Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:28:54 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: chukharev@mail.ru Cc: "freebsd-qa@freebsd.org" <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: About ports QA by 'port test' Message-ID: <20100314212854.75f43763@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <op.u89g6dh3mhpy7y@vova-vaio> References: <op.u89g6dh3mhpy7y@vova-vaio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/gbUo/NsDQFq2L38SolejrZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:19:15 +0200 chukharev@mail.ru wrote: > Recently I've been trying to run some additional tests during updating > the ports I have installed on my computer. That means I select a > number of oldest installed ports (using dates of directories > in /var/db/pkg/), and for each of them run 'port > test' (ports-mgmt/porttools) and then 'portupgrade -f'. >=20 > FYI, the 'port test' uses portlint, builds in a different place, > installs into a different place, packages, then de-installs and > checks for left files. No jail, no chroot. >=20 > From what I have seen till now, about 25% of the ports do not pass > the test, either for fatal errors from portlint or due to errors > exhibited because of PREFIX and PKG_DBDIR variables. And this is done > only for the ports I have successfully installed on my system for > some reason not connected to the QA purposes. >=20 > I do not want to trouble the port maintainers with direct e-mails. >=20 > I've been posting the results (and the original description I'm > modifying now) to freebsd-qa@ for a while, but that turned out to be > of some burden and also I received there no feedback at all. > Therefore I set a webpage at my day-job where I will copy the results. > I hope I will not need to keep the site for long, if running 'port > test' is found useful, it should be added into QAT or tinderbox, I > think. Though without jail it is faster I guess. >=20 > The URL: http://kemia.me.tut.fi/~chu/FreeBSD.port_tests/ > Current statistics: >=20 > Ports having fatal errors: 109 (21 %) > Ports having warnings: 216 (43 %) > Ports without fatal errors: 391 (78 %) > Ports having warnings or fatal errors: 325 (65 %) > Totally tested ports: 500 I will take a look at your work the following days. > Additionally to the above stats, java/jdk16 is interactive and hangs > on input despite of BATCH=3Dyes in /etc/make.conf. Yes, I noticed this today.=20 --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/gbUo/NsDQFq2L38SolejrZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkudOPYACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeU92QCdEab38dY9DJLZ0xk404cEzDBu Y0YAn3tmyf4wM3/MauitRadbez25sD9L =+B+V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gbUo/NsDQFq2L38SolejrZf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100314212854.75f43763>