From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 00:22:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169B2106566C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:22:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE65E8FC0A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTDESKTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PMV23-00082i-UI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:22:20 -0500 Message-ID: <8EF88817C5E041E792C26B219F73C665@GRANTDESKTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:22:17 -0500 Organization: The Net Now Internet Services. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3502.922 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Console Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:22:26 -0000 Hi all, I am using FreeBSD 8.0 and am getting lots of these: negative sbsize for uid =3D 0 +negative sbsize for uid =3D 0 +negative sbsize for uid =3D 0 +negative sbsize for uid =3D 0 +negative sbsize for uid =3D 0 any ideas what it means or how to cure it? -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 00:36:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8787B1065670 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242BD8FC14 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so1483680ewy.13 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:36:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.136 with SMTP id p8mr5071806ebp.51.1290904569775; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:36:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:36:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:36:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Brennan To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Software Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:36:11 -0000 My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is weather this pulls updates from packages or ports. P.s. I think I asked this before but it got lost in some other hubbub. So appologies if I did ask already. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 01:01:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589B1065672 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127688FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so1487039ewy.13 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:01:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mZ2C1a6+GRnzsyZNayEVD+//ytdji1EavByzOHi2Qrk=; b=r4ifGrwCgsmqf71UnsdCxYh2B8lbXe0qtsmKJ2jH/7mxS1BbBKt8FMyzk6LUnNf+Ns +0h8Pe4f5upUMgt0b5T9uVT3zXxDdgpvZPL+ptCoMZmnfS9ngPvGLs5D5ratxC3szj5X CTI9244zk2+igbQs2raloE56GIFv9xKsR8AYE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Fgl/JUYyUQoouboP9TeY2WThhBJ85pxPF3XIW3Vg4iPGYUfOEVvyUab/oZ2neABO5W 2/cY+OH7wcXlDAVkrs8eFN8u8utUmpLZC/7NCjx/mwTz0bEKKzxDE0/fK47xxWewttn4 /DQ7kK4UKaYs3SfwHt6KbjmEwONt49+lICrVA= Received: by 10.14.53.66 with SMTP id f42mr2966651eec.46.1290906084800; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:01:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v51sm3413404eeh.10.2010.11.27.17.01.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:01:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:01:04 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101128010104.28201ea8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Software Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:01:26 -0000 On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500 Chris Brennan wrote: > My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is > weather this pulls updates from packages or ports. There are a few applications, such as opera, that can "phone home" and check for newer versions. Typically they can't upgrade because they lack privileges. Perhaps you could be a little less vague. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 01:50:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913A51065670 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@too1337.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ABA8FC24 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so1562056yxh.13 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.167.20 with SMTP id u20mr2941764ano.108.1290909025101; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.105] (ip68-99-20-136.om.om.cox.net [68.99.20.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t39sm3925873ano.7.2010.11.27.17.50.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:50:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CF1B55F.8020705@too1337.com> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:50:23 -0600 From: Steven Susbauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101019 Lanikai/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101128010104.28201ea8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101128010104.28201ea8@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Software Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:50:26 -0000 On 11/27/2010 07:01 PM, RW wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500 > Chris Brennan wrote: > >> My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is >> weather this pulls updates from packages or ports. > > There are a few applications, such as opera, that can "phone home" and > check for newer versions. Typically they can't upgrade because they lack > privileges. > > Perhaps you could be a little less vague. Software Update is provided by gnome-packagekit (or the kde equivalent) and will nag if updated packages are available. To the op, according to http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057056.html PackageKit was given support for ports using portupgrade or portaudit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 02:01:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2A51065679 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 02:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EC78FC1E for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 02:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1490314eyb.13 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:01:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.16.72 with SMTP id n8mr7872601eba.38.1290909676849; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:01:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:00:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF1B55F.8020705@too1337.com> References: <20101128010104.28201ea8@gumby.homeunix.com> <4CF1B55F.8020705@too1337.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:00:56 -0500 Message-ID: To: Steven Susbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 02:01:20 -0000 On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Steven Susbauer wrote: > On 11/27/2010 07:01 PM, RW wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500 >> Chris Brennan wrote: >> >> My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is >>> weather this pulls updates from packages or ports. >>> >> >> There are a few applications, such as opera, that can "phone home" and >> check for newer versions. Typically they can't upgrade because they lack >> privileges. >> >> Perhaps you could be a little less vague. >> > > Software Update is provided by gnome-packagekit (or the kde equivalent) and > will nag if updated packages are available. > > To the op, according to > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057056.htmlPackageKit was given support for ports using portupgrade or portaudit. > > Thanks Steven, that's what I was looking for. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 04:03:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A18106566C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4E88FC14 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B43A26278B7; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:22 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znf+zDdp7DBv; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.9] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90CF326278B6; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:20 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman X-Priority: 1 (Highest) In-Reply-To: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:02 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <94D1BC04-8CE6-4495-890D-863245EA5DA9@cwis.biz> References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:03:08 -0000 On Nov 27, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello list >=20 > I have a digital camera, Canon powershoot sx130 is. That I wish to = mount. The camera contains an sd-card that I wish to extract the photos = from. >=20 > ugen2.2: at usbus2 >=20 > %uname -a > FreeBSD testbox.fqdn 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 23 = 22:05:11 CEST 2010 amd64 It's FAT32, so I'd try... mount_msdosfs /dev/ugen2.2 ... or something similar= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 04:21:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C06106566C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442608FC12 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAS4LtVk092637; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:21:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:21:55 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Bernt Hansson In-Reply-To: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> Message-ID: References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:21:59 -0000 On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Bernt Hansson wrote: > I have a digital camera, Canon powershoot sx130 is. That I wish to > mount. The camera contains an sd-card that I wish to extract the photos > from. > > ugen2.2: at usbus2 I have a Canon Powershot S5IS that behaves similarly. I have found that it can't be mounted like a disk drive, even though you would think it should work that way. Instead, I have to use gtkam to get the pictures off of it - /usr/ports/graphics/gtkam Also had to change some system stuff in order to be able to do this as an ordinary user: Added to /etc/devfs.conf # Allow members of group operator to use USB own usb* root:operator perm usb* 0660 ...and here is my /etc/devfs.rules in its entirety: # Added so ordinary users can use the USB camera if they are # members of group 'usb' # [usb_devices=10] add path 'ugen*' mode 0660 group usb add path 'da*s*' mode 0660 group usb # # 20091231: added the following for 8.0, since usb is handled # differently now. Hoping this will make gtkam work. add path 'usb/*' mode 0660 group usb HTH... -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 05:46:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C11106566C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geoff@apro.com.au) Received: from mail.ricksure.com.au (mail.ricksure.com.au [203.98.89.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5888FC15 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apromail1.apro.com.au [61.28.222.38] by mail.ricksure.com.au with SMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:30:44 +1100 Received: from localhost (horde.internal [10.1.1.23]) by mail.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531375869D4 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:30:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from 171.78.233.220.static.exetel.com.au (171.78.233.220.static.exetel.com.au [220.233.78.171]) by aprosrv2.apro.com.au (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:30:48 +1100 Message-ID: <20101128163048.21211cl7o3xpi8lc@aprosrv2.apro.com.au> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:30:48 +1100 From: Geoff Roberts To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7) / FreeBSD-7.3 X-Declude-Sender: geoff@apro.com.au [61.28.222.38] X-Declude-Spoolname: 45064234.eml X-Declude-RefID: X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.6.35 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm" X-Declude-Scan: Outgoing Score [0] at 16:30:49 on 28 Nov 2010 X-Declude-Tests: Whitelisted X-Country-Chain: X-Declude-Code: 0 X-Declude-Recipcount: 1 Organization: Declude, Inc. X-Helo: mail.internal X-RevDNS: Subject: zpool won't mount as dataset stuck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:46:06 -0000 Hi, In a slight panic here as my main ZFS pool "tank" won't mount. I have two ZFS pools on two different drives - a system pool on a single disk called "data" and a mirrored pool on two disks called "tank". The "tank" zpool contains all my jails and non-system boot type data. I was wanting to test FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE and therefore took a snapshot of "data" and "tank": zfs snapshot -r data@pre82 zfs snapshot -r tank@pre82 "tank" seemed to hang on the above command for ages and I had to Ctrl-C. Long and short is I can see the "tank" zpool without a problem, but whenever I try to import it the disk light flashes every second and the datasets won't mount. I can run a history command on "tank" and that shows the following repeated every second (tgx keeps incrementing by one): 2010-11-28.15:08:33 [internal rollback txg:9645688] dataset = 222 [user root on systemname.com] 2010-11-28.15:08:34 [internal rollback txg:9645689] dataset = 222 [user root on systemname.com] The zpool seems to be stuck. What should I do from here? Is there a way to "freeze" dataset operations so I can at least mount them? Other thoughts and questions I had: a) What would be the best way to take a raw image of the zpool so I can work on a copy of the zpool rather than the original? b) Would it be worth trying to import the zpool on FreeBSD current or OpenSolaris? Any help greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Geoff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 08:18:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF73106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@pcartwright.com) Received: from cl104.justhost.com (cl104.justhost.com [69.175.91.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956238FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.65.91.107] (helo=paulandcilla.homelinux.org) by cl104.justhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMOJd-0003SE-4n for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:12:01 -0600 Message-ID: <4CF13BE0.5000503@pcartwright.com> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:00 -0500 From: Paul Cartwright User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101125230217.GA25485@thought.org> <4CEFA3DD.9090106@qeng-ho.org> <4CF1395D.27634.1829768@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cl104.justhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - pcartwright.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: next question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: paul@pcartwright.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:18:34 -0000 On 11/27/2010 12:06 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > You need to add yourself to the 'wheel' group to su or you need to add the > proper line to /usr/local/etc/sudoers to sudo correctly. > no sudoers on my system: $ cd /usr/local/etc $ cd sudoers cd: can't cd to sudoers $ ls CORBA esd.conf.default lynx.lss psiconv ConsoleKit fonts lynx.lss.sample rc.d PolicyKit gconf mtree rndc.key X11 gnome named.conf sound apache22 gnome-vfs-2.0 openldap vfs aspell.ver gnome-vfs-mime-magic orbit2rc xdg avahi gnome.subr orbit2rc.default xml2Conf.sh bash_completion.d gtk-2.0 pam.d xsltConf.sh bonobo-activation hal pango dbus-1 lynx.cfg polkit-1 esd.conf lynx.cfg.sample profile.d $ pwd /usr/local/etc $ uname -a FreeBSD bsd.paulandcilla.homelinux.org 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC 2010 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 367800 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 08:25:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0764106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.net (mail.mgwigglesworth.net [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A84E8FC1A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:25:34 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 03:14:55 -0500 Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4CF20F7F.9030400@mgwigglesworth.net> From: "Martes G Wigglesworth" Received: from devsecure.mgwigglesworth.net (192.168.5.10 [192.168.5.10]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.net; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:10:30 -0500 Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Build World fails on 7-stable with cvs sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:25:34 -0000 Greetings. I have cvs'd to the most current 7-stable source tree and have compiled a kernel using these sources. However, when I attempt to complete the buildworld process, I keep getting failures in the below-listed areas. Does anyone know of an issue with these sources? I see that this release is now considered "legacy" so I hope I am not at end of life on this source tree. The system is just an edge router so I am just updating to the newest stable release due to the assumptions that there may be some fixes included in the sources. I have my own patched ipfirewall sources, (don't feel like writing a script for ipfw to run and figure out why it isn't running at boot, etc....),however, I have not installed them yet, since I have not patched anything on this test upgrade box, yet. I have the full logs from build world and kernel build, if someone would like to see them. (very long, and don't fail until the point listed below) The kernel kept failing as well, until I used the old method by hand, in the /usr/src/sys/i386/conf directory. That is another question that I would like to ask. Why am I able to compile and install a kernel just fine using the old method, however, using the make buildkernel... method fails on some obscure module that I usually don't even have included within the config file? gnu/lib/libgomp (buildincludes) sed -e 's/@OMP_LOCK_ALIGN@/4/g' -e 's/@OMP_LOCK_KIND@/4/g' -e 's/@OMP_LOCK_SIZE@/4/g' -e 's/@OMP_NEST_LOCK_ALIGN@/4/g' -e 's/@OMP_NEST_LOCK_KIND@/8/g' -e 's/@OMP_NEST_LOCK_SIZE@/8/g' < /usr/src/gnu/lib/libgomp/../../../contrib/gcclibs/libgomp/omp.h.in > omp.h ===> gnu/lib/libregex (buildincludes) sed 's===g' < /usr/src/gnu/lib/libregex/regex.h > regex.h.patched ===> gnu/lib/libregex/doc (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history/doc (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline/doc (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libstdc++ (buildincludes) Segmentation fault (core dumped) *** Error code 139 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 09:51:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EA5106566B for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D3F8FC14 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3221764bwz.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:51:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=Rjunl2Sbm3VRH6LOsX9srZ8IMgkagMpLRU87sl32psQ=; b=AwFZthZOmYKZL/1D3ZvrNVJdUyYZ1oMxO552vvfzuAmaR80Vh7kfP0nOJXFUxuSAR8 WGwwBAKwx5ZRNTDFd/d3pO1gvHQNzGxcCqCHc9+CgfvL33inHbkjCSmK9RwJa6Nma3vq W8QkbgDpzIU5dJR2FgVDXajU2j4Mjl0XdwTpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=VyuMeLDaOXOwz/B+Pmn9x8YGgl6D9RMvMSm26dXPXJ2C2hES3L6L/3LmbCFxXYTGk0 IGQfHIIIewd6Sxtp8bTi9+T9zFqzIIcHjfAR7b5UTYcQ9RPBs2Hq+hGCjp198BgaYAby BH3nPNwzHH6n8b78YQMLGvJj/EQR/OkbG2vGg= Received: by 10.204.123.83 with SMTP id o19mr3262808bkr.31.1290937873211; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:51:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:50:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF13BE0.5000503@pcartwright.com> References: <20101125230217.GA25485@thought.org> <4CEFA3DD.9090106@qeng-ho.org> <4CF1395D.27634.1829768@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <4CF13BE0.5000503@pcartwright.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:50:42 +0000 Message-ID: To: paul@pcartwright.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: next question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:51:15 -0000 On 27 November 2010 17:12, Paul Cartwright wrote: > On 11/27/2010 12:06 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: >> You need to add yourself to the 'wheel' group to su or you need to add the >> proper line to /usr/local/etc/sudoers to sudo correctly. >> > no sudoers on my system: > $ cd /usr/local/etc > $ cd sudoers > cd: can't cd to sudoers Yeah, you need to install sudo: # pkg_add -r sudo Then use visudo as root to edit sudoers. Do NOT edit sudoers without using visudo, you can lock yourself out if you mess up the syntax (yes, the voice of experience)! Chris > -- > Paul Cartwright > Registered Linux user # 367800 Hope you're enjoying the switch.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 12:52:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8670106566B for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E1D8FC0C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80352E60CB; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:52:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-27-19-187.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.19.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:52:14 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:51:41 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Ryan Coleman Message-ID: <20101128125141.1aaa84da@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <94D1BC04-8CE6-4495-890D-863245EA5DA9@cwis.biz> References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> <94D1BC04-8CE6-4495-890D-863245EA5DA9@cwis.biz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:52:16 -0000 On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:02 -0600 Ryan Coleman wrote: > It's FAT32, so I'd try... > > mount_msdosfs /dev/ugen2.2 You can't mount ugen devices! It seems umass hasn't attached so I guess the camera might use the Picture Transfer Protocol instead - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picture_Transfer_Protocol . -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 13:19:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309661065670 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44848FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so1683755yxh.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.72.5 with SMTP id u5mr3402148aga.114.1290950371530; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r31sm1789555yhc.24.2010.11.28.05.19.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:19:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B882E54856 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:19:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:19:28 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101128081928.5e6ae5c0@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101128125141.1aaa84da@core.draftnet> References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> <94D1BC04-8CE6-4495-890D-863245EA5DA9@cwis.biz> <20101128125141.1aaa84da@core.draftnet> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:19:33 -0000 On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:51:41 +0000 Bruce Cran articulated: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:02 -0600 > Ryan Coleman wrote: > > > It's FAT32, so I'd try... > > > > mount_msdosfs /dev/ugen2.2 > > You can't mount ugen devices! It seems umass hasn't attached so I > guess the camera might use the Picture Transfer Protocol instead - see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picture_Transfer_Protocol . It looks like libptp2 might be interesting ; however, I don't see any support for it in FBSD. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 14:12:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E99106566B for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EBE8FC12 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oASEBrt2000848; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:11:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 32921B85D; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:11:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:11:53 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Bruce Cran Message-ID: <20101128141153.GA49450@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> <94D1BC04-8CE6-4495-890D-863245EA5DA9@cwis.biz> <20101128125141.1aaa84da@core.draftnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101128125141.1aaa84da@core.draftnet> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Bernt Hansson , Ryan Coleman , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:12:08 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:51:41PM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:03:02 -0600 > Ryan Coleman wrote: >=20 > > It's FAT32, so I'd try... > >=20 > > mount_msdosfs /dev/ugen2.2 >=20 > You can't mount ugen devices! It seems umass hasn't attached so I guess > the camera might use the Picture Transfer Protocol instead - see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picture_Transfer_Protocol . Use the graphics/gphoto2 port. You'll need read/write access to the USB devices. Create a group called 'usb', and add your user-id to it using pw(8); pw groupadd usb -m Edit devfs.rules(5) to give the usb group write access to the usb and ugen devices: # excerpt from /etc/devfs.rules [myrules=3D10] add path 'usb/*' mode 0660 group usb add path 'ugen*' mode 0660 group usb Do not forget to activate the ruleset in /etc/rc.conf; # excerpt from /etc/rc.conf devfs_system_ruleset=3D"myrules" After a reboot, the permissions are fixed. You can of course also use chown= (8) and chmod(1) to fix the permissions without rebooting. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzyYykACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVlXwCdG+G2vAK+P8KxfeRjU9dosXKB Qc8AnibyY2I8DUUalnNuQ7YuHZc30Zgv =igcM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 14:20:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC001065679 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523208FC13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22307 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 14:20:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Nov 2010 14:20:52 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E620550825; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:20:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6E47B1CC3A; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:20:45 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Bernt Hansson , FreeBSD Questions , Chris Hill References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:20:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Hill's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:21:55 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <44sjylo7gi.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:20:53 -0000 Chris Hill writes: > I have a Canon Powershot S5IS that behaves similarly. I have found > that it can't be mounted like a disk drive, even though you would > think it should work that way. Instead, I have to use gtkam to get the > pictures off of it - /usr/ports/graphics/gtkam I prefer extracting the memory card from the camera and loading it through a card reader. The advantages are speed and lack of battery drain on the camera. This only matters when there are a lot of pictures involved. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 14:39:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA7F106566C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDD58FC12 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4552F1E691; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:39:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oASEdHhI001469; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:39:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:39:17 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Hill Message-Id: <20101128153917.d1f9a075.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:39:24 -0000 On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:21:55 -0500 (EST), Chris Hill wrote: > On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Bernt Hansson wrote: > > > I have a digital camera, Canon powershoot sx130 is. That I wish to > > mount. The camera contains an sd-card that I wish to extract the photos > > from. > > > > ugen2.2: at usbus2 > > I have a Canon Powershot S5IS that behaves similarly. I have found that it > can't be mounted like a disk drive, even though you would think it should > work that way. Instead, I have to use gtkam to get the pictures off of it > - /usr/ports/graphics/gtkam Yes, the camera is PTP. I have the Canon PowerShot S3 IS myself and went the following way: I remove the SD card from the camera and use the internal reader of my machine. :-) Instead of using Gtkam, a GUI application, you will be happy being able to use a non-interactive way, provided by gphoto2. You can even automate copying with (or without) deleting the photos. The gphoto2 program also has a good manpage. Oh, and check if the camera provides a menu entry to select which "personality" it will come up with when connected to USB. Some cameras have the ability to be either a PTP compatible (use gphoto2 and gtkam) or DA compatible (use mount_msdosfs). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 15:23:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626D5106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA098FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8294 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 15:23:37 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Nov 2010 15:23:37 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED755081F; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C6B2C1CC7C; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:23:28 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Grant Peel References: <8EF88817C5E041E792C26B219F73C665@GRANTDESKTOP> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:23:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8EF88817C5E041E792C26B219F73C665@GRANTDESKTOP> (Grant Peel's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:22:17 -0500") Message-ID: <44k4jxo4jz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:23:38 -0000 "Grant Peel" writes: > I am using FreeBSD 8.0 and am getting lots of these: > > negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > > any ideas what it means or how to cure it? Hmm. Interesting. You may need to go -hackers for this... Apparently a socket buffer is claiming to use a negative amount of space. Offhand I'd guess that it wrapped around, but there seem to be checks in place to avoid that. It's something running as root, which should help you track it down (most network daemons should be run as other users anyway). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 17:37:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E771065695 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAF08FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.191.75.95) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:37:24 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:36:53 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Web mail for not local domains. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:37:00 -0000 Hello all. I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for the following. I am supporting a non profit organization, so the budget is less than zero. They already have a freebsd server (8.1) and are using sendmail for about 20 accounts, not big traffic. In their pc's (windows xp) they are using eudora (free version) as a client without problems (POP). I would like to install them a webmail that let them access the local accounts in the server BUT that also let them access some other accounts with another providers. No gmail, hotmail or so, but POP3 accounts that are hosted under other domains with other ISP's . Actually no problem under they eudora mail client, but the idea is that when they out in conference or so they also can have access to the accounts under the freebsd server and the other provider. Thanks in advance for your comments. Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 17:41:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09662106566B for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:41:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from firas@fkraiem.org) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7385B8FC16 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.19.2] (unknown [88.181.14.184]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572624C8049 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:41:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CF2944E.5040200@fkraiem.org> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:41:34 +0100 From: Firas Kraiem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:41:44 -0000 On 28/11/10 18:36, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for > the following. > > I am supporting a non profit organization, so the budget is less than > zero. They already have a freebsd server (8.1) and are using sendmail > for about 20 accounts, not big traffic. In their pc's (windows xp) they > are using eudora (free version) as a client without problems (POP). I > would like to install them a webmail that let them access the local > accounts in the server BUT that also let them access some other accounts > with another providers. No gmail, hotmail or so, but POP3 accounts that > are hosted under other domains with other ISP's . Actually no problem > under they eudora mail client, but the idea is that when they out in > conference or so they also can have access to the accounts under the > freebsd server and the other provider. > > Thanks in advance for your comments. > > Jorge Biquez > Hi, I *think* (not 100% sure and I don't have one to test right now) Horde IMP can do that Firas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 17:51:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA99106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11348FC1D for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3438959bwz.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:51:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=APYDr50SZqyFKTdC1CBB6W3JSdlhBc3ENwraVa+1KVs=; b=ZkF6pv2CCTfpUoAMspBM13mHTLZ2Ry7aqO/cgJ+P8jOCoLf1/YpGLNyVpeKJO9Ff94 EVRN/zbTUOPXKcfQGIB2oGm2N8ZwlPwCU6WhnN5GXkwhbZ99F5zCXjPo/63hyYJHuwLV cD83pz0i1psFhws8kphxZnnyav94eW6VGAMhw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=o5M9U3BScCi6xhiPPcE7PgncLYl+R4RYA+56ZQ/5KCui1piPatpWunIsJtoh8w/JZi tA1g7lJNf5KBH1eh9s2QPg2PGyRrc1JKAOLdPXJbn5jEiioW7aK+BA/+B00V6hIwoQH+ bpWy3Be+VMEiWS+2NR9gnIC2rwSwv2CJl0ATY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.69 with SMTP id v5mr2133602bkp.84.1290966708087; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.10.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:51:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CEE987D.9040008@locolomo.org> References: <4CEE987D.9040008@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:51:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016e6d58cfc0d6adc0496209cb6 Subject: Re: can't use godaddy SSL cert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:51:50 -0000 --0016e6d58cfc0d6adc0496209cb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric and John Thanks for your input.. > As mentioned in my previous mail, there is no need to specify TLSCACertif= icateFile in > > slapd.conf unless your server will request client certific= ate for authentication. Nor is there > any point in trying multiple files, = you can concatenate the CA certificates into a single file. I have removed TLSCACertificateFile form slapd and now recognize that this directive is only needed on the client side. Thanks for clueing me into that. And here is my /etc/ldap.conf file on on the CentOS 5.5 client: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#cat /etc/ldap.conf host 192.168.1.44 base dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom sudoers_base ou=3Dsudoers,ou=3DServices,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom scope sub pam_password exop nss_base_passwd ou=3Dstaff,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom nss_base_shadow ou=3Dstaff,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom TLS_CACERT /etc/openldap/cacerts/gd_sf_all.crt And here are the contents of the cacerts directory on the CentOS 55 client: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ls -l /etc/openldap/cacerts/ total 36 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 27529 Nov 28 12:10 all.crt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Nov 28 12:20 b737b221.0 -> all.crt And this is the way that nsswitch is setup on the CentOS client: passwd: files ldap shadow: files ldap group: files ldap sudoers: ldap I have revised the location of the cert files on the server noted in slapd.conf in order to separate out the certs from the cacerts. This is just to organize things a little more neatly. ## TLS options for slapd TLSCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:+SSLv2 TLSCertificateFile /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/slapd.crt TLSCertificateKeyFile /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/slapd.pem And here are the contents of the /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs directory, also on the server that is referenced in the TLS lines in slapd.conf: -r--r--r-- 1 root ldap 2309 Nov 26 18:52 LBSD2.summitnjhome.com.crt dr--r--r-- 3 root ldap 512 Nov 28 03:32 bak drwxr-xr-x 2 root ldap 512 Nov 28 03:26 cacerts -r--r--r-- 1 root ldap 2309 Nov 26 18:53 slapd.crt -r--r--r-- 1 root ldap 1781 Nov 26 18:36 slapd.csr -r--r--r-- 1 root ldap 3311 Nov 26 18:35 slapd.key -r--r--r-- 1 root ldap 3243 Nov 26 18:54 slapd.pem Here is the location of the cacert file on the server that the /etc/ldap.conf file on the client references; LBSD2# ls -l /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts -r--r--r-- 1 root ldap 27529 Nov 28 15:49 all.crt The all.crt file is the result of concatenating these files together: all.crt gdroot-g2.crt sf_issuing.crt ca_bundle.crt sf_bundle.crt sfroot-g2.crt gd_bundle.crt sf-class2-root.crt sfsroot.crt gd-class2-root.crt sf_cross_intermediate.crt sfsroot-g2.crt gd_intermediate.crt sf_intermediate.crt Here is where the testing begins: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#openssl s_client -connect ldap.summitnjhome.com:389 -showcerts -CAfile /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/all.crt 10073:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:bss_file.c:122:fopen('/usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/all.c= rt','r') 10073:error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file:bss_file.c:125: 10073:error:0B084002:x509 certificate routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system lib:by_file.c:279: CONNECTED(00000003) 10073:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:188: CONNECTED(00000003) 10065:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:188: As you can see I have provided openssl the full path to the all.crt file on the server and am still receiving a handshake failure. It looks like When I turn > No. I assume that your hostname is the CN indicated above, so your -h is = not the issue. >When you do -ZZ then ldapsearch will fail if it cannot vali= date the certificate. You can try >with a single -Z to see if it works. Yes the hostname is in the CN of the cert file. So I agree that -h is not the issue. :) When I try to turn on LDAP with tls on a centos machine, getent freezes when it tries to access the information in ldap: I have scp'd the cert file to the right location on the centos machine (/etc/openldap/cacerts) Here's what happens when I try to connect using openssl s_client from a remote machine (CentOS): [root@LCENT01 ~]# LBSD2# openssl s_client -connect ldap.summitnjhome.com:389 -showcerts -CAfile /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/gd_sf_all.crt -bash: LBSD2#: command not found [root@LCENT01 ~]# openssl s_client -connect ldap.summitnjhome.com:389 -showcerts -CAfile /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/gd_sf_all.crt 4299:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:bss_file.c:122:fopen('/usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/gd_sf= _all.crt','r') 4299:error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file:bss_file.c:125: 4299:error:0B084002:x509 certificate routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system lib:by_file.c:279: CONNECTED(00000003) 4299:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:188: As you can see I have provided openssl s_client with the full path to the cacert (all.crt) on the server. It looks as if it's claiming that the file isn't there, when it clearly is. If I do an ldapsearch from the CentOS client it claims that it can't verify the certificate: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h ldap -b "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -Z -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" "(objectclass=3DsudoRole)" -W ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) additional info: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed Enter LDAP Password: ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) additional info: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed If I provide some more information with the -d -44 flags this is what I see= : [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h ldap -b "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -d -44 -Z -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" "(objectclass=3DsudoRol= e)" -W ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb62e8 ptr=3D0x8eb62e8 end=3D0x8eb6307 len=3D31 0000: 30 1d 02 01 01 77 18 80 16 31 2e 33 2e 36 2e 31 0....w...1.3.6.= 1 0010: 2e 34 2e 31 2e 31 34 36 36 2e 32 30 30 33 37 .4.1.1466.20037 ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb62e8 ptr=3D0x8eb62ed end=3D0x8eb6307 len=3D26 0000: 77 18 80 16 31 2e 33 2e 36 2e 31 2e 34 2e 31 2e w...1.3.6.1.4.1= . 0010: 31 34 36 36 2e 32 30 30 33 37 1466.20037 ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb7678 ptr=3D0x8eb7678 end=3D0x8eb7684 len=3D12 0000: 02 01 01 78 07 0a 01 00 04 00 04 00 ...x........ ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb7678 ptr=3D0x8eb767b end=3D0x8eb7684 len=3D9 0000: 78 07 0a 01 00 04 00 04 00 x........ request done: ld 0x8ead530 msgid 1 ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb7678 ptr=3D0x8eb767b end=3D0x8eb7684 len=3D9 0000: 78 07 0a 01 00 04 00 04 00 x........ ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb7678 ptr=3D0x8eb767b end=3D0x8eb7684 len=3D9 0000: 78 07 0a 01 00 04 00 04 00 x........ ber_dump: buf=3D0x8eb7678 ptr=3D0x8eb7684 end=3D0x8eb7684 len=3D0 TLS certificate verification: Error, unable to get local issuer certificate TLS: can't connect. ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) additional info: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed Enter LDAP Password: ldap_build_search_req ATTRS: supportedSASLMechanisms ber_dump: buf=3D0x8f1e6a0 ptr=3D0x8f1e6a0 end=3D0x8f1e6e0 len=3D64 0000: 30 3e 02 01 02 63 39 04 00 0a 01 00 0a 01 00 02 0>...c9........= . 0010: 01 00 02 01 00 01 01 00 87 0b 6f 62 6a 65 63 74 ..........objec= t 0020: 63 6c 61 73 73 30 19 04 17 73 75 70 70 6f 72 74 class0...suppor= t 0030: 65 64 53 41 53 4c 4d 65 63 68 61 6e 69 73 6d 73 edSASLMechanism= s ber_dump: buf=3D0x8f1e6a0 ptr=3D0x8f1e6a5 end=3D0x8f1e6e0 len=3D59 0000: 63 39 04 00 0a 01 00 0a 01 00 02 01 00 02 01 00 c9.............= . 0010: 01 01 00 87 0b 6f 62 6a 65 63 74 63 6c 61 73 73 .....objectclas= s 0020: 30 19 04 17 73 75 70 70 6f 72 74 65 64 53 41 53 0...supportedSA= S 0030: 4c 4d 65 63 68 61 6e 69 73 6d 73 LMechanisms ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) additional info: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed I am including the output of a -d -1 as an attachment for those that are still curious because the output of that command is quite long. :) When I issue getent commands for passwd and group it hangs forever when it tries to access information from ldap: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#getent passwd | grep ldapAccount [root@VIRCENT03:~]#getent group | grep ldapAccount However if I remove TLS from the equation with the -x flag everything starts working again: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -x -h ldap -b "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -w localG30rg3T0wn "(objectclass=3DsudoRole)" # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base with scope subtree # filter: (objectclass=3DsudoRole) # requesting: ALL # # defaults, sudoers, Services, summitnjhome.com dn: cn=3Ddefaults,ou=3Dsudoers,ou=3DServices,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom objectClass: top objectClass: sudoRole cn: defaults description: Default sudoOption's go here # %wheel, sudoers, Services, summitnjhome.com dn: cn=3D%wheel,ou=3Dsudoers,ou=3DServices,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom objectClass: top objectClass: sudoRole cn: %wheel sudoHost: ALL sudoRunAsUser: ALL sudoCommand: ALL sudoOption: !authenticate sudoUser: %wheel sudoUser: bluethundr # search result search: 2 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 3 # numEntries: 2 That's all I have for now. Sincere thanks to all those who have provided input. I'll keep pounding away at this and hopefully figure this out today. Best regards!!! freebsd-questions@freebsd.o On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Erik Norgaard wro= te: > On 25/11/10 17.26, bluethundr wrote: > >> I have setup the certificate chain in my slapd.conf like so: >> >> [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#grep -i tls >> /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf## TLS options for slapd >> TLSCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:+SSLv2 >> TLSCertificateFile >> =A0/usr/local/etc/openldap/cacerts/LBSD2.summitnjhome.com.crt >> TLSCertificateKeyFile /usr/local/etc/openldap/cacerts/slapd.pem >> TLSCACertificateFile =A0/usr/local/etc/openldap/cacerts/sf_issuing.crt >> >> I have tried each of the following certs with no luck in getting my >> cert to talk to it's CA: >> >> -rw-r--r-- =A01 root =A0bluethundr =A02604 Nov 25 11:37 ca_bundle.crt >> -r--r----- =A01 root =A0ldap =A0 =A0 =A0 =A04604 Nov 24 18:57 gd_bundle.= crt >> -r--r----- =A01 root =A0ldap =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01537 Nov 25 02:00 sf_issuing= .crt > > As mentioned in my previous mail, there is no need to specify > TLSCACertificateFile in slapd.conf unless your server will request client > certificate for authentication. Nor is there any point in trying multiple > files, you can concatenate the CA certificates into a single fiel. > > Since these are certificates you can leave global read access. > >> and I get the same result for each when I attempt to connect to SSL on >> the LDAP server: >> >> [root@LCENT01:/tmp/Foswiki-1.1.2]#openssl s_client -connect >> ldap.example.com:389 -showcerts -CAfile sf_issuing.crt >> 13730:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or >> directory:bss_file.c:122:fopen('sf_issuing.crt','r') >> 13730:error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such >> file:bss_file.c:125: >> 13730:error:0B084002:x509 certificate >> routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system lib:by_file.c:279: >> CONNECTED(00000003) >> 13730:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake >> failure:s23_lib.c:188: > > Can't find sf_issuing.crt, well, from your CWD it appears that the > certificate is not found in that path. > >> ldapsearch -h ldap.example.com -d -1 -ZZ "dc=3Dexample,dc=3Dcom" >> >> TLS certificate verification: depth: 0, err: 20, subject: >> /O=3DLBSD2.summitnjhome.com/OU=3DDomain Control >> Validated/CN=3DLBSD2.summitnjhome.com, issuer: >> /C=3DUS/ST=3DArizona/L=3DScottsdale/O=3DGoDaddy.com, >> Inc./OU=3Dhttp://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/CN=3DGo Daddy Secur= e >> Certification Authority/serialNumber=3D07969287 >> TLS certificate verification: Error, unable to get local issuer >> certificate >> tls_write: want=3D7, written=3D7 >> =A0 0000: =A015 03 01 00 02 02 30 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ......0 >> TLS trace: SSL3 alert write:fatal:unknown CA >> TLS trace: SSL_connect:error in SSLv3 read server certificate B >> TLS trace: SSL_connect:error in SSLv3 read server certificate B >> TLS: can't connect. >> ldap_perror >> ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0additional info: error:14090086:SSL >> routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed >> >> It seems to indicate that it can't talk to it's CA... >> >> does anyone have any suggestions on how to make this work? > > No. I assume that your hostname is the CN indicated above, so your -h is = not > the issue. When you do -ZZ then ldapsearch will fail if it cannot validat= e > the certificate. You can try with a single -Z to see if it works. > > You have not included your ldap.conf above, the ldapsearch reads ldap.con= f, > including where to find any ca certificates. Either you have not installe= d > the godaddy CA certificate or not updated our ldap.conf accordingly. > > BR, Erik > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 --0016e6d58cfc0d6adc0496209cb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="detailed-ldapsearch.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="detailed-ldapsearch.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_gh27zvoa0 W3Jvb3RAVklSQ0VOVDAzOn5dI2xkYXBzZWFyY2ggLWggbGRhcCAtYiAiZGM9c3VtbWl0bmpob21l LGRjPWNvbSIgLWQgLTEgLVogLUQgImNuPU1hbmFnZXIsZGM9c3VtbWl0bmpob21lLGRjPWNvbSIg IihvYmplY3RjbGFzcz1zdWRvUm9sZSkiIC1XCmxkYXBfY3JlYXRlCmxkYXBfdXJsX3BhcnNlX2V4 dChsZGFwOi8vbGRhcCkKbGRhcF9leHRlbmRlZF9vcGVyYXRpb25fcwpsZGFwX2V4dGVuZGVkX29w ZXJhdGlvbgpsZGFwX3NlbmRfaW5pdGlhbF9yZXF1ZXN0CmxkYXBfbmV3X2Nvbm5lY3Rpb24gMSAx IDAKbGRhcF9pbnRfb3Blbl9jb25uZWN0aW9uCmxkYXBfY29ubmVjdF90b19ob3N0OiBUQ1AgbGRh cDozODkKbGRhcF9uZXdfc29ja2V0OiAzCmxkYXBfcHJlcGFyZV9zb2NrZXQ6IDMKbGRhcF9jb25u ZWN0X3RvX2hvc3Q6IFRyeWluZyAxOTIuMTY4LjEuNDQ6Mzg5CmxkYXBfY29ubmVjdF90aW1lb3V0 OiBmZDogMyB0bTogLTEgYXN5bmM6IDAKbGRhcF9vcGVuX2RlZmNvbm46IHN1Y2Nlc3NmdWwKbGRh cF9zZW5kX3NlcnZlcl9yZXF1ZXN0CmJlcl9zY2FuZiBmbXQgKHtpdCkgYmVyOgpiZXJfZHVtcDog YnVmPTB4YTAzMTJlOCBwdHI9MHhhMDMxMmU4IGVuZD0weGEwMzEzMDcgbGVuPTMxCiAgMDAwMDog IDMwIDFkIDAyIDAxIDAxIDc3IDE4IDgwICAxNiAzMSAyZSAzMyAyZSAzNiAyZSAzMSAgIDAuLi4u dy4uLjEuMy42LjEgIAogIDAwMTA6ICAyZSAzNCAyZSAzMSAyZSAzMSAzNCAzNiAgMzYgMmUgMzIg MzAgMzAgMzMgMzcgICAgICAuNC4xLjE0NjYuMjAwMzcgICAKYmVyX3NjYW5mIGZtdCAoeykgYmVy OgpiZXJfZHVtcDogYnVmPTB4YTAzMTJlOCBwdHI9MHhhMDMxMmVkIGVuZD0weGEwMzEzMDcgbGVu PTI2CiAgMDAwMDogIDc3IDE4IDgwIDE2IDMxIDJlIDMzIDJlICAzNiAyZSAzMSAyZSAzNCAyZSAz MSAyZSAgIHcuLi4xLjMuNi4xLjQuMS4gIAogIDAwMTA6ICAzMSAzNCAzNiAzNiAyZSAzMiAzMCAz MCAgMzMgMzcgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAxNDY2LjIwMDM3ICAgICAgICAKYmVyX2ZsdXNo OiAzMSBieXRlcyB0byBzZCAzCiAgMDAwMDogIDMwIDFkIDAyIDAxIDAxIDc3IDE4IDgwICAxNiAz MSAyZSAzMyAyZSAzNiAyZSAzMSAgIDAuLi4udy4uLjEuMy42LjEgIAogIDAwMTA6ICAyZSAzNCAy ZSAzMSAyZSAzMSAzNCAzNiAgMzYgMmUgMzIgMzAgMzAgMzMgMzcgICAgICAuNC4xLjE0NjYuMjAw MzcgICAKbGRhcF93cml0ZTogd2FudD0zMSwgd3JpdHRlbj0zMQogIDAwMDA6ICAzMCAxZCAwMiAw MSAwMSA3NyAxOCA4MCAgMTYgMzEgMmUgMzMgMmUgMzYgMmUgMzEgICAwLi4uLncuLi4xLjMuNi4x ICAKICAwMDEwOiAgMmUgMzQgMmUgMzEgMmUgMzEgMzQgMzYgIDM2IDJlIDMyIDMwIDMwIDMzIDM3 ICAgICAgLjQuMS4xNDY2LjIwMDM3ICAgCmxkYXBfcmVzdWx0IGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBtc2dpZCAx CndhaXQ0bXNnIGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBtc2dpZCAxIChpbmZpbml0ZSB0aW1lb3V0KQp3YWl0NG1z ZyBjb250aW51ZSBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgbXNnaWQgMSBhbGwgMQoqKiBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgQ29u bmVjdGlvbnM6CiogaG9zdDogbGRhcCAgcG9ydDogMzg5ICAoZGVmYXVsdCkKICByZWZjbnQ6IDIg IHN0YXR1czogQ29ubmVjdGVkCiAgbGFzdCB1c2VkOiBTdW4gTm92IDI4IDEyOjM5OjU1IDIwMTAK CioqIGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBPdXRzdGFuZGluZyBSZXF1ZXN0czoKICogbXNnaWQgMSwgIG9yaWdp ZCAxLCBzdGF0dXMgSW5Qcm9ncmVzcwogICBvdXRzdGFuZGluZyByZWZlcnJhbHMgMCwgcGFyZW50 IGNvdW50IDAKKiogbGQgMHhhMDI4NTMwIFJlc3BvbnNlIFF1ZXVlOgogICBFbXB0eQpsZGFwX2No a1Jlc3BvbnNlTGlzdCBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgbXNnaWQgMSBhbGwgMQpsZGFwX2Noa1Jlc3BvbnNl TGlzdCByZXR1cm5zIGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBOVUxMCmxkYXBfaW50X3NlbGVjdApyZWFkMW1zZzog bGQgMHhhMDI4NTMwIG1zZ2lkIDEgYWxsIDEKYmVyX2dldF9uZXh0CmxkYXBfcmVhZDogd2FudD04 LCBnb3Q9OAogIDAwMDA6ICAzMCAwYyAwMiAwMSAwMSA3OCAwNyAwYSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAwLi4uLnguLiAgICAgICAgICAKbGRhcF9yZWFkOiB3YW50PTYsIGdvdD02CiAg MDAwMDogIDAxIDAwIDA0IDAwIDA0IDAwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IC4uLi4uLiAgICAgICAgICAgIApiZXJfZ2V0X25leHQ6IHRhZyAweDMwIGxlbiAxMiBjb250ZW50 czoKYmVyX2R1bXA6IGJ1Zj0weGEwMzI2OTAgcHRyPTB4YTAzMjY5MCBlbmQ9MHhhMDMyNjljIGxl bj0xMgogIDAwMDA6ICAwMiAwMSAwMSA3OCAwNyAwYSAwMSAwMCAgMDQgMDAgMDQgMDAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAuLi54Li4uLi4uLi4gICAgICAKcmVhZDFtc2c6IGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBtc2dpZCAx IG1lc3NhZ2UgdHlwZSBleHRlbmRlZC1yZXN1bHQKYmVyX3NjYW5mIGZtdCAoe2VhYSkgYmVyOgpi ZXJfZHVtcDogYnVmPTB4YTAzMjY5MCBwdHI9MHhhMDMyNjkzIGVuZD0weGEwMzI2OWMgbGVuPTkK ICAwMDAwOiAgNzggMDcgMGEgMDEgMDAgMDQgMDAgMDQgIDAwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgeC4uLi4uLi4uICAgICAgICAgCnJlYWQxbXNnOiBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgMCBuZXcgcmVmZXJy YWxzCnJlYWQxbXNnOiAgbWFyayByZXF1ZXN0IGNvbXBsZXRlZCwgbGQgMHhhMDI4NTMwIG1zZ2lk IDEKcmVxdWVzdCBkb25lOiBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgbXNnaWQgMQpyZXNfZXJybm86IDAsIHJlc19l cnJvcjogPD4sIHJlc19tYXRjaGVkOiA8PgpsZGFwX2ZyZWVfcmVxdWVzdCAob3JpZ2lkIDEsIG1z Z2lkIDEpCmxkYXBfcGFyc2VfZXh0ZW5kZWRfcmVzdWx0CmJlcl9zY2FuZiBmbXQgKHtlYWEpIGJl cjoKYmVyX2R1bXA6IGJ1Zj0weGEwMzI2OTAgcHRyPTB4YTAzMjY5MyBlbmQ9MHhhMDMyNjljIGxl bj05CiAgMDAwMDogIDc4IDA3IDBhIDAxIDAwIDA0IDAwIDA0ICAwMCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIHguLi4uLi4uLiAgICAgICAgIApsZGFwX3BhcnNlX3Jlc3VsdApiZXJfc2NhbmYgZm10 ICh7aWFhKSBiZXI6CmJlcl9kdW1wOiBidWY9MHhhMDMyNjkwIHB0cj0weGEwMzI2OTMgZW5kPTB4 YTAzMjY5YyBsZW49OQogIDAwMDA6ICA3OCAwNyAwYSAwMSAwMCAwNCAwMCAwNCAgMDAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB4Li4uLi4uLi4gICAgICAgICAKYmVyX3NjYW5mIGZtdCAofSkgYmVy OgpiZXJfZHVtcDogYnVmPTB4YTAzMjY5MCBwdHI9MHhhMDMyNjljIGVuZD0weGEwMzI2OWMgbGVu PTAKCmxkYXBfbXNnZnJlZQpUTFMgdHJhY2U6IFNTTF9jb25uZWN0OmJlZm9yZS9jb25uZWN0IGlu aXRpYWxpemF0aW9uCnRsc193cml0ZTogd2FudD0xMjEsIHdyaXR0ZW49MTIxCiAgMDAwMDogIDgw IDc3IDAxIDAzIDAxIDAwIDRlIDAwICAwMCAwMCAyMCAwMCAwMCAzOSAwMCAwMCAgIC53Li4uLk4u Li4gLi45Li4gIAogIDAwMTA6ICAzOCAwMCAwMCAzNSAwMCAwMCAxNiAwMCAgMDAgMTMgMDAgMDAg MGEgMDcgMDAgYzAgICA4Li41Li4uLi4uLi4uLi4uICAKICAwMDIwOiAgMDAgMDAgMzMgMDAgMDAg MzIgMDAgMDAgIDJmIDAzIDAwIDgwIDAwIDAwIDA1IDAwICAgLi4zLi4yLi4vLi4uLi4uLiAgCiAg MDAzMDogIDAwIDA0IDAxIDAwIDgwIDAwIDAwIDE1ICAwMCAwMCAxMiAwMCAwMCAwOSAwNiAwMCAg IC4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4gIAogIDAwNDA6ICA0MCAwMCAwMCAxNCAwMCAwMCAxMSAwMCAgMDAg MDggMDAgMDAgMDYgMDQgMDAgODAgICBALi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uICAKICAwMDUwOiAgMDAgMDAg MDMgMDIgMDAgODAgMDAgMDAgIGZmIGQyIDQ5IDFhIGI4IGEyIDU5IDI5ICAgLi4uLi4uLi4uLkku Li5ZKSAgCiAgMDA2MDogIDhmIDU2IGRkIGFmIDllIGZiIDliIGY3ICAxYSBjZCA3ZiBmZCBmNCAx MiBlZCBjMiAgIC5WLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4gIAogIDAwNzA6ICBjOCA3YyA5YiA3NCBmYiBiZiAy MiAxMCAgM2UgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAufC50Li4iLj4gICAgICAgICAKVExTIHRy YWNlOiBTU0xfY29ubmVjdDpTU0x2Mi92MyB3cml0ZSBjbGllbnQgaGVsbG8gQQp0bHNfcmVhZDog d2FudD03LCBnb3Q9NwogIDAwMDA6ICAxNiAwMyAwMSAwMCA0YSAwMiAwMCAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAuLi4uSi4uICAgICAgICAgICAKdGxzX3JlYWQ6IHdhbnQ9NzIsIGdv dD03MgogIDAwMDA6ICAwMCA0NiAwMyAwMSA0YyBmMiBjZCAwNCAgMzYgNzcgYmMgMzYgZmQgYTMg YzYgYmQgICAuRi4uTC4uLjZ3LjYuLi4uICAKICAwMDEwOiAgOWQgZDQgMmYgMDMgNmEgOWQgZTcg NWEgIDkyIGZlIDU4IDFhIGFiIDk4IDdiIDNhICAgLi4vLmouLlouLlguLi57OiAgCiAgMDAyMDog IGQxIDA5IDhmIDgyIDIwIGM0IDg0IDlhICAyYiAyMiA2ZiA5YiBmNyA5MiA0ZSAxOCAgIC4uLi4g Li4uKyJvLi4uTi4gIAogIDAwMzA6ICA5NiA4NiAwZSA0YSAwYSA1ZCAxNCAwZCAgYTkgZjcgMTcg ZGIgOTQgMjEgNGMgM2YgICAuLi5KLl0uLi4uLi4uIUw/ICAKICAwMDQwOiAgY2QgZTAgNmYgNDEg ZjYgMDAgMzUgMDAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLi5vQS4uNS4gICAgICAgICAg ClRMUyB0cmFjZTogU1NMX2Nvbm5lY3Q6U1NMdjMgcmVhZCBzZXJ2ZXIgaGVsbG8gQQp0bHNfcmVh ZDogd2FudD01LCBnb3Q9NQogIDAwMDA6ICAxNiAwMyAwMSAwNiA4YiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAuLi4uLiAgICAgICAgICAgICAKdGxzX3JlYWQ6IHdhbnQ9MTY3 NSwgZ290PTEzNjQKICAwMDAwOiAgMGIgMDAgMDYgODcgMDAgMDYgODQgMDAgIDA2IDgxIDMwIDgy IDA2IDdkIDMwIDgyICAgLi4uLi4uLi4uLjAuLn0wLiAgCiAgMDAxMDogIDA1IDY1IGEwIDAzIDAy IDAxIDAyIDAyICAwNyAwNCAzMCBkNyBhMCAyNyA2NSA0MCAgIC5lLi4uLi4uLi4wLi4nZUAgIAog IDAwMjA6ICAzMCAwZCAwNiAwOSAyYSA4NiA0OCA4NiAgZjcgMGQgMDEgMDEgMDUgMDUgMDAgMzAg ICAwLi4uKi5ILi4uLi4uLi4wICAKICAwMDMwOiAgODEgY2EgMzEgMGIgMzAgMDkgMDYgMDMgIDU1 IDA0IDA2IDEzIDAyIDU1IDUzIDMxICAgLi4xLjAuLi5VLi4uLlVTMSAgCiAgMDA0MDogIDEwIDMw IDBlIDA2IDAzIDU1IDA0IDA4ICAxMyAwNyA0MSA3MiA2OSA3YSA2ZiA2ZSAgIC4wLi4uVS4uLi5B cml6b24gIAogIDAwNTA6ICA2MSAzMSAxMyAzMCAxMSAwNiAwMyA1NSAgMDQgMDcgMTMgMGEgNTMg NjMgNmYgNzQgICBhMS4wLi4uVS4uLi5TY290ICAKICAwMDYwOiAgNzQgNzMgNjQgNjEgNmMgNjUg MzEgMWEgIDMwIDE4IDA2IDAzIDU1IDA0IDBhIDEzICAgdHNkYWxlMS4wLi4uVS4uLiAgCiAgMDA3 MDogIDExIDQ3IDZmIDQ0IDYxIDY0IDY0IDc5ICAyZSA2MyA2ZiA2ZCAyYyAyMCA0OSA2ZSAgIC5H b0RhZGR5LmNvbSwgSW4gIAogIDAwODA6ICA2MyAyZSAzMSAzMyAzMCAzMSAwNiAwMyAgNTUgMDQg MGIgMTMgMmEgNjggNzQgNzQgICBjLjEzMDEuLlUuLi4qaHR0ICAKICAwMDkwOiAgNzAgM2EgMmYg MmYgNjMgNjUgNzIgNzQgIDY5IDY2IDY5IDYzIDYxIDc0IDY1IDczICAgcDovL2NlcnRpZmljYXRl cyAgCiAgMDBhMDogIDJlIDY3IDZmIDY0IDYxIDY0IDY0IDc5ICAyZSA2MyA2ZiA2ZCAyZiA3MiA2 NSA3MCAgIC5nb2RhZGR5LmNvbS9yZXAgIAogIDAwYjA6ICA2ZiA3MyA2OSA3NCA2ZiA3MiA3OSAz MSAgMzAgMzAgMmUgMDYgMDMgNTUgMDQgMDMgICBvc2l0b3J5MTAwLi4uVS4uICAKICAwMGMwOiAg MTMgMjcgNDcgNmYgMjAgNDQgNjEgNjQgIDY0IDc5IDIwIDUzIDY1IDYzIDc1IDcyICAgLidHbyBE YWRkeSBTZWN1ciAgCiAgMDBkMDogIDY1IDIwIDQzIDY1IDcyIDc0IDY5IDY2ICA2OSA2MyA2MSA3 NCA2OSA2ZiA2ZSAyMCAgIGUgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiAgIAogIDAwZTA6ICA0MSA3NSA3NCA2OCA2 ZiA3MiA2OSA3NCAgNzkgMzEgMTEgMzAgMGYgMDYgMDMgNTUgICBBdXRob3JpdHkxLjAuLi5VICAK ICAwMGYwOiAgMDQgMDUgMTMgMDggMzAgMzcgMzkgMzYgIDM5IDMyIDM4IDM3IDMwIDFlIDE3IDBk ICAgLi4uLjA3OTY5Mjg3MC4uLiAgCiAgMDEwMDogIDMxIDMwIDMxIDMxIDMyIDM2IDMxIDM5ICAz MyAzNSAzMSAzNyA1YSAxNyAwZCAzMSAgIDEwMTEyNjE5MzUxN1ouLjEgIAogIDAxMTA6ICAzMSAz MSAzMSAzMiAzNSAzMCAzMSAzMCAgMzEgMzQgMzEgNWEgMzAgNjUgMzEgMWYgICAxMTEyNTAxMDE0 MVowZTEuICAKICAwMTIwOiAgMzAgMWQgMDYgMDMgNTUgMDQgMGEgMTMgIDE2IDRjIDQyIDUzIDQ0 IDMyIDJlIDczICAgMC4uLlUuLi4uTEJTRDIucyAgCiAgMDEzMDogIDc1IDZkIDZkIDY5IDc0IDZl IDZhIDY4ICA2ZiA2ZCA2NSAyZSA2MyA2ZiA2ZCAzMSAgIHVtbWl0bmpob21lLmNvbTEgIAogIDAx NDA6ICAyMSAzMCAxZiAwNiAwMyA1NSAwNCAwYiAgMTMgMTggNDQgNmYgNmQgNjEgNjkgNmUgICAh MC4uLlUuLi4uRG9tYWluICAKICAwMTUwOiAgMjAgNDMgNmYgNmUgNzQgNzIgNmYgNmMgIDIwIDU2 IDYxIDZjIDY5IDY0IDYxIDc0ICAgIENvbnRyb2wgVmFsaWRhdCAgCiAgMDE2MDogIDY1IDY0IDMx IDFmIDMwIDFkIDA2IDAzICA1NSAwNCAwMyAxMyAxNiA0YyA0MiA1MyAgIGVkMS4wLi4uVS4uLi5M QlMgIAogIDAxNzA6ICA0NCAzMiAyZSA3MyA3NSA2ZCA2ZCA2OSAgNzQgNmUgNmEgNjggNmYgNmQg NjUgMmUgICBEMi5zdW1taXRuamhvbWUuICAKICAwMTgwOiAgNjMgNmYgNmQgMzAgODIgMDIgMjIg MzAgIDBkIDA2IDA5IDJhIDg2IDQ4IDg2IGY3ICAgY29tMC4uIjAuLi4qLkguLiAgCiAgMDE5MDog IDBkIDAxIDAxIDAxIDA1IDAwIDAzIDgyICAwMiAwZiAwMCAzMCA4MiAwMiAwYSAwMiAgIC4uLi4u Li4uLi4uMC4uLi4gIAogIDAxYTA6ICA4MiAwMiAwMSAwMCBkMyBmNSBjZSA3YSAgODMgMzcgNjcg ZjEgODcgZWQgNjEgMjUgICAuLi4uLi4uei43Zy4uLmElICAKICAwMWIwOiAgMDggNTIgNmUgYTIg ODkgMTEgOTIgOTUgIDk0IDU1IDM3IDI2IDdiIDFiIDM2IGYwICAgLlJuLi4uLi4uVTcmey42LiAg CiAgMDFjMDogIDk2IGQ4IDc3IDY2IGIzIGZlIGQxIDNkICBkYyBkOCAyYyBkZiBiNiAwNCAyYiAy YSAgIC4ud2YuLi49Li4sLi4uKyogIAogIDAxZDA6ICA1NSBjZSA0NiAyOSA1YiAxMCA2NiBjOSAg ODggYWEgMTQgOWMgZGIgNzUgZGQgZDIgICBVLkYpWy5mLi4uLi4udS4uICAKICAwMWUwOiAgMDgg MjggOWYgY2UgZjUgYjMgYmIgYmMgIDg3IGEwIDJmIDgyIDM0IDE4IDQ0IGQyICAgLiguLi4uLi4u Li8uNC5ELiAgCiAgMDFmMDogIGI5IDQ5IGZkIDgxIGUxIGYyIDk2IGMyICAzMiA0ZiA3NCA2MSBj OCBhZSBjYSAwNCAgIC5JLi4uLi4uMk90YS4uLi4gIAogIDAyMDA6ICA2MCA1ZiA5NyAwMiAwNCBi YyBlZSAyZCAgODEgNTMgOWMgODIgNjYgNzcgNWMgYWUgICBgXy4uLi4uLS5TLi5md1wuICAKICAw MjEwOiAgM2QgMTggYzMgNDIgOTggM2UgMGQgNDIgIDk3IDg0IDY4IDlmIGVhIDNmIGZjIDk5ICAg PS4uQi4+LkIuLmguLj8uLiAgCiAgMDIyMDogIDdhIGI0IDY4IDVmIGZhIDBlIDk5IGE3ICA3NiBh NSA1YyBjNSBhOSA0ZiA0ZiBiNSAgIHouaF8uLi4udi5cLi5PTy4gIAogIDAyMzA6ICA4OCA2NCBi MiBmMCBlMyAzNyAyMSBjMCAgODMgYzEgMmIgYjUgYmEgOTAgNjggNjMgICAuZC4uLjchLi4uKy4u LmhjICAKICAwMjQwOiAgYzQgOWIgZmUgOGQgY2UgN2QgZGEgZDQgIGY4IGUxIDU1IDBiIDI1IDE0 IDI0IDEwICAgLi4uLi59Li4uLlUuJS4kLiAgCiAgMDI1MDogIGZjIDE2IDUwIGVjIDNkIGI1IDFm IGQ4ICA0YSBjNyAxMiAzZiAzMiAwZCA5MSBjMCAgIC4uUC49Li4uSi4uPzIuLi4gIAogIDAyNjA6 ICBhZSBhZSBhMCAxNyBkNSA4OSAzYyA4MSAgM2YgZDAgMzEgZTEgYzcgODYgNzggOTAgICAuLi4u Li48Lj8uMS4uLnguICAKICAwMjcwOiAgY2EgODAgODIgMDMgODAgYmIgZGMgMWIgIGZhIDYwIDVj IDU1IGEzIDQxIGU1IDUwICAgLi4uLi4uLi4uYFxVLkEuUCAgCiAgMDI4MDogIDEwIGI1IGMwIDgw IDA4IDJmIDFlIDYwICBmZSA4YSA3ZiA1YSA1MyA5YyA4YiA0OCAgIC4uLi4uLy5gLi4uWlMuLkgg IAogIDAyOTA6ICBmNiBmNiBiZSA0MSBkYSA3OCBiZiA3ZCAgOTcgODcgNzUgMDUgNTMgY2IgYmQg NTMgICAuLi5BLngufS4udS5TLi5TICAKICAwMmEwOiAgYWQgOWMgMTIgZGIgYWIgZDggOTEgMzEg IDhhIDU4IDkzIGNjIDY0IDgwIDZmIDNjICAgLi4uLi4uLjEuWC4uZC5vPCAgCiAgMDJiMDogIDBh IGExIDc0IDllIDM0IDkxIDY1IGM3ICA1ZiBlMyA2MSBhNiA3YSBjZCA3YSBhYiAgIC4udC40LmUu Xy5hLnouei4gIAogIDAyYzA6ICBmNSBmNCBkNiA0YyA0MCBmMiBmMCA0NSAgMzMgODkgMzYgNTkg MzMgNTQgZmMgNWMgICAuLi5MQC4uRTMuNlkzVC5cICAKICAwMmQwOiAgMjggYjIgNzggMTkgMTcg YWMgZjIgZDEgIDkzIDRiIGI3IDJjIGY2IDk1IGM3IDg2ICAgKC54Li4uLi4uSy4sLi4uLiAgCiAg MDJlMDogIDQ0IDRiIGNmIDhmIGJkIDZjIDk5IDFjICAwZSA5NCBhNyAwMCA0NiBhZiA4NiBlNyAg IERLLi4ubC4uLi4uLkYuLi4gIAogIDAyZjA6ICA5NSA4MyA4MyA3NyA0YyA4MCBiMSBjNiAgZjAg MGUgODEgMmEgMDIgMTIgOTggMTIgICAuLi53TC4uLi4uLiouLi4uICAKICAwMzAwOiAgZmYgZjUg M2YgMTcgZTAgYzEgYjIgODQgIDdiIDUzIDdlIDhlIGY5IDUzIDczIDhhICAgLi4/Li4uLi57U34u LlNzLiAgCiAgMDMxMDogIGRlIGYyIDE5IDY1IGI3IGZlIDU2IDQ1ICBkMCAwNSBhMiAwMyAwNCA4 NCAxMSAyZCAgIC4uLmUuLlZFLi4uLi4uLi0gIAogIDAzMjA6ICAwZCAwYiA1ZiA1MiAzNCBjMSAy MiA0YSAgNDAgYzIgZTcgZDEgYjcgOTUgY2MgYTcgICAuLl9SNC4iSkAuLi4uLi4uICAKICAwMzMw OiAgNTkgMzggY2YgMGYgNzkgZDEgYWQgMTQgIDE0IDY1IGMxIDI3IDYwIDM2IGI4IDg0ICAgWTgu LnkuLi4uZS4nYDYuLiAgCiAgMDM0MDogIGU4IDM3IDk2IGVhIGNkIDYxIDhlIDlhICA3MSBiMCBj MCAyYyA2OCBlMyBhNyBiNCAgIC43Li4uYS4ucS4uLGguLi4gIAogIDAzNTA6ICAwYiA3YSBjYyA3 MSA0NCA2NSAxNCBhYyAgOWQgYmMgNTQgZjYgMDEgOGUgMTYgNjEgICAuei5xRGUuLi4uVC4uLi5h ICAKICAwMzYwOiAgZmIgODggYWIgYWUgZjcgODAgY2MgMWYgIDQwIDg3IGFiIDVlIDliIGQ4IGQ2 IDM3ICAgLi4uLi4uLi5ALi5eLi4uNyAgCiAgMDM3MDogIDNhIGM1IDJmIDViIDVmIDgwIGNmIDYy ICBiNiA5MyA4MCA1ZiA3YiA1ZiBlZiA2ZCAgIDouL1tfLi5iLi4uX3tfLm0gIAogIDAzODA6ICBj YiA4ZSBlZiA2NyBjOSBjMiA3OCAzNyAgYmIgM2UgYjAgZWUgYTMgMDcgOGEgYWIgICAuLi5nLi54 Ny4+Li4uLi4uICAKICAwMzkwOiAgYjcgMDIgNzYgYjYgYTAgMTggN2QgMzcgIGNjIDU0IDQ0IGU0 IGU1IGFkIDNlIGYwICAgLi52Li4ufTcuVEQuLi4+LiAgCiAgMDNhMDogIDk3IDM0IDc2IGM3IDAy IDAzIDAxIDAwICAwMSBhMyA4MiAwMSBjYSAzMCA4MiAwMSAgIC40di4uLi4uLi4uLi4wLi4gIAog IDAzYjA6ICBjNiAzMCAwZiAwNiAwMyA1NSAxZCAxMyAgMDEgMDEgZmYgMDQgMDUgMzAgMDMgMDEg ICAuMC4uLlUuLi4uLi4uMC4uICAKICAwM2MwOiAgMDEgMDAgMzAgMWQgMDYgMDMgNTUgMWQgIDI1 IDA0IDE2IDMwIDE0IDA2IDA4IDJiICAgLi4wLi4uVS4lLi4wLi4uKyAgCiAgMDNkMDogIDA2IDAx IDA1IDA1IDA3IDAzIDAxIDA2ICAwOCAyYiAwNiAwMSAwNSAwNSAwNyAwMyAgIC4uLi4uLi4uLisu Li4uLi4gIAogIDAzZTA6ICAwMiAzMCAwZSAwNiAwMyA1NSAxZCAwZiAgMDEgMDEgZmYgMDQgMDQg MDMgMDIgMDUgICAuMC4uLlUuLi4uLi4uLi4uICAKICAwM2YwOiAgYTAgMzAgMzMgMDYgMDMgNTUg MWQgMWYgIDA0IDJjIDMwIDJhIDMwIDI4IGEwIDI2ICAgLjAzLi5VLi4uLDAqMCguJiAgCiAgMDQw MDogIGEwIDI0IDg2IDIyIDY4IDc0IDc0IDcwICAzYSAyZiAyZiA2MyA3MiA2YyAyZSA2NyAgIC4k LiJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmcgIAogIDA0MTA6ICA2ZiA2NCA2MSA2NCA2NCA3OSAyZSA2MyAgNmYgNmQg MmYgNjcgNjQgNzMgMzEgMmQgICBvZGFkZHkuY29tL2dkczEtICAKICAwNDIwOiAgMzIgMzYgMmUg NjMgNzIgNmMgMzAgNGQgIDA2IDAzIDU1IDFkIDIwIDA0IDQ2IDMwICAgMjYuY3JsME0uLlUuIC5G MCAgCiAgMDQzMDogIDQ0IDMwIDQyIDA2IDBiIDYwIDg2IDQ4ICAwMSA4NiBmZCA2ZCAwMSAwNyAx NyAwMSAgIEQwQi4uYC5ILi4ubS4uLi4gIAogIDA0NDA6ICAzMCAzMyAzMCAzMSAwNiAwOCAyYiAw NiAgMDEgMDUgMDUgMDcgMDIgMDEgMTYgMjUgICAwMzAxLi4rLi4uLi4uLi4lICAKICAwNDUwOiAg NjggNzQgNzQgNzAgNzMgM2EgMmYgMmYgIDYzIDY1IDcyIDc0IDczIDJlIDY3IDZmICAgaHR0cHM6 Ly9jZXJ0cy5nbyAgCiAgMDQ2MDogIDY0IDYxIDY0IDY0IDc5IDJlIDYzIDZmICA2ZCAyZiA3MiA2 NSA3MCA2ZiA3MyA2OSAgIGRhZGR5LmNvbS9yZXBvc2kgIAogIDA0NzA6ICA3NCA2ZiA3MiA3OSAy ZiAzMCA4MSA4MCAgMDYgMDggMmIgMDYgMDEgMDUgMDUgMDcgICB0b3J5LzAuLi4uKy4uLi4uICAK ICAwNDgwOiAgMDEgMDEgMDQgNzQgMzAgNzIgMzAgMjQgIDA2IDA4IDJiIDA2IDAxIDA1IDA1IDA3 ICAgLi4udDByMCQuLisuLi4uLiAgCiAgMDQ5MDogIDMwIDAxIDg2IDE4IDY4IDc0IDc0IDcwICAz YSAyZiAyZiA2ZiA2MyA3MyA3MCAyZSAgIDAuLi5odHRwOi8vb2NzcC4gIAogIDA0YTA6ICA2NyA2 ZiA2NCA2MSA2NCA2NCA3OSAyZSAgNjMgNmYgNmQgMmYgMzAgNGEgMDYgMDggICBnb2RhZGR5LmNv bS8wSi4uICAKICAwNGIwOiAgMmIgMDYgMDEgMDUgMDUgMDcgMzAgMDIgIDg2IDNlIDY4IDc0IDc0 IDcwIDNhIDJmICAgKy4uLi4uMC4uPmh0dHA6LyAgCiAgMDRjMDogIDJmIDYzIDY1IDcyIDc0IDY5 IDY2IDY5ICA2MyA2MSA3NCA2NSA3MyAyZSA2NyA2ZiAgIC9jZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZXMuZ28gIAogIDA0 ZDA6ICA2NCA2MSA2NCA2NCA3OSAyZSA2MyA2ZiAgNmQgMmYgNzIgNjUgNzAgNmYgNzMgNjkgICBk YWRkeS5jb20vcmVwb3NpICAKICAwNGUwOiAgNzQgNmYgNzIgNzkgMmYgNjcgNjQgNWYgIDY5IDZl IDc0IDY1IDcyIDZkIDY1IDY0ICAgdG9yeS9nZF9pbnRlcm1lZCAgCiAgMDRmMDogIDY5IDYxIDc0 IDY1IDJlIDYzIDcyIDc0ICAzMCAxZiAwNiAwMyA1NSAxZCAyMyAwNCAgIGlhdGUuY3J0MC4uLlUu Iy4gIAogIDA1MDA6ICAxOCAzMCAxNiA4MCAxNCBmZCBhYyA2MSAgMzIgOTMgNmMgNDUgZDYgZTIg ZWUgODUgICAuMC4uLi4uYTIubEUuLi4uICAKICAwNTEwOiAgNWYgOWEgYmEgZTcgNzYgOTkgNjgg Y2MgIGU3IDMwIDNkIDA2IDAzIDU1IDFkIDExICAgXy4uLnYuaC4uMD0uLlUuLiAgCiAgMDUyMDog IDA0IDM2IDMwIDM0IDgyIDE2IDRjIDQyICA1MyA0NCAzMiAyZSA3MyA3NSA2ZCA2ZCAgIC42MDQu LkxCU0QyLnN1bW0gIAogIDA1MzA6ICA2OSA3NCA2ZSA2YSA2OCA2ZiA2ZCA2NSAgMmUgNjMgNmYg NmQgODIgMWEgNzcgNzcgICBpdG5qaG9tZS5jb20uLnd3ICAKICAwNTQwOiAgNzcgMmUgNGMgNDIg NTMgNDQgMzIgMmUgIDczIDc1IDZkIDZkIDY5IDc0IDZlIDZhICAgdy5MQlNEMi5zdW1taXRuaiAg CiAgMDU1MDogIDY4IDZmIDZkIDY1ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIGhvbWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAp0bHNfcmVhZDogd2FudD0zMTEsIGdvdD0zMTEKICAwMDAw OiAgMmUgNjMgNmYgNmQgMzAgMWQgMDYgMDMgIDU1IDFkIDBlIDA0IDE2IDA0IDE0IGY0ICAgLmNv bTAuLi5VLi4uLi4uLiAgCiAgMDAxMDogIDUzIDZkIDAxIDY5IDI5IDg2IDY5IGZjICBlZSA0ZSBk NSA5NCAwYyA5YSAwZSAyYyAgIFNtLmkpLmkuLk4uLi4uLiwgIAogIDAwMjA6ICAwMCA3NiAzMiAz MCAwZCAwNiAwOSAyYSAgODYgNDggODYgZjcgMGQgMDEgMDEgMDUgICAudjIwLi4uKi5ILi4uLi4u ICAKICAwMDMwOiAgMDUgMDAgMDMgODIgMDEgMDEgMDAgYTggIGUzIDFjIGVhIDUzIDg2IDQxIDcw IDYzICAgLi4uLi4uLi4uLi5TLkFwYyAgCiAgMDA0MDogIDQ1IDkzIDQ1IGUyIGZjIDYwIDZiIDQ2 ICBlMyBjOSBhNSA1MiBkMyA3OCBkMCBkYSAgIEUuRS4uYGtGLi4uUi54Li4gIAogIDAwNTA6ICAw OCBiMyAyYSA5NyBlZiA3NiBlNCAwYSAgNTYgZjEgOGUgZTUgNTYgOTIgMzUgMDQgICAuLiouLnYu LlYuLi5WLjUuICAKICAwMDYwOiAgY2IgN2IgZDggYzkgMDEgYmYgYjQgYjkgIDdkIDFhIGNmIDYx IDY4IGIwIDgwIDVlICAgLnsuLi4uLi59Li5haC4uXiAgCiAgMDA3MDogIDU0IGY0IDMwIGYzIGU1 IDFhIDI2IDIyICBhOSBjMyA3MiA2NCBiNiBiOSAyYyA2ZiAgIFQuMC4uLiYiLi5yZC4uLG8gIAog IDAwODA6ICAxYyA1NSAxNiAxNCBmZSBlYiA3MSBkOSAgNjkgYWUgNmYgODkgNWIgN2QgMzMgMjQg ICAuVS4uLi5xLmkuby5bfTMkICAKICAwMDkwOiAgMzMgYTMgMzMgNTQgNjMgZTAgNzkgYzUgIGJi IGM1IDk0IGE2IDJkIDBiIDRlIGY4ICAgMy4zVGMueS4uLi4uLS5OLiAgCiAgMDBhMDogIDJjIGU5 IGIwIDU5IGIzIGIzIGI0IDE4ICBjNyA2ZCBmZiAxMyBjMyA1YSAzZSAwZSAgICwuLlkuLi4uLm0u Li5aPi4gIAogIDAwYjA6ICAwZSAzNCA2YiA0MCA3MyA2ZCBiZiBlNiAgOWMgNzAgMzAgOTUgN2Ig ZTIgYWMgNmQgICAuNGtAc20uLi5wMC57Li5tICAKICAwMGMwOiAgYzggNTggOTIgZTQgY2EgMjYg YmUgNjUgIGE3IGRiIDYxIGIzIDQxIDhmIDBlIGM5ICAgLlguLi4mLmUuLmEuQS4uLiAgCiAgMDBk MDogIDVkIDBhIGM4IDhkIDVkIDNhIDFiIGIxICA1ZSBlOSAwYSAzZiBkOCBhOSA1OCBhYiAgIF0u Li5dOi4uXi4uPy4uWC4gIAogIDAwZTA6ICBhZiA2NSA0MSBhYSBkNyA0NyA0NyAzNCAgOTYgZjIg MTMgNmQgYTMgZGIgOWQgZTIgICAuZUEuLkdHNC4uLm0uLi4uICAKICAwMGYwOiAgNzIgOTYgZDMg ODcgMzQgMjUgOTIgZWIgIDk2IDM4IDVmIDdjIGY4IDJkIGUxIGU0ICAgci4uLjQlLi4uOF98Li0u LiAgCiAgMDEwMDogIDI2IGNlIGYzIGJhIGY0IGZiIDg5IDY1ICAwNiA1MCA4YyAyZSBlZSAyOCBl NCBjNyAgICYuLi4uLi5lLlAuLi4oLi4gIAogIDAxMTA6ICBlMyAyYSBiMSA1MCA0NCBiOCA5MSBl ZCAgZjUgYzQgNWYgOWMgZGQgYzYgNTUgZjcgICAuKi5QRC4uLi4uXy4uLlUuICAKICAwMTIwOiAg MGYgN2YgZTUgNWQgZjIgYWUgMTAgZWYgIGY0IGVmIGM1IDM4IGU3IGM3IGRjIDg1ICAgLi4uXS4u Li4uLi44Li4uLiAgCiAgMDEzMDogIDFlIDAxIGEzIDFiIGY2IGQ0IGY2ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC4uLi4uLi4gICAgICAgICAgIApUTFMgY2VydGlmaWNhdGUgdmVyaWZp Y2F0aW9uOiBkZXB0aDogMCwgZXJyOiAyMCwgc3ViamVjdDogL089TEJTRDIuc3VtbWl0bmpob21l LmNvbS9PVT1Eb21haW4gQ29udHJvbCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQvQ049TEJTRDIuc3VtbWl0bmpob21lLmNv bSwgaXNzdWVyOiAvQz1VUy9TVD1Bcml6b25hL0w9U2NvdHRzZGFsZS9PPUdvRGFkZHkuY29tLCBJ bmMuL09VPWh0dHA6Ly9jZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZXMuZ29kYWRkeS5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9DTj1HbyBE YWRkeSBTZWN1cmUgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkvc2VyaWFsTnVtYmVyPTA3OTY5Mjg3 ClRMUyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB2ZXJpZmljYXRpb246IEVycm9yLCB1bmFibGUgdG8gZ2V0IGxvY2Fs IGlzc3VlciBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZQp0bHNfd3JpdGU6IHdhbnQ9Nywgd3JpdHRlbj03CiAgMDAwMDog IDE1IDAzIDAxIDAwIDAyIDAyIDMwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC4uLi4u LjAgICAgICAgICAgIApUTFMgdHJhY2U6IFNTTDMgYWxlcnQgd3JpdGU6ZmF0YWw6dW5rbm93biBD QQpUTFMgdHJhY2U6IFNTTF9jb25uZWN0OmVycm9yIGluIFNTTHYzIHJlYWQgc2VydmVyIGNlcnRp ZmljYXRlIEIKVExTIHRyYWNlOiBTU0xfY29ubmVjdDplcnJvciBpbiBTU0x2MyByZWFkIHNlcnZl ciBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBCClRMUzogY2FuJ3QgY29ubmVjdC4KbGRhcF9wZXJyb3IKbGRhcF9zdGFy dF90bHM6IENvbm5lY3QgZXJyb3IgKC0xMSkKCWFkZGl0aW9uYWwgaW5mbzogZXJyb3I6MTQwOTAw ODY6U1NMIHJvdXRpbmVzOlNTTDNfR0VUX1NFUlZFUl9DRVJUSUZJQ0FURTpjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB2 ZXJpZnkgZmFpbGVkCkVudGVyIExEQVAgUGFzc3dvcmQ6IApsZGFwX3B2dF9zYXNsX2dldG1lY2gK bGRhcF9zZWFyY2gKcHV0X2ZpbHRlcjogIihvYmplY3RjbGFzcz0qKSIKcHV0X2ZpbHRlcjogc2lt cGxlCnB1dF9zaW1wbGVfZmlsdGVyOiAib2JqZWN0Y2xhc3M9KiIKbGRhcF9idWlsZF9zZWFyY2hf cmVxIEFUVFJTOgogICAgc3VwcG9ydGVkU0FTTE1lY2hhbmlzbXMKbGRhcF9zZW5kX2luaXRpYWxf cmVxdWVzdApsZGFwX3NlbmRfc2VydmVyX3JlcXVlc3QKYmVyX3NjYW5mIGZtdCAoe2l0KSBiZXI6 CmJlcl9kdW1wOiBidWY9MHhhMDk5YmM4IHB0cj0weGEwOTliYzggZW5kPTB4YTA5OWMwOCBsZW49 NjQKICAwMDAwOiAgMzAgM2UgMDIgMDEgMDIgNjMgMzkgMDQgIDAwIDBhIDAxIDAwIDBhIDAxIDAw IDAyICAgMD4uLi5jOS4uLi4uLi4uLiAgCiAgMDAxMDogIDAxIDAwIDAyIDAxIDAwIDAxIDAxIDAw ICA4NyAwYiA2ZiA2MiA2YSA2NSA2MyA3NCAgIC4uLi4uLi4uLi5vYmplY3QgIAogIDAwMjA6ICA2 MyA2YyA2MSA3MyA3MyAzMCAxOSAwNCAgMTcgNzMgNzUgNzAgNzAgNmYgNzIgNzQgICBjbGFzczAu Li5zdXBwb3J0ICAKICAwMDMwOiAgNjUgNjQgNTMgNDEgNTMgNGMgNGQgNjUgIDYzIDY4IDYxIDZl IDY5IDczIDZkIDczICAgZWRTQVNMTWVjaGFuaXNtcyAgCmJlcl9zY2FuZiBmbXQgKHspIGJlcjoK YmVyX2R1bXA6IGJ1Zj0weGEwOTliYzggcHRyPTB4YTA5OWJjZCBlbmQ9MHhhMDk5YzA4IGxlbj01 OQogIDAwMDA6ICA2MyAzOSAwNCAwMCAwYSAwMSAwMCAwYSAgMDEgMDAgMDIgMDEgMDAgMDIgMDEg MDAgICBjOS4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uICAKICAwMDEwOiAgMDEgMDEgMDAgODcgMGIgNmYgNjIgNmEg IDY1IDYzIDc0IDYzIDZjIDYxIDczIDczICAgLi4uLi5vYmplY3RjbGFzcyAgCiAgMDAyMDogIDMw IDE5IDA0IDE3IDczIDc1IDcwIDcwICA2ZiA3MiA3NCA2NSA2NCA1MyA0MSA1MyAgIDAuLi5zdXBw b3J0ZWRTQVMgIAogIDAwMzA6ICA0YyA0ZCA2NSA2MyA2OCA2MSA2ZSA2OSAgNzMgNmQgNzMgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICBMTWVjaGFuaXNtcyAgICAgICAKYmVyX2ZsdXNoOiA2NCBieXRlcyB0byBz ZCAzCiAgMDAwMDogIDMwIDNlIDAyIDAxIDAyIDYzIDM5IDA0ICAwMCAwYSAwMSAwMCAwYSAwMSAw MCAwMiAgIDA+Li4uYzkuLi4uLi4uLi4gIAogIDAwMTA6ICAwMSAwMCAwMiAwMSAwMCAwMSAwMSAw MCAgODcgMGIgNmYgNjIgNmEgNjUgNjMgNzQgICAuLi4uLi4uLi4ub2JqZWN0ICAKICAwMDIwOiAg NjMgNmMgNjEgNzMgNzMgMzAgMTkgMDQgIDE3IDczIDc1IDcwIDcwIDZmIDcyIDc0ICAgY2xhc3Mw Li4uc3VwcG9ydCAgCiAgMDAzMDogIDY1IDY0IDUzIDQxIDUzIDRjIDRkIDY1ICA2MyA2OCA2MSA2 ZSA2OSA3MyA2ZCA3MyAgIGVkU0FTTE1lY2hhbmlzbXMgIApsZGFwX3dyaXRlOiB3YW50PTY0LCB3 cml0dGVuPTY0CiAgMDAwMDogIDMwIDNlIDAyIDAxIDAyIDYzIDM5IDA0ICAwMCAwYSAwMSAwMCAw YSAwMSAwMCAwMiAgIDA+Li4uYzkuLi4uLi4uLi4gIAogIDAwMTA6ICAwMSAwMCAwMiAwMSAwMCAw MSAwMSAwMCAgODcgMGIgNmYgNjIgNmEgNjUgNjMgNzQgICAuLi4uLi4uLi4ub2JqZWN0ICAKICAw MDIwOiAgNjMgNmMgNjEgNzMgNzMgMzAgMTkgMDQgIDE3IDczIDc1IDcwIDcwIDZmIDcyIDc0ICAg Y2xhc3MwLi4uc3VwcG9ydCAgCiAgMDAzMDogIDY1IDY0IDUzIDQxIDUzIDRjIDRkIDY1ICA2MyA2 OCA2MSA2ZSA2OSA3MyA2ZCA3MyAgIGVkU0FTTE1lY2hhbmlzbXMgIApsZGFwX3Jlc3VsdCBsZCAw eGEwMjg1MzAgbXNnaWQgMgp3YWl0NG1zZyBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgbXNnaWQgMiAoaW5maW5pdGUg dGltZW91dCkKd2FpdDRtc2cgY29udGludWUgbGQgMHhhMDI4NTMwIG1zZ2lkIDIgYWxsIDEKKiog bGQgMHhhMDI4NTMwIENvbm5lY3Rpb25zOgoqIGhvc3Q6IGxkYXAgIHBvcnQ6IDM4OSAgKGRlZmF1 bHQpCiAgcmVmY250OiAyICBzdGF0dXM6IENvbm5lY3RlZAogIGxhc3QgdXNlZDogU3VuIE5vdiAy OCAxMjo0MDowMCAyMDEwCgoqKiBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgT3V0c3RhbmRpbmcgUmVxdWVzdHM6CiAq IG1zZ2lkIDIsICBvcmlnaWQgMiwgc3RhdHVzIEluUHJvZ3Jlc3MKICAgb3V0c3RhbmRpbmcgcmVm ZXJyYWxzIDAsIHBhcmVudCBjb3VudCAwCioqIGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBSZXNwb25zZSBRdWV1ZToK ICAgRW1wdHkKbGRhcF9jaGtSZXNwb25zZUxpc3QgbGQgMHhhMDI4NTMwIG1zZ2lkIDIgYWxsIDEK bGRhcF9jaGtSZXNwb25zZUxpc3QgcmV0dXJucyBsZCAweGEwMjg1MzAgTlVMTApsZGFwX2ludF9z ZWxlY3QKcmVhZDFtc2c6IGxkIDB4YTAyODUzMCBtc2dpZCAyIGFsbCAxCmJlcl9nZXRfbmV4dAps ZGFwX3JlYWQ6IHdhbnQ9OCwgZ290PTgKICAwMDAwOiAgMTYgMDMgMDEgMDAgMDQgMGUgMDAgMDAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLi4uLi4uLi4gICAgICAgICAgCmJlcl9nZXRfbmV4 dCBmYWlsZWQuCmxkYXBfcGVycm9yCmxkYXBfc2FzbF9pbnRlcmFjdGl2ZV9iaW5kX3M6IENhbid0 IGNvbnRhY3QgTERBUCBzZXJ2ZXIgKC0xKQoJYWRkaXRpb25hbCBpbmZvOiBlcnJvcjoxNDA5MDA4 NjpTU0wgcm91dGluZXM6U1NMM19HRVRfU0VSVkVSX0NFUlRJRklDQVRFOmNlcnRpZmljYXRlIHZl cmlmeSBmYWlsZWQKCg== --0016e6d58cfc0d6adc0496209cb6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 18:23:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5639F106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091988FC13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.1-16-172-dyn.locolomo.org (unknown [172.16.1.127]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE1C91C0852 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:23:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CF29E38.6020305@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:23:52 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CEE987D.9040008@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: can't use godaddy SSL cert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:23:56 -0000 On 28/11/10 18.51, bluethundr wrote: > Yes the hostname is in the CN of the cert file. So I agree that -h is > not the issue. :) > [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h ldap -b "dc=summitnjhome,dc=com" -Z > -D "cn=Manager,dc=summitnjhome,dc=com" "(objectclass=sudoRole)" -W Maybe I didn't make myself clear: the host name you use to connect to (-h), in your command line example above, ldap, must be the same as the CN of the server certificate. It is irrelevant if the servers hostname is the same as the CN. That might be why you get > ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) > additional info: error:14090086:SSL > routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed Try -h LBSD2.summitnjhome.com BR, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 18:43:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3162C1065670 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0918FC12 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCA95C21 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:47:50 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CF2A1DF.9080401@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:39:27 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:43:06 -0000 On 11/29/10 03:36, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider > for the following. > > I am supporting a non profit organization, so the budget is less than > zero. They already have a freebsd server (8.1) and are using sendmail > for about 20 accounts, not big traffic. In their pc's (windows xp) > they are using eudora (free version) as a client without problems > (POP). I would like to install them a webmail that let them access the > local accounts in the server BUT that also let them access some other > accounts with another providers. No gmail, hotmail or so, but POP3 > accounts that are hosted under other domains with other ISP's . > Actually no problem under they eudora mail client, but the idea is > that when they out in conference or so they also can have access to > the accounts under the freebsd server and the other provider. > > Thanks in advance for your comments. > > Jorge Biquez mail/atmail no question. A little annoying for me (as I don't specifically want those features) but perfect for what you want. HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 18:49:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F413A106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDD08FC0C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3469615bwz.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:49:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nidTXZGLa75+fTKwCZGh1NBYR/JwaLGGrkJiuF3yrqM=; b=vWdsb0wkQrzeK9eRbJHNM3Oo5SLIh0weMaKjHcfrYJeZIFBG2QX62fUEJYSO7/ilKc ukhE06UFLKqwrlj3s1OjoXEh4lw4P0uGV8UN5XfIbXQ6nDtBXPXLUhg/p1jqZWH0nrqD ZlskYSLRoSapEvkqNjGmCoFgCRmkxnfqd1hSs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nbCi+chPye5UBfmEylld3JhjJjSN/YUwql6vzR05wmZFI9QfTZSiOT0/w81Ml+3CKX vyV7Jsop8RAFOadvhZD/V2C9lfoQ2or2NGU0GbpvMWVp6SnOmdkoOE87ooCBZ3IHgqOm L0HfWLn62+YRfBm9lBpjr6Atuyrgy2B/thgmM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.69 with SMTP id v5mr2177462bkp.84.1290970184160; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.10.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:49:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF29E38.6020305@locolomo.org> References: <4CEE987D.9040008@locolomo.org> <4CF29E38.6020305@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:49:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: can't use godaddy SSL cert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:49:48 -0000 Hi Eric, Sorry I am clear on that now. I have tried the -h value that matches the one in the cert, but I get the same result, unfortunately: [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h LBSD2.summitnjhome.com -b "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -Z -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom= " "(objectclass=3DsudoRole)" -W ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) additional info: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed Enter LDAP Password: ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) additional info: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed [root@VIRCENT03:~]#openssl s_client -connect LBSD2.summitnjhome.com:389 -showcerts -CAfile /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/all.crt 10504:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:bss_file.c:122:fopen('/usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/all.c= rt','r') 10504:error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file:bss_file.c:125: 10504:error:0B084002:x509 certificate routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system lib:by_file.c:279: CONNECTED(00000003) 10504:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:188: Thanks again for following up! On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Erik Norgaard wrot= e: > On 28/11/10 18.51, bluethundr wrote: > >> Yes the hostname is in the CN of the cert file. So I agree that -h is >> not the issue. :) >> [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h ldap -b "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -Z >> -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" "(objectclass=3DsudoRole)" = -W > > Maybe I didn't make myself clear: the host name you use to connect to (-h= ), > in your command line example above, ldap, must be the same as the CN of t= he > server certificate. It is irrelevant if the servers hostname is the same = as > the CN. > > That might be why you get > >> ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) >> =A0 =A0 =A0 additional info: error:14090086:SSL >> routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed > > Try > > =A0-h LBSD2.summitnjhome.com > > BR, Erik > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 19:45:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2871065672 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB4A8FC14 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3500230bwz.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:45:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dh43/S2b59BStd7gJedMcuJYSbfaYmnieMGGs6IEA7c=; b=XejOxFthLsWJsfftxVrw8Xnz0k++BbwijihBRuVkqsZ51tb/+V3of59sHC6ypyXkNe mZEWdnR8W6noCDlwgUO1xSi4iEeQvy3mi6EHYDJlWBaQVApzhKm3vkCYiFVZR3yCkWzU gktzbuSXzku/Q54NylEz0wsykbJCjFDYxuEqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iT2hiBP2yaEeIAijiZJkTzrOZOwyuiMY7/DaZVsb4uTqi/Qw2yFYpuyJPPbvWBBNdy Xc7kWdzwM9krOTHiMT0aI8cAvDAJNNnNy5lIebR45wgFgg0sV2FV0WiFdmYoLe3xdC9X zmHM5wL1h5NgmixCOktFDgesqVVRd2CX61p3w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.116.201 with SMTP id n9mr4059838bkq.138.1290973530935; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:45:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.10.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:45:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CEE987D.9040008@locolomo.org> <4CF29E38.6020305@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:45:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: can't use godaddy SSL cert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:45:33 -0000 I have also I have revised my /etc/ldap.conf on the client to read: uri ldaps://LBSD2.summitnjhome.com/ ssl start_tls tls_cacertdir /etc/openldap/cacerts pam_password crypt I have also tried using uri ldap://LBSD2.summitnjhome.com/ with the same results as before. thanks again. On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:49 PM, bluethundr wrote: > Hi Eric, > > =A0Sorry I am clear on that now. I have tried the -h value that matches > the one in the cert, but I get the same result, unfortunately: > > =A0[root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h LBSD2.summitnjhome.com -b > "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -Z -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dc= om" > "(objectclass=3DsudoRole)" -W > ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0additional info: error:14090086:SSL > routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed > Enter LDAP Password: > ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0additional info: error:14090086:SSL > routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed > > [root@VIRCENT03:~]#openssl s_client -connect > LBSD2.summitnjhome.com:389 -showcerts -CAfile > /usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/all.crt > 10504:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or > directory:bss_file.c:122:fopen('/usr/local/etc/openldap/certs/cacerts/all= .crt','r') > 10504:error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file:bss_file.c:12= 5: > 10504:error:0B084002:x509 certificate > routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system lib:by_file.c:279: > CONNECTED(00000003) > 10504:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake > failure:s23_lib.c:188: > > Thanks again for following up! > > > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Erik Norgaard wr= ote: >> On 28/11/10 18.51, bluethundr wrote: >> >>> Yes the hostname is in the CN of the cert file. So I agree that -h is >>> not the issue. :) >>> [root@VIRCENT03:~]#ldapsearch -h ldap -b "dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" -= Z >>> -D "cn=3DManager,dc=3Dsummitnjhome,dc=3Dcom" "(objectclass=3DsudoRole)"= -W >> >> Maybe I didn't make myself clear: the host name you use to connect to (-= h), >> in your command line example above, ldap, must be the same as the CN of = the >> server certificate. It is irrelevant if the servers hostname is the same= as >> the CN. >> >> That might be why you get >> >>> ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 additional info: error:14090086:SSL >>> routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed >> >> Try >> >> =A0-h LBSD2.summitnjhome.com >> >> BR, Erik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >> > > > > -- > Here's my RSA Public key: > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 > --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 20:06:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E611065672 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@paz.bz) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [207.34.147.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D438FC0C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 75-237-53-209.qcislands.net ([209.53.237.75] helo=[192.168.100.105]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMn8w-000758-IK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:42:40 -0800 Message-ID: <4CF2B0BA.4030206@paz.bz> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:42:50 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (75) Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:06:57 -0000 On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for the following. roundcube -- Jim Pazarena fquest@paz.bz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 20:56:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7073310656D5 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DAA8FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTDESKTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PMoIm-000GM9-2L; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:56:52 -0500 Message-ID: <9B336DE06AF34E4ABBF9ACAC82685F25@GRANTDESKTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: "Jim Pazarena" , References: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> <4CF2B0BA.4030206@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <4CF2B0BA.4030206@paz.bz> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:56:49 -0500 Organization: The Net Now Internet Services. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3502.922 Cc: Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:56:58 -0000 Openwebmail 1.53 -Grant -----Original Message----- From: Jim Pazarena Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:42 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for > the following. roundcube -- Jim Pazarena fquest@paz.bz _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 21:00:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0575B106564A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07858FC0A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTDESKTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PMoLo-000GNP-AR; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:00:00 -0500 Message-ID: <305525B1348E4966902BD867B2D809C7@GRANTDESKTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: "Lowell Gilbert" References: <8EF88817C5E041E792C26B219F73C665@GRANTDESKTOP> <44k4jxo4jz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44k4jxo4jz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:59:57 -0500 Organization: The Net Now Internet Services. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3502.922 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:00:06 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Lowell Gilbert Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:23 AM To: Grant Peel Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages "Grant Peel" writes: > I am using FreeBSD 8.0 and am getting lots of these: > > negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > +negative sbsize for uid = 0 > > any ideas what it means or how to cure it? Hmm. Interesting. You may need to go -hackers for this... Apparently a socket buffer is claiming to use a negative amount of space. Offhand I'd guess that it wrapped around, but there seem to be checks in place to avoid that. It's something running as root, which should help you track it down (most network daemons should be run as other users anyway). Glibert, What is -hackers? freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org? Thanks for the reply :-) -Grant _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 00:22:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255AE106564A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from random@arnet.com.ar) Received: from avas-mr17.fibertel.com.ar (avas-mr17.fibertel.com.ar [24.232.0.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8618A8FC18 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 32-216-114-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.114.216.32]:65183 "EHLO arnet.com.ar" smtp-auth: "bme024042@fibertel.com.ar" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by avas-mr17.fibertel.com.ar with ESMTPA id S1824405Ab0K1WVO; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:21:14 -0300 From: random@arnet.com.ar ( REPARAMOS ) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: 29 Nov 2010 02:50:59 +0430 Message-ID: <20101129025044.FB6CA6E08C49F526@arnet.com.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Fib-Al-Info: Al X-Fib-Al-MRId: 1a5795bc15a65cbf6ac1f85f7d951596 X-Fib-Al: noav X-Fib-Al-SA: analyzed X-Fib-Al-From: random@arnet.com.ar Subject: IMPRESORAS HP LASER SERVICIO TECNICO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: NORESPONDERAQUI@SPEEDY.COM.AR List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:22:03 -0000 IMPRESORAS LASER HEWLETT PACKARD VISITAS Y RELEVAMIENTOS SIN CARGO HP LJ 1320N, 2420N, 2600N, 3700N, P3005, 4000, 4050N, 4250, 4350DTN, 5500DTN, 8000N, 8550N, 9000 TECNICOS CERTIFICADOS, REPUESTOS ORIGINALES Consulte por los Alcances de la Revisión Sin Cargo en Capital Federal 4982.9696 SOLARCOM srl BME. MITRE 4042 C.A.B.A. solarcom@solarcomsrl.com.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 00:50:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A599106566B for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2408FC0A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3650551bwz.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:50:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0cOX82i/LzXAgOOceUwLziRK6krXMlwmuumA7VpjL+k=; b=rcEcSIxSwdnk+OkH3BaB0cqIm3a7C8jcmmP9+wo/CFt9ctScwa6havXBCCER32G9Tw vModDpRQOqWRVrb5lM2iZ8eU7ZpfSGbKfmmII+6hi7lpxF0u4z33NE52ngzl9+AR12XY N/BHusOAdrttMRnG46aHME9VE4V5I5FzMu3gc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=tbBvJzAqWHMcnyk/ZrhsxquzHU608gWY0utwFSLv5DOvM8fs19c96dFZEUCOhAMxOk +Q4NHxXohNuFy09TIFlDlkfnZip4OfvpQ79HppfAEsHBzyT0iZBAdHTBHvpLgLPALobe +owTwtAK/1aZsEn7HokQm8HjECSyiPWAhNZnI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.62.201 with SMTP id y9mr203021bkh.30.1290991817333; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:50:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.10.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:50:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:50:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: firefox fails to launch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:50:19 -0000 hi list I finally got KDE 4 running on my FreeBSD 8.1 box! It was a happy day as it took several days to compile... However after installing the firefox port I get a dialog box claiming that "firefox is already running but not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process or restart your system" doing a ps -ef | grep firefox does not show any firefox processes running. how can I get firefox to work under freebsd? thanks -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 01:04:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544E5106566C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5948FC17 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so1747420ewy.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.9.66 with SMTP id k2mr492536ebk.51.1290992652347; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:04:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:03:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:03:51 -0500 Message-ID: To: bluethundr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: firefox fails to launch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:04:15 -0000 On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:50 PM, bluethundr wrote: > hi list > > I finally got KDE 4 running on my FreeBSD 8.1 box! It was a happy day > as it took several days to compile... > > However after installing the firefox port I get a dialog box claiming that > > "firefox is already running but not responding. To open a new window, > you must first close the existing Firefox process or restart your > system" > > doing a ps -ef | grep firefox does not show any firefox processes > running. how can I get firefox to work under freebsd? > > thanks > > very odd, ff worked ootb for me .... look around in /var/run, see if you have a mis-permissioned lockfile From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 01:07:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA96F106564A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 003098FC13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2010 00:40:22 -0000 Received: from d039062.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO [80.171.39.62]) [80.171.39.62] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 01:40:22 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19py/l8TRFp0zi2UD0xETFasoEjLPNOcj91LzcEGE 5dae2zfG1A8/Ju Message-ID: <4CF2F675.4010505@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:40:21 +0100 From: Lokadamus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lamac Lamaco References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gateway_enable="NO" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:07:04 -0000 Am 25.11.2010 05:38, schrieb Lamac Lamaco: > The system installed now and in adresses /etc or /etc/rc.d there is no > script. > Does system work in default as ROUTER? > I ask this question, because i tried it works. > As it is written "gateway_enable="NO" # Set to YES if this host will be a > gateway" in the address -> /etc/defaults/rc.conf > But if I write gateway_enable="NO" in the address /etc/rc.conf , my > system will work in as ROUTER. I say this because the host in my system's > local network can ping my system's global IP. As i know it can be only in > ROUTER. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > No, in default FreeBSD isn't working as a router. Look with sysctl at: net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept When is it set to 1, FreeBSD is working as a router, with a value of 0 it doesn't work as a router. Look with tcpdump where networktraffic is going. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-natd.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 01:08:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BD01065679 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2054B8FC1D for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAT17wFK029895; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:08:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4CF2FCEA.2070309@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:07:54 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101117 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bluethundr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: firefox fails to launch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:08:22 -0000 2010-11-29 01:50, bluethundr skrev: > hi list > > I finally got KDE 4 running on my FreeBSD 8.1 box! It was a happy day > as it took several days to compile... > > However after installing the firefox port I get a dialog box claiming that > > "firefox is already running but not responding. To open a new window, > you must first close the existing Firefox process or restart your > system" You need to remove ye olde lockfile, normally at ~/.mozilla/firefox/profilename/!lock One can even remove .parentlock in the same directory > doing a ps -ef | grep firefox does not show any firefox processes > running. how can I get firefox to work under freebsd? > > thanks > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 03:12:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6771065673 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BAF8FC12 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oAT3Ce1q072411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:12:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oAT3Ceac072410; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA06478; Sun, 28 Nov 10 19:04:04 PST Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:03:46 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: gpeel@thenetnow.com Message-Id: <4cf31812.fxeGY067W1K8ow7T%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <8EF88817C5E041E792C26B219F73C665@GRANTDESKTOP> <44k4jxo4jz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <305525B1348E4966902BD867B2D809C7@GRANTDESKTOP> In-Reply-To: <305525B1348E4966902BD867B2D809C7@GRANTDESKTOP> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:12:47 -0000 "Grant Peel" wrote: > > ... You may need to go -hackers for this... > > What is -hackers? freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org? Yep. I've observed a tendency not to put full listname@domain addresses in messages, perhaps in an attempt to avoid harvesting by spammers :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 03:31:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C751065679 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E9D8FC0A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAT3V61E032431; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:31:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4CF31E7A.2070809@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:31:06 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101117 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4CF1C9D2.3010207@bah.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Digital camera (Canon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:31:11 -0000 2010-11-28 05:21, Chris Hill skrev: > On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> I have a digital camera, Canon powershoot sx130 is. That I wish to >> mount. The camera contains an sd-card that I wish to extract the >> photos from. >> >> ugen2.2: at usbus2 Thank you all for your input on this issue. Merry whatever your winter holiday is, and yes, the pictures is aviable to download from the camera. Thank you! > I have a Canon Powershot S5IS that behaves similarly. I have found that > it can't be mounted like a disk drive, even though you would think it > should work that way. Instead, I have to use gtkam to get the pictures > off of it - /usr/ports/graphics/gtkam > > Also had to change some system stuff in order to be able to do this as > an ordinary user: > > Added to /etc/devfs.conf > # Allow members of group operator to use USB > own usb* root:operator > perm usb* 0660 > > ...and here is my /etc/devfs.rules in its entirety: > # Added so ordinary users can use the USB camera if they are > # members of group 'usb' > # > [usb_devices=10] > add path 'ugen*' mode 0660 group usb > add path 'da*s*' mode 0660 group usb > # > # 20091231: added the following for 8.0, since usb is handled > # differently now. Hoping this will make gtkam work. > add path 'usb/*' mode 0660 group usb > > HTH... > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 03:36:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDCE1065674 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from que11.charter.net (que11.charter.net [209.225.8.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAF88FC16 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.02.04 201-2219-117-106-20090629) with ESMTP id <20101129031417.REPH3705.mta21.charter.net@imp10> for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:14:17 -0500 Received: from [192.168.10.106] ([71.93.14.246]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id crEF1f00B5JXkbK05rEGCq; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:14:17 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=7AyF3mq78LMA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=-pC8G0LByncxfilFyCsA:9 a=hdVZRz0pcglNZwqFNqwA:7 a=_o4YerOBAo1_R7LHTZU-4FYswrUA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4CF20F7F.9030400@mgwigglesworth.net> References: <4CF20F7F.9030400@mgwigglesworth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:14:07 -0800 Message-ID: <1291000447.19411.16.camel@devel.atol.pacnwsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Build World fails on 7-stable with cvs sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:36:06 -0000 On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 03:14 -0500, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote: > Greetings. > > I have cvs'd to the most current 7-stable source tree and have compiled > a kernel using these sources. > However, when I attempt to complete the buildworld process, I keep > getting failures in the below-listed areas. > > Does anyone know of an issue with these sources? I see that this > release is now considered "legacy" so I hope I am not at end of life on > this source tree. > > The system is just an edge router so I am just updating to the newest > stable release due to the assumptions that there may be some fixes > included in the sources. > > I have my own patched ipfirewall sources, (don't feel like writing a > script for ipfw to run and figure out why it isn't running at boot, > etc....),however, I have not installed them yet, since I have not > patched anything on this test upgrade box, yet. > > I have the full logs from build world and kernel build, if someone would > like to see them. (very long, and don't fail until the point listed below) > > The kernel kept failing as well, until I used the old method by hand, in > the /usr/src/sys/i386/conf directory. > > That is another question that I would like to ask. > > Why am I able to compile and install a kernel just fine using the old > method, however, using the make buildkernel... method fails on some > obscure module that I usually don't even have included within the config > file? > > gnu/lib/libgomp (buildincludes) > sed -e 's/@OMP_LOCK_ALIGN@/4/g' -e 's/@OMP_LOCK_KIND@/4/g' -e > 's/@OMP_LOCK_SIZE@/4/g' -e 's/@OMP_NEST_LOCK_ALIGN@/4/g' -e > 's/@OMP_NEST_LOCK_KIND@/8/g' -e 's/@OMP_NEST_LOCK_SIZE@/8/g' < > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libgomp/../../../contrib/gcclibs/libgomp/omp.h.in > omp.h > ===> gnu/lib/libregex (buildincludes) > sed 's===g' < > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libregex/regex.h > regex.h.patched > ===> gnu/lib/libregex/doc (buildincludes) > ===> gnu/lib/libreadline (buildincludes) > ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history (buildincludes) > ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history/doc (buildincludes) > ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline (buildincludes) > ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline/doc (buildincludes) > ===> gnu/lib/libstdc++ (buildincludes) > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > *** Error code 139 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/lib. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > Curious. What does your ``make'' command look like? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 04:52:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB781065670 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl@chave.us) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBBB8FC0A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2267156fxm.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:52:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.98.198 with SMTP id r6mr4797178fan.96.1291004965979; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:29:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.94.79 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:29:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Carl Chave To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Bridging Gigabit and Fast Ethernet Interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:52:08 -0000 if_bridge(4) says: The if_bridge driver currently supports only Ethernet and Ethernet-like (e.g., 802.11) network devices, with exactly the same interface MTU size as the bridge device. Am I correct to assume then that I can bridge a gigabit interface and a fast ethernet interface and that one of the "negatives" of doing this is that Jumbo frames couldn't be used on the gigabit side? I've got an Atom based server with an onboard gigabit nic and only one PCI slot. The server sits physically close to my 10/100 switch that hangs off my firewall. I was thinking of putting a 10/100 nic into the single PCI slot and running that to the 10/100 switch for internet access and then running cable across the room from the gigabit interface to a gigabit switch on my workbench. Wired gigabit clients on the bench would then have the benefit of gigabit access to the server for doing backups but also still have internet access via the server's bridge interface right? Is there a reason I wouldn't want to do it this way? Thanks, Carl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 05:27:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B171065673 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B801A8FC17 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3783697bwz.13 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:27:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XgIexqG8euayxUG2+WHLVRmNtZATE0ycZvuXehBRBK4=; b=w+tfTAHqZvZ9PHQZohXUQq5mem+YQUNFBwclTQq94uFOutNh7RdyjgysxsJmXrLEmn 2Z3j6tD8enFTihm9qjBuUlak6Y+h0KlsU5EIG1f71q8R1ejbk2rTsyc+7tdZCUD0FgHm WRNbWaL/0W2hcLE/fEmJTrL+pmzhcPY2Mz8XQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uMnDmISrW1catMqpNL5ANYwJNGMa2HWH+M49jVUtv7Ff7rclhATXm2mHYi1shz/R3l qHfBFQ4cPpW5hVb89j76zOH0dP96hJVKhos/zHdqOS+sI2B1JUqzvpZAhXj7iejD32V/ cpC0NqH7LpYfTR2PmpxMBSRYyZe1ulGksCTLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.69 with SMTP id v5mr2586894bkp.84.1291008435612; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:27:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.10.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:27:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF2FCEA.2070309@bah.homeip.net> References: <4CF2FCEA.2070309@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:27:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: firefox fails to launch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:27:18 -0000 that did it!! whoo-hoo!! love it..thanks On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote= : > > > 2010-11-29 01:50, bluethundr skrev: >> >> hi list >> >> =A0I finally got KDE 4 running on my FreeBSD 8.1 box! It was a happy day >> as it took several days to compile... >> >> =A0However after installing the firefox port I get a dialog box claiming >> that >> >> =A0"firefox is already running but not responding. To open a new window, >> you must first close the existing Firefox process or restart your >> system" > > You need to remove ye olde lockfile, normally at > ~/.mozilla/firefox/profilename/!lock > > One can even remove .parentlock in the same directory > >> doing a ps -ef | grep firefox does not show any firefox processes >> running. how can I get firefox to work under freebsd? >> >> thanks >> > --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 07:21:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5110106564A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573D18FC08 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so349081wwb.31 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:21:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.205 with SMTP id 55mr2610883wex.72.1291015275979; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.242.139 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:21:15 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [118.93.162.65] In-Reply-To: <20101125080509.GA1852@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20101125080509.GA1852@osiris.chen.org.nz> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:21:15 +1300 Message-ID: From: Jonathan Chen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: PCI Parallel Port I/O card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:21:17 -0000 On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a system which has a PCI I/O card with a parallel port > on it. I'd like my 8-STABLE/amd64 machine to recognise this card. > > The relevant bits of "pciconf -lcv" is: > > =A0 =A0none2@pci0:4:6:0: =A0 class=3D0x070103 card=3D0x2000a000 chip=3D0x= 98659710 rev=3D0x00 hdr=3D0x00 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0vendor =A0 =A0 =3D 'MosChip Semiconductors (Was: Netmos Te= chnology)' > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0class =A0 =A0 =A0=3D simple comms > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0subclass =A0 =3D parallel port > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cap 01[48] =3D powerspec 2 =A0supports D0 D3 =A0current D0 > > However, a verbose boot reveals: > =A0 =A0ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range > =A0 =A0ppc0: failed to probe at irq 7 on isa0 For the archives: It appears there isn't any to configure the card to be recognised out-of-box. I had to add an entry in sys/dev/ppc_pci.c with the matching chip number, and recompile the kernel. Currently, it is recognised as: ppc1: port 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd880-0xd887 mem 0xfe8ff000-0xfe8fffff,0xfe8fe000-0xfe8fefff irq 21 at device 6.0 on pci4 If I had multi-I/O ports on the card, I would have had to modify sys/dev/puc/puc_data.c instead. Cheers. --=20 Jonathan Chen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 08:52:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6EB106566B; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC91B8FC08; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PMzT3-00031F-2Y>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:52:13 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PMzT2-00041b-VH>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:52:13 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:52:20 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:52:14 -0000 I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a "zpool export" on both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing "zpool import BACKUP00" results in cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available and on console I receive message ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 But the drive is and was ada3! Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: pool: BACKUP00 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM BACKUP00 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data pool: THOR00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the same command! I did a full "zpool scrub" on both pools - no effect. Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. gpart show ada3 lists this: => 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD ( at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. Thanks in advance, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 09:22:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19E91065672 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A348FC18 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so4128947wyf.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:22:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HVMVILMBsL7EhnPJcyzbrJGSCvvhxQ63PjJT6HazT6k=; b=T5/hNzwsp2o/WpX37mfdxTZC6Zlf416cdC3hckePckbdxpriGK7lOPdiFd7PmBUS4a 3IxMaoiagO7Rx7Y2wz+dpqjtLTOgvGAxHGNJ3zwOCpD3XopFt0IhMwG6C2NKCr3WINzp Z6kCXgJHwzjhpzA5zLor1Cgrlq+v7uAYSWGyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NvzzIAosMDjjA8hyXvVQWEeAwJZQ0Mg6icXUdzqfVlrQyq4SjwML42zWMsotTWNVBZ m6Eid87+EByiUdAWWu40hG0NwdbO7ELxYC+Y7T5qXcLABed+6R3U9MyTh3iBw1C+9u2v LGFbjSqudHOSgnas+6GT+yUXz56q3Mj+txemw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.66 with SMTP id q44mr4655084wed.44.1291022545467; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.37.132 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:22:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9B336DE06AF34E4ABBF9ACAC82685F25@GRANTDESKTOP> References: <3373810644-437626305@intranet.com.mx> <4CF2B0BA.4030206@paz.bz> <9B336DE06AF34E4ABBF9ACAC82685F25@GRANTDESKTOP> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:22:25 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Grant Peel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jim Pazarena , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:22:27 -0000 On 28 November 2010 20:56, Grant Peel wrote: > Openwebmail 1.53 > > -Grant > > -----Original Message----- From: Jim Pazarena > Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:42 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. > > > On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > >> Hello all. >> >> I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for >> the following. >> > > roundcube > -- > Jim Pazarena fquest@paz.bz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > all of the above will do it fine. Just make sure you set them up to do it via imap not pop3. Google mail should work fine as well as that can hook into imap accounts From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 10:13:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00825106566C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from hp9.esiee.fr (hp9.esiee.fr [147.215.1.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44488FC18 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by hp9.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BC23E8EAF for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id 17FAF1054440 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017641054422 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CF378B9.70007@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:09 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:13:59 -0000 Hello Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build a backups server to store sensitive data ? In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 10:44:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5AE106566B for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95988FC1B for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so1258469qyk.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:44:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=by+bdxMcl2rDJ/6o1D/dwIDpC7KS7OI7ch8WQZMOY5g=; b=c5dOuy4omJWOTdqdBArZbw7TZyrJPiUNA25NuQybAY+7CR9OHxHoAj70UXlauSmEgS Y2lsO7oK+UFVcLOf2C3vLpQW5UpBdZECjsBYuv4vvZhefSCEGAFbez3XEHMR3VwLMmQ2 uM3vuaKc2zAktL1OSM4nbsQMU/wkrJgZXGkxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bJxLTm9xtvgdYiXuJk2UDMJvvzLxZ5D2dYmZLUnL734qQiJlOFFPKveZ/mh7FPT4ZI ihNH0xeKMwQtdkE8y6oqJ5D6NXdXkkWT1C1yAtwtwVyBBzqFmqrJkhh7/9+fal5J5hIV BxZbPhOtMo6THsH0se/p+dWfVuBfWRcKkuKrs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.230.208 with SMTP id jn16mr4665308qcb.269.1291027484855; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.100.142 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:44:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF378B9.70007@esiee.fr> References: <4CF378B9.70007@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: Frank Bonnet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:44:46 -0000 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: > In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? > Yes. But do it with a machine with a lot of memory and run 64bit. -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 10:54:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BED106566C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7784C8FC08 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATAssb0081882; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:54:55 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4CF3867E.8010302@qeng-ho.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:54:54 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <4CF378B9.70007@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4CF378B9.70007@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:54:58 -0000 On 11/29/10 09:56, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build > a backups server to store sensitive data ? > > In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? That's a regular theological debate round here, and some people will say yes, and others an emphatic no. I'm personally happy with ZFS raidz, others prefer UFS + mirroring + journalling. Speaking with far too many years of experience as a sysadmin, no single backup solution is ever truly adequate. You want off site backups as well as on site. For the off site backups, take a look at tarsnap: http://www.tarsnap.com/ -- "Although the wombat is real and the dragon is not, few know what a wombat looks like, but everyone knows what a dragon looks like." -- Avram Davidson, _Adventures in Unhistory_ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 11:04:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512621065673 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B7E8FC12 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so4225004wyf.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:04:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nkCxMD+JbVElbRwH5R9LsWL/RL1MsDtGpD4ulumojfc=; b=O0bMVSjyh21Mem9kDwc/z3HUSQ96T0xxQHJ9j0QGc2+IQxRmx6lpg3+WSVsZXh8wcu jDEKbHlMu0FF+z+nHc2Tl8fsN6MoxjkwQiNLuWPKN1FTlTz2IX6KFWR2dVw23qngdAgq AMcIjx1KiEkEOVyAuPnCGwj2CWqKGLUSCX0UE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=WLWrkkaHTAy8/WGNHDsv7WNKh45o58gwfofwGDSgipWsJKLy3yHMEi30QETKThAEtg dofjNBk1JvLetGPVmrrbbAdu4D456v/HKbC4iZsHarDnqZkv9B47L4Jo4m4InlLfsxC4 0VhOAExXqygqG0oTJXnaKUA7VnYOpDd3sf8xI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.20 with SMTP id a20mr4775466wem.14.1291028669854; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.37.132 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:04:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF3867E.8010302@qeng-ho.org> References: <4CF378B9.70007@esiee.fr> <4CF3867E.8010302@qeng-ho.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:04:29 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Arthur Chance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Frank Bonnet , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:04:31 -0000 On 29 November 2010 10:54, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 11/29/10 09:56, Frank Bonnet wrote: > >> Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build >> a backups server to store sensitive data ? >> >> In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? >> > > That's a regular theological debate round here, and some people will say > yes, and others an emphatic no. I'm personally happy with ZFS raidz, others > prefer UFS + mirroring + journalling. > > Speaking with far too many years of experience as a sysadmin, no single > backup solution is ever truly adequate. You want off site backups as well as > on site. For the off site backups, take a look at tarsnap: > > http://www.tarsnap.com/ > > -- > "Although the wombat is real and the dragon is not, few know what a > wombat looks like, but everyone knows what a dragon looks like." > > -- Avram Davidson, _Adventures in Unhistory_ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > It does all come down to risk analysis. In my experience company politics have far to much influence on this than I like. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 13:04:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9146F106566C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0F78FC18 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PN3Oy-00049I-FG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:16 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PN3Oy-000768-Bl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:16 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATD4GP0048122 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:16 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oATD4Gqv048121 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:16 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:16 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:04:17 -0000 ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar ----- On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: [ia64] > ia64% file a.out > a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped [amd64] > amd64% file a.out > a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's properly declared as FreeBSD. This is a binutils problem. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com ----- End forwarded message ----- Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant by "binutils problem", and how to fix it? I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 13:51:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F551065672 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71EE8FC12 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PN48C-00022M-A6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:51:00 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PN48C-0005J2-6r for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:51:00 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATDox4S008544 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:50:59 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oATDoxE7008541 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:50:59 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:50:59 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: linking against shared libraries not in default path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:51:02 -0000 I compiled some numerical libraries under my home directory, including static and shared libs. The shared lib is % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 ./src/libslatec.so.1 % Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec % ./test01.x /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libslatec.so.1" not found, required by "test01.x" % How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but it didn't help. Perhaps I completely misunderstand how shared libraries work.. Please advise many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 13:57:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4EF1065675 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@canmos.ru) Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3803D8FC0A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) by sta1.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3201271D6; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:57:50 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:57:50 +0300 (MSK) From: "Igor V. Ruzanov" To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-GPG-PUBLIC-KEY: 1024D/494AF6DC 2008-03-20 Igor V. Ruzanov X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: A723 B6CC 11ED A4E2 1909 C4DC 6EDE 9089 494A F6DC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:57:52 -0000 On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: |I compiled some numerical libraries under my home |directory, including static and shared libs. The |shared lib is | |% ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 |./src/libslatec.so.1 |% | |Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do | |% gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec |% ./test01.x |/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libslatec.so.1" not found, required by "test01.x" |% | |How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library |in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but |it didn't help. | |Perhaps I completely misunderstand how shared libraries work.. | |Please advise | ldconfig -m ./src/libslatec.so.1 (in your example) +-------------------------------------------+ ! CANMOS ISP Network ! +-------------------------------------------+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: igorr@canmos.ru ! +-------------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 14:01:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39894106564A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@canmos.ru) Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBBA8FC17 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) by sta1.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE621271D6; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:01:08 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:01:08 +0300 (MSK) From: "Igor V. Ruzanov" To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-GPG-PUBLIC-KEY: 1024D/494AF6DC 2008-03-20 Igor V. Ruzanov X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: A723 B6CC 11ED A4E2 1909 C4DC 6EDE 9089 494A F6DC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:01:10 -0000 On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: |I compiled some numerical libraries under my home |directory, including static and shared libs. The |shared lib is | |% ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 |./src/libslatec.so.1 |% | |Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do | |% gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec |% ./test01.x |/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libslatec.so.1" not found, required by "test01.x" |% | |How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library |in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but |it didn't help. | Ooops, sorry, you must give full path of shared object, *NOT* a file name: ldconfig -m ./src in your test example. +-------------------------------------------+ ! CANMOS ISP Network ! +-------------------------------------------+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: igorr@canmos.ru ! +-------------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 14:30:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DDF1065673 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B818FC15 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:30:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am0GADZA80xbsZH3/2dsb2JhbACUe44BcsIvhUcE Received: from 247.145-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.145.247]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2010 15:00:57 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATE0sHs003426; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:00:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:00:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.5.2; i386; ; ) References: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1332642.6ZWloR6saY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011291500.52940.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:30:16 -0000 --nextPart1332642.6ZWloR6saY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 29 November 2010 14:50:59 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I compiled some numerical libraries under my home > directory, including static and shared libs. The > shared lib is >=20 > % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 > ./src/libslatec.so.1 > % >=20 > Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do=20 >=20 > % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec > % ./test01.x=20 > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libslatec.so.1" not found, required = by "test01.x" > % >=20 > How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library > in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but > it didn't help. The name of the variable is LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It is described in the rtld(1) manpage. You can also add it to the executable using -R as in: % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -R -lslatec --nextPart1332642.6ZWloR6saY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAkzzshQACgkQfoCS2CCgtistpwD/QWYw6j7SrT12UdvGiTd6nOfp ppTZRawLXK0z47kGL2oA/2EyEtTs59c3m6IJK0mi+11mJUxcs9wAgK79/ZsVEj54 =LNww -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1332642.6ZWloR6saY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 14:40:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14C01065673 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520648FC15 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so4192592bwz.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:40:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jm5QwqYrYY3ezA87EKhlf0RWzoF6a1dUVuIzFfXfuhA=; b=DB1e4eaB71Z+sGJsmcdWmTgh3SV7uHqNeydv1Vt1+SSSvnYtsvfth2XJdhK0CZCDdJ un6/4FrgugG/KhmCYErPQsBTrm/58/ZNTKGvZPOOBPUmomuCdyFLucV4pSgimaR1/ihj ehTco1c+xMECY57Xi73D7re63DrgC8HsnPK+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BDYDVVeBclTYK9s/fpMX0HEju6gFyX02yf/+Cj1Djm7qZRl+oqQm09MTlDCr16qncC DJe6R+u19KZjsmC/jwSqP3VIgg3O1N/Y6tb61uzG3BgaLylDZ2bDgICHosiwzILI0VtP wGr97yHIRdt0fnBNTlJR+XM0ujyKewd+UT6Dc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.56.3 with SMTP id w3mr1569618bkg.192.1291041653381; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.10.72 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:40:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:40:53 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:40:55 -0000 Hey list On my CentOS machines I usually keep track of my rsa key with ssh-agent, ssh-add and keychain I would like to know a) how to install keychain under FreeBSD and b) how to fix this error: [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh sum1 Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.a Whenever I try to ssh to another box on the network (with a homedir shared amongst all centos and FreeBSD machines) it prompts me for my passphrase. Usually on the CentOS boxes exec ssh-agent bash does the trick. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working on the FreeBSD box? thanks!! -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 14:47:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC231065670 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (mail-ww0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F108FC1A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so4667340wwe.8 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L7LSwJZ7Qn4Sk7Uc6r9SDA0lwC/4CSZqRZG92B6AwRI=; b=kF+0WQbF/mI+i/Ifj9uq8ivt/E8F5u/VjW+1pxG8ZLun43y/+3RstNQbmuFTBD7Moe 41SMHpDmzpfW96p7gCIn27kjB5vJwXXJS851acm+zsDqQtYElZOOJLTbIGLZK5wGegJX t+Xn1WS+nAC0FIB4oKPLOMajpLLHMwFDAmnBo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=B48+J6dHoxpPalZAnunR9r7XKRjFclNJsXSro+D2fIanQieCxyYwuMwOUOUfsbwCd6 vnAwmicrzVVBK6xb8bo8LpODh8rycGDB3Coh9awthmvXET3p7kFWCbunXGRrvaKNmKTN OJ3Y0UcCwNLaqo7RHv6MDYjFqc21tRn/MZVTQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.4.82 with SMTP id 60mr418915wei.89.1291042037021; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.12.80 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:47:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:47:16 -0600 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: bluethundr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:47:19 -0000 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, bluethundr wrote: > Hey list > > =A0On my CentOS machines I usually keep track of my rsa key with > ssh-agent, ssh-add and keychain > > =A0I would like to know > > a) how to install keychain under FreeBSD > and > b) how to fix this error: > > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh sum1 > Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh-add > Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.a > > > Whenever I try to ssh to another box on the network (with a homedir > shared amongst all centos =A0and FreeBSD machines) it prompts me for my > passphrase. Usually on the CentOS boxes exec ssh-agent bash does the > trick. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working on the FreeBSD box? > > thanks!! The man page for ssh-agent is very informative: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dssh-agent&sektion=3D1 I read it recently when setting up my system to do as you're trying to do. Of course, don't hesitate to refer to the EXCELLENT FreeBSD Handbook, it is absolutely one of the best references I've ever seen for any software: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/openssh.html Good luck! -Brandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 15:01:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6CC1065675 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044B38FC26 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PN5ES-0006UH-Ne; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:32 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PN5ES-0004PR-CV; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:32 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATF1WN2059290; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:32 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oATF1V3x059264; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:31 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:31 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Tijl Coosemans Message-ID: <20101129150131.GA45297@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Tijl Coosemans , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht References: <20101129135058.GA6756@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201011291500.52940.tijl@coosemans.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011291500.52940.tijl@coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:34 -0000 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Monday 29 November 2010 14:50:59 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I compiled some numerical libraries under my home > > directory, including static and shared libs. The > > shared lib is > > > > % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 > > ./src/libslatec.so.1 > > % > > > > Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do > > > > % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec > > % ./test01.x > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libslatec.so.1" not found, required by "test01.x" > > % > > > > How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library > > in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but > > it didn't help. > > The name of the variable is LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It is described in the > rtld(1) manpage. You can also add it to the executable using -R as in: > > % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -R -lslatec Tijl, thank you. Both options work for me on amd64 and ia64. thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 15:32:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2637106566C; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943218FC18; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 503E446B38; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:32:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5106F8A009; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:32:23 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:54:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20101102; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <7EA93980-478A-418A-8FB1-3249097A7011@forsythia.net> In-Reply-To: <7EA93980-478A-418A-8FB1-3249097A7011@forsythia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011290954.07958.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:32:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Andrew Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msk0 interface stops working when downloading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:32:27 -0000 On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:25:06 pm Andrew Moran wrote: > > Hey guys, > > After banging my head against this for a few hours, I've decided to ask for help. I installed FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 on a Shuttle J1 4100 system (tech specs here http://us.shuttle.com/J1_4100.aspx). I installed from DVD and the install went fine. > > I notice when I pkg_add -r anything, the network stops responding. > > Some details: > > 1) I can reproduce it 100% by downloading a large file. low traffic like the SSH connection does not trigger it. I think it's being triggered by traffic above a certain rate. > 2) I can recover by restarting the network interfaces (/etc/rc.d/netif stop; /etc/rc.d/netif start) > 3) I see no errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages. Nothing at all. > 4) I've tried the following in /etc/sysctl.conf: > net.inet.tcp.tso=0 > net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 > > and in /boot/loader.conf: > hw.pci.enable_msix="0" > hw.pci.enable_msi="0" > hw.bce.tso_enable="0" > > But the problem persists. > > The interface is identified as: > > mskc0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfebfc000-0xfebfffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 > msk0: on mskc0 > msk0: Ethernet address: 80:ee:73:01:60:7d > miibus0: on msk0 > e1000phy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto > mskc0: [ITHREAD] When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien on the same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream of pause frames. I've only had this problem with a gigE switch, it works fine for me on a 10/100 switch. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 16:09:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E395410656AA for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604248FC2C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oATG9Ol4019480; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:09:24 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:09:24 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Lokadamus In-Reply-To: <20101129052727.7028310656EF@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101130015913.W47536@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101129052727.7028310656EF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Lamac Lamaco , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gateway_enable="NO" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:09:27 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 339, Issue 1, Message: 20 On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:40:21 +0100 Lokadamus wrote: > Am 25.11.2010 05:38, schrieb Lamac Lamaco: > > The system installed now and in adresses /etc or /etc/rc.d there is no > > script. > > Does system work in default as ROUTER? > > I ask this question, because i tried it works. > > As it is written "gateway_enable="NO" # Set to YES if this host will be a > > gateway" in the address -> /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > But if I write gateway_enable="NO" in the address /etc/rc.conf , my > > system will work in as ROUTER. I say this because the host in my system's > > local network can ping my system's global IP. As i know it can be only in > > ROUTER. No, being able to ping any address on any interface on a system is not the same as being able to route packets elsewhere through that system. Only specific firewall rules would prevent that, if you had some need to deny inside net hosts access to some service/s bound to your outside IP. If a local network host can ping anywhere outside through your system, then it's acting as a gateway aka router for that host; not otherwise. > > Thanks. No worries. > No, in default FreeBSD isn't working as a router. Right. > Look with sysctl at: > net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept > When is it set to 1, FreeBSD is working as a router, with a value of 0 > it doesn't work as a router. Wrong; sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept has nothing to do with this; gateway_enable=YES causes setting sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 > Look with tcpdump where networktraffic is going. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html Good advice. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 17:11:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D6E106566C; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltsampros@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD96A8FC17; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so4595700wyf.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:11:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=iEAlbJ20kF4XePD7uiPztOWLVSaMJtkvNO6IVYmbQGI=; b=PG8agNwngOCXeDA2madt8KTmZT/5shwKM0eCqdclmAr1f1wKFAK6gbUDMqGQzPexKw Lawu5kXAVOD41PPpfueUjthiV1UEsXGc4vQGKgBZN6Hh1ZLqYBPfWCy0EaDMYPHjLfb6 JdUrGBFhDc3ZZlCADr+ijRMcCcsymq/f8oTVI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=waocQ1LfbyBH8t7kOyJm98C7dgjvg7kb0LqeF8W3ereCl4gyKMagsICDgAQhOIFfeX BCYyW1nRtbCYWFx7cBTvxsNFNnNPmTv+gG/WdVavrFhmc+xTSGNMyxwF1w23y/dY1QjQ 9NpOQP/ea36WpMO04um9tj54ectqusizI33bs= Received: by 10.227.134.20 with SMTP id h20mr6307873wbt.88.1291049033687; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:43:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ltsampros-laptop (darth.bytemobile-rio.ondsl.gr [83.235.57.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x65sm2489427weq.1.2010.11.29.08.43.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:43:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Leonidas Tsampros Received: from ltsampros-laptop (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ltsampros-laptop (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8077342A39; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:41:18 +0200 (EET) From: Leonidas Tsampros To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:41:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> (O. Hartmann's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:52:20 +0100") Message-ID: <87oc98dqvx.fsf@bifteki.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:11:15 -0000 "O. Hartmann" writes: > I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former > OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD > harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB > HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to > parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, > GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive > is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, > also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. > In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two > 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with > the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a "zpool export" on > both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The > system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or > something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. > > Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD > 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on > the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing "zpool import BACKUP00" > results in > > cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available > > and on console I receive message > > ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 > > But the drive is and was ada3! > > Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: > > pool: BACKUP00 > state: FAULTED > status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing > or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to > continue > functioning. > action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. > see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > BACKUP00 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data > ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data > > pool: THOR00 > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada1p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada2p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > > This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the > same command! > > I did a full "zpool scrub" on both pools - no effect. > > Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in > FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. > gpart show ada3 lists this: > > => 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) > 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) > 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) > > The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD ( WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80> at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). > > Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the > new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the > HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. > > Thanks in advance, > > Oliver > Hi Oliver, just a wild guess and maybe completely wrong: are the ZFS version numbers and zpool version numbers the same across 8.1 and 9-CURRENT ? Best Regards, Leonidas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 18:16:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E44106566C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD058FC13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2913432fxm.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:16:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Q5NNaBN2ZiA+yN3Sr8qtCsO2nKNcGJaNq9p0ui4s2I8=; b=nl67hMkNkLOX/NHjl1Ew8uVfOUlbcFgmKeANi6BBTa3hdr1O/2ULf3NpCLV3FmiAUj opqgF/VSrgnwHbmMu7l1VIy8/6wh0hK4+TQwwllkJWJzaRmLfSd+qrjImmK8UQmThYq4 dgRN+wW3CpsEPSha+2B5E2dDdmaUAqo4kdSdc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mSD4gy6HS4lbkqR0XUy6wmhigHqs/nkjzYvpr/Lpv/NTarL3IWabGieWK+tuFKQtvC YouwJBGnOSzPZkzFDL/r9JHyky69mkf1GNJ6vTVWr3TjvEAfftKCJcnYRbKGBGyS7Wrr 6xd+Akx5mcsnNGeSdIMMvJGGyOs81EEcIylS4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.133 with SMTP id l5mr5721124far.52.1291054607248; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.75.208 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:16:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87oc98dqvx.fsf@bifteki.lan> References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87oc98dqvx.fsf@bifteki.lan> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:16:47 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Leonidas Tsampros Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:16:49 -0000 On 29 November 2010 16:41, Leonidas Tsampros wrote: > "O. Hartmann" writes: > > I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former > > OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD > > harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB > > HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to > > parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, > > GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive > > is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, > > also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. > > In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two > > 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with > > the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a "zpool export" on > > both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The > > system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or > > something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. > > > > Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD > > 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on > > the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing "zpool import BACKUP00" > > results in > > > > cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available > > > > and on console I receive message > > > > ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 > > > > But the drive is and was ada3! > > > > Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: > > > > pool: BACKUP00 > > state: FAULTED > > status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is > missing > > or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to > > continue > > functioning. > > action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. > > see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E > > scrub: none requested > > config: > > > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > BACKUP00 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data > > ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data > > > > pool: THOR00 > > state: ONLINE > > scrub: none requested > > config: > > > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > ada1p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > ada2p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > > errors: No known data errors > > > > > > This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the > > same command! > > > > I did a full "zpool scrub" on both pools - no effect. > > > > Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in > > FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. > > gpart show ada3 lists this: > > > > => 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) > > 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) > > 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) > > > > The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD ( > WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80> at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). > > > > Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the > > new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the > > HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Oliver > > > > Hi Oliver, > > just a wild guess and maybe completely wrong: are the ZFS version numbers > and zpool version numbers > the same across 8.1 and 9-CURRENT ? > > Best Regards, > Leonidas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > i think both are on version 15, however a v22 patch is in testing and will probably hit head fairly soon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 18:34:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBADF106566C for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f68.google.com (mail-ww0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750368FC08 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1162002wwb.7 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:34:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oho2cUXG9kRmO+9TZTT4qk26W1JLENhqEkiE5peU5sc=; b=sHgRajFEiimBfJnuu3g2Fk/GCoQEhr4UtvCCLvkRIWUu+ogH9aTpFhq/J5hOEgSB3H 0P2VmPMiS9XIAbKFW+Z0bDQ1kIRr4zSOHHqwgKKByWQkTlBSUxqfUXgg67XQyfdsXZtI NVPGfUx1JktNoSu3PgS8eNHhMn1qEslmCZ3bg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gG8WRl2qsiiHujuXbYBeRUQ7eWtGSeHXDCaV0xT9ZA98+iMjvQeqTYPTZVsbk/ncHd fFT9MP5VdEp9nex6gWYL5t9NU1JiV4YX14gGAqtJlkhKbB4TAr2bxheeAYk5rB7rGMiz bi+jEiRLLdc/cgQ8iVIiwwV8p3WxJkXoBZEI0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.15 with SMTP id d15mr6369530wbt.37.1291055661424; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:34:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.138.12 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:34:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:34:18 -0700 Message-ID: From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Broken port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:34:22 -0000 List, I tried to install django with sqlite support from ports and got the error shown below. What do I do to fix this? Do I email a port maintainer or something? I used portsnap to update my ports collection before trying the install. I'm on 8.1-RELEASE amd64. Thanks! -Modulok- Error Below: ===> Installing for py26-django-1.2.3 ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/_psp.so - found ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so - found ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on package: py26-MySQLdb>=1.2.2 - found ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => Python-2.6.5.tgz is not in /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo. => Either /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo is out of date, or => Python-2.6.5.tgz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 19:00:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C813E106564A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@jrv.org) Received: from mail.jrv.org (rrcs-24-73-246-106.sw.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6670B8FC12 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kremvax.housenet.jrv (kremvax.housenet.jrv [192.168.3.124]) by mail.jrv.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oATIWWME006071; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:32:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from james@jrv.org) Authentication-Results: mail.jrv.org; domainkeys=pass (testing) header.from=james@jrv.org DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=enigma; d=jrv.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gyBtTS8AwpzKNlQ1Xq+JMfzya907yoVn8Y7YMd007cMDLhN6A5uPE079IvWpAlE2l gEBk1kS1MoG/KiZXrPsJsf0SDbTDaw+hFlaeSSQb8YJEGlY+Z5dxG3mhhyvi2OEnSEJ Bvc1Cg9+Z9ULsX0FtVb3GQUMpYHsYsh2chHdg8k= Message-ID: <4CF3F1C0.1080309@jrv.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:32:32 -0600 From: "James R. Van Artsdalen" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:00:06 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem > on GPT partitioning scheme. Please send the output of "camcontrol devlist" and "zpool status" on FreeBSD-8.1. Then export the pool in FreeBSD-8.1, boot FreeBSD-9 with verbose booting and send the output of "camcontrol devlist", "zpool import BACKUP" and the part of /var/log/messages that shows FreeeBSD searching for the pool during the import. It might be useful to know what disk controller is being used. > => 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) > 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) > 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) It is not related to your problem, but how did that unused space wind up before partition 1? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 19:03:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D851065675 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551D88FC1B for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (emlpfilt2.waddell.com [10.1.10.30]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB4050842; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:03:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 95F412F8002; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:03:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com (wadphtcas0.waddell.com [192.168.203.229]) by emlpfilt2.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3FC2F8001; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:03:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.151]) by WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com ([192.168.203.229]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:03:02 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: 'John Baldwin' , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:03:01 -0600 Thread-Topic: msk0 interface stops working when downloading Thread-Index: AcuP2yqjlQhqXe5/QLKEf1hDRG4SyAAHJK9g Message-ID: <9549_1291057382_4CF3F8E6_9549_238_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8D81@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <7EA93980-478A-418A-8FB1-3249097A7011@forsythia.net> <201011290954.07958.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201011290954.07958.jhb@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Andrew Moran , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: msk0 interface stops working when downloading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:03:13 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Baldwin Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:54 AM To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Andrew Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msk0 interface stops working when downloading On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:25:06 pm Andrew Moran wrote: >=20 > Hey guys, >=20 > After banging my head against this for a few hours, I've decided to ask f= or=20 help. I installed FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 on a Shuttle J1 4100 system (tech= =20 specs here http://us.shuttle.com/J1_4100.aspx). I installed from DVD and = the=20 install went fine. >=20 > I notice when I pkg_add -r anything, the network stops responding.=20 >=20 > Some details: >=20 > 1) I can reproduce it 100% by downloading a large file. low traffic l= ike=20 the SSH connection does not trigger it. I think it's being triggered by= =20 traffic above a certain rate.=20 > 2) I can recover by restarting the network interfaces (/etc/rc.d/netif st= op;=20=20 /etc/rc.d/netif start) > 3) I see no errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages. Nothing at all. > 4) I've tried the following in /etc/sysctl.conf: > net.inet.tcp.tso=3D0 > net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=3D0 >=20 > and in /boot/loader.conf: > hw.pci.enable_msix=3D"0" > hw.pci.enable_msi=3D"0" > hw.bce.tso_enable=3D"0" >=20 > But the problem persists. >=20 > The interface is identified as: >=20 > mskc0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem=20 0xfebfc000-0xfebfffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 > msk0: on= =20 mskc0 > msk0: Ethernet address: 80:ee:73:01:60:7d > miibus0: on msk0 > e1000phy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT,=20 1000baseT-FDX, auto > mskc0: [ITHREAD] When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien on the= =20 same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream of pau= se=20 frames. I've only had this problem with a gigE switch, it works fine for m= e=20 on a 10/100 switch. --=20 John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" " When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien on t= he same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream of = pause frames. " If there's an option to disable Ethernet flow control, (commonly used on Gi= g stuff) perhaps disabling it will prevent the unwanted "spewing". Unwaant= ed spewing is always bad.
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 19:08:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id D398F1065672; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:08:42 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Brandon Gooch Message-ID: <20101129190842.GA57956@freebsd.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: bluethundr , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:08:42 -0000 On Mon Nov 29 10, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, bluethundr wrote: > > Hey list > > > >  On my CentOS machines I usually keep track of my rsa key with > > ssh-agent, ssh-add and keychain > > > >  I would like to know > > > > a) how to install keychain under FreeBSD > > and > > b) how to fix this error: > > > > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh sum1 > > Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': > > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash ^^ this looks wrong. i think you want eval `ssh-agent` so the envars get set. otherwise ssh-add won't know where to look for a running ssh-agent. cheers. alex > > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh-add > > Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.a > > > > > > Whenever I try to ssh to another box on the network (with a homedir > > shared amongst all centos  and FreeBSD machines) it prompts me for my > > passphrase. Usually on the CentOS boxes exec ssh-agent bash does the > > trick. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working on the FreeBSD box? > > > > thanks!! > > The man page for ssh-agent is very informative: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ssh-agent&sektion=1 > > I read it recently when setting up my system to do as you're trying to do. > > Of course, don't hesitate to refer to the EXCELLENT FreeBSD Handbook, > it is absolutely one of the best references I've ever seen for any > software: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/openssh.html > > Good luck! > > -Brandon -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 19:15:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65441065672 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armin@frozen-zone.org) Received: from mailbackup.inode.at (mailbackup.inode.at [213.229.60.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6561D8FC19 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.99.145.6] (port=9819 helo=mx.inode.at) by mailbackup.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PN9C0-00044P-L8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:15:16 +0100 Received: from [84.119.26.126] (port=10820 helo=fz-sub1.local) by smartmx-06.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PN9Bu-0005c2-SM; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:15:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF3FBBD.8070901@frozen-zone.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:15:09 +0100 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101030 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Modulok References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:15:17 -0000 Hi! The current version of databases/py-sqlite3 is 2.6.6_1 (python version 2.6.6) - therefore I suggest you update your ports tree and your ports. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html for more information on how to do that if you have not done that before. If the problem still occurs afterward you should file a problem report. ( http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html ) Armin On 11/29/10 19:34, Modulok wrote: > List, > > I tried to install django with sqlite support from ports and got the > error shown below. What do I do to fix this? Do I email a port > maintainer or something? I used portsnap to update my ports collection > before trying the install. I'm on 8.1-RELEASE amd64. > > Thanks! > -Modulok- > > Error Below: > > ===> Installing for py26-django-1.2.3 > ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found > ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/_psp.so - found > ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so - found > ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on package: py26-MySQLdb>=1.2.2 - found > ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so - not found > ===> Verifying install for > /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so in > /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => Python-2.6.5.tgz is not in /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo. > => Either /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo is out of date, or > => Python-2.6.5.tgz is spelled incorrectly. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 20:25:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C02106566C; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791278FC1D; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PNAHw-0004TK-Ia>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:25:28 +0100 Received: from e178019054.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.19.54] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PNAHw-0000HM-A8>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:25:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF40C38.8030103@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:25:28 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101127 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leonidas Tsampros References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87oc98dqvx.fsf@bifteki.lan> In-Reply-To: <87oc98dqvx.fsf@bifteki.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.19.54 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:25:30 -0000 On 11/29/10 17:41, Leonidas Tsampros wrote: > "O. Hartmann" writes: >> I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former >> OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD >> harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB >> HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to >> parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, >> GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive >> is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, >> also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. >> In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two >> 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with >> the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a "zpool export" on >> both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The >> system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or >> something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. >> >> Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD >> 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on >> the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing "zpool import BACKUP00" >> results in >> >> cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available >> >> and on console I receive message >> >> ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 >> >> But the drive is and was ada3! >> >> Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: >> >> pool: BACKUP00 >> state: FAULTED >> status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing >> or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to >> continue >> functioning. >> action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. >> see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E >> scrub: none requested >> config: >> >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> BACKUP00 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data >> ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data >> >> pool: THOR00 >> state: ONLINE >> scrub: none requested >> config: >> >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> ada1p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> ada2p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> >> errors: No known data errors >> >> >> This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the >> same command! >> >> I did a full "zpool scrub" on both pools - no effect. >> >> Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in >> FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. >> gpart show ada3 lists this: >> >> => 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) >> 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) >> 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) >> >> The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD (> WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80> at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). >> >> Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the >> new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the >> HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Oliver >> > > Hi Oliver, > > just a wild guess and maybe completely wrong: are the ZFS version numbers and zpool version numbers > the same across 8.1 and 9-CURRENT ? > > Best Regards, > Leonidas Hello Leonidas, both pools are versioned '15', that is the most recent version in 9.0-CURRENT and 8.2-PRE. One of the both pools, that one spanned over two 1 TB hard drives, works perfectly. The backup pool on the 2TB hdd does not. It seems that the partitioning information got lost in FreeBSD 9. The hdd in question is one of that new 2TB drives of WD with 4k blocks ... maybe I made a mistake when initiatet the GPT layout ... (started the partition at block 4096 with the '-b'-option of 'gpart add'). Greetings, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 20:49:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA2E1065696 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2B28FC2E for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTDESKTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PNAfQ-0004aT-PT; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:49:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Grant Peel" To: References: <8EF88817C5E041E792C26B219F73C665@GRANTDESKTOP><44k4jxo4jz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan><305525B1348E4966902BD867B2D809C7@GRANTDESKTOP> <4cf31812.fxeGY067W1K8ow7T%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4cf31812.fxeGY067W1K8ow7T%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:49:42 -0500 Organization: The Net Now Internet Services. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3502.922 Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:49:57 -0000 ----Original Message----- From: perryh@pluto.rain.com Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:03 PM To: gpeel@thenetnow.com Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages "Grant Peel" wrote: > > ... You may need to go -hackers for this... > > What is -hackers? ... ? Yep. I've observed a tendency not to put full listname@domain addresses in messages, perhaps in an attempt to avoid harvesting by spammers :( _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Indeed, I have have tendencies in the past to accidentally hit the reply all instead of the reply button .... will pay more attention in the future. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 21:28:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0810656B8 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A448FC18 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so2429468ewy.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.9.66 with SMTP id k2mr2041280ebk.51.1291066103534; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:28:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:28:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF3FBBD.8070901@frozen-zone.org> References: <4CF3FBBD.8070901@frozen-zone.org> From: Chris Brennan Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:28:03 -0500 Message-ID: To: Armin Pirkovitsch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Modulok Subject: Re: Broken port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:28:25 -0000 > > > On 11/29/10 19:34, Modulok wrote: > >> List, >> >> I tried to install django with sqlite support from ports and got the >> error shown below. What do I do to fix this? Do I email a port >> maintainer or something? I used portsnap to update my ports collection >> before trying the install. I'm on 8.1-RELEASE amd64. >> >> Thanks! >> -Modulok- >> >> Error Below: >> >> ===> Installing for py26-django-1.2.3 >> ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - >> found >> ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: >> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/_psp.so - found >> ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: >> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so - found >> ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on package: py26-MySQLdb>=1.2.2 - found >> ===> py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: >> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so - not found >> ===> Verifying install for >> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so in >> /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >> => Python-2.6.5.tgz is not in /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo. >> => Either /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo is out of date, or >> => Python-2.6.5.tgz is spelled incorrectly. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. >> > This actually looks like he port is failing to pull in it's required dependency (in this case, sqlite). I would as Armin suggested to do, first update your port-tree again, try to install it again, cd into the port and 'make distclean rmconfig' to start fresh and start from the beginning. If it still fails, file the pr and/or contact the port maintainer. I would actually do all of this and document it for the pr and the port-maintainer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 22:18:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A05106566B; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770AB8FC19; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATMISEF021445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:18:34 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oATMISEF021445 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1291069115; bh=oC1t+UYaLNpqZxWNL40d2ju+cg2BJkj94aJqKnpREfc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4CF426AC.6030507@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2029=20Nov=202010=2022:18:20=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.12)=20Gecko/20101027=20Thunderbird/3.1.6|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20Alexander=20Best=20|CC:=20Brandon=20 Gooch=20,=20=0D=0A=20bluethundr=20,=0D=0A=20freebsd-questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20ssh-agent=20and=20ssh-add=20on=20F reeBSD|References:=20=09=20<20101129190842.GA57956@freebsd.org>|In-Rep ly-To:=20<20101129190842.GA57956@freebsd.org>|X-Enigmail-Version:= 201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed= 3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-sign ature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigC91636D14D279260E9D8 1237"; b=oWsZjjszng/GCytDb8s0XGOcIDt+80ZGal4dPL3gPplptxS9YSON/vCYQu1punNqG e5wWmChUtcorGU0YbVxssonO11QXNAt6f5dGGXbcj4Oabze94g3wi2X4f2WS85e8pn o5EDlEsuXzLa5b4d2PnZ2gi5jVoygM5GGvPATF1c= Message-ID: <4CF426AC.6030507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:18:20 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Best References: <20101129190842.GA57956@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101129190842.GA57956@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC91636D14D279260E9D81237" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Brandon Gooch , bluethundr , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:18:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC91636D14D279260E9D81237 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/11/2010 19:08, Alexander Best wrote: >>> [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#ssh sum1 >>> > > Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': >>> > > [bluethundr@LBSD2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash > ^^ this looks wrong. i think you want eval `ssh-agent` so the envars ge= t set. > otherwise ssh-add won't know where to look for a running ssh-agent. Both forms are correct. "eval $(ssh-agent)" modifies the environment in the current shell so ssh-add can contact ssh-agent, whereas "ssh-agent bash" causes ssh-agent to run a copy of bash, which will it will pass down the appropriate environmental settings to. "exec" is just gravy, in that it replaces the current shell with the ssh-agent process, rather than leaving it lying around uselessly. For the OP: no good idea why the command isn't working for you. Try it without the exec and also try it adding '-d' to the ssh-agent flags to see if the debug output contains any clues. Be sure /tmp has the correct permissions (1777) and that the partition hasn't filled up, so running ssh-agent can create a directory containing the unix domain socket ssh-add uses to connect to the agent. As for installing keychain try: # cd /usr/ports/security/keychain # make all install clean or if you've installed it: # portmaster security/keychain Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC91636D14D279260E9D81237 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkz0JrQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw2TQCcDLP7/8J8Bl7G5CMbxGZLiwGX m20AnRI6IXYNf5+KqbH73sIRMlqk7p/O =vyHA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC91636D14D279260E9D81237-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 01:09:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CDF1065673 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominique.belougne@free.fr) Received: from ml.free.fr (ml-g19.proxad.net [212.27.60.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676658FC0A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml-g19 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ml.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DE8C27E1 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:47:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from ml-g19 by ml-g19 (LISTAR/0.42); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:47:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:47:02 +0100 (CET) From: Listar To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-listar-antiloop: ml-g19 Precedence: list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Expiry-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:47:02 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Listar command results: -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:09:20 -0000 Request received for list 'bnfrance' via request address. >> The original message was received at Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:44:56 -0800 Unknown command. >> from freebsd.org [172.144.236.172] Unknown command. >> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- Unknown command. >> Unknown command. >> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- Unknown command. >> ... while talking to host ml.free.fr.: Unknown command. >> >> DATA Unknown command. >> <<< 400-aturner; -RMS-E-CRE, ACP file create failed Unknown command. >> <<< 400 Unknown command. --- Gestionnaire de liste Listar/0.42 - fin de traitement/job execution complete. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 01:48:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311811065675 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [130.149.58.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3108FC19 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (localhost.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAU1m8W9097389; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:48:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: (from elon@localhost) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAU1m7NL097388; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:48:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:48:07 +0100 From: Leon =?iso-8859-15?Q?Me=DFner?= To: Adam McDougall Message-ID: <20101130014807.GC98014@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Mail-Followup-To: Adam McDougall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CF44E2E.4070700@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CF44E2E.4070700@egr.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:48:14 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare > minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers > (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd. > delivery is via procmail which doesn't touch the dovecot metadata and > webmail uses imapd. Client connections to imapd go to random servers > and I don't yet have solid means to keep certain users on certain > servers. I upgraded some of the servers to 8.x and dovecot 1.2 and ran > into Stale NFS file handles causing index/uidlist corruption causing > inboxes to appear as empty when they were not. In some situations their > corrupt index had to be deleted manually. I first suspected dovecot 1.2 > since it was upgraded at the same time but I downgraded to 1.1 and its > doing the same thing. I don't really have a wealth of details to go on > yet and I usually stay quiet until I do, and half the time it is > difficult to reproduce myself so I've had to put it in production to get > a feel for progress. This only happens a dozen or so times per weekday > but I feel the need to start taking bigger steps. I'll probably do what Does it depend on the size of the message? > I can to get IMAP back on a stable base (7.x?) and also try to debug 8.x > on the remaining servers. A binary search is within possibility if I > can reproduce the symptoms often enough even if I have to put a test > server in production for a few hours. > > Any tips on where we could start looking, or alterations I could try > making such as sysctls to return to older behavior? It might be worth there were some problems on nullfs mounted nfs shares (like in jails) and dovecot, as dovecot changed its location for temporary file creation to the user home. But IIRC the error message looked more like: http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg26856.html And are fixed in stable. Just a hint, Leon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 01:21:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF800106566B for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolaiw@embarqmail.com) Received: from mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com (mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com [208.47.184.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A5A8FC0C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:21:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=embarqmail.com; s=s012408; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@embarqmail.com; t=1291078862; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=6C0g14WgtGAn9s2U+2S9ygIFbSU=; b=o4emHtCx6sPQrSLVScSPryJ63tUAHyrPW3fd+REZm0t7OBy3UBZAqAuBp67E70Ge tc3VV0YKHPsbnHWKq9/C57lUysandS2gCbnYDNiLOh/2+/Dp1jMwd8JXm+5N7Kpj; X-BINDING: X-Spam-Rating: None X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=FqH+40RfSLtAcSobiNKava/YdBIhi/jpTtN5tLpAIDM= c=1 sm=0 a=yl_-HBv_Sf8A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=hMfcJUQc7LyOlU/nS9PWCQ==:17 a=fJ-_xL2aQg0CWnxEnusA:9 a=q-ecznzo3atvO6Ue23gA:7 a=nOnjHRUutXbk2d7n0lMx7ULgtIwA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=hMfcJUQc7LyOlU/nS9PWCQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=nikolaiw@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [76.4.108.154] ([76.4.108.154:25868] helo=[172.27.2.50]) by mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTPA id 6C/15-21955-ECC44FC4; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF44CCE.8030005@embarqmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:02 -0500 From: Nikolai Wendorf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:31:00 +0000 Cc: carmel_ny@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:21:04 -0000 All, I was getting exactly this same error following a fresh 8.1 load Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back the solution was explained in the gnome install FAQ - here is a clip - the devfs.conf changes fixed the problem. To figure out which CD/DVD drive you will be using, run the following command as root: # camcontrol devlist Your output will look similar to the following: at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) The devices in parentheses at the end are important. You must make sure the /dev entries for those devices are writable by the users that will be using brasero, totem, rhythmbox, or sound-juicer. In addition to those devices, /dev/xpt* must also be writable to your brasero, totem, rhythmbox, and sound-juicer users. The following /etc/devfs.conf configuration will achieve the desired results given the above devlist: perm cd0 0666 perm xpt0 0666 perm pass0 0666 Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 07:18:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5632106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EC18FC13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B004D2210E06 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:18:16 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1291101496; bh=wwbsN6VlRjWFy/doI7pfVtqiSKsFV2GQUaJMR/ZJqCs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZN2RJtnwM8IMX9osKEqGjuqnr8mNlnzQzdRpFHT0NjotIQ72m2QmUphRNL+Uhldd+ ThsPpO1kTaqBV83bkF5dtRwomINHJ2Siughy0hJL0qVJVH4bATdvE7RBAlUamh/dE2 S4gxlcDm6iNzVb0VHvxR1cKPs14PcBnAy2luJtoI= Received: from kes.in (unknown [77.93.42.18]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPA id 7B74B13E80A6 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:18:16 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:18:36 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: snmp cpu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:18:18 -0000 Hi, reading this: http://old.nabble.com/Measuring-CPU-usage-via-SNMP-td23392403.html >So fetching the matching >ssCpuRaw* oids and totaling them up should always equal 100% cpu. but when I fetch cpurawidle it is about 100, system 25 totalling give me 125. What wrong I do? -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Êîíüêîâ mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 07:26:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABD01065672 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.real.david.allen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECAC8FC15 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so2697128yxh.13 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:26:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qxFuFEmi3ZwnRQ4spNUiABcgev4WUbh33+q3LDxQUUY=; b=GzFhJyBvwxBhY99NdXgNWWzAhDGWmWmzsy/rTinS70TlIhNCkxrSqb3AULzmn/KDg/ afT/IppMycEcz3whCgXLhZgm79Jrlw9ZQlXNBOyyDNFDTHMwSS8mg+LdO9I+vRKKxyiY I6hDr4Ei/rfkm2uC/WjnbcF/XHerylrMoH04Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WJzA+7wg6/NmYiplJGrnMEhEXHB76AlFnaoK8dX8juHs/xdskwQ5DAV05lIVZqycqV prx3ijlWqHTFHjEOSGUUgw4kLkk7hJCbMGYPLyrB/KiB4KScx/lHCv4kQkvbvJ7eSeGI a4WtOL6GfH5bV5AmkjrNqRf9a6eZZFUyizY/Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.154.72 with SMTP id p8mr2003815icw.59.1291100489121; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.228.72 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:01:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:01:28 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Allen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: PHP Command Line X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:26:02 -0000 I'm new to PHP, and I'm trying to make use of the interactive commandline, but I'm finding 'php -a' isn't working. More specifically, no 'php>' prompt, no output, nada. I've found comments on the intarwebs making mention of the need for readline support, but past that, I'm at a loss. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 10:36:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0811065679 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:36:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BE38FC26 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP81 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:24:28 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [71.77.39.64] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([71.77.39.64]) by BLU0-SMTP81.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:24:27 -0800 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA95FE54824 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:24:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:24:25 -0500 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <4CF44CCE.8030005@embarqmail.com> References: <4CF44CCE.8030005@embarqmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2010 10:24:27.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[C42BC830:01CB9078] Subject: Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:36:30 -0000 On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:02 -0500 Nikolai Wendorf articulated: > All, > > I was getting exactly this same error following a fresh 8.1 load > > Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL > REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 Sep 25 > 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status > Error Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: > Check Condition Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI > sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) Sep 25 > 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back > > the solution was explained in the gnome install FAQ - here is a clip > - the devfs.conf changes fixed the problem. > > To figure out which CD/DVD drive you will be using, run the following > command as root: > > # camcontrol devlist > > > Your output will look similar to the following: > > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) > > > The devices in parentheses at the end are important. You must make > sure the /dev entries for those devices are writable by the users > that will be using brasero, totem, rhythmbox, or sound-juicer. In > addition to those devices, /dev/xpt* must also be writable to your > brasero, totem, rhythmbox, and sound-juicer users. The > following /etc/devfs.conf configuration will achieve the desired > results given the above devlist: > > perm cd0 0666 > perm xpt0 0666 > perm pass0 0666 I made those modifications a long time ago without success. # camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,cd0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 1 (pass2,da1) at scbus2 target 0 lun 2 (pass3,da2) at scbus2 target 0 lun 3 (pass4,da3) # cat /etc/devfs.conf perm cd0 0666 perm acd0 0666 perm xpt0 0666 perm pass0 0666 perm pass1 0666 perm pass2 0666 perm pass3 0666 perm pass4 0666 -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. __________________________________________________________________ To err is human, but when the eraser wears out before the pencil, you're overdoing it a little. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 11:24:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEEB1065673 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E53B8FC16 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAUBOaIA061479; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:24:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4CF4DEF4.6080905@bah.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:24:36 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101117 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <4CF44CCE.8030005@embarqmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:41 -0000 2010-11-30 11:24, Carmel skrev: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:02 -0500 > Nikolai Wendorf articulated: One can not play audio-cd on freebsd without root access. No matter what you put in devfs* Tried it since freebsd4* >> All, >> >> I was getting exactly this same error following a fresh 8.1 load >> >> Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL >> REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 Sep 25 >> 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status >> Error Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: >> Check Condition Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI >> sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) Sep 25 >> 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back >> >> the solution was explained in the gnome install FAQ - here is a clip >> - the devfs.conf changes fixed the problem. >> >> To figure out which CD/DVD drive you will be using, run the following >> command as root: >> >> # camcontrol devlist >> >> >> Your output will look similar to the following: >> >> at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) >> >> >> The devices in parentheses at the end are important. You must make >> sure the /dev entries for those devices are writable by the users >> that will be using brasero, totem, rhythmbox, or sound-juicer. In >> addition to those devices, /dev/xpt* must also be writable to your >> brasero, totem, rhythmbox, and sound-juicer users. The >> following /etc/devfs.conf configuration will achieve the desired >> results given the above devlist: >> >> perm cd0 0666 >> perm xpt0 0666 >> perm pass0 0666 > > I made those modifications a long time ago without success. > > # camcontrol devlist > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,cd0) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 1 (pass2,da1) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 2 (pass3,da2) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 3 (pass4,da3) > > # cat /etc/devfs.conf > > > > perm cd0 0666 > perm acd0 0666 > perm xpt0 0666 > perm pass0 0666 > perm pass1 0666 > perm pass2 0666 > perm pass3 0666 > perm pass4 0666 > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 12:03:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E291E1065679 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBCB8FC25 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNOvX-0007Qb-0F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:03:19 +0100 Received: from 87.242.97.5 ([87.242.97.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:03:18 +0100 Received: from citrin by 87.242.97.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:03:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Anton Yuzhaninov Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Vega Lines: 12 Sender: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.242.97.5 X-Comment-To: David Allen User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT (i386)) Subject: Re: PHP Command Line X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:03:21 -0000 On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:01:28 -0800, David Allen wrote: DA> I'm new to PHP, and I'm trying to make use of the interactive commandline, DA> but I'm finding 'php -a' isn't working. More specifically, no 'php>' DA> prompt, no output, nada. If you need prompt, try to install realine extension from /usr/ports/lang/php52-extensions (if php52 is used). -- WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 12:33:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CFA106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038A98FC17 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A351D994; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oAUCXheS001436; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Bernt Hansson Message-Id: <20101130133343.4f9502f9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CF4DEF4.6080905@bah.homeip.net> References: <4CF44CCE.8030005@embarqmail.com> <4CF4DEF4.6080905@bah.homeip.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carmel , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:33:46 -0000 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:24:36 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: > One can not play audio-cd on freebsd without root access. > No matter what you put in devfs* Tried it since freebsd4* Not fully true. Maybe the statement ist right along with the mentioning of "on modern systems" - where "modern" deserves an additional set of quotes. :-) I've been playing audio CDs regularly on FreeBSD 4 and 5, but I was lucky to have a sound card and a wired internal audio connector for my drive(s). The command % cdcontrol play 1 for example sets the CD drive to "play" state, and the audio signal was available at the front connector (often not present anymore on today's drives), as well as on the rear connector connected to the foot bone, the foot bone connected to the sound card, and the sound card connected to the amp system. :-) I'm sad, REALLY sad to see more and more simple things stopping working... Giving *others* write access (o+w) to sensitive system devices may not be a good idea in every setting. For the "old fashioned" solution, this was not needed: The user went to the operator ground, and g+w. Done. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 13:10:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730EC1065673 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8A08FC16 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PNPyG-00048u-6g>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:10:12 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PNPyG-0001yp-1v>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:10:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF4F7BD.6050701@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:10:21 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: subversion authentication via SASL2 using a OpenLDAP backend X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:10:13 -0000 Hello. I just try to authenticate users of our subversion repository via sasl2 against a running OpenLDAP backend (all services running on FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/8.1 and 7.3). After setting up a config file /usr/local/etc/sasl2/svn.conf containing the following: pwcheck_method: auxprop auxprop_plugin: ldap ldapdb_uri: ldap://ldap.host ldapdb_mech: PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 ANONYMOUS EXTERNAL CRAM-MD5 OTP #ldapdb_rc: /usr/local/etc/sasl2/ldaprc ldapdb_startls: yes log_level: 7 and a proper olcAuthzRegexp in the cn=config container of OpenLDAP like uid=([^,]*),cn=realm,cn=plain,cn=auth uid=$1,ou=users,dc=domain,dc=foo I never see any attempt of subversion connecting to the OpenLDAP server via sasl2. I can not even proff whether my setups in the LDAP are correct or not, since the subversion try of autheticate seems to run into nowhere. After several tries of importing something (I assume having set up properly svnserv.conf and authz in the subversion repos for this specific case) I receive this message on the console: svn: Authentication error from server: SASL(-13): user not found: no secret in database svn: Your commit message was left in a temporary file: Besides, I already installed the port /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2-ldapdb but it does not help. Can anybody give a hint or tip? Thanks in advance, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 15:10:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE5B1065672 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BD18FC18 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so2858588eyb.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:10:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NbjZ4OHDtJG/SX4XtO5EjfTolK49qbPFgupSD72tesY=; b=vTsd63Jb+41Z+YRzpHeyjvyTc8aBFBfiZmlwbtnuz5vUE5/81Hn5QhkQu0U5FaFQPF mNgtjGsYQQegwN5j/NdzZYUE5W0R99z4u5x5UV4vuJCuRVYi0OgPtbSI4k7pcQqfcCRN zv30y9hB93DRqA4TV4KMekmsO8ogQK7Fc6VOM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sYMts2UGbPFEXyWA1GqeQD/ln2QsBHjR3Z0Bjo+iaR6UujbzgdkrwHdJt3f/rkTa2I ujItpdzB73fnqBKKXsovm6HBRLKopAl7YlhfwEhoZMMHEyIxEFUa/FmAFPXIB6LHV8pz zYRYsDEa5HylmdpqwszNXj/x6nbazupedbCEY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.66 with SMTP id q44mr6625755wed.44.1291129818318; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:10:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.37.132 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:10:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101130014807.GC98014@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> References: <4CF44E2E.4070700@egr.msu.edu> <20101130014807.GC98014@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:10:18 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Adam McDougall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:10:20 -0000 On 30 November 2010 01:48, Leon Me=DFner wro= te: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > > I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare > > minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers > > (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd. > > delivery is via procmail which doesn't touch the dovecot metadata and > > webmail uses imapd. Client connections to imapd go to random servers > > and I don't yet have solid means to keep certain users on certain > > servers. I upgraded some of the servers to 8.x and dovecot 1.2 and ran > > into Stale NFS file handles causing index/uidlist corruption causing > > inboxes to appear as empty when they were not. In some situations thei= r > > corrupt index had to be deleted manually. I first suspected dovecot 1.= 2 > > since it was upgraded at the same time but I downgraded to 1.1 and its > > doing the same thing. I don't really have a wealth of details to go on > > yet and I usually stay quiet until I do, and half the time it is > > difficult to reproduce myself so I've had to put it in production to ge= t > > a feel for progress. This only happens a dozen or so times per weekday > > but I feel the need to start taking bigger steps. I'll probably do wha= t > > Does it depend on the size of the message? > > > I can to get IMAP back on a stable base (7.x?) and also try to debug 8.= x > > on the remaining servers. A binary search is within possibility if I > > can reproduce the symptoms often enough even if I have to put a test > > server in production for a few hours. > > > > Any tips on where we could start looking, or alterations I could try > > making such as sysctls to return to older behavior? It might be worth > > there were some problems on nullfs mounted nfs shares (like in jails) > and dovecot, as dovecot changed its location for temporary file creation > to the user home. But IIRC the error message looked more like: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg26856.html > And are fixed in stable. > > Just a hint, > Leon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > im seeing similar issues on a large mail platform with netapp and dovecot o= n freebsd 8.1 as well. The problems existed in 7.x as well though. Basically the NFS mount just locks up. I've not managed to pin point it yet but one thing im certain of its a client os issue rather than the filer. This is because only one node out fo the 16 will lock at any time on that particula= r nfs mount. Strangely as well if I remount the dead nfs share on say /mnt on the affected node, it works fine. I'm convinced its some kind of locking issue. I have dtrace (WITH_CTF=3D1) in the kernel, so will have a poke around with that and see if I can see anything interesting. Can anyone recommend anything here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 16:41:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA43A106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gorgarath@xsmail.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28688FC27 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5F75A7 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from oldweb1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.31]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:30 -0500 Received: by oldweb1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id CCA8B1FCEBC; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:30 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1291134270.25788.1407903171@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: ZYT4KYR+4BlhDLt1FYIixMKyD5lWwFKNLpc6b1cqaM3W 1291134270 From: "John D McDonnell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:30 -0500 Subject: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:41:27 -0000 I appologize as I know that this has to have been discussed before, but my Google-foo is failing me. I currently subscribe to a few FreeBSD mailing lists using my work e-mail account (handy for archiving important mailing list messages) which is hosted on MS Exchange (connecting with Outlook) and I'm under the impression that some settings can be configured on the Exchange server that will allow me to be able to post to the mailing lists from that account instead of this one. Currently all e-mail I send from my work account to the lists bounces back. I thought I had seen instructions for making Exchange play nice and send proper messages to the mailing list, but I am unable to find them now, if I ever did indeed see them, this is MS and quite possible it simply won't play nice. Outlook is also configured to do text only e-mail, so I think I can rule out it being an Outlook issue. I have no issues with the FreeRADIUS mailing list, but I'm assuming they're more lax in what type of mail can be submitted. If anyone can tell me what settings need changed on the Exchange server (or in Outlook if it is indeed an Outlook problem) please let me know. If it is impossible to get Exchange to play nice with the FreeBSD mailing lists, please also let me know so I can give up on trying to get it to work. Thank you, John McDonnell -- John D. McDonnell gorgarath@xsmail.com http://www.gorgarath.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 17:06:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4BE106566C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timur@bat.ru) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457648FC14 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so3009611ywp.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.53.11 with SMTP id b11mr5471919ana.37.1291135133559; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:38:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.110.7 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:38:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <30282675.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <30252640.post@talk.nabble.com> <30282675.post@talk.nabble.com> From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:38:31 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ivo Karabojkov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD samba+winbind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:06:04 -0000 Hi, Ivo! Just a wild guess - could it be the result of moving lockdir in Samba3.5 port from /var/db/samba34 back to /var/db/samba ? Can you check, that, by renaming appropriate directory? Regards, Timur. On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ivo Karabojkov wrote: > > Perhaps I couldn't get any attention with my problem or I couldn't explain it > in enough details. > As you probably read, IDMapping works OK. It seems that my problem occurs in > nsswitch. In my /etc/nsswitch.conf I have: > > group: files winbind > #group_compat: nis > hosts: files dns > networks: files > passwd: files winbind > #passwd_compat: nis > shells: files > services: compat > services_compat: nis > protocols: files > rpc: files > > wbinfo -u / -g / -i DOMAIN_user works OK. > Name service switch works almost OK, since system utilities like id, pw > /usershow/, chown, ls resolve domain usernames <-> IDMapped UIDs OK. > But getent passwd and getent group return only local (system) users /groups. > Any clue how to make this work too? > > > > Ivo Karabojkov wrote: >> >> Dear Sirs, >> >> I am having troubles with IDMapping users from Server 2003 AD to my >> FreeBSD 8.1 Samba 3.5. >> Well, most of Samba documentation should be considered outdated, I had >> total failure with RID backend for IDMap. The only working (so far) for me >> is the default: tdb. >> I have set nsswitch.conf, pam.d and so on correctly. >> >> And here is my problem: everything works almost fine, wbinfo shows my >> domain accounts, I am able to set these accounts and groups as owners of >> files. Commands like ls, chown, id show AD accounts correctly. >> pw, getent - show only local system accounts. >> I need Samba only for file sharing with ACLs, no PAM authentication or >> something more. So, technically, it works but since I can't see ALL >> accounts with getent I think something is wrong. >> >> IDMapped accounts are with uid and gid > 10000 >> >> I think I am missing something very small and simple, so I hope someone >> will help me! >> Thanks in advance, >> Ivo >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-samba%2Bwinbind-tp30252640p30282675.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 17:23:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC86A1065672 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856A78FC14 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAUHNc1I034481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:23:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAUHNcJp096763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:23:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAUHNcGM096762; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:23:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:23:38 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: kes-kes@yandex.ru Message-ID: <20101130172338.GJ58734@dan.emsphone.com> References: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:23:38 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: snmp cpu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:23:40 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 30): > Hi, > reading this: > http://old.nabble.com/Measuring-CPU-usage-via-SNMP-td23392403.html > > > So fetching the matching ssCpuRaw* oids and totaling them up should > > always equal 100% cpu. > > but when I fetch cpurawidle it is about 100, system 25 > totalling give me 125. What wrong I do? Hey! I recognize that post :) Note that ssCpuRawSystem is a synthetic value that net-snmp generates by adding ssCpuRawKernel and ssCpuRawInterrupt. If you are doing the totalling yourself, you should ignore it, or you'll be counting kernel time twice. In case anyone else reading is unclear: Totalling the raw values always gives 100% cpu, but the units aren't percent; they're ticks. You may get a different total on different machines, depending on Hz and the number of CPUs. If you want to graph the values as percentages, you'll need to record the previous values for each variable, then sum the differences to get the total number of ticks for your sampling period. Then divide each variable's difference by that total to get a percentage. Raw values on my machine using a ~ 5-second sampling period: User Nice Idle Kernel Interrupt 14993233 67689938 1943767096 171721693 11277468 14993237 67690250 1943768892 171722224 11277487 14993246 67690357 1943770991 171722649 11277495 Deltas: 4 312 1796 531 19 Total: 2662 9 107 2099 425 8 Total: 2648 Percent: 0.2 11.7 67.5 19.9 0.7 0.3 4.0 79.3 16.0 0.3 -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 17:46:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29ACF106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3158FC14 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so3046029gwj.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.133.20 with SMTP id g20mr3525848ybd.146.1291139197087; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:46:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm4178168yba.15.2010.11.30.09.46.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6C2AE54824 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:46:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:46:27 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101130124627.45ee9292@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <1291134270.25788.1407903171@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1291134270.25788.1407903171@webmail.messagingengine.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:46:39 -0000 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:24:30 -0500 John D McDonnell articulated: > I currently subscribe to a few FreeBSD mailing lists using my work > e-mail account (handy for archiving important mailing list messages) > which is hosted on MS Exchange (connecting with Outlook) and I'm under > the impression that some settings can be configured on the Exchange > server that will allow me to be able to post to the mailing lists from > that account instead of this one. Currently all e-mail I send from my > work account to the lists bounces back. Please post the bounce message. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 17:48:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2738C10656A6 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout030.mac.com (asmtpout030.mac.com [17.148.16.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB6E8FC16 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:37 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCP00K4TLGBFV60@asmtp030.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:48:12 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011300100 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-30_09:2010-11-30, 2010-11-30, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <1291134270.25788.1407903171@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:48:11 -0800 Message-id: References: <1291134270.25788.1407903171@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: John D McDonnell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:14:34 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:38 -0000 On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:24 AM, John D McDonnell wrote: [ ... ] > Currently all e-mail I send from my work account to the lists bounces back. OK. You should either discuss the bounce message with postmaster@ your domain and/or , or post it here.... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 18:54:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36F5106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFD48FC16 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNW8M-0007Z7-CP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:45:03 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:54:33 -0800 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:54:33 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: vbox@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101130185433.GB24772@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: vbox@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Cc: Subject: virtualbox-ose port broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:54:40 -0000 --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As of this morning's portsnap (Tue Nov 30 10:35:59 PST 2010), virtualbox-ose no longer builds: # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose && make install clean 2>&1 | tail = -n 25 kBuild: Adjusting BCC Assembly PcBiosBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-= ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/PcBiosBin/romb= ios0.s kBuild: Compiling VgaBiosBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Vir= tualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/VgaBiosBin/_vgabios_.c kBuild: Linking VgaDefBiosLogo kBuild: Compiling EfiThunkBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Vi= rtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/EfiThunkBin/EfiThunkBin.c kBuild: iasl DevicesR3 - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBo= x-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox/Dev= ices/PC/vbox.dsl 736: Name (_CID, "smc-napa") Error 4001 - = String must be entirely alphanumeric ^ (smc-n= apa) ASL Input: /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/= src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl - 1305 lines, 46193 bytes, 288 keywords Compilation complete. 1 Errors, 0 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 404 Optimizations kmk[2]: *** [/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE= /out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxaml.hex] Error 255 kmk[2]: *** Deleting file `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Virtual= Box-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxaml.hex' kmk[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... kmk[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Virtual= Box-3.2.10_OSE' kmk[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Virtua= lBox-3.2.10_OSE' kmk[2]: *** Exiting with status 2 kmk[1]: *** [pass_libraries_this] Error 2 kmk[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Virtual= Box-3.2.10_OSE' kmk: *** [pass_libraries_order] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose. # uname -a FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PREREL= EASE #107: Mon Nov 29 11:31:29 PST 2010 sterling@libertas.local.camdens= oftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIBERTAS amd64 All other ports are up to date. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM9UhpAAoJEIpckszW26+RtDsIAMN2Lka97J5a5fT6lcciuOLR egcTVJwQPK8P+vwQiU4sXbOSG+MvYj9hDxZSo6DxD0jySZKL4eRHvO/QsXJSoU+g vkWW9EgUJnI7W5NH8i5NFfYAR7UH9EVM1WkKj6OIbqzuH6ndkMwYCIYdFVQ/vwF5 O6NR88QVPout1FDNU4LLQJIThC8+cKd23HgjHUECUzfzheo2t124pWrBlHpvuLRu /EnY8eZ/im7JNgyonYaHc54DupT195vavU1Kb0nUyYeLbEjX9cl9QqJA48sG0sb1 If6ocCdBGxdmj23sC+HI938PKW6YaHiRj+LXECfC7Ddfss+PmChaprK2kk/kIDE= =GSBz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 19:17:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FEB106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gorgarath@xsmail.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E07B8FC08 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88BB1DC for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:17:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from oldweb1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.31]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:17:03 -0500 Received: by oldweb1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id CA85C1FC3D1; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:17:03 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: ODXUtoIhFgR1zRYlHy9AceKsoXNjHcuvs2K79ILVVFFK 1291144623 From: "John D McDonnell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:17:03 -0500 Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:17:04 -0000 Sorry if this is a repost, had an error when sending the original e-mail and after waiting a bit, I haven't seen the message show up on Questions, so I'm guessing it didn't go through. In regards to contacting postmaster@pcam.org, that would be either me or my boss, neither of which is very knowledgeable of Exchange, though I somewhat know my way around sendmail. I pulled this from our e-mail archiver (the last test message I sent was in Oct, I mostly just read the lists): From: Microsoft Exchange To: John McDonnell Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:54:21 -0400 Subject: Undeliverable: Testing... Thread-Topic: Testing... Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lgBkkXt6 Message-ID: References: <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.local> In-Reply-To: <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 05 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: exchange.pcam.local X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-organization-originalsize: 5669 x-ms-exchange-organization-recipient-limit-verified: True x-ms-exchange-organization-dsn-version: 12 Content-Type: multipart/report; boundary="_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_"; report-type=delivery-status MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_" --_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists: freebsd-test@freebsd.org Microsoft Exchange has been trying to deliver this message without success = and has stopped trying. Please try sending this message again, or provide t= he following diagnostic text to your system administrator. ________________________________ Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: exchange.pcam.local freebsd-test@freebsd.org #550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired ## Original message headers: Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:47 -0400 From: John McDonnell To: "freebsd-test@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0400 Subject: Testing... Thread-Topic: Testing... Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lg=3D=3D Message-ID: <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.loc= al> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 --_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Delivery has failed= to these recipients or distribution lists:

freebsd-test@freebsd.org
Microsoft Exchange has been trying to deliver this message without success = and has stopped trying. Please try sending this message again, or provide t= he following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Ex= change Server 2007





Diagnostic informa= tion for administrators:

Generating server: exchange.pcam.local

freebsd-test@freebsd.org
#550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired ##

Original message headers:

Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by
exchange.pcam.loc=
al
 ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:47 -0400
From: John McDonnell <mcdonnjd@pcam.org>
To: "freebsd-test@freebsd.org"
<freebsd-test@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0400
Subject: Testing...
Thread-Topic: Testing...
Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lg=3D=3D
Message-ID:
<5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.=
local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
= --_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_-- --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; exchange.pcam.local Final-recipient: RFC822; freebsd-test@freebsd.org Action: failed Status: 4.4.7 X-Supplementary-Info: < #4.4.7 smtp;550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired> --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:47 -0400 From: John McDonnell To: "freebsd-test@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0400 Subject: Testing... Thread-Topic: Testing... Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lg== Message-ID: <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 This is obviously a test. ^_^ -- John D McDonnell Penn Cambria School District mcdonnjd@pcam.org O< ASCII Ribbon Campain - http://www.asciiribbon.org/ --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_-- -- John D. McDonnell gorgarath@xsmail.com http://www.gorgarath.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 19:27:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE91C1065672 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout027.mac.com (asmtpout027.mac.com [17.148.16.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4D48FC12 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:27:33 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCP0015KQ1VPA60@asmtp027.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:27:33 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-30_10:2010-11-30, 2010-11-30, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011300113 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:27:31 -0800 Message-id: <0EFC4E88-1986-4DCB-B86E-9E89F1D9DC5F@mac.com> References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: John D McDonnell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:27:33 -0000 On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:17 AM, John D McDonnell wrote: > In regards to contacting postmaster@pcam.org, that would be either me or > my boss, neither of which is very knowledgeable of Exchange, though I > somewhat know my way around sendmail. There's no signs of an error message resulting from Exchange actually talking to a MX server for freebsd.org, just a queue timeout on your side. I'd guess that your Exchange server is broken somehow, perhaps from your ISP blocking port 25, but there isn't enough useful information for that to even be more than a guess. If you know sendmail, for testing purpose set that up and have Exchange relay external email via your copy of sendmail. At least that would provide some sort of useful logging or a DSN... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 19:28:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A25A106567A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9392E8FC13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from overdrive.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67590F7449; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:28:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:28:12 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "John D McDonnell" Message-Id: <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:28:15 -0000 In response to "John D McDonnell" : > Sorry if this is a repost, had an error when sending the original e-mail > and after waiting a bit, I haven't seen the message show up on > Questions, so I'm guessing it didn't go through. > > In regards to contacting postmaster@pcam.org, that would be either me or > my boss, neither of which is very knowledgeable of Exchange, though I > somewhat know my way around sendmail. > > I pulled this from our e-mail archiver (the last test message I sent was > in Oct, I mostly just read the lists): That is some of the most useless diagnostics I've seen in a while -- kudos to Microsoft for continuing to be worthless. However, giving a (somewhat wild) guess, I would first see if Exchange is actually stupid enough to use exchange.pcam.local as its HELO name in the SMTP dialog. This is obviously not a valid DNS name and would trigger a lot of spam systems to reject the email (mine, in particular, would) > > From: Microsoft Exchange > > To: John McDonnell > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:54:21 -0400 > Subject: Undeliverable: Testing... > Thread-Topic: Testing... > Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lgBkkXt6 > Message-ID: > References: > <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.local> > In-Reply-To: > <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.local> > Accept-Language: en-US > Content-Language: en-US > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 05 > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: exchange.pcam.local > X-MS-Has-Attach: yes > X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > x-ms-exchange-organization-originalsize: 5669 > x-ms-exchange-organization-recipient-limit-verified: True > x-ms-exchange-organization-dsn-version: 12 > Content-Type: multipart/report; > boundary="_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_"; > report-type=delivery-status > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_" > > --_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists: > > freebsd-test@freebsd.org > Microsoft Exchange has been trying to deliver this message without > success = > and has stopped trying. Please try sending this message again, or > provide t= > he following diagnostic text to your system administrator. > > ________________________________ > Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 > > > > > > > Diagnostic information for administrators: > > Generating server: exchange.pcam.local > > freebsd-test@freebsd.org > #550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired ## > > Original message headers: > > Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by exchange.pcam.local > ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:47 -0400 > From: John McDonnell > To: "freebsd-test@freebsd.org" > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0400 > Subject: Testing... > Thread-Topic: Testing... > Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lg=3D=3D > Message-ID: > <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.loc= > al> > Accept-Language: en-US > Content-Language: en-US > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > acceptlanguage: en-US > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > --_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ > Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > >

Delivery has > failed= > to these recipients or distribution lists:

>

href=3D"mailto:fre= > ebsd-test@freebsd.org">freebsd-test@freebsd.org
> Microsoft Exchange has been trying to deliver this message without > success = > and has stopped trying. Please try sending this message again, or > provide t= > he following diagnostic text to your system administrator.

> >
Sent by Microsoft > Ex= > change Server 2007 >





>

Diagnostic > informa= > tion for administrators:

>

Generating server: exchange.pcam.local

>

freebsd-test@freebsd.org
> #550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired ##

>

Original message headers:

> 
Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by
> exchange.pcam.loc=
> al
>  ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:47 -0400
> From: John McDonnell <mcdonnjd@pcam.org>
> To: "freebsd-test@freebsd.org"
> <freebsd-test@freebsd.org>
> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0400
> Subject: Testing...
> Thread-Topic: Testing...
> Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lg=3D=3D
> Message-ID:
> <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.=
> local>
> Accept-Language: en-US
> Content-Language: en-US
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> acceptlanguage: en-US
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> > > = > > --_002_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_-- > > --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > Reporting-MTA: dns; exchange.pcam.local > > Final-recipient: RFC822; freebsd-test@freebsd.org > Action: failed > Status: 4.4.7 > X-Supplementary-Info: < #4.4.7 smtp;550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message > expired> > > > --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_ > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > > Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by exchange.pcam.local > ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:47 -0400 > From: John McDonnell > To: "freebsd-test@freebsd.org" > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0400 > Subject: Testing... > Thread-Topic: Testing... > Thread-Index: Act0XPK0+2s6XIazSNy5B+gk+G1+lg== > Message-ID: > <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719135D07@exchange.pcam.local> > Accept-Language: en-US > Content-Language: en-US > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > acceptlanguage: en-US > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > This is obviously a test. ^_^ > > -- > John D McDonnell > Penn Cambria School District > mcdonnjd@pcam.org > O< ASCII Ribbon Campain - http://www.asciiribbon.org/ > > > > --_000_ad4cb5ac5ee0456dba74dcc66ea52ac9_-- > > -- > John D. McDonnell > gorgarath@xsmail.com > http://www.gorgarath.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 19:34:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFF31065670 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (smtprelay-h21.telenor.se [195.54.99.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2888FC13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (ipb1.telenor.se [195.54.127.164]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D23C143F9 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:15:46 +0100 (CET) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.7.221] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsWAHvc9ExV4QfdPGdsb2JhbAAHiBiMbI4XAQEBATXEZ4VHBIpi X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,281,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="155597656" Received: from c-dd07e155.166-7-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO [172.25.0.40]) ([85.225.7.221]) by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2010 20:15:33 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:15:32 +0100 Message-Id: <8FB835EA-1688-4E0A-B45F-335084F78D79@pean.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Splitting hw raid mirror. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:34:25 -0000 Hi, Im running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE (FreeBSD hostname 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #1: Tue Dec 1 = 16:10:08 CET 2009 peter@hostname:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64) and have a MTP-raidcard with a configured mirror.=20 mpt0 Adapter: Board Name: SAS3041E Board Assembly: L3-01101-04F Chip Name: C1064E Chip Revision: UNUSED RAID Levels: RAID0, RAID1, RAID1E RAID0 Stripes: 64K RAID1E Stripes: 64K RAID0 Drives/Vol: 2-10 RAID1 Drives/Vol: 2 RAID1E Drives/Vol: 3-10 Now I want to split this mirror into standalone drives but I dont know = if its possible. Since Im using zfs anyway it seems better to let zfs take care of the mirroring giving = it the possibility to self heal and so on. and of course ease of administration. When consulting the manual i see this: clear Delete the entire configuration including all volumes and = spares. All drives will become standalone drives. and=20 delete volume Delete the volume volume. Member drives will become = standalone drives. IF! what this does is just leave da0 as one of the disks and makes the = other disk in the mirror available to the operating system as da1 then everything should be fine. = But I cant take the risk if everything goes boom. :D Is there anyone that has any experience in this situation? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 19:54:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45162106566C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dak.col@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F165D8FC19 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so3129716gyf.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:54:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aKwEk3SQr7l1FxAFTF89Dqr1kjbY8A9EQZYCMKo6WHg=; b=F+uKyswjQ2rLqoy17uVcs5B4qsV12c+mYLFMsG/evcAgUvDUg7km1ECIaaoPHPP2EB e6cwb2yfV4TkTQTQSYXHfZXshwfXO31tLKeZ3FwsrgX0S5IlBGfd7GegwdtUxM64IBUQ UhxnpwZo7xo9Dz0DZNzQApdVC2ws5A2bm4aX8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=AFzzPv00LE44ap55yvM+q9QfNZzWp7CJlwAc5btOLn4YJFBKfkD509SGjufLybH1s3 5oKTeW2ACAWr8/lPy8N3nCcIXbueSLDJBnriwCkpbnJkemcQD7FDlkeOcqy1Zgqs40RA quycJtUHGceDujTuW0iBrlcPgRBWkjI7eNMZc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.116.74 with SMTP id l10mr7420383bkq.113.1291146844323; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.127.149 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:54:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:54:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: Diego Arias To: Bill Moran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: John D McDonnell , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:54:07 -0000 On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to "John D McDonnell" : > > > Sorry if this is a repost, had an error when sending the original e-mail > > and after waiting a bit, I haven't seen the message show up on > > Questions, so I'm guessing it didn't go through. > > > > In regards to contacting postmaster@pcam.org, that would be either me or > > my boss, neither of which is very knowledgeable of Exchange, though I > > somewhat know my way around sendmail. > > > > I pulled this from our e-mail archiver (the last test message I sent was > > in Oct, I mostly just read the lists): > > That is some of the most useless diagnostics I've seen in a while -- kudos > to Microsoft for continuing to be worthless. > > However, giving a (somewhat wild) guess, I would first see if Exchange is > actually stupid enough to use exchange.pcam.local as its HELO name in > the SMTP dialog. This is obviously not a valid DNS name and would trigger > a lot of spam systems to reject the email (mine, in particular, would) > You can customize the out-going header. Try this: Send a message and check the queue viewer on exchange to check if the queue its getting some kind of error message. -- Still Going Strong!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:13:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ABD10656A4 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from marvin.chruetertee.ch (marvin.chruetertee.ch [217.150.245.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969968FC21 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from daedalus.network.local (216-49.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.49.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by marvin.chruetertee.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAUJgFfI020597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:42:16 GMT (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4CF5539F.1020402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:42:23 +0100 From: Beat Gaetzi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101028 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sterling@camdensoftware.com References: <20101130185433.GB24772@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <20101130185433.GB24772@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vbox@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: virtualbox-ose port broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:13:36 -0000 On 30.11.2010 19:54, Chip Camden wrote: > As of this morning's portsnap (Tue Nov 30 10:35:59 PST 2010), > virtualbox-ose no longer builds: > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose && make install clean 2>&1 | tail -n 25 > kBuild: Adjusting BCC Assembly PcBiosBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/PcBiosBin/rombios0.s > kBuild: Compiling VgaBiosBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/VgaBiosBin/_vgabios_.c > kBuild: Linking VgaDefBiosLogo > kBuild: Compiling EfiThunkBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/EfiThunkBin/EfiThunkBin.c > kBuild: iasl DevicesR3 - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl 736: Name (_CID, "smc-napa") > Error 4001 - String must be entirely alphanumeric ^ (smc-napa) > > ASL Input: /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl - 1305 lines, 46193 bytes, 288 keywords > Compilation complete. 1 Errors, 0 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 404 Optimizations > kmk[2]: *** [/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxaml.hex] Error 255 > kmk[2]: *** Deleting file `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxaml.hex' > kmk[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > kmk[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE' > kmk[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE' > kmk[2]: *** Exiting with status 2 > kmk[1]: *** [pass_libraries_this] Error 2 > kmk[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE' > kmk: *** [pass_libraries_order] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose. Could you please try this patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152710 Beat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:17:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05670106566C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC558FC0C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNXQZ-0007HD-Ek for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:07:56 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:17:27 -0800 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:17:27 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101130201726.GC24772@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20101130185433.GB24772@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <4CF5539F.1020402@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sHrvAb52M6C8blB9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CF5539F.1020402@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Cc: Subject: Re: virtualbox-ose port broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:17:33 -0000 --sHrvAb52M6C8blB9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Beat Gaetzi on Tuesday, 30 November 2010: > On 30.11.2010 19:54, Chip Camden wrote: > > As of this morning's portsnap (Tue Nov 30 10:35:59 PST 2010), > > virtualbox-ose no longer builds: > >=20 > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose && make install clean 2>&1 | t= ail -n 25 > > kBuild: Adjusting BCC Assembly PcBiosBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtual= box-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/PcBiosBin/= rombios0.s > > kBuild: Compiling VgaBiosBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work= /VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/VgaBiosBin/_vgabios_.c > > kBuild: Linking VgaDefBiosLogo > > kBuild: Compiling EfiThunkBin - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/wor= k/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/EfiThunkBin/EfiThunkB= in.c > > kBuild: iasl DevicesR3 - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Virtu= alBox-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl > > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_OSE/src/VBox= /Devices/PC/vbox.dsl 736: Name (_CID, "smc-napa") > > Error 4001 - = String must be entirely alphanumeric ^ (s= mc-napa) > >=20 > > ASL Input: /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10_= OSE/src/VBox/Devices/PC/vbox.dsl - 1305 lines, 46193 bytes, 288 keywords > > Compilation complete. 1 Errors, 0 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 404 Optimizations > > kmk[2]: *** [/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.10= _OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxaml.hex] Error 255 > > kmk[2]: *** Deleting file `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Vir= tualBox-3.2.10_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxaml.hex' > > kmk[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > kmk[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Vir= tualBox-3.2.10_OSE' > > kmk[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Vi= rtualBox-3.2.10_OSE' > > kmk[2]: *** Exiting with status 2 > > kmk[1]: *** [pass_libraries_this] Error 2 > > kmk[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/Vir= tualBox-3.2.10_OSE' > > kmk: *** [pass_libraries_order] Error 2 > > *** Error code 2 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose. >=20 > Could you please try this patch: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D152710 >=20 > Beat That works for me. Cheers! --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --sHrvAb52M6C8blB9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM9VvWAAoJEIpckszW26+RzrAH/0vybdkFmP2bZFgnTeOVp+6w Q5f1R08P/gDOKGcXTP9GT5Z+2GcVBFm9K9PeoxXK3RSw8bolbWrl0llPv2tZXx5T Xw9ndNACdZ2wpXn2tMb4PUxPItboRg/PDsnEc2devT6jGkRZjcGJIfSALAfhIPe+ aKXkmqgFsYDCkBYvU5xqIlxu5I+B4xT7KxA//MfvfXTbTsT12x+6QzqXJNOJSmCP 948UEzxVsK+BhB1NyrkSSV8odXDpoarHyLzrpWrhXoov6eJ5MHFI6c/MzBEqNiiI 6fkBsv5/GzPaTFESdNfzO7cvhDEa9wrgV0gpyByL70IN+fwHUrnQhjjU15bhfDc= =Mdni -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sHrvAb52M6C8blB9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:39:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19161106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D9C8FC14 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PNWyy-0002mP-lj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:28 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:24 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> References: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: pkg_add fail on FreeBSD V8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:30 -0000 OK, another show stopper for me, but probably a simple fix for the wise on list. FreeBSD V8.0 that I'm slowley getting to know (and beginning to like!) FreeBSD FBSD.67MK181QZ 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Apr 14 22:55:09 BST 2010 root@FBSD.67MK181QZ:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PPSGENERIC i386 Looking to install the Hiawatha webserver, but got this when I tried... pkg_add -r hiawatha Error: Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0- release/Latest/hiawatha.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0- release/Latest/hiawatha.tbz' by URL It worked ok on a V8.1 box I threw together for testing things during the works lunch hour. So, can I (and how) get this version to use I guess the 8.1 repository, or how do I cleanly update this to 8.1, though to maintain my needed PPS support I guess I'll need to recompile the kernel again? Is the change from V8.0 to V8.1 realy that a big step? Or compile Hiawatha from sources? (I *Will* need guidance and hand- holding to do that!) Advice please, before I mess things up. Regards. Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:45:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC64106567A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66838FC16 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so6089644wyf.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:45:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HP10l4wwRAfYXcITZcYLXzoMTHj5/IG2Qxdm+Qc5faA=; b=fIfwa61XNqCgQGm5iwmZWmFZ6KvFI6f1kk8ORd8RosyRed72cMVuxbCo+NlnQdrTLn 1lril4dxjNHyXsmxH0tyLGB6lZpiE6Cn52k5hZRqq3ZBxfnAR1Mej5ObPiAw9WlEAfuw 3vs8wUrYVo+s1R9sW8CjoXzr66LZOpqaUkNXA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nYQJXXwasi+9hsISj4y/ntVHvlmaK62ZiaXiAsABoS3kcR0n0DsCISJ5T1Bu853bYN FVXSs+5i3DtLMLLtZhEv6PZzA+QSZBvJ86doQmV6SnsjpbiqccCdtvUQLiKR1+O90SGG fNiJuQjhCFV+RxEXvjs2kBdNE1xwjUKngckaE= Received: by 10.227.154.7 with SMTP id m7mr8289342wbw.211.1291149937832; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:45:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (65.21.102-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm2259701wbj.1.2010.11.30.12.45.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:45:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101130 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:45:40 -0000 Hello, We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions iirc. I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is dedicated to ZFS? Kind regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:49:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CF4106566C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE26F8FC17 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:49:21 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCP00DN5TU4DQ70@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:49:17 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011300132 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-30_11:2010-11-30, 2010-11-30, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:49:16 -0800 Message-id: <8B0F28BE-71C2-448C-9846-6884709B3C24@mac.com> References: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> To: Dave X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add fail on FreeBSD V8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:49:22 -0000 On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Dave wrote: > Or compile Hiawatha from sources? (I *Will* need guidance and hand-holding to do that!) Well. Start with: cd /usr/ports/www/hiawatha make install Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:52:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3F3106566B for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509B08FC19 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75433D225; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:52:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oAUKqEx3003806; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:52:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:52:14 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Dave" Message-Id: <20101130215214.7c647b12.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> References: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add fail on FreeBSD V8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:52:17 -0000 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:24 -0000, "Dave" wrote: > So, can I (and how) get this version to use I guess the > 8.1 repository, or how do I cleanly update this to 8.1, though to > maintain my needed PPS support I guess I'll need to recompile the kernel > again? Is the change from V8.0 to V8.1 realy that a big step? There is no such thing like a "version-centered repository" like on many Linusi. If you install a port via pkg_add -r, it will always be a current port. As time marches on, the ports tree on the servers changes. >From time to time, packages are built from this ports tree using each port's default settings. Those binary packages are then installed via the pkg_add -r program. See "man pkg_add", especially where PACKAGEROOT and PACKAGESITE are mentioned. You can, however, install precompiled binary packages for -RELEASE if you want. Instead of Latest/, a different subtree of packages will be addressed on the server. > Or compile Hiawatha from sources? (I *Will* need guidance and hand- > holding to do that!) No big deal. # cd /usr/ports/www/hiawatha/ # make install See "man ports" for details on how the ports system holds your hand when dealing with source. :-) You can also use a port management tool to do that. In my opinion, the most important one is portmaster. I've been using portinstall / portupgrade for many years now. It also allows you to select if you want to compile from source, e. g. # portinstall www/hiawatha/ or if you intendedly want to use a precompiled package if available, e. g. # portinstall -PP www/hiawatha/ See "man portupgrade" and "man pkgdb" for details. Allthough some consider it "bad behaviour", you can mix using ports and packages. As long as you keep an eye on not duplicating stuff (pkgdb -aF helps here), it will work well. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:52:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63F0106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818028FC0A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352F07A0DCF; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:52:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1291150339; x=1292964739; bh=HapWphLbgbG+/Lxyg5pv7II2W4/WVQWwwd5 t8i0JNYY=; b=fRNIqmHZX5OUznFySuXj2faKTZNE3Ja0oaNM6tRqHSH2enxQf/9 GXnBltAvlvpQ+UhYVT1DpikIAR3CgvaJ6MMgiYkzMmSk/fbTyiCr9xqHGhwIVYDc UYCcsoWaM/Cd+vc2q+tW3XR72EEqJK3NcM0jgrS4aVxDurN8GVbi3woI= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5s1Br9bVCckZ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:52:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.122]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E5DC97A0DCD; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 43981 invoked by uid 1001); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:49:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:49:18 -0800 From: Jason Helfman To: Dave Message-ID: <20101130204917.GD40540@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <7810389687.20101130091836@yandex.ru> <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CF560FC.2510.11BD7E12@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add fail on FreeBSD V8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:52:19 -0000 On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:39:24PM -0000, Dave thus spake: >OK, another show stopper for me, but probably a simple fix for the >wise on list. > >FreeBSD V8.0 that I'm slowley getting to know (and beginning to like!) > >FreeBSD FBSD.67MK181QZ 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Apr 14 >22:55:09 BST 2010 >root@FBSD.67MK181QZ:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PPSGENERIC i386 > >Looking to install the Hiawatha webserver, but got this when I tried... > >pkg_add -r hiawatha > >Error: Unable to get >ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0- >release/Latest/hiawatha.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, >no access) >pkg_add: unable to fetch >'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0- >release/Latest/hiawatha.tbz' by URL > >It worked ok on a V8.1 box I threw together for testing things during the >works lunch hour. So, can I (and how) get this version to use I guess the >8.1 repository, or how do I cleanly update this to 8.1, though to >maintain my needed PPS support I guess I'll need to recompile the kernel >again? Is the change from V8.0 to V8.1 realy that a big step? > >Or compile Hiawatha from sources? (I *Will* need guidance and hand- >holding to do that!) > >Advice please, before I mess things up. > >Regards. > >Dave B. Are you using sudo by chance when installing? > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 21:10:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42C11065679 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C218FC0C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B230C3CFB2; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:10:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oAULAc0g003874; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:10:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:10:38 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Demelier Message-Id: <20101130221038.b13ae264.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:10:41 -0000 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions iirc. I thought the limit was 26, as the letters a to z... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 21:11:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7AE1065674 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A038FC23 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so3232131eyb.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:11:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0/13NRrP5pGR4FIsG/MmGRz3LDAusD/tPLcbhl78gwo=; b=w+YSNRfA9cEE/GoWb+JTwAcw4gIw+hPnyYTss9hbOXo7hkV/Cl2Lzt/4ydy0B5oQSI CjqjXyklnH5xX/1gqZDRbXHmZJRt8rteGOB8BzqujvW6xmP5Xt9ZTczFbnuh8pbi8dW2 TVdH8jNyL6DCBxrlZy2a0a0+VhbMp0ytldLR8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=cnxsPhVPHLlUrSlWQNVlcN/pvM5MjDJieoT5Yk1dJcZCYp6STBpCmh6HkDjlDjaABk 9eqsFjk0Ln6lUuMYUu7doc3iGKR3kjf8s5aiZvahkBeqqtldqSobwVcb5irEaGSIxTG6 aerYtq9px04Ry2/4T8YaHxqdSubdfkqY6hm4U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.164.194 with SMTP id c44mr7545779wel.107.1291151480750; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:11:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.234.82 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:11:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:11:20 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:11:23 -0000 On 11/30/10, David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd slice. > Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions iirc. > > I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? Actually FreeBSD supports more that 8 ufs partitions via gpart(8). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 21:15:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD184106566C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CA78FC1C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AFF633205 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:15:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2E02CF69A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:15:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:15:50 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:15:44 -0000 Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, David Demelier a écrit : > Hello, Hello, > We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd > slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions > iirc. > > I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? > > Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is > dedicated to ZFS? hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html « bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions Status: Committed to -CURRENT Will appear in 8.0: sure Author: Marcel Moolenaar Web: commit message bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letters. To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels). » Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 21:42:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195A7106566C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998738FC17 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so5767018bwz.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:42:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SwhyZR0hsTRR/fbd15KQd53FenIJbhUnIgFVdQT5FRs=; b=gK5OJ0sPQM0Af8ZMrIc5V3I3dgbddSeFwpmjmnl23mducAFo+YyB8jIg0MrGI+DSL/ ZR09nt4jOKHDt8yOr54bYkG7fRoLIlDtyULArmpeyKM8WDaL1cgt2vfJjjsnJjAvucpA SW/HL/wWtmeehVeVoGaU21Sp9auN2WEs00GfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZaYvbCharsqw8F4j2KzzfVbt9/zZ9RzPxBCnKI6Ht9ZTLUojmqKMyjVQfYTQeX6xWN j50kICHbTmc7NO4Nrdkb0bjaByWjPtMoy1QRBMDUMpbUxNr/wicGfe/sBBvG6j3693p1 VXvusmZyxnkLRrEJ1PjCeFAv1om7ynHCG0gow= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.117.12 with SMTP id o12mr6193343bkq.166.1291153359834; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.127.20 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:42:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:42:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Patrick Lamaiziere Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:42:43 -0000 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere : > Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, > David Demelier a =C3=A9crit : > >> Hello, > > Hello, > >> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >> iirc. >> >> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >> >> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >> dedicated to ZFS? > > hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? > from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 > http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html > =C2=AB > bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions > > Status: Committed to -CURRENT > Will appear in 8.0: sure > Author: Marcel Moolenaar > Web: commit message > > bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The > new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letters. > > To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of > GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels). > =C2=BB > I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it should be pulled in. > Regards. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > But why : # /dev/md2s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 10m 16 4.2BSD 0 0 b: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 d: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 e: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 f: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 g: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 h: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 i: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 j: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 k: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 c: 2047973 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't= edit line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k re-edit the label? [y]: I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. Cheers, --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 21:49:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48BB106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374008FC0C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1969781wwf.31 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ctJrMHlk3EuFxYVqBqnmNZPYbD5WZZNOZSkN8Ay88LY=; b=AtP7Q4jSwTAaB6OJHdajxISG+O3L1WyeMRdmTMumkLdrUqDLbyBTWC4ApMkpDD2smN /c8M6wY/jL4vcUjaGCNhFTxPc9E1BKyX+lNjgmdgpvwKmueA3yl2bxhXsG79IvvBymES fTItwOhT7S+DTDVjbPpU51ye1g4nTnLZ74zz4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BJuIbuEocEjp4PqyzUxdWGr8Tjp0oQQTSaFWZeb0ObmK/UpUQV3bGI7zaFq6cMJs2M JbMp9wEIPohI9GosEogGEMEXltXxsmh0WHZLfw4OBPTm0/4Grmm6lgL3m+y9IKFXFihJ YqirSEg8BRqVCO89kS3P10jyv/LIsJKlHz1n0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.164.194 with SMTP id c44mr7589945wel.107.1291153775478; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.234.82 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:49:35 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: David DEMELIER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:49:38 -0000 On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere : >> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >> David Demelier a ecrit : >> >>> Hello, >> >> Hello, >> >>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>> iirc. >>> >>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>> >>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>> dedicated to ZFS? >> >> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >> << >> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >> >> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >> Will appear in 8.0: sure >> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >> Web: commit message >> >> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The >> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letters. >> >> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels). >> >> >> > > I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it > should be pulled in. > >> Regards. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > But why : > > # /dev/md2s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 10m 16 4.2BSD 0 0 > b: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > d: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > e: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > f: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > g: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > h: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > i: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > j: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > k: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 > > c: 2047973 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > edit > > line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i > line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j > line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k > re-edit the label? [y]: > > I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). bsdlabel is not going to work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 21:53:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6631B106566B for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A708FC0C for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so5777669bwz.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:53:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xUNPxcZMRi3u0zChtFH+CixqWFdhiRu/6BxkEzBUt7A=; b=AucVMqxqq41a4Qjep7LuFniGMPCk3iiUFqeqDkbUXmU/vAtL5AKjDH8EC5+ulf2pVA pIpXWSOB8kxcU+YV6LceR4Ur5t6zaUsGbzlIt+ChA4fRjwtzNn+YvAzwzGrSC17IJ98z kUdlhPBoa3mksnncxjSoN+W60WmzFsfqcnWEs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WUXTvjJo1sPdIkWWQiq6Gn6xzQXIIrhGT6Ikh8GvxC85bFD8uWgeMItxJmJParR9GZ +wgdCEm/3CRZKd73n9Egcx9rxEcva849Fj8qNyQIgGR70M4/ppSxtza083QKo0f/W/+9 T4nz04K1xBGUc41hFF4QRtLUw6WcAANOBYtpM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.97.131 with SMTP id l3mr7602911bkn.112.1291154007605; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.127.20 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:53:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:53:27 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:53:29 -0000 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol : > On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere : >>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>> David Demelier a ecrit : >>> >>>> Hello, >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>> iirc. >>>> >>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>> >>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>> >>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>> << >>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>> >>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>> Web: commit message >>> >>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The >>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letters. >>> >>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels). >>> >> >>> >> >> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >> should be pulled in. >> >>> Regards. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> But why : >> >> # /dev/md2s1: >> 8 partitions: >> # =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0size =C2=A0 offset =C2=A0 =C2=A0fstype =C2= =A0 [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >> =C2=A0 a: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 16 =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 b: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 d: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 e: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 f: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 g: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 h: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 i: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 j: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> =C2=A0 k: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >> >> =C2=A0 c: =C2=A02047973 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0unused= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 #= "raw" part, don't >> edit >> >> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >> re-edit the label? [y]: >> >> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. > > To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). > > bsdlabel is not going to work. > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dmyfile.img bs=3D1m count=3D10= 0 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 md2 created markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 gpart: No such geom: md2s1. markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 md2s1 added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 gpart: No such geom: md2s1. markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 md2s1 created markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1a added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1b added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1d added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1e added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1f added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1g added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 md2s1h added markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 gpart: index '9': No space left on device markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 1m md2s1 gpart: index '9': No space left on device Maybe I really need GEOM_PART? Or I'm doing something wrong. --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 22:29:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C78510656A7 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B352F8FC25 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so6186621wyf.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RFF6JNgu9Z6EtxouvotxfZmB+A46JjbzEzlG40c2cKg=; b=fRRfcxXGvZM+nTY39zuyuAAaBOthcU8ac6lD0iyu5MemlYTK61Rb6kBsgL6w3y9jbl ta4HglHo+Ms0/y/C+NNPIuQsHehlm4Httb392g4sVeZKM/PsBy6D6vo/oACkSZV0NPoB ixv8Ynv8+vC3OyTps4SXyST5iNEDgYY9dkl8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NCkMwPebeJQTG3EMyOs3MdJalUipsOZ/PCfI7PNeHCknHxH2aKiQxHXtyicoNMA9fm yxh/MraM5YQMmSEzp1Mhh0XH7NrVLejqmW5KNS7tG3HFyBRHUDXyTIzfLic0UjYv5NTn Xgz7RAHFCVbS43zTxguoqyHmsCY4yTekBPwgQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.231.162 with SMTP id l34mr2224990weq.77.1291156144440; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.234.82 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:29:04 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: David DEMELIER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:29:06 -0000 On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol : >> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere : >>>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>>> David Demelier a ecrit : >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>>> iirc. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>>> >>>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>>> >>>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>>> << >>>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>>> >>>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>>> Web: commit message >>>> >>>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The >>>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letters. >>>> >>>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels). >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >>> should be pulled in. >>> >>>> Regards. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> But why : >>> >>> # /dev/md2s1: >>> 8 partitions: >>> # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >>> a: 10m 16 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> b: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> d: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> e: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> f: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> g: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> h: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> i: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> j: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> k: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>> >>> c: 2047973 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, >>> don't >>> edit >>> >>> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >>> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >>> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >>> re-edit the label? [y]: >>> >>> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. >> >> To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). >> >> bsdlabel is not going to work. >> > > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=myfile.img bs=1m count=100 > 100+0 records in > 100+0 records out > 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 > md2 created > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 > gpart: No such geom: md2s1. > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 > md2s1 added > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 > gpart: No such geom: md2s1. > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md2s1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 23:17:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE883106564A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [130.149.58.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566558FC19 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (localhost.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAUNH0Ju056368; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:17:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: (from elon@localhost) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAUNH0m8056367; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:17:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:17:00 +0100 From: Leon =?iso-8859-15?Q?Me=DFner?= To: krad Message-ID: <20101130231700.GD98014@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Mail-Followup-To: krad , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CF44E2E.4070700@egr.msu.edu> <20101130014807.GC98014@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:17:02 -0000 I set a wrong cc . Please look over to -stable. Sorry for that, Leon On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:10:18PM +0000, krad wrote: > On 30 November 2010 01:48, Leon Meßner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > > > I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare > > > minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers > > > (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd. > > > delivery is via procmail which doesn't touch the dovecot metadata and > > > webmail uses imapd. Client connections to imapd go to random servers > > > and I don't yet have solid means to keep certain users on certain > > > servers. I upgraded some of the servers to 8.x and dovecot 1.2 and ran > > > into Stale NFS file handles causing index/uidlist corruption causing > > > inboxes to appear as empty when they were not. In some situations their > > > corrupt index had to be deleted manually. I first suspected dovecot 1.2 > > > since it was upgraded at the same time but I downgraded to 1.1 and its > > > doing the same thing. I don't really have a wealth of details to go on > > > yet and I usually stay quiet until I do, and half the time it is > > > difficult to reproduce myself so I've had to put it in production to get > > > a feel for progress. This only happens a dozen or so times per weekday > > > but I feel the need to start taking bigger steps. I'll probably do what > > > > Does it depend on the size of the message? > > > > > I can to get IMAP back on a stable base (7.x?) and also try to debug 8.x > > > on the remaining servers. A binary search is within possibility if I > > > can reproduce the symptoms often enough even if I have to put a test > > > server in production for a few hours. > > > > > > Any tips on where we could start looking, or alterations I could try > > > making such as sysctls to return to older behavior? It might be worth > > > > there were some problems on nullfs mounted nfs shares (like in jails) > > and dovecot, as dovecot changed its location for temporary file creation > > to the user home. But IIRC the error message looked more like: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg26856.html > > And are fixed in stable. > > > > Just a hint, > > Leon > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > im seeing similar issues on a large mail platform with netapp and dovecot on > freebsd 8.1 as well. The problems existed in 7.x as well though. Basically > the NFS mount just locks up. I've not managed to pin point it yet but one > thing im certain of its a client os issue rather than the filer. This is > because only one node out fo the 16 will lock at any time on that particular > nfs mount. Strangely as well if I remount the dead nfs share on say /mnt on > the affected node, it works fine. I'm convinced its some kind of locking > issue. > > I have dtrace (WITH_CTF=1) in the kernel, so will have a poke around with > that and see if I can see anything interesting. Can anyone recommend > anything here? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 23:19:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85314106566B for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724688FC0A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.206.78.30] (port=45025 helo=dt.vicor.com) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNZU0-0004N6-W0 for FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:19:38 -0800 From: Devin Teske To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vicor, Inc Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:19:36 -0800 Message-Id: <1291159176.17868.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-41.el4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: 3ac2881c5dcc75402359056e13437500 X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Cc: Subject: OpenSSL Optimizations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:19:39 -0000 I'm trying to determine what -- if any -- compiler optimizations are applied to crytpo libs/engines in FreeBSD, and the following output is not very helpful: $ uname -spr FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 $ openssl version -a OpenSSL 0.9.8n 24 Mar 2010 built on: date not available platform: FreeBSD-i386 options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/ssl" Can someone clue me into what optimizations (if any) are applied? -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> FUN STUFF <- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.1 GAT/CS d(+) s: a- C++(++++) UB++++$ P++(++++) L++(++++) !E--- W++ N? o? K- w O M+ V- PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t(+) 5? X+(++) R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI+(++) D(+) G+>++ e>+ h r>++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ http://www.geekcode.com/ -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 00:01:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889EE1065803 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAF88FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:01:08 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCQ00K8C2PEGI10@asmtp028.mac.com> for FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:00:53 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011300170 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-30_13:2010-12-01, 2010-11-30, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <1291159176.17868.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:00:50 -0800 Message-id: <46F19FD7-5666-4CD2-81DE-5CD8C82799E3@mac.com> References: <1291159176.17868.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: Devin Teske X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL Optimizations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:01:09 -0000 On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > I'm trying to determine what -- if any -- compiler optimizations are > applied to crytpo libs/engines in FreeBSD, and the following output is > not very helpful: The default compiler flags are: cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 01:00:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E57106566C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brucec@muon.cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4A08FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 03E5EE60EB; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:00:48 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:00:48 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101201010048.GB18296@muon.cran.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: gpt zfs booting - loader takes 25s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:00:49 -0000 I've recently installed a ZFS-only system which is booting from GPT using a 'legacy' BIOS. Something I noticed straight away is that the loader takes a very long time: it pauses after enumerating the disks but before displaying information about the installed memory: BTX loader 1.0.0 BTX version is 1.02 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive C: is disk0 BIOS drive D: is disk1 BIOS drive E: is disk2 BIOS drive F: is disk3 -> pauses for 25 seconds, with the spinner occasionally moving BIOS 631kB/3666816kB available memory Is it normal for booting to take such a long time when booting from GPT? -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 01:08:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14B0106566B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D5D8FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 65E99395B; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:08:03 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Bruce Cran References: <20101201010048.GB18296@muon.cran.org.uk> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.16.8; tzolkin = 6 Lamat; haab = 1 Mac Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:08:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20101201010048.GB18296@muon.cran.org.uk> (Bruce Cran's message of "Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:00:48 +0000") Message-ID: <86r5e2cnbg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpt zfs booting - loader takes 25s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:08:03 -0000 >>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Cran writes: Bruce> Is it normal for booting to take such a long time when booting Bruce> from GPT? Are you shutting down cleanly? I noticed my VPS takes a bit when I've done a hard reboot, but not when I let it go through all the nice sync, even though there aren't any console messages. I imagine something high-up in the kernel is asking the ZFS for the first block of a file, and only at that point does all the paperwork processing for consistency check come into play, so there are no messages, just a pause. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 01:23:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68052106566B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042188FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D77EE60CA; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:23:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:23:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:23:22 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Message-ID: <20101201012322.5bdcb093@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <86r5e2cnbg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <20101201010048.GB18296@muon.cran.org.uk> <86r5e2cnbg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpt zfs booting - loader takes 25s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:23:33 -0000 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:08:03 -0800 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > I imagine something high-up in the kernel is asking the ZFS for the > first block of a file, and only at that point does all the paperwork > processing for consistency check come into play, so there are no > messages, just a pause. I'm doing a clean reboot, and I don't remember it taking this long when I had a ZFS-only system booting from a disk with an MBR scheme. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 01:48:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EC11065670 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEA68FC1C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.206.78.30] (port=45582 helo=dt.vicor.com) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNboM-0004SW-Cl; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:50 -0800 From: Devin Teske To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <46F19FD7-5666-4CD2-81DE-5CD8C82799E3@mac.com> References: <1291159176.17868.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46F19FD7-5666-4CD2-81DE-5CD8C82799E3@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vicor, Inc Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:46 -0800 Message-Id: <1291168126.17868.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-41.el4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: 686168b083bebe0229d0cf78d78c0aff X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL Optimizations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:48:51 -0000 On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:00 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > > I'm trying to determine what -- if any -- compiler optimizations are > > applied to crytpo libs/engines in FreeBSD, and the following output is > > not very helpful: > > The default compiler flags are: > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing That's not the type of optimizations I was referring to. Rather, I was referring to OpenSSL specific optimizations such as the *_ASM compile- time directives et cetera. When pitting the following (built from source via openssl.org): OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 built on: Tue Sep 1 07:48:40 PDT 2009 platform: BSD-x86-elf options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) idea(int) blowfish(idx) compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -pthread -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/ssl" against the default (provided by FreeBSD): OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 built on: date not available platform: FreeBSD-i386 options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/ssl" The baseline FreeBSD version (which reports only "cc") is _faster_ than the same exact version of OpenSSL taken from OpenSSL.org compiled with optimizations. I can't possibly believe that the FreeBSD baseline version is _not_ optimized given empirical testing. I also doubt that `-O2' and `-fno- strict-aliasing' are the only optimization flags used (and I can prove that this is not the case). I notice that crypto/openssl/crypto/cversion.c is simply: #ifdef CFLAGS static char buf[sizeof(CFLAGS)+11]; sprintf(buf,"compiler: %s",CFLAGS); return(buf); #else return("compiler: information not available"); #endif Which cversion.c expects to have CFLAGS defined by buildinf.h (which it includes at the top) ... Where buildinf.h as generated from the OpenSSL.org Configure/make process accurately sets CFLAGS to something meaningful, the FreeBSD make process doesn't. buildinf.h under FreeBSD is generated by secure/lib/libcrypto/Makefile.inc (included by secure/lib/libcrypto/Makefile): buildinf.h: ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; \ echo " /* auto-generated by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cversion.c */"; \ echo " #define CFLAGS \"$(CC)\""; \ echo " #define PLATFORM \"`uname -s`-`uname -m`\""; \ echo " #define DATE \"`LC_ALL=C date`\""; \ echo "#endif" ) > ${.TARGET} As shown above, the output of `openssl version -a' will always simply show whatever $(CC) expands to (which on all binary releases that I could find simply reports "cc"). Shouldn't the Makefile.inc set the CFLAGS CPP-Macro to "$(CC) $(CFLAGS)" in buildinf.h rather than to "$(CC)" ?? I see that in secure/lib/libcrypto/Makefile.inc that CFLAGS does contain the optimizers that we're looking for... -DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM ... ad nauseum... .if !defined(NOPERL) CFLAGS+= -DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM .endif I'm seriously considering the following patch: --- Makefile.inc.orig Wed Aug 7 09:31:48 2002 +++ Makefile.inc Tue Nov 30 17:45:53 2010 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ CLEANDIRS+= openssl buildinf.h: ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; \ echo " /* auto-generated by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cversion.c */"; \ - echo " #define CFLAGS \"$(CC)\""; \ + echo " #define CFLAGS \"$(CC) $(CFLAGS)\""; \ echo " #define PLATFORM \"`uname -s`-`uname -m`\""; \ echo " #define DATE \"`LC_ALL=C date`\""; \ echo "#endif" ) > ${.TARGET} Although, there surely must be a reason as to why this hasn't been done in the past, No? -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> FUN STUFF <- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.1 GAT/CS d(+) s: a- C++(++++) UB++++$ P++(++++) L++(++++) !E--- W++ N? o? K- w O M+ V- PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t(+) 5? X+(++) R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI+(++) D(+) G+>++ e>+ h r>++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ http://www.geekcode.com/ -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 01:54:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB79106566B; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oxyd.oxyd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE9C8FC1B; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1877576qyk.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:54:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Nvcj2n+Rv79zUZz70jL7MZ4HTkFXsQGen6Ro08NptpU=; b=X94GZl7h18W0ZZ1RkX0N72IVQ8Imx30tzLz2jurB37olKzxGEN8FZWQKf+pe7wtNnX Dz2WsrqtmyFrNUf2DS3C8bZ8f0AXwX9CSDR5nC9jdan5YpbvIR65SSMg1GjDvJq2n5lz K+uIWd9nejd5acvVl/n9JkCBPQkEyIhG9049s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mocaa88Xcm+KM8H+ikARgCQ1bTYep60rzfMG1lizOJnaqPe25C791J36TcT3ecIRfm /t2aNb2RR1YBeqGCfnjnQHtVvUjwsGzIauXkASKJrf1hWtliYJg9fnjodGApe/N6tD5q OJl94Xr5cuOLPFUnV07j3v7zC1BC75lF0o5pA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.100.20 with SMTP id w20mr6730551qcn.233.1291166599659; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:23:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.183.19 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:23:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 02:23:19 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Majerech?= To: FreeBSD Mailing List , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: 8.1-RELEASE hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:54:46 -0000 Hello, my 8.1-R system has just started hanging on reboot. Specifically after I svn up'd my source and updated from 8.1-R-p1 to -p2. Some kind of hang occurs on every reboot attempt. Usually it hangs at the "Rebooting..." message, but sometimes the thing just locks up before it even syncs disks. shutdown -p now seems to shutdown the system successfully each time. So I booted into single-user mode, executed "reboot" and during the "Syncing disks" I pressed Ctrl-Alt-Escape to break into the debugger. There I single-stepped with the "s" command until the thing simply stopped doing anything. (Even if I pressed NumLock, the LED on the keyboard wouldn't turn off.) The screen content at the moment of hang is (dutifully typed over as the thing is dead and I don't have a serial cable): [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] Stopped at sckbdevent+0x5f: call _mtx_unlock_flags db> [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags: pushq %rbp db> [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x1: movq %rsp,%rbp db> [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unloock_flags+0x4: subq $0x20,%rsp db> [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x8: movq %rbx,(%rsp) db> [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0xc: movq %r12,0x8(%rsp) db> [thread pid 12 pid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x11: movq %rdi,%rbx db> [thread pid 12 pid 100017 ] Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x14: movq %r13,0x10(%rsp) db> E Including that "E" at the end. As I said, it's 8.1-RELEASE-p2; it's on AMD64. I'm using custom kernel which only differs from GENERIC by addition of the debugging options: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT options WITNESS options DEBUG_LOCKS options DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS options DIAGNOSTIC I tried rebooting with ACPI disabled, but the thing paniced on boot with panic: Duplicate free of item 0xffffff00025e0000 from zone 0xffffff00bfdcc2a0(1024) cpuid = 0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 0 tid 100000 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movq $0, 0x6b2d20(%rip) db> bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100000 td 0xffffffff80c63fc0 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3d panic() at panic+0x17b uma_dbg_free() at uma_dbg_free+0x171 uma_zfree_arg() at uma_zfree_arg+0x68 free() at free+0xcd device_set_driver() at device_set_driver+0x7c device_attach() at device_attach+0x19b bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x1a pci_attach() at pci_attach+0xf1 device_attach() at device_attach+0x69 bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x1a legacy_pcib_attach() at legacy_pcib_attach+0x70 device_attach() at device_attach+0x69 bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x1a legacy_attach() at legacy_attach+0x19 device_attach() at device_attach+0x69 bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x1a nexus_attach() at nexus_attach+0x68 device_attach() at device_attach+0x69 bus_generic_new_pass() at bus_generic_new_pass+0xd6 bus_set_pass() at bus_set_pass+0x7a configure() at configure+0xa mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x59 btext() at btext+0x2c db> reboot That panic is 100% repeatable -- every time I try booting with ACPI disabled, I get exactly the same panic. So -- what can I do about it? I'll gladly provide more information of course. Ondra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 05:07:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E77D10671F2 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl@chave.us) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3139F8FC12 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so4605881fxm.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:07:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.86.16 with SMTP id q16mr5226629fal.58.1291180058012; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:07:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.94.79 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:07:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:07:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: Carl Chave To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: GPT/ZFS/USB mountroot prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:07:58 -0000 I followed a gpt/zfs on USB stick guide for putting a base 8.1-RELEASE amd64 onto a 4GB sandisk USB memory stick. All went fairly well and the system will boot but fails to mount the root file system and dumps me a the mountroot> prompt. Entering zfs:zrootusb at the prompt works and the system finishes booting. In /boot/loader.conf I've got: zfs_load="YES" vfs.root.mountfrom="zfs:zrootusb" zrootusb mountpoint is set to legacy and /etc/fstab exists but is empty, per the guide. Any ideas? Thanks, Carl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 05:20:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D581065877 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl@chave.us) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BCA8FC1A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so4612259fxm.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:19:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.93.137 with SMTP id v9mr7798364fam.77.1291180794695; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:19:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.94.79 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:19:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:19:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Carl Chave To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: GPT/ZFS/USB mountroot prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:20:39 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Carl Chave wrote: > I followed a gpt/zfs on USB stick guide for putting a base 8.1-RELEASE > amd64 onto a 4GB sandisk USB memory stick. =A0All went fairly well and > the system will boot but fails to mount the root file system and dumps > me a the mountroot> prompt. =A0Entering zfs:zrootusb at the prompt works > and the system finishes booting. > > In /boot/loader.conf I've got: > zfs_load=3D"YES" > vfs.root.mountfrom=3D"zfs:zrootusb" > > zrootusb mountpoint is set to legacy and /etc/fstab exists but is > empty, per the guide. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Carl > adding kern.cam.boot_delay=3D10000 to /boot/loader.conf seems to have fixed it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 05:59:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F63106597E for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1E78FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so6128830bwz.13 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:59:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KcYDuCRGsSN2UyN4iMxzmoJc87wPMfmmevxpq5mjvHM=; b=Pz8EtwkFmCe2h1fvh1y2YWzrl1WbW3NWrJUTWlY+kUjydwVYMWbQq1JC6A+Lj5LYo2 Ius6bwX92guWN0fjP7ajRW80NKIqtCHloZPBXR38z6PYhtEdx56jpTfpF9skfKbbfK2p x7cmYV5noB5iJCR6iGwN/Zer+S25dQuhR9Byg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rZizCS+8aBR/ZF/LTlPCMUDpw7b7LuCxP79eBx4SHhM42pFfj2jH4VwBvy26WX2rzv nLo2XzxNCSuypohlP/E2rp2uAQJehopyUnu2tYts9E0Nesa/oWR+ttd7R+QZjBZsMdBs PoOmYOIezgL0UoZZEBG07nxzYPg7ujc6xb+EM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.97.131 with SMTP id l3mr7936738bkn.112.1291183167147; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:59:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.127.20 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:59:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:59:27 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:59:29 -0000 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol : > On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >> 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol : >>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>>> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere : >>>>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>>>> David Demelier a ecrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>>>> iirc. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>>>> >>>>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>>>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>>>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>>>> << >>>>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>>>> >>>>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>>>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>>>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>>>> Web: commit message >>>>> >>>>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. Th= e >>>>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letter= s. >>>>> >>>>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>>>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels= ). >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >>>> should be pulled in. >>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>> >>>> But why : >>>> >>>> # /dev/md2s1: >>>> 8 partitions: >>>> # =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0size =C2=A0 offset =C2=A0 =C2=A0fstype = =C2=A0 [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >>>> =C2=A0 a: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 16 =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 b: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 d: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 e: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 f: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 g: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 h: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 i: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 j: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> =C2=A0 k: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>> >>>> =C2=A0 c: =C2=A02047973 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0unus= ed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= # "raw" part, >>>> don't >>>> edit >>>> >>>> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >>>> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >>>> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >>>> re-edit the label? [y]: >>>> >>>> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. >>> >>> To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). >>> >>> bsdlabel is not going to work. >>> >> >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dmyfile.img bs=3D1m count= =3D100 >> 100+0 records in >> 100+0 records out >> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 >> md2 created >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 >> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 >> md2s1 added >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 >> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 > > gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md2s1 Thank you, I didn't see this little part of gpart(8). --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 06:17:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221001065673; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward4.mail.yandex.net (forward4.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C111B8FC13; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.mail.yandex.net (smtp1.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.101]) by forward4.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 056396AD8746; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:17:11 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1291184231; bh=dpj2MVKyWwNQiAW+7ID5+y43TH+4EtwtIi1H3kTY3mE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pLvsH3+8ySgq7nBYpSKW5DtBC/IaPJSWKoJvF2wEMptwcQ2iau+fyux4lSPq4KR1U +T4PowWcTjR8A/St28Je8A6yM8oY4DxGerk/8Bx+X0o0UmVJ7i1TJGyhDbOpHMNQgd va9OxfuZ0U61AvEM3kt62/pTjZkgdEgLzf9Iey+4= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ns.kirov.so-ups.ru [77.72.136.145]) by smtp1.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id A0CCF29007B; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:17:10 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4CF5E860.2050809@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:17:04 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig51C6CFA9A8B5630B69FD2D07" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:17:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig51C6CFA9A8B5630B69FD2D07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29.11.2010 11:52, O. Hartmann wrote: > Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBS= D 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with > the most recent make world of today fails on the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volu= me BACKUP00). Issuing "zpool > import BACKUP00" results in >=20 > cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available > and on console I receive message It seems strange, why the pool name in error message is 'BACKUP' but not = 'BACKUP00'? > Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in Fre= eBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in > FreeBSD 8.2. > gpart show ada3 lists this: >=20 > =3D> 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) > 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) > 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) Do you have something related to GPT in log files? Can you show full outp= ut of `gpart show` from FreeBSD-8 and FreeBSD-9? --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --------------enig51C6CFA9A8B5630B69FD2D07 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM9ehlAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6xKgIAIG7xPDPrJs28WjbETlT1TMT +K4E4cHUPfv1M4oPZjjP3jY/r/6EsTHdCiJU9EqocHS/rLxHOuX7hlKfeiohRq7Y F9Q2iLI7RwlQCluMUGtzuJK3c0frKXCi3EfYj77JOUk1zASeEj3HjGvn1jTm7jp1 bHjcGeIWuSYndKVgkn6l97xTRS39QDGc6aJT7cf7Aibq5NM9p9Kp29/F0ZYdzlXm cHUpujodf4+wYXZ9Kr+LD7NslIXXmzLLK3Qy3OUEsTegNSVoHZSE3nhs6TyRhK+1 zN9ljobcSLla+IB6sr0SDkCnil/3MAfuRLSO/NgVYyng00fasCenK5yvRv/ZhBY= =FxF+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig51C6CFA9A8B5630B69FD2D07-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 07:15:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F0E1065673 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D668B8FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2407639wwf.31 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:15:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u8Qoxri4CvnbdRQyhZ+Hw37MfaihtFxPOLgRkyWQs1s=; b=hWk2Igc3XSguxWnBAiZEI3fXLELawF4Rcp+yP1ltbZe2WoG3P2pWEN4hm1bZ8EV0/Y +OG3VU1hi/EX/aQfXdOCMcqnXyIhdaxHN9tjJKkQaIYP6x1vA3lfp2+RmJ/lU4cm6F8N TXjJ6XHHrA+blMVMJV5j6fOE7mPISFP7UaT2A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Oz+M8Q/vrOEu6YaKPCEXzkrJdUgV3bgcfmkx+a29RUUQEOJtF3I5HmAsX2X9q5k4ga PMeNc/h2IZvkkbkodIemVZuq6lyelMNLf81rd/f5zNy/Ukcu4AUT4i7CMsvXlO9qdXjK XcZm1Z6YQq5YAvY68ewQ+1KWFZ+SsurmPwIzU= Received: by 10.227.156.21 with SMTP id u21mr8907573wbw.9.1291187739580; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:15:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (wifi-osiris-sec-182-60.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.182.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm4935791wbi.12.2010.11.30.23.15.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:15:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:15:04 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101130 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul B Mahol References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:15:41 -0000 On 30/11/2010 23:29, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >> 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol: >>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>>> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere: >>>>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>>>> David Demelier a ecrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>>>> iirc. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>>>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>>>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>>>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>>>> << >>>>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>>>> >>>>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>>>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>>>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>>>> Web: commit message >>>>> >>>>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The >>>>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case letters. >>>>> >>>>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>>>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older kernels). >>>> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >>>> should be pulled in. >>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>> But why : >>>> >>>> # /dev/md2s1: >>>> 8 partitions: >>>> # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >>>> a: 10m 16 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> b: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> d: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> e: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> f: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> g: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> h: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> i: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> j: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> k: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>> >>>> c: 2047973 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, >>>> don't >>>> edit >>>> >>>> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >>>> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >>>> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >>>> re-edit the label? [y]: >>>> >>>> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. >>> To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). >>> >>> bsdlabel is not going to work. >>> >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=myfile.img bs=1m count=100 >> 100+0 records in >> 100+0 records out >> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 >> md2 created >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 >> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 >> md2s1 added >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 >> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 > gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md2s1 markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md0s1 gpart: entries '26': Invalid argument markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 8 md0s1 md0s1 created From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 08:37:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120A1106566B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AB68FC12 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2468307wwf.31 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:37:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v/EatfG4pvde3TWJJCswIMKTsNgozE7JSAulfJRSFiM=; b=APDuEH6tUFaEnzesoL6P752odbvrYjDQeR/P0elPjnYzjnihpNyq+yoq4s04rW0Y+8 Qpq9SEH+uD2UQuVQwqywzppvdcDMX4iLy+EK7C1p2cxS0lDa/qubeRvIOxOlbpVFNqvn 9ZED9i/n80D/EEg2q/cDvQEw3dSbJ2g/1ud4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=X5Fa/jFg2BXOJbs2l7VIFFymgImUsXl9E7pzQ8er//zYi3F31Y66nh6a76KEQzRP3I Jd9Ke2lktggl0molVBLIoXUv220vfFsbrjFrUzK5NTXFXltZEHaBGKo2CtqUw1HtuEFY yKaWeQUzcRiLrTd1on1KhOAx7H//k1LG+hGyI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.8 with SMTP id a8mr1618323wec.62.1291192662560; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:37:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.234.82 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:37:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:37:42 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:37:45 -0000 On 12/1/10, David Demelier wrote: > On 30/11/2010 23:29, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>> 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol: >>>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>>>> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere: >>>>>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>>>>> David Demelier a ecrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>>>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>>>>> iirc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>>>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>>>>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>>>>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>>>>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>>>>> << >>>>>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>>>>> >>>>>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>>>>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>>>>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>>>>> Web: commit message >>>>>> >>>>>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. The >>>>>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case >>>>>> letters. >>>>>> >>>>>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>>>>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older >>>>>> kernels). >>>>> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >>>>> should be pulled in. >>>>> >>>>>> Regards. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>> >>>>> But why : >>>>> >>>>> # /dev/md2s1: >>>>> 8 partitions: >>>>> # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >>>>> a: 10m 16 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> b: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> d: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> e: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> f: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> g: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> h: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> i: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> j: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> k: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>> >>>>> c: 2047973 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, >>>>> don't >>>>> edit >>>>> >>>>> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >>>>> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >>>>> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >>>>> re-edit the label? [y]: >>>>> >>>>> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. >>>> To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). >>>> >>>> bsdlabel is not going to work. >>>> >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=myfile.img bs=1m count=100 >>> 100+0 records in >>> 100+0 records out >>> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 >>> md2 created >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 >>> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 >>> md2s1 added >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 >>> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 >> gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md2s1 > > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md0s1 > gpart: entries '26': Invalid argument > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 8 md0s1 > md0s1 created > Looks like max number is 20, up to md2s1t. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 09:27:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD451065675 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E6E8FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so6255034bwz.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:27:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=atcejgSYcBT9AIc/fgxcSPMMw9WfvmkLK11Bz36LJQU=; b=cMG79Nzv2fLFrFXC0pjHhHT64+PbpkGucVuSucsvTUwyccExR/Sk2tTbsRosm9Nbr5 4pIPkUtjxcW4J8mh+z9pgBVR2t+l6XCNViUOHgsP/jgYs1UDUMx7lmtynleR9WzBKH7X xS0iAtQkXxfxzQTFMHmjDRBqlEfanli9OGz3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dpt4xEUP/RDodGAjbP6b7f3DFw9p/RftmAy8s8gsa/Dsf0KiEcN0ULIe8fZUt4txwc UpP4lc7Ahy5QjWM2tVuZZHXRW2MIVkU6q2X3DIOLQ/qI2gdkf+/Ci7t+aryk+vwoAmib hVHl8yXhYRx8LfPEXYc86rxS6YHdjwl7z1zjw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.65.73 with SMTP id h9mr1558591bki.4.1291195666725; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:27:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.127.20 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:27:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:27:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:27:48 -0000 2010/12/1 Paul B Mahol : > On 12/1/10, David Demelier wrote: >> On 30/11/2010 23:29, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER =C2=A0wrote: >>>> 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol: >>>>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER =C2=A0wrote: >>>>>> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere: >>>>>>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>>>>>> David Demelier =C2=A0a ecrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>>>>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>>>>>> iirc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>>>>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>>>>>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>>>>>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>>>>>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>>>>>> << >>>>>>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>>>>>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>>>>>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>>>>>> Web: commit message >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. = The >>>>>>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case >>>>>>> letters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>>>>>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older >>>>>>> kernels). >>>>>> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >>>>>> should be pulled in. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>> >>>>>> But why : >>>>>> >>>>>> # /dev/md2s1: >>>>>> 8 partitions: >>>>>> # =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0size =C2=A0 offset =C2=A0 =C2=A0fstype = =C2=A0 [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0a: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 16 =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BS= D =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0b: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0d: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0e: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0f: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0g: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0h: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0i: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0j: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0k: =C2=A010m =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * =C2=A0 =C2=A04.2BSD= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0c: =C2=A02047973 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0unused =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 # "raw" part, >>>>>> don't >>>>>> edit >>>>>> >>>>>> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >>>>>> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >>>>>> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >>>>>> re-edit the label? [y]: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. >>>>> To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). >>>>> >>>>> bsdlabel is not going to work. >>>>> >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dmyfile.img bs=3D1m count= =3D100 >>>> 100+0 records in >>>> 100+0 records out >>>> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 >>>> md2 created >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 >>>> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 >>>> md2s1 added >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 >>>> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 >>> gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md2s1 >> >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md0s1 >> gpart: entries '26': Invalid argument >> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 8 md0s1 >> md0s1 created >> > > Looks like max number is 20, up to md2s1t. > Yes I saw that it was only 20 max, so how to get 26 partitions using bsdlabel ? :-) Cheers, --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 10:16:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1C6106566C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from return1@e-mail-system.com) Received: from mail317.e-mail-system.com (mail317.e-mail-system.com [62.93.9.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755FA8FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (mail317.e-mail-system.com [62.93.9.65]) by mail317.e-mail-system.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DD014E843 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:00:58 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andrea_M=FCller?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101201110058.E0DD014E843@mail317.e-mail-system.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:00:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Anfrage von Kundennummer KK-85561 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:16:06 -0000 Guten Tag Kundennummer KK-85561,=20 die erste Woche im Dezember steht vor uns. Nehmen Sie sich 1 Minute Zeit um den Traif Ihrer Krankenkasse zu vergleiche= n. 2011 =E4ndern sich fast alle Tarife und Leistungen.=20 Durch einen Vergleich der privaten Krankenkasse k=F6nnen Sie 190,00 Euro un= d mehr im Monat(!) sparen.=20 Oft erhalten Sie sogar mehr Leistungen als vorher, und zahlen auch noch wen= iger daf=FCr.=20 Nutzen Sie unseren Vergleich - es dauert nur 1 Minute. Kostenlos und unverbindlich: http://c.optimal-2011.net/k-504-5574379.htm Wir freuen uns Ihnen zu helfen. Ihre Andrea M=FCller Sie erhalten dieses E-Mailing, da Sie uns oder einem unserer Partner Ihre E= inwilligung dazu gegeben haben. Gerne k=F6nnen Sie Ihre E-Mail Adresse l=F6= schen. Klicken Sie dazu einfach hier: http://c.optimal-2011.net/a/?i=3D7271285&e=3Dfreebsd-questions%40freebsd.or= g&c=3D5574379 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 13:22:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85212106566B; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D2E8FC17; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C029446B3B; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:22:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 938A58A009; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:22:00 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:17:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20101102; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201012010817.17120.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:22:00 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej_Majerech?= , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: 8.1-RELEASE hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:22:02 -0000 On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:23:19 pm Ond=C5=99ej Majerech wrote: > Hello, >=20 > my 8.1-R system has just started hanging on reboot. Specifically after > I svn up'd my source and updated from 8.1-R-p1 to -p2. >=20 > Some kind of hang occurs on every reboot attempt. Usually it hangs at > the "Rebooting..." message, but sometimes the thing just locks up > before it even syncs disks. shutdown -p now seems to shutdown the > system successfully each time. >=20 > So I booted into single-user mode, executed "reboot" and during the > "Syncing disks" I pressed Ctrl-Alt-Escape to break into the debugger. > There I single-stepped with the "s" command until the thing simply > stopped doing anything. (Even if I pressed NumLock, the LED on the > keyboard wouldn't turn off.) >=20 > The screen content at the moment of hang is (dutifully typed over as > the thing is dead and I don't have a serial cable): >=20 > [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] > Stopped at sckbdevent+0x5f: call _mtx_unlock_flags > db> > [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags: pushq %rbp > db> > [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x1: movq %rsp,%rbp > db> > [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unloock_flags+0x4: subq $0x20,%rsp > db> > [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x8: movq %rbx,(%rsp) > db> > [thread pid 12 tid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0xc: movq %r12,0x8(%rsp) > db> > [thread pid 12 pid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x11: movq %rdi,%rbx > db> > [thread pid 12 pid 100017 ] > Stopped at _mtx_unlock_flags+0x14: movq %r13,0x10(%rsp) > db> > E >=20 > Including that "E" at the end. No good ideas here, though I think we just turned off PSL_T by accident so it ran for a while before hanging after this. 'E' must be the start of a message on the console. > As I said, it's 8.1-RELEASE-p2; it's on AMD64. I'm using custom kernel > which only differs from GENERIC by addition of the debugging options: >=20 > options INVARIANTS > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > options WITNESS > options DEBUG_LOCKS > options DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS > options DIAGNOSTIC >=20 > I tried rebooting with ACPI disabled, but the thing paniced on boot with >=20 > panic: Duplicate free of item 0xffffff00025e0000 from zone > 0xffffff00bfdcc2a0(1024) >=20 > cpuid =3D 0 > KDB: enter: panic > [thread pid 0 tid 100000 ] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movq $0, 0x6b2d20(%rip) > db> bt > Tracing pid 0 tid 100000 td 0xffffffff80c63fc0 > kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3d > panic() at panic+0x17b > uma_dbg_free() at uma_dbg_free+0x171 > uma_zfree_arg() at uma_zfree_arg+0x68 > free() at free+0xcd > device_set_driver() at device_set_driver+0x7c > device_attach() at device_attach+0x19b > bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x1a > pci_attach() at pci_attach+0xf1 The free() should be the free to free the softc but that implies it had a=20 previous driver and softc. Maybe add some debug info to devclass_set_drive= r()=20 to print out the previous driver's name (and maybe the value of the pointer) before free'ing the softc. You could use gdb on the kernel.debug and the=20 pointer value to figure out exactly which driver was the previous one and l= ook=20 to see if it's probe routine does something funky with the softc pointer. =2D-=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 13:51:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7851065672 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB118FC17 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so203144wwb.1 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:51:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=92DuLxdUnyJ6nN2QUu8mPrd9nTFe6GvNdlXBXsb7BE4=; b=jVqDXkvJgZzgO217oGkUYy2cU+2j7H+SC0KAS678NWrb2Y1r4odwvrPwIWO8WYF9z4 KdOCngYT7gyPclrsreQZsierok0yIGDjkDMFfPRI8nrFd8CfMDqSLppHhFJxEhx1yzgR dArCU4rFcXrEW4PRMnj+SAZUxo9+P/t9EiPEg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=f/f7Z3Jas3KgGVGQwUIKn0anZbRlTb6r1sxzheHUN1hOVl7T2VTPHzLAb/+oRwuoXr t/Q6lZBELhD5Or8Pf/JGRtgID0k+CieH712RsNcGkEcQ3k8h2tzZUQTSo/bPwxQWwsCf I15J6tlFCEcGjgdcQocuUDE88VLR/4D/FJPdM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.187.207 with SMTP id y57mr91696wem.92.1291211508743; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.234.82 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:51:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: David DEMELIER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:51:50 -0000 On 12/1/10, David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/12/1 Paul B Mahol : >> On 12/1/10, David Demelier wrote: >>> On 30/11/2010 23:29, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>>>> 2010/11/30 Paul B Mahol: >>>>>> On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER wrote: >>>>>>> 2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere: >>>>>>>> Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, >>>>>>>> David Demelier a ecrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd >>>>>>>>> slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions >>>>>>>>> iirc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is >>>>>>>>> dedicated to ZFS? >>>>>>>> hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ? >>>>>>>> from what's cooking for FreeBSD 8.0 >>>>>>>> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html >>>>>>>> << >>>>>>>> bsdlabel gets extended to 26 partitions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Status: Committed to -CURRENT >>>>>>>> Will appear in 8.0: sure >>>>>>>> Author: Marcel Moolenaar >>>>>>>> Web: commit message >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bsdlabel is (finally!) extended to support more than 8 partitions. >>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>> new limit of 26 partitions comes from the number of lower-case >>>>>>>> letters. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To make use of this change, GEOM_PART needs to be used instead of >>>>>>>> GEOM_BSD (this is default in 8.0 but will not work with older >>>>>>>> kernels). >>>>>>> I don't have GEOM_PART in my kernel, but if you said it's default it >>>>>>> should be pulled in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> But why : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # /dev/md2s1: >>>>>>> 8 partitions: >>>>>>> # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >>>>>>> a: 10m 16 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> b: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> d: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> e: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> f: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> g: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> h: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> i: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> j: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> k: 10m * 4.2BSD 0 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> c: 2047973 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" >>>>>>> part, >>>>>>> don't >>>>>>> edit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> line 11: partition name out of range a-h: i >>>>>>> line 12: partition name out of range a-h: j >>>>>>> line 13: partition name out of range a-h: k >>>>>>> re-edit the label? [y]: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm on 8.1-RELEASE. >>>>>> To make use of such feature you need to recreate table with gpart(8). >>>>>> >>>>>> bsdlabel is not going to work. >>>>>> >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=myfile.img bs=1m count=100 >>>>> 100+0 records in >>>>> 100+0 records out >>>>> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.095537 secs (50038530 bytes/sec) >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo mdconfig -a -f myfile.img -u 2 >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s MBR md2 >>>>> md2 created >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart show md2s1 >>>>> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd md2 >>>>> md2s1 added >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart add -t freebsd-ufs md2s1 >>>>> gpart: No such geom: md2s1. >>>>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD md2s1 >>>> gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md2s1 >>> >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 26 md0s1 >>> gpart: entries '26': Invalid argument >>> markand@Melon ~ $ sudo gpart create -s BSD -n 8 md0s1 >>> md0s1 created >>> >> >> Looks like max number is 20, up to md2s1t. >> > > Yes I saw that it was only 20 max, so how to get 26 partitions using > bsdlabel ? :-) It is hardcoded. Not my code. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 14:07:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BCA1065675 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A23A8FC12 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1607401qwj.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XJXvVIXnDLlCNTyIfPZpX2C2NAG02pZn6MF3WVKsgfU=; b=nT8Ku5yw2oL0ZPcoGf9sReUTyg0bnMihe6pC8Zu3wrIKpBIlV5K3YrSIKF4DgHu3x9 LGc1ZL7jJQZP+yKTfcdZZo83kzcHxBu4NmlwpU8J9zFuw7Tjo1tuSVczB2iPQUHTf5fy qGqSdHp40+O87wzftF76czbyq9E7Y8UQ5Du8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ZTxl59dBlIsdiXHYbV1mqIlFxFTGADheZ8QDKxU0kfjTIX6cMxIHCCuQfNAECH51Bh +RFnCDVWnWr2DDdsZWz8t9itMC5CUUAOx45ztWoe0YXN42gY3OOijm4vxzCMjGmnVt2Q 2pUfXP0gcmgYTqu+lzn3vXVAJppi6PQ+M+jhA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.67.72 with SMTP id q8mr7700080qai.385.1291210955422; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.178.197 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:42:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:42:35 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brian McCann To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: /etc/rc.d/netif & em interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:07:28 -0000 I'm having an interesting problem on a fresh 8.1-RELEASE1 install. I'll start by saying this didn't happen on 7.1 on the same exact machine. I've been fighting with this for 2 days now and have come up with no answers on my own, so I'm hoping one of you guys can have some insight here. When I run "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" (also happens with a stop / start) , I can no longer get to the server over the network. When I do a packet capture on my workstation, it looks like it's MAC address changed somehow. The first two bytes of the address are different. For example, the real MAC is 00:15:17:1b:cf:7a , but I'll see the replies from a MAC of "02:67:17:1b:cf:7a". After each run of "/etc/rc.d/netif restart", the first two bytes will change again. I have to reboot the server to get it working again. The "em" cards in question are: dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5 dev.em.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x8086 device=3D0x108c subvendor=3D0x8086 subdevice=3D0x348d class=3D0x020000 dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.1 dev.em.1.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x8086 device=3D0x1076 subvendor=3D0x8086 subdevice=3D0x348d class=3D0x020000 FWIW, this is on an Intel 1530 series server. Thanks in advance, --Brian --=20 _-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 14:13:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2CA1065674 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004B88FC1C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4351EE7154; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:13:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:13:35 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:13:25 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Paul B Mahol Message-ID: <20101201141325.7a223b5e@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:13:37 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +0000 Paul B Mahol wrote: [snip 9 levels of quoting] > It is hardcoded. Not my code. Could you remember to remove excess quotes please? It's getting a bit ridiculous having to scroll past 50 lines to see a one-line reply :) -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 14:15:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D021065693 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE978FC0A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1616108qwj.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:15:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5bYLzUw73iZG30/6Xz4T5ophG6ZOr0MhdDsXpJoI2nc=; b=hkinAk4JdSldMXSB2RyB1KMmiG4dNE2f5L5bPI+jaulZ4cw4IakKnaW9K+U5XdZ9Ua iQXG3T3xESAeLNLyojdumuBe0TKmC8WI6vmYW7+aoxQnnT5MQQbyGW7njrkH3t8bg01x mUc/tfqg5S+fiB1sOkeqmXhMJ2uY4tikYc0Q8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K9YChDCWL1yaAfZlzKruEoH3l8uRo9WyD002FfkZtD/s4T3DfVSMIgn25CoTlc6Mq6 QTvF8u7JiibXBMjsHmENmg6SIe1GKU2n540FxVsHeZTTfFhuqZioVdt3ZxxFn+Tnc4Pg vbUqNWji93obDtvTOBBDxIAxlebMc4gS/Pw1Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.198.5 with SMTP id em5mr8774qab.335.1291212930339; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:15:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.178.197 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:15:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:15:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brian McCann To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/netif & em interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:15:31 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Brian McCann wrote: > I'm having an interesting problem on a fresh 8.1-RELEASE1 install. > I'll start by saying this didn't happen on 7.1 on the same exact > machine. =A0I've been fighting with this for 2 days now and have come up > with no answers on my own, so I'm hoping one of you guys can have some > insight here. > > When I run "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" (also happens with a stop / > start) , I can no longer get to the server over the network. =A0When I > do a packet capture on my workstation, it looks like it's MAC address > changed somehow. =A0The first two bytes of the address are different. > For example, the real MAC is 00:15:17:1b:cf:7a , but I'll see the > replies from a MAC of =A0"02:67:17:1b:cf:7a". =A0After each run of > "/etc/rc.d/netif restart", the first two bytes will change again. =A0I > have to reboot the server to get it working again. =A0The "em" cards in > question are: > > dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5 > dev.em.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x8086 device=3D0x108c subvendor=3D0x8086 > subdevice=3D0x348d class=3D0x020000 > dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.1 > dev.em.1.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x8086 device=3D0x1076 subvendor=3D0x8086 > subdevice=3D0x348d class=3D0x020000 > > FWIW, this is on an Intel 1530 series server. > > Thanks in advance, > --Brian I botched the problem description slightly. In the packet capture on the workstation, the server's MAC is always correct. The response (SYN/ACK packet) from the server is destined to the wrong MAC address. The first two bytes are wrong somehow. The arp table on the server is correct. If I run "arp -ad", the problem remains. I've also produced this problem by doing "ifconfig em1 down" then "ifconfig em1 up". To make this problem even stranger, I can make a connection from the server to a workstation without issue. It appears to only be incoming connections. Thanks again, --Brian --=20 _-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 14:44:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197FD106567A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0CA8FC24 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:29:46 -0500 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::6388 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; s=noc_cfi_pgh_pa_us_key_dkim; l=475; t=1291213786; i=@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; h=Message-ID:Date:From: Reply-To:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=frA05G4eisgKfxmPq91/XgG3giY=; b=KUxpP/nMl9bxjXXFvS8nVrUO8BOBu AdDIgw+7+mSqz4mmeSKlP4811t9QQAa4BXarWt34X3JVmN9G0HFoCim28xys+aUF 7qs8JWirOiJr9lvuQVoNaHiH8VZh9+/Xv/a Message-ID: <4CF65BD8.7090401@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:29:44 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)" Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. (DRP NOC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian McCann References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/netif & em interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:44:52 -0000 > To make this problem even stranger, I can make a connection from the > server to a workstation without issue. It appears to only be incoming We've seen something very similar to this; we assumed it was EEPROM corruption. Is this a Dell PowerEdge by chance? Do you have TSO enabled? (-tso or tso flag in $ifconfig_emX) Does appending "up" to the end of if $ifconfig_emX solve the problem? ~BAS > connections. > > Thanks again, > --Brian > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 15:51:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8650F106564A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:51:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8668FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so3670102ywp.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:51:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jL2O63vYeczXt4R3eztisDtu7T8ch0+7Htrq5/mJdY4=; b=jnKaq62GLd6rjFcjvXRmMzGxM+YLGlN1ff23tG1K8wVE6xpt3/7l3+2IknCJe89Ai1 P6rMCAsOw99QTf8YQVov0/mLhF2cGHmRdel1ypHYkhGN7gZDnyqMOHhZd09jFMlqsEub S3oDzr2LM5GiJZ/SaDLl7XylfLZ+LpDUivpL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I7ZW35eTaX5tGDNr/ozTmyGtMwMhJJBKeGrtCTOH6NqY+T+KHxEeCa7UnHt+EgJFEa lk9GIAsdHH5K6sgZen417z5ceM65nvxUFLkA6XpJd61cG2En1kIRK/NfRR5O4IHkqaQM 0BFyDxxJI/YurB3b24zpgjsOyZjXHYyHg5O2I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.207 with SMTP id cl15mr7994931qcb.190.1291218700335; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.178.197 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:51:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF65BD8.7090401@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> References: <4CF65BD8.7090401@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:51:40 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brian McCann To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/netif & em interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:51:41 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote: > >> To make this problem even stranger, I can make a connection from the >> server to a workstation without issue. =A0It appears to only be incoming > > =A0We've seen something very similar to this; we assumed it was > =A0EEPROM corruption. > > =A0Is this a Dell PowerEdge by chance? > > =A0Do you have TSO enabled? (-tso or tso flag in $ifconfig_emX) > > =A0Does appending "up" to the end of if $ifconfig_emX solve the problem? > > ~BAS > This isn't a Dell PoweEdge, but at least this is two platforms it's happening on now. Strangely, my VMWare virtual machines that use the em driver do not have this problem. TSO is disabled. I just tried adding "up" to the $ifconfig_emX lines in rc.conf, and it didn't help. What I discovered (and I'm still playing with a bit), is that it has to do with checksum offloading. If you run "ifconfig emX -rxcsum", the interface comes back to life. I just added "-rxcsum" to the $ifconfig_emX lines in rc.conf, and I can run "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" now, and the NIC continues to work fine. I tried emailing the folks @ Intel that are mentioned in the man page for the em driver, but the mail bounced... --Brian --=20 _-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 16:05:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B341065673 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C478FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2884682wwf.31 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:05:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=d3cawA0PlL3kHgEOF2dF9UuCKMrUnl4vojGPsbBkEl0=; b=JngWE/hHsOXF8oRLnvWJzUCbEeMAvyOwnMxR8F/4+E6HhYwJzSbnMFVRsy/EQ/5XgU JRsiQSq4gmk5Hsml8KbsdYI7VwXH+DG/hXXm/AoOy/qAQs0iHF2MWnhORkXnOvRkIYlm QcDISc70mlLoQ4sN3C/sVEh9dDseHeaCzCq+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CsG6DZOO7sZAAXrvouSofKl8isp1MGWJZUSRrzuL+UY/A46dJ7HiA4aTsAkth9D0lF Uebv/tGUETU9JJ38r0ILpk9SeQDg59ZH+ywPSJaRbS0fCY5i+wBO1KCwNpNF5DLQDRig uFLwig8G/VfV3t4YW3sX01DIKEacWt/0NN8hc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.20 with SMTP id a20mr8172608wem.14.1291219505593; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:05:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.37.132 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:05:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101201141325.7a223b5e@core.draftnet> References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> <20101201141325.7a223b5e@core.draftnet> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:05:05 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Paul B Mahol , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:05:34 -0000 On 1 December 2010 14:13, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +0000 > Paul B Mahol wrote: > [snip 9 levels of quoting] > > It is hardcoded. Not my code. > > Could you remember to remove excess quotes please? It's getting a bit > ridiculous having to scroll past 50 lines to see a one-line reply :) > > -- > Bruce Cran > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Is this a theoretical exercise as I cant see why you would need that many file systems? Why not just use a EFI layout then you can have 128 file sytems? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 16:15:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E051065670 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84D58FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so4145285qyk.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:15:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=88viKfgSD0WtAC6BxMCJfJsnF1URBBnI2epYT3qdbcM=; b=RChxhQ4wLag7GICW6qjndqxiF4Cm4weLyEIlnxR4dIIj+fFvYEm2PA9rPYOquFWS8d wsz2IUYysD6KnfAAFnXndxaZMvGd+v/CG5w/y6Q7i6lUBN6xVGeodWjIgOI1DFDvrFLE bmbZHyrWKTn3yjkGQqjcSVEdLwpnhW8j3MFN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xqSzDl1mR7VwpPbRIXrlYbSBi+MtVxfmroIhZj593Fhg153iRbLMNqGGHopLFqksGE Ywvf2Ufl2DAC9jsIRpNlwirW4/CL4527mMeuyeZMp3wzG+VAxrviRi+MfIgo4dbSyH48 yY9f2x7AQLbMep2/2upaiq8KbmRRAnWNbUaIM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.174.70 with SMTP id s6mr7860751qaz.285.1291220128057; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:15:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.178.197 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:15:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF65BD8.7090401@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:15:27 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brian McCann To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/netif & em interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:15:29 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Brian McCann wrote: > > This isn't a Dell PoweEdge, but at least this is two platforms it's > happening on now. =A0Strangely, my VMWare virtual machines that use the > em driver do not have this problem. > > TSO is disabled. > > I just tried adding "up" to the $ifconfig_emX lines in rc.conf, and it > didn't help. > > What I discovered (and I'm still playing with a bit), is that it has > to do with checksum offloading. =A0If you run "ifconfig emX -rxcsum", > the interface comes back to life. =A0I just added "-rxcsum" to the > $ifconfig_emX lines in rc.conf, and I can run "/etc/rc.d/netif > restart" now, and the NIC continues to work fine. > > I tried emailing the folks @ Intel that are mentioned in the man page > for the em driver, but the mail bounced... > > --Brian > > -- Brian (and everyone else reading the thread), I just found this...the patch was submitted some time ago, but somehow didn't make it into 8.1. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D141843 . I'm trying it now. I'll keep you posted. --Brian --=20 _-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 16:47:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C01C106564A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AB18FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3773835ewy.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr10422216ebd.38.1291222067335; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:47:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:47:26 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:26 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:47:50 -0000 I have a need to use a thumb drive on my FBSD8.1/amd64 laptop and when I plugged it in before leaving to make sure I could mount it, I discovered I couldn't. /var/log/messages produced this: Dec 1 11:38:22 blackdragon root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0324 product 0xbc06 bus uhub1 Dec 1 11:38:22 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 Dec 1 11:38:22 blackdragon kernel: umass0: on usbus1 Dec 1 11:38:22 blackdragon kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2 Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 (Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed) Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers Dec 1 11:38:23 blackdragon kernel: da0: 30592MB (62652416 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 3899C) Dec 1 11:38:24 blackdragon kernel: GEOM: da0: partition 1 does not start on a track boundary. Dec 1 11:38:24 blackdragon kernel: GEOM: da0: partition 1 does not end on a track boundary. Dec 1 11:38:24 blackdragon console-kit-daemon[1135]: WARNING: kvm_getenvv failed: cannot open /proc/31126/mem Dec 1 11:38:58 blackdragon kernel: GEOM: da0: partition 1 does not start on a track boundary. Dec 1 11:38:58 blackdragon kernel: GEOM: da0: partition 1 does not end on a track boundary. when I try to mount the device da0 I get [root@BlackDragon [~]# kldload ntfs (just so I can read from the device and copy what I wanted off it) [root@BlackDragon [~]# mount -t ntfs /dev/da0 /mnt/thumb mount_ntfs: /dev/da0: Invalid argument [root@BlackDragon [~]# 'uname -a' FreeBSD blackdragon.xaerolimit.net 8.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 #2: Sat Oct 30 02:55:00 EDT 2010 root@blackdragon.xaerolimit.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BlackDragon amd64 usbconfig: ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON did I miss something? -- Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 16:56:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A7F106566B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8D8FC1B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E5E7154; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:56:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:56:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:55:58 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Chris Brennan Message-ID: <20101201165558.45430f2a@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:56:11 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:26 -0500 Chris Brennan wrote: > did I miss something? Is it partitioned? Try "ls /dev/da0*" to see if there's a "/dev/da0s1" entry (for example). If so, try and mount that. To see if there's a filesystem on the disk you can run "file -s" against the device node. e.g. /dev/ada0s3: x86 boot sector, code offset 0x52, OEM-ID "NTFS ", sectors/cluster 8, reserved sectors 0, Media descriptor 0xf8, heads 255, hidden sectors 440608768, dos < 4.0 BootSector (0x80) That tells me /dev/ada0s3 has an NTFS filesystem. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 17:00:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DC9106564A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C638FC12 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EEBE7154; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:10 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:00 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Chris Brennan Message-ID: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:00:13 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:26 -0500 Chris Brennan wrote: > [root@BlackDragon [~]# kldload ntfs (just so I can read from the > device and copy what I wanted off it) > [root@BlackDragon [~]# mount -t ntfs /dev/da0 /mnt/thumb > mount_ntfs: /dev/da0: Invalid argument I think Windows defaults to FAT32 on removable drives, so you might need to use '-t msdosfs' instead. In newer versions of Windows you can also format disks using exFAT which I don't believe is supported in the open source world yet. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 17:40:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC861065696 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5CE8FC0A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so7167939wyf.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:40:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WfH9SNbIWKE1bhU/Ldpr2KUT9zu3yhNq2/accATaDlY=; b=smxsUfjsOm9tOmWUUucBCLTlk4PtiYJAlezU3PGrdSUARqVqaE9Q82SSor2aQeFe5A C4qpmGiXdYlTb1OpZGCOuR7ttVI9d5Hu+s044tc97D5Yq2kOv0GalHAbHEuqja2vq9RG 6GCxMasBvMLfAr7cDeMmYsB85m0zo9Q5JBv34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kkrv7/vtFnbgwepDSycY9O8Z/tTgxim3O/nUOxpmPz8ugPT0DOzFweluKTHWLUfiHv GPAXPunB/EAbNORLEuwOPgk5SSrqVppHNtMBamvMAgDi34CIobhaXOht+gElA2F/YJxK zsHsWp3MGWkBe+ATsXMaXk3bB3et95PyLBKdw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.173.4 with SMTP id u4mr2659534wel.87.1291223369585; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.76 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Problem building netdisco 1.0 from ports on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:40:13 -0000 Working on 7.1 Release. Ports tree up to date, and a portupgrade -a done yesterday was successful. I did the following: # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/netdisco # make install It bombs out with the below errors - I think it's an error in libXaw, but can't quite be sure. Any thoughts? Kurt ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xaw7.pc in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw ===> Building for libXaw-1.0.7,1 make all-recursive Making all in include Making all in src CC libXaw6_la-Actions.lo Actions.c:38:28: error: X11/IntrinsicP.h: No such file or directory Actions.c:39:28: error: X11/StringDefs.h: No such file or directory Actions.c:40:23: error: X11/CoreP.h: No such file or directory Actions.c:41:28: error: X11/Constraint.h: No such file or directory Actions.c:42:29: error: X11/Xmu/CharSet.h: No such file or directory Actions.c:43:29: error: X11/Xmu/SysUtil.h: No such file or directory In file included from Actions.c:45: Private.h:149: error: expected ')' before '*' token *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw/work/libXaw-1.0.7/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw/work/libXaw-1.0.7. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw/work/libXaw-1.0.7. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/graphviz. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/graphviz. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/p5-GraphViz. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/netdisco. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 18:10:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267891065694 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB12C8FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so3803607gwj.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.140.15 with SMTP id n15mr15230656ybd.366.1291227031450; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm99239yhl.27.2010.12.01.10.10.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:10:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ACFFE54856 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:10:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:10:25 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> References: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:10:33 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:00 +0000 Bruce Cran articulated: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:26 -0500 > Chris Brennan wrote: > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# kldload ntfs (just so I can read from the > > device and copy what I wanted off it) > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# mount -t ntfs /dev/da0 /mnt/thumb > > mount_ntfs: /dev/da0: Invalid argument > > I think Windows defaults to FAT32 on removable drives, so you might > need to use '-t msdosfs' instead. In newer versions of Windows you can > also format disks using exFAT which I don't believe is supported in > the open source world yet. I believe that exFAT is the default in Windows 7. In any case, there is no support for it in FreeBSD; although I believe there is support, rudimentary perhaps, in Linux. Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT#Licensing) -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 18:16:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899711065696 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout030.mac.com (asmtpout030.mac.com [17.148.16.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5928FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCR0019UHFRTRA0@asmtp030.mac.com> for FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:16:42 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012010100 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-01_09:2010-12-01, 2010-12-01, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <1291168126.17868.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:16:39 -0800 Message-id: References: <1291159176.17868.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46F19FD7-5666-4CD2-81DE-5CD8C82799E3@mac.com> <1291168126.17868.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: Devin Teske X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL Optimizations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:16:59 -0000 On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:00 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote: >>> I'm trying to determine what -- if any -- compiler optimizations are >>> applied to crytpo libs/engines in FreeBSD, and the following output is >>> not very helpful: >> >> The default compiler flags are: >> >> cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing > > That's not the type of optimizations I was referring to. Well, I can only respond to what you've written. :-) > Rather, I was referring to OpenSSL specific optimizations such as the *_ASM compile- > time directives et cetera. > > When pitting the following (built from source via openssl.org): > > OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 > built on: Tue Sep 1 07:48:40 PDT 2009 > platform: BSD-x86-elf > options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) idea(int) blowfish(idx) > compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -pthread -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM > OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/ssl" > > against the default (provided by FreeBSD): > > OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 > built on: date not available > platform: FreeBSD-i386 > options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) blowfish(idx) > compiler: cc > OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/ssl" > > The baseline FreeBSD version (which reports only "cc") is _faster_ than > the same exact version of OpenSSL taken from OpenSSL.org compiled with > optimizations. > > I can't possibly believe that the FreeBSD baseline version is _not_ > optimized given empirical testing. I also doubt that `-O2' and `-fno- > strict-aliasing' are the only optimization flags used (and I can prove > that this is not the case). Well, I did a "nohup make buildworld" using 7-STABLE sources and grep'ed for obvious strings, and I see: [ ... ] cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DL_ENDIAN -DMONOLITH -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl -DNO_IDEA -c /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl/apps/x509.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DL_ENDIAN -DMONOLITH -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl -DNO_IDEA -o openssl app_rand.o apps.o asn1pars.o ca.o ciphers.o cms.o crl.o crl2p7.o dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o dsa.o dsaparam.o ec.o ecparam.o enc.o engine.o errstr.o gendh.o gendsa.o genrsa.o nseq.o ocsp.o openssl.o passwd.o pkcs12.o pkcs7.o pkcs8.o prime.o rand.o req.o rsa.o rsautl.o s_cb.o s_client.o s_server.o s_socket.o s_time.o sess_id.o smime.o speed.o spkac.o verify.o version.o x509.o -lssl -lcrypto I also grep'ed for the "_ASM" strings you seem to be interested in, and libmd is built with: mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/lib/libmd -DSHA1_ASM -DELF -DRMD160_ASM -DELF /usr/src/lib/libmd/md2c.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/md4c.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/md5c.c md2hl.c md4hl.c md5hl.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/rmd160c.c rmd160hl.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/sha0c.c sha0hl.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/sha1c.c sha1hl.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/sha256c.c sha256hl.c /usr/src/lib/libmd/i386/sha.S /usr/src/lib/libmd/i386/rmd160.S cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libmd -DSHA1_ASM -DELF -DRMD160_ASM -DELF -c /usr/src/lib/libmd/md2c.c > [ ... ] > I'm seriously considering the following patch: > > --- Makefile.inc.orig Wed Aug 7 09:31:48 2002 > +++ Makefile.inc Tue Nov 30 17:45:53 2010 > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ CLEANDIRS+= openssl > buildinf.h: > ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; \ > echo " /* auto-generated by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cversion.c */"; \ > - echo " #define CFLAGS \"$(CC)\""; \ > + echo " #define CFLAGS \"$(CC) $(CFLAGS)\""; \ > echo " #define PLATFORM \"`uname -s`-`uname -m`\""; \ > echo " #define DATE \"`LC_ALL=C date`\""; \ > echo "#endif" ) > ${.TARGET} > > Although, there surely must be a reason as to why this hasn't been done in the past, No? That seems like a good idea. The version of openssl from ports includes the compiler flags: # /usr/local/bin/openssl version -a OpenSSL 1.0.0b 16 Nov 2010 built on: Wed Nov 17 15:13:42 EST 2010 platform: BSD-x86-elf options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(4x,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) idea(int) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM OPENSSLDIR: "/usr/local/openssl" Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 18:27:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA951065674 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E648FC25 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3868326ewy.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:27:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WfFtJaJGZGXMiuWDlb6ORrXPWXYP+7z4jYyq/6cvaVA=; b=Ubr4S4TqL7vg+FnesNsc+BPfIq3rlgtSuq7JVhj/9OhsUptl2wMIBRU/YLKzxqsVMq TZp0VracvjIqVbY9DCQMM2BpCV9TVLNQ3CMNEBdSfAVMX0XgNp+uyu99RWkAAUlfC7GL G/nOJBTkmfmGtgMso3V/IHLsFmU8Bp8w3QX8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lZFjDWOE/45uYwosFuGEyExsh7dwBxTb7KSOIivfofNM2ZS1ICKxK1utgoqHD5a5RP 6Yk5I54Qd7kqd3N6vczA6J7GAXaVlkPle3JziPgnXYb3HNbj88SrihALiJfE15UymRrb 285Oa92UcBTTQ0iaTMVjv4+9DCPInUA+nzAzU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.93.9 with SMTP id k9mr7966474wef.89.1291226489777; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.12.80 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:01:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:01:29 -0600 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Kurt Buff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem building netdisco 1.0 from ports on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:27:33 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Working on 7.1 Release. Ports tree up to date, and a portupgrade -a > done yesterday was successful. > > I did the following: > > # cd =A0/usr/ports/net-mgmt/netdisco > # make install > > It bombs out with the below errors - I think it's an error in libXaw, > but can't quite be sure. Any thoughts? > > Kurt > > =3D=3D=3D> =A0 =A0Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xaw7= .pc in > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Building for libXaw-1.0.7,1 > make =A0all-recursive > Making all in include > Making all in src > =A0CC =A0 =A0 libXaw6_la-Actions.lo > Actions.c:38:28: error: X11/IntrinsicP.h: No such file or directory > Actions.c:39:28: error: X11/StringDefs.h: No such file or directory > Actions.c:40:23: error: X11/CoreP.h: No such file or directory > Actions.c:41:28: error: X11/Constraint.h: No such file or directory > Actions.c:42:29: error: X11/Xmu/CharSet.h: No such file or directory > Actions.c:43:29: error: X11/Xmu/SysUtil.h: No such file or directory > In file included from Actions.c:45: > Private.h:149: error: expected ')' before '*' token [SNIP] It seems that the header files can't be found. Have you checked /usr/local/include/X11 to verify their existence? If not, perhaps you should (re)install libX11 (I thinks that's where the header files above are found). -Brandon -Brandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 18:33:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D1A10656A9 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F3D8FC16 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oB1IV5GD012325; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:31:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oB1IV51R012324; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:31:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:31:04 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101201183104.GA12140@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:33:18 -0000 On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:10:25PM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:00 +0000 > Bruce Cran articulated: > > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:26 -0500 > > Chris Brennan wrote: > > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# kldload ntfs (just so I can read from the > > > device and copy what I wanted off it) > > > [root@BlackDragon [~]# mount -t ntfs /dev/da0 /mnt/thumb > > > mount_ntfs: /dev/da0: Invalid argument > > > > I think Windows defaults to FAT32 on removable drives, so you might > > need to use '-t msdosfs' instead. In newer versions of Windows you can > > also format disks using exFAT which I don't believe is supported in > > the open source world yet. > Sorry I didn't keep the thread, but, in case it is helpful, here is the line in my /etc/fstab for my USB stick plug-ins. (There are some other USB devices that use up da0 and da1) /dev/da2s1 /stick msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 I just plug one in, su to root, type 'mount /stick' and then can read it just fine - even from non-root. I do this frequently to suck .jpg files off the cards from my digital camera. (I have an adapter to make them USB plug-in-able). I can write as root, but I haven't messed around figuring out if I can manage to write as non-root. As you see, it is msdosfs or in other words, FAT32. I don't know anything about the exFAT mentioned below. ////jerry > I believe that exFAT is the default in Windows 7. In any case, there is > no support for it in FreeBSD; although I believe there is support, > rudimentary perhaps, in Linux. > > Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT#Licensing) > > -- > Jerry ??? > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 18:36:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2359D106566B for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD2E8FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC9026282C3 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:37:07 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lxPYhwwGnIfJ for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:37:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C75D26282C2 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:37:04 -0600 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:36:43 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:36:49 -0000 On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:00 +0000 > Bruce Cran articulated: >=20 >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:26 -0500 >> Chris Brennan wrote: >>> [root@BlackDragon [~]# kldload ntfs (just so I can read from the >>> device and copy what I wanted off it) >>> [root@BlackDragon [~]# mount -t ntfs /dev/da0 /mnt/thumb >>> mount_ntfs: /dev/da0: Invalid argument >>=20 >> I think Windows defaults to FAT32 on removable drives, so you might >> need to use '-t msdosfs' instead. In newer versions of Windows you = can >> also format disks using exFAT which I don't believe is supported in >> the open source world yet. >=20 > I believe that exFAT is the default in Windows 7. In any case, there = is > no support for it in FreeBSD; although I believe there is support, > rudimentary perhaps, in Linux. >=20 > Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT#Licensing) As the page says, it's READ ONLY in Linux... kinda pathetic. Thanks, = Microsoft, for changing things AGAIN so you cannot be shared safely with = others. Any thoughts on when hey might require their users to wear latex gloves = when using something other than Windows? -- Ryan= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 19:09:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D93F1065697 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EE28FC1A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so3946816eyb.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:09:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.124.201 with SMTP id x49mr8290184eeh.7.1291230556116; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.53.67 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:09:16 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.158.38] In-Reply-To: References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:09:16 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:09:18 -0000 You might also try sending a message from the exchange server to another email account of yours, so you can examine the headers on the outgoing message for anything strange. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 20:10:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EFC1065695 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744BF8FC18 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so4003003eyb.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr10822679ebd.38.1291234247796; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:10:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:10:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:10:27 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jerrymc@msu.edu, Bruce Cran , Ryan Coleman , Jerry Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:10:50 -0000 Thanks all for the feedback, problem solved, details below. Bruce -> "/dev/ad0s1" did the trick ... I was in such a hurry, I forgot to actually look further, I was in a hurry and got impatient :P. "file -s /dev/DEVICE" is a nice little trick, gonna have to tuck this one away for another rainy day when I am stuck. The drive is ntfs, I formatted it that way (I lost nearly 8gb of the 32gb capasity because of fat32). [..] [root@BlackDragon [~]# file -s /dev/da0s1 /dev/da0s1: x86 boot sector, code offset 0x52, OEM-ID "NTFS ", sectors/cluster 8, reserved sectors 0, Media descriptor 0xf8, heads 255, hidden sectors 2048, dos < 4.0 BootSector (0x0) [..] [root@BlackDragon [~]# mount | grep thumb /dev/da0s1 on /mnt/thumb (ntfs, local) [root@BlackDragon [~]# [..] Jerry -> I kinda like the idea of exFAT but I don't put much stock in it (yet). It is by far not a tried-and-true filesystem yet. And since M$ has there hands in it, I doubt we'll see legit F/OSS drivers for it anytime soon. Jerry McAllister -> your fstab entry is my next step, thanks for the reminder though :D Ryan -> As I was saying to Jerry, I don't think we'll see reliable exFAT drivers for the *nix world anytime soon :( It's sad really. M$ might actually get something right in exFAT and it becomes a viable, scalable alternative to NTFS. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 20:23:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48802106566C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C228FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so6876025bwz.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:23:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uuoDvHPO7265oIzEnQN1gGn53aQNAW1UmL9alqibRvc=; b=FeW1KNgtlldtzdTtgtm90cloq2HCL6q6Dy5ncl+vQKAwaa8jLIDRtuUSMVfLmpGXXg jfdaErfCBJCnvZsEfKBB0whzuvMYGYCCOhmstz6ZioJf7RWD9WTsWfwHdJCFUm+dDNzH KwDIQXBGZpJJgqt1+HsC0qgJ4tkV6F/YeM9mQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IUI17MWy90xl2P0I67LMbVY+zA/7IPvi8kyqKwJGq+F/jus90g9+69haRRePh00IPh jAYEtPODZibYgGagKlBXXwfohcANUL7qAWtDNZM6WGhYRx87GIjF1fHP2Rxshb2eUBJ3 rjiGbpreE6PqJRrfo4piDlsTNmf5+/ByxeFEE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.129.210 with SMTP id p18mr9138218bks.85.1291235015432; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:23:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.127.20 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:23:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> <20101201141325.7a223b5e@core.draftnet> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Bruce Cran , Paul B Mahol , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:23:38 -0000 2010/12/1 krad : > On 1 December 2010 14:13, Bruce Cran wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +0000 >> Paul B Mahol wrote: >> [snip 9 levels of quoting] >> > It is hardcoded. Not my code. >> >> Could you remember to remove excess quotes please? It's getting a bit >> ridiculous having to scroll past 50 lines to see a one-line reply :) >> >> -- >> Bruce Cran >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > Is this a theoretical exercise as I cant see why you would need that many > file systems? Why not just use a EFI layout then you can have 128 file > sytems? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Yes it is just exercises, I heard bsdlabel was grow up so I wanted to test, now I don't really understand why it's fixed to 20 only. I also wanted to try partitionning a disk using only gpart and not fdisk/bsdlabel at all so to check if what announced is real but it seems not :-). Kind regards, -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 20:59:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99E01065672 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697218FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so3922151gxk.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:59:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.26.1 with SMTP id d1mr3151026ybj.295.1291237173719; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:59:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q31sm239054yba.18.2010.12.01.12.59.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:59:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54164E54856 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:59:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:59:30 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101201155930.67f30a2b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20101201170000.0305126f@core.draftnet> <20101201131025.5d192c65@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:59:36 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:36:43 -0600 Ryan Coleman articulated: > As the page says, it's READ ONLY in Linux... kinda pathetic. Thanks, > Microsoft, for changing things AGAIN so you cannot be shared safely > with others. First of all, exFAT is a major improvement over FAT32 for Flash drives. The fact that it is apparently only READ ONLY in a Linux environment has nothing to do with Microsoft but rather with the FOSS community at large. They could either purchase a license, which of course they won't; or they could reverse engineer a driver for it. There is also this link on the page: http://www.tuxera.com/products/exfat-for-embedded-systems/ Perhaps that might be of assistance. In any case, I find using removable drives far easier on a Microsoft machine anyway From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 21:18:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2141065674 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B998FC20 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PNu3r-00018m-pb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:18:00 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:17:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4CF6BB87.7169.170736FC@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Success! (Was Re: pkg_add fail on FreeBSD V8.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:18:01 -0000 Thanks Guys. (Jason H, Chuck S and Polytropon.) OK. I managed to get Hiawatha compiled, installed, configured and running! It even works, though I've not yet finished reading up on all it's features etc, so it'll be a while before I let it loose on the public, but so far, it appears to work well. I also managed to duplicate it all on the V8.1 machine I have to play with at work, so I can fiddle during a lunch break, also having SSH access to the V8.0 box here at home too now, from my desk at work. ;-) I'm liking F'BSD more and more, and with multiple SSH "terminals" open on another PC, it's getting easier to understand. Guess in time I'll look to running X on the thing, and do it that way, but for now, headless via SSH over the LAN works just fine. I've got a lot of other stuff to do now, so the BSD box's will have to look after themselves for a little while, till I catch up on things. I'm sure I'll be back when something else puzzles me. Many thanks again people. Best Regards. Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 21:18:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5E51065674 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3708FC16 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2033954qwj.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:18:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7d9Ysf2ny36sgrdgPsAyyR59HtMvvH+jR9Em7QPo4Jc=; b=NVzueaNF6TQjIXbQFtkFeAaM634cFUCQNpzcarMMrv46z0Oz3bmrHd7BvQUESe5YBr 8YZqbMWhFXX4dWgWVoaM2ZHYJqo//cdPRT0ELRCWvwF+47JXdlQ9BKzUVDSzFcw5FdGH o4O1QTiQdgtijULTO3bxua//fBc6UleTl03D0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=O9BKWQPDl47RAen+REGKAlggz61IgWn4E/nVrdHU+/M958s4mUGcfYYyUJg0kJQbaJ 4sdpAtH5qbNUY9QWF7Wrzjs8cCTOQRWaLflYNvUTnoFs33TJkjwrZhVAkEA9qoALY0Lm UWh6QAjfP1EAUs8HtGOOFVJCfshyCqvvjq6/Q= Received: by 10.229.227.12 with SMTP id iy12mr7816346qcb.101.1291238314262; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:18:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.188.68 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:17:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:17:54 +0100 Message-ID: To: David Brodbeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:18:36 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:09 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: > You might also try sending a message from the exchange server to > another email account of yours, so you can examine the headers on the > outgoing message for anything strange. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I installed a mail server recently (dovecot/postfix), that checks for the HELO message. I wasn't able to send any mail from Outlook. The problem beeing that Outlook send its hostname as HELO message... root@mephibox : tail -f /var/log/mail.log [..] # starting outlook Dec 1 21:34:12 localhost dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=3D, method=3DPLAIN, rip=3Dmy_ip, lip=3Dsrv_ip Dec 1 21:34:13 localhost dovecot: IMAP(faust): Disconnected in IDLE Dec 1 21:34:13 localhost dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=3D, method=3DPLAIN, rip=3Dmy_ip, lip=3Dsrv_ip Dec 1 21:34:14 localhost dovecot: IMAP(faust): Disconnected in IDLE # sending mail Dec 1 21:34:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[11381]: connect from ma_box[my_ip] Dec 1 21:34:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[11381]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from ma_box[my_ip]: 504 5.5.2 : Helo command rejected: need fully-qualifie= d hostname; from=3D to=3D proto= =3DSMTP helo=3D Dec 1 21:34:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[11381]: disconnect from ma_box[my_ip= ] beta beeing my WinXP client's hostname I tried to change my hostname to beta.example.com, but windows keeps saying I can't put dots in this field... Then, I checked the 'Domain' option (instead of 'Workgroup'), typed my domain name, tryied to connect ... Checking the error details, the main idea was that there wasn't any ldap record in my DNS (which is wrong, there's just no LDAP at that address). It ended up that there's no way I would setup any LDAP server to provide mail services to my VMs. So... back to your problem, first thing to check: are you member of your mail server's domain? Did IT correctly configured your computer/Are you trying from your own laptop? Even if you can send mail to other members of your domain or a large part o= f mail servers (mostly based on exchange, poorly configured postfix, ...): I won't be surprise if Exchange isn't checking the HELO message... --=20 Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE /* * If the new process paused because it was * swapped out, set the stack level to the last call * to savu(u_ssav). This means that the return * actually returns from the last routine which did * the savu. * * You are not expected to understand this. */ if(rp->p_flag&SSWAP) { rp->p_flag =3D& ~SSWAP; aretu(u.u_ssav); } Unix V6 Kernel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 22:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17F51065679 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee (kuller.raad.tartu.ee [213.184.43.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5421A8FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F743982A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:48:37 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at post.raad.tartu.ee Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (kuller.raad.tartu.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IaAa7-6xubue for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:48:36 +0200 (EET) Received: by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (Postfix, from userid 80) id 4171939828; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:48:36 +0200 (EET) Received: from 179.37.190.90.dyn.estpak.ee (179.37.190.90.dyn.estpak.ee [90.190.37.179]) by webmail.raad.tartu.ee (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:48:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20101201234836.13548oib143slay8@webmail.raad.tartu.ee> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:48:36 +0200 From: Toomas Aas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101116221701.992236aw0tf36su8@webmail.raad.tartu.ee> In-Reply-To: <20101116221701.992236aw0tf36su8@webmail.raad.tartu.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7) X-Originating-IP: 90.190.37.179 Subject: Re: Rebuilding perl with threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:08:16 -0000 Previously, I wrote > I'm in a process of installing a new server. I have already built > and installed a lot of ports over the past weeks, and now that I'm > almost done I discovered that one of the last things I need to > install (misc/amanda-server) needs Perl installed with threads > support, whereas I have it installed without threads. > > For this kind of change, is it safe to reinstall just the Perl port, > or do I also need to rebuild all ports that depend on Perl? That > would be a *lot* of rebuilding. The version I currently have > installed is perl-5.12.2_2, lang/perl5.12 seems to currently be at > 5.12.4. I can now report that there will be problems if you rebuild just the perl port. I used portmaster to perform this task. Then I discovered that (at least some of the) libraries built against non-threaded Perl refuse to be loaded with threaded Perl. A rather typical error message you'll see is 'Undefined symbol"PL_sv_undef"'. In order to get amavisd-new running again, I rebuilt the following ports using portmaster: devel/p5-Time-HiRes sysutils/p5-Unix-Syslog security/p5-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA www/p5-HTML-Parser converters/p5-Convert-UUlib textproc/p5-YAML-Tiny devel/p5-ExtUtils-CBuilder devel/p5-ExtUtils-ParseXS devel/p5-ExtUtils-Install devel/p5-version devel/p5-Module-Build converters/p5-Encode-Detect net/p5-IO-Socket-INET6 net/p5-Socket6 I now have amavisd-new running again, but it is possible that I'll discover more (non-amavisd-related) ports that need rebuilding. -- Toomas Aas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 22:27:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A46B1065675 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920688FC16 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so3250687wwf.31 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:27:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lLE2sVorVorjMadBjbvl6zKjSjFfSn9kY+1fBdp2380=; b=UF+AS1XhDB5LrPe8TAGqAEQg3qj0BtgPsQnrhs8E3ut45BjfK79qzjUUrMiryaoDUl gD1wV0e9Usjx/R1bwDQz8+nGQylCuc8NLavsbR47S6xBvayAVQVfFcadaE4Jxl9jU6UE TKFYOLVvLcMiMOhCU4DnT6/f6PPu85mdo8xYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bNTY5vvuFpXoS7sRWFhXQ1m2lftmM61muwmjDcFoq0GgH0tyYFmoUnIlAIjMe5ihV7 OV+E3QNtdgJH6Ep9TzHjulXSYPF7iwxFRop+um3z+rxkUUhOdrDf+L9jbK8AMgL9DAEw 6tGBlwXJbh/ugpL5dPzW50H2Dp75o8AFUeid8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr9757500wei.87.1291242469006; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:27:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.76 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:27:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:27:48 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Problem building netdisco 1.0 from ports on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:27:51 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:01, Brandon Gooch w= rote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Working on 7.1 Release. Ports tree up to date, and a portupgrade -a >> done yesterday was successful. >> >> I did the following: >> >> # cd =C2=A0/usr/ports/net-mgmt/netdisco >> # make install >> >> It bombs out with the below errors - I think it's an error in libXaw, >> but can't quite be sure. Any thoughts? >> >> Kurt >> >> =3D=3D=3D> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconf= ig/xaw7.pc in >> /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw >> =3D=3D=3D> =C2=A0Building for libXaw-1.0.7,1 >> make =C2=A0all-recursive >> Making all in include >> Making all in src >> =C2=A0CC =C2=A0 =C2=A0 libXaw6_la-Actions.lo >> Actions.c:38:28: error: X11/IntrinsicP.h: No such file or directory >> Actions.c:39:28: error: X11/StringDefs.h: No such file or directory >> Actions.c:40:23: error: X11/CoreP.h: No such file or directory >> Actions.c:41:28: error: X11/Constraint.h: No such file or directory >> Actions.c:42:29: error: X11/Xmu/CharSet.h: No such file or directory >> Actions.c:43:29: error: X11/Xmu/SysUtil.h: No such file or directory >> In file included from Actions.c:45: >> Private.h:149: error: expected ')' before '*' token > > [SNIP] > > It seems that the header files can't be found. Have you checked > /usr/local/include/X11 to verify their existence? > > If not, perhaps you should (re)install libX11 (I thinks that's where > the header files above are found). > > -Brandon Thanks for the help, Brandon. Checked /usr/local/include/X11, and none of the files listed above (IntrinsicP.h, StringDefs.h, etc.) are there. cd'ed to /usr/ports/x11/libX11, did a 'make deinstall', 'make clean', 'make install' - same results. Any other thoughts? Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 22:33:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D561065670 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85F98FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817421ED53; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:33:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB1MXha5055426; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:33:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:33:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Kurt Buff Message-Id: <20101201233343.8afb85d5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem building netdisco 1.0 from ports on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:33:47 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:27:48 -0800, Kurt Buff wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:01, Brandon Gooch wrote: > > It seems that the header files can't be found. Have you checked > > /usr/local/include/X11 to verify their existence? > > > > If not, perhaps you should (re)install libX11 (I thinks that's where > > the header files above are found). > > > > -Brandon > > Thanks for the help, Brandon. > > Checked /usr/local/include/X11, and none of the files listed above > (IntrinsicP.h, StringDefs.h, etc.) are there. > > cd'ed to /usr/ports/x11/libX11, did a 'make deinstall', 'make clean', > 'make install' - same results. > > Any other thoughts? You'll need libXt for that, I think. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 22:50:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036C41065694 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B16E8FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so7472409wyf.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=677FGFlc3DJenujcCxGfJFfw9ZxbuUX7lrHfGR/YgIY=; b=s+tC6jYkwfy1AZDdB6JupR01mRt/Vq7fu85kKPwJu9EBfXnoKNZWGqwLZpkSNGnW+3 ic/YdFxOiVE8wL32iZunlvbJlLYBn6kMGxEcLtxy3RBnxXC1eHPADma46fBuhZ1n3X6y jxbTUnC+rV1uQ+SsU85fT6RctxdfPEIZ23VVE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nQNXsyYyVN7qXom+6K0+rlUuF3OvzMjMsDn7ExfVO/7tmKBq5saJrqeJMVEPjFtwbS bmIb4L1WA0yUcnkmdBwq+Al/V6hnMs7ZKEN7vby2cdRJ3r402ystqyifWrePKt5JJbzT mQuYz+hP9RcqAIy9urHBVSYWWHOoCN55B+/D8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.141 with SMTP id p13mr2645691wep.102.1291243851276; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.76 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:50:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101201233343.8afb85d5.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20101201233343.8afb85d5.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:50:51 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: Problem building netdisco 1.0 from ports on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:50:53 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 14:33, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:27:48 -0800, Kurt Buff wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:01, Brandon Gooch wrote: >> > It seems that the header files can't be found. Have you checked >> > /usr/local/include/X11 to verify their existence? >> > >> > If not, perhaps you should (re)install libX11 (I thinks that's where >> > the header files above are found). >> > >> > -Brandon >> >> Thanks for the help, Brandon. >> >> Checked /usr/local/include/X11, and none of the files listed above >> (IntrinsicP.h, StringDefs.h, etc.) are there. >> >> cd'ed to /usr/ports/x11/libX11, did a 'make deinstall', 'make clean', >> 'make install' - same results. >> >> Any other thoughts? > > You'll need libXt for that, I think. Excellent! That worked well. Still getting an error, but it's clear that libXmu is what I need next. Also, very strange that it's not installing dependencies as expected, but I can deal with that. Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 23:35:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FD91065672 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Received: from nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60B848FC20 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Dec 2010 23:23:11 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.36] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Dec 2010 23:23:11 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Dec 2010 23:23:11 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 903944.88103.bm@omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 99148 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Dec 2010 23:23:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291245791; bh=Wpn58X3PZJct2NNpqal3/g0QnF/N2nxQ4e7Ym6NAf9A=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=w5GR7BiuZ10D912qIjbVNrsGBqH6Q0SYjHWiTWUUYiIMVmPGk+Tcmv4Min5FSaVqBMdVX4O7p1xLIDFsqxUGVRBksRzZVqt3PuMVCjqWroQlfIFRrnHzHt6UTn31UZXELsAPxr/TdzeWAsKKOgUJQRffvt1GWw5/IUmrDm4nf8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KTs40KhBh7MhIJv3ZvZ9CEsBtFPLEi5DFStM0m80D3tzkz2fl66Ti6EE23ABjhP77Zvj6ZcxcfstxXEFYb+DhrJ+eKWZaBWldyrFWHrwi43MCkjnc60gDl5pRUZOy7xZ5Q3WRMqLuGgzQweWfuQsnVltX9QLpJM4cVFNHH4oZOE=; Message-ID: <552239.98378.qm@web110303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: __2zxkQVM1kT_d_3HZyhmnie0xr1rCqL.agatZ7Y_SPSj7K 8ZAkwFIi5cYVd_4xH1hFPeUY.OrGkcYTfL57l9AQs_Q_zEBTCUmSinL_45kM LxY7YebL5dX6AjjDLB80IYn4b_30QRRHb1i9RZIY50FSe2bFUAy9Jm.lV_fe 16RxJMJ2XRlZpwzFoKSnbeoyWxkmUfFuZM2bSfBeKzKgjWzUZG9u_T7fUgbo 3NjRmoa6mqD4hVodJ2ekchNYV2PqocqVBEe_WCPVwVZErOF8cSTxhGLOxU4n f3DPM8ynh1WJ4q1sOrr3ssPfCy_143w5KY2RCs1YheS5SE9M8wb4Ggiyx1Ia E1uwbtHas5QcpNh7FBzCn3uBe6syDK7TchbKI9H.P48gP9A-- Received: from [24.228.57.153] by web110303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:10 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:23:10 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20101130120032.B79B010656A4@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: swap pager:indefinite wait buffer: message out of vm.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:35:54 -0000 Hi, Would some kind soul please tell me the meaning of a message coming from vm.c (FreeBSD 7.2): "swap pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 2, size: 4096" This message occurs after a return from an msleep whose last args are PSWP, "swread", and HZ*20 . When it occurs, some interactive program is locked up. It recovers sometime later. My best guess is that this is a complaint that swap or paging I/O has been excessively delayed. It is occurring while I am running disk-to-disk transfers that have deep buffering. Think mbuf(1), but it's my own code, testing some algorithms. I speculate that if the disk queuing/head movement optimization doesn't let the heads move off the file system where the file resides (and I only see this with large, single files) then this problem might result. But that is a guess, and speculation. Does anyone know if this can occur under later versions of FreeBSD? Thank you for your help. Mark Terribile materribile@yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 23:36:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659311065674 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A2A8FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PNwEK-0000OA-C8>; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:36:56 +0100 Received: from e178008207.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.8.207] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PNwEK-0006RV-4L>; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:36:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF6DC17.3080208@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:36:55 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101127 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "James R. Van Artsdalen" References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4CF3F1C0.1080309@jrv.org> In-Reply-To: <4CF3F1C0.1080309@jrv.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.8.207 Cc: bu7cher@yandex.ru, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:36:59 -0000 On 11/29/10 19:32, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: >> Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem >> on GPT partitioning scheme. > > Please send the output of "camcontrol devlist" and "zpool status" on > FreeBSD-8.1. Then export the pool in FreeBSD-8.1, boot FreeBSD-9 with > verbose booting and send the output of "camcontrol devlist", "zpool > import BACKUP" and the part of /var/log/messages that shows FreeeBSD > searching for the pool during the import. Appended, you'll find some of the requested data. There is no valuable dmesg/message output, due to the simple fact, that after yesterday's "make world" and another import try the BACKUP00 pool was imported. The only thing to report is, that while importing the BACKUP00 pool, which is on devise ada3, I got an message on console like: Nov 29 21:13:36 <0.2> thor kernel: ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1. This strange message always came up when importing the BACKUP00 pool (BACKUP is a typo, sorry for the inconvenience) and when it was about to fail. > > It might be useful to know what disk controller is being used. > >> => 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) >> 34 4062 - free - (2.0M) >> 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) > > It is not related to your problem, but how did that unused space wind up > before partition 1? Well, my fault. I initiated the partitions with the "-b 4096" option set for the first partition. It was so nice and at ease playing around with gpart ... And here comes the data requested: #FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 ---------------------- camcontrol devlist at scbus4 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0) at scbus5 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,ada1) at scbus6 target 0 lun 0 (pass2,ada2) at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3) at scbus9 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass4) #FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 -------------------------- camcontrol devlist at scbus4 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0) at scbus5 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,ada1) at scbus6 target 0 lun 0 (pass2,ada2) at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3) at scbus8 target 0 lun 0 (pass4,ada4) at scbus9 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass5) (needed to swap 1st and 5th drive since FBSD 8 was installed with MBR and no labels and needed device special file for mounting partitions while on FreeBSD 9 I used the first time GPT partitioning scheme with labeling for mounting via /etc/fstab) #FreeBSD 8 zpool status: ------------------------ pool: BACKUP00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM BACKUP00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada3p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: THOR00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors #FreeBSD 8 pciconf -lcv (for the requested controller) ------------------------ ahci1@pci0:0:31:2: class=0x010601 card=0x82d41043 chip=0x3a228086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '6 port SATA AHCI Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SATA cap 05[80] = MSI supports 16 messages enabled with 1 message cap 01[70] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 12[a8] = SATA Index-Data Pair cap 09[b0] = vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 In kernel config, I use AHCI driver modell, not the atapi one, but I guess this is obvious due to 'adaXX' ... And by the way, the 2 TB drive in question is sold as a 'PVR/VCR video special device", I mistakenly ordered this one since it promissed low power, high sustain-reliability (it is used for backups), but some web sites claim that the controller of this specific, expensive 2 TB hdd deals different with errornous blocks read or written out - I can not verify this, since I have no technical paper nor do I understand much of HDD electrical engineering ... Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 02:03:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714DB106564A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernaadiaz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2875F8FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so4046913yxh.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:03:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer; bh=oRczRqQTfG7ksATBQy4eudF0CxVxOLGYE9pepmE5jw4=; b=Y1U86GjoCt0Oxp86Vdx5E4wVF4YSUjKz7KBAqQGA4fsZrZSRcB3kHNUb20Wj7zqL8O E+DOd0brM6JU8HaF9FCC6g/7iasrjNigPbxTQ0hCRjb6I1fq3+Uz8CWEgBu/YO4RYftx AKSyEwA8mZmYSaXrR3OAF0nXi6dq3VpZ1S5Fc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=p1IEBH8gwS+aVZGfPvrSUocZ8grv7EwmpUvVcT/KN0Ar73ZN6f7hJS7gbDS7eJIFW+ h/WoGGDlMlAe7eJkp+Wfl1C1eT1Tw20rNpBW+Um2q3tFOxn5iizuleRdD+vTb3W6QrnA bFXKv8r65U4v0CzhFcdTbdG1V4ZFH1+kLr4ao= Received: by 10.150.215.3 with SMTP id n3mr396726ybg.78.1291253626410; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (pc-231-44-161-190.cm.vtr.net [190.161.44.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm2081924ybe.18.2010.12.01.17.33.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:33:45 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <86841FBA-78CD-4CA6-9A77-F5668515C0E6@gmail.com> From: Fernando To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B500) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:36:46 -0300 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B500) Subject: How to running air video server on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 02:03:21 -0000 Enviado desde mi iPad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 03:26:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106B71065674 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 03:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE00D8FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 03:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EF51CDC9; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:10:36 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4CF70E2C.60708@hdk5.net> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:10:36 -1000 From: Al Plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org, Manolis Kiagias Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: No resopnse on FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:26:30 -0000 Is the questions site and the test server off line? -- ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* + < email: noc@hdk5.net > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 04:10:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1CF10656A3; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 04:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (adsl-75-1-14-242.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net [75.1.14.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A608FC0C; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 04:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id oB21X12M064624; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:33:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201012020133.oB21X12M064624@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:33:01 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis To: oxyd.oxyd@gmail.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 8.1-RELEASE hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:10:34 -0000 On 1 Dec, Ondøej Majerech wrote: > Hello, > > my 8.1-R system has just started hanging on reboot. Specifically after > I svn up'd my source and updated from 8.1-R-p1 to -p2. > > Some kind of hang occurs on every reboot attempt. Usually it hangs at > the "Rebooting..." message, but sometimes the thing just locks up > before it even syncs disks. shutdown -p now seems to shutdown the > system successfully each time. One of my systems running 8.1-STABLE started reliably(?) hanging at the "Rebooting..." step whenever try to reboot it. It's been doing this for the last month or so. I haven't seen the earlier hang. 9.0-CURRENT on the same hardware doesn't experience this problem. I haven't had time to try to debug this, so I've just been using the reset switch when it hangs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 06:26:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71925106564A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14D38FC14 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB26Q0Rn022067; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:26:01 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:26:00 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Jerry In-Reply-To: <20101201233603.5E9A610656E9@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101202163648.A20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101201233603.5E9A610656E9@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:26:04 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 339, Issue 6, Message: 22 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:59:30 -0500 Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:36:43 -0600 > Ryan Coleman articulated: > > > As the page says, it's READ ONLY in Linux... kinda pathetic. Thanks, > > Microsoft, for changing things AGAIN so you cannot be shared safely > > with others. > > First of all, exFAT is a major improvement over FAT32 for Flash drives. So is UFS, especially if you use suitable parameters to makefs :) > The fact that it is apparently only READ ONLY in a Linux environment > has nothing to do with Microsoft but rather with the FOSS community at > large. They could either purchase a license, which of course they > won't; or they could reverse engineer a driver for it. That's rich, Jerry .. you expect FREE, OPEN SOURCE operating systems to pay Microsoft for a licence to implement a PROPRIETARY, CLOSED SOURCE, PATENT-PENDING filesystem? Or reverse engineer it and risk a lawsuit for patent infringement, should the US Patent Office rubber-stamp it? Ok, benefit of the doubt: how much would a licence to implement exFAT so it can be freely distributed with FreeBSD cost the FreeBSD Foundation? No real clues at: http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/IPLicensing/Programs/exFATFileSystem.aspx?pf=true but as an insider you should be able to get us some more solid info? > There is also this link on the page: > http://www.tuxera.com/products/exfat-for-embedded-systems/ > > Perhaps that might be of assistance. To the ability to freely distribute exFAT access with FreeBSD? Hardly. > In any case, I find using removable drives far easier on a Microsoft > machine anyway Unless you were being compensated for such inconvenience, it's amazing that you'd ever consider using anything other than 'Microsoft machines'. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 06:41:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44209106566C for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james-freebsd-fs2@jrv.org) Received: from zimbra.jrv.org (adsl-70-243-84-11.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [70.243.84.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A2A8FC12 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0771816A095; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:21:35 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.housenet.jrv Received: from zimbra.jrv.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.housenet.jrv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNFmGbvFO70X; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:21:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.2.15] (adsl-70-243-84-14.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [70.243.84.14]) by zimbra.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6297816A04D; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:21:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4CF73B2D.6040506@jrv.org> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:22:37 -0600 From: "James R. Van Artsdalen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4CF369C4.4030007@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4CF3F1C0.1080309@jrv.org> <4CF6DC17.3080208@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4CF6DC17.3080208@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bu7cher@yandex.ru, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:41:32 -0000 On 12/1/2010 5:36 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > There is no valuable dmesg/message output, due to the simple fact, > that after yesterday's "make world" and another import try the > BACKUP00 pool was imported. The only thing to report is, that while > importing the BACKUP00 pool, which is on devise ada3, I got an message > on console like: > > Nov 29 21:13:36 <0.2> thor kernel: ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1. Unfortunately until the problem reproduces there's no way to dig into it further. boot-verbose will show what ZFS finds when it scans ada3p1 both for the pool and for the vdev (by GUID). ZFS can't claim ada1 since that's GPT-partitioned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 11:45:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220F71065670 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1E08FC19 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so4249471gyf.13 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:45:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=ISnSUs/aHJCfuoOtVvKGb68CF4VjDpf76AxqRDVBCLE=; b=uWlLEFvR3f69uIzkkxWRUkDHFkszmIpRuFfr1KIa8gHf5vOPnZuHvV39nBaOxT8N8R 45b2rgaS399dZVu6fC8piHysP0F11LxsGyBDqVj1s+6YcDqVHGSdMdHsjRFYc4DelIQ6 afnlo6VLmJxazOaqbzoIHn4ZZYg6zLZ4J+QrM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=X3hP3/6tn9HcetG3pS7G22PSICy7c6WJ6xVj4w7+wUb8KLAvINEjmjjr013yU99kz2 wrqz+kXUYDfjccHYAVu7vlwTrM5+MvZ0rs2NJM8R/XRJFpyKl2W6cVwlrDCWo69CMBf2 VUXLmc4GO20iHOeG9nrl6ZJ4J1RZlFH3UtoSs= Received: by 10.150.57.1 with SMTP id f1mr1369160yba.48.1291290319152; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:45:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([201.21.169.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n28sm259583yha.16.2010.12.02.03.45.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:45:18 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20101202163648.A20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101201233603.5E9A610656E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20101202163648.A20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:45:15 -0200 Message-ID: <1291290315.9744.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:45:20 -0000 According to Darwin's law, the most fit will survive... if you have the choice of buying 2 usb drivers, one that have fat32 and other that have exfat you, as a normal customer, does not know about the details of fat32, ntfs, ufs, zfs, xfs.... but you know about price, that is: the one that pays something to M$ costs more than the other, I bet the one that costs less (even a cent less...) will get better chance to survive.. and in some time there will be no exfat usb drivers ... besides it is easy to format a fat32 on FreeBSD or even in Linux, Mac.. I can show, for example, the docx, in my country, the document format standard is ODT... or PDF... no no doc, no docx... Thanks for listening... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 14:22:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CCE1065694 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C28FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oB2EKAwe016930; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:20:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oB2EKAgl016929; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:20:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:20:09 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi Message-ID: <20101202142009.GC16748@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101201233603.5E9A610656E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20101202163648.A20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1291290315.9744.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1291290315.9744.6.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Thumb Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:22:25 -0000 On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:45:15AM -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > According to Darwin's law, > the most fit will survive... That is a misrepresentation of Darwin's theory. It does not say the 'most fit' will survive. It says that the one that is best able to expoit the environmental resources will survive. It could be one who would be less or even least fit in another environment. A lot of [possibly conflicting] things go in to defining an environment. ////jerry > > if you have the choice of buying 2 usb drivers, > one that have fat32 and other that have exfat > you, as a normal customer, does not know about > the details of fat32, ntfs, ufs, zfs, xfs.... > but you know about price, that is: > the one that pays something to M$ costs > more than the other, > > I bet the one that costs less (even a cent less...) will > get better chance to survive.. and in some time > there will be no exfat usb drivers ... > > besides it is easy to format a fat32 on FreeBSD or even in > Linux, Mac.. > > I can show, for example, the docx, in my country, the document > format standard is ODT... or PDF... no no doc, no docx... > > Thanks for listening... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 19:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB48106567A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 19:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce-14519295-689737005@nf114.n-email.net) Received: from nf114.n-email.net (nf114.n-email.net [208.40.253.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EBE8FC08 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 19:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.114] ([172.16.2.114:3764] helo=nf114.n-email.net) by ecelerity (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.0.28.38595 r(38597)) with ESMTP id 3F/1B-13642-293F7FC4; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:29:22 -0500 From: "Skyline Exhibits" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:28:27 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: X-Binding: skyline MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Was your last trade show successful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:54:48 -0000 [1]click here if you are having problems viewing this email [2]Skyline Exhibits Trade Show and Event Calculator CD [measurement_cd.jpg] Justify the value of your trade show program! If you can't prove the value of your program, you can't fund it. This CD has 13 calculators to measure and report the value of your trade show program. [3]Click here to request any of Skyline's exhibiting tools Booth Staffing Guidebook [boothstaff_brochure.jpg] Designed to provide hints, tips and techniques from the best practices in the industry to help exceed exhibitor objectives. 46 pages. [4]Click here to request any of Skyline's exhibiting tools Request free valuable tools from Skyline Exhibits today! [whatsworking_wp.PNG] [internationalexh_wp.PNG] [custommodular_wp.PNG] [it_wp.PNG] [skylinebrochure.PNG] What's Working in Exhibiting Whitepaper International Exhibiting Whitepaper The Trend to Custom Modular Exhibits Whitepaper Whitepaper: Information Technology Exhibition & Event Marketing Trends & Outlook Skyline Products Brochure [5]CLICK HERE to request complimentary copies of any of Skyline's exhibiting tools. This email was sent to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org This email was sent by: Skyline Exhibits 3355 Discovery Road, Eagan, MN 55121 [6]Click here to leave this mailing list References 1. http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14519295/689737005/54072428/0/ 2. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmpnpyjlp.html#FPMap0 3. http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14519295/689737005/50600159/0/ 4. http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14519295/689737005/50600159/0/ 5. http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14519295/689737005/50600159/0/ 6. http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14519295/689737005/17596298/0/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 20:33:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028101065672 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce-14520150-689737005@nf114.n-email.net) Received: from nf114.n-email.net (nf114.n-email.net [208.40.253.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB5F8FC18 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.114] ([172.16.2.114:42466] helo=nf114.n-email.net) by ecelerity (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.0.28.38595 r(38597)) with ESMTP id 1B/E7-02918-DEDF7FC4; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:13:33 -0500 Message-ID: X-eadmin-type: unsubscribed From: "Email Administrator" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:12:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Binding: skyline Subject: Re: your unsubscribe request X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:33:35 -0000 You have been unsubscribed from 'skyline-sbm'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 22:04:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19F4106564A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@b1c1l1.com) Received: from lancer.b1c1l1.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f358:1a:1a:1000::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D946B8FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from supra.b1c1l1.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc48:12:2:225:4bff:fecf:472e]) by lancer.b1c1l1.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E7B35C29; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:04:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CF817F7.8050005@b1c1l1.com> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:04:39 -0800 From: Benjamin Lee User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101126 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Terribile References: <552239.98378.qm@web110303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <552239.98378.qm@web110303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA23BAB3E09BDCCAF43ACD8DF" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: swap pager:indefinite wait buffer: message out of vm.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:04:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA23BAB3E09BDCCAF43ACD8DF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/01/2010 03:23 PM, Mark Terribile wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Would some kind soul please tell me the meaning of a message coming > from vm.c (FreeBSD 7.2): > "swap pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 2, size: 4096" >=20 > This message occurs after a return from an msleep whose last args are P= SWP, > "swread", and HZ*20 . >=20 > When it occurs, some interactive program is locked up. It recovers > sometime later. >=20 > My best guess is that this is a complaint that swap or paging I/O has b= een > excessively delayed. It is occurring while I am running disk-to-disk > transfers that have deep buffering. Think mbuf(1), but it's my own cod= e, > testing some algorithms. I speculate that if the disk queuing/head mov= ement optimization doesn't let the heads move off the file system > where the file resides (and I only see this with large, single files) > then this problem might result. But that is a guess, and speculation. >=20 > Does anyone know if this can occur under later versions of FreeBSD? Hi Mark, Do you have any test cases that reliably reproduce the problem? I've seen it crop up very infrequently on 8.1-RELEASE but I haven't been able to reproduce it. --=20 Benjamin Lee http://www.b1c1l1.com/ --------------enigA23BAB3E09BDCCAF43ACD8DF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM+Bf8AAoJEDQaOGXZe8jknmcQALOAR5LFb5VI/sSTTjKrjHS1 22FgzsXrW47e+qMPSlIuApGiTNvqIqjvwI7HZmdlVkm0B9nbJjPI+eMvxrSlYSoT huG/v33ia2RfAh0iQhBBVHx9FtOyQ4ybVZbcRyrqVKWXXkdIWdz28VpG4zmWZ4S0 jjpd29BWLqafB1GKO/GehKOzMXwMCvC/Wu6mAHZ/yZBf3eZEGPSGNSERwYFTBcg8 RZewuRE/sueHNTVZtxxnYZvTSFMVjzaCLwn86PsupOL82PMqDmH9qCZKKnQuz4Gw J9Yf9Em3VwC7qFMRr2Hj/Tm8IsXIHSYrXDxWVK79kGxf2GvQOIvZS5Y7KaUP9bkS f3eYdIyl+X4bJvAzTvoBD/p8NDpcEEuoshplNE+x1DaN0407KFLSEUYkmqeDJYAZ U1TFUw/63IUKI9r8degF+HBkSjOsScH1NanqlqznEQIjMevz41EqIjqQBKzIIBLz 8Xq3QviWPtTIwtRy3S2wdFjUghzqCigNybePtREYKLBTbkY0Hr333jcTc0nfG9a/ 4qfbcWelwTXaLAUCvPCfBiae78cptx58wGMv8X9q7cU5Yf2JgTeBfIYLaKJ39K0F 9mBjqWSIKn5bCBfhud39v53q1gZgBxJ9p1ASt3ZtUCgUlfu6fooh1Z2n+PNp9c4O 4ypcYzP5h8hTGFsFhBuf =SfoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA23BAB3E09BDCCAF43ACD8DF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 22:10:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6265A1065673 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2A98FC12 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POHLm-0000AS-MV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:10:02 +0100 Received: from cpe-188-129-89-231.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.89.231]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:10:02 +0100 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-89-231.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:10:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:09:49 +0100 Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <4CF5624F.4020901@gmail.com> <20101130221550.2cf6d726@davenulle.org> <4CF5F5F8.9070408@gmail.com> <20101201141325.7a223b5e@core.draftnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-89-231.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: 8 partitions maximum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:10:10 -0000 On 12/01/10 21:23, David DEMELIER wrote: > Yes it is just exercises, I heard bsdlabel was grow up so I wanted to > test, now I don't really understand why it's fixed to 20 only. I also It turns out that something like 22.75 bsdlabel partition table entries fit in a 512 byte sector, so this was rounded down to 20. This is where this limit comes from - the size of the sector. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 00:30:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A561065672 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.net (mail.mgwigglesworth.net [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052898FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:30:55 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:30:52 -0500 Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CF20F7F.9030400@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291000447.19411.16.camel@devel.atol.pacnwsystems.com> Message-ID: <4CF83A3C.10802@mgwigglesworth.net> From: "Martes G Wigglesworth" Received: from devsystem.mgwigglesworth.net (192.168.5.12 [192.168.5.12]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.net; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:25:20 -0500 Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Build World fails on 7-stable with cvs sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:30:56 -0000 Greetings Mickael I am now testing with the same sources tree on three different virtual machines to see if it will fail. If it won't, then I will just have to accept that one of the other poster's indications that it may be hardware related, is the cause, and look at replacing that equipment. So far, two of them are still running without error with the same sources tree. (Just started the third on another system for good measure.) I am running them on different host architectures as both a test of the vm, and as a test to make sure that a clean install of 7.3-Release will not fail upon building world on them. On 11/28/2010 10:14 PM, Michael Eubanks wrote: > Curious. What does your ``make'' command look like? My make command is as follows: make buildworld I actually have the entire process built into a simple shell script which runs the commands and throws their output to log files, and then reports back to the central "updater" script with any errors at any level of the process. Nothing fancy, because I forgot that it was their about a month later when I didn't need to update anymore systems. -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 00:40:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA591065674 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E328FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix, from userid 12346) id EA8CE16B501; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:16:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.90]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B8C2916B4FE for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:16:01 -0600 (CST) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:13:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:13:53 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@debranded.6dollardialup.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101202181201.F3715@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sanitizer: Anomy and SpamAssassin mail filter - see http://www.6dollardialup.com/support/spaminfo.html Subject: Switch ppp.conf with tun w/o reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:40:50 -0000 Can I switch ppp configurations for ppp on demand using tunneling without rebooting? -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 00:45:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2C21065672 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712408FC15 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:45:42 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCT00C68U40R190@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:45:36 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012020155 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-02_12:2010-12-03, 2010-12-02, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20101202181201.F3715@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:45:36 -0800 Message-id: <55DFCB0B-C7D7-48E9-BBCF-1A758C97E40E@mac.com> References: <20101202181201.F3715@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> To: Lars Eighner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switch ppp.conf with tun w/o reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:45:42 -0000 On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: > Can I switch ppp configurations for ppp on demand using tunneling without rebooting? If you're asking about the userland ppp using tunXX interfaces, yes. You can kill ppp, then re-run "ppp -auto config2" and it will bring up ppp using a second config instead. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 02:03:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2908C1065670 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24C38FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so7212156ewy.10 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:03:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.76 with SMTP id m12mr1896254ebb.25.1291341817194; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:03:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:03:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> References: <20101122170806.GA58734@dan.emsphone.com> <20101122213155.GC58734@dan.emsphone.com> <47405515-D6EF-4B80-B020-0C93987EBA29@vt.edu> <7F1EA323-F04F-4921-B169-E168E1CB1FC1@vt.edu> <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:03:16 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Weihang Wang Subject: Re: Got an error: Unknown option "DDB_CTF" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:03:39 -0000 > > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for your kind help. Now I am running FreeBSD on Virtualbox as a > guest OS on Ubuntu. But I got some other problems. I have searched on the > Internet but could not find a solution work for me. > Now the guest OS does have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual > ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) > has no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0="DHCP" in > /etc/rc.conf. But it still has no network access. In the virtualbox, I > choose the networking mode "Bridged" or "NAT", they don't work, either. I > found in the virtualbox the name of this virtual network interface is eth0. > But when i use ifconfig, there is no eth0 in this operating system. I don't > know whether this is the reason. > Hope you could give me some possible ideas on solutions. I will post a new > email on this problem, too. > Thank you very much. > > Best, > W.W. > Greetings Weihang, I've had a simmilar issue, infact. Having one now in my VM that will be fbsd9+zfs (testing stuff for my environment). The only way I can get proper access to the outside world is to allow VMWare or VBox to install the Bridgeing Adapter. In the VM Software, choose the bridging device and then choose any network device the VM offers you (in vBox I have 2 PCINET devices and 3 others, the choice doesn't matter really). When I assigned a static IP to the VM (in my case 192.168.0.20) but it doesn't work (be sure yo set the default route, 'route add gateway ). The only way I had it working was to let DHCP get an IP at the command line w/ 'dhclient -q '. Anyway, hope that helps a little. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 02:04:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CB41065693 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273728FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dagger.cc.vt.edu (dagger.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.114]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB323hmP006621 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:03:43 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by dagger.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id OCS84670; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:03:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB323hNw018690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:03:43 -0500 From: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:03:42 -0500 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=dagger.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020202.4CF84FFF.0073,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:04:14 -0000 Hi all, I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now = the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the = virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet = FAST III) has no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0=3D"DHCP" = in /etc/rc.conf. But it still has no network access. In the virtualbox, = I choose the networking mode "Bridged" or "NAT", they don't work, = either. I found in the virtualbox the name of this virtual network = interface is eth0. But when i use ifconfig, there is no eth0 in this = operating system. I am a little mass and struggling in this problem = several days and could not find a solution from the Internet. Hope who have ideas about this could give me some possible solutions. Thanks in advance. Best, W.W.=20= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 02:32:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0459106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBFB8FC16 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zidane.cc.vt.edu (zidane.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.227]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB32VUKq013830; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:31:30 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by zidane.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id MSS16808; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:31:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB32VTFM021204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:31:29 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:31:29 -0500 Message-Id: <3E47732A-E0F6-4E36-869B-2C816ECABD23@vt.edu> References: <20101122170806.GA58734@dan.emsphone.com> <20101122213155.GC58734@dan.emsphone.com> <47405515-D6EF-4B80-B020-0C93987EBA29@vt.edu> <7F1EA323-F04F-4921-B169-E168E1CB1FC1@vt.edu> <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=zidane.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020209.4CF85682.00D4,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Got an error: Unknown option "DDB_CTF" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:32:01 -0000 On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > Hi Chris, >=20 > Thanks for your kind help. Now I am running FreeBSD on Virtualbox as a = guest OS on Ubuntu. But I got some other problems. I have searched on = the Internet but could not find a solution work for me.=20 > Now the guest OS does have network access. When using ifconfig, the = virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet = FAST III) has no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0=3D"DHCP" = in /etc/rc.conf. But it still has no network access. In the virtualbox, = I choose the networking mode "Bridged" or "NAT", they don't work, = either. I found in the virtualbox the name of this virtual network = interface is eth0. But when i use ifconfig, there is no eth0 in this = operating system. I don't know whether this is the reason. > Hope you could give me some possible ideas on solutions. I will post a = new email on this problem, too. > Thank you very much.=20 >=20 > Best, > W.W. >=20 > Greetings Weihang, >=20 > I've had a simmilar issue, infact. Having one now in my VM that will = be fbsd9+zfs (testing stuff for my environment). The only way I can get = proper access to the outside world is to allow VMWare or VBox to install = the Bridgeing Adapter. In the VM Software, choose the bridging device = and then choose any network device the VM offers you (in vBox I have 2 = PCINET devices and 3 others, the choice doesn't matter really). When I = assigned a static IP to the VM (in my case 192.168.0.20) but it doesn't = work (be sure yo set the default route, 'route add gateway ). The = only way I had it working was to let DHCP get an IP at the command line = w/ 'dhclient -q '. Anyway, hope that helps a little. Hi, I will try and see whether the same method works for me. If it could not = get network access. I am afraid I could not use virtual machine and = might go back to run FreeBSD on real hardware. Thank you very much, Best, W.W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 02:40:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0FD1065679 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8088FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so4966037eyb.13 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.17.147 with SMTP id s19mr222113eba.51.1291344056784; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:40:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:40:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3E47732A-E0F6-4E36-869B-2C816ECABD23@vt.edu> References: <20101122170806.GA58734@dan.emsphone.com> <20101122213155.GC58734@dan.emsphone.com> <47405515-D6EF-4B80-B020-0C93987EBA29@vt.edu> <7F1EA323-F04F-4921-B169-E168E1CB1FC1@vt.edu> <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> <3E47732A-E0F6-4E36-869B-2C816ECABD23@vt.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:40:36 -0500 Message-ID: To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Got an error: Unknown option "DDB_CTF" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:40:58 -0000 > > Hi, > > I will try and see whether the same method works for me. If it could not > get network access. I am afraid I could not use virtual machine and might go > back to run FreeBSD on real hardware. Thank you very much, > > Best, > W.W. > > Weihang, The whole point of the VM right now is to try and test your software to see if it works on newer versions of FreeBSD. What is the Host OS? Is the Host OS doing anything strange to connect to the network? Did you allow the VM Software to install the bridge Adapter? C- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 02:57:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5171065670 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569168FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.cc.vt.edu (vivi.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.43]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB32v6QF020749; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:57:08 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by vivi.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id OMK62036; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:57:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB32v7r2023411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:57:08 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:57:07 -0500 Message-Id: <43D3F2D2-F9BB-4AA5-B21A-893E548CEEF5@vt.edu> References: <20101122170806.GA58734@dan.emsphone.com> <20101122213155.GC58734@dan.emsphone.com> <47405515-D6EF-4B80-B020-0C93987EBA29@vt.edu> <7F1EA323-F04F-4921-B169-E168E1CB1FC1@vt.edu> <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> <3E47732A-E0F6-4E36-869B-2C816ECABD23@vt.edu> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A02020A.4CF85C84.0145,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Got an error: Unknown option "DDB_CTF" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:57:39 -0000 On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I will try and see whether the same method works for me. If it could = not get network access. I am afraid I could not use virtual machine and = might go back to run FreeBSD on real hardware. Thank you very much, >=20 > Best, > W.W. >=20 >=20 > Weihang, >=20 > The whole point of the VM right now is to try and test your software = to see if it works on newer versions of FreeBSD. What is the Host OS? Is = the Host OS doing anything strange to connect to the network? Did you = allow the VM Software to install the bridge Adapter? >=20 > C- Hi Chris, I use FreeBSD version 8.1, the host OS is Ubuntu 10.10. The host OS = could connect to the Internet correctly. This host uses a private IP = address. Yes, I allowed the VM software to install the bridge adapter = now, when booting there are some msgs "no DHCP offers received". = Actually I am a little confused where the DHCP server is, do I need to = install a DHCP server? Also, do I need to add that line = "ifconfig_le0/pcn0=3D"DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf? I am also don't understand how to set the static IP address since when = setting a static IP address, we should have a router interface address, = right? But now it's only a virtual machine running on a real machine, = how can we do that? Thank you so much for your help. I am sorry for bring you so much = trouble.=20 Best, W.W.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 03:16:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EFD106566B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512368FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so4974095eyb.13 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.76 with SMTP id m12mr1934858ebb.25.1291346182865; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:16:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 19:16:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <43D3F2D2-F9BB-4AA5-B21A-893E548CEEF5@vt.edu> References: <20101122170806.GA58734@dan.emsphone.com> <20101122213155.GC58734@dan.emsphone.com> <47405515-D6EF-4B80-B020-0C93987EBA29@vt.edu> <7F1EA323-F04F-4921-B169-E168E1CB1FC1@vt.edu> <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> <3E47732A-E0F6-4E36-869B-2C816ECABD23@vt.edu> <43D3F2D2-F9BB-4AA5-B21A-893E548CEEF5@vt.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:16:02 -0500 Message-ID: To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Got an error: Unknown option "DDB_CTF" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:16:26 -0000 > > Hi Chris, > > I use FreeBSD version 8.1, the host OS is Ubuntu 10.10. The host OS could > connect to the Internet correctly. This host uses a private IP address. Yes, > I allowed the VM software to install the bridge adapter now, when booting > there are some msgs "no DHCP offers received". Actually I am a little > confused where the DHCP server is, do I need to install a DHCP server? Also, > do I need to add that line "ifconfig_le0/pcn0="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf? > I am also don't understand how to set the static IP address since when > setting a static IP address, we should have a router interface address, > right? But now it's only a virtual machine running on a real machine, how > can we do that? > Thank you so much for your help. I am sorry for bring you so much trouble. > > Best, > W.W. > Weihang, It's no trouble, below you will see what I have in my /etc/rc.conf for a static IP. I use this same configuration in FreeBSD7.3 (and old Sony Vaio PIII), FreeBSD8.1-amd64 (My HP Laptop) and in my FreeBSD9 VM. Obviously the device name changes depending on the machine, but otherwise the configuration is the same. If you have a Router that your internet is connected to, that will usually provide DHCP Services, else you would indeed need to set one up on the host and tell the bridge to use it. ifconfig_nfe0="inet 192.168.0.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" A quick search of vBox and Ubuntu revealed this URL: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking, I suggest giving it a read and see if you missed something. I do believe there are some extra steps necessary to set up a bridging device correctly on a Linux Host. I would also check out the vBox Community wiki as I believe there are some tips there as well for your Host OS. I am purposly vague about instructing you in *Linux* for a reason. Each OS does things differently, just as FreeBSD does things differently then Linux. They all speak a different langauge. The thing with Linux is that they are speak a different dialect of the same root language. The problem here, I don't speak Ubuntu's dialect. So I'll just safely point you to the resources that can help you. Some Links for you *https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VirtualBox https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=1787 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=716404 http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html - This one will be *endlessly* useful for you ... I would suggest checking out the whole handbook. vBox is actually very well documented* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 03:45:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA6E1065695 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BB08FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.cc.vt.edu (vivi.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.43]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB33igOI000311; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:44:42 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by vivi.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id OMK84785; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:44:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB33igdJ027247 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:44:42 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:44:41 -0500 Message-Id: <7DDA775B-9B93-4E4B-B719-77ADB8A763FA@vt.edu> References: <20101122170806.GA58734@dan.emsphone.com> <20101122213155.GC58734@dan.emsphone.com> <47405515-D6EF-4B80-B020-0C93987EBA29@vt.edu> <7F1EA323-F04F-4921-B169-E168E1CB1FC1@vt.edu> <3D14D589-F080-4D4C-93C1-60A896F8D6F3@vt.edu> <3E47732A-E0F6-4E36-869B-2C816ECABD23@vt.edu> <43D3F2D2-F9BB-4AA5-B21A-893E548CEEF5@vt.edu> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020201.4CF867AA.013D,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Got an error: Unknown option "DDB_CTF" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:45:13 -0000 On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:16 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > Hi Chris, >=20 > I use FreeBSD version 8.1, the host OS is Ubuntu 10.10. The host OS = could connect to the Internet correctly. This host uses a private IP = address. Yes, I allowed the VM software to install the bridge adapter = now, when booting there are some msgs "no DHCP offers received". = Actually I am a little confused where the DHCP server is, do I need to = install a DHCP server? Also, do I need to add that line = "ifconfig_le0/pcn0=3D"DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf? > I am also don't understand how to set the static IP address since when = setting a static IP address, we should have a router interface address, = right? But now it's only a virtual machine running on a real machine, = how can we do that? > Thank you so much for your help. I am sorry for bring you so much = trouble.=20 >=20 > Best, > W.W. >=20 > Weihang, >=20 > It's no trouble, below you will see what I have in my /etc/rc.conf for = a static IP. I use this same configuration in FreeBSD7.3 (and old Sony = Vaio PIII), FreeBSD8.1-amd64 (My HP Laptop) and in my FreeBSD9 VM. = Obviously the device name changes depending on the machine, but = otherwise the configuration is the same. If you have a Router that your = internet is connected to, that will usually provide DHCP Services, else = you would indeed need to set one up on the host and tell the bridge to = use it. >=20 >=20 > ifconfig_nfe0=3D"inet 192.168.0.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter=3D"192.168.0.1" >=20 > A quick search of vBox and Ubuntu revealed this URL: = https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking, I suggest = giving it a read and see if you missed something. I do believe there are = some extra steps necessary to set up a bridging device correctly on a = Linux Host. I would also check out the vBox Community wiki as I believe = there are some tips there as well for your Host OS. I am purposly vague = about instructing you in *Linux* for a reason. Each OS does things = differently, just as FreeBSD does things differently then Linux. They = all speak a different langauge. The thing with Linux is that they are = speak a different dialect of the same root language. The problem here, I = don't speak Ubuntu's dialect. So I'll just safely point you to the = resources that can help you. >=20 > Some Links for you >=20 > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VirtualBox > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking > http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=3D1787 > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=3D716404 > http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html - This one will be = *endlessly* useful for you ... I would suggest checking out the whole = handbook. vBox is actually very well documented Hi Chris, Thank you so much. I typed the lines you used in your rc.conf, it does = not work here. Perhaps I need do some other things, I do not know. I = have to check some of these resources you provide. I got this problem = several days ago, but still could not solve it now. It is really time = consuming... But anyway, I will check these resources. I will contact = you if I have any progress or other problems. : ) Thanks, Best, W.W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 04:00:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C51110656A4 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antarex@land.ru) Received: from mail3.ks.pochta.ru (mail3.ks.pochta.ru [62.141.94.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003278FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:00:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=land.ru; s=dkim; h=Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=3uxNYSnqufnddC6HcMoxuZek8pYWZ7PZb0gp51LMTog=; b=I4nmKFGulaoFcS0AfiPwvjB0SJFsaw7Xx7kyUO+i1tvDnbMF5L1eAE/WTNnBTJmJB9cW3KLF7NzIe1OB5SScGsFUfgh0KsrAvu6Seem6utzvb+m90uBuw1DzLPUl4Q00; Received: from [193.33.26.11] (port=3528 helo=[192.168.1.77]) by mail3.ks.pochta.ru with esmtpa id 1POMSe-0003YG-QM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:37:28 +0300 From: Dmitry Postolov Organization: Antarex Software To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:37:25 +0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201012030837.25426.antarex@land.ru> X-NoSpam-Exim-Host: 62.141.94.133 X-NoSpam-Exim-Port: 8092 X-NoSpam-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-NoSpam-Exim-Result: OK Subject: Kernel Panic at loading FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:00:35 -0000 Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English... On my notebook HP ProBook 4510s (Bios Compaq F17 (latest)) the problem of times in some weeks is observed at loading FreeBSD 8.1. --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid=0; apic id=00 fault virtual adress=0x14 fault code=supervisos read, page not present instruction pointer=0x20:0xc0966916 stack pointer=0x28:0xea0b7c50 frame pointer=0x28:0xea0b7c50 code segment=base 0x0, limit 0xfffff type 0x1b =DPL 0, pres 1, def 32 1, gran 1 processor eflags=interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 current process=15 (acpi_thermal) trap number=12 ppanic:smp_tlp_shutdown: interrapts disabled cpuid=0 Uptime: 25s Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort or switch off the system now --- Loading was spent with options by default (ACPI ON) as at ACPI OFF, the system isn't loaded in general on this notebook (into networks there were similar cases on this model laptop). Drops out too kernel panic at loading if it is necessary - then I will write log. Any thoughts to solve this problem? best regards, Dmitry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 04:38:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB331065693 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150278FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.87]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eRQU1f0031smiN4ACUe84d; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:38:08 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eUe61f0031f6R9u8gUe7sE; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:38:08 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:38:06 -0800 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:38:05 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:38:09 -0000 My old HP Laserjet 4+ is broken and I'm thinking about buying a new printer. I'd appreciate hearing recommendations from the list. My requirements: - Compatible with FreeBSD (obviously) - Laserjet preferred. Black & White only. I don't need to print photos or business brochures. - Very light home usage. (Tax forms and the occasional printout of a software manual for offline study.) - Low upfront and maintenance costs. Printers are like the old Gillette razors: the money's in the blades (toner or ink cartridges), not the device. - Any interface is OK. Parallel, USB, networked. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 04:51:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D581065673 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26208FC1F for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96595C21 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:56:38 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CF8768D.2090607@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:48:13 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:51:53 -0000 On 12/03/10 14:38, Charlie Kester wrote: > My old HP Laserjet 4+ is broken and I'm thinking about buying a new > printer. I'd appreciate hearing recommendations from the list. > > My requirements: > > - Compatible with FreeBSD (obviously) > > - Laserjet preferred. Black & White only. I don't need to print photos > or business brochures. > > - Very light home usage. (Tax forms and the occasional printout of a > software manual for offline study.) > > - Low upfront and maintenance costs. Printers are like the old Gillette > razors: the money's in the blades (toner or ink cartridges), not the > device. > - Any interface is OK. Parallel, USB, networked. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I haven't had too much trouble with printers except for photo and colour ones. Check the foomatic db and you should be fine. I have got a canon pixma photo printer and a samsung colour laser working with no trouble, just can't get photo quality so you should have no trouble I'd reckon. Low up front _and_ maintenance costs is pushing it IMO- like oil and water: never together. But of course that is always relative :) And it is also relative to where you live too. Just my 2c... :) Good luck! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 04:56:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF0B1065679 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.net (mail.mgwigglesworth.net [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D858FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:56:18 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:55:48 -0500 Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Message-ID: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> From: "Martes G Wigglesworth" Received: from devsecure.mgwigglesworth.net (192.168.5.10 [192.168.5.10]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.net; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:50:12 -0500 Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:56:19 -0000 On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: > Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) has no IP address. Have you attempted to select different available network interfaces? I have a similar issue when I first started using virtualbox, and it was due to not having the correct interface drop-down option from within the Settings tab on the VirtualBox Gui. (Where all the VMs are listed.) -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 05:33:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4FD106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFC38FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.cc.vt.edu (vivi.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.43]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB35XFWn028968; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:33:15 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by vivi.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id OML41413; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:33:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB35XDni002368 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:33:14 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:33:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020204.4CF8811B.0010,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:33:46 -0000 Hi Martes, I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by = FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel = PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for = Chris! Best, W.W. On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:55 PM, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote: >=20 > On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: >> Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, = the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using = PCnet FAST III) has no IP address. > Have you attempted to select different available network interfaces? >=20 > I have a similar issue when I first started using virtualbox, and it = was due to not having the correct interface drop-down option from within = the Settings tab on the VirtualBox Gui. (Where all the VMs are listed.) >=20 > --=20 > Respectfully, >=20 >=20 > Martes G Wigglesworth > M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC > www.mgwigglesworth.net >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 06:11:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAF31065695; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amoran@forsythia.net) Received: from celebrian.forsythia.net (celebrian.forsythia.net [173.13.138.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150BF8FC0A; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.200.0.171] (cerberus.forsythia.net [173.13.138.197]) by celebrian.forsythia.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB36B2e8047242; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:11:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amoran@forsythia.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Andrew Moran In-Reply-To: <9549_1291057382_4CF3F8E6_9549_238_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8D81@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:10:57 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <7EA93980-478A-418A-8FB1-3249097A7011@forsythia.net> <201011290954.07958.jhb@freebsd.org> <9549_1291057382_4CF3F8E6_9549_238_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8D81@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> To: Gary Gatten , John Baldwin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msk0 interface stops working when downloading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:11:23 -0000 Good to know about the GB switch vs 100MB switch.=20 But rather than downgrade my switch, I went ahead and bought a NIC and = installed it and will just ignore the onboard Marvel one until it = someday works :)=20 --Andy On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Gary Gatten wrote: >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org = [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Baldwin > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:54 AM > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: Andrew Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: msk0 interface stops working when downloading >=20 > On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:25:06 pm Andrew Moran wrote: >>=20 >> Hey guys, >>=20 >> After banging my head against this for a few hours, I've decided to = ask for=20 > help. I installed FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 on a Shuttle J1 4100 system = (tech=20 > specs here http://us.shuttle.com/J1_4100.aspx). I installed from DVD = and the=20 > install went fine. >>=20 >> I notice when I pkg_add -r anything, the network stops responding.=20= >>=20 >> Some details: >>=20 >> 1) I can reproduce it 100% by downloading a large file. low = traffic like=20 > the SSH connection does not trigger it. I think it's being triggered = by=20 > traffic above a certain rate.=20 >> 2) I can recover by restarting the network interfaces = (/etc/rc.d/netif stop; =20 > /etc/rc.d/netif start) >> 3) I see no errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages. Nothing at all. >> 4) I've tried the following in /etc/sysctl.conf: >> net.inet.tcp.tso=3D0 >> net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=3D0 >>=20 >> and in /boot/loader.conf: >> hw.pci.enable_msix=3D"0" >> hw.pci.enable_msi=3D"0" >> hw.bce.tso_enable=3D"0" >>=20 >> But the problem persists. >>=20 >> The interface is identified as: >>=20 >> mskc0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff = mem=20 > 0xfebfc000-0xfebfffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 >> msk0: = on=20 > mskc0 >> msk0: Ethernet address: 80:ee:73:01:60:7d >> miibus0: on msk0 >> e1000phy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 >> e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, = 1000baseT,=20 > 1000baseT-FDX, auto >> mskc0: [ITHREAD] >=20 > When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien = on the=20 > same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream = of pause=20 > frames. I've only had this problem with a gigE switch, it works fine = for me=20 > on a 10/100 switch. >=20 > --=20 > John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 > " When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien = on the same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless = stream of pause frames. " >=20 > If there's an option to disable Ethernet flow control, (commonly used = on Gig stuff) perhaps disabling it will prevent the unwanted "spewing". = Unwaanted spewing is always bad. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > >
>
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 06:24:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAD71065675 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F96B8FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.9] (dynamic-24-42-224-110.knology.net [24.42.224.110] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id oB36Dnh2002640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:13:50 -0600 References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <0D9AC4DE-844E-4C53-BBD6-2F956A2AFCD4@hiwaay.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: David Kelly Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:13:50 -0600 To: Charlie Kester X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:24:07 -0000 On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > My old HP Laserjet 4+ is broken and I'm thinking about buying a new > printer. I'd appreciate hearing recommendations from the list. My Brother HL5250DN has served 14,000 pages very satisfactorily so far. = Was $250 full MSRP at Staples in 2005 or 2006. Believe the current = version is 5350. Commonly appear on sale for $189 (but not that I've = seen at Staples). The xx50's have PCL and Postscript emulation, an xx40 only has PCL. xx70 = appears to be a 50 with WiFi. "D" stands for duplex. "N" for ethernet. Speaks lpd. 3rd party toner refills for 7,000 pages are $20. The one thing my 5250 has disappointed is printing of envelopes. The = envelope gets printed but comes out wrinkled and nearly wadded up. = Perhaps the 53xx's fixed this? I keep an HP inkjet loaded with = envelopes. This is important because I print something like 2 envelopes = per month. :-) Several years ago I was secretary/treasurer of a dirtbike club and was = printing as many as 1800 envelopes and the materials inside the = envelopes per year. Many times I went to the Post Office and bought $400 = of stamps. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 06:51:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D5F106566B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mta31.charter.net (mta31.charter.net [216.33.127.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D47E8FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.02.04 201-2219-117-106-20090629) with ESMTP id <20101203065134.CKUN4190.mta31.charter.net@imp11> for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:51:34 -0500 Received: from [192.168.10.106] ([71.93.14.246]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id eWrZ1f0045JXkbK05WrZNx; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:51:34 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=7AyF3mq78LMA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=NnU4A5Iv8r3oQ55M46YA:9 a=ONvUFfQzKnaJJy_hYs8A:7 a=iE4HHksz3wTnYkh1-RmMt4ceglkA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4CF83A3C.10802@mgwigglesworth.net> References: <4CF20F7F.9030400@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291000447.19411.16.camel@devel.atol.pacnwsystems.com> <4CF83A3C.10802@mgwigglesworth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:51:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1291359070.27025.9.camel@devel.atol.pacnwsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Build World fails on 7-stable with cvs sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:51:36 -0000 On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:30 -0500, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote: > Greetings Mickael > > I am now testing with the same sources tree on three different virtual > machines to see if it will fail. If it won't, then I will just have to > accept that one of the other poster's indications that it may be > hardware related, is the cause, and look at replacing that equipment. So > far, two of them are still running without error with the same sources > tree. (Just started the third on another system for good measure.) > Yes. This is probably dead on. The documentation will tell you the same thing. > I am running them on different host architectures as both a test of the > vm, and as a test to make sure that a clean install of 7.3-Release will > not fail upon building world on them. > > On 11/28/2010 10:14 PM, Michael Eubanks wrote: > > Curious. What does your ``make'' command look like? > My make command is as follows: > make buildworld > The only thing that I would suggest you might try, assuming that there are some options on the command line or in make.conf, is to remove those options (e.g., -j, etc.). This is what I was getting at before. If your other builds are successful and all else fails, though, you have a hardware issue on that machine. > I actually have the entire process built into a simple shell script > which runs the commands and throws their output to log files, and then > reports back to the central "updater" script with any errors at any > level of the process. Nothing fancy, because I forgot that it was their > about a month later when I didn't need to update anymore systems. > -Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 07:51:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE371065673 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F38FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so7067772fxm.13 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:51:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OE9xlQiepEw+MHP84lONIB/63K4lEtQkWFqtA9vuc3A=; b=t6yMRRThjaHNRhyGMGO2g1MIfvtebUHMw2KUj15o+ddX8RBsk2taHndeFOIeqxnSIr Fd36GC/JAXokVyF7OvCa4HasjtfvpB/5LYcjWRGw8InK3OWfPDVDVP4ZKTb+T1oy+wlX v0vwkNxrfdCBzs1cIUvOZzHppOLOej8BsqtOc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hyzf80zqmPg32pSI0Fj3Rafk81SfytGNbjB5RrC/XPELu3U32JLpf7mdb1pjzv5Rxo nGBq6IkeQXz2SNLFLd57OAwnlwnvBMRZLHcpMRO31mk24c1XAUoSSxebbhKH3DLTtSGX qwCytk5KerUVCwu2i6NT5LYnUZZDuHNQ528a0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.103.4 with SMTP id i4mr1683343fao.70.1291362667342; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.107.79 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 23:51:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF83A3C.10802@mgwigglesworth.net> References: <4CF20F7F.9030400@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291000447.19411.16.camel@devel.atol.pacnwsystems.com> <4CF83A3C.10802@mgwigglesworth.net> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:51:07 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build World fails on 7-stable with cvs sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:51:08 -0000 On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Martes G Wigglesworth < mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net> wrote: > I am now testing with the same sources tree on three different virtual > machines to see if it will fail. If it won't, then I will just have to > accept that one of the other poster's indications that it may be hardware > related, is the cause, and look at replacing that equipment. So far, two of > them are still running without error with the same sources tree. (Just > started the third on another system for good measure.) > > I am running them on different host architectures as both a test of the vm, > and as a test to make sure that a clean install of 7.3-Release will not fail > upon building world on them. > > > On 11/28/2010 10:14 PM, Michael Eubanks wrote: > >> Curious. What does your ``make'' command look like? >> > My make command is as follows: > make buildworld > > I actually have the entire process built into a simple shell script which > runs the commands and throws their output to log files, and then reports > back to the central "updater" script with any errors at any level of the > process. Nothing fancy, because I forgot that it was their about a month > later when I didn't need to update anymore systems. > You should follow ***ALL*** the steps on the handbook page on buildworld. >From what you have stated so far, you have not done that. If that still proves unsuccessful, booting off of a USB FreeBSD clean install drive should allow you to test a buildworld without attempting to run down an elusive hardware issue. If it's still broken in that situation, it would give the hardware problem theory a lot more credence. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 09:41:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DE21065679 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timm@ticore.de) Received: from businessbox4.server-home.net (businessbox4.server-home.net [195.137.212.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE7F8FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.141] (mail.shr.cc [87.193.183.98]) by businessbox4.server-home.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C444EA819A; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:25:51 +0100 (CET) From: Timm Wimmers To: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:25:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:41:45 -0000 Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang: > Hi Martes, > > I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! > Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris! In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get a private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM, because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as your HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you define routes, but bridging is mostly easier. In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP). -- Timm [1] HSOT = your Ubuntu Workstation From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 11:35:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3A11065672 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE978FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POTuq-0006zl-5x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:35:04 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:35:04 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:35:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 15 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: bash command line - can not type "c" char (not echoed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:35:05 -0000 Hi, this happens both in console and gnome xterm. No problem when change from bash prompt to sh subshell. There are packages, no ports on my system. $ uname -r 8.1-RELEASE $ env |grep -i shell SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash $ ls /var/db/pkg/bash-4.1.7/ No readline lib present. JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 08:02:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC541065675 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kan.sin@askit.com.hk) Received: from s221.sureserver.com (s221.sureserver.com [203.194.200.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28FB8FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15630 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Dec 2010 07:36:02 -0000 Received: from 153.35.246.220.static.netvigator.com (HELO BillGates) (220.246.35.153) by s221.sureserver.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2010 07:36:02 -0000 Message-ID: <32A06FA3CB2F4530BEFC066B42070B99@BillGates> From: "kan" To: Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:36:02 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:06:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: About FreeBSD command question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:02:44 -0000 Hi Support, I have a FreeBSD server for mailing, I must make backup and check the = which bit (32bit/64bit) is now use in FreeBSD,=20 so can you provide the command for me? Regards, Kan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 12:10:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDBD106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net (fmailhost03.isp.att.net [204.127.217.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384EE8FC14 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mueller6722.bellsouth.net (adsl-210-172-163.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.210.172.163]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20101203115958H03002teq3e>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:00:01 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.210.172.163] Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:00:29 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:10:12 -0000 Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard drive > 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive firmware can make sector size look like 512 bytes. I know fdisk can handle up to 2 TB; this limit is not just for BSD but Linux too. Western Digital has come out with a SATA hard drive of 3 TB. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 12:47:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2BA10656A6 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7BA8FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4052232qwj.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:47:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nKKGDjRBZ/xDIfm3S7jtccCuITR9dtMcDDEdFwb547c=; b=rGqXaZ+pt82rb5a2PlQ74vdCjXtNenOE1m9J+SuL/fd3FUu2/RoSNfjrPBB9yo2C0g 8ZydawM2i0fapTOLzBeoxoNESDMLi/mmt0/eptpU5jehmHxAhQeD5vh4i49+IX/SR5Q8 bjnVvnOlHkEEdxhiNum8Oyy6bmJs659AA2Yjc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dvKe5HL5C5K/k/sMFpRfQCuBSHra471BTxbZVrZrU+hVFpsZ7TYwNxHbpE/A++8rSI jVx0rBRKNoGR4kTT5kHkf69+XJ6xPRjfBlcOXZC6ZWN3uHx5USJpko4iYK3OFOqmKBSO /Av/C7c8ODqT7yxIaWp+Ydk37YCbzXPPi0IPM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.224.201 with SMTP id ip9mr1241906qcb.16.1291378891524; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.251.193 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:21:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 06:21:31 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Thomas Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:47:10 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard = drive > 2 TB? =A0Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive f= irmware can make sector size look like 512 bytes. =A0I know fdisk can handl= e up to 2 TB; this limit is not just for BSD but Linux too. > > Western Digital has come out with a SATA hard drive of 3 TB. > > Tom just curious if there is a 3TB disk that is NOT green.. I can only find the green version on newegg.com --=20 Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks http://www.fourmannetworks.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 12:53:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA821065694 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:53:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb.1234abcd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79598FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4058354qwj.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:53:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KtXlNvHnLwuc4rnK5JTM/8jIXFi6Nst6xGoyRcKpeUQ=; b=kvYMoKeD8LVzMzBHWhgaq4tU7NCiQaYGtsviP1TgfmA90fnO+MawmBGrbcoHnYcwJs At/KyEQ9GvpoCcn8LwASKarJsTVj99XcJa6HS2IsE7LYJ1j8ugtXBeU8LAWAO61/z76S bvnSQoC6pSpg8koCKjUz6yKz5PLbtU3A3I4vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iHXDBs2Tn4BS99dklUqLob4BTZb5b1VaHmZDLn4iZkkNFHeTgh+qABGMax1K2kcQNa MNyPx8GcrbrfcILbUxJHZDdLN2dsB+baDCORWRcezGstXFVep4mFRXdlZZx7MQJk8CCg ZD7ObfaqTwVX0ewqowrygKxmZGbTDp7TRybFA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.246.82 with SMTP id lx18mr1222741qcb.0.1291379309415; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:28:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.90.148 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 04:28:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:28:29 +0100 Message-ID: From: J B To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: bash command line - can not type "c" char (not echoed) [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:53:43 -0000 my .bashrc had some bind commands and that probably had something to do with it. I relogged in and all is OK. JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 13:12:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE6D1065672 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBF18FC1D for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB3DC5Z1008504; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:12:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MszD5WMFqSCL; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:12:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (ezekiel.daleco.biz [66.76.92.18]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB3DBvUU008497; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:11:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4CF8ECA1.6020507@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:12:01 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kan References: <32A06FA3CB2F4530BEFC066B42070B99@BillGates> In-Reply-To: <32A06FA3CB2F4530BEFC066B42070B99@BillGates> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About FreeBSD command question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:12:19 -0000 kan wrote: > Hi Support, > > I have a FreeBSD server for mailing, > I must make backup and check the which > bit (32bit/64bit) is now use in FreeBSD, > so can you provide the command for me? > > Regards, > Kan What output does: $ uname -m produce? Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 13:18:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74E51065673 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675978FC16 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so6470097qyk.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:18:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2+qMo9ncPnoUBHHr0y59byyO8/n0mo14Usfh+2AK5ro=; b=jn4nbuzbdzrIYvBjkChzTNfglA+k8uin0WoUKbyEl0hMwh1q2HL9OyfBBn0QHpkNlr OePyq16krKeOm1VANjnciid2z4x/kZICQ4GTNh/XmesYIIwdTg1QFjpd4qIyT3UUzoj+ mVfeIRVQAiCDi4PrR+Y1s/4RTvyzrC5t33HIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DaWTk+DKPmVtxhNlWscSg8vNIm7ZHy+65eUVHyhIw+nfzPB+MV6rzgfheOTNLn0D7L ulWBuKgGr39LdpzcgnZYRV96Regv1nLpg+rh4b+rASV6suexfGSbj5YxgiTABBkT3sFN ownk3HS9NJNz/A6KrTCMBy2hi4R8+eQU+hk0M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.207 with SMTP id cl15mr1348913qcb.190.1291382310735; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:18:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.178.197 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:18:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF65BD8.7090401@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:18:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brian McCann To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/netif & em interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:18:31 -0000 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Brian McCann wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Brian McCann wrote: > >> >> This isn't a Dell PoweEdge, but at least this is two platforms it's >> happening on now. =A0Strangely, my VMWare virtual machines that use the >> em driver do not have this problem. >> >> TSO is disabled. >> >> I just tried adding "up" to the $ifconfig_emX lines in rc.conf, and it >> didn't help. >> >> What I discovered (and I'm still playing with a bit), is that it has >> to do with checksum offloading. =A0If you run "ifconfig emX -rxcsum", >> the interface comes back to life. =A0I just added "-rxcsum" to the >> $ifconfig_emX lines in rc.conf, and I can run "/etc/rc.d/netif >> restart" now, and the NIC continues to work fine. >> >> I tried emailing the folks @ Intel that are mentioned in the man page >> for the em driver, but the mail bounced... >> >> --Brian >> >> -- > > Brian (and everyone else reading the thread), > > I just found this...the patch was submitted some time ago, but somehow > didn't make it into 8.1. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D141843 . =A0I'm trying it > now. =A0I'll keep you posted. > > --Brian > So, the patch didn't work against 8.1-RELEASE...it wouldn't compile since there were some new files in the driver package. So, I checked out the e1000 driver from HEAD and put it in my src tree (in addition to some supporting files that were necessary), and compiled that. I went through the SVN notes for the e1000 files, found the SVN version number, and updated all the files listed in the commit. Here's the link: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D209616 . Once I installed the new kernel module, all was well...no more problems. Hopefully this will be included in 8.2-RELEASE. Thanks, and good luck to all! --Brian --=20 _-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_-=3D-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 13:23:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095C91065696 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958518FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB3DNd9l000328; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:23:39 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB3DNbP8000304; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:23:37 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB4B533C1F; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:23:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:23:36 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: kan Message-ID: <20101203132336.GA17837@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <32A06FA3CB2F4530BEFC066B42070B99@BillGates> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32A06FA3CB2F4530BEFC066B42070B99@BillGates> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About FreeBSD command question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:23:55 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 03:36:02PM +0800, kan wrote: > > Hi Support, > > I have a FreeBSD server for mailing, I must make backup and check the which bit (32bit/64bit) is now use in FreeBSD, > so can you provide the command for me? > > Regards, > Kan Not too sure I'm clear what you're asking....you want to know whether your machine is 32 bit or 64 bit? $ uname -p If it says "amd64" it's 64 bit and if it says "i386" it's 32 bit. HTH. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 13:41:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E401065672 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb.1234abcd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEDC8FC15 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4105389qwj.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:41:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VgIN/Aybj0gPa3gSC24O5u7DzORrMN7S8RYfIpiswME=; b=Hx3exjY1ukJH3aoTJmilGirihK7y206X8bdwSjzXXHiMwj5cFMOl7y9MSRnevN/uff lSCmX3AK8O7q/AJ2pslUKwCKr6xdgxaqt/E5VBldJGaLN7kav4pgLRsx3p8ursst3wjj Ni/8ALhQAprp/JdmvMRqEP6CuOENgJNmiL8Uk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=nthklyVhpvifOx+Gcy1vzqvWNiaobFN+b/75EFmYEco2h5fvF50aHyfdblpY6c4IMn acKDW0smUXPELObymxxfWEDwBrOCnt39oYuAssWkn1jCi7o1OM7ppXNwuCbBqduVIxuf g6lYgrxxqNoG2gniCSJaLLcSkT7IqAne1yliU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.238.148 with SMTP id ks20mr1229875qcb.262.1291383681812; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.90.148 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:41:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:41:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: J B To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: console and bash - how to get Delete key working properly ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:41:23 -0000 Hi, I searched BSD docs and Google for answers, but none of them works. By "working properly" I mean for Del key to delete char under the cursor and not the previous one. It works in gnome xterm, but not in console. It works in sh with config hint from FreeBSD handbook: bind ^? ed-delete-next-char # for console bind ^[[3~ ed-delete-next-char # for xterm but not in bash (with or w/o the hint). Having readline lib installed does not make any difference as well. $ uname -r 8.1-RELEASE $ env |grep -i shell SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash $ ls /var/db/pkg/bash-4.1.7/ No readline lib installed. JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 13:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406351065674 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb.1234abcd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE748FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4106284qwj.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:42:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2E/NHUufPLDIqwlXoxXn8pqp4OByZsNDIBW+WT0gubg=; b=MLRA7bOfmiRH1Aa082s5VFgBhMRZ04l6Ject3JD2aFKtWXOfLAbEc+5oPf4ykKmSy7 IVtBvgvfBc78tOLz5fBiU7f1GYo/YWBz9Y7IRujk5gn2saQ6AIx3dQZMMeW28cwCLrzy M9Xla3XpWQUKb61yXhJ/g2Eug3JKbY36mzD9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PFt8XzVDp6eNZBQ+HZjO9Jj6bAD3yYc/RzhV8yg7rjnVxagCGBzptDd7ePtlmMN3N3 Su5boN1bIPMczCG603/mYltR5KWMuGeBLg5zSPjBA9b7OEqvwiCC/J9FsC52BoHlLtD2 8p40lSUlIofjY4SqDQzlWdH7sz50tBYOxy7jE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.80.77 with SMTP id s13mr1265718qck.186.1291383729842; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:42:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.90.148 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:42:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100 Message-ID: From: J B To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:42:11 -0000 Hi, I have: $ uname -r 8.1-RELEASE installed. I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in time), and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed CURRENT. But I have difficulty placing them in a dev and respository tree. For example, in my case, can I describe it as below 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE and the cycle repeats ? JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 15:54:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2493106566B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564428FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so5284423eyb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.76 with SMTP id m12mr2728290ebb.25.1291391667945; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:54:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:54:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:54:29 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Weihang Wang wrote: > Hi Martes, > > I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by > FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel > PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! > Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for > Chris! > > Best, > W.W. > > Good, glad it works for you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 16:14:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31C61065670 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC358FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so5303272eyb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.7.2 with SMTP id b2mr862423ebb.38.1291392857306; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:14:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:13:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:13:56 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Sam Fourman Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:14:23 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Thomas Mueller > wrote: > > Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard > drive > 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive > firmware can make sector size look like 512 bytes. I know fdisk can handle > up to 2 TB; this limit is not just for BSD but Linux too. > > > > Western Digital has come out with a SATA hard drive of 3 TB. > > > > Tom > > just curious if there is a 3TB disk that is NOT green.. I can only > find the green version on newegg.com > > -- > I don't believe their is one that isn't green. Even Tigerdirect lists the 3TB model as green. It also lists every model >1.5TB to be green as well.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 16:24:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568081065693 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67368FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07670E7167; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:24:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=FOzqYpxv+3Cl GKVwDR0+evOy8Fk=; b=WriK3HzuoSgqAuB84KTLmjwlY/BcrO4hOUigzVqPWGj7 oylmaYhb4fuNUCXOaYqiMXhB0ZgD7JbHsjNXqL8YemAQCnmW5qQtgY13iQXG0W17 hQ5JI/UBsaybeTF21VDgn1yDGdfGoxq/XpvJ3+7ZU4K3cGd1V2ugZyMSbgp22II= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=L/LWjD AyksAYZFqteJBlBUwd8QFkTdUlXtxSS+qVyBN3x2MU0wwE3RwiUgU9CRbQqHnNIY +wSNbFyEtMHKf75GMXftE90iILT6+iuISm5CAoMnP3wVudhXy0FnynxfV2/hiz10 49h35Be3t2ypFkmRcOmQ9WtveSpRWFsiwhCr0= Received: from unknown (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89918E7161; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:24:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:24:22 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Chris Brennan Message-ID: <20101203162422.00007981@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Sam Fourman Jr." , Thomas Mueller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:24:44 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:13:56 -0500 Chris Brennan wrote: > I don't believe their is one that isn't green. Even Tigerdirect lists > the 3TB model as green. It also lists every model >1.5TB to be green > as well.... According to http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=100 there are Caviar Black drives up to 2TB. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 16:26:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86A11065673 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FDE8FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so9628288wyf.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:26:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UX3vV3XzFHitqPZUJ5AtuAO4J5TmmPpEEHKTglSFwz0=; b=JyswmSVHgYK4wkWuS3S99Cz25jPZTMfXYY1fAHxURrmWekiqJCGk2Z9yCdMfoBb6Bm RH1210w6ABgueV9inserrHlInuWuiaV8XUKiFxQatnT0Y0xnagGqnX7TQtlP7yo6OcA4 VqyfZjBEzY9TRDhm8nwbebSEjG2u58WDyK3L0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Mh2O9M/6vYpAMfCOIqvZyM0t3S/IdSJ6oPWkzUrMp9dV6oLp93zdmwejR9+Xbdm2dZ tQFx4pZ7vFhzRhwMNA6JmTKbOekEGy0hqB+nFvECEiDY7q09k1nTW2T9uQ/62G/FjNtk f2DqlZyTA8tZJogChVhhxm5cpc0+pC+IaCDf8= Received: by 10.227.133.2 with SMTP id d2mr2156420wbt.92.1291393597975; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10sm1377291wbc.22.2010.12.03.08.26.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:26:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:26:33 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101203162633.2a84687d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:26:39 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100 J B wrote: > Hi, > > I have: > $ uname -r > 8.1-RELEASE > installed. > > I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in > time), and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch > followed CURRENT. But I have difficulty placing them in a dev and > respository tree. > > For example, in my case, can I describe it as below > 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE > and the cycle repeats ? Broadly n-STABLE branch-off from CURRENT and release security branches branch-off from a STABLE branch. Release candidates are usually points on a Stable Branch, and releases are points on the security branch. Occasionally it has been bit more complicated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:02:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13C51065679 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7848FC14 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POZyA-0000fv-B0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:02:54 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:02:54 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:02:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <20101203162633.2a84687d@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: np-19-75.prenet.pl User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:02:56 -0000 On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:26:33 +0000, RW wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100 > J B wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have: >> $ uname -r >> 8.1-RELEASE >> installed. >> >> I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in >> time), and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed >> CURRENT. But I have difficulty placing them in a dev and respository >> tree. >> >> For example, in my case, can I describe it as below 8.1-RELEASE -> >> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE and the cycle >> repeats ? > > Broadly n-STABLE branch-off from CURRENT and release security branches > branch-off from a STABLE branch. Release candidates are usually points > on a Stable Branch, and releases are points on the security branch. > Occasionally it has been bit more complicated. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks RW, this is how I visualize it: 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE CURRENT branch branches off RELEASE branch; STABLE branch branches off CURRENT branch; Release Security branch branches off STABLE branch; RCn are usually points (snapshots) on STABLE branch; RELEASE is a point (snapshot) on STABLE branch; RELEASE is a point (snapshot) on Release Security branch; Occasionally it has been a bit more complicated -:) Still not sure about: CURRENT (off RELEASE branch at time of release ?) RC (why "usually" ?) RELEASE (only one valid, or both, depending on circumstances ?) JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:09:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E12106566C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F3C8FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so9047150bwz.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:09:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CARegAWERocqruSk539zA6pIkAbAnCmBykBx6oBtgbk=; b=q8T4VUw/EGlMDTVkMQ9bNGqcXC9G6kfyVavtAUemwVq2uTB5QLNnhcKs7H2oWj2p+G 191SoMRYSSD6QiMcqOQGO8NjAKKWGljppZDdyKAsSg/tEWkNw5Rrt/8F4cxrglMiQJ3f VOy8P6aXBGKtKWNEaKHsEb+qid3mIt0ZTzCIU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=N7jk/Pky9RdX61RBpHENNFt4euCHEmVK/CJWcaQTrQZuCwfgDfk8QgMEMdZ7hUcr5y JK9l2W8RUBI6Bj+dmjIecaZkvhrQoeeIdM4BTdabytv9Bjkar0fqtsLjLzM0RtiqPvPm GQStjrd2opLvctGYVdMGGcwPcfjTyfa8AyHeQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.62.209 with SMTP id y17mr2949333bkh.88.1291399766420; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:09:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.121.67 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:09:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012030837.25426.antarex@land.ru> References: <201012030837.25426.antarex@land.ru> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:09:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Dmitry Postolov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Panic at loading FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:09:29 -0000 2010/12/3 Dmitry Postolov : > Hi to All! > > Sorry for my bad English... > > On my notebook HP ProBook 4510s (Bios Compaq F17 (latest)) the > problem of times in some weeks is observed at loading FreeBSD 8.1. > > --- > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid=0; apic id=00 > fault virtual adress=0x14 > fault code=supervisos read, page not present > instruction pointer=0x20:0xc0966916 > stack pointer=0x28:0xea0b7c50 > frame pointer=0x28:0xea0b7c50 > code segment=base 0x0, limit 0xfffff type 0x1b =DPL 0, pres 1, def 32 1, gran > 1 > processor eflags=interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 > current process=15 (acpi_thermal) > trap number=12 > ppanic:smp_tlp_shutdown: interrapts disabled > cpuid=0 > Uptime: 25s > Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort or switch > off the system now > > --- > > Loading was spent with options by default (ACPI ON) as at ACPI OFF, the system > isn't loaded in general on this notebook (into networks there were similar > cases on this model laptop). Drops out too kernel panic at loading if it is > necessary - then I will write log. > > Any thoughts to solve this problem? > > best regards, > Dmitry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Which version is it? I also have a probook 4510s and I don't have any problem .. cheers -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:13:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915CF1065670 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1EC8FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1BB3D67B; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:13:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB3IDdDi001507; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:13:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:13:39 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Charlie Kester Message-Id: <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:13:42 -0000 On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:38:05 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > My old HP Laserjet 4+ is broken and I'm thinking about buying a new > printer. In case you have been happy with your 4+, consider getting a used HP office-class laser printer. I can recommend the HP LaserJet 4000 (maybe including a duplexer, very handy). Interfaces are parallel and network - use network if possible. > I'd appreciate hearing recommendations from the list. Office-class equipment. Really. Don't mess with home consumer crap - it will turn out to be more expensive than you might think at the beginning. Used office-class hardware is okay. If possible, test it before buying. > My requirements: > > - Compatible with FreeBSD (obviously) Make sure it conforms to existing standards. Postscript is good, PCL is good. Both are well supported, and PS makes your life even easier. > - Laserjet preferred. Black & White only. I don't need to print photos > or business brochures. I'm using a HP Laserjet 4000 duplex for more than 5 years now at home, I'm happy with it, allthough it's a _huge_ printer with all the accessories, but I don't care for that. On a secondary system, I have a HP Laserjet 4 (the "normal 4"), which I own for more than 15 years now and did HEAVILY use it. I got it as a used printer, so I can't tell you what the pre-owner did with it. This printer is still FULLY FUNCTIONAL. This should give you an impression of HOW GOOD "old hardware" is - if you have the right one. > - Very light home usage. (Tax forms and the occasional printout of a > software manual for offline study.) Also a plus for a laser printer. Unlike regular home-crap ink, toner doesn't get solid. One toner cartridge should serve you many years. > - Low upfront and maintenance costs. Printers are like the old Gillette > razors: the money's in the blades (toner or ink cartridges), not the > device. Used office-class equipment, I can't emphasize it enough. The HP Laserjet printers have a good "eco-mode standby behaviour", so even energy costs are low, compared to the usual home consumer ink-pee stuff where a seperate power supply consumes energy even when the printer is "off" (haha). > - Any interface is OK. Parallel, USB, networked. Network is the way to go. USB *may* be okay. Parallel is not living anymore - allthough I'm still using it that way, but my home setting is a life support system for obsolete technology anyway. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:17:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8902110656AB for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5A18FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so5215171gwj.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:17:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=4VH7QroXZsDaLrNp7rQgQa8S7ALzZwImJHfmXMoMhiU=; b=CaHX6/1va5b/6iQrRi/d9yNADfvUyjskjUOb67e3B8hUm8tSb8/LOksZgDpG2TABFl 97sceSCmiFRwL3Sys+g1pTV95UpzM4vpcJvcOf38sMZPCVfmrhZ8ot/hhUfveWvigQkt NcWLUerJbgyfn+kBjhB6wgac6+lpSiE/RARmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=g0ihDFTsn3EXdGVXqJM0wFKpA99QWSdvIiS4aQZKjB1mVdK2FL4FKZcioRtD1SSXoY ES5x76P3seMeREAFV2e7bbZBvdnckZ3ce0kELNe7zq/P2Euj3kxOZfPo382yv4odIzri S6mXY3ksPEoaKn0+Bz2IaOvvzv7Qs5871y0gY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.83 with SMTP id o19mr2920711bkr.31.1291400269491; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:17:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:17:49 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: JB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bash command line - can not type "c" char (not echoed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:17:51 -0000 Glad you solved it. Are you aware that packages and ports are identical once installed? Chris -------- Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 3 Dec 2010 11:35, "JB" wrote: > Hi, > > this happens both in console and gnome xterm. > No problem when change from bash prompt to sh subshell. > There are packages, no ports on my system. > > $ uname -r > 8.1-RELEASE > $ env |grep -i shell > SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash > $ ls /var/db/pkg/bash-4.1.7/ > No readline lib present. > > JB > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:27:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C02106566B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:27:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antarex@land.ru) Received: from mail3.ks.pochta.ru (mail3.ks.pochta.ru [62.141.94.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1B58FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:27:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=land.ru; s=dkim; h=Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=hJstPpyoZ8rCJHhNHbp1Y79l/m+eqaEKwzeMvBF0xqY=; b=o3RaYRNITpwbnwpzMK+exC/PO2G+4PSMw0mUSM7ppO0QBt1G5PvuQsL9ZfUsNemjIHr9JBuRbpW87DX4UCDZ/M+A2Ps/Qx8zMV+/s6oqxVvYm78SgIdlbSQptUGSRRiE; Received: from [193.33.26.11] (port=43498 helo=[192.168.1.77]) by mail3.ks.pochta.ru with esmtpa id 1POaM4-0003wF-G2; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:27:36 +0300 From: Dmitry Postolov Organization: Antarex Software To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, demelier.david@gmail.com Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:27:32 +0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201012030837.25426.antarex@land.ru> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201012032327.33114.antarex@land.ru> X-NoSpam-Exim-Host: 62.141.94.133 X-NoSpam-Exim-Port: 8092 X-NoSpam-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-NoSpam-Exim-Result: OK Cc: Subject: Re: Kernel Panic at loading FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:27:40 -0000 On Friday 03 December 2010 23:09:26 David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/12/3 Dmitry Postolov : > > Hi to All! > > > > Sorry for my bad English... > > > > On my notebook HP ProBook 4510s (Bios Compaq F17 (latest)) the > > problem of times in some weeks is observed at loading FreeBSD 8.1. > > > > --- > > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > cpuid=0; apic id=00 > > fault virtual adress=0x14 > > fault code=supervisos read, page not present > > instruction pointer=0x20:0xc0966916 > > stack pointer=0x28:0xea0b7c50 > > frame pointer=0x28:0xea0b7c50 > > code segment=base 0x0, limit 0xfffff type 0x1b =DPL 0, pres 1, def 32 1, > > gran 1 > > processor eflags=interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 > > current process=15 (acpi_thermal) > > trap number=12 > > ppanic:smp_tlp_shutdown: interrapts disabled > > cpuid=0 > > Uptime: 25s > > Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable > > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort or > > switch off the system now > > > > --- > > > > Loading was spent with options by default (ACPI ON) as at ACPI OFF, the > > system isn't loaded in general on this notebook (into networks there were > > similar cases on this model laptop). Drops out too kernel panic at > > loading if it is necessary - then I will write log. > > > > Any thoughts to solve this problem? > > > > best regards, > > Dmitry > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Which version is it? I also have a probook 4510s and I don't have any > problem .. > > cheers HP ProBook 4510s (Bios latest F17 and old) & RUS-BSD 8.0.1 (based on FreeBSD 8.1). Also in 7.3, 8.0. Please, try boot FreeBSD 8.1 with ACPI OFF -> then stable Kernel panic, if ACPI ON -> then Kernel panic one times in some weeks on boot on my notebook. I am tested memory in Memtest86+, no problems found. And on WinXP and Russian ALT Linux I am have no problems. On forum bsdportal.ru says, that some time ago, subroutines of acpi sensors were updated, and will be this problem fix in FreeBSD 8.2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:31:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237D81065679 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6528FC1A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POaPf-0007lc-MU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:31:19 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:31:19 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:31:19 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: Re: bash command line - can not type " c" char (not echoed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:31:21 -0000 Chris Rees gmail.com> writes: > > Glad you solved it. > > Are you aware that packages and ports are identical once installed? > ... > > ... > > There are packages, no ports on my system. > > Yes, I am. I made a statement that looks incomprehensible -:) JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 18:46:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF538106566B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A348FC1C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857A53D647; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:46:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB3Ik5Sd001613; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:46:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:46:05 +0100 From: Polytropon To: J B Message-Id: <20101203194605.068da7e8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:46:07 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100, J B wrote: > Hi, > > I have: > $ uname -r > 8.1-RELEASE > installed. > > I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in time), > and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed CURRENT. > But I have difficulty placing them in a dev and respository tree. > > For example, in my case, can I describe it as below > 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE > and the cycle repeats ? Not quite. RELEASE and STABLE are points in time of the CURRENT development branch. The difference is that CURRENT is "experimental", this means changes go there, and maybe get removed. A CURRENT system, updated at 3:00, even may not compile, and updated later on at 5:00, it will. The changes that have been considered "good" go to STABLE. STABLE usually always compiles and runs. RELEASE is always considered a "high quality" point in the development cycle. Even the ports tree is frozen for some time to make RELEASE a good release. PRERELEASE and RC are made from STABLE. STABLE gets all the working functionality from CURRENT that is "good", and will therefore be the basis of RELEASE. The security patches are also made from this basis, they accompany RELEASE. See the text file /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree for details. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 19:08:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FC7106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3795A8FC1C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so7872085ewy.10 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr3113365ebd.38.1291403330803; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:08:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:08:30 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:08:30 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: devel/gobject-introspection throws up because of python X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:08:52 -0000 While trying to compile audio/tagtool on a FreeBSD7.3 (x86) machine devel/gobject-introspection decides to throw up and I got this: (the install was via portmaster -d) checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 version... 2.6 checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 platform... freebsd7 checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 extension module directory... ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages checking for headers required to compile python extensions... not found configure: error: Python headers not found ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please run the gnomelogalyzer, available from "http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/gnomelogalyzer.sh", which will diagnose the problem and suggest a solution. If - and only if - the gnomelogalyzer cannot solve the problem, report the build failure to the FreeBSD GNOME team at gnome@FreeBSD.org, and attach (a) "/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.9.12/config.log", (b) the output of the failed make command, and (c) the gnomelogalyzer output. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (i.e. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). Put your attachment up on any website, copy-and-paste into http://freebsd-gnome.pastebin.com, or use send-pr(1) with the attachment. Try to avoid sending any attachments to the mailing list (gnome@FreeBSD.org), because attachments sent to FreeBSD mailing lists are usually discarded by the mailing list software. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection. ===>>> make failed for devel/gobject-introspection ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for devel/gobject-introspection failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for atk-1.24.0 failed ===>>> Aborting update [root@Ziggy [~]# python -v # installing zipimport hook import zipimport # builtin # installed zipimport hook # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site.py import site # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/os.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/os.py import os # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/os.pyc import errno # builtin import posix # builtin # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/posixpath.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/posixpath.py import posixpath # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/posixpath.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/stat.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/stat.py import stat # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/stat.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/genericpath.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/genericpath.py import genericpath # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/genericpath.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/warnings.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/warnings.py import warnings # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/warnings.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/linecache.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/linecache.py import linecache # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/linecache.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/types.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/types.py import types # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/types.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/UserDict.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/UserDict.py import UserDict # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/UserDict.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/_abcoll.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/_abcoll.py import _abcoll # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/_abcoll.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/abc.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/abc.py import abc # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/abc.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/copy_reg.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/copy_reg.py import copy_reg # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/copy_reg.pyc import encodings # directory /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/__init__.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/__init__.py import encodings # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/__init__.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/codecs.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/codecs.py import codecs # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/codecs.pyc import _codecs # builtin # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/aliases.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/aliases.py import encodings.aliases # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/aliases.pyc # /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/ascii.pyc matches /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/ascii.py import encodings.ascii # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/encodings/ascii.pyc Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Oct 14 2010, 14:19:46) [GCC 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]] on freebsd7 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. dlopen("/usr/local/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload/readline.so", 2); import readline # dynamically loaded from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload/readline.so >>> [root@Ziggy [~]# uname -a FreeBSD ziggy.xaerolimit.net 7.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p3 #8: Sun Oct 24 01:53:03 EDT 2010 root@ziggy.xaerolimit.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ZIGGY i386 [root@Ziggy [~]# Python is installed from ports. It just seems odd to me that devel/gobject-introspection is throwing up like this, I did see this before, on my FreeBSD8.1 install of my laptop but it went away when I re-ran what I was trying to install. This time, it didn't go away, it's very repeatable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 19:29:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A22106566B for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gorgarath@xsmail.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914958FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CED622 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:29:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from oldweb1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.31]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:29:02 -0500 Received: by oldweb1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9D87E1FCA37; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:29:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1291404542.25615.1408530417@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: Hp2fQERsxN017Hg9DmfwsnYznYOSEuoxPTwv5PG644T9 1291404542 From: "John D McDonnell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:29:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:29:04 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > On Behalf Of David Brodbeck > > You might also try sending a message from the exchange server to > another email account of yours, so you can examine the headers on the > outgoing message for anything strange. I sent a test e-mail to another account of mine to get a full view of the headers in the message and this is what I got: Return-Path: X-Original-To: gorgarath@gorgarath.com Delivered-To: x11356971@homiemail-mx19.g.dreamhost.com Received: from diehard.dreamhost.com (fltr-in2.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.72]) by homiemail-mx19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED27925DD4A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diehard.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E738F17BC064 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) X-DH-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at diehard.dreamhost.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RDNS_NONE=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from godfather.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.72]) by localhost (diehard.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.157]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znubp4p2+pCC for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from exchange.pcam.local (unknown [68.234.51.1]) <-- Note 1 by godfather.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CE91B006A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by exchange.pcam.local <-- Note 2 ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:14:19 -0500 From: John McDonnell To: "gorgarath@gorgarath.com" Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:14:18 -0500 Subject: Test to check Exchange's headers. Thread-Topic: Test to check Exchange's headers. Thread-Index: AcuTHwFJ6xz1pO34R8WYUhguK17Taw== Message-ID: <5C15CC37D15E0540B4D554157EE33EB7012719136002@exchange.pcam.local> <-- Note 3 Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB92F5.187AE0A0" MIME-Version: 1.0 Note 1: Not sure why our external IP address is showing up with the name exchange.pcam.local instead of mail.pcam.local, but I'm pretty sure that's what I need to fix to be able to send to the FreeBSD mailing list, and anyone else who rejects similar mails. Odd that the FreeRADIUS mailing list doesn't reject it. Obviously a bit more slack in spam filtering. (Not that I'm complaining, much easier for me since I do send more mail to the FR list than the FBSD list.) Note 2: Not sure if this is an issue or not since it is an internal IP address and not the last hop before heading out into the wild. Note 3: I'm almost certain exchange.pcam.local isn't an issue here since I think Message-ID is a fairly arbitrary header in actual mail delivery. Am I correct in my assumptions about the 3 instances of the .local domain? Is there anything else that looks wrong that I'll also need to take a look at? I'm not sure where in Exchange to change these settings, but I'll do some Googling and see what I can find. Preferably I'd like for it to refer to itself as mail.pcam.org on the inside and outside as we currently get a certificate error in Outlook on the inside due to it not matching mail.pcam.org. -- John D. McDonnell gorgarath@xsmail.com http://www.gorgarath.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 20:20:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD32A106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 20:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09018FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 20:20:22 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCV000UACHL5Z00@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:20:09 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012030106 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-03_13:2010-12-03, 2010-12-03, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <1291404542.25615.1408530417@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:20:08 -0800 Message-id: <4E743E78-A452-4FCD-A665-F17A1A316248@mac.com> References: <1291144623.17510.1407935057@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20101130142812.932dc144.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1291404542.25615.1408530417@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: John D McDonnell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can MS Exchange play nice with the mailing lists? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:20:22 -0000 On Dec 3, 2010, at 11:29 AM, John D McDonnell wrote: > Received: from exchange.pcam.local (unknown [68.234.51.1]) <-- Note 1 > by godfather.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CE91B006A > for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) > Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by exchange.pcam.local > <-- Note 2 > ([10.10.0.13]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:14:19 -0500 [ ... ] > Note 1: Not sure why our external IP address is showing up with the name > exchange.pcam.local instead of mail.pcam.local, but I'm pretty sure > that's what I need to fix to be able to send to the FreeBSD mailing > list, and anyone else who rejects similar mails. Yes. If your domain is really pcam.org, tell this box it is exchange.pcam.org and get reverse DNS setup for IP 68.234.51.1. Evidently, you have a mail.pcap.org, presumably your incoming MX host, at IP 68.234.51.13. > Note 2: Not sure if this is an issue or not since it is an internal IP > address and not the last hop before heading out into the wild. It's normal for MTAs to list all hostname/IP combinations in Received: headers, to help avoid mailing loops. Some people view this with a concern to security and disclosing internal information, but in practice any hacker who gains even minimal access can figure out your internal network info anyway, so it's not a big help. > Note 3: I'm almost certain exchange.pcam.local isn't an issue here since > I think Message-ID is a fairly arbitrary header in actual mail delivery This won't matter in practice mostly, but it preferable to include a valid domain so that the Message-IDs are truly unique. > Am I correct in my assumptions about the 3 instances of the .local > domain? Is there anything else that looks wrong that I'll also need to > take a look at? I'm not sure where in Exchange to change these settings, > but I'll do some Googling and see what I can find. Preferably I'd like > for it to refer to itself as mail.pcam.org on the inside and outside as > we currently get a certificate error in Outlook on the inside due to it > not matching mail.pcam.org. It looks like you have a different box receiving emails...? Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 21:15:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF281106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EB38FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POcy3-0000CY-C6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:14:59 +0100 Received: from 193.33.173.33 ([193.33.173.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:14:59 +0100 Received: from c.kworr by 193.33.173.33 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:14:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:14:48 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4CF95DC8.9010000@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.33.173.33 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:15:00 -0000 03.12.2010 04:03, Weihang Wang wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) has no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf. But it still has no network access. In the virtualbox, I choose the networking mode "Bridged" or "NAT", they don't work, either. I found in the virtualbox the name of this virtual network interface is eth0. But when i use ifconfig, there is no eth0 in this operating system. I am a little mass and struggling in this problem several days and could not find a solution from the Internet. > Hope who have ideas about this could give me some possible solutions. > Thanks in advance. If you do use amd64 version of freebsd try not to stick to the hardware from the ISA days. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 21:26:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DAC106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FFC8FC1C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POd9H-0005Lq-Ee for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:26:35 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:26:35 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:26:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <20101203194605.068da7e8.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:26:37 -0000 Polytropon edvax.de> writes: > ... > See the text file /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree for > details. > Hi, thanks for your response. I looked at that diagram of UNIX and *BSD history. When I go to the bottom of it (CURRENT state) I see a difference in how FreeBSD and other *BSD are developed. I am not sure that I should interpret it this way, but perhaps it is a case of WYSIWYG. The other *BSD are developed sequentially, that is, there is one branch and each major/minor release cycle follows the previous one (at no time there is a parallel major/minor branch development). In case of FreeBSD, it seems (visually) that there is some mainline CURRENT branch repository since FreeBSD 1.0 time, from which major branches are started in parallel (right now there are 8.2-CURRENT and 9.0-CURRENT developed, if I am correct), and they end their own life so to speak, without affecting other major branches; but there were periods of sequential dvelopments as well, e.g. 5.0 thru 5.2. So, this is the overview, as I see it. But, if my interpretation above is correct, then the question arises at what time at least some of the changes (not all, because some may be confined to individual branches only) from major and their subsequent minor branches are contributed back to the mainline CURRENT branch, so next major branches can start and build upon some common base in an organized manner ? I would appreciate your comments. JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 21:38:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DDC1065670 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E347C8FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so7804573fxm.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:38:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nTHYSoLbW8h50qZxNXTSHwZAiSpPYcs7NVipXxkaVWQ=; b=s5qZg5KhLHQgyoD4u0vsp7kb2wDuy9DWDCFU11pS1oaYefwFQJyryLDKIwowBsfZS6 fW0yV55jhlaqhYfkUcYbM6mGVzal/35eNPMiDSzTKBxlQMpuMKIIyY2Hhk7/Faakivnj 21D2htSIxq8fOqFfqq3wDHE47Jei+YKgdu3eU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ZJ+GB+/PmQHOd/jrhyKPhXs1T1Or/oPT+xZqYSo1I34HmXJa4wnpEvkI2HIXDbKwii kX+H/XNqqGiIEw+JsEvc/MGrLXgSJoqxpuNfumFCXLoX+0juGbRelN0bBxb4r4iJrzhh KSBNeJElrPiBy46DXIqVwV/XWvWMx3VVlD8Ts= Received: by 10.223.72.14 with SMTP id k14mr2660604faj.45.1291410891673; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from limbo.lan ([193.33.173.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n15sm787203fam.12.2010.12.03.13.14.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:14:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CF95DC8.9010000@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:14:48 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions To: Weihang Wang References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:38:36 -0000 03.12.2010 04:03, Weihang Wang wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) has no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf. But it still has no network access. In the virtualbox, I choose the networking mode "Bridged" or "NAT", they don't work, either. I found in the virtualbox the name of this virtual network interface is eth0. But when i use ifconfig, there is no eth0 in this operating system. I am a little mass and struggling in this problem several days and could not find a solution from the Internet. > Hope who have ideas about this could give me some possible solutions. > Thanks in advance. If you do use amd64 version of freebsd try not to stick to the hardware from the ISA days. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 22:06:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8FA1065679 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B91C8FC22 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A371E9EB; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:06:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB3M67Si003322; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:06:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:06:07 +0100 From: Polytropon To: JB Message-Id: <20101203230607.8c46bb1d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101203194605.068da7e8.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:06:10 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:26:23 +0000 (UTC), JB wrote: > In case of FreeBSD, it seems (visually) that there is some mainline > CURRENT branch repository since FreeBSD 1.0 time, from which major > branches are started in parallel (right now there are 8.2-CURRENT > and 9.0-CURRENT developed, if I am correct), and they end their own > life so to speak, without affecting other major branches; but there > were periods of sequential dvelopments as well, e.g. 5.0 thru 5.2. > So, this is the overview, as I see it. > > But, if my interpretation above is correct, then the question > arises at what time at least some of the changes (not all, because > some may be confined to individual branches only) from major and > their subsequent minor branches are contributed back to > the mainline CURRENT branch, so next major branches can start and > build upon some common base in an organized manner ? Basically, this is corret. There are often two branches, aiming toward the "production release" and a "legacy release", are developed in parallel. Let me give an example from 4.x and 5.0 at the same time. Technology requiring the 5 kernel infrastructure did not make the way back to the 4.x branch, but many other things got backported. At the time a legacy release and the current release are supported, development takes place in both branches to make sure the legacy release receives the valid security updates during the support period. This may cause sub-branches to appear during the support time period. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/misc/bsd-family-tree?rev=1.141;content-type=text%2Fplain The current diagram shows that there is development for the upcoming release 9.0, as well as development for the current release branch 8 (with 8.2 expected) and also 7.3, the last release of the branch 7, the legacy branch. Those individual branches do exist for some time, but as a release branch is out of support, the development for this branch is stopped, it won't continue. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 22:33:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78834106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nekoexmachina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066408FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so5600404eyb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:33:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=n46A5Ko8BkMyCr+IIOtDO+45uGURW9PKap5hHEh8H+o=; b=b0aTtvI+7+G6l/MSAAjXNgfog9Z/Aaj0LVFO8wS2aLSEi/b3O0dxHixIMkJ/gh+C3R g2Bv1LwfjnsU2BbqXljVRiDGadQH5cJhwhnmORm/UAgosRr0RCYPStx6WtrRH8i/ukSK 47IcdCtXgB09KjH1iPYfsPIir8keSxYTmy2PE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ePxQLqo21/cDfrK5LgTGPVhnmu7JoIMAFn/xr7/imtgYNKOAxtID4OVaDwbk1wpkJH I7XM5VTEED6/1Espjl9Da2at0ZZ8RILyzEiXEsrK6/gGjCD/CYdJKQEfLBw2zYVTk794 WEVCf+qwG+ZN1uPSGYma9GLitw1QHauOCJjjg= Received: by 10.213.34.77 with SMTP id k13mr1418145ebd.84.1291415581885; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:33:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([188.134.12.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w20sm1952509eeh.6.2010.12.03.14.32.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:33:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:32:50 +0300 From: Mikle Krutov To: J B Message-ID: <20101203223250.GA80668@takino.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:33:03 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:42:09PM +0100, J B wrote: > Hi, > > I have: > $ uname -r > 8.1-RELEASE > installed. > > I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in time), > and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed CURRENT. > But I have difficulty placing them in a dev and respository tree. > > For example, in my case, can I describe it as below > 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE > and the cycle repeats ? Hm. I always thought that it was like x.y-RELEASE -> x.y-STABLE -> x.y+1-RCn -> x.y+1-RELEASE ^--------------------------------x+1-CURRENT (some changes from current go to stable) -- Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup. With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 23:12:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1522106564A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBE48FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B44657378; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 08:11:59 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=soyeomul; i=bh@izb.knu.ac.kr; bh=m zuO3EZcLJcq5gTzYVDZssbi+uNNyVo8g6QRu5LCmTI=; b=gJ3hMfHe54xYYUHwJ iTlsqgr1Q0uAky/1Z69K5nhN86CcdakFBgqDqizWSxvBghzap4czWJ5hw9Z6RyyI zqVWVK0/BscIRpf9ee8/zz+Vjlr3CM+mbGdgVdr51kQ7842GD+tCyZv6xUCfR7eN dU3fU6eNv4ilbWgVu8zoBgh8rA= Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFF257375; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 08:11:58 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.home (unknown [183.106.74.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20BFA1CD73; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 08:11:58 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: J B Organization: GR References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEVMM2UIAhGJrpkJDwsD AwgJAggKPnwFBAIEBAQJAjTkRM0eAAACN0lEQVQ4jW3Tv2sbMRQHcPnSDt78bMWctkOBgDc7 10I8Cl6DOpZm6RgPBx4LgbrjUbVVNiuXHNF/2yfJzqnEwmDfffyV9PSD2UNTfuu9A/65cT39 AnZ4j8pTcxzM/HlO4F8BnAcHCK14CuBeQXAFAJwbg/MmS2igEDWtrfZ9PyQiiJCxei1o+CNY bUJX4J1Cr8TQlbWmFZ3vijFwT58c7kW3Z3K84oJrFAPYds8Yk6zmwnGLGai9rApZnaGgBbAZ wF6GdoY3DiADA74IMMa5KzFPGEWDSLmAiSttDkhTqUVxAX+c/g9ER7BeVnzyZAdA5Go9Y+OC ydXNXZlDCetJtfpWyXp6xzNQmkA+i0J+nI7jGJjKVjPfXYUKpXtc3AbQR2CraazQP17StKgr /QpXEZrNAdIY7Wx/HmHR91U2K8XP10BLSEvS94scoPUJvN/mCVSqxiVBBdCzAbDkeG2/XlVy BCA8ZoD4AZdUxYsiABPABNCIhsagnng4LDvL0LYYijdWCZrsRTx3YUnQGh46+0sZ2tv3MZ1A xdKNxnuYFO9onTEClYZpHX//LNjyOiRs2ihzhO9MVnYACqo051YUZwMYhXEW1L7s2XU6LxZv I6g4L1NTeSm7+wUBlCpD3Cyl3KXEqq5ZG+8RhEfBqsN2jrqaQYQ2PH/qRqmnh4auGgjnXPrj j1udunqg887i/daHXTlA+Gbgm8aX9k1jvifQp2Ajm+2pRL+hk3QKGikv3dv3IdE4cwL+ATzH tMu8OktOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-Window-System: GNU Network Object Model Environment X-My-Name: =?utf-8?B?7IaM7Jes66y8IO2Zqeuzke2drCjpu4PngrPnhpkp?= X-My-Country: Republic of Korea OpenPGP: id=96B196FE (expiration: 2013-10-26); perference=sign Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 08:11:44 +0900 In-Reply-To: (J. B.'s message of "Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100") Message-ID: <86y686bgen.fsf@betla.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:12:01 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable J B writes: > [...] > 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE > and the cycle repeats ? So do I. =2D-=20 =EC=86=8C=EC=97=AC=EB=AC=BC =ED=99=A9=EB=B3=91=ED=9D=AC(=E9=BB=83=E7=82=B3= =E7=86=99) | .. =EC=B6=9C=ED=95=AD 15=EB=B6=84=EC=A0=84.. "I want you to eat well, to rest and sleep." -- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 39 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkz5eTUACgkQsCouaZaxlv6i2wCfU2Zd3VXj4v8mKRBMqA6NaSzI 8bUAnjo2XcyiVL1iI7NvcMQ0JPoX9Nd2 =yk8m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 00:31:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F41106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C22B8FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696DC162; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:14:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:14:12 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: LL3oorHdYlazkmT86HDIsNrPDbpkBWS500/xoUERHPWQ 1291421651 Received: from tcbug.ixsystems.com (174-158-170-239.pools.spcsdns.net [174.158.170.239]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80A335E0AE6; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:14:11 -0500 (EST) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:12:58 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1642129.yIELchBEGW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012031813.11266.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:31:26 -0000 --nextPart1642129.yIELchBEGW Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, December 03, 2010 06:00:29 am Thomas Mueller wrote: > Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard > drive > 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive > firmware can make sector size look like 512 bytes. I know fdisk can > handle up to 2 TB; this limit is not just for BSD but Linux too. >=20 > Western Digital has come out with a SATA hard drive of 3 TB. >=20 > Tom Sure. FreeBSD supports installing to and booting from GPT labeled disks th= at=20 don't suffer from the 2TB size limitation that fdisk imposes. The caveat i= s=20 that very few systems have a BIOS that can boot from a GPT labeled drive. = So=20 regardless of your OS, you may still have issues. It's worth noting that RAID arrays have been larger than 2 TB for years, an= d=20 the way RAID cards have gotten around the issue is to carve off a chunk of = the=20 array and present it to the OS as a small boot LUN. =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel --nextPart1642129.yIELchBEGW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJM+YeWAAoJEKFq1/n1feG2cK0H/1uY+zCeSX/vp98kkz4L8nTK U8YgDZqu7kC2u0KLykvK9x5hb/shXBB7ZB5Renjc+QZxdexqhwefy21kL7uY5Xo5 VGoQZHX85LUyzHTpXrQFIPlZii/Oth9YjOfuUFkY6zpkye0c+kCN8P8UNpAlHRoX UgeLBPf4/LS2FeEgswizenjiC3easEKsZR/bFfvOZ8sZlG7vQg6Ujqqd2XeRCGWS IXGl7Q9OsiFT1RlgoJX5r1juq6jCnQlXfy1triHYIeCLCfi/DxL9LBc4u5aj1C5K XxdWiGDfVUDPiId5xd2do7TFIIArXTyEiOBzb7QZL+KU3cUqsAQyGITRTIKne1o= =Ohw/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1642129.yIELchBEGW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 00:41:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A1C106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD7E8FC15 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so5796662wwf.31 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:40:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nzOm5f+Xj4L45g8nXle8hVs15MbqfrQi4vBEQBXlkFA=; b=QtjLhi6LQJYuN303zUqdVMkoA41Tpc2EEQaEhDm162HBkfrmpnZ78JsAYjpWE1k3OQ aTPJ8nPMUezgXsDo7pqkGsXKzWSDk1vzgArcTdqZBHzg/5qNhR0Nq061/azFv54b3jH5 70UdgPAboHYkPcng4JO+/UDBHmclePhHUQlcA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IWbYNZ2gtN6PM4MEs44Q76DcmbDSBtkSknaWQB43N9uvCTi/394VtKtUc6aTKfW0To 34/RNbqGcSmEI6+q0sVkmw4LzHz6OLkFIClr2VwFpj7XC9nDDSut4CMOR+P3dGan+WQj BfAMWPZOC065g/IKAFJEPDL9OQEeUUusCn99w= Received: by 10.227.137.138 with SMTP id w10mr2716252wbt.19.1291423257962; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10sm1676947wbc.10.2010.12.03.16.40.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:40:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:40:53 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101204004053.4ad2c16c@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20101203162633.2a84687d@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:41:00 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:02:43 +0000 (UTC) JB wrote: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:26:33 +0000, RW wrote: > > Broadly n-STABLE branch-off from CURRENT and release security > > branches branch-off from a STABLE branch. Release candidates are > > usually points on a Stable Branch, and releases are points on the > > security branch. Occasionally it has been bit more complicated. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > > unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks RW, > this is how I visualize it: > > 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE > > CURRENT branch branches off RELEASE branch; That may have effectively happened in the distant past, but it's not the norm. CURRENT is the one branch that's updated indefinitely, it's the continuous line of development where all new work is done. The term 9-CURRENT simply refers to CURRENT between the branching of 8-STABLE and the branching of 9-STABLE. Likewise 8.2-STABLE is 8-STABLE between between the branching of 8.1 and 8.2 release branches. There is no such thing as 8.2-CURRENT. This aspect, where different bits of a branch have different names is IMO needlessly confusing. > STABLE branch branches off CURRENT branch; yes > Release Security branch branches off STABLE branch; yes > RCn are usually points (snapshots) on STABLE branch; yes > RELEASE is a point (snapshot) on STABLE branch; *A* release is a point on a security branch (i.e. release branch) which is branched-off a stable branch. > RELEASE is a point (snapshot) on Release Security branch; The original release is followed by point releases with security updates, these all occur on that branch. > Occasionally it has been a bit more complicated -:) There's a diagram somewhere (in the handbook I think) that shows the convoluted history of the early branches. > Still not sure about: > CURRENT (off RELEASE branch at time of release ?) no, that's wrong. > RC (why "usually" ?) Once a release security branch is created, any late RCs have to go in that. > RELEASE (only one valid, or both, depending on circumstances ?) There are many releases and release branches - only a subset is officially supported by the security team. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 00:55:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ACE106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07DD8FC17 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4731081qwj.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:55:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.168.70 with SMTP id t6mr532473vcy.49.1291424120574; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:55:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.9 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:55:20 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.183] In-Reply-To: References: <20101203194605.068da7e8.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:55:20 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: JB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:55:25 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 13:26, JB wrote: > The other *BSD are developed sequentially, that is, there is one > branch and each major/minor release cycle follows the previous one > (at no time there is a parallel major/minor branch development). > > In case of FreeBSD, it seems (visually) that there is some mainline > CURRENT branch repository since FreeBSD 1.0 time, from which major > branches are started in parallel (right now there are 8.2-CURRENT > and 9.0-CURRENT developed, if I am correct), and they end their own > life so to speak, without affecting other major branches; but there > were periods of sequential dvelopments as well, e.g. 5.0 thru 5.2. > So, this is the overview, as I see it. In the past 5.x and prior, I believe things were a bit different, but this represents what has happened for the last several years: There is only one current. It is the main branch in CVS and is where primary development occurs. There are no guarantees with current - the ABI may change at any time, features added/removed, and other major changes made, with the build sometimes broken. Some debugging stuff is turned on by default and there is an expectation that you follow the commit mails and current@freebsd.org list to keep track of things which may affect you. Current is branched off every 18 months (approximately) to make a stable branch. On this branch, the ABI is consistent (applications will not need recompiled due to changes) and backwards compatibility isn't broken within the branch. Nothing is committed directly here - if a change in current meets these criteria, then it may be MFC'ed (merged from current) after it has been proven to work properly (can be several days to weeks/months depending on the severity). There are two supported stable branches right now, 7 and 8. The CVS tags have the form RELENG_8. For current and stable you build your system from source, though snapshots are generated monthly for a convenient starting point. Several times per year, a new release is created from the stable branches - such as 8.1. There is a list on the website of which are currently supported and when they will EoL. Once a release is created, only security fixes and serious errata fixes may be applied on that branch. CVS tags are like RELENG_8_1. These can also be updated with freebsd-update (binary updates). Current is (right now) called 9.0 for cases where a version number is necessary, because that is what will be branched from it next, but it will become 10.0, 11.0, etc. without a new branch in CVS once more stable branches exist. See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/index.html -- Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 00:56:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B43106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshsuid@yahoo.com) Received: from nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40ADC8FC19 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Dec 2010 00:43:32 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.32] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Dec 2010 00:43:32 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1032.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Dec 2010 00:43:32 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 331122.11307.bm@omp1032.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 38697 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Dec 2010 00:43:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291423411; bh=K1bgA+A4vSBCWP9Ci6m8LVKH+TMpIpTViQwpPZ7GEnM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=seY6yzEFim9qwBCmbC/xSWrOJYzyitUVz77fYCLBZRLUgxvIqL77avmP6t3aa6fpYhfrQf/FQrI9Jq8QsUH3obLJApPjHLrTXjp/CFLk+UsdlvercQDSKpMaLcp92dRErYTmi3c3TWU+VlfFt6z4kh74BlgBe5IFLBDcCioUo00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=31nF1lhC75TuKO7ne0CY6OtzMZB4Y/evSvX1vNuHBOc7ByLz3yuDdezLAUJh4DfD6eKHVYD7Gz7ohpUkIuWyE/FCygrKPn1jbrjQHR5I6skP7qSMMCHCGnIn3Zixyo4AbEBZwj/7ZSo8jwkquRCC02YDGjaL1QDcp2fjWMIICeQ=; Message-ID: <894762.38692.qm@web114415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: D7VV4isVM1kOSwmp2bl89CJLmgSe8boV5tVTcjIvv0tz3jD 1qQYgqsJR89GWcVqPN9wP2P3jEg6fcbp6WJgDM6y15v6nVZt58ACPLMAr7KP AN3jm6Yqqif3y7eaGmveGhZYLMzKpjY8tehSw1MDrCJ8byvGWxCl3fwCatSY 2_clCOVWFSaWnJNAS75PN4OxjhTP38CAa.i8mqwzJm5xOI2FsIW6PbXytQHc M_wXzYleHg.en2rfeBoaqclv3xPPyRM5woPGTQlMVlcs- Received: from [64.7.84.114] by web114415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:43:31 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:43:31 -0800 (PST) From: Josh Suid To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: ssh interactive session, through intermediate hosts ... problems ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:56:31 -0000 I connect to some systems via a series of ssh "jumps" - something like: # ssh user@host Password: host~/ # ssh user@host2 Password: host2~/ # ssh user@host3 Password: host3~/ # (do some work) This is working well for me and does what I want it to. However, there are some things I'd like to do that are not working well for me... First, where on the ssh client command line (see above) can I specify a more liberal timeout value ? Since my interactive session has three or more layers of host between it, the whole thing falls apart if even one link slows down a bit... how can I make my ssh sessions more tolerant to timeouts ? Alternatively, since I control all of these systems, is there a global FreeBSD setting (sysctl ?) that would do this ? Second, how can I construct this session with just a single command ? When I try this: ssh user@host ssh user@host2 ssh user@host3 I get this error: # ssh user@host ssh user@host2 Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). Is there a way to build this tunnel with a single command ? (an ssh command, run over an ssh command, run over an ssh command) Finally, is there a way to scp a file over intermediate hosts ? That is to say, I want to scp the file: user@host:/some/file to myself, but I want the ssh session to go through hosts X and Y first ... there must be a way to do this where you pipe the output of scp over ssh to ... head spinning... Thanks a lot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 01:18:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8BB1065697 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E49F8FC0C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE489E716A; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:18:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=jJn4URJDNXVc 5rO/62I3slEf8yc=; b=TDEgz2n+j8uozdz7HgdI1W4evSs12amVQlEXMvABTRys srnoARzfDm7rpnfC2RHT/Ex1d/l0Dwh2gRaCQbIxEni3aBGuEjmPQVUhIGdZyDVw ZZra8Fv72gDyRCd7wS0sWNxcfJVrG/0n8tzFMyX+M0Iu1pRJvqNo3++071IFiTU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=LHKPJc cQzZGDkh48cLuMz2Je1+DbuyCAxRBWwVGMEfK4qvma6hRq+3rspZAi1jiagosXr8 fH6DsQfMtO91zeGfno/UkgEgMnXo6JFpETbb1CQTLBdPKgE6KLF4jBJscrz4OXxn UJqWHZP/SZyQxEfik/HFU559PD3qqSHS7pAL0= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45C25E7161; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:18:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:17:41 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Josh Paetzel Message-ID: <20101204011741.79353836@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <201012031813.11266.josh@tcbug.org> References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> <201012031813.11266.josh@tcbug.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:18:03 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:12:58 -0600 Josh Paetzel wrote: > Sure. FreeBSD supports installing to and booting from GPT labeled > disks that don't suffer from the 2TB size limitation that fdisk > imposes. The caveat is that very few systems have a BIOS that can > boot from a GPT labeled drive. So regardless of your OS, you may > still have issues. That's why we have the Protective MBR that allows a 'legacy' BIOS to boot from GPT. I'm not sure if you can boot past the 2TB point with it though. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 02:16:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79611065672 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4764C8FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so7951351fxm.13 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:16:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hQE9Xac6ZCFfy9H7O37IXvnjvCcuPGrTAHDuKl6bsTA=; b=oTfoqr00H5HzhrMhiJS+WYh2ayzQrEcb3LeAqyjTZ8otr0yCc3eBLFnj1+mluMUTrh BolyZ+U1jWjGu1v7VHKdiPpW+rsFvEXy02bZBF2IoHiiAkd7NT1BVR75hv0sLJXikRQQ U7wEvjB3cxCol7cC7PoHmn+RacUE+BrYeFXbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=fpzarPNOL9lzVXE58fhO2OdY1EDj+yfV9+y4Lj7/ZxAHfFRO4uMCcIOkNfxAYbgqhf m6Q40qFANgp0M+ilZo9skdI/dRC2VZntY+UkmZPLBChUKvV0I7PkoRgzasOk3oU41azG IZaQErwEHn9D2hBViO4eEWE3KXzGdMkRcTi5Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.97.13 with SMTP id j13mr631684fan.146.1291429012263; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.107.79 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:16:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <894762.38692.qm@web114415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <894762.38692.qm@web114415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 20:16:52 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Josh Suid Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh interactive session, through intermediate hosts ... problems ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:16:55 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Josh Suid wrote: > # ssh user@host ssh user@host2 > Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. > Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). > > Is there a way to build this tunnel with a single command ? (an ssh > command, > run over an ssh command, run over an ssh command) > > Finally, is there a way to scp a file over intermediate hosts ? That is to > say, I want to scp the file: user@host:/some/file to myself, but I want > the ssh session to go through hosts X and Y first ... there must be a way > to do this where you pipe the output of scp over ssh to ... head > spinning... > Generally speaking, you'll do something like this: http://www.rzg.mpg.de/networkservices/ssh-tunnelling-port-forwarding then you can do fancier stuff to speed up working like passwordless login's, terminal multiplexer's like tmux etc. You may also wish to consider setting up a VPN. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 02:26:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376B6106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFB28FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB42QiMV090343; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oB42QhKB090340; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:26:44 -0700 (MST) Cc: Charlie Kester , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:26:49 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Polytropon wrote: > I'm using a HP Laserjet 4000 duplex for more than 5 years now > at home, I'm happy with it, allthough it's a _huge_ printer > with all the accessories, but I don't care for that. It's only huge in comparison to smaller, lesser printers. A LaserJet 8000 makes a 4000 look small. > Used office-class equipment, I can't emphasize it enough. The > HP Laserjet printers have a good "eco-mode standby behaviour", > so even energy costs are low, compared to the usual home consumer > ink-pee stuff where a seperate power supply consumes energy > even when the printer is "off" (haha). Office-class printers also have power switches, so they can be turned off for zero power consumption. Some home printers don't have a power switch at all. >> - Any interface is OK. Parallel, USB, networked. > > Network is the way to go. USB *may* be okay. Parallel is not > living anymore - allthough I'm still using it that way, but > my home setting is a life support system for obsolete > technology anyway. :-) The last time I used parallel on FreeBSD, it was slow...well, slower than expected. Haven't really tested USB printers for speed. Ethernet is superior in many ways. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 03:29:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B81106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849F68FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92351E3A1; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB43TqtY005484; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:29:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:29:52 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Message-Id: <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Charlie Kester , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:29:55 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Polytropon wrote: > > > I'm using a HP Laserjet 4000 duplex for more than 5 years now > > at home, I'm happy with it, allthough it's a _huge_ printer > > with all the accessories, but I don't care for that. > > It's only huge in comparison to smaller, lesser printers. A LaserJet > 8000 makes a 4000 look small. Not a big difference. Rotate printer 90 degree and make sure it has enough (at least two) additional (!) paper supply cartridges. :-) > > Used office-class equipment, I can't emphasize it enough. The > > HP Laserjet printers have a good "eco-mode standby behaviour", > > so even energy costs are low, compared to the usual home consumer > > ink-pee stuff where a seperate power supply consumes energy > > even when the printer is "off" (haha). > > Office-class printers also have power switches, so they can be turned > off for zero power consumption. Some home printers don't have a power > switch at all. I thought it was obvious that REAL printers have REAL power switches. But you're right of course: Power consumption is zero when switched off, and you will notice that when using the printer occassionally (compare cummulative standby to zero). > The last time I used parallel on FreeBSD, it was slow...well, slower > than expected. Haven't really tested USB printers for speed. Ethernet > is superior in many ways. The speed is acceptable, just the "error messages" are annoying, started with FreeBSD 7, I think. I do feed PCL into the printer as this is faster than PS, but recent office class printers do provide good (and FAST!) PS support. An example for a well-designed internal CPU is the Kyocera FS-3900DN which also supports different "personalities"; it might be considered "expensive", but it will pay. Good networking printers usually do provide their own lpd, so you can simply hand them the files according to the IP. The system's lp* commands (lpr, lpq, lprm) then query the printer. A simple entry in /etc/printcap is enough to make them work. No "drivers", "USB access permissions" or other strange stuff is needed. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 03:49:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4974F106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla_strick@att.net) Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 295DA8FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62610 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2010 03:22:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1291432961; bh=9ZARbFOSV+0L1HPuh72SovXQ/2zE0pGXiFSH4InaBd0=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Received:Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject; b=Ba4NQpMPumxEsRAq6OFFzuLKBTu0WVKXUilDq+bJpKWwh9dJBoWPx5VBBQANNowrJRjWO6wondGPqxnsZXRyFiabxagMJ+gXTRvx8i8DHhi+BgxuTkOTWdIOLsiM5D7cAFjugt6g+afnUsFMWqoItygD43VX9wyj9WN3zJ7KjY0= Received: from mist.nodomain (mla_strick@69.228.203.87 with login) by smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Dec 2010 19:22:41 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: ppEzeiKswBBq7wHVNDEiPbPsAwzyGELyRI8IdiDYGqsxaD5uQA-- X-YMail-OSG: tf2kwKoVM1kb_FqtqPU_EkVxdGOlg4iJHurwmQTQJre9nsW whJ_ycgwiaQk5wLpmisk.62mrXQRE2cSn21b.rJ9SMBfqhNX_mclYN_HTf6K lJq5qIM7SZvNgIZDD6LSKBauyzZDLw17wtRVsHDFBvvS.P8oJiGGJyO9x_zK 5_2kFFrxR2Np9.p5P.dPH2TtLXD9jT8N10Y1k1qr6S0zdBstm1s6s9K8xyOO cekkDPxDh9SXg0zV14sZB9uWghLcR_SdPKDqY X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB43MYkQ077722 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:22:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mla@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB43MYTU077721 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:22:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mla) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:22:34 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <201012040322.oB43MYTU077721@mist.nodomain> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: printing from inside Linux firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:49:22 -0000 I am running FreeBSD release 8.1. I normally run a Linux Firefox (currently version 3.5.15) because I need the flash plugin (/usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10). I also need to print web pages on occasion but the Linux Firefox does not recognize the printers attached to my system. It writes warning/error messages like this in the window from which I ran the Firefox program: (firefox-bin:77065): Gtk-WARNING **: libcups.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If I copy the missing library (from Fedora 10 Linux) into /compat/linux, Firefox complains about another missing library. If I give it more libraries until it shuts up, it still does not find my printers. I speculated that cups requires additional configuration, so I created the file /compat/linux/etc/cups/pinters.conf with a entry, but Firefox still won't recognize my printer and it produces no warning/error messages that might give me a hint. Obviously, I don't know what I am doing. Can this be made to work? I tried /usr/ports/www/firefox which installs as firefox3, a native FreeBSD Firefox program. It will print via lpr, but It won't do flash. I tried the flashplugin-mozilla port, but it just causes a segmentation violation when I visit a page with flash items. (Oddly enough, if I install linux-f10-flashplugin10 in a recent 3.6.xxx version of Linux Firefox, it seems to fail in the same way.) I tried printing to a file, but both the Linux and FreeBSD Firefox programs create slightly strange postscript and pdf files which seem to display correctly via the ghostscript and acroread programs but won't print correctly on my postscript printer (a Brother HL-1270N). I tried Linux Opera. It fails just like the Linux Firefox. This is actually a serious problem. There are sometimes when I just *have* to be able to save a postscript image (e.g. a map) and print it later. My sister tells me that I should be using MS Windows because that always works correctly. I don't know how to prove her wrong. Help! Dan Strick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 04:47:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F44106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6D08FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB44LCx7013613 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 20:21:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4CF9C1E5.3070101@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:21:57 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade causes kernel message: maxproc limit exceeded by uid 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 04:47:20 -0000 Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like this: kern.maxproc: 6164 kern.maxprocperuid: 5547 What may be causing such condition? Yuri --- sample log from portupgrade --- mv -f .deps/regex.Tpo .deps/regex.Po /bin/sh /usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/gnome-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -o markup-escape markup-escape.o ../../glib/libglib-2.0.la mv -f .deps/gdatetime.Tpo .deps/gdatetime.Po /bin/sh /usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/gnome-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -o markup-subparser markup-subparser.o ../../glib/libglib-2.0.la ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable /printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ./printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable cd: can't cd to /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /printf /printf /printf /sprintf GLib-ERROR **: failed to fork test program: Resource temporarily unavailable aborting... GLib-ERROR **: failed to fork test program: Resource temporarily unavailable aborting... cd: can't cd to /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf /snprintf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 04:50:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9E0106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0947b435c9=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6978FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 04:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27068 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2010 04:23:18 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Dec 2010 04:23:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=166ec.4cf9c236.k1012; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=X/jVcAqaS7Ow3TDX6uEiVlo4+0XPiync1Os9CTDqpGM=; b=URgU3+DbmkmJ5bnlLeuabHQtVfJBu63lzhivo1IdnHfVTUZYFhS0QUUvqkzGtEAnU5d4V7qcc5BAQbmq011mZaTYBAS8bdPYJcR14bJeYAQJfzoaYfW6l7Cp1NAz57d2dbZ2Aew05RlLl6uJB3nu2UiNNtJNaoqz23U9xRXMwlQ= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 4 Dec 2010 04:23:18 -0000 Message-ID: <20101204042318.91883.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 04:50:00 -0000 >> Network is the way to go. USB *may* be okay. Parallel is not >> living anymore - allthough I'm still using it that way, but >> my home setting is a life support system for obsolete >> technology anyway. :-) My printer is a sturdy old Lexmark Optra T610. CUPS has a driver, which does duplex, N-up, and so forth. Each toner cartridge is good for over 10K pages, so I buy one about every two years, and I can usually find one for $100, making the per page cost very low. I bought a USB to parallel adapter cable for about $10 which works well, drives the printer fast without swamping the PC. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 05:57:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2E71065694 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 05:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436AA8FC22 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 05:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id etn31f0010b6N64A3txr5e; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 05:57:51 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id etxp1f0091f6R9u8PtxqjS; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 05:57:51 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:57:49 -0800 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:57:49 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 05:57:52 -0000 On Fri 03 Dec 2010 at 19:29:52 PST Polytropon wrote: >On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: >> The last time I used parallel on FreeBSD, it was slow...well, slower >> than expected. Haven't really tested USB printers for speed. >> Ethernet is superior in many ways. > >The speed is acceptable, just the "error messages" are annoying, >started with FreeBSD 7, I think. I do feed PCL into the printer >as this is faster than PS, but recent office class printers do >provide good (and FAST!) PS support. An example for a well-designed >internal CPU is the Kyocera FS-3900DN which also supports >different "personalities"; it might be considered "expensive", >but it will pay. My LJ4+ was connected via parallel and I never noticed any problems with error messages or the speed. But I had nothing to benchmark the speed against, so maybe I just didn't know what I was missing. I'm OK with a printer that's as slow as I am. ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 07:40:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0B2106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEB58FC15 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so5465393gxk.17 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:40:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ImXVZWw/9FPHngFxR+dNXa8nsscHbGe+qnVIBMsYnD0=; b=ML87pwFPhcV7tse4VtE5G1BdJpghmevq2JzyxkCRDIADsE+HV4ezDChtR9K3Dk7tPG g7V71cObrnPHUc0uX63kOYB2vWubG3XzxaJI+IyS+uEs0tU6jpmGFLK6jwP1hQ3YDF/e dIkLI1MC+4Qpn0EMjgHO+BYuBmhwLJuVOK+K8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LYIEU+nvANL9b+beG826DaNW9/QGjVcBkycE3p7dsq2CZO3KtBffo7OG7WWW88NC/0 hQDGi/goQfxceaW/uLr7g2qFzgCa2lfui2FQxlm1awprVzMlfvPnxeAcnxalDlQxtj50 AbFCfF2BmmgVb49DkF/t2RGQojWTWl+5S+M9U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.45.4 with SMTP id x4mr4456256agj.77.1291448418305; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.73.18 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:40:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <15762619@bb.ipt.ru> References: <15762619@bb.ipt.ru> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 08:40:18 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Boris Samorodov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: No GPT on an usb key X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:40:19 -0000 2010/11/8 Boris Samorodov : > Hi, > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:52:55 +0200 David DEMELIER wrote: > >> I'm trying to put on my USB mass storage device a GPT scheme >> partitions. But gpart still add them as slices : > >> To be sure to remove the MBR before I dd'ed it > >> $ sudo dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/da0 bs=3D512 count=3D1 >> 1+0 records in >> 1+0 records out >> 512 bytes transferred in 0.003369 secs (151970 bytes/sec) >> $ sudo gpart create -s GPT da0 >> da0 created >> $ gpart show da0 >> =3D> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A034 =C2=A015771653 =C2=A0da0 =C2=A0GPT =C2=A0(7.= 5G) >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 34 =C2=A015771653 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - fre= e - =C2=A0(7.5G) > >> $ sudo gpart add -b 34 -t freebsd da0 >> da0s1 added > >> Why it is still s1? In my kernel config I have this : > > GPART(8) may be a good start here. Ex.: > ----- > ... > PARTITION TYPES > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 The gpart utility uses symbolic names for common partition = types to avoid > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 that the user needs to know what the partitioning scheme in= question is > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 and what the actual number or identification needs to be us= ed for a par- > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ticular type. =C2=A0The gpart utility also allows the user = to specify scheme- > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 specific partition types for partition types that do not ha= ve symbol > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 names. =C2=A0The symbolic names currently understood are: > ... > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 freebsd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0A FreeBSD partition that= uses the BSD disklabel to sub- > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0divi= de the partition into file systems. =C2=A0This is a legacy > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0part= ition type and should not be used for the APM or GPT > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0sche= mes. =C2=A0The scheme-specific types are "!165" for MBR, > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0"!Fr= eeBSD" for APM, and > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0"!51= 6e7cb4-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b" for GPT. > ... > ----- > >> device =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0crypto >> options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_ELI >> options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_PART_GPT >> options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_LABEL >> options =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_VOL > >> Do I need something that I forgot? > > Seems you forgot to read the manual page carefully. ;-) > > -- > HTH & WBR, bsam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Yes, a friend tole me there is a problem. But I was sure that a freebsd slive even on GPT will be named da0s1 but he was really sure so I asked here and I forgot to answer. Cheers, :-) --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 07:49:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43F4106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822D28FC1D for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oB47mx8L019564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:49:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oB47mx2r019563; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA26222; Fri, 3 Dec 10 23:44:50 PST Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:44:22 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bruce@cran.org.uk Message-Id: <4cf9f156.iRyLYEzYqdNg1mf7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> <201012031813.11266.josh@tcbug.org> <20101204011741.79353836@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101204011741.79353836@core.draftnet> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mueller6724@bellsouth.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, josh@tcbug.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:49:07 -0000 Bruce Cran wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:12:58 -0600 > Josh Paetzel wrote: > > ... The caveat is that very few systems have a BIOS that can > > boot from a GPT labeled drive. So regardless of your OS, you > > may still have issues. > That's why we have the Protective MBR that allows a 'legacy' BIOS > to boot from GPT. I'm not sure if you can boot past the 2TB point > with it though. although why anyone would need a root partition > 2TB escapes me :) If they did, they could always make a small /boot partition near the beginning of the disk; BIOS will surely not need to read anything that's not on /boot. Another possible downside: if you want to multi-boot, the other OS may also need to understand both GPT and PMBR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 13:32:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2384C1065672 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A088FC17 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB4DWE7V003043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:32:14 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oB4DWE7V003043 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1291469535; bh=1thqKuaYbsCsM5f+6TlXKU+jKyGaRv1GsnmDURiJy+s=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4CFA42D8.5010605@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S at,=2004=20Dec=202010=2013:32:08=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.12)=20Gecko/20101027=20Thunderbird/3.1.6|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20FreeBSD=20 on=20Virtualbox:=20No=20network=20access|References:=20=09<4CF87854.1030103@mgwiggleswo rth.net>=09=20<129136 8354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002>|In-Reply-To:=20<1291368354.2905.19. camel@SHR-42-002>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE 908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D =0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3 D"------------enigE307ED768DDC6963A41CB6D7"; b=UuoszcVgT7xA6ROGj5Ajn/V7aWtHlJEbGetG4YYbbjzJk3RXTs6//ToD/eij9jCMb Rcdce60c49GqniGFjgfRNEOn3GqKv0JyMrvgj3/F4s1sw+La5l5NMKhw5PiQLGz5ul QCwlH5ZemWGtd6FTaMEVtdITX8A4FBZchTG9jixo= Message-ID: <4CFA42D8.5010605@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:32:08 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> In-Reply-To: <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE307ED768DDC6963A41CB6D7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:32:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE307ED768DDC6963A41CB6D7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/12/2010 09:25, Timm Wimmers wrote: > Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang: >> Hi Martes, >> >> I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported b= y FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel= PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! >> Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for = Chris! >=20 > In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get = a > private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM, > because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as you= r > HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you defin= e > routes, but bridging is mostly easier. >=20 > In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and > will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP). >=20 Hmmm.... I don't know about bridge mode being appropriate in "most" cases. NAT and bridge modes are useful in different circumstances * NAT mode means that your VMs are not exposed to incoming connections on the net. * Bridge mode means that the VMs can run network services for users on other machines. Which one of those you prefer depends very much on how you're using the VMs. Eg. for a dev playground and for local testing, NAT looks like a better idea. Now, I run VirtualBox on my Mac with FreeBSD (inter alia) as a guest OS. Your setup may differ, but I find NAT mode to be the best choice. In addition to the considerations above, I also see: * In NAT mode, the FreeBSD guest is insulated from how the Mac connects to the network. Switching between wired or wireless networking, or even using a 3G dongle "just works" as far as the FreeBSD guest is concerned. * Similarly if the MAC gets a new IP when switching between different networks and DHCP servers, the guest OS just doesn't care. You don't need to worry about configuring routing and so forth in the guests: just use DHCP for the i/f, and it all works automagically. Actually, I generally enable two network interfaces for unixoid guests (ie. capable of running sshd) -- set to NAT and vboxnet0. This means I can ssh into local guest OSes from a Terminal.app session, which I find more convenient than logging in via the console. Again, it's all configured effortlessly with DHCP. My only complaint is that IPv6 doesn't work in these modes, but I can live with that. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE307ED768DDC6963A41CB6D7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkz6Qt4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxNfQCdFsQpTAn/5UJaNzKmj4mXKUaT GgwAn2Kkzx3iEwFiJ2jeJDTWxtHFJCDI =tKoX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE307ED768DDC6963A41CB6D7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 13:40:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5AE106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yy.guest@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAB18FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so9683145bwz.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 05:40:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mw8wFSvrB7tq4lh5twnzpKJOcwVeToIFJNLdr9zzPU4=; b=t1Sl+8ssLGUuc2teoBBZ062F2+3PO5DbSs65GIdrMejATOsrBTn0YQoiOOeJ7IrqD9 /PpO5ykFFY4FTeqndcl7/iHVg028/Cy/l9zr+EfNTEJ3PMQ27G0ToGCv7OQ6rhoUmjML zOZ9kPeNi0b11JkeUGQsnYNLD/dQOn3wAEToQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iyZDo3YjU6eqKl013K3uwgqS1tDNOCWLPobqxxTl3j7wpszuRDlnES9Xf1GuffDetc mby1JO8qeQEfHRhm5XLibOliUOeBBoMipsx8Iv5MOE2sW5M3uO6pksTTwiUV+IjxEK7H qDXqJ/pIdSPgyoCfE1z93ytUuEmbqSj/gjItw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.137 with SMTP id p9mr3741803bkr.209.1291468582912; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 05:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.102.196 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 05:16:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:16:22 +0300 Message-ID: From: "K. Yura" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD .dlink 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #1: Tue Nov 9 21:13:03 MSK 2010 root@.dlink:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:40:40 -0000 Can't use watch. How to install snp snoop device? =============================================================== [root@ /dev]# cd /usr/src/sys/modules/snp [root@ /usr/src/sys/modules/snp]# make Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/modules/snp @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings -mp referred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector -Wall - Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-ext ensions -c /usr/src/sys/modules/snp/../../dev/snp/snp.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o snp.kld snp.o :> export_syms awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/snp/../../conf/kmod_syms.awk snp.kld export_sym s | xargs -J% objcopy % snp.kld ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o snp.ko snp.kld objcopy --strip-debug snp.ko [root@ /usr/src/sys/modules/snp]# make install install -o root -g wheel -m 555 snp.ko /boot/kernel kldxref /boot/kernel [root@ /usr/src/sys/modules/snp]# w 3:35PM up 4:17, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT root v0 - 11:37AM 3:58 -bash (bash) root pts/0 192.168.0.10 1:30PM - w root pts/1 192.168.0.10 1:31PM 1:50 -bash (bash) [root@ /usr/src/sys/modules/snp]# cd [root@ ~]# watch -W ttyv0 watch: snp module not available: Operation not permitted watch: fatal: cannot open snoop device --------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 14:09:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49355106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8308FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B105C21 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 00:14:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFA4AB7.7030900@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:05:43 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101204042318.91883.qmail@joyce.lan> In-Reply-To: <20101204042318.91883.qmail@joyce.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:09:30 -0000 On 12/04/10 14:23, John Levine wrote: >>> Network is the way to go. USB *may* be okay. Parallel is not >>> living anymore - allthough I'm still using it that way, but >>> my home setting is a life support system for obsolete >>> technology anyway. :-) >>> > My printer is a sturdy old Lexmark Optra T610. CUPS has a driver, > which does duplex, N-up, and so forth. Each toner cartridge is good > for over 10K pages, so I buy one about every two years, and I can > usually find one for $100, making the per page cost very low. > > I bought a USB to parallel adapter cable for about $10 which works > well, drives the printer fast without swamping the PC. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Pardon me, but Oh God No! Anything but that! As a tech from the industry (and I'll have to adjust my comments from before) I must say some manufacturers were never meant to build printers! IBM should have stuck to the computing and stayed the hell away from printers... Lexmarks are very badly designed (but very slowly getting better ergonomically), expensive to run, and crap themselves with generic toner. They are unreliable, and I've seen big corporations jump up and down about it not running, and then if they're not in an IBM contract they will go out and buy two small kyocera 1010/1020 (whatever they're up to now) to do the same job better and with more features for a lower cost- and give them redundancy to boot. Bottom line is that unless they've entered a contract with IBM there are many _far_ better printers out there cheaper and heaps more reliable. And a 610 was one of their first- so not only was is crap to start, its worse now, and EOL by about 5 years so no parts. For comparison the closest Kyocera (the most reliable cheap printer I've experienced- and I've been repairing printers for over 10 years now, and Xerox biased) say 10xx is half the footprint, at least triple the output per month, double capacity toner, and half again in speed. New they're about 1/6 price, and I've only serviced them a third as much. Lexmark parts are double and more the price, and last half as long. I'd visit them around once a fortnight (and thats being nice) for service, more frequently under heavy load. The newer ones can be worse- they look like kyoceras but are very touchy and a pain to fix. So, to adjust my earlier statements: just about any printer will work, just don't expect photo quality- just stay very well clear of a Lexmark! I agree ink would not be a good way to go, toner is more efficient and cost friendly, but either way cheap upfront and low cost maintenance is still a very tall order. As others have mentioned, a good ex-office HP is probably a good investment. Very durable and parts plentiful- and probably the only way to achieve the cheap tall order :) HTH BTW if you have a HP laser check Canon for toner compatibility- cheaper and essentially the same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 14:27:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2E1106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2447B8FC22 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POt4k-0002vA-K4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:26:58 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:26:58 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:26:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: np-19-75.prenet.pl User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:27:02 -0000 On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100, J B wrote: > ... Hi, thanks to every body who contributed to this thread. If I only, in addition, could get that console/bash Delete key working properly (delete a char under the cursor instead of the preceding one) it would be a perfect first rendezvous with this FreeBSD help group :-) JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 14:34:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87783106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C6A8FC16 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072C5E7165; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:34:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=leafUaha7mTc y4grVe15kZzTdD8=; b=gScmFqb3D073MYtsAvJrIuo9yNvAqbdX/8LhBXTWk0Cn tDxQcZn2eVCMLzeAPHKAPa1oqSfVjOScXl07yZyYYWiEnvUknYf9KcVLL5+ert43 +B5ksu5nWx2IaokcQ9wJt77qp/mEL4lPDTEAiXeOvNK6+80pF5lmZBHB9fpS/98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Vhjq1c Qlx5ON3dNckh2pN5IUrDkE7YHYJiAyD2GYFblYswr3LHOmjVIL52CdgPWKkBUv5x 18QEcILvyr28rX4nAZ6m0c6t/hGmfeHqGBW7GK67fqdpLFHhU7Mf5Oim8VnRga+M icsBt5ZHLqQ325hyS+Ivu91hwPfBJeovTVbL4= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90CDBE6025; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:34:04 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20101204143404.30cea6cb@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <4cf9f156.iRyLYEzYqdNg1mf7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> <201012031813.11266.josh@tcbug.org> <20101204011741.79353836@core.draftnet> <4cf9f156.iRyLYEzYqdNg1mf7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mueller6724@bellsouth.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, josh@tcbug.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:34:28 -0000 On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:44:22 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Another possible downside: if you want to multi-boot, the other OS > may also need to understand both GPT and PMBR. That can be a big problem actually: I'd heard that Windows 7 supported GPT so I recently tried to install it. It turns out that it only supports booting from GPT via an EFI firmware, not using the PMBR and a legacy BIOS. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 14:59:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA5B106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4C48FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB4ExS1B092911; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:59:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oB4ExS5J092908; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:59:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:59:28 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Dan Strick In-Reply-To: <201012040322.oB43MYTU077721@mist.nodomain> Message-ID: References: <201012040322.oB43MYTU077721@mist.nodomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:59:28 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing from inside Linux firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:59:30 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Dan Strick wrote: > I tried /usr/ports/www/firefox which installs as firefox3, a native > FreeBSD Firefox program. It will print via lpr, but It won't > do flash. Actually, it will. > I tried the flashplugin-mozilla port, but it just causes a > segmentation violation when I visit a page with flash items. Yes, that's not the right plugin. Deinstall it and follow the Handbook Flash instructions: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html#MOZ-FLASH-PLUGIN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 15:31:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B563C106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFCB8FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POu5O-0005yy-Kk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:31:42 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:31:42 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:31:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 6 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: hilarious quotes (from across the pond) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:31:54 -0000 "To some extent it is a waste of time but I like the point that we pay Linux with our time by which we get educated." A Linux user JB :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 17:25:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D59E1065670 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0947b435c9=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111958FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82124 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2010 17:25:34 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Dec 2010 17:25:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4eb.4cfa798e.k1012; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=k8p/WMZI4WE3Ui0lr2v1q/LwA2jqGZhKCuGza0S/KCo=; b=jQehoImgSkqLc3CEe01AGj5f3j3BD9r/vJIrxTHvU/drcp7i7k2XipL34hbKR7fD+TL2Cs5ufAGHqWmSRGMbG/idt059tLGBrzksvoj3OQi8XF2pr04fvKTD3mM5v9P0i7j5DAWhvTdld9SZviz4mqUmSs3xT62QHOP+Z6a7L9M= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 4 Dec 2010 17:25:34 -0000 Message-ID: <20101204172534.1258.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4CFA4AB7.7030900@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:25:36 -0000 >> My printer is a sturdy old Lexmark Optra T610. CUPS has a driver, >> which does duplex, N-up, and so forth. Each toner cartridge is good >> for over 10K pages, so I buy one about every two years, and I can >> usually find one for $100, making the per page cost very low. >Lexmarks are very badly designed (but very slowly getting better >ergonomically), expensive to run, and crap themselves with generic >toner. ... So, just to be clear, you're telling me that I am imagining the fact that my printer has worked reliably for ten years? I can believe that Lexmark has made bad printers, but if you can still find an Optra T, they're great. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 17:38:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD3F1065670 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utf128@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265488FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so8304355fxm.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:38:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eXQscDAn5nke3s+24GRQJ29QVWOsay7KoKxW2lVW3Yw=; b=Y+1ZS4YMu9qyHpDs1Wafv0Hu5jmPDPWOTliaA5dC3xxtJ6sBKGQRQolqS+BWa7YXOA ht7uYWz8+MQsfNOF8Had5zGZ9ujqC3hOSr0sQeTvXxX7rkwFWEra4rZwS2TvurzDLiHY Kpur0cnh0C0Yk9Lf6p4DSMq5y9HYij1bpNaQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rfPf8QEAVukklcm1jB1agtySwEXLek14Gu94uveUMfSbR39nqrsMqUdtjGgzH7TXTO ilvHm7Un+CTM7K/mVyvHLOzOGZCm8eWH250nAq3HpqsBZqWszX1NyUux9Z2IEab6Q0Yk L5EIWRSfFgE7n6NUFPZJ6UDlPbr3m0rfQP+Q4= Received: by 10.223.71.198 with SMTP id i6mr3561055faj.140.1291482522347; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.14] (dslb-084-063-095-184.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.95.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f24sm993175fak.24.2010.12.04.09.08.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:08:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CFA7576.6010002@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:08:06 +0100 From: Michael Schaefer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100708 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: massive hdd/geli problems after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:38:59 -0000 Hey folks, some days ago i upgraded my FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 system to 8.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update. I'm using a generic kernel so the upgrade process was just straight forward. However I encountered massive problems with my hdd which I now found out are attributed to this upgrade. I'm using a WD15EARS Caviar Green 1.5TB for data which is formated with ufs inside a geli container. The system itself runs on a 1GB CF card. Both is attached to a VIA EPIA Mini ITX platform. After the upgrade every read or write operation on the WD drive results in very slow performance (100k/s up to 2mb/s with significant lags) and dmesg is flooded with messages like the following: ad4: FAILURE - READ_MUL48 status=51 error=84 LBA=594632984 bt kernel: GEOM_ELI: g_eli_read_done() failed ad4p1.eli[READ(offset=304452055040, length=4096)] bt kernel: g_vfs_done():ad4p1.eli[READ(offset=304452055040, length=4096)]error = 5 bt kernel: ad4: FAILURE - READ_MUL48 status=51 error=84 LBA=2452694208 bt kernel: GEOM_ELI: g_eli_read_done() failed ad4p1.eli[READ(offset=1255779401728, length=131072)] bt kernel: g_vfs_done():ad4p1.eli[READ(offset=1255779401728, length=131072)]error = 5 bt kernel: ad4: TIMEOUT - READ_MUL48 retrying (1 retry left) LBA=2452698560 A filesystem check on the attached geli container reports thousands of errors and unreadable sectors. In the end every read or write operation (such as copying a larger file over the network) results in freezing the system after several minutes. So does the fsck which I didn't manage to perform completely. files transferred are mostly broken. As the messages look like a dying hdd I replaced the cable, checked connection, etc. Nothing changes. Have been fiddling around for one day now and was close to file an RMA request. But just to make sure I did a rollback using freebsd-udpate back to 8.0-RELEASE-p4. Behold now everything goes smooth again and no errors occur at all. performance stability - everything back to normal. Any ideas on this? Since 8.0 is approaching end-of-life I would really like to upgrade to 8.1.. thx a lot Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 17:46:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CAE106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDA78FC38 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB4HkBb9031175; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:46:11 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB4HkAex031171; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:46:10 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 259BB33C1F; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:46:10 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:46:10 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Dan Strick Message-ID: <20101204174610.GB17837@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <201012040322.oB43MYTU077721@mist.nodomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012040322.oB43MYTU077721@mist.nodomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing from inside Linux firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:46:15 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:22:34PM -0800, Dan Strick wrote: > > I am running FreeBSD release 8.1. I normally run a Linux Firefox > (currently version 3.5.15) because I need the flash plugin > (/usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10). I also need to print web pages > on occasion but the Linux Firefox does not recognize the printers attached > to my system. It writes warning/error messages like this in the window > from which I ran the Firefox program: > (firefox-bin:77065): Gtk-WARNING **: libcups.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > If I copy the missing library (from Fedora 10 Linux) into /compat/linux, > Firefox complains about another missing library. If I give it more > libraries until it shuts up, it still does not find my printers. I > speculated that cups requires additional configuration, so I created the > file /compat/linux/etc/cups/pinters.conf with a > entry, but Firefox still won't recognize my printer and it produces > no warning/error messages that might give me a hint. > > Obviously, I don't know what I am doing. Can this be made to work? > > I tried /usr/ports/www/firefox which installs as firefox3, a native > FreeBSD Firefox program. It will print via lpr, but It won't > do flash. I tried the flashplugin-mozilla port, but it just causes a > segmentation violation when I visit a page with flash items. > (Oddly enough, if I install linux-f10-flashplugin10 in a recent 3.6.xxx > version of Linux Firefox, it seems to fail in the same way.) > > I tried printing to a file, but both the Linux and FreeBSD Firefox > programs create slightly strange postscript and pdf files which seem > to display correctly via the ghostscript and acroread programs but > won't print correctly on my postscript printer (a Brother HL-1270N). Firefox produces OK postscript. Your printer setup is borked. Try using lpr and doing away with CUPS is my advice. Then you can send ps directly to the printer. Below are the important files for my postscript printer. I just convert everything to postscript before I lpr it. $ cat /etc/printcap lexmark|local:\ :lp=/dev/lpt0:\ :if=/home/frank/bin/myfilter:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/lexmark:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/lexmark/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/lexmark/acct:\ :mx:\ :sh: $ cat /home/frank/bin/myfilter #!/bin/sh # cat - echo "\f" > I tried Linux Opera. It fails just like the Linux Firefox. > This is actually a serious problem. There are sometimes when I just > *have* to be able to save a postscript image (e.g. a map) and print > it later. > > My sister tells me that I should be using MS Windows because that always > works correctly. I don't know how to prove her wrong. > You can prove her wrong by reading the handbook and installing flash with the native Firefox; it works fine for me. > Help! > > Dan Strick Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 17:57:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EEC10656A6 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF448FC34 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1986144qyk.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:57:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.81.148 with SMTP id x20mr2595068qck.18.1291485428869; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.9 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.183] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:57:08 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: "K. Yura" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD .dlink 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #1: Tue Nov 9 21:13:03 MSK 2010 root@.dlink:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:57:10 -0000 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 05:16, K. Yura wrote: > Can't use watch. How to install snp snoop device? > The module is built during normal kernel builds, unless you are using the MODULES_OVERRIDE directive in your kernel. Run kldload snp. Put snp_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf to get it automatically every boot. If you are going to manually build things in /usr/src, you should run make obj in the directory first, to create a directory in /usr/obj for output. Otherwise, your .o files and such are mixed in with your sources. -- Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 19:01:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D166106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AC68FC19 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POy9s-00048d-FS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:52:37 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:01:06 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:01:06 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101204190105.GC51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:01:11 -0000 --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth JB on Saturday, 04 December 2010: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100, J B wrote: >=20 > > ... >=20 > Hi, > thanks to every body who contributed to this thread. >=20 > If I only, in addition, could get that console/bash Delete key working=20 > properly (delete a char under the cursor instead of the preceding one) it= =20 > would be a perfect first rendezvous with this FreeBSD help group :-) >=20 > JB >=20 I'm not a bashophile, and I apologize if I misunderstand your request because I deleted the rest of this thread without reading it,=20 but if you mean the "Backspace" key, try putting the following in ~/.inputr= c: set bind-tty-special-chars Off RUBOUT: delete-char the "Delete" key already works that way for me. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM+o/xAAoJEIpckszW26+RuZgIAJ3tZ4is/NgtAxSTHb4vLYCy b75t8hj71fUccHxcaHPVNa/1tZtTKcdumIkmRyo7WuQzLwhp+F4X1INoma0/0yn5 pjo31bnztJG3MGVXBwRzQl6ZJwdV2BFbghSKM8i6yuh6oHPHwTDkNQfrH4kN/Xf4 sGewhtbmAMINJSscIjClzMFk61hNwlhinIfh6AufK+WrkPPUNHpNmi64+G2ArJwX BHRMXCPr0TiMnn82EQpv0LjDejYEGEWQMIXptd2V/3i0seHmtDj3xMZu2juT07Re FlycWlFnLQk9fnj0FsFONLWIxnqOZZaN+bBGC9A/L3jUiZdsSkOFmBENypBx4dQ= =iVOv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 19:17:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87502106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:17:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB428FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1POxbe-0003sf-LB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:17:14 -0800 Message-ID: <30366636.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:17:14 -0800 (PST) From: Ivo Karabojkov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: ivo@kit-bg.com References: <30252640.post@talk.nabble.com> <30282675.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD samba+winbind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:17:15 -0000 Hi! Thanks for your reply! Sorry, but that didn't help. I even tried installing samba 3.4 (also form ports). With the same configuration as Samba 3.5 there was no idmapping at all. I'll try to raise loglevel to see what happens. With Samba 3.5 and loglevel 10 there were no significant errors and I think the problem is with nssd and nss_winbind.so (some specific behavior for getting all users - getent). Best wishes, Ivo Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > > Hi, Ivo! > > Just a wild guess - could it be the result of moving lockdir in > Samba3.5 port from /var/db/samba34 back to /var/db/samba ? Can you > check, that, by renaming appropriate directory? > > Regards, > Timur. > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ivo Karabojkov wrote: >> >> Perhaps I couldn't get any attention with my problem or I couldn't >> explain it >> in enough details. >> As you probably read, IDMapping works OK. It seems that my problem occurs >> in >> nsswitch. In my /etc/nsswitch.conf I have: >> >> group: files winbind >> #group_compat: nis >> hosts: files dns >> networks: files >> passwd: files winbind >> #passwd_compat: nis >> shells: files >> services: compat >> services_compat: nis >> protocols: files >> rpc: files >> >> wbinfo -u / -g / -i DOMAIN_user works OK. >> Name service switch works almost OK, since system utilities like id, pw >> /usershow/, chown, ls resolve domain usernames <-> IDMapped UIDs OK. >> But getent passwd and getent group return only local (system) users >> /groups. >> Any clue how to make this work too? >> >> >> >> Ivo Karabojkov wrote: >>> >>> Dear Sirs, >>> >>> I am having troubles with IDMapping users from Server 2003 AD to my >>> FreeBSD 8.1 Samba 3.5. >>> Well, most of Samba documentation should be considered outdated, I had >>> total failure with RID backend for IDMap. The only working (so far) for >>> me >>> is the default: tdb. >>> I have set nsswitch.conf, pam.d and so on correctly. >>> >>> And here is my problem: everything works almost fine, wbinfo shows my >>> domain accounts, I am able to set these accounts and groups as owners of >>> files. Commands like ls, chown, id show AD accounts correctly. >>> pw, getent - show only local system accounts. >>> I need Samba only for file sharing with ACLs, no PAM authentication or >>> something more. So, technically, it works but since I can't see ALL >>> accounts with getent I think something is wrong. >>> >>> IDMapped accounts are with uid and gid > 10000 >>> >>> I think I am missing something very small and simple, so I hope someone >>> will help me! >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Ivo >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-samba%2Bwinbind-tp30252640p30282675.html >> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-samba%2Bwinbind-tp30252640p30366636.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 19:20:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857CD106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BC58FC0C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB4JK9Zi067642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:20:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4CFA945F.70708@sentex.net> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:19:59 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Schaefer References: <4CFA7576.6010002@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFA7576.6010002@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: massive hdd/geli problems after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:20:12 -0000 On 12/4/2010 12:08 PM, Michael Schaefer wrote: > > ad4: FAILURE - READ_MUL48 status=51 error=84 > LBA=594632984 Those do seem like hardware errors on the disk. But going back to the old kernel however should not make a difference. Try (/usr/ports/sysutiles/smartmontools and do a smartctl -x /dev/ad4 and see if the drive thinks it has any errors. Does atacontrol cap ad4 show any differences between the two kernels ? perhaps something new is enabled or disabled between versions like the power management ? ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 19:46:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260F1065672 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utf128@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C50F8FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so8361311fxm.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TsQbtzmS1lJ0hLgKhRp/UXvycdPh8zQJAkHkStvcw6c=; b=QQVllZ1vi93azP11PTG1h5FciVL645AHLAEEAnHN7F7yMVen116QUis8/GEJGbFJrs SL4C2rbeLvZWaoUO49kPQIZFDqjIy8lszN7YSIBWep5dsc7zHMGU6vB9Y9dGEZ66cISP ulPMjJ1SzPW+HobDOvO/cPymAnCpb6BCruN44= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tla26/z7XMn5GkkiHZARjYqqSkc5o2WuD91+MHbe6wcnwC71iFQ1jh4/KG45txo4qi epoOPRDOSI3ddn9idrO3ZQ97dbUW70ow9Qvl52E9mPKwFT9bnQOpiAtzkBKVZ/XfPNKv CQwfVeapEgbgXUasFdGlqmKmDb0Fsyi5VgWlA= Received: by 10.223.125.132 with SMTP id y4mr2807874far.148.1291491965068; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.14] (dslb-084-063-095-184.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.95.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm919598fam.4.2010.12.04.11.46.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CFA9A79.8050709@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:46:01 +0100 From: Michael Schaefer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100708 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> FreeBSD Questions" References: <4CFA7576.6010002@googlemail.com> <4CFA945F.70708@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <4CFA945F.70708@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: massive hdd/geli problems after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:46:07 -0000 Hi Mike and thank you for your response please find the smartctl output here: http://pastecode.org/index.php/view/27349679 will do the atacontrol comparison later on since I would ahve to upgrade the system again. I stressed the hdd now with the old kernel for several hours copying reading/writing large amounts of data without any error. even the filesystem check ran through with just some softupdate inconsistencies but without sector errors... don't know what to think about all this.. Well maybe I should mention that I formatted the hard disk according to this discussion http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=12088&page=3 aligned with the 4k sector size of the drive... regards Michael On 04.12.2010 20:19, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/4/2010 12:08 PM, Michael Schaefer wrote: >> >> ad4: FAILURE - READ_MUL48 status=51 error=84 >> LBA=594632984 > > Those do seem like hardware errors on the disk. But going back to the > old kernel however should not make a difference. Try > (/usr/ports/sysutiles/smartmontools and do a > smartctl -x /dev/ad4 > and see if the drive thinks it has any errors. Does > atacontrol cap ad4 > show any differences between the two kernels ? > > perhaps something new is enabled or disabled between versions like the > power management ? > > ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 19:46:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E95106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout027.mac.com (asmtpout027.mac.com [17.148.16.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881CB8FC18 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [17.151.77.219] by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCX00LG35LZ8V40@asmtp027.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:48 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-04_07:2010-12-04, 2010-12-04, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=2 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012040107 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:47 -0800 Message-id: References: To: JB X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:46:51 -0000 On Dec 4, 2010, at 6:26 AM, JB wrote: > If I only, in addition, could get that console/bash Delete key working > properly (delete a char under the cursor instead of the preceding one) it > would be a perfect first rendezvous with this FreeBSD help group :-) "man bash" suggests: Commands for Changing Text delete-char (C-d) Delete the character at point. If point is at the beginning of the line, there are no characters in the line, and the last character typed was not bound to delete-char, then return EOF. backward-delete-char (Rubout) Delete the character behind the cursor. When given a numeric argument, save the deleted text on the kill ring. forward-backward-delete-char Delete the character under the cursor, unless the cursor is at the end of the line, in which case the character behind the cur- sor is deleted. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 20:00:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCEF1065674 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FCE8FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB4K09pM071926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:00:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4CFA9DBE.2080605@sentex.net> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:59:58 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Schaefer References: <4CFA7576.6010002@googlemail.com> <4CFA945F.70708@sentex.net> <4CFA9A79.8050709@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFA9A79.8050709@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: massive hdd/geli problems after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:00:23 -0000 On 12/4/2010 2:46 PM, Michael Schaefer wrote: > > http://pastecode.org/index.php/view/27349679 Well, the drive doesnt think it has any issues which is good! > > will do the atacontrol comparison later on since I would ahve to upgrade > the system again. I stressed the hdd now with the old kernel for several > hours copying reading/writing large amounts of data without any error. even > the filesystem check ran through with just some softupdate inconsistencies > but without sector errors... You should be able to boot with just an updated kernel. If I had to guess, it might be some power saving mode of the drive being enabled or disabled. atacontrol will hopefully shed some light on the issue. Not sure about the 4k sector thing. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 20:14:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FE3106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5C68FC17 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POyUr-0007yP-6K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:14:17 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:14:17 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:14:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <20101204190105.GC51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:14:20 -0000 Chip Camden camdensoftware.com> writes: > ... Thanks. It works in console/bash, both Delete and Backspace keys. But now Backspace stopped working in gnome xterm ... JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 20:32:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD78106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EBC8FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POzaZ-0006MD-MG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:24:16 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:32:45 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:32:45 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101204203245.GD51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101204190105.GC51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:32:51 -0000 --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth JB on Saturday, 04 December 2010: > Chip Camden camdensoftware.com> writes: >=20 > > ... >=20 > Thanks. > It works in console/bash, both Delete and Backspace keys. > But now Backspace stopped working in gnome xterm ... >=20 > JB >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" By "stopped working", you mean it doesn't do anything? For me, it works the same way when using urxvt and bash, but oddly xterm does override the BS to delete the previous character in spite of the =2Einputrc settings. Try urxvt? --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM+qVtAAoJEIpckszW26+RcJ8H/1sI9LwJToAeqXiwmVcFezEe nzr9gRnxvJgXBFl8CFyeu+8emOnnFQUle8pZJfgFdVl7a9rrw5DuGeuccgC/CgS8 w6hA3vLf/16LjmY3Ui7wLWi3luHg0kyA9dl2Hx8FjnmUOC9bf70b+f4HWzR/6L+U LZpAf4dVxieHvpT732YnUXtSbI46dv8AHkb8AC9xlwAXqTSTeNg1+eF84iQW4yj5 lCpYeukQAsTuI7YySPjkr9phpf50/EBws2IkoyrjN/TjSyb5PrYZhQvQvHbdE8mx 8ItQMsmd1gqV3hWJMPCzBf/feLiysF+kK9+cquT9C9IA9FtkNVcEfzDP9Cb2Lvk= =wXJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 20:56:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3698D106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB238FC16 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POz9H-0006rZ-9z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:56:03 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:56:03 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:56:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20101204190105.GC51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101204203245.GD51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:56:05 -0000 Chip Camden camdensoftware.com> writes: > ... > By "stopped working", you mean it doesn't do anything? > ... Backspace does not do anything in gnome xterm. I am wondering what is the line format if I wanted to put Chuck's suggested forward-backward-delete-char in .inputrc ? This is a case of "not bound" key. JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 21:12:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0223C106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97ED8FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP0Cm-000507-Ne for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:03:45 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:12:14 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:12:14 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101204211214.GE51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101204190105.GC51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101204203245.GD51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:12:20 -0000 --2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth JB on Saturday, 04 December 2010: > Chip Camden camdensoftware.com> writes: >=20 > > ...=20 > > By "stopped working", you mean it doesn't do anything? > > ... >=20 > Backspace does not do anything in gnome xterm. >=20 > I am wondering what is the line format if I wanted to put Chuck's suggest= ed > forward-backward-delete-char > in .inputrc ? > This is a case of "not bound" key. >=20 > JB >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" That would just be: RUBOUT: forward-backward-delete-char I'm not a gnome user, so I can't help you much beyond this. Perhaps there might be a way to use a different .inputrc when running as console versus gnome xterm? --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM+q6uAAoJEIpckszW26+Rb2MIAKkY2VPIMQtQARaJPYU+Bvw5 gjC5XSPTDpZRW0KoOJ1xz5E6Pd2j8orbyf450BouQHMAqqGLyAkowf1OpDYPiqRL t2UAyvg13fP/dtn1PsU4J5MHKdBInr3E7gBHFvOCvdrOmfOdH+iV+AdpuZ0X5Tnc sMAthUrAUoXgQoKiyYdS1y7BXcxaeor4sfI2G4EMjIrqvcqed7uT+1KIBjYEY5t2 E+LSHpLYN0j6veh8OBxjR1QQPspoNqQaujyWuwE2P3CSP4qFHtL4Wa73SvqehzRV mm2WIee4NodZzsxr0gxUNz0lUUqVqJ4Fy/4HurmKfDwRXdftD+Ki3AT0PSgGv90= =e/gf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 21:49:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F524106564A for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F728FC15 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POzzM-000386-NM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:49:52 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:49:52 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:49:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JB Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20101204190105.GC51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101204203245.GD51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101204211214.GE51632@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/3.6.4) Subject: Re: RELEASE vice CURRENT vice STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:49:56 -0000 Chip Camden camdensoftware.com> writes: > ... > RUBOUT: forward-backward-delete-char > ... That fixed Delete behavior. It changed behavior of Backspace in gnome xterm slightly, but it is acceptable. Thanks to both of you. JB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 22:05:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC03106566B for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F97C8FC15 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so10861992wyf.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:05:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CpsoIiUidTJtsB514oJDisxqlpho0s/+9vAQaNKZrCM=; b=m4bKnXj3tZmiYwm+A431BuH4tgFp8fUZ6VuzkpvfPP9Bdgt4e60YFKjSwxBPr5tbMb mNUTsuqz8bKvg1pukFnLbViFUlmlmNA5tptsCIcdsu5HvPALkKCNWCeWqjTBi3RwWoNz VE8OyC/WwgnblRg9zYBZWjU0yAhd9YesKFOlg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VmWiP6roBXMgQ9Xb/UXBGdKuQ1+d9T9jiwTnzOt334XDEQyVzaId4d5AHai8ISroYQ BDK4/P8KuCWELaWY8sdgnXYdP8ohyXccOJ222zFzs8r8OJZnsbLQgv+ZqwPcKT+fjfQq H/VDCBPBPTsfkPwaQusRV/8Zyluswe7NNQqqU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.135 with SMTP id b7mr898898wec.29.1291500350741; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:05:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4cf9f156.iRyLYEzYqdNg1mf7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4cf8dbdd.7sbsexcxBlJtEO11%mueller6724@bellsouth.net> <201012031813.11266.josh@tcbug.org> <20101204011741.79353836@core.draftnet> <4cf9f156.iRyLYEzYqdNg1mf7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:05:50 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bruce@cran.org.uk, mueller6724@bellsouth.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, josh@tcbug.org Subject: Re: Support for hard drives > 2 TB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:05:52 -0000 On 4 December 2010 07:44, wrote: > Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:12:58 -0600 > > Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > ... The caveat is that very few systems have a BIOS that can > > > boot from a GPT labeled drive. So regardless of your OS, you > > > may still have issues. > > That's why we have the Protective MBR that allows a 'legacy' BIOS > > to boot from GPT. I'm not sure if you can boot past the 2TB point > > with it though. > > although why anyone would need a root partition > 2TB escapes me :) > > If they did, they could always make a small /boot partition near the > beginning of the disk; BIOS will surely not need to read anything > that's not on /boot. > > Another possible downside: if you want to multi-boot, the other OS > may also need to understand both GPT and PMBR. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > maybe is you were using zfs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 22:22:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF77106566C for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A868FC17 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dagger.cc.vt.edu (dagger.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.114]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB4MLYTC004856; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:21:34 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by dagger.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ODK97510; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:21:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB4MLXfG030035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:21:33 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: <4CFA42D8.5010605@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:21:33 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <61F01BFE-B57A-43DA-A860-555174A3AE17@vt.edu> References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <4CFA42D8.5010605@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=dagger.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A02020A.4CFABEEE.0114,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:22:05 -0000 Hi, Thank you so much for your advices. I am using NAT mode now. Just as you = said, there is no need to configure DHCP in /etc/rc.conf. I just choose = the Intel PRO/1000 T Server as my virtual network interface. It works = well.=20 Thank you very much. : ) Best, W.W. On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/12/2010 09:25, Timm Wimmers wrote: >> Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang: >>> Hi Martes, >>>=20 >>> I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported = by FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option = "Intel PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! >>> Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works = for Chris! >>=20 >> In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM = get a >> private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM, >> because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as = your >> HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you = define >> routes, but bridging is mostly easier. >>=20 >> In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network = and >> will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP). >>=20 >=20 > Hmmm.... I don't know about bridge mode being appropriate in "most" > cases. NAT and bridge modes are useful in different circumstances >=20 > * NAT mode means that your VMs are not exposed to incoming > connections on the net. > * Bridge mode means that the VMs can run network services > for users on other machines. >=20 > Which one of those you prefer depends very much on how you're using = the > VMs. Eg. for a dev playground and for local testing, NAT looks like a > better idea. >=20 > Now, I run VirtualBox on my Mac with FreeBSD (inter alia) as a guest = OS. > Your setup may differ, but I find NAT mode to be the best choice. > In addition to the considerations above, I also see: >=20 > * In NAT mode, the FreeBSD guest is insulated from how the Mac > connects to the network. Switching between wired or wireless > networking, or even using a 3G dongle "just works" as far as > the FreeBSD guest is concerned. > * Similarly if the MAC gets a new IP when switching between > different networks and DHCP servers, the guest OS just doesn't > care. >=20 > You don't need to worry about configuring routing and so forth in the > guests: just use DHCP for the i/f, and it all works automagically. >=20 > Actually, I generally enable two network interfaces for unixoid guests > (ie. capable of running sshd) -- set to NAT and vboxnet0. This means = I > can ssh into local guest OSes from a Terminal.app session, which I = find > more convenient than logging in via the console. Again, it's all > configured effortlessly with DHCP. >=20 > My only complaint is that IPv6 doesn't work in these modes, but I can > live with that. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20