From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 8 13:30:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD45106568B for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71AA8FC29 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so2052709ewy.43 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:30:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=4Bqhd28Ag7NJAccpsXGRp0pswCl2soUHnX2K5RDh5PM=; b=BMZGF9mNoB7wv1syzQ2GfylvFgwLiIWJ4J95T1NhjnUGLDmMMG1+Gn6JC08ZpjFz9I RnhnANY4vVhQ9gqwME8SfUshsWzYX8IEaqUkQhBD77Aws7EYQ/7tHjM+vcBqvGt27Xjy X51CILBDkKDR7wlO8UVioyHaKJ7gFtiQIrjw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=iblGnxbwlArKtEA1KNd29hXdwereC8AT/w4a5wQYehZ3zdilpyudovYcT8PWm4a7w+ spBM0XWfvJaGZHHiIXITUNevDUak0TIR9Lm12iE1lwpig7PcwUUbUyP1dMSSq8v5qsGQ At5NWMiXJe0stygG0/1mfOFPBxECVPf0TftUs= Received: by 10.213.1.5 with SMTP id 5mr1880482ebd.22.1257687050719; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mac-mini.lan (bl7-119-248.dsl.telepac.pt [85.240.119.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm3558533eyh.2.2009.11.08.05.30.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:30:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: Rui Paulo From: Rui Paulo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:30:48 +0000 Message-Id: To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) Subject: SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:30:52 -0000 Hi, I guess this has been discussed in the past but, can't we turn on ULE on ARM embedded systems ? What's the bottleneck or performance regression (assuming there's one) ? -- Rui Paulo From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 9 10:25:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93713106566C; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0b:1:50:40:63ff:feea:93a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329D18FC0C; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (pluxor@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.2/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA9AR5fk076085; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.2/8.14.3/Submit) id nA9AR5oU076084; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:04 +0100 From: Olivier Houchard To: Rui Paulo Message-ID: <20091109102704.GA75988@ci0.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:25:45 -0000 On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:30:48PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: > Hi, > I guess this has been discussed in the past but, can't we turn on ULE > on ARM embedded systems ? What's the bottleneck or performance > regression (assuming there's one) ? > > -- > Rui Paulo Hi, At one point ULE was buggy on arm, but I think it's been fixed like years ago, so it should be safe to use it. Regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 9 11:06:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705101065670 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC238FC26 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA9B6mwm078932 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:06:48 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nA9B6lwU078930 for freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:06:47 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:06:47 GMT Message-Id: <200911091106.nA9B6lwU078930@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:06:48 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o arm/134368 arm [patch] nslu2_led driver for the LEDs on the NSLU2 o arm/134338 arm [patch] Lock GPIO accesses on ixp425 o arm/134092 arm [patch] NSLU.hints contains wrong hints for on board n 3 problems total. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 9 19:47:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157A81065672; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74128FC0A; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA9Is2OV054578; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:54:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nA9Is2dZ054553; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:54:02 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:54:02 GMT Message-Id: <200911091854.nA9Is2dZ054553@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-current.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Cc: Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:47:12 -0000 TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:10 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h cvsup.sentex.ca /tinderbox/HEAD/arm/arm/supfile TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - building world TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - TARGET=arm TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - TARGET_ARCH=arm TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - cd /src TB --- 2009-11-09 18:15:47 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Mon Nov 9 18:15:47 UTC 2009 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] (cd /src/rescue/rescue/../../sbin/camcontrol && /usr/bin/make -DRESCUE CRUNCH_CFLAGS=-DRESCUE DIRPRFX=rescue/rescue/camcontrol/ depend && /usr/bin/make -DRESCUE CRUNCH_CFLAGS=-DRESCUE DIRPRFX=rescue/rescue/camcontrol/ camcontrol.o util.o modeedit.o) rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -DRESCUE /src/sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.c /src/sbin/camcontrol/util.c /src/sbin/camcontrol/modeedit.c echo camcontrol: /obj/arm/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a /obj/arm/src/tmp/usr/lib/libcam.a /obj/arm/src/tmp/usr/lib/libsbuf.a /obj/arm/src/tmp/usr/lib/libutil.a >> .depend cc -O -pipe -DRESCUE -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c /src/sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.c: In function 'atapm': /src/sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.c:4156: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sbin/camcontrol. *** Error code 1 Stop in /obj/arm/src/rescue/rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/rescue/rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2009-11-09 18:54:02 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2009-11-09 18:54:02 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2009-11-09 18:54:02 - 1693.77 user 465.28 system 2342.73 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-head-HEAD-arm-arm.full From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 10 04:49:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414211065670 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8318FC14 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ice.local ([10.0.0.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id nAA4cvQ6006657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:38:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <4AF8EE61.8060502@errno.com> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:38:57 -0800 From: Sam Leffler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Houchard References: <20091109102704.GA75988@ci0.org> In-Reply-To: <20091109102704.GA75988@ci0.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC--Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:49:28 -0000 Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:30:48PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Hi, >> I guess this has been discussed in the past but, can't we turn on ULE >> on ARM embedded systems ? What's the bottleneck or performance >> regression (assuming there's one) ? >> >> -- >> Rui Paulo > > Hi, > > At one point ULE was buggy on arm, but I think it's been fixed like years ago, > so it should be safe to use it. Last I measured it was slower than 4BSD on my xscale boards (not much but measurable). This was mostly doing network packet pushing (wired+wireless). Sam From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 10 10:50:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40FF106566B for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de) Received: from mailgate2.arcor-ip.de (mailgate2.arcor-ip.de [145.253.2.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5749B8FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailer.brunellocal.de (ffmcospub2ffmbrunelfw2lo-cs-nat-mail-server.adm.arcor.net [145.254.28.157]) by mailgate1.cs.arcor.net (Arcor-CN-MailRelay-l-B) with ESMTP id 3E814F908B2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754B45470 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at brunellocal.de Received: from mailer.brunellocal.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailer.brunellocal.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id YPjLFtLsS2hn for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-hv.brunel.de (mail-hv.brunellocal.de [192.168.1.234]) by mailer.brunellocal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF14145466 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from bcslx10.bcs.brunel.local ([172.16.101.231]) by 935s02su.brunellocal.de (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.3FP1) with ESMTP id 2009111011500146-45734 ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:01 +0100 Received: from bcspc139.bcs.brunel.local (bcspc139.bcs.brunel.local [172.16.101.98]) by bcslx10.bcs.brunel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2D1134194; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:01 +0100 (CET) From: Matthias Reyelt Organization: Brunel Communications To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:49:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) References: <200911040956.09749.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> <200911051623.56583.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> <200911061435.57673.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> In-Reply-To: <200911061435.57673.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200911101150.00262.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on HUB93501/Brunel/De(Release 7.0.3FP1|February 24, 2008) at 10.11.2009 11:50:01 AM, Serialize by Router on HUB10149/Brunel/De(Release 7.0.3FP1|February 24, 2008) at 10.11.2009 11:50:02 AM, Serialize complete at 10.11.2009 11:50:02 AM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Marvell MV6281 OpenRD client mge1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:50:07 -0000 Hi, I have changed the PHY address for mge1 to 0x18 in the code, and the second= =20 PHY is now correctly detected. I can ifconfig the interface and I am able t= o=20 receive packets. I am not able to send packets yet.=20 If I ping mge1 over the network tcpdump reports the ARP requests and it=20 reports the ARP replies as well. The replies do not reach the cable though.= =20 (They aren't sent to mge0 either).=20 I haven't yet found out, where the packets get lost, they seem to pass=20 mge_start_locked() correctly. I will check the register settings. =20 Matthias Am Freitag 06 November 2009 14:35:55 schrieb Matthias Reyelt: > Hi, >=20 > I have built a linux kernel with some debug code and found out that the b= ase=20 > address for the second phy is not at 0x09 but at 0x18. Actually it's in t= he=20 > config files, but I wasn't looking for an extra configuration for this bo= ard=20 > before.=20 >=20 > I think this would require a patch to mge_miibus_readreg(), because it's = a=20 > different mapping. Is that correct? >=20 > I will do a quick patch on monday to test it. Are there other files that= =20 have=20 > to be patched, Rafal?=20 >=20 > Matthias > =20 >=20 =2D-=20 Dr.-Ing. Matthias Reyelt Master Software Designer Brunel GmbH Bereich Communications Daimlerring 9 31135 Hildesheim Tel: +49 5121 1760 805 =46ax: +49 5121 1760 999 email: Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de Internet: www.brunel.de Hauptsitz: Airport City, Hermann-K=F6hl-Str. 1, 28199 Bremen Amtsgericht Bremen HRB 16935 General Manager: Johan Arie van Barneveld From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 10 19:57:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82851065694 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070F78FC1D for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so391690ewy.43 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:56:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc :from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=Mh3dhCdV4NUGfB8PJ4W3g7zlytazWossBwROxV1yM5I=; b=BQdWJYhyaOin0Z1438MLY6/Pa2lPkrnl0OElT6pO4h5l+kGGCWNGHHNFa9bC6fRjv8 lXgQLyT/3BdQZ/8lhmOLW9PIQ/cwv1X+Jk4fr/ON/Il/L1x7dLdVpxAPOsvRtlWoVA1p RPSeuHAEaWrMDj4q+uCN+5jiJCdRJaa3U7w1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=IKmvSDhQ17pABqYZ6xYJoXqR1hTrxWJROBs5UmQ7YSmCbvzhL3wXadHPF7kDrhQFil ekd6/nEuOYrakWJzjNIJJ9tpMA9Jm+Yyu2hheFgwNj0sM5BRRgP68WJYYO6rHFqyN8eE QwA7ee2cSOOBUCQXu5SNciwIGDjsNiMXtfoXM= Received: by 10.213.107.8 with SMTP id z8mr597323ebo.32.1257883019007; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:56:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rui-macbook.lan (bl5-227-167.dsl.telepac.pt [82.154.227.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm2474398eyz.35.2009.11.10.11.56.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:56:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: Rui Paulo References: <20091109102704.GA75988@ci0.org> <4AF8EE61.8060502@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <4AF8EE61.8060502@errno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <43EE151E-574E-4A17-9946-0BC5A6B3BC69@freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Rui Paulo Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:56:56 +0000 To: Sam Leffler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:57:00 -0000 Hi, On 10 Nov 2009, at 04:38, Sam Leffler wrote: > Olivier Houchard wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:30:48PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I guess this has been discussed in the past but, can't we turn on = ULE on ARM embedded systems ? What's the bottleneck or performance = regression (assuming there's one) ? >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Rui Paulo >> Hi, >> At one point ULE was buggy on arm, but I think it's been fixed like = years ago, >> so it should be safe to use it. >=20 > Last I measured it was slower than 4BSD on my xscale boards (not much = but measurable). This was mostly doing network packet pushing = (wired+wireless). I also tested this on the Cambria board and I concluded the same (I used = sysbench). -- Rui Paulo From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 10 20:31:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46309106568D; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C448FC1C; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nAAKNPUM026297; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:23:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:23:35 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20091110.132335.1735450040.imp@bsdimp.com> To: rpaulo@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <43EE151E-574E-4A17-9946-0BC5A6B3BC69@freebsd.org> References: <20091109102704.GA75988@ci0.org> <4AF8EE61.8060502@errno.com> <43EE151E-574E-4A17-9946-0BC5A6B3BC69@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:31:18 -0000 In message: <43EE151E-574E-4A17-9946-0BC5A6B3BC69@freebsd.org> Rui Paulo writes: : Hi, : : On 10 Nov 2009, at 04:38, Sam Leffler wrote: : : > Olivier Houchard wrote: : >> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:30:48PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: : >>> Hi, : >>> I guess this has been discussed in the past but, can't we turn on ULE on ARM embedded systems ? What's the bottleneck or performance regression (assuming there's one) ? : >>> : >>> -- : >>> Rui Paulo : >> Hi, : >> At one point ULE was buggy on arm, but I think it's been fixed like years ago, : >> so it should be safe to use it. : > : > Last I measured it was slower than 4BSD on my xscale boards (not much but measurable). This was mostly doing network packet pushing (wired+wireless). : : I also tested this on the Cambria board and I concluded the same (I used sysbench). This isn't too surprising, since it is optimized for multicore and 4BSD grew up on single-core systems... Warner From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 12 14:42:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85AC1065679 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de) Received: from mailgate2.arcor-ip.de (mailgate2.arcor-ip.de [145.253.2.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EC58FC1C for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailer.brunellocal.de (ffmcospub2ffmbrunelfw2lo-cs-nat-mail-server.adm.arcor.net [145.254.28.157]) by mailgate1.cs.arcor.net (Arcor-CN-MailRelay-l-B) with ESMTP id CDB08F90CE4 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2DA4527D for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at brunellocal.de Received: from mailer.brunellocal.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailer.brunellocal.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id lGY6btwc-ov0 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-hv.brunel.de (mail-hv.brunellocal.de [192.168.1.234]) by mailer.brunellocal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789D03C469 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from bcslx10.bcs.brunel.local ([172.16.101.231]) by 935s02su.brunellocal.de (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.3FP1) with ESMTP id 2009111215425028-46333 ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:50 +0100 Received: from bcspc139.bcs.brunel.local (bcspc139.bcs.brunel.local [172.16.101.98]) by bcslx10.bcs.brunel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F40AFD86C; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:46 +0100 (CET) From: Matthias Reyelt Organization: Brunel Communications To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200911121542.45078.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on HUB93501/Brunel/De(Release 7.0.3FP1|February 24, 2008) at 12.11.2009 03:42:50 PM, Serialize by Router on HUB10149/Brunel/De(Release 7.0.3FP1|February 24, 2008) at 12.11.2009 03:42:51 PM, Serialize complete at 12.11.2009 03:42:51 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Eval board Marvell 78xxx (Discovery) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:42:54 -0000 Hi, I am looking for an Eval board with the 78xxx Discovery cpu to run FreeBSD on. Does the Marvell DB-MV78100-A1 run FreeBSD (regarding Ethernet, Flash,..)? Are there other Discovery based boards, that have been successfully booted with FreeBSD? Regards Matthias From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 12 15:38:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1FB106568B for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raj@semihalf.com) Received: from smtp.semihalf.com (smtp.semihalf.com [213.17.239.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E668FC23 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.17.239.109]) by smtp.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B4DC3BA7; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:39:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at semihalf.com Received: from smtp.semihalf.com ([213.17.239.109]) by localhost (smtp.semihalf.com [213.17.239.109]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFmS4NiNh-Zf; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:39:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.34] (cardhu.semihalf.com [213.17.239.108]) by smtp.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4FCAC3B9C; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:39:10 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Rafal Jaworowski In-Reply-To: <200911121542.45078.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:38:26 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <60F8C54E-69DF-4ABD-8619-6093EDF240F0@semihalf.com> References: <200911121542.45078.Matthias.Reyelt@brunel.de> To: Matthias Reyelt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eval board Marvell 78xxx (Discovery) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:38:29 -0000 On 2009-11-12, at 15:42, Matthias Reyelt wrote: > I am looking for an Eval board with the 78xxx Discovery cpu to run > FreeBSD on. > Does the Marvell DB-MV78100-A1 run FreeBSD (regarding Ethernet, > Flash,..)? The DB -78100 board is supported and should boot. Marcel is seeing some cache coherency problems still with it, but that's a separate story i.e. bug(s). I didn't manage to return to your issues with secondary mge unit on Kirkwood, but the only board with more than one Eth port we have is this MV-78xxx, and it both ports worked for us on this board. Rafal