by mpt(4). Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 00:43:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4737216A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A78713C4A3 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: (qmail 96949 invoked by uid 0); 9 Mar 2007 00:43:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.41?) (spork@216.220.116.154) by smtp.bway.net with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 00:43:24 -0000 In-Reply-To: <45887C16.2010801@vindaloo.com> References: <200612191347.kBJDlg5c058711@lurza.secnetix.de> <45881546.30400@vindaloo.com> <45887C16.2010801@vindaloo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0D61B3BC-F865-4AF2-A2AB-9CDCCBF8C04D@bway.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Sprickman Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:43:22 -0500 To: Christopher Hilton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD's spamd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:43:25 -0000 On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Christopher Hilton wrote: > Charles Sprickman wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Christopher Hilton wrote: >>> Oliver Fromme wrote: >>>> Dimitry Andric wrote: >>>> > Oliver Fromme wrote: >>>> > > What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's >>>> > > "greet_pause" feature? >>>> > > See here: >>>> > http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/mgp00014.html >>>> >>>> OK, so the answer to my question seems to be "yes". :-) >>>> >>> >>> Actually I'd say it's similar. If you telnet to port 25 on a >>> server that's using sendmail's greet_pause option I'm assuming >>> that you get nothing for 5 seconds. OpenSD's Spamd sends the >>> initial greeting at a rate of one character per second and only >>> accepts data from you at the same rate. >> It also sets the window size to something like 1 byte. :) > > Yes, it does. This results in the remote smtp daemon getting bound > up by it's own kernel. > >> Someone had mentioned that this would consume many threads/ >> processes, but that is not the case. Bob explained that spamd >> runs in a select() loop. I don't totally understand that, but to >> me it sounds like the same methodology that thttpd used, and that >> sure scaled up nice. > > It keeps an array of file descriptors, one for each connection to > the remote smtp daemon. It periodically uses the select(2) system > call to see which of the descriptors is ready and services them > accordingly. > >> Here's what I think is the latest version of Bob's talk. It's >> quite good. >> http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/ >> There's audio available here: >> http://www.nycbsdcon.org/slides > > I heard the talk in the beginning of November, right about the > middle of the big October/November spamming event of '06. To me the > most interesting part of the talk was when he spoke about the > results of tarpitting his greylisted connections and how he > eliminated 1,300,000 Mail messages from a total of 3,000,000 before > they ever hit his MTA. That's the feature that's missing from > FreeBSD since the port pulls spamd from OpenBSD 3.7 and the > tarpitting feature was added in the revision right after the > release 3.7 tag. > >> Was the original question "when will the FreeBSD port be >> updated"?? :) > > Yes. There's lots of ways to do it. One could pull diff from the > openbsd cvs servers and drop it into the patch directory. That > should go cleanly but it would be nice to get this revved up to the > latest release. I've got a copy of the latest code to compile. The > call symantics of openbsd's openlog_r(3) and syslog_r(3) differ > from FreeBSD openlog(3) and syslog(3). But It should work. I need > to throw some polish on it but after I do I'll post the patches > here and send them to the port maintainer. I know this is kind of old, but I'm needing to work with spamd on FreeBSD and I noticed the port is still stuck at the 3.7 version. Do you have anything that you'd like people to test? Thanks, Charles > -- Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 02:28:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DAA16A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F3313C4A5 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18ABEB09FC; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:28:05 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([210.51.165.229]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q5OVglavzRRZ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:27:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.100.3.224] (lupin.hongo.wide.ad.jp [203.178.135.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E78EB0994; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:27:50 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=o2dYs5RW1gf1oDms04ci8q3IDzbIzad7byS6+2BLe1WRljsgDITOCmcqoFPgBCoaR qWOT8YzCSexg3LTxDbIzA== Message-ID: <45F0C624.6090302@delphij.net> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:27:48 +0900 From: LI Xin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Sprickman References: <200612191347.kBJDlg5c058711@lurza.secnetix.de> <45881546.30400@vindaloo.com> <45887C16.2010801@vindaloo.com> <0D61B3BC-F865-4AF2-A2AB-9CDCCBF8C04D@bway.net> In-Reply-To: <0D61B3BC-F865-4AF2-A2AB-9CDCCBF8C04D@bway.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47205A50890FF8506A7074F5" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Christopher Hilton Subject: Re: OpenBSD's spamd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:28:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47205A50890FF8506A7074F5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Charles Sprickman wrote: >=20 > On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Christopher Hilton wrote: >=20 >> Charles Sprickman wrote: >>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Christopher Hilton wrote: >>>> Oliver Fromme wrote: >>>>> Dimitry Andric wrote: >>>>> > Oliver Fromme wrote: >>>>> > > What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's >>>>> > > "greet_pause" feature? >>>>> > > See here: >>>>> > http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/mgp00014.html >>>>> >>>>> OK, so the answer to my question seems to be "yes". :-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Actually I'd say it's similar. If you telnet to port 25 on a server >>>> that's using sendmail's greet_pause option I'm assuming that you get= >>>> nothing for 5 seconds. OpenSD's Spamd sends the initial greeting at >>>> a rate of one character per second and only accepts data from you at= >>>> the same rate. >>> It also sets the window size to something like 1 byte. :) >> >> Yes, it does. This results in the remote smtp daemon getting bound up >> by it's own kernel. >> >>> Someone had mentioned that this would consume many threads/processes,= >>> but that is not the case. Bob explained that spamd runs in a >>> select() loop. I don't totally understand that, but to me it sounds >>> like the same methodology that thttpd used, and that sure scaled up >>> nice. >> >> It keeps an array of file descriptors, one for each connection to the >> remote smtp daemon. It periodically uses the select(2) system call to >> see which of the descriptors is ready and services them accordingly. >> >>> Here's what I think is the latest version of Bob's talk. It's quite >>> good. >>> http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/ >>> There's audio available here: >>> http://www.nycbsdcon.org/slides >> >> I heard the talk in the beginning of November, right about the middle >> of the big October/November spamming event of '06. To me the most >> interesting part of the talk was when he spoke about the results of >> tarpitting his greylisted connections and how he eliminated 1,300,000 >> Mail messages from a total of 3,000,000 before they ever hit his MTA. >> That's the feature that's missing from FreeBSD since the port pulls >> spamd from OpenBSD 3.7 and the tarpitting feature was added in the >> revision right after the release 3.7 tag. >> >>> Was the original question "when will the FreeBSD port be updated"?? := ) >> >> Yes. There's lots of ways to do it. One could pull diff from the >> openbsd cvs servers and drop it into the patch directory. That should >> go cleanly but it would be nice to get this revved up to the latest >> release. I've got a copy of the latest code to compile. The call >> symantics of openbsd's openlog_r(3) and syslog_r(3) differ from >> FreeBSD openlog(3) and syslog(3). But It should work. I need to throw >> some polish on it but after I do I'll post the patches here and send >> them to the port maintainer. >=20 > I know this is kind of old, but I'm needing to work with spamd on > FreeBSD and I noticed the port is still stuck at the 3.7 version. >=20 > Do you have anything that you'd like people to test? I think we need a new maintainer for the port, I'm busy working on other stuff and it would be nice if someone else who has time and interest to maintain it to take it instead of me. If anyone needs a checked out copy of the current state of OpenBSD's spamd to ease their port work (note that the tarball I have provided is a patched version), please let me know. For those who wants to became the new maintainer for the port, please note that, there was some discussion about other improvements to the port, please merge them at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=3Dmail&portname=3Dsp= amd Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig47205A50890FF8506A7074F5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8MYkOfuToMruuMARCkzTAJ9XA8Fu/OlS8lSv89ILNvpS+yabIQCfW8DZ qyf7DtYJdFHljVtPP7SSWK8= =Y0dn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47205A50890FF8506A7074F5-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 02:41:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDB216A404 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD8313C471 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2B71A3C19; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4EF1515A5; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:41:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:41:57 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Eirik ?verby Message-ID: <20070309024157.GA58736@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3FCD4E86-40CA-4E27-AF97-DFB94F02077C@anduin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FCD4E86-40CA-4E27-AF97-DFB94F02077C@anduin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic: spin lock smp rendezvous ... held too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:41:58 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual =20 > P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID =20 > controller. >=20 > It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being =20 > giant-locked, is very inefficient) for a little while, but as I was =20 > extracting a bunch of tarballs it paniced like so: >=20 > spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc9d54600 for > 5 seconds > panic: spin lock held too long > cpuid =3D 0 >=20 > I don't have a dump device (though I'm setting that up for the next =20 > reboot). However, I have tried turning off HT, to see if that might =20 > help. >=20 > Does this look familiar to anyone? Or do I need to produce more data =20 > if it happens again? It can mean that something deadlocked. Turning on WITNESS may help to debug this, although it has a large performance impact. Kris --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8Ml1Wry0BWjoQKURAqHxAJ4yIKMMi/z98VQvwFUdBo34Tc5GxQCdGo85 dC/rm5rIPeJuH49L9gtSEXk= =LAA+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 05:24:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA0516A403; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 05:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B4813C491; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 05:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.42.21] (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l295OseI058876; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:24:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45F0EFA4.3030102@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:24:52 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fluffles References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2782/Thu Mar 8 21:18:57 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:24:58 -0000 On 03/08/07 09:58, Fluffles wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: >> On 03/07/07 23:13, Fluffles wrote: >>> On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID? >>> >>> The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU; >>> maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern systems should get 100MB/s+ in >>> per-char bonnie benchmark, even a Sempron 2600+ 1.6GHz 128KB cache which >>> costs about $39. Then it might be logical DD gets higher results since >>> this is more 'easy' to handle by the CPU. The VFS/UFS layer adds >>> potential for nice performance-increases but it does take it's toll in >>> the form of cputime overhead. If your CPU is very slow, i can imagine >>> these optimizations having a detrimental effect instead. Just >>> guessing here. >> >> Before making speculative claims about slow CPU's and putting the VIA >> C3 in with that pile, please at least refer to what makes you believe >> that it is an issue. Comparing the VIA C3 to 'some old pentium' isn't >> exactly fair or accurate, and inferring it isn't a modern system isn't >> true either. > > I'm sorry if i offended you. But it is well-known that C3 Nehemiah has a > much lower IPC than processors from AMD and Intel. For general purpose > comparisons, i would guess a 400MHz Athlon 64 to outperform the 1GHz C3 > Nehemiah; just guessing here! Not to talk about Core2Duo who has even > higher IPC. No offense, I just prefer the fud to be kept off lists - it's essentially trolling I suppose. No doubt the C3 and C7 processors are slower than the top of the line Intel and AMD's - that's like comparing a Prius with a Porsche. If you can find a 400MHz Athlon 64, I'd enjoy seeing the benchmarks. :) However, just simple benchmarks for IPC don't tell much about a processor. > Though Nehemiah does have some fancy MPEG/AES hardware acceleration > stuff built-in, which makes it a suitable platform for a Media Center or > anything like that. Personally i think a budget AMD processor to be a > better option; they have the same power consumption under standby mode > (thanks to Cool'N'Quiet) but can deliver much higher performance when > needed (such as HighDef 1080p video?). Well, not actually the same power consumption at all. Again, do a little googling here, and you might find some actual numbers (not just reported numbers). > The bonnie Per Char-benchmark is often bottlenecked by the CPU since it > requires either a lot of cpu power or a lot of memory activity; both > which puts demands on the cpu. If i see only 0.5MB in the Per > Char-benchmark, i would suspect a slow CPU. Slow is a relative term > though; C3 can be powerful enough for the task you bought it, so i don't > want to discredit it. Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern, and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't. Eric From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 05:42:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5C216A405 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 05:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253A313C4B6 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 05:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 23849 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 05:42:18 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 9 Mar 2007 05:42:18 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l295gHwB002844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:42:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l295gGfg002843; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:42:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: stable@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:42:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: sos@FreeBSD.org Subject: panic in ATA (atacontrol reinit ata2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:42:19 -0000 Hello! I can reinit the ata0 (no devices) and ata1 (a single DVD drive) without any problems -- they are both IDE (PATA). Reinit-ing ata2 (with one SATA drive) hangs the machine solid. Most of the time... This one time, however, it paniced and dumped core instead of hanging. Here is the debugging session (something is wrong with most of the stack): http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/ata-crash-kgdb.txt Let me know, if you need the contents of other variables... I'm using 6.2-STABLE/amd64 as of March 2nd on a quad-core Opteron system with 4Gb of RAM. The system and home drives are SCSI, but this 500Gb one is where I keep my backups, pictures, and videos... The drive has recently developed a nasty habit of detaching (maybe, due to heat?) -- but interrogating it with smartmontools does not show any errors... Either way, the kernel is not supposed to panic -- there is not even any swap on the drive. Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 06:03:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B59116A403; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 06:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [195.62.0.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CEF13C494; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 06:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21EB91705D; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:39:54 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:39:54 +0600 From: Max Khon To: "Bruce M. Simpson" Message-ID: <20070309053953.GA50354@samodelkin.net> References: <45F01C0F.9090501@janh.de> <45F05F9D.7010703@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F05F9D.7010703@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: Jan Henrik Sylvester , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RT2561 does not work (was: [CALL FOR TESTERS] (was: ral(4) and second/third gen devices)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:03:19 -0000 Hi! On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:10:21PM +0000, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > >Some searching led me to: http://samodelkin.net/~fjoe/if_ral.diff -- > >which compiles on 6.2-RELEASE and, loaded as module, makes the card > >available. > I was under the impression this code had been merged to -STABLE already. > Sorry to hear about the problems you're having. I myself have an > rt2661and have not seen such problems. Yes. The code is merged to RELENG_6. However it is not in 6.2-RELEASE. > ral is currently not on the critical path for anything I'm doing > otherwise I'd look at it just now; I would suggest filing a PR with this > information. /fjoe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 06:52:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA5516A403 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 06:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-3-125.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.3.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C5E13C4A3 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 06:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l296q4LG001171; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:52:04 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l296q26i001170; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:52:02 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:52:02 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: "Daniel O'Connor" Message-ID: <20070309065202.GD856@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <200703011149.02601.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200703051136.42494.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20070305183426.GD853@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200703061446.52461.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703061446.52461.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fork wedging (I think) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:52:06 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Mar-06 14:46:50 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrot= e: >Would a crash dump be useful? I think I will be able to update the ataraid= =20 >stuff to allow a dump onto the array. I doubt it will be feasible to make any progress without either a crashdump or KDB/DDB access to the system. --=20 Peter Jeremy --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8QQS/opHv/APuIcRAvxuAJ9UQTNzC0WIIylLYidrbG4Rt6paDgCgg20J Ji2L0NblMKiJVVL7Hxs8Evc= =NDNy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 07:32:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D76716A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B313C474 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1162079ugh for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:32:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b3RML550bePaU56FfZS5BgKefJKoiZ6e0qMnt3N77xmWhSTHYyT/g67tdRVpBSl58Z2PUVVPm+wt98Zx/V8U4R521OZO9N7fI94Krt6hnnZFFDUcqDSHLUJ3XbYC02eTeuHCHn5liorUQq1leBkafWRm/AEo7guApFTbl0Fwtwc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=loFEqM3FxDmKZtvUgrh401u0TMOCZIb76k6FhtGK1ZzytCR9LYnMmtUtciSWyLXgmV7t4F/cZYopOQdbh13EEAk9a8v6AUNnn5nfJTZ2jkQpm85YC9TqVr3XP/vOREglymSvuo80m55vceavAcAiN/hUZC1ZfXyQun2XXbOVxr0= Received: by 10.115.54.1 with SMTP id g1mr451321wak.1173425533227; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.160.9 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:32:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:32:13 +0100 From: "Claus Guttesen" To: "Vivek Khera" In-Reply-To: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: fibre channel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:32:15 -0000 > Are there any other fibre channel cards supported on FreeBSD? > > What card would one recommend to connect to an external RAID array > for running a fairly busy database (several million inserts/selects/ > updates per day)? I've tried qlogic's 2310 and haven't had any issue with those. I did recompile the kernel and included ispfw which is commented out by default in GENERIC. I don't know whether they perform better or worse than hba's from LSI. regards Claus From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 08:03:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0996316A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC9713C428 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so888282nfc for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:03:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EEVoUddZbK6JMDqGmSCQ7ZTgPObhrndIPa1do8ZdRBebTxXFFmJEjiH2A2zW4bsfJKZc1q3N3PnVPPLn8U4oRq9YHwop+yMwHX5Ej89i2QnK12CW29GWTwBeW9fXp08pvy6MA3SuBEqltlX5pMnWFmqnSd3ooLx07OuQXxRLPnw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m2i/hyfa7kx4rEnCg6yRHNzIOH9jobs1NMpYlWlAkK5vH7x9QmBzr/M1x/ASCra1UmI5H2yUHcvwFE1WA3saUF4diOpIvPJqKUbaEpjvklNx4DtrNNjj3NkuYLB67Cx8Cn9XoiuRfd5SrrnQkptBAkf8bPa07T/lFZoa4w4nn4Q= Received: by 10.115.106.7 with SMTP id i7mr428840wam.1173425915604; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.25.18 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:38:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7579f7fb0703082338q489dfcb5sd1affa5c00e1deec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:38:35 -0800 From: "Matthew Jacob" To: "Claus Guttesen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> Cc: Vivek Khera , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: fibre channel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:03:21 -0000 Generally speaking, the LSI-Logic cards are faster, at least for 2Gb, in terms of IOPS. However, the LSI-Logic firmware is less capable of coping with complicated topologies and the mpt(4) driver is less mature than isp(4). Another thing to keep in mind is that for new cards (as opposed to 'EBay' cards) that LSI is half the port cost of QLogic. On 3/8/07, Claus Guttesen wrote: > > Are there any other fibre channel cards supported on FreeBSD? > > > > What card would one recommend to connect to an external RAID array > > for running a fairly busy database (several million inserts/selects/ > > updates per day)? > > I've tried qlogic's 2310 and haven't had any issue with those. I did > recompile the kernel and included ispfw which is commented out by > default in GENERIC. I don't know whether they perform better or worse > than hba's from LSI. > > regards > Claus > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 09:48:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0765616A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B000E13C4B3 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPbhd-0006c4-9b for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:47:57 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:47:57 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:47:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:47:37 +0100 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9D10B2B3B4776C6126652692" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:48:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9D10B2B3B4776C6126652692 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ivan Voras wrote: > Since I need it in production, I'll try i386 6.2-release+PAE... Ok, PAE uniprocessor kernel boots fine, finds all the memory but I can't create (clone) a vlan device ("ifconfig vlan0 create"). It fails with an error in SIOCIFCREATE. Since creating vlan0 worked in amd64 mode (and is probably 64-bit-friendly), is it a problem with PAE? --------------enig9D10B2B3B4776C6126652692 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8S1CldnAQVacBcgRAsQNAJ91PM+3lDgisTv0lrnsYvmAdyK1JgCaAmcj 7IAoO/j1NR8Sr/AFbPYCSHw= =/eyo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9D10B2B3B4776C6126652692-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 11:23:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462E416A405 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE24A13C4A5 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPdB4-0005xi-FU for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:22:26 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:22:26 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:22:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:21:56 +0100 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig700FF98358D09975D63A6659" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: SMP doesn't work without ACPI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:23:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig700FF98358D09975D63A6659 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ivan Voras wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >=20 >> Since I need it in production, I'll try i386 6.2-release+PAE... >=20 > Ok, PAE uniprocessor kernel boots fine, finds all the memory but I can'= t > create (clone) a vlan device ("ifconfig vlan0 create"). It fails with a= n > error in SIOCIFCREATE. >=20 > Since creating vlan0 worked in amd64 mode (and is probably > 64-bit-friendly), is it a problem with PAE? Ok, I found it - on a non-PAE system this works because ifconfig automagically loads if_vlan.ko, but since there are no modules in PAE kernel, this obviously fails... (so I'll build device vlan into the kerne= l) --------------enig700FF98358D09975D63A6659 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8UNUldnAQVacBcgRAgFoAJ42ayVSboSKSN8nmz+YealgnVuPqACeIj0O uQ6h3kAV/8GyFfbMyEWijRs= =U6Nk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig700FF98358D09975D63A6659-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 13:19:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC7B16A404 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from spork.qfe3.net (spork.qfe3.net [212.13.207.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293ED13C478 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from [81.104.144.87] (helo=voi.aagh.net) by spork.qfe3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPf0N-000281-BD; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:19:31 +0000 Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPf0F-000DY0-4p; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:19:23 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:19:23 +0000 From: Thomas Hurst To: Vivek Khera Message-ID: <20070309131923.GA50212@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: Vivek Khera , FreeBSD Stable References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> Organization: Not much. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: Thomas Hurst Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:19:33 -0000 * Vivek Khera (vivek@khera.org) wrote: > Has anyone successfully booted FreeBSD 6 on the new "M2" variants of > sun's X2100 or X4100 boxes? I have three X4100 original versions that > works stunningly well (but I don't use the internal disks) with > FreeBSD 6.1. I was just curious how the new ones work, and the X2100 > seems to fit the bill for what I currently need. We have a pair of X4100M2's in production right now running 6.2, though we run a pretty cut-down kernel that lacks USB support. There are some dmesg warnings related to the IOAPICs but they seem harmless: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 6 ioapic1: WARNING: intbase 48 !=3D expected base 24 ioapic2: Changing APIC ID to 7 ioapic2: WARNING: intbase 56 !=3D expected base 55 ioapic3: Changing APIC ID to 5 ioapic3: WARNING: intbase 24 !=3D expected base 63 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic3 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 48-54 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 56-62 on motherboard Disks work fine with mpt(4), just as with !M2. > Also, if anyone knows which ethernet ports they put in that'd be =20 > helpful. I'd avoid them if they had broadcom chips :-( 2 nVidia nForce nve(4)'s and 2 Intel Pro/1000 em(4)'s. Quite a step back from the quad em(4)'s in !M2's, but 2 usable NIC's should be enough for most uses. --=20 Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 14:47:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50B816A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0839413C47E for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 24950 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 17:47:16 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 17:47:16 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180755, updated: 9.03.2007] Message-ID: <000d01c76259$d25e8650$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "FreeBSD Stable" References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:47:09 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:47:18 -0000 Maybe someone could help me. I have a machine with 4GB of RAM 128MB of which is wasted and i really need 2 gigs more. This is a heavy duty production server with a lot of jails and custom scripts, etc.. and i am afraid i cannot reinstall all from scratch. Furthermore it is located in the data center away from the office and i simply cannot spend whoel day there, but 2-4 hours would be ok. Currentlyt it is 5.4-STABLE (i386, 32bit architecture) Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via csup and source build? Any recomendations? -- Regards Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 14:52:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5056016A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED49A13C461 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54089B80A for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:52:14 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20070309131923.GA50212@voi.aagh.net> References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> <20070309131923.GA50212@voi.aagh.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--276278173; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:52:13 -0500 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:52:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail-2--276278173 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Thomas Hurst wrote: >> Also, if anyone knows which ethernet ports they put in that'd be >> helpful. I'd avoid them if they had broadcom chips :-( > > 2 nVidia nForce nve(4)'s and 2 Intel Pro/1000 em(4)'s. Quite a step > back from the quad em(4)'s in !M2's, but 2 usable NIC's should be > enough > for most uses. > Thanks for the info... I just need 2 NICs so that works for me. Now, if they'd rearrange the guts to take a full-height card I could go back to using LSI RAID cards instead of Adaptec ones :-) --Apple-Mail-2--276278173-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 15:00:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4678516A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976E613C48D for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1010454nfc for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:00:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qMyQNPq2jFgP9oDUqTeJRDSHFBIvzP37kRle2LHOy4nnvQ6HRN/VygLJ3CjzpFK2x5aJiVVctjfQ4vt79vyY1E24K/omceOriVcylq8EgNBpAv7l7NHopyjtnsKR3BzrFIq5xdkzYwaA0qLujGg69WKz65w9WFKo6k/inALyHFY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=CwZ/uBkOWSHVSsu24uTXgtk+qTZTv6ezGEYiY7U5tnGhSd1rs5JXJCnJ9saAaY2jp8wvjDhOMGnp2NEmxP/zvOEuUKQFJmmdpVLDSDM9LMjII01fUnVb+QzadV6IUCA7fzUvF2lAL/VsESm8FcqTcqMc0WEleaf+z7LccO5BZOQ= Received: by 10.82.175.2 with SMTP id x2mr2905483bue.1173452423203; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:00:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.148.3 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:00:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7ad7ddd90703090700q708a82ddr84a35b32da7b04df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:00:23 +0100 From: "Ulrich Spoerlein" To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Weird NFS behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:00:26 -0000 Hi, we have performance problems with our FreeBSD 6.2 based NFS server. Picture the following setup: FreeBSD Client ---> Samba-Server ---> NFS-Server all three machines are running FreeBSD 6.2 (the same image). The NFS server is configured with 16 nfsd. sysctl.conf has net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 Now, what's the problem: The Samba-Server mounts shares via NFS. All servers are on Gigabit Ethernet and I get read transfer rates exceeding 50MB/s from the NFS server. This is all good and well, but if I copy a file via scp(1) (sic!) to the samba server into the NFS mounted directory, not only do I seldomly exceed 12MB/s but I also get a very strange traffic pattern on the em0 interface of the samba server. I get _twice_ as much incoming traffic on the em0 interface as outgoing traffic. systat -if on samba: em0 in 24.726 MB/s 25.905 MB/s 3.046 GB out 12.941 MB/s 13.558 MB/s 1.994 GB systat -if on nfs-server em0 in 11.497 MB/s 12.999 MB/s 3.727 GB out 11.878 MB/s 13.423 MB/s 995.485 MB To stress, this is running: gigabit-client:# scp large-file user@samba:/mnt/nfs-share/ The wicked part is this: If I copy a file from the samba server directly to the NFS share (not as a passthrough), I get these traffic patterns: systat -if on samba: em0 in 432.724 KB/s 432.724 KB/s 3.772 GB out 12.399 MB/s 12.399 MB/s 2.481 GB systat -if on nfs: em0 in 12.091 MB/s 15.791 MB/s 184.766 MB out 440.939 KB/s 562.521 KB/s 1.339 GB This is running: samba:# cp large-file /mnt/nfs-share/ What on earth is causing each received NFS packet to be _bounced_ to the samba server when using ssh, scp, smbd, etc. And not when generating the traffic locally? nfsstat -s is showing an increase in READ calls similar to WRITE calls when using the samba machine as pass-through. It is showing _no_ increase in READ calls when copying the files directly. NB: All these test were run _without_ smbd running, it's just that this server is designated to become our samba server. Setting vfs.nfsrv.async=1 doubled write performance, but the weird traffic pattern remains. (Am I asking for too much trouble by setting async NFS?) Thanks for any pointers! Uli From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 15:02:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5147716A407 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE75F13C491 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2DFB80A for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:02:53 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <45F0A6DE.4090604@FreeBSD.org> References: <52267.194.69.32.50.1173359004.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> <45F0A6DE.4090604@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-5--275639136; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:02:52 -0500 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Background process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:02:54 -0000 --Apple-Mail-5--275639136 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:14 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Failing that, if you need to preserve anything that is emitted from > the program, nohup is probably your best bet. If it isn't going to > spit anything out on the terminal, take a look at daemon(8), which > you probably will want to run with the -f option. I can't remember needing nohup to run *anything* since the ancient days of the old old old /bin/sh which would kill all of your processes upon logout. Modern shells do not do this. Just redirect the stdin/stdout/stderr appropriately and run in bg. The more appropriate tool, assuming the original program has no "run as daemon" flag is the daemon(8) program as mentioned above. --Apple-Mail-5--275639136-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 15:06:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3719216A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@vsi.ru) Received: from serv4.vsi.ru (serv4.vsi.ru [80.82.32.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A986F13C4BB for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@vsi.ru) Received: from delloleg (dell-berry.vsi.ru [88.83.197.200]) by serv4.vsi.ru (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with SMTP id l29F6OGl017199; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:06:25 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <001101c7625c$c9997860$c8c55358@delloleg> From: "Oleg Derevenetz" To: "Kostik Belousov" References: <007d01c7605f$79fa60c0$3b215250@NOTEBOOK> <20070307030448.GQ10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:08:25 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Processes get stuck in "ufs" state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:06:27 -0000 On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: >> Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same >> symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) >> Processor 850: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat= >> >> Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that >> interacts with disk gets stuck in "ufs" state, but in my case >> SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. > > See developer handbook, Deadlock Debugging chapter for instruction what > information shall be gathered to debug the problem. OK, I built kernel with debug options and will wait for stuck. By the way, when debug options turned on, I see this message on every boot when nullfs mounting in progress: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "vnode interlock" 1st vnode interlock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:806 2nd vnode interlock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2040 KDB: stack backtrace: kdb_backtrace(3,cfc60300,c05926d0,c05926d0,c05542c4,...) at kdb_backtrace+0x29 witness_checkorder(cfd5c4dc,9,c051cf1e,7f8) at witness_checkorder+0x578 _mtx_lock_flags(cfd5c4dc,0,c051cf1e,7f8,cfb28b90,...) at _mtx_lock_flags+0x78 vrefcnt(cfd5c414) at vrefcnt+0x20 null_checkvp(cff5eae0,c050c4a6,215) at null_checkvp+0x56 null_lock(f02f1a68) at null_lock+0x66 VOP_LOCK_APV(c054d540,f02f1a68) at VOP_LOCK_APV+0x87 vn_lock(cff5eae0,1002,cfc60300,cff5eae0,cff5ed04,...) at vn_lock+0xac nullfs_root(cff76b90,2,f02f1ae0,cfc60300,0,8,0,c05cfca0,0,c051c79c,407) at nullfs_root+0x26 vfs_domount(cfc60300,cfe3d340,cfe3d130,d,cfe3d3f0,c05817e0,0,c051c79c,2bf) at vfs_domount+0x975 vfs_donmount(cfc60300,d,cfe73080,cfe73080,0,...) at vfs_donmount+0x3f9 nmount(cfc60300,f02f1d04) at nmount+0x8b syscall(3b,3b,3b,bf7fe5f5,bf7feea0,...) at syscall+0x25b Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (378, FreeBSD ELF32, nmount), eip = 0x280bc0e7, esp = 0xbf7fe5bc, ebp = 0xbf7fee38 --- This host have nullfs filesystems. Is this can be related to deadlock ? -- Oleg Derevenetz OOD3-RIPE Phone: +7 4732 539880 Fax: +7 4732 531415 http://www.vsi.ru CenterTelecom Voronezh ISP http://isp.vsi.ru From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 15:10:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE1916A407 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [74.92.149.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CDE13C494 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88C1B80F; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:10:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--275209597; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:10:02 -0500 To: Jens Fallesen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:10:03 -0000 --Apple-Mail-6--275209597 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Jens Fallesen wrote: > One issue I have is that the embedded management software can run > on NIC 1 only. And once FreeBSD detects this, the embedded > management software is disabled. Does anyone know of a way to make > FreeBSD detect NIC 0 only? Did you spring for the $100 LOM card or are you just using the embedded software? --Apple-Mail-6--275209597-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 15:10:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1B016A403 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B176D13C4B9 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HPgjY-000PqN-Oq for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:10:25 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l29FABXs036921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:10:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29FABxG019624; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:10:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l29FAAx3019608; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:10:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:10:10 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Oleg Derevenetz Message-ID: <20070309151010.GC73957@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <007d01c7605f$79fa60c0$3b215250@NOTEBOOK> <20070307030448.GQ10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <001101c7625c$c9997860$c8c55358@delloleg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001101c7625c$c9997860$c8c55358@delloleg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: b11a0dd960b728cbee92fea3b4ac1d10 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 852 [Mar 09 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Processes get stuck in "ufs" state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:10:29 -0000 --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:08:25PM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: >=20 > >>Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same > >>symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD=20 > >>Opteron(tm) > >>Processor 850: > >> > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D104406&cat=3D > >> > >>Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that > >>interacts with disk gets stuck in "ufs" state, but in my case > >>SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. > > > >See developer handbook, Deadlock Debugging chapter for instruction what > >information shall be gathered to debug the problem. >=20 > OK, I built kernel with debug options and will wait for stuck. By the way= ,=20 > when debug options turned on, I see this message on every boot when nullf= s=20 > mounting in progress: >=20 > acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "vnode interlock" > 1st vnode interlock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:806 > 2nd vnode interlock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2040 > KDB: stack backtrace: > kdb_backtrace(3,cfc60300,c05926d0,c05926d0,c05542c4,...) at=20 > kdb_backtrace+0x29 > witness_checkorder(cfd5c4dc,9,c051cf1e,7f8) at witness_checkorder+0x578 > _mtx_lock_flags(cfd5c4dc,0,c051cf1e,7f8,cfb28b90,...) at=20 > _mtx_lock_flags+0x78 > vrefcnt(cfd5c414) at vrefcnt+0x20 > null_checkvp(cff5eae0,c050c4a6,215) at null_checkvp+0x56 > null_lock(f02f1a68) at null_lock+0x66 > VOP_LOCK_APV(c054d540,f02f1a68) at VOP_LOCK_APV+0x87 > vn_lock(cff5eae0,1002,cfc60300,cff5eae0,cff5ed04,...) at vn_lock+0xac > nullfs_root(cff76b90,2,f02f1ae0,cfc60300,0,8,0,c05cfca0,0,c051c79c,407) a= t=20 > nullfs_root+0x26 > vfs_domount(cfc60300,cfe3d340,cfe3d130,d,cfe3d3f0,c05817e0,0,c051c79c,2bf= )=20 > at vfs_domount+0x975 > vfs_donmount(cfc60300,d,cfe73080,cfe73080,0,...) at vfs_donmount+0x3f9 > nmount(cfc60300,f02f1d04) at nmount+0x8b > syscall(3b,3b,3b,bf7fe5f5,bf7feea0,...) at syscall+0x25b > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f > --- syscall (378, FreeBSD ELF32, nmount), eip =3D 0x280bc0e7, esp =3D=20 > 0xbf7fe5bc, ebp =3D 0xbf7fee38 --- >=20 > This host have nullfs filesystems. Is this can be related to deadlock ? This is harmless, just ignore it. --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8XjSC3+MBN1Mb4gRAhGYAJkBhYQHVymZIAHrI+aubM6PM4IAygCeO9iw eb1kKBx+suko9z0MpgFmwmk= =r6v/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 15:23:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8511016A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C7513C481 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1019238nfc for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:23:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ZnYJmjvsdLXCuBa+F5I+8nYefw4gTIz6YejnB3vbrjZl2EPWRz2s/yZh6s7gI7wJ9w8RxQLDi5Zdeo/LuRUirfsYkqocCBBwWGDjgq+Bj+7eD42bioMdnPdB8etuMtxXSzEve2oxFSSfZ5M666nF3Dgq4rHM0AG/MMNTgNTKlPE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=TrZhci/utHQzy/ROSVywKQ0uTjrRWbqBRKi2ep0pXgotoJaGik//fSe7PsscccrQUVuYbmR/N+K38WGS8+hBKEPzf558bHorQAEXPPt2Qg7aDdt6LBoy+atnimImRkkQmf53kBW5bqKNj2i9PDvKYxgFhq7kTwm+GV0QeoVpy3c= Received: by 10.82.175.2 with SMTP id x2mr2896784bue.1173452131917; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.11 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 06:55:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <62b856460703090655u5759f767kc86a678148630654@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:55:31 +0100 From: "Michael Grant" Sender: michael.grant@gmail.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200612291811.10521.pokui@psg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061229135848.GC996@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4595239F.5090502@seclark.us> <200612291811.10521.pokui@psg.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7547fa0cbcf27c56 Subject: Re: Canonical 4.x to 6.x upgrade docs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:23:26 -0000 Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step? Michael Grant From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 16:04:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4B16A405 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EFE13C494 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29FrP01005993; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:53:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:53:22 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDD563EBF0DB316AD9669CD41" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:04:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDD563EBF0DB316AD9669CD41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alex Dupre wrote: > Ivan Voras ha scritto: >> I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable >=20 > It was backported 34 hours ago ;-) That was fast :) I've cvsupped before trying to get the blade to work (needed SerDes support for bce cards) but wow, it has been almost three days now :( time flies... I'll try it now and report how it's doing. --------------enigDD563EBF0DB316AD9669CD41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8YL0ldnAQVacBcgRAifHAKC6dIiQ5CuDsmuLy+mZnqqXLi2ucgCgmSYq A4VJQTeuAuL822o2aacd4+w= =Ozxu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDD563EBF0DB316AD9669CD41-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 16:14:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ADF16A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5FB613C474 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 39584 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 15:47:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.5?) (192.168.2.5) by andxor.it with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 15:47:15 -0000 Message-ID: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:47:15 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:14:16 -0000 Ivan Voras ha scritto: > I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable It was backported 34 hours ago ;-) > My card identifies itself as 2462s, in an IBM blade. Nobody tested the new code with a 246x card, but probably is the same as 242x (tested). -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 16:15:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C7916A404; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (grgw.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.64.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6F213C4B5; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29G1X6K001443; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:01:35 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l29G1U3q001442; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:01:30 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:01:30 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070309160130.GA1396@grosbein.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Chu , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/108150: [ste] [patch] ASUS NX1001 (if_ste) hardware support X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:15:50 -0000 Hi! I confirm that the problem exists and proposed solution works. I've just installed a router with ASUS NX1001 PCI card and have been forced to rebuild kernel with device id manually added to the driver. Only then the card was attached by the driver. Please commit this. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 16:56:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86B16A404 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BAE413C49D for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 27970 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 19:56:49 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 19:56:49 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180762, updated: 9.03.2007] Message-ID: <008801c7626b$ebd201e0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Michael Grant" , References: <20061229135848.GC996@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4595239F.5090502@seclark.us><200612291811.10521.pokui@psg.com> <62b856460703090655u5759f767kc86a678148630654@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:56:44 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Canonical 4.x to 6.x upgrade docs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:56:52 -0000 > Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without > upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step? tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a problem. But i suspect than going from older 4.x to newer 5.x (like 5.4) might not work and it might need another round of upgrade lile 4.x - 5.1 - 5.4 - 6.2 I don't kwow for sure. -- Regards Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 17:30:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561B716A40A for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C12513C507 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.119] (hornet.kitchenlab.org [64.142.31.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l29HU4lc010416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:30:07 -0800 Message-ID: <45F19999.6050707@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:30:01 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artem Kuchin References: <20061229135848.GC996@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4595239F.5090502@seclark.us><200612291811.10521.pokui@psg.com> <62b856460703090655u5759f767kc86a678148630654@mail.gmail.com> <008801c7626b$ebd201e0$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <008801c7626b$ebd201e0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4091F47E7B487E82E5A71100" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Canonical 4.x to 6.x upgrade docs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:30:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4091F47E7B487E82E5A71100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Artem Kuchin wrote: >=20 >> Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without= >> upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step? >=20 >=20 >=20 > tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a prob= lem. > But i suspect than going from older 4.x to newer 5.x (like 5.4) might n= ot work > and it might need another round of upgrade lile 4.x - 5.1 - 5.4 - 6.2 > I don't kwow for sure. What's the basis for your suspicion? 5.X releases up through and including 5.4 included a migration guide (written mostly by me) with step-by-step instructions on migrating from 4.X. I don't recall any widespread problem reports from people when following these directions correctly on migrating from 4.X to 5.4. And I'm fairly sure that a number of the FreeBSD.org machines were upgraded using exactly this procedure (4.X to 5.4, then 5.4 to 6.X). Bruce. --------------enig4091F47E7B487E82E5A71100 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8ZmZ2MoxcVugUsMRAtf0AJ9ur58OUw/jYhqqGZrlR+W+DyehDACg8FFO 6luaTNAVv2KpwyzKzFQH7YE= =ajyT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4091F47E7B487E82E5A71100-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 17:41:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FB916A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC1113C481 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPj5e-0004eL-LD for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:41:14 +0100 Received: from 83-131-163-54.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.163.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:41:14 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-163-54.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:41:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:40:47 +0100 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <000d01c76259$d25e8650$0c00a8c0@Artem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig44A7BBF74DD68AB5CE66E5BD" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-163-54.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <000d01c76259$d25e8650$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:41:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig44A7BBF74DD68AB5CE66E5BD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: > Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via > csup and > source build? AFAIK nobody has lived to tell the tale (or at least I didn't see any followups from people who claimed they'd try it). In any case it would be better to migrate it via binary reinstall (the same as installing from scratch, using the boot CD...). > Any recomendations? Try using PAE, but read up on possible problems. --------------enig44A7BBF74DD68AB5CE66E5BD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8ZwfldnAQVacBcgRAuYvAJ0Z2xuaDhBNziVvZU9+gqAoa6+WwgCg7Wni 3wh0LFg4uKGx/lqGnUoWWr0= =Xalx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig44A7BBF74DD68AB5CE66E5BD-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 17:51:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6913116A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96A7213C467 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 29077 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 20:51:14 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 20:51:14 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180762, updated: 9.03.2007] Message-ID: <001601c76273$85db2080$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Bruce A. Mah" References: <20061229135848.GC996@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4595239F.5090502@seclark.us><200612291811.10521.pokui@psg.com> <62b856460703090655u5759f767kc86a678148630654@mail.gmail.com> <008801c7626b$ebd201e0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45F19999.6050707@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:51:08 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Canonical 4.x to 6.x upgrade docs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:51:17 -0000 >What's the basis for your suspicion? My memory might play tricks on me, but i think I remember that i tried to upgrade from 4.1 to 5.3 longtime ago and it did not work. I had to up to 5.0 and the to 5.3. But that might be just some weird client install (i did not install freebsd on that box originally). The world just did not compile. I canot provide any more detail on that, sorry. -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 17:54:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCD716A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED0C213C48D for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 29093 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 20:54:47 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 20:54:47 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180762, updated: 9.03.2007] Message-ID: <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: , "Ivan Voras" References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <000d01c76259$d25e8650$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:54:42 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:54:49 -0000 >> Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via >> csup and >> source build? > >AFAIK nobody has lived to tell the tale (or at least I didn't see any >followups from people who claimed they'd try it). In any case it would >be better to migrate it via binary reinstall (the same as installing >from scratch, using the boot CD...). Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself. Theoretically, what would be the procedure? >> Any recomendations? > >Try using PAE, but read up on possible problems. No, just not PAE. Tried it on 6.2, felt all the pain, cried outloud and went back to simple plain 32 bit. As it has been told - PAE IS AN UGLY HACK. -- Regards Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 18:03:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E06C16A400 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:03:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCBE13C471 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPjRa-0000Mx-EV for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:03:54 +0100 Received: from 83-131-163-54.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.163.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:03:54 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-163-54.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:03:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:03:40 +0100 Lines: 254 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAA3684F8F5A1A2C16EF5A5F7" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-163-54.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Progress installing on IBM LS21 "Blade" machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:03:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAA3684F8F5A1A2C16EF5A5F7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As you may know, I've been sending all sorts of messages trying to get help running FreeBSD 6.x on this AMD Opteron-based blade (LS21). Now I've managed to get it to work mostly as I want it, so here's some maps for future explorers. First, things that don't work: * 64-bit kernels. With or without ACPI, on 6-stable or on 7-current, kernels in AMD64 mode don't finish booting, or in the best case boot but can't run SMP (they don't find additional CPUs, but mptable information is correct - see previous posts). There's even a sort-of regression in 7-current: while 6-stable without ACPI boots but finds only one CPU, 7-current kernel hangs with or without ACPI, either during USB bus' detection or just after "parallel port" detection (which is obviously not present on blades but still detected...). * One irritating umass device. It seems that there's an embedded umass (USB mass storage) device in the blade or blade center which is listed in device tree but doesn't respond to any probes, thus hanging the boot process for upto 15 minutes until all timeouts expire. First time this happened I almost gave up and pronounced it a lost cause, but it appears to be a harmless (if irritating) timeout issue. I've built a kernel without umass support, but that means I also lost the built-in CD/DVD drive in the chasis. Second, what works: * 32-bit i386 kernels in any mode: UP, SMP, UP/PAE, SMP/PAE, I've tried them all, and except the problem with umass, they all work as advertised. I'm running SMP/PAE since I need the additional memory. * Network interfaces are of the bce variety and need SerDes support to work. This has been MFC'ed somewhere early february. * FibreChannel interface is QLogic 24xx, support for which has been MFCed very recently (almost 2 days ago). So, plain 6.2-release can't run on the blade, but 6-stable can, without additional patches. Here's dmesg for the machine: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.= FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #4: Fri Mar 9 17:10:32 CET 2007 ivoras@quad.cc.fer.hr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAESMP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 HE (2400.10-MHz 686-class C= PU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x40f12 Stepping =3D 2 Features=3D0x178bfbff Features2=3D0x2001 AMD Features=3D0xea500800= AMD Features2=3D0x1f,,CR8> Cores per package: 2 real memory =3D 4815060992 (4592 MB) avail memory =3D 4191055872 (3996 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 ioapic1 irqs 16-31 on motherboard ioapic0 irqs 0-15 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x488-0x48b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_throttle1: on cpu1 acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6 cpu2: on acpi0 acpi_throttle2: on cpu2 acpi_throttle2: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle2 attach returned 6 cpu3: on acpi0 acpi_throttle3: on cpu3 acpi_throttle3: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle3 attach returned 6 pcib0: on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 13.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 bce0: mem 0xea000000-0xebffffff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci2 bce0: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz miibus0: on bce0 gentbi0: on miibus0 gentbi0: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto bce0: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:6d:2d:74 bce1: mem 0xec000000-0xedffffff irq 18 at device 5.0 on pci2 bce1: ASIC ID 0x57060021; Revision (A2); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz miibus1: on bce1 gentbi1: on miibus1 gentbi1: 1000baseSX, 1000baseSX-FDX, auto bce1: Ethernet address: 00:14:5e:b3:2a:38 isab0: at device 2.2 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 ohci0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 3 at device 3.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ohci1: port 0x3100-0x31ff mem 0xf9ffe000-0xf9ffefff irq 3 at device 3.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: port 0x3200-0x32ff mem 0xf9ffd000-0xf9ffdfff irq 3 at device 3.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: (0x1166) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered uhub3: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.07, addr 2 uhub3: multiple transaction translators uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xe8010000-0xe8013fff,0xe8000000-0xe800ffff irq 19 at device 4.0 on pci3 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=3D1.5.12.0 mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). isp0: port 0x4100-0x41ff mem 0xe8014000-0xe8014fff irq 20 at device 5.0 on pci3 isp0: [GIANT-LOCKED] isp0: Board Type 2422, Chip Revision 0x2, loaded F/W Revision 4.0.20 isp1: port 0x4200-0x42ff mem 0xe8015000-0xe8015fff irq 21 at device 5.1 on pci3 isp1: [GIANT-LOCKED] isp1: Board Type 2422, Chip Revision 0x2, loaded F/W Revision 4.0.20 pcib4: at device 7.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: at device 8.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: at device 9.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 pcib7: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 pcib8: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci8: on pcib8 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff on isa0 ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0 ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0= ukbd0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd2 at ukbd0 ums0: IBM IBM MM2, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Timecounters tick every 2.000 msec da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 100.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 20480MB (41943040 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2610C) da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da2: 100.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 20480MB (41943040 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2610C) da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 70006MB (143374000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da1 is ufs/qservices. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1a is ufs/root. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1b is label/swap. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1d is ufs/usr. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1e is ufs/var. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1f is ufs/home. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1g is ufs/storage. I'm very grateful for GEOM_LABEL because it saved me a lot of problems when drive numbers were shifting :) --------------enigAA3684F8F5A1A2C16EF5A5F7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8aF8ldnAQVacBcgRAjyRAJwOfzaRBVji1nHBqRDInrrd0bIAhACgv/cf DRsMQzeHDI7QWr7SX2ee5d4= =E78a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAA3684F8F5A1A2C16EF5A5F7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 18:45:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B66E16A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-3-125.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.3.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECF813C461 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29IjtHu009058; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:45:55 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l29IjtAx009057; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:45:55 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:45:55 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Artem Kuchin Message-ID: <20070309184555.GF856@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:45:58 -0000 --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Mar-09 20:54:42 +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: >>>Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via >>>csup and >>>source build? =2E.. >Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself. Definitely. >Theoretically, what would be the procedure? 1) Backup system. 2) Download amd64 install ISO and burn to CD 3) Boot from CD 4) Follow instructions for fresh install 5) Restore/merge configuration from backups. If you have a spare amd64 system and most of the content is static, you could reduce downtime by doing steps 4 thru 5 on the second system and either swapping the disk(s) or the entire system. --=20 Peter Jeremy --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8atj/opHv/APuIcRAnSKAJ42DZsM8g7egXioVViPTEpGLqR5kwCgr1j1 N6o9uM7FGUeRfGKG5nHT1ug= =w4jF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 19:16:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F120416A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C71213C461 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 30791 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2007 22:16:42 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 22:16:42 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180800, updated: 9.03.2007] Message-ID: <000c01c7627f$7636f3f0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Peter Jeremy" References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070309184555.GF856@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:16:36 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:16:45 -0000 >>>>Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via >>>>csup and >>>>source build? >... >>Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself. > >Definitely. > >>Theoretically, what would be the procedure? > >1) Backup system. >2) Download amd64 install ISO and burn to CD >3) Boot from CD >4) Follow instructions for fresh install >5) Restore/merge configuration from backups. > >If you have a spare amd64 system and most of the content is static, >you could reduce downtime by doing steps 4 thru 5 on the second system >and either swapping the disk(s) or the entire system. no, that's no what i ment. I mean the procedure to source build/install amd64 on x86 and make it work. Just theoretically, -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 19:27:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C23516A400; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACDA13C48E; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29ItPIw021241; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:55:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1B1AC40029; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:55:25 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807126-9f797bb0000007dd-60-45f1ad9dee8e Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 09B4540012; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:55:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45F0EFA4.3030102@freebsd.org> References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> <45F0EFA4.3030102@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <110C0B85-1FFA-4EF3-A48C-935AD2B5542E@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:55:24 -0800 To: Eric Anderson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:27:26 -0000 On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Eric Anderson wrote: [ ... ] > Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was > communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern, > and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't. I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it is, which is a low-power clone of the Pentium-MMX in terms of capabilities; the newer C3 Nehemiah is roughly comparable to a P2, plus SSE and the extra AES/RNG crypto stuff. Look at dmesg or cpuid and compare CPU features. A quick sample from http://www.nycbug.org/?NAV=dmesgd;f_bsd=FreeBSD suggests: CPU: VIA C3 Samuel 2 (601.37-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x803035 CPU: Pentium/P55C (167.05-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x8001bf CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (397.33-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x652 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183fbff CPU: VIA C3 Nehemiah+RNG (1000.35-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x693 Stepping = 3 Features=0x380b33d CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III CPU family 1400MHz (1403.27-MHz 686- class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383fbff -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 19:33:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA7D16A401; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F1813C4CB; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:33:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29J6q5i034983; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:06:52 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l29J6qYE034982; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:06:52 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:06:52 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20070309190652.GA33763@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <62b856460703090655u5759f767kc86a678148630654@mail.gmail.com> <008801c7626b$ebd201e0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45F19999.6050707@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F19999.6050707@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Canonical 4.x to 6.x upgrade docs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:33:13 -0000 On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:30:01AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > > >> Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without > >> upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step? > > > > > > > > tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a problem. > > But i suspect than going from older 4.x to newer 5.x (like 5.4) might not work > > and it might need another round of upgrade lile 4.x - 5.1 - 5.4 - 6.2 > > I don't kwow for sure. > > What's the basis for your suspicion? > > 5.X releases up through and including 5.4 included a migration guide > (written mostly by me) with step-by-step instructions on migrating from > 4.X. I don't recall any widespread problem reports from people when > following these directions correctly on migrating from 4.X to 5.4. And > I'm fairly sure that a number of the FreeBSD.org machines were upgraded > using exactly this procedure (4.X to 5.4, then 5.4 to 6.X). I've found a description of direct 4.x -> 6.x remote upgrade method (in Russian): http://ark-devil.livejournal.com/2007/02/04/ Here comes a translation: /***************************************************************************** Hail those that make the sunset by hands, ski'd and standing in hammock (c) DE 1. Install a loader of 6.x 2. Install a kernel of 4.x into /boot/kernel 3. Install GENERIC of 6.x into /boot/kernel6 4. Install mfsroot.gz with utilities into /boot/mfsroot.gz 5. echo 'mfsroot_load="YES"' > "/boot/loader.conf" echo 'mfsroot_type="mfs_root"' >> "/boot/loader.conf" echo 'mfsroot_name="/boot/mfsroot"' >> "/boot/loader.conf" 6. echo 'nextboot_enable="YES"' > /boot/nextboot.conf echo 'kernel="kernel6"' >> /boot/nextboot.conf echo 'vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:md0"' >> /boot/nextboot.conf Now reboot. The loader will try to boot the kernel6 and, if successful, run sshd from mfsroot. You should now log in remotely and perform upgrade as you like. If not successful, the system will boot 4.x after power-cycle and you have another chance. ****************************************************************************/ Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 19:34:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DF016A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F82513C481 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.42.21] (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29JYLX5012954; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:34:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45F1B6BB.1070703@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:34:19 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> <45F0EFA4.3030102@freebsd.org> <110C0B85-1FFA-4EF3-A48C-935AD2B5542E@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <110C0B85-1FFA-4EF3-A48C-935AD2B5542E@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2788/Fri Mar 9 12:27:23 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:34:22 -0000 On 03/09/07 12:55, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Eric Anderson wrote: > [ ... ] >> Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was >> communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern, >> and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't. > > I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it is, which > is a low-power clone of the Pentium-MMX in terms of capabilities; the > newer C3 Nehemiah is roughly comparable to a P2, plus SSE and the > extra AES/RNG crypto stuff. Look at dmesg or cpuid and compare CPU > features. I'm pretty familiar with C3 and C7 chips. I wouldn't compare performance of a CPU based on CPU features. Eric From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 20:06:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4766016A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from ilk.de (mx-out09.ilk.de [194.121.104.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE46A13C481 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:06:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from bologna.intern.smo.de (pool63.ka.ilk.net [212.86.194.63]) by ilk.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/ilk-relay) with ESMTP id l29K6eif021613; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:06:40 +0100 Received: from [192.168.153.208] (herdubreid.intern.smo.de [192.168.153.208]) by bologna.intern.smo.de (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l29K53DP023203; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:05:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F1BE39.6020406@smo.de> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:06:17 +0100 From: Philipp Ost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20070120 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Grosbein References: <62b856460703090655u5759f767kc86a678148630654@mail.gmail.com> <008801c7626b$ebd201e0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45F19999.6050707@freebsd.org> <20070309190652.GA33763@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <20070309190652.GA33763@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Canonical 4.x to 6.x upgrade docs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:06:43 -0000 Hi all, some time ago Yar Tikhiy posted a message to this list in which he described a way to directly update a 4.11 box to 6.2. The message can be found here: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=190896+0+archive/2007/freebsd-stable/20070225.freebsd-stable HTH, Philipp -- www.familie-ost.info/~pj From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 20:41:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C98E16A405; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5208713C4A3; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29KfKBM008180; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1C0B329C004; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:41:20 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807123-a0121bb000004462-bc-45f1c670d5fd Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 049EC30400B; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:41:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45F1B6BB.1070703@freebsd.org> References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> <45F0EFA4.3030102@freebsd.org> <110C0B85-1FFA-4EF3-A48C-935AD2B5542E@mac.com> <45F1B6BB.1070703@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7623318E-FFAD-44D1-BF6C-C6A7611602DF@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:41:19 -0800 To: Eric Anderson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:41:20 -0000 On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Eric Anderson wrote: >> I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it is, >> which is a low-power clone of the Pentium-MMX in terms of >> capabilities; the newer C3 Nehemiah is roughly comparable to a >> P2, plus SSE and the extra AES/RNG crypto stuff. Look at dmesg or >> cpuid and compare CPU features. > > I'm pretty familiar with C3 and C7 chips. > > I wouldn't compare performance of a CPU based on CPU features. Of course not-- but then, I said "capabilities", not performance. If you'd like to compare performance, choose a task or benchmark which matters to you, and go from there. The comparisons I have done suggests a 200MHz PPro will do a "make buildworld" faster than a 600MHz C3 Samuel, for example. YMMV, and I'd rather not debate this matter further if you feel strongly about it... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 20:45:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F1F16A406; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D4913C48E; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B68D14924B; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:45:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 67D37D5004A; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:45:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 526FFD50047; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:45:50 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rCbfPqxRhEKiI5gY9b4JZ/E6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (89-172-59-228.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.59.228]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id 119395E011C; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:45:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:45:48 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3A8B66DB1C6B76E1AD10C28B" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matt Jacob Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:45:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3A8B66DB1C6B76E1AD10C28B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joao Barros wrote: > On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras wrote: >> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one= >> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere = a >> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these >> should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this >> correct? I can write to both drives. >=20 > I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the except= ion. > I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better > explanation ;) I don't think it's because of multipath (as far as I understand it) because both disks are atached to isp0: da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and isp1 are connected to two switches... It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) ) --------------enig3A8B66DB1C6B76E1AD10C28B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8cd8ldnAQVacBcgRAluYAJwKRTfLzwg0ZVOHBFAQPfKzzWeqTACeMHbb T8u1rpDUTLpQCQY01aYy4VQ= =Oq7w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3A8B66DB1C6B76E1AD10C28B-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 20:58:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D155A16A403 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-3-125.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.3.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B43C13C4B3 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29KwseW009743; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:58:54 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l29Kwqaf009742; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:58:52 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:58:52 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Artem Kuchin Message-ID: <20070309205852.GH856@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070309184555.GF856@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <000c01c7627f$7636f3f0$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3siQDZowHQqNOShm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000c01c7627f$7636f3f0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:58:56 -0000 --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Mar-09 22:16:36 +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: >>>>>Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via >>>>>csup and >>>>>source build? >>... >>>Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself. >> >>Definitely. >> >>>Theoretically, what would be the procedure? >> >>1) Backup system. >>2) Download amd64 install ISO and burn to CD >>3) Boot from CD >>4) Follow instructions for fresh install >>5) Restore/merge configuration from backups. >> >>If you have a spare amd64 system and most of the content is static, >>you could reduce downtime by doing steps 4 thru 5 on the second system >>and either swapping the disk(s) or the entire system. > >no, that's no what i ment. I mean the procedure to source build/install >amd64 on x86 and make it work. Just theoretically, I presume you've read the bottom bit of /usr/src/UPGRADING You should be able to cross-build an amd64 world with: # make TARGET_ARCH=3Damd64 buildworld # make TARGET_ARCH=3Damd64 KERNCONF=3DYourKernel buildkernel (I'm confident this will work but watch out for CPU or architecture-specific flags in your /etc/make.conf) # mkdir /lib32 /usr/lib32 # cp -p /lib/* /lib32 # cp -p /usr/lib/* /usr/lib32 # cp -p /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints /var/run/ld-elf32.so.hints # cp -p /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 These steps setup the i386 emulation infrastructure (some of these steps may be overkill) # make TARGET_ARCH=3Damd64 KERNCONF=3DYourKernel DESTDIR=3D/ installkernel I think this will work. Reboot to single user mode (shouldn't have any problems) Mount /usr /var and anything else needed for the install # mergemaster -p # make TARGET_ARCH=3Damd64 DESTDIR=3D/ installworld These steps are probably the riskiest because you are relying on tricking the amd64 kernel into believing your i386 world is an i386 emulation. If anything goes wrong here, you will probably need to restore from backups because you can't run on the old kernel once you've started installing amd64 binaries. I haven't tried running an amd64 kernel with an i386 userland but after symlinking /lib32 -> lib and /usr/lib32 -> lib and copying the ld-elf.so files in my i386 filesystems, I can chroot into it whilst running my amd64 kernel and execute commands. # make delete-old # mergemaster These steps should be OK Note that I wouldn't attempt to try going from 5.4/i386 to 6.2/amd64 in one step. You want to minimise the things that can go wrong... --=20 Peter Jeremy --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8cqM/opHv/APuIcRAk8yAJ4leYTgl3g7S861ojIt5i6Pph+ClACgwBI/ cyBfQfMxvsJCsMF++aXUuF4= =329q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3siQDZowHQqNOShm-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 21:04:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AE416A407 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0575613C491 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1137641nfc for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:04:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rzsbfrFZ7H+GOVSGyug7OrwpC7hNDuAE63alZTux38ym9LLvdQiVRygW1UUx9Z+vLYEzkC9BcqPYuUmsOgtFxyZ6lIxpzQ2Ll3K2283gfrcX70j5lZKxGIxmWVigZcksgyBHhAg8gh+SsPx7ok4ssorp+ywUs5nL0fXmUelxssM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=egN2Gx1BxOTCpW7CNXykGVSOJWuugcAT+u66mWMVz+lNos1I38VJ26BJCHsFojsh1bx4/N3LSsvUJnL+bxDrNPS8GV0FxNXtJ8Zgcpam4HQjS4Is2T0BEEPamuLA18xcABdEVlLvs/isf63fIPlCIlO5ytxFCYGBS6tsuNF9MCc= Received: by 10.78.185.7 with SMTP id i7mr277362huf.1173472815841; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:40:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.15.2 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:40:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:40:15 +0000 From: "Joao Barros" To: "Ivan Voras" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matt Jacob Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:04:46 -0000 On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras wrote: > I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one > test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a > discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these > should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this > correct? I can write to both drives. I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception. I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better explanation ;) -- Joao Barros From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 21:40:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E83F16A402 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D938113C441 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29LeVwU030779; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:40:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l29LeUZ8002593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:40:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200703092140.l29LeUZ8002593@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:42:39 -0500 To: Nick Hibma From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <200702202256.l1KMuTPN046797@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200702202256.l1KMuTPN046797@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 Makefile watchdog.4 src/share/man/man9 watchdog.9 src/sys/arm/xscale/i80321 i80321_wdog.c src/sys/dev/ichwd ichwd.c src/sys/dev/ipmi ipmi.c src/sys/dev/mk48txx mk48txx.c src/sys/dev/watchdog watchdog.c ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:40:32 -0000 Hi, The commit below to ichwd.c, breaks the watchdog on a number of Intel boards I tried it against. (ICH5 and ICH7) The module loads, but the box never reboots after sending a sig 11 to watchdogd ichwd module loaded ichwd0: on isa0 Reverting to the version of ichwd.c prior to your commit unbreaks it and the watchdog works once again in that the box reboots after killing watchdogd. ---Mike At 05:56 PM 2/20/2007, Nick Hibma wrote: >n_hibma 2007-02-20 22:56:29 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > share/man/man4 Makefile watchdog.4 > share/man/man9 watchdog.9 > sys/arm/xscale/i80321 i80321_wdog.c > sys/dev/ichwd ichwd.c > sys/dev/ipmi ipmi.c > sys/dev/mk48txx mk48txx.c > sys/dev/watchdog watchdog.c > sys/i386/i386 elan-mmcr.c > sys/kern kern_clock.c > sys/sys watchdog.h > usr.sbin/watchdogd watchdog.8 watchdogd.c > Log: > MFC the following commits: > > Align the interfaces for the various watchdogs and make the interface > behave as expected. > > Also: > - Return an error if WD_PASSIVE is passed in to the ioctl as only > WD_ACTIVE is implemented at the moment. See sys/watchdog.h for an > explanation of the difference between WD_ACTIVE and WD_PASSIVE. > - Remove the I_HAVE_TOTALLY_LOST_MY_SENSE_OF_HUMOR define. If you've > lost your sense of humor, than don't add a define. > > Specific changes: > > i80321_wdog.c > Don't roll your own passive watchdog tickle as this would defeat the > purpose of an active (userland) watchdog tickle. > > ichwd.c / ipmi.c: > WD_ACTIVE means active patting of the watchdog by a userland process, > not whether the watchdog is active. See sys/watchdog.h. > > kern_clock.c: > (software watchdog) Remove a check for WD_ACTIVE as this does not make > sense here. This reverts r1.181. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.371 +1 -0 src/share/man/man4/Makefile > 1.8 +69 -25 src/share/man/man4/watchdog.4 > 1.4 +7 -1 src/share/man/man9/watchdog.9 > 1.3 +15 -11 src/sys/arm/xscale/i80321/i80321_wdog.c > 1.7 +12 -30 src/sys/dev/ichwd/ichwd.c > 1.8 +8 -17 src/sys/dev/ipmi/ipmi.c > 1.8 +3 -1 src/sys/dev/mk48txx/mk48txx.c > 1.4 +4 -1 src/sys/dev/watchdog/watchdog.c > 1.33 +9 -9 src/sys/i386/i386/elan-mmcr.c > 1.193 +3 -3 src/sys/kern/kern_clock.c > 1.4 +0 -4 src/sys/sys/watchdog.h > > and > > Don't exit from watchdogd on receiving a signal if we cannot > stop the watchdog. > That'll require -KILL. This avoids resetting your system on one of the > watchdogs that you cannot disable. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.15 +18 -11 src/usr.sbin/watchdogd/watchdogd.c > > Reviewed by: phk > > Revision Changes Path > 1.320.2.25 +1 -0 src/share/man/man4/Makefile > 1.6.8.2 +69 -25 src/share/man/man4/watchdog.4 > 1.3.8.1 +7 -1 src/share/man/man9/watchdog.9 > 1.2.2.1 +15 -11 src/sys/arm/xscale/i80321/i80321_wdog.c > 1.5.2.2 +12 -30 src/sys/dev/ichwd/ichwd.c > 1.3.2.5 +6 -17 src/sys/dev/ipmi/ipmi.c > 1.6.2.2 +3 -1 src/sys/dev/mk48txx/mk48txx.c > 1.2.8.1 +9 -2 src/sys/dev/watchdog/watchdog.c > 1.31.2.2 +9 -9 src/sys/i386/i386/elan-mmcr.c > 1.178.2.4 +3 -3 src/sys/kern/kern_clock.c > 1.3.8.1 +0 -4 src/sys/sys/watchdog.h > 1.6.2.1 +5 -4 src/usr.sbin/watchdogd/watchdog.8 > 1.10.2.2 +19 -13 src/usr.sbin/watchdogd/watchdogd.c >_______________________________________________ >cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 22:13:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE4416A408 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4AF13C494 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1155549nfc for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:13:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=txccWfctvXj6FedddyXegbt6+HI/ee0ICtnLLqFwphaKKinXODbnC1jt9WYIryr/fVlPb120xSjB88EvNb28GY9pAIrZuf5lMXhcZiWyuqbraZFgOCgK6U6g/OWJ4DYF0Ja4e5U0J+qXLtE9vAMmF4OEZXX5DzS4WbKCJ4yi47k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KvP4+VomIcFUewMtDLfxgeQJg528aHHhEPtDvGK73rmfT4IU9VQl9I7+Y1q69nKvrD/MX7ailyzxLr+HQQYUL4WwWmhZlrlbnTCXEh5zXhzatkGJBPYQg7ahXFjBFljlvF128elzfa4up+H/17p4ila7MppWwnx11YngEAa1B4k= Received: by 10.78.204.20 with SMTP id b20mr292776hug.1173478387819; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:13:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.15.2 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:13:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e8236f0703091413o473db67fr451e3be49c44b025@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:13:07 +0000 From: "Joao Barros" To: "Ivan Voras" In-Reply-To: <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matt Jacob Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:13:09 -0000 On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras wrote: > Joao Barros wrote: > > On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one > >> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a > >> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these > >> should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this > >> correct? I can write to both drives. > > > > I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception. > > I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better > > explanation ;) > > I don't think it's because of multipath (as far as I understand it) > because both disks are atached to isp0: > > da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > > There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for > example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and > isp1 are connected to two switches... > > It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management > console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) ) You're right, I missed that detail :) You can always ask the "responsible" guy what he did, but right now I'd say you have a freebie ;) -- Joao Barros From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 23:03:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3F016A401; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F5713C428; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29MSp73061518; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:28:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l29MSoPO061515; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:28:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:28:50 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> Message-ID: <20070309142834.S61513@ns1.feral.com> References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matt Jacob Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:03:47 -0000 The GEOM multipath code hasn't been MFC'd yet. On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Ivan Voras wrote: > Joao Barros wrote: >> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one >>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a >>> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these >>> should be a read-write and another "read-only" device, but is this >>> correct? I can write to both drives. >> >> I'd say because you have a multipath setup, the driver being the exception. >> I guess the in house isp guru Matt Jacob can give you a better >> explanation ;) > > I don't think it's because of multipath (as far as I understand it) > because both disks are atached to isp0: > > da1 at isp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da2 at isp0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > > There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for > example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and > isp1 are connected to two switches... > > It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management > console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) ) > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 23:03:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D0D16A404; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B9513C461; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29MUFnx061536; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l29MUFl8061533; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:30:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:30:15 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Joao Barros In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0703091413o473db67fr451e3be49c44b025@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070309142918.V61513@ns1.feral.com> References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091413o473db67fr451e3be49c44b025@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1856546850-1173479415=:61513" Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matt Jacob , Ivan Voras Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:03:47 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1856546850-1173479415=:61513 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joao Barros wrote: >> >> There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for >> example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and >> isp1 are connected to two switches... >> >> It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management >> console (I din't do it - it's another guy's responsibility :) ) > > You're right, I missed that detail :) > You can always ask the "responsible" guy what he did, but right now > I'd say you have a freebie ;) > Use the attached to see if the attached disks are in fact paths to the same device based upon serial # --0-1856546850-1173479415=:61513 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=FINDPAIRS Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20070309143015.L61513@ns1.feral.com> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=FINDPAIRS IyEvYmluL3NoDQojDQojIFRoaXMgc2NyaXB0IGdldHMgYSBsaXN0IG9mIGRh IGRldmljZXMgYW5kIFZpdGFsIFByb2R1Y3QgRGF0YSBTZXJpYWwgbnVtYmVy cy4NCiMNCiMgSXQgY2hlY2tzIGZvciBzYW1lIGRldmljZXMgYnkgbWF0Y2hp bmcgc2VyaWFsIG51bWJlciAqYW5kKiBsb2dpY2FsIHVuaXQNCiMNCmNhbWNv bnRyb2wgZGV2bHxzZWQgLWUgJ3MvXi4qbHVuLi8vJyAtZSAncy8oLy8nIC1l ICdzLykvLycgLWUgJ3MvLC8gLyd8Z3JlcCBkYXxcDQogc2VkIC1lICdzL3Bh c3MuKiAvLycgLWUgJ3MvcGFzcy4qJC8vJyB8IHdoaWxlIHJlYWQgbHVuIGRp c2sNCmRvDQogIHNlcm5vPWBjYW1jb250cm9sIGlucXVpcnkgJHtkaXNrfSAt U2ANCiAgaWYgWyBYIiR7c2Vybm99IiAhPSBYIF0NCiAgdGhlbg0KICAgIGVj aG8gIiR7ZGlza30gJHtsdW59ICR7c2Vybm99IiA+Pi90bXAvdCQkDQogICAg ZWNobyAke2x1bn0iLiIke3Nlcm5vfSA+PiAvdG1wL3kkJA0KICBmaQ0KZG9u ZQ0KY2F0IC90bXAveSQkIHwgd2hpbGUgcmVhZCBzZXJub19sdW5fcGFpcg0K ZG8NCiAgZ3JlcCAkc2Vybm9fbHVuX3BhaXIgL3RtcC90JCQgPiAvdG1wL2Ek JA0KICBubWF0Y2g9YGNhdCAvdG1wL2EkJCB8d2MgLWx8c2VkICdzLyAvL2cn YA0KICBpZiBbICRubWF0Y2ggLWx0IDIgXQ0KICB0aGVuDQogICAgY29udGlu dWUNCiAgZmkNCiAgZWNobyAiUG90ZW50aWFsIFNhbWUgRGV2aWNlczoiDQog IGNhdCAvdG1wL2EkJCB8IGF3ayAnIHsgcHJpbnRmICJcdCVzIChsdW4gJXMp XHQlc1xuIiwgJDEsICQyLCAkMyB9Jw0KICBjYXQgL3RtcC90JCQgfCBncmVw IC12ICRzZXJub19sdW5fcGFpciA+IC90bXAvZCQkDQogIG12IC90bXAvZCQk IC90bXAvdCQkDQpkb25lDQpybSAtZiAvdG1wL3QkJCAvdG1wL3kkJCAvdG1w L2EkJA0K --0-1856546850-1173479415=:61513-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 23:47:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D9616A409 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [213.225.74.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1624813C49D for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from [212.62.248.147] (helo=[192.168.2.10]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPonc-0009ct-30; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:47:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20070309024157.GA58736@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3FCD4E86-40CA-4E27-AF97-DFB94F02077C@anduin.net> <20070309024157.GA58736@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-9--244202815" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:46:49 +0100 To: Kris Kennaway X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic: spin lock smp rendezvous ... held too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:47:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-9--244202815 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 9, 2007, at 03:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual >> P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID >> controller. >> >> It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being >> giant-locked, is very inefficient) for a little while, but as I was >> extracting a bunch of tarballs it paniced like so: >> >> spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc9d54600 for > 5 seconds >> panic: spin lock held too long >> cpuid = 0 >> >> I don't have a dump device (though I'm setting that up for the next >> reboot). However, I have tried turning off HT, to see if that might >> help. >> >> Does this look familiar to anyone? Or do I need to produce more data >> if it happens again? > > It can mean that something deadlocked. Turning on WITNESS may help to > debug this, although it has a large performance impact. I can't turn on WITNESS here "just like that", as I'll need some time to find a replacement server for some critical applications. However, the strange thing is that this server has been running solid as a rock (not one single crash) for 2 years with FreeBSD 4.x on it, so I am fairly sure there is no hardware issue. It crashed today, and I have obtained a dump. I am running 6.2- RELEASE with the stock SMP kernel, and haven't recompiled yet, so I can't seem to find a kernel.debug, but I'm building one now with the 6.2-RELEASE sources, as supplied on the CD. I'm assuming this will give me a useable kernel.debug. Anything in particular I should look for if/when I'm able to peek into the dump with kgdb? thanks, /Eirik > > Kris --Apple-Mail-9--244202815 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF8fHpDRlfnc8VQWcRAuKWAJ4p/0F0SnJ1WE7vwJ+V8PUznOEvxgCgnVL8 19CGK4J4luiTTR0lV2P82TM= =tmf9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-9--244202815-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 00:00:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E5216A403 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [213.225.74.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A910B13C441 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from [212.62.248.147] (helo=[192.168.2.10]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPp12-0009zl-Ow; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:00:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20070309024157.GA58736@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3FCD4E86-40CA-4E27-AF97-DFB94F02077C@anduin.net> <20070309024157.GA58736@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-10--243369446" Message-Id: <3B8198E4-78E6-41AC-93EB-193529550CBC@anduin.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:00:42 +0100 To: Kris Kennaway X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic: spin lock smp rendezvous ... held too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:00:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-10--243369446 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Mar 9, 2007, at 03:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual >> P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID >> controller. >> >> It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being >> giant-locked, is very inefficient) for a little while, but as I was >> extracting a bunch of tarballs it paniced like so: >> >> spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc9d54600 for > 5 seconds >> panic: spin lock held too long >> cpuid = 0 >> >> I don't have a dump device (though I'm setting that up for the next >> reboot). However, I have tried turning off HT, to see if that might >> help. >> >> Does this look familiar to anyone? Or do I need to produce more data >> if it happens again? > > It can mean that something deadlocked. Turning on WITNESS may help to > debug this, although it has a large performance impact. Just opened the vmcore file, and this is what I see, with a bt at the end: Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: dev = da0s1f, block = 3802920, fs = /usr panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block cpuid = 1 Uptime: 23h59m46s Dumping 3967 MB (3 chunks) chunk 0: 1MB (158 pages) ... ok chunk 1: 3966MB (1015280 pages) 3950 3934 3918 3902 3886 3870 3854 3838 3822 3806 3790 3774 3758 3742 3726 3710 3694 3678 3662 3646 3630 3614 3598 3582 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 06 fault virtual address = 0x18c fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc04542f4 stack pointer = 0x28:0xe98a3c88 frame pointer = 0x28:0xe98a3c90 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 18 (swi2: cambio) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 1 3566 3550 3534 3518 3502 3486 3470 3454 3438 3422 3406 3390 3374 3358 3342 3326 3310 3294 3278 3262 3246 3230 3214 3198 3182 3166 3150 3134 3118 3102 3086 3070 3054 3038 3022 3006 2990 2974 2958 2942 2926 2910 2894 2878 2862 2846 2830 2814 2798 2782 2766 2750 2734 2718 2702 2686 2670 2654 2638 2622 2606 2590 2574 2558 2542 2526 2510 2494 2478 2462 2446 2430 2414 2398 2382 2366 2350 2334 2318 2302 2286 2270 2254 2238 2222 2206 2190 2174 2158 2142 2126 2110 2094 2078 2062 2046 2030 2014 1998 1982 1966 1950 1934 1918 1902 1886 1870 1854 1838 1822 1806 1790 1774 1758 1742 1726 1710 1694 1678 1662 1646 1630 1614 1598 1582 1566 1550 1534 1518 1502 1486 1470 1454 1438 1422 1406 1390 1374 1358 1342 1326 1310 1294 1278 1262 1246 1230 1214 1198 1182 1166 1150 1134 1118 1102 1086 1070 1054 1038 1022 1006 990 974 958 942 926 910 894 878 862 846 830 814 798 782 766 750 734 718 702 686 670 654 638 622 606 590 574 558 542 526 510 494 478 462 446 430 414 398 382 366 350 334 318 302 286 270 254 238 222 206 190 174 158 142 126 110 94 78 62 46 30 14 ... ok chunk 2: 1MB (128 pages) #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 165 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); (kgdb) bt #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 #1 0xc067550a in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/ kern_shutdown.c:409 #2 0xc0675831 in panic (fmt=0xc0911dc2 "ffs_blkfree: freeing free block") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:565 #3 0xc07b375e in ffs_blkfree (ump=0xc9607c00, fs=0xc93c5800, devvp=0xc9625110, bno=3802920, size=16384, inum=39400) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:1869 #4 0xc07c38c6 in indir_trunc (freeblks=0xcb2bfa00, dbn=15210848, level=0, lbn=12, countp=0xe98b8c6c) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:2894 #5 0xc07c32f6 in handle_workitem_freeblocks (freeblks=0xcb2bfa00, flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:2744 #6 0xc07c01b1 in process_worklist_item (mp=0xc95d87c8, flags=0) at / usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:967 #7 0xc07bfeb2 in softdep_process_worklist (mp=0xc95d87c8, full=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:851 #8 0xc07bfc08 in softdep_flush () at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ ffs_softdep.c:762 #9 0xc065ec4d in fork_exit (callout=0xc07bfa6c , arg=0x0, frame=0xe98b8d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:821 #10 0xc0879dac in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/ exception.s:208 --Apple-Mail-10--243369446 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF8fUqDRlfnc8VQWcRArJ0AJ481ek9NNls67l420KH9isjMAtyLwCglQxa Sbjea3/sS8PiEnsuVRHEhj4= =32Ts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-10--243369446-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 06:49:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6189716A402 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from optimus.centralmiss.com (ns.centralmiss.com [206.156.254.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387DD13C474 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by optimus.centralmiss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D507287AD; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:24:52 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id C06B561C3A; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:24:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:24:51 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Artem Kuchin Message-ID: <20070310062451.GM31683@over-yonder.net> References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14-fullermd.3 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:49:23 -0000 On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:54:42PM +0300 I heard the voice of Artem Kuchin, and lo! it spake thus: > > Theoretically, what would be the procedure? - Do a full cross-build of the amd64 world/kernel. - newfs your swap partition (or an extra partition/drive). - installworld/kernel the amd64 stuff onto that. - Boot into that temporary amd64 world. - installworld/kernel the amd64 stuff onto your main partition. - Boot back normal-like, re-enable swap. You should be able to do that in an hour hands-on easily. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 08:32:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B05716A404 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9769313C46B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from dynabook-freebsd.advok.com (pool-141-151-75-239.phlapa.east.verizon.net [141.151.75.239]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6142C4EA; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:15:19 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:11:13 -0500 From: Yoshihiro Ota To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-Id: <20070310031113.8b7789fa.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20070310062451.GM31683@over-yonder.net> References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070310062451.GM31683@over-yonder.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Kuchin , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:32:34 -0000 About one year ago, I was able to do the regular procedure after enabling i386 compat. It was just another make world for me. options COMPAT_IA32 What I mean is: # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). # 2. `make buildworld' # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). # 6. `mergemaster -p' # 7. `make installworld' # 8. `make delete-old' # 9. `mergemaster' # 10. `reboot' There are some risks doing this way, though. Regards, Hiro On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:24:51 -0600 "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:54:42PM +0300 I heard the voice of > Artem Kuchin, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Theoretically, what would be the procedure? > > - Do a full cross-build of the amd64 world/kernel. > - newfs your swap partition (or an extra partition/drive). > - installworld/kernel the amd64 stuff onto that. > - Boot into that temporary amd64 world. > - installworld/kernel the amd64 stuff onto your main partition. > - Boot back normal-like, re-enable swap. > > You should be able to do that in an hour hands-on easily. > > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ > On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 11:17:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5731416A401; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D6913C467; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from godot.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l2ABHgKt001152; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:17:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:17:42 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: ClamAV Development In-Reply-To: <1173106098.8193.6.camel@syntax.dstl.gov.uk> Message-ID: <20070310121342.I6787@godot.imp.ch> References: <20070305152453.H18301@godot.imp.ch> <1173106098.8193.6.camel@syntax.dstl.gov.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Daniel Eischen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:17:46 -0000 Hi, > Don't use it, it's broken. > > -trog Nope, it looks like a race in cli_scanmail() which deadlocks somewhere with libpthread.so. This workaround fixes the problem for me. I'm still investigating where the real cause for this problem is. --- libclamav/scanners.c Tue Feb 13 02:06:28 2007 +++ libclamav/scanners.c Sat Mar 10 12:00:16 2007 @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ #include #endif +# include +static pthread_mutex_t extractmail_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; + #if HAVE_MMAP #if HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H #include @@ -1652,12 +1655,16 @@ /* * Extract the attachments into the temporary directory */ + pthread_mutex_lock(&extractmail_mutex); if((ret = cli_mbox(dir, desc, ctx))) { - if(!cli_leavetemps_flag) + if(!cli_leavetemps_flag) { + pthread_mutex_unlock(&extractmail_mutex); cli_rmdirs(dir); + } free(dir); return ret; } + pthread_mutex_unlock(&extractmail_mutex); ret = cli_scandir(dir, ctx); From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 11:19:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E115C16A401 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A6BC13C49D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 50363 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2007 14:19:12 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2007 14:19:12 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180934, updated: 10.03.2007] Message-ID: <001e01c76305$eb8d70d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Yoshihiro Ota" , "Matthew D. Fuller" References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org><002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem><20070310062451.GM31683@over-yonder.net> <20070310031113.8b7789fa.ota@j.email.ne.jp> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:19:05 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:19:16 -0000 > About one year ago, I was able to do the regular procedure after enabling i386 compat. It was just another make world for me. > > options COMPAT_IA32 This is interesting. I have setup and amd64 box with this option enabled. And i am sure i have to leave foreve, since some client have their binaries w/o sources and they need to run anyway. The quesiton, does this option have any perfomance impact? -- Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 11:26:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9303016A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC3F13C49D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2ABQ9Vu009237; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:26:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <45F295CB.4090403@fer.hr> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:26:03 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yoshihiro Ota References: <6D01FD53-497A-46FE-ADC3-4988DB2ADD74@khera.org> <002301c76274$04d05900$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070310062451.GM31683@over-yonder.net> <20070310031113.8b7789fa.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20070310031113.8b7789fa.ota@j.email.ne.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD5861B90B787145A311BF231" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:26:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD5861B90B787145A311BF231 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > About one year ago, I was able to do the regular procedure after enabli= ng i386 compat. It was just another make world for me. >=20 > options COMPAT_IA32 >=20 > What I mean is: >=20 > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source = tree). > # 2. `make buildworld' > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is G= ENERIC). But if you already have an i386 kernel running, wouldn't running "make buildkernel" just make another i386 kernel? --------------enigD5861B90B787145A311BF231 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8pXRldnAQVacBcgRAnN5AKDLN7Vx/NCe+Vj5m3BBBpBuAPUy3gCg16KV cgJeXR8vFapCv+OS9TOj3G0= =E7kJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD5861B90B787145A311BF231-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 12:50:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE66E16A403 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54A713C442 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1HQ0CD-000MDH-7l; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:57:09 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Ivan Voras In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:26:03 +0100 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:57:09 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: Yoshihiro Ota , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:50:41 -0000 > Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > > About one year ago, I was able to do the regular procedure after enabling i386 compat. > > It was just another make world for me. > > > > options COMPAT_IA32 > > > > What I mean is: > > > > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). > > # 2. `make buildworld' > > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > > But if you already have an i386 kernel running, wouldn't running "make > buildkernel" just make another i386 kernel? try make buildkernel TARGET_ARCH=amd64 KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE works for me, danny From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 13:13:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF1016A405; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3898213C47E; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from godot.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l2ADCxmp055685; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:13:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:12:59 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: ClamAV Development In-Reply-To: <20070310121342.I6787@godot.imp.ch> Message-ID: <20070310141202.C6787@godot.imp.ch> References: <20070305152453.H18301@godot.imp.ch> <1173106098.8193.6.camel@syntax.dstl.gov.uk> <20070310121342.I6787@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Daniel Eischen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:13:04 -0000 And even more narrowed down ... --- libclamav/mbox.c.orig Tue Feb 13 14:06:57 2007 +++ libclamav/mbox.c Sat Mar 10 14:09:09 2007 @@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ #ifdef CL_THREAD_SAFE static pthread_mutex_t tables_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; +static pthread_mutex_t body_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; #endif #ifndef O_BINARY @@ -1494,6 +1495,7 @@ /* * Write out the last entry in the mailbox */ + pthread_mutex_lock(&body_mutex); if((retcode == CL_SUCCESS) && messageGetBody(body)) { messageSetCTX(body, ctx); switch(parseEmailBody(body, NULL, &mctx, 0)) { @@ -1505,6 +1507,7 @@ break; } } + pthread_mutex_unlock(&body_mutex); /* * Tidy up and quit Martin Blapp, ------------------------------------------------------------------ ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP: PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E ------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 14:03:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4DE16A401 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from mail.hamcom.de (mail2.hamcom.de [212.37.37.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1742713C441 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from adsl-dyn-88-208-151-165.heliweb.de ([88.208.151.165] helo=chikuku.dunkelkammer.void) by mail.hamcom.de with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQ1gC-0008VU-4E; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:32:12 +0100 Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void [192.168.0.99]) by chikuku.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68713BC60; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:32:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 0B0D43CBC; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:32:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:32:10 +0100 From: Stefan Walter To: Bill Smith Message-ID: <20070310133210.GA932@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <45E45AD4.7040005@lumeta.com> <20070227124644.U34426@n.cwu.edu> <45E58C52.3090001@lumeta.com> <45EDA3F5.6070102@rakupottery.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EDA3F5.6070102@rakupottery.org.uk> Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:03:55 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Bill Smith, 06.03.07, 18:25h CET: > I have been having problems with this as well, I have the linprocfs=20 > mounted, but the buil is > dying with the following error: >=20 > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.ja= va:1186=20 > : warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact ar= gument type=20 > for las t parameter; > cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call > cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this=20 > warning > return (IOException)ctr.newInstance(args); > ^ > ../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/StandardMetaDataImpl.j= ava:637=20 > : warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact ar= gument type=20 > for las t parameter; > cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call > cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this=20 > warning > result =3D meth.invoke(instance,null); > ^ > ../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/MBeanInstantiatorImpl.= java:16=20 > 2: warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact a= rgument type=20 > for la st parameter; > cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call > cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this=20 > warning > moi=3D cons.newInstance(null); > ^ > Note: * uses or overrides a deprecated API. > Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. > Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. > Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. > 21 errors > 12 warnings > gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/ja= va' > gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' > gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' > gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. The warnings about varargs are harmless. The errors causing the build to fail seem to have happened earlier and are not listed here. It might be easier for you to just use the java/diablo-jdk15 port, which installs precompiled binaries. Regards, Stefan --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBRfKzWlaRERsSueCzAQJXJQwAtCQacKeKhNOdBQEH9dzYJdMyYUsgRBki eSF0mmkLv8YYh8l7IkDkeesp0Vay0K3DiQws/0sW6rDCIuCCc1OwtQHml8SWK1oO CGAmyiiaQ3iN2kDPJ3eDaM1XA+TN8tJ/dGzEjXP8f8wtfMEMh7Kv+kse8zNYWWSD 5CJT4oA3mwd3iML0wOLqNaKyAZLQ8FcHRVOpo9igJKEMWR2TeesrELeGG128FfGb yB7NPN8EaKiv3NYacGqYtvCDv+yJPx0Tysm+fuxZfA/SFiaSdobdSLB6OL2pcsMd y0nriGz1oAo289+mFG9NR16JYF0yewLibU4v5ia7Kq2tfSr0kpXK+EwfanKdPVNJ z54gkisSv5OL+rTGJDSdjmdOC0zzSa6TvhS/fq9vYgvVpH29D1gat1lPNdbtftEo HVlwTKMHErQdV1fGXKmr8vRTqw1K9o2I6UkmksWpKpiitep3rLM8fKyhPNKBv3Yq dzMVuliQIY8jTiURNTDDeCtdFaSzmXeE =8EQi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 14:53:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6844A16A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.mouritsen@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E8D13C48E for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.mouritsen@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1415162muf for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:53:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=aN7gsOzzE2YCdjt9RoOOHUseKwbKXLQgfey1fmurI/N92/VwmcJVMhDB0wqFLr1hVjHir24zWUWU9ShcL9+a02YcCJ/XZ5Fuj8cx74j6IfnfwGGwpg0IOcB5pJLxrHcmapgrmVRJenJzrlu2r9lrSYKhIa+EZCcaTJU09qxPtP0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=aSKBlpaDYaj/yBaiqyB1O293iw9hfP4iIjbgSuRNPawXhIyMgpzhFiAvgPgW1XQgxWq/olRoR0Bc6QRWD1u8Cx3aQZSubowa7yMZySm171x4ITHD0PlyStbx77PCkK5EbfnqRkBZD/8BZ9/5fHRhXlkOJGbTQNxst4KcEeZQJ6I= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr4946447bud.1173536629937; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:23:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.191.20 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:23:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:23:49 +0100 From: "Daniel Mouritsen" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Some questions from a newcomer X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:53:05 -0000 Hello, I'm playing around with using freebsd for my home server (which used to use linux), and I have a quick question regarding the distributions you can select with sysinstall during the install phase. I've chosen developer(since i wish to use the ports packages, i figured selecting developer might be a good idea to get gcc and such), user and minimal. Just out of curiosity, is does one cancel out the other? i mean, is it really necessary to pick user and minimal if i choose developer? I mean, wont everything in "minimal" be included in "developer"? The reason im asking is, all this server is gonna be running is apache, pf and ntpd to handle the clock. I pretty much want to close down everything else and make as minimal a system as possible. Any suggestions about the layout of this machine? Is developer "overkill"? Also, i was wondering, i tried playing around with portsnap, but dear lord it was slow :D I tried googling for European mirrors close to me, but i haven't had much success, any help with finding a faster portsnap server would be much appreciated Best regards, Daniel Kirkegaard Mouritsen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 15:16:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395AE16A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1E2F13C494 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 11616 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2007 14:49:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2UIs5ERQs0fLE6N4m4bQNsL5s3YPnaE5M7782VIgcRgEHRBoWoqN26VkqlYp02Q5D8M+qozhKTyDIwl+j4wIyf33KJDtJF45O2UFenlAay+HAHSmE9kFnQ7Yemw5947O8Zwz5rKT2wUuKtqwN7FlhtJG4+CsPoGePnGQ2KJKeVI= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.200?) (mikej@rogers.com@74.111.253.239 with plain) by smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2007 14:49:40 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: LBy9_9sVM1kGcFnEc.htwYmQgkiUmxXRm6h6OCdFXAFyWnuL8K6jML_fePMg6fQqxQ-- Message-ID: <45F2C520.6000006@rogers.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:48:00 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Blapp , stable@freebsd.org References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> <200702270305.l1R35MX2067221@lava.sentex.ca> <20070227035603.GA49430@tmn.ru> <20070227183553.B18301@godot.imp.ch> <867iu2gtny.fsf@sparrow.local> <3aaaa3a0703010217u63e389f2hbe848a8fc42cd9f2@mail.gmail.com> <868xehfdcs.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070301121848.L18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070301134326.GA43757@crete.org.ua> <20070301155557.GA16805@bluepex.com> <863b4fkedu.fsf@sparrow.local> <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> In-Reply-To: <20070308180618.X13160@godot.imp.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:16:22 -0000 Martin Blapp wrote: > Clamd with libpthread.so is still broken. Please use libthr.so. I'm > currently > investigating why libpthreads.so has problems with clamd, and it looks > to me > like a library bug. This may be related to a problem i had with Mysql on a large server recently. Mysql threads would start eating a lot of CPU and staying around forever. I switched to libthr and the problem went away. Sorry, i don't have any more info than this, because it is a production server i cant mess around with it any more. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 15:25:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA9616A402 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E038F13C442 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 19662 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2007 14:58:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JsNvWiCTnNjZx6Xvd61lJvsQKehfffrJLmvuLeUpWMyBUhBKPzjlMXm640RI4R9OGf02lJXBmjeNC/K9MhItjb6b7RDsZNZurA9wtC18/6uS31TKTxcDeHJN7H+prALPhq//fgPvaWqr+dBhaPV/MNoz0KSnnLNYd/tX2i21FB8= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.200?) (mikej@rogers.com@74.111.253.239 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2007 14:58:40 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: Uk5u1.gVM1mrm3CnDsAra43u_nIcAvtks9Qwfn65fK5i1dXEhVQEyTaZYDBSb._Kbg-- Message-ID: <45F2C73C.1090500@rogers.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:57:00 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Mouritsen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some questions from a newcomer X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:25:22 -0000 Daniel Mouritsen wrote: > Hello, > > I'm playing around with using freebsd for my home server (which used > to use > linux), and I have a quick question regarding the distributions you can > select with sysinstall during the install phase. > > I've chosen developer(since i wish to use the ports packages, i figured > selecting developer might be a good idea to get gcc and such), user and > minimal. > > Just out of curiosity, is does one cancel out the other? i mean, is it > really necessary to pick user and minimal if i choose developer? I mean, > wont everything in "minimal" be included in "developer"? > > The reason im asking is, all this server is gonna be running is > apache, pf > and ntpd to handle the clock. I pretty much want to close down everything > else and make as minimal a system as possible. Any suggestions about the > layout of this machine? Is developer "overkill"? > You don't need the developer packages to compile or use the ports. I would recommend you choose the basic user option instead. > Also, i was wondering, i tried playing around with portsnap, but dear > lord > it was slow :D I tried googling for European mirrors close to me, but i > haven't had much success, any help with finding a faster portsnap server > would be much appreciated You may want to try cvsup instead. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 15:39:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8E416A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3422213C48D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2AFcwiP059938; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:38:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E0E00B82D; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:38:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:38:57 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Daniel Mouritsen Message-ID: <20070310153857.GA41866@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Mouritsen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some questions from a newcomer X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:39:01 -0000 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 03:23:49PM +0100, Daniel Mouritsen wrote: > I'm playing around with using freebsd for my home server (which used to u= se > linux), and I have a quick question regarding the distributions you can > select with sysinstall during the install phase. >=20 > I've chosen developer(since i wish to use the ports packages, i figured > selecting developer might be a good idea to get gcc and such), user and > minimal. The C compiler is part of the base system. It is part of the required binary distributions. > The reason im asking is, all this server is gonna be running is apache, pf > and ntpd to handle the clock. I pretty much want to close down everything > else and make as minimal a system as possible. Any suggestions about the > layout of this machine? Is developer "overkill"? Could be. Why not use "custom" and choose what you want? I've marked the things that I'd recommend with an 'X'. =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] base Binary base distribution (required) =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] kernels Binary kernel distributions (require= d) =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [ ] dict Spelling checker dictionary files =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] doc Miscellaneous FreeBSD online docs =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [ ] games Games (non-commercial) =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] info GNU info files =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] man System manual pages - recommended =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [ ] catman Preformatted system manual pages =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [ ] proflibs Profiled versions of the libraries =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] src Sources for everything =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [X] ports The FreeBSD Ports collection =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [ ] local Local additions collection =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 [ ] X.Org The X.Org distribution If you won't be recompiling the kernel or system binaries you can forgo installing the source code ('src'). But in general I think it is a good idea to have the source handy, in case you want to build a custom kernel or want to patch a vulnerability. You can always restart sysinstall at a later date, and install additional stuff if you like. Things like apache are from ports, and you can install as little as you lik= e. > Also, i was wondering, i tried playing around with portsnap, but dear lord > it was slow :D I tried googling for European mirrors close to me, but i > haven't had much success, any help with finding a faster portsnap server > would be much appreciated The first time you invoke portsnap ('fetch extract'), it will be slow because it needs to download a lot. Subsequent invocations ('fetch update') will be much faster. I'm using portsnap from Europe, and it is usually faster than a csup from a european mirror. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8tEREnfvsMMhpyURAjIBAKCBrBOhM/EIbbWAMCx80RsV2IrvKQCfS7nB gHD1vw6Wc0xbEm8WjnjoQKo= =xNJY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 16:19:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3052816A405 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (grgw.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.64.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FF213C4A3 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2AGJ8TU003298 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:19:08 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2AGJ8Aa003297 for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:19:08 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:19:08 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070310161908.GA3238@grosbein.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: devfs promlem: creating new partition in empty slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:19:15 -0000 Hi! There is FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (updated yesterday) having single SATA drive. The drive has two equal-sized slices ad4s1 and ad4s2, both marked with sysid 165 (FreeBSD). The system occupies ad4s1 (partitions from a to h), and ad4s2 is empty. This scheme was created at installation time with sysinstall started by system boot CD (official disk1). Now, when the system is up and running, I need to create partitions within slice ad4s2. Questions are: 1. Do I really need 'sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16' if I do not want to touch MBR or living slice at all, and why, if I do? 2. How should I create new partitions within ad4s2? I've tried to use sysinstall, it fills bsdlabel right but fails to newfs/mount new partitions because device nodes do not exist. So now I have this: # bsdlabel ad4s2 # /dev/ad4s2: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 524288 2097152 4.2BSD 0 0 0 b: 2097152 0 swap c: 78702435 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 524288 2621440 4.2BSD 0 0 0 e: 4194304 3145728 4.2BSD 0 0 0 f: 20971520 7340032 4.2BSD 0 0 0 g: 20971520 28311552 4.2BSD 0 0 0 h: 29419363 49283072 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # ls -l /dev/ad4s2* crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 75 10 ÍÁÒ 14:53 /dev/ad4s2 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 84 10 ÍÁÒ 14:53 /dev/ad4s2c What should I do now to get needed device nodes? The server is remote one, it runs in production and I'd prefer to not reboot it. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 16:39:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426E116A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail1.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C15113C46B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from dynabook-freebsd.advok.com (pool-141-151-95-117.phlapa.east.verizon.net [141.151.95.117]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77522E825; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 01:39:51 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:35:51 -0500 From: Yoshihiro Ota To: Danny Braniss Message-Id: <20070310113551.ef38ff83.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:39:56 -0000 On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:57:09 +0200 Danny Braniss wrote: > > Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > > > About one year ago, I was able to do the regular procedure after enabling i386 compat. > > > It was just another make world for me. > > > > > > options COMPAT_IA32 > > > > > > What I mean is: > > > > > > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). > > > # 2. `make buildworld' > > > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > > > > But if you already have an i386 kernel running, wouldn't running "make > > buildkernel" just make another i386 kernel? > > try > make buildkernel TARGET_ARCH=amd64 KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE > > works for me, > danny > I believe I have done with TARGET_ARCH=amd64 or something on the line. As I've done it about a year ago, I don't recall some of these details. After a couple of months, I decided to switch back to i386. It was just to experiment amd64. I share the same executables among multiple systems (although there are only 2 or 3) to sync software versions. (It is not often but having diffrent versions of the same software causes some problems.) Since I have i386 machines, I cannot share amd64 binraries. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 19:21:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290FF16A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E5713C461 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B31A1435E5; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:21:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 67C2ED5004A; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:21:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 4E2E1D50047; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:21:27 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rPIeznm1BLNNOoetMtgqrFI6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (83-131-99-238.adsl.net.t-com.hr [83.131.99.238]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id 7F8395E0112; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:21:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F3052C.7090200@fer.hr> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:21:16 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Braniss References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB65331A2A25CED2C076184B4" Cc: Yoshihiro Ota , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from x86 (32) to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:21:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB65331A2A25CED2C076184B4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Danny Braniss wrote: > try > make buildkernel TARGET_ARCH=3Damd64 KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE Yes, that's better :) --------------enigB65331A2A25CED2C076184B4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8wU0ldnAQVacBcgRAr3pAKCL1NJyGr8h5EZQDrRyFdnWHLvpxwCePPcK 44kceEFyeoOXxC6e14tfW5U= =wJ52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB65331A2A25CED2C076184B4-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 19:28:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F19216A40E for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.mouritsen@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96C613C494 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:28:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.mouritsen@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1481447muf for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:28:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZN590tPRgcXHq9ISWAcfkYwsEP06VOenycw9UG2qrY3UaymzNao0Z6z/N0cTnd6cEIhnqVzRvAanTa7mhzPATE5a1do7TYUXOujjmeWHl+sF1EZlAlIvVjiSx1vscDrIyWWGB8ecY6gqFMuswjFj/stiW3UcplTzwfPqmvmsFQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dKiuwHDIZYELxqrmSGTdSxGAk2gDgSsb/mmHVsN7T113me2PyGGPDnuIUJj2P5jJ02U6/T9PDh14DGUFIjmZLQayhtSEoZCrcb7LdCgwmfBE5Q4ZrRbAJxmUHeak069SDHZK8efherhVb2PiNzTMPSHn9e378bfpRfQ2dCZET+Y= Received: by 10.82.187.16 with SMTP id k16mr5484016buf.1173554925680; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.191.20 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:28:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:28:45 +0100 From: "Daniel Mouritsen" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Another newbie question, about makefile options X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:28:48 -0000 Hi, quick question.. When installing apache, i used the following make WITH_CATEGORY1_MODULES="yes" WITH_CATEGORY2_MODULES="yes" etc.. etc and "make install clean" which seemed to work fine and install everything I wanted.. but when instealling vim using the NO_GUI="yes" option, it wanted to install X when i did "make install clean" using make NO_GUI="yes" install clean made it install without the gui... So my question is, should i pass the makefile options only when running "make" to compile the program (that would make sence wouldnt it?) or should i use them everytime i run make as in both when doing "make" and "make install clean". From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 21:20:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B0016A405 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd15624.kasserver.com (dd15624.kasserver.com [85.13.136.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E27313C474 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-061-126-065.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.126.65]) by dd15624.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62506182DFC1B; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:02:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F31CB9.2000808@chillt.de> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:01:45 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Mouritsen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another newbie question, about makefile options X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:20:33 -0000 > So my question is, should i pass the makefile options only when running > "make" to compile the program (that would make sence wouldnt it?) or should > i use them everytime i run make as in both when doing "make" and "make > install clean". I think your experience already showed you that the options have to be specified both when compiling and when installing. The reason is that when you run make a second time, the makefile gets parsed again and the dependencies are checked again. Even if you pass the same flags, new dependencies may still appear during the "make install" stage. These are run-time dependencies that were not required to build the port but must be present in order for it to function correctly. Thus, always pass the same options to make but do not be surprised if "make install" still pulls in new dependencies. - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 21:39:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C4416A400 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:39:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304D913C461 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2ALdTaW010158; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:39:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 73630B82D; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:39:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:39:29 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Daniel Mouritsen Message-ID: <20070310213929.GA50901@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Mouritsen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another newbie question, about makefile options X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:39:31 -0000 --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:28:45PM +0100, Daniel Mouritsen wrote: > So my question is, should i pass the makefile options only when running > "make" to compile the program (that would make sence wouldnt it?) or shou= ld > i use them everytime i run make as in both when doing "make" and "make > install clean". You can put the options in /etc/make.conf. That way you can't forget them when you're (re)building a port. For example, for apache22 you could put the following in /etc/make.conf: =2Eif ${.CURDIR:M*/www/apache22} WITH_CATEGORY1_MODULES=3Dyes WITH_CATEGORY2_MODULES=3Dyes =2Eendif This effectively sets the variables whenever make is invoked in a directory that ends with www/apache22. See make(1). Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF8yWREnfvsMMhpyURAthHAJ4grptxFVgxuvPmZH+ukJgyEjgG6wCfaNye TlXw68QFtK2pzZCrzuHm4QQ= =SxOK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 22:53:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5AF16A403 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS1=9bbd7c853beab7edd3ea8f4229f2106d80e99e11=es.net==9bbd7c853beab7edd3ea8f4229f2106d80e99e11=270=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651F113C494 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS1=9bbd7c853beab7edd3ea8f4229f2106d80e99e11=es.net==9bbd7c853beab7edd3ea8f4229f2106d80e99e11=270=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from postal4.es.net (postal4.es.net [198.124.252.66]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id PZY05355 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:40:55 -0800 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal4.es.net (Postal Node 4) with ESMTP (SSL) id PZY60950; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:40:50 -0800 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 7CFCB45053; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:40:49 -0800 (PST) To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:38:57 +0100." <20070310153857.GA41866@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1173566449_91676P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:40:49 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20070310224049.7CFCB45053@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Daniel Mouritsen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some questions from a newcomer X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:53:15 -0000 --==_Exmh_1173566449_91676P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:38:57 +0100 > From: Roland Smith > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 03:23:49PM +0100, Daniel Mouritsen wrote: > > I'm playing around with using freebsd for my home server (which used to u> se > > linux), and I have a quick question regarding the distributions you can > > select with sysinstall during the install phase. > > > > I've chosen developer(since i wish to use the ports packages, i figured > > selecting developer might be a good idea to get gcc and such), user and > > minimal. > > The C compiler is part of the base system. It is part of the required > binary distributions. > > > The reason im asking is, all this server is gonna be running is apache, pf > > and ntpd to handle the clock. I pretty much want to close down everything > > else and make as minimal a system as possible. Any suggestions about the > > layout of this machine? Is developer "overkill"? > > Could be. Why not use "custom" and choose what you want? I've marked the > things that I'd recommend with an 'X'. > > │ │ [X] base Binary base distribution (required) > │ │ [X] kernels Binary kernel distributions (require> d) > │ │ [ ] dict Spelling checker dictionary files > │ │ [X] doc Miscellaneous FreeBSD online docs > │ │ [ ] games Games (non-commercial) > │ │ [X] info GNU info files > │ │ [X] man System manual pages - recommended > │ │ [ ] catman Preformatted system manual pages > │ │ [ ] proflibs Profiled versions of the libraries > │ │ [X] src Sources for everything > │ │ [X] ports The FreeBSD Ports collection > │ │ [ ] local Local additions collection > │ │ [ ] X.Org The X.Org distribution > > If you won't be recompiling the kernel or system binaries you can forgo > installing the source code ('src'). But in general I think it is a good > idea to have the source handy, in case you want to build a custom kernel > or want to patch a vulnerability. > > You can always restart sysinstall at a later date, and install > additional stuff if you like. > > Things like apache are from ports, and you can install as little as you lik> e. > > > Also, i was wondering, i tried playing around with portsnap, but dear lord > > it was slow :D I tried googling for European mirrors close to me, but i > > haven't had much success, any help with finding a faster portsnap server > > would be much appreciated > > The first time you invoke portsnap ('fetch extract'), it will be slow > because it needs to download a lot. Subsequent invocations ('fetch > update') will be much faster. I'm using portsnap from Europe, and it is > usually faster than a csup from a european mirror. I recommend NOT installing ports from the distribution media. If you install this ports collection (which are certainly a bit out of date) and then use csup (or cvsup) to bring it up to date, you may find stale patch files hanging around as csup only knows to delete files it created and will ignore any files already in the ports directory tree which have since been deleted. This can lead to very interesting (and unexpected behavior. I simply install without ports and, as soon as I have the system up and on the net, run csup to pull in the entire ports tree in clean form. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1173566449_91676P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFF8zPxkn3rs5h7N1ERAjmVAJwPljaHblgToMabBtotuo/tgXfW3QCgm1QK PZUBOIszrDU3kxo3h0wSb2U= =xNhR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1173566449_91676P-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 23:11:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DCC16A401 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsyphers@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E8013C461 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsyphers@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l2ANBX6Z025136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:11:33 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-24-19-52-201.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [24.19.52.201]) (authenticated authid=dsyphers) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l2ANBWAU019445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:11:33 -0800 From: David Syphers To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:11:30 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20070310224049.7CFCB45053@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20070310224049.7CFCB45053@ptavv.es.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703101511.31944.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> X-PMX-Version: 5.3.0.289146, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.3.10.145934 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CD 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Roland Smith , Daniel Mouritsen Subject: Re: Some questions from a newcomer X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:11:58 -0000 On Saturday 10 March 2007 14:40, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I simply install without ports and, as soon as I have the system up and > on the net, run csup to pull in the entire ports tree in clean form. You can also download /pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/ports.tar.gz from a FreeBSD ftp site, and expand that. It's the ports tree, updated every day. Then you can update with c[v]sup later. I don't know if this is faster for a user, but I'd assume it's less load for the cvsup servers. -David -- Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 23:25:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0EE16A402 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@w21.org) Received: from w21.org (w21.org [217.173.146.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E634F13C474 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@w21.org) Received: by w21.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 227E11163D; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:25:11 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Juergen Nickelsen Newsgroups: w21.lists.freebsd-stable Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:25:08 +0100 Organization: 52.45 13.34 Lines: 14 Distribution: w21 Message-ID: References: <20070310133210.GA932@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> NNTP-Posting-Host: wittduen-wl.ni.w21.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: oland.ni.w21.org 1173569111 17678 10.0.1.14 (10 Mar 2007 23:25:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@w21.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:25:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (fiddleheads, darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gSAGUMnGr7z0Rd0hEjXL0c4aBtk= Subject: Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:25:14 -0000 Stefan Walter writes: > It might be easier for you to just use the java/diablo-jdk15 port, which > installs precompiled binaries. Although I have, with the much appreciated help from people here, successfully installed the jdk15 port in between, I thought about diablo-jdk15, too. Would there be any difference between both ports in terms of compatibility, features, and performance from the viewpoint of the Java developer and user? -- I don't know anything about music. In my line you don't have to. -- Elvis Presley