From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 8 22:09:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEF810656F6 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DACE8FC25 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 652ED8FCA5 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:54:57 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 10F5B8FC59; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:29:27 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 781283981A; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:29:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:29:18 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-Id: <20090409002918.e48eecde.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DCCC93.2010209@p6m7g8.com> <1239216349.50237.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Apr 9 01:54:57 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49dd1d31967001990318312 Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , ruby@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rubygems-]: Request for Review and -exp Run X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:09:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:50:26 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Diff: > >> ----- > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/rubygems.diff > > > > If only the individual ports are changed, we does not need to waste > > resources on exp run. Just run these seven ports in Tinderbox... > > Would have helped if you looked at the diff or did you and that still applies ? > > Those seven ports have the deltas listed in *ADDITION* to the first 3 > which are global across all remaining rubygem-* ports (except maybe mongrel > and merb) > > > $ grep -c Index: rubygems.diff > 111 I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited to the affected ports only. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkndCSoACgkQK/VZk+smlYEPNQCfaZJD/LzuQ2ckl+qx8qV/Udjb orYAn2h5syUNYJet8/nBH58oUTfO2NpO =Xplo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49dd1d31967001990318312! From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 8 22:35:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3966106564A for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF178FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (76.161.175.34) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:25:14 -0700 Message-ID: <49DD2449.4080509@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:25:13 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Application User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <49DCCC93.2010209@p6m7g8.com> <1239216349.50237.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com> <20090409002918.e48eecde.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090409002918.e48eecde.stas@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , ruby@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rubygems-]: Request for Review and -exp Run X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:35:15 -0000 Stanislav Sedov wrote: > I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby > ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited > to the affected ports only. I've already run it on a tinderbox at $work (RideCharge Inc) unfortunately its not public. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net Senior Sys Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com Contractor - PositiveEnergyUSA http://positiveenergyusa.com ASF Member - Apache Software Foundation http://apache.org FreeBSD Committer - FreeBSD Foundation http://freebsd.org Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 8 22:39:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36D31065676 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A478FC17 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3413D8FC51 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:39:17 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8B1C8FC1D; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:39:14 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AC75F3981A; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:39:17 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:39:17 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-Id: <20090409023917.223c7d1e.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49DD2449.4080509@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DCCC93.2010209@p6m7g8.com> <1239216349.50237.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com> <20090409002918.e48eecde.stas@FreeBSD.org> <49DD2449.4080509@p6m7g8.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Apr 9 02:39:16 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49dd2794967001105412841 Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , ruby@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rubygems-]: Request for Review and -exp Run X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:39:18 -0000 On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:25:13 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby > > ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited > > to the affected ports only. > I've already run it on a tinderbox at $work (RideCharge Inc) > > unfortunately its not public. > Then it should be safe to commit if the run was successfull. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE !DSPAM:49dd2794967001105412841! From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 10 22:31:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03C9106566B; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7448FC16; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (76.161.175.34) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:21:54 -0700 Message-ID: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:21:52 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: RideCharge Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stanislav Sedov Subject: [RFC]: use --no-rdoc to implement NOPORTDOCS for rubygem-* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:31:57 -0000 http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/no_rdoc.diff The only rubygem-* port this breaks is www/rubygem-merb mysql> select count(1) from build_ports bp, ports p where bp.port_id = p.port_id and p.port_directory like '%/rubygem-%' and bp.build_id = 27; +----------+ | count(1) | +----------+ | 168 | +----------+ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@ridecharge.com) p: 703.549.2050x206, did: 703.579.6947 Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 10 22:40:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9511065673; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184198FC12; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (76.161.175.34) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:40:44 -0700 Message-ID: <49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:40:43 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Application User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> In-Reply-To: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: [RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:40:45 -0000 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/no_rdoc.diff > > The only rubygem-* port this breaks is www/rubygem-merb > > Now that all rubygem-* ports use RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST except www/rubygem-merb and www/rubygem-mongrel I'd like to see Mk/bsd.ruby.mk have USE_RUBYGEMS= yes imply RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST=yes Then tweaking the previous no_rdoc.diff patch we can set RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST=no for these 2 'unique' ports. I'd provide a diff, but I'm so far ahead of whats in CVS right now it would be useless. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net Senior Sys Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com Contractor - PositiveEnergyUSA http://positiveenergyusa.com ASF Member - Apache Software Foundation http://apache.org FreeBSD Committer - FreeBSD Foundation http://freebsd.org Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 10 23:24:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B5106564A; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349918FC0A; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (76.161.175.34) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:24:38 -0700 Message-ID: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:24:37 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Application User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ruby@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov , "pav@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: */rubygem-* => MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Is it worth setting this ? They all have NO_BUILD= yes from Mk/bsd.ruby.mk (at any rate all 168 of them work on quad core with -j8 in my tbs) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net Senior Sys Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com Contractor - PositiveEnergyUSA http://positiveenergyusa.com ASF Member - Apache Software Foundation http://apache.org FreeBSD Committer - FreeBSD Foundation http://freebsd.org Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 06:32:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46182106564A for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66B78FC13 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r5af140.net.upc.cz [86.49.39.140]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3B65idR016659; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 08:05:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AD4oQiIkkb2uSWDZ0dii" Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 08:05:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1239429944.70926.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -1.415 () AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 86.49.39.140; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: Stanislav Sedov , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: */rubygem-* => MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:32:56 -0000 --=-AD4oQiIkkb2uSWDZ0dii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philip M. Gollucci p=ED=B9e v p=E1 10. 04. 2009 v 19:24 -0400: > Is it worth setting this ? >=20 > They all have NO_BUILD=3D yes from Mk/bsd.ruby.mk So it would be no-op? > (at any rate all 168 of them work on quad core with -j8 in my tbs) >=20 >=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik If God is perfect, why did He create discontinuous functions? --=-AD4oQiIkkb2uSWDZ0dii Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkngMzgACgkQntdYP8FOsoLu0wCfd+nyI8ZlFqHmVmKjd00iGfCZ /okAoM6WGY0Jd70BW3lSWySP6N/qBWht =RgXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AD4oQiIkkb2uSWDZ0dii-- From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 07:20:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39B1106566C for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A736D8FC24 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D67A8FC4E for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:20:29 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 16BE38FC1D; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:20:27 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F10B039832; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:20:34 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:20:30 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-Id: <20090411112030.2279adc2.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Apr 11 11:20:29 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49e044bd967002020418523 Cc: ruby@freebsd.org, "pav@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: */rubygem-* => MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:20:31 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:24:37 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > Is it worth setting this ? > > They all have NO_BUILD= yes from Mk/bsd.ruby.mk > > (at any rate all 168 of them work on quad core with -j8 in my tbs) > Have you checked if it have any real benefit? - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkngRMIACgkQK/VZk+smlYEQUwCfY5DKdedUG/mYkaQlqKQEpsbE bPQAnAm9DADkgp1syomlPFxR1En/DWpk =9RVJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49e044bd967002020418523! From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 07:32:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB469106566B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6748FC1A for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E7818FC2B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:32:10 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F08628FC1D; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:32:09 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BE05339832; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:32:16 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:32:16 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-Id: <20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> <49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Apr 11 11:32:10 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49e0477a967005749415982 Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:32:12 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:40:43 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/no_rdoc.diff > > > > The only rubygem-* port this breaks is www/rubygem-merb > > > > > > Now that all rubygem-* ports use RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST > except www/rubygem-merb and www/rubygem-mongrel > > I'd like to see Mk/bsd.ruby.mk have > USE_RUBYGEMS= yes > > imply RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST=yes > > Then tweaking the previous no_rdoc.diff patch > > we can set RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST=no > for these 2 'unique' ports. > > I'd provide a diff, but I'm so far ahead of whats in CVS right now > it would be useless. > I don't think it is a good idead as historically we prefer static pkg-plists over dynamic ones. For ports where names of the files are perfectly known AUTOPLIST feature is not required. When I introduced this option my intention was to work around rdoc names generation problem and to not eliminate rubygem pkg-plists entirely. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkngR4AACgkQK/VZk+smlYH4FQCfRjR1Jk22gtjFOtVqkZu6Lper RCgAn0XTaaZKwS1zaHKo5/rhKkDS78Gt =4QuZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49e0477a967005749415982! From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 07:41:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A641065673 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679A08FC16 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 605608FC4E for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:41:58 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 31DDD8FC1D; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:41:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBC4539832; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:42:03 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:42:03 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" , clsung@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20090411114203.b70ab3fd.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Apr 11 11:41:58 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 9809 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49e049c6967005065714533 Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: use --no-rdoc to implement NOPORTDOCS for rubygem-* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:42:00 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:21:52 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/no_rdoc.diff > > The only rubygem-* port this breaks is www/rubygem-merb > Nice. Thanks for working on it! Can you work on the rubygem-merb as well? Probably, we can implement some temporary hack here... - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkngScsACgkQK/VZk+smlYFuvwCeL+GKJ+JOwUb4kv6g1C4uMili yFUAn1LBXjXn0FLCi5v2W0RIu9Gu86gy =0eeB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49e049c6967005065714533! From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 14:36:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2985106564A; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8518FC08; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from [192.168.2.170] (98.231.209.125) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:36:34 -0700 Message-ID: <49E0AAE2.9090803@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:36:18 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> <1239429944.70926.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1239429944.70926.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Stanislav Sedov , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: */rubygem-* => MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:36:35 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci píše v pá 10. 04. 2009 v 19:24 -0400: >> Is it worth setting this ? >> >> They all have NO_BUILD= yes from Mk/bsd.ruby.mk > > So it would be no-op? Thats correct, but I forgot if we were adding it to all ports for Tracking. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 14:38:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4076C106564A; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A85C8FC12; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from [192.168.2.170] (98.231.209.125) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:38:32 -0700 Message-ID: <49E0AB5D.60403@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:38:21 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> <49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com> <20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:38:33 -0000 > I don't think it is a good idead as historically we prefer static pkg-plists > over dynamic ones. For ports where names of the files are perfectly known > AUTOPLIST feature is not required. When I introduced this option my intention > was to work around rdoc names generation problem and to not eliminate rubygem > pkg-plists entirely. *sigh*. Wouldn't every rubygem port have to use it to work around that issue (the zfs one?)? That means every rubygem should fail in QAT then b/c of the NOPORTDOCS .... he must be excluding them. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 16:20:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A061065673 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12378FC17 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [89.24.242.234] (89-24-242-234.i4g.tmcz.cz [89.24.242.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3BGKD5K065396; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:20:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <49E0C34A.2090107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:20:26 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <49DFD535.2000107@p6m7g8.com> <1239429944.70926.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <49E0AAE2.9090803@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <49E0AAE2.9090803@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -3.166 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 89.24.242.234; Sender-helo: [89.24.242.234]; ) Cc: Stanislav Sedov , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: */rubygem-* => MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:20:39 -0000 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> Philip M. Gollucci píše v pá 10. 04. 2009 v 19:24 -0400: >>> Is it worth setting this ? >>> >>> They all have NO_BUILD= yes from Mk/bsd.ruby.mk >> >> So it would be no-op? > Thats correct, but I forgot if we were adding it to all ports for Tracking. Not at this point. But adding a note about it to Wiki page would be nice. Pav From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 16:31:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F37B1065672 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D9C8FC0A for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E389D8FC2B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:31:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5ACA18FC1D; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:31:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F27843981A; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:32:03 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:31:59 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-Id: <20090411203159.25fd4c48.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49E0AB5D.60403@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> <49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com> <20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org> <49E0AB5D.60403@p6m7g8.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Apr 11 20:31:56 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49e0c5fc967001346518677 Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:31:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:38:21 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > > I don't think it is a good idead as historically we prefer static pkg-plists > > over dynamic ones. For ports where names of the files are perfectly known > > AUTOPLIST feature is not required. When I introduced this option my intention > > was to work around rdoc names generation problem and to not eliminate rubygem > > pkg-plists entirely. > *sigh*. > > Wouldn't every rubygem port have to use it to work around that issue > (the zfs one?)? Nope, as not all gem ports contain auto-generated rdoc files. > > That means every rubygem should fail in QAT then b/c of the NOPORTDOCS > .... he must be excluding them. > Well, as I said before I like the idea of automatic handle of NOPORTDOCS key. Often, docs included are just static files with known names, and in this case AUTOPLIST feature is not needed. Otherwise, the port can use AUTOPLIST feature. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkngxgMACgkQK/VZk+smlYHlgQCffRvPSYjYDFU5LRr3LiYunC2E sHIAn23DUOgquFzhQpTRlUhLGT9rBhvM =8scD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49e0c5fc967001346518677!