From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 19 15:00:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A3F1065672 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yu-sheng.guo@hp.com) Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com (g4t0016.houston.hp.com [15.201.24.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ECF8FC08 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G1W0401.americas.hpqcorp.net (g1w0401.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.236.31.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g4t0016.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34FA1462C for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G4W1853.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.234.97.231) by G1W0401.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.236.31.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:40:30 +0000 Received: from GVW1160EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.232.35.122]) by G4W1853.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.97.231]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:40:29 +0000 From: "Guo, Yusheng" To: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:40:26 +0000 Thread-Topic: ubench memory performacne on FreeBSD 8.0 Thread-Index: AcqZFVbTKpV8RDzoQJSeS9kGS4xtiw== Message-ID: <7B3C0A02AC544544A5F171217AA881B54C01A83D57@GVW1160EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US Content-Language: zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: zh-TW, en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ubench memory performacne on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:00:49 -0000 Hi FreeBSD users, I get a problem when running ubench benchmark program on FreeBSD 8.0 using = following H/W HP Proliant DL360G6 E5520 CPU and 48GB memory And the memory performance result seems bad, any one get such situation bef= ore ? thanks PS : I try to compare with another H/W model and find even Intel 2.4G with = 4GB memory gets 300000 but I only have 70000 ~ 100000, why ?? Ubench Ubench CPU Ubench Ubench Memory Ubench avg Score Unix Bench Final Score 1 3,532,399 113,280 1,822,839 975.7 2 3,533,350 63,432 1,798,391 954.0 3 3,515,831 67,059 1,791,445 948.4 4 3,441,039 0 1,720,519 945.1 5 3,455,552 116,382 1,785,967 946.3 6 3,457,453 129,894 1,793,673 941.7 7 3,525,363 77,158 1,801,260 949.7 8 3,522,608 75,211 1,798,909 952.7 9 3,518,105 78,794 1,798,449 951.9 10 3,528,269 60,745 1,794,507 942.5 11 3,526,319 105,385 1,815,852 949.2 12 3,451,140 0 1,725,570 951.8 13 3,450,887 65,432 1,758,159 950.3 14 3,527,321 113,770 1,820,545 942.6 15 3,451,400 92,767 1,772,083 947.8 16 3,444,316 61,810 1,753,063 945.0 17 3,450,074 66,742 1,758,408 941.1 18 3,458,248 65,867 1,762,057 952.2 19 3,456,579 103,133 1,779,856 947.8 20 3,523,447 67,637 1,795,542 954.4 From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 19 15:34:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CB210656C8 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED68FC26 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NXG69-0007Bc-SF for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:34:29 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:34:29 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:34:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:34:11 +0100 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <7B3C0A02AC544544A5F171217AA881B54C01A83D57@GVW1160EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100118 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <7B3C0A02AC544544A5F171217AA881B54C01A83D57@GVW1160EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: ubench memory performacne on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:34:33 -0000 On 01/19/10 15:40, Guo, Yusheng wrote: > Hi FreeBSD users, > > I get a problem when running ubench benchmark program on FreeBSD 8.0 using following H/W > > HP Proliant DL360G6 E5520 CPU and 48GB memory > > And the memory performance result seems bad, any one get such situation before ? thanks For reference, could you try disabling or removing all but 2-4 GB of memory and try again? If you have multiple physical CPUs (sockets), can you disable or remove all but one of them?