From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 11:06:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17F6106564A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8418FC0A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n19B6kYr009021 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:06:46 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n19B6k0G009017 for freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:06:46 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:06:46 GMT Message-Id: <200902091106.n19B6k0G009017@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:06:47 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/130683 acpi [ACPI] shutdown hangs after syncing disks - ACPI race? o i386/129953 acpi [acpi] ACPI timeout (CDROM) with Shuttle X27D o kern/129618 acpi [acpi] Problem with ACPI on HP Pavilion DV2899 laptop o kern/129563 acpi [acpi] sleep broken on IBM/Lenovo T61 in amd64 mode o kern/128639 acpi [patch] [acpi_asus] acpi for ASUS A6F,A3E,A3F,A3N not f kern/128634 acpi [patch] fix acpi_asus(4) in asus a6f laptop o kern/127581 acpi [patch] [acpi_sony] Add support for more Sony features o kern/124744 acpi [acpi] [patch] incorrect _BST result validation for To o kern/124412 acpi [acpi] power off error on Toshiba M40 laptop o kern/123039 acpi [acpi] ACPI AML_BUFFER_LIMIT errors during boot o kern/121504 acpi [patch] Correctly set hw.acpi.osname on certain machin f kern/121454 acpi [pst] Promise SuperTrak SX6000 does not load during bo o kern/121102 acpi [acpi_fujitsu] [patch] update acpi_fujitsu for the P80 o kern/120515 acpi [acpi] [patch] acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler: can't alloc o kern/119356 acpi [acpi]: i386 ACPI wakeup not work due resource exhaust o kern/119200 acpi [acpi] Lid close switch suspends CPU for 1 second on H o kern/118973 acpi [acpi]: Kernel panic with acpi boot o kern/117605 acpi [acpi] [request] add debug.cpufreq.highest o kern/116939 acpi [acpi] PCI-to-PCI misconfigured for bus three and can o i386/114562 acpi [acpi] cardbus is dead after s3 on Thinkpad T43 with a o kern/114165 acpi [acpi] Dell C810 - ACPI problem s kern/112544 acpi [acpi] [patch] Add High Precision Event Timer Driver f o kern/108954 acpi [acpi] 'sleep(1)' sleeps >1 seconds when speedstep (Cx o kern/108695 acpi [acpi]: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault when in o kern/108581 acpi [sysctl] sysctl: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argume o kern/108488 acpi [acpi] ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed o kern/108017 acpi [acpi]: Acer Aspire 5600 o kern/106924 acpi [acpi] ACPI resume returns g_vfs_done() errors and ker o kern/105537 acpi [acpi] problems in acpi on HP Compaq nc6320 o kern/104625 acpi ACPI on ASUS A8N-32 SLI/ASUS P4P800 does not show ther o kern/102252 acpi acpi thermal does not work on Abit AW8D (intel 975) o kern/97383 acpi Volume buttons on IBM Thinkpad crash system with ACPI s i386/91748 acpi acpi problem on Acer TravelMare 4652LMi (nvidia panic, s kern/91038 acpi [panic] [ata] [acpi] 6.0-RELEASE on Fujitsu Siemens Am s kern/90243 acpi Laptop fan doesn't turn off (ACPI enabled) (Packard Be f kern/89411 acpi [acpi] acpiconf bug o i386/83018 acpi [install] Installer will not boot on Asus P4S8X BIOS 1 o kern/81000 acpi [apic] Via 8235 sound card worked great with FreeBSD 5 o i386/79081 acpi ACPI suspend/resume not working on HP nx6110 o kern/76950 acpi ACPI wrongly blacklisted on Micron ClientPro 766Xi sys s kern/73823 acpi [request] acpi / power-on by timer support o i386/72566 acpi ACPI, FreeBSD disables fan on Compaq Armada 1750 o i386/69750 acpi Boot without ACPI failed on ASUS L5 f kern/67309 acpi zzz reboot computer (ACPI S3) o kern/56024 acpi ACPI suspend drains battery while in S3 o i386/55661 acpi ACPI suspend/resume problem on ARMADA M700 o i386/54756 acpi ACPI suspend/resume problem on CF-W2 laptop 47 problems total. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 11:49:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1EA106564A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D533B8FC29 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWUdk-0005gk-Qf for freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:49:28 -0800 Message-ID: <21911316.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 03:49:28 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <21719238.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <494DBF33.7040301@micom.mng.net> <21555335.post@talk.nabble.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D83085811C41320@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D83085811C41358@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <21719238.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: RE: ACPI error, No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:49:30 -0000 Hello again. Updated to ACPICA 20090123, got 2 new warnings: ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0624): 32/64X length mismatch in Pm1aControlBlock: 16/32 [20090123] ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0496): Invalid length for Pm1aControlBlock: 32, using default 16 [20090123] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ACPI-error%2C-No-pointer-back-to-NS-node-in-buffer-obj-tp21112077p21911316.html Sent from the freebsd-acpi mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 17:56:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1461065672 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5B98FC0C for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2009 09:55:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,406,1231142400"; d="scan'208";a="664103573" Received: from orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.49]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2009 10:00:41 -0800 Received: from orsmsx002.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.105) by orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:56:45 -0800 Received: from orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.47]) by orsmsx002.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.105]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:56:44 -0800 From: "Moore, Robert" To: Jakub Lach , "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:56:43 -0800 Thread-Topic: ACPI error, No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj Thread-Index: AcmKrIF3L1VkQvzESYuxf7ILjBYk+wAMtCcg Message-ID: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858146AC638@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <494DBF33.7040301@micom.mng.net> <21555335.post@talk.nabble.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D83085811C41320@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D83085811C41358@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <21719238.post@talk.nabble.com> <21911316.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <21911316.post@talk.nabble.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: RE: ACPI error, No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:56:59 -0000 You can ignore these, I think. >ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0624): 32/64X length mismatch in Pm1aControlBlock: >16/32 [20090123] There is a mismatch between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the PM1A cont= rol block in the FADT. 32-bit version: [059h 089 1] PM1 Control Block Length : 02 64-bit version: [0ACh 172 12] PM1A Control Block : [0ACh 172 1] Space ID : 01 (SystemIO) [0ADh 173 1] Bit Width : 20 The 32-bit version is in bytes (2) - 16 bits. The 64-bit version specifies = 32 bits. >ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0496): Invalid length for Pm1aControlBlock: 32, using >default 16 [20090123] The default ACPICA behavior is to override the incorrect value. >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >acpi@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Lach >Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:49 AM >To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: ACPI error, No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj > > >Hello again. > >Updated to ACPICA 20090123, got 2 new warnings: > >ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0624): 32/64X length mismatch in Pm1aControlBlock: >16/32 [20090123] >ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0496): Invalid length for Pm1aControlBlock: 32, using >default 16 [20090123] > > > >-- >View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ACPI-error%2C-No- >pointer-back-to-NS-node-in-buffer-obj-tp21112077p21911316.html >Sent from the freebsd-acpi mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 18:55:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3C3106564A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CB58FC21 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWbHe-00008I-Pn for freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:55:06 -0800 Message-ID: <21919004.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858146AC638@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <494DBF33.7040301@micom.mng.net> <21555335.post@talk.nabble.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D83085811C41320@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D83085811C41358@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <21719238.post@talk.nabble.com> <21911316.post@talk.nabble.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858146AC638@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> Subject: RE: ACPI error, No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:55:08 -0000 Thank you for ensuring me I have understood those messages correctly, and explaining ACPICA behaviour. Moore, Robert wrote: > > You can ignore these, I think. > > >>ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0624): 32/64X length mismatch in Pm1aControlBlock: >>16/32 [20090123] > > There is a mismatch between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the PM1A > control block in the FADT. > > 32-bit version: > > [059h 089 1] PM1 Control Block Length : 02 > > > > 64-bit version: > > [0ACh 172 12] PM1A Control Block : > [0ACh 172 1] Space ID : 01 (SystemIO) > [0ADh 173 1] Bit Width : 20 > > > The 32-bit version is in bytes (2) - 16 bits. The 64-bit version specifies > 32 bits. > > > >>ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0496): Invalid length for Pm1aControlBlock: 32, using >>default 16 [20090123] > > The default ACPICA behavior is to override the incorrect value. > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >>acpi@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Lach >>Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:49 AM >>To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org >>Subject: RE: ACPI error, No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj >> >> >>Hello again. >> >>Updated to ACPICA 20090123, got 2 new warnings: >> >>ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0624): 32/64X length mismatch in Pm1aControlBlock: >>16/32 [20090123] >>ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0496): Invalid length for Pm1aControlBlock: 32, using >>default 16 [20090123] >> >> >> >>-- >>View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ACPI-error%2C-No- >>pointer-back-to-NS-node-in-buffer-obj-tp21112077p21911316.html >>Sent from the freebsd-acpi mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ACPI-error%2C-No-pointer-back-to-NS-node-in-buffer-obj-tp21112077p21919004.html Sent from the freebsd-acpi mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 00:04:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42416106568F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivakras1@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7118FC13 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivakras1@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1044221fgb.35 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:04:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=3epIrr5CH26V1mUF2al1R4uA/LFP2YUePUfviAgP+1o=; b=tqtrMV8RHSpOMYdklPLip8QtN/Zj0uu5dGxyzbCNMiorVHTodvX8RNsIxzJgM4bytb c6GNotQ7/7GIcyvW/F3GlWXs3m5oQfbiJ2EMwZI4yMxaecBKzr9pdtU03sm1EHzl8wmr dvU7E4K5XIOuwJsj7o37CDE8LQTNwTwmeb5tw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=Qar6u+E66GsfGoK3X+JdxbDUJZZoKj/Zvm0Ek9aNHIj+8cpqcOAdiAFoyY7vYpf6w4 fZ3+F7wIPxQt5dgqrBXznq20W65kczsjkoyLz/XeeGnCjFvlXtWg8GXE94jNa7nusVKE r0Sf3Xo1VgYwL1Z9l9QpNam0Y+NB0v+gm2tFE= Received: by 10.223.106.12 with SMTP id v12mr1662647fao.16.1234224290651; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:04:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.15.129? ([92.50.244.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z15sm6941324fkz.31.2009.02.09.16.04.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:04:50 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Kolosov To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:03:57 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <494DBF33.7040301@micom.mng.net> <21911316.post@talk.nabble.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858146AC638@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D830858146AC638@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902100303.57193.ivakras1@gmail.com> Subject: ACPI events X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:04:53 -0000 Hi all! I have acpi events mapped to Fn+F7 (lcd brightness up) and to Fn+F8 (lcd brightness down), and several other combinations. I think the corresponding code in my `acpidump -dt` produced asl file is: If (LEqual (Local1, 0x07)) { Store ("Fn+F7 Pressed", Debug) If (LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6)) { If (IGDS) { BRTN (0x87) } Else { Notify (^^PCI0.PEGP.VGA.LCD, 0x87) } } Else { Store (0x15, SMIF) Store (Zero, TRP0) } Sleep (0x32) Store (0xB6, Index (DerefOf (Index (Local0, 0x02)), Zero)) Store (One, Index (DerefOf (Index (Local0, 0x02)), One)) } and If (LEqual (Local1, 0x08)) { Store ("Fn+F8 Pressed", Debug) If (LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6)) { If (IGDS) { BRTN (0x86) } Else { Notify (^^PCI0.PEGP.VGA.LCD, 0x86) } } Else { Store (0x14, SMIF) Store (Zero, TRP0) } Sleep (0x32) Store (0xB7, Index (DerefOf (Index (Local0, 0x02)), Zero)) Store (One, Index (DerefOf (Index (Local0, 0x02)), One)) } It is no effect when i pressed it, it is also no keycodes sent (tested with xev). The question is: how to debug usage of this combinations? Is there a way to get it work? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 13:58:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCF0106566C; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:58:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50A18FC1B; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gavin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1ADwvlD073667; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:58:57 GMT (envelope-from gavin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gavin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1ADwvEm073663; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:58:57 GMT (envelope-from gavin) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:58:57 GMT Message-Id: <200902101358.n1ADwvEm073663@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gavin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: gavin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/131473: powerd is not responsive enough for Intel CPUs with many CPU speed-steps X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:58:58 -0000 Synopsis: powerd is not responsive enough for Intel CPUs with many CPU speed-steps Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-acpi Responsible-Changed-By: gavin Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 10 13:57:25 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Although not strictly acpi-related, this seems to be where most of the work on powerd(1) takes place. Over to interested parties. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131473 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 18:15:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8771065678; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D828FC21; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (mav@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1AIForU068200; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:50 GMT (envelope-from mav@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from mav@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1AIFoXP068196; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:50 GMT (envelope-from mav) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:50 GMT Message-Id: <200902101815.n1AIFoXP068196@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ntai@smartfruit.com, mav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: mav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/131473: powerd(8) is not responsive enough for Intel CPUs with many CPU speed-steps X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:50 -0000 Synopsis: powerd(8) is not responsive enough for Intel CPUs with many CPU speed-steps State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: mav State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 10 18:14:47 UTC 2009 State-Changed-Why: This is duplicate PR. The problem already fixed in 7-STABLE. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131473