From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 10 16:20:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3181065676 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0455C8FC14 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id o0AGKXdk079753; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:20:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0AGKXZB079752; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:20:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:20:33 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: brad dreisbach Message-ID: <20100110162033.GA79724@alchemy.franken.de> References: <0334FB50-D299-4723-A36A-0228EC062D34@ameri.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0334FB50-D299-4723-A36A-0228EC062D34@ameri.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:20:44 -0000 On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:49:30AM -0500, brad dreisbach wrote: > what is the status of smbfs support in the sparc64 port? AFAICT it's still unchanged from last Februrary: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2009-February/006189.html It still would be interesting to know how far the kernel part actually gets these days on sparc64. Marius