From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 20:15:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C44106564A for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristoph.bauer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343288FC0C for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so5399953iwr.13 for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 13:15:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mdCoaPaWnTj9GpvjbYWXUvCy8RpBmof7h9OCJ261Ooc=; b=oHH5gApb4gTMF4esQAqFBynKdcRpQR0i9/DdK6naFePMwhNqJj8hibEOzKJXQRx3JD QShTWIJlAnPTbhNBiNoJS9YgDHnFYT/u+dPGUZEXuafvdVpkYpotQ8uXAW4KFL7QqTnE QrPJshJZVVSwaBlf7+xX9EZkEqCi01ghoES40= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.47.207 with SMTP id o15mr5015230ibf.35.1309722496947; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.43.68 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 12:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:48:16 -0600 Message-ID: From: Kris Bauer To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ZFS on geli X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:15:45 -0000 Hello, Related to a thread that I saw in freebsd-stable ( http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-June/063145.html ), I wondered about the security of ZFS on geli. When using a zpool that is backed by geli disks, is there information contained in the unencrypted zpool.cache that would directly correspond to encrypted zfs metadata in a predictable location on the geli disks? Thanks.