From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 23 23:27:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225A2106566B; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from llwang@llwang.org) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC58FC13; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so1841443yxt.13 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.124.4 with SMTP id w4mr31802066yhh.30.1319411091955; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: llwang@llwang.org Received: by 10.236.47.168 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:04:51 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IrCwH1Vrt7OCMeoIbw5wlKGfvK0 Message-ID: From: "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:27:28 -0000 Hi, Although I only encounter this kind of problem when running wine (because it is one of the few ports that need to compile into 32-bit), it is a problem of i386 binaries on x64 FreeBSD in general. The problem that I'm running into recently is http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28857 . In short, wine recently implemented GetUdpTable() for Mac OS and BSD. It uses sysctlbyname() to get net.inet.udp.pcblist, and parses it into xinpgen structures. However, the size of xinpgen is different on i386 and x64. As a result, when I run applications that call GetUdpTable(), the kernel supplies wine with 64-bit structures, while wine expects 32-bit structures, and crashes. They decided that this is a FreeBSD bug rather than a wine bug, and that the kernel or LD should know a 32-bit binary is being run and return proper structures, as is done in Mac OS. xinpgen is not the only structure of wrong sizes for 32-bit binaries on x64. A while ago I was trying to make my usb gamepad work on wine using the ugen device. libusbhid uses ioctl to get the usb_gen_descriptor structure, which is also of different sizes on i386 and x64. I had to manually "pad" the pointers to 64-bit and build a custom libusbhid for it to work. As it stands, they will probably not fix GetUdpTable() on wine side, and any windows applications that uses GetUdpTable() will not run properly in wine on FreeBSD x64. Do we have plans to fix this kind of problems in general? Although wine port on FreeBSD is only supported for ARCH=i386, could there be workarounds? -- llwang From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 05:26:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6559F106566B; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443228FC16; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9O5QBVv059102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:26:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9O5QBne059101; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16044; Sun, 23 Oct 11 22:02:26 PDT Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:01:11 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: llwang@infor.org Message-Id: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:26:12 -0000 "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote: > ... the kernel or LD should know a 32-bit binary is being run > and return proper structures, as is done in Mac OS. > > ... Do we have plans to fix this kind of problems in general? > Although wine port on FreeBSD is only supported for ARCH=i386, > could there be workarounds? Does it work if you run the 32-bit app in a 32-bit jail? If so, it might be a workaround (or, arguably, a solution). From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 11:07:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133451065673 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1818FC1C for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9OB70CA025268 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9OB707h025266 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:00 GMT Message-Id: <201110241107.p9OB707h025266@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:07:01 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/159646 emulation [linux] [patch] bump Linux version in linuxulator f kern/156691 emulation [vmware] [panic] panic when using hard disks as RAW de o kern/156353 emulation [ibcs2] ibcs2 binaries that execute on 4.x not working o kern/155577 emulation [boot] BTX halted after install. Reboot during install o kern/155040 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux recvfrom doesn't handle proto fa o kern/153990 emulation [hyper-v]: Will not install into Hyper-V on Server 200 o kern/153887 emulation [linux] Linux emulator not understand STB_GNU_UNIQUE b o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o kern/151714 emulation [linux] print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of supp a bin/150262 emulation [patch] truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted p kern/144584 emulation [linprocfs][patch] bogus values in linprocfs o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux] path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain so o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 12:27:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4793B106566B; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7578FC08; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5CF446B0D; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:27:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52A0B8A02E; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:27:51 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:42:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110240742.10896.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:27:51 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:27:52 -0000 On Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:04:51 pm Li-Lun "Leland" Wang wrote: > Hi, > > Although I only encounter this kind of problem when running wine > (because it is one of the few ports that need to compile into 32-bit), > it is a problem of i386 binaries on x64 FreeBSD in general. > > The problem that I'm running into recently is > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28857 . > In short, wine recently implemented GetUdpTable() for Mac OS and BSD. > It uses sysctlbyname() to get net.inet.udp.pcblist, and parses it into > xinpgen structures. However, the size of xinpgen is different on i386 > and x64. As a result, when I run applications that call > GetUdpTable(), the kernel supplies wine with 64-bit structures, while > wine expects 32-bit structures, and crashes. They decided that this > is a FreeBSD bug rather than a wine bug, and that the kernel or LD > should know a 32-bit binary is being run and return proper structures, > as is done in Mac OS. > > xinpgen is not the only structure of wrong sizes for 32-bit binaries > on x64. A while ago I was trying to make my usb gamepad work on wine > using the ugen device. libusbhid uses ioctl to get the > usb_gen_descriptor structure, which is also of different sizes on i386 > and x64. I had to manually "pad" the pointers to 64-bit and build a > custom libusbhid for it to work. > > As it stands, they will probably not fix GetUdpTable() on wine side, > and any windows applications that uses GetUdpTable() will not run > properly in wine on FreeBSD x64. Do we have plans to fix this kind of > problems in general? Although wine port on FreeBSD is only supported > for ARCH=i386, could there be workarounds? Fixing this problem generically is very hard. Instead, we have patched individual sysctls and ioctls on a case-by-case basis. I do think newer interfaces often opt to use fixed-size types so that the structure is the same for both 32-bit and 64-bit, but that will not work for existing interfaces. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 13:21:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7390E106564A; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from llwang@llwang.org) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D658FC0A; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so2500140yxt.13 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.192.133 with SMTP id i5mr9078837yhn.13.1319462489094; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: llwang@llwang.org Received: by 10.236.47.168 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:21:29 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bP_qN-BrUVz0sSLQHLtNZaB9QZQ Message-ID: From: "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:21:30 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:01 AM, wrote: > "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote: > >> ... the kernel or LD should know a 32-bit binary is being run >> and return proper structures, as is done in Mac OS. >> >> ... Do we have plans to fix this kind of problems in general? >> Although wine port on FreeBSD is only supported for ARCH=i386, >> could there be workarounds? > > Does it work if you run the 32-bit app in a 32-bit jail? > If so, it might be a workaround (or, arguably, a solution). I can't test the same app directly in the 32-bit jail because a lot of things (e.g. certain devices in the devfs) are not available in the jail. However, I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit structures even in 32-bit jails. -- llwang From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 00:37:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFB01065680; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584428FC15; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9P0b4cs085206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9P0b4tJ085205; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA20228; Mon, 24 Oct 11 17:31:22 PDT Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:30:06 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: llwang@infor.org Message-Id: <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:05 -0000 "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote: > a lot of things (e.g. certain devices in the devfs) > are not available in the jail. I have gotten the impression that there's a way to fix that -- it involves something along the lines of a nullfs mount IIRC -- but I'm by no means an expert on jails. > ... I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit > structures even in 32-bit jails. That is arguably a bug in the jail support :( From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 01:15:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAC71065674; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from llwang@llwang.org) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBED8FC12; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so8197226gyd.13 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:14:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.176.69 with SMTP id a45mr37227511yhm.47.1319505299403; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: llwang@llwang.org Received: by 10.236.47.168 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:14:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:14:59 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Dz-pQpeEMF5I6WmeIqIKWr_ZFf8 Message-ID: From: "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:15:00 -0000 On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:30 AM, wrote: > "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote: >> ... I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit >> structures even in 32-bit jails. > > That is arguably a bug in the jail support :( I think the only difference as a i386 jail is that the libraries are built 32bit, and setting of certain environment variables to tell uname to return i386, and possibly some make variables in make.conf to specify the CPUTYPE or ARCH. These won't affect how the 64bit kernel acts---you are still using the same kernel. -- llwang From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 14:10:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41483106566B for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from tethys.ringofsaturn.com (tethys.ringofsaturn.com [71.252.219.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0588FC08 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ASSP.nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by tethys.ringofsaturn.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9PDbjW5036046 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:37:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from mail.ringofsaturn.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.ringofsaturn.com) by ASSP.nospam with ESMTP (ASSP 1.9); 25 Oct 2011 08:37:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:37:44 -0500 From: Rusty Nejdl To: Mail-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Sender: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7-svn Subject: Virtualbox 4.0.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:10:49 -0000 Is anyone working on porting 4.0.14? Also, is there any update on committing that and kbuild to the ports tree? I checked http://home.bluelife.at/ports/ and don't see anything recent. Thanks! Rusty Nejdl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 14:47:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC3B1065674 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@FreeBSD.org) Received: from groupware.itac.at (groupware.itac.at [91.205.172.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A698FC0C for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.bluelife.at (93.104.210.95) by groupware.itac.at (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 3A05F2; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:32:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:32:20 +0200 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <471e2dd746ba9aba633b1fbcf7a3ba74@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.6 X-AxigenSpam-Level: 1 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020C.4EA6C873.01E2,ss=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualbox 4.0.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:47:30 -0000 On 25.10.2011 15:37, Rusty Nejdl wrote: > Is anyone working on porting 4.0.14? Also, is there any update on > committing that and kbuild to the ports tree? I checked > http://home.bluelife.at/ports/ and don't see anything recent. 4.0.14 and 4.1.4 is ready to be committed to the tree but this will happen after the FreeBSD 9.0 release. Main reason for that is that we need to synchronize this with the kBuild update so we need to throw out 3.2.12 at the same time and also update 4.0.12 to 4.0.14 because 4.0.12 requires the old kBuild that we currently have and 4.0.14 requires the new one. Timing on that is really bad because if we had 2-3 weeks more time I would do a cft and try to get it committed before 9.0 but we are already on RC1 and I don't want to push it in just to release with broken vbox packages. Additionally I've put all my spare time in the last 2 months into redports.org to get it going so I did not have much time for virtualbox. I hope this will change once the first redports beta starts which is planned in about a month but we will see. So if anyone cares to help out on virtualbox this would be a good time now. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 15:07:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1C1106564A for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xmirya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928B88FC08 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faar19 with SMTP id r19so879914faa.13 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z1hfygb4+hgLndaAd1ozI6RtDk/nMvXpVv2/q188HTM=; b=GNlUT1L1LepCi1jjG2UwmiosUUdzeV7XaBcgyRcq5dFxXT4DxFha5ox+XJ6Ik4hTZc NWxddCJFaNd+TD0PxRMRFiy/jIK5mOF/XiJiMgxg4gC/0lWtRoPOlhpg4uGVgyxs36Vr R8lPgd492owMFFrTOInBU3JpK3JEWNdZdgpBk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.58.146 with SMTP id g18mr25125134fah.13.1319553483853; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.166 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:38:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:38:03 +0300 Message-ID: From: m irya To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualbox 4.0.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:07:56 -0000 2011/10/25 Rusty Nejdl : > Is anyone working on porting 4.0.14? =A0Also, is there any update on > committing that and kbuild to the ports tree? =A0I checked > http://home.bluelife.at/ports/ and don't see anything recent. > You probably mean 4.1.4; i have changed the 4.1.2 ports Makefiles to point to 4.1.4 and rebuilt those ports several weeks ago, for now everything is working fine for me (including Ubuntu 11.10 guests). So if you want to get 4.1.4 on your box, get the updated ports from http://home.bluelife.at/ports/, change DISTVERSION to 4.1.4 in ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/Makefile and ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/Makefile, run "make makesum" to update distfiles, then reinstall both. Best Regards, Kyryll Mirnenko From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 16:52:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D94106566C; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9541C8FC0A; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwn22 with SMTP id 22so5414004wwn.1 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:52:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=VVpDnDnFnM3Zyn3+6VIiAYzsnkwSTN+bv7X4YqsbVW0=; b=CKuSpfUEFXvqyvCpni/TiZzTrXUE3bpOIzyYiPW68ObRSMTK0MPKNTzv9d0IMGRPRV QpWDdtUfwTwXUA+LqcP9mTIYy2X3ECCEBXnvkzXvw3wWRMRnaTASVPIV10lN6YpS3Uer X88ZT0kJDPLgQlVfhR08Yzbq7ppSAaO14deb0= Received: by 10.227.205.78 with SMTP id fp14mr4623290wbb.23.1319561562632; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-93-69.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.93.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id es5sm46094152wbb.11.2011.10.25.09.52.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:52:41 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:52:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart17365073.zbQvqplTZ8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110251852.47385.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.31 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:52:44 -0000 --nextPart17365073.zbQvqplTZ8 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.31 have been uploaded to mediafire [2] and= =20 the wine-fbsd64.diff patch has been updated. There is a known UDP related= =20 problem with wine (see http://markmail.org/message/i7rtfz7uxd5s4fvl for=20 details). =20 To date there has been 1217 (+70) downloads from mediafire. =20 The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on= =20 installation (if the relevant files are accessable). Please read the=20 installation messages for further information. =20 Regards, David [1]=20 MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.31,1.tbz) =3D 3ada791cc70a692b71f331a9b658d= 0ce MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.31,1.txz) =3D 7b9f0b9a122646822542e540aeed0= 9e5 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh --nextPart17365073.zbQvqplTZ8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk6m6V8ACgkQUaaFgP9pFrL69wCcDFpwYPYaLf/TX2wKy1aj8/hc y8wAnRmNgiVAtY/+DdV4ae5tBCC6KhSv =//sG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart17365073.zbQvqplTZ8-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 21:49:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A241065673 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED1E8FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4783968wwi.31 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RwH/5oH8WzI/n0CenTAWsxaARoMxk54JUs/6RALSq6E=; b=WaJkH1+oDYnHE02grHtd3yA6MK8cE/SAZZwLasvhy//Z6NbC2mmpClRxHSrkbFhigU 1UAdxWmuixvGFlF1i3b1hzjfD//j3I8pYeZaRzsAMWnVwz9H0vsaP2AJ8QyP+P/uRv7z dYVHkNaWWrAX9P3k24/hlXKr9+/e+PVlUjvlw= Received: by 10.227.198.77 with SMTP id en13mr18392148wbb.28.1319750354124; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:19:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.55.133 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:18:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:18:44 -0400 Message-ID: To: emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Sahil Tandon Subject: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:49:26 -0000 Hi, A PR came in (ports/161825) with a flash11 port ready to commit. I have a few questions: (a) What should the port be named? Based on my understanding it should be www/linux-f10-flash11 (b) Would emulation like to own this port? (c) Should flash10 be removed? If so can we eliminate the version number from the port? (d) Can you please provide a general review of the port? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161825 for details. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 22:16:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BDE1065672; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748CE8FC0A; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (smtp8.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.54]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 852AD1023284; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:36 +0400 (MSD) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 64DFB1B6050C; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:36 +0400 (MSD) Received: from 93.91.0.219.tel.ru (93.91.0.219.tel.ru [93.91.0.219]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id GaLS0NVq-GaLGDwoF; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:36 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4EA9D843.9050002@passap.ru> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:35 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Sahil Tandon Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:16:38 -0000 28.10.2011 01:18, Eitan Adler пишет: > Hi, > > A PR came in (ports/161825) with a flash11 port ready to commit. I > have a few questions: > > (a) What should the port be named? Based on my understanding it should > be www/linux-f10-flash11 I'd suggest www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 for a consistency. > (b) Would emulation like to own this port? That's OK for me. > (c) Should flash10 be removed? If so can we eliminate the version > number from the port? I wouldn't do it since flash10 finally works. Let's test the new port for a while. However I'm not an active user of the port. > (d) Can you please provide a general review of the port? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161825 for details. If time permits I'll be glad to, but won't argue if someone do it faster. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 03:01:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8999C106564A for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from tethys.ringofsaturn.com (tethys.ringofsaturn.com [71.252.219.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5558FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ASSP.nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by tethys.ringofsaturn.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9S3124j031898 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:01:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from mail.ringofsaturn.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.ringofsaturn.com) by ASSP.nospam with ESMTP (ASSP 1.9); 27 Oct 2011 22:01:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:01:01 -0500 From: Rusty Nejdl To: Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7-svn Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:01:03 -0000 On 2011-10-27 16:18, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hi, > > A PR came in (ports/161825) with a flash11 port ready to commit. I > have a few questions: > > (a) What should the port be named? Based on my understanding it > should > be www/linux-f10-flash11 > (b) Would emulation like to own this port? > (c) Should flash10 be removed? If so can we eliminate the version > number from the port? > (d) Can you please provide a general review of the port? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161825 for details. Two quick comments: 1) This is unfetchable: => install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/11.0r1.152. => Attempting to fetch http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz 100% of 6584 kB 1678 kBps => linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/11.0r1.152. => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/download/linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/download/linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz: No address record => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/11.0r1.152/linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/11.0r1.152/linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/11.0r1.152 and try again. *** Error code 1 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10. Thanks! Rusty Nejdl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 03:30:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5AD1065670 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987958FC13 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so4646075wyi.13 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:30:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2/OCVV0wWTIZrCMzor1IOfKPAOzCJlvjJNxc8oQoIgc=; b=AB77R2l1noRX6gVORuZBKWih1nzyhfo7mKHllT47DHra9Rs7v8kZQ4moCE1YEQhdzE U0zO+Zp4dEwJwU6iL3uUTtmt3Fq6D6RgvtTdnvsvp1HZd4BA9CpfQufw7ybVLwsc3O56 twJTM5OZI9R4o7jYDBckhrhmbrRz8sXc1KR9Q= Received: by 10.227.198.140 with SMTP id eo12mr976264wbb.20.1319771053118; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:04:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.55.133 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:03:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:42 -0400 Message-ID: To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:30:33 -0000 > 1) This is unfetchable: Sorry, I thought the patch for this made it to the audit trail: --- ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin11/Makefile.orig 2011/10/20 00:00:00 +++ ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin11/Makefile 2011/10/21 21:55:00 @@ -3,14 +3,15 @@ PORTVERSION= 11.0r1.152 CATEGORIES= www multimedia linux MASTER_SITES= http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/:plugin \ - ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/download/:suplib + ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/download/:suplib \ + LOCAL/nox:suplib PKGNAMEPREFIX= linux-f10- DISTFILES= install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz:plugin \ linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz:suplib > 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10. Will fix. Thanks. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 19:27:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2890F106564A for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C142E8FC16 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo110.cox.net ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111029191648.UYJR3765.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo110.cox.net> for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:16:48 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.236]) by eastrmimpo110.cox.net with bizsmtp id qjGo1h00455wwzE02jGoiV; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:16:48 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4EAC5120.0070,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=uJ/qTlwYUPBYhdejbfpiXZ084Nq1odojvP+g2rDuwMA= c=1 sm=1 a=22My0DWCU9gA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=wXQR0324ukUv1c7tFN0A:9 a=G8wC2Snb20ZUZYjhfqwA:7 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9TJGmgH005811 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:16:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:16:43 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111029141643.7ee8d61e@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <4EA9D843.9050002@passap.ru> References: <4EA9D843.9050002@passap.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:27:46 -0000 On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:35 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > 28.10.2011 01:18, Eitan Adler =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >=20 > > (d) Can you please provide a general review of the port? > >=20 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D161825 for details. >=20 > If time permits I'll be glad to, but won't argue if someone > do it faster. >=20 Just a quick chiming in here: I installed the port, and it seems to be working fine on my amd64 9.0-RC1 box. --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 19:30:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B2106564A for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net [68.230.241.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86478FC18 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo306.cox.net ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111029193005.QALH3804.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo306.cox.net> for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:30:05 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.236]) by eastrmimpo306.cox.net with bizsmtp id qjW41h00555wwzE02jW4Y2; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:30:04 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.4EAC543C.0092,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=sGR9G2hYIFXa2xB4aZiX1SVRJ2zjCAfsdSGqvGTS29E= c=1 sm=1 a=22My0DWCU9gA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=xmjhkm52xjN_W0s3s8IA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9TJU3XA006586 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:30:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:29:58 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111029142958.673cd3e0@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20111029141643.7ee8d61e@cox.net> References: <4EA9D843.9050002@passap.ru> <20111029141643.7ee8d61e@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:30:11 -0000 On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:16:43 -0500 "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > > Just a quick chiming in here: I installed the port, and it seems to be > working fine on my amd64 9.0-RC1 box. One more quick addition: so far, with this version, I haven't seen any of those annoying artifacts in other windows or on the desktop itself while the player is running. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net