From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 00:10:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D43B106566B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F218FC16 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9V0A4NA006615; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:10:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9V0A3lt006612; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:10:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:10:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Tim Dunphy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:10:04 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't add entries to fsab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:10:05 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: > I am having some trouble adding entries to /etc/fstab.. what happens > to work under CentOS does not under FreeBSD!! no surprise there, I > suppose.. heh > > > I have nfs_client_enable="YES" in my /etc/rc.conf > > Yet if I add even one line such as > > nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home /home nfs rw 0 0 > > the system refuses to boot normally and I have to add the path to > /bin//sh manually each time Add the "late" option ('man mount | less +3/late') to the rw option in that line: nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home /home nfs rw,late 0 0 > why on Earth can I not add entries to fstab as I do to CentOS?? Beyond knowing that they're different, dunno. Maybe the async DHCP in FreeBSD is different. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 00:13:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC37D106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814F78FC16 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9V0D1GP006637; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:13:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9V0D0Jw006634; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:13:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:13:00 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Chip Camden In-Reply-To: <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Message-ID: References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:13:01 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:13:04 -0000 On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Chip Camden wrote: >> % man csh | less +/rehash >> >> rehash Causes the internal hash table of the contents of the directo- >> ries in the path variable to be recomputed. This is needed if >> [...] >> Error executing formatting or display command. >> system command exited with status 36096 >> Error executing formatting or display command. >> system command exited with status 36096 >> No manual entry for csh >> % >> > > (meant to reply to list) > > I can confirm that the very latest 8.1-STABLE (csup and build this > morning) reproduces the problem. uname -a: > > FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #85: Fri Oct 29 10:27:19 PDT 2010 sterling@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIBERTAS amd64 This seems to be a problem with the csh man page. Other pages work fine, like 'man hosts | less +/named' or 'man devfs | less +/ruleset'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 02:15:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A291106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd_bronson@sbcglobal.net) Received: from cheyenne.sixcompanies.com (75-9-98-151.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net [75.9.98.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368FD8FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4CCCCE43.6000607@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:02:43 -0500 From: "J.D. Bronson" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ACPI Warning: 32/64X FACS address mismatch in FADT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:15:21 -0000 I have an INTEL DP43TF motherboad with an Intel Core 2 Quad. (non-HTT) When I boot up Freebsd 8.1 I see a message like this: "ACPI Warning: 32/64X FACS address mismatch in FADT..(blah)..using 32" I cant determine if this is OK and a cosmetic type of message or something more serious to question. Google turned up several hits but nothing explains what this is and/or the importance of it. Thanks, -- J.D. Bronson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 02:50:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4295C106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE348FC08 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9V2op3N007012; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:50:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9V2opaM007009; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:50:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:50:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Chip Camden In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:50:51 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:50:55 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Chip Camden wrote: > >>> % man csh | less +/rehash >>> >>> rehash Causes the internal hash table of the contents of the >>> directo- >>> ries in the path variable to be recomputed. This is >>> needed if >>> [...] >>> Error executing formatting or display command. >>> system command exited with status 36096 >>> Error executing formatting or display command. >>> system command exited with status 36096 >>> No manual entry for csh >>> % >>> >> >> (meant to reply to list) >> >> I can confirm that the very latest 8.1-STABLE (csup and build this >> morning) reproduces the problem. uname -a: >> >> FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE >> #85: Fri Oct 29 10:27:19 PDT 2010 >> sterling@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIBERTAS >> amd64 > > This seems to be a problem with the csh man page. Other pages work fine, > like 'man hosts | less +/named' or 'man devfs | less +/ruleset'. Actually, it appears to be a problem with long manual pages, including csh, bash, or perlfunc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 03:19:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE254106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9B88FC0A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.51]) by hrndva-qmta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20101031030959840.UJQV7732@hrndva-qmta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:09:59 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=i+/JZ7yNYkEB9O74GrsxMg==:17 a=s1O25tkdAAAA:8 a=ePsyhcdrAAAA:8 a=TWSgf9a6mDExTcUmp0MA:9 a=PA7YLJtTeiGTS7UM84QA:7 a=SXyPrQB6FXamylK_lzXguHlvstwA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=OyOq_G8mXAEA:10 a=i+/JZ7yNYkEB9O74GrsxMg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.188.22 Received: from [67.49.188.22] ([67.49.188.22:60831] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 91/93-26142-9CDDCCC4; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:08:58 +0000 Received: from holstein.holy.cow (parv [127.0.0.2]) by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8465CA9; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:13:54 -1000 (HST) Received: (from parv@localhost) by holstein.holy.cow (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o9V3Dr86002395; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:13:53 -1000 (HST) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) X-Authentication-Warning: holstein.holy.cow: parv set sender to parv@pair.com using -f Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:13:53 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: parv@pair.com, Warren Block , Chip Camden , questions@freebsd.org References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Chip Camden , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:19:28 -0000 in message , wrote Warren Block thusly... > > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Warren Block wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Chip Camden wrote: > > > >>> % man csh | less +/rehash > >>> > >>> rehash Causes the internal hash table of the contents of the > >>> directo- > >>> ries in the path variable to be recomputed. This is > >>> needed if > >>> [...] > >>> Error executing formatting or display command. > >>> system command exited with status 36096 > >>> Error executing formatting or display command. > >>> system command exited with status 36096 > >>> No manual entry for csh ... > >> I can confirm that the very latest 8.1-STABLE (csup and build > >> this morning) reproduces the problem. uname -a: > >> > >> FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE > >> #85: Fri Oct 29 10:27:19 PDT 2010 > >> sterling@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIBERTAS > >> amd64 > > > > This seems to be a problem with the csh man page. Other pages > > work fine, like 'man hosts | less +/named' or 'man devfs | less > > +/ruleset'. > > Actually, it appears to be a problem with long manual pages, > including csh, bash, or perlfunc. I tried with "man perlfunc | less '+/y'" (also repeated the above with csh) which did not result in any error messages in zsh 4 on FreeBSD 8-STABLE (c. Sep 9 2010). - parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 03:27:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25E5106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7A98FC18 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4318375fxm.13 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lvVspeGTNWtqLjURE5buYE4CE8eX34JFhLNKu9A4XzM=; b=N/ChswlFURaXyAU5XkyzJ6JQfBfrNqpc0tazIMW6aw2mTWopxUowVKw1hVBXYhPeBL /gzvJR1GEYoPtsA4FZCRWrgSMxfzO4wAAWXwLsDq/UcfAfrIoYh6YDITCDV91jR0lDmA efnmmGuPQwS3II2TkT6m/CxhAqi4Fl3Bem0vY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sE0GQdpe3Q+yjFGk+HmQJy+tiyyp611tk2S0gRCGU7bZGWvWuJ2d84P2xA0isBlF8O eAkuai//wTGrkhK2LRfEHxru+3VqyQYIRHS0PonN/qjpZ6hrgbPUVg+bQqdIabOVy5XO WwIKOglJlpS7p0Jm7D9shbcceaHblhlBVEkd0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.115.130 with SMTP id i2mr4265765faq.1.1288495669049; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.108.194 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:27:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:27:49 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: parv@pair.com, Warren Block , Chip Camden , questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:27:50 -0000 On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:13 PM, wrote: > I tried with "man perlfunc | less '+/y'" (also repeated the above > with csh) which did not result in any error messages in zsh 4 on > FreeBSD 8-STABLE (c. Sep 9 2010). > Perhaps it's not directly related to the shell since your config is similar to except my stable is from Oct 4 and the error happens here. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 03:53:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67143106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:53:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3B88FC13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C254E81EBE; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:52:51 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101031035248.GA20814@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: kwik one... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:53:46 -0000 Main reason I have linux as my desktop is to watch motion pix; A/V, but this stuff usually requires that crappy animation add-on. So: can anybody give me a menu to add/build linux-firefox and that plug-in. I already have ad-blockers on my Ubuntu; hulu flips me off at that.... tx gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 04:14:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142921065674 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48448FC1C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EF43D526; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:14:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9V4EBBR001503; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:14:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:14:11 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Adam Vande More Message-Id: <20101031051411.7cb91186.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:14:14 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:27:49 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:13 PM, wrote: > > > I tried with "man perlfunc | less '+/y'" (also repeated the above > > with csh) which did not result in any error messages in zsh 4 on > > FreeBSD 8-STABLE (c. Sep 9 2010). > > > > Perhaps it's not directly related to the shell since your config is similar > to except my stable is from Oct 4 and the error happens here. zsh 4 on FreeBSD 7: % man perlfunc | less '+/y' Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 No manual entry for perlfunc bash 4 on FreeBSD 7: $ man perlfunc | less '+/y' Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 No manual entry for perlfunc Maybe some buffer issue as the length of the man page seems to have an influence? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 04:18:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94551065670 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8F68FC14 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226D3D54C; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:18:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9V4IOYZ001529; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:18:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:18:24 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Message-Id: <20101031051824.6298b279.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101031035248.GA20814@thought.org> References: <20101031035248.GA20814@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: kwik one... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:18:26 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:52:51 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > Main reason I have linux as my desktop is to watch motion pix; A/V, > but this stuff usually requires that crappy animation add-on. So: > can anybody give me a menu to add/build linux-firefox and that > plug-in. I already have ad-blockers on my Ubuntu; hulu flips me > off at that.... I would think something like 6.2.3, to be found here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/desktop-browsers.html I know this worked in the past, but I'm not sure if this is still the standard way of getting it working. I assume the handbook is not "fully complete" in this regards, as http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=18449 mentiones some more things to keep an eye on. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 04:21:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B10106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:21:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8157B8FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9V4L34K007246; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:21:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9V4L23L007243; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:21:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:21:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:21:03 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Chip Camden , questions@freebsd.org, parv@pair.com Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:21:06 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:13 PM, wrote: > I tried with "man perlfunc | less '+/y'" (also repeated the above > with csh) which did not result in any error messages in zsh 4 on > FreeBSD 8-STABLE (c. Sep 9 2010). > > > Perhaps it's not directly related to the shell since your config is similar to except my stable is from Oct 4 and the error happens here. Sounds right. The initial search command for less (+/whatever) is not always needed; after the error appears with it, just 'man perlfunc | less' will give the errors. The errors appear here when 'man perlfunc | less +/y' is run on csh, bash, or zsh and "q" is pressed before the EOF has been reached: % man perlfunc | less +/y Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 No manual entry for perlfunc The status is always 36096, or 0x8d00. Haven't yet found a short man page which does this. Interestingly, longer man pages may do it twice: % man ifconfig | less +/following Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 No manual entry for ifconfig Go to the EOF with "G" first, then press "q", and there are no errors. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 04:44:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB81106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078F48FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E855F3D5D3; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:44:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9V4iPjj001655; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:44:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:44:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Message-Id: <20101031054425.d73accae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:44:27 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:21:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > Sounds right. The initial search command for less (+/whatever) is not > always needed; after the error appears with it, just 'man perlfunc | > less' will give the errors. > > The errors appear here when 'man perlfunc | less +/y' is run on csh, > bash, or zsh and "q" is pressed before the EOF has been reached: > > % man perlfunc | less +/y > Error executing formatting or display command. > system command exited with status 36096 > No manual entry for perlfunc > > The status is always 36096, or 0x8d00. Haven't yet found a short man > page which does this. Interestingly, longer man pages may do it twice: > > % man ifconfig | less +/following > Error executing formatting or display command. > system command exited with status 36096 > Error executing formatting or display command. > system command exited with status 36096 > No manual entry for ifconfig > > Go to the EOF with "G" first, then press "q", and there are no errors. True - and just confirmed on 5.4-p14, so it must have been waiting inside the machine for many years now... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 05:14:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E89106566B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2C68FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4346015fxm.13 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:14:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ascanSYQKGUG07nnvNI33pxOmkxtOUTB7++oIVAKne0=; b=YbFgKayZuN4dJFzGn1a3NYJvGbE5Bt06Wy7bYz3jovqUxY4CF0Vfg6vPsZOJYDVgA5 89Z4tl08JKkM/vpdgF5Um6L8IqY+7KngaGmEu57uVGJ9wHeeH0s3L1xRXi8VB8qG1eNs g6xLBEWgEnHi0PGtrjI4ZR6z7fO6/rdIrtQpc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nGXBfUMvt8PKIQi9W5PpMQ7yOCzrp0bB/c36//Nq247ZQa6chISVZ+0mrdr3sv0Pvi Mo6+6prclCRdwQUoZBFGZTQUuPT1Khxp81nrmV6/GsftdID0iI4wkRKDx4Aeri1LvpsU nJYdX61vp3tUJK7YYzOSOGKp8MhM0Dzh6d0IQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.74.10 with SMTP id s10mr4589655faj.77.1288502086116; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.108.194 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101031054425.d73accae.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> <20101031054425.d73accae.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:14:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:14:49 -0000 On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Polytropon wrote: > True - and just confirmed on 5.4-p14, so it must have been > waiting inside the machine for many years now... > Looks like the Norwiegans got to the the south pole first: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/030705.html -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 06:02:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D617C1065670 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B204F8FC14 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o9V626pg002603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o9V6267T002593; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA25016; Sat, 30 Oct 10 22:01:05 PDT Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:00:41 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: wblock@wonkity.com, sterling@camdensoftware.com Message-Id: <4cccf7f9.0UgCkeA+owm8JoKb%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:02:14 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > >>> % man csh | less +/rehash > >>> [...] > >>> Error executing formatting or display command. > >>> system command exited with status 36096 > >>> Error executing formatting or display command. > >>> system command exited with status 36096 > >>> No manual entry for csh > >>> % ... > > This seems to be a problem with the csh man page. > > Other pages work fine, like 'man hosts | less +/named' > > or 'man devfs | less +/ruleset'. > > Actually, it appears to be a problem with long manual pages, > including csh, bash, or perlfunc. Does it by any chance go away if you cause "less" to read the pipe all the way to EOF, e.g. by entering G, before exiting? If so, there may be a problem in the way man handles SIGPIPE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 06:16:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2071065672 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B20A8FC08 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED5B3D276; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:16:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9V6GB7Z001970; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:16:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:16:11 +0100 From: Polytropon To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-Id: <20101031071611.916fe7e0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4cccf7f9.0UgCkeA+owm8JoKb%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <4cccf7f9.0UgCkeA+owm8JoKb%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:16:14 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:00:41 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Does it by any chance go away if you cause "less" to read the > pipe all the way to EOF, e.g. by entering G, before exiting? In this case - no error message (either by typing G, End, or manually scrolling through the whole manpage). % man csh | less :q Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 Error executing formatting or display command. system command exited with status 36096 No manual entry for csh % % man csh | less :G (END) :q % > If so, there may be a problem in the way man handles SIGPIPE. Would be understandable. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 06:58:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B12106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348DB8FC15 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E77CBE80AA3; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:58:31 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101031065827.GA3034@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: no spaces .... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:58:33 -0000 Looks like the spacebar on my clicky keyboard is busted. Same thing on FBSD as on the desktop [[ubuntu]]]. I'm typing this on my laptop. Seems like every other key works. Another thing is that the ctl key seems not to work. IF I type A ^c I get c. ^D yields simply d. Is here any chance this can be a software glitch? Can't see how tho since I can KVM button from a konsoleon tao [desktop] to an xterm on ethic.... No spacebar. Suggestions? This might be time to buy a USB "clicky" kybd. gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 07:16:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E7F106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DCD8FC15 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD151D93C; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:16:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9V7GD2w002203; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:16:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:16:13 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Message-Id: <20101031081613.2a309c0a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101031065827.GA3034@thought.org> References: <20101031065827.GA3034@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no spaces .... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:16:16 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:58:31 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > Looks like the spacebar on my clicky keyboard is busted. Same thing > on FBSD as on the desktop [[ubuntu]]]. I'm typing this on my > laptop. Seems like every other key works. You can remap one of the unused advertising keys (those that are for "Windows" to be an additional space key. The keycode should be 115 or 116 or similar. I can't check as I do not own ANY keyboard with "Windows" keys on it. You can easily find it out by (installing and) running % xev and pressing those keys - the number will then be displayed, and by default, a key symbol should be assigned. Here's an example: KeyPress event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0x1200001, root 0x73, subw 0x0, time 18453834, (43,160), root:(203,623), state 0x10, keycode 115 (keysym 0xffe7, Meta_L), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False KeyRelease event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0x1200001, root 0x73, subw 0x0, time 18453902, (43,160), root:(203,623), state 0x18, keycode 115 (keysym 0xffe7, Meta_L), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False This is the left Meta key on the Sun USB keyboard I'm currently using: Its keycode is 115, the symbol currently assigned is Meta_L. If you would want to make that an additional space "bar", create ~/.xmodmaprc and code keycode 115 = space Your X startup file (~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession) should load this file if present: [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc This would be a simple workaround for nonworking keys. > Another thing is that the ctl key seems not to work. IF I type > A ^c I get c. ^D yields simply d. Same here, keycode 115 = Control_L keycode 116 = space could be a temporary solution. > Is here any chance this can be a > software glitch? Could be possible - I've experienced something similar with a nonworking left shift key, or keys stuck in "control mode". A bit "hammering" on the keyboard and some focus-shifting solved the problem. It does happen once a few months and is not predictable. Maybe some USB issue? Polling? > Can't see how tho since I can KVM button from > a konsoleon tao [desktop] to an xterm on ethic.... No spacebar. So switching over from one system to another does keep the problem... maybe a mechanical or electrical problem caused by the keyboard? > Suggestions? This might be time to buy a USB "clicky" kybd. In any case, try to check with "xev" and see what - IF - really happens when pressing keys. I can recommend the Sun USB keyboard (I have model 6 here, but model 7 should be fine, too). It's not IBM clicky quality, of course. It's not clicky at all. But it's very comfortable and feels still good in use. The 2x5 plus 1 extra keys on the left and the 4 on the right are wonderful add-ons - fully programmable and usable (I use them for window sizing, rolling, focusing, and starting programs, as well as for volume control, lock session, log out and shutdown); Compose is also a nice feature, as well as the real Meta keys. You can get them for cheap via eBay, for example. Pay attention to get a USB model - you won't be able to use the regular serial ones (with the round plug) on a PC. This is the only USB keyboard I have. All other systems use PS/2 IBM keyboards intendedly. Never had a problem with them, even after Cola shower and disassembly. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 09:28:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E86A1065673 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513B98FC08 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=i+/JZ7yNYkEB9O74GrsxMg==:17 a=s1O25tkdAAAA:8 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=JURFrD1CJAnuigDJ8akA:9 a=joMz10_kNSrStd3N7EUA:7 a=J_nwzRH-c_-LL2su0MdL7rcU_3QA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=OyOq_G8mXAEA:10 a=v2EulsF24l4A:10 a=i+/JZ7yNYkEB9O74GrsxMg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.188.22 Received: from [67.49.188.22] ([67.49.188.22:13367] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 46/6A-14897-8A63DCC4; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:28:09 +0000 Received: from holstein.holy.cow (parv [127.0.0.2]) by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DA85CB2; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:33:06 -1000 (HST) Received: (from parv@localhost) by holstein.holy.cow (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o9V9X5NZ005550; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:33:05 -1000 (HST) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) X-Authentication-Warning: holstein.holy.cow: parv set sender to parv@pair.com using -f Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:33:05 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20101031093305.GA2080@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: parv@pair.com, Warren Block , Adam Vande More , Chip Camden , questions@freebsd.org References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Adam Vande More , Chip Camden , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:28:10 -0000 in message , wrote Warren Block thusly... > > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Adam Vande More wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:13 PM, wrote: > > I tried with "man perlfunc | less '+/y'" (also repeated the above > > with csh) which did not result in any error messages in zsh 4 on > > FreeBSD 8-STABLE (c. Sep 9 2010). > > > > > > Perhaps it's not directly related to the shell since your config > > is similar to except my stable is from Oct 4 and the error > > happens here. > > Sounds right. The initial search command for less (+/whatever) is > not always needed; after the error appears with it, just 'man > perlfunc | less' will give the errors. > > The errors appear here when 'man perlfunc | less +/y' is run on > csh, bash, or zsh and "q" is pressed before the EOF has been > reached: > > % man perlfunc | less +/y > Error executing formatting or display command. > system command exited with status 36096 > No manual entry for perlfunc Yes, pressing "q" in less produces the above too here. > The status is always 36096, or 0x8d00. Haven't yet found a short > man page which does this. Interestingly, longer man pages may do > it twice: > > % man ifconfig | less +/following > Error executing formatting or display command. > system command exited with status 36096 > Error executing formatting or display command. > system command exited with status 36096 > No manual entry for ifconfig Now this is also reproducible. > Go to the EOF with "G" first, then press "q", and there are no > errors. Yep. Thanks Warren for listing various cases. That made me realize that I did went to the end of two manual pages when I had tried to reproduce the error earlier. - parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 11:34:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9979106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC488FC17 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3814111bwz.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:34:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fiAITRS2lN2jKEb1oyixXk1KKaRSguXMAmdVwoh/2m4=; b=t1kfVcwzK6KSkLKdLxduauTNGCEOf8VUy70aTqBla5Gz9KRIBO+kaEfOyanM9JWM/E 3Nm2yJEzDpaX26XV0oBqa3Dx8zxLIE1tKrFvoEJZ8fsDetN09yDNd9glW2my425FsPZK cqGAR3UU4ul3+FaPYVKau6VIWRaVF33OVNmr4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kgLZ+mQLK/X/ON/BXPkrRnYO21C2iBkDNlIT9W81zgbUcSZ2ICL7i2Pshahn5o+iGL oHeSBY8mAK0UUj3FWhbTP+7jWznmd2JQePiwnGVQ0/fRvdBl29rMUHSrlkZB37tJBVEX zrE1TR6jUB/g0WBlFS0IDXHVDzMgemNmaftz4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.120.195 with SMTP id e3mr5510842bkr.77.1288524868122; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.77.1 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:34:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Portable Makefile(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:34:29 -0000 Hello, I'm working on many projects, and writing makefile is really painful. I love the BSD Makefile syntax obviously, but I also love that people using Linux could run make to build my projects too. And using BSD makefile syntax disallow this. Reducing the makefile to the minimal makes them portable, but then you canno't use loops, conditionnals, and this is getting my nerves. What could I do to write Makefile compatible on every operating systems ? I'm thinking about Cmake but I hate the syntax, also for dmake... Kind regards, -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 12:06:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9E1065693 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843B38FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3824147bwz.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=Aecq17Aik9kbpk6+81iTIL11kRkRRj53HHObSjla584=; b=TJemiKK+YGHUa6m2Er8ZGJsaoQkl+KawBrVohVo5H3LE+ELLCTqghjoNo9DZsEDOxv 1Ml+0YZ2p0TfKSpHWrMnbodmAHLVDBATbyT/wUHp8BQDkB1NhRo3djtz3UDCrQxILhIp Ol8+y3LIBQmFQmbjvvmkZTnQb+1PsRNOVqFow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=KGJRWFi7h0u3kQA4LvoBP5k4QP/2fCQYKWzNyJo88DFl9hmcPhsDSuZYJ2ceOM+Lsh OU6Qnkojm2sYSXEMbyQHFczGwPXCYW/kXRDrd/iRXnLG6M15T6IAlfVR3//4q0OFNcbi s2CEBwLwmy9bqmn/AoOixYLARgz59CdjKqBo8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.61.16 with SMTP id r16mr193258bkh.4.1288525294632; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:41:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:41:34 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: David DEMELIER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portable Makefile(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:06:02 -0000 You could (at the risk of war) use autotools? Chris -------- Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 31 Oct 2010 11:35, "David DEMELIER" wrote: Hello, I'm working on many projects, and writing makefile is really painful. I love the BSD Makefile syntax obviously, but I also love that people using Linux could run make to build my projects too. And using BSD makefile syntax disallow this. Reducing the makefile to the minimal makes them portable, but then you canno't use loops, conditionnals, and this is getting my nerves. What could I do to write Makefile compatible on every operating systems ? I'm thinking about Cmake but I hate the syntax, also for dmake... Kind regards, -- Demelier David _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 12:19:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2491065670 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbergstrom@pathscale.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEDA8FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so2919411gxk.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.177.19 with SMTP id z19mr4199704ybe.275.1288525784419; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.16] (59-124-0-127.HINET-IP.hinet.net [59.124.0.127]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 50sm3948882yhl.41.2010.10.31.04.49.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CCD5880.3000102@pathscale.com> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:52:32 +0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David DEMELIER References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portable Makefile(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:19:35 -0000 David DEMELIER wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on many projects, and writing makefile is really painful. > I love the BSD Makefile syntax obviously, but I also love that people > using Linux could run make to build my projects too. And using BSD > makefile syntax disallow this. > > Reducing the makefile to the minimal makes them portable, but then you > canno't use loops, conditionnals, and this is getting my nerves. > > What could I do to write Makefile compatible on every operating > systems ? I'm thinking about Cmake but I hate the syntax, also for > dmake... > We had this same choice at our company and ended up going wiht cmake for everything. In the end you'll save time and get portability across all platforms and build environments. Don't really think of cmake as a makefile replacement, but a replacement for auto* tools and makefiles together. (cmake generates platform native makefiles) If you do go with cmake don't try to support older versions though. Anything 2.8.1+ is really quite solid from my experience.. /* no I don't work for kitware */ good luck ./C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 12:20:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE82106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416F88FC19 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E539750AE7 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:07:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.71] (aegir.webrz.net [10.10.10.71]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C909050ABF for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:07:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CCD5BE4.9070009@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:07:00 +0100 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Subject: Fwd: Postfix SMTP server: errors from mx2.freebsd.org[69.147.83.53] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:20:01 -0000 Hi, It looks like mx2.freebsd.org is blacklisted by Sorbs.net: -------- Original Message --------Transcript of session follows. In: EHLO mx2.freebsd.org Out: 250-PIPELINING Out: 250-SIZE 25600000 Out: 250-ETRN Out: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES Out: 250-8BITMIME Out: 250 DSN In: MAIL FROM: SIZE=3777 Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok Out: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [69.147.83.53] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Currently Sending Spam See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?69.147.83.53 In: DATA Out: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients In: RSET Out: 250 2.0.0 Ok In: QUIT Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye --- regards, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 13:25:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1F3106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F3E8FC16 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:25:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <4CCD69C7.5000300@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:06:15 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: mount_smbfs problem after upgrade Samba 3.4 -> 3.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:25:45 -0000 Hi, I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs: mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo@mars/inter /home/mnt Password: mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error Samba server log says: mbd/sesssetup.c:1703(reply_sesssetup_and_X) reply_sesssetup_and_X: Attempted encrypted session setup without negprot denied! smbclient works fine and so does connecting to the shares from Windows and Konqerour like "smb://192.168.1.8/". Anybody on the list with enough knowledge of Samba that could take a shot at this? Apparently something changed between version 3.4 and 3.5 of Samba. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 13:36:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DBE1065693 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3968FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:36:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <4CCD70D5.4080201@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:36:21 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <4CCD69C7.5000300@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <4CCD69C7.5000300@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: mount_smbfs problem after upgrade Samba 3.4 -> 3.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:36:25 -0000 On 10/31/10 14:06, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to > the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a > remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs: > > mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo@mars/inter /home/mnt > Password: > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error > > Samba server log says: > mbd/sesssetup.c:1703(reply_sesssetup_and_X) > reply_sesssetup_and_X: Attempted encrypted session setup without negprot > denied! > > > smbclient works fine and so does connecting to the shares from Windows > and Konqerour like "smb://192.168.1.8/". > > Anybody on the list with enough knowledge of Samba that could take a > shot at this? Apparently something changed between version 3.4 and 3.5 > of Samba. > > Thanks! Just noted another post from yesterday, same issue: "Issue wit Samba 3.5.6 and Mac OS X 10.5" I've filed a bug report to see if the maintainer could have a look. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 13:48:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B7E1065674 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE01F8FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9VDmepd009045; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:48:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9VDmdls009042; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:48:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:48:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101031031353.GA2241@holstein.holy.cow> <20101031054425.d73accae.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:48:40 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:48:44 -0000 On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Polytropon wrote: > True - and just confirmed on 5.4-p14, so it must have been > waiting inside the machine for many years now... > > > Looks like the Norwiegans got to the the south pole first: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/030705.html Yes. A followup explains the problem more: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/030708.html Why I do this: it's nice to give people a direct link to a spot in a man page. There's an alternate way, which is ugly and visually confusing but does not show errors: % man -P 'less +/following' ifconfig From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 15:20:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12B3106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E89F8FC16 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3898472bwz.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jK3tNrjL9Z5y8Pq+5C7A5cN0Jdr88XrEddsH/zheEHM=; b=JowHNtBS4hyXoDjwhMUAl2B+4t4m0tGLigiH6JCvziSmsRVhrI5ewn1qDCaj9BN06v 6hzOC+H0p+UGfgJxd2UBbz6xWYw0A1sl1VzB2HV/5SO5KsyRIygjPji30eNHi9L4ay4N yU4nU0lwPrIudiGMY4lbTa0YvsVEufEfmVRvU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gz1P3bHQrE91AIslD09F5Iswc6VmWrOiUyrA4szkjK+h01wr/FYVczNl5Vn1dXA0fq TCs8WVa/O4Z7SG5nWELAJiDBLWvr3CvbTi57/bCpKDccID1Cs+yl1wSZAxyGaPSkLBuQ FoTNJXxDssp4gcVzJquN1RgK+rXp5K9R42unU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.53.193 with SMTP id n1mr3951293bkg.3.1288538444622; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.153 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:20:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:20:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Tim Dunphy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: can't add entries to fsab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:20:48 -0000 hey guys, thanks!! Yeah I tried adding the late option, but that didn't change anything. But then I thought that perhaps DNS was not loaded by the time the fstab is parsed making any DNS style mounts render the machine unbootable in normal mode. So I tried referring to the mount by the IP address rather than the DNS name, and that fixed it.. I suppose I could setup the order in which the services load in /etc/rc.d/ by pre-pending each one with numbers (i.e. 00netif 01named 02syslogd...etc etc). Not sure I care enough to do that on my home system, but maybe I will.. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: > >> I am having some trouble adding entries to /etc/fstab.. what happens >> to work under CentOS does not under FreeBSD!! no surprise there, I >> suppose.. heh >> >> >> I have nfs_client_enable=3D"YES" in my /etc/rc.conf >> >> Yet if I add even one line such as >> >> nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home =A0 /home =A0 =A0nfs rw =A00 =A0 0 >> >> the system refuses to boot normally and I have to add the path to >> /bin//sh manually each time > > Add the "late" option ('man mount | less +3/late') to the rw option in th= at > line: > > nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home =A0 /home =A0 =A0nfs rw,late =A00 =A0 0 > >> why on Earth can I not add entries to fstab as I do to CentOS?? > > Beyond knowing that they're different, dunno. =A0Maybe the async DHCP in > FreeBSD is different. > --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 15:58:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A831F1065670 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0D08FC1B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9VFwM1I009367; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:58:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9VFwMis009364; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:58:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:58:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Tim Dunphy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-902635197-1243713345-1288540702=:9357" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:58:22 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't add entries to fsab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:58:23 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---902635197-1243713345-1288540702=:9357 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: >> >>> I am having some trouble adding entries to /etc/fstab.. what happens >>> to work under CentOS does not under FreeBSD!! no surprise there, I >>> suppose.. heh >>> >>> >>> I have nfs_client_enable="YES" in my /etc/rc.conf >>> >>> Yet if I add even one line such as >>> >>> nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home   /home    nfs rw  0   0 >>> >>> the system refuses to boot normally and I have to add the path to >>> /bin//sh manually each time >> >> Add the "late" option ('man mount | less +3/late') to the rw option in that >> line: >> >> nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home   /home    nfs rw,late  0   0 >> >>> why on Earth can I not add entries to fstab as I do to CentOS?? >> >> Beyond knowing that they're different, dunno.  Maybe the async DHCP in >> FreeBSD is different. > > thanks!! Yeah I tried adding the late option, but that didn't change > anything. But then I thought that perhaps DNS was not loaded by the > time the fstab is parsed making any DNS style mounts render the > machine unbootable in normal mode. > > So I tried referring to the mount by the IP address rather than the > DNS name, and that fixed it.. I suppose I could setup the order in > which the services load in /etc/rc.d/ by pre-pending each one with > numbers (i.e. 00netif 01named 02syslogd...etc etc). Changing that order is not easy, there are internal dependencies. Forcing the startup to wait for DHCP in /etc/rc.conf may be enough: ifconfig_re0="SYNCDHCP" re0 used for example, change to whatever interface you have. ---902635197-1243713345-1288540702=:9357-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 16:06:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DDF106566B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3468FC1A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-233.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.233] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCaHi-0008QE-Au for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:57:31 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:06:15 -0700 Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:06:15 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101031160615.GA89086@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20101029185853.0631917f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101029184958.GE2439@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Cc: Subject: Re: man(1) output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:06:21 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Warren Block on Saturday, 30 October 2010: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Warren Block wrote: >=20 > >On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Chip Camden wrote: > > > >>>% man csh | less +/rehash > >>> > >>> rehash Causes the internal hash table of the contents of the= =20 > >>>directo- > >>> ries in the path variable to be recomputed. This is= =20 > >>>needed if > >>> [...] > >>>Error executing formatting or display command. > >>>system command exited with status 36096 > >>>Error executing formatting or display command. > >>>system command exited with status 36096 > >>>No manual entry for csh > >>>% > >>> > >> > >>(meant to reply to list) > >> > >>I can confirm that the very latest 8.1-STABLE (csup and build this > >>morning) reproduces the problem. uname -a: > >> > >>FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE= =20 > >>#85: Fri Oct 29 10:27:19 PDT 2010=20 > >>sterling@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIBERTA= S=20 > >>amd64 > > > >This seems to be a problem with the csh man page. Other pages work fine= ,=20 > >like 'man hosts | less +/named' or 'man devfs | less +/ruleset'. >=20 > Actually, it appears to be a problem with long manual pages, including=20 > csh, bash, or perlfunc. Yes -- it also fails on 'man zshall | less +/alias', for instance. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMzZP3AAoJEIpckszW26+RmPsIAJUJjDLXzR+DbN6gLewfkBIB NLxDWV0jhcntq2Nxb1MCbBul2n5nzcwrlsjXzkEHPUWsFyLf/v1ebRpelpRfNdfC iGh/eoO+QaNZz9AYEacnydQSgDEez3LnOyib0IbCv9QNZhehhF3B3lxIFjR4yeCk WztSszQTQyBAJJHTBrHHQBzG3560CQQocMbKeyLSKDlii4Rv4T5ZupZTDJR++JR2 om5O+Z74DH97L+zK7RRwFVA9/+JpNaJzK1zV2ASg9SYA07rpK9ep8X7POr59K8wJ lnNsq3kxz1rpRyA+YR/yuXxHSxwy0vi0Mm9lrRcwJ+mBQxRTyElTIC4EvWkSi+4= =GqeY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 16:11:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB699106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353B68FC1D for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3918857bwz.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:11:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EZ4eQ6QgaBcd13Gf3Al5tm54tU9hHbGueWRWx5byvFo=; b=A6xTg76wtLZk3bSwZ78OND+U/KGisTUWCgZxbf7DH7b79ueOzD7n459df20O0H3kI/ hXAJQ7HfuZdv8VC5afDVqXRwbVj1dJpVc8L3E1n9O0UeRj8cJTZatt2xNPVFX0cGF+EP tO5tRQwwdEVGwDuMFrhBlti/PuDpoEWlrihL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gI6iL2AFJDTiKLLiGdjUaor6Y2O8J8h20nQ9pQ0uv6sY+C9BpDOjkHEwqDDQWWEt/g OkXoV7SdcHGfMWmwnya1OgIVsee/VVzS/ktw22aUkHjOLhhwYUGXZcvX3XDobK78FqTC 3POTIBT0wz7ksCi2whZeacaco3YSx+EERDAJ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.53.193 with SMTP id n1mr3982093bkg.3.1288541491961; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.153 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:11:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:11:31 -0400 Message-ID: From: Tim Dunphy To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't add entries to fsab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:11:34 -0000 oh ok, thanks good thing I saw this before I got to long in this process. I backed up the /etc/rc.d directory and started re-ordering things like this: 000netif 001netoptions 002routing 003network_ipv6 004ppp 005ipfw 006defaultroute 007routed 008mrouted 009route6d 0010mroute6d 011named 012resolv 013hostname 014hostapd 015hostid 016hostid_save 017rpcbind 018nfsclient 019nfscbd 020nfsdrpcbind 021mountd 022mountcritlocal 023mountcritremote 024mountlate I realized there may be dependencies but I was gonna give it a try and see if I got it right. If not I would restore from backup. Actually this machine isn't on DHCP, it's statically assigned. My basic goal is to get the box to the point where it can resolve DNS before it mounts the contents of /etc/fstab... do you have any suggestions on how best to achieve this goal? thanks On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Warren Block wrote= : >>> >>> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: >>> >>>> I am having some trouble adding entries to /etc/fstab.. what happens >>>> to work under CentOS does not under FreeBSD!! no surprise there, I >>>> suppose.. heh >>>> >>>> >>>> I have nfs_client_enable=3D"YES" in my /etc/rc.conf >>>> >>>> Yet if I add even one line such as >>>> >>>> nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home =A0 /home =A0 =A0nfs rw =A00 =A0 0 >>>> >>>> the system refuses to boot normally and I have to add the path to >>>> /bin//sh manually each time >>> >>> Add the "late" option ('man mount | less +3/late') to the rw option in >>> that >>> line: >>> >>> nas2.summitnhome.com:/mnt/home =A0 /home =A0 =A0nfs rw,late =A00 =A0 0 >>> >>>> why on Earth can I not add entries to fstab as I do to CentOS?? >>> >>> Beyond knowing that they're different, dunno. =A0Maybe the async DHCP i= n >>> FreeBSD is different. >> >> thanks!! Yeah I tried adding the late option, but that didn't change >> anything. But then I thought that perhaps DNS was not loaded by the >> time the fstab is parsed making any DNS style mounts render the >> machine unbootable in normal mode. >> >> So I tried referring to the mount by the IP address rather than the >> DNS name, and that fixed it.. I suppose I could setup the order in >> which the services load in /etc/rc.d/ by pre-pending each one with >> numbers (i.e. 00netif 01named 02syslogd...etc etc). > > Changing that order is not easy, there are internal dependencies. Forcing > the startup to wait for DHCP in /etc/rc.conf may be enough: > > ifconfig_re0=3D"SYNCDHCP" > > re0 used for example, change to whatever interface you have. --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 16:35:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F21106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3AA8FC18 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9VGZJ6P009500; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:35:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9VGZJ5G009497; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:35:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:35:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Tim Dunphy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:35:19 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't add entries to fsab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:35:21 -0000 On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Tim Dunphy wrote: >>> So I tried referring to the mount by the IP address rather than the >>> DNS name, and that fixed it.. I suppose I could setup the order in >>> which the services load in /etc/rc.d/ by pre-pending each one with >>> numbers (i.e. 00netif 01named 02syslogd...etc etc). >> >> Changing that order is not easy, there are internal dependencies. Forcing >> the startup to wait for DHCP in /etc/rc.conf may be enough: >> >> ifconfig_re0="SYNCDHCP" >> >> re0 used for example, change to whatever interface you have. > oh ok, thanks good thing I saw this before I got to long in this > process. I backed up the /etc/rc.d directory and started re-ordering > things like this: > > 000netif > 001netoptions > 002routing > 003network_ipv6 ... [Please don't top-post, it makes responding more work.] Look at the PROVIDE and REQUIRE keywords in those files. They aren't executed in filename order. > Actually this machine isn't on DHCP, it's statically assigned. My > basic goal is to get the box to the point where it can resolve DNS > before it mounts the contents of /etc/fstab... I thought mountlate would be late enough. It may depend on your network card, some are slow to wake up or associate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 17:36:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6878106564A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22D78FC14 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6DCA0E81EE4; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:35:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:35:58 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20101031173558.GA4466@thought.org> References: <20101031065827.GA3034@thought.org> <20101031081613.2a309c0a.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101031081613.2a309c0a.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no spaces .... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:36:04 -0000 On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:16:13AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:58:31 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > Looks like the spacebar on my clicky keyboard is busted. Same thing > > on FBSD as on the desktop [[ubuntu]]]. I'm typing this on my > > laptop. Seems like every other key works. > > You can remap one of the unused advertising keys (those that > are for "Windows" to be an additional space key. > > The keycode should be 115 or 116 or similar. I can't check as > I do not own ANY keyboard with "Windows" keys on it. You can > easily find it out by (installing and) running > > % xev > > and pressing those keys - the number will then be displayed, > and by default, a key symbol should be assigned. Here's an > example: > > KeyPress event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0x1200001, > root 0x73, subw 0x0, time 18453834, (43,160), root:(203,623), > state 0x10, keycode 115 (keysym 0xffe7, Meta_L), same_screen YES, > XLookupString gives 0 bytes: > XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes: > XFilterEvent returns: False > > KeyRelease event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0x1200001, > root 0x73, subw 0x0, time 18453902, (43,160), root:(203,623), > state 0x18, keycode 115 (keysym 0xffe7, Meta_L), same_screen YES, > XLookupString gives 0 bytes: > XFilterEvent returns: False > > This is the left Meta key on the Sun USB keyboard I'm currently > using: Its keycode is 115, the symbol currently assigned is Meta_L. > > If you would want to make that an additional space "bar", create > ~/.xmodmaprc and code > > keycode 115 = space > > Your X startup file (~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession) should load this > file if present: > > [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc > > This would be a simple workaround for nonworking keys. > > > > > Another thing is that the ctl key seems not to work. IF I type > > A ^c I get c. ^D yields simply d. > > Same here, > > keycode 115 = Control_L > keycode 116 = space > > could be a temporary solution. > > > > > Is here any chance this can be a > > software glitch? > > Could be possible - I've experienced something similar with a > nonworking left shift key, or keys stuck in "control mode". > A bit "hammering" on the keyboard and some focus-shifting > solved the problem. It does happen once a few months and is > not predictable. Maybe some USB issue? Polling? > > > > > Can't see how tho since I can KVM button from > > a konsoleon tao [desktop] to an xterm on ethic.... No spacebar. > > So switching over from one system to another does keep the > problem... maybe a mechanical or electrical problem caused > by the keyboard? > > > > > Suggestions? This might be time to buy a USB "clicky" kybd. > > In any case, try to check with "xev" and see what - IF - really > happens when pressing keys. > > I can recommend the Sun USB keyboard (I have model 6 here, but > model 7 should be fine, too). It's not IBM clicky quality, of > course. It's not clicky at all. But it's very comfortable and > feels still good in use. The 2x5 plus 1 extra keys on the left > and the 4 on the right are wonderful add-ons - fully programmable > and usable (I use them for window sizing, rolling, focusing, > and starting programs, as well as for volume control, lock > session, log out and shutdown); Compose is also a nice feature, > as well as the real Meta keys. You can get them for cheap > via eBay, for example. Pay attention to get a USB model - you > won't be able to use the regular serial ones (with the round > plug) on a PC. > > This is the only USB keyboard I have. All other systems use > PS/2 IBM keyboards intendedly. Never had a problem with them, > even after Cola shower and disassembly. :-) > It _was_ the kybd; fortunately, being a packrat, i still have the 2003 Dell, *and* since it has a PS/2 plug, it fits my temporary adaptor. ___WHEW___ I have the "click" part of the driver working, but that's all. ``xset x 50'' never has worked under BSD [ ditto linux ] ... soo I'm stuck with buying the click-type keyboards. Why this is such a big deal, I have 0.0 clue. Given that we do have people more familiar with hacking drivers. Oh well. gary PS: xev. Couldn't remember that, tho I've used it pretty often. > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 18:11:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD15106566B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C78C8FC0C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3967226bwz.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:11:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JpSHvoWMXeFkKoGCMiayct+bklJeBlzzMkhv8jBlfvg=; b=MYf4ug0DanR0CPsWQNaq88U0kgC0yvxa0pn2d8+YsQvBlao0Gf3WD4xlyl1BDFYJxZ 1ucN+qluyFaaQL1eKpY5878/j5oeB274F1rGEAgRcCv4XEERkLy6zTC7H2pp8ur68thc Lx7ynQa7Njm/ECVsKnv0J+MiEt93CsGuTXjyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=xZi1eoaOWMIhK3yiymMFQncN04J6QSkPi/q9m6kXQCApreNsK4U9Kg5CD7XlCNOAFM d6A5RFMlVNHYNUH+BKH0uRXpOtU/s+/ARS2x1DCo6Q6mi7wm1Xxtk4PT9DREqUUjwDs0 LDs52gd8Kz7AMo1Dul87X+LOTHGLImjwV3ev0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.102.76 with SMTP id f12mr8966888bko.57.1288548682862; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.153 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:11:22 -0400 Message-ID: From: Tim Dunphy To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: can't start firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:11:26 -0000 Whenever I try to launch firefox I get a message saying Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system. Then I try doing a ps so that I can find the pid and kill it... LBSD1# ps -auxwww | grep firefox LBSD1# But it does not appear to be running. I've tried rebooting and reinstalling the port.. nothing works.. HELP!!! :) -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 19:01:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E100106566B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E3D8FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [109.85.73.168] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de.) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCd9T-0004nP-Ub for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:01:12 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9VK308q001329 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:03:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o9VK2xxF001328 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:02:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de.: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:02:58 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 109.85.73.168 Subject: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:01:15 -0000 Hello, I installed a 9-CURRENT from an USB key to a hard disk of a laptop and encountered a strange problem: I booted the USB key to normal multiuser mode and wanted to wipe out the Windows on the disk, create one slice ad4s1 and partitions in it for /, /usr, /var, ... I thought the simplest way would be just run sysinstall(8) and use the FDISK and BSDLABEL from the post-install dialog. FDISK went fine and in the BSDLABEL dialog I just used 'A' (auto defaults). On 'W' (write to disk) the sysinstall(8) complained about 'unable to open /dev/ad4s1a and so on for all the created partitions a...f. And also in the dev fs there were no entries created for /dev/ad4s1[a-f]. They apeared after a reboot of the system from the USB key. How this is supposed to work using sysinstall(8) or should one use only bsdlabel(8) directly in such a case? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 19:20:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B58B106566B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD57B8FC13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C45A3D5F7; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:20:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9VJKCmn001472; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:20:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:20:12 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Tim Dunphy Message-Id: <20101031202012.063ecf7b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't add entries to fsab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:20:15 -0000 On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:11:31 -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Actually this machine isn't on DHCP, it's statically assigned. My > basic goal is to get the box to the point where it can resolve DNS > before it mounts the contents of /etc/fstab... In case the interface is already up at mount time, you can maybe use the /etc/hosts mechanisms to assign hostnames to the IPs you're refering to in /etc/fstab, so you can use hostnames or aliases there which will then automatically be resolved. > do you have any suggestions on how best to achieve this goal? You can write your own "NFS mount wrapper" and place it into /usr/local/etc/rc.d; use a template from /etc/rc.d and check the keywords for REQUIRE that you'll need (references to interfaces and maybe routing). Then add a _enable="YES" for your script in /etc/rc.conf and it will be started by the system when the requirements (indicated by keywords) are met. There is no need to exactly define this as a point in time in a given order. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 19:25:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1209F106566C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84278FC0A for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76753D07D; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:25:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o9VJPtUN001506; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:25:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:25:55 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Tim Dunphy Message-Id: <20101031202555.836e0b66.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: can't start firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:25:57 -0000 On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:11:22 -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Whenever I try to launch firefox I get a message saying Firefox is > already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must > first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system. Restart the system... very funny... :-) > Then I try doing a ps so that I can find the pid and kill it... > > LBSD1# ps -auxwww | grep firefox > LBSD1# > > > But it does not appear to be running. I've tried rebooting and > reinstalling the port.. nothing works.. HELP!!! :) First check what happens: Try to start Firefox from a terminal window (e. g. xterm) to see if any messages appear. In parallel, have another xterm open and the "top -s 1" command running. Firefox should appear on top of the list, and look something like this: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 1496 poly 10 104 0 49004K 37000K ucond 0:00 151.17% firefox-bin The Firefox's process name is "firefox-bin". If the program doesn't seem to react anymore, look what state it is in. As you should also see the PID, try to kill it and see how the top output changes (in most cases, the process should disappear). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 00:03:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C585106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1751E8FC13 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36752E720B; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:03:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:03:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:03:54 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:03:57 -0000 On Sunday 31 October 2010 20:02:58 Matthias Apitz wrote: > How this is supposed to work using sysinstall(8) > or should one use only bsdlabel(8) directly in such a case? sysinstall isn't really intended for post-install use: you should probably learn how to use gpart instead - e.g. gpart create -s mbr /dev/disk gpart add -t freebsd /dev/disk gpart create -s bsd /dev/disk gpart add -t freebsd-ufs /dev/disks1 newfs /dev/disks1a -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 06:09:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E50106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23528FC1D for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.51.125] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCnae-0005cl-EU; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:09:56 +0100 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA169vff002267; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:09:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oA169ucT002266; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:09:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:09:51 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Bruce Cran Message-ID: <20101101060951.GA2156@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.51.125 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 06:09:58 -0000 El día Monday, November 01, 2010 a las 12:03:54AM +0000, Bruce Cran escribió: > On Sunday 31 October 2010 20:02:58 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > How this is supposed to work using sysinstall(8) > > or should one use only bsdlabel(8) directly in such a case? > > sysinstall isn't really intended for post-install use: you should probably > learn how to use gpart instead - e.g. > > gpart create -s mbr /dev/disk > gpart add -t freebsd /dev/disk > gpart create -s bsd /dev/disk > gpart add -t freebsd-ufs /dev/disks1 > > newfs /dev/disks1a Bruce, Thanks for the reply. Is there any document explaining this in more detail as the man page of gpart(8). The FreeBSD Handbook in chaptar 18.3 points still to sysinstall(8) and bsdlabel(8)... Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 07:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1187C106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:22:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christopher.Illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp5.ki.se (smtp5.ki.se [130.237.99.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB318FC16 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from KIMSX09.user.ki.se (kimsx09.user.ki.se [130.229.20.26]) by smtp5.ki.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4DB295A2C; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:13:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from KIMSXCLU01.user.ki.se ([fe80::5934:e0d5:1ab1:4cec]) by KIMSX09.user.ki.se ([fe80::44bd:1e0f:a2f2:550%16]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:13:38 +0100 From: Christopher Illies To: Vincent Hoffman Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:13:37 +0100 Thread-Topic: Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl Thread-Index: Act3fxrgV6bcd8x7QZiS0vXVsWGFjgCE8ta7 Message-ID: References: <4CC98291.8000609@bah.homeip.net> <4CC9E9A9.2090105@unsane.co.uk> <4CCABB82.9080504@unsane.co.uk> , <4CCAE9EA.9000508@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4CCAE9EA.9000508@unsane.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, sv-SE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:22:55 -0000 >On 29/10/2010 14:49, Christopher Illies wrote: >> >> <...> >> Ok, when I use telnet, this happens: >>> telnet send.ki.se 587 >> Trying 130.xxx.xxx.26... >> Connected to send.ki.se. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> 220 KIMSX09.user.ki.se Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Fri, 29 Oct= 2010 14:55:51 +0200 >> EHLO >> 250-KIMSX09.user.ki.se Hello [136.xxx.xxx.214] >> 250-SIZE 10485760 >> 250-PIPELINING >> 250-DSN >> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES >> 250-STARTTLS >> 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM <<<<<<< >> 250-8BITMIME >> 250-BINARYMIME >> 250 CHUNKING <...> >I'd guess from here that the microsoft mail server (i'd say exchange but >its part of IIS these days i think) is being awkward. GSSAPI is kerberos >related i believe, NTLM is a windows method from what i remember. I'm >not familiar with either i'm afraid. Thanks for your suggestions, anyhow. It might very well be that something about the server's behaviour is awkward. fetchmail, which worked well with the old server, stopped working after the mailserver was changed to the current one. The settings were correct, but only after I installed a ne= w version of fetchmail, it worked again. It looks like that I will have to us= e=20 webmail for now. Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 07:34:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F68F106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christopher.Illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp6.ki.se (smtp6.ki.se [130.237.98.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138048FC14 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from KIMSX12.user.ki.se (kimsx12.user.ki.se [130.229.20.29]) by smtp6.ki.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECE3D4F9A; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:34:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from KIMSXCLU01.user.ki.se ([fe80::5934:e0d5:1ab1:4cec]) by KIMSX12.user.ki.se ([fe80::38d2:3ad1:d952:430%16]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:34:47 +0100 From: Christopher Illies To: Matthew Seaman Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:34:47 +0100 Thread-Topic: Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl Thread-Index: Act3e8dvRFExpF15QZuOE7SQ7VWkqQCGJg+s Message-ID: References: <4CC98291.8000609@bah.homeip.net> <4CC9E9A9.2090105@unsane.co.uk> <4CCABB82.9080504@unsane.co.uk> , <4CCAE43F.5050607@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4CCAE43F.5050607@infracaninophile.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, sv-SE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Vincent, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Hoffman Subject: RE: Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:34:50 -0000 >GSSAPI is the "Generic Security Services Application Program Interface" >and NTLM is "NT Lan Manager" -- they are both authentication systems >popular amongst various generations of Microsoft OSes. GSSAPI is >actually based on that old Unix stalwart: Kerberos, and hence is also >fairly popular amongst non-Microsoft types. They are some of the >authentication mechanisms that come as standard with SASL implementations. > >Unless you know that you do need them, you almost certainly don't. =20 <...> Thanks your for the explanation. I was actually not sure whether or not these options were needed. Authentication to the smarthost did not work, and at one point I noticed the line: <...> 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM <...> coming from the server. So I gave it a try - and it still did not work. Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 07:49:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF7F106566C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB89C8FC08 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD30E7207; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:49:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:49:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:49:22 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101101060951.GA2156@current.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20101101060951.GA2156@current.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011010749.22654.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:49:25 -0000 On Monday 01 November 2010 06:09:51 Matthias Apitz wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Is there any document explaining this in more > detail as the man page of gpart(8). The FreeBSD Handbook in chaptar 18.3 > points still to sysinstall(8) and bsdlabel(8)... The documentation for gpart is still rather poor, and I'm not aware of any official documentation. I wrote a more detailed post in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-August/009176.html which explains the commands. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 09:06:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE411065670 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61468FC16 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.51.125] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCqLu-0001JR-LH; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:06:54 +0100 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA196thV002947; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:06:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oA196sAR002946; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:06:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:06:53 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Bruce Cran Message-ID: <20101101090653.GA2874@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.51.125 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:06:56 -0000 El día Monday, November 01, 2010 a las 12:03:54AM +0000, Bruce Cran escribió: > On Sunday 31 October 2010 20:02:58 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > How this is supposed to work using sysinstall(8) > > or should one use only bsdlabel(8) directly in such a case? > > sysinstall isn't really intended for post-install use: you should probably > learn how to use gpart instead - e.g. > > gpart create -s mbr /dev/disk > gpart add -t freebsd /dev/disk > gpart create -s bsd /dev/disk > gpart add -t freebsd-ufs /dev/disks1 > > newfs /dev/disks1a Combining the above and your posting in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-August/009176.html for my case I should have done: # gpart create -s mbr ad4 # Init the disk with an MBR # gpart add -t freebsd ad4 # Create a BSD container # gpart create -s bsd ad4s1 # Init with a BSD scheme # gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1G ad4s1 # 1GB for / # gpart add -t freebsd-swap -s 2G ad4s1 # 2GB for swap # gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 2G ad4s1 # 2GB for /var # gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1G ad4s1 # 1GB for /tmp # gpart add -t freebsd-ufs ad4s1 # all rest for /usr Right? I'm unsure about the 3rd command (gpart create -s bsd ad4s1), should it use 'ad4' as you say above, or 'ad4s1' as in the August's post? In any case, next time whene I have an empty disk to initialize, I will play around with this. Thanks again matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 09:39:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE78F106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FE98FC19 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4003E7207; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:39:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:39:44 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: Matthias Apitz Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:39:43 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101101090653.GA2874@current.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20101101090653.GA2874@current.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011010939.43607.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:39:46 -0000 On Monday 01 November 2010 09:06:53 Matthias Apitz wrote: > I'm unsure about the 3rd command (gpart create -s bsd ad4s1), should it > use 'ad4' as you say above, or 'ad4s1' as in the August's post? Since you're creating the bsd scheme inside the freebsd container, you would use ad4s1. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 10:58:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3493F1065670 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=UFcTka+i=SC=beatsnet.com=beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com) Received: from vulcan.beatsnet.com (sigi.broker.freenet6.net [IPv6:2001:5c0:1400:b::2a7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92978FC28 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Beat-Siegenthalers-MacBook-Pro.local (zux165-132.adsl.green.ch [80.254.165.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by vulcan.beatsnet.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA1AwhJE004411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:58:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=beatsnet.com; s=VULCAN_DKIM; t=1288609124; bh=uFLitzywYsAUVPjO+jIE0mBz2bqz7AxPSknvVrpkObY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BUo8IWrHyVcWDVvR3LsNeqbr3O2MKi/nRkt6wgEhZpQi/rh97Ojio4zx44WvY1oXf Ulfx4+GWg7I5/4McSXqftb0CYQVBPNRsX0nJC+166iE+b+J5xlhj4zzcP0arPJtGdP dEx8UmznCdOTMkRJhlgXZaDKLfXQbjwX/xNdpiWg= Message-ID: <4CCE9D5D.7010503@beatsnet.com> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:58:37 +0100 From: Beat Siegenthaler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <201011010003.54682.bruce@cran.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (vulcan.beatsnet.com [193.138.215.102]); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:58:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at vulcan.beatsnet.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:58:46 -0000 On 01.11.10 01:03, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sunday 31 October 2010 20:02:58 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > sysinstall isn't really intended for post-install use: you should probably > learn how to use gpart instead - e.g. > Maybe sade (sysadmins disk editor) would help too... looks like sysinstall's disk part.. Beat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 11:08:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835A91065672 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313C78FC36 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.unitedinsong.com.au (abracadabra.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.80]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFF25C21 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:54:16 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AtMail Atmail Open 1.04 Message-ID: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: X-Origin: 192.168.0.200 X-Atmail-Account: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:54:16 +1100 From: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:08:40 -0000 =20 Anyone tried the data tethering feature on the Android phones? I've tried cdce and tried modifying cdce but no luck. I need to regenerate the device list, but I haven't had any luck yet- simply running make doesn't work, and I've read Makefiles and googled out the wazoo. I tried modifying the details off the openmoko site for their data tether system (for FreeBSD8, mind), still no luck. Apparently it uses the cdc_ether RNDIS according to my Fedora shit media system. usbconfig concurs. Any hints, suggestions on how to further my investigations and getting this thing working? Anyone happen to be working on this? Cheers ------------------------- Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 11:45:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC93106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out8.libero.it (cp-out8.libero.it [212.52.84.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE918FC0C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (151.51.29.139) by cp-out8.libero.it (8.5.107) id 4CC9864100728913 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:34:21 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA1BYHDu000264 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:34:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4CCEA5B9.7010603@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:34:17 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101028 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: Subject: Newer Sambas and PAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:45:57 -0000 Hello. I'd like to have every service on my systems authenticating via Samba (through PAM). With older, now deprecated, 3.0.x version, I did this through security/pam_smb: no problems at all. Since 3.0 was removed, I tried upgrading to 3.4 on one box: since then I am not able to authenticate anything through PAM against it. Is anyone doing this? How? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 11:49:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1EA106566C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E3A8FC08 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA1BnPAV016211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:49:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4CCEA944.4020409@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 06:49:24 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli , FreeBSD Mailing List References: <4CCEA5B9.7010603@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4CCEA5B9.7010603@netfence.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 06:49:25 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: oA1BnPAV016211 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: Newer Sambas and PAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:49:33 -0000 On 11/1/2010 6:34 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'd like to have every service on my systems authenticating via Samba (through PAM). > > With older, now deprecated, 3.0.x version, I did this through security/pam_smb: no problems at all. > > Since 3.0 was removed, I tried upgrading to 3.4 on one box: since then I am not able to authenticate anything through PAM against it. > > Is anyone doing this? How? > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Be aware that the samba password directory moved from /usr/local/etc/samba to /usr/local/etc/samba34 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 12:12:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D113E10656A6 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7EC8FC1B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF87B668 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:12:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.213]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:12:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=M2ZrOqwgzGAbWwI+vsXgppijjyU=; b=EnBUkteKTGa4UnxBwruqv/uKR9os/+/oRGYpnuk6CVS3d1RcbHrmRG740TuV076LbIqRUD4BRIN6uixnW5xyoVkEiLg1wl+P4VFzU/kR4FKtD4TfZN8zCTTx6n2OkZsTOOpbcfNsTkqos5Jq0zj68Xac3ZxLlneE2lf1StSebUo= Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id B3B09AA19C2; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:12:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1288613544.13669.1402968563@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: j0kJZTnNzNryDhp0mbOTImrU2el6N4CDJG/wqwFPjvf9 1288613544 From: "Jud" To: "freebsd-questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:12:24 -0400 Subject: FreeBSD Doesn't "See" Crucial C300 SSD on Marvell Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:12:26 -0000 The old desktop gave up the ghost after many years of use (memory problems plus a hard drive with an increasing number of bad sectors), and I've just finished putting together a new one. Win7 x64 and Ubuntu amd64 are running on it, and I would dearly love to install FreeBSD. Hardware is an ASUS Rampage III Formula motherboard with a Crucial C300 256GB SATA 6GB/s-capable SSD connected to one of the motherboard's two internal SATA 6GB/s ports. These two ports use a Marvell 88SE9128 onboard chip as the controller. The controller is supposed to support (hardware) RAID, but of course with one drive I am using it in "normal" non-RAID mode. (To say this particular controller chip has a problematic reputation at the moment is a bit of an understatement. I've personally seen some weirdness, including the Crucial drive not showing up in the BIOS boot priority menu a time or two. Nevertheless, as I said Winders and Ubuntu are running and I'm really looking forward to having my favorite OS on my new box.) I also have two Hitachi Deskstar drives and a USB stick. I tried the October amd64 DVD snapshot of -CURRENT from the snapshots page, guessing it would have the latest hardware support. The DVD boots into the installer, but sysinstall only shows me the Deskstars and the USB stick as options to install to. Puttering around the lists trying to find something that has any chance of being relevant, I ran across this excerpt from a post to the freebsd-current list in October: **************************************************************************** >> In an attempt to get more information about this issue, I'd like to ask >> people on freebsd-current if they're using any Sandforce-based SSDs with >> FreeBSD. So far, it appears not a lot of people do, making it hard to >> debug this issue (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151608). > > MCP5x SATA are not the best controllers for compatibility testing. They > have enough problems on their own, even without Sandforce. > > When you tested Marvell, have you tried to use mvs(4) driver? No, I only tried to use ata(4). I tried using mvs(4) now, and that works! mvs0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xb0100000-0xb01fffff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci1 mvs0: Gen-II, 8 3Gbps ports, Port Multiplier supported mvsch0: at channel 0 on mvs0 mvsch1: at channel 1 on mvs0 mvsch2: at channel 2 on mvs0 mvsch3: at channel 3 on mvs0 mvsch4: at channel 4 on mvs0 mvsch5: at channel 5 on mvs0 mvsch6: at channel 6 on mvs0 mvsch7: at channel 7 on mvs0 ada0 at mvsch0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 2048bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 85857MB (175836528 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) **************************************************************************** I don't know enough to understand whether "using mvs" has a chance of working for me. If it might, how do I "use mvs" when attempting to install? (The DVD does have the fixit environment available.) Thanks in advance for any helpful suggestions, Jud -- "I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 12:38:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFBC106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out7.libero.it (cp-out7.libero.it [212.52.84.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844478FC1F for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (151.51.29.139) by cp-out7.libero.it (8.5.107) id 4CB9BCB101CF0C3B; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:38:49 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA1CcdbJ012708; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:38:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4CCEB4CF.3060808@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:38:39 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101028 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Daneliuk References: <4CCEA5B9.7010603@netfence.it> <4CCEA944.4020409@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <4CCEA944.4020409@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Newer Sambas and PAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:38:51 -0000 On 11/01/10 12:49, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Be aware that the samba password directory moved from /usr/local/etc/samba > to /usr/local/etc/samba34 Thanks, I know, but that's not the problem. pamsmbd doesn't read the password file directly; instead it asks smbd. I discovered it uses LanMan passwords, which are now disabled by default, so I added "lanman auth=yes" to smb.conf: this was some step ahead, but still not enough. I also tried pam_smbpass.so, which comes with Samba and reads the smbpasswd file directly: I expect it would know where it is, since it comes from the same port. No success here either. This worries me a lot, since the working samba version was removed from the port tree... bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 12:47:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793E106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC008FC14 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so3863711vws.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 05:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mPKo3/qqIFpxfzyGwuVwD+LSC3vhLShmJfaopfxvuC8=; b=l+x3Q46SqYL+wEddHOFmFttrpVFpNUcpKUUkNRBjeATion/g9UKEGc4768iV/Z8viX DaUAK8ygNTkegqmWwkUkXVJw4Btq9lBcJBZ1EKc6vTVlYXTkLTHz5r246r1QyuSzXHiQ c/RZKV3mghpH8TbDJe19+wXCK5omTyhq/UAFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aoHkpf4vwb2IaJJFpMK+lG/fNZY+6ppAb64uLsXYLl6GJRNEhpE1yjBJprVpRZdOQg jvBlIA3YB/IYnpf4mUOt9u5IphzSRmr0rUqET3EqxOVweYYiVvttsDD8+reoySTKikbx MjjJO7YsWhTfV3jdS0JhUPtNx4kxjhFe2bNFg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.208.1 with SMTP id ga1mr9064004qab.111.1288615636184; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 05:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.94.209 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 05:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:47:16 +1100 Message-ID: From: David N To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Managing ports on multiple jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:47:17 -0000 Hi, I have multiple jails using ezjails, approx 20. I'm currently doing portsnap fetch update ezjail-admin update -P then doing a portmaster -Bad on each jail, but its pretty time consuming, esp when you have to peridically come back and check if its done and do the next one. I've tried building packages in one jail and sharing it to all the other jails. make package-recursive But sometimes a particular package won't install properly, then I'll end up building from source again. Does anyone have any other ways to quickly upgrade multiple jails or even multiple boxes? Regards David N From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 14:38:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF677106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4A18FC14 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so5559639wyb.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:38:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.149 with SMTP id l21mr3902079wbv.171.1288622299142; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:38:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:38:19 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -uix1sd5NX2FFjCaKZiWM4OYjSk Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:38:20 -0000 On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:54 AM, wrote: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Anyone tried the data tethering feature on the Android pho= nes? > Just my .02: I'm not sure but I think there are several issues you have to overcome, at least from my Linux experience: Assuming you are using USB (Bluetooth is similar in some ways...): 1) When you connect the Android usb port to your PC you have a multi-function usb port and you must select the correct option (or choice as their are named in Linux), this means that you should be able to either select the mass storage (sd card) or the tty. So you first need to figure out how to do that. I use CyanogenMod that has several usb debugging features but I haven't had a chance to experiment with tethering yet. Anyway, you must use soemthing at the usb layer level that handles the multi-function usb port. 2) I suspect that tethering works like most usb gsm modems in Linux, simply by mounting ttyUSB0 and the using something like wvdial with your provider's APN. So I think that once you figure out (1) you should have a tty and you can simply dial #777 or whatever your phone carrier specifies in their APN. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I've tried cdce and tried modifying cdce but no luck. I ne= ed to > regenerate the device list, but I haven't had any luck yet- simply > running make doesn't work, and I've read Makefiles and googled out the > wazoo. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I tried modifying the details off the openmoko site for th= eir data > tether system (for FreeBSD8, mind), still no luck. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apparently it uses the cdc_ether RNDIS according to my Fed= ora shit > media system. usbconfig concurs. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Any hints, suggestions on how to further my investigations= and > getting this thing working? Anyone happen to be working on this? > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Cheers > > ------------------------- > Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 14:43:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4903D106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4B58FC16 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCvbM-0003Md-IT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:43:12 +0100 Received: from 207.155.204.151.ptr.us.xo.net ([207.155.204.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:43:12 +0100 Received: from atkin901 by 207.155.204.151.ptr.us.xo.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:43:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mark Atkinson Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:42:57 -0700 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.204.151.ptr.us.xo.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:43:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2010 03:54, freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: > > Anyone tried the data tethering feature on the Android phones? I have, it works. Attaching via usb in the proper mode should attach the umodem device which you can then use the published serial device with the userland ppp(8). Defining the correct section name for tethering can be a little daunting however. Google for things like 'telstra GSM ppp.conf' or such and then you just have to convert any linux scripts you find into freebsd ppp.conf. If you're lucky you may find freebsd specific configurations. Or, someone on the list may have one to share. - -Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzO0fEACgkQrDN5kXnx8ybfHwCffDLttNzAL8g1kUxhYbYv1/Z+ 9fEAnjqr0IT7BU1+T2zSvQR82LnLp+js =8Res -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 15:11:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406FD106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from nm26.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm26.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A9B08FC0A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm26.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 14:58:31 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.37] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 14:58:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1037.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 14:58:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 265473.78573.bm@omp1037.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32487 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Nov 2010 14:58:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1288623510; bh=k3miSXdUh2SuAySIKx/XnpddanH0Sq+4jc08cfSI7iQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1A6qPU9fQ0STv+eMweH4BSxGu1KGSB2Rg2y/9xnI+ACaJicVlT5WXQ4q08Bv9LMGW8wQ1x15dAs+6huGdnwqAVWBPnN3mn9YKnw7EXCzZ1obOnAQ6FAYTbtLD1aU3iwVdf1Zb5Nr+gyLk/fx0SfHpQWpDtw6N/asBBi8Mvzz6Xg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=R+vv4Kfdmb6WagdkcggxBcm325nfyHcPE6oAV1RXIHNpXhcAyhH/HyP/bHGfy+HBQfCaXLmAGtaGW/UCT90Wy9imCmf40Yso8+0hxWYBBrdeJPp3jQxXjgG+CtBszk2fPGHFY62dFJq7I1TmGAZUWCgV2ZvJpS++JPoEgidIsKA=; Message-ID: <362988.27749.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 8MNNNGsVM1niKJ.uMCkfgKNUEiLXUis_7ZhD7cs8vNpOgpi RkBx0c.9f_b5ZwoORFLweyl8tk0IVCWdIzuyBs7zyau2JuWUHKTvGm7SOAnp PRuB88_.HrZApKZpu5KhjRC9_92nHSQa7YRIe7QiOGg6pPj10GxbP6WslsYT 4C8nVpa7tr5_LH1p8pC9svK6j5A3.QCZzkILwkkl04LFTrxAPEXRh9kWWz2f HWzC2_RW9FSVxLab7NOuziRYLIUXLqvMzZIV5Cuis8nRVlzOE.nUZsvD5yWr dwwvD4s7vsdEXdmI98qHVnnVyo8BV0h2ow7neU_NHPQFWhwaI3dxV Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:58:30 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.284920 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:58:30 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:42:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Apache2 and UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:11:13 -0000 Hi, I would like to know if anyone faced the same issue as me. I have a web= site encoded as UTF-8, and it looks correctly in Firefox, but not in Googl= e Chrome. My setup is FreeBsd 8.1 - x86_64, Apache 2.2 Thanks,Leonardo. =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 15:55:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7807106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 762768FC0C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.70] by nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 15:55:09 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.53] by tm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 15:55:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1053.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 15:55:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 131679.75446.bm@omp1053.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 56140 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Nov 2010 15:55:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1288626908; bh=nRpLNxs/TemCQdmdJof36sLxxsu3XdybHgAI/7+i6f8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Nl08/9RiEU9Onpkr0vB3puapbBBrjipFcb8lDNScTEH/WtmoYn0ti26j7g0UN4l5gNa4fXagrEc0h337H3RGg+pW0RiiYrUspx69UBX1X0nux5b9Mn739VMY/kAQZZ2I0wxGPpMNm9yJgQuE/N009DkVKOjPUS0txTqUe9opmKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OY7Jrzv4y5W91XDDrjTP9cklmKBkxt8Na7tfrWS7kXS5XBx3XROxwedX90SUXXIs0Wv/lYCV1GoJpa8XpsQ7NHL1dxZXYd+38sXpPSHD3+BXDMrYRweyZwUEdLdoYU3K7vgf669Px3inDa6A2Jla4N9q73UUw6pYe8aczgVpwtQ=; Message-ID: <639929.55888.qm@web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: mWm53FsVM1kLs6TrcHZlrfw87XalKIdPSXdl2TOD.d3Zysr mhOqZ6QL0RTK0RCqN6ZfYNIzymVCaot5Awp46B0Y2nbMT0VCHXCq4Hf.IFk4 _QxFwwQWyflS1idEQPhgUo_jtpzIiCDCR.jm1rZ0iFAvpu5rbRzfOPKyrzSz zEx27PHgAmRKO0oGySr9Iy7AEdARnCvaFUl_Vcxy.GZmP_U4.z3ntmyi94q5 OeJ8jCNKa5rvnG5zxOrxkqfkwCweaiwuTC9FLsEktYiGOGGGK9CAyPQi0w1J YfNHB7yzeSJDZUS83DKX6FXL6wZgjrZUf98HAL73sHuw6Hzb6WzyeqHZsq5l lSDP9NuFmNtiKvA6DjE0dW.vIPI9JKR0TvA-- Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:55:08 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.284920 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:55:08 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <362988.27749.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Apache2 and UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:55:09 -0000 I found the solution, I had to iconv from iso-8859-1 to utf-8 my index.html Leonardo M. Ram=E9 =0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com --- On Mon, 11/1/10, Leonardo M. Ram=E9 wrote: From: Leonardo M. Ram=E9 Subject: Apache2 and UTF-8 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Monday, November 1, 2010, 12:58 PM Hi, I would like to know if anyone faced the same issue as me. I have a web= site encoded as UTF-8, and it looks correctly in Firefox, but not in Googl= e Chrome. My setup is FreeBsd 8.1 - x86_64, Apache 2.2 Thanks,Leonardo. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 16:04:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F4106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD1F8FC18 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.206.78.30] (port=36695 helo=dt.vicor.com) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCwro-00074a-46; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:04:18 -0700 From: Devin Teske To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vicor, Inc Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:04:15 -0700 Message-Id: <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-41.el4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: addf82e302fb7b54175bfd27340b229c X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:04:19 -0000 On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 21:02 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > I installed a 9-CURRENT from an USB key to a hard disk of a laptop and > encountered a strange problem: I booted the USB key to normal > multiuser mode and wanted to wipe out the Windows on the disk, create > one slice ad4s1 and partitions in it for /, /usr, /var, ... > > I thought the simplest way would be just run sysinstall(8) and use the > FDISK and BSDLABEL from the post-install dialog. FDISK went fine and in > the BSDLABEL dialog I just used 'A' (auto defaults). On 'W' (write to > disk) the sysinstall(8) complained about 'unable to open /dev/ad4s1a sysinstall probes hardware when it starts. Therefore, after making changes (specifically after writing) to the disk in the FDISK partition editor, you need to Ctrl-C and Abort-out and relaunch sysinstall so that it probes the new disk devices (ad4s1, ad4s2, etc.) before you can start adding BSD disklabels (ad4s1a, ad4s1b, etc.) to the slice (aka partition). This has been an age-old problem (hmmm, perhaps get could some mad karma for fixing it). I imagine that sade has this problem too. Though, what annoys me about sade is that the Ctrl-C menu doesn't work -- the "Restart" option does nothing and though "Continue" works, I'm seething over the lack of an "Abort" option (hmmm, perhaps should file a PR on that one). > and > so on for all the created partitions a...f. And also in the dev fs > there were no entries created for /dev/ad4s1[a-f]. They apeared after a > reboot of the system from the USB key. Reboot should not be required. Just exit sysinstall(8) and go back into it. I've made it a habit to (when using sysinstall(8) as a userland utility to format disks): 1. Launch sysinstall(8) (as root) 2. Main Menu 3. Custom 4. Partition 5. (if more than one disk is present in the system you'll be prompted to select the disk... use spacebar to select disk, then TAB over to OK and hit ENTER) 6. partition the disk in whatever manner required 7. Press `W' to write out the changes 8. (select which boot manager or None) 9. Press Ctrl-C after partition table is successfully written 10. Select `Abort' and hit ENTER then 1. Relaunch sysinstall(8) (as root) 2. Main Menu 3. Custom 4. Partition 5. (if more than one disk is present in the system, use spacebar to select disk, then TAB over to OK and hit ENTER) NOTE: This is required to select which disk to operate on within the disklabel editor 6. Press `Q' to quit-out of the FDISK partition editor (this time, we don't want to make any changes, we just needed to indicate that this is the disk that we're going to operate on within the disklabel editor) 7. (select which boot manager or None) NOTE: This time around, since we're not going to write the partition table again, it really doesn't matter what you select here NOTE: you're now back at the custom menu from step 3/4. 8. Label 9. Now use the FreeBSD Disklabel Editor to allocate FreeBSD partitions from the BIOS partition ad0s1 (or whatever your partition was named) 10. When finished, press `W' to write out changes, perform newfs actions, and mount the devices as necessary > > How this is supposed to work using sysinstall(8) > or should one use only bsdlabel(8) directly in such a case? > I'll be the first to admit that sysinstall(8) could be a little easier to use in the userland. It should be noted that sade(8) (System Administrator's Disk Editor) is no different -- sade, at this point at least, is nothing more than the `Partition' and `Label' menus ripped straight from sysinstall(8)'s `Custom' menu (with some minor other differences, like the fact that the Ctrl-C menu doesn't work whereas it does in sysinstall(8) -- really ought to file a PR on that one). > Thanks > > matthias -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 16:41:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4801F106566C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Bob.Brower@amd.com) Received: from TX2EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F998FC08 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail143-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.244) by TX2EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.9.40.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:44 +0000 Received: from mail143-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail143-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709418E8248 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:44 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -7 X-BigFish: VPS-7(zzbb2cKzz1202hzz8275bh8275dh186Mz32i2a8h34h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 Received: from mail143-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail143-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1288628803474233_21610; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.240]) by mail143-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C2990059 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ausb3extmailp02.amd.com (163.181.251.22) by TX2EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (10.9.99.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.482.44; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:42 +0000 Received: from ausb3twp01.amd.com ([163.181.249.108]) by ausb3extmailp02.amd.com (Switch-3.2.7/Switch-3.2.7) with SMTP id oA1GQucm029834 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:26:59 -0500 X-WSS-ID: 0LB7SCB-01-8SH-02 X-M-MSG: Received: from sausexhtp01.amd.com (sausexhtp01.amd.com [163.181.3.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ausb3twp01.amd.com (Tumbleweed MailGate 3.7.2) with ESMTP id 2F139102858C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:26:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com ([163.181.3.198]) by sausexhtp01.amd.com ([163.181.3.165]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:26:37 -0500 From: "Brower, Bob" To: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:26:36 -0500 Thread-Topic: Bluray Driver support Thread-Index: Act54Y4Fyv63zRoDRQKsr7as7gJjuw== Message-ID: <02996998A2997C4ABA226A8114BB473460A21732@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_02996998A2997C4ABA226A8114BB473460A21732SAUSEXMBP01amdc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Reverse-DNS: ausb3extmailp02.amd.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Bluray Driver support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:41:50 -0000 --_004_02996998A2997C4ABA226A8114BB473460A21732SAUSEXMBP01amdc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've been working with an outside customer on= development system running FreeBSD. Their intention is to incorporate a bl= uray drive into the system. Unfortunately the one's they claim have FreeBSD= support are END of Life. That was a Matshita BD-MLT SW-5584. Last week I = sent a request to this email address and received the attached response. I= never received a followup so I can only assume it was deemed to be spam an= d so it received no followup. I don't feel the need to register and enter f= orums as the customer only wants us to configure a system that will operate= with your version of Unix. Please help direct this query to someone that = can be of assistance. Or redirect me to an up to date driver listing for Fr= eeBSD. I've spent numerous hours on the FreeBSD website and can't find anyt= hing other than some loosely worded support for some CD drives but not spec= ifically DVD or Bluray. Best Regards, Bob Brower AMD Hardware Test Engineering 90 Central Street Boxboro, MA 01719 P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail --_004_02996998A2997C4ABA226A8114BB473460A21732SAUSEXMBP01amdc_ Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from ausb3twp02.amd.com (163.181.249.109) by sausexhtp01.amd.com (163.181.3.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.83.0; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:46:00 -0500 Received: from ausb3extmailp01.amd.com (ausb3extmailp01.amd.com [163.181.251.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ausb3twp02.amd.com (Tumbleweed MailGate 3.7.2) with ESMTP id 29018C8BCA for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:45:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail18-db3-R.bigfish.com (mail-db3.bigfish.com [213.199.154.135]) by ausb3extmailp01.amd.com (Switch-3.2.7/Switch-3.2.7) with ESMTP id o9QIjrOY018569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:45:56 -0500 Received: from mail18-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020D0172041B for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail18-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1288118754650358_30233; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB3EHSMHS012.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.252]) by mail18-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9101A600046 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (69.147.83.53) by DB3EHSMHS012.bigfish.com (10.3.87.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.482.44; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:53 +0000 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B9F14EC80 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50060106566C for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) From: "owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" To: "Brower, Bob" Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:45:51 -0500 Subject: Your message to freebsd-questions awaits moderator approval Thread-Topic: Your message to freebsd-questions awaits moderator approval Thread-Index: Act1Pg8SAopzwOLGTyi/HT4JMkQ5AA== Message-ID: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: sausexhtp01.amd.com X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: SoftFail X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: freebsd.org X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-wss-id: 0LAWUSN-02-7ZA-01 x-spamscore: -12 x-bigfish: vps-12(zzzz2cfT1202hzz8275dhz2fh66h) x-spam-tcs-scl: 5:0 x-reverse-dns: mx2.freebsd.org received-spf: SoftFail (sausexhtp01.amd.com: domain of transitioning owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org discourages use of 163.181.249.109 as permitted sender) list-id: User questions errors-to: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org x-beenthere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org x-mailman-version: 2.1.5 x-list-administrivia: yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Your mail to 'freebsd-questions' with the subject Driver Query Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-questions/0bb56fe8077c= afae76cde9cb3dff43b00807337d PLEASE NOTE! If you would like to post freely to the list, please subscribe first. If you post from multiple addresses, you can subscribe each address and go into the options page and select 'no mail' for all but one address. This will allow you to post without delay in the future. Sorry for the hassle, but certain immature people made this necessary. --_004_02996998A2997C4ABA226A8114BB473460A21732SAUSEXMBP01amdc_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 19:51:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3647E106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F201F8FC12 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so4257549vws.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:51:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.137.136 with SMTP id w8mr8722365qat.343.1288641075099; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.235.67 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:51:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.203.43.176] Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:51:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: OpenGL 3.3 and 4.0/4.1 for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:51:16 -0000 Hi, I'd like to write some 3D programs with OpenGL 3.3 and OpenGL 4.0/4.1 API on FreeBSD, but I wonder which GPUs are supported at all, and which are well supported with stable drivers (on FreeBSD/i386 and FreeBSD/amd64). I know that MesaGL is still at OpenGL 2.1 level, so a proprietary closed binary blob driver + libs are needed to get 3.3 and 4.0/4.1 APIs, right? Do they have to be installed manually, or are there ports that are up to date and regularly updated? How painful is the experience? Which (GPU, driver) pair works best? I have no problems getting a new GPU, as long as it is definitely well supported on i386 and on amd64. Oh, while we're at it, I'm also interested in stuff like OpenCL and CUDA, so I guess I'll probably need nVidia hardware more than AMD/ATI atm... TIA, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 20:10:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0137106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E2A8FC18 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so3777502gwa.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.98.209 with SMTP id r17mr8649661qcn.241.1288642228266; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k11sm3270914vbp.3.2010.11.01.13.10.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90D9AE54857 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:10:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:10:18 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101101161018.3e8f2e2d@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/8vVZ6mbwiUgLIiYvfJJtj3l"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: "portsnap" unable to locate mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:10:29 -0000 --Sig_/8vVZ6mbwiUgLIiYvfJJtj3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been having problems with 'portsnap' for two days now. It continually emits error messages. The latest being: Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Has anyone else experienced this phenomena? --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/8vVZ6mbwiUgLIiYvfJJtj3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMzx6wAAoJEHdwsA8xwKhFP+QH+wWXwS5Ox6HgZKLkabA5bFlu XSEGkkwhS18xcW8s1l/JxLAyDOYT/9vpa7scVfrQOS7Z7ywt8JDTaLOINjNlRVT4 gUN8owuiqu3ZWnQyCQcQDwCINMwt2eFa0PEB724Ql1V3aa5jCXqlxpaDBfetK6B+ FrEE3Qan0cgSjVfvxFLkeeoIqFitTYM3L3twGiflst8GueBB8EOWojmYS9tnG3FL qr3ICHpPUX2+8+w07HxXYJgChYZbX0fksU8jhVm7kJ+7jJ7m4tZWqnPozMSzP/6U jzWQNXnBf4q846mZ5DOMJQOAt24LMZ3g2l/p+1Q5klmVJoaEGvRBbC1YMsRURN0= =dQ6t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8vVZ6mbwiUgLIiYvfJJtj3l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 20:36:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84DF106566C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm2-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm2-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CCE38FC13 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.216] by nm2.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 20:36:39 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.162] by tm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 20:36:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2010 20:36:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 909317.67840.bm@omp1003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 67383 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2010 20:36:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1288643799; bh=SAMI8nu4kOgBwmeqwYbuPwmUR7pSjD6lqlzFOPiyZm8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Content-Type; b=5Es3lrd06yX31mGryqv+SMcLLJLwjH6hnF79J2AUXnv0JIhfkq4FL5YgcWLeuvxNcA6K+97G0/GIx69QMZDmDdmvvq+p/mczKZWBisv3Emci1H+JsIZwbmKoRev8muGRFUn+/UK3JTX4ECYcrzSD7xxUliJdxVq7ZrwG4ZIYac4= Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (axelbsd@74.125.82.182 with plain) by smtp140.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Nov 2010 20:36:39 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u X-YMail-OSG: 9q5iJYgVM1m5h4JeXOlWjE4DQv04kY1EniKVJjLJ6924iH4 5.UywJ7E6AGbHq.VfsWmy0sEC4tTfb_Y46Asan1.JYLMOquIxOg70EjRBKJP K0B4xZXVNEaV6hnj2MvaUdqJ8jNhTkOzdXKj1Gc7TznhKkCDx1z0ZAvIjjB0 OLJ_gx3F2L2cO4DlSGseKJytNMc7n5t_XikpFn0A.4bFcU6Bjt_7eryY5H_A iDHlO_ECI0BW8V62QDA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so5922893wyb.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.152.9 with SMTP id e9mr16221173wbw.169.1288643799500; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:36:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.134.67 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:36:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101101161018.3e8f2e2d@scorpio> References: <20101101161018.3e8f2e2d@scorpio> From: Alexandre Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:36:18 +0100 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: "portsnap" unable to locate mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:36:41 -0000 On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Jerry wrote: > I have been having problems with 'portsnap' for two days now. It > continually emits error messages. The latest being: > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > Has anyone else experienced this phenomena ? I just use # portsnap fetch update without problem. Maybe a Internet connection problem ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 20:36:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8AA10656C0 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307928FC27 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA1KaoDF034834; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:36:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AFF3BAAC; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:36:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:36:50 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: David N Message-ID: <20101101203649.GA33316@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Managing ports on multiple jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:36:52 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:47:16PM +1100, David N wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have multiple jails using ezjails, approx 20. > Does anyone have any other ways to quickly upgrade multiple jails or > even multiple boxes? If you don't mind that all 20 boxes have the same software installed; 1) Use one box or jail as the build box. Only this box/jail needs a ports tree. The others don't need /usr/ports, nor /var/db/ports or /var/db/pk= g. 2a) In case of real boxes, rsync /usr/local from the build box to the other boxes. Then re-start updated ports. =20 2b) In case of jails, have all but the build jail share (a read-only) /usr/local via nullfs. Use rsync to copy /usr/local from the build jail= to the shared location of the other jails, then restart the upgraded ports= on all jails. Except from /usr/local, you might need to update stuff in other parts of the filesystem, depending on the port. Like /etc/rc.conf, or sometimes stuff in /var.=20 The usage of nullfs (with unionfs) is described on one of my web pages: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/unix/misc.html Look under the section "Using nullfs and unionfs for the ports tree in a ja= il". Hope this helps. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzPJOEACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVn+wCgm6dL93GVlRVdqPg49HzPfVE0 5mcAnjQDt6ttgnBz8rD7rUfpV5vOME9C =Kn0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 20:56:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6705B1065673 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lystic1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82288FC08 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5029104bwz.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:56:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GqouvvFdsPmxdjO/5y2bTLnUXovZXxant2KkaxWt6VA=; b=PT63frHWleZGndrwEpwdHTxqCRS54Xrojtl/Tgg1Kcdn7kbTfsjiuUfYAZFDjDqeZz tSyzrg3B6Q0GNctZdacxxT8j5OZ+7J0OFRQL6ZEKiWmGBxwbgZbtTA/VU2Q70r5FWlxa 5g3SUbskr3okh7KheWWu3FuweOtMHKqsqVG20= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=STwlt2HHvFHuL/VWW6ppuLJDOUWmeSynnS2/AtuduGPNxkuxuZ1z7XP3frT1D00ts1 JCZYRFYU/MO80ZPtDp5ZWcjWcmpI+AturEZA9HLDuaJVCsJ6Ns3xn5icmaw5blAhYdKx bdzLVvhQqxuGzeM5/YTVECmYyJEpeNnwGOrTg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.120.195 with SMTP id e3mr7335464bkr.77.1288643354650; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.212 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101101161018.3e8f2e2d@scorpio> References: <20101101161018.3e8f2e2d@scorpio> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:29:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lystic Emsen To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: "portsnap" unable to locate mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:56:37 -0000 >From the machine you run portsnap on, try this: nslookup portsnap2.freebsd.org Let me know if that works. It may be a DNS error. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jerry wrote: > I have been having problems with 'portsnap' for two days now. It > continually emits error messages. The latest being: > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > Has anyone else experienced this phenomena? > > -- > Jerry =E2=9C=8C > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > --=20 -- Lystic http://UnixNews.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 22:25:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C581065767 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D44B8FC15 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PD2oV-0000GY-Tq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:25:15 +0100 Received: from 93-138-69-80.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.69.80]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:25:15 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 93-138-69-80.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:25:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:25:04 +0100 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-138-69-80.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101008 Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:25:17 -0000 On 11/01/10 15:42, Mark Atkinson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/01/2010 03:54, freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: >> >> Anyone tried the data tethering feature on the Android phones? > > I have, it works. Attaching via usb in the proper mode should attach > the umodem device which you can then use the published serial device > with the userland ppp(8). Defining the correct section name for > tethering can be a little daunting however. > > Google for things like 'telstra GSM ppp.conf' or such and then you just > have to convert any linux scripts you find into freebsd ppp.conf. If > you're lucky you may find freebsd specific configurations. Or, someone > on the list may have one to share. I believe it depends on the phone manufacturer. HTC phones apparently use some kind of "Ethernet over USB" which is well supported under Windows and Linux but not FreeBSD: Nov 1 23:20:52 betelgeuse kernel: (da4:umass-sim1:1:0:0): lost device Nov 1 23:20:52 betelgeuse kernel: (da4:umass-sim1:1:0:0): removing device entry Nov 1 23:20:53 betelgeuse root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0ffe bus uhub5 Nov 1 23:20:53 betelgeuse kernel: ugen4.4: at usbus4 In the above messages, the kernel detaches the storage device (umass) and tries to attach the new device, which doesn't have a driver so it's attached as "ugen" - generic USB. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 23:12:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE84106566C; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF97D8FC1E; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so6062739wyb.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:11:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.127.142 with SMTP id g14mr16104919wbs.200.1288653118317; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:11:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <56546.1288608856@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:11:57 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7YbMQVZYQMQcufTo3Fm7hAK5ZCY Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:12:00 -0000 On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/01/10 15:42, Mark Atkinson wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 [...] > In the above messages, the kernel detaches the storage device (umass) and > tries to attach the new device, which doesn't have a driver so it's attached > as "ugen" - generic USB. > Yes. One has to remember that USB is just the bus just like pci, microchannel, etc. Even though you have access to the device on the bus you still need a driver for that specific ethernet chip your kernel. This is analogous to having a video card on the pci bus, you still need for the kernel to drive the specific chipset of the card regardless if it can see it on the bus. I have an HTC Nexus One so I may fiddle with this and see if I can help some more here. I am wishful that at least we can get a tty just like other gsm modems and from there it's pretty straight forward using wvdial or alike. If it's only the Ethernet over usb like you mention, then the chipset driver would have to be translated/ported to the FBSD kernel, if it's not already there ? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 23:12:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C907D1065723 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp204.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp204.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA108FC18 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp40.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 28A8F350507 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:52:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp40.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 97B70350503 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:52:24 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:52:23 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: FreeBSD Message-ID: Thread-Topic: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster Thread-Index: Act6F3JC7lD/MsF/Z0yB90gNt7NK4Q== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:12:05 -0000 portmaster is looping on devel/php5-spl. it seems as though php5-spl depends on itself. the excerpt below shows two cycles of the recursion. the list ">> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >>" gets one longer on each interation. any ideas how to fix this? thanks tom ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/php5-spl from ports ===>>> Starting dependency check ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/autoconf268 ===>>> Checking dependency: lang/php5 ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 seems to be handled by php5-pcre-5.2.11_1 ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 seems to be handled by php5-spl-5.2.11_1 ===>>> Launching child to update php5-spl-5.2.11_1 to php5-spl-5.3.3_2 pear-1.9.0 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/php5-spl from ports ===>>> Starting dependency check ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/autoconf268 ===>>> Checking dependency: lang/php5 ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 seems to be handled by php5-pcre-5.2.11_1 ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 seems to be handled by php5-spl-5.2.11_1 ===>>> Launching child to update php5-spl-5.2.11_1 to php5-spl-5.3.3_2 pear-1.9.0 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 23:26:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7421065670 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danolson100@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA798FC12 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so7651997iwn.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:26:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5RaTrHp2jJf3/PiwPo/RDb2/dN5zARe/5UEKcFd5f+I=; b=v0IC8294ccX/cAkOlMnsMLy7NM2EbiJ4p4fc+/YXMobjD2iTBF2AR7odA9zRa7o2Tg XzS9OjR226gmwfGu5/z4/9YPsQnEXdp7WN8kKmeMraZvpEdgcimm2WfoUJk+uZdRwLx+ eOJRJnj0DbxeTiMgcomA2gfaMg5KNDuUEqHs0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DkWVcEa5kscryLsZF93FTyNwEd6VYkO9QZDuxzdmN8wCCQRXdcENUdI+5EfHfXg0GW bw8+hT1oBRIKFhwC2bv9tTOO1XwRByPvhLKFE4spSTn+7dn/wR1bB6SgdGFDZeYFwp2E 56v2pPAnu22eIMVKLBQC2U6eGDu7VjIQuDKdM= Received: by 10.231.35.131 with SMTP id p3mr14153839ibd.177.1288652661871; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.240.150] (174-20-71-107.mpls.qwest.net [174.20.71.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w9sm9011157ibc.13.2010.11.01.16.04.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CCF4772.30504@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:04:18 -0500 From: Dan Olson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, judmarc@fastmail.fm References: <1288613544.13669.1402968563@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1288613544.13669.1402968563@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Doesn't "See" Crucial C300 SSD on Marvell Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:26:48 -0000 On 11/1/2010 7:12 AM, Jud wrote: > The old desktop gave up the ghost after many years of use (memory > problems plus a hard drive with an increasing number of bad sectors), > and I've just finished putting together a new one. Win7 x64 and Ubuntu > amd64 are running on it, and I would dearly love to install FreeBSD. > > Hardware is an ASUS Rampage III Formula motherboard with a Crucial C300 > 256GB SATA 6GB/s-capable SSD connected to one of the motherboard's two > internal SATA 6GB/s ports. These two ports use a Marvell 88SE9128 > onboard chip as the controller. The controller is supposed to support > (hardware) RAID, but of course with one drive I am using it in "normal" > non-RAID mode. (To say this particular controller chip has a > problematic reputation at the moment is a bit of an understatement. > I've personally seen some weirdness, including the Crucial drive not > showing up in the BIOS boot priority menu a time or two. Nevertheless, > as I said Winders and Ubuntu are running and I'm really looking forward > to having my favorite OS on my new box.) I also have two Hitachi > Deskstar drives and a USB stick. > > I tried the October amd64 DVD snapshot of -CURRENT from the snapshots > page, guessing it would have the latest hardware support. The DVD boots > into the installer, but sysinstall only shows me the Deskstars and the > USB stick as options to install to. > > Puttering around the lists trying to find something that has any chance > of being relevant, I ran across this excerpt from a post to the > freebsd-current list in October: > > **************************************************************************** >>> In an attempt to get more information about this issue, I'd like to ask >>> people on freebsd-current if they're using any Sandforce-based SSDs with >>> FreeBSD. So far, it appears not a lot of people do, making it hard to >>> debug this issue (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151608). >> >> MCP5x SATA are not the best controllers for compatibility testing. They >> have enough problems on their own, even without Sandforce. >> >> When you tested Marvell, have you tried to use mvs(4) driver? > > No, I only tried to use ata(4). I tried using mvs(4) now, and that > works! > > mvs0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem > 0xb0100000-0xb01fffff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci1 > mvs0: Gen-II, 8 3Gbps ports, Port Multiplier supported > mvsch0: at channel 0 on mvs0 > mvsch1: at channel 1 on mvs0 > mvsch2: at channel 2 on mvs0 > mvsch3: at channel 3 on mvs0 > mvsch4: at channel 4 on mvs0 > mvsch5: at channel 5 on mvs0 > mvsch6: at channel 6 on mvs0 > mvsch7: at channel 7 on mvs0 > > ada0 at mvsch0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device > ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 2048bytes) > ada0: Command Queueing enabled > ada0: 85857MB (175836528 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) > > **************************************************************************** > > I don't know enough to understand whether "using mvs" has a chance of > working for me. If it might, how do I "use mvs" when attempting to > install? (The DVD does have the fixit environment available.) > > Thanks in advance for any helpful suggestions, > > Jud Try the ahci driver or lower the speed to 3Gbps and see if that works. Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 23:48:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373961065672 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BDF8FC08 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DE2E7207; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:48:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from unknown (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:48:20 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:48:24 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Devin Teske Message-ID: <20101101234824.00007f5f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4cvs1 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:48:22 -0000 On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:04:15 -0700 Devin Teske wrote: > I'll be the first to admit that sysinstall(8) could be a little easier > to use in the userland. It should be noted that sade(8) (System > Administrator's Disk Editor) is no different -- sade, at this point at > least, is nothing more than the `Partition' and `Label' menus ripped > straight from sysinstall(8)'s `Custom' menu (with some minor other > differences, like the fact that the Ctrl-C menu doesn't work whereas > it does in sysinstall(8) -- really ought to file a PR on that one). There's a new version of sade being worked on by ae@ in svn /user/ae that fixes lots of the problems. With pc-sysinstall getting all the attention I doubt sysinstall will have any more work done on it. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 00:02:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44901065674 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8551F8FC17 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.206.78.30] (port=38582 helo=dt.vicor.com) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PD4L2-0007Fv-IH; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:02:58 -0700 From: Devin Teske To: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20101101234824.00007f5f@unknown> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20101101234824.00007f5f@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vicor, Inc Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:02:56 -0700 Message-Id: <1288656176.6744.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-41.el4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: 88db2959e544eeecca737f26d1e2c941 X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Cc: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:02:59 -0000 On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 23:48 +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:04:15 -0700 > Devin Teske wrote: > > > I'll be the first to admit that sysinstall(8) could be a little easier > > to use in the userland. It should be noted that sade(8) (System > > Administrator's Disk Editor) is no different -- sade, at this point at > > least, is nothing more than the `Partition' and `Label' menus ripped > > straight from sysinstall(8)'s `Custom' menu (with some minor other > > differences, like the fact that the Ctrl-C menu doesn't work whereas > > it does in sysinstall(8) -- really ought to file a PR on that one). > > There's a new version of sade being worked on by ae@ in svn /user/ae > that fixes lots of the problems. Excellent! I'll have to check it out. (should we then save our PR's for ae and neglect any problems in sade? I wonder what `ae' stands for, "alas, edamame?!", I kid). > With pc-sysinstall getting all the > attention I doubt sysinstall will have any more work done on it. I'm _very_ pleased to see from... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0yOuDelXUU ...that pc-sysinstall will support scripted installation using a syntax similar to sysinstall's own install.cfg. I thought I was going to have to lose sleep over this. -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 00:16:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EBD106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lystic1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5A28FC14 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5163569bwz.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NoKqSLnMkyxdW9NL+GAVqTnz5xY0G5P7GmYgTBjey64=; b=tDsv2xisvcH8OzLPdcEUBizW7tYdbByUtCCCZcl+khYOhr8MHMeFt5DULoJNPBGLvr 59tVYloZsZxc5lhlr66XGggmIyw1u80Fm4PDyySUzx0WAZmIpV1vYd4+llsKoC8MUTLC yLnwhuSTfTaDV+tvNcQ/aOPBDMLfTABn/Lli0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kBJUVr0THlnRvT7OMgRP5c+Gnb+NaR+PYB3/0zBkAJzwAw5atqpy0xxIAfGWj8FSVz OnAUoGJWjl/ozu3jrHMzpvLQRzmOP/GESGt4zeigsThdQxmgbpU493ipgxVClr9fgmIT Maz8N70aNytvcBXsSJrwMAa3m8u2AQ/iN0R+o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.64.139 with SMTP id e11mr2173347bki.212.1288656968267; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.212 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:16:08 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lystic Emsen To: Tom Worster Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:16:11 -0000 I just upgrade my php5 port to php5.3 and ran into a similar problem with portupgrade. However, I just unregistered php5-spl, because its no longer necessary. I believe php5-spl and php5-pcre are now integrated into PHP-5.3 by default. I also ran into a couple of other problems. These notes may be of some help later. http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/error-with-apr-parameter-is-incorrect.html http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/pcre-error-with-php5-filter-and-php5.html -Lystic On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Tom Worster wrote: > portmaster is looping on devel/php5-spl. it seems as though php5-spl > depends > on itself. the excerpt below shows two cycles of the recursion. the list > ">> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >>" gets one longer on each > interation. > > any ideas how to fix this? > > thanks > tom > > > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl > > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/php5-spl from ports > ===>>> Starting dependency check > ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/autoconf268 > ===>>> Checking dependency: lang/php5 > > ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 > seems to be handled by php5-pcre-5.2.11_1 > > > ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 > seems to be handled by php5-spl-5.2.11_1 > > ===>>> Launching child to update php5-spl-5.2.11_1 to php5-spl-5.3.3_2 > pear-1.9.0 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 > > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl > > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/php5-spl from ports > ===>>> Starting dependency check > ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/autoconf268 > ===>>> Checking dependency: lang/php5 > > ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 > seems to be handled by php5-pcre-5.2.11_1 > > > ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 > seems to be handled by php5-spl-5.2.11_1 > > ===>>> Launching child to update php5-spl-5.2.11_1 to php5-spl-5.3.3_2 > pear-1.9.0 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> > php5-spl-5.2.11_1 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- Lystic http://UnixNews.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 00:22:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66A11065674 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809E98FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so3961338gxk.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.85.18 with SMTP id n18mr2079098ybl.1.1288657351194; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z16sm8297987ybm.4.2010.11.01.17.22.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F8D1E54856 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:22:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:22:25 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101101202225.737d2679@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20101101161018.3e8f2e2d@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "portsnap" unable to locate mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:22:33 -0000 On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:29:14 -0500 Lystic Emsen articulated: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jerry > wrote: > > > I have been having problems with 'portsnap' for two days now. It > > continually emits error messages. The latest being: > > > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. > > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... failed. > > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > > > Has anyone else experienced this phenomena? > > From the machine you run portsnap on, try this: > > nslookup portsnap2.freebsd.org > > Let me know if that works. It may be a DNS error. Well, some minor progress. This is the latest output: Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... fetch: http://portsnap1.FreeBSD.org/t/c4523276897a50ff0ca27add61344a4e96cc19a5f7e0bc8f8e17d138819e19a2: No address record sha256: c4523276897a50ff0ca27add61344a4e96cc19a5f7e0bc8f8e17d138819e19a2: No such file or directory [: !=: unexpected operator mv: rename c4523276897a50ff0ca27add61344a4e96cc19a5f7e0bc8f8e17d138819e19a2 to tINDEX.new: No such file or directory done. grep: tINDEX.new: No such file or directory look: tINDEX.new: No such file or directory Portsnap metadata appears bogus. Cowardly refusing to proceed any further. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 00:33:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB769106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB348FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.unitedinsong.com.au (abracadabra.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.80]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13BA5C21; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:37:12 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AtMail Atmail Open 1.04 Message-ID: <50963.1288658232@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: "Alejandro Imass" , "Ivan Voras" X-Origin: 192.168.0.200 X-Atmail-Account: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:37:12 +1100 From: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:33:04 -0000 On Tue 2/11/10 10:11 AM , Alejandro Imass wrote:On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/01/10 15:42, Mark Atkinson wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 [...] > In the above messages, the kernel detaches the storage device (umass) and > tries to attach the new device, which doesn't have a driver so it's attached > as "ugen" - generic USB. > Yes. One has to remember that USB is just the bus just like pci, microchannel, etc. Even though you have access to the device on the bus you still need a driver for that specific ethernet chip your kernel. This is analogous to having a video card on the pci bus, you still need for the kernel to drive the specific chipset of the card regardless if it can see it on the bus. I have an HTC Nexus One so I may fiddle with this and see if I can help some more here. I am wishful that at least we can get a tty just like other gsm modems and from there it's pretty straight forward using wvdial or alike. If it's only the Ethernet over usb like you mention, then the chipset driver would have to be translated/ported to the FBSD kernel, if it's not already there ? Ok. But I will clarify here: The HTC Android systems uses an "Internet Sharing" feature- essentially Google has coded in routing/nat system into the base OS (probably moding the leftover code already in the linux base), and is trying to allow similar using bluetooth and wifi at a later date as well. The RNDIS is a M$ system that allows sharing anything over USB (network, files, etc- but all essentially operated as network anyway), something they've been playing with for some years- I was looking for an A-A USB cable since around 2003 or so to quickly transfer files when needed. Apparently M$ opened the specs a year or two ago and everyone's jumped on to use it. So where Google started was to start allowing the use of the router/nat via RNDIS USB - somehow this was easier than allowing bluetooth or wifi (probably security and available hardware features). So yes, apparently the phone hooks up as a usb mass storage device, uploads a file to the computer, and disconnects and becomes a network device. Here is the output from linux: usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice scsi9 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device found at 4 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ff9 usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1 usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726 usb-storage: device scan complete scsi 9:0:0:0: Direct-Access HTC Android Phone 0100 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 sd 9:0:0:0: [sdf] Attached SCSI removable disk sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0 usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 4 usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5 usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ffe usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1 usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726 usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether usb0: register 'rndis_host' at usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device, ae:f6:3d:da:20:39 usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_wlan usb0: no IPv6 routers present usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 5 usb0: unregister 'rndis_host' usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device So. What would be my next step to make this work? OpenMoko have something similar and I tried moding some of their scripts (they've made theirs work with ALL OS- not just linux and Winblow$! Take heed manufacturers!) but it didn't mesh on the Android. I still end up with a generic host. As I mentioned, I tried modifying the cdce driver and the device list but that didn't help either, so when I moded the scripts and devd.conf I figured that was the missing piece of my puzzle. I'd actually pay someone to do this, but I do need to figure this out for myself anyway so I'm diving in deep and going to keep on struggling till I get it. I need it figured out before the year's end so I'm not going to sit on my laurels :) That, and a usb mass storage device emulator to trick a dumb digital photo frame.... > > _______________________________________________ > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions [3]" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio= ns > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "" > _______________________________________________ mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions [6]" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio= ns To unsubscribe, send any mail to "" ------------------------- Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ Links: ------ [3] http://webmail.unitedinsong.com.au/parse.php?redirect=3D Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E141065670 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0915322010=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD188FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30492 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 01:14:55 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 2 Nov 2010 01:14:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=8d1f.4ccf660f.k1010; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=u6P/6RJrYWxrsCdCbJesvu+8Nvcn6KnV/mN7EMxDqjA=; b=aEQByKfVQMcVOcyQJTjH+D/FDi5VOZZhpd12AveSy/h/amekn/mZNlZvTDfuVUAt8pU+xb7/oKnehkxqEx0D2Lg91kxl0oN3VqpjMRK1kTJXeWM4YwfZ+PkWv3HBDHaa2UJ1VvA/TE/o15s/GaQ9/jJXxqP3x4KYdVXmymg2LZY= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 2 Nov 2010 01:14:55 -0000 Message-ID: <20101102011455.36126.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: lystic1@gmail.com Subject: Re: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 01:41:37 -0000 >portupgrade. However, I just unregistered php5-spl, because its no longer >necessary. I believe php5-spl and php5-pcre are now integrated into PHP-5.3 >by default. Yes and no. pcre depends on the separate pcre package, and php will fail in baffling ways is your pcre is too old. The maintainer of the php port is aware of this but has declined both to make a one-line change to the Makefile to use the bundled pcre package, or an alternate one-line change to document the version dependency. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 03:17:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0613A106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nekoexmachina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD988FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so3293117eyb.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:17:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=0nuiMvbEiuWLHmG2pmC1/ExjX7Rm3eU1QM6WYE4ev1s=; b=i7fRMHZpGShNz0AAzDEG7doP8kI8j4CsVXE9bLGyoOXyiM3qsgWDBDzA6tyeIlgj2u xFaC9SRYMuwV07dZUF+YOqnjrCk27XPf200NBkjVOP8LfKTJ2obNh14mI3wK5oVmOggh FWkBdKS0gyFv+4pMpoSuaDEegkQdtI1dAveWc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=ki7V8mDGZC1/sLslHi3FKAOkMMQum9Q5mRNyZPa+JoWBCj1dgIPRQil2FraQb2IZ1X uTeUzhv3nbOHs3mVY2xibGfjw08EeytOIz7KSkGS3wz+Zr8N2oolk2SHyI/q9Sn/fPc9 wRnf9/FtUhFHfBwi6J+uSZOCU3BpYXIQm3MTk= Received: by 10.14.47.78 with SMTP id s54mr627977eeb.21.1288667875567; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([188.134.12.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm4920679eeh.17.2010.11.01.20.17.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:17:17 +0300 From: Mikle Krutov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101102031717.GA1554@takino.homeftp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: ZFS: can not import pool after export X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:17:57 -0000 Hello, list! With latest 8-STABLE I can not import pool after exporting: sysctls for kern version: kern.osrelease: 8.1-STABLE kern.osrevision: 199506 kern.osreldate: 801500 trying to import just-created pool: [neko][1]%sudo zpool create test /dev/gpt/test [neko][0]%sudo zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT test 472M 79.5K 472M 0% ONLINE - [neko][0]%sudo zpool export test [neko][0]%sudo zpool import test cannot import 'test': pool is formatted using a newer ZFS version [neko][1]% WTF happens? How do i avoid that? -- Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup. With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 03:42:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE76E106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8558FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C8B70E82ACE; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:42:06 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:42:07 -0000 People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? tia, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 03:48:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEC21065670 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1863A8FC13 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so4045681gxk.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xNxJIR8yQrAjVxRPkAr95882k+yEFPFom7Q/cQqt19g=; b=HUK5LVi1UfDzJytGG+UemS32JS1o30dLhFMDo49A+HuKbbK/vPoPuHrH7cNuM3YtFC 1ZFRBz9pRJfmfoHAAdOLDh80Sq5zEEMkjzEaq5F0c11kHiu2PzoT6F84eMvYUwqbLkiM UoIJUHKXCOf3EuVR4Zxh0ix4rsRIrln1LN1P8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sljKziO9t+MP7L467jKyl7xqiQLB8X5oThl3aiW2o7AmYqs5fvWz8rRglL0Hr8Jg0J WberQ4VV9FHlHWoIdIrPQ5U7H/h5QOWWZ/y/oSVbXHiqPvZo9tYSAwQVmnfViftK+EM6 k68fC74qOEs/kP7v0Eys6BCI3JKIHqM+9qjnM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.213 with SMTP id p21mr2194683qcl.127.1288669681802; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.250.129 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:48:01 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Gary Kline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:48:04 -0000 On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am > _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? > > tia, > > gary > > -- > =A0Gary Kline =A0kline@thought.org =A0http://www.thought.org =A0Public Se= rvice Unix > =A0 =A0The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.p= hp > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://w= ww.thought.org/#oL > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Try iperf? http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/benchmarks/iperf.html Used it to test speed on modem connection. Hope this helps. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 04:23:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DD0106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 04:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88C8FC0A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 04:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45ABA2624CCB; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:07:03 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7w1TeLS-XtFf; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:07:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 685442624CCA; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:07:01 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:06:50 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <66BD51D4-77AD-4AB7-B26A-F9AD13468C85@cwis.biz> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> To: Antonio Olivares X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:23:20 -0000 Gary, Keep in mind that their rate and your rate WILL be different. At least a = 10% difference, due to TCP overhead. So make sure you test on already = compressed data (like an MP3 stream). The more compressed the data the = less likely it will go through protocol compression en route. -- Ryan On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Gary Kline wrote: >> People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am >> _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? >>=20 >> tia, >>=20 >> gary >>=20 >> -- >> Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public = Service Unix >> The 7.90a release of Jottings: = http://jottings.thought.org/index.php >> An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking = http://www.thought.org/#oL >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 > Try iperf? >=20 > http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/benchmarks/iperf.html >=20 > Used it to test speed on modem connection. >=20 > Hope this helps. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Antonio > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 04:28:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC6B106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 04:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A028FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 04:28:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=T_y6kAmB_P8A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=rWdDcm16AAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Aq3Jkd5MAAAA:8 a=A7Wvaz8EAAAA:8 a=LJdorIIWhTaocE8EB0AA:9 a=wiACu87px151bfMtQcIA:7 a=ProK4w4QoNa1PrPLwLRDpWWONggA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=nATBmSxW2oAA:10 a=85aO3MvqblMA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=jgoaQNzrKcYA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:43892] helo=hbca.yeaguy.com) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FE/56-14897-3539FCC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:28:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Gary Kline" , "Antonio Olivares" References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:28:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "justin v" Organization: Yea_Guy Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (FreeBSD) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:28:05 -0000 On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:48:01 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Gary Kline wrote: >> People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am >> _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? >> >> tia, >> >> gary >> >> -- >> Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service >> Unix >> The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php >> An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking >> http://www.thought.org/#oL >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Try iperf? > > http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/benchmarks/iperf.html > > Used it to test speed on modem connection. > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > > Antonio > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Dont you need a Client when using IPERF?? If you want to see your current in/out in realtime try: netstat -I -w 1 To see my throughput I do: netstat -I wlan0 -w 1 Hope this helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 05:12:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43428106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212898FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oA25Crro082011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:12:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oA25CrVY082010; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA03009; Mon, 1 Nov 10 21:04:26 PST Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:03:58 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: dteske@vicor.com Message-Id: <4ccf9bbe.l08XJVISTgP78tSZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: guru@unixarea.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:12:55 -0000 Devin Teske wrote: > sysinstall probes hardware when it starts. Therefore, after making > changes (specifically after writing) to the disk in the FDISK > partition editor, you need to Ctrl-C and Abort-out and relaunch > sysinstall so that it probes the new disk devices (ad4s1, ad4s2, > etc.) before you can start adding BSD disklabels (ad4s1a, ad4s1b, > etc.) to the slice (aka partition). > > This has been an age-old problem (hmmm, perhaps get could some mad > karma for fixing it). At least in 8.1, there is a sysinstall operation somewhere to re-probe devices, presumably to cover exactly this sort of situation. Does it not work? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 06:04:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C13D106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFF28FC12 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.107.250] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PD9ya-0005un-LU; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:04:08 +0100 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA2649Ix001877; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:04:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oA2648oS001876; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:04:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:04:08 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20101102060408.GA1860@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101031200258.GA1302@tiny.Sisis.de> <1288627455.6744.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4ccf9bbe.l08XJVISTgP78tSZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4ccf9bbe.l08XJVISTgP78tSZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.107.250 Cc: dteske@vicor.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:04:22 -0000 El día Monday, November 01, 2010 a las 10:03:58PM -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com escribió: > Devin Teske wrote: > > > sysinstall probes hardware when it starts. Therefore, after making > > changes (specifically after writing) to the disk in the FDISK > > partition editor, you need to Ctrl-C and Abort-out and relaunch > > sysinstall so that it probes the new disk devices (ad4s1, ad4s2, > > etc.) before you can start adding BSD disklabels (ad4s1a, ad4s1b, > > etc.) to the slice (aka partition). > > > > This has been an age-old problem (hmmm, perhaps get could some mad > > karma for fixing it). > > At least in 8.1, there is a sysinstall operation somewhere to > re-probe devices, presumably to cover exactly this sort of > situation. Does it not work? My situation was in 9-CURRENT. matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 06:07:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551C1106567A; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265B78FC0C; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22so831813pvc.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:07:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4DQjO3+GdrmuZH1ZjYyGwPRtVgrM0/mmpJrFRtzpHF8=; b=C+r2AKgzFKi/sxy2TMPgfcSZ8A54+nhF6x7dTZwgEaZgd4sQ6DrTXzKmVAC9/HkhRn W0ZCa/ixKlRc9RIHRnK3a+s/XFt5J3BoyeM4ROo/1tgWuXNjUwYkAdf7cxyq8OwO+T7G KJCw8QwFNA/Hs36rprn+AJwnj21kSk9PxyMMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=O9a4JaPM1VRQ3YeVMt7NOL3KyhQzPULIezf5ppTE2f7HOxWQ/e8+JBkvP5ijSQw0Nb gtyoU5cL/ktdN3fZwQmGWutFlXlg7rAQFNkxbWA+VsP7+Idi487lA3rWptrtK/Bt5DpG 84PRoWhUy7QRWjdaUbzn9OuiKeb87DQ8u2n+4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.109.14 with SMTP id h14mr3739517wfc.260.1288678022820; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.164.12 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 02:07:02 -0400 Message-ID: From: grarpamp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, elhosots@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stephen@missouri.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ghostscript x11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:07:05 -0000 >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-October/222897.html >> Unknown device: x11 >> Unrecoverable error: undefined in .uninstallpagedevice >> Operand stack: defaultdevice > Wrote elhosots: > After my post, ive been unable to reproduce my own results. The > only thing that works for me under fbsd 8.1-stable is to use > ghostscript7 So are you installing (-f force overwrite?) ghostscript7 after gv installs 8? Hmm... given that with my package set on RELENG_8, in today's list of i386/packages-8-stable we have the following list of conflicts on 7 and pkgdeps on 8, I'm a bit confused as to how things work. Were I to install 7 first, it looks like gv/gsview are going to try installing 8 over top of it? And they will fail as 8 conflicts. Were I to install 7 last, it may break the apps that dep on the newer 8 due to binary, feature and clobbering issues. Yet curiously, gsview does display fine with 8 (no x11 error) yet I do not have 7 installed (the one claimed to work with gv without and x11 error, as in your case). My state is clean as I rm -rf /usr/local, which also contains the pkg database for that instance, before installing the local package set. /usr/local/pkg/ghostscript8-8.71_6/+CONTENTS:@conflicts ghostscript7-[0-9]* /usr/local/pkg/ghostscript8-8.71_6/+CONTENTS:@conflicts ghostscript7-*-[0-9]* /usr/local/pkg/epstool-3.08_3/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep ghostscript8-8.71_6 /usr/local/pkg/epstool-3.08_3/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:print/ghostscript8 /usr/local/pkg/gsfonts-8.11_5/+CONTENTS:@dirrm share/ghostscript/fonts /usr/local/pkg/gsfonts-8.11_5/+CONTENTS:@unexec rmdir %D/share/ghostscript 2>/dev/null || true /usr/local/pkg/gsview-4.9_3/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep ghostscript8-8.71_6 /usr/local/pkg/gsview-4.9_3/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:print/ghostscript8 /usr/local/pkg/gv-3.7.1/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep ghostscript8-8.71_6 /usr/local/pkg/gv-3.7.1/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:print/ghostscript8 /usr/local/pkg/pstotext-1.9_2/+CONTENTS:@pkgdep ghostscript8-8.71_6 /usr/local/pkg/pstotext-1.9_2/+CONTENTS:@comment DEPORIGIN:print/ghostscript8 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 08:50:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF14106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01ADD8FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so378759wwb.1 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 01:50:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JYLfnmZjIQJcFovCaf6XI1ZV62yaTbkHBBougUXf5U4=; b=WudyYC4bZMS4xXMyxsBGDY07vIzj+YgAeB+cAp1shvpRpah+Hs/1odWFwZFWE2SQW+ zKg0AQT6ei0n2eFWYV9ZTYISQEKKTRdFUBG9bu+uEz3+SkeJFQPi88kUdHQUMRCVCPGC 9QfjP43DHVydlsmi7BIP3vs6F3HBoX6KKVvTI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wxpCAFzgNQdrtZQ99c5R4KB47Ho7r5Aa0T2AXz9jlXHIMpszih8Kl7WqnFNlnZjYLO ngPLdt25WEiYTxzIp3hSM4qgo5inmTcecUErKkCF0rXrjGQhUMVJN3NNUMqulfVTN2Nz bEF/+IhbgEi2NE4A8rN4YvY+pXG4lKs3Dzkxg= Received: by 10.216.71.206 with SMTP id r56mr752596wed.29.1288687806626; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 01:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x28sm4520705weq.16.2010.11.02.01.50.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 01:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:50:03 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:50:08 -0000 On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:42:06 -0700 Gary Kline wrote: > People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am > _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? If your modem or router has some means of configuring it, typically via a browser, you can get usually get that information there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 09:08:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A5A106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843EA8FC16 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D1C10EE05 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:09:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYIFL-Vnh9sF for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:09:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AA610EDFF for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:09:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CCFD51E.4050701@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:08:46 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Fetching distfiles via cron does not download... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:08:51 -0000 Hello list. I have the following in /etc/crontab @reboot root portsnap -I cron update && /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron && pkg_version -vIL= The script /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron #!/bin/sh portmaster --clean-distfiles-all portmaster -aF Message received from cron: ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Checking for stale distfiles ]0;portmaster: All===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates ===>>> Distfile fetching is complete libxul-1.9.2.9_1 < needs updating (index has 1.9.2.12) pciids-20101005 < needs updating (index has 20101020) Even so I do not get the distfiles downloaded. Where am I going wrong? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 09:13:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605CB106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christopher.Illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp6.ki.se (smtp6.ki.se [130.237.98.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD068FC13 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from KIMSX09.user.ki.se (kimsx09.user.ki.se [130.229.20.26]) by smtp6.ki.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B756D4BE6 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:13:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from muck.ks.se (136.155.136.214) by KIMSX09.user.ki.se (130.229.20.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:12:37 +0100 Received: from chris (uid 1001) (envelope-from christopher.illies@ki.se) id 1d0dd by muck.ks.se (DragonFly Mail Agent) Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:12:33 +0100 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:12:33 +0100 From: Christopher Illies To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20101102091233.GA34092@muck.ks.se> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [Solved in a way] Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:13:08 -0000 On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Christopher Illies wrote: >> To send email from my computer at work I need to send through a >> smarthost. <...> After having had no success with sendmail and sasl, I switched to mail/dma and it worked right away. Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 10:53:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AB5106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lystic1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F6D8FC14 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5475621bwz.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:53:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=su6YaF/ZCux3KYJIptN6Kn77GF1YH/OXA2rto8RiHbQ=; b=LO2h0AF857dI4gPF5vhN8EBlg3WAaXPnnslGYQ+hjmOQY2QrXsHnrWvP101K9xGsjG +UE/mN8Mmle47OY2ab/uGWcrPhExVAmJpiqYhHNhMB/6TD2AdN6HxHXAEcC1mkQ5ExiI zO/9aAlGagTQD2e+oJ1ATMoDSaZH8R/vz5fTI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=H7W7nWNdGlvnuD297jaGQrNxDKu9/o2LRYrEwBW4obLj5hVLO+EGdUFivjAnqC7urT 1q0arre6q5xKHAYUVyCpMDxWn/vs5yAkn1InfZXMfmG5Nv2Bb5gkvlq7kP8/cl+fWA7U 9T8h5l5b57n6kZy8J44vc61AQBAp8X9ogPMBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.132 with SMTP id x4mr6227825bks.50.1288695190403; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.212 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 03:53:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CCFD51E.4050701@eskk.nu> References: <4CCFD51E.4050701@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:53:10 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lystic Emsen To: Leslie Jensen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fetching distfiles via cron does not download... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:53:12 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Hello list. > > I have the following in /etc/crontab > > @reboot root portsnap -I cron update && /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron && > pkg_version -vIL= > > > I don't see where you are doing a portsnap fetch first. If you haven't done a fetch, then the update will probably fail. If the update fails, because you are using && it won't execute the next part of your script. > > The script /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron > > #!/bin/sh > portmaster --clean-distfiles-all > portmaster -aF > > > > > Message received from cron: > > > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > ===>>> Checking for stale distfiles > ]0;portmaster: All ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available > updates > > ===>>> Distfile fetching is complete > libxul-1.9.2.9_1 < needs updating (index has 1.9.2.12) > pciids-20101005 < needs updating (index has 20101020) > > > Even so I do not get the distfiles downloaded. > > Where am I going wrong? > > Thanks > > > /Leslie > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- Lystic http://UnixNews.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:17:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B89A106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164888FC1F for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D558E60C8; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:15 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011021117.15697.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:17:18 -0000 On Tuesday 02 November 2010 03:42:06 Gary Kline wrote: > People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am > _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? You can normally find out what rate the modem has synced to your ISP at - that should tell you the theoretical maximum raw throughput. It's normally obtained via a web browser but some modems can also be configured to provide it over SNMP. By the way your subject lines could be improved - they don't tend to be very descriptive :) -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:17:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EF9106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058028FC0A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA775E1DE; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:54:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.343 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.257, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7PnwhsmBepvQ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:54:42 +0100 (CET) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from [172.17.0.138] (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E9C5E1A6; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:54:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CCFEE96.10700@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:57:26 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lystic Emsen References: <4CCFD51E.4050701@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fetching distfiles via cron does not download... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:17:58 -0000 Lystic Emsen skrev 2010-11-02 11:53: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> Hello list. >> >> I have the following in /etc/crontab >> >> @reboot root portsnap -I cron update&& /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron&& >> pkg_version -vIL= >> >> >> I don't see where you are doing a portsnap fetch first. If you haven't > done a fetch, then the update will probably fail. If the update fails, > because you are using&& it won't execute the next part of your script. According to the handbook this command is supposed to do that. portsnap -I cron update /Leslie > > > >> >> The script /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron >> >> #!/bin/sh >> portmaster --clean-distfiles-all >> portmaster -aF >> >> >> >> >> Message received from cron: >> >> >> ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports >> >> ===>>> Checking for stale distfiles >> ]0;portmaster: All ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available >> updates >> >> ===>>> Distfile fetching is complete >> libxul-1.9.2.9_1< needs updating (index has 1.9.2.12) >> pciids-20101005< needs updating (index has 20101020) >> >> >> Even so I do not get the distfiles downloaded. >> >> Where am I going wrong? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> /Leslie >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:34:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B01106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476AA8FC18 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so4212959gwa.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.52.18 with SMTP id z18mr604313ybz.189.1288697690412; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m12sm8743572ybn.12.2010.11.02.04.34.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D3F1E54856 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:34:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:34:40 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/QIOOGY/c43PrDRNRR+iiFOV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:34:51 -0000 --Sig_/QIOOGY/c43PrDRNRR+iiFOV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since "portsnap' has been failing on my system, I tried a different approach and decided to rebuild the port entirely rather than just download an updated snapshot. This is the result of just such a venture: portsnap fetch extract =20 Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. You will notice that all the mirrors appear broken. Now, I can reach the FreeBSD web site, and every other site I commonly visit without a problem; therefore, I believe the problem resides somewhere with the portsnap mirrors. Can anyone confirm or further thesis this thesis? --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do = we." George W. Bush August 5, 2004 Washington, D.C. --Sig_/QIOOGY/c43PrDRNRR+iiFOV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMz/dXAAoJEHdwsA8xwKhFNnwH/0PhNAKSBPl/hTF8Yq1UHV3l km74TUFWEFEAt2OgpJeBi6itdaykr4zglOD3J+hgmhaBv6OQmd+71nxBumCDdC98 /MsG8RnG/RcK670i4o8Ib/pic8pPQaj5xyyCHIsMZWAz40vfAY4THcW/ZXkO7FSC 4Y5+8CbURmU2GOmtqXJYS8ByatQGWzzVnRBo+pbgkOGUAQ+lA3RMMXUnpZBSmny4 cplpGmgfnunWpxkYEwCrSAWwTKo7WpwBmCW1elTBTAyg8V0Ykvr/VGqnw+iUS1L5 LJiIDs8hr5r08DMOD16oPSFwMZMZFc+DNTGcFueCxzFo8gc5pb9QSqUE44UpRVs= =o8cc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QIOOGY/c43PrDRNRR+iiFOV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:38:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891BD106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466A58FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbooklocal.local (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA2BcIRB034072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:38:22 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:38:18 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:38:28 -0000 On 02/11/2010 11:34, Jerry wrote: > Since "portsnap' has been failing on my system, I tried a different > approach and decided to rebuild the port entirely rather than just > download an updated snapshot. This is the result of just such a > venture: > > portsnap fetch extract > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > You will notice that all the mirrors appear broken. Now, I can reach the > FreeBSD web site, and every other site I commonly visit without a > problem; therefore, I believe the problem resides somewhere with the > portsnap mirrors. > > Can anyone confirm or further thesis this thesis? > Working from the UK [root@seaurchin ~]# portsnap fetch Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Updating from Tue Nov 2 02:25:26 GMT 2010 to Tue Nov 2 11:26:20 GMT 2010. Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 0 metadata files... done. Fetching 9 patches..... done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 3 new ports or files... done. Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:44:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F71106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FBB8FC18 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F4110EDFF; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:45:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UiYhtpbTqV36; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:44:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD26410E50A; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:44:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:44:03 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincent Hoffman References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:44:07 -0000 On 2010-11-02 12:38, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 02/11/2010 11:34, Jerry wrote: >> Since "portsnap' has been failing on my system, I tried a different >> approach and decided to rebuild the port entirely rather than just >> download an updated snapshot. This is the result of just such a >> venture: >> >> portsnap fetch extract >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> No mirrors remaining, giving up. >> >> You will notice that all the mirrors appear broken. Now, I can reach the >> FreeBSD web site, and every other site I commonly visit without a >> problem; therefore, I believe the problem resides somewhere with the >> portsnap mirrors. >> >> Can anyone confirm or further thesis this thesis? >> > Working from the UK > > [root@seaurchin ~]# portsnap fetch > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Tue Nov 2 02:25:26 GMT 2010 to Tue Nov 2 11:26:20 GMT 2010. > Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > Fetching 9 patches..... done. > Applying patches... done. > Fetching 3 new ports or files... done. > > Working from Sweden, maybe a little slow! As you can see it can't find any mirrors. portsnap fetch Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Updating from Tue Nov 2 09:57:27 CET 2010 to Tue Nov 2 12:26:20 CET 2010. Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 0 metadata files... done. Fetching 4 patches... done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 1 new ports or files... done. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:44:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CBF10656EA for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lystic1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757758FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5508991bwz.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:44:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6TiMrZTsDUZdWaxxwiAmFM/Z28Tl6dp+OJHK7EgnV+U=; b=xtt7iaGMkFvV3yXAke1wpwvC/sc1v9FUEoIoP3Q/9XrGQ7HAbyzYEcpNKtX9eNi7s0 PJkraiT9uRMke66Zbo8UEK9ZCCGsxOW5Tp/nhsESpni6KvmtJH3baChEpEiQEhFGlrDs BVCNAiW7D7Vt0OcJoWVdaImMPiJ1J+rurLYZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ia2tnOlTkOkvSLtrNmoWA9TyUM8lLgVDwbLZ5d6QIj4pptBxZ0E6B9854eIFqdHbzG MGq4bgIAFnxVY+zOxQvPD1hPwSCUQXUz5eTygUhDb/JeRqbI+PwdlwWGgJlpAWJGcoG/ Z+ZIdhnWZgEPfjM+WJU8aXicr7Oj9ZPbPmzQ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.209 with SMTP id i17mr13589671bkj.185.1288698249152; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.212 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 04:44:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CCFEE96.10700@eskk.nu> References: <4CCFD51E.4050701@eskk.nu> <4CCFEE96.10700@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:44:09 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lystic Emsen To: Leslie Jensen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fetching distfiles via cron does not download... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:44:12 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > Lystic Emsen skrev 2010-11-02 11:53: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: >> >> Hello list. >>> >>> I have the following in /etc/crontab >>> >>> @reboot root portsnap -I cron update&& /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron&& >>> pkg_version -vIL= >>> >>> >>> I don't see where you are doing a portsnap fetch first. If you haven't >>> >> done a fetch, then the update will probably fail. If the update fails, >> because you are using&& it won't execute the next part of your script. >> > > According to the handbook this command is supposed to do that. > > portsnap -I cron update > > Yeah, you are right, I missed that. However, the problem is that you didn't specify the full path to portsnap. That will cause it to fail and the && operator won't let it proceed. When using cron, you need to specify the full path because cron doesn't have access to all the environment variables your normal shell does. -- Lystic http://UnixNews.net > /Leslie > > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> The script /root/bin/cv_portsnap_cron >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> portmaster --clean-distfiles-all >>> portmaster -aF >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Message received from cron: >>> >>> >>> ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports >>> >>> ===>>> Checking for stale distfiles >>> ]0;portmaster: All ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for >>> available >>> updates >>> >>> ===>>> Distfile fetching is complete >>> libxul-1.9.2.9_1< needs updating (index has 1.9.2.12) >>> pciids-20101005< needs updating (index has 20101020) >>> >>> >>> Even so I do not get the distfiles downloaded. >>> >>> Where am I going wrong? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> /Leslie >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >> >> >> -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 11:51:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02901065672 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lystic1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4388FC15 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5513832bwz.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:51:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=srMHo0BSwgRuXxGueGUWGWwxDNyTdOIlw1BC0z0bThI=; b=GzrD5gFI9GDhKS3CFGogEX9QhzVMUbyiYVps1ZSLHn8TjF59YMJpRRpmEPWGxFm41S sAoqVbfhXTsIaVOpuyHqxmrYXKn0Odw7JxfpciH3Z9TxpV1v8UCJZqTvDlcl1Xuqs3vy jFyw64XGn0o0rQvsHPVK9s/ipUtYdLFf25+34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u4x0BUSOnzv506vWbhFzS64P0H0+JD3SXrindxoJBV8kQYtoJgbqMNcIYaQOvBeHnY RhDL/TWYehUp8LQtxRvO93wD/b46rMGP7VZN34r37KNhnsDWQyaR5k/MGcpt+ahOyogI mT2B+yt2PVFAfXIefpxlT8WIgvo2m2l9aM+kk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.83 with SMTP id g19mr6493733bkj.158.1288698690030; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.212 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 04:51:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 06:51:29 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lystic Emsen To: Leslie Jensen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Vincent Hoffman Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:51:31 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > On 2010-11-02 12:38, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > >> On 02/11/2010 11:34, Jerry wrote: >> >>> Since "portsnap' has been failing on my system, I tried a different >>> approach and decided to rebuild the port entirely rather than just >>> download an updated snapshot. This is the result of just such a >>> venture: >>> >>> portsnap fetch extract >>> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. >>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. >>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. >>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. >>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. >>> No mirrors remaining, giving up. >>> >>> You will notice that all the mirrors appear broken. Now, I can reach the >>> FreeBSD web site, and every other site I commonly visit without a >>> problem; therefore, I believe the problem resides somewhere with the >>> portsnap mirrors. >>> >>> Can anyone confirm or further thesis this thesis? >>> >>> Can you try editing your /etc/portsnap.conf ? SERVERNAME=eu.portsnap.FreeBSD.org That should make it look for servers closer to you first. -- Lystic http://UnixNews.net > Working from the UK >> >> [root@seaurchin ~]# portsnap fetch >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. >> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. >> Updating from Tue Nov 2 02:25:26 GMT 2010 to Tue Nov 2 11:26:20 GMT >> 2010. >> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. >> Applying metadata patches... done. >> Fetching 0 metadata files... done. >> Fetching 9 patches..... done. >> Applying patches... done. >> Fetching 3 new ports or files... done. >> >> >> > > Working from Sweden, maybe a little slow! > As you can see it can't find any mirrors. > > > portsnap fetch > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Tue Nov 2 09:57:27 CET 2010 to Tue Nov 2 12:26:20 CET 2010. > > Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > Fetching 4 patches... done. > Applying patches... done. > Fetching 1 new ports or files... done. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 12:21:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65971065670 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6749B8FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so4247507yxl.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.228.18 with SMTP id a18mr781089anh.242.1288700500457; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b22sm3995929anb.15.2010.11.02.05.21.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8F3BE54856 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:21:36 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:21:41 -0000 On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:44:03 +0100 Leslie Jensen articulated: > > > On 2010-11-02 12:38, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > > On 02/11/2010 11:34, Jerry wrote: > >> Since "portsnap' has been failing on my system, I tried a different > >> approach and decided to rebuild the port entirely rather than just > >> download an updated snapshot. This is the result of just such a > >> venture: > >> > >> portsnap fetch extract > >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> No mirrors remaining, giving up. > >> > >> You will notice that all the mirrors appear broken. Now, I can > >> reach the FreeBSD web site, and every other site I commonly visit > >> without a problem; therefore, I believe the problem resides > >> somewhere with the portsnap mirrors. > >> > >> Can anyone confirm or further thesis this thesis? > >> > > Working from the UK > > > > [root@seaurchin ~]# portsnap fetch > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. > > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > > Updating from Tue Nov 2 02:25:26 GMT 2010 to Tue Nov 2 11:26:20 > > GMT 2010. Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > > Applying metadata patches... done. > > Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > > Fetching 9 patches..... done. > > Applying patches... done. > > Fetching 3 new ports or files... done. > > Working from Sweden, maybe a little slow! > As you can see it can't find any mirrors. > > portsnap fetch > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Tue Nov 2 09:57:27 CET 2010 to Tue Nov 2 12:26:20 CET > 2010. Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > Fetching 4 patches... done. > Applying patches... done. > Fetching 1 new ports or files... done. I tried it eight times in quick succession and it finally worked. Obviously, there is something wrong somewhere. I don't know who to contact to get it looked at though. As you stated, it could not find any mirrors either. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ If 1 in 10 people suffer from diarrhea, does that mean the other 9 enjoy it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 12:32:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9B4106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B628FC15 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so4268544gxk.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.175.199 with SMTP id bb7mr7156726icb.207.1288701164463; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.71 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.181] In-Reply-To: <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:32:45 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 05:21, Jerry wrote: >> >> portsnap fetch extract >> >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. >> >> No mirrors remaining, giving up. What does this give: fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl openssl rsautl -pubin -inkey pub.ssl -verify < snapshot.ssl You should get something like: portsnap|1288656202|c4523276897a50ff0ca27add61344a4e96cc19a5f7e0bc8f8e17d138819e19a2 It seems like you are having a problem fetching the tag - can you ping the servers? are you behind a proxy? >> Working from Sweden, maybe a little slow! >> As you can see it can't find any mirrors. >> >> portsnap fetch >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. This is a separate issue due to bad DNS - the list of mirrors is obtained from: host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org and falls back to just portsnap.freebsd.org if it doesn't work. -- Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 13:37:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E549D1065670 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900DD8FC13 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gya6 with SMTP id 6so4355062gya.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.10.15 with SMTP id 15mr882868anj.23.1288705054458; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm4059959anq.10.2010.11.02.06.37.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DDE4E54856 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:37:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:37:07 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101102093707.60a2bd0c@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/xSLTuDtpt+9Gn2SKrPNu_1_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:37:36 -0000 --Sig_/xSLTuDtpt+9Gn2SKrPNu_1_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 Rob Farmer articulated: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 05:21, Jerry > wrote: > >> >> portsnap fetch extract > >> >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap4.FreeBSD.org... failed. > >> >> No mirrors remaining, giving up. >=20 > What does this give: >=20 > fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl > fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl > openssl rsautl -pubin -inkey pub.ssl -verify < snapshot.ssl >=20 > You should get something like: > portsnap|1288656202|c4523276897a50ff0ca27add61344a4e96cc19a5f7e0bc8f8e17d= 138819e19a2 >=20 > It seems like you are having a problem fetching the tag - can you ping > the servers? are you behind a proxy? >=20 > >> Working from Sweden, maybe a little slow! > >> As you can see it can't find any mirrors. > >> > >> portsnap fetch > >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. >=20 > This is a separate issue due to bad DNS - the list of mirrors is > obtained from: >=20 > host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org >=20 > and falls back to just portsnap.freebsd.org if it doesn't work. Results: $ fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl fetch: http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl: No address record $ fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl fetch: http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl: No address record $ host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Yes, I would say that something is broken somewhere, I just am not sure where. --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ I have a terrible headache, I was putting on toilet water and the lid fell. --Sig_/xSLTuDtpt+9Gn2SKrPNu_1_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM0BQaAAoJEHdwsA8xwKhFKzoH/iqHZJxPJ/cwKoM9mJxx0YN4 c/F8AcUAzA6y73Weyw8n/tQPcuI+ZJ+znC+jkW+uolvuLiuLS+95EHH49mcaJtNO f2r0eO1ZTNCa49CYPPe+thW21iz6HjeALK12XgBlTDWJftfCdIS4KI4LqK3V3Zmf 7phvHH8ATbE9LkV4l1uybpjglHDEZR4bbhvisy+DnkKwc4BGYkBzStiSkiqtyhkY yjxUxLWJ+p0ncoEUCWX2ODra1/MHtSnjb3Gmf8b5UrxsZUQ7SaCSFJ/+gbRAMQgv H7JG2CExqWnpcTmw2qhLtrmwt+LrUed0DeXMH0uwu9HD5h1kjPDyA6WAFdj40RI= =JAea -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xSLTuDtpt+9Gn2SKrPNu_1_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 13:46:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F530106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nekoexmachina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28668FC19 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so3463438ewy.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:46:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=f6IQHn06lrlROum7NuX2k5n/8fqSO5u8AXZut1oCPlo=; b=Z9wYjvHUHU+cD18/WV9VbdVEFLoOS5H9yEVYSImNCON22IKAok50oDLnHNd6Rx0rnE 4XOdWQ79EFlIzxZSD5I/fmf97RpwDj6OAuq4SikRjV+OPmivDO6/AfmyKOnIdkCbUEhK e8ufAcSO5xczdPIFr95ScW8lmKLjK6eNAcXTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=FESFO+lhMFhft5Oo57tkA97/ZrRvII34R1wCACvgJP8zuPe31G8APsdKqSwz4yzeKS NXIXw54QsbWjyZ0wB2f/3UcSKEX1BUamUbWJ0r8NX4pwojRbdvfm21mo+tMLjDYMWvef 0D8V9Z7QBVioOAJ5t/LnON8dsOd9P0S7HBEFU= Received: by 10.213.10.136 with SMTP id p8mr13847294ebp.40.1288705591110; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([188.134.12.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w20sm5422366eeh.12.2010.11.02.06.46.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:45:51 +0300 From: Mikle Krutov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101102134551.GA27199@takino.org> References: <20101102031717.GA1554@takino.homeftp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101102031717.GA1554@takino.homeftp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [solved] ZFS: can not import pool after export X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:46:33 -0000 On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 06:17:17AM +0300, Mikle Krutov wrote: > Hello, list! > With latest 8-STABLE I can not import pool after exporting: > sysctls for kern version: > kern.osrelease: 8.1-STABLE > kern.osrevision: 199506 > kern.osreldate: 801500 > > trying to import just-created pool: > [neko][1]%sudo zpool create test /dev/gpt/test > [neko][0]%sudo zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > test 472M 79.5K 472M 0% ONLINE - > [neko][0]%sudo zpool export test > [neko][0]%sudo zpool import test > cannot import 'test': pool is formatted using a newer ZFS version > [neko][1]% > > > WTF happens? How do i avoid that? The thing was, i forgot to installworld, e.g. module version and zfs-userland-tools version mismatch. -- Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup. With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 13:48:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C033C1065672 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4473D8FC1E for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbooklocal.local (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA2DmCnt039383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:48:13 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4CD0169C.5070207@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:12 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> <20101102093707.60a2bd0c@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101102093707.60a2bd0c@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:15 -0000 On 02/11/2010 13:37, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 > Rob Farmer articulated: > >> >> This is a separate issue due to bad DNS - the list of mirrors is >> obtained from: >> >> host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org >> >> and falls back to just portsnap.freebsd.org if it doesn't work. > Results: > > $ fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl > fetch: http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl: No address record > > $ fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl > fetch: http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl: No address record > > $ host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > Yes, I would say that something is broken somewhere, I just am not sure > where. > Sounds like DNS to me. what output do you get from dig +trace portsnap.freebsd.org Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 13:50:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B51F106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54A38FC19 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oA2DoTtJ034395; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:50:30 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:50:29 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20101102120030.B01F210656EF@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101102233129.R33417@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101102120030.B01F210656EF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1834733438-1288705829=:33417" Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall(8) && bsdlabel a new disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:50:33 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1834733438-1288705829=:33417 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 3, Message: 2 On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:04:08 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Monday, November 01, 2010 a las 10:03:58PM -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com escribió: > > > Devin Teske wrote: > > > > > sysinstall probes hardware when it starts. Therefore, after making > > > changes (specifically after writing) to the disk in the FDISK > > > partition editor, you need to Ctrl-C and Abort-out and relaunch > > > sysinstall so that it probes the new disk devices (ad4s1, ad4s2, > > > etc.) before you can start adding BSD disklabels (ad4s1a, ad4s1b, > > > etc.) to the slice (aka partition). > > > > > > This has been an age-old problem (hmmm, perhaps get could some mad > > > karma for fixing it). > > > > At least in 8.1, there is a sysinstall operation somewhere to > > re-probe devices, presumably to cover exactly this sort of > > situation. Does it not work? Options menu: Rescan Devices works to pick up devices like a USB disk or memstick that you may even have booted off but sysinstall then fails to find, as it does with some older kit and/or slow devices (here memsticks on USB1 ports). > My situation was in 9-CURRENT. When running sysinstall(8) as init from a CD/DVD/memstick boot, you can do mostly what you like to the disk/s in terms of slicing - fdisk and like boot0cfg under the hood - and partitioning of slices - bsdlabel under the hood, or rather sysinstall's version of those utilities; it still uses libdisk(3) rather than libgeom(3), at 8-STABLE anyway. When running sysinstall from a booted system (where you could exit after any committed steps and restart it, as mentioned above) you need to have previously set sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 (the 'foot-shooting' bit) if you want to be able to write to sector 0 (the boot sector including MBR) or to any non-boot slice - even unmounted - on the boot disk. Sysinstall doesn't let you know when you've failed to modify the disk, sadly, hence mysterious problems such as the above. It's fairly obvious when it fails to newfs some partitions you think you've nicely set up :) Same goes for sade(8). Neither manpage mentions kern.geom.debugflags, but boot0cfg(8) does, and points to the fuller description in geom(4). I haven't checked up on new work on sysinstall on -CURRENT for a while, but suspect that you'll still have to set that flag to write to any disk that's in use. Don't forget to set it back to 0 later! cheers, Ian --0-1834733438-1288705829=:33417-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 14:33:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723E4106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214838FC18 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so4359791gwa.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.156.2 with SMTP id i2mr13088093ybo.371.1288708421772; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x45sm6302747yhc.45.2010.11.02.07.33.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 653B6E54856 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:33:38 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101102103338.13e556ff@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4CD0169C.5070207@unsane.co.uk> References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> <20101102093707.60a2bd0c@scorpio> <4CD0169C.5070207@unsane.co.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:33:43 -0000 On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:12 +0000 Vincent Hoffman articulated: > On 02/11/2010 13:37, Jerry wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:32:44 -0700 > > Rob Farmer articulated: > > > >> > >> This is a separate issue due to bad DNS - the list of mirrors is > >> obtained from: > >> > >> host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org > >> > >> and falls back to just portsnap.freebsd.org if it doesn't work. > > Results: > > > > $ fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl > > fetch: http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/pub.ssl: No address record > > > > $ fetch http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl > > fetch: http://portsnap1.freebsd.org/snapshot.ssl: No address record > > > > $ host -t srv _http._tcp.portsnap.freebsd.org > > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > > > Yes, I would say that something is broken somewhere, I just am not > > sure where. > > > Sounds like DNS to me. > what output do you get from > dig +trace portsnap.freebsd.org $ dig +trace portsnap.freebsd.org ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> +trace portsnap.freebsd.org ;; global options: +cmd . 18158 IN NS h.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS a.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS d.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS k.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS g.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS i.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS f.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS e.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS j.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS b.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS c.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS l.root-servers.net. . 18158 IN NS m.root-servers.net. ;; Received 228 bytes from 209.18.47.62#53(209.18.47.62) in 10 ms ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 14:54:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE2C106566B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526CA8FC17 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbooklocal.local (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA2EsaHf042116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:54:36 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4CD0262C.6050309@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:54:36 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101102073440.5b7f6e74@scorpio> <4CCFF82A.8080905@unsane.co.uk> <4CCFF983.4020005@eskk.nu> <20101102082136.34dfd94d@scorpio> <20101102093707.60a2bd0c@scorpio> <4CD0169C.5070207@unsane.co.uk> <20101102103338.13e556ff@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101102103338.13e556ff@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Continuing problem with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:54:39 -0000 On 02/11/2010 14:33, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:12 +0000 > Vincent Hoffman articulated: > >> >> Sounds like DNS to me. >> what output do you get from >> dig +trace portsnap.freebsd.org > $ dig +trace portsnap.freebsd.org > > ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> +trace portsnap.freebsd.org > ;; global options: +cmd > . 18158 IN NS h.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS a.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS d.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS k.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS g.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS i.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS f.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS e.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS j.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS b.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS c.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS l.root-servers.net. > . 18158 IN NS m.root-servers.net. > ;; Received 228 bytes from 209.18.47.62#53(209.18.47.62) in 10 ms > > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > Hmm you should be seeing something like jhary@ostracod (13:48:49 <~>) 0 $ dig +trace portsnap.freebsd.org ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> +trace portsnap.freebsd.org ;; global options: +cmd . 424412 IN NS c.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS l.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS f.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS g.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS k.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS h.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS b.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS i.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS j.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS d.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS a.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS m.root-servers.net. . 424412 IN NS e.root-servers.net. ;; Received 332 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 1 ms org. 172800 IN NS d0.org.afilias-nst.org. org. 172800 IN NS c0.org.afilias-nst.info. org. 172800 IN NS b0.org.afilias-nst.org. org. 172800 IN NS a2.org.afilias-nst.info. org. 172800 IN NS b2.org.afilias-nst.org. org. 172800 IN NS a0.org.afilias-nst.info. ;; Received 440 bytes from 128.8.10.90#53(d.root-servers.net) in 125 ms freebsd.org. 86400 IN NS ns3.isc-sns.info. freebsd.org. 86400 IN NS ns2.isc-sns.com. freebsd.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.isc-sns.net. ;; Received 126 bytes from 2001:500:b::1#53(c0.org.afilias-nst.info) in 69 ms portsnap.freebsd.org. 3600 IN A 204.109.56.116 freebsd.org. 3600 IN NS ns1.isc-sns.net. freebsd.org. 3600 IN NS ns3.isc-sns.info. freebsd.org. 3600 IN NS ns2.isc-sns.com. ;; Received 246 bytes from 2001:5a0:10::1#53(ns3.isc-sns.info) in 47 ms It should recurse through the DNS hierarchy, starting at the servers for . then the servers for org then the servers for freebsd and finally give you a result. I guess this means either you or your ISP is filtering access on port 53 other than to their severs, or else your ISP has a connectivity issue. can you currently resolve any .org domains? (netbsd.org or openbsd.org or apache.org spring to mind) Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 16:35:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FA9106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575088FC18 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=PKzKJ9CDBTgXrBVWYPIA:9 a=ka7cM0VA33E3eUZt-LUA:7 a=VB9_QHybgJJIARY8m6V4bxpLWwQA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=THA9MvWw29MSY6Ir:21 a=GM03C8Bk4695QsK3:21 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:15105] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id CE/DB-24070-EAD30DC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:34:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:34:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:35:13 -0000 Hi, Would this be considered bruteforce?? This goes on and on: Nov 2 05:42:19 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:42:53 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:43:11 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:43:31 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:43:35 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:43:54 yeaguy last message repeated 2 times Nov 2 05:44:27 yeaguy last message repeated 2 times Nov 2 05:44:47 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:44:53 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:45:27 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:45:44 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:46:05 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:46:12 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:46:47 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:47:03 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:47:24 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:47:31 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:48:06 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:48:24 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:48:45 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:48:50 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:49:25 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:49:42 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:50:01 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:50:08 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:50:40 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:50:58 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:51:20 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] Too many authentication failures Nov 2 05:51:25 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] Nov 2 05:51:59 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times Nov 2 05:52:16 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] My sshgaurd config: # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/pf/pf.conf,v 1.1.4.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $ # $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.34 2007/02/24 19:30:59 millert Exp $ # # See pf.conf(5) and /usr/share/examples/pf for syntax and examples. # Remember to set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 and/or net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 # in /etc/sysctl.conf if packets are to be forwarded between interfaces. ext_if="wlan0" #int_if="int0" #table persist table persist #set skip on lo #scrub in #nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" #rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" #nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0) #rdr pass on $int_if proto tcp to port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021 #no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port smtp #rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ # -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd #anchor "ftp-proxy/*" #block in block in log quick on $ext_if from label "bruteforce" #pass out #pass quick on $int_if no state #antispoof quick for { lo $int_if } #pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port ssh #pass in log on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port smtp #pass out log on $ext_if proto tcp from ($ext_if) to port smtp LOGS: yeaguy# nslookup a214.amber.fastwebserver.de Server: 10.1.1.1 Address: 10.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: a214.amber.fastwebserver.de Address: 217.79.189.214 yeaguy# tcpdump -n -e -ttt -r /var/log/pflog | grep 217.79.189.214 reading from file /var/log/pflog, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file) yeaguy# Thanks, Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 16:56:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7869310657C0 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B48D8FC28 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so8676384iwn.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:56:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.13.201 with SMTP id d9mr7935370iba.152.1288716993437; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.71 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:56:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.181] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:56:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:56:34 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 09:34, Justin V. wrote: > Hi, > > Would this be considered bruteforce?? Yes > > This goes on and on: > > > Nov =A02 05:42:19 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARN= ING] > Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov =A02 05:42:53 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times [...] > > My sshgaurd config: Something isn't set up right if you are getting that many attempts - it should kill them right away: Nov 1 10:47:51 peridot sshd[77847]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Nov 1 10:47:53 peridot sshd[77967]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Nov 1 10:47:54 peridot sshd[78123]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Nov 1 10:47:56 peridot sshd[78228]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Nov 1 10:47:56 peridot sshguard[49177]: Blocking 178.238.137.213:4 for >420secs: 4 failures over 5 seconds. Do you have the syslog.conf part set up as well as the pf part? I've only used it for ssh but something like the following needs to be there: auth.info;authpriv.info |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshgu= ard > yeaguy# =A0nslookup =A0a214.amber.fastwebserver.de > Server: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 10.1.1.1 > Address: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A010.1.1.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: =A0 a214.amber.fastwebserver.de > Address: 217.79.189.214 > I wouldn't waste your time trying to find out who they are - just block and move on. That site is probably a shared web hosting account that was compromised by a bad php script - even if you successfully complain (assuming it is a legit hoster that cares) and they do something about it, there are thousands more. --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 17:03:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7BD106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48E38FC0A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:03:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=fQfmUbWOAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=LfvH3UrpAAAA:8 a=8hatjc3sSTX5aTJG9akA:9 a=H5Povo_pettYwQzelf8A:7 a=07ShRVfgJGRZuI79r-WZcyNQ0KEA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9dkskfOryOwA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=r1Rw5q6XLFEA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=oWjAShNCytsmTrYx:21 a=UCdzXoRO-VnWARcm:21 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:36237] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id B7/4D-26142-15440DC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:03:13 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-1366268797-1288717392=:18489" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:03:15 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-1366268797-1288717392=:18489 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 09:34, Justin V. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Would this be considered bruteforce?? > > Yes > >> >> This goes on and on: >> >> >> Nov  2 05:42:19 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [WARNING] >> Authentication failed for user [Administrator] >> Nov  2 05:42:53 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > [...] >> >> My sshgaurd config: > > Something isn't set up right if you are getting that many attempts - > it should kill them right away: > > Nov 1 10:47:51 peridot sshd[77847]: reverse mapping checking > getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - > POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Nov 1 10:47:53 peridot sshd[77967]: reverse mapping checking > getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - > POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Nov 1 10:47:54 peridot sshd[78123]: reverse mapping checking > getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - > POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Nov 1 10:47:56 peridot sshd[78228]: reverse mapping checking > getaddrinfo for 178-238-137-213.hostnoc.eu [178.238.137.213] failed - > POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Nov 1 10:47:56 peridot sshguard[49177]: Blocking 178.238.137.213:4 > for >420secs: 4 failures over 5 seconds. > > Do you have the syslog.conf part set up as well as the pf part? I've > only used it for ssh but something like the following needs to be > there: > > auth.info;authpriv.info |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard > >> yeaguy#  nslookup  a214.amber.fastwebserver.de >> Server:         10.1.1.1 >> Address:        10.1.1.1#53 >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:   a214.amber.fastwebserver.de >> Address: 217.79.189.214 >> > > I wouldn't waste your time trying to find out who they are - just > block and move on. That site is probably a shared web hosting account > that was compromised by a bad php script - even if you successfully > complain (assuming it is a legit hoster that cares) and they do > something about it, there are thousands more. > > -- > Rob Farmer > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > This is the guide I used: http://www.sshguard.net/docs/setup/firewall/pf/ I followed this section to block all brute attempts: Add this line in the packet filtering (rules) section: block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port 22 label "ssh bruteforce" Replace $ext_if with your WAN interface name if needed. Omit the proto tcp and the to any port 22 segment if you want to block all the traffic from attackers (not just ssh). I really like this port, just keeps the logs from filling up.. Im not going to email their abuse desk just wishing that sshguard would do what I expected it to do via the how to.. :( --623271173-1366268797-1288717392=:18489-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 17:28:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B331065672 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:28:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591E58FC13 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so6634gwj.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.228.70 with SMTP id jd6mr9314218icb.301.1288718891265; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.71 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.181] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:28:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:28:12 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:03, Justin V. wrote: > This is the guide I used: > > http://www.sshguard.net/docs/setup/firewall/pf/ > > I followed this section to block all brute attempts: Right, but did you do this part too? http://www.sshguard.net/docs/setup/getlogs/syslog/ The part you mentioned sets up the table and has pf drop the connection attempts, but you need to configure syslog to fill the table with IPs of attackers. -- Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 17:40:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13CF1065679 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D99E8FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:40:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=LfvH3UrpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=fQfmUbWOAAAA:8 a=WhnKQcDePHNVVxfp_TcA:9 a=9o5_6D04fEvOpVLTemEA:7 a=S3N12pOWH7c_WkOOJogkAH3NFCAA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=BtQAhrSs5kQA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=r1Rw5q6XLFEA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:51662] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id C0/04-24070-3FC40DC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:40:08 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:40:10 -0000 On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:03, Justin V. wrote: >> This is the guide I used: >> >> http://www.sshguard.net/docs/setup/firewall/pf/ >> >> I followed this section to block all brute attempts: > > Right, but did you do this part too? > > http://www.sshguard.net/docs/setup/getlogs/syslog/ > > The part you mentioned sets up the table and has pf drop the > connection attempts, but you need to configure syslog to fill the > table with IPs of attackers. > > -- > Rob Farmer > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Actually this was installed after the port completed: yeaguy# grep sshg /etc/syslog.conf auth.info;authpriv.info |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard But it is not exactly what the HOWTO ways, the HOWTO does not mention the "exec" part. Put this line high into this file: auth.info;authpriv.info |/usr/local/sbin/sshguard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 18:05:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D97B106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF128FC24 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi8 with SMTP id 8so1712584pwi.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:05:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.43.5 with SMTP id q5mr6418486wfq.401.1288721144983; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.71 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.181] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:05:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:05:46 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:40, Justin V. wrote: > Actually this was installed after the port completed: > > > yeaguy# grep sshg /etc/syslog.conf > auth.info;authpriv.info =A0 =A0 |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard > > But it is not exactly what the HOWTO ways, the HOWTO does not mention the > "exec" part. Could be that the docs are written for Linux or another version of syslog. The port and the man page say include the exec, so I would go with that. > > Put this line high into this file: > > auth.info;authpriv.info =A0 =A0|/usr/local/sbin/sshguard Ok - if that isn't working, then check to see if your ftp server is logging to syslog under auth or authpriv. If not you'll need to change the setup to get the logs from the right place. --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 18:25:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32408106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06378FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:25:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=fQfmUbWOAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=TUwG_g2B8ACdXgIqAHEA:9 a=7fn6RSeTsJWC5qzoTCwA:7 a=RLmRVtKbxJNkgZMML84FdmqwDNAA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9dkskfOryOwA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=r1Rw5q6XLFEA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:26517] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 29/3D-24070-18750DC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:25:06 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:25:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-1257277227-1288722304=:20165" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:25:07 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-1257277227-1288722304=:20165 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:40, Justin V. wrote: >> Actually this was installed after the port completed: >> >> >> yeaguy# grep sshg /etc/syslog.conf >> auth.info;authpriv.info     |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard >> >> But it is not exactly what the HOWTO ways, the HOWTO does not mention the >> "exec" part. > > Could be that the docs are written for Linux or another version of > syslog. The port and the man page say include the exec, so I would go > with that. > >> >> Put this line high into this file: >> >> auth.info;authpriv.info    |/usr/local/sbin/sshguard > > Ok - if that isn't working, then check to see if your ftp server is > logging to syslog under auth or authpriv. If not you'll need to change > the setup to get the logs from the right place. > > -- > Rob Farmer > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I do not see ftp going to auth: yeaguy# grep -i pure /var/log/auth.log yeaguy# grep -i ftp /var/log/auth.log Oct 30 07:36:49 yeaguy sshd[74718]: subsystem request for sftp Oct 30 08:37:25 yeaguy sshd[74942]: subsystem request for sftp Oct 30 08:51:20 yeaguy sshd[74984]: subsystem request for sftp Oct 30 12:49:04 yeaguy sshd[2301]: subsystem request for sftp Oct 30 12:49:56 yeaguy sshd[2308]: subsystem request for sftp Nov 2 08:44:42 yeaguy sshd[17190]: subsystem request for sftp Nov 2 08:46:14 yeaguy sshd[17241]: subsystem request for sftp yeaguy# But I dont have pure-ftp looking at pam so that makes sense right? Probably wouldnt show up there then? I am doing virtual user for pure-ftp. Here is the passwd db for pure: yeaguy# grep pure /etc/inetd.conf ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/pure-ftpd pure-ftpd -l puredb:/usr/local/etc/pureftpd.pdb yeaguy# so i need to pipe the pure db to auth? thanks, justin --623271173-1257277227-1288722304=:20165-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 18:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AE2106564A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339AC8FC1A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:42:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=fQfmUbWOAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=CdDfgVYrAAAA:8 a=rvguk7sjhAumHDfDOiIA:9 a=deZfAp6Xd-2fZii3hhMA:7 a=hL-p0PXU_uH_svMNxoy0ZSwzOXQA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=BtQAhrSs5kQA:10 a=m5bX9KGS68cA:10 a=9dkskfOryOwA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=r1Rw5q6XLFEA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=xsNwqeuY9ZUA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:39096] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 5A/98-26142-18B50DC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:42:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:42:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-1277716228-1288723328=:20336" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:42:11 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-1277716228-1288723328=:20336 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:40, Justin V. wrote: >> Actually this was installed after the port completed: >> >> >> yeaguy# grep sshg /etc/syslog.conf >> auth.info;authpriv.info     |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard >> >> But it is not exactly what the HOWTO ways, the HOWTO does not mention the >> "exec" part. > > Could be that the docs are written for Linux or another version of > syslog. The port and the man page say include the exec, so I would go > with that. > >> >> Put this line high into this file: >> >> auth.info;authpriv.info    |/usr/local/sbin/sshguard > > Ok - if that isn't working, then check to see if your ftp server is > logging to syslog under auth or authpriv. If not you'll need to change > the setup to get the logs from the right place. > > -- > Rob Farmer > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > So i added this: auth.info;authpriv.info;ftp.info /var/log/auth.log This is existing: ftp.info /var/log/xferlog I see my failed attempts going to auth.log and sshguard is still not blocking or logging.. I restarted both syslog and sshguard.. I feel like we are almost there thanks, jv --623271173-1277716228-1288723328=:20336-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 18:49:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A991065672 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA078FC15 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so8778176iwn.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.197 with SMTP id y5mr3830760ibd.151.1288723739479; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.71 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.181] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:48:59 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:49:00 -0000 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:42, Justin V. wrote: > So i added this: > > auth.info;authpriv.info;ftp.info =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0/var/log/= auth.log > > > This is existing: > > ftp.info =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0/var/log/xferlog > > > > > I see my failed attempts going to auth.log and sshguard is still not > blocking or logging.. > > I restarted both syslog and sshguard.. I feel like we are almost there > > > thanks, > > jv Great - then try: ftp.info |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard in your /etc/syslog.conf (don't forget to restart syslog) and it should be working - I'm not sure what the threshold for sshguard to block someone is, but you could test it - just make sure you have a way to get back in if it works and your IP is blocked (or wait for the next script kiddie). --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 18:54:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0F41065674 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E895A8FC2C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:54:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=R-xHR5bUbbIA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=CdDfgVYrAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=4IGu5jqUgKzH7nPO2ysA:9 a=_52KSjGlu_0beYDuzfoA:7 a=cjGhLhVQSG19E9u6SjAnDQrV2kUA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9dkskfOryOwA:10 a=dqjIezjyrbIA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=r1Rw5q6XLFEA:10 a=xsNwqeuY9ZUA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:52337] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 45/A6-24070-F6E50DC4; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:54:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:54:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-696175327-1288724078=:20636" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:54:41 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-696175327-1288724078=:20636 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:42, Justin V. wrote: >> So i added this: >> >> auth.info;authpriv.info;ftp.info                /var/log/auth.log >> >> >> This is existing: >> >> ftp.info                                        /var/log/xferlog >> >> >> >> >> I see my failed attempts going to auth.log and sshguard is still not >> blocking or logging.. >> >> I restarted both syslog and sshguard.. I feel like we are almost there >> >> >> thanks, >> >> jv > > Great - then try: > > ftp.info |exec /usr/local/sbin/sshguard > > in your /etc/syslog.conf (don't forget to restart syslog) and it > should be working - I'm not sure what the threshold for sshguard to > block someone is, but you could test it - just make sure you have a > way to get back in if it works and your IP is blocked (or wait for the > next script kiddie). > > -- > Rob Farmer > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Your the man.. Worked like a charm. Thanks for all your help! jv --623271173-696175327-1288724078=:20636-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 21:37:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F211065674 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7A38FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4AFE7209; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:37:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:37:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:37:18 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011022137.18690.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: Rob Farmer , "Justin V." Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:37:21 -0000 On Tuesday 02 November 2010 16:56:33 Rob Farmer wrote: > I wouldn't waste your time trying to find out who they are - just > block and move on. That site is probably a shared web hosting account > that was compromised by a bad php script - even if you successfully > complain (assuming it is a legit hoster that cares) and they do > something about it, there are thousands more. Yes but it's one less. Most recently I emailed a VPS provider and got the owner's account suspended after they ran an ssh attack on my server. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 22:12:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CB21065695 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D199E8FC14 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp35.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 36FEA2C81EE; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:12:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp35.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id CE0E82C8172; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:12:48 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:12:47 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: John Levine , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster Thread-Index: Act62xR3qrf3mTlBbUWIcoZxGme38Q== In-Reply-To: <20101102011455.36126.qmail@joyce.lan> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: lystic1@gmail.com Subject: Re: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:12:50 -0000 On 11/1/10 9:14 PM, "John Levine" wrote: > >> portupgrade. However, I just unregistered php5-spl, because its no longer >> necessary. I believe php5-spl and php5-pcre are now integrated into PHP-5.3 >> by default. > > Yes and no. pcre depends on the separate pcre package, and php will fail > in baffling ways is your pcre is too old. > > The maintainer of the php port is aware of this but has declined both > to make a one-line change to the Makefile to use the bundled pcre > package, or an alternate one-line change to document the version > dependency. gosh! is there a test i can run to see if my pcre is going to fail in any baffling ways? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 22:15:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA04E106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825AE8FC14 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp35.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F01EE1000B; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:15:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp35.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 74B522C8371; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:15:30 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:15:28 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: Lystic Emsen Message-ID: Thread-Topic: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster Thread-Index: Act623Ru2TsDZn32Rk+q/143F9xRLQ== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:15:31 -0000 hi lystic, finally i remembered to look in /usr/ports/UPDATING which says: 20100409: AFFECTS: users of lang/php5 AUTHOR: ale@FreeBSD.org As of PHP 5.3, a few extensions were removed from or included into the core PHP5 package. Follow the steps below to update your installation. 1) Delete the following packages (if installed): - php5-dbase - php5-ncurses - php5-pcre - php5-spl - php5-ming - php5-mhash 2) Rebuild lang/php5 and all ports that depend on it. On 11/1/10 8:16 PM, "Lystic Emsen" wrote: > I just upgrade my php5 port to php5.3 and ran into a similar problem with > portupgrade. However, I just unregistered php5-spl, because its no longer > necessary. I believe php5-spl and php5-pcre are now integrated into PHP-5.3 > by default. > > I also ran into a couple of other problems. These notes may be of some help > later. > > http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/error-with-apr-parameter-is-incorrect.html > http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/pcre-error-with-php5-filter-and-php5.html > > -Lystic > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Tom Worster wrote: > >> portmaster is looping on devel/php5-spl. it seems as though php5-spl >> depends >> on itself. the excerpt below shows two cycles of the recursion. the list >> ">> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >>" gets one longer on each >> interation. >> >> any ideas how to fix this? >> >> thanks >> tom >> >> >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl >> >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/php5-spl from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/autoconf268 >> ===>>> Checking dependency: lang/php5 >> >> ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 >> seems to be handled by php5-pcre-5.2.11_1 >> >> >> ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 >> seems to be handled by php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> ===>>> Launching child to update php5-spl-5.2.11_1 to php5-spl-5.3.3_2 >> pear-1.9.0 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl >> >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/php5-spl from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/autoconf268 >> ===>>> Checking dependency: lang/php5 >> >> ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 >> seems to be handled by php5-pcre-5.2.11_1 >> >> >> ===>>> The dependency for lang/php5 >> seems to be handled by php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> ===>>> Launching child to update php5-spl-5.2.11_1 to php5-spl-5.3.3_2 >> pear-1.9.0 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> php5-spl-5.2.11_1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 22:29:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397941065673 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05818FC0C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A105E1D4; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:27:13 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.346 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.254, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZkbilNJIpq-6; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:27:10 +0100 (CET) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from [172.17.0.138] (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435245E1AA; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:27:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD090E6.1020300@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:29:58 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lystic Emsen References: <4CCFD51E.4050701@eskk.nu> <4CCFEE96.10700@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fetching distfiles via cron does not download... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:29:55 -0000 Lystic Emsen skrev 2010-11-02 12:44: >> >> According to the handbook this command is supposed to do that. >> >> portsnap -I cron update >> >> > Yeah, you are right, I missed that. However, the problem is that you didn't > specify the full path to portsnap. That will cause it to fail and the&& > operator won't let it proceed. When using cron, you need to specify the > full path because cron doesn't have access to all the environment variables > your normal shell does. > > -- Lystic > > http://UnixNews.net > > If what you say is correct then I shouldn't get the result of pkg_version -vIL telling me that there are ports that need an upgrade, should I? /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 23:40:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E87106566C for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bartosz.stec@it4pro.pl) Received: from mainframe.kkip.pl (kkip.pl [87.105.164.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929E98FC14 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static-78-8-144-74.ssp.dialog.net.pl ([78.8.144.74] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mainframe.kkip.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PDPuE-000DuV-Ok; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:04:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD09908.6080508@it4pro.pl> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:04:40 +0100 From: Bartosz Stec Organization: IT4Pro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100702 Lanikai/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: peo@intersonic.se Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: bartosz.stec@it4pro.pl X-Authenticator: plain X-Sender-Verify: SUCCEEDED (sender exists & accepts mail) X-Spam-Score: -8.1 X-Spam-Score-Int: -80 X-Exim-Version: 4.72 (build at 10-Jun-2010 13:05:33) X-Date: 2010-11-03 00:04:50 X-Connected-IP: 78.8.144.74:54901 X-Message-Linecount: 45 X-Body-Linecount: 33 X-Message-Size: 1717 X-Body-Size: 1243 X-Received-Count: 1 X-Recipient-Count: 2 X-Local-Recipient-Count: 2 X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0 X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: re: mount_smbfs problem after upgrade Samba 3.4 -> 3.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:40:18 -0000 > Hi, Hello! > I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to > the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a > remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs: > > mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo at mars /inter /home/mnt > Password: > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error > > Samba server log says: > mbd/sesssetup.c:1703(reply_sesssetup_and_X) > reply_sesssetup_and_X: Attempted encrypted session setup without > negprot denied! > > > smbclient works fine and so does connecting to the shares from Windows > and Konqerour like "smb://192.168.1.8/". > > Anybody on the list with enough knowledge of Samba that could take a > shot at this? Apparently something changed between version 3.4 and 3.5 > of Samba. My knowledge about Samba is limited at best, but it seems that I found possible couse and working override (solution?). Check this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151887 If this fixes your problem too, please submit followup - more information port maintainer gets, less time he's gonna need to fix this. -- Bartosz Stec From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 23:41:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7371065741 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0915322010=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046078FC0A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44059 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 23:41:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=ac1a.4cd0a1be.k1011; i=johnl@submit.iecc.com; bh=z/V617ntewfSBq7KhuMxE1crQhMruCGlLFDUkodgxLU=; b=McHydmndollPASs8JS2DyNlzcdkMXdpnHpzgCL7NNjY4hU2vIcJapazf42GGGTeDTZ9QCXnFSgzKjn7+LZ60gAeVhDtHqpThBOhXS3a4OApBFnP14MluoBolO5KXTROKFqG3DwhgptXIKdZA3VFO1jUJGswEFIeT7+D5YV5Ob8E= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Received: (ofmipd johnl@64.57.183.62) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 23:41:28 -0000 Date: 2 Nov 2010 19:41:49 -0400 Message-ID: From: "John R. Levine" To: "Tom Worster" In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Cleverness: None detected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: lystic1@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems installing php (php5-spl) with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:41:52 -0000 > is there a test i can run to see if my pcre is going to fail in any baffling > ways? Just do a portupgrade on it to the current version, and it'll be find. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 00:25:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC237106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor.radnai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DA48FC15 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so41955fxm.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:25:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=vHaHZmCbJ/6TA8l74FEu5J8HIHpHbpYC7LXi5Zf+xkw=; b=j/VemjpdcerMU+5ifrmY6BPQW3KYGUdM2Evn2tlcz+bIajhnhYnKOsrOvkN8GDZ8yK MlNeH9YxykdobNIFltfRLMonHUVJnI0hJC1RF5WtRAi4jT8/B3nllatsCpfpp0rLhPaa VcFPngC+UReA2uQkgc6Z3JwwtHBstG4ztqoDk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=XXsx232kDI5+luL49mWWzigCSucN4xLmcNSvuq8mLl05/8gU0TeVX+/hSvkeu8fF8Z ilodGapvxjk06ZIe04ePhk0F41wvJ8KoABpYp9eCwvItR0Xaxuxrk4IDy0doIUL69uV1 cbqTzOJS1OfOTLCfv79BVCIBIEohgaAUKvqx0= Received: by 10.223.79.6 with SMTP id n6mr11195426fak.103.1288742348844; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:59:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.86.139 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:58:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Gabor Radnai Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:58:53 +0100 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re0 driver or hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:25:51 -0000 Hi, I have an Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard with integrated Nvidia MCP51 Gigabit Ethernet NIC and TP-Link TG-3468 PCIe network card which is basically using Realtek chip. I have several problems: 1. There is a boot time menu for tp-link card which says it is a 8111b/8111c but re driver supports RTL8139C+, RTL8169, RTL8169S, RTL8110S, RTL8168S, RTL8111S and RTL8101E. Is it correct using the re driver? 2. The Nvidia network interface is working properly but the other though it seems recognized by OS I cannot use. Sporadically it remains down and if it gets up then does not get ip address via DHCP nor help if I set static ip address. Can manipulate via ifconfig but unreachable via IP. I replaced cable, interchanged cable working with Nvidia, restarted switch/router but no luck so far. And advise please? Thanks, Gabor ------------------------ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0 r210200M: Wed Jul 21 14:21:18 CEST 2010 root@neo.vx.sk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC pciconf: nfe0@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x068000 card=0x816a1043 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' class = bridge re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x816810ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'Gigabit Ethernet NIC(NDIS 6.0) (RTL8168/8111/8111c)' class = network subclass = ethernet rc.conf: ifconfig_nfe0="inet 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" hostname="xxx" ifconfig_re0="DHCP" dmesg: nfe0: port 0xc800-0xc807 mem 0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff irq 21 at device 20.0 on pci0 miibus1: on nfe0 e1000phy0: PHY 19 on miibus1 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:1a:92:38:dc:95 nfe0: [FILTER] re0: port 0xac00-0xacff mem 0xfdbff000-0xfdbfffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 re0: Using 1 MSI messages re0: Chip rev. 0x38000000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: d8:5d:4c:80:b4:88 re0: [FILTER] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 01:17:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57842106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7BD8FC18 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 85D61E8040C; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:17:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: RW Message-ID: <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 01:17:02 -0000 On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:50:03AM +0000, RW wrote: > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:42:06 -0700 > Gary Kline wrote: > > > People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am > > _supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL? > > If your modem or router has some means of configuring it, typically via > a browser, you can get usually get that information there. The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It occured that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is data that is flowing in via the background that stalls things. (I have just shut off the automated flow.) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 01:44:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A193106566B for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E2E8FC14 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E30E7209; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:44:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-81-107-141-216.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [81.107.141.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:44:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:44:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: RW , Gary Kline Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 01:44:40 -0000 On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It > occured that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is > data that is flowing in via the background that stalls things. > (I have just shut off the automated flow.) You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by the computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 05:49:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA031065670 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741C48FC0C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A2952E8094D; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Bruce Cran Message-ID: <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:49:59 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > > The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > > googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It > > occured that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is > > data that is flowing in via the background that stalls things. > > (I have just shut off the automated flow.) > > You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by the > computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. Yes... outstanding. Is there any sort of GUI app tat has this in a geaph or histogram? :-) gary > > -- > Bruce Cran > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 05:55:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7F9106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AD78FC0A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA35tSF0095942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:55:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA35tSCp002005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:55:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA35tSaP002004; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:55:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:55:28 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:55:29 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: Bruce Cran , RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:55:31 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > > > The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > > > googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It occured > > > that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is data that is > > > flowing in via the background that stalls things. (I have just shut > > > off the automated flow.) > > > > You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by the > > computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. > > Yes... outstanding. Is there any sort of GUI app tat has this in a geaph > or histogram? Not a gui app, but I use "netstat -I em0 1" a lot to watch my network activity. Replace em0 with your nic device. Gkrellm is a gui app that gives you little network histograms for each interface, but they're little :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 06:33:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B6A106566C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506F78FC14 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:33:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD10224.1040003@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:33:08 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:33:20 -0000 On 11/03/2010 06=3A55 AM=2C Dan Nelson wrote=3A =3E In the last episode =28Nov 02=29=2C Gary Kline said=3A =3E=3E On Wed=2C Nov 03=2C 2010 at 01=3A44=3A37AM +0000=2C Bruce Cran wrote= =3A =3E=3E=3E On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01=3A17=3A00 Gary Kline wrote=3A =3E=3E=3E=3E =09The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M=2E Up is 864Kbps=2E I s= pent hours =3E=3E=3E=3E =09googling around and trying things=2E So far=2C not much=2E= ---It occured =3E=3E=3E=3E =09that I =5Fmight=5F be geting the full thru-put=3B that it i= s data that is =3E=3E=3E=3E =09flowing in via the background that stalls things=2E =28I h= ave just shut =3E=3E=3E=3E =09off the automated flow=2E=29 =3E=3E=3E You can run =22systat -if=22 to see how much bandwidth is being u= sed by the =3E=3E=3E computer=2E At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink=2E =3E=3E Yes=2E=2E=2E outstanding=2E Is there any sort of GUI app tat has th= is in a geaph =3E=3E or histogram=3F =3E Not a gui app=2C but I use =22netstat -I em0 1=22 a lot to watch my net= work =3E activity=2E Replace em0 with your nic device=2E Gkrellm is a gui app= that =3E gives you little network histograms for each interface=2C but they=27re= little =3A=29 =3E You could setup mrtg and snmp to graph the network bandwidth usage and integrate it in your website DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 06:36:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D80106566C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702828FC1F for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:36:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD102FA.1080604@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:36:42 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:36:53 -0000 On 11/03/2010 06=3A55 AM=2C Dan Nelson wrote=3A =3E In the last episode =28Nov 02=29=2C Gary Kline said=3A =3E=3E On Wed=2C Nov 03=2C 2010 at 01=3A44=3A37AM +0000=2C Bruce Cran wrote= =3A =3E=3E=3E On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01=3A17=3A00 Gary Kline wrote=3A =3E=3E=3E=3E =09The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M=2E Up is 864Kbps=2E I s= pent hours =3E=3E=3E=3E =09googling around and trying things=2E So far=2C not much=2E= ---It occured =3E=3E=3E=3E =09that I =5Fmight=5F be geting the full thru-put=3B that it i= s data that is =3E=3E=3E=3E =09flowing in via the background that stalls things=2E =28I h= ave just shut =3E=3E=3E=3E =09off the automated flow=2E=29 =3E=3E=3E You can run =22systat -if=22 to see how much bandwidth is being u= sed by the =3E=3E=3E computer=2E At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink=2E =3E=3E Yes=2E=2E=2E outstanding=2E Is there any sort of GUI app tat has th= is in a geaph =3E=3E or histogram=3F =3E Not a gui app=2C but I use =22netstat -I em0 1=22 a lot to watch my net= work =3E activity=2E Replace em0 with your nic device=2E Gkrellm is a gui app= that =3E gives you little network histograms for each interface=2C but they=27re= little =3A=29 Or in Gnome put the system monitor thing on a panel I used to use vnstat for this on servers Path=3A /usr/ports/net/vnstat Info=3A A console-based network traffic monitor DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 06:47:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC60106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D37A8FC1E for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:47:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <4CD1058C.3030302@intersonic.se> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:47:40 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101022 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartosz Stec References: <4CD09908.6080508@it4pro.pl> In-Reply-To: <4CD09908.6080508@it4pro.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs problem after upgrade Samba 3.4 -> 3.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:47:44 -0000 On 11/03/10 00:04, Bartosz Stec wrote: > >> Hi, > Hello! >> I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to >> the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a >> remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs: >> >> mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo at mars >> /inter >> /home/mnt >> Password: >> mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error >> >> Samba server log says: >> mbd/sesssetup.c:1703(reply_sesssetup_and_X) >> reply_sesssetup_and_X: Attempted encrypted session setup without >> negprot denied! >> >> >> smbclient works fine and so does connecting to the shares from Windows >> and Konqerour like "smb://192.168.1.8/". >> >> Anybody on the list with enough knowledge of Samba that could take a >> shot at this? Apparently something changed between version 3.4 and 3.5 >> of Samba. > My knowledge about Samba is limited at best, but it seems that I found > possible couse and working override (solution?). Check this PR: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151887 > If this fixes your problem too, please submit followup - more > information port maintainer gets, less time he's gonna need to fix this. > Yes, it fixed my problem. Submitting followup, thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 06:54:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F28B106566C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8148FC19 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so216672fxm.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:54:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nHdNvsXT2nitpFCCvpb8F7GN/mSNoo4kyq415VCf4aI=; b=BiLK+UTIZrd3RCPLiYSZfo64hWA2HkWYafx+k6OVl9Kdwn8S0+fgeIpJ/W4TUI4Vwd ALwUVPDejQ9H9do52R9Zb+S95wxEjiu+A/aK1aZqc4wwB4+tjtGLYBBHp85OEBoqCL/h oQUHSSdxYFf1bh0ZCntZVG7Oaitvcg8RL7I5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eh2XsV5zIYtBCnab1BHRXqzC4xKOriV0Xk0FsLOedbERWSGJvMhVfihpJDkwIcdgqv 8wZ+mN/9Hs00h/VnDJlH6WTGkIQ21YYxFaMVCxsWmNp0LVWCpBcWk8A1mjwfHMAfQshO whsnPpHAycTtiGNAQx/LZWMsK9mWG/Zo3IKEs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.86.4 with SMTP id q4mr9790671fal.20.1288767241783; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.108.194 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:54:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD102FA.1080604@ose.nl> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> <4CD102FA.1080604@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:54:01 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Bas Smeelen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gary Kline , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:54:03 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > Or in Gnome put the system monitor thing on a panel > I used to use vnstat for this on servers > Path: /usr/ports/net/vnstat > Info: A console-based network traffic monitor > If you want to avoid proc, try net-mgmt/iftop or net/trafshow I prefer trafshow, but haven't tried vnstat. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 07:23:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AE61065673 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valentin.bud@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A6F8FC1A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so250189yxl.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:23:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=CQFqNSlJdHi++0a4l50Dx/+naMZf7h2qeT0+pM+0mv0=; b=ui05MmI22pHrdJIgU6GLU9llfvK5Kz/mbZpFPvqvzGKTL8XisbcrcLJlXRrK+ZAzqd skrSr9v7M41Gdef5IjY3fDIM/05MmTc+Sl8m+vQRizkYoU7rcRGHeC0Fu7iJWYMrV51h k+j2awDGd5DEXhfupQHpN5jhZFxIN9cguVFpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=b9BOPaEOf1LnMp122LjApMZeJr+ViYt+IzttxJK8JC+RMtHTV7li3lVYuGzOzXJEib J87ZKi9jwcFWvoGMkXTdM97005ChNaihhxosdk2aXPKEw466yrihEm0C3uqWCWrq75cj zgIvLxchWBmKW0YLUSG8x5jgDekonekrZnSbA= Received: by 10.100.249.8 with SMTP id w8mr1712128anh.112.1288767365604; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:56:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.67.9 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:55:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Bud Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:55:45 +0200 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: rc startup script - daemon: failed to set user environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:23:09 -0000 Hello community, I am trying to build a startup script for an application built from source code. The application name is SOGo (sogo.nu). I will attach the rc script and the error I receive when I run it. #!/bin/sh # # # PROVIDE: sogod # REQUIRE: memcached # # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to enable sogod: # # sogod_enable (bool): Set it to "YES" to enable sogod. # Default is "NO" # # . /etc/rc.subr name="sogod" rcvar=`set_rcvar` load_rc_config ${name} : ${sogod_enable="NO"} : ${sogod_user="sogo"} : ${sogod_workers="-WOWorkersCount 1"} : ${sogod_command="/usr/local/GNUstep/Local/Tools/Admin/sogod"} : ${sogod_logfile="/var/log/sogo/sogo.log"} pidfile="/var/run/sogo/sogo.pid" command="/usr/sbin/daemon" command_args="-f -p ${pidfile} -u ${sogod_user} ${sogod_command} ${sogod_workers} -WOPidFile ${pidfile} -WOLogFile ${sogod_logfile}" start_precmd="${name}_prestart" sogod_prestart() { if [ ! -d `dirname ${pidfile}` ]; then mkdir `dirname ${pidfile}` >/dev/null 2>&1 && chown ${sogod_user} `dirname ${pidfile}` fi if [ ! -d `dirname ${sogod_logfile}` ]; then mkdir `dirname ${sogod_logfile}` >/dev/null 2>&1 touch ${sogod_logfile} && chown ${sogod_user} ${sogod_logfile} fi if [ -z ${GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_ROOT} ]; then . /usr/local/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh fi } run_rc_command "$1" The sogo daemon requires memcached running to start and the file ${sogod_logfile} to be readable by ${sogod_user}. I also requires the directory /var/run/sogo/ to be read/write by ${sogod_user} so it can write the PID file. The GNUstep.sh makefile must be loaded so it can run properly. The other command_args are the startup arguments sogod takes. memcached is already started: sogo# sockstat | grep memcached nobody memcached 71167 16 tcp4 172.31.32.6:11211 *:* nobody memcached 71167 17 udp4 172.31.32.6:11211 *:* sogod is enabled is /etc/rc.conf # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod rcvar # sogod # sogod_enable="YES" # (default: "") This is the error I receive when I try to start sogod sogo# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod start Starting sogod. daemon: failed to set user environment /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod: WARNING: failed to start sogod This is the first rc script I write. What can I do to debug the problem further? Thank you and have a great day, v -- network warrior From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 07:26:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69894106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor.radnai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E928FC12 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so229269fxm.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:26:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5iotHV2b9gXvbru5F79IUKtnYDbY/zpHk9f2erW9858=; b=tPoYgAtBq/91vxswkQXgkQYq4jaf4dUqpXZG19hD5u+2JYM7fTtHrAyaAfmd3m5IGZ FDS2Xv5CmjN1h0QjgDkn6q0TsO+OcRFXfPk+5NlU7NekhNNCV6CGxGTv3rvLS1m0HWk7 7vejphnPDXWxUsy++CCSatTTcJbQ4SQWxsKbc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Z2zkh9kwyxrle+/Hb8ETKsAk2i14SQAvRUeD2nCmXcltk+XtYnYmOrrL/1b6STJ2Tx 85c682R88jUYqkd4rafQ2nSVF6IMocaz56EqFdLSlNw0H8wwBs8yxgriTLMQIicC87M1 l89BoCuGWv6jzyonwCgkqEbSTqKiriaDRA140= Received: by 10.223.93.140 with SMTP id v12mr9328150fam.65.1288769218008; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:26:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.86.139 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:26:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Gabor Radnai Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re0 driver or hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:26:59 -0000 Oh, and forgot to mention: - the tp-link card in another Windows PC is working nicely - booting from Ubuntu Live CD on the same machine where FreeBSD is installed - the tp-link card is working, get an IP address via DHCP Gabor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 10:47:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229911065695 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B938FC22 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA3Al1IU010446; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:01 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA3Al0h9010442; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:01 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8BDA533C1F; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:00 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:00 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Valentin Bud Message-ID: <20101103104700.GA16329@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: rc startup script - daemon: failed to set user environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:47:04 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:55:45AM +0200, Valentin Bud wrote: > > Hello community, > > I am trying to build a startup script for an application built from source > code. The application name is SOGo (sogo.nu). > > I will attach the rc script and the error I receive when I run it. > > #!/bin/sh > # > # > # PROVIDE: sogod > # REQUIRE: memcached > # > # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to enable sogod: > # > # sogod_enable (bool): Set it to "YES" to enable sogod. > # Default is "NO" > # > # > > . /etc/rc.subr > > name="sogod" > rcvar=`set_rcvar` > > load_rc_config ${name} > > : ${sogod_enable="NO"} > : ${sogod_user="sogo"} > : ${sogod_workers="-WOWorkersCount 1"} > : ${sogod_command="/usr/local/GNUstep/Local/Tools/Admin/sogod"} > : ${sogod_logfile="/var/log/sogo/sogo.log"} > > pidfile="/var/run/sogo/sogo.pid" > command="/usr/sbin/daemon" > command_args="-f -p ${pidfile} -u ${sogod_user} ${sogod_command} > ${sogod_workers} -WOPidFile ${pidfile} -WOLogFile ${sogod_logfile}" > > start_precmd="${name}_prestart" > > sogod_prestart() { > if [ ! -d `dirname ${pidfile}` ]; then > mkdir `dirname ${pidfile}` >/dev/null 2>&1 && chown > ${sogod_user} `dirname ${pidfile}` > fi > if [ ! -d `dirname ${sogod_logfile}` ]; then > mkdir `dirname ${sogod_logfile}` >/dev/null 2>&1 > touch ${sogod_logfile} && chown ${sogod_user} > ${sogod_logfile} > fi > if [ -z ${GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_ROOT} ]; then > . /usr/local/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh > fi > } > > run_rc_command "$1" > > The sogo daemon requires memcached running to start and the > file ${sogod_logfile} > to be readable by ${sogod_user}. I also requires the > directory /var/run/sogo/ to be read/write > by ${sogod_user} so it can write the PID file. The GNUstep.sh makefile must > be loaded > so it can run properly. > > The other command_args are the startup arguments sogod takes. > > memcached is already started: > sogo# sockstat | grep memcached > nobody memcached 71167 16 tcp4 172.31.32.6:11211 *:* > nobody memcached 71167 17 udp4 172.31.32.6:11211 *:* > > sogod is enabled is /etc/rc.conf > # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod rcvar > # sogod > # > sogod_enable="YES" > # (default: "") > > This is the error I receive when I try to start sogod > sogo# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod start > Starting sogod. > daemon: failed to set user environment > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod: WARNING: failed to start sogod > > This is the first rc script I write. What can I do to debug the problem > further? > > Thank you and have a great day, > v > -- > network warrior Starting with the obvious, did you create a sogo userID with adduser(8)? You want to give it nologin as a shell. It will also want a group. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 11:26:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3CC1065672 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valentin.bud@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FC98FC1A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so366952yxl.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 04:26:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zREcIy/exKDG6kIRHlkk8nyDIz/bZVMsYyadRQBZo5s=; b=b/r2TzmiCWgrHM/1qMagCQ2b0BeZT2eQcAemVm0NGMz/fEeOOC6FShwusGfm0yOLVR gKsSjmepRCIi1F22yoiRoDFSqT2L3ApzLc5u8zkW1HMKUv5jhYEKmDZFPl7nQ/WMnLsJ LV1IybiquCGzZY5mwyOlmKan5I77R78KC40Q8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=foCtjdeyhk/LwI1AUiK2yWdfsx1GSPS4a/m9XKZKBcmmhywdjjszV+dQE74Csdvx/9 fUS/Tf9qWKGprBaplXUNtDs2YTjppj9TlKVh0tYsA0YQBtih6BzMOOJtWtTZaqBkX48v iQBGPPnnJZBRR+ZhqZvWm/ZKQpLLYw1zvEnjQ= Received: by 10.100.249.8 with SMTP id w8mr1932295anh.112.1288783581908; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 04:26:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.67.9 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 04:26:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101103104700.GA16329@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20101103104700.GA16329@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> From: Valentin Bud Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:26:01 +0200 Message-ID: To: Frank Shute Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: rc startup script - daemon: failed to set user environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:26:23 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Frank Shute wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:55:45AM +0200, Valentin Bud wrote: > > > > Hello community, > > > > I am trying to build a startup script for an application built from > source > > code. The application name is SOGo (sogo.nu). > > > > I will attach the rc script and the error I receive when I run it. > > > > #!/bin/sh > > # > > # > > # PROVIDE: sogod > > # REQUIRE: memcached > > # > > # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to enable sogod: > > # > > # sogod_enable (bool): Set it to "YES" to enable sogod. > > # Default is "NO" > > # > > # > > > > . /etc/rc.subr > > > > name="sogod" > > rcvar=`set_rcvar` > > > > load_rc_config ${name} > > > > : ${sogod_enable="NO"} > > : ${sogod_user="sogo"} > > : ${sogod_workers="-WOWorkersCount 1"} > > : ${sogod_command="/usr/local/GNUstep/Local/Tools/Admin/sogod"} > > : ${sogod_logfile="/var/log/sogo/sogo.log"} > > > > pidfile="/var/run/sogo/sogo.pid" > > command="/usr/sbin/daemon" > > command_args="-f -p ${pidfile} -u ${sogod_user} ${sogod_command} > > ${sogod_workers} -WOPidFile ${pidfile} -WOLogFile ${sogod_logfile}" > > > > start_precmd="${name}_prestart" > > > > sogod_prestart() { > > if [ ! -d `dirname ${pidfile}` ]; then > > mkdir `dirname ${pidfile}` >/dev/null 2>&1 && chown > > ${sogod_user} `dirname ${pidfile}` > > fi > > if [ ! -d `dirname ${sogod_logfile}` ]; then > > mkdir `dirname ${sogod_logfile}` >/dev/null 2>&1 > > touch ${sogod_logfile} && chown ${sogod_user} > > ${sogod_logfile} > > fi > > if [ -z ${GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_ROOT} ]; then > > . /usr/local/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh > > fi > > } > > > > run_rc_command "$1" > > > > The sogo daemon requires memcached running to start and the > > file ${sogod_logfile} > > to be readable by ${sogod_user}. I also requires the > > directory /var/run/sogo/ to be read/write > > by ${sogod_user} so it can write the PID file. The GNUstep.sh makefile > must > > be loaded > > so it can run properly. > > > > The other command_args are the startup arguments sogod takes. > > > > memcached is already started: > > sogo# sockstat | grep memcached > > nobody memcached 71167 16 tcp4 172.31.32.6:11211 *:* > > nobody memcached 71167 17 udp4 172.31.32.6:11211 *:* > > > > sogod is enabled is /etc/rc.conf > > # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod rcvar > > # sogod > > # > > sogod_enable="YES" > > # (default: "") > > > > This is the error I receive when I try to start sogod > > sogo# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod start > > Starting sogod. > > daemon: failed to set user environment > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sogod: WARNING: failed to start sogod > > > > This is the first rc script I write. What can I do to debug the problem > > further? > > > > Thank you and have a great day, > > v > > -- > > network warrior > > Starting with the obvious, did you create a sogo userID with adduser(8)? > You want to give it nologin as a shell. It will also want a group. > > > Regards, > > -- > > Frank > > Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html > > > Hello Mr. Frank, Yes I did. sogo# id sogo uid=1001(sogo) gid=1001(sogo) groups=1001(sogo) Thank you, v -- network warrior From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 15:54:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CB71065741 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524A3A21.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.74.58.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8898FC14 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 1FA541; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:54:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:08 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: installing a window manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:54:01 -0000 Up 'till now I had a server without X. I've a need however to be able to graphically work on that server so I thought: I install x11-servers/xorg.server and after that I build windowmaker (nice and light). However, this does not seem to be enough to get X working. Can somebody tell me what to build (with portmaster) to get a minimal X server station with windowmaker. I run 8.1/amd64 with up2date ports. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 16:05:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EA106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5958FC13 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so778436wyb.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.127.142 with SMTP id g14mr18403296wbs.200.1288800350540; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> References: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:05:50 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HoaCGzrSXuqVSIaYf0sc4vjlWzU Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Dick Hoogendijk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: installing a window manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:05:52 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Up 'till now I had a server without X. I've a need however to be able to > graphically work on that server so I thought: I install > x11-servers/xorg.server and after that I build windowmaker (nice and light). > However, this does not seem to be enough to get X working. > Even WM is heavy compared to Blackbox ! I use Gnome in FBSD via binary install out of laziness. Maybe blackbox binary install will solve your problem quickly or portmaster blackbox may get it working as well. Just speculation though since I've never used blackbox in FBSD but the port is there and blackbox really rules when it come to light and flexible WM. Best, Alejandro Imass > Can somebody tell me what to build (with portmaster) to get a minimal X > server station with windowmaker. > I run 8.1/amd64 with up2date ports. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 16:18:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1065D1065693 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0398FC21 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26163 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 16:18:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Nov 2010 16:18:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A0CD150863; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:17:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:17:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> (Dick Hoogendijk's message of "Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:08 +0100") Message-ID: <44fwvie5zd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: installing a window manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:18:04 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk writes: > Up 'till now I had a server without X. I've a need however to be able > to graphically work on that server so I thought: I install > x11-servers/xorg.server and after that I build windowmaker (nice and > light). However, this does not seem to be enough to get X working. > > Can somebody tell me what to build (with portmaster) to get a minimal > X server station with windowmaker. > I run 8.1/amd64 with up2date ports. Building windowmaker should be enough. However, do you really need to run the X server on your server machine? Usually, what I do is just run the applications on the server, and display them on another machine. ssh makes this easy and secure. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 16:27:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB37106566C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8E18FC17 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:27:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=aR16PxjQAAAA:8 a=1W5t_bu8ma7NtTaHFUYA:9 a=AFI3HvDZnyz0GOJjDjAA:7 a=FnRHfr78SVCGDalO2JVanArt6hwA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=CiSHi91Bn78A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:49253] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 7D/55-24070-88D81DC4; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:27:53 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:27:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Dick Hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> Message-ID: References: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: installing a window manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:27:54 -0000 On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Up 'till now I had a server without X. I've a need however to be able to > graphically work on that server so I thought: I install > x11-servers/xorg.server and after that I build windowmaker (nice and light). > However, this does not seem to be enough to get X working. > > Can somebody tell me what to build (with portmaster) to get a minimal X > server station with windowmaker. > I run 8.1/amd64 with up2date ports. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Here is what i have installed for X: [vic@yeaguy ~]$ pkg_info | grep -i xorg linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 Xorg libraries (Linux Fedora 10) xorg-7.5 X.Org complete distribution metaport xorg-apps-7.5 X.org apps meta-port xorg-docs-1.4,1 X.org documentation files xorg-drivers-7.5 X.org drivers meta-port xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.5 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-7.5 X.org fonts meta-port xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.5 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-7.5 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.5 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-7.5 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-7.5 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-libraries-7.5 X.org libraries meta-port xorg-server-1.7.5,1 X.Org X server and related programs [vic@yeaguy ~]$ For Xorg all I did was pkg_add -r xorg and Im using Awesome WM, very lightweight and quick.. But its not your typical WM.. Its a tiling WM, you cant resize your windows.. really.. you organize your desktop window by clicking in the right hand corner of the desktop.. This WM has grown on me... give it a shot. The purpose of it, i guess, is to elimiate wasting your time resizing your windows.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 16:55:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252BC1065672 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3678FC0C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2010 12:26:43 -0400 Received: from mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.54]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ARX84114; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:26:43 -0400 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2010 12:26:43 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19665.36163.79464.673775@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:26:43 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: OT: apache+ssl question _off-list_ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:55:49 -0000 Would any folks with experience in Apache/SSL be willing to help with a (probably novice) problem off-list? (My search-fu is inferior: I've found the problem mentioned, but no solutions.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 17:31:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB38C106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1FE8FC0C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 56387E809C5; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:32:02 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20101103173202.GB5700@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Bruce Cran , RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:31:53 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:55:28AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > > > > The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > > > > googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It occured > > > > that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is data that is > > > > flowing in via the background that stalls things. (I have just shut > > > > off the automated flow.) > > > > > > You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by the > > > computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. > > > > Yes... outstanding. Is there any sort of GUI app tat has this in a geaph > > or histogram? > > Not a gui app, but I use "netstat -I em0 1" a lot to watch my network > activity. Replace em0 with your nic device. Gkrellm is a gui app that > gives you little network histograms for each interface, but they're little :) > Thanks for the insights! I'll check them out. ("Small is beautiful") ... > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 18:45:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D4F1065670 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BE68FC08 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so509302ewy.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.108.196 with SMTP id g4mr848796ebp.31.1288808079696; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:14:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:14:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:14:19 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:45:34 -0000 I figured the general users list was a good place to start. I'm somewhat new to FreeBSD still, I have one fbsd7.3 home server and it serves it's purposes quite nicely. I decided to installed FreeBSD64 on my laptop. For the most part, things went very well. I got X/Gnome/OOo3 (for school) installed and am trucking along quite nicely. My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about my Wireless Card. I have been following the handbook ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to use 64-bit Windows drivers coupled w/ ndisgen to get my wireless card working. I got ndisgen to generate a kernel module but it immediately caused my laptop to reboot when the kernel was loaded. This left me scratching my head. I think I might need firmware (I remember having to extract firmware from the driver for linux). pciconf shows the following: [root@BlackDragon [~]# pciconf -lv | grep -A3 0x4315 none8@pci0:8:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x137c103c chip=0x431514e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' class = network [root@BlackDragon [~]# The laptop is an HP dv2845SE and it's running FreebSD64-8.1. Let me know if I missed anything. Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 19:17:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3704106566B for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7906E8FC08 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so957171wyb.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:17:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8QnqroII0rCWKlXpXd6lquCEoOp0BvrWl9suYcJmYpM=; b=BYdtSOJU3oDohq7oY5urZYRx5UZsS5onP99w1ZBAHg+G26zNmobbyYmAOc1eEpOsjI 9jkYLxK7Si7TpHa04pLqbW3vuUgQtfWHbG6A4kaNAURGmGVKS067eNijWlV2qeVg8faD QzRkrq2Et22JC2vQwErQqMoEg4lITWdZRrp2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KFHb5HHmbm4uaOsQapjFogDq7iIALLRBok9rBMiw3HLb2bCTznGZXZnKe3ByIf0tR3 tnrLvIL4mC1hriQhi+LvwtXzbTWEYC0g2ezBn75eA9aIAZTkvxN1RdDvYJoIkxvfFVEs q3qBzvjSQCAbqJ4KnAfF+7/3HTaQQlE/NLsbs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.142.206 with SMTP id r14mr6206979wbu.147.1288811841970; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.50.140 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:17:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Chris Brennan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:17:24 -0000 On 11/3/10, Chris Brennan wrote: > I figured the general users list was a good place to start. I'm somewhat new > to FreeBSD still, I have one fbsd7.3 home server and it serves it's purposes > quite nicely. I decided to installed FreeBSD64 on my laptop. For the most > part, things went very well. I got X/Gnome/OOo3 (for school) installed and > am trucking along quite nicely. My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about > my Wireless Card. I have been following the handbook ( > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to use > 64-bit Windows drivers coupled w/ ndisgen to get my wireless card working. I > got ndisgen to generate a kernel module but it immediately caused my laptop > to reboot when the kernel was loaded. This left me scratching my head. I > think I might need firmware (I remember having to extract firmware from the > driver for linux). > > pciconf shows the following: > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# pciconf -lv | grep -A3 0x4315 > none8@pci0:8:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x137c103c chip=0x431514e4 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' > class = network > [root@BlackDragon [~]# > > The laptop is an HP dv2845SE and it's running FreebSD64-8.1. Let me know if > I missed anything. NDISulator support for amd64 is currently broken. You can try http://gitorious.org/NDISulator but note that amd64 does not work for me too. > > Did you know... > > If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, > > but what's worse is when you play it forward.... > ...it installs Windows 2000 > > -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 19:24:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F919106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C288FC1B for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so566378eyb.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.11.18 with SMTP id r18mr4943324ebr.44.1288812278526; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:24:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:24:18 -0400 Message-ID: To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:24:41 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 11/3/10, Chris Brennan wrote: > > I figured the general users list was a good place to start. I'm somewhat > new > > to FreeBSD still, I have one fbsd7.3 home server and it serves it's > purposes > > quite nicely. I decided to installed FreeBSD64 on my laptop. For the most > > part, things went very well. I got X/Gnome/OOo3 (for school) installed > and > > am trucking along quite nicely. My Hiccup as the subject suggests is > about > > my Wireless Card. I have been following the handbook ( > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to > use > > 64-bit Windows drivers coupled w/ ndisgen to get my wireless card > working. I > > got ndisgen to generate a kernel module but it immediately caused my > laptop > > to reboot when the kernel was loaded. This left me scratching my head. I > > think I might need firmware (I remember having to extract firmware from > the > > driver for linux). > > > > pciconf shows the following: > > > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# pciconf -lv | grep -A3 0x4315 > > none8@pci0:8:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x137c103c chip=0x431514e4 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > > device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' > > class = network > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# > > > > The laptop is an HP dv2845SE and it's running FreebSD64-8.1. Let me know > if > > I missed anything. > > NDISulator support for amd64 is currently broken. > You can try http://gitorious.org/NDISulator but note that amd64 does > not work for me too. > > I did some googleing (is that even spelled right?) on this over the last few days and I saw posts about NDISulator being broken, but it wasn't in reference to AMD64. In fact the archived e-mail I read referenced FreeBSD5.x and I assumed 32-bit given the version number, I was also left w/ the assumption that NDISulator was new w/ that release of FreeBSD. Can anyone else shed some light on this subject (even enough light for a solution :D) > > > > Did you know... > > > > If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, > > > > but what's worse is when you play it forward.... > > ...it installs Windows 2000 > > > > -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 20:34:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9048D10656D2 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614638FC14 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 26BD3E80CBC; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:34:56 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20101103203456.GA8236@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Bruce Cran , RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:34:46 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:55:28AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > > > > The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > > > > googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It occured > > > > that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is data that is > > > > flowing in via the background that stalls things. (I have just shut > > > > off the automated flow.) > > > > > > You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by the > > > computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. > > > > Yes... outstanding. Is there any sort of GUI app tat has this in a geaph > > or histogram? > > Not a gui app, but I use "netstat -I em0 1" a lot to watch my network > activity. Replace em0 with your nic device. Gkrellm is a gui app that > gives you little network histograms for each interface, but they're little :) I think this little gadget is neat! Not much on the network section, tho. The Config window/dialog has a space to type in a string for "Net" ... I have "NIC" for the "Optional label"; what command string should I enter below? gary PS: I d/loaded a different face// ["theme"?] for this, but went back to the default! OH: PPS: How should I activate "lo"? > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 20:43:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA84106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AD68FC16 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 40415E80CBC; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:43:18 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Bas Smeelen Message-ID: <20101103204318.GB8236@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> <4CD10224.1040003@ose.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD10224.1040003@ose.nl> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:43:06 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 07:33:08AM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 11/03/2010 06:55 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said: > >> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > >>>> The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > >>>> googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It occured > >>>> that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is data that is > >>>> flowing in via the background that stalls things. (I have just shut > >>>> off the automated flow.) > >>> You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by the > >>> computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. > >> Yes... outstanding. Is there any sort of GUI app tat has this in a geaph > >> or histogram? > > Not a gui app, but I use "netstat -I em0 1" a lot to watch my network > > activity. Replace em0 with your nic device. Gkrellm is a gui app that > > gives you little network histograms for each interface, but they're little :) > > > You could setup mrtg and snmp to graph the network bandwidth usage and > integrate it in your website > I had mrtg going several years ago; plan to integrate this and other things that moritor behavior in time.... > > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is for the intended recipient(s) only. Access, disclosure, copying, > distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited. If you have received it > by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system. > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 20:53:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB180106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40458FC0A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTLAPTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PDk4U-000Em5-9n for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:36:38 -0400 Message-ID: <51A327FA9F464DD2B0EFF2903E4DF6FE@GRANTLAPTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:36:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Subject: FreeBSD - POP3 timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:53:13 -0000 Hello all, I have serveral servers setup with FreeBSD 8.0. Each of these servers are running vm-pop3d, which has worked well for many years now. Since installing FreeBSD 8.0, the number of timeouts on port 110 have skyrocketed on all the servers. Some clients connecting (checking thier email) 200 times a day, may be seeing as many as 50 timeouts. Is there any tuning somewhere I have missed? Each server has about 200 domains on it, and each domain has an average of 5 pop accounts. -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 20:55:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7A8106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5C88FC18 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA3KtYQN080975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:55:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA3KtX0v047173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:55:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA3KtXPr047172; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:55:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:55:33 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20101103205533.GB11737@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> <20101103203456.GA8236@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101103203456.GA8236@thought.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:55:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: Bruce Cran , RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:55:36 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 03), Gary Kline said: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:55:28AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said: > > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours > > > > > googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It > > > > > occured that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is > > > > > data that is flowing in via the background that stalls things. (I > > > > > have just shut off the automated flow.) > > > > > > > > You can run "systat -if" to see how much bandwidth is being used by > > > > the computer. At 1M you should see around 120KB/s downlink. > > > > > > Yes... outstanding. Is there any sort of GUI app tat has this in a > > > geaph or histogram? > > > > Not a gui app, but I use "netstat -I em0 1" a lot to watch my network > > activity. Replace em0 with your nic device. Gkrellm is a gui app that > > gives you little network histograms for each interface, but they're > > little :) > > I think this little gadget is neat! Not much on the network > section, tho. The Config window/dialog has a space to type in > a string for "Net" ... I have "NIC" for the "Optional label"; > what command string should I enter below? You don't need to fill either one in. The optional label will show up just above the interface name in the display, and entering a command string turns the interface name into a button you can click to launch that command. If you right-click on one of the charts, you can change the scale, and the drawing style for TX/RX data. > gary > > PS: I d/loaded a different face// ["theme"?] for this, but went > back to the default! > > OH: PPS: How should I activate "lo"? Just check the "Enable lo0" checkbox in the config tab for the lo0 interface, in the Builtins->Net category. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 21:06:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8800A106566B for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246CF8FC17 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so658449eyb.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.16.75 with SMTP id n11mr995689eba.5.1288818398746; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:06:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:06:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <303002.73329.qm@web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <303002.73329.qm@web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:06:18 -0400 Message-ID: To: Mark Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:06:40 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Mark wrote: > > I've got a dell mini with the same card, it works with 8.0 and 8.1 32 bit > but I had to use the 32bit XP files with NDISwrapper to get the driver to > build. HTH > Not really, as Mr. Mahol has pointed out, NDISulator is not working in a 64 Bit environment (which I am am using) and I can't mix 32bit and 64bit drivers. So it's great that it's working for you and I am glad it does (and continues to) I still need to get it working in a 64bit environment. I tried installed FreeBSD32 by mistake and it refused to boot, so I am limited to the 64bit version. Does ndiswrapper work in FreeBSD? I couldn't find any documentation for it. I do remember using it in linux but I don't remember what I did, so I am basically starting all over again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 22:32:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F071E106566B for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joshua.D.Siebenaler@boeing.com) Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.32.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A4C8FC1A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id oA3M8qeN016174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id oA3M8qMg003154 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:08:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-10.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.113]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id oA3M8p5B003133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:08:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.64.97]) by XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.113]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:08:51 -0700 From: "Siebenaler, Joshua D" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:08:50 -0700 Thread-Topic: ECCN Number Thread-Index: Act7o7GqcM8t613+QU6f2nSvZ/p8Og== Message-ID: <25ADE4525E031F4392C556E1A548FF6158FADDDBA9@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: ECCN Number X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:32:58 -0000 Hello- My name is Joshua Siebenaler, I am a procurement agent with the Boeing Comp= any in Kent, WA. I had a request come across my desk recently inquirying about FreeBsD's V7.= 3 software. What is the ECCN number associated with this product? Please let me know. Thank you, Joshua D. Siebenaler Boeing BDS (Boeing Defense Space and Security) Supplier Management Advanced Programs / Phantom Works Phone - 206-662-4785 Fax - 253-657-4542 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 22:34:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id C85131065679; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101103223438.GA26003@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:34:38 -0000 hi there, is this a known issue with kldunload(8)? ***beginn*** otaku% kldunload sound otaku% echo $? 0 otaku% kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 35 0xffffffff80100000 a2da40 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff80b2e000 295e8 snd_hda.ko 3 1 0xffffffff80b58000 85110 sound.ko 4 1 0xffffffff80bde000 da4bb8 nvidia.ko 5 4 0xffffffff81983000 418e0 linux.ko 6 1 0xffffffff819c5000 80e8 ng_ubt.ko 7 2 0xffffffff819ce000 fa78 ng_hci.ko 8 2 0xffffffff819de000 2bd0 ng_bluetooth.ko 9 3 0xffffffff819e1000 15e68 netgraph.ko 10 1 0xffffffff81c12000 3edb linprocfs.ko 11 3 0xffffffff81c16000 4698 pseudofs.ko 12 1 0xffffffff81c1b000 31b3 procfs.ko 13 1 0xffffffff81c1f000 a37 linsysfs.ko otaku% kldunload sound kldunload: attempt to unload file that was loaded by the kernel kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy otaku% echo $? 1 otaku% ***end*** cheers. alex -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 23:35:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8330510656A6 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfunk6@cox.net) Received: from eastrmpop107.cox.net (eastrmpop107.cox.net [68.230.240.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C888FC13 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20101103232029.ZUNV5870.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:20:29 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([68.0.73.73]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id SnLT1f00G1asDc402nLUVK; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:20:28 -0400 X-VR-Score: -110.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=tlJZYCN2Cp4aPpLxpzU8rlN9bDQWxG6J/afkrnDjtPw= c=1 sm=1 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=cldQwrSUzPq7T4OJ8kWhDA==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Me3UeVcelM9epfqQxqUA:9 a=76e8Oh7aMYsS0XTNvPgA:7 a=3jO0Pkh558xIEDF4zXdxC4RHbSYA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=wWvzhTUdvr8A:10 a=pAlXNk7oWvoA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=3X9UKlHZf3BR9ZaJ:21 a=EKxfLo7WB0VCzYvI:21 a=cldQwrSUzPq7T4OJ8kWhDA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=dfunk6@cox.net Message-ID: <4CD1EE43.7060103@cox.net> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:20:35 -0500 From: Derek Funk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101005 Thunderbird/3.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <25ADE4525E031F4392C556E1A548FF6158FADDDBA9@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> In-Reply-To: <25ADE4525E031F4392C556E1A548FF6158FADDDBA9@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101103-2, 11/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: ECCN Number X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:35:10 -0000 On 11/3/2010 5:08 PM, Siebenaler, Joshua D wrote: > Hello- > > My name is Joshua Siebenaler, I am a procurement agent with the Boeing Company in Kent, WA. > > I had a request come across my desk recently inquirying about FreeBsD's V7.3 software. > > What is the ECCN number associated with this product? > > > > Please let me know. > > > > Thank you, > > > Joshua D. Siebenaler > Boeing BDS (Boeing Defense Space and Security) > Supplier Management > Advanced Programs / Phantom Works > Phone - 206-662-4785 > Fax - 253-657-4542 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From what I can find, it itself does not have one. The encryption software within does and that would depend on the administrator which encryption method is used. By default it uses MD5 which I understand does not need an ECCN. I definitely can be wrong. Derek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 00:58:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B061065672 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF8C8FC14 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so1244275wyb.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:58:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.129 with SMTP id l1mr27708wbv.55.1288832320182; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25ADE4525E031F4392C556E1A548FF6158FADDDBA9@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> References: <25ADE4525E031F4392C556E1A548FF6158FADDDBA9@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:58:40 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WIOrE2VhCbuBJFdw2OEY9RXHfpk Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: "Siebenaler, Joshua D" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: ECCN Number X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:58:43 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Siebenaler, Joshua D wrote: > Hello- > > My name is Joshua Siebenaler, I am a procurement agent with the Boeing Company in Kent, WA. > > I had a request come across my desk recently inquirying about FreeBsD's V7.3 software. > This has been discussed before here are some excerpts: - Some have said it's the same as Linux : ECCN# is 5D002. - If the ECCN for the computer hardware won't suffice, then use NLR in block 27 of the Shipper's Export Declaration, and use EAR99 in block 28. Here are some of the references: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2005-April/003269.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-December/164217.html http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=13746 Best, Alejandro Imass > What is the ECCN number associated with this product? > > > > Please let me know. > > > > Thank you, > > > Joshua D. Siebenaler > Boeing BDS (Boeing Defense Space and Security) > Supplier Management > Advanced Programs / Phantom Works > Phone - 206-662-4785 > Fax - 253-657-4542 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 01:00:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E15106564A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C252D8FC13 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (ethic.thought.org [10.47.0.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA410Uc3003616; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:00:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 kline@thought.org; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:00:30 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Adam Vande More Message-ID: <20101104010030.GB3451@thought.org> References: <20101102034203.GA4799@thought.org> <20101102085003.58ce8202@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101103011700.GB3490@thought.org> <201011030144.37369.bruce@cran.org.uk> <20101103055000.GB4073@thought.org> <20101103055527.GA11737@dan.emsphone.com> <4CD102FA.1080604@ose.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Bas Smeelen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:00:44 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:54:01AM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > Or in Gnome put the system monitor thing on a panel > > I used to use vnstat for this on servers > > Path: /usr/ports/net/vnstat > > Info: A console-based network traffic monitor > > > > If you want to avoid proc, try > > net-mgmt/iftop > or > net/trafshow > > I prefer trafshow, but haven't tried vnstat. > > -- > Adam Vande More Thanks. I'll try trafshow, but iftop is _nice_. i never realized how much traffic was happening. Interesting... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org ethic From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 02:12:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A086106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E648FC0A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oA42A7rb008179 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:10:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:10:07 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:12:12 -0000 > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 > From: Gary Kline > Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? > *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable. There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org' The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on a query. % nslookup -type=any thought.org Non-authoritative answer: thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net Authoritative answers can be found from: thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net ns2.everydns.net internet address = 208.76.62.100 ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns2.everydns.net ; (1 server found) ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? ;; res_send() ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 ;; timeout ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 ;; timeout ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 ;; timeout ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 ;; timeout ;; res_send to server ns2.everydns.net 208.76.62.100: Operation timed out ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns1.thought.org ; Bad server: ns1.thought.org -- using default server and timer opts ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? ;; res_send() ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 02:36:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795C51065672 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A1D8FC1A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oA42Yojn008316; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:34:50 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:34:50 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201011040234.oA42Yojn008316@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Joshua.D.Siebenaler@boeing.com Cc: Subject: Re: ECCN Number X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:36:55 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Nov 3 16:31:15 2010 > From: "Siebenaler, Joshua D" > To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" > Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:08:50 -0700 > Cc: > Subject: ECCN Number > > Hello- > > My name is Joshua Siebenaler, I am a procurement agent with the Boeing Comp= > any in Kent, WA. > > I had a request come across my desk recently inquirying about FreeBsD's V7.= > 3 software. > > What is the ECCN number associated with this product? > > > > Please let me know. > Douglas Adams believes the answer to be "42", but I don't vouch for the accuracy thereof. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 02:51:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6ABF106564A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC138FC19 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72112624F81; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:19 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cTIWv7wqEIPG; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C49592624F80; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:17 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: Robert Bonomi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:51:08 -0000 He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago and = nothing's been fixed. On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: >=20 >> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 >> From: Gary Kline >> Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? >>=20 >=20 > *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable. >=20 > There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org'=20= > The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on a query. >=20 > % nslookup -type=3Dany thought.org >=20 > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org nameserver =3D ns1.thought.org > thought.org nameserver =3D ns2.everydns.net >=20 > Authoritative answers can be found from: > thought.org nameserver =3D ns1.thought.org > thought.org nameserver =3D ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net internet address =3D 208.76.62.100 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns2.everydns.net=20 > ; (1 server found) > ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) > ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? > ;; res_send() > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 > ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; thought.org, type =3D A, class =3D IN >=20 > ;; Querying server (# 1) address =3D 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address =3D 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address =3D 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address =3D 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; res_send to server ns2.everydns.net 208.76.62.100: Operation timed = out >=20 >=20 > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns1.thought.org=20 > ; Bad server: ns1.thought.org -- using default server and timer opts > ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) > ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? > ;; res_send() > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 > ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; thought.org, type =3D A, class =3D IN >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 05:00:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9D1106564A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122FC8FC16 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E75B1DF0B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:00:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oA450aMD001539 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:00:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:00:36 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101104060036.d3d6e8af.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> References: <4CD185A0.1060805@nagual.nl> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: installing a window manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:00:39 -0000 On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:08 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Up 'till now I had a server without X. I've a need however to be able to > graphically work on that server so I thought: I install > x11-servers/xorg.server and after that I build windowmaker (nice and > light). Good choice - here on a long-running regular workstation. > However, this does not seem to be enough to get X working. Three steps: 1. Get X (itself) working 2. Install WindowMaker and its dependencies 3. Make your user account a .xinitrc or .xsession (depends on if you use xdm or startx command) See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x-config.html Example for ~/.xinitrc: #!/bin/sh # $XConsortium: xinitrc.cpp,v 1.4 91/08/22 11:41:34 rws Exp $ [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc xrandr --fb 1400x1050 xrandr --size 1400x1050 xsetroot -solid rgb:3b/4c/7a xset b 100 1000 15 & xset r rate 250 30 & xset s off & xset -dpms & exec wmaker The last line will "transfer control" to the WindowMaker program. Then, configure WindowMaker to your needs. > Can somebody tell me what to build (with portmaster) to get a minimal X > server station with windowmaker. Any dependencies should be recursively by portmaster (as it does per portmanager, port's make install, and even pkg_add -r). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 05:29:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DC9106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4901D8FC1C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4F21E215; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:29:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oA45Tdob001607; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:29:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:29:38 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:29:48 -0000 On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote: > He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago > and nothing's been fixed. Seems to be fine from here: % nslookup -type=any thought.org Server: 192.168.100.1 Address: 192.168.100.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: thought.org mail exchanger = 10 ethic.thought.org. thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. Authoritative answers can be found from: % host ethic.thought.org ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 % host ns1.thought.org ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 % host ns2.everydns.net ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100 % ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=107.684 ms 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=107.073 ms 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=107.046 ms --- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms Or am I misreading that? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 05:30:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E881065672; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimmiejaz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D2F8FC08; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so1124940gwj.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FfdM9XoNgxuODSEjWRIHEtCfpFaMU4z6aDv6euM1uKo=; b=Pw53hSU3ZpJhQrx7LCG2Jx64ZJ+IjigYVx8y6vNDWnOl399r6aUKyUouqrtaCEYng0 mXuEIgUlBkFShf32NXLfqthjBW1OAIL5sCrq/9w+Wiuv7w8KgHt5tleu10fls/Tt9bD6 cF8U4IKEIDvbQEdt0k5IouBeiOGuuWLjYZpk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HY/LcesUOanvB7Gquw0q8gmZqAeLaZ3Ww5bUWYLts8AQoLoojYgN4aWJ/3S/xK5sFY OTUkRiTMRTKq3ERHN/xmiPi2sYxC+Z47NsJ1A+EneYLOBwGf7aTLp93XamhrQ/Lw4SMQ WHepfruDUivglNMp+CLfw1KonE/xrKTO6Oc0w= Received: by 10.151.156.21 with SMTP id i21mr466487ybo.432.1288846795800; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jimmiejaz.org (bas9-toronto63-1128678266.dsl.bell.ca [67.70.67.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m25sm7846742yha.43.2010.11.03.21.59.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CD23DC7.1040305@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:59:51 -0400 From: Jimmie James User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: portsclean -CDD oddness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jimmiejaz@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:30:30 -0000 After doing a portupgrade, I've always run portsclean -CDD [for reference] -C Clean out all the working directories of the ports tree. (cf. WRKDIRPREFIX) -D Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any port in the ports tree. Specified twice (i.e. -DD), clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any port that is currently installed. (cf. DISTDIR) This time, fresh csup and a few ports updated, it wiped out EVERY distfile for reasons I don't understand. Anyone have a clue as to why, or what the frak is going on? Now I know it's not a huge deal, unless there's a bug somewhere, nothing's changed in my /etc/make.conf or my pkgtools.conf in... about 6 months. FreeBSD jimmiejaz.org 7.3-STABLE FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #0: Tue Jun 1 23:22:54 EDT 2010 jimmie@jimmiejaz.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FORTYTWO i386 pkg_info |grep -i portupgrade portupgrade-2.4.6_4,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15978 Mar 15 2010 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean ls -al /usr/ports/distfiles/* ls: No match. pkg_info |wc -l 1217 ls /var/db/pkg/ |wc -l 1220 ls -R /var/db/ports | wc -l 1268 pkgdb -Ff ---> Checking the package registry database /usr/ports/INDEX-7.bz2 100% of 1425 kB 189 kBps done [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 22279 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000.........17000.........18000.........19000.........20000.........21000.........22000.. ..... done] evilvte < libsndfile < p5-Class-MOP < p5-IO-Socket-SSL < p5-Moose < p5-Package-Stash < portmaster < xf86-input-citron < auditfile.tbz 100% of 63 kB 31 kBps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 05:52:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C32106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249B38FC17 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9901774; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9901772; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4CD24A11.9000604@radel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:17 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020101010001050902020607" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:52:34 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020101010001050902020607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman = wrote: >> He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago >> and nothing's been fixed. > Seems to be fine from here: > > % nslookup -type=3Dany thought.org > Server: 192.168.100.1 > Address: 192.168.100.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org mail exchanger =3D 10 ethic.thought.org. > thought.org nameserver =3D ns2.everydns.net. > thought.org nameserver =3D ns1.thought.org. > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > > % host ethic.thought.org > ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns1.thought.org > ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100 > % ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net > PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.684 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.073 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.046 ms > > --- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms > > Or am I misreading that? > > > You're overlooking the fact that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond to=20 queries about thought.org, though it is happy to respond to queries=20 about everydns.net. When half the servers for your zone refuse to=20 answer, things work less than 100%. On the other hand, I don't think=20 things are completely broken. Actually they're less broken than Gary's=20 DNS frequently is; it gets discussed on a regular basis for a reason. So is the last octet of ns1.thought.org's address 209 or 210? ;-) --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. --------------ms020101010001050902020607-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 05:59:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064451065670 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6178FC18 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4BF9BE80B2A; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:59:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <20101104055900.GA4796@thought.org> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:59:02 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 > > From: Gary Kline > > Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? > > > > *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable. > > There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org' > The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on a query. > If I knew how to fix this I would. The only IP that is pingable is 209.180.213.209; this is "cd0" of my WAN on my pfSense computer. I changed ns1.thought.org to the prev IP on my registrar and a few minutes ago edited my master/thought.org.*files. If this doesn't work in a few days, let me know. I loggged into my only outside account on a server in the SouthEast, I pinged ns1.thought.org, and it echoed the above IP. .... > % nslookup -type=any thought.org > > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org > thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org > thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net internet address = 208.76.62.100 > > > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns2.everydns.net > ; (1 server found) > ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) > ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? > ;; res_send() > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 > ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN > > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; res_send to server ns2.everydns.net 208.76.62.100: Operation timed out > > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns1.thought.org > ; Bad server: ns1.thought.org -- using default server and timer opts > ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) > ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? > ;; res_send() > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 > ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 06:07:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9EB1065679 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5ED8FC0A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B0A8E80B2A; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:07:59 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <20101104060759.GB4796@thought.org> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:08:00 -0000 Seee below for typing from deadbbs.com. On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 > > From: Gary Kline > > Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? > > > > *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable. > > There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org' > The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on a query. > > % nslookup -type=any thought.org > > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org > thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org > thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net internet address = 208.76.62.100 > > > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns2.everydns.net > ; (1 server found) > ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) > ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? > ;; res_send() > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 > ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN > > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 > ;; timeout > ;; res_send to server ns2.everydns.net 208.76.62.100: Operation timed out > > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns1.thought.org > ; Bad server: ns1.thought.org -- using default server and timer opts > ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) > ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? > ;; res_send() > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 > ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN > SO far, this works:: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (vhost) #0: Sat Sep 13 04:51:19 PDT 2008 Wed Nov 3 22:50:57 PDT 2010 vhost % ping usage: ping [-AaDdfnoQqRrv] [-c count] [-G sweepmaxsize] [-g sweepminsize] [-h sweepincrsize] [-i wait] [-l preload] [-M mask | time] [-m ttl] [-P policy] [-p pattern] [-S src_addr] [-s packetsize] [-t timeout] [-W waittime] [-z tos] host ping [-AaDdfLnoQqRrv] [-c count] [-I iface] [-i wait] [-l preload] [-M mask | time] [-m ttl] [-P policy] [-p pattern] [-S src_addr] [-s packetsize] [-T ttl] [-t timeout] [-W waittime] [-z tos] mcast-group vhost % ping ns1.thought.org PING ns1.thought.org (209.180.213.209): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 209.180.213.209: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=84.971 ms 64 bytes from 209.180.213.209: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=85.005 ms 64 bytes from 209.180.213.209: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=84.827 ms 64 bytes from 209.180.213.209: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=82.973 ms 64 bytes from 209.180.213.209: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=84.772 ms ^C --- ns1.thought.org ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 82.973/84.510/85.005/0.773 ms vhost % nslookup -type=any thought.org Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. Authoritative answers can be found from: thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. ns1.thought.org internet address = 209.180.213.209 ns2.everydns.net internet address = 208.76.62.100 vhost % Everybody should see the name thing is a day or so. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 06:12:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987701065670 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694C98FC15 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7AF8DE80B2A; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:12:51 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20101104061251.GC4796@thought.org> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:12:51 -0000 On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:29:38AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote: > > He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago > > and nothing's been fixed. > > Seems to be fine from here: > > % nslookup -type=any thought.org > Server: 192.168.100.1 > Address: 192.168.100.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org mail exchanger = 10 ethic.thought.org. > thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. > thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > > % host ethic.thought.org > ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns1.thought.org > ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100 > % ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net > PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=107.684 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=107.073 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=107.046 ms > > --- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms > > Or am I misreading that? > Or am I? Once I found the `ping' worked on a rarely-used remote server, I cp'd Robert's nslookup line and got: round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 82.973/84.510/85.005/0.773 ms vhost % nslookup -type=any thought.org Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. Authoritative answers can be found from: thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. ns1.thought.org internet address = 209.180.213.209 ns2.everydns.net internet address = 208.76.62.100 vhost % What is left? > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 06:13:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482071065675 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69838FC12 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so887592qyk.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:13:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7yM+k6HDr8GtgGeRQToZyBWrgr8owc+BsPKqVtC1v+s=; b=P2IU+MLxQv9MN85q6snN+FDv9+BvnK9+oUYkenngdDzhS6mvxTUF+ZleyuXeCvT8Ss wRAbYPNe2ODY5SOrpxA7f3DbiKedhDzUpc+98HZhbEco/lQ5/i4aGWmq7xNvsr60NmVv B8/3MwhHny6vT1WQAp1juoaT1m+HTPGQ0aMGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ZG6GcGO4kpipInd+o4c+/qbnvu0HEDHdX/kvisFFmkD/SxTXdulRxJIhodiCTFGxtT rSnbRutpMrVHSpNBz6fE6yxjfyyIaWemokOVOGhWVKxWC7StBjeYKPkt5LE5YJpKHOva R3E20bnRrL8O0zdpuXe8zt2MW41Y4Ux18rLrQ= Received: by 10.224.177.143 with SMTP id bi15mr268237qab.65.1288851195041; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:13:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.20 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:12:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A327FA9F464DD2B0EFF2903E4DF6FE@GRANTLAPTOP> References: <51A327FA9F464DD2B0EFF2903E4DF6FE@GRANTLAPTOP> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:12:44 +0300 Message-ID: To: Grant Peel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD - POP3 timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:13:16 -0000 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Peel wrote: > Hello all, > > I have serveral servers setup with FreeBSD 8.0. > > Each of these servers are running vm-pop3d, which has worked well for many > years now. > > Since installing FreeBSD 8.0, the number of timeouts on port 110 have > skyrocketed on all the servers. > What do es "since installing FreeBSD 8.0" mean here? Why did you install FreeBSD 8.0?? What were you running before? > Some clients connecting (checking thier email) 200 times a day, may be > seeing as many as 50 timeouts. > > Is there any tuning somewhere I have missed? > You must also show us the server logs showing the timeouts. Please enable debug logging on vm-pop3d if possible. I hope you do realize that in this forum, we mostly handle questions about FreeBSD and not those related to the daily running of apps (like vm-pop3d). so you'll bear with us since some of us run other pop3/imap4 servers different than vm-pop3d. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Damn!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 06:29:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C6D106566C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:29:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=LOh6BY=SF=comsurl.com=c1@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout08.yourhostingaccount.com (mail18.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990198FC19 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailscan21.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.21] helo=mailscan21.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1PDsqr-0004xG-2E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:59:09 -0400 Received: from impout03.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.3] helo=impout03.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan21.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1PDsqq-0000KA-Ub for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:59:08 -0400 Received: from authsmtp04.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.4]) by impout03.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id Stz81f00305G96J0000000; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:59:08 -0400 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.4 X-EN-IMPSID: Stz81f00305G96J0000000 Received: from 65-254-224-23.yourhostingaccount.com ([65.254.224.23] helo=www.comsurl.com) by authsmtp04.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim) id 1PDsqq-0000mW-Gz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:59:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:59:07 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Comsurl Team Message-ID: <3a918815118ae8be4b6500e6b649cd34@www.comsurl.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.1 (phpmailer.sourceforge.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EN-UserInfo: 05357e9303437aee68d312555dabbca4:11353889d09a1357b1e93a930fecaac1 X-EN-AuthUser: c1@comsurl.com Sender: Comsurl Team X-EN-OrigIP: 65.254.224.23 X-EN-OrigHost: 65-254-224-23.yourhostingaccount.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Submit your URL here for free, we will promote. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Comsurl Team List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:29:28 -0000 To view the message, please use an HTML compatible email viewer! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 08:08:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B9106564A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241DC8FC0C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-68-0.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.68.0] (may be forged)) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oA488RVi055049; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:08:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4CD269F8.3040105@bah.homeip.net> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:08:24 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101025 Thunderbird/3.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101104055900.GA4796@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20101104055900.GA4796@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:08:41 -0000 2010-11-04 06:59, Gary Kline: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 >>> From: Gary Kline >>> Subject: Re: is there a utillity...? >>> >> >> *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable. >> >> There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org' >> The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on a query. >> > > > If I knew how to fix this I would. The only IP that is > pingable is 209.180.213.209; this is "cd0" of my WAN on my > pfSense computer. I changed ns1.thought.org to the prev IP > on my registrar and a few minutes ago edited my > master/thought.org.*files. If this doesn't work in a few days, > let me know. > > I loggged into my only outside account on a server in the > SouthEast, I pinged ns1.thought.org, and it echoed the above > IP. > > .... > > > > > >> % nslookup -type=any thought.org >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org >> thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net >> >> Authoritative answers can be found from: >> thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org >> thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net >> ns2.everydns.net internet address = 208.76.62.100 >> >> >> >> ;<<>> DiG 8.1<<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns2.everydns.net >> ; (1 server found) >> ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) >> ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? >> ;; res_send() >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 >> ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 >> ;; QUERY SECTION: >> ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN >> >> ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 >> ;; timeout >> ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 >> ;; timeout >> ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 >> ;; timeout >> ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 208.76.62.100 >> ;; timeout >> ;; res_send to server ns2.everydns.net 208.76.62.100: Operation timed out >> >> >> ;<<>> DiG 8.1<<>> +deb +d2 thought.org @ns1.thought.org >> ; Bad server: ns1.thought.org -- using default server and timer opts >> ;; res_mkquery(0, thought.org, 1, 1) >> ;; res options: init debug recurs defnam dnsrch ?0x80000000? >> ;; res_send() >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 >> ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 >> ;; QUERY SECTION: >> ;; thought.org, type = A, class = IN Have a look here http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org/1285986283 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 08:42:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECF21065670 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E2A8FC13 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2420408wwi.1 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:42:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OBZwz94XIiu7KEDVRAm7FwUGo3Dl4JQcmdXD8ZrqXfg=; b=TChDsSZlmjQ7kgqclg0/u69ZpI7G1c6nTcAazsHz0hO6XdP94VHFHa01Q9H3AolThs Z3ud1ss5KUIZDIWdSR7Gf76YNIFLU16e7GgExwjKrYi4Y+YoOmvPM4ULPEMH4tLsT9Fr UnrT+ttGX+GFnDyVJ7dXSAbUuffeSgu/2Hqp8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Nuo0rRNdkm67zmDmPfmQKoJauSAlfwFppcYRJo2nKhlw3pU7PRusnwh2nlQqLY8UjF 31W7/urVFcImr1UHbQCCOsOqQJGY8F0tPL2m9nRDf3jTazQ3NmHK5+h7Ox24M2kX80/G wi/LHyRVVbXqRcnshYCwriZsJbrQHntapB45w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.66 with SMTP id q44mr394587wed.44.1288860172071; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.50.140 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:42:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <303002.73329.qm@web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:42:51 +0100 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Chris Brennan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:42:54 -0000 On 11/3/10, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Mark wrote: > >> >> I've got a dell mini with the same card, it works with 8.0 and 8.1 32 bit >> but I had to use the 32bit XP files with NDISwrapper to get the driver to >> build. HTH >> > > Not really, as Mr. Mahol has pointed out, NDISulator is not working in a 64 > Bit environment (which I am am using) and I can't mix 32bit and 64bit > drivers. So it's great that it's working for you and I am glad it does (and > continues to) I still need to get it working in a 64bit environment. I tried > installed FreeBSD32 by mistake and it refused to boot, so I am limited to > the 64bit version. Does ndiswrapper work in FreeBSD? I couldn't find any > documentation for it. I do remember using it in linux but I don't remember > what I did, so I am basically starting all over again. It is faster/easier to fix NDISulator than to port ndiswrapper to FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 10:40:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EF31065673 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B03A8FC0A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so1088483qyk.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:40:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=tUoWxRhBFpVqp+DjkP4Phq8nxf4Bcon73QULjgPLCS0=; b=cXfzSDZuFO/Flcgj5ykU3MTen/KuTjPHHHvtDiGtOSQwE1Iv05CD2juCzGOfx8La92 IwMBKObMISJkP6riOiHgyHQoLdZb4iNEwOjE3d7tyJK/b/fq878mJpBAlUjV6M3RtWwh V2mMHAt6eZYPKTOoOyEMOyCl2Zki9juKJGPPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=RTIkkmku//fMDTUgQZHMGBkakQ56+bgoeHDVNqo3fLPaeN47LOSuLXj0xAwANxBpfQ HnGgay80/Vc2nVP6X7e9/lmFg8LoyUJiaYtoUs3SOVPoYuKnVecjnEU9SnkX/FlwBIwg CAjXEr6oVOUSTbXFSkBtIJmMGnRmqtRS67PfY= Received: by 10.229.189.66 with SMTP id dd2mr506355qcb.123.1288865751988; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:15:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.67 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 03:15:11 -0700 (PDT) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:15:11 +0100 Message-ID: To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: openvpn client on pf gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:40:49 -0000 Hi, I'm using a FreeBSD-8.1 (RELEASE, amd64) as gateway for my local network. And pf as firewall. I'm renting a dedicated box, running openvpn. My gateway is configured as a client of this VPN. I modified my pf.conf to provide internet to my local network. I configured iptables on the VPN server (debian-5) to accept everything, an= d redirect what I needed to. Everything seems to work... except... How can I redirect a port through the VPN? I mean... The problem does not seem to come from the VPN server, as I can access my local gateway from an external server, through the iptables redirection. But, when I try to access a host behind that gateway, it won't connect... Here's the pf.conf: ext_if=3D"bge0" int_if=3D"bge1" vpn_if=3D"tun0" lc =3D $int_if:network vpn=3D"10.253.254.1" emma=3D"10.242.42.200" alpha=3D"10.42.42.42" delta=3D"10.42.42.44" xi=3D"10.42.142.44" set skip on lo0 scrub in on $ext_if all fragment reassemble scrub in on $vpn_if all fragment reassemble INTERNETZ nat on $ext_if from $lc to any -> ($ext_if) nat on $vpn_if from $lc to any -> ($vpn_if) rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1666 -> $alpha port 1666 rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1666 -> $alpha port 1666 rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1667 -> $delta port 22 rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1667 -> $delta port 22 rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1668 -> $alpha port 22 rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1668 -> $alpha port 22 rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1669 -> $xi port 22 rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1669 -> $xi port 22 rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 9418 -> $xi port 9418 rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 9418 -> $xi port 9418 pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 1664 pass in on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to $vpn_if port 1664 pass in on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any pass in on $int_if inet proto udp from any to any block in log on $ext_if inet proto icmp from any to $ext_if block in log on $vpn_if inet proto icmp from any to $vpn_if every rules for $ext_if is working as expected so I copied them, replacing my external interface by the vpn one ssh from internet to the gateway (1664) works. but accessing a ssh server behind the gateway (say alpha, 1668) does not... What am I doing wrong? Regards, --=20 Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 11:27:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4C4106566B; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38998FC08; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.unitedinsong.com.au (abracadabra.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.80]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFCE5C21; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:32:16 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AtMail Atmail Open 1.04 Message-ID: <53672.1288870335@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: , "Alejandro Imass" , "Ivan Voras" X-Origin: 192.168.0.200 X-Atmail-Account: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:32:15 +1100 From: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:27:39 -0000 On Tue 2/11/10 11:37 AM , freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On Tue 2/11/10 10:11 AM , Alejandro Imass wrote:On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/01/10 15:42, Mark Atkinson wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 [...] > In the above messages, the kernel detaches the storage device (umass) and > tries to attach the new device, which doesn't have a driver so it's attached > as "ugen" - generic USB. > Yes. One has to remember that USB is just the bus just like pci, microchannel, etc. Even though you have access to the device on the bus you still need a driver for that specific ethernet chip your kernel. This is analogous to having a video card on the pci bus, you still need for the kernel to drive the specific chipset of the card regardless if it can see it on the bus. I have an HTC Nexus One so I may fiddle with this and see if I can help some more here. I am wishful that at least we can get a tty just like other gsm modems and from there it's pretty straight forward using wvdial or alike. If it's only the Ethernet over usb like you mention, then the chipset driver would have to be translated/ported to the FBSD kernel, if it's not already there ? Ok. But I will clarify here: The HTC Android systems uses an "Internet Sharing" feature- essentially Google has coded in routing/nat system into the base OS (probably moding the leftover code already in the linux base), and is trying to allow similar using bluetooth and wifi at a later date as well. The RNDIS is a M$ system that allows sharing anything over USB (network, files, etc- but all essentially operated as network anyway), something they've been playing with for some years- I was looking for an A-A USB cable since around 2003 or so to quickly transfer files when needed. Apparently M$ opened the specs a year or two ago and everyone's jumped on to use it. So where Google started was to start allowing the use of the router/nat via RNDIS USB - somehow this was easier than allowing bluetooth or wifi (probably security and available hardware features). So yes, apparently the phone hooks up as a usb mass storage device, uploads a file to the computer, and disconnects and becomes a network device. Here is the output from linux: usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice scsi9 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device found at 4 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ff9 usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1 usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726 usb-storage: device scan complete scsi 9:0:0:0: Direct-Access HTC Android Phone 0100 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 sd 9:0:0:0: [sdf] Attached SCSI removable disk sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0 usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 4 usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5 usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ffe usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1 usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726 usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether usb0: register 'rndis_host' at usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device, ae:f6:3d:da:20:39 usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_wlan usb0: no IPv6 routers present usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 5 usb0: unregister 'rndis_host' usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device So. What would be my next step to make this work? OpenMoko have something similar and I tried moding some of their scripts (they've made theirs work with ALL OS- not just linux and Winblow$! Take heed manufacturers!) but it didn't mesh on the Android. I still end up with a generic host. As I mentioned, I tried modifying the cdce driver and the device list but that didn't help either, so when I moded the scripts and devd.conf I figured that was the missing piece of my puzzle. I'd actually pay someone to do this, but I do need to figure this out for myself anyway so I'm diving in deep and going to keep on struggling till I get it. I need it figured out before the year's end so I'm not going to sit on my laurels :) That, and a usb mass storage device emulator to trick a dumb digital photo frame.... > >=20 So I have more on this: sourceforge.jp has a project rndis for freebsd. Its a little hard to navigate, but I downloaded the source code and tried to build it on 8.0. No go, but I'm not sure what usb library its using. I think it said usb2, but I'm not exactly sure what that meant (usb2.0, or libusb2, whatever). Now, I've only just quickly grabbed it and tried to make- I haven't had a chance to look too deeply into it as yet- but these are the errors if someone could throw me a clue as to what it might be indicating? (wrong library? generic error I have to debug?) if_rndis.c: In function 'rndis_recv_message': if_rndis.c:985: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' if_rndis.c: In function 'rndis_bulk_read_callback': if_rndis.c:1167: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' if_rndis.c:1187: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' if_rndis.c:1204: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' *** Error code 1 I did get from the site that it was for Windows Mobile, but I believe that this is a generic system coming out now. It might help? Cheers ------------------------- Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 12:04:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF63106564A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Received: from phsmgmx12.partners.org (phsmgmx12.partners.org [155.52.251.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6A48FC13 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:04:38 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AncFAAY30kyEt5wS/2dsb2JhbACTb44Ecbx0hUYE Received: from hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu ([132.183.156.18]) by phsmgmx12-out.partners.org with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Nov 2010 07:35:55 -0400 Received: from buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu (buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.105]) by hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA4BZtto001539 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:35:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) From: Richard Morse Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:35:54 -0400 Message-Id: <918795E7-B590-4D1C-BB2B-36C68AFA01D8@partners.org> To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Kernel panics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:04:39 -0000 Hi! I'm having a problem with an 8.1-RELEASE #0 amd64 machine. Three weeks ago, it had a kernel panic, which I was too tired to properly c= apture. On reboot, I forgot to run fsck in single user mode; about 12-14 ho= urs later it crashed complaining that the background file system checks wer= e inconsistent. A day later it crashed with a "server double fault"; I was unfortunately on= the way to a meeting, along with all of my technical co-workers, so I wasn= 't able to see the screen, and it was being reported by someone who was poo= rly equipped to give a good report. A few days later, it had hung (it didn't respond to input), and I needed to= hard restart. A few days later, the same thing happened. Last weekend, on Friday evening it complained about the hard disk controlle= r disappearing (at least, as far back as I was able to go in the screen buf= fer). Saturday night, I finally got a kernel panic that I captured; after this, I= turned on core dumps. However, last night, it crashed again, and tried to write out a core, but d= idn't succeed. The kernel panic from Saturday night was: panic: unknown cluster size cpuid =3D 0 Uptime: 1h49m37s Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable. aac0: shutting down controller... =20 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid =3D 9; apic id =3D 10 fault virtual address =3D 0x1d fault code =3D supervisor write data, page not present ... current process =3D 12 (irq256: em0) trap number =3D 12 done Last night's: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid =3D 9; apic id =3D 11 fault virtual address =3D 0x8098f90e fault code =3D supervisor read data, page not present ... current process =3D 97530 (taper) trap number =3D 12 panic: page fault cpuid =3D 9 Uptime: 3d21h24m57s Physical memory: 12211MB Dumping 2942MB: Note that there was nothing after the "Dumping 2942MB:"; the cursor was sit= ting just after the colon. On reboot, it did not find any cores to save to = disk (I did have to boot single user and fsck -y; is it possible that this = interfered with the core dump? if so, how do I fix this?). I tried, this morning, to run memtest86, however both 3.5 and 3.4 just give= loud annoying beeps, not displaying anything on screen (not even a menu; o= nce I get past the boot loader from the memtest86 cd, it just starts beepin= g). Any suggestions? Thanks, Ricky The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-ma= il contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLi= ne at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in e= rror but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and pro= perly dispose of the e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 13:45:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4985106564A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D68C8FC13 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so957812eyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.8.70 with SMTP id g6mr576527ebg.44.1288878354563; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:45:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:45:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <303002.73329.qm@web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:45:34 -0400 Message-ID: To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:45:56 -0000 > It is faster/easier to fix NDISulator than to port ndiswrapper to FreeBSD. > No doubt it would be faster and easier to fix NDISulator then to port ndiswrapper. This at least answers my question as to weather ndiswrapper actually works/exists in FreeBSD64. So am I basically screwed here for wireless till it is fixed (I'm no programmer so it's out of my field of expertise) Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 14:12:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86904106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A908FC0C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so984050eyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:12:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KtKHejkDbXhD8pw2FxhZ/zASEZaz4nF1Uu2rNCCOMvI=; b=YH/x+D15lb/EAGR+9uS4+TnSfo9Wv/fHXV1jTy/5pTqrH6W5EyxbtQ0wa8g8I/K3fO 7xBg8Y1GbW24mLCXgaWcoSiZliMRfPu90YFElkbh8OZacm8TeOLg2YXBWg0wvq9yM+MQ 7RvY/AjM2wm9SMCGhHX9P3BEMX23jUR6gbHj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XbZOZmgZplZwj0veM3FEmS6zFb2QIyH8CszJuCD97qysYAeR+jGUaRKnCkrd51eE3e ZVHmhJBJ5VPUhpumY1+ovsbg2ktHefpr8OWlinah7s4cAGb8y+QyJXSwJZlCje7TpvjH mwY895bFN9X6vQ+H7vig7DiKreQXwhOGCYdnA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.5.21 with SMTP id 21mr1976440wek.20.1288879974778; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.25.85 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:12:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:12:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openvpn client on pf gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:12:57 -0000 On 4 November 2010 10:15, Samuel Mart=EDn Moro wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm using a FreeBSD-8.1 (RELEASE, amd64) as gateway for my local network. > And pf as firewall. > > > I'm renting a dedicated box, running openvpn. > My gateway is configured as a client of this VPN. > I modified my pf.conf to provide internet to my local network. > I configured iptables on the VPN server (debian-5) to accept everything, > and > redirect what I needed to. > > Everything seems to work... except... > > How can I redirect a port through the VPN? > I mean... > The problem does not seem to come from the VPN server, as I can access my > local gateway from an external server, through the iptables redirection. > But, when I try to access a host behind that gateway, it won't connect... > > > Here's the pf.conf: > > ext_if=3D"bge0" > int_if=3D"bge1" > vpn_if=3D"tun0" > > lc =3D $int_if:network > vpn=3D"10.253.254.1" > emma=3D"10.242.42.200" > alpha=3D"10.42.42.42" > delta=3D"10.42.42.44" > xi=3D"10.42.142.44" > > set skip on lo0 > scrub in on $ext_if all fragment reassemble > scrub in on $vpn_if all fragment reassemble > INTERNETZ > nat on $ext_if from $lc to any -> ($ext_if) > nat on $vpn_if from $lc to any -> ($vpn_if) > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1666 -= > > $alpha port 1666 > rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1666 -= > > $alpha port 1666 > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1667 -= > > $delta port 22 > rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1667 -= > > $delta port 22 > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1668 -= > > $alpha port 22 > rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1668 -= > > $alpha port 22 > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1669 -= > > $xi port 22 > rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 1669 -= > > $xi port 22 > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 9418 -= > > $xi port 9418 > rdr on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to ($vpn_if) port 9418 -= > > $xi port 9418 > pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 1664 > pass in on $vpn_if inet proto tcp from any to $vpn_if port 1664 > pass in on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any > pass in on $int_if inet proto udp from any to any > block in log on $ext_if inet proto icmp from any to $ext_if > block in log on $vpn_if inet proto icmp from any to $vpn_if > > every rules for $ext_if is working as expected > so I copied them, replacing my external interface by the vpn one > ssh from internet to the gateway (1664) works. > but accessing a ssh server behind the gateway (say alpha, 1668) does not.= .. > > > What am I doing wrong? > > > > Regards, > > -- > Samuel Mart=EDn Moro > {EPITECH.} tek5 > CamTrace S.A.S > (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 > 1 All=E9e de la Venelle > 92150 Suresnes > FRANCE > > "Nobody wants to say how this works. > Maybe nobody knows ..." > Xorg.conf(5) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Im not sure if i understand you correctly but are you trying to forward ports from your colo rented machine to boxes on your LAN via the openvpn connection? If you are and this is where the problem is, you probably need to be nattin= g on the colo boxes vpn interface (tun0). So you will need some iptables config. Doing this avoids the asymetric routing and natting issue you will be getting. Basically if a packet enters your colo box (dst ip A) from client (B), your coloe box will forward it down the tunnel to host C on a private ip. This will respond, and create a packet to goto B. However when this packet will have a public ip as a destination, so when it hits your pf firewall it will probably get routed out of the default route, and not the vpn interface. As its not a tcp syn it will most probably be dropped by pf. However if it isn= t it will be natted to the the public ip of your pf box. This is a problem as this source address isnt the same as the destination address of the initial packet generated by the client B. Therefore when it actually get to the client it will just be dropped Natting on the colo boxes vpn interface sorts all this out for you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 14:18:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722DA1065674 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F181E8FC15 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so27527wyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eOgB1REhNpSc1aN6oVbKCKr9GvIxciILWzcFpfzKHGQ=; b=p0JOh1sHZ9mPek6cufkbqfLTyM/9Op5y6vTByQy4oTWsd2gFEeLChu+0cS20pRNnQ2 zjhB6jjGYP7g6/UStif6og1JfgXvq9Yl/WhzbiRp6e38MdjP5vY34/UX9BWjft9idCvW iTpG8jevHFCf7vPyMTVx/ejAHG9D9GRrIVKlw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OmILahiA9lCwBEoC6u5hnmpugbJAk99EMiAGFSpbF0g2j41kUDzk74HyR2lAXaJheu GPN7FL6JuwjrpTMzxT9U1ezrnFH/J9UYPX8dK9DmUb9v2WB+ty2TQX83aSuK3tIyVXl1 tmAWUBRRUBw3IgaMjnM+veV1rek2MulMWJgTQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.129.83 with SMTP id n19mr828344wbs.33.1288880291978; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.25.85 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:18:11 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHgaurd and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:18:14 -0000 On 2 November 2010 16:34, Justin V. wrote: > Hi, > > Would this be considered bruteforce?? > > This goes on and on: > > > Nov 2 05:42:19 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:42:53 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:43:11 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:43:31 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:43:35 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:43:54 yeaguy last message repeated 2 times > Nov 2 05:44:27 yeaguy last message repeated 2 times > Nov 2 05:44:47 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:44:53 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:45:27 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:45:44 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:46:05 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:46:12 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:46:47 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:47:03 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:47:24 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:47:31 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:48:06 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:48:24 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:48:45 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:48:50 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:49:25 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:49:42 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:50:01 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:50:08 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:50:40 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:50:58 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:51:20 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) [ERROR] > Too many authentication failures > Nov 2 05:51:25 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > Nov 2 05:51:59 yeaguy last message repeated 3 times > Nov 2 05:52:16 yeaguy pure-ftpd: (?@a214.amber.fastwebserver.de) > [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [Administrator] > > > > My sshgaurd config: > > > > # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/pf/pf.conf,v 1.1.4.1.4.1 2010/06/14 > 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $ > # $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.34 2007/02/24 19:30:59 millert Exp $ > # > # See pf.conf(5) and /usr/share/examples/pf for syntax and examples. > # Remember to set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 and/or > net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 > # in /etc/sysctl.conf if packets are to be forwarded between interfaces. > > ext_if="wlan0" > #int_if="int0" > > #table persist > table persist > > #set skip on lo > > #scrub in > > #nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > #rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > #nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0) > #rdr pass on $int_if proto tcp to port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021 > #no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port smtp > #rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ > # -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd > > #anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > #block in > block in log quick on $ext_if from label "bruteforce" > #pass out > > #pass quick on $int_if no state > #antispoof quick for { lo $int_if } > > #pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port ssh > #pass in log on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port smtp > #pass out log on $ext_if proto tcp from ($ext_if) to port smtp > > > LOGS: > > yeaguy# nslookup a214.amber.fastwebserver.de > Server: 10.1.1.1 > Address: 10.1.1.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: a214.amber.fastwebserver.de > Address: 217.79.189.214 > > yeaguy# tcpdump -n -e -ttt -r /var/log/pflog | grep 217.79.189.214 > reading from file /var/log/pflog, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file) > yeaguy# > > > Thanks, > > Justin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > even if it is do you really need to leave ssh accessible to the whole world or can you not lock it down with acls, eg explicity block all ssh attempts apart from those in table ssh say? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 16:27:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA391065674 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425BA8FC13 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE2eg-0002sC-8r for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:27:14 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:27:14 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:27:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:27:05 +0100 Lines: 75 Message-ID: References: <918795E7-B590-4D1C-BB2B-36C68AFA01D8@partners.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <918795E7-B590-4D1C-BB2B-36C68AFA01D8@partners.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Kernel panics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:27:16 -0000 On 11/04/10 12:35, Richard Morse wrote: > Hi! I'm having a problem with an 8.1-RELEASE #0 amd64 machine. Looks like too many different problem all at once. Almost certainly there's a hardware problem somewhere. Try running memtest86 > Three weeks ago, it had a kernel panic, which I was too tired to properly capture. On reboot, I forgot to run fsck in single user mode; about 12-14 hours later it crashed complaining that the background file system checks were inconsistent. > > A day later it crashed with a "server double fault"; I was unfortunately on the way to a meeting, along with all of my technical co-workers, so I wasn't able to see the screen, and it was being reported by someone who was poorly equipped to give a good report. > > A few days later, it had hung (it didn't respond to input), and I needed to hard restart. > > A few days later, the same thing happened. > > Last weekend, on Friday evening it complained about the hard disk controller disappearing (at least, as far back as I was able to go in the screen buffer). > > Saturday night, I finally got a kernel panic that I captured; after this, I turned on core dumps. > > However, last night, it crashed again, and tried to write out a core, but didn't succeed. > > The kernel panic from Saturday night was: > > panic: unknown cluster size > cpuid = 0 > Uptime: 1h49m37s > Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable. > aac0: shutting down controller... > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 9; apic id = 10 > fault virtual address = 0x1d > fault code = supervisor write data, page not present > ... > current process = 12 (irq256: em0) > trap number = 12 > done > > Last night's: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 9; apic id = 11 > fault virtual address = 0x8098f90e > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > ... > current process = 97530 (taper) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 9 > Uptime: 3d21h24m57s > Physical memory: 12211MB > Dumping 2942MB: > > Note that there was nothing after the "Dumping 2942MB:"; the cursor was sitting just after the colon. On reboot, it did not find any cores to save to disk (I did have to boot single user and fsck -y; is it possible that this interfered with the core dump? if so, how do I fix this?). > > I tried, this morning, to run memtest86, however both 3.5 and 3.4 just give loud annoying beeps, not displaying anything on screen (not even a menu; once I get past the boot loader from the memtest86 cd, it just starts beeping). > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Ricky > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 16:47:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF36E106566C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD7E8FC17 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1134227eyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.6.201 with SMTP id a9mr762172eba.18.1288889265081; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:47:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <918795E7-B590-4D1C-BB2B-36C68AFA01D8@partners.org> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:47:24 -0400 Message-ID: To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel panics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:47:47 -0000 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Looks like too many different problem all at once. Almost certainly > there's a hardware problem somewhere. Try running memtest86 On 11/04/10 12:35, Richard Morse wrote: > >> Hi! I'm having a problem with an 8.1-RELEASE #0 amd64 machine. > I think Mr. Morse said he ran memtest86 and it produced many loud beeps. This to me suggest that memtest86 is unable to preform it's tests. Have you tried swapping out the ram (same type, size/speed matters not as long as what goes in matches) and try memtest86 again? Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 18:30:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F651065670 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp194.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp194.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3238FC18 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp39.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 846E498185 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:30:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp39.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 540A698186 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:30:16 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:30:15 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: FreeBSD Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Why does apache22 port want python? Thread-Index: Act8TlLhDUXZP4uWaEO8+VFmGAAcKQ== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Why does apache22 port want python? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:30:17 -0000 I don't need python for anything, afaik. What does apache want it for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 19:24:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBA1106566C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonio@antonioshome.net) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDAE8FC1D for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so317952wyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.157.73 with SMTP id a9mr1113977wbx.75.1288897288737; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from antonio.antonioshome.net ([87.223.131.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f14sm216875wbe.2.2010.11.04.12.01.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CD30277.4090501@antonioshome.net> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:59:03 +0100 From: Antonio Vieiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100630 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why does apache22 port want python? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:24:39 -0000 Maybe this is configurable in the port? I don't think apache22 depends on python at all, but maybe some apache plugin does. I'd try with make config install clean Cheers, Antonio On 04/11/2010 19:30, Tom Worster wrote: > I don't need python for anything, afaik. What does apache want it for? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 19:38:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3675E1065675 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D5F8FC15 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp45.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F32C3178024; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:38:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp45.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id BC8A590EE3; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:38:51 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:38:51 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: Antonio Vieiro , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Why does apache22 port want python? Thread-Index: Act8V+g1kyZEwmP7O0GwJ4prypo1tw== In-Reply-To: <4CD30277.4090501@antonioshome.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Why does apache22 port want python? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:38:53 -0000 I can't spot anything obvious in the config menu for apache22 or apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42 1.4.2.1.3.10 that would lead to python dependency. Here's my selections: Options for apache 2.2.17_1 [ ] THREADS Enable threads support in APR [ ] MYSQL Enable MySQL support for apr-dbd [ ] PGSQL Enable PostgreSQL support for apr-dbd [ ] SQLITE Enable SQLite support for apr-dbd [ ] IPV6 Enable IPv6 support [ ] BDB Enable BerkeleyDB dbm [X] AUTH_BASIC Enable mod_auth_basic [X] AUTH_DIGEST Enable mod_auth_digest [X] AUTHN_FILE Enable mod_authn_file [ ] AUTHN_DBD Enable mod_authn_dbd [X] AUTHN_DBM Enable mod_authn_dbm [X] AUTHN_ANON Enable mod_authn_anon [X] AUTHN_DEFAULT Enable mod_authn_default [X] AUTHN_ALIAS Enable mod_authn_alias [X] AUTHZ_HOST Enable mod_authz_host [X] AUTHZ_GROUPFILE Enable mod_authz_groupfile [X] AUTHZ_USER Enable mod_authz_user [X] AUTHZ_DBM Enable mod_authz_dbm [X] AUTHZ_OWNER Enable mod_authz_owner [X] AUTHZ_DEFAULT Enable mod_authz_default [X] CACHE Enable mod_cache [X] DISK_CACHE Enable mod_disk_cache [X] FILE_CACHE Enable mod_file_cache [ ] MEM_CACHE Enable mod_mem_cache [ ] DAV Enable mod_dav [ ] DAV_FS Enable mod_dav_fs [ ] BUCKETEER Enable mod_bucketeer [ ] CASE_FILTER Enable mod_case_filter [ ] CASE_FILTER_IN Enable mod_case_filter_in [ ] EXT_FILTER Enable mod_ext_filter [ ] LOG_FORENSIC Enable mod_log_forensic [ ] OPTIONAL_HOOK_EXPORT Enable mod_optional_hook_export [ ] OPTIONAL_HOOK_IMPORT Enable mod_optional_hook_import [ ] OPTIONAL_FN_IMPORT Enable mod_optional_fn_import [ ] OPTIONAL_FN_EXPORT Enable mod_optional_fn_export [ ] LDAP Enable mod_ldap [ ] AUTHNZ_LDAP Enable mod_authnz_ldap [X] ACTIONS Enable mod_actions [X] ALIAS Enable mod_alias [X] ASIS Enable mod_asis [X] AUTOINDEX Enable mod_autoindex [X] CERN_META Enable mod_cern_meta [X] CGI Enable mod_cgi [X] CHARSET_LITE Enable mod_charset_lite [ ] DBD Enable mod_dbd [X] DEFLATE Enable mod_deflate [X] DIR Enable mod_dir [X] DUMPIO Enable mod_dumpio [X] ENV Enable mod_env [X] EXPIRES Enable mod_expires [X] HEADERS Enable mod_headers [X] IMAGEMAP Enable mod_imagemap [X] INCLUDE Enable mod_include [X] INFO Enable mod_info [X] LOG_CONFIG Enable mod_log_config [X] LOGIO Enable mod_logio [X] MIME Enable mod_mime [X] MIME_MAGIC Enable mod_mime_magic [X] NEGOTIATION Enable mod_negotiation [X] REWRITE Enable mod_rewrite [X] SETENVIF Enable mod_setenvif [X] SPELING Enable mod_speling [X] STATUS Enable mod_status [X] UNIQUE_ID Enable mod_unique_id [X] USERDIR Enable mod_userdir [X] USERTRACK Enable mod_usertrack [X] VHOST_ALIAS Enable mod_vhost_alias [X] FILTER Enable mod_filter [X] VERSION Enable mod_version [ ] PROXY Enable mod_proxy [ ] PROXY_CONNECT Enable mod_proxy_connect [ ] PATCH_PROXY_CONNECT Patch proxy_connect SSL support [ ] PROXY_FTP Enable mod_proxy_ftp [ ] PROXY_HTTP Enable mod_proxy_http [ ] PROXY_AJP Enable mod_proxy_ajp [ ] PROXY_BALANCER Enable mod_proxy_balancer [ ] PROXY_SCGI Enable mod_proxy_scgi [X] SSL Enable mod_ssl [ ] SUEXEC Enable mod_suexec [ ] SUEXEC_RSRCLIMIT SuEXEC rlimits based on login class [X] REQTIMEOUT Enable mod_reqtimeout [ ] CGID Enable mod_cgid Options for apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42 1.4.2.1.3.10 [X] THREADS Enable Threads in apr [ ] IPV6 Enable IPV6 Support in apr [ ] BDB Enable Berkley BDB support in apr-util [X] GDBM Enable GNU dbm support in apr-util [ ] LDAP Enable LDAP support in apr-util [ ] MYSQL Enable MySQL suport in apr-util [ ] NDBM Enable NDBM support in apr-util [ ] PGSQL Enable Postgresql suport in apr-util [ ] SQLITE Enable SQLite3 support in apr-util [X] DEVRANDOM Use /dev/random or compatible in apr On 11/4/10 2:59 PM, "Antonio Vieiro" wrote: > Maybe this is configurable in the port? I don't think apache22 depends > on python at all, but maybe some apache plugin does. > > I'd try with make config install clean > > Cheers, > Antonio > > On 04/11/2010 19:30, Tom Worster wrote: >> I don't need python for anything, afaik. What does apache want it for? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 19:40:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D56B10656C1 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A038FC1C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so1805242ywh.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:40:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dB9lehmJhWQiR7htMP657OckzTFGJnaf4Mmbwbdq/GE=; b=AQA8vSdUsKFlgrGOVVg/S7GdCvmagDLLGmH6s5xw6U0608lEyPRNRvsxGZfaAp1QGl 4KSb3yNRFA2Nkw0RBBtpU9DoHu26mkARUi+Ntt3aIwCiVlkRTzdxei70T6s2EMWalBp2 /MZv1pTTx4ZNl/gLYE1R7VQWbUOrXC/2oE9Jw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=T1JxvLKdN1TpJaJYQkQxkaWGeo+60YdaRyvSsbKa1g2MB0nnUfX80KaZ55Eu3wANp5 bw4q3WvlTJLUt9j/1xzfIEFiB2oJ5fiVuqRB2RG0YpAtDCYgsQFlwK2+hgKGr90ydeM6 +ayBAZwZ63qTnOMSeMaQZb2KA8vBbKlnCD7N8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.116.201 with SMTP id n9mr1022323bkq.138.1288899623655; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.153 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:40:23 -0400 Message-ID: From: Tim Dunphy To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: failure to import ldif into ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:40:27 -0000 Thanks all.. I have read the man of ldif.... your advice has gotten me quite far both in my current implementation and in my overall understanding of LDAP which I am hoping grows with each passing day. In my attempt to build my current directory, I have taken a dump of my last successful implementation (which was created on FreeBSD 8.1) and substituted values for the dc=company and dc=com values with the correct ones for the current directory (attempting to implement under CentOS 5.4) and even tho the correct schemas are in place it is choking on this entry: # defaults, sudoers, Services, acadaca.com dn: cn=defaults,ou=sudoers,ou=Services,dc=acadaca,dc=net objectClass: top objectClass: sudoRole cn: defaults description: Default sudoOption's go here And again I should have all the schemas in place to make this work... include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema inlcude /etc/openldap/schema/sudoers.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema [root@ldap ldif]# ldapadd -h ldap -a -w secret -x -D "cn=Manager,dc=acadaca,dc=net" -f /home/tim/txt/ldif/acadaca-master.ldif adding new entry "cn=defaults,ou=sudoers,ou=Services,dc=acadaca,dc=net" ldapadd: Invalid syntax (21) additional info: objectClass: value #1 invalid per syntax Why this ldif will work in one directory but not another is a mystery at this point.. thanks again -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 20:31:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5C91065768 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 397798FC1D for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20649 invoked by uid 0); 4 Nov 2010 20:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 20:31:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=BZL+U+ALa7LTYR5fwd6R2qp3kzWa/tk4FxvaeXMF92uZejYsIflHhlrWWGdL79pdAtJOaQSvFTNKtALAv6qd7tkrqA8TC87h0uKtE+0zkGVPGa1OXezRzQJR05f+H4lj; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE6Sn-0007jo-1E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:31:14 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:25:23 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:25:23 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:31:16 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Last night, I decided to read a little bit about Chromium browser extensions, and peeked at the source for the Vimium extension to see what was wrong with it. Vimium is one of several Chromium extensions that provide some vi-like keybindings, and arguably the one with the best vi-like experience. Unfortunately, it is not quite up to the standards of Vimperator on Firefox, but it is definitely better than nothing. Also unfortunately, it does not install on FreeBSD in its current official form. It only produces an error. I cloned the GitHub repository to my laptop and figured out how to tweak it so that it *would* install, but it's an ugly (if simple) hack and not the "right" way to do things, I think. As such, it is not the sort of thing that is likely to be a good idea to submit upstream to the Vimium maintainer -- at least until I can determine *why* the official Vimium does not install on FreeBSD's Chromium browser port. If you want details about how I got Vimium to install, and on Vimium plus FreeBSD in general, I chronicled the experience in my personal devlog: http://blogstrapping.com/?page=3D2010.308.12.13.14 --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzTFrMACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKV+LgCdHlQD6o0LYhLbuQcOmeRmd32K Vt4An3++L7tGr6xsLERhfhR//b2U2kuh =VF9B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 21:17:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705B1106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6CE8FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2048471bwz.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:17:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v+260I4kgNpVJ7hBp3nGk6SYgBAqSpmyAZIWg0hVlJA=; b=eg+lq0FVCS5TitcbEnKZpiTMedWyxSj+R50dO1wki61uBv20phKvZA8AoCSzgR3gzs Z3V6HjZBd/HVwy+JA5GAAlhLdnX+SGwuXSSZM4Omrf/azi2a2tddlXPmkEfUlDyV4XcX 57c6ZkQ5y+DFDyWcZU4e5XmQoVIh/G7vYkIT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vCtd8ilPsOFA6EXTx8DrpXX2QtBhTyMCs5j0/wiKQYHW/s4BrKYxY7P4Q3RVTtTMHf PyraIXkYSwXB84b9VdGyY2szwvgPp+yOmHrscvvs1byHC2xZ745Nbz1vXIVJYP906OTB c7nkUUJGVY01is+xa1gAVxALLpHmcAzZyoCSk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.116.201 with SMTP id n9mr1108851bkq.138.1288905441866; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.153 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:17:21 -0400 Message-ID: From: Tim Dunphy To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: version of slapd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:17:24 -0000 hello list! how do I get the version of slapd under FreeBSD? under CentOS it's simply [root@ldap schema]# slapd -V @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.43 (Aug 11 2010 09:09:21) $ mockbuild@builder17.centos.org:/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.3.43/openldap-2.3.43/build-servers/servers/slapd Need to do the same thing for FreeBSD [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd -V /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd: unknown directive '-V'. Usage: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar|status|poll) [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#su - root Password: Last login: Thu Nov 4 18:44:15 on pts/0 LBSD2# slapd -V slapd: Command not found. thanks! -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 21:18:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B2B106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660C08FC0A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 17726E8201E; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:18:40 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Jon Radel Message-ID: <20101104211840.GB8425@thought.org> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4CD24A11.9000604@radel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD24A11.9000604@radel.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:18:53 -0000 On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:52:17AM -0400, Jon Radel wrote: > On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote: > >On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote: > >>He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago > >>and nothing's been fixed. > >Seems to be fine from here: > > > >% nslookup -type=any thought.org > >Server: 192.168.100.1 > >Address: 192.168.100.1#53 > > > >Non-authoritative answer: > >thought.org mail exchanger = 10 ethic.thought.org. > >thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net. > >thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org. > > > >Authoritative answers can be found from: > > > >% host ethic.thought.org > >ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > > >% host ns1.thought.org > >ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > > >% host ns2.everydns.net > >ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100 > >% ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net > >PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes > >64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=107.684 ms > >64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=107.073 ms > >64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=107.046 ms > > > >--- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics --- > >3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms > > > >Or am I misreading that? > > > > > > > You're overlooking the fact that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond > to queries about thought.org, though it is happy to respond to > queries about everydns.net. When half the servers for your zone > refuse to answer, things work less than 100%. On the other hand, I > don't think things are completely broken. Actually they're less > broken than Gary's DNS frequently is; it gets discussed on a regular > basis for a reason. > > So is the last octet of ns1.thought.org's address 209 or 210? ;-) > 209 as of midnight last. I _may_ have things a bit closer now. I can ping ns1 from a server somewhere in SoCal, and nslookup finds stuff also. (krap hit two fans simultaneously circa 29-30 Sept which was when I last got at this. I forgot to update the Serial number.) --Ordinarrily, this would be an excuse for not getting the DNS files right; not considering. Anyway, try ping and dig and nslookup... . gary > -- > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 21:27:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12DE1065672 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:27:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307468FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.unitedinsong.com.au (abracadabra.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.80]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073365C21; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:32:18 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AtMail Atmail Open 1.04 Message-ID: <62525.1288906338@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: "Tim Dunphy" , "freebsd-questions" X-Origin: 192.168.0.200 X-Atmail-Account: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:32:18 +1100 From: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: failure to import ldif into ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:27:40 -0000 On Fri 5/11/10 6:40 AM , Tim Dunphy wrote:Thanks all.. I have read the man of ldif.... your advice has gotten me quite far both in my current implementation and in my overall understanding of LDAP which I am hoping grows with each passing day. In my attempt to build my current directory, I have taken a dump of my last successful implementation (which was created on FreeBSD 8.1) and substituted values for the dc=3Dcompany and dc=3Dcom values with the correct ones for the current directory (attempting to implement under CentOS 5.4) and even tho the correct schemas are in place it is choking on this entry: # defaults, sudoers, Services, acadaca.com dn: cn=3Ddefaults,ou=3Dsudoers,ou=3DServices,dc=3Dacadaca,dc=3Dnet objectClass: top objectClass: sudoRole cn: defaults description: Default sudoOption's go here And again I should have all the schemas in place to make this work... include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema inlcude /etc/openldap/schema/sudoers.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema [ ldif]# ldapadd -h ldap -a -w secret -x -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dacadaca,dc=3Dnet" -f /home/tim/txt/ldif/acadaca-master.ldif adding new entry "cn=3Ddefaults,ou=3Dsudoers,ou=3DServices,dc=3Dacadaca,dc=3Dnet" ldapadd: Invalid syntax (21) additional info: objectClass: value #1 invalid per syntax Why this ldif will work in one directory but not another is a mystery at this point.. thanks again I'd be checking in a schema browser- make sure your objectclasses are all present and accounted for, plus your attributes and syntaxes match. HTH ------------------------- Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 21:41:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DB5106566C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.piggybox@virgin.net) Received: from queueout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (queueout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB948FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.4]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20101104203933.WTIK29865.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:39:33 +0000 Received: from [86.25.234.13] (helo=ideapad.piggybox) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PE6ar-0002Eb-F3 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:39:33 +0000 Received: from ideapad.piggybox (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ideapad.piggybox (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA4LcfhM001516 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:38:41 GMT (envelope-from peter@ideapad.piggybox) Received: (from peter@localhost) by ideapad.piggybox (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA4LceJO001515 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:38:41 GMT (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:38:40 +0000 From: Peter Harrison To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101104213840.GA1484@ideapad.piggybox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=DhNl2YeytwJssBBGe49HJX82LNDFEEVkpVB34RXKaPo= c=1 sm=0 a=Xdp3fyQ2GR4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7bwXyfqNb1iHf_aKaTMA:9 a=f719h4Wzky_fUzeX8wcA:7 a=BkWKmsLQPphlhWgO4561V-S5748A:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=oYPas11yM68HfYZA:21 a=W0q1uwdSaewKVtb7:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: Subject: hald doesn't start on boot... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:41:18 -0000 Dear all, I'm having a problem with hald. I have the following in my rc.conf: hald_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" and I see a "starting hald" message on boot, with seemingly no errors. Yet afterwards hald is not running - but if I then run /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald start hald starts without complaint, no messages, no problems. So why won't it start at boot? This is on 8.1-RELEASE. Does anyone have any ideas on how to track down what the problem is, and fix it? TIA. Peter Harrison. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 22:33:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F871106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:33:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880608FC12 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1423645eyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.6.201 with SMTP id a9mr1020955eba.18.1288910008148; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:33:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101104231813.GA1491@ideapad.piggybox> References: <20101104213840.GA1484@ideapad.piggybox> <20101104231813.GA1491@ideapad.piggybox> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:33:07 -0400 Message-ID: To: Peter Harrison Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hald doesn't start on boot... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:33:30 -0000 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Peter Harrison wrote: > Thursday, 4 November 2010 at 17:56:56 -0400, Chris Brennan said: > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Peter Harrison < > peter.piggybox@virgin.net>wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I'm having a problem with hald. > > > > > > I have the following in my rc.conf: > > > > > > hald_enable="YES" > > > dbus_enable="YES" > > > > > > and I see a "starting hald" message on boot, with seemingly no errors. > Yet > > > afterwards hald is not running - but if I then run > > > > > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald start > > > > > > hald starts without complaint, no messages, no problems. So why won't > it > > > start at boot? > > > > > > This is on 8.1-RELEASE. > > > > > > Does anyone have any ideas on how to track down what the problem is, > and > > > fix it? > > > > > > TIA. > > > > > > > > I just looked at my FBSD64-8.1 install and hald did successfully start on > > reboot. I'm not sure why it's failing to start for you. Have you tried > > modify the init script to include '--use-syslog' and check > > /var/log/messages for any messages? > > Thanks for coming back to me Chris. I added this to rc.conf: > > hald_flags="--use-syslog" > > but I get nothing logged when starting hald. The strange thing is that this > was working fine until after I ran my last portupgrade - but this didn't > touch hal. These are the ports that got updated (based on the packages from > my package building machine): > > ImageMagick-6.6.4.10.tbz > autoconf-2.68.tbz > automake-1.11.1.tbz > bash-4.1.9.tbz > cdrtools-3.00_1.tbz > cmake-2.8.2_1.tbz > conky-1.8.1.tbz > dbus-1.4.0.tbz > fetchmail-6.3.18.tbz > ffmpeg-0.6.1,1.tbz > firefox-3.6.12,1.tbz > fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_7.tbz > iso-codes-3.21.tbz > libSM-1.1.1_3,1.tbz > libpciaccess-0.12.0.tbz > libtasn1-2.8.tbz > libxul-1.9.2.9_1.tbz > mencoder-1.0.r20100717_2.tbz > mplayer-1.0.r20100717_2.tbz > nss-3.12.8.tbz > orc-0.4.11.tbz > p5-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.031.tbz > p5-Digest-MD5-2.51.tbz > p5-IO-Compress-2.030.tbz > p5-URI-1.56.tbz > p5-WWW-Mechanize-1.66.tbz > p5-XML-Parser-2.40.tbz > p5-YAML-Tiny-1.44.tbz > p5-libwww-5.837.tbz > pciids-20101005.tbz > ruby+nopthreads-1.8.7.248_5,1.tbz > samba34-libsmbclient-3.4.9.tbz > sane-backends-1.0.21_2.tbz > schroedinger-1.0.10.tbz > sqlite3-3.7.3.tbz > vim-7.3.32.tbz > xpaint-2.9.6.3.tbz > youtube_dl-2010.10.03.tbz > > For shiggles, try reinstalling hald w/ 'portmaster -dRrt sysutils/hal' >From the portmaster manpage -t recurse dependencies thoroughly, using all-depends-list -d always clean distfiles [-R] -r rebuild port, and all ports that depend on it > > > > Did you know... > > > > If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, > > but what's worse is when you play it forward.... > > ...it installs Windows 2000 > > > > -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Peter Harrison. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 22:46:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BD7106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnrp@gnrp.in-berlin.de) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6E58FC0C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:46:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-From: gnrp@gnrp.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from adolfputzen (p4FCDE66C.dip.t-dialin.net [79.205.230.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id oA4M7kIg026123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:07:47 +0100 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:07:41 +0100 From: Julian Fagir To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101104230741.0a0ab4ca@adolfputzen> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_//6Qow+LZeZTU8kKzarKAQdW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Subject: Re: version of slapd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:46:27 -0000 --Sig_//6Qow+LZeZTU8kKzarKAQdW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd -V > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd: unknown directive '-V'. > Usage: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd > [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar|status|poll) > [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#su - root > Password: > Last login: Thu Nov 4 18:44:15 on pts/0 > LBSD2# slapd -V > slapd: Command not found. slapd is located in libexec of your local directory, i.e.=20 /usr/local/libexec/slapd which is usually not in your PATH. The rc.d-script is just the startfile, not the executable itself. Alternatively, you can look at the version of your installed package, e.g. pkg_info | grep openldap Regards, Julian --Sig_//6Qow+LZeZTU8kKzarKAQdW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzTLq0ACgkQc7h7cu1Hpp6VTgCgswd1Gnv810CjTRbxZDYzUQZ1 Bf4AoIUpCNuqVt4foRNEECxZzoXDCHyr =ep6w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//6Qow+LZeZTU8kKzarKAQdW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 23:29:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F485106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@fastmail.fm) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3E8FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B8A4F9 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:10:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:10:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=+vxJZ3ZJcoY4Gg7RzMA97pGma5c=; b=Xa4hhRe4dRREVOaLrS+2HxOdQFGuXC29KBVX4572pGmmfIge0HD/cIAWnw5Hl00eI0oHstmocbPy7ofgZPeq5/7Ij+UHXC/pTx0WniTqZykO7+//SY/pyv4maPGmiEmqm/B6LYHiPihqaBP+YvB5IEi5PUvkUz38sIgHEgVflY0= X-Sasl-enc: DhS/lSVXi1nZj34QoWb5+IceXRAE9IXBcT4+1bzlviQ2 1288912222 Received: from oslo.ath.cx (d91-128-195-4.cust.tele2.at [91.128.195.4]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87A6F5E5430 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:10:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:10:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87r5f0bs82.wl%hskuhra@fastmail.fm> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: In-Reply-To: References: <4CD30277.4090501@antonioshome.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Why does apache22 port want python? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:29:57 -0000 On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:38:51 -0400 Tom Worster wrote: > I can't spot anything obvious in the config menu for apache22 or > apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42 1.4.2.1.3.10 that would lead to python > dependency. Here's my selections: % egrep -i "(python|.py)" /usr/ports/devel/apr1/Makefile USE_PYTHON_BUILD= -2.7 ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '1 s/python/${PYTHON_VERSION}/' \ ${APR_WRKDIR}/build/gen-build.py -Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 23:38:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E4B106566C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728628FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so2068215iwn.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:38:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:references:from :content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sOf16AbUYSxpUNSqKL8ksIP3Vfc9xtn+Oh7w9cH2udg=; b=vFtjaEFmTeXpkftaeLbxD7LOPiPjnF2OSCgQdSCuQMVBDb1hU2RGOYVaQKQg9aNSDQ ZPwkgmuS8svdyJE2kPupSlZAcQ4xuNAq8uCJqzYDOXZ3nPPd8hxCSW35I6ukPM/USLdI r/TtsX820Xu9Db749s7TXgwIKWxipCWLXsn3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=gKRHOJY2hf3/VqUh6NZfeOxMZkCzNcpL3nruUB5kkuDK5QPaC2EK2rIbNKlaBwtxtH KpvxqJI7Y9/i7nr2GtGjzHGtLdV6NhH8ICcmLh9amIgC99i8WHrhS8TSneGzhEQcLjQG vS5U+6pHohPhbOo+TZ3gyxmRhqxgOU/6tqY6Q= Received: by 10.42.169.132 with SMTP id b4mr1103455icz.236.1288913890423; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.130.18.16] (mobile-166-137-139-061.mycingular.net [166.137.139.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fw4sm473631ibb.13.2010.11.04.16.38.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:38:09 -0700 (PDT) References: <20101104230741.0a0ab4ca@adolfputzen> From: Tim Dunphy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) In-Reply-To: <20101104230741.0a0ab4ca@adolfputzen> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:37:55 -0400 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Subject: Re: version of slapd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:38:11 -0000 That did it!!! [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#pkg_info | grep openldap openldap-sasl-client-2.4.23 Open source LDAP client implementation with SASL= 2 support openldap-sasl-server-2.4.23 Open source LDAP server implementation I will put /usr/local/libexec/ on my path when I get a chance btw, thanks fo= r mentioning it! Also thank you for making my Jedi powers that much stronger= !!! ;-) Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Julian Fagir wrote: > Hi, >=20 >> [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd -V >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd: unknown directive '-V'. >> Usage: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd >> [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar|status|poll) >> [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#su - root >> Password: >> Last login: Thu Nov 4 18:44:15 on pts/0 >> LBSD2# slapd -V >> slapd: Command not found. >=20 > slapd is located in libexec of your local directory, i.e.=20 > /usr/local/libexec/slapd > which is usually not in your PATH. > The rc.d-script is just the startfile, not the executable itself. >=20 > Alternatively, you can look at the version of your installed package, e.g.= > pkg_info | grep openldap >=20 >=20 > Regards, Julian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 00:27:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A38106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 806DE8FC08 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2779 invoked by uid 0); 5 Nov 2010 00:27:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 00:27:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=WFdAzuqflOJO/rT2uo1hjIsb/lgI8Cqwj2wx/JBHwcB85Pj1Zu6VcEVaxIFpZl6U0ltwBd/PhqZI6/rIV2x0NLLw4sxsPHdYZzNB67MRThej2eD64Yd5YOIeH6lRX7Kr; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEA9i-00071e-Ok for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:27:47 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:21:56 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:21:56 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:27:48 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:25:23PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: >=20 > Vimium is one of several Chromium extensions that provide some vi-like > keybindings, and arguably the one with the best vi-like experience. > Unfortunately, it is not quite up to the standards of Vimperator on > Firefox, but it is definitely better than nothing. Also unfortunately, > it does not install on FreeBSD in its current official form. It only > produces an error. I figured out why the version of Chromium in ports does not support the URL scheme wildcard: that was a feature of the matches value that was added in Chromium v6.x. Chromium is up to 7.x now, but the version in FreeBSD ports is still 5.0.x, so my ugly "fix" is necessary to make Vimium installable. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzTTiQACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXRLwCg8WJDdXVPtGoFU1n4B1J6vETf SJIAniCsEQNKPHlorg/zmRYLVqRbpOpx =Ct9U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 00:32:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B23B1065698 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC9C8FC13 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1454262eyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.28.205 with SMTP id n13mr1229971ebc.5.1288917151457; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:32:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:32:11 -0400 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:32:34 -0000 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:25:23PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > Vimium is one of several Chromium extensions that provide some vi-like > > keybindings, and arguably the one with the best vi-like experience. > > Unfortunately, it is not quite up to the standards of Vimperator on > > Firefox, but it is definitely better than nothing. Also unfortunately, > > it does not install on FreeBSD in its current official form. It only > > produces an error. > > I figured out why the version of Chromium in ports does not support the > URL scheme wildcard: that was a feature of the matches value that was > added in Chromium v6.x. Chromium is up to 7.x now, but the version in > FreeBSD ports is still 5.0.x, so my ugly "fix" is necessary to make > Vimium installable. > > So are there plans to get 7x into ports? I would love to go back to Chrome as a browser ... I find Firefox so clunky now! :D > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 01:15:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id AB5D91065695; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 01:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 01:15:24 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101105011524.GA25738@freebsd.org> References: <20101103223438.GA26003@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101103223438.GA26003@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:15:24 -0000 On Wed Nov 3 10, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > is this a known issue with kldunload(8)? this is also very interesting: ***beginn*** otaku% kldstat -v|grep netgraph 7 3 0xffffffff80bfa000 15e68 netgraph.ko (/boot/kernel/netgraph.ko) 6 netgraph otaku% sudo kldunload netgraph otaku% echo $? 0 otaku% kldstat -v|grep netgraph 7 2 0xffffffff80bfa000 15e68 netgraph.ko (/boot/kernel/netgraph.ko) 6 netgraph otaku% ***end*** there seems to be a logical error in the ref counting code. cheers. alex > > ***beginn*** > otaku% kldunload sound > otaku% echo $? > 0 > otaku% kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 35 0xffffffff80100000 a2da40 kernel > 2 1 0xffffffff80b2e000 295e8 snd_hda.ko > 3 1 0xffffffff80b58000 85110 sound.ko > 4 1 0xffffffff80bde000 da4bb8 nvidia.ko > 5 4 0xffffffff81983000 418e0 linux.ko > 6 1 0xffffffff819c5000 80e8 ng_ubt.ko > 7 2 0xffffffff819ce000 fa78 ng_hci.ko > 8 2 0xffffffff819de000 2bd0 ng_bluetooth.ko > 9 3 0xffffffff819e1000 15e68 netgraph.ko > 10 1 0xffffffff81c12000 3edb linprocfs.ko > 11 3 0xffffffff81c16000 4698 pseudofs.ko > 12 1 0xffffffff81c1b000 31b3 procfs.ko > 13 1 0xffffffff81c1f000 a37 linsysfs.ko > otaku% kldunload sound > kldunload: attempt to unload file that was loaded by the kernel > kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy > otaku% echo $? > 1 > otaku% > ***end*** > > cheers. > alex > > -- > a13x -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 02:13:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3FB106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB548FC21 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:13:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=dEqhbLcxm4cA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=jzIRTFf7VEiVCUKctzMA:9 a=tyPgHh_usCtNBY9p91sA:7 a=QtPOt8aeWeOP2CxxajWZXTzwHUgA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=qKklcAH13T5ISEJ7:21 a=v-R5CZXYf_xPu_Jp:21 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:52285] helo=hbca.yeaguy.com) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 8F/0C-24070-26863DC4; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:13:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:13:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "justin v" Organization: Yea_Guy Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (FreeBSD) Subject: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:13:56 -0000 I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first line after the splash menu thing: 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) is a stick bad perhaps? yeaguy# dmidecode -t memory # dmidecode 2.10 SMBIOS 2.3 present. Handle 0x1000, DMI type 16, 15 bytes Physical Memory Array Location: System Board Or Motherboard Use: System Memory Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC Maximum Capacity: 1 GB Error Information Handle: Not Provided Number Of Devices: 4 Handle 0x1100, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x1000 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 1024 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM_1 Bank Locator: Not Specified Type: DDR Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: 7F7F7F7F7F9B0000 Serial Number: 00000000 Asset Tag: 000A28 Part Number: CT12864AA800.M8FH Handle 0x1101, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x1000 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 1024 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM_3 Bank Locator: Not Specified Type: DDR Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: 7F7F7F7F7F9B0000 Serial Number: 00000000 Asset Tag: 000A28 Part Number: CT12864AA800.M8FH Handle 0x1102, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x1000 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 1024 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM_2 Bank Locator: Not Specified Type: DDR Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: 7F7F7F7F7F9B0000 Serial Number: 00000000 Asset Tag: 000A28 Part Number: CT12864AA800.M8FH Handle 0x1103, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x1000 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 1024 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM_4 Bank Locator: Not Specified Type: DDR Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: 7F7F7F7F7F9B0000 Serial Number: 00000000 Asset Tag: 000A28 Part Number: CT12864AA800.M8FH yeaguy# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 02:35:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9B81065670 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F83C8FC12 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9903198; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:35:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9903196; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:35:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:35:20 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: justin v References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040408080207010202090508" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:35:35 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms040408080207010202090508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: > > I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first=20 > line after the splash menu thing: > > 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored > > dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: > > real memory =3D 4294967296 (4096 MB) > avail memory =3D 3139940352 (2994 MB) > > is a stick bad perhaps? > Start by reading=20 http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory= =2Ehtml If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little=20 information about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're using. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms040408080207010202090508-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 02:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF5E106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879348FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1481002eyb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.108.196 with SMTP id g4mr1144044ebp.31.1288924929080; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:41:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> References: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:41:48 -0400 Message-ID: To: Jon Radel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: justin v , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:42:11 -0000 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Jon Radel wrote: > On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: > >> >> I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first line >> after the splash menu thing: >> >> 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored >> >> dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: >> >> real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) >> avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) >> >> is a stick bad perhaps? >> >> Start by reading > http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory.html > > If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little information > about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're using. > > Justin, where you the one who was getting weird coredumps w/ no data and memtest86 beeped at you? On a side note, mismatched pairs might cause this .... bank's 0-1 need to match each other in speed/size and banks 2-3 have to match each other but banks 0-1 don't have to match banks 2-3 ... (e.g. My desktop has 2 2GB Modules and 2 1GB modules for a total of 6gb (in my case they are the same speed all across (DDR2/800) hth/chris Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > -- > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 03:41:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89871065679 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D568FC14 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:41:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=UCLC2FDiInsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=-5WMeQcgAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=RAbaEJs0133RCJ0deNcA:9 a=YxWhML051JqqKEFr3PnQVF3DXRoA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=tc2ICF-Aw_EA:10 a=5KDeGo4aUKgA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:10639] helo=hbca.yeaguy.com) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 74/A5-24070-7DC73DC4; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:41:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Jon Radel" References: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "justin v" Organization: Yea_Guy Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:41:10 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (FreeBSD) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:41:12 -0000 On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:35:20 -0700, Jon Radel wrote: > On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: >> >> I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first >> line after the splash menu thing: >> >> 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored >> >> dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: >> >> real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) >> avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) >> >> is a stick bad perhaps? >> > Start by reading > http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory.html > > If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little > information about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're using. > -- Thank you, that covers it.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 04:23:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2E7106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 04:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145DA8FC19 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 04:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.47.0.108] (newtao.thought.org [10.47.0.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA54Mtao015726; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) From: kline To: Bernt Hansson In-Reply-To: <4CD269F8.3040105@bah.homeip.net> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101104055900.GA4796@thought.org> <4CD269F8.3040105@bah.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Thought Unlimited Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:22:55 -0700 Message-ID: <1288930975.2625.35.camel@newtao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:23:08 -0000 On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:08 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2010-11-04 06:59, Gary Kline: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >> > >>> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700 > >>> From: Gary Kline > >>> Subject: Re: is there a utility...? > >>> > >> > >> *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable. > >> > >> There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org' > >> The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on a query. > >> > > > > > > If I knew how to fix this I would. The only IP that is > > pingable is 209.180.213.209; this is "cd0" of my WAN on my > > pfSense computer. I changed ns1.thought.org to the prev IP > > on my registrar and a few minutes ago edited my > > master/thought.org.*files. If this doesn't work in a few days, > > let me know. > > > > I logged into my only outside account on a server in the > > SouthEast, I pinged ns1.thought.org, and it echoed the above > > IP. i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jargon is lost. What does "glue" means? and how should I resolve? It is time to get this stuff arrow-straight, so hoping that someone on-list can clue me in. tx, gary http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org/1288928790 > > .... > > > > > > > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 04:54:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AC4106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 04:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@club.kyutech.ac.jp) Received: from sapphire.club.kyutech.ac.jp (sapphire.club.kyutech.ac.jp [131.206.108.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F092C8FC13 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 04:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sapphire.club.kyutech.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sapphire.club.kyutech.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFBC11450 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:35:07 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at club.kyutech.ac.jp Received: from club.kyutech.ac.jp (rose.club.kyutech.ac.jp [131.206.108.6]) by sapphire.club.kyutech.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4976D1144F for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:35:06 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:35:04 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101105043503.GA12706@club.kyutech.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: problem on building perl5.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:54:15 -0000 I tried to upgrade perl 5.10 to 5.12 according to UPDATING but building perl 5.12 fails. I believe the failure is caused by needless "-lnsl" option. How to build it fine? # portmaster -o lang/perl5.12 lang/perl5.10 ---(snip)--- and I got the following output: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnsl I can't compile the test program. You have a BIG problem. Shall I abort Configure [y] Ok. Stopping Configure. ===> Script "Configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to skv@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/lang/perl5.12/work/perl-5.12.2/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 See also; whole portmaster outputs: http://www.club.kyutech.ac.jp/~meta/temp/perlerror.txt -- kiwao From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 05:32:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66311065674 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A338FC28 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9903362; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:32:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9903360; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:32:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4CD396DB.5000204@radel.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:32:11 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kline References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101104055900.GA4796@thought.org> <4CD269F8.3040105@bah.homeip.net> <1288930975.2625.35.camel@newtao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <1288930975.2625.35.camel@newtao.thought.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080506090704050902040306" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:32:19 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080506090704050902040306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote: > > i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type > responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it > has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jargon is lost. Wha= t > does "glue" means? and how should I resolve? > > It is time to get this stuff arrow-straight, so hoping that someone > on-list can clue me in. > > > tx, > > > gary > > http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org/1288928790 If your parents, the nameservers authoritative for .org, tell the world=20 that one of the nameservers for thought.org is ns1.thought.org, they=20 also have to tell the world what the IP address for ns1.thought.org is=20 using an A record. That A record is glue. Otherwise you get a machine=20 conversation something like: Resolving nameserver trying to find a record in the thought.org zone=20 (RN): Please Mr. root server, I'd like to know about www.thought.org....= Root: See the .org folks over there.... RN: Please Mr. top-level dude, about that www.thought.org.... Org: Well, see ns1.thought.org.... RN: Ahem, I'm trying to find out basic stuff about thought.org and I=20 don't know the address for ns1.thought.org in order to ask it Org: Well, ask ns1.thought.org what the address for ns1.thought.org is..= =2E RN: But, but, but....followed by petulant stomping off Glue A records fix that problem. BTW, the fact that a glue record isn't returned for ns2.everydns.net in=20 response to a query about NS records for thought.org really isn't a=20 problem; note the "info" rather than "fail" from DNSCog. Biggest problem I still see is that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond=20 to queries about thought.org. You sure your account there is still=20 active and functional and that you're allowing zone transfers to them? =20 I note that you don't allow transfers from arbitrary addresses, and=20 http://www.everydns.com/faq/secondary-domain/example-setup does warn=20 that the source address for transfer requests was/will/did change. Some of the problems reported by DNSCog appear to be bogus. They've got = some bugs related to cases where a nameserver has a name in the domain=20 in question. (And also some bugs related to nameservers which are=20 reachable by both ipv4 and ipv6, but that doesn't apply to you.) --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms080506090704050902040306-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 05:38:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD852106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A068FC08 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [66.253.36.39]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F66F28405; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 01:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CD3985A.4090803@cyberleo.net> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:38:34 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100911 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Best References: <20101103223438.GA26003@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101103223438.GA26003@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:38:36 -0000 On 11/03/2010 05:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > is this a known issue with kldunload(8)? > > ***beginn*** > otaku% kldunload sound > otaku% echo $? > 0 > otaku% kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 35 0xffffffff80100000 a2da40 kernel > 2 1 0xffffffff80b2e000 295e8 snd_hda.ko > 3 1 0xffffffff80b58000 85110 sound.ko > 4 1 0xffffffff80bde000 da4bb8 nvidia.ko > 5 4 0xffffffff81983000 418e0 linux.ko > 6 1 0xffffffff819c5000 80e8 ng_ubt.ko > 7 2 0xffffffff819ce000 fa78 ng_hci.ko > 8 2 0xffffffff819de000 2bd0 ng_bluetooth.ko > 9 3 0xffffffff819e1000 15e68 netgraph.ko > 10 1 0xffffffff81c12000 3edb linprocfs.ko > 11 3 0xffffffff81c16000 4698 pseudofs.ko > 12 1 0xffffffff81c1b000 31b3 procfs.ko > 13 1 0xffffffff81c1f000 a37 linsysfs.ko > otaku% kldunload sound > kldunload: attempt to unload file that was loaded by the kernel > kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy sound.ko was presumably loaded by snd_hda.ko, as it is a dependency. You must unload all the modules depending on sound.ko before it will unload. At that point, I believe I've seen it unload itself. Same with netgraph.ko, and the modules that require it (ng_*.ko). -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 07:01:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99085106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65E2D8FC16 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8499 invoked by uid 0); 5 Nov 2010 07:01:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 07:01:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=IhcgJ4w5+FhfznHSWy8dQXHHKfcCz0tmy/OCHcWeXHvqViwizhl2n38TI241XGUUcqPhq3oOILVvd0HZB31D2h4v6SjhFnh0Mi2v/IKjsPuOAHjReiFYzkLdWTM5JdY2; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEGIm-000398-Kw; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:01:33 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:55:41 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:55:41 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: Chris Brennan , FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101105065541.GC5340@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Brennan , FreeBSD Questions References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Cc: Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:01:34 -0000 --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 08:32:11PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: >=20 > So are there plans to get 7x into ports? I would love to go back to Chrome > as a browser ... I find Firefox so clunky now! :D Well . . . I have no idea what plans there are for updating the port, since I'm not the port maintainer for Chromium. On the other hand, 5.x is still smother and nicer than Firefox in many, many ways. The real limitations for Chromium are the restrictions that apply to extension development. If those restrictions don't really affect you, if for instance you don't care about vi-like keybindings and don't use KB SSL Enforcer on Chromium or HTTPS Everywhere on Firefox (so you don't care about the fact that Chromium's extension system limits KB SSL Enforcer's functionality so that it leaks data that should have been encrypted), then you could start using Chromium on FreeBSD now. Just install it from ports. I'm not *too* worried about getting the most up-to-date version of my browser, as long as the version I'm using doesn't have security vulnerabilities addressed in later versions, unless there is a specific feature I need. In this case, there *are* some specific features I want, features for extension development that should fix some of the flakiness of Vimium. Your mileage may vary, of course. I'm basically going back to using Firefox, after figuring out how to get Vimium installed (but not operating properly), I think. 5.x just doesn't support what I need, and I don't have the time and specific skills needed to submit updates to the port myself. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzTqm0ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWsyACgk7ECkhVHaR11M8SN1TUq1fWw Kw8AoNgZldnZImcHbC5/spl3eEa4HJTw =YA3f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 07:12:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76F5106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A511F8FC13 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oA57CpWk000585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:12:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oA57CpLN000584; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14340; Thu, 4 Nov 10 23:04:36 PST Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:10:09 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bluethundr@gmail.com Message-Id: <4cd3add1.QoFP99EPgzwBizhV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101104230741.0a0ab4ca@adolfputzen> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: version of slapd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:12:52 -0000 Tim Dunphy wrote: > I will put /usr/local/libexec/ on my path when I get a chance ... This is not necessarily a good idea. Usually things are installed into libexec instead of into bin to keep them _out of_ the path. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 07:19:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A423A106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D97A8FC21 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF1D10EDFF; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:20:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-WQf1bLVESp; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:20:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E323610E50A; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:20:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD3B00F.7030501@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:19:43 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: justin v References: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Jon Radel Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:19:52 -0000 On 2010-11-05 04:41, justin v wrote: > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:35:20 -0700, Jon Radel wrote: > >> On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: >>> >>> I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first >>> line after the splash menu thing: >>> >>> 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored >>> >>> dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: >>> >>> real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) >>> avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) >>> >>> is a stick bad perhaps? >>> >> Start by reading >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory.html >> >> >> If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little >> information about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're using. >> > > I would suggest you to give us the output of uname -a I suspect you are running the 32-bit version of FreeBSD and it cannot address more that 3 Gb of RAM. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 07:27:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46961065670 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A4198FC08 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9460 invoked by uid 0); 5 Nov 2010 07:27:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 07:27:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=MGXy85NbxGI2+NJbKn7Fv2tUEC+NGrXdy67NybuLD4LRAC/QBdIt4ZcTQzZlN9MmF9nkTKGShaynvjEj2w6DBv5mVISbSO7iWIV2APEc+KGW9oMGXEOtj83K0TqTN9dh; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEGhU-0005lp-PZ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:27:05 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:21:13 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 01:21:13 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101105072113.GA5506@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions , Chris Brennan References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> <20101105065541.GC5340@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101105065541.GC5340@guilt.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Cc: Chris Brennan Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:27:06 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:55:41AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 08:32:11PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > >=20 > > So are there plans to get 7x into ports? I would love to go back to Chr= ome > > as a browser ... I find Firefox so clunky now! :D >=20 > Well . . . I have no idea what plans there are for updating the port, > since I'm not the port maintainer for Chromium. On the other hand, 5.x > is still smother and nicer than Firefox in many, many ways. The real s/smother/smoother/ oops --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzTsGkACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW+QgCeOEWzBx4uHJ0wjWDLEVWwM5cq fN8AoKtCgMlAXeElMZXTc9BipgDWTXet =PbBf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 07:28:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA895106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277438FC1D for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oA57SRbw044953; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:28:28 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:28:27 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Jon Radel In-Reply-To: <20101105053844.71239106577C@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101105174858.X16633@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101105053844.71239106577C@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: kline , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:28:32 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 8, Message: 29 On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:32:11 -0400 Jon Radel wrote: > On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote: [..] > > It is time to get this stuff arrow-straight, so hoping that someone > > on-list can clue me in. [..] > > http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org/1288928790 > If your parents, the nameservers authoritative for .org, tell the world > that one of the nameservers for thought.org is ns1.thought.org, they > also have to tell the world what the IP address for ns1.thought.org is > using an A record. That A record is glue. Otherwise you get a machine > conversation something like: > > Resolving nameserver trying to find a record in the thought.org zone > (RN): Please Mr. root server, I'd like to know about www.thought.org.... > Root: See the .org folks over there.... > RN: Please Mr. top-level dude, about that www.thought.org.... > Org: Well, see ns1.thought.org.... > RN: Ahem, I'm trying to find out basic stuff about thought.org and I > don't know the address for ns1.thought.org in order to ask it > Org: Well, ask ns1.thought.org what the address for ns1.thought.org is... > RN: But, but, but....followed by petulant stomping off > > Glue A records fix that problem. Lovely description Jon :) But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do; eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au so DNS reports always whinge about lack of glue .. nonetheless it works, though only after a hunt down through the .au servers, until cached. > BTW, the fact that a glue record isn't returned for ns2.everydns.net in > response to a query about NS records for thought.org really isn't a > problem; note the "info" rather than "fail" from DNSCog. > > Biggest problem I still see is that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond > to queries about thought.org. You sure your account there is still > active and functional and that you're allowing zone transfers to them? Confirmed here, no response at all after a good long wait; worse than reyrning 'we don't do thought.org' % dig @ns2.everydns.net. thought.org ; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1 <<>> @ns2.everydns.net. thought.org ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached where they really should be quickly issuing a REFUSED response. 'dig @ns2.everydns.net. everydns.net' works fine, so I'm reaching it ok. > I note that you don't allow transfers from arbitrary addresses, and > http://www.everydns.com/faq/secondary-domain/example-setup does warn > that the source address for transfer requests was/will/did change. > > Some of the problems reported by DNSCog appear to be bogus. They've got > some bugs related to cases where a nameserver has a name in the domain > in question. (And also some bugs related to nameservers which are > reachable by both ipv4 and ipv6, but that doesn't apply to you.) Bogus indeed. Tested one local domain there and got whinging about not accepting <> and postmaster@ mail; odd, thought I, but maillog shows: Nov 4 22:43:43 xxxx sm-mta[81227]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=[216.146.46.136], arg2=216.146.46.136, relay=[216.146.46.136], reject=550 5.7.1 Fix reverse DNS for 216.146.46.136 % dig -x 216.146.46.136 [..] ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 18278 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;136.46.146.216.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: 46.146.216.in-addr.arpa. 1800 IN SOA ns1.mydyndns.org. zone-admin.dyndns.com. 2008082768 10800 1800 604800 1800 Seems a bit amateurish to me, running a service like that on a dynamic address without reverse resolution, then expecting mail to work .. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 08:23:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9750A106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523C8FC08 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2415314bwz.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0RRx1WAxy5YMPHjYUL4bngieD6OffIbDbDcLkeg3+M8=; b=g68qRMo9L5coEpWlh23MsFI2i5FKf30s5rwXrBJkxsdTOgDRqcERWjE0CRHCLQ7P4t s0FgX6G5x0Y9r0eZigTy575Ulkmll8xfMGlwRc1xfwO+7hn5LuvAuXbHtE/qWC7UmQwx slaMHUMR3nmzUguJ94ku/YVCqC7QJTO9I7v6s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hLA71BYsGFyQexoWGcaAOqdFqUTCrY3SPzo1nxDnoQ6Sya8ZTi2U0a/I3jV+ya8Gyi HdfkKQPpKj4ZyVTtOqzRHgAoopbqLeQRXsKroNyC+NYYpGJ/KRjs09FlTqUggYhHrtoZ saIys6e0nNUEfxDbPEQ1QruGfVHCum07mx1vw= Received: by 10.204.102.76 with SMTP id f12mr1623755bko.57.1288945396964; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ecs ([213.8.162.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c40sm1071950fay.0.2010.11.05.01.23.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4cd3bef4.28a4df0a.5edf.56ec@mx.google.com> From: four.harrisons@googlemail.com To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au, ait@p2ee.org, ivoras@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:28:35 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:23:20 -0000 =0D=0A=0D=0AOn Tue 2/11/10 11:37 AM , freebsd-questions@herveybayaustral= ia.com.au=0D=0Awrote:=0D=0A On Tue 2/11/10 10:11 AM , Alejandro Imass w= rote:On Mon, Nov 1, 2010=0D=0A at 6:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:=0D=0A > On= 11/01/10 15:42, Mark Atkinson wrote:=0D=0A >>=0D=0A >> -----BEGIN PGP = SIGNED MESSAGE-----=0D=0A >> Hash: SHA1=0D=0A [...]=0D=0A > In the abo= ve messages, the kernel detaches the storage device=0D=0A (umass) and=0D=0A= > tries to attach the new device, which doesn't have a driver so=0D=0Ai= t's=0D=0A attached=0D=0A > as "ugen" - generic USB.=0D=0A >=0D=0A Yes.= One has to remember that USB is just the bus just like pci,=0D=0A micro= channel, etc. Even though you have access to the device on the=0D=0A bus= you still need a driver for that specific ethernet chip your=0D=0A kern= el. This is analogous to having a video card on the pci bus, you=0D=0A s= till need for the kernel to drive the specific chipset of the card=0D=0A = regardless if it can see it on the bus.=0D=0A I have an HTC Nexus One s= o I may fiddle with this and see if I can=0D=0A help some more here. I a= m wishful that at least we can get a tty=0D=0Ajust=0D=0A like other gsm = modems and from there it's pretty straight forward=0D=0A using wvdial or= alike. If it's only the Ethernet over usb like you=0D=0A mention, then = the chipset driver would have to be translated/ported=0D=0A to=0D=0A the= FBSD kernel, if it's not already there ?=0D=0A Ok. But I will clarify he= re:=0D=0A The HTC Android systems uses an "Internet Sharing" feature-=0D=0A= essentially Google has coded in routing/nat system into the base OS=0D=0A= (probably moding the leftover code already in the linux base), and is=0D= =0A trying to allow similar using bluetooth and wifi at a later date as=0D= =0A well. The RNDIS is a M$ system that allows sharing anything over USB=0D= =0A (network, files, etc- but all essentially operated as network=0D=0Aan= yway),=0D=0A something they've been playing with for some years- I was lo= oking for=0D=0A an A-A USB cable since around 2003 or so to quickly trans= fer files=0D=0A when needed. Apparently M$ opened the specs a year or two= ago and=0D=0A everyone's jumped on to use it. So where Google started wa= s to start=0D=0A allowing the use of the router/nat via RNDIS USB - someh= ow this was=0D=0A easier than allowing bluetooth or wifi (probably securi= ty and=0D=0A available hardware features).=0D=0A So yes, apparently the p= hone hooks up as a usb mass storage device,=0D=0A uploads a file to the c= omputer, and disconnects and becomes a network=0D=0A device. Here is the = output from linux:=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_= hcd and address 4=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice=0D= =0A scsi9 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices=0D=0A usb-storage= : device found at 4=0D=0A usb-storage: waiting for device to settle befor= e scanning=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProd= uct=3D0ff9=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2,= SerialNumber=3D1=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone=0D=0A usb 2-2.2= : Manufacturer: HTC=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726=0D=0A usb= -storage: device scan complete=0D=0A scsi 9:0:0:0: Direct-Access HTC = Android Phone 0100 PQ: 0=0D=0A ANSI: 2=0D=0A sd 9:0:0:0: [sdf] At= tached SCSI removable disk=0D=0A sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg6 ty= pe 0=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 4=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: new high= speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: configura= tion #1 chosen from 1 choice=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVen= dor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ffe=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr= =3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Pho= ne=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07= TNX00726=0D=0A usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether=0D=0A u= sb0: register 'rndis_host' at usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device,=0D=0A a= e:f6:3d:da:20:39=0D=0A usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_hos= t=0D=0A usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_wlan=0D=0A usb0: n= o IPv6 routers present=0D=0A usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 5=0D=0A u= sb0: unregister 'rndis_host' usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device=0D=0A So.= What would be my next step to make this work? OpenMoko have=0D=0A someth= ing similar and I tried moding some of their scripts (they've=0D=0A made = theirs work with ALL OS- not just linux and Winblow$! Take heed=0D=0A man= ufacturers!) but it didn't mesh on the Android. I still end up=0D=0Awith=0D= =0A a generic host.=0D=0A As I mentioned, I tried modifying the cdce driv= er and the device list=0D=0A but that didn't help either, so when I moded= the scripts and=0D=0Adevd.conf=0D=0A I figured that was the missing piec= e of my puzzle.=0D=0A I'd actually pay someone to do this, but I do need = to figure this out=0D=0A for myself anyway so I'm diving in deep and goin= g to keep on=0D=0A struggling till I get it. I need it figured out before= the year's end=0D=0A so I'm not going to sit on my laurels :) That, and = a usb mass storage=0D=0A device emulator to trick a dumb digital photo fr= ame....=0D=0A >=0D=0A >=20=0D=0ASo I have more on this: sourceforge.jp = has a project rndis for=0D=0Afreebsd.=0D=0A=0D=0AIts a little hard to nav= igate, but I downloaded the source code and=0D=0Atried to build it on 8.0= =2E No go, but I'm not sure what usb library its=0D=0Ausing. I think it s= aid usb2, but I'm not exactly sure what that meant=0D=0A(usb2.0, or libus= b2, whatever).=0D=0A=0D=0ANow, I've only just quickly grabbed it and trie= d to make- I haven't=0D=0Ahad a chance to look too deeply into it as yet-= but these are the=0D=0Aerrors if someone could throw me a clue as to wha= t it might be=0D=0Aindicating? (wrong library? generic error I have to de= bug?)=0D=0A=0D=0Aif_rndis.c: In function 'rndis_recv_message':=0D=0Aif_rn= dis.c:985: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument=0D=0A3 h= as type 'long unsigned int'=0D=0Aif_rndis.c: In function 'rndis_bulk_read= _callback':=0D=0Aif_rndis.c:1167: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int'= , but argument=0D=0A4 has type 'long unsigned int'=0D=0Aif_rndis.c:1187: = warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument=0D=0A4 has type 'lo= ng unsigned int'=0D=0Aif_rndis.c:1204: warning: format '%d' expects type = 'int', but argument=0D=0A4 has type 'long unsigned int'=0D=0A*** Error co= de 1=0D=0A=0D=0AI did get from the site that it was for Windows Mobile, b= ut I believe=0D=0Athat this is a generic system coming out now. It might = help?=0D=0A=0D=0ACheers=0D=0A-------------------------=0D=0AMessage sent = via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/=0D=0A_______________________________= ________________=0D=0Afreebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=0D=0Ahtt= p://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0D=0ATo unsubscr= ibe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0D=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 08:27:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46498106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.mckeown@ru.ac.za) Received: from f.mail.ru.ac.za (f.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4271A8FC14 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:27:42 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ru-msa; d=ru.ac.za; h=Received:From:Organization:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:X-Face:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Virus-Scanned:X-Authenticated-User; b=NsWM0W/dBH+yxjt4uvBD+pfEbRvqocVX0vHpZOFmHl5Gx4+jJ7tILMnq3YMdCm8WKkmQMkT+bSAd1x/haBJ2w2EcqfND7947ckhPoHvDENF4uUXlgELTBF3FlqB7J06P; Received: from vorkosigan.ru.ac.za ([2001:4200:1010:1058:219:d1ff:fe9f:a932]:60511) by f.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PEHe7-000LLG-6W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:27:39 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Rhodes University To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20101105053844.71239106577C@hub.freebsd.org> <20101105174858.X16633@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20101105174858.X16633@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Face: $@VrUx^RHy/}yu]jKf/<4T%/d|F+$j-Ol2"2J$q+%OK1]&/G_S9(=?utf-8?q?HkaQ*=60!=3FYOK=3FY!=27M=60C=0A=09aP=5C9nVPF8Q=7DCilHH8l=3B=7E!4?= =?utf-8?q?2HK6=273lg4J=7Daz?=@1Dqqh:J]M^"YPn*2IWrZON$1+G?oX3@ =?utf-8?q?k=230=0A=0954XDRg=3DYn=5FF-etwot4U=24b?=dTS{i X-Virus-Scanned: f.mail.ru.ac.za (2001:4200:1010::25:6) X-Authenticated-User: s0900137 from vorkosigan.ru.ac.za (2001:4200:1010:1058:219:d1ff:fe9f:a932) using auth_plaintext Subject: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:27:43 -0000 On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote: > But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do; > eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au so DNS reports always > whinge about lack of glue They should be whingeing about lack of clue (their own) unless I'm horribly wrong about how DNS works. When a nameserver delegates a zone, it's not responsible for any of that zone's records any more, with two exceptions. It provides NS records to indicate which nameservers /are/ responsible, and it retains responsibility for the A records of nameservers inside the zone - and only those nameservers. (That's glue.) There's no way a .com nameserver should be providing A records for hosts in the .au zone. > nonetheless it works, though only after a hunt down through the .au > servers, until cached. Yes, this is exactly what /should/ happen. Only the .au servers (or servers they delegate to) are authoritative for hosts in the .au zone. Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 08:52:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id C6E861065679; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:52:31 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: CyberLeo Kitsana Message-ID: <20101105085231.GA72821@freebsd.org> References: <20101103223438.GA26003@freebsd.org> <4CD3985A.4090803@cyberleo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD3985A.4090803@cyberleo.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:52:31 -0000 On Fri Nov 5 10, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 11/03/2010 05:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > is this a known issue with kldunload(8)? > > > > ***beginn*** > > otaku% kldunload sound > > otaku% echo $? > > 0 > > otaku% kldstat > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 35 0xffffffff80100000 a2da40 kernel > > 2 1 0xffffffff80b2e000 295e8 snd_hda.ko > > 3 1 0xffffffff80b58000 85110 sound.ko > > 4 1 0xffffffff80bde000 da4bb8 nvidia.ko > > 5 4 0xffffffff81983000 418e0 linux.ko > > 6 1 0xffffffff819c5000 80e8 ng_ubt.ko > > 7 2 0xffffffff819ce000 fa78 ng_hci.ko > > 8 2 0xffffffff819de000 2bd0 ng_bluetooth.ko > > 9 3 0xffffffff819e1000 15e68 netgraph.ko > > 10 1 0xffffffff81c12000 3edb linprocfs.ko > > 11 3 0xffffffff81c16000 4698 pseudofs.ko > > 12 1 0xffffffff81c1b000 31b3 procfs.ko > > 13 1 0xffffffff81c1f000 a37 linsysfs.ko > > otaku% kldunload sound > > kldunload: attempt to unload file that was loaded by the kernel > > kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy > > sound.ko was presumably loaded by snd_hda.ko, as it is a dependency. You > must unload all the modules depending on sound.ko before it will unload. > At that point, I believe I've seen it unload itself. > > Same with netgraph.ko, and the modules that require it (ng_*.ko). thanks for your help. the issue is however not that i expect any of the modules i tested to unload successfully. as you pointed out sound.ko and netgraph.ko are being used so they cannot be unloaded. however kldunload suceeds, atlthough it shouldn't. only the second time it is being invoked it fails with EBUSY. it should also fail the first time. cheers. alex > > -- > Fuzzy love, > -CyberLeo > Technical Administrator > CyberLeo.Net Webhosting > http://www.CyberLeo.Net > > > Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 09:32:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62690106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyris-noreply@lyris.sunbelt-software.com) Received: from lyris.sunbelt-software.com (lyris.sunbelt-software.com [64.128.133.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A5BC8FC15 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: X-lyris-type: match-phrase From: "Lyris ListManager" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:02:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: No Attachments Please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:32:39 -0000 You sent an email to the Exchange list with an attachment. We have disabled this option as recently a virus was attached. Please resend your posting without it? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 13:39:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD3C1065672 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE5B8FC1D for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1110268wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.64.17 with SMTP id b17mr1941906wed.114.1288964383021; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:39:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.154.8 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 06:39:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101105072113.GA5506@guilt.hydra> References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> <20101105065541.GC5340@guilt.hydra> <20101105072113.GA5506@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:39:22 -0400 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: perrin@apotheon.com Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:39:45 -0000 On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:55:41AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 08:32:11PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Chad Perrin > wrote: > > > > > > So are there plans to get 7x into ports? I would love to go back to > Chrome > > > as a browser ... I find Firefox so clunky now! :D > > > > Well . . . I have no idea what plans there are for updating the port, > > since I'm not the port maintainer for Chromium. On the other hand, 5.x > > is still smother and nicer than Firefox in many, many ways. The real > > s/smother/smoother/ > > oops > > Fair enough .... I am semi-conscience of security, it's something I do keep in mind and I'm sure portaudit would complain anyway if I did install it ... that would make my e-mail's all the longer. I did come across wiki.freebsd.org/Chromium but it breaks at the patch and that's where I left it (for now) > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 13:48:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FFF106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnrp@physik.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.tu-berlin.de (mail.tu-berlin.de [130.149.7.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BE98FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:48:36 +0000 (UTC) X-tubIT-Incoming-IP: 130.149.58.163 Received: from mail.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.58.163] helo=mail.physik.tu-berlin.de) by mail.tu-berlin.de (exim-4.69/mailfrontend-b) with esmtp for id 1PEMTo-0004CO-8p; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:37:20 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87EE11405 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:37:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at physik.tu-berlin.de Received: from mail.physik.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.physik-pool.TU-Berlin.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScMxReMIuQF9 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:37:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from adolfputzen (laptopecke.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [130.149.58.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.physik.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A29B11402 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:37:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:37:12 +0100 From: Julian Fagir To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101105143712.374dc622@adolfputzen> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/.b4vc3kyV88XqStHEjzpxVH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-tubIT-Score: 0.0 () Subject: SAS2-controller for 64bit-FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:48:37 -0000 --Sig_/.b4vc3kyV88XqStHEjzpxVH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I'm going to buy a new storage-server and don't know yet which storage-controller to take. We found it the cheapest way to buy an external jbod-storage and a small server with an sas-controller. The chosen jbod will support SAS2, and as the system will have to last at least three years, we want something that can cope with growing disk-io - especially when using several raidzs and generating more and more overhead. Our vendor suggested us a LSI 9200-8e or 9280-4i4e [and a mainboard with onboard LSI2008]. But after searching a bit, I did not find anyone who uses this one in FreeBSD yet. There are 32bit-drivers directly from LSI, but we want to use the 64bit-por= t. New drivers were uploaded in September, but no reviews yet whether they wor= k.u If you were to buy a sas2-controller, which one would you take? Or did anyone test these new drivers? Btw: The chassis will be a SuperMicro 847E-RJBOD1 - do you have any experience with that one? Is it recommendable? Regards, Julian --Sig_/.b4vc3kyV88XqStHEjzpxVH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzUCIgACgkQFV4nWcOPv/AgSQCbB7hXCIIwGoegr4IvLlgn5KJg rBMAniGTn/B1pHXQj743xbpdzqvcuCT2 =FvT9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.b4vc3kyV88XqStHEjzpxVH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 14:12:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365B51065672; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CEE8FC0A; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.unitedinsong.com.au (abracadabra.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.80]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665005C21; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:17:24 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AtMail Atmail Open 1.04 Message-ID: <18337.1288966644@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: , , , X-Origin: 192.168.0.200 X-Atmail-Account: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 01:17:24 +1100 From: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Android usb tethering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:12:47 -0000 On Thu 4/11/10 10:28 PM , four.harrisons@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue 2/11/10 11:37 AM ,=20 wrote: On Tue 2/11/10 10:11 AM , Alejandro Imass wrote:On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/01/10 15:42, Mark Atkinson wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 [...] > In the above messages, the kernel detaches the storage device (umass) and > tries to attach the new device, which doesn't have a driver so it's attached > as "ugen" - generic USB. > Yes. One has to remember that USB is just the bus just like pci, microchannel, etc. Even though you have access to the device on the bus you still need a driver for that specific ethernet chip your kernel. This is analogous to having a video card on the pci bus, you still need for the kernel to drive the specific chipset of the card regardless if it can see it on the bus. I have an HTC Nexus One so I may fiddle with this and see if I can help some more here. I am wishful that at least we can get a tty just like other gsm modems and from there it's pretty straight forward using wvdial or alike. If it's only the Ethernet over usb like you mention, then the chipset driver would have to be translated/ported to the FBSD kernel, if it's not already there ? Ok. But I will clarify here: The HTC Android systems uses an "Internet Sharing" feature- essentially Google has coded in routing/nat system into the base OS (probably moding the leftover code already in the linux base), and is trying to allow similar using bluetooth and wifi at a later date as well. The RNDIS is a M$ system that allows sharing anything over USB (network, files, etc- but all essentially operated as network anyway), something they've been playing with for some years- I was looking for an A-A USB cable since around 2003 or so to quickly transfer files when needed. Apparently M$ opened the specs a year or two ago and everyone's jumped on to use it. So where Google started was to start allowing the use of the router/nat via RNDIS USB - somehow this was easier than allowing bluetooth or wifi (probably security and available hardware features). So yes, apparently the phone hooks up as a usb mass storage device, uploads a file to the computer, and disconnects and becomes a network device. Here is the output from linux: usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice scsi9 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device found at 4 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ff9 usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1 usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726 usb-storage: device scan complete scsi 9:0:0:0: Direct-Access HTC Android Phone 0100 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 sd 9:0:0:0: [sdf] Attached SCSI removable disk sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0 usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 4 usb 2-2.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5 usb 2-2.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice usb 2-2.2: New USB device found, idVendor=3D0bb4, idProduct=3D0ffe usb 2-2.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D1 usb 2-2.2: Product: Android Phone usb 2-2.2: Manufacturer: HTC usb 2-2.2: SerialNumber: SH07TNX00726 usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether usb0: register 'rndis_host' at usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device, ae:f6:3d:da:20:39 usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_wlan usb0: no IPv6 routers present usb 2-2.2: USB disconnect, address 5 usb0: unregister 'rndis_host' usb-0000:00:04.1-2.2, RNDIS device So. What would be my next step to make this work? OpenMoko have something similar and I tried moding some of their scripts (they've made theirs work with ALL OS- not just linux and Winblow$! Take heed manufacturers!) but it didn't mesh on the Android. I still end up with a generic host. As I mentioned, I tried modifying the cdce driver and the device list but that didn't help either, so when I moded the scripts and devd.conf I figured that was the missing piece of my puzzle. I'd actually pay someone to do this, but I do need to figure this out for myself anyway so I'm diving in deep and going to keep on struggling till I get it. I need it figured out before the year's end so I'm not going to sit on my laurels :) That, and a usb mass storage device emulator to trick a dumb digital photo frame.... > >=20 So I have more on this: sourceforge.jp has a project rndis for freebsd. Its a little hard to navigate, but I downloaded the source code and tried to build it on 8.0. No go, but I'm not sure what usb library its using. I think it said usb2, but I'm not exactly sure what that meant (usb2.0, or libusb2, whatever). Now, I've only just quickly grabbed it and tried to make- I haven't had a chance to look too deeply into it as yet- but these are the errors if someone could throw me a clue as to what it might be indicating? (wrong library? generic error I have to debug?) if_rndis.c: In function 'rndis_recv_message': if_rndis.c:985: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' if_rndis.c: In function 'rndis_bulk_read_callback': if_rndis.c:1167: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' if_rndis.c:1187: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' if_rndis.c:1204: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' *** Error code 1 I did get from the site that it was for Windows Mobile, but I believe that this is a generic system coming out now. It might help? Cheers ------------------------- Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ [2]" target=3D"_blank">http://atmail.org/ _______________________________________________ mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions [4]" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio= ns To unsubscribe, send any mail to "" _______________________________________________ mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions [7]" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio= ns To unsubscribe, send any mail to "" No, I'm afraid its not ethernet over usb as in an ethernet adaptor like axe. RNDIS is a protocol- and apparently there could be many more devices that use it as a universal medium since M$ opened the specs to public use. The linux output above says its something similar to cdce, but I don't think its the same- it also mentions rndis (rndis over cdce? or the reverse? Or just a slightly different form of cdce?). M$ were apparently talking about using it as a common medium for device comms so it could get hairy without it (much as I hate admitting that). I fiddled with cdce before, but didn't have any success- but that I think was more due to the fact I didn't know how to generate the devs file. I ended up putting the device manually into the driver but I don't think I was successful. (Incidentally I now know how to generate the damn file; stumbled on it by complete accident- so much for google! Couldn't find it by actually searching could I? I'll doc that here too: to generate usbdevs.h, run awk on the usbdevs2h.awk script in the dir- tools I think. There, that'll do I believe :) Google cache that!) This rndis module for Winblows Mobile should be close, but will probably need tweaking. Maybe merge with cdce as it appears to be in linux? That said if you have a Nexus maybe we can crack at it and share notes? I've gotten this far in ~2-3 mths, I'm sure it'll be quicker with someone with more coding experience and/or another phone. Interested? Incidentally, won't it be easier if it isn't just another modem, but just a network device? If the phone provides the IP all that needs to happen is to change the default route- right? The idea is, if I can crack it, is to use it for business purposes as the phone provides some functionality which can than be boosted by laptop for x11 connections, whatever over the vpn (the possibilties are endless- a complete mobile office and more). I was hoping to get a look into that code today; but today will be tomorrow in a matter of minutes (actually it is now), so I guess that was a pipe dream . Hopefully tomorrow... I mean today... its way too late for this! Cheers ------------------------- Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/ Links: ------ [2] http://webmail.unitedinsong.com.au/parse.php?redirect=3D Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F304910656AC for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6568FC12 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:23:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=UCLC2FDiInsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=-5WMeQcgAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=OV3CtmMe3NxUdrNjcSIA:9 a=2YEIfT5tZEOU3WRuKOYA:7 a=rHHMZkGAg_KGuTGzzLceM4otim8A:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=tc2ICF-Aw_EA:10 a=5KDeGo4aUKgA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:32674] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 02/1F-26142-94314DC4; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:23:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: Leslie Jensen In-Reply-To: <4CD3B00F.7030501@eskk.nu> Message-ID: References: <4CD36D68.5060100@radel.com> <4CD3B00F.7030501@eskk.nu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Jon Radel Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:23:09 -0000 On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > On 2010-11-05 04:41, justin v wrote: >> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:35:20 -0700, Jon Radel wrote: >> >>> On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: >>>> >>>> I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first >>>> line after the splash menu thing: >>>> >>>> 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored >>>> >>>> dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: >>>> >>>> real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) >>>> avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) >>>> >>>> is a stick bad perhaps? >>>> >>> Start by reading >>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory.html >>> >>> >>> If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little >>> information about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're using. >>> >> >> > > I would suggest you to give us the output of uname -a > > I suspect you are running the 32-bit version of FreeBSD and it cannot address > more that 3 Gb of RAM. > > /Leslie > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > yep running 32-bit and have a 686. No PAE happening. oh well. i wasnt sure if id run into any compatiblity issues.. i have this server running how i want, no issues, so, 32bit OS with 3GB ram will do... thanks for the response. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 14:25:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DA21065672 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74AE8FC15 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oA5EPYh2066909; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 01:25:35 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 01:25:34 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Jonathan McKeown In-Reply-To: <20101105120030.93D3E10656CA@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101106001140.X16633@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101105120030.93D3E10656CA@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:25:39 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 9, Message: 7 On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200 Jonathan McKeown wrote: > On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote: > > But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do; > > eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au so DNS reports always > > whinge about lack of glue > > They should be whingeing about lack of clue (their own) unless I'm horribly > wrong about how DNS works. Indeed, my point .. I've tried quite a few free DNS health reporters over the time; some eg thednsreport.com list missing glue records as a warning, ending: "This will usually occur if your DNS servers are not in the same TLD as your domain" which is just the case, but others have splashed red ink over this one .. sorry, don't recall which offhand. > When a nameserver delegates a zone, it's not responsible for any of that > zone's records any more, with two exceptions. It provides NS records to > indicate which nameservers /are/ responsible, and it retains responsibility > for the A records of nameservers inside the zone - and only those > nameservers. (That's glue.) > > There's no way a .com nameserver should be providing A records for hosts in > the .au zone. Nor, I guess, .org nameservers having A RRs for a .net NS, like Gary's. > > nonetheless it works, though only after a hunt down through the .au > > servers, until cached. > > Yes, this is exactly what /should/ happen. Only the .au servers (or servers > they delegate to) are authoritative for hosts in the .au zone. Just so, Jonathan; I was referring to lack of clue of some reporting gadgets. dnscog.com got this one right, but its mail report is sus. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 17:04:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1296106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jozsi.avadkan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF4C8FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so2998849iwn.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:04:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Inc/zNWm/lEePedJjaZMP8+k4Z8ElpkFUdROHP0VrcY=; b=CJcubHyNGfbl72+KI8AXB3ZjS0O0GOrWrGqbkPKKiMsZIlABohLsiotOh0Raw+sTwY bY2KKGTTS8YyrgiiOz93R0GiWDxP92ftbDE4Y9/8bYxiCfyxjFSKEojEJZFDOMi/PfiQ AywdJ2KdPkeeeE7hTJyRaSr8PEYry87mMNWbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YSCBbSCMPyCOPwpUb2o33EUNxaB1j4/WhHsP38b+jteABtzbJz+e/TYpKfbKyu88mn TgBURmCFx8YkJFdXeK6Em8IHB20oXZDp50TEKfaU2yEvSDP6f3GIVLPZcviRW4na32QU AcCJU6IB4iNj0cClbw6G6VWfI504MQw6sS8TM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.33.5 with SMTP id f5mr1835980ibd.115.1288975239615; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.185.8 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:40:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: Arthur Bela To: FreeBSD Mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:04:43 -0000 Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? Thanks.. :D :\ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 17:15:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76612106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (mailgate.jr-hosting.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100BD8FC1B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:980:4a50::21e:c2ff:febc:d902] (axantucar.elvandar.org [IPv6:2001:980:4a50:0:21e:c2ff:febc:d902]) by mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C14A1CC29; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:15:46 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Remko Lodder In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:15:45 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: Arthur Bela X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:15:48 -0000 No, but a simple search reveals some information; http://einstein.drexel.edu/courses/Comp_Phys/General/C_basics/ On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > > Thanks.. :D :\ > -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | Quis custodiet ipsos custodes / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 17:41:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0F1106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F1B8FC0C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-204.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.204] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEQ9K-0003Bm-9a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:32:27 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:41:33 -0700 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:41:33 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101105174133.GB97550@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:41:39 -0000 --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 04 November 2010: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:25:23PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > >=20 > > Vimium is one of several Chromium extensions that provide some vi-like > > keybindings, and arguably the one with the best vi-like experience. > > Unfortunately, it is not quite up to the standards of Vimperator on > > Firefox, but it is definitely better than nothing. Also unfortunately, > > it does not install on FreeBSD in its current official form. It only > > produces an error. >=20 > I figured out why the version of Chromium in ports does not support the > URL scheme wildcard: that was a feature of the matches value that was > added in Chromium v6.x. Chromium is up to 7.x now, but the version in > FreeBSD ports is still 5.0.x, so my ugly "fix" is necessary to make > Vimium installable. >=20 > --=20 > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Works for me. Thanks, Chad! --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM1EHNAAoJEIpckszW26+RJ4wIAJB4sI0CuifhDvQesONrIy/3 E2mNczUPN18SYrU5vTZUvKkzSLkva3MXs6TrFE3AmQKG62YJ22g4s7ON4G8inM9w ohzbSlcIwpLTKnNlLfXD/F80GpWyOcxkQz0WMa9WX+YJjReF5Lyg3KHKS9JYaCYn chf0ZnxhEEj+ifOWyRr2LMdJ95zdM5CNc9Rj8gqoMlb2MjDPZ3i5C8TKCT3tAUZ1 MDbPuO7WCUvtmdzDYx9MgMGV6Snn0rRDODTvtMk1PNIBJ4Ti8EFIE09oQr3GS+PW 3gRtfQFeZXCu+xwzrRSGjD0S9I8diIxnUASJ5UgJsrH2Y9/WzxwmTWO/GUKy38s= =7rFG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 18:02:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5D0106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05F18FC18 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so3294877wwb.31 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:02:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.153.21 with SMTP id i21mr2355476wbw.26.1288978745855; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:39:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:05 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OEZJAO7ddFFCHMJCNTF4zmdVoVQ Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Remko Lodder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Arthur Bela , FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:02:31 -0000 This is how I do it in perl use constant PI =3D> 4 * atan2(1, 1); In C it owuld probably be (using math.h): pi =3D 4.0*atan(1.0); On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: > > No, but a simple search reveals some information; > > http://einstein.drexel.edu/courses/Comp_Phys/General/C_basics/ > > On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: > >> Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? >> >> Thanks.. :D :\ >> > > -- > /"\ =A0 Best regards, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| re= mko@FreeBSD.org > \ / =A0 Remko Lodder =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| > X =A0 =A0http://www.evilcoder.org/ =A0 =A0| Quis custodiet ipsos custodes > / \ =A0 ASCII Ribbon Campaign =A0 =A0| Against HTML Mail and News > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 18:14:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6112106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834028FC0C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AF23D975; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:14:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oA5IDxax002650; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:14:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:13:59 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Alejandro Imass Message-Id: <20101105191359.2c047c29.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:14:02 -0000 On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:05 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: > This is how I do it in perl > use constant PI => 4 * atan2(1, 1); > > In C it owuld probably be (using math.h): > > pi = 4.0*atan(1.0); Or use M_PI from /usr/include/math.h, as we already #include'd it. :-) #define M_PI 3.14159265358979323846 -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 18:21:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79499106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1647F8FC16 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1377266wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:21:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.142.145 with SMTP id q17mr2373669wbu.229.1288981300666; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:21:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101105191359.2c047c29.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20101105191359.2c047c29.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:21:40 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GqTQq301uLPVAHIng3bE3A63iFM Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:21:42 -0000 On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:05 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> This is how I do it in perl >> use constant PI =3D> 4 * atan2(1, 1); >> >> In C it owuld probably be (using math.h): >> >> pi =3D 4.0*atan(1.0); > > Or use M_PI from /usr/include/math.h, as we already #include'd > it. :-) > > #define M_PI =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A03.14159265358979323846 > jaja. live and learn > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 18:30:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E165106567A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6D58FC1A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 39-6-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net ([94.179.6.39] helo=localhost) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtps ID 1PER3a-0003PA-7c ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:30:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:30:31 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Alejandro Imass Message-ID: <20101105203031.15062bee@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/6JTNHJxRUAWpvLj6c5rLj=N" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Arthur Bela , Remko Lodder , FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:30:37 -0000 --MP_/6JTNHJxRUAWpvLj6c5rLj=N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =D0=92 Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:05 -0400 Alejandro Imass =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > This is how I do it in perl > use constant PI =3D> 4 * atan2(1, 1); >=20 > In C it owuld probably be (using math.h): >=20 > pi =3D 4.0*atan(1.0); >=20 > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Remko Lodder > wrote: > > > > No, but a simple search reveals some information; > > > > http://einstein.drexel.edu/courses/Comp_Phys/General/C_basics/ > > > > On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: > > > >> Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > >> > >> Thanks.. :D :\ > >> > > > > -- > > /"\ =C2=A0 Best regards, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| remko@FreeBSD.org > > \ / =C2=A0 Remko Lodder =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| > > X =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.evilcoder.org/ =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Quis custodiet = ipsos custodes > > / \ =C2=A0 ASCII Ribbon Campaign =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Against HTML Mail and N= ews > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 adapt the code to build on FreeBSD... --MP_/6JTNHJxRUAWpvLj6c5rLj=N-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 18:37:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19646106567A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AA08FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 39-6-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net ([94.179.6.39] helo=localhost) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtps ID 1PER9r-0004IM-Bl ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:37:03 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:37:02 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Alejandro Imass Message-ID: <20101105203702.1a364893@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Arthur Bela , Remko Lodder , FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:37:05 -0000 =D0=92 Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:39:05 -0400 Alejandro Imass =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > This is how I do it in perl > use constant PI =3D> 4 * atan2(1, 1); >=20 > In C it owuld probably be (using math.h): >=20 > pi =3D 4.0*atan(1.0); >=20 > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Remko Lodder > wrote: > > > > No, but a simple search reveals some information; > > > > http://einstein.drexel.edu/courses/Comp_Phys/General/C_basics/ > > > > On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: > > > >> Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > >> > >> Thanks.. :D :\ > >> > > > > -- > > /"\ =C2=A0 Best regards, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| remko@FreeBSD.org > > \ / =C2=A0 Remko Lodder =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| > > X =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.evilcoder.org/ =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Quis custodiet = ipsos custodes > > / \ =C2=A0 ASCII Ribbon Campaign =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Against HTML Mail and N= ews > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 adapt the code to build on FreeBSD... excuse me - the problem in acceding file ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= /// /* ** PI.C - Computes Pi to an arbitrary number of digits ** ** Uses far arrays so may be compiled in any memory model */ #include #include #if defined(__ZTC__) #include #define FAR _far #define Fcalloc farcalloc #define Ffree farfree #define Size_T unsigned long #elif defined(__TURBOC__) #include #define FAR far #define Fcalloc farcalloc #define Ffree farfree #define Size_T unsigned long #else /* assume MSC/QC */ #include #define FAR _far #define Fcalloc _fcalloc #define Ffree _ffree #define Size_T size_t #endif long kf, ks; long FAR *mf, FAR *ms; long cnt, n, temp, nd; long i; long col, col1; long loc, stor[21]; void shift(long FAR *l1, long FAR *l2, long lp, long lmod) { long k; k =3D ((*l2) > 0 ? (*l2) / lmod: -(-(*l2) / lmod) - 1); *l2 -=3D k * lmod; *l1 +=3D k * lp; } void yprint(long m) { if (cnt 9) { wk =3D m / 10; m %=3D 10; for (wk1 =3D loc; wk1 >=3D 1; wk1--) { wk +=3D stor[(int)wk1]; stor[(int)wk1] =3D wk % 10; wk /=3D 10; } } } stor[(int)(++loc)] =3D m; } void memerr(int errno) { printf("\a\nOut of memory error #%d\n", errno); if (2 =3D=3D errno) Ffree(mf); _exit(2); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int i=3D0; char *endp; stor[i++] =3D 0; if (argc < 2) { puts("\aUsage: PI "); return(1); } n =3D strtol(argv[1], &endp, 10); if (NULL =3D=3D (mf =3D Fcalloc((Size_T)(n + 3L), (Size_T)sizeof(long= )))) memerr(1); if (NULL =3D=3D (ms =3D Fcalloc((Size_T)(n + 3L), (Size_T)sizeof(long= )))) memerr(2); printf("\nApproximation of PI to %ld digits\n", (long)n); cnt =3D 0; kf =3D 25; ks =3D 57121L; mf[1] =3D 1L; for (i =3D 2; i <=3D (int)n; i +=3D 2) { mf[i] =3D -16L; mf[i+1] =3D 16L; } for (i =3D 1; i <=3D (int)n; i +=3D 2) { ms[i] =3D -4L; ms[i+1] =3D 4L; } printf("\n 3."); while (cnt < n) { for (i =3D 0; ++i <=3D (int)n - (int)cnt; ) { mf[i] *=3D 10L; ms[i] *=3D 10L; } for (i =3D(int)(n - cnt + 1); --i >=3D 2; ) { temp =3D 2 * i - 1; shift(&mf[i - 1], &mf[i], temp - 2, temp * kf); shift(&ms[i - 1], &ms[i], temp - 2, temp * ks); } nd =3D 0; shift((long FAR *)&nd, &mf[1], 1L, 5L); shift((long FAR *)&nd, &ms[1], 1L, 239L); xprint(nd); } printf("\n\nCalculations Completed!\n"); Ffree(ms); Ffree(mf); return(0); } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= /// From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 18:50:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170AB106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnrp@physik.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.tu-berlin.de (mail.tu-berlin.de [130.149.7.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3208FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:50:30 +0000 (UTC) X-tubIT-Incoming-IP: 130.149.58.163 Received: from mail.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.58.163] helo=mail.physik.tu-berlin.de) by mail.tu-berlin.de (exim-4.69/mailfrontend-b) with esmtp for id 1PERMr-0003IB-95; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:50:30 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7366211402 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:50:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at physik.tu-berlin.de Received: from mail.physik.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.physik-pool.TU-Berlin.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mnxXzzyvfLHX for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:50:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from adolfputzen (laptopecke.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [130.149.58.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.physik.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23D4011401 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:50:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:50:19 +0100 From: Julian Fagir To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101105195019.4462c479@adolfputzen> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/QJ_Ts1XzibFJAAaulhvm4P1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-tubIT-Score: 0.0 () Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:50:32 -0000 --Sig_/QJ_Ts1XzibFJAAaulhvm4P1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? The solution of Ivan Klymenko is surely much more suffisticated, but as I wrote this down, I just want to publish it... ;-) 1 #include 2 #include 3 #include 4=20 5 // Change this for a more accurate result. 6 long max =3D 100000000; 7 double a, b; 8 double pi; 9 long counter; 10 long i; 11=20 12 int main() { 13 for (i =3D 0; i< max; i++) { 14 a =3D drand48(); 15 b =3D drand48(); 16 if (a*a + b*b <=3D 1) 17 counter++; 18 } =20 19 pi =3D 4*counter; 20 =20 21 printf("%e\n", pi); 22 return(0); 23 } =20 Note that the result must be shifted to the potence of the max-int. I didn't care for the problems with long-lengths now, but just dividing would not ha= ve done the job. Also, this implementations is stupid, as you see, no caring for the lengths of the variables in the computer, if you go too far with your max, you will surely become problems with the maximum number that can be represented. The detail of this approximation heavily depends on the pseudo-rng you are using, as does its correctness (e.g., when your 'rng' always returns 10, pi would be computed to be 10). But if you have a good prng, it can approximate pi to a fair amount of numbers. If you had *real* random numbers (whatever that might be), you could even be more approriate. This approximation is stupid, but I like the simplicity of it (we did it in uni last year). Just take 'random' numbers and look whether they are in a circle (that's the a*a + b*b <=3D 1). Regards, Julian --Sig_/QJ_Ts1XzibFJAAaulhvm4P1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAkzUUewACgkQFV4nWcOPv/CtWACYwrAxjpbfDm0hbnskzxhN4SO+ IgCeI3KotjqE7fWPfZ32MKt0zES5Ero= =nlIO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QJ_Ts1XzibFJAAaulhvm4P1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 19:11:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3A7106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E724D8FC13 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1422832wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.23.213 with SMTP id s21mr2427703wbb.84.1288984307438; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:11:47 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:11:49 -0000 Hey folks, A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me thinking... Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people here on ZFS before I continue using it. Many thanks, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 19:14:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7053C106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EBF8FC12 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1425259wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:14:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.23.213 with SMTP id s21mr2430437wbb.84.1288984484879; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:14:44 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jgOXdtZq0DzbeIgbyP2G5gs3-B8 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:14:46 -0000 Hey folks, A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me thinking... Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people here on ZFS before I continue using it. Many thanks, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 19:15:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6AC10656A6 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524A3A21.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.74.58.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5135B8FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 0890B6; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:15:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD457CF.60403@nagual.nl> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:15:27 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:15:26 -0000 Trying to update with portmaster (-a -B -d) but everytime the process stops after some time and I can't find out why this happens. All I see is a screen full of names, but no message why the thing dumped core. Is there a way to find out _WHY_ portmaster can't complete the proces? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 19:25:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A7106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@stangl.us) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A888FC18 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scout.stangl.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id E251EB895; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:25:20 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stangl.us Received: from stangl.us ([127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (scout.stangl.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHdEM599dEXz; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:25:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DFF4EB872; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:25:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:25:19 -0500 From: Alex Stangl To: Arthur Bela Message-ID: <20101105192519.GA78113@scout.stangl.us> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:25:21 -0000 On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:40:39PM +0100, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? Search for pi spigot algorithm. Here is a tiny C program from Jeremy Gibbon's Unbounded Spigot paper (due to Dik Winter and Achim Flammenkamp): a[52514],b,c=52514,d,e,f=1e4,g,h;main(){for(;b=c-=14;h=printf("%04d", e+d/f))for(e=d%=f;g=--b*2;d/=g)d=d*b+f*(h?a[b]:f/5),a[b]=d%--g;} This produces the first 15,000 digits concisely, but is obfuscated. If you need an unbounded number of digits, search out the spigot algorithm papers. Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 19:44:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811C8106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (d80.iso100.no [81.175.61.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371AB8FC14 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.12.4]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id 517AF23 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:25:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:25:05 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDDC38C73E73F8D58C6381D72" Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:44:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDDC38C73E73F8D58C6381D72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05.11.2010 20:14, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Hey folks, >=20 > A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I > decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the > pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links > and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This > really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me > thinking... >=20 > Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing > to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very > reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people > here on ZFS before I continue using it. Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox? //Svein --=20 --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg =D8stli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------enigDDC38C73E73F8D58C6381D72 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzUWhQACgkQODUnwSLUlKSq6gCgi9imXYmsqlZ0qkPskdVsPjdK sQ8An0n8imIbMo7L20hN1mpJnCNgn3fg =dX8G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDDC38C73E73F8D58C6381D72-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 20:04:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB8C106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0D88FC13 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so2802719qyk.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.216.5 with SMTP id hg5mr1350879qab.76.1288987447802; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.235.67 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.203.53.2] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:04:09 -0000 On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing > to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very > reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people > here on ZFS before I continue using it. Technically, as long as Oracle keeps supplying the source code for versions of ZFS above v28 (no matter how long it takes, i.e. maybe after releasing Solaris 11 (?)) under the CDDL, we should have no problems using that code in FreeBSD. Just note that FreeBSD is not yet at ZFS v28, though it seems there's a patch for that [*], and we can hope to see it integrated when it is ready. As a matter of taste, you're free to use whatever file system you like. > Many thanks, > Alejandro Imass [*] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-August/019541.html Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 20:15:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC13106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C428FC0C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2959CE82006; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:15:35 -0700 From: kline To: Jon Radel Message-ID: <20101105201534.GB18133@thought.org> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101104055900.GA4796@thought.org> <4CD269F8.3040105@bah.homeip.net> <1288930975.2625.35.camel@newtao.thought.org> <4CD396DB.5000204@radel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD396DB.5000204@radel.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:15:37 -0000 On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:32:11AM -0400, Jon Radel wrote: > On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote: > > > >i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type > >responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it > >has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jargon is lost. What > >does "glue" means? and how should I resolve? > > > >It is time to get this stuff arrow-straight, so hoping that someone > >on-list can clue me in. > > > > > >tx, > > > > > >gary > > > >http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org/1288928790 > If your parents, the nameservers authoritative for .org, tell the > world that one of the nameservers for thought.org is > ns1.thought.org, they also have to tell the world what the IP > address for ns1.thought.org is using an A record. That A record is > glue. Otherwise you get a machine conversation something like: > > Resolving nameserver trying to find a record in the thought.org zone > (RN): Please Mr. root server, I'd like to know about > www.thought.org.... > Root: See the .org folks over there.... > RN: Please Mr. top-level dude, about that www.thought.org.... > Org: Well, see ns1.thought.org.... > RN: Ahem, I'm trying to find out basic stuff about thought.org and > I don't know the address for ns1.thought.org in order to ask it > Org: Well, ask ns1.thought.org what the address for ns1.thought.org is... > RN: But, but, but....followed by petulant stomping off > > Glue A records fix that problem. > > BTW, the fact that a glue record isn't returned for ns2.everydns.net > in response to a query about NS records for thought.org really isn't > a problem; note the "info" rather than "fail" from DNSCog. I did not see the "info" tag, thanks. Here is what I have for my "A" recordes in thought.org's external [and internal] filees. Note that plsto and ns1 are different computers. plato is my firewall. thought.org.e.hosts:19:ethic A 209.180.213.210 thought.org.e.hosts:20:plato A 209.180.213.209 thought.org.e.hosts:21:ns1 A 209.180.213.209 thought.org.i.hosts:14:ethic A 10.47.0.230 thought.org.i.hosts:15:plato A 10.47.0.1 thought.org.i.hosts:16:tao A 10.47.0.250 thought.org.i.hosts:18:zen A 10.47.0.190 FWIW, ethic *is* ns1. LAst time someone criticized having three IP's with the same quad decimal. (A couple years ago I was sown for several days and my wife had to talk with some tech [from Qwest]. He was either in Mumbai or Manilla and had her erase a bunch of lines from my "modem"/router. I don't think that has any effect here, tho I may be wrong.) > > Biggest problem I still see is that ns2.everydns.net refuses to > respond to queries about thought.org. You sure your account there > is still active and functional and that you're allowing zone > transfers to them? I note that you don't allow transfers from > arbitrary addresses, and > http://www.everydns.com/faq/secondary-domain/example-setup does warn > that the source address for transfer requests was/will/did change. I saw that and chaanged it, allowing transfers a day or two ago. Where do I look in /var/log/ to see if these actually happened? It may be that everydns.net got tired of requests and I need to re-do something. > > Some of the problems reported by DNSCog appear to be bogus. They've > got some bugs related to cases where a nameserver has a name in the > domain in question. (And also some bugs related to nameservers > which are reachable by both ipv4 and ipv6, but that doesn't apply to > you.) > Thankee much. I'll grep around for xfer in /var/log/* and hopefully see something from I recognize.) gary > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php An Open Letter to Stephen Hawking http://www.thought.org/#oL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 20:27:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5E61065673 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045B58FC1E for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTLAPTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PESt3-000LcZ-RZ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:27:50 -0400 Message-ID: <7528EB03F1464070AA402F8C6CCAC42A@GRANTLAPTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: "Odhiambo Washington" References: <51A327FA9F464DD2B0EFF2903E4DF6FE@GRANTLAPTOP> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:27:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD - POP3 timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:27:55 -0000 Please see below. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Odhiambo Washington" To: "Grant Peel" Cc: Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:12 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD - POP3 timeouts > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Peel wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I have serveral servers setup with FreeBSD 8.0. >> >> Each of these servers are running vm-pop3d, which has worked well for >> many >> years now. >> >> Since installing FreeBSD 8.0, the number of timeouts on port 110 have >> skyrocketed on all the servers. >> > > What do es "since installing FreeBSD 8.0" mean here? Why did you install > FreeBSD 8.0?? What were you running before? It means I have been running the same configuration for many years without seeing the issue, and am currently using the same setup with a fresh install of Freebsd 8.0 The same setup ran fine for years on FreeBSD 4.4, 4.10, 5.2.1, 6.1, 6.3, 7.0/ > > > >> Some clients connecting (checking thier email) 200 times a day, may be >> seeing as many as 50 timeouts. >> >> Is there any tuning somewhere I have missed? >> > > > You must also show us the server logs showing the timeouts. Please enable > debug logging on vm-pop3d if possible. Here is a sample from /var/log/maillog. It wont say much, other than the user session timed out: Nov 5 16:16:50 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: Connect from 24.114.xxx.xxx Nov 5 16:16:50 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: uid 0, gid 6 Nov 5 16:16:51 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: cmd: USER info@somedomain.ca Nov 5 16:16:51 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: uid 65534, gid 6 Nov 5 16:16:51 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: User 'info' of 'somedomain.ca' logged in Nov 5 16:16:51 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: cmd: STAT Nov 5 16:21:57 pegasus vm-pop3d[22070]: Session timed out for user: info > > I hope you do realize that in this forum, we mostly handle questions about > FreeBSD and not those related to the daily running of apps (like > vm-pop3d). > so you'll bear with us since some of us run other pop3/imap4 servers > different than vm-pop3d. I have been using these forums for many years now, and I do understand that this is for FreeBSD and not ports like vm-pop3d. I posted it here thinking there may be some strange Ethernet driver issue, or sysctl setting the I might not be aware of, or possibly some problem with inetd that may have popped up in FreeBSD 8.0. FWIW here is the process for inetd\: 80070 ?? Ss 0:07.36 /usr/sbin/inetd -wW -C 60 and here is the config line from inetd.conf: pop3 stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/tcpd /usr/local/sbin/vm-pop3d -D9 -t300 There are lots of Virtual Pop3d accounts spread over many domains on the servers, and I have a number of them myself. I have not seen this issue with any of the accounts I use, ever. I do not beleive thier is a firewall issue here. Just for investigations, I am going to switch form inetd to daemon mode.... -Grant > > > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254733744121/+254722743223 > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > Damn!! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 20:53:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53BD106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97D58FC17 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oA5Kp145022389; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:51:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:51:01 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201011052051.oA5Kp145022389@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, j.mckeown@ru.ac.za Cc: Subject: Re: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:53:08 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 02:26:31 2010 > From: Jonathan McKeown > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200 > Subject: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE) > > On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote: > > But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do; > > eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au so DNS reports always > > whinge about lack of glue > > They should be whingeing about lack of clue (their own) unless I'm horribly > wrong about how DNS works. > > When a nameserver delegates a zone, it's not responsible for any of that > zone's records any more, with two exceptions. It provides NS records to > indicate which nameservers /are/ responsible, and it retains responsibility > for the A records of nameservers inside the zone - and only those > nameservers. (That's glue.) > > There's no way a .com nameserver should be providing A records for hosts in > the .au zone. sure there is. Domain: foo.com (an aussie company) nameservers ns1.alicesprings.au, ns2.umelbourneatperth.au They're still wrong to bw whinging about a lack o glue records. glue is needed _only_ when the nameserver is _in_ the domain it is the authoritative servr for. So, in the above frivolous example, foo.com does *NOT* need any glue records, but if ns1.alicesprings.au is an authoritative server for alicesprings.au, then *it* needs a glue record for that domain. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 21:35:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B579106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7B918FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1771 invoked by uid 0); 5 Nov 2010 21:35:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 21:35:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=awZQ8xss6osGw4MPt70QXuMDCWjjGo/UIhhzDKqe7TbRzAAhq3sLCcQ8JAR3FMdd+b/i7I+nRQwhGJe7SozPDWPiMZht/ogg+VWyVRldZ2DN8RRLWK43RdFuJhi/1kcK; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PETwa-0001g7-TQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:35:34 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:29:40 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:29:40 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101105212940.GB8648@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:35:36 -0000 --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:11:47PM -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: >=20 > A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I > decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the > pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links > and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This > really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me > thinking... >=20 > Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing > to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very > reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people > here on ZFS before I continue using it. Frankly, it may be a couple of years before Oracle even decides what it will do with ZFS in the long run. I have not started using it to any substantial degree and, considering the change in ownership, I'm unlikely to start using it if I do not have an immediate, specific use-case that calls for the capabilities of ZFS in particular. =2E . . on top of which, I don't feel a need to do Oracle any favors. Your mileage may vary, of course. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzUd0QACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUAhQCeIya/rpAyTyMEUf9sgqKO5n7h ErwAoMm13z0pf+qwTBCs0mJatbdqbzhd =SiWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 21:40:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D449A106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D34C8FC1B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28965 invoked by uid 0); 5 Nov 2010 21:40:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 21:40:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=D9TEAHkmdYJRX/nxXawoRBEdhMrbndu4nCNcTxg3l28J5ZPPxsOwOUHpBn2ZvFXo0qyaOAbxY/ggEs1sexGSN5wUamydH1n0mamEmc+9GzLydnnE1zrehpXpxD+Z6VAt; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEU1J-0007np-L1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:40:26 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:34:33 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:34:33 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:40:27 -0000 --kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) w= rote: >=20 > Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you > similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox? I think Alejandro's more worried about what will happen with future versions of ZFS based on the company that now owns the copyrights, which is not (in any meaningful way I've been able to determine) at all similar to the Mozilla Foundation. Yes, the current stable version is CDDL. Will the next be purely proprietary, or some new license, or simply discontinued? Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than Solaris from using it? Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just wonders if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzUeGkACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUTjgCgujU7wizJNO4AaCuzEIgLnl6o OJwAoNIHt/c1ROxu6iEIhhP0UwHxkiTj =xV+T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 22:10:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDEB106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411AB8FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1574642wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:10:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EazEDPOarXQBR1gsI++kBbw/52AVQ47ATTpdE0SwzQg=; b=RCv2RBh6bB5pPvp2zbOkl9oPjrC4TVwpcCSpA9VOilfRa0OhCRAZjEhfd7HFz1emrB LAwGpudbZkjmePxJ0eaqwC8Fb0OLJCNXJMl4ZkDcEIVE+jg4MqObQQ9QKQ5pIFiRoUP9 Fi+7fOj3EWHaQq4dLIWFGIU8b6hR+fpN08wLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CBA3PDpxTK6x7z+D78wRYm/OEdXr70B+5RZsgfYJfS6m4ICLs36AKTyNblZPmyNZo4 dBJKMBmwuWc5D+ecPIM6AHA2F9cvHL/lx4lEzvYIeZqvZpTocLPNNhWtDdSb0xgRea0I nj1nMTpUblbsTtTs6mFUcrEVKloiN89IYK8ho= Received: by 10.216.173.79 with SMTP id u57mr2666146wel.40.1288994818685; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x3sm1208079wes.46.2010.11.05.15.06.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:06:41 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101105220641.618df4d6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD457CF.60403@nagual.nl> References: <4CD457CF.60403@nagual.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:10:42 -0000 On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:15:27 +0100 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Trying to update with portmaster (-a -B -d) but everytime the process > stops after some time and I can't find out why this happens. All I > see is a screen full of names, but no message why the thing dumped > core. > > Is there a way to find out _WHY_ portmaster can't complete the proces? Did you follow the UPDATING entry for portmaster? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 22:19:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120EB106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61CA8FC18 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1580941wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:19:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.127.142 with SMTP id g14mr2569119wbs.200.1288995595929; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:19:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:19:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:19:55 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iYCL2fVq0EBaWFHXudvlgAWmYjk Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:19:58 -0000 On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)= wrote: >> >> Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you >> similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox? > > I think Alejandro's more worried about what will happen with future > versions of ZFS based on the company that now owns the copyrights, which > is not (in any meaningful way I've been able to determine) at all similar > to the Mozilla Foundation. =A0Yes, the current stable version is CDDL. > Will the next be purely proprietary, or some new license, or simply > discontinued? =A0Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop peop= le > who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than > Solaris from using it? > > Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long > run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just wonders > if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. > Precisely. This is Larry Ellison's position on Open Source: If an open source product gets good enough, we'll simply take it. [...] So the great thing about open source is nobody owns it =96 a company like Oracle is free to take it for nothing, include it in our products and charge for support, and that's what we'll do. So it is not disruptive at all =96 you have to find places to add value. Once open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. [...] We don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source. Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006 http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=3Dfto041820061306424713 I am not about to check the actual licensing of ZFS, I mean to which parts are actually licensed with the CDDL or not, for example the HTML error message documents. Which patents Sun or Oracle have obtained on the technology, etc. Look at what happened to Android for choosing Java. Supposedly, it was Open Source and there you have it: it's open source if and only if... For example, WyTF do I have to login to Oracle to access the error message information? So, my inquiry to this community is: should we really be promoting the use of ZFS directly by putting it on the FBSD handbook? Maybe it should go on a different document, and make it really optional. MySQL is another example, and Open Office, and to top it off BDB. Yes, it's "Oracle Berkeley DB" - are we as a community continue to allow, and worse yet promote, this trend? Anyway, I'm not going to use it any more. I think that we have to raise awareness to Companies that create Open Source not sell themselves out to these vicious looters. Or at least have the decency to release one final version under a license that will allow the communities to continue development and keeping the software really open. Best, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 22:31:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66C2106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6B98FC12 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oA5MTZVp022783 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:29:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:29:35 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201011052229.oA5MTZVp022783@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:31:39 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 01:18:07 2010 > Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:19:43 +0100 > From: Leslie Jensen > To: justin v > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , > Jon Radel > Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately > > > > On 2010-11-05 04:41, justin v wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:35:20 -0700, Jon Radel wrote: > > > >> On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: > >>> > >>> I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first > >>> line after the splash menu thing: > >>> > >>> 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored > >>> > >>> dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: > >>> > >>> real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) > >>> avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) > >>> > >>> is a stick bad perhaps? > >>> > >> Start by reading > >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory.html > >> > >> > >> If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little > >> information about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're using. > >> > > > > > > I would suggest you to give us the output of uname -a > > I suspect you are running the 32-bit version of FreeBSD and it cannot > address more that 3 Gb of RAM. Must be a hardware issue, too. I'm running 7.2/i386 on a P-III box, and the boot messages shows 3.9+ gigs 'avail mem'. I double-checked, no mention of PAE in the kernel config, either. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 23:03:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737141065672 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036E58FC15 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3099286fxm.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:03:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+BvcBHFi5akl1Km8HpyUh1PeC3otxcd2Qf8HrFQaPRA=; b=iRWlu3N69xudzUwrFyG2EOf+Z4aaJwbzN5Grw7BIfcJSVVTvY76Kht4pRIacF2uK8B Z0e+fTcBhEEnPsdsAYvBmfWfZ/BI44oTUtR2iliC/36Ia0NDLKn63djWrwR+yGgi1CDr VJ8RxS/Gt6JtFXZFxbk6HbvicVkMc6n8OFZOY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XMFvnjm9sFGqJvvRiURwNvNPWrpX5w5HgJj0foTaTjpsC3XcwnGFfK3oKO4Ub1vzzW OVRHnURiBgBR6EfA8HXzgtFNTqpvL0dZ8N4aUca05B29Zpmj0Ds2D7EkvmL9pIUVPV3s 3mBggB12lx0bagwT5Pv+6phR/GB5ptylGVUwQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.102.79 with SMTP id f15mr1468312fao.134.1288998227867; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.108.194 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201011052229.oA5MTZVp022783@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201011052229.oA5MTZVp022783@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:03:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:03:49 -0000 On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > > I suspect you are running the 32-bit version of FreeBSD and it cannot > > address more that 3 Gb of RAM. > > > Must be a hardware issue, too. I'm running 7.2/i386 on a P-III box, and > the boot messages shows 3.9+ gigs 'avail mem'. I double-checked, no > mention > of PAE in the kernel config, either. > In a way, yes. The video memory counts agaisnt the 4GB/32bit addressable cap so a large video card will make the discrepancy worse. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 23:22:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97742106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:22:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D76D8FC19 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so401qyk.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:22:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.216.5 with SMTP id hg5mr1529426qab.76.1288999342039; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.41.68 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.203.53.2] In-Reply-To: References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:22:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:22:23 -0000 On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > So, my inquiry to this community is: should we really be promoting the > use of ZFS directly by putting it on the FBSD handbook? Maybe it > should go on a different document, and make it really optional. MySQL > is another example, and Open Office, and to top it off BDB. Yes, it's > "Oracle Berkeley DB" - are we as a community continue to allow, and > worse yet promote, this trend? First of all, FreeBSD devs are putting ZFS in the source tree, not just in the handbook. Then, what's being put there is under the CDDL. Should Oracle change the license for subsequent releases of ZFS in a way unacceptable to us, FreeBSD's ZFS will either stagnate and rot, or it will get developed independently in FreeBSD (and perhaps in IllumOS?) along a different path, a.k.a. a fork. This leaves us the problem of patents... and here we're always on slippery grounds, especially in the few countries in the world where software is patentable at all. But this is a general problem, not limited to ZFS. > Anyway, I'm not going to use it any more. I think that we have to > raise awareness to Companies that create Open Source not sell > themselves out to these vicious looters. Or at least have the decency > to release one final version under a license that will allow the > communities to continue development and keeping the software really > open. Again, you're free to use UFS (or any other file system) instead. In many cases, UFS is also a better choice. But those who opt to use ZFS should still be able to do so. Should things go horribly wrong in the future (and with Oracle's bad behaviour towards the OpenSolaris community, there are reasons to be skeptical), copying data back to UFS shouldn't be such a big problem, right? > Best, > Alejandro Imass -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 23:34:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AC2106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F578FC0C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:34:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NFUeGz0loTdi/T6hXKngYYtckjed7x3pKvNOqmBBK18= c=1 sm=0 a=UCLC2FDiInsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=lM4-zUH5AAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=-5WMeQcgAAAA:8 a=A7Wvaz8EAAAA:8 a=wRFe621eAWnfiSMYs1gA:9 a=nb0vaYEqt8uIzJtaExgA:7 a=BbLL7AX688anDuNuhP2PSfoikloA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=tc2ICF-Aw_EA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=5KDeGo4aUKgA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:34628] helo=hbca.yeaguy.com) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 17/9C-12606-19494DC4; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:34:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Robert Bonomi" References: <201011052229.oA5MTZVp022783@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:34:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "justin v" Organization: Yea_Guy Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201011052229.oA5MTZVp022783@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (FreeBSD) Cc: Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:34:43 -0000 On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:29:35 -0700, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 01:18:07 2010 >> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:19:43 +0100 >> From: Leslie Jensen >> To: justin v >> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , >> Jon Radel >> Subject: Re: Installed memory today, questions immediately >> >> >> >> On 2010-11-05 04:41, justin v wrote: >> > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:35:20 -0700, Jon Radel wrote: >> > >> >> On 11/4/10 10:13 PM, justin v wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I installed 4GB or memory today. I rebooted and see this, the first >> >>> line after the splash menu thing: >> >>> >> >>> 983040K of memory above 4GB ignored >> >>> >> >>> dmesg shows avail mem amount and I am concerned as well: >> >>> >> >>> real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) >> >>> avail memory = 3139940352 (2994 MB) >> >>> >> >>> is a stick bad perhaps? >> >>> >> >> Start by reading >> >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/compatibility-memory.html >> >> >> >> >> >> If that doesn't cover it, come back here and include a little >> >> information about the version of FreeBSD and the hardware you're >> using. >> >> >> > >> > >> >> I would suggest you to give us the output of uname -a >> >> I suspect you are running the 32-bit version of FreeBSD and it cannot >> address more that 3 Gb of RAM. > > Must be a hardware issue, too. I'm running 7.2/i386 on a P-III box, and > the boot messages shows 3.9+ gigs 'avail mem'. I double-checked, no > mention > of PAE in the kernel config, either. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I running 32bit OS.. i should have run 64bit actually.. I forgot about the memory limitations with 32bit os. -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 04:44:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FBD106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@too1337.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BD28FC0C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so2730167ywh.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.12.9 with SMTP id 9mr140998anl.19.1289018670579; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macmini.susnet (ip68-99-10-223.om.om.cox.net [68.99.10.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w3sm2413193anw.5.2010.11.05.21.44.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:44:28 -0500 From: Steven Susbauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:44:32 -0000 On 11/5/10 5:19 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Precisely. This is Larry Ellison's position on Open Source: > > > If an open source product gets good enough, we'll simply take it. > [...] So the great thing about open source is nobody owns it – a > company like Oracle is free to take it for nothing, include it in our > products and charge for support, and that's what we'll do. So it is > not disruptive at all – you have to find places to add value. Once > open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. [...] > We don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source. > > Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006 > http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto041820061306424713 It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see how this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory words like "exploit." The basics of what he says are exactly what Red Hat has done from the beginning, and Apple with OS X. Note he says "take it for nothing," he is not referring to buying companies but the practice of including/distributing this software and providing support for the entirety. > the technology, etc. Look at what happened to Android for choosing > Java. Supposedly, it was Open Source and there you have it: it's open > source if and only if... For example, WyTF do I have to login to > Oracle to access the error message information? Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about. Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using the Java VM there would be no lawsuit. Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java standard). Somehow people continued using Java, despite this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 04:52:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD32B106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@too1337.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB028FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so2691723gwj.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.229.14 with SMTP id b14mr416456anh.155.1289017516062; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macmini.susnet (ip68-99-10-223.om.om.cox.net [68.99.10.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d15sm2387341ana.20.2010.11.05.21.25.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:25:13 -0500 From: Steven Susbauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:52:42 -0000 On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people > who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than > Solaris from using it? > > Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long > run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just wonders > if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. > I would be surprised. Oracle (real Oracle, not Sun) is still the primary developer of btrfs on Linux. They are pretty much going for feature parity with ZFS and want people to actually use it. If they start suing over ZFS patents which are certainly applicable to btrfs, it will have repercussions on that side. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 07:44:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E89A106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from appdebgr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40818FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so201327qyk.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w4SGeOIFtNn/AELkauKfb3TDrhuqEYfUhyllEAcQGmg=; b=j9uLChnJZuCAtfmDW2OJZVEyPgIacR5OUC8c3FS9WGY2HRKoMHxtWRXPI23nuTBfSA rSguCVkswtwoTki4hBry1MeZ0nQTDeINFBjRVxZGM/nD4Ra9DwT1I85+yhHdZ83shDNp BqWPzSnbgx6B9FRF5WwaDSiqYTzQJFtwWROEw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZT81GEJore9kJgzYuMfovYeHDWI4+O8jjU8FWB185SZRhu4EFrYlTI2+sVzEE7L8hi wacPfgIivdo45Qi+fcClfekL1iEXgwjfrhRNJzGEbPZoPpknReepRHpf+vJx3oTg4SS3 lFjUoOABATF8ktIKcHxwskzqpZiGWXJ/nAUC0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.181.12 with SMTP id bw12mr2775785qcb.249.1289027765754; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.88.212 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:16:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: App Deb To: Steven Susbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 07:44:40 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote: > Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about. > Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using > the Java VM there would be no lawsuit. Sun was able to successfully sue > Microsoft for similar reasons in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java > standard). Somehow people continued using Java, despite this. Actually they were not. If I remember correctly, the Microsoft Java VM was abandoned because of this and everyone had to switch to the Sun one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 08:12:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03941065673 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CD28FC17 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oA68Bxks095843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 6 Nov 2010 01:11:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oA68BwrX095842; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 01:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18258; Sat, 6 Nov 10 00:00:29 PST Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:00:34 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: gnrp@physik.tu-berlin.de Message-Id: <4cd50b22.r80gL0SMmLLFy03t%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101105195019.4462c479@adolfputzen> In-Reply-To: <20101105195019.4462c479@adolfputzen> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to generate pi in c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 08:12:00 -0000 Julian Fagir wrote: > > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? ... > 1 #include > 2 #include > 3 #include > 4 > 5 // Change this for a more accurate result. > 6 long max = 100000000; > 7 double a, b; > 8 double pi; > 9 long counter; > 10 long i; > 11 > 12 int main() { > 13 for (i = 0; i< max; i++) { > 14 a = drand48(); > 15 b = drand48(); > 16 if (a*a + b*b <= 1) > 17 counter++; > 18 } > 19 pi = 4*counter; > 20 > 21 printf("%e\n", pi); > 22 return(0); > 23 } ... > This approximation is stupid ... Just take 'random' numbers and > look whether they are in a circle (that's the a*a + b*b <= 1). Not stupid, clever. Very clever. I rather doubt it resembles what the OP had in mind, but it is a brilliant example of what can be accomplished when one casts aside any perceived need to adopt a conventional approach. > The detail of this approximation heavily depends on the pseudo-rng > you are using, as does its correctness Perhaps it would be useful in a PRNG test suite? > (e.g., when your 'rng' always returns 10, pi would be computed to > be 10) ... Bad example. If abs(drand48()) always exceeded (0.5 * sqrt(2.0)), a*a + b*b would always exceed 1.0, thus counter would never be incremented and pi would be reported as zero. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 09:35:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528851065694 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524A3A21.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.74.58.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD588FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 23E234; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:35:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD52176.1030903@nagual.nl> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:35:50 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: dying disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:35:49 -0000 My system disk is dying. No problem here. I know how to move a FreeBSD system to new hardware. I have a question though about my GEOM mirror. The system now had one geom mirror consisting of two 1Tb drives. How can I move that mirror over to the Fbsd system on the new hardware. I guess I don't know the right steps to take on a new fbsd system for an existing geom mirror. Any help is welcome. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 10:03:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633C3106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B544C8FC17 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA6A2u7K042833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:02:56 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oA6A2u7K042833 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1289037776; bh=hAuArsWqEmXeo6wvXt9YOHDWzh7oWAY3B2mIPY7hoEk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4CD527C9.7010901@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S at,=2006=20Nov=202010=2010:02:49=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac= 20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-GB=3B=20rv:1.9.2.12)=20Gecko/20101027=20Th underbird/3.1.6|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebs d.org|Subject:=20Re:=20dying=20disk|References:=20<4CD52176.103090 3@nagual.nl>|In-Reply-To:=20<4CD52176.1030903@nagual.nl>|X-Enigmai l-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multip art/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applicati on/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig6055700A9 49A755F5FF559FA"; b=rCKO6Qm03p01i4KMwPFMXS8lW5kARBiNX+OpG8K3xOyOloM4WLf57m15cxLGqFjX0 pdC84r+Wim7eniMgSz1LlL0NE9Dm8lQPP5sDDvzcCpU1PGu8MDQVc9XMVi4BsRMK1j e0Xxt+1OIhXql8KplmIPOHCqwKYM5qZgHYD4GIY4= Message-ID: <4CD527C9.7010901@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:02:49 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD52176.1030903@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4CD52176.1030903@nagual.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6055700A949A755F5FF559FA" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: dying disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:03:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6055700A949A755F5FF559FA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/11/2010 09:35, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > My system disk is dying. No problem here. I know how to move a FreeBSD > system to new hardware. I have a question though about my GEOM mirror. > The system now had one geom mirror consisting of two 1Tb drives. How ca= n > I move that mirror over to the Fbsd system on the new hardware. I guess= > I don't know the right steps to take on a new fbsd system for an > existing geom mirror. Any help is welcome. Do you mean physically moving over the disk hardware behind the gmirror from one machine to another? Well, assuming that the processors on the old and new machines are binary compatible, it's just a matter of hooking up both drives to the new system[*]. It doesn't matter if they end up with different underlying device names -- so long as the kernel can taste the geom metadata on both drives it can reconstruct your gmirror. If the gmirror contains the root FS, it's actually easier than moving a traditionally configured system on a single drive, since you won't have to fiddle about rewriting /etc/fstab and teaching the bootloader the new place to mount the root directory from. It's much the same effect when moving ZFS RAID sets between systems -- as you might hope, since this is basic functionality required when setting up hot-swap and high-availability disk systems. Similarly, using glabel helps make moving single drives between systems (eg. USB memory sticks) much more pleasurable. Cheers, Matthew [*] Or you could just move one drive from your gmirror plus install a blank drive which you could later add to the mirror and resynch. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig6055700A949A755F5FF559FA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzVJ9AACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwUVACfSPAw+omC6UiQHL64qvxr1pIZ 7ycAnicPlfBOF3PLSeLNBVrcpi7l4g8o =adL1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6055700A949A755F5FF559FA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 09:13:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4706B106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tushar770@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f58.google.com (mail-yw0-f58.google.com [209.85.213.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED138FC18 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so4751810ywh.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:13:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.113.9 with SMTP id q9mr134749agm.2.1289034082840; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by r4g2000prj.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT) X-IP: 124.253.178.35 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.125 Safari/533.4, gzip(gfe) Message-ID: From: Tushar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:55:45 +0000 Subject: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:13:56 -0000 I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... please help... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:05:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B400106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524A3A21.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.74.58.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D2A8FC1C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 3C84C5; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:05:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD5367C.4000002@nagual.nl> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:05:32 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD52176.1030903@nagual.nl> <4CD527C9.7010901@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4CD527C9.7010901@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: Re: dying disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:05:30 -0000 On 6-11-2010 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 06/11/2010 09:35, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >> My system disk is dying. No problem here. I know how to move a FreeBSD >> system to new hardware. I have a question though about my GEOM mirror. >> The system now had one geom mirror consisting of two 1Tb drives. How can >> I move that mirror over to the Fbsd system on the new hardware. I guess >> I don't know the right steps to take on a new fbsd system for an >> existing geom mirror. Any help is welcome. > Do you mean physically moving over the disk hardware behind the gmirror > from one machine to another? Thanks for the answer so far. No, I don't intend to buy a new system. I'll just replace the old system drive with a new one in the same system. If I understand you corrrectly it will be enough to have geom_load set on this new fbsd install to have FreeBSD load (and create) the existing geom mirror I now already have? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:23:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263441065675 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B589B8FC1A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF13E7215; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:23:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from unknown (client-82-26-212-122.pete.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.26.212.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:23:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:22:56 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Tushar Message-ID: <20101106112256.00006b8b@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:23:03 -0000 On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Tushar wrote: > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > please help... You can run Windows from FreeBSD, or FreeBSD from within Windows. Either way, use VirtualBox (http://www.virtualbox.org, emulators/virtualbox-ose from ports) to run both at the same time. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:34:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC20B1065673 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA448FC16 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419143D3CA; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:33:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oA6BXvUp002561; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:33:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:33:56 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Tushar Message-Id: <20101106123356.e619e825.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:34:00 -0000 On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT), Tushar wrote: > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > please help... Consider using a virtualization solution to run both operating systems in parallel. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:43:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6CA106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abalour@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA97C8FC17 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3430033bwz.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:43:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zw4pN29QrHZyhmtn5ZYocd8IHvcKqAC/7sknp5xgfts=; b=tQfKe+y4EIDqdPrXk5bBMj31iLe2/89SE1YACvmoSPW8+Vd+GBD9NsFvw6mPU8XTbp Rh2NFc+yx5A3R4Kt1hRDoEIZbqlLvPO+QHGLavNu3Q/dro7SnBCTk3CO/MPcFWG9VrMm qOrTDWwlF8oMVPHQfblK8uq4gOEEqdtQeylxs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=NgBGEC5BiDuykrnSQYxsM4VidxJRhup/rWEl5winxJ3APPEBBf9MXa0+QQD5443fn3 9bAjOnrXUXTqrVoAz++aup/QoAQkfbva9ellbFxW2VMwfp18Lx0WG45Uf9kMImOYsBhk LfeOIgLs0ToSqYOahbyG6BsMrI7Q600VXiQR8= Received: by 10.204.180.75 with SMTP id bt11mr2841539bkb.115.1289042429625; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:20:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: abalour@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.140.193 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:20:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ross Cameron Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:20:09 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: J23miEowp0DmPm0bWtDS-37gbc4 Message-ID: To: Tushar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ross.cameron@linuxpro.co.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:43:54 -0000 Personally I would install FreeBSD as the primary operating system and install Windows in a VirtualBox VM. That way you can get the best of both worlds and no need to reboot to access a particular application. "Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tushar wrote: > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > please help... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:45:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01311065694 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igalgand@freemail.hu) Received: from mail00a.mail.t-online.hu (mail00a.mail.t-online.hu [84.2.40.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454028FC16 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd02.snowboard.ice (dsl5402048B.pool.t-online.hu [84.2.4.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail00a.mail.t-online.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D3A925C14B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:26:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from freebsd02.snowboard.ice (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd02.snowboard.ice (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA6BQtuw086957 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:26:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from igalgand@freebsd02.snowboard.ice) Received: (from igalgand@localhost) by freebsd02.snowboard.ice (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA6BQt6Y086956 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:26:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from igalgand) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:26:55 +0100 From: Istvan Galgand To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101106112655.GA86891@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: update issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:45:51 -0000 Hi All, I regularly update my ports tree using portsnap fetch/update followed by portmanager -u commands. (Not forgetting to check the content of /usr/ports/UPDATING file.) It seems that some of the stuff can't be downloaded from the servers, so the update process is not finished successfully. I found that this problem is caused by pciids-20101005 and v4l_compat-1.0.20101027. They can't be retrieved from the servers or 'operation is not permitted'. These are the very last messages of my portmanager -u command: skipping pciids-20101005 /misc/pciids marked IGNORE reason: failed during make fetch skipping libpciaccess-0.12.0 /devel/libpciaccess until dependency pciids-20101020 updated skipping v4l_compat-1.0.20100403_1 /multimedia/v4l_compat marked IGNORE reason: failed during make fetch skipping hal-0.5.14_9 /sysutils/hal until dependency v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated skipping gstreamer-plugins-v4l2-0.10.25,3 /multimedia/gstreamer-plugins-v4l2 until dependency v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated skipping webcamd-0.1.16 /multimedia/webcamd until dependency v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated skipping libv4l-0.6.4 /multimedia/libv4l until dependency v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated skipping pwcview-1.4.1_3 /multimedia/pwcview until dependency v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated I missed something important, I am afraid. Could anyone be so kind as to provide me with an idea, what happened to my system and how to mitigate the issue, please? Istvan -- This mail was sent by Mutt-1.4.2.3_5, FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 #0, GENERIC i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:52:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DB410656C0 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf03.insightbb.com (mxsf03.insightbb.com [74.128.0.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C2F8FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:52:31 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,307,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="977734757" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2010 07:23:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj03AH/X1ExKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIA4wIjXwMAQEBATUtu2mDDAGCOwQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,307,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="67883898" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2010 07:23:40 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:23:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p1; KDE/4.5.3; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:52:32 -0000 I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I had previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use port 465 SSL LOGIN. I can send mail when I don't use port 465: mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: UseTLS=YES then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It does when I don't use SSL on port 465. KMail does work with SSL on port 465. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.3 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 11:56:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174451065673 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524A3A21.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.74.58.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6DF8FC14 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.102.65.160] (62.133.64.5) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 25C338; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:55:43 +0100 X-User-Agent: K-9 Mail voor Android References: <4CD457CF.60403@nagual.nl> <20101105220641.618df4d6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101105220641.618df4d6@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:22:49 +0100 To: RW ,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7d53ee65-ddfb-420b-8621-3bece87222eb@email.android.com> X-AxigenSpam-Level: 10 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Cc: Subject: Re: portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:56:00 -0000 Yes, of course I did. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 12:39:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7D3106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7C18FC12 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1939121wyb.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 05:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WB0ZMJem8qI9qGMC4DZF+PbqwqVCxhVJGeZxQweLAuA=; b=hSLrozFxJAAbHi3+iyXHf/g3Szcr8FywFZIvP1Uu5MGJN16WpAJWyNRpS6HJOEV+dO iYFowqYsImUwaAe/HLNR9bHrUQ7vh53BK/HxQhrgtZNdujHiMTjEO4wOgxSgBAn20vnt xon9tzyKxniZLcLe8Giy0e2hamUv0MtT+6hrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jdUeVvZiMG6rtfRPh89n37J3nYfkHHtuVaCehpVwJdtCpyVUWoB+zRfcO4KfwWGeCX QzRRXgoMOVfUHUHNChIf2zMGsM1whAzcKnWHG1XHCfRARPUzMJ4U9bAkDhV9j63n/Xot 7czpFlTK4vM385KBNswxi716gmpkXHa1FD/ws= Received: by 10.227.134.20 with SMTP id h20mr3218228wbt.88.1289047175394; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 05:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm2120742wbc.21.2010.11.06.05.39.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 05:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:39:31 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106123931.53d2e6c8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <7d53ee65-ddfb-420b-8621-3bece87222eb@email.android.com> References: <4CD457CF.60403@nagual.nl> <20101105220641.618df4d6@gumby.homeunix.com> <7d53ee65-ddfb-420b-8621-3bece87222eb@email.android.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:39:37 -0000 On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:22:49 +0100 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Yes, of course I did. Then of course you should have mentioned it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 13:34:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F56A106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19E58FC14 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1964787wyb.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:34:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.149 with SMTP id l21mr3183990wbv.171.1289050495603; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:34:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:34:55 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OKX5lC-7WCgODfunSEeJag07kmU Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Steven Susbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:34:58 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote: > On 11/5/10 5:19 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> [...] > It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see how > this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory words like > "exploit." The basics of what he says are exactly what Red Hat has done from > the beginning, and Apple with OS X. Note he says "take it for nothing," he > is not referring to buying companies but the practice of > including/distributing this software and providing support for the entirety. > Yes, but in practice, it looks like its really about buying companies mostly for their IP and IMHO, in turn sequestering, and to potentially close previously open source software. Of course, communities could potentially fork the already released OSS, but patents and tricky licensing schemes may stop them from doing so. I'm no expert and perhaps is very much speculation but my gut feeling is that companies like Oracle are in a position somewhat like SCO was a while back, trying to compensate their shrinking revenue streams on software sales by suing people. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 13:37:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15381106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F628FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2287968ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.16.75 with SMTP id n11mr2410749eba.5.1289050664390; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:37:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:37:24 -0400 Message-ID: To: Steven Friedrich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:37:48 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I had > previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use port 465 > SSL > LOGIN. > > I can send mail when I don't use port 465: > mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com > > but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: > UseTLS=YES > > then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword > as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com > > and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It does > when I don't use SSL on port 465. > > KMail does work with SSL on port 465. > > What does /var/log/maillog say? Can you post /usr/local/etc/ssmtp.conf? (without password of course) Here is mine and it works fine. MailHub=smtp.gmail.com:587 UseTLS=YES AuthUser=r********@xaerolimit.net AuthPass=******** FromLineOverride=YES Hostname=mail.xaerolimit.net root=********@xaerolimit.net UseSTARTTLS=YES Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > -- > System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org > Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory > OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) > manager(s): kde4-4.5.3 > X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 14:19:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47A2106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D33A8FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PEjcN-0002gB-Fv>; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:19:43 +0100 Received: from e178030193.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.30.193] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PEjcN-0000M7-6T>; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD563FF.9010909@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:19:43 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.30.193 Subject: OpenLDAP: slapd and all clienttools coredumping on FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:19:44 -0000 I got three FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64 servers running acting as OpenLDAP servers and clients. On one box every cleint out of the openldap-sasl-client suite crashes as well as slapd itself. On all three boxes we use identical installations, the OS is mostly identical (most recent FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64). Well, I tried recompiling everything neccessary for OpenLDAP via portmaster -f, but it does not seem to help. I deleted on the crashing box every config and tried configuring from scratch, but then I realized that slapd and, for instance, slapcat, coredumping immediately. This happens to all openldap related clients. It seems there is a kind of miscompilation. Using truss results in the following appended. I feel a little bit desperated since on two boxes the OpenLDAP suite works perfectly truss /usr/local/libexec/slapd -d 255 -f /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf ======================================================================= [snip] fstat(2,{ mode=-rw-r--r-- ,inode=211975,size=1613,blksize=16384 }) = 0 (0x0) read(2,"# $FreeBSD: stable/8/etc/hosts 1"...,16384) = 1613 (0x64d) close(2) = 0 (0x0) open("/usr/local/etc/openldap/ldap.conf",O_RDONLY,0666) = 2 (0x2) fstat(2,{ mode=-rw-r--r-- ,inode=801488,size=339,blksize=16384 }) = 0 (0x0) read(2,"#\n# LDAP Defaults\n#\n\n# See l"...,16384) = 339 (0x153) read(2,0x801e32000,16384) = 0 (0x0) close(2) = 0 (0x0) geteuid() = 0 (0x0) getuid() = 0 (0x0) open("/root/ldaprc",O_RDONLY,0666) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("/root/.ldaprc",O_RDONLY,0666) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("ldaprc",O_RDONLY,0666) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' socket(PF_LOCAL,SOCK_DGRAM,0) = 2 (0x2) fcntl(2,F_SETFD,FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 (0x0) connect(2,{ AF_UNIX "/var/run/logpriv" },106) = 0 (0x0) write(2,"@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.23 (No"...,153) = 153 (0x99) clock_gettime(13,{1289053015.000000000 }) = 0 (0x0) access("/etc/localtime",4) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' issetugid(0x8018a45e0,0x8019d9120,0x1,0x2,0x568f6b,0x0) = 0 (0x0) open("/usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC",O_RDONLY,056) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' issetugid(0x8018a4521,0x8019d9120,0x0,0x8018a45e8,0x101010101010101,0x8080808080808080) = 0 (0x0) open("/usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules",O_RDONLY,056) = 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=-r--r--r-- ,inode=71592,size=3519,blksize=16384 }) = 0 (0x0) read(3,"TZif2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,41448) = 3519 (0xdbf) close(3) = 0 (0x0) getpid() = 35315 (0x89f3) sendto(2,"<167>Nov 6 14:16:55 slapd[35315"...,187,0x0,NULL,0x0) = 187 (0xbb) __sysctl(0x7fffffffe8c0,0x2,0x7fffffffe8e0,0x7fffffffe8b8,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) stat("/etc/nsswitch.conf",{ mode=-rw-r--r-- ,inode=212011,size=491,blksize=16384 }) = 0 (0x0) open("/etc/hosts",O_RDONLY,0666) = 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=-rw-r--r-- ,inode=211975,size=1613,blksize=16384 }) = 0 (0x0) read(3,"# $FreeBSD: stable/8/etc/hosts 1"...,16384) = 1613 (0x64d) close(3) = 0 (0x0) write(2,"ldap_pvt_gethostbyname_a: host=t"...,61) = 61 (0x3d) write(2,"daemon_init: \n",20) = 20 (0x14) getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE,{ cur=11095,max=11095 }) = 0 (0x0) pipe(0x64b748) = 0 (0x0) fcntl(4,F_GETFL,) = 2 (0x2) fcntl(4,F_SETFL,O_NONBLOCK|0x2) = 0 (0x0) write(2,"daemon_init: listen on ldap:///"...,32) = 32 (0x20) write(2,"daemon_init: 1 listeners to open"...,36) = 36 (0x24) write(2,"ldap_url_parse_ext(ldap:///)\n",29) = 29 (0x1d) socket(PF_INET6,SOCK_DGRAM,0) ERR#43 'Protocol not supported' socket(PF_INET,SOCK_DGRAM,0) = 5 (0x5) close(5) = 0 (0x0) socket(PF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0) = 5 (0x5) setsockopt(0x5,0xffff,0x4,0x7fffffffea0c,0x4,0x0) = 0 (0x0) bind(5,{ AF_INET 0.0.0.0:389 },16) = 0 (0x0) write(2,"daemon: listener initialized lda"...,38) = 38 (0x26) write(2,"daemon_init: 1 listeners opened"...,32) = 32 (0x20) write(2,"ldap_create\n",12) = 12 (0xc) SIGNAL 11 (SIGSEGV) process exit, rval = 0 ======================================================================= And for slapcat: ======================================================================= [snip] sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) getpid() = 35317 (0x89f5) __sysctl(0x7fffffffe3e0,0x2,0x801afd370,0x7fffffffe3e8,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffe370,0x2,0x7fffffffe300,0x7fffffffe368,0x8019f76a8,0xd) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffe300,0x3,0x801afc268,0x7fffffffe3e8,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffe3a0,0x2,0x8019d07c8,0x7fffffffe398,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffdec0,0x2,0x8019d0088,0x7fffffffdeb8,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffdde0,0x2,0x7fffffffdd70,0x7fffffffddd8,0x80189d220,0xc) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffdd70,0x2,0x8019d0290,0x7fffffffde38,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) readlink("/etc/malloc.conf",0x7fffffffdee0,1024) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' issetugid(0x80189bed9,0x7fffffffdee0,0xffffffffffffffff,0x0,0x2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) break(0x800000) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl(0x7fffffffe1a0,0x2,0x7fffffffe1bc,0x7fffffffe1b0,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = 34389143552 (0x801c0b000) mmap(0x801e0b000,2052096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = 34391240704 (0x801e0b000) munmap(0x801c0b000,2052096) = 0 (0x0) thr_self(0x801e041c0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x188,0x801e00080) = 0 (0x0) mmap(0x7fffffbff000,4096,PROT_NONE,MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = 140737484156928 (0x7fffffbff000) thr_set_name(0x187f7,0x8019f76f0,0x400000,0x1000,0xffffffff,0x0) = 0 (0x0) rtprio_thread(0x0,0x187f7,0x7fffffffe390,0x1000,0xffffffff,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sysarch(0x81,0x7fffffffe3b0,0x801afbe40,0x801afc048,0xffffffff,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS|SIGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigaction(32,{ 0x8019f0fc0 SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO ss_t },0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) SIGNAL 11 (SIGSEGV) process exit, rval = 0 thor# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 13:01:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B3410656AD for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tushar770@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f186.google.com (mail-pv0-f186.google.com [74.125.83.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB588FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvb32 with SMTP id 32so1023204pvb.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:01:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.150.13 with SMTP id x13mr153093wfd.6.1289048475729; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by x4g2000pre.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:01:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106112256.00006b8b@unknown> X-IP: 124.253.179.160 References: <20101106112256.00006b8b@unknown> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.125 Safari/533.4, gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <9576c5e8-22e0-4e66-a87c-b436c81ca1b4@x4g2000pre.googlegroups.com> From: Tushar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:04:52 +0000 Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:01:16 -0000 Yes, I'm going to try virtualbox. Thankyou On Nov 6, 4:22=A0pm, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT) > > Tushar wrote: > > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > > please help... > > You can run Windows from FreeBSD, or FreeBSD from within Windows. > Either way, use VirtualBox (http://www.virtualbox.org, > emulators/virtualbox-ose from ports) to run both at the same time. > > -- > Bruce Cran > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing listhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailma= n/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 13:01:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E19D1065693 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tushar770@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f58.google.com (mail-gw0-f58.google.com [74.125.83.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5215E8FC1D for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj18 with SMTP id 18so4907360gwj.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:01:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.6.23 with SMTP id 23mr149858agf.19.1289048494833; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by a9g2000pro.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:01:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106123356.e619e825.freebsd@edvax.de> X-IP: 124.253.179.160 References: <20101106123356.e619e825.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.125 Safari/533.4, gzip(gfe) Message-ID: From: Tushar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:24:37 +0000 Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:01:35 -0000 Yes, I'm going to try virtualbox. Thankyou On Nov 6, 4:33=A0pm, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:01:22 -0700 (PDT), Tushar wro= te: > > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > > please help... > > Consider using a virtualization solution to run both operating > systems in parallel. > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing listhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailma= n/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 13:01:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFEC10656A6 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tushar770@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f186.google.com (mail-yx0-f186.google.com [209.85.213.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EB68FC16 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxt3 with SMTP id 3so4894721yxt.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:01:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.225.4 with SMTP id x4mr153346agg.39.1289048504299; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by s12g2000prs.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:01:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-IP: 124.253.179.160 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.125 Safari/533.4, gzip(gfe) Message-ID: From: Tushar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:24:54 +0000 Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:01:45 -0000 Yes, I'm going to try virtualbox. Thankyou On Nov 6, 4:20=A0pm, Ross Cameron wrote: > Personally I would install FreeBSD as the primary operating system and > install Windows in a VirtualBox VM. > > That way you can get the best of both worlds and no need to reboot to acc= ess > a particular application. > > "Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in > overalls and looks like work." > =A0 =A0 Thomas Alva Edison > =A0 =A0 Inventor of 1093 patents, including: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tushar wrote: > > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > > please help... > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing listhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailma= n/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:07:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770151065670 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 406648FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26618 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 16:07:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 16:07:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=O7trCb2J3IjiReRGaA2H5CyjGYFdhFt7tSn/m+iebG/L8pRY61gO2HehJIN07eEkUzG19HhqZDZPQBPSbrrutGN2lTc6c9tfLRXeW3C6y8vEL9OZTvGMNNQdimm88+tq; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PElIy-0008VI-CX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:07:49 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:01:53 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:01:53 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:07:50 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:23:39AM -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I ha= d=20 > previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use port 465= SSL=20 > LOGIN. >=20 > I can send mail when I don't use port 465: > mailhub=3Dmail.InsightBB.com >=20 > but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: > UseTLS=3DYES >=20 > then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword > as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com >=20 > and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It doe= s=20 > when I don't use SSL on port 465. >=20 > KMail does work with SSL on port 465. I'm not entirely clear on what you're using as a mail user agent. Are you still using KMail as your MUA, but using ssmtp to send the emails to your SMTP server, or have you switched MUAs when you started using ssmtp? Chris Brennan suggested you send more information; in addition to answering my question, it might be useful to give us the information Chris requested -- but make sure you obscure any username/password information. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVe/EACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVCLwCgh5MjcSbXmUsIcp7rf46WqVLQ flIAn1ga8OQSMj3C+fbgxZv2shuCHzMK =t6cE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:16:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805AD106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 473E28FC14 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4983 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 16:16:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 16:16:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=KBRUk8KW71GuCMrqbhpVFM7ViXv0LTj6OaafCH4s/YX4MZQYDb5rBX90/30o3lER1hmgRem15FUc19My34t80uzS3mwtoT0ih3ZYEJ+vrP+ueQIg5/ws3xtfXa5ASNR4; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PElRK-00007A-He for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:16:27 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:10:31 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:10:31 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106161031.GB12418@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:16:28 -0000 --uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:44:28PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote: > On 11/5/10 5:19 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >Precisely. This is Larry Ellison's position on Open Source: > > > > > >If an open source product gets good enough, we'll simply take it. > >[...] So the great thing about open source is nobody owns it =E2=80=93 a > >company like Oracle is free to take it for nothing, include it in our > >products and charge for support, and that's what we'll do. So it is > >not disruptive at all =E2=80=93 you have to find places to add value. On= ce > >open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. [...] > >We don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source. > > > >Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006 > >http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=3Dfto041820061306424713 >=20 > It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see= =20 > how this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory=20 > words like "exploit." The basics of what he says are exactly what Red=20 > Hat has done from the beginning, and Apple with OS X. Note he says "take= =20 > it for nothing," he is not referring to buying companies but the=20 > practice of including/distributing this software and providing support=20 > for the entirety. It *does* seem that way, at first glance. Taken in the context of Oracle's recent behavior, though, a less pleasant picture emerges. Combining Oracle's willingness to violate the spirit of open source software development in the case of the Google/Java lawsuit with its willingness to essentially end an open source project as with Solaris, we end up with a situation where it becomes risky to rely on the open source status of anything Oracle "owns", regardless of the license under which it is distributed. What happens if Oracle decides to close up a previously open project on which your projects rely? Will Oracle lawyers find some patent related to the creation of that software the company "owns" and use that to sue you if you fork the project to ensure the survival of your own development projects? It seems somewhat likely, somehow. As much as I think MySQL and OpenOffice.org are crappy software in many respects, I'm glad they've both been forked following Oracle's acquisition, if only because they can serve as tests of Oracle's readiness to sue people for forking the company's "intellectual property". --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVffcACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWaSQCgwoid/ov3tke7uk6oOQEf1M2j 3tAAnRwV+83pafOP8Z13FHbqEfkFPVLY =P0jz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:17:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2913106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 686728FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20573 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 16:17:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 16:17:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=hiXmHWHBikLj8VldSPNMOGckR7iGv/EYcMAmrTg/jKATF605aThM3c8dQTH9g1amYNyAt4QTLW/TeNKGVxp4UiMz0UzaRuQ/Xug5+Rl/6Mov8jdvQL0FZyo688yqqVFe; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PElRz-0000mf-JU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:17:08 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:11:12 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:11:12 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106161112.GC12418@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4DD2C.1090407@too1337.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:17:09 -0000 --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:05AM +0200, App Deb wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrot= e: >=20 > > Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about. > > Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was = using > > the Java VM there would be no lawsuit. Sun was able to successfully sue > > Microsoft for similar reasons in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the= Java > > standard). Somehow people continued using Java, despite this. >=20 > Actually they were not. If I remember correctly, the Microsoft Java VM > was abandoned because of this and everyone had to switch to the Sun > one. I think Steven was saying that people are still using Java the language, not that they're still using Microsoft's Java implementation. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVfiAACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUG9QCeJ0judG1MYR31vUzDmmugHjDw UY0Anj+VO921CFWT1hKkJ9AGOuD7H4CJ =LL7T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:22:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CAD1065672 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 047A88FC19 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26982 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 16:22:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 16:22:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=hT4zo5YuhjS2S6A1NAiERDTLaaU0GdhbYH8HadlrWpb70wm572bdH8txrcgUjeeqz7z4fGSwRyWlgluWUn3/1OPlD8tGayOwSfa7FJ0P22ykbSFmcW4yeGW24sftl6Uu; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PElXD-00068l-FK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:22:32 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:16:36 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:16:36 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GyRA7555PLgSTuth" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:22:33 -0000 --GyRA7555PLgSTuth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote: > On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > >Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people > >who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than > >Solaris from using it? > > > >Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long > >run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just wonders > >if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. > > >=20 > I would be surprised. Oracle (real Oracle, not Sun) is still the primary= =20 > developer of btrfs on Linux. They are pretty much going for feature=20 > parity with ZFS and want people to actually use it. If they start suing= =20 > over ZFS patents which are certainly applicable to btrfs, it will have=20 > repercussions on that side. Perhaps. On the other hand, Oracle could offer some kind of "patent covenant" protecting btrfs while going after a ZFS fork as a way of "focing" people to migrate from it to btrfs, as a more hostile way of achieving what Microsoft does when it ends support for an older OS to get people to buy the newer Windows release. =2E . . or maybe Oracle will decide it doesn't need the open source community's help any longer at some future date, and shut down *both* open source filesystem development projects. Oracle is known to be at least intermittently hostile toward open source software, in ways that are sometimes more frightening than Microsoft's hostility. This is scaring people, and I don't blame them. The uncertainty about Oracle's future position on everything it has acquired with Sun is something that will need to be tested and observed to see how it shakes out in the next few years; in the meantime, I do not blame anyone for being cautious about committing to use of open source software under the Oracle umbrella. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --GyRA7555PLgSTuth Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVf2QACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVlIACgmDIXhdirg6PX/hWafIMsYVZS pUYAnArQ31V6ivPM9mPlTLr0Ndud9Vuu =cQQz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GyRA7555PLgSTuth-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:30:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2AB1065673 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00498FC18 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so2250984eyb.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.14.146 with SMTP id g18mr2750697eba.18.1289061050088; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:30:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:30:29 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:30:53 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:23:39AM -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I > had > > previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use port 465 > SSL > > LOGIN. > > > > I can send mail when I don't use port 465: > > mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com > > > > but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: > > UseTLS=YES > > > > then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword > > as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com > > > > and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It > does > > when I don't use SSL on port 465. > > > > KMail does work with SSL on port 465. > > I'm not entirely clear on what you're using as a mail user agent. Are > you still using KMail as your MUA, but using ssmtp to send the emails to > your SMTP server, or have you switched MUAs when you started using ssmtp? > > Chris Brennan suggested you send more information; in addition to > answering my question, it might be useful to give us the information > Chris requested -- but make sure you obscure any username/password > information. > If you reference my last e-mail, I posted my my working ssmtp.conf (for communicating w/ GMail/Google for Domains). If sSMTP is your only MTA, then using my example will get you up and running very quickly. You can also reference http://wiki.freebsd.org/SecureSSMTP on how to secure it (if this is a (semi-)public machine with more then one user on it. > > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:45:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D646A106567A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688E68FC1A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so2253273eyb.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.6.201 with SMTP id a9mr2509386eba.18.1289061902100; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:45:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:44:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:44:41 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:45:03 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote: > > On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > >Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people > > >who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than > > >Solaris from using it? > > > > > >Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long > > >run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just > wonders > > >if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. > > > > > > > I would be surprised. Oracle (real Oracle, not Sun) is still the primary > > developer of btrfs on Linux. They are pretty much going for feature > > parity with ZFS and want people to actually use it. If they start suing > > over ZFS patents which are certainly applicable to btrfs, it will have > > repercussions on that side. > > Perhaps. > > On the other hand, Oracle could offer some kind of "patent covenant" > protecting btrfs while going after a ZFS fork as a way of "focing" people > to migrate from it to btrfs, as a more hostile way of achieving what > Microsoft does when it ends support for an older OS to get people to buy > the newer Windows release. > > . . . or maybe Oracle will decide it doesn't need the open source > community's help any longer at some future date, and shut down *both* > open source filesystem development projects. > > Oracle is known to be at least intermittently hostile toward open source > software, in ways that are sometimes more frightening than Microsoft's > hostility. This is scaring people, and I don't blame them. The > uncertainty about Oracle's future position on everything it has acquired > with Sun is something that will need to be tested and observed to see how > it shakes out in the next few years; in the meantime, I do not blame > anyone for being cautious about committing to use of open source software > under the Oracle umbrella. > > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps flagging your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's nothing bad :D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:50:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1791F106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf12.insightbb.com (mxsf12.insightbb.com [74.128.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62C98FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:50:25 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,308,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="199380953" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf12.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2010 12:50:25 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aqc3AJ8j1UxKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIA4wIjX0MAQEBATUtvQeDBAgBBAWCMgQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,308,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="304822615" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2010 12:50:24 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:50:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p1; KDE/4.5.3; i386; ; ) References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011061250.24353.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:50:26 -0000 On Saturday 06 November 2010 12:01:53 pm Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:23:39AM -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I > > had previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use > > port 465 SSL LOGIN. > > > > I can send mail when I don't use port 465: > > mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com > > > > but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: > > UseTLS=YES > > > > then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword > > as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com > > > > and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It > > does when I don't use SSL on port 465. > > > > KMail does work with SSL on port 465. > > I'm not entirely clear on what you're using as a mail user agent. Are > you still using KMail as your MUA, but using ssmtp to send the emails to > your SMTP server, or have you switched MUAs when you started using ssmtp? > > Chris Brennan suggested you send more information; in addition to > answering my question, it might be useful to give us the information > Chris requested -- but make sure you obscure any username/password > information. I still use KMail for my essential email. However, I want to be able to use send-pr. There is a port called ssmtp, and I use it only for outgoing mail, it allows any userID to send outgoing email using a single ISP account. When my /usr/local/etc/ssmtp.conf is: root=FreeBSD@InsightBB.com mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com rewriteDomain=InsightBB.com hostname=_HOSTNAME_ I can send an outgoing email to myself so I can prove it works. ssmtp -v freebsd@insighttbb.com And the verbose output indicates success. I didn't post it, just stated what it was. But when I configure SSL on port 465, it also shows a good exchange, but maybe I didn't wait long enough to see it get thru the ISP's system. So my SSL version of ssmtp.conf is: root=FreeBSD@InsightBB.com mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com:465 rewriteDomain=InsightBB.com hostname=_HOSTNAME_ # Use SSL/TLS to send secure messages to server. UseTLS=YES The verbose option indicated success when sending an email from root. Let me verify that it wasn't my mistake for not waiting longer... -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.3 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 16:55:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA26106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFE08FC19 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2337353ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.29.68 with SMTP id p4mr2409810ebc.31.1289062499465; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:54:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201011061250.24353.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> <201011061250.24353.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:54:39 -0400 Message-ID: To: Steven Friedrich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:55:03 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > On Saturday 06 November 2010 12:01:53 pm Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:23:39AM -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I > > > had previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use > > > port 465 SSL LOGIN. > > > > > > I can send mail when I don't use port 465: > > > mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com > > > > > > but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: > > > UseTLS=YES > > > > > > then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword > > > as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com > > > > > > and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It > > > does when I don't use SSL on port 465. > > > > > > KMail does work with SSL on port 465. > > > > I'm not entirely clear on what you're using as a mail user agent. Are > > you still using KMail as your MUA, but using ssmtp to send the emails to > > your SMTP server, or have you switched MUAs when you started using ssmtp? > > > > Chris Brennan suggested you send more information; in addition to > > answering my question, it might be useful to give us the information > > Chris requested -- but make sure you obscure any username/password > > information. > > I still use KMail for my essential email. > > However, I want to be able to use send-pr. There is a port called ssmtp, > and I use it only for outgoing mail, it allows any userID to send outgoing > email using a single ISP account. > > When my /usr/local/etc/ssmtp.conf is: > root=FreeBSD@InsightBB.com > mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com > rewriteDomain=InsightBB.com > hostname=_HOSTNAME_ > > I can send an outgoing email to myself so I can prove it works. > ssmtp -v freebsd@insighttbb.com > > And the verbose output indicates success. I didn't post it, just stated > what > it was. > > But when I configure SSL on port 465, it also shows a good exchange, but > maybe > I didn't wait long enough to see it get thru the ISP's system. > > So my SSL version of ssmtp.conf is: > root=FreeBSD@InsightBB.com > mailhub=mail.InsightBB.com:465 > rewriteDomain=InsightBB.com > hostname=_HOSTNAME_ > # Use SSL/TLS to send secure messages to server. > UseTLS=YES > > The verbose option indicated success when sending an email from root. Let > me > verify that it wasn't my mistake for not waiting longer... > -- > System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org > Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory > OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) > manager(s): kde4-4.5.3 > X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 > _______________________________________________ > /var/log/maillog is where you will see success/fail. Your config looks good to me, so I would watch maillog while sending mail and see what crops up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 17:12:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751DB106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (d80.iso100.no [81.175.61.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CA18FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.12.4]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id 7A00423 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:11:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD58C7A.70609@stillbilde.net> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:12:26 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7D5A7389D53775FB53808C18" Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:12:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7D5A7389D53775FB53808C18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.11.2010 17:44, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chad Perrin wro= te: >=20 >> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote: >>> On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: >>>> Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people >>>> who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other tha= n >>>> Solaris from using it? >>>> >>>> Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the l= ong >>>> run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just >> wonders >>>> if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. >>>> >>> >>> I would be surprised. Oracle (real Oracle, not Sun) is still the prim= ary >>> developer of btrfs on Linux. They are pretty much going for feature >>> parity with ZFS and want people to actually use it. If they start sui= ng >>> over ZFS patents which are certainly applicable to btrfs, it will hav= e >>> repercussions on that side. >> >> Perhaps. >> >> On the other hand, Oracle could offer some kind of "patent covenant" >> protecting btrfs while going after a ZFS fork as a way of "focing" peo= ple >> to migrate from it to btrfs, as a more hostile way of achieving what >> Microsoft does when it ends support for an older OS to get people to b= uy >> the newer Windows release. >> >> . . . or maybe Oracle will decide it doesn't need the open source >> community's help any longer at some future date, and shut down *both* >> open source filesystem development projects. >> >> Oracle is known to be at least intermittently hostile toward open sour= ce >> software, in ways that are sometimes more frightening than Microsoft's= >> hostility. This is scaring people, and I don't blame them. The >> uncertainty about Oracle's future position on everything it has acquir= ed >> with Sun is something that will need to be tested and observed to see = how >> it shakes out in the next few years; in the meantime, I do not blame >> anyone for being cautious about committing to use of open source softw= are >> under the Oracle umbrella. >> >> -- >> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]= >> >=20 > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps flaggi= ng > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's nothi= ng > bad :D I suppose they are the PGP signature? //Svein --=20 --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg =C3=98stli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------enig7D5A7389D53775FB53808C18 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzVjH0ACgkQODUnwSLUlKT9ywCgii0OQ9B7Y25Uibf1vOET6c0a CtIAn2WcxH1a36uA2kfxwxMh3mNgUn9H =6MAi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7D5A7389D53775FB53808C18-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 17:21:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BE1106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7BB8FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2341653ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.11.18 with SMTP id r18mr2774425ebr.44.1289064060151; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:21:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:20:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD58C7A.70609@stillbilde.net> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> <4CD58C7A.70609@stillbilde.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:20:39 -0400 Message-ID: To: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:21:01 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) < svein-listmail@stillbilde.net> wrote: > > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps > flagging > > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's nothing > > bad :D > > I suppose they are the PGP signature? > > //Svein > You could suppose that but I'm on a windows machine at the moment so not going to risk it and ... your attachment shows as a PGP Signature ... his didn't, just 'noname' for the file name.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 17:36:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4B106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADD08FC15 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:36:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=9HKKaUf4LrbQLNvPEfUA:9 a=6OvyAydc1IGTtoFjblSKdj0i7ucA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=7d_gOjy5M6Pqr4Es:21 a=CqP5A46EqNK96NCT:21 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:49281] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 94/5E-26142-B0295DC4; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:36:11 +0000 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:36:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin V." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: 802.11 USB recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:36:12 -0000 Can anyone recommend a stable USB Wifi NIC?? Mine seems to be having issues: [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /var/log/messages | grep wlan0 Nov 4 19:03:29 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a Nov 4 19:03:30 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Nov 4 20:59:53 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a Nov 4 20:59:54 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Nov 6 00:16:15 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN Nov 6 00:16:19 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Nov 6 00:16:47 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN Nov 6 00:16:47 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Nov 6 00:17:30 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN Nov 6 00:17:31 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Nov 6 04:23:40 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN Nov 6 04:23:53 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Nov 6 10:28:18 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN Nov 6 10:28:28 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP [vic@yeaguy ~]$ grep rum /var/run/dmesg.boot rum0: on usbus2 rum0: MAC/BBP RT2573 (rev 0x2573a), RF RT2528 rum0: need multicast update callback [vic@yeaguy ~]$ Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 18:24:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8BE1065679 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524A3A21.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.74.58.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541AE8FC1F for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by arwen (Axigen) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 06278D; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:25:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD59D48.8090307@nagual.nl> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:24:08 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk Organization: de nagual User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD457CF.60403@nagual.nl> <20101105220641.618df4d6@gumby.homeunix.com> <7d53ee65-ddfb-420b-8621-3bece87222eb@email.android.com> <20101106123931.53d2e6c8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101106123931.53d2e6c8@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 Subject: Re: portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:24:08 -0000 On 6-11-2010 13:39, RW wrote: > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:22:49 +0100 > Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >> Yes, of course I did. > Then of course you should have mentioned it. Ans of course you are right. ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 18:49:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD9F106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17598FC0C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so2896862ywh.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.50.14 with SMTP id x14mr5696058ybx.389.1289069391879; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3sm2082876yha.28.2010.11.06.11.49.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFAE1E54856 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:49:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:49:48 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101106144948.0338be2d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101106112655.GA86891@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> References: <20101106112655.GA86891@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: update issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:49:53 -0000 On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:26:55 +0100 Istvan Galgand articulated: > Hi All, >=20 > I regularly update my ports tree using portsnap fetch/update followed > by portmanager -u commands. (Not forgetting to check the content of=20 > /usr/ports/UPDATING file.) It seems that some of the stuff > can't be downloaded from the servers, so the update process is not > finished successfully. I found that this problem is caused by > pciids-20101005 and v4l_compat-1.0.20101027. They can't be retrieved > from the servers or 'operation is not permitted'. These are the very > last messages of my portmanager -u command: >=20 > skipping pciids-20101005 /misc/pciids marked IGNORE reason: failed > during make fetch > skipping libpciaccess-0.12.0 /devel/libpciaccess until dependency > pciids-20101020 updated > skipping v4l_compat-1.0.20100403_1 /multimedia/v4l_compat marked > IGNORE reason: failed during make fetch > skipping hal-0.5.14_9 /sysutils/hal until dependency > v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated > skipping gstreamer-plugins-v4l2-0.10.25,3 > /multimedia/gstreamer-plugins-v4l2 until dependency > v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated > skipping webcamd-0.1.16 /multimedia/webcamd until dependency > v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated > skipping libv4l-0.6.4 /multimedia/libv4l until dependency > v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated > skipping pwcview-1.4.1_3 /multimedia/pwcview until dependency > v4l_compat-1.0.20101027 updated >=20 > I missed something important, I am afraid. Could anyone be so kind as > to provide me with an idea, what happened to my system and how to > mitigate the issue, please? That happens sometimes. I usually just cd to the afflicted port directory and try to download the requisite files prior to running portmanager. --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ "The most important job is not to be governor, or first lady in my case." George W. Bush January 30, 2000 =46rom speech in Pella, Iowa and quoted in the San Antonio Express-News. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 18:52:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CB2106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9028FC15 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so916534wwb.1 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gjuFazbIfq8n4rsnavdX5ss+9RvZ3PDnFbA6Botpqvw=; b=ZzT/lV4wW4lzXEJE5dmq0aBALs+LEwn1d86/yoRVaZYkwILU+Y9qZCbZSEo47mpPcW t0w8fBz4s/4r48ggWFh3ZIme96s1I4lPvLqF0TIGHVGtKSqD45nL4OktJEbgocD+tpjo BI6XTzQZHv79HSQnOIbnYemY7PockEb5lMtIo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KhUEp5EGNXY+VBF6cbz7RqLnHnF6mNb6G/F6cT6OvzHloTG3B2cz62Jm9viZzDeNe3 4KHd50mmS4PvswMbwg+iBo1dcr9+qsostGZwl5LgwoEh6Cy2Cpx+0AL7pnKDO6lbb8SK jOHP0Sitj9OeMPHDjuSRha5Rm7THAUuIeU++s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.5.21 with SMTP id 21mr2567525wek.20.1289069539808; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.25.85 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:52:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:52:19 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:52:23 -0000 On 5 November 2010 19:11, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Hey folks, > > A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I > decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the > pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links > and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This > really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me > thinking... > > Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing > to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very > reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people > here on ZFS before I continue using it. > > Many thanks, > Alejandro Imass > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > the main problem is geom and ufs isnt a like for like replacement yet. Good as though geom is it just not as easy as zfs from an adminsistration point of view in my opinion. It may potentinally get a block checksum class but it will be a long time before its like for like. I've had a play around with btrfs, which is supposed to be an opensource equivelent to zfs. It is far from ready yet though. It may mature into a good product in the future, but its a long way off and far from polished (dam horrible from what ive seen so far). Most of its development was backed by oracle though from what i have read, so who knows where that will go now. If oracle want to continue to push linux and it to have a decent fs, it may well just be easier for them to drop the licensing issues with cddl which was preventing zfs from making it into linux. Who knows but for anything in the near to medium future there is nothing to rival zfs on the opensource market. Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important data can do without checksuming. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 18:56:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379B51065693 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61808FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so2133805wyb.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+4tgcTFayrZ3CrmpELDCm3/jzQWTN1SPy47JcsHTfQs=; b=mRFkVaeDNRlVVu6QrywN7WyyXp6Yd+UWupouyRftPDrvy2DxhVPKGtYgBThmVN5oCF fzqZYc38iPfMeAReOtBrr4aO3SdgKPZsRhj9X+Zsn0l6F+xLlI51Kjkqvk3WImV4Uw1H D50EvPkG+/Vut5mLB84YY2gurCXSb24GjiQW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YADMTxUPS4QHdGXRcIONlluX0mg6Kh/NMqygyNi76qz+YezNdCRx+8VsAEZUtCkCSa +NyRncb5hkjFMfOzYkfzplCMJd9TK0r/MhKgXQ6Df9rEwi5KV72Bls5kS294PJvQQMNI k8EXARfJrccFUMtnlszs0ekgIlIDFy4n0M8GM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.5.21 with SMTP id 21mr2570468wek.20.1289069771392; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.25.85 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:56:11 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:56:13 -0000 On 5 November 2010 22:19, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail accoun= t) > wrote: > >> > >> Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you > >> similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox? > > > > I think Alejandro's more worried about what will happen with future > > versions of ZFS based on the company that now owns the copyrights, whic= h > > is not (in any meaningful way I've been able to determine) at all simil= ar > > to the Mozilla Foundation. Yes, the current stable version is CDDL. > > Will the next be purely proprietary, or some new license, or simply > > discontinued? Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop peop= le > > who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than > > Solaris from using it? > > > > Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long > > run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just wonde= rs > > if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. > > > > Precisely. This is Larry Ellison's position on Open Source: > > > If an open source product gets good enough, we'll simply take it. > [...] So the great thing about open source is nobody owns it =96 a > company like Oracle is free to take it for nothing, include it in our > products and charge for support, and that's what we'll do. So it is > not disruptive at all =96 you have to find places to add value. Once > open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. [...] > We don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source. > > Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006 > http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=3Dfto041820061306424713 > > I am not about to check the actual licensing of ZFS, I mean to which > parts are actually licensed with the CDDL or not, for example the HTML > error message documents. Which patents Sun or Oracle have obtained on > the technology, etc. Look at what happened to Android for choosing > Java. Supposedly, it was Open Source and there you have it: it's open > source if and only if... For example, WyTF do I have to login to > Oracle to access the error message information? > > So, my inquiry to this community is: should we really be promoting the > use of ZFS directly by putting it on the FBSD handbook? Maybe it > should go on a different document, and make it really optional. MySQL > is another example, and Open Office, and to top it off BDB. Yes, it's > "Oracle Berkeley DB" - are we as a community continue to allow, and > worse yet promote, this trend? > > Anyway, I'm not going to use it any more. I think that we have to > raise awareness to Companies that create Open Source not sell > themselves out to these vicious looters. Or at least have the decency > to release one final version under a license that will allow the > communities to continue development and keeping the software really > open. > > Best, > Alejandro Imass > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affected by all the same licensing issues From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 18:57:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B26E106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (d80.iso100.no [81.175.61.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FDE8FC12 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.12.4]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id A880D26 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:56:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD5A50D.3090602@stillbilde.net> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:57:17 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1530E039A2FE558020C95E60" Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:57:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1530E039A2FE558020C95E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.11.2010 19:52, krad wrote: > On 5 November 2010 19:11, Alejandro Imass wrote: >=20 >> Hey folks, >> >> A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I >> decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the >> pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links >> and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This >> really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me >> thinking... >> >> Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing >> to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very >> reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people= >> here on ZFS before I continue using it. >> >> Many thanks, >> Alejandro Imass >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >=20 > the main problem is geom and ufs isnt a like for like replacement yet. = Good > as though geom is it just not as easy as zfs from an adminsistration po= int > of view in my opinion. It may potentinally get a block checksum class b= ut it > will be a long time before its like for like. >=20 > I've had a play around with btrfs, which is supposed to be an opensourc= e > equivelent to zfs. It is far from ready yet though. It may mature into = a > good product in the future, but its a long way off and far from polishe= d > (dam horrible from what ive seen so far). Most of its development was b= acked > by oracle though from what i have read, so who knows where that will go= now. > If oracle want to continue to push linux and it to have a decent fs, it= may > well just be easier for them to drop the licensing issues with cddl whi= ch > was preventing zfs from making it into linux. Who knows but for anythin= g in > the near to medium future there is nothing to rival zfs on the opensour= ce > market. >=20 > Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra > features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important da= ta > can do without checksuming. The question I keep asking myself, is what could FreeBSD + DragonFlyBSD do with DragonFly's "Hammer". Is there any work in progress porting Hammer to FreeBSD, or is that unlikely for ... personal history reasons? //Svein --=20 --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg =D8stli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------enig1530E039A2FE558020C95E60 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzVpRAACgkQODUnwSLUlKTNigCeJOWs3vmMvygyzLytS0lAKvtB 2u8AnRiqp3nhfKpqoH+aDZY8oaApaT7L =4ka/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1530E039A2FE558020C95E60-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 19:02:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199D2106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net) Received: from ns2.bafirst.com (ns2.bafirst.com [97.67.198.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9643A8FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unixmania.com ([187.153.245.195]) by ns2.bafirst.com with esmtp; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:52:00 -0500 id 000D4E55.4CD5A3D0.0000E239 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80) by unixmania.com with local; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:52:08 -0600 id 000CF00B.4CD5A3D8.00017ABD Received: from dsl-187-153-245-195-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (dsl-187-153-245-195-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [187.153.245.195]) by econet.encontacto.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:52:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20101106135208.152232memfr0h5us@econet.encontacto.net> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:52:08 -0500 From: eculp To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (5.0-cvs) X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.106 Safari/533.4 X-IMP-Server: 187.153.245.195 X-Originating-IP: 187.153.245.195 X-Originating-User: eculp@encontacto.net Subject: Is Intel Core I7 930 2.80 Ghz as good or better option than AMD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:02:14 -0000 I've always been an AMD fan but am getting the idea that they are loosing their edge. So my question if the Intel Core I7 930 2.80 Ghz is as good and option or is their a better AMD at a similar o cheaper price? I plan to install this in a GigaByte GA-X58A/UD7 motherboard with 6 Gb in a Cosmos-S Cooler Master cabinet with extra fans and Cooler Master 600w power supply. Any comments appreciated. Please copy me on your answers. Enjoy your weekend. ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 19:09:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55681065670 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E8A8FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-204.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.204] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEnzy-0005wB-7X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:00:23 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:09:34 -0700 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:09:34 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106190934.GB67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:09:39 -0000 --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, I would recommend that configuration also, because FreeBSD is much more lightweight of the two, so you don't impose the overhead of running Windows when all you need is FreeBSD. Quoth Ross Cameron on Saturday, 06 November 2010: > Personally I would install FreeBSD as the primary operating system and > install Windows in a VirtualBox VM. >=20 > That way you can get the best of both worlds and no need to reboot to acc= ess > a particular application. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > "Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in > overalls and looks like work." > Thomas Alva Edison > Inventor of 1093 patents, including: > The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tushar wrote: >=20 > > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > > please help... > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM1afuAAoJEIpckszW26+RB+QH/17JmF0jxuZ7yAJ2pYoX6+Ao qBe1D8F7Pg8SfbJlxEAS47lq9NpNH40MT8ZWkn7Ji3QSjq/ZrwfLyfY+Tpxu7onP DtqE1Vj/n3kt2tPqFyPOsOJhLWRJgdkgM6Dos4dt+OLRYl67zZTlJP9BDpJDnCnG Dc6E66jdSonSn7GQaTW9p2nm5g8IpXZOyGob/9iJhINi+bxM4o3utycSqo2IRHaM 8pgfYlw6zE4vgDdNnlemkZA8lGw8k0L9pvNEk58//zMCnq25Y8Pre1DwmJtN6Ntv 5th84g/UHsi1fNOhVRFUlWCoWXpLpxU3X5GUEuBziD/eJo4wSkfA8MtIIEeBTJI= =S518 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 19:34:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7781065670 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:34:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbergstrom@pathscale.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23E38FC16 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gya6 with SMTP id 6so2850670gya.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.148.14 with SMTP id a14mr5749343ybo.298.1289072086108; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.54] (123-193-5-149.dynamic.kbronet.com.tw [123.193.5.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z4sm2117852yhz.1.2010.11.06.12.34.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CD5AE89.2050404@pathscale.com> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 03:37:45 +0800 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eculp References: <20101106135208.152232memfr0h5us@econet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20101106135208.152232memfr0h5us@econet.encontacto.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Is Intel Core I7 930 2.80 Ghz as good or better option than AMD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:34:47 -0000 eculp wrote: > I've always been an AMD fan but am getting the idea that they are > loosing their edge. So my question if the Intel Core I7 930 2.80 Ghz > is as good and option or is their a better AMD at a similar o cheaper > price? > > I plan to install this in a GigaByte GA-X58A/UD7 motherboard with 6 Gb > in a Cosmos-S Cooler Master cabinet with extra fans and Cooler Master > 600w power supply. > > Any comments appreciated. > > Please copy me on your answers. What will you be doing with it? Will you actually be running FBSD on it and what sort of applications? You're talking about value here, but who is going to do the research for you.. So please don't be lazy and pick an exact AMD processor you're looking at.. (most likely Istanbul/Magny-cours) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 20:02:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D266A106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CEF8FC1A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D52E7215; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:02:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from unknown (client-82-26-212-122.pete.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.26.212.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:02:44 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:02:39 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Chip Camden Message-ID: <20101106200239.00004b64@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20101106190934.GB67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <20101106190934.GB67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:02:46 -0000 On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:09:34 -0700 Chip Camden wrote: > Yes, I would recommend that configuration also, because FreeBSD is > much more lightweight of the two, so you don't impose the overhead of > running Windows when all you need is FreeBSD. I'm not sure that's true, actually. FreeBSD by itself may be a lot more lightweight than Windows but once you add in Xorg and KDE I think it needs about the same, if not more, memory. People will argue that you don't have to run KDE or GNOME but as can be seen from the success of Ubuntu people like complete desktop environments. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 20:21:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C18106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED93E8FC16 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26937 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 20:21:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 20:21:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=MAlPp45eyD29cq2nri7CHh0P+voDZN0yq892EDWtwCEH9TvPSlZJY24dAavzj5BTMYDdAeVWKl6DDmnizZi6ptKEVa/VTFL6s5GTcs77F70EYQX9cwbJvWA4icyiYSvP; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEpGH-00013a-U2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:21:19 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:15:22 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:15:22 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106201522.GA13095@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> <201011061250.24353.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:21:20 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:54:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Steven Friedrich = wrote: > > > > I still use KMail for my essential email. Okay, thanks for clarifying, Steven. > > > > And the verbose output indicates success. I didn't post it, just stated > > what > > it was. > > > > But when I configure SSL on port 465, it also shows a good exchange, but > > maybe I didn't wait long enough to see it get thru the ISP's system. > > > > So my SSL version of ssmtp.conf is: > > root=3DFreeBSD@InsightBB.com > > mailhub=3Dmail.InsightBB.com:465 > > rewriteDomain=3DInsightBB.com > > hostname=3D_HOSTNAME_ > > # Use SSL/TLS to send secure messages to server. > > UseTLS=3DYES > > > > The verbose option indicated success when sending an email from > > root. Let me verify that it wasn't my mistake for not waiting > > longer... =2E . . and you said that setting it to send email through mail.insightbb.com:465 in KMail config works. Right? In addition to Chris Brennan's article references, there's another that I wrote quite some time ago that I think explains ssmtp config for TLS use pretty well: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=3D440 =46rom what you said so far, it seems like ssmtp is configured correctly. It seems likely, then, that the problem is with KMail or with something filtering port 465. Does KDE have something going on with firewall management that might be allowing KMail to send stuff on port 465 while outside of KDE's "help" you cannot? Have you checked to see whether you can send with your TLS settings for ssmtp from outside of KMail? If you are not wedded to ssmtp per se, you could always try msmtp instead: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=3D1842 It does much the same sort of stuff as ssmtp, but is a bit more "feature rich", and appears to be more actively maintained than ssmtp. >=20 > /var/log/maillog is where you will see success/fail. Your config looks go= od > to me, so I would watch maillog while sending mail and see what crops up. It appears that Chris Brennan knows a bit about this subject. Yes, that file may prove useful in troubleshooting this issue. If you are having trouble figuring out whether maillog has anything to offer for hints, you might want to paste its contents into pastebin and give us a link to it there so we can give it a look (after checking to make sure you are not pasting any sensitive data, of course). --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVt1oACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXuSQCgjsxTcm2DEnuOQydpZH/aHsDV W0cAoPAbTPAOReIKjjhXjUayOZstlNZC =93zG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 20:36:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F80F1065696 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DB158FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6427 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 20:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 20:36:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=cuh5xmMz3/bQt7yuLcQQPgPyg/NqQwlBrWsonTmuIpRjwVL6sWXNqDzrNme5tYzSakGZks+1C8RqUnngtX2FqGjOGlYHnE0AM3waOzOsbTQ5vOrPD6+d4+FCtcMu5gMq; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEpUh-00077Y-JR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:36:12 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:30:16 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:30:16 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101106203016.GB13095@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cmJC7u66zC7hs+87" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:36:13 -0000 --cmJC7u66zC7hs+87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:52:19PM +0000, krad wrote: >=20 > the main problem is geom and ufs isnt a like for like replacement yet. Go= od > as though geom is it just not as easy as zfs from an adminsistration point > of view in my opinion. It may potentinally get a block checksum class but= it > will be a long time before its like for like. I have not really spent any quality time with ZFS, so I'm a little sketchy on the details. Is there anything the checksumming capabilities of ZFS do that cannot be duplicated with an external tool -- perhaps something like a filesystem integrity auditing system? >=20 > I've had a play around with btrfs, which is supposed to be an opensource > equivelent to zfs. It is far from ready yet though. It may mature into a > good product in the future, but its a long way off and far from polished > (dam horrible from what ive seen so far). Most of its development was bac= ked > by oracle though from what i have read, so who knows where that will go n= ow. > If oracle want to continue to push linux and it to have a decent fs, it m= ay > well just be easier for them to drop the licensing issues with cddl which > was preventing zfs from making it into linux. Who knows but for anything = in > the near to medium future there is nothing to rival zfs on the opensource > market. As far as I'm aware, btrfs has not been ported to any BSD Unix systems, either -- so there's a major downside to btrfs (as compared with ZFS). >=20 > Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra > features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important data > can do without checksuming. I guess that depends on what you're doing with the data and what kind of external tools you have in place to protect/duplicate it in case of a problem. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --cmJC7u66zC7hs+87 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVutgACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKV7wQCggfS0Rm/UvdS5twPiYpd9GtN2 vjMAnieGVr5dpk+IH4DKoTp3g+Vim21k =sgua -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cmJC7u66zC7hs+87-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 20:38:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C4D106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A6E18FC12 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8601 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 20:38:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 20:38:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=PsV6cgmZ/A0X34WeI5Jyr3dMiK6iCh0dEPO9SnxRkEHJFXaWcEzwrU44L/eolqEb/aKANv/s45sv9d97EkoJoMUvPaetFnzK+065hbdYypnM3PW2UJnHIt1xvAsN/UfB; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEpWa-0000ZA-Vr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:38:10 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:32:13 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:32:13 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106203213.GC13095@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101106190934.GB67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101106200239.00004b64@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101106200239.00004b64@unknown> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:38:10 -0000 --UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:02:39PM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:09:34 -0700 > Chip Camden wrote: >=20 > > Yes, I would recommend that configuration also, because FreeBSD is > > much more lightweight of the two, so you don't impose the overhead of > > running Windows when all you need is FreeBSD. >=20 > I'm not sure that's true, actually. FreeBSD by itself may be a lot more > lightweight than Windows but once you add in Xorg and KDE I think it > needs about the same, if not more, memory. People will argue that you > don't have to run KDE or GNOME but as can be seen from the success of > Ubuntu people like complete desktop environments. Well, there's your problem -- you're using Windows Lite (KDE). Anyway, it appears to be fairly reliably reported that KDE and (especially now) GNOME still run lighter than the whole MS Windows GUI, even if they're much heavier than other options. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVu00ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVl6gCfT1itIhhthCihH5ipQcSFe1FL VEoAoLG9Puuiz+IuQ83CJra2E4KJGIU8 =CVcy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 20:42:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5FB106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71C6F8FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31501 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 20:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 20:42:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=Rhu7Imz2SYki77pH2Z6fr5F919mBRfebM1WdvjjKK4No6cqOiGXBXaaMyoqBrkAIHgGCjpfr1LZWOOzm6EwKyCvJY9h1n7aSW6VO8tmh4mXjDHO71u7ZXaUoHPXwPDZ2; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEpan-0004pQ-KJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:42:30 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:36:34 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:36:34 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106203634.GD13095@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:42:31 -0000 --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +0000, krad wrote: >=20 > this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affect= ed > by all the same licensing issues While we're at it, OpenOffice.org, MySQL, Solaris, Java, and VirtualBox are also entangled with Oracle. There may be others that escape my memory at this exact moment, too. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVvFIACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWfmACfVO2Ny9n24oCBscNg37wVFUzF EeUAn0ZhOmGAO/24rOGRDFAXVOFW/2oK =yWQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 20:45:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BA8106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38BBD8FC16 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16371 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2010 20:45:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2010 20:45:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=LRwM03Ql2gK+YI9l9160p1OOBvUwO43um/yqm4m8DOCIcIMVJz2Z8Y6duRzL2SLzHCkIRJOO9QQE5ub2prvKqSTfLqrcP0nEA65yUjmRZc1gVyXdN3uguY2h/2XQ7wCV; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEpdc-0007u1-Ks for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:45:25 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:39:29 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:39:29 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106203929.GE13095@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> <4CD58C7A.70609@stillbilde.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jTMWTj4UTAEmbWeb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:45:26 -0000 --jTMWTj4UTAEmbWeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) < > svein-listmail@stillbilde.net> wrote: >=20 > > > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps > > flagging > > > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's not= hing > > > bad :D > > > > I suppose they are the PGP signature? >=20 > You could suppose that but I'm on a windows machine at the moment so not > going to risk it and ... your attachment shows as a PGP Signature ... his > didn't, just 'noname' for the file name.... That supposition is correct. I find it odd that someone else's signature is labeled as such and mine is not for you; for me, I see mine labeled as PGP signatures as well. I'm currently using GnuPG with Mutt; I don't know if that makes a difference. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --jTMWTj4UTAEmbWeb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVvQEACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW4CwCcDhIdyQJoHxxMrXL46Fk/ltCS aUoAoK3Ash4dM6akESMekrqAwb+NWQOq =tGgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jTMWTj4UTAEmbWeb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 21:38:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF2106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41A98FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA6LcaZV057379 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:38:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 161C9BAA1; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:38:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:38:36 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101106213836.GA77198@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20101106203016.GB13095@guilt.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101106203016.GB13095@guilt.hydra> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:38:38 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra > > features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important da= ta > > can do without checksuming. >=20 > I guess that depends on what you're doing with the data and what kind of > external tools you have in place to protect/duplicate it in case of a > problem. The GEOM_ELI class provides optional authentication/checksumming. See geli(= 8), especially the -a option. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzVytwACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXBwACdFovQsMFlKrzG49agCCW+KYTH gfcAoKWD+3MOESSUjwwKouYZnQDd4So9 =uqoN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 21:45:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8A3106566C; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCB28FC0A; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A9714FE9; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:26:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5KKSYrunRCv; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (adsl-66-122-66-37.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net [66.122.66.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9606714FEB; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:26:23 -0700 (PDT) References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPod Mail 8B117) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPod Mail (8B117) From: Jason Helfman Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:28:21 -0700 To: Chris Brennan Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:45:10 -0000 I should port this wiki to @doc On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:23:39AM -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: >>> I recently figured out how to send mail thru my ISP ID using ssmtp. I >> had >>> previously only been using KMail, and I had it configured to use port 46= 5 >> SSL >>> LOGIN. >>>=20 >>> I can send mail when I don't use port 465: >>> mailhub=3Dmail.InsightBB.com >>>=20 >>> but if I add the port 465 a,d enable SSL with: >>> UseTLS=3DYES >>>=20 >>> then I use the -v switch and also -auFreeBSD -apPassword >>> as in smtp -v -auFreeBSD -apPassword freebsd@insightbb.com >>>=20 >>> and the messages all indicate success, but the mail never arrives. It >> does >>> when I don't use SSL on port 465. >>>=20 >>> KMail does work with SSL on port 465. >>=20 >> I'm not entirely clear on what you're using as a mail user agent. Are >> you still using KMail as your MUA, but using ssmtp to send the emails to >> your SMTP server, or have you switched MUAs when you started using ssmtp?= >>=20 >> Chris Brennan suggested you send more information; in addition to >> answering my question, it might be useful to give us the information >> Chris requested -- but make sure you obscure any username/password >> information. >>=20 >=20 > If you reference my last e-mail, I posted my my working ssmtp.conf (for > communicating w/ GMail/Google for Domains). If sSMTP is your only MTA, the= n > using my example will get you up and running very quickly. You can also > reference http://wiki.freebsd.org/SecureSSMTP on how to secure it (if this= > is a (semi-)public machine with more then one user on it. >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 22:49:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D24106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394F58FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2390263ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.14.146 with SMTP id g18mr2956290eba.18.1289083796095; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:49:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:49:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106203929.GE13095@guilt.hydra> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> <4CD58C7A.70609@stillbilde.net> <20101106203929.GE13095@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:49:33 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:49:58 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) < > > svein-listmail@stillbilde.net> wrote: > > > > > > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps > > > flagging > > > > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's > nothing > > > > bad :D > > > > > > I suppose they are the PGP signature? > > > > You could suppose that but I'm on a windows machine at the moment so not > > going to risk it and ... your attachment shows as a PGP Signature ... his > > didn't, just 'noname' for the file name.... > > That supposition is correct. I find it odd that someone else's signature > is labeled as such and mine is not for you; for me, I see mine labeled as > PGP signatures as well. I'm currently using GnuPG with Mutt; I don't > know if that makes a difference. > > Shouldn't .... but just to be clear .... Chad's signature-attachement is claimed to be safe! And the answer is 42. Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 22:53:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BA21065679 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE098FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2390635ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.14.146 with SMTP id g18mr2957840eba.18.1289084006307; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:53:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:53:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201011060723.39786.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20101106160153.GA12418@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:53:06 -0400 Message-ID: To: Jason Helfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ssmtp - possible anomaly with SSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:53:28 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jason Helfman wrote: > I should port this wiki to @doc > > if you need an extra pair of eyes, I shall provide mine and what little free time I may have. Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 22:54:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30DF1065759 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E3C8FC14 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-204.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.204] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PErVu-0003H8-9v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:45:35 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:54:46 -0700 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:54:46 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106225446.GC67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101106190934.GB67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101106200239.00004b64@unknown> <20101106203213.GC13095@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101106203213.GC13095@guilt.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:54:53 -0000 --ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Chad Perrin on Saturday, 06 November 2010: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:02:39PM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:09:34 -0700 > > Chip Camden wrote: > >=20 > > > Yes, I would recommend that configuration also, because FreeBSD is > > > much more lightweight of the two, so you don't impose the overhead of > > > running Windows when all you need is FreeBSD. > >=20 > > I'm not sure that's true, actually. FreeBSD by itself may be a lot more > > lightweight than Windows but once you add in Xorg and KDE I think it > > needs about the same, if not more, memory. People will argue that you > > don't have to run KDE or GNOME but as can be seen from the success of > > Ubuntu people like complete desktop environments. >=20 > Well, there's your problem -- you're using Windows Lite (KDE). >=20 > Anyway, it appears to be fairly reliably reported that KDE and > (especially now) GNOME still run lighter than the whole MS Windows GUI, > even if they're much heavier than other options. >=20 > --=20 > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] I'm using FBSD xith Xorg sans KDE or GNOME quite productively. And with everything running that I normally need, I use less than 1GB out of the 4GB available -- less than 300MB on boot. Windows 7 wants the a whole GB just to start up, or it's painfully slow. Actually, it's painfully slow anyway -- and furthermore it imposes that pain on guest OSes as well. What does KDE or GNOME buy you anyway? Besides overhead. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM1dy2AAoJEIpckszW26+RgpoH/iSb+Kv1LZv7B0+Hmrpk3Jis w1AwpSfTsVic5jTrkHbGudOc/hasL9FuiLPCX+55347KepVyoGpa4NCpF26p4Zgx kaEVs77SrAG+fmXl78U/c5CS2I8uOO8WMovZXk2CGVBnl0RojOHWmHi5r7ck9pLW Fs3e+o6qaqEIOjakBemULX5QTFznM1T/jF+exRImF54b5KO5LKE+pVSxilpGvsnf /VT7rsb0NGHrqbWmGntyUzFCuU9GHymcfMv8P4yFSEG40ewvEZeurpw15UoBkWGT QyB+K3Oe5ZvTqjz4bVcuUPJDZI2g9ijuNTmJNveVUgiXbSi1yzF5dAESV9OBE2g= =+x9r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 22:57:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12761065672 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C9B8FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-204.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.204] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PErYB-0003tX-QM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:47:57 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:57:08 -0700 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:57:08 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101106225708.GD67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <20101106203634.GD13095@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101106203634.GD13095@guilt.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:57:13 -0000 --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Chad Perrin on Saturday, 06 November 2010: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +0000, krad wrote: > >=20 > > this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affe= cted > > by all the same licensing issues >=20 > While we're at it, OpenOffice.org, MySQL, Solaris, Java, and VirtualBox a= re > also entangled with Oracle. There may be others that escape my memory at > this exact moment, too. >=20 > --=20 > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM1d1EAAoJEIpckszW26+R6MAH/1V+ncQ9BEJWk3wSMVz8evRD QR86wqg95IHWrSXeqQq05vm8h91gFAvNRhW8h19dMD3dRjabOIxSD9QoRuIZVMkz OruOzBi+vgikF032AWGBEvbro+exes4GN0ZEeC7ut5GwHeYFMIXkC+IP06xyD3FC ZfxS3pAAE3e/gzerKHMv5N97WLkClGSTxr8Um9+PqQsfOAFpDDsRWXQ4Z7erlahz E1HY1JxHNCFp51rQUdlKdTUn9Pg6tv/c++G+4Yt8lxeoq+dZlMv4audgH/lDH8QZ H7T0aa+W8TZChNkoqshsAI1oHVT3RWGiMd7ZjBhzdNVZD3liZeLM6uG7YoOe5o4= =/ZZs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 23:06:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4BD106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754E98FC15 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2392547ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.29.68 with SMTP id p4mr2608158ebc.31.1289084796316; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:06:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:06:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106225446.GC67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <20101106190934.GB67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101106200239.00004b64@unknown> <20101106203213.GC13095@guilt.hydra> <20101106225446.GC67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:06:16 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:06:38 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Chad Perrin on Saturday, 06 November 2010: > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:02:39PM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:09:34 -0700 > > > Chip Camden wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, I would recommend that configuration also, because FreeBSD is > > > > much more lightweight of the two, so you don't impose the overhead of > > > > running Windows when all you need is FreeBSD. > > > > > > I'm not sure that's true, actually. FreeBSD by itself may be a lot more > > > lightweight than Windows but once you add in Xorg and KDE I think it > > > needs about the same, if not more, memory. People will argue that you > > > don't have to run KDE or GNOME but as can be seen from the success of > > > Ubuntu people like complete desktop environments. > > > > Well, there's your problem -- you're using Windows Lite (KDE). > > > > Anyway, it appears to be fairly reliably reported that KDE and > > (especially now) GNOME still run lighter than the whole MS Windows GUI, > > even if they're much heavier than other options. > > > > -- > > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > > > I'm using FBSD xith Xorg sans KDE or GNOME quite productively. And with > everything running that I normally need, I use less than 1GB out of the > 4GB available -- less than 300MB on boot. Windows 7 wants the a whole GB > just to start up, or it's painfully slow. Actually, it's painfully slow > anyway -- and furthermore it imposes that pain on guest OSes as well. > > What does KDE or GNOME buy you anyway? Besides overhead. > > Preference .... I use Gnome on occasion but I stick w/ {open|black|etc}box because I'm more a minimalist then anything and I abhor desktop icons ... even in windows, I turn them off. > -- > Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F > http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | > http://chipsquips.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 23:07:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BB01065670 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44B38FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.124.10) id 4CCAF076003917EE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:07:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4CD5DF7C.8030500@onetel.com> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:06:36 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Thinkpad R51 + xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_3 = lockup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:07:42 -0000 Hello I aquired an R51 model 2887 recently. It has the latest BIOS and the video chipset is 855GM. I am getting the same problem as mentioned here and here Loading X (with/without -retro) causes the machine to lock up with a black screen. I have to press and hold the power button to turn the machine off and Xorg.0.log is empty on reboot. This occurs with xorg-7.5 and xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_3. With xorg_7.4_3 and xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 it works. Replacing the intel driver with vesa also works. Other things I have tried are: replace xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_3 in the xorg-7.5 setup with xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 from a package compiled with xorg_7.4_3 - works but lots of warnings of version mismatches when installing. compile xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 with xorg-7.5 - failed to compile. add Option "AccelMethod" "EXA" to xorg.conf (because xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 failed to compile with errors about uxa) - no effect. remove a second instance of screen, device etc in xorg.conf which gets set up by X -configure - no effect. One thing I haven't done is add Option "UseSIGIO" and Option "NoTrapSignals" to xorg.conf as they both have warnings which I didn't feel competent to deal with. I haven't included xorg.conf and dmesg as they are both virtually identical to the ones in the links above, but of course I can if required. OS is 8.1-R Any suggestions welcome. thanks Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 23:10:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE211065697 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDE08FC2A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2393026ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.11.18 with SMTP id r18mr2959268ebr.44.1289085017629; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:09:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106225708.GD67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <20101106203634.GD13095@guilt.hydra> <20101106225708.GD67566@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:09:57 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:10:19 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > > The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a > truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere > that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle. > > I agree, vBox is vital .... OOo3 has movement as well. See the following links http://www.documentfoundation.org/ http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument_Foundation > -- > Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F > http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | > http://chipsquips.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 23:13:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7D106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEC98FC12 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2393355ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.28.205 with SMTP id n13mr2970875ebc.5.1289085188531; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:13:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:12:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD5DF7C.8030500@onetel.com> References: <4CD5DF7C.8030500@onetel.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:12:48 -0400 Message-ID: To: Chris Whitehouse Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Thinkpad R51 + xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_3 = lockup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:13:10 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > Hello > > I aquired an R51 model 2887 recently. It has the latest BIOS and the video > chipset is 855GM. I am getting the same problem as mentioned here > < > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=991679+1008170+/usr/local/www/db/text/2010/freebsd-questions/20100829.freebsd-questions > > > > and here > > < > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=453703+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2010/freebsd-questions/20100829.freebsd-questions > > > > Loading X (with/without -retro) causes the machine to lock up with a black > screen. I have to press and hold the power button to turn the machine off > and Xorg.0.log is empty on reboot. > > This occurs with xorg-7.5 and xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_3. With xorg_7.4_3 and > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 it works. > > Replacing the intel driver with vesa also works. > > Other things I have tried are: > > replace xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_3 in the xorg-7.5 setup with > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 from a package compiled with xorg_7.4_3 - works but > lots of warnings of version mismatches when installing. > > compile xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 with xorg-7.5 - failed to compile. > > add Option "AccelMethod" "EXA" to xorg.conf (because > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_1 failed to compile with errors about uxa) - no > effect. > > remove a second instance of screen, device etc in xorg.conf which gets set > up by X -configure - no effect. > > One thing I haven't done is add Option "UseSIGIO" and Option > "NoTrapSignals" to xorg.conf as they both have warnings which I didn't feel > competent to deal with. > > I haven't included xorg.conf and dmesg as they are both virtually identical > to the ones in the links above, but of course I can if required. > > OS is 8.1-R > > Any suggestions welcome. > > thanks > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Installed from packages or Ports? Are you mixing the two? (I would hope not.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 23:34:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CDC106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFB48FC12 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so111113qyk.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.95.211 with SMTP id e19mr3560114qcn.139.1289086451600; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.41.68 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.203.37.112] Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 00:34:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [2nd try] OpenGL 3.3 and 4.0/4.1 for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0000 Sorry to repeat my question: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-November/223379.html but I got no replies at all. Anyone with accelerated 3D on FreeBSD out there using binary drivers and the new OpenGL APIs? Some practical recommendations as to GPUs and drivers? Pointers? Hints? TIA, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/