From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 07:34:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28381065675 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC978FC14 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 66A554AC42 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:34:13 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:34:12 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:34:14 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-embedded. Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is comple= tely broken and almost useless. Even my bugfix about make.conf (PR 151696, SVNrev 215070) is only committed to CURRENT, but is not MFCed and is not closed. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 08:16:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EB5106564A; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cochard@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F4C8FC13; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so6560279iwn.13 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/PkLX4tUcSiSaEIQ9/yOGY4/Q3I2fgXbjKVpwtZVdbk=; b=xS9WJK/Wb2s/uojOw+H7jiCuEkTjGBlg/2LknTLyx7ZeYCqM3ZpS1UyYBwcxLuq+aY ZgXCSo5kTboBPq3VcbD7ZaSaIHXHfEuO9R7BYuPGGJAtOhA5FkHeQs+klME9GQNYrRpn HXXNCGDon3spCAW7c5f35zkZEmr9pEFD1fKQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=VdYuvfLs9pAvRWbR3MS0t4Z1mBDoze8ypQktSSChw+iTEvik/1ImVTiIeijyQE6urq c9yqoQZjYNdomMReXelw3Pxf5ja+8tOjdAj80nB3yUAk65P+vH/0D5ukCTA5D/6lIr/3 vGo8/LQTEirSJenKnBPdT5i2nvEonaRJAt4os= Received: by 10.231.142.32 with SMTP id o32mr5024740ibu.143.1302508289351; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:51:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cochard@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.169.14 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:51:09 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fnR71GSkFgesskANS7_Q0HhpJk0 Message-ID: To: lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:16:12 -0000 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov : > Hello, Freebsd-embedded. > > =A0Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one > hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is comp= letely > broken and almost useless. > Hi Lev, I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem. What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ? Regards, Olivier http://bsdrp.net From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 08:53:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08414106567C; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA938FC12; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 742694AC42; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:53:20 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:53:19 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= In-Reply-To: References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:53:22 -0000 Hello, Olivier. You wrote 11 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2011 =E3., 11:51:09: >> =A0Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one >> hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is com= pletely >> broken and almost useless. > I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem. > What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ? (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/' script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to "ufs/labels1") sed complains. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 09:08:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C87F106566B; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cochard@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A8D8FC08; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so6628845iyj.13 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:08:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zra5nUGESSowfdB/B9041b4jOXB4LkM1mN/osDlBzGA=; b=YsaRs0+Q11NG0bN+8ecRGN67dt0+s77WoaacXjydAXnvO2yQofmvabLplShzStanNk jNo+KnYyZG32SWabfAVn17aLBDvlGzsijJOiPkoBDJ/YIfOqvZMH3G/OLrK23LHZRovR nqSsDYjdqozm5V4OUzVEpzIPEDTSi+0gUyrm4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YWQ0mZNBch/vGpjFZtr31PyRXKxAZIy+Rc5oDlyXGgxQSctr7fPjnKapBB/+DGD8jq q3QsnuP8pEkoiKl3hPS6GTCOC8Wb1dRj4HMoacRpJZPr76kBfQ5t8zrl1JLn1fThEBIt 4wXe8kGV6NiRKAGKRVe/mP1sxEvIkDv2VgOO8= Received: by 10.231.39.130 with SMTP id g2mr5269573ibe.118.1302512884205; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:08:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cochard@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.169.14 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:07:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:07:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dkiRJxnlvqKbLcAH57tqIlj-pBE Message-ID: To: lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:08:05 -0000 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov : > Hello, Olivier. > You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 11:51:09: > =C2=A0(1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, an= d > needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition > > =C2=A0(2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/' > script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to > "ufs/labels1") sed complains. > OK, I didn't see this problem because I'm using my own upgrade script (I've merged update1 and update2 in one script): http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/Files/usr/local/sbin/up= grade You could try to adapt it to your needs. Regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 11:06:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45781065674 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AFE8FC21 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3BB6wr8025842 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3BB6w4U025840 for freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:06:58 GMT Message-Id: <201104111106.p3BB6w4U025840@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:06:59 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p misc/151696 embedded [nanobsd] [patch] nanobsd.sh doesn't run "make_conf_bu o misc/151695 embedded [nanobsd] [patch] Enhance tools/nanobsd/fill_pkg.sh o misc/136889 embedded [nanobsd] [patch] nanobsd error reporting and other re o misc/52256 embedded [picobsd] picobsd build script does not read in user/s o kern/42728 embedded [picobsd] many problems in src/usr.sbin/ppp/* after c 5 problems total. From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:34:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A34106566B; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212F88FC0A; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BETMBC064533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:29:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:29:22 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <359551D2-008C-41B0-9646-EB0BD5B312A7@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: lev@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:29:22 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:34:58 -0000 On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:34 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-embedded. >=20 > Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one > hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is = completely > broken and almost useless. Even my bugfix about make.conf (PR 151696, > SVNrev 215070) is only committed to CURRENT, but is not MFCed and is > not closed. I have been working on it, but not actively merging it or tracking = bugs... I think I need to spend a little time on house-keeping. Warner From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:35:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1386B1065673; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF58FC13; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BEUobh064552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:50 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:51 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:26 -0000 On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=E9 wrote: > 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov : >> Hello, Freebsd-embedded. >>=20 >> Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one >> hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is = completely >> broken and almost useless. >>=20 >=20 > Hi Lev, >=20 > I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem. > What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ? I'd like to know the problem as well since FreeNAS uses it without any = problems at all. I don't believe "completely broken" based on my = first-hand experience, so maybe a better description of the problem = would help me fix it. Warner From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:35:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665CE1065675; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA4F8FC1A; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BEUobi064552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r From: Warner Losh X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:50 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <62AD945C-4357-433B-8BED-7E5BB9233B75@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: lev@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:51 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:27 -0000 On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:53 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Olivier. > You wrote 11 =C1=D0=D2=C5=CC=D1 2011 =C7., 11:51:09: >=20 >>> Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on = one >>> hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is = completely >>> broken and almost useless. >> I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem. >> What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ? > (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and > needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition >=20 > (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/' > script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to > "ufs/labels1") sed complains. That hardly qualifies as completely broken. Those are bugs, and I'll look at fixing them. Warner From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:35:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55EF106564A; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFF88FC1B; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BEUobj064552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:28 -0000 On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 wrote: > 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov : >> Hello, Olivier. >> You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., = 11:51:09: >=20 >> (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and >> needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition >>=20 >> (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/' >> script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to >> "ufs/labels1") sed complains. >>=20 >=20 > OK, I didn't see this problem because I'm using my own upgrade script > (I've merged update1 and update2 in one script): > = http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/Files/usr/local/sbin/u= pgrade I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been = merged to head. Warner From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 07:38:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9F0106566C; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01D98FC1E; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 575BE4AC42; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:38:04 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:38:02 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <375260633.20110412113802@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:38:07 -0000 Hello, Warner. You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 18:32:24: > I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been mer= ged to head. It seems, every NanoBSD-based project (FreeNAS, BSDRP, maybe other) has "home-brew" patches to nanobsd.sh and some support scripts, which, IMHO, worth to evaluate and, may be, integrate to "official" NanoBSD. Also, here is attempt to re-write NanoBSD in more clean and modular way (to be honest, nanobsd.sh code is not an example of clean & good shell code, compare to rc.d infrastructure, for example): http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/NanoBSD_NG P.S. I get these messages with my AND list addresses in To/CC: only once, as "personal" ones, is it Ok? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 20:09:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBB31065670 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C1F8FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3CK3Nfe081293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Warner Losh X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <375260633.20110412113802@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:15 -0600 Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <18A31C67-D0B5-4E28-AA50-241F60EBFB83@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> <375260633.20110412113802@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:25 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:09:30 -0000 On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Warner. > You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., = 18:32:24: >=20 >=20 >> I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been = merged to head. > It seems, every NanoBSD-based project (FreeNAS, BSDRP, maybe other) > has "home-brew" patches to nanobsd.sh and some support scripts, which, > IMHO, worth to evaluate and, may be, integrate to "official" NanoBSD. I have a queue of patches to try to integrate back into main FreeBSD = from these projects already. I just need a little bit of time to do = that. > Also, here is attempt to re-write NanoBSD in more clean and modular > way (to be honest, nanobsd.sh code is not an example of clean & good = shell > code, compare to rc.d infrastructure, for example): >=20 > http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/NanoBSD_NG I saw that. We'll see where it goes. Not sure I entirely share your = views on cleanliness. To be honest, though, this sort of thing would really be better written = in python, since that language is much more expressive and easier to use = in many ways than shell. > P.S. I get these messages with my AND list addresses in To/CC: only > once, as "personal" ones, is it Ok? I just removed all the cc's except embedded. Warner > --=20 > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov >=20 >=20 >=20