From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 7 11:07:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797C31065676 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654D48FC28 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m67B76Rt062171 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:07:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m67B75jx062167 for freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:07:05 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:07:05 GMT Message-Id: <200807071107.m67B75jx062167@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:07:06 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/39388 scsi ncr/sym drivers fail with 53c810 and more than 256MB m o kern/40895 scsi wierd kernel / device driver bug o kern/52638 scsi [panic] SCSI U320 on SMP server won't run faster than s kern/57398 scsi [mly] Current fails to install on mly(4) based RAID di o kern/60598 scsi wire down of scsi devices conflicts with config o kern/60641 scsi [sym] Sporadic SCSI bus resets with 53C810 under load s kern/61165 scsi [panic] kernel page fault after calling cam_send_ccb o kern/74627 scsi [ahc] [hang] Adaptec 2940U2W Can't boot 5.3 o kern/90282 scsi [sym] SCSI bus resets cause loss of ch device o kern/92798 scsi [ahc] SCSI problem with timeouts o kern/94838 scsi Kernel panic while mounting SD card with lock switch o o kern/99954 scsi [ahc] reading from DVD failes on 6.x [regression] o kern/110847 scsi [ahd] Tyan U320 onboard problem with more than 3 disks o kern/120247 scsi [mpt] FreeBSD 6.3 and LSI Logic 1030 = only 3.300MB/s o kern/124667 scsi [amd] [panic] FreeBSD-7 kernel page faults at amd-scsi 15 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/35234 scsi World access to /dev/pass? (for scanner) requires acce o kern/38828 scsi [dpt] [request] DPT PM2012B/90 doesn't work o kern/44587 scsi dev/dpt/dpt.h is missing defines required for DPT_HAND o kern/76178 scsi [ahd] Problem with ahd and large SCSI Raid system o kern/114597 scsi [sym] System hangs at SCSI bus reset with dual HBAs o kern/119668 scsi [cam] [patch] certain errors are too verbose comparing o kern/120487 scsi [sg] scsi_sg incompatible with scanners o sparc/121676 scsi [iscsi] iscontrol do not connect iscsi-target on sparc o kern/123666 scsi [aac] aac(4) will not work with Adaptec SAS RAID 3805 o kern/123674 scsi [ahc] ahc driver dumping 10 problems total. From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 16:55:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD591065675 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@accid.net) Received: from postville.darq.net (postville.darq.net [82.136.41.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C350B8FC0C for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@accid.net) Received: from localhost (postville.darq.net [82.136.41.65]) by postville.darq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3624A3153FF2 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:35:58 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at darq.net Received: from postville.darq.net ([82.136.41.65]) by localhost (postville.darq.net [82.136.41.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JLfiiH+0j4n7 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:35:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from mig.darq.net (78-105-7-89.zone3.bethere.co.uk [78.105.7.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrew@accid.net) by postville.darq.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B07EF3153FE0 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:35:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48739769.2070902@accid.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:35:53 +0100 From: Andrew Von Cid User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: HP StorageWorks U320e supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:55:51 -0000 Hi everyone, I've got a Quantum CL1102 LTO-3 tape drive that I need to hook up to a FreeBSD 7 server. As far as I'm aware, as long as I have a supported SCSI adapter, the tape drive should work fine. I'm looking into getting a HP StorageWorks U320e (AH627A) SCSI card [1], but I couldn't find any info whether it'll work with FreeBSD. Can someone confirm if it's supported or not? Alternatively, I'd be very grateful if someone could recommend a supported SCSI(Ultra160) adapter that works with FreeBSD 7. It needs to fit either PCI-e or PCI-X solts. Many thanks, Andrew. From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 17:25:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EE4106567B for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from plato.miralink.com (mail.miralink.com [70.103.185.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B128FC26 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED6F1A9149; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:24:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.295 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.295 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.104, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from plato.miralink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.miralink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pl7YE0xpiS8I; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iago.office.miralink.com (iago.office.miralink.com [10.0.0.40]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0981A90C7; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4873A2F4.5070501@miralink.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:25:08 -0700 From: Sean Bruno User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Von Cid References: <48739769.2070902@accid.net> In-Reply-To: <48739769.2070902@accid.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP StorageWorks U320e supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:25:09 -0000 Andrew Von Cid wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've got a Quantum CL1102 LTO-3 tape drive that I need to hook up to a > FreeBSD 7 server. As far as I'm aware, as long as I have a supported > SCSI adapter, the tape drive should work fine. > > I'm looking into getting a HP StorageWorks U320e (AH627A) SCSI card > [1], but I couldn't find any info whether it'll work with FreeBSD. > Can someone confirm if it's supported or not? > > Alternatively, I'd be very grateful if someone could recommend a > supported SCSI(Ultra160) adapter that works with FreeBSD 7. It needs > to fit either PCI-e or PCI-X solts. > > > Many thanks, > > > Andrew. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I'd suggest sticking with the "old standby" Adaptec 29160 board(PCI-X). If you _need_ PCI-E then I would suggest going with the 29320. -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 19:15:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86375106564A for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from plato.miralink.com (mail.miralink.com [70.103.185.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6454F8FC1B for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9341A90E2 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:14:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from plato.miralink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.miralink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWFrFIFforsP for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iago.office.miralink.com (iago.office.miralink.com [10.0.0.40]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B391A90C7 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4873BCC9.80603@miralink.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:15:21 -0700 From: Sean Bruno User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: share/examples/scsi_target doesn't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:15:24 -0000 Is the scsi_target example code supposed to install when a "make install" is invoked? [sbruno@ophelia ~/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_15APR08/src/share/examples/scsi_target]$ sudo make install install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 scsi_target usage: install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2 install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... *** Error code 64 Stop in /usr/home/sbruno/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_15APR08/src/share/examples/scsi_target. -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 19:10:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F47106566C for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from westr@connection.ca) Received: from nc-tor-mail1.connection.ca (nc-tor-mail1.connection.ca [205.207.122.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D4D8FC0C for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from westr@connection.ca) Received: from localhost (external.tor.connection.ca [216.234.38.18]) by nc-tor-mail1.connection.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FF144B3CF for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:53:56 -0400 From: Ross Organization: Network Connection X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1557532186.20080710145356@connection.ca> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: isp - error/scsi message X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ross List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:10:54 -0000 I'm getting the following error every so often, and I'm wondering if someone else has had it and knows what it means. -= kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 1 10 eb bf 0 0 20 0 kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): UNIT ATTENTION asc:2a,6 kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): Reserved ASC/ASCQ pair kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) -= A quick google of the ASC/ASCQ code gives the message "ASYMMETRIC ACCESS STATE CHANGED", which I'm wondering has something to do with the fact that the corresponding lun is accessible via multiple paths (4 paths - 2x isp QHM2432 adapters). If anyone can help shed some light on this, I'd be grateful! Ross. -- From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 21:18:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCAC106564A for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from plato.miralink.com (mail.miralink.com [70.103.185.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036BA8FC0A for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAC61A922C; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:16:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.334 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.334 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from plato.miralink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.miralink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxbiMpCgHb03; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iago.office.miralink.com (iago.office.miralink.com [10.0.0.40]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D421A922B; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48767C9B.3060804@miralink.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:18:19 -0700 From: Sean Bruno User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ross References: <1557532186.20080710145356@connection.ca> In-Reply-To: <1557532186.20080710145356@connection.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isp - error/scsi message X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:18:21 -0000 Ross wrote: > I'm getting the following error every so often, and I'm wondering if > someone else has had it and knows what it means. > > -= > kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 1 10 eb bf 0 0 20 0 > kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition > kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): UNIT ATTENTION asc:2a,6 > kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): Reserved ASC/ASCQ pair > kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > -= > > A quick google of the ASC/ASCQ code gives the message "ASYMMETRIC > ACCESS STATE CHANGED", which I'm wondering has something to do with > the fact that the corresponding lun is accessible via multiple paths > (4 paths - 2x isp QHM2432 adapters). > > If anyone can help shed some light on this, I'd be grateful! > > > Ross. > > What version of FreeBSD is this related to? Sean -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 21:24:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB8C106564A for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from westr@connection.ca) Received: from nc-tor-mail2.connection.ca (nc-tor-mail2.connection.ca [205.207.122.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436458FC24 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from westr@connection.ca) Received: from localhost (external.tor.connection.ca [216.234.38.18]) by nc-tor-mail2.connection.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C0B74E5BA for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:24:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:24:53 -0400 From: Ross Organization: Network Connection X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <477336220.20080710172453@connection.ca> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <48767C9B.3060804@miralink.com> References: <1557532186.20080710145356@connection.ca> <48767C9B.3060804@miralink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: isp - error/scsi message X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ross List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:24:47 -0000 >> >> -= >> kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 1 10 eb bf 0 0 20 0 >> kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error >> kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition >> kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): UNIT ATTENTION asc:2a,6 >> kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): Reserved ASC/ASCQ pair >> kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:1): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) >> -= >> >> A quick google of the ASC/ASCQ code gives the message "ASYMMETRIC >> ACCESS STATE CHANGED", which I'm wondering has something to do with >> the fact that the corresponding lun is accessible via multiple paths >> (4 paths - 2x isp QHM2432 adapters). >> >> If anyone can help shed some light on this, I'd be grateful! SB> What version of FreeBSD is this related to? Sorry, forgot that details - it's running Freebsd 7.0, with the included isp driver on a custom kernel (ie: trimmed and with PAE/ULE) Biggest thing to note is that the isp firmware is 4.00.90 - which is the builtin fw for the card (newer than the OS included one). And a small correction: it's a QHM2462 card. -- From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 13:08:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A95C106566B for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-scsi@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA928FC1E for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-scsi@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KHI4Y-00037U-RU for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:50:02 +0000 Received: from borg.bfh.ch ([147.87.102.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:50:02 +0000 Received: from ktk by borg.bfh.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:50:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org From: Adrian Gschwend Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:52:07 +0200 Organization: netlabs.org Lines: 80 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: borg.bfh.ch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: iSCSI performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:08:22 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I finally invested some time to get iSCSI to work on FreeBSD. Now I do have an iSCSI disk mounted in the system so I started doing some performance tests against an NetApp FAS3020 head with an iSCSI LUN configured for my FreeBSD 7.0-stable box. It's a rather old IBM server and I used sysbench to get some stats. The results I got were: local SCSI disk, UFS: - -- Operations performed: 5999 Read, 4001 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total Read 93.734Mb Written 62.516Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (2.2672Mb/sec) 145.10 Requests/sec executed - -- NFS share on the NetApp (no tweaking, default NFS mount): - -- Operations performed: 6006 Read, 3994 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total Read 93.844Mb Written 62.406Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (11.948Mb/sec) 764.69 Requests/sec executed - -- iSCSI with UFS: - -- Operations performed: 6004 Read, 3996 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total Read 93.812Mb Written 62.438Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (489.41Kb/sec) 30.59 Requests/sec executed - -- which is a rather bad results for iSCSI ;) Note that I didn't want to get the real performance so I just took the default sysbench lines I found in the docs. It was just to get something to compare to. Googling a bit I found this posting here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-February/003383.html Is this patch in -CURRENT by now or do I still have to compile the stuff on my own if I want to do some more tests? And is anyone actively working on iSCSI right now? I do have some proposals regarding iscontrol as well, the tool is not yet idiot proof ;) What would be the appropriate list to post feedback regarding that? next thing on my list is to try ZFS on the iSCSI share but I would like to see some better performance on UFS first :) BTW in case you wonder why I want to use iSCSI: I am running a subversion server with rather big repositories using "fsfs" on NFS and I run into very weird PROPFIND problems (Apache frontent) when importing large quantities of data and I don't have the problem doing the same on a local drive of the server. So I guess that's some NFS locking stuff I couldn't get rid of. The idea is to replace that with iSCSI and ZFS (I love NetApps snapshot feature and I want that too in the future, so ZFS) once both is declared as stable (yes, I have time :) cu Adrian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFId1d3qpMUYrZbQBERAhjfAJ96YsvsVyLgeRY3Ah54UM1jvwHKwgCeIaoM ibhoi7c6jovvBIF/jaI5IQ8= =mr7E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 14:04:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188981065670 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70E28FC1D for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1KHJEp-000ChB-4N; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:04:43 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Adrian Gschwend In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Adrian Gschwend message dated "Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:52:07 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:04:43 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:04:47 -0000 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I finally invested some time to get iSCSI to work on FreeBSD. Now I do > have an iSCSI disk mounted in the system so I started doing some > performance tests against an NetApp FAS3020 head with an iSCSI LUN > configured for my FreeBSD 7.0-stable box. > > It's a rather old IBM server and I used sysbench to get some stats. > > The results I got were: > > local SCSI disk, UFS: > - -- > Operations performed: 5999 Read, 4001 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total > Read 93.734Mb Written 62.516Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (2.2672Mb/sec) > 145.10 Requests/sec executed > - -- > > > NFS share on the NetApp (no tweaking, default NFS mount): > - -- > Operations performed: 6006 Read, 3994 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total > Read 93.844Mb Written 62.406Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (11.948Mb/sec) > 764.69 Requests/sec executed > - -- > > > iSCSI with UFS: > - -- > Operations performed: 6004 Read, 3996 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total > Read 93.812Mb Written 62.438Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (489.41Kb/sec) > 30.59 Requests/sec executed > - -- > > which is a rather bad results for iSCSI ;) > > Note that I didn't want to get the real performance so I just took the > default sysbench lines I found in the docs. It was just to get something > to compare to. > > Googling a bit I found this posting here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-February/003383.html > > Is this patch in -CURRENT by now or do I still have to compile the stuff > on my own if I want to do some more tests? > the patches were for -STABLE, and I haven't seen them, but before the patches, try increasing the tag opening, ie camcontrol tags daX -N128 or via iscontrol (and yes it's not idiot proof, nor is is it developer proof :-) > And is anyone actively working on iSCSI right now? I do have some > proposals regarding iscontrol as well, the tool is not yet idiot proof > ;) What would be the appropriate list to post feedback regarding that? absolutely! > > next thing on my list is to try ZFS on the iSCSI share but I would like > to see some better performance on UFS first :) > > BTW in case you wonder why I want to use iSCSI: I am running a > subversion server with rather big repositories using "fsfs" on NFS and I > run into very weird PROPFIND problems (Apache frontent) when importing > large quantities of data and I don't have the problem doing the same on > a local drive of the server. So I guess that's some NFS locking stuff I > couldn't get rid of. > The idea is to replace that with iSCSI and ZFS (I love NetApps snapshot > feature and I want that too in the future, so ZFS) once both is declared > as stable (yes, I have time :) > > cu > > Adrian > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFId1d3qpMUYrZbQBERAhjfAJ96YsvsVyLgeRY3Ah54UM1jvwHKwgCeIaoM > ibhoi7c6jovvBIF/jaI5IQ8= > =mr7E > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >