From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 07:52:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9302C106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout3.freenet.de (mout3.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BCF8FC16 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.19] (helo=9.mx.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1MUyXK-0006JB-Ve; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:52:51 +0200 Received: from tdb70.t.pppool.de ([89.55.219.112]:17492 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 9.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #93) id 1MUyXK-00031Q-NT; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:52:50 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:52:48 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20090726095248.49fef285@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <32688442@ipt.ru> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru> <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> <32688442@ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-purgate-ID: 149285::1248594770-000007A7-EAE63431/0-0/0-0 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:52:53 -0000 On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:01:57 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > Rerouting from stable@ to emulation@ as it may be a serious matter. > > Alexander Kabaev writes: > > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400 > > Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> > >> As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very > >> helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both > >> linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better > >> then flashplugin[7|9]. > > > > It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our futex > > implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent deadlock and > > causes multiple threads to get stuck on process exit. One can easily > > collect dozens of those stuck processes doing causal web browsing. > > Can anybody comment on this? Thanks! > flashplugin10 works fine for me with AMD64-current as long as I set compat.linux32.maxssiz=4194304 in /etc/sysctl.conf. No more hanging processes, no more core dumps. I also have linux_base-f10-10 installed. --- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 13:32:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97C11065673 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882158FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1246389qwe.7 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=TGM5jTq1L4Qxc+2V9mrWnpwPCz4/9U/2TEWwkKQwFuo=; b=BWJ31N6D+VPrDtPP3vDubZX60Nu2TbyOSSE0Km/F9AFKpiljvhgz4TPGLHgiSp5yFC ogO8HjsrCI8rUcXvJY+Q2yZzQaup3d0Vq4xNleBwMIrtCVNaM7NDJsPv+/BbM+RWkew7 tMratkQ1OyU2PwtcJ+SDekSHuZrxVfAEVaErs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=pLfvgtaTErZOzcdeO0FWyyPdkTNgqu3NpxOguQhP+hFMRCmn0FVl1CjSinJQEN6Ylp /KhCBKeWEnJR4Tlb1lGvCTpG1nZ4if6mikVURpbAXQZW1LSmeeM1VHgVh/M9r2KmyNpX z6ws3chtjDZh5DpmgHoXQv3ZlRaLlHrEFCr00= Received: by 10.224.10.206 with SMTP id q14mr5031797qaq.242.1248613738354; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (c-24-91-218-112.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.218.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm6928115qwj.36.2009.07.26.06.08.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:08:50 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Message-ID: <20090726090850.233e0368@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20090726095248.49fef285@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru> <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> <32688442@ipt.ru> <20090726095248.49fef285@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/nvemmV8_Vfrv+Ij+RpXUFXH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:32:10 -0000 --Sig_/nvemmV8_Vfrv+Ij+RpXUFXH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:52:48 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > compat.linux32.maxssiz=3D4194304=20 Thanks, I'll give this a try and will report here. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/nvemmV8_Vfrv+Ij+RpXUFXH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKbFVmQ6z1jMm+XZYRAokJAKCLMCmcHimVz+yDKpIyhz3io+eWfACg3a/A bZihlG2cgFL6pUIh7R1C3ck= =/qTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/nvemmV8_Vfrv+Ij+RpXUFXH-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 13:50:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361AC1065670 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A348FC1F for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1248405qwe.7 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:50:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=hpjVfKsPExmmFBDBkRCo6nUZKJslTysqkF90HXxT3qg=; b=WkUezjiTTErMAMaqdcwlrhze5Y3K0Y0hWWH+LiUX/ve0RU0Ih2bXTtlWb/lmNqxfyx IeYXazcmwNXTO4/MkczKM2H4mKrKueOylrg8+RyvBmRthEU3K9MVNkwWdfet/GzWvuX/ bRJQuNRaf/8vAvq7sJq3eufyhYNbwLJ/p7ly0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=XPDeFCHcmDP6Ij+BuYB5Q3zPU76jf9S9EGwSg488It/IYPN6ED+Ovr9qbAFcBRgSQA Cn0DKWuybZAmb03AOfD+UZXDj+rf5F7X4b+aSSC65vSMfaqycZj1DTrNZ8lbh5RlMjPb Nz2WCPwWCsy8mboLq7W279mV1zGdhLOKJb7dE= Received: by 10.224.6.147 with SMTP id 19mr5046592qaz.348.1248616240263; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (c-24-91-218-112.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.218.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm8607161qwj.16.2009.07.26.06.50.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:50:32 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Message-ID: <20090726095032.139bb4e3@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20090726095248.49fef285@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru> <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> <32688442@ipt.ru> <20090726095248.49fef285@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1RDJ4DO_jroc.mf7mA8Yk4Y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:50:41 -0000 --Sig_/1RDJ4DO_jroc.mf7mA8Yk4Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:52:48 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:01:57 +0400 > Boris Samorodov wrote: >=20 > > Rerouting from stable@ to emulation@ as it may be a serious matter. > >=20 > > Alexander Kabaev writes: > > > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400 > > > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > >>=20 > > >> As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very > > >> helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both > > >> linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better > > >> then flashplugin[7|9]. > > > > > > It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our > > > futex implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent > > > deadlock and causes multiple threads to get stuck on process > > > exit. One can easily collect dozens of those stuck processes > > > doing causal web browsing. > >=20 > > Can anybody comment on this? Thanks! > >=20 >=20 > flashplugin10 works fine for me with AMD64-current as long as I set > compat.linux32.maxssiz=3D4194304 in /etc/sysctl.conf. >=20 > No more hanging processes, no more core dumps. >=20 > I also have linux_base-f10-10 installed. >=20 Nope, does not help. I still am getting npviewer.bin processes left behind and never exiting, blockerd on futexes. Another bullet proof way to block flash is to run firefox on the same X display using two different users and try to start flash in both of them. One firefox instance will deadlock, until other has exited. This might be related to the original problem I complained as both seem to be somehow related to futexes. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/1RDJ4DO_jroc.mf7mA8Yk4Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKbF8sQ6z1jMm+XZYRAl0kAJsFjQnMF7O6ah82zNusZ3VERaX/oACfeyEg XW/Jw53t3iPssILHymzSwI4= =UwOy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1RDJ4DO_jroc.mf7mA8Yk4Y-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 14:45:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63E5106566B; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borisbsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A978FC19; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borisbsd@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so853564ewy.43 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:45:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=G/sbLT+HyDtCroEEtWLeqnIIjyx0x9eWaJrAT2AOC68=; b=o29/G/6GMqrPT669uNU9vUAkjLo/GRhS3S8oXk1HikAOQ+T+tkLR1H+iMUKJQ07R9p upXDJ4DIXNcYi3S7QkEK0Mres3xoWGESetryGrf/EVXUx7UYDfel7IAj4a0/ugEBy+bI Rhe4qcTM2x0xlfBnyc6NFslonjzFqAVqoUhUY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VHvAkB+Doi9kx7wJPSlAa+HYg6on7/it9YRealj0LOIi+dhTupLBBvU4JVuM/Q396v 4VUtbE4J/PkaFA9lOm/PJNF+XOZo0YF5LA+s3XtL+57JA7qFVg2q2x/WBwFrNdRczw/X TepGjrEbt+QcSNkedAYmIsHY8ivIbCLPJwrUI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.44.211 with SMTP id n61mr1453572web.133.1248619545144; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:45:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A6A0EDA.6010007@FreeBSD.org> References: <1247175832.1455.36.camel@zero.mshome.net> <1248092972.1756.7.camel@localhost> <90e3c9587dbba03b2b7d253fa26adca1.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <1248112074.1756.39.camel@localhost> <0eef4f4e9462e4fc86429b96ee215a37.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <4A6A0EDA.6010007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:45:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Boris To: Beat Gaetzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox - no screen refresh X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:45:47 -0000 Thanks Beat, I was confused by the VT-x feature which was reported as working by some users. As per our discussion, it sounds like an exception when it works. Thanks for your work on porting virutalbox to FreeBSD. Boris On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Fri, July 24, 2009 15:51, Boris wrote: > >> I built the world and recompiled with revision 430 and I can start > 32-bit > >> VM > >> without VT-x selected. I do not have a system crash anymore. > >> > >> I still cannot start 32-bit nor 64-bit VM while VT-x is checked. I got > an > >> error message. I have read it's not supported and the opposite > throughout > >> different threads. > >> > >> Can anybody confirm what is really supported at the moment? > > > > as I'm not a dev from this project, I can say what I tested and was ok :) > > > >> - 32-bit VM without VT-x ? OK for me > > OK > >> - 32-bit VM with VT-x? > >> - 64-bit VM with VT-x ? > > VT-x does not work yet. Not working features are documented on the wiki > page: http://wiki.freebsd.org/VirtualBox > > > OK for some things using 7.2-STABLE and rev 428. > > > > what's the major diff from 428 and 430 ? > > Nothing, rev 429 and 430 belongs to other ports in this repository. > > Beat > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 18:23:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB07C106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB098FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1283125qwe.7 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=cclqDUTj0hH2N1Kl1WP7kZfCoXBHD7wagfsnfBX0qxM=; b=jSGL75KOm9WwKGaOZP/9BgYZL4SPrutZDaKBd0oJvHUfjaaKyRFPsSHuPMMmK6gqLj ZMZFAVid6kn3IM9n+xixIQDLnAz9Nk7TXdudIDEClaJkzQijGFT4LzfVgcyggmqOlF/J qN9lUJJwlNd/mwN7Tc6g8WF5OtwBqWHPCoTPo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=d6mOOlepcMjYUCPahpPvzYzFY0h7reshFO0A0SnEFZb6/YcA7LkoCQWN33pyWrKxsO Poei0ecdozYEXoqy6iW94rpgE6cznOWSfJLUjiRLODfDSrAcWdtxgqkaWuILNfblgYyf 7gYZbxiJeQweDvd3jlY63TyhuD95gKrtepPwQ= Received: by 10.224.61.15 with SMTP id r15mr5261430qah.222.1248632620607; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.108.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm8973643qwf.48.2009.07.26.11.23.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 98911B80C2; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:23:25 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 10.1.1.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by 10.1.1.10 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:23:25 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <62b90f53f9c216fcd52f80d244b57b11.squirrel@10.1.1.10> In-Reply-To: <0d181f1802a7045b84651c655f4b2c4b.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> References: <1247175832.1455.36.camel@zero.mshome.net> <1247471193.1664.129.camel@localhost> <1247480074.1664.140.camel@localhost> <1247602161.2105.14.camel@localhost> <301c9e6c36d74e0c66ee5731638691d1.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <1247658678.5135.6.camel@localhost> <1248092972.1756.7.camel@localhost> <90e3c9587dbba03b2b7d253fa26adca1.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <1248112074.1756.39.camel@localhost> <0eef4f4e9462e4fc86429b96ee215a37.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <7c7b93e9fb1b7b656639da0fe80a4d09.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <8411b09a217baaea0f80f492684f88de.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <0d181f1802a7045b84651c655f4b2c4b.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:23:25 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: VirtualBox - no screen refresh X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:23:41 -0000 On Thu, July 23, 2009 03:14, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > On Thu, July 23, 2009 2:02 am, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> >> On Wed, July 22, 2009 20:15, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, July 21, 2009 05:58, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >>>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 10:33 pm, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 14:47, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>>> I got Revision 427 compiled on amd64 unfortunately it crashes at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> time of >>>>>>> launching any VM. I have provided some details to Beat and pointed >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> thread as the issue looked similar to Vladimir's one when reading >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> core.txt file produced after the system crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> It does not crash any more with very recent kernel. >>>>>> So, probably you may do another try. >>>>> >>>>> I have here: >>>>> $ uname -a >>>>> FreeBSD xxx 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 17 15:30:47 BRT >>>>> 2009 >>>>> root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx amd64 >>>>> >>>>> and got to boot debian 5 amd64 cd and right now I'm quite at the end >>>>> of >>>>> the install. this is just possible using just one cpu. when tried >>>>> using >>>>> two cpu's, somewhere before disk selection it dies. >>>> >>>> Did the install finish successfully or did the vm crash? Because with >>>> 7.2-RELEASE/amd64 i have spotted a problem which crashes the VM after >>>> a >>>> few minutes with I/O activity. I couldn't fully install Arch Linux nor >>>> Windows7 yet. >>> >>> I got it running here. tested the last svn rev today. i got so much >>> happy >>> I installed debian and got both cpu to full load. a while after I >>> looked >>> and my box was frozen :( >>> >>> so now on small steps. I have now two cpu and VT-x enabled. it looks >>> good >>> so far. but I know when I fire folding at home, using both cpu is no >>> good >>> anymore. >>> I'll let it this way for a while to see if it freezes, and then will >>> try >>> one cpu and full load. >>> >>> this is work, so I'll try to reproduce this at home, using 8-beta and >>> post >>> here. >>> >>> thanks, >> >> slight change of plans. I did run the single core test first. 40 minutes >> full load and ok. >> >> I'll run both cores and a single core full load to see. >> > > Sounds good so far. Could you please also try to copy something in the VM > around? Would be interesting if that causes the crash. this time I had this problem. On Stable from yesterday, I got vbox rev 428 working and got to install debian64 vt-x enabled. Boot ok with 1 cpu and two cpu's, and when I did scp from another machine, some MB of data, I got a crash right in front my head :( I have the logs here, if anyone wants to see :) thanks all you for this port :) matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 21:57:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46601065675 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f191.google.com (mail-qy0-f191.google.com [209.85.221.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468A78FC1A for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so3403304qyk.3 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:57:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=E407E25iJoy8MHExRsGJn5FiScgLOYnc2FWhOTIDfws=; b=HB89YOmMYf2mdzG/WCmRMAW/ojMGkdsvy3TeHARSV2PfdjECvnOSjsodbxvr3OvFo9 a4MvL0KKZS4RBX/teqPlFt3EggvWcNBjTqa1xPUNSPxLDFvUdWAdvTlq3ZVU4/p9F8mV GZga1O1v+/6q65OmwVypjpvkDwwH7G/WB0YaE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=h9oyTFRW0HTHZF4RawDvG+fAVmAimI6deNUakbUaUsM5GOjYRhUFk9T8f+C2jBPd2J ChgilKlSUgOBzTxIIxYZmiARWl+tHS6TndGBONXuXzwfvQdWWpqLxj9m6Tskb83rQG0D bWrXMTiAlzYnQqFcl/qyiivfD8QCyJoa7VeiQ= Received: by 10.224.28.83 with SMTP id l19mr5291343qac.296.1248645422443; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.108.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm9437545qwe.47.2009.07.26.14.57.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 805C5B80C2; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:56:56 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 10.1.1.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by 10.1.1.10 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:56:56 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0d181f1802a7045b84651c655f4b2c4b.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> References: <1247175832.1455.36.camel@zero.mshome.net> <1247471193.1664.129.camel@localhost> <1247480074.1664.140.camel@localhost> <1247602161.2105.14.camel@localhost> <301c9e6c36d74e0c66ee5731638691d1.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <1247658678.5135.6.camel@localhost> <1248092972.1756.7.camel@localhost> <90e3c9587dbba03b2b7d253fa26adca1.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <1248112074.1756.39.camel@localhost> <0eef4f4e9462e4fc86429b96ee215a37.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <7c7b93e9fb1b7b656639da0fe80a4d09.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <8411b09a217baaea0f80f492684f88de.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <0d181f1802a7045b84651c655f4b2c4b.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:56:56 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: VirtualBox - no screen refresh X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:57:04 -0000 On Thu, July 23, 2009 03:14, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > On Thu, July 23, 2009 2:02 am, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> >> On Wed, July 22, 2009 20:15, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, July 21, 2009 05:58, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >>>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 10:33 pm, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 14:47, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>>> I got Revision 427 compiled on amd64 unfortunately it crashes at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> time of >>>>>>> launching any VM. I have provided some details to Beat and pointed >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> thread as the issue looked similar to Vladimir's one when reading >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> core.txt file produced after the system crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> It does not crash any more with very recent kernel. >>>>>> So, probably you may do another try. >>>>> >>>>> I have here: >>>>> $ uname -a >>>>> FreeBSD xxx 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 17 15:30:47 BRT >>>>> 2009 >>>>> root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx amd64 >>>>> >>>>> and got to boot debian 5 amd64 cd and right now I'm quite at the end >>>>> of >>>>> the install. this is just possible using just one cpu. when tried >>>>> using >>>>> two cpu's, somewhere before disk selection it dies. >>>> >>>> Did the install finish successfully or did the vm crash? Because with >>>> 7.2-RELEASE/amd64 i have spotted a problem which crashes the VM after >>>> a >>>> few minutes with I/O activity. I couldn't fully install Arch Linux nor >>>> Windows7 yet. >>> >>> I got it running here. tested the last svn rev today. i got so much >>> happy >>> I installed debian and got both cpu to full load. a while after I >>> looked >>> and my box was frozen :( >>> >>> so now on small steps. I have now two cpu and VT-x enabled. it looks >>> good >>> so far. but I know when I fire folding at home, using both cpu is no >>> good >>> anymore. >>> I'll let it this way for a while to see if it freezes, and then will >>> try >>> one cpu and full load. >>> >>> this is work, so I'll try to reproduce this at home, using 8-beta and >>> post >>> here. >>> >>> thanks, >> >> slight change of plans. I did run the single core test first. 40 minutes >> full load and ok. >> >> I'll run both cores and a single core full load to see. >> > > Sounds good so far. Could you please also try to copy something in the VM > around? Would be interesting if that causes the crash. hail, I have some more info on this. In my work pc there is latest vbox from svn installed. when I tried to run FAH in its smp version, I got a frozen pc. I'm now trying the same test at home, always 7.2-STABLE, and for more than two hours it is fine, at full load. I think it is exactly what you said above. in my work pc, I used 384 ou 512MB Ram for the vm, here I used 768M. so the pc has free memory. debian here says has 284000KB of free memory and 485000KB of used ram. when I tried the single core client, which uses far less ram, it was ok. so I think the swap is being used and that relies on the disk. this I said makes sense to you all ? if so, great cause I can put more ram to the vm and run my fah client. the machine uses both cores of this E6750, and the performance is the same as native linux. thanks all ! matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 27 11:06:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A981065672 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A338F8FC33 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6RB6p3i018896 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:51 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6RB6pVi018892 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:51 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:51 GMT Message-Id: <200907271106.n6RB6pVi018892@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:52 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/136321 emulation x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based po o ports/136229 emulation [linux] certain linux apps look for libraries using a o ports/135341 emulation [PATCH] linux-f10 ports that install manpages: add NOM o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage o ports/135322 emulation Port graphics/linux_dri has incorrect packaging list c o kern/130724 emulation [linprocfs] [patch] cpuinfo in linprocfs is dated, cau o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n f ports/127018 emulation Linuxulator incapable of using FreeBSD's LDAP environm o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/97326 emulation [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux emulation o kern/73777 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir special hand a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/56451 emulation [linprocfs] /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo gives wrong CPU o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/29698 emulation [linux] [patch] linux ipcs doesn'work o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 18 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 28 01:14:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3091065670 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [64.146.239.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19698FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from kstewart2.owt.com (kstewart2.owt.com [64.146.237.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.owt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6S0vFkF008009 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:57:15 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=owt.com; s=default; t=1248742635; bh=0pXSxlu3csJluyClOzb5FZD59kUVwI/8cWmXH3EIgmQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=n4/ZAn915D8FD/G2UyydiZsJWD e1wV0gOvTV7EubszrC5kaFfJFEEs6Z9sptWNrhvUbLZILyvo9Dx3iDTNMHCBJyj7sED 2O4zVErAJcnUXvlp0Y/ZKXr7FsX0YsgaiICDACEfqcXgpyigRldSq4Taea8DaRUA1BQ nCQ4xLoZGfg= From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:57:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907271757.15060.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: linux-f?-xorg-libs X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:14:31 -0000 I was trying to build packages of the linux-xorg-libs and found that the pkg-plist for both f8 and f10 have a bogus file referenced. It is listed as "etc/ld.so.conf.d/xorg-x11-i386.conf" It never gets created and the tar fails. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 28 04:01:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55566106566B for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtai101.cox.net (eastrmmtai101.cox.net [68.230.240.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7208FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090728033814.SZOX14603.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:38:14 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.103.37.153]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id MFeD1c0063JFCbG02FeDiQ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:38:14 -0400 X-VR-Score: -20.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=zTj42rSAEz8A:10 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=b5mW2zsAsv9qALOyHoYA:9 a=4aoGaTJcRBlo7upaE2gnipUuljcA:4 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:39:18 -0500 To: emulation@freebsd.org From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.64 (Linux) Cc: Subject: VirtualBox NAT network works or not? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:01:36 -0000 Hello, I have installed VirtualBox and very surpised about that it's very fast. Very nice! But I have a problem with NAT network and uses DHCP in guest. It does not work. The host is yesterday -CURRENT and very latest installed ports with libtool 2.2. I don't know how I can debug it. I have decided to install VirtualBox in Windows 7 and I have setup very same exactly how I do with guest of FreeBSD 6.4. It works perfect. The only difference is that VirtualBox version is 3.x in Windows and 2.x in -CURRENT. It is either bug or not ready? I have tried to disable VT-x and it makes no difference. I have tried all network adapter and no difference. BTW: Please add me in CC as I am not in this list. Thanks. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 28 04:36:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BDA106564A for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38488FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1737576qwe.7 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:36:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:cc :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; bh=kNR0ENBrnEgEt14TBYCwQCUh4FN1rMWO64ws5tyBwHc=; b=D2ryQX/z2VuRfW2aGrqMOIWlXQRR5PGarw8RCCcUYpt/WVpyIgWV+R0W+RKQU1tBZW bMCher/puF9MpYIRSv9moGPJy/THK8zYGF/79QZottvlW0EAa9r+gPEmut9WuB7F1fdA mzLFg/vSuXeb1eohxmfwxNEPFPhsMd/GyYUx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:cc :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=isw9Dm71qkxA1PNi7kd8x0yhRCT7bhZOgzNDoteL/AquCAiWRsJUoj0C+7iDy6g0G7 OHYtAjnIY6fXg94XCjK5LF/r0On+9XsvW8nZwyTqd8S3HKfRRrdol3tFC5S9Kf/fDIBH jVWkTA+xeBT1J6ByYedboUSBty0zIUhOG72gM= Received: by 10.224.2.129 with SMTP id 1mr6847242qaj.138.1248754297122; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.108.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm10769694qwe.17.2009.07.27.21.11.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8728FB80C2; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:11:31 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 10.1.1.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by 10.1.1.10 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:11:31 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:11:31 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: "Jeremy Messenger" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox NAT network works or not? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:36:02 -0000 On Tue, July 28, 2009 00:39, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello, > > I have installed VirtualBox and very surpised about that it's very fast. > Very nice! > > But I have a problem with NAT network and uses DHCP in guest. It does not > work. The host is yesterday -CURRENT and very latest installed ports with > libtool 2.2. I don't know how I can debug it. I have decided to install > VirtualBox in Windows 7 and I have setup very same exactly how I do with > guest of FreeBSD 6.4. It works perfect. The only difference is that > VirtualBox version is 3.x in Windows and 2.x in -CURRENT. It is either bug > or not ready? I have tried to disable VT-x and it makes no difference. I > have tried all network adapter and no difference. I've been using Vbox 3 in FreeBSD for a bit more of a week now, and it is doing what I want it to. the svn svn co http://svn.bluelife.at/projects/packages/blueports/emulators/virtualbox I can use nat, but still trying to figure out how to reach the vm using network. if anyone has any leads. so far, the best thing I think is to make a reverse tunnel using ssh. matheus ps: I can't use my amd64 vm's if not from 7.2-STABLE. -CURRENT is no good in here, tested three diff machines by now. > BTW: Please add me in CC as I am not in this list. Thanks. > > Cheers, > Mezz > > > -- > mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD GNOME Team > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 28 08:14:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5DC106564A for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADFF8FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.173.16.176] (helo=moosi) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MVhpq-00028o-7A; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:14:58 +0400 To: Kent Stewart References: <200907271757.15060.kstewart@owt.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:16:08 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200907271757.15060.kstewart@owt.com> (Kent Stewart's message of "Mon\, 27 Jul 2009 17\:57\:14 -0700") Message-ID: <66571831@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux-f?-xorg-libs X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:15:00 -0000 Kent Stewart writes: > I was trying to build packages of the linux-xorg-libs and found that the > pkg-plist for both f8 and f10 have a bogus file referenced. It is listed as > "etc/ld.so.conf.d/xorg-x11-i386.conf" > It never gets created and the tar fails. Something is wrong with your system/setup: ----- % pkg_info -W /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf.d/xorg-x11-i386.conf /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf.d/xorg-x11-i386.conf was installed by package linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4 ----- -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 30 16:37:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2FD106567D for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rich@pencil.math.missouri.edu) Received: from pencil.math.missouri.edu (pencil.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A368FC17 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rich@pencil.math.missouri.edu) Received: from pencil.math.missouri.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pencil.math.missouri.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6UGA5xu062851; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:10:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rich@pencil.math.missouri.edu) Received: (from rich@localhost) by pencil.math.missouri.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6UGA5Tv062850; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:10:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rich) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:10:05 -0500 From: Rich Winkel To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090730161005.GA61915@pencil.math.missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9634/Wed Jul 29 22:03:31 2009 on pencil.math.missouri.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Rich Winkel Subject: Linux libs problem with matlab java X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:37:56 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to get matlab R13 running under freebsd 7.1 with linux_base-fc-4_14. compat.linux.osrelease is set to 2.4.2 Matlab comes with jre 1.1.8. When I try to run matlab, the error is: Warning: Unable to load Java Runtime Environment: /usr/local/matlab/sys/java/jre/glnx86/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference. Warning: Disabling Java support. Does anyone know what's going on here? Thanks, Rich From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 30 23:40:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720861065670; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4913A8FC1D; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (edwin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6UNeFJQ057458; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:40:15 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6UNeFYx057448; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:40:15 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:40:15 GMT Message-Id: <200907302340.n6UNeFYx057448@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137281: update www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:40:16 -0000 Synopsis: update www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jul 30 23:40:14 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=137281 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 11:56:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9411065673; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from ns.kfs.ru (kfs.kfs.ru [194.186.81.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211A98FC1A; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from bsam by ns.kfs.ru with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MWqOC-000KJl-Rp; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:35:08 +0400 To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org References: <200907302340.n6UNeFYx057448@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:35:08 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200907302340.n6UNeFYx057448@freefall.freebsd.org> (edwin@freebsd.org's message of "Thu\, 30 Jul 2009 23\:40\:15 GMT") Message-ID: <45094083@serv3.int.kfs.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137281: update www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:56:16 -0000 edwin@FreeBSD.org writes: > Synopsis: update www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jul 30 23:40:14 UTC 2009 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) Can someone test the patch and report back? And it will be good to create a patch for www/linux-f10-flashplugin10. -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 1 18:26:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270C81065673; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F001A8FC16; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:25:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n71IPxDg099877; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:25:59 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n71IPxWg099873; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:25:59 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:25:59 GMT Message-Id: <200908011825.n71IPxWg099873@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137332: add caution messages to some adobe products X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:26:00 -0000 Synopsis: add caution messages to some adobe products Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Aug 1 18:24:15 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer of www/linux-flashplugin9. Someone there will have to figure out the maintainership of the various ports involved. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=137332