From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 04:43:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDDC16A41A for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8255E13C457 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id PAA17306; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:43:15 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:43:14 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: acpi@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Richard Arends Subject: Re: Management of Thermal (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:43:24 -0000 Hi, Maybe pertinent to current discussions of thermal management on various thinkpads .. I just checked acpi_ibm.c 1.7.2.4 (6.x) and see that it still doesn't include the fan level support introduced to 7.x at 1.10 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.10&r2=text&tr2=1.7.2.4 Is there any particular reason this wasn't / can't be MFC'd to 6.x? cheers, Ian ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:55:51 +0200 From: Richard Arends To: Ian Smith Cc: Norberto Meijome , FreeBSD Mobile ML Subject: Re: Management of Thermal On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:27:48AM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: Ian, > Just browsing: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c > > What revision of that have you? It's not clear to me tha this fan level > stuff, documented with rev 1.10, was ever MFC'd to 6-STABLE. If I'm > diffing the right versions it appears that it wasn't, and the comment on > 1.7.2.3 (6.X) says only 'MFC: 1.11, 1.12', but that seems not so, if I'm > reading the diffs against any of those versions right (incl 1.14 @ 7.0) You are absolutely right. On my stable tree I MFC'ed the acpi_ibm a few times myself. Totaly forget about it :) Now i'm running the normal acpi_ibm in stable again and indeed the fan_level hook isn't there anymore. Adapting acpi_ibm to stable was not that hard but you can also try to run RELENG_7, it is fairly stable at the moment :) -- Regards, Richard.