From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 6 11:07:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859941065677 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720478FC2D for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n66B71g0010827 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n66B70KB010823 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:07:00 GMT Message-Id: <200907061107.n66B70KB010823@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:07:01 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/133265 jail [jail] is there a solution how to run nfs client in ja o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 7 01:29:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36C61065675 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill.marquette@ucsecurity.com) Received: from mail.ucsecurity.com (70-88-79-149-BusName-il.chicago.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.88.79.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BBD8FC14 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill.marquette@ucsecurity.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ucsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BC8352002 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:14:04 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucsecurity.com Received: from mail.ucsecurity.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ucsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QjGMjne1bD4K for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.ucsecurity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ucsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2F3352001 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Bill Marquette To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Message-ID: <10880739.281246929242603.JavaMail.root@mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.69.153] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.14_GA_2850.UBUNTU8 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/5.0.14_GA_2850.UBUNTU8) Subject: Multicast in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:29:47 -0000 I'm trying to run Avahi in a jail, much the same as Alexander Leidinger in this email from late last year http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00587.html. I couldn't find any replies to that thread and it seems that I'm running into the same issues - the service announcements make it on the wire and the other devices in the network see them. However after some time, the other devices expire the service from their cache and ask for an update. As best as I can tell, the multicast update packets aren't making it into the jail (I can certainly imagine why not!). I don't have MROUTED compiled in the kernel, however the previously noted email did and it still didn't work. I'm running 8.0-CURRENT as of 27-June-2009 on this machine now, GENERIC kernel with WITNESS and INVARIANTS compiled out. Host: > ifmcstat em0: inet 192.168.69.100 igmpv3 flags=0<> rv 2 qi 125 qri 10 uri 3 group 224.0.0.251 mode exclude mcast-macaddr 01:00:5e:00:00:fb group 224.0.0.1 mode exclude mcast-macaddr 01:00:5e:00:00:01 lo0: inet 127.0.0.1 igmpv3 flags=0<> rv 2 qi 125 qri 10 uri 3 group 224.0.0.1 mode exclude inet6 fe80::1%lo0 mldv2 flags=0<> rv 2 qi 125 qri 10 uri 3 group ff01::1%lo0 mode exclude group ff02::2:736f:581e%lo0 mode exclude group ff02::1%lo0 mode exclude group ff02::1:ff00:1%lo0 mode exclude Jail: > ifmcstat lo0: inet6 fe80::1%lo0 mldv2 flags=0<> rv 2 qi 125 qri 10 uri 3 group ff01::1%lo0 mode exclude group ff02::2:736f:581e%lo0 mode exclude group ff02::1%lo0 mode exclude group ff02::1:ff00:1%lo0 mode exclude I'm pretty sure I saw em0 in the ifmcstat output for the jail the other day when I was messing with this, but I've rebooted since and have no idea what sequence of events led to that. I hope I'm just missing something and I can get this setup working. Any help would be most appreciated. Thanks --Bill From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 7 09:21:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D021065673 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E458FC20 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2EABF.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.234.191]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DE4D844614; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:01:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ADFBDC66; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:01:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1246957310; bh=nekWvc4b/S2L9wk9/4cFTnGTyL7oTPOGOPZ6KPOIMrc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xLS0p3dXFIj5jPoR2amU6jgpzBVhY4oMi47B/+gJ5wPVl+HFb5585sGFBsirYvfXH j8oRpiUUblJPlDRgA4NJZYYPOzcDnk8Xjz2pk/XMNetVcmsGpp64NJiOi7cG87/SOQ cnKxK1P9pWRyUwp5INFJtFlI8cZ3GJBaFB9T8XgYnTNO90FeL1kvPumLf+3V1QwpBR FvXpHevQHswieTAa7ICSZVp0+6o0SDILCpWvBiOGoBK8RHW63lW+Wcr/sHVX4JQ3Lq tB0JPnApbhfnXm1nPI6xR6icr+RrBfao/Tr0aRWdWAUlZqjBx0Apz0pcfslvTxFA+8 dGfaYHUMw3oGg== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.3/8.13.8/Submit) id n6791nQg091849; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:01:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:01:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20090707110149.93723i84ufre1vco@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:01:49 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Bill Marquette References: <10880739.281246929242603.JavaMail.root@mail> In-Reply-To: <10880739.281246929242603.JavaMail.root@mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 / FreeBSD-8.0 X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 8DE4D844614.3DE92 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.84, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, J_CHICKENPOX_56 0.60) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1247562114.38463@KrUlof4EWsMLxl+7XFKzJQ X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multicast in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:21:00 -0000 Quoting Bill Marquette (from Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT)): > I'm trying to run Avahi in a jail, much the same as Alexander > Leidinger in this email from late last year > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00587.html. > I couldn't find any replies to that thread and it seems that I'm > running into the same issues - the service announcements make it on > the wire and the other devices in the network see them. So far I have nothing working. I assume that the mcast traffic is not arriving at all IPs. Either because on overly restrictive jail check, and/or just because there's no code which is distributing the traffic to all IPs. It seems kern_jail.c is a place to check if there's some code which handles this. Maybe prison_check_ip[46] if mcast is on top of this, or something new to write if mcast is a different "AF". Again, this is a wild guess, I don't have enough understanding of the network code in the kernel to even make educated guesses about the real reason. Bye, Alexander. -- Ask not for whom the Bell tolls, and you will pay only the station-to-station rate. -- Howard Kandel http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 7 11:10:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45977106564A for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [195.88.108.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E5F8FC1B for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9A541C64A; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([195.88.108.3]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FyYAJWrXzG47; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id E041C41C667; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECC84448E6; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:08:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20090707110149.93723i84ufre1vco@webmail.leidinger.net> Message-ID: <20090707110601.U245@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <10880739.281246929242603.JavaMail.root@mail> <20090707110149.93723i84ufre1vco@webmail.leidinger.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multicast in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:10:08 -0000 On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Bill Marquette (from Mon, 6 Jul 2009 > 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT)): > >> I'm trying to run Avahi in a jail, much the same as Alexander Leidinger in >> this email from late last year >> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00587.html. I >> couldn't find any replies to that thread and it seems that I'm running into >> the same issues - the service announcements make it on the wire and the >> other devices in the network see them. > > So far I have nothing working. > > I assume that the mcast traffic is not arriving at all IPs. guess>Either because on overly restrictive jail check, and/or just because > there's no code which is distributing the traffic to all IPs. > > It seems kern_jail.c is a place to check if there's some code which handles No, in_pcb.c in6_pcb.c in_m*.[ch] in6_m*.[ch] are the files you need as a starting point; there's more and more and more. > this. Maybe prison_check_ip[46] if mcast is on top of this, or something new > to write if mcast is a different "AF". Again, this is a wild guess, I don't > have enough understanding of the network code in the kernel to even make > educated guesses about the real reason. But you first will have to understand all implications, that need a proper design plan and after that thoughtout implementation. Alternatively I wouldn't wonder if enabling raw sockets would give what you want or you'll wait for virtualization to be ready. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 7 11:23:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3580D1065705 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E978FC1F for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2EABF.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.234.191]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 422DD8445A2; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128E418196F; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:23:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1246965829; bh=W2ETRnG6Nsj3IgvgB/qu6x4H149SrMdcZBGjE0+25tE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=e1tC+ZkhY/64VB9W853NZ54admCYsRrkWSUTHw5slFOsYnUgsxirG4FjNc7TIHl9y 12gCMuX1TQPZWxwNeAwO4R7uREnQdb3T4IEOxcZdSGdOOCy3v5WP9lLbEUR4y8mcsj kqn4DBSAQvPrfClTqJujybLRp1BCWDNrc+/oJhaew412KUenJhFcFZikjpUHlXvM5u MvuJh4+plgQDUHBnjbRZorCdMVVatibDrZI83cK85iARP/NVcjiRzHaz88zl0wCVRw S7Jb0jmP+uJdO/J7M+M0mOMlAfSnGBD+Xt820lVsR4BXseQWaE62UXyZ3Ms6GhpR5v UXXFJ44S/lLYQ== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.3/8.13.8/Submit) id n67BNlwM017459; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:23:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:23:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20090707132347.17603crgm3ln9y4g@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:23:47 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <10880739.281246929242603.JavaMail.root@mail> <20090707110149.93723i84ufre1vco@webmail.leidinger.net> <20090707110601.U245@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20090707110601.U245@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 / FreeBSD-8.0 X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 422DD8445A2.228AB X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1247570632.53412@MwpKsRKe2408px66Q2ajSg X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multicast in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:23:58 -0000 Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" (from Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:08:46 +0000 (UTC)): > Alternatively I wouldn't wonder if enabling raw sockets would give Didn't work for me. > what you want or you'll wait for virtualization to be ready. As _I_ don't need it on -stable: it's what I'm waiting for. Bye, Alexander. -- The greatest of faults is to be conscious of none. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 7 13:47:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F41F1065672 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill.marquette@ucsecurity.com) Received: from mail.ucsecurity.com (70-88-79-149-BusName-il.chicago.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.88.79.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B708FC1B for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill.marquette@ucsecurity.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ucsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CF7352002; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:47:14 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucsecurity.com Received: from mail.ucsecurity.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ucsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3zJ6fV6ECH8; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:47:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.ucsecurity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ucsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4EC352001; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:47:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:47:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Bill Marquette To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <18147857.401246974433018.JavaMail.root@mail> In-Reply-To: <9276499.381246974079019.JavaMail.root@mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.69.153] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.14_GA_2850.UBUNTU8 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/5.0.14_GA_2850.UBUNTU8) Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multicast in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:47:34 -0000 ----- "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Quoting Bill Marquette (from Mon, 6 > Jul 2009 > > 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT)): > > > >> I'm trying to run Avahi in a jail, much the same as Alexander > Leidinger in > >> this email from late last year > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00587.html. > I > >> couldn't find any replies to that thread and it seems that I'm > running into > >> the same issues - the service announcements make it on the wire and > the > >> other devices in the network see them. > Alternatively I wouldn't wonder if enabling raw sockets would give > what you want or you'll wait for virtualization to be ready. I tried raw sockets also but as with Alexander, that didn't make any appreciable difference. In the short term I think I can work around this by bouncing Avahi every couple of minutes (it appears to work properly over the last couple minutes at least). I'm certainly willing to give VIMAGE a try if it's likely to fix the issue although by your statement, it sounds like it's unlikely to at this time. Thanks --Bill From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 8 21:03:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EF7106566C for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8428FC17 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from localhost (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54653E65CD8 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:44:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secnap.net; h= content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id; s=dkim; t=1247085885; x=1248900285; bh=5skAe9HMix6K IoALfPXrw7yM8T/UNoIlrFjCK2kdD+M=; b=kmK1c0GLq4sHyMXrgSAqKx84GKXs WFzym8RjhKsEgbkZN4q/TZwqgvUsg1OWOvlIqASQ9EvTfHL0cdyLdlz67lKCqOiS gjz7vve3Boe/60yape+h8c4pc9qQLgL3CHuf/HlApBCwN/awDJsaLNgcFTWc/P72 EQxr6sZK3nAZx4w= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.03 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from secnap3.secnap.com (secnap3.secnap.com [204.89.241.130]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD16E65CD6 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:44:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Mikes-Laptop.local ([10.70.3.3] RDNS failed) by secnap3.secnap.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:44:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4A55055D.8030902@secnap.net> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:45:17 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2009 20:44:45.0194 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED2876A0:01CA000C] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: ssl accelerator cards and jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:03:57 -0000 has anyone done any work with hardware ssl accelerator cards and freebsd? specifically, freebsd 7.1 amd64? and, is it transparent in 'jail' so all jailed servers can use the one card? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 _________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ _________________________________________________________________________