Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:52:10 +0200 From: Joerg Traeger <jt@xoasis.de> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: est CPU support Message-ID: <201011011052.11084.jt@xoasis.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I have got several mainboards with CPUs which appear not to be supportet by est. An error exists: (examle of somewhat older Intel DG45FC with DualCore E5200 and latest BIOS) est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 61a4c1f06004c1f device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 <---------- p4tcc0: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu0 [...] est1: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu1 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 61a4c1f06004c1f device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 p4tcc1: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu1 Searching the net I found several hints this CPU (Intel DualCore E5200) _is_ supported by EST and the voltage is being reduced in idle states like intended. So it looks like there are more things which might break success using est for me. Can you explain what may be a reason for this problem? In the past it was about hardcoding cpu data about voltages into the source but as I know this is not the case anymore but ACPI is involved. Is the BIOS likely to be the reason or is it an ignored CPU stepping or...? Same happens with the new CPU Intel Atom N550 on a Jetway board called NC9c-550-LF. est does not attach and some watts are wasted. Thank you!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011011052.11084.jt>