From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 11:06:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8C7106567E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7868FC3F for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2UB6tpI054791 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:06:55 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2UB6s3t054787 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:06:54 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:06:54 GMT Message-Id: <200903301106.n2UB6s3t054787@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:06:56 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/132092 jail [jail] jail can listen on *:port when jail_socket_unix o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 14:54:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFA3106564A for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from mx1.bct.ionspam.net (mx1.bct.ionspam.net [204.89.241.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67188FC19 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from localhost (mx1.bct.ionspam.net [204.89.241.173]) by mx1.bct.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309F2417419 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:38:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secnap.net; h= content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id; s=dkim; t=1238510295; x=1240324695; bh=vvGqAFSHwaDq oIMYRkouwr5QNWLToapCLLpjCczoFhU=; b=kXRsyYRAI/VIJ9OcjMtPcil1VZ7E Y2F7sHm+cOJkp1KOiRx3wlm3ez9SR179m7dxBedrfWeAz5xvCr/GoC/yBGOnPX88 M85t2qUXFr9tzUya4RzSPxrG+gHeC5lawkJXPivqpHvNhQGdR2Y+NVkvuttAxbuo FOsc3l+s+j7ViRY= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mx1.bct.ionspam.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) SME-150 1.95 at mx1.bct.ionspam.net Received: from secnap3.secnap.com (secnap3.secnap.com [204.89.241.130]) by mx1.bct.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B43D41740C for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:38:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49D22ADE.6070005@secnap.net> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:38:22 -0700 From: Michael Scheidell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2009 14:38:14.0787 (UTC) FILETIME=[52F56530:01C9B20E] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: anyone using ssl accellorator cards in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:54:53 -0000 would I need a card for each jail? each IP? What os? FBSD 6.4 or 7.1? what are your experiences? what about Self signed certs and those cards? having 'issues' I suspect with 30 ish https hosts on one jail, with multiple readers. trying to speed things up. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2009 Hot Company Award, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 _________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ _________________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 16:53:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC35F106566B for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6764E8FC13 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter@pean.org) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFB432152; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:53:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <0E9FFDD0-E87F-44D8-8900-61A701AF0426@pean.org> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= To: stef@memberwebs.com In-Reply-To: <20090325215107.C491EEFB6E8@mx.npubs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:53:39 +0200 References: <20090323232804.36215EFB6E7@mx.npubs.com> <98B67F85-CFB1-4105-97BD-BD02F59CCE86@pean.org> <20090325031621.B7FCFEFB6F6@mx.npubs.com> <8E55FD43-EB8F-4C24-A54D-9CD860ECC79C@pean.org> <20090325215107.C491EEFB6E8@mx.npubs.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New 7.2 compatible versions of jailutils and bsnmp-jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:53:43 -0000 On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Stef Walter wrote: > > > > It lets you poll a URL that looks like: > > snmp://public@example.com/jailInOctets?jailHost=3Djail.example.com > > > See 'TABLE QUERIES' here: > > http://memberwebs.com/stef/software/rrdbot/rrdbot.conf.5.html > > http://memberwebs.com/stef/software/rrdbot/rrdbot-get.1.html > > Damn, I cant figure out how to get the MIB-file working. Where should =20= I place the .txt? and client-side, server-side, both? path? -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/ From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 03:40:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E2E106564A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stef-list@memberwebs.com) Received: from mx.npubs.com (mail.npubs.com [209.66.100.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF19F8FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stef-list@memberwebs.com) Received: from mx.npubs.com (avhost [209.66.100.194]) by mx.npubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AC0EFB6F6; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from northstar-srv2 (unknown [172.27.2.11]) by mx.npubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601FCEFB6EE; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:13:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Stef Walter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= References: <20090323232804.36215EFB6E7@mx.npubs.com> <98B67F85-CFB1-4105-97BD-BD02F59CCE86@pean.org> <20090325031621.B7FCFEFB6F6@mx.npubs.com> <8E55FD43-EB8F-4C24-A54D-9CD860ECC79C@pean.org> <20090325215107.C491EEFB6E8@mx.npubs.com> <0E9FFDD0-E87F-44D8-8900-61A701AF0426@pean.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20090401031337.601FCEFB6EE@mx.npubs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New 7.2 compatible versions of jailutils and bsnmp-jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stef@memberwebs.com List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:40:31 -0000 Peter Ankerstål wrote: > Damn, I cant figure out how to get the MIB-file working. Where should I > place the > .txt? and client-side, server-side, both? path? On the client side, either in /usr/local/share/mib or /usr/local/share/snmp/mibs ... depending on the SNMP software you're using. You should see a bunch of *-MIB.txt files in either of those locations. If you'd like to join us on rrdbot@googlegroups.com, this discussion is probably more on topic there. Cheers, Stef From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 10:42:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82566106564A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DC18FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter@pean.org) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391323260E for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:42:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:42:12 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:42:16 -0000 I cant start spamd inside my new jails running 7.2-PRERELEASE. [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not =20 create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 2: spamd: could not =20 create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address [3679] error: spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't =20 assign requested address spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested =20= address running on FreeBSD new.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #2: Tue =20= Mar 24 00:06:58 UTC 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAMURAI amd64 But on FreeBSD old.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #1: Sat =20= Mar 28 15:30:25 CET 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NINJA amd64 everything still works fine. other programs can bind to adresses and so on but not spamd. I tried to write something like this: = http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=3D416119 but with tcp and port 783, not warnings or error messages. Do you =20 think this is a jail-issue or a spamd issue? I have tried to config spamd to bind to alot of different addresses =20 with same result 0.0.0.0, 127.0.0.1, the jails ip and so on. -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/ From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 10:50:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7D9106564A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10C8FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter@pean.org) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE216339DC; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:50:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <1D527067-D3BF-42C2-B3E0-92BBC8B129E2@pean.org> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= To: Redd Vinylene In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:50:44 +0200 References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:50:47 -0000 On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Ankerst=E5l =20= > wrote: > I cant start spamd inside my new jails running 7.2-PRERELEASE. > > [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not =20 > create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address > [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 2: spamd: could not =20 > create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address > [3679] error: spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't =20 > assign requested address > spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign =20 > requested address > > running on > FreeBSD new.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #2: =20 > Tue Mar 24 00:06:58 UTC 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/=20 > SAMURAI amd64 > > But on > FreeBSD old.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #1: =20 > Sat Mar 28 15:30:25 CET 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NINJA =20= > amd64 > > everything still works fine. > > other programs can bind to adresses and so on but not spamd. > > I tried to write something like this: = http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=3D416119 > but with tcp and port 783, not warnings or error messages. Do you =20 > think this is > a jail-issue or a spamd issue? > > I have tried to config spamd to bind to alot of different addresses =20= > with same result > 0.0.0.0, 127.0.0.1, the jails ip and so on. > > -- > Peter Ankerst=E5l > peter@pean.org > http://www.pean.org/ > > > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd =20= > will hardly stop any spam. > > --=20 > http://www.home.no/reddvinylene I dont know if I was clear about that Im using p5-Mail-Spamassasin. But if you have any pointers what I should use instead I would be very =20= happy. Maybe even a guide? :) It needs to be something simple. Not a large mysql-database and admin-=20= interface. Jast a daemon that postfix could use to check for spam. Thanks! -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/ From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:01:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1040B1065673 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f167.google.com (mail-fx0-f167.google.com [209.85.220.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3CC8FC17 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mail-fx0-f167.google.com with SMTP id 11so2749429fxm.43 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:01:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fcqAR631Geqv0u2IHz9Vy7xdz1FRN75ogNKiSSdIVUQ=; b=SFX1H4ZNnbceCgimCLyQBt7ULVBDM29Hqi4JC1AsoZwA6EBc7QbQEEohlvp1c45fum ld4/je1Z6ZO3vTndroem45sbGop1kQ7mCZi7D9AIbrMY/GO7FsfV9/nDVtYwhmSBftdl /7WEyaTOfaApI4/ocJ7L7T/Xca7MX13I+//ZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hDPcbZ3WToqLQCtqFu53enI96xahp3rQ9NIp6RZ+E7+XRhsH4roPJ77NX7/wLJ/UdT wpfj2433OSk/l1UJhoWcPbocww6nsBCtBQ0Q860QR3oT+U67rdpk2ZarNxXr09mZExgY B2Y8AzwH+e6tXDRTKWcioD3x2WlclQ+gcZKPs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.172.7 with SMTP id z7mr2768636muo.15.1238583674344; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:01:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1D527067-D3BF-42C2-B3E0-92BBC8B129E2@pean.org> References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> <1D527067-D3BF-42C2-B3E0-92BBC8B129E2@pean.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:01:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:01:17 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote= : > >> I cant start spamd inside my new jails running 7.2-PRERELEASE. >> >> [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not creat= e >> INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address >> [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 2: spamd: could not creat= e >> INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address >> [3679] error: spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assig= n >> requested address >> spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested >> address >> >> running on >> FreeBSD new.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #2: Tue Ma= r >> 24 00:06:58 UTC 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAMURAI amd64 >> >> But on >> FreeBSD old.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #1: Sat Ma= r >> 28 15:30:25 CET 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NINJA amd64 >> >> everything still works fine. >> >> other programs can bind to adresses and so on but not spamd. >> >> I tried to write something like this: >> http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=3D416119 >> but with tcp and port 783, not warnings or error messages. Do you think >> this is >> a jail-issue or a spamd issue? >> >> I have tried to config spamd to bind to alot of different addresses with >> same result >> 0.0.0.0, 127.0.0.1, the jails ip and so on. >> >> -- >> Peter Ankerst=E5l >> peter@pean.org >> http://www.pean.org/ >> >> > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd will > hardly stop any spam. > > -- > http://www.home.no/reddvinylene > > I dont know if I was clear about that Im using p5-Mail-Spamassasin. > But if you have any pointers what I should use instead I would be very > happy. > Maybe even a guide? :) > > It needs to be something simple. Not a large mysql-database and > admin-interface. > Jast a daemon that postfix could use to check for spam. > > Thanks! > -- > Peter Ankerst=E5l > peter@pean.org > http://www.pean.org/ > > Indeed, check out the postgrey port. I think it's exactly what you want. --=20 http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:05:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221F11065672 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03538FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LoyFi-000BF8-MY; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:05:02 +0200 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:05:02 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ankerst=E5l?= Message-ID: <20090401110502.GD27326@home.opsec.eu> References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:05:05 -0000 Hi! > I cant start spamd inside my new jails running 7.2-PRERELEASE. I use spamd_enable="YES" spamd_flags="-A -i " and it works fine. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 11 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:10:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBFA106567C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f167.google.com (mail-fx0-f167.google.com [209.85.220.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB7E8FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so2753428fxm.43 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:10:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UCg1g+9fb6wgu1v0N+tPoii+UsULR/8pOVRkvX+B/0w=; b=MLb+Og/KwH9tO2Bs+upiw9TpL92t7U93pznBmrNGwE8O5729ThNbC3VVNSuLf0TBAv fdOLeUGUK0nB3mY7Tck+IskY65/79loPbAZ2ncOwTS9w+oVYrl6zee6C7iWdBV8GvV5Z RIfwelMZkGBRhwTksdydDFPdmGm2gWaJ8lqGQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZP32HMVj+Dmp4ZHvJIS+E+5Ccrl7SPO/mK+84AcGedyzT+rnuu0sQPZd7c/nAa1lrJ j1Q0lilugIWkAfntUUoNYadCIXMjwSq5sj8j6YrJaBUNPqwPdwPmHj7aPq5ni2+1gFUs goX4dB/q7cU4/BKJzDbc9qLbA7pB/BRf1lClk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.226.10 with SMTP id d10mr2765484mur.35.1238582782623; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:46:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:46:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, peter@pean.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:10:30 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote: > I cant start spamd inside my new jails running 7.2-PRERELEASE. > > [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create > INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address > [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 2: spamd: could not create > INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address > [3679] error: spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign > requested address > spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested > address > > running on > FreeBSD new.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #2: Tue Mar > 24 00:06:58 UTC 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAMURAI amd64 > > But on > FreeBSD old.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #1: Sat Mar > 28 15:30:25 CET 2009 peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NINJA amd64 > > everything still works fine. > > other programs can bind to adresses and so on but not spamd. > > I tried to write something like this: > http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=3D416119 > but with tcp and port 783, not warnings or error messages. Do you think > this is > a jail-issue or a spamd issue? > > I have tried to config spamd to bind to alot of different addresses with > same result > 0.0.0.0, 127.0.0.1, the jails ip and so on. > > -- > Peter Ankerst=E5l > peter@pean.org > http://www.pean.org/ > > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd will hardly stop any spam. --=20 http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:53:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9556106564A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com (mail-bw0-f169.google.com [209.85.218.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6718FC19 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so2816781bwz.37 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:53:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YPjKLu+WXroMIWv/pOaxOjN/hMwFv3Yn2eyGxggbDE0=; b=FDY7e6/dtkwUyFDMtIBwgClIeyrIzl86hlDVCeJExe9zy8cvtkifP7gbo3lh2wi/9o yNCDVhdF5GR3HjX/3+abIFQmGCZGYj87UfqyIceB9azyPlEtewD80bXtzpwq5eZMn86J gYGFRdROyLFlr7lSm6TzmAgzOtVVF+QVP/pKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iLNrF6zIPKXn0zA3zEMpzgPcEZST9pprFVwMtrdeW1DV+F57PVyvB422aLM2ZK00zo qyEGNxa/YvLchFlbAUdaWNCtCh3M8Tfw5jafJFD/ZrMTcckG2qbIlznj53+S+nAtdIzO GVj5FPzlb9kvsy+92L9WCOQ+Vlqc/nkWK4C5Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.226.10 with SMTP id d10mr2794989mur.84.1238586791608; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:53:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49D352B8.5070403@beardz.net> References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> <49D352B8.5070403@beardz.net> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:53:11 +0200 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: Jase Thew , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:53:15 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Jase Thew wrote: > Redd Vinylene wrote: > > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd will >> hardly stop any spam. >> >> > It seems to be doing a pretty effective job of stopping spam here. > > Regards, > > Jase. > Without greylisting? -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:56:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDCD106566C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bazerka@beardz.net) Received: from mx-2.btshosting.co.uk (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [87.117.208.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A7E8FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bazerka@beardz.net) Received: from localhost (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [87.117.208.79]) by mx-2.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23666E54DE; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-2.btshosting.co.uk ([87.117.208.79]) by localhost (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [87.117.208.79]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87905-02; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-2.btshosting.co.uk (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [87.117.208.79]) by mx-2.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1966E54D3; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:40:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=beardz.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=postfix; bh=8AsmzxshW GIsmxKQZ7LAYw0MtEWIpeYTMMsfYnAmlb0=; b=XFI3nK5aNUNMXT0u3pTkw07Qz bR13qREP7hpOuJoF0nuJElBJK492MBB2GqNfAv5NbS+/+8z415lrLXoP2NJ+DXTZ NSWzU5Au+VgAyCg5U3F+NjyaewRHusmww+NWEgG2sUioOjebf0ogXoLnMHgIQMIR nVuYJhFXTr03kf5TC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=beardz.net; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b=DGr lwwwmNmpsdO6H+CsnUgogHoUoj4v3GyS9PTAH5SMqAcsaNBMsRwA0lxBi0yj9Js+ h1XKJr7sh9GgE69qCv3WTXdXjP2/SHU/FF/0+fqhrJGFTQVpw4lLgC4hU/dnOBg8 XRkPy9SprozXFbnuxN6poc5nji8R7FbqNbN00i1k= Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host217-42-181-161.range217-42.btcentralplus.com [217.42.181.161]) (Authenticated sender: bazerka@beardz.net) by mx-2.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 514FA6E54A3; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <49D352B8.5070403@beardz.net> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:40:40 +0100 From: Jase Thew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Redd Vinylene References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:56:29 -0000 Redd Vinylene wrote: > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd will > hardly stop any spam. > It seems to be doing a pretty effective job of stopping spam here. Regards, Jase. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:57:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64D51065673 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:57:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f164.google.com (mail-bw0-f164.google.com [209.85.218.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEAD8FC1D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2717424bwz.43 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:57:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1L5RcmFmFnTJ9g2ezNedVyBdzewuaE2UwYoNPH29GGc=; b=eww6K/MvIqd4UaIHzCCEl/naMUrw1BpWkoIcydU1InuC/mLA0SJKL6I9ICzwEsiqi+ WeuKoI3eFeIfjHGcfKttjQcj4IhkcIsWpfEjt3C8uRxlbL9TN2KdwjJH5J/RsVJj5RJt ilnj2OBKlGtsbnjp6/yNjyJA4/SW6XCjNWgug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aqItuVgEo1vSbyjpqnFUwpdqiTpEIdmlf7dcay7fybh8k46yb36tKT3Q93KTuGX76e uo5YF37bU9VDwc/L0y0yE9ohy0gmfga135EqYhin7BxGUqh01uOb3ZK9/MacxvBWURhM FoMimdscKzf6WPYuZ7H99CFYvqMYW2IKZ/YlU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.241.15 with SMTP id t15mr2794003mur.85.1238587036060; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:57:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49D352B8.5070403@beardz.net> References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> <49D352B8.5070403@beardz.net> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:57:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: Jase Thew , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:57:19 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Jase Thew wrote: > Redd Vinylene wrote: > > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd will >> hardly stop any spam. >> >> > It seems to be doing a pretty effective job of stopping spam here. > > Regards, > > Jase. > When I ran spamd I used to get hundreds of spam emails a day. But the minute I switched to greylisting in Postfix, it all stopped. -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 12:01:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746A2106566C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f170.google.com (mail-fx0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C278FC1A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so209fxm.16 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:01:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f39iqbMCnBpssB5zgv6n7TFOsinOjyHaYeDO/sikyy8=; b=JA3Tj/hfTQH9fNMgopYLEj2zeH71LPSOzAdQuq6E6vO730Q5zyS7dURvqCaYtaIG1B RLHjwcd/VNb5CXgOmXvxbT5yQVCIR3ziB6p/I/GMJBqrL5k1riIpkvzfZiycv+rsuSrH XZ41udgt5N+PQFHndSj5V+97BdZMN+0bkrfBQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=W6x8iKEPG5wGsOu5s/w6oFROf/fMS1ARUno6U6Dd+V2MfhZxq/Ya9ulPuNTFSZwxxF 6CZssZHmzYwgeahQj79SgpeweesGWji6zfd7dkh9D9n+MQwU82yAG61u/WKSs6XWP6hb 16u+4NiLEToxy7/e5QeYbFKlAnnzpCASrzLSY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.182.3 with SMTP id j3mr2798219mup.107.1238587284125; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:01:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090401115702.GE27326@home.opsec.eu> References: <5FE6B06E-8E94-4EC0-AEDA-657DB3DD45F3@pean.org> <49D352B8.5070403@beardz.net> <20090401115702.GE27326@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:01:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: spamd inside jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:01:26 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd > will > > >> hardly stop any spam. > > > > It seems to be doing a pretty effective job of stopping spam here. > > > Without greylisting? > > Yes. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 11 years to > go ! > Fine. But I still don't like it. -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 17:43:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21691065672 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808918FC36 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:3::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter@pean.org) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A68D3C789 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:43:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= To: jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:43:46 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Cc: Subject: Adding ips to running jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:43:50 -0000 Is it possible to add ip-addresses to an already running jail? -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/ From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 21:20:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A79F106566B for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [195.88.108.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036D18FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB43641C757; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:20:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([195.88.108.3]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HcxLwINip+4a; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 7BE4F41C750; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C4B4448EC; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:19:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090402211902.J15361@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1324036280-1238707159=:15361" Cc: jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding ips to running jail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:20:07 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1324036280-1238707159=:15361 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote: > Is it possible to add ip-addresses to an already running jail? Not yet but possibly soon (in FreeBSD 8). --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. --0-1324036280-1238707159=:15361--