Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:45:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: pf@freebsd.org, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, Jim Sifferle <jim@sifferle.net> Subject: Re: Network simulation using jails & vimage Message-ID: <20100221084118.W27327@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <4B80F076.5020109@elischer.org> References: <1266739527.25137.519.camel@localhost> <4B80F076.5020109@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-415875220-1266741835=:27327 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: <20100221084413.C27327@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Julian Elischer wrote: Hi, > Jim Sifferle wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> I've used ipfw and Dummynet as well as ipfw + DSCP recognition patch and >> pf/altq to simulate Internet and MPLS WAN environments for several >> years. All of my setups have run under VMWare, which for many reasons >> isn't ideal. I would like to collapse all of these VMs into one FreeBSD >> box using jails and vimages. >>=20 >> Does any FreeBSD branch / vimage release combination support separate pf >> AND ipfw configurations per jail? I need ipfw+pf/altq for HFSC queuing >> to simulate the queueing effects of MPLS provider edge and core >> routers.=20 > > -current (9) should be close, with patches for pf supplied by ceri. s,ceri,eri, (Ermal Lu=E7i) > 8 can do separate ipfw but pf is not changed. > 9 has bugs fixed. but I'm not sure if the changes for pf went in.. > they do exis tif they are not in already. No, pf hasn't gone in yet; it lives in user/eri/pf45/ in svn and I am not sure what the plans are. Apart from the latest changes 8 and 9 should be pretty much in sync wrt to VIMAGE I think. >> I'm hoping the latest 7.2-STABLE-201001 snapshot will work. The DSCP >> recognition patch for ipfw that I rely on doesn't seem to work with >> 8.0.=20 >> If 7.2 won't work for my needs, but 8 or 9-CURRENT will, is anyone aware >> of an updated ipfw DSCP patch? I haven't seen anything on Google or the >> freebsd-ipfw mailing list.=20 > > what is DSCP? I guess Differentiated Services CodePoint (if talking MPLS). /bz --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing. --0-415875220-1266741835=:27327--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100221084118.W27327>