From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:33:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99750106564A for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joris@vandalon.nl) Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DACC8FC08 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so3531418eya.21 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:33:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vandalon.nl; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=rHwXHBhcETV/2DbpdxoeS1ulY9ZK1bsHHvSNfcwxeeQ=; b=BP6NwaFZgEOTsgthnbLVsnW3/Ydi0xuZjksw7Vj53vDfooWZiCIAvpE9nBnvJxIz5d LHbsN6yyyezu7XaKguIIkUWGN3HQVm7DS7jy3S+TdXmNiYMZoBqBrmNvVfbwUsCZVfkJ RYMKdRFAcf9Nn/ZCNur31kRPdT8B3ARrVMfOA= Received: by 10.213.25.73 with SMTP id y9mr1298723ebb.45.1311505443245; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (D4CC867D.cm-2.dynamic.ziggo.nl [212.204.134.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n42sm2386537eef.2.2011.07.24.04.04.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Joris Vandalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:04:00 +0200 Message-Id: <89792658-145E-4548-B930-C847FCE6E990@vandalon.nl> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: Subject: Port submit status (Port/157426). X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:33:18 -0000 Hi, I submitted a freebsd port (157426) the 30th of may. Now I know I should be patient but I was wondering if there is something = is wrong with this port since previous ports where always accepted = within a month. Best regards, Joris Vandalon= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:55:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932951065672; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B8D8FC0C; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736561FBFD; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 55A491FBFC; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:55:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from dijkstra (p5B37A45D.dip.t-dialin.net [91.55.164.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08A981FBF1; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:55:19 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110724135519.4d666ad5@dijkstra> In-Reply-To: References: <20110723124517.7274A103B4@portscout.cc> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/0YVJubtMtrIyZwshs1zV8oX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Cc: Martin Wilke Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:55:31 -0000 --Sig_/0YVJubtMtrIyZwshs1zV8oX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 02:52:06 +0800 Martin Wilke wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I finally managed to get portscout back on a stable server. I have > removed all mail addresses from the old portscout to cleanup all the > unused mail addresses. If you are a maintainer and would like to get > a mail notification, please drop me a mail using your maintainer mail > address and I'll add to the list. The RSS feature will be back very > soon as well. Thanks to Martin Matuska (mm@) for hosting portscout > now. >=20 > Note that portscout.org will be rerouted as soon as possible. As for > now, please use http://portscout.cc. >=20 > - Martin > =20 Hello Martin, please include me on the list. Thanks for your effort, cheers --=20 Christopher J. Ruwe TZ GMT + 2 --Sig_/0YVJubtMtrIyZwshs1zV8oX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOLAgsAAoJEJTIKW/o3iwUjcEQAN6yHJG/WaeZt3igmA2Megk5 tp1jYrpGNi94ZXljAjen1dccWAdDD/CjCyeP6W7CdESvxhaB4a4+6S8ODQOIJucz vI0nZ7evAfn05SafoUMnWQEe8NvkxUb9mm+YNm1KXnCNJsVXLjRIovw6pjtkq5QC LGDbIseyx1s0mC3JVDvGIzJmO2RaiNv1v/k+OQz3E0fnYlw7HkmAU+OLqF1/d+Sx GaS3z5RvOtB8HUNEuUoQn9RdOySe50Jox806sgYIWUgUSYrv3mQxFvW1NR+PFW7k Ceie159HxiNatUI91d2M6AVtVToHUnZiNVlguzD09gy7KonV5Dv1mWPhcQ0lP8ZC J49gDD83OLXk6szXdW3Rc7iWTETbu+VDPG5dFmdcO533GO3o1wsmtvwPkMMIFTqW Pa2a02mgY1UOfm56X33jG7KdPQOPlvD9O6gm9Am5b5OgYAJyYJLRVa8CBAFGIheL YUwGAsPisgq42mAXQVSPwhgStJsiLBVuunwst51t7QIdOD+Y+oB32fiNzMEgaVH/ xvo8RczI9TLFbD/QEN5w6n+K65JFptQDyKDqp/aReUTpEUM/Izzlo9JoqVC4JoBo lQaF+NCLpmH5prVQROz+jmoSAh1N+JQSu84tmIIl225ykxWCPKQNjR8gm0h+3EYA RpjxXNfU36q1xcGvx8Oj =FRWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0YVJubtMtrIyZwshs1zV8oX-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:23:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B8A1065674 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listen@heringa.de) Received: from eka.heringa.de (eka.heringa.de [IPv6:2001:4d88:ffff:ffff:d0:b723:6daf:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B7D8FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eka.heringa.de (localhost.heringa.de [127.0.0.1]) by eka.heringa.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D989F45782 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:23:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=heringa.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=abc; t=1311521000; x= 1313335400; bh=9CuvJExlBdm53AUtTC1viUhFDIfAkafXZOwKqXwI0n0=; b=V opE43KWdsXQAQ2wf3aetqckjbZiJGHvvgagpHzlvisaHCyJhdZNvOjdQnIJL8CeA A0kOZxiVMZDk0VBm7RiGcxdXq7+kWiS8qfbXY6N6o2cHq7mGOaqlSWZ3v7JkhVK5 Z1SlQZ5TBWFFzE22mT1tIKRvfuEkRGfwORDzA3NcZs= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eka.heringa.de Received: from eka.heringa.de ([127.0.0.1]) by eka.heringa.de (eka.heringa.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 17ZW+9Ue6zLT for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:23:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fbsd.home.depee.de (unknown [IPv6:2001:4dd0:fce3:0:226:b9ff:fe83:4172]) (Authenticated sender: dp) by eka.heringa.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:23:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2C38E5.7030206@heringa.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:23:17 +0200 From: Detlef Peeters User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110723 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20110723124517.7274A103B4@portscout.cc> In-Reply-To: <20110723124517.7274A103B4@portscout.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:23:24 -0000 On 23.07.2011 14:45, miwi@FreeBSD.org wrote: > The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your > ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check > each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, > submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can > safely ignore the entry. What is with the Port mail/postfix? Current version is 2.8.3 and new version is 2.8.4 regards, Detlef From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:42:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A421065672; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41198FC0A; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so5118836iyb.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=xqX8MEjikWBkTb+l+izVvwSy5eCbDlIxMOAa3C6wQpg=; b=iqOdL3XPi2GW5XQj5SJsxYEmbr+2pFD9VerMFeuy03y5CJK8gI9KNjAMQXh31+OZhc mg9pTaw32BGd0MwwkvMuYGMgX+PsZiMzRI4A/QEFcaYvD9HWYJeQMsazI7nATIUiDMxY kL6AdJ2/RBThV1KHfSF20bSTBeGj/xnq8x9z8= Received: by 10.231.0.234 with SMTP id 42mr3662572ibc.110.1311525759091; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E2C38E5.7030206@heringa.de> References: <20110723124517.7274A103B4@portscout.cc> <4E2C38E5.7030206@heringa.de> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:42:09 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5k_-X0GOa_LhoQDaPGuJquRz3mU Message-ID: To: Detlef Peeters , Sahil Tandon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:42:40 -0000 On 24 July 2011 16:23, Detlef Peeters wrote: > On 23.07.2011 14:45, miwi@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your >> ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check >> each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, >> submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can >> safely ignore the entry. > > What is with the Port mail/postfix? Current version is 2.8.3 and new > version is 2.8.4 > Best ask the maintainer, CC'd. There's usually a lag between a release and the port being updated; we do tend to test them :P Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 17:18:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27864106564A for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2F48FC08 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so5153479iyb.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KrVCyJ180AG3Oy/L7QpIx01MVJ9ib6XvPxo7KL1YstI=; b=IZFxODZ68ARXEC1HrfJLmUEQGLzE+RLa76f7RGXz7TOUWgOufbafr28mcPaBApoV/H oJ5kQZ5H6/r36QindjVV7WMGPQf+PME4qDgkmS7nNO7SlsQpg0EoE0kEhF89XIU1G9oZ Yzd/oCG5ICYzaOiBL4vH3Inc7gNhWgYHEJU9I= Received: by 10.231.118.18 with SMTP id t18mr3555920ibq.60.1311527926068; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:18:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <89792658-145E-4548-B930-C847FCE6E990@vandalon.nl> References: <89792658-145E-4548-B930-C847FCE6E990@vandalon.nl> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:18:16 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UaWhEDIM71uSpEcH3OXPIFFx3VI Message-ID: To: Joris Vandalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port submit status (Port/157426). X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:18:48 -0000 On 24 July 2011 12:04, Joris Vandalon wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted a freebsd port (157426) the 30th of may. > Now I know I should be patient but I was wondering if there is something is wrong with this port since previous ports where always accepted within a month. > Hi Joris, I've replied to the PR, and scanning over it again I've just noticed that you've patched the distribution's Makefile to make an install target. Normally we use something like (in the port's Makefile): do-install: ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/${PORTNAME} ${PREFIX}/bin/ ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/${MAN1} ${MAN1PREFIX}/man/man1/ Oops, in patch-config.mk: UNRAR_LIB=/usr/lcoal/lib Probably better (rather than hardcoding /usr/local) to use %%LOCALBASE%% in the patch for the UNRAR_LIB and FUSE_SRC, and %%PREFIX%% for DESTDIR and then: post-patch: ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,%%LOCALBASE%%,${LOCALBASE},' \ -e 's,%%PREFIX%%,${LOCALBASE},' \ ${WRKSRC}/config.mk If you fix these issues I'll take it. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 17:56:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D130D1065672; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joris@vandalon.nl) Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBD28FC1A; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so3615885eya.21 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:56:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vandalon.nl; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Iaja0IGn58xH7+ba8mwbew1gCGYbaOWEgeAB1SJNR8c=; b=Ru/snbL6njU21vjMO3K2b/xLUhZsM4Aylu+UFs9PENPMyBQm+3o2vK0I5E7cfWYtmW KWBfzN7jML/1ByW57pqRtSmPByF/8RaAI55LRzwlvNpUX9QA6pDtU6fr8e098b0MOLlW CyeTfQ38DRuHBmk2xIdwoOwspe/aPtIlAwra8= Received: by 10.213.100.9 with SMTP id w9mr1478851ebn.13.1311530184937; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (D4CC867D.cm-2.dynamic.ziggo.nl [212.204.134.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q16sm2500592eef.41.2011.07.24.10.56.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Joris Vandalon In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:56:22 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <01342C21-0E58-4E99-8138-1463DDF382D6@vandalon.nl> References: <89792658-145E-4548-B930-C847FCE6E990@vandalon.nl> To: Chris Rees X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port submit status (Port/157426). X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:56:26 -0000 On 24 jul. 2011, at 19:18, Chris Rees wrote: > If you fix these issues I'll take it. Hi Chris, I just updated the pr with version 1.13.0 and your suggestions included. Cheers, Joris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 00:35:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99184106566B; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AD58FC17; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B806B1711F; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:35:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1311554143; bh=NEQKFF1SXBXGqnnl6CwGz6kHNftWsiKsM1jdzqLm8d8=; b=r 5SdA9UMbOjG00Newui3T7JUCq3QV6VebCnHIaAASGUOyeNaE3KXLD1ckAg0jzLeI ggjh91be+R3if36ZwZyhL2L7ar7tIZQWTngcl1eZy5vDEAXPd9shRVThEr0LYfS3 9XFNCBx4cdqm+Qc9i9fdFL1Hvuy9GCn66cHUNw72oU= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id EgFEzjj9A9bc; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:35:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:35:07 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20110725003506.GA725@magic.hamla.org> References: <20110723124517.7274A103B4@portscout.cc> <4E2C38E5.7030206@heringa.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Detlef Peeters , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:35:15 -0000 On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:42:09 +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 24 July 2011 16:23, Detlef Peeters wrote: > > On 23.07.2011 14:45, miwi@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > > >> The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your > >> ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check > >> each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, > >> submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can > >> safely ignore the entry. > > > > What is with the Port mail/postfix? Current version is 2.8.3 and new > > version is 2.8.4 > > Best ask the maintainer, CC'd. There's usually a lag between a release > and the port being updated; we do tend to test them :P Although I try to minimize that lag for my ports, it is sometimes unavoidable: I had, until a few hours ago, been on vacation with limited internet access. I will try to commit this update in the next few days. Sorry for the delay. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:20:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3191065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B048FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so3559732vxg.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:20:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/y43zc0fKjxyHnCHqNJdWadXZufvfszWbFp8hhPH9dI=; b=KLbokLRNlLAP2Ogt6E0n9mMW+ZbXajgmk8BhqZczuBg6/sXGV8h45k10xUIEUT9id4 ++so6mC66NN2kGvBNBa4Ejnn8fkOvLxU6HBUIZT+qzytbWJELpF2BuoiF0zwjPoBu4lQ +/PFbktW/08SraYo2399b0LgkVYjsYVI2p09k= Received: by 10.52.74.69 with SMTP id r5mr1432644vdv.307.1311560453089; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:20:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.166.161 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:20:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:20:23 +0000 Message-ID: To: freebsd ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:20:54 -0000 At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large number of PRs have been filed against it (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to officially drop it. -- Eitan Adler I From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:53:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E12E106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8A08FC14 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6P2U4rI011263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:30:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:30:04 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:30:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org, freebsd ports Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:53:15 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/11 22:20, Eitan Adler wrote: > At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large > number of PRs have been filed against it (see > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No > one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to > officially drop it. Personally, I agree it's time to drop it if no one is going to do the work to maintain it, which at this point it seems clear is not going to happen. I'd be happy to be proven wrong about that. So the question becomes, how do we go about doing it? First step would be changing the handbook. Most UPDATING entries seem to include both portupgrade and portmaster instructions these days, so that should be covered. The next issue would be warning portupgrade users, perhaps by marking the port DEPRECATED? I'd think a date a little longer than the usual month would be needed before expiring. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOLNUsAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhUwoH/279L3SKUUaKdSI4eUacIHDC +RDoNvcW06qFiDwEMIPi0olWxQU1O3PnNXVf0X7ackS/k5JElTJUV79Dw7i+4VOW fa5ON9Fi2ggIG93Az+mqDgVGVlFqhCKQWeLypadGWX9Ykx3EitkudC4cXZLxC9Hq pAPC45BoJWVkaAyTwvP3K+jbSCFG+2yY+OIuPIFco+3FP5X5cJcv8x/L43N1tbRa PRvz7MUmDJ+vvQNgwukTdHmfFUH5hZ/Y9E3U79TsIYy/uUhZ8tYZjp9rOn98LOay sfnHY3MoKWxc/fNgrd7T2v4E9kF72rf7uhcdtpz7HHCxHcMzU7sFal+5ZvUQQF0= =TbrA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 03:02:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20771106567F; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5F98FC16; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1070) id 1160E119D9F; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:44:48 -0700 From: milki To: Steve Wills Message-ID: <20110725024448.GC36676@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Eitan Adler , freebsd ports , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:02:19 -0000 On 22:30 Sun 24 Jul , Steve Wills wrote: > On 07/24/11 22:20, Eitan Adler wrote: > > At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large > > number of PRs have been filed against it (see > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No > > one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to > > officially drop it. > > Personally, I agree it's time to drop it if no one is going to do the > work to maintain it, which at this point it seems clear is not going to > happen. I'd be happy to be proven wrong about that. > > So the question becomes, how do we go about doing it? First step would > be changing the handbook. Most UPDATING entries seem to include both > portupgrade and portmaster instructions these days, so that should be > covered. The next issue would be warning portupgrade users, perhaps by > marking the port DEPRECATED? I'd think a date a little longer than the > usual month would be needed before expiring. I would agree with this for the most part. However, when I recently fubarred my /usr/ports/packages when I accidently terminated in the middle of portmaster operations, I found the easiest way to recover was to use portupgrade (portmaster was complaining about missing packages and deleting/reinstalling/deinstalling/etc failed to fix this). I think its good to have alternate installers for situations like this since they have different strengths and weaknesses. Certainly documentation for portmaster needs to be added and promoted as a ports manager. That being said, I personally have had some vested interest in improving portupgrade and looked over the code when I submitted a patch before knowing no one was fixing it. In my naivete, maybe I could tackle portupgrade... -- milki milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 03:30:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45992106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ahurt@anbcs.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4C48FC08 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so2409929ywf.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.61.12 with SMTP id j12mr3885808aga.147.1311562869411; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from charlie.anbcs.com (c-68-53-31-188.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [68.53.31.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v20sm4670065ani.41.2011.07.24.20.01.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2CDC72.8000103@anbcs.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:01:06 -0500 From: Aaron Hurt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110628 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ayu@commun.jp Subject: audio/umurmur X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:30:07 -0000 This port was added but has not been updated. When I created the following PR ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157100 ) ... this port wasn't in the repository yet. Please commit the newer version of this port found at the link provided. I'd also be glad to takeover ownership of this port as I already maintain it's dependency devel/protobuf-c Thank You -- Aaron Hurt From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 04:03:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781171065674 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp7.server.rpi.edu (smtp7.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6598FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilead.netel.rpi.edu (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.124.121]) by smtp7.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p6P319SH019562; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:01:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2CDC75.20904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:01:09 -0400 From: Garance A Drosehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0) X-RPI-SA-Score: 1.50 (*) [Hold at 12.00] COMBINED_FROM,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.227 Cc: freebsd ports Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:03:01 -0000 On 7/24/11 10:20 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large > number of PRs have been filed against it (see > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No > one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to > officially drop it. > FWIW, it has been working fine for me, and it would have been quite a surprise to find out it was deprecated. (except, of course, that I do follow this mailing list. I'm just saying that someone who isn't following this mailing list might be very surprised if portupgrade were suddenly dropped). Part of me would like to try my hand at fixing whatever the problems are, but I am swamped at work and am very likely to continue to be swapped because the college where I work is very keen on not hiring any more people right now. Maybe I can find some time, but if someone else has the time then certainly they should take the lead. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 04:16:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847E7106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434148FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so3610546vws.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.168.200 with SMTP id v8mr1050130vcy.131.1311565958425; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s13sm1003196vcc.37.2011.07.24.20.52.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:52:37 -0400 From: Francisco Reyes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:16:37 -0000 Is there a list/page somewhere of port commiters willing to do paid work for sponsored ports? Would be great to have a list of such developers at http://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts I am looking for someone to work on porting http://pypy.org If anyone knows of developer(s) or is such developer please drop me a line with estimate cost. This is "personal sponsoring" (no company... just me..) so please be gentle on the estimate. :-) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 07:33:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109371065673 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail01.rise-w.com (iris.rise-s.com [88.116.105.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC84A8FC16 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.rise-w.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352C040E0ED; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:31:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.59.162] (chello080108063010.8.11.vie.surfer.at [80.108.63.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rise-world.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83C5D40E056; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:33:10 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGlsbWFuIEtlc2tpbsO2eg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:33:15 -0000 On 07/25/2011 04:20 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large > number of PRs have been filed against it (see > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No > one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to > officially drop it. Despite the fact that there are many PRs about it, it still works for most users i guess. I am ok with switching the documentation to portmaster, but i am against marking it DEPRECATED. I have been using portupdate for 10 years and it works for all my usecases. Switching to portmaster means i have to learn new -options and new error messages. Unless there is a killer feature in portmaster i don't see a reason to switch. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:17:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AAC106566B; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7544D8FC15; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so6536207fxe.17 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:17:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JiFuT4upoePEDomWVfhvLp//XVq4fR99brOzxInfBLI=; b=TlGomj/cgidemL318oRe2qi7ob4UV7lrXVm3WWKLd49SztrQnWS5qT+HmR0o0DCyPJ na/ARKDoJA5bpmDSDPdVCIkP3LMP6gY2K9b6gcpk8wpvsIMSGke44RPwK+AQMnr7qu/2 pkcVUg1AmN0y0/sBJ4IvMJcNcr6BVUllkiOHo= Received: by 10.223.26.70 with SMTP id d6mr6376286fac.78.1311583855232; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (254.166.broadband10.iol.cz [90.177.166.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w11sm3672659faj.14.2011.07.25.01.50.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 01:50:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Varga To: Tilman =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Keskin=F6z?= In-Reply-To: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:17:37 -0000 On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 09:33 +0200, Tilman Keskinöz wrote: > I am ok with switching the documentation to portmaster, but i am against > marking it DEPRECATED. I have been using portupdate for 10 years and it > works for all my usecases. > > Switching to portmaster means i have to learn new -options and new error > messages. Unless there is a killer feature in portmaster i don't see a > reason to switch. Basically, this. I'm on the very same boat, so to reiterate it again, from my point of view: 1. Portupgrade may have bugs, sure, but none of them are critical and every one I know about can be easily worked around whenever situation arises. Some of them are so old now that most regular users probably count them as features. 2. I too have been using portupdate for 10 years (hello!) and it works for all my usecases. 3. Switching to portmaster means retraining for a different *mission critical* software, that behaves differently, and that I currently have no need for, because the former one works fine. To point out a specific examply that I see frequently in UPDATING: If you use portmaster: # portmaster -r icu If you use portupgrade: # portupgrade -fr devel/icu Ok, sure, easy task.. Hey..what? In portupgrade, -r builds all my ports recursively and updates those which are out of date, where -f forces it to rebuild every single one along the path. Clear, right? So why is this different for portmaster? Where is my -f[orce] option? Will -r always rebuild everything? Or will it never, as it is with portupgrade without -f used? IF that's the case, how can my scripts recursively rebuild only needed stuff and...damn. Sure, by that time I spent on writing this email, I might have been halfway through portmaster documentation and have my questions answered, but that's obviously not the point - I just don't need, and don't want to. While portupgrade works (and it works), I don't want spending my time on cross-checking every single usecase between portmaster and portupgrade so that my upgrade scripts can safely play with the new popular kid on the block. Unless there is something fundamentally broken with portupgrade (other than a few open PRs) that prevents it from working on a modern FreeBSD system, I don't see a point in deprecation. Especially when portmaster is *NOT* a drop-in replacement. Again, from recent UPDATING: portmaster cannot process the upgrade of www/p5-libwww from version 5 to version 6. To upgrade p5-libwww, use portupgrade instead, or deinstall p5-libwww before reinstalling: If you use portmaster: # pkg_delete -f 'p5-libwww-5*' ; portmaster www/p5-libwww If you use portupgrade, no special treatment is necessary. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:36:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E8F106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9556A8FC14 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2011 09:36:53 -0000 Received: from g229210208.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO apollo.emma.line.org) [92.229.210.208] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 25 Jul 2011 11:36:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/hcdlKWIbhkcC4MZWBDvo6OEEJ22rNEFuOvmB0iX cVZWZer+PwebmK Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6525B23CE4E for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:36:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2D392F.1080902@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:36:47 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:36:56 -0000 Am 25.07.2011 10:50, schrieb Michal Varga: > Sure, by that time I spent on writing this email, I might have been > halfway through portmaster documentation and have my questions answered, > but that's obviously not the point - I just don't need, and don't want > to. You will do once it's the only tool. OK, I wasn't being serious. Seriously the point is that new users should be kept away from a tool that is known to have lots of unfixed bugs. > While portupgrade works (and it works), I don't want spending my time on > cross-checking every single usecase between portmaster and portupgrade > so that my upgrade scripts can safely play with the new popular kid on > the block. > > Unless there is something fundamentally broken with portupgrade (other > than a few open PRs) that prevents it from working on a modern FreeBSD > system, I don't see a point in deprecation. Especially when portmaster > is *NOT* a drop-in replacement. Lack of port quality and maintenance are good reasons for removal. > Again, from recent UPDATING: > > portmaster cannot process the upgrade of www/p5-libwww from version > 5 to version 6. To upgrade p5-libwww, use portupgrade instead, or > deinstall p5-libwww before reinstalling: > > If you use portmaster: > # pkg_delete -f 'p5-libwww-5*' ; portmaster www/p5-libwww > > If you use portupgrade, no special treatment is necessary. Doug is aware of the problem, and it isn't a case against portmaster. Frankly I haven't even tried if portupgrade would have been able to handle it. Anyways, there are various upgrades that *neither* of the two tools can handle without manual help of the administrator. This frequently happens if a certain interdependent set of packages (such as GNOME) moves functions between ports, or removes a port. Basically I'd say let's mark portupgrade without EXPIRATION_DATE and with DEPRECATED= and bump PORTREVISION, stating as reason that we need a volunteer to maintain it and else people should use portmaster. If someone picks it up, problem solved. If not, we at least scare new users away and direct them to portmaster. Marking the port DECPRECATED like that gives the maintenance problem a much wider exposure than just repeated discussions on mailing lists that no-one (in relation to the overall user count) reads. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:42:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8417D1065675; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DEC14FD6E; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:42:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110723 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Varga References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:42:29 -0000 Change is hard. :) I have no objections to someone (or some group) choosing to maintain portupgrade. I've always said that I don't regard portmaster and portupgrade to be in competition. However if no one steps up to maintain it, portupgrade will eventually bitrot and become unusable. So for all of you saying "save portupgrade!" this is something you seriously need to consider. That said, I was going to avoid responding to this thread altogether however you said some things below that I felt compelled to respond to. On 07/25/2011 01:50, Michal Varga wrote: > 3. Switching to portmaster means retraining for a different *mission > critical* software, that behaves differently, and that I currently have > no need for, because the former one works fine. To point out a specific > examply that I see frequently in UPDATING: > > If you use portmaster: > # portmaster -r icu > > If you use portupgrade: > # portupgrade -fr devel/icu > > Ok, sure, easy task.. Hey..what? In portupgrade, -r builds all my ports > recursively and updates those which are out of date, where -f forces it > to rebuild every single one along the path. Clear, right? So why is this > different for portmaster? Because I never used portupgrade, and I never set out to create a feature-by-feature replacement for it. More pointedly, there are certain things about they way that portupgrade works that I don't like and/or don't agree with; hence my desire to create a new tool. > Where is my -f[orce] option? Will -r always > rebuild everything? Or will it never, as it is with portupgrade without > -f used? IF that's the case, how can my scripts recursively rebuild only > needed stuff and...damn. zomg, change is hard. :) > Sure, by that time I spent on writing this email, I might have been > halfway through portmaster documentation and have my questions answered, > but that's obviously not the point - I just don't need, and don't want > to. zomg, change is hard. :) > While portupgrade works (and it works), I don't want spending my time on > cross-checking every single usecase between portmaster and portupgrade > so that my upgrade scripts can safely play with the new popular kid on > the block. zomg, change is hard. :) > Unless there is something fundamentally broken with portupgrade (other > than a few open PRs) that prevents it from working on a modern FreeBSD > system, I don't see a point in deprecation. I tend to agree with you, actually, but ... > Especially when portmaster is *NOT* a drop-in replacement. This is a red herring, as portmaster is never going to be a drop-in replacement for portupgrade. > Again, from recent UPDATING: > > portmaster cannot process the upgrade of www/p5-libwww from version > 5 to version 6. To upgrade p5-libwww, use portupgrade instead, or > deinstall p5-libwww before reinstalling: > > If you use portmaster: > # pkg_delete -f 'p5-libwww-5*' ; portmaster www/p5-libwww > > If you use portupgrade, no special treatment is necessary. This issue arose because the maintainer of the port chose a non-standard way of dealing with the issue of one package separating itself into 2 parts, and then chose not to apply the workaround that I suggested for dealing with the problem; which turned out to be an example of an issue that I brought up on the list a little while ago and was told that it didn't need attention because if it happened it was always an error in the port. So just to be clear, if someone wants to maintain portupgrade and/or people want to continue using it, no objection from me. :) Meanwhile, the portmaster man page contains a very detailed treatment of what portmaster does, and how and why it does it. Anyone considering switching is encouraged to install it, and read the man page. Doug (zomg, change is hard.) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:14:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA76F106566C; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487C58FC0C; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so6587232fxe.17 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nnNiCGH07lCDFrwIUYe/b8AfDyK7Ct/S8eZLk/y46nA=; b=FLNEQC7p8q6s8fo7+VjqNAUlGkYfbKgtXGcVfIMubUGv3u3L/DZDxqhkolqhLCUjPB lMsSlXNMUrdW8m4pA5QnvssbvpcNg0+1ZkmoI21dimcxEJNxPoZrd2dhEOtxI3baJ5xB 4lti7C7D1wiYPf5ur+fNKhvrGPNWp9HLEhKPM= Received: by 10.223.144.141 with SMTP id z13mr5974625fau.18.1311588863910; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (254.166.broadband10.iol.cz [90.177.166.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20sm3706285fai.20.2011.07.25.03.14.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:14:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Varga To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:14:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tilman =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Keskin=F6z?= , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:14:25 -0000 On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 02:42 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Change is hard. :) In fact, that's the whole point of the story, ironically or not. > I have no objections to someone (or some group) choosing to maintain > portupgrade. I've always said that I don't regard portmaster and > portupgrade to be in competition. > > However if no one steps up to maintain it, portupgrade will eventually > bitrot and become unusable. So for all of you saying "save portupgrade!" > this is something you seriously need to consider. There is a difference in "saving" portupgrade and simply cold murdering it from behind just because it's that particular time of the month for a 'change' (cough). Believe or not, as a decade long user, I hated portupgrade from the day one, and learned to hate it even more as the code base bloated and everybody lost a slightest idea how it even holds together to the point where it is today. I can still (though barely) remember times when portupgrade was actually spending 95% cpu time on compilation and rest on "fixing / saving / database / dependencies", in contrast to the current 30% compilation time + 70% portupgrade database fractal magic disco that nobody gets anymore. That said, I don't propose (nor volunteer, for the love of god) to maintain portupgrade - I just say - leave it be. As was already said before me - change the handbook/documentation, feel free to wipe all tracks of portupgrade from it, that doesn't matter even slightest to the current portupgrade user base, as we don't read that anyway. But I have machines and scripts that need to be kept up to date and will need to be for years to come, and portupgrade is the current mission critical tool for that. Change is hard, *especially* when there is nothing broken with stuff that already works. "Unmaintained" portupgrade is not a security threat, it's not a network service, it may have bugs that nobody cares about to fix anymore, but most people [citation needed] don't care about them, they're worked around for years, and a stable bug is almost as good as a feature, isn't it? Again, as you said - portmaster is not a replacement for portupgrade. I have no objections in its promotion to new users as the new, one and only "approved" way of managing ports, but this in no way cuts it for currently deployed portupgrade setups, where portupgrade works 'just fine' (and can work the same for years to come). Deprecate it, or kill it, and you will only force many current users to keep a local copy, because it's still easier than a change. Is there any win in that? m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:42:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE3E106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A638FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-174-50-4-38.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [174.50.4.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9051337B49F; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 05:42:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 07B8B61C5A; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 05:42:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 05:42:20 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Michal Varga Message-ID: <20110725104219.GC2369@over-yonder.net> References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21-fullermd.4 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.1 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Tilman =?iso-8859-1?Q?Keskin=F6z?= , Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:42:22 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:14:19PM +0200 I heard the voice of Michal Varga, and lo! it spake thus: > > I have no objections in [portmaster's] promotion to new users as the > new, one and only "approved" way of managing ports, but this in no > way cuts it for currently deployed portupgrade setups, where > portupgrade works 'just fine' (and can work the same for years to > come). +1 For all its troubles (and certainly they are legion), portupgrade gets along with what I try to do. portmaster does 90%, and I fight it tooth and nail on the last 10% (or would, if I didn't just use portmaster instead), because what it's trying to do just doesn't quite match what I'm trying to do. (also, it's really nice having portupgrade around for upgrading portmaster, and portmaster for upgrading portupgrade or ruby*. Even if neither is strictly necessary, it's still very comfortable and comforting ;) > I can still (though barely) remember times when portupgrade was > actually spending 95% cpu time on compilation and rest on "fixing / > saving / database / dependencies", in contrast to the current 30% > compilation time + 70% portupgrade database fractal magic disco that > nobody gets anymore. Just earlier today, I did a perl upgrade on my workstation. That means I upgrade perl, then force-rebuild p5-*. You can darn well bet I used portmaster for that latter. Spending giant piles of time on database fractal magic disco is one thing wrapped around a 10 minute firefox build; wrapped around couple-second perl module builds it's just insane. I'll just fire off a pair of rebuilds... % time portmaster p5-version [...] 2.906u 2.501s 0:07.51 71.9% 706+2679k 0+21io 167pf+0w % time portupgrade -f p5-version [...] 15.555u 8.054s 0:26.55 88.8% 299+2510k 0+10io 17pf+0w And really, that's best-case for portupgrade, since p5-version actually has some C files to compile. Most modules are just files to copy, and take less time. Still portupgrade takes more than 3 times as long. 19 seconds of overheard, times 130 p5-*'s, is over 41 minutes on a full rebuild, just to do its hinky-dance. The actual run is out of my backscroll now, but from history: 30 22:17 time nice portmaster p5- 31 22:30 pkgdb -F so it took at most 13 minutes. I know it sat idle a little while before I noticed it was done. Still, portupgrade would be almost an hour, instead of less than a quarter hour. All that said, 95% of my port upgrading happens via portupgrade. Presumably, were there were no other choice, I could twist things around so I'd get by with just portmaster. Maybe someday I'll have to do that due to portupgrade rotting completely out of usability. But I'd be real cranky about being crammed into it while portupgrade still works for me. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:47:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8E4106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [204.109.61.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011508FC13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:47:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter Received: from krypta.anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [204.109.61.206]) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6P9uo48063365; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:56:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:56:50 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nikola_Le=C4=8Di=C4=87?= To: C-S In-Reply-To: <1311450560.5098.6.camel@laptop> References: <20110723120040.0E1F710656EF@hub.freebsd.org> <1311450560.5098.6.camel@laptop> Message-ID: <1713b8c4f7b78f5e8c7791dd4eea1130@anthesphoria.net> X-Sender: nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.1 on FreeBSD Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Announcement] TeX Live 2011: Extended FreeBSD support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:47:37 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:49:20 +0200, C-S wrote: > First of all, this is great news. > My question is: what is the reason for not creating a port given that > you claim in your README.txt file that these binaries have been built in > jails with minimal dependencies. This means that you have figured out > what these dependencies are. Hence, I'd appreciate it a lot if you could > help us create a working port of texlive. TeX Live is a standalone distribution and I announced FreeBSD support in/for the official TeX Live release. As a standalone distribution with its own package management tools, it can live together with your other software, including other TeX distributions. A FreeBSD port of TeX Live has been discussed many times in the past on this mailing list. For now, Romain Tartière created a TeX Live port that can be fusioned with the current ports tree using the portshaker tool. Please visit http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/. (Btw, you can find the list of dependencies in the README.txt, section 2.) -- Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:52:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD561065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D9C8FC1B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so2700494qyk.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.197.3 with SMTP id ei3mr805045qab.261.1311591134572; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p15sm889167qct.46.2011.07.25.03.52.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seibercom.net (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3RMztN0p7Fz2CG44 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:52:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:52:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110725065211.35f2aa7d@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:52:16 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:14:19 +0200 Michal Varga articulated: > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 02:42 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > Change is hard. :) > > In fact, that's the whole point of the story, ironically or not. > > > I have no objections to someone (or some group) choosing to maintain > > portupgrade. I've always said that I don't regard portmaster and > > portupgrade to be in competition. > > > > However if no one steps up to maintain it, portupgrade will > > eventually bitrot and become unusable. So for all of you saying > > "save portupgrade!" this is something you seriously need to > > consider. > > There is a difference in "saving" portupgrade and simply cold > murdering it from behind just because it's that particular time of > the month for a 'change' (cough). > > Believe or not, as a decade long user, I hated portupgrade from the > day one, and learned to hate it even more as the code base bloated and > everybody lost a slightest idea how it even holds together to the > point where it is today. I can still (though barely) remember times > when portupgrade was actually spending 95% cpu time on compilation > and rest on "fixing / saving / database / dependencies", in contrast > to the current 30% compilation time + 70% portupgrade database > fractal magic disco that nobody gets anymore. > > That said, I don't propose (nor volunteer, for the love of god) to > maintain portupgrade - I just say - leave it be. As was already said > before me - change the handbook/documentation, feel free to wipe all > tracks of portupgrade from it, that doesn't matter even slightest to > the current portupgrade user base, as we don't read that anyway. > > But I have machines and scripts that need to be kept up to date and > will need to be for years to come, and portupgrade is the current > mission critical tool for that. Change is hard, *especially* when > there is nothing broken with stuff that already works. > > "Unmaintained" portupgrade is not a security threat, it's not a > network service, it may have bugs that nobody cares about to fix > anymore, but most people [citation needed] don't care about them, > they're worked around for years, and a stable bug is almost as good > as a feature, isn't it? > > Again, as you said - portmaster is not a replacement for portupgrade. > I have no objections in its promotion to new users as the new, one and > only "approved" way of managing ports, but this in no way cuts it for > currently deployed portupgrade setups, where portupgrade works 'just > fine' (and can work the same for years to come). Deprecate it, or kill > it, and you will only force many current users to keep a local copy, > because it's still easier than a change. Is there any win in that? I have not seen any verified upside to removing "portupgrade" from the ports system, so while kill it. While we are on the subject of port management tools, I still use "portmanager" when a version bump on a port requires that a massive number of dependencies be rebuild. I have had all too many instances when both "portupgrade" and "portmaster" simply bombed out and left me with only a partially updated system, and in many cases, a virtually useless one. Portmanager would simple get the job done right the first time. It might be overkill for one or two port upgrades; however, it works fine on massive projects that seem to bewilder the other two competing contenders. The "p5-libwww-5*" example in the case of "portmaster" being a perfect example. Just my 2¢. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+ports@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 11:06:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434FF1065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316B68FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6PB665f045561 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:06:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6PB65cg045559 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:06:05 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:06:05 GMT Message-Id: <201107251106.p6PB65cg045559@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:06:06 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/159177 sysutils/muse on 8.2-STABLE o ports/159173 cad/spice: more CLANG fixes o ports/159168 Update port german/tipp10 to current program version f ports/159166 [UPDATE] www/py-werkzeug to 0.7 o ports/159152 New port: sysutils/battray f ports/159147 Patch cmp to cmpq for security/libgcrypt 1.5.0 fails o f ports/159128 www/rt40 Makefile contains one-character typo that cau o ports/159121 net/freevrrpd: Make adv_int a runtime configurable opt o ports/159114 [new port] sysutils/flock: Manage locks from shell scr o ports/159111 [new port] devel/py-msgpack: MessagePack (de)serialize f ports/159108 sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs update to 0.5.3 o ports/159102 sysutils/fusefs-kmod: fusefs daemonizes before mount i o ports/159083 [NEW PORT] www/py27-django_compressor: Compresses link f ports/159050 PORT graphics/fotoxx Makefile update o ports/159032 [MAINTAINER] devel/gwenhywfar, devel/libchipcard, fina f ports/159031 [PATCH] devel/Ice: Fix close socket and incorporate se o ports/159025 New port: www/py-tornado2 - An open source scalable, n o ports/159018 Fixed LIB_DEPENDS and avahi support in audio/ario o ports/159007 New ports: print/linux-f10-cups-libs, security/linux-f o ports/158980 New port: net/py-msrplib Python MSRP client library f ports/158968 Update port: lang/mosh version 0.2.7 f ports/158949 [PATCH] x11-wm/icewm: fix build when WITH_GNOME is req o ports/158948 [patch] dns/py-namebench: update to 1.3.1 o ports/158940 [NEW PORT] devel/py-pytest: Cross-project testing tool f ports/158935 [PATCH] print/lpr-wrapper: update to 0.7 o ports/158931 print/perlftlib is not built with perl5.14 o ports/158929 emulators/desmume updated to 0.9.7 f ports/158927 [PATCH] quick patch for ports/math/asir2000 to work o ports/158925 New Port: audio/pithos GNOME Pandora player f ports/158922 devel/py-levenshtein: point to new home f ports/158916 [PATCH] textproc/ctpp2: update to 2.7.1 f ports/158910 [PATCH] sysutils/battmond: update to 0.3 f ports/158907 [PATCH] www/interchange: update to 5.6.3 o ports/158906 New port: devel/py-xcaplib Python XCAP client library f ports/158900 [PATCH] archivers/lrzip: update to 0.606 f ports/158898 [PATCH] www/libecap: update to 0.2.0 f ports/158897 [PATCH] net/phamm: update to 0.5.18 f ports/158889 [PATCH] sysutils/ucspi-proxy: update to 0.98 f ports/158886 [PATCH] net/crtmpserver: update to 0.380 o ports/158878 [patch] textproc/dadadodo assumes long is 32 bits o ports/158875 New port: devel/py-application Basic building blocks f o ports/158872 [maintainer-update] [patch] devel/diffuse: Update to 0 o ports/158847 [patch][maintainer-update] net-mgmt/virt-viewer: updat f ports/158824 devel/flyspray: share/flyspray/flyspray.conf.php remai f ports/158799 [PATCH] devel/pear-PHPUnit: update to new pear channel o ports/158791 Update security/openvas-* o ports/158789 [MAINTAINER] graphics/gimp-gmic-plugin: update to 1.5. o ports/158781 New port: games/drcreep Platform Puzzle Game o ports/158738 japanese/ical f ports/158731 sysutils/byobu wants module "snack" o ports/158704 New port: mail/mailfromd o ports/158703 New port: mail/mailutils o ports/158647 audio/bebocd: request for marking it BROKEN and DEPREC o ports/158624 [update] www/xpi-downthemall 1.1.10 to 2.0.7 o ports/158622 [update] www/xpi-torbutton 1.2.5 to 1.4.0 o ports/158600 [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3-devel and slaves o ports/158598 [MAINTAINER] emulators/tiemu3: Fix build with clang o ports/158564 [PATCH] update to and clang buildfix for lang/librep o ports/158561 [PATCH] fix net-im/gicq to build using clang o ports/158558 [PATCH] fix games/blackjack to build using clang o ports/158546 [PATCH] fix audio/cdplay to build with clang o ports/158545 [PATCH] fix net/tptest to build with clang f ports/158533 [NEW PORT] devel/tiled: 2D game map editor o ports/158531 games/hlstats: upgrade from 1.50 to 1.62 f ports/158501 [patch] multimedia/mplayer: faad dependency problem o ports/158499 Update port: games/tuxpaint to 0.9.21 o ports/158494 Update port: audio/pd to 0.43.0 o ports/158477 Update port: japanese/today to 2.12 o ports/158467 Update port: multimedia/gmerlin-avdecoder to 1.1.0 o ports/158464 Update port: japanese/celrw to 0.16 o ports/158462 Update port: misc/nut to 16.12 o ports/158454 Update port: devel/avra to 1.3.0 o ports/158445 Update port: sysutils/eiciel to 0.9.8.1 o ports/158443 Update port: security/gcipher to 1.1 o ports/158428 net/xwhois: request for marking it BROKEN and DEPRECAT o ports/158421 [PATCH] update to lang/icon f ports/158305 math/scilab Error building the scilab manual file f ports/158265 fix for editors/xxe o ports/158204 [PATCH] java/jde: update to 2.4.0.1 f ports/158187 update ports/devel/log4cplus o ports/158179 some packages do not fully honor -P dir option in pkg_ o ports/158167 [NEW PORT] databases/percona-server: Multithreaded SQL o ports/158077 [PATCH] graphics/sswf: update to allow compilation wit o ports/158044 Multiple net/iaxmodem instances started o ports/158020 deprecate net-p2p/gift and dependent ports o ports/157791 audo/midimountain fails to copy all xpm files and fail o ports/157738 New port: net/py-ldaptor o ports/157719 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-CheckPing: Provides nagios o ports/157715 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-libvirt: Provides monitori o ports/157628 [patch] www/red5 remove user data while reinstalling u o ports/157505 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-DeviceSearch: Provides the o ports/157504 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-NetApp: Provides monitorin o ports/157503 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-InterfaceGraphs: Provides f ports/157494 lang/ezm3 fails to compile o ports/157320 [NEW PORT] databases/pecl-pdo_user: PECL classes provi o ports/157301 [New port] net-mgmt/zbxlog: Syslog server receives mes o ports/157282 [MAINTAINER PATCH] net/xrdp: effective login name is n o ports/157242 Updating port sysutils/swapexd for legacy compatibilit o ports/157212 japanese/font-alias: use shell instead of perl for pkg o ports/157197 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-deviceAdvDetail: Provides o ports/157196 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-DellMon: Provides addition o ports/157194 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-NtpMonitor: Monitors the o o ports/157191 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-MACReport: Lists MAC addre o ports/157190 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-GraphPortlet: Enables user o ports/157176 [patch] sysutils/heartbeat crashes when clock_t (signe o ports/157172 [NEW PORT] devel/libunistring: Unicode string library o ports/157136 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-Domain: Provides expiratio o ports/157135 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-DellMonitor: Provides Zeno o ports/157133 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-ApacheMonitor: Provides pe f ports/157109 conflict between net/netpipes and sysutils/timelimit f ports/157107 conflict between mail/p5-Mail-SPF and mail/libspf2 o ports/157092 [PATCH] audio/thunar-media-tags-plugin, broken with li f ports/157044 x11-toolkits/slgtk: fails to start f ports/157021 multimedia/mplayer: does not build with multimedia/lib o ports/157014 devel/jam: does not compile on FreeBSD 9.0 CURRENT/amd o ports/156998 [patch] new version of graphics/xnview is available o ports/156984 www/analog doesn't recognize Chrome browser type prope o ports/156876 update to comms/uarduno port for 9.0-CURRENT o ports/156834 New port: games/fairymax-devel latest version of games o ports/156791 New port: security/py-kerberos Python bindings for ker f ports/156747 multimedia/mplayer: fix 24-bits OSS + some improvement o ports/156737 [patch] www/squid31: squid.in startup script fixes to o ports/156693 [PATCH] security/hmap: refine this port a bit f ports/156629 [patch] sysutils/puppet patch to use PACKAGEROOT inste o ports/156539 [NEW PORT] print/frescobaldi: A music score editor for o ports/156495 [NEW PORT] audio/mscore: MuseScore music notation prog o ports/156472 [new port] devel/ocaml-react - OCaml library for react f ports/156376 [PATCH] graphics/optipng: update to 0.6.5 o ports/156362 New port: games/rftg Race for the Galaxy AI o ports/156343 multimedia/xbmc 10.1_1 mp3 playback problem - CALSADir o ports/156313 [patch][new port] astro/gkrellsun2 (Gkrellm2 Plugin) f ports/156252 New port: devel/radar Opensource tools to disasm, debu f ports/156171 port multimedia/mplayer patch-libao2-ao_oss.c is incor f ports/156143 New port: devel/arduino-mk: Build Arduino sketches fro o ports/156119 x11-fonts/font-manager: ignore a problem caused by the f ports/156075 [new port] graphics/openfst: library for constructing, f ports/156034 print/lyx-devel spell checking with enchant does not w o ports/156002 New port: sysutils/pefs-kmod kernel level stacked cryp f ports/155941 mwserv library support is not included in nepenthes.co f ports/155898 Update port devel/libthai o ports/155788 ports security/cfsd startup -- multiple problems f ports/155697 ports-mgmt/pkg_replace doesn't want to replace java/op o ports/155593 lang/mpd .16.1 ignores embedded cue sheets in FLAC fil f ports/155592 polish/ekg, after polish/libgadu update, contacts are o ports/155570 [patch] devel/py-twistedCore: update to 10.2.0 and oth f ports/155547 java/jboss5 port build failure o ports/155538 new port devel/radlib radlib developer library. Event- o ports/155447 Update ports: net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp-* to 2.2.1, New port f ports/155404 [PATCH] mail/mutt-devel: doesn't build in presence of f ports/155356 audio/xwave changed master site o ports/155350 repocopy www/drupal6-wysiwyg to www/drupal7-wysiwyg f ports/155306 multimedia/openshot doesn't work o ports/155225 plz split antlr2 and antlr3 ports. not update antlr2 - o ports/155166 update deskutils/org-mode.el to 7.4 f ports/155120 Update of port devel/php-libawl f ports/155115 devel/doxygen: dependancy loop o ports/155070 NEW PORT: games/CastleVox - new fast strategy board ga o ports/155064 New port: devel/stringtemplate, a java lib for text fo a ports/155062 Port update: devel/antlr f ports/154973 [PATCH] security/ike: fix plist when QTGUI=off, respec f ports/154902 [patch] Port devel/libedit: added libedit.pc for gnome f ports/154765 [NEW PORT] games/ghost++: Warcraft 3 game hosting bot o ports/154711 security/heimdal: kadmin: hdb_open: hdb_open failed in f ports/154682 net/iaxmodem: add rc script for running more than 1 ia o ports/154548 textproc/pootle: Pootle's rc.d script don't take into f ports/154546 update port: games/gemrb to version 0.6.3 f ports/154431 [patch] ports/Tools/scripts: python scripts use bad sh o ports/154401 New port: www/jetty7 - newer fork by Eclipse/Codehaus o ports/154285 [NEW PORT] java/netty: Java NIO client server framewor o ports/154254 [patch] asmail imap login broken with gmail at al. f ports/154217 New port: ports-mgmt/portsreinstall o ports/154202 New port: security/scannedonly - A Samba VFS virus sca o ports/154031 New port: audio/shoutcast2: SHOUTcast Distributed Netw o ports/153926 New port net/freeswitch-snapshot f ports/153842 [patch] multimedia/mplayer: add VAAPI option o ports/153810 [PATCH] Fix usb_interrupt_read() in devel/libusb for f o ports/153795 repocopy www/drupal5/bsd.drupal.mk to Mk/bsd.drupal.mk o ports/153793 repocopy www/drupal6 to www/drupal7 f ports/153733 [patch] emulators/visualboyadvance-m: problem with joy f ports/153645 Update ports: emulators/mame update to v0.141 f ports/153612 Update devel/arm-elf-binutils to version 2.17 f ports/153607 Update devel/djgpp-binutils to version 2.17 f ports/153437 [patch] emulators/dgen-sdl: mark BROKEN on non-i386 ar o ports/153429 [patch] Fix explicite uses of unzip in ports f ports/153425 [PATCH] www/limesurvey: Added a switch to use PostgreS f ports/153287 [PATCH] net-mgmt/ndpmon: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] f ports/153148 change port: deskutils/x-tile A tiling application for o ports/153130 sysutils/k3b: problem with k3b and mounting ntfs with o ports/152982 [patch] net/nss_ldap, ignore option nss_initgroups_ign f ports/152915 russian/xmms v. 1.2.11_12 don't see cdinfo and tag's i o ports/152453 textproc/urlview port should install gecko.sh optional o ports/152376 New port: audio/lastfmsubmitd o ports/152236 [patch] x11/slim: Enable pam support, add hald and dbu s ports/152195 [PATCH] deskutils/pinot update to xapian-core 1.2.3 f ports/152192 [PATCH] databases/xapian-bindings update to 1.2.3 o ports/152191 [PATCH] databases/xapian-core update to 1.2.3 o ports/152118 New port: deskutils/linux-tahometer A worktime trackin f ports/151930 [PATCH] net-mgmt/netams links to libmysqlclient/libpq f ports/151783 mail/fetchmail: rc.d script broken in case of MDA use f ports/151774 [new port] sysutils/pprotectd o ports/151747 new port: emulators/wine-fbsd64: request for (a variat f ports/151689 dns/rbldnsd does not use preassigned UID/GIDs f ports/151637 Update port: security/maia Much needed updates for Per f ports/151431 Update to include ZFS module in sysutils/grub2-1.98 o ports/151318 [repocopy][new port] x11-wm/stumpwm: rename to x11-wm/ f ports/151296 [patch] ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod build fails: MNT_NF f ports/150783 mail/qpopper: fails to configure ocasionally o ports/150425 www/squid31: rc.d/squid's squid_fib setting ineffectiv f ports/150316 new port: net/neatx f ports/150235 sysutils/smartmontools build system bug o ports/150194 There is no startup script for databases/cassandra f ports/150169 www/havp: Assertion failed: file llvm/lib/System/Mutex o ports/150086 [NEW PORT] net-im/tkabber-plugins-devel: External Plug f ports/149947 [NEW PORT] devel/smartCVS, a powerful graphical CVS cl o ports/149564 patch for various games/ adding appropriate LICENSEs t o ports/149538 sysutils/fusefs-ntfs panic on writte on 8.1 f ports/148871 bad packages: p5-XML-Parser-2.36_1 p5-XML-SAX-Expat-0. f ports/148027 New port: graphics/ramenhdr, node based video composit f ports/147943 New port: net/radsecproxy Radsecproxy is a generic RAD s ports/147829 Improved net/ucarp startup script: multiple VHID and F s ports/147169 bsd.ruby.mk: Adding GEM_ARGS o ports/143566 sysutils/diskcheckd runs constantly when using gmirror f ports/140939 [patch] security/vuxml: fix and extend files/newentry. f ports/139203 sysutils/freebsd-snapshot more careful patch not depen o ports/137378 Advisory locks fail with ports/security/cfs on FreeBSD o ports/133563 security/cfs rc script needs "mntudp" option on 8-CURR f ports/122333 net/arping - patch to lookup for interface and src ip, s ports/57498 HEIMDAL_HOME should be defined in src or ports Makefil 228 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 11:07:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F056C106567B; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBB28FC22; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA20644; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:45:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1QkdS0-000Axk-4i; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:45:08 +0300 Message-ID: <4E2ADE72.8080106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:45:06 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koop Mast References: <20110723131613.GF17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kernel Intel GPU driver and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:07:18 -0000 on 23/07/2011 16:51 Koop Mast said the following: > svn co http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/ports/browser/branches/xorg-dev svn: The OPTIONS response did not include the requested activity-collection-set; this often means that the URL is not WebDAV-enabled I am not an svn power user - is there anything I am doing wrong? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 11:27:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C05B106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1DC8FC16 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so3828420vxg.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:27:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=v9KOST0UZHz0rYplhlva7g5VKnpDR+CVH55QTM2pWXQ=; b=YQZYl6nnSaDsZzQ5atgyDuiOT/MWIANhs1jZ1arbpavFRlVTOjTmx2AcKJsjAPB+lX 20YYEhnr1SWaJLrMi9/OohFkZA8Fxn0bdY0grRiI43a8zjVseKuhU57+3jKfxmFO9Go2 631RSupb8exUgayNrQsm8+1ro6p3JaNXvc6vo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.96.226 with SMTP id dv2mr3857007vdb.480.1311593267284; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.194 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:27:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110725065211.35f2aa7d@seibercom.net> References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> <20110725065211.35f2aa7d@seibercom.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:27:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:27:48 -0000 My two cents after reading this whole thread: like it or not, portupgrade is currently the "official" tool (it's in the Handbook and all other docs). So in my view, this is what needs to be done: a) select a new "official tool" b) create or update said tool so it is working to 95% of all the wishes c) update all the documentation pointing to this new tool, and set a warning ("the old tool, portupgrade, is going away in X years") d) wait X years e) remove portupgrade As Doug wrote, change is hard. But there is a difference between change because all other options has run out of time, and planned change. We can make it less hard, at the cost of a longer timeframe. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 11:41:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EA91065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149DA8FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so3015171gwb.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:41:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=evR76LbQgfwSREydZuZoluEqUxhNJoAb4/OfYRcluNI=; b=BBbGcl5LCtky71oQr3DONQetybpTVHGU9Izrk5MIXL8XB3EN7NELNBjWRT4H1/mbr8 IibTw3KnB/JwTHgykz9Qaa9KXKkZRfAA5cCV9GiqPVu7pbyFPIGIE1DkfiYK+xXgEbYp Km84p62/pK35UnyszzvUnPS1eAIOk8GePBJMw= Received: by 10.231.0.234 with SMTP id 42mr4530769ibc.110.1311594071106; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:41:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:40:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> <20110725065211.35f2aa7d@seibercom.net> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:40:41 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lJ_v5lsGZjO_WHSpI5MxvZTi6ZE Message-ID: To: Torfinn Ingolfsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:41:12 -0000 On 25 July 2011 12:27, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > My two cents after reading this whole thread: > > like it or not, portupgrade is currently the "official" tool (it's in > the Handbook and all other docs). > So in my view, this is what needs to be done: > a) select a new "official tool" > b) create or update said tool so it is working to 95% of all the wishes > c) update all the documentation pointing to this new tool, and set a > warning ("the old tool, portupgrade, is going away in X years") > d) wait X years > e) remove portupgrade > > As Doug wrote, change is hard. But there is a difference between > change because all other options has run out of time, and planned > change. > We can make it less hard, at the cost of a longer timeframe. The usual process of deprecaction is to add a warning in one release, and then remove it in the next. While I appreciate portupgrade isn't part of the base system, I think this process would be appropriate. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 12:25:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC541065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail01.rise-w.com (iris.rise-s.com [88.116.105.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B41B8FC25 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.rise-w.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A34E40E09F; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.59.162] (chello080108063010.8.11.vie.surfer.at [80.108.63.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rise-world.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3615040E056; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:23:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2D60BC.50908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:25:32 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGlsbWFuIEtlc2tpbsO2eg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:25:46 -0000 On 07/25/2011 04:20 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large > number of PRs have been filed against it (see > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=portupgrade). No > one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to > officially drop it. > > I shortly went through the list. There are currently 22 PRs filed against portupgrade Of these: 4 are general problems of the ports collection/pkg_tools. (architecture-specific INDEX, Detecting of OPTIONs set, Overriding/removing files changed by the user etc.) 2 are documentation bugs 1 wishlist item 4 contain patches 1 i believed is already fixed, i set to feedback. So this leaves the following, which need someone (a maintainer?) to investigate/write a patch: 112818 ruby ports open non-criti medium current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade -a fails with database error 127019 ruby ports open serious medium current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade does not recognize fail conditions 127889 ruby ports open non-criti low current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade detects spurious failures and skips ports unnecessarily 129930 ruby ports open serious high current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade - portinstall tries to install dependencies twice 131111 ruby ports open serious medium current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel: completely removes package on installation error 140008 ruby ports open non-criti medium current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel chokes on bsdpan pkgs 147242 ruby ports open critical medium current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade incorrectly remove old port when new one fails to compile 151662 ruby ports open non-criti low current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade: upgrade of autoconf leaves old version 154210 ruby ports open serious medium current-us ports-mgmt/portupgrade 2.4.8_1,2: cross-thread violation on rb_gc() IMHO the situation is not that bad, that we need to DEPRECATE it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 13:27:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C044106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward13.mail.yandex.net (forward13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B75E8FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67]) by forward13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7F95B1413E6; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:27:33 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1311600453; bh=UQ8/Dwhu33RzL7+gIXjgcKEkdJFHb9Z6UcDUXet50f8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bIOQLIC+xHUHnRB8IrK4YWPq50dnrhaOgRC3oGzGgNvmOBU8c1wXnv5qg9sNia1/N C8CKf6O45cTOsBfaSSODBw1YDk28s5U8YKsX8UgK9VQhX2592cwLfbqp6tza7ZeRUl NRkdF+V9Fnmv8n1RQZc34S6EotpES5TG7fPjVLDY= Received: from smeshariki2.local (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 22BAF4CC0080; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:27:32 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4E2D6F41.8080907@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:27:29 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francisco Reyes References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> In-Reply-To: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:27:36 -0000 Hi, Francisco. Francisco Reyes wrote on 25.07.2011 07:52: > Is there a list/page somewhere of port commiters willing to do paid work > for sponsored ports? > > Would be great to have a list of such developers at > http://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts > > I am looking for someone to work on porting http://pypy.org I can make such port. Is this still actual? > > If anyone knows of developer(s) or is such developer please drop me a > line with estimate cost. > This is "personal sponsoring" (no company... just me..) so please be > gentle on the estimate. :-) -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:31:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8407B1065676 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500508FC16 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so6504352iyb.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZIk6fl99Qp3vn0WBPqw7spC6srp9xvVsCxY/yqWNYs8=; b=Cf6kv6IIvxtSeqKX+T0kb6pe5OFzUUO9sfrqzWKvhgyVooeNrtGYeNEKnY76XlXJvu Kfqq7CJYhDaq+RwZ+KHtu+xBdd5+INKsEQdYYuGaxUXrB8XBBNXS2KDcsOjalyDHIYga 1KMpOgqYksmTPtcDVWB1en4Azdxvkm1t2E5sg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.0.234 with SMTP id 42mr4660507ibc.110.1311604259729; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:30:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Francisco Reyes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:31:00 -0000 On 25 Jul 2011 05:16, "Francisco Reyes" wrote: > > Is there a list/page somewhere of port commiters willing to do paid work for sponsored ports? > > Would be great to have a list of such developers at > http://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts > > I am looking for someone to work on porting http://pypy.org > > If anyone knows of developer(s) or is such developer please drop me a line with estimate cost. > This is "personal sponsoring" (no company... just me..) so please be gentle on the estimate. :-) Assume we all are, and put an offer on the Wiki page :P Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:33:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61279106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD2F8FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6PEXORF012128; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:33:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p6PEXOio012125; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:33:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:33:24 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Michal Varga In-Reply-To: <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> Message-ID: References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:33:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:33:25 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Michal Varga wrote: > 3. Switching to portmaster means retraining for a different *mission > critical* software, that behaves differently, and that I currently have > no need for, because the former one works fine. To point out a specific > examply that I see frequently in UPDATING: > > If you use portmaster: > # portmaster -r icu > > If you use portupgrade: > # portupgrade -fr devel/icu > > Ok, sure, easy task.. Hey..what? In portupgrade, -r builds all my ports > recursively and updates those which are out of date, where -f forces it > to rebuild every single one along the path. Clear, right? More precisely: portupgrade -r : upgrade this port, and any outdated ports that depend on it. portupgrade -fr : upgrade this port, and update or rebuild all ports that depend on it, outdated or not portmaster : same as portupgrade -r, except it also checks ports on which this one depends, like portupgrade -rR portmaster -r : same as portupgrade -frR portmaster makes default a lot of the things that portupgrade needs to be told (as above, but also -c and -C). It also parallels some tasks. But the overall killer feature is active maintenance. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:24:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCDC106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2C8FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6PFOk1D008198; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:24:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p6PFOk5F008197; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:24:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:24:46 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20110725152446.GC1773@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hYooF8G/hrfVAmum" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:24:47 -0000 --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 08:33:24AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > ... > portmaster ... > But the overall killer feature is active maintenance. Well, that, and the fact that portmaster doesn't depend on bits that it is upgrading. Peace, david (who used to use portupgrade, but switched some time ago) --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4tir0ACgkQmprOCmdXAD11+wCdEoE0p8czRJNadwCWrAo4F6Ds rlgAoIQjwfKAN4YUkzoQHQLr+OBTyVjj =ocLI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:15:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9102D1065688 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlakno.cz [46.28.110.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DD48FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vlakno.cz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id DCE107F3854; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:59:20 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:15:10 -0000 --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! =20 =20 Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=3Dclang and CXX=3Dclang++. The resu= lts can be seen here: =20 =20 http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.201107232057= 54/ Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that uncovered others that need fixing. The "Reason" column was extended and now shows "assumes_gcc" which is the lowest hanging fruit :) =20 A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. assumes_gcc reason) and pre= vent a lot of other ports from building. =20 It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the por= ts you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction = into the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang. =20 Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other ports from building). =20 Thank you for helping us again!=20 =20 Roman Divacky --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4tktgACgkQLVEj6D3CBExPyACeLp6bF8SsBcVfn8Vh5mf/mv4B lJ4An0LKKvPDyc6hWtMz5/j8LTssuHQC =i5R8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:56:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D29106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732A8FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so2935846qyk.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.203.5 with SMTP id fg5mr3574564qab.356.1311612969025; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Francisco-Reyess-IMac.local ([64.61.107.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id du3sm7021948qab.1.2011.07.25.09.56.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:56:06 -0400 From: Francisco Reyes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:56:10 -0000 On 7/25/11 10:30 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > > If anyone knows of developer(s) or is such developer please drop me > a line with estimate cost. > > This is "personal sponsoring" (no company... just me..) so please be > gentle on the estimate. :-) > > Assume we all are, and put an offer on the Wiki page :P > > Got two replies and working with one of the responders. So, would a good process be to put a note on Wiki and email list or just put in Wiki and see if someone picks up? Hm.. or should this be something for the "jobs" list? I figure the request would usually be small enough and be port related that this list may be the most appropriate.. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:23:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A371065679; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (diana.db.net [66.113.102.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09FB8FC16; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4691A2282A; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:58:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A57EC5F11; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:06:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:06:32 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: Roman Divacky Message-ID: <20110725170632.GA53180@night.db.net> References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:23:53 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:59:20PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > Hi! > > > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be > seen here: > > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/ > It would be good to also do an exp run on i386. I ran into one port that compiled fine with clang on amd64, but failed under i386. (inline asm error) - Diane -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db Why leave money to our children if we don't leave them the Earth? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:05:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18659106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE51B8FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so4210961vws.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:05:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uYS80bcKk+8KwTuw6T2YRMr+dGZQjb/mT03Y9ZFpAWA=; b=ckXk7dya2WJCVzuJ5+0ulBbz4CAahi+L2nuhrUiEc9V3d9TGlQFHEaBWqlLwSjn9Bu e/JRhSjL8E4gUsDDzuzxvT0j182Uk4+d8Ytak6ad8Ckv3PVtD1nvyD6o/rkymN2/oxYR EiWvq+JknLopDmavSCQmO20f5n329tys74Dew= Received: by 10.52.89.194 with SMTP id bq2mr4631042vdb.374.1311617120091; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:05:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.166.161 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:04:50 -0400 Message-ID: To: Francisco Reyes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:05:21 -0000 > Got two replies and working with one of the responders. Cool! Thanks for offering this. > > So, would a good process be to put a note on Wiki and email list or just put > in Wiki and see if someone picks up? No. (a) That would be a polling requirement on the developers and (b) only developers have access to the wiki. > Hm.. or should this be something for the "jobs" list? I figure the request > would usually be small enough and be port related that this list may be the > most appropriate.. We probably should have a dedicated system for handling these types of requests. As long as the volume stays small sending mail to -ports (like you did) is probably the best way for now. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:29:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE342106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96588FC14 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so3013711qwc.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.175.76 with SMTP id w12mr3982787qaz.42.1311618562656; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Francisco-Reyess-IMac.local ([64.61.107.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bh11sm3876608qab.2.2011.07.25.11.29.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2DB601.9000600@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:29:21 -0400 From: Francisco Reyes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:29:24 -0000 On 7/25/11 2:04 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > We probably should have a dedicated system for handling these types of > requests. As long as the volume stays small sending mail to -ports > (like you did) is probably the best way for now Agree. For contract/long term tasks sure.. jobs is the right place, but we should have a place where people can "sponsor" short, specific, features in FreeBSD. It may be more than just ports, it may also be functionally changes to the OS. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:54:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEA91065814 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DCD8FC14 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so4256985vws.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=7s7bBXB/i+bLjFdaQ8hVvECUGph6edkl1P4hqQXbI/w=; b=kp/mHtROFW+SH05cLOjNDqil3Ref2u/LJLRui+MjGmDP8B+qDCDTs8dhi6W66ZYFs9 Y8/U7QJ9FKGKNlwmX4sGZlukVhHPBPkmIjm3uLDYE48OS15KouTZYPycZVwW36E0FHZw BdALkl2kpUJ5vJhZJr/8+PT00FUn5pu6L2yDw= Received: by 10.52.100.65 with SMTP id ew1mr4864250vdb.441.1311620012094; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:53:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.166.161 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:53:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E2DB601.9000600@stringsutils.com> References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> <4E2DB601.9000600@stringsutils.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:53:02 -0400 Message-ID: To: Francisco Reyes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:54:34 -0000 > Agree. > For contract/long term tasks sure.. jobs is the right place, but we should > have a place where people can "sponsor" short, specific, features in > FreeBSD. It may be more than just ports, it may also be functionally changes > to the OS. This often results in people offering very low sums of money for very large amounts of work. IMHO the comitters should set the price for the work and we should have a system to pool individual donations for such work. One such example is Doug Barton's portmaster work (see http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-proposal.html). -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:11:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FE4106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745188FC14 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so3022088qyk.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.18.76 with SMTP id v12mr3678048qaa.338.1311621089457; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Francisco-Reyess-IMac.local ([64.61.107.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cd4sm3387437qab.12.2011.07.25.12.11.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2DBFDE.7080202@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:11:26 -0400 From: Francisco Reyes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Test Rat References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <864o2ary5i.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <864o2ary5i.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:11:30 -0000 On 7/25/11 2:52 PM, Test Rat wrote: > > Why not contact someone who is already working on it? > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106082125.56696.naylor.b.david > Thanks for the link. I searched for "pypy freebsd" and a few other variations and did not see the link. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:15:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDAF1065670; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7:d77::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698CD8FC14; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maximum3.maximumdata.biz (akbeech-2-pt.tunnel.tserv14.sea1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:a:2e9::2]) by bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878E2C3A9D; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:52:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:14:59 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) References: <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14449526.3VmDjgMDct"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107251115.00049.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:15:02 -0000 --nextPart14449526.3VmDjgMDct Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 24 July 2011 18:30:04 Steve Wills wrote: > On 07/24/11 22:20, Eitan Adler wrote: > > At this point noone is maintaining portupgrade any more and a large > > number of PRs have been filed against it (see > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=3Dportupgrade). No > > one has stepped up to do the work to fix these bugs so it is time to > > officially drop it. >=20 > Personally, I agree it's time to drop it if no one is going to do the > work to maintain it, which at this point it seems clear is not going to > happen. I'd be happy to be proven wrong about that. >=20 > So the question becomes, how do we go about doing it? First step would > be changing the handbook. Most UPDATING entries seem to include both > portupgrade and portmaster instructions these days, so that should be > covered. The next issue would be warning portupgrade users, perhaps by > marking the port DEPRECATED? I'd think a date a little longer than the > usual month would be needed before expiring. Why pick portupgrade when a lot of people (including myself) use it? There = are=20 probably 100's of ports more worthy of deprecation. Maybe there should be a= =20 policy to deprecate all unmaintained ports if nobody steps up. You can alwa= ys=20 drag it out of the attic if enough people squak and probably find someone t= o=20 maintain it in the process. Just my .02 Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart14449526.3VmDjgMDct Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAk4twLMACgkQQLNZXRF1OntdJAD+OFWd6E7MaBtGrB2J7W0fHdyM lG1r6m0AujxayPIe7OsBAI8IP8PtFDP8JDDpiRWiVjiLuAzpZFZacxpsBM8WP+uN =dwpV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14449526.3VmDjgMDct-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:18:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FB61065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttsestt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBE78FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so7121708fxe.17 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:18:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=/1x/J9h4lsjt/jXD0+00Sd2L72qCU+sPKiJjeYVrkZg=; b=vT2Il/Gh8NGjfWcSIs6oxPNEcl7GustS7qJa0qwWIa6ZNx7WH9wjs61lkIWNoZ3dBP IfpMci/QCgFIARM3UgUF1P4SUcdsk2g9QMwBvp6uPGzRVv+MT4jkkFfHVfbp/ToZqB8B DmTPW1BJtYZmNwtTgYDyAtRC4mlCvGqKz9pLg= Received: by 10.223.57.85 with SMTP id b21mr5120759fah.110.1311619951750; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.118.2.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20sm3949941fai.20.2011.07.25.11.52.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:52:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Test Rat To: Francisco Reyes References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:52:09 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> (Francisco Reyes's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:52:37 -0400") Message-ID: <864o2ary5i.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:18:27 -0000 Francisco Reyes writes: > Is there a list/page somewhere of port commiters willing to do paid > work for sponsored ports? > > Would be great to have a list of such developers at > http://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts > > I am looking for someone to work on porting http://pypy.org Why not contact someone who is already working on it? http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106082125.56696.naylor.b.david > If anyone knows of developer(s) or is such developer please drop me a > line with estimate cost. > This is "personal sponsoring" (no company... just me..) so please be > gentle on the estimate. :-) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:31:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525A31065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56CF8FC1C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so7134277fxe.17 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:31:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zESfUlh9xoLOSXFQ/OPwmZj+P4widNtiFnWRLLwrS4c=; b=aC/+Web87iEtRMTt8Zscws0PlSOd5QF9DloVGpKh1tqry6hkqsJg8KQ3r1C5cpCCgz mtn1sh37Mk9Q6Mwt6lLg+F2UilWxi6zXq09hdd2yanGxWypvqtbnimGEa5KLwrp5WE0K QM1Mb7uK3w89VaGiQ5ztzqX6OManNBR5sX+Lg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.68.22 with SMTP id t22mr7188144fai.145.1311620997733; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.124.67 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:09:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> <4E2DB601.9000600@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:09:57 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Chris Rees , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Francisco Reyes Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:31:48 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Agree. > > For contract/long term tasks sure.. jobs is the right place, but we > should > > have a place where people can "sponsor" short, specific, features in > > FreeBSD. It may be more than just ports, it may also be functionally > changes > > to the OS. > > This often results in people offering very low sums of money for very > large amounts of work. > IMHO the comitters should set the price for the work and we should > have a system to pool individual donations for such work. > One such example is Doug Barton's portmaster work (see > http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-proposal.html). > I don't know the deep details, but I've heard that the FreeBSD Foundation cannot take escrow deposits like this for legal reasons. I wonder if there has been any thought by the Foundation to use some of it's funding to spin off some type of legal and technical infrastructure that could handle such a system. If the barrier to entry isn't too high, I suspect something like this would be a great boon to base, ports, and freelance devs. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:35:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1777C106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5848FC08 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so3035657qyk.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:35:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=o3tfPKW9doSAYXEInwju8yJ5O40H/SkYIjLWuwwg1y4=; b=i/cTrO+3ThsudcpzfjdNXyI9ORFOtWCVVMUJbQ95NPzw47RvBKV1ZweH9Mc6KyWkHk P8AjXL1m0yFU87f7NBgvdFskjXjhJg5VUFwLZnqshfVX7c8XBHUgEyTUPBwQNsqN7N8/ oWclXoeXjgs9ZSJaOucbDSBrp8hg+rXmjf+o0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.68.12 with SMTP id t12mr3541298qci.254.1311620808953; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.230.18 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:06:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:06:48 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:35:48 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Roman Divacky wrote: > Hi! > > > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be > seen here: > > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/ > > > Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that > uncovered others that need fixing. The "Reason" column was extended and now > shows "assumes_gcc" which is the lowest hanging fruit :) > > A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. assumes_gcc reason) and prevent > a lot of other ports from building. > > It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports > you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction into > the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang. > > Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other > ports from building). > > Thank you for helping us again! > > Roman Divacky > > Hello! I added some jquery for sorting / searching at the latest clang exp run. http://cybertron.gr/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/index.html I hope you 'll find it useful. Regards, George From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:05:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B80106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CF38FC13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so2996477ywf.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z1s4M3gPdjcej4SQwsUVpTuqu5wLUaltH8g/5NeVehY=; b=dbNMAFkoFIzcoeWcLBWUsO36VYEnMoL11KfusI7m929fnOMbo5vTMlrZpshd2qB0U0 3egfQXVJxivULRg19H7/r9bKL/iI9R+RR+WnUn/DM2dfQ6lh79ODpoZUMo7VhBR970XB 7tKC6GuNH6r3WPKtiKulr3p1IC0Pn0wDdMqUo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.118.18 with SMTP id t18mr4743566ibq.60.1311624313403; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:05:12 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Francisco Reyes Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:05:14 -0000 On 25 Jul 2011 19:05, "Eitan Adler" wrote: > > No. (a) That would be a polling requirement on the developers and (b) > only developers have access to the wiki. > Anyone in ContributorsGroup (basically any verified human) has write access to the Wiki. The only developer perks are the ability to add contributors and a small select number of pages. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:13:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3510C106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C138FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vx0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 33so4332082vxg.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:13:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ze0GpH922HbjJFCP2UJPNkN3+mx18Y1nIEciiX2kXgI=; b=xXCJhVKmvOMG5o6dKVnJsP7OX1zqzEWs1NyN0yQsukquB24yiMz4TPpTCBoK2DZSz+ MdWMHqXF3cfDRYI7MOLvpUZko84zATylG2pgcg9J+dhnhoKJpCRFSJ78Y3b+VrlTW39V sDfEBszriAaQ6Ij1D9kEEX5rcixY7I2pZXvkQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.19.161 with SMTP id g1mr4696387vde.11.1311624818595; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.194 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:13:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> <20110725065211.35f2aa7d@seibercom.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:13:38 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:13:39 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 25 July 2011 12:27, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> My two cents after reading this whole thread: >> >> like it or not, portupgrade is currently the "official" tool (it's in >> the Handbook and all other docs). >> So in my view, this is what needs to be done: >> a) select a new "official tool" >> b) create or update said tool so it is working to 95% of all the wishes >> c) update all the documentation pointing to this new tool, and set a >> warning ("the old tool, portupgrade, is going away in X years") >> d) wait X years >> e) remove portupgrade >> >> As Doug wrote, change is hard. But there is a difference between >> change because all other options has run out of time, and planned >> change. >> We can make it less hard, at the cost of a longer timeframe. > > The usual process of deprecaction is to add a warning in one release, > and then remove it in the next. > > While I appreciate portupgrade isn't part of the base system, I think > this process would be appropriate. We have lived with portupgrade for ten years or more now. Why the sudden rush to get rid of it? As others have stated, portupgrade is still functional, and there isn't any "total failure" scenarios imminent that I am aware of. In my view, change is useful in two situations: a) when it brings in new functionality or replaces existing functionality with better functionality b) when it removes "dead weight", ie. non-working and non-maintained ports or other programs, thus decreasing the load of the people who have to maintain the code. Since portupgrade is still functional, I would argue that b) doesn't apply. Just my opinion. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:46:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B29106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D628FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so4361026vxg.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:46:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=XYr+8xNetKJNNWnxNKlcrN1HDDFWutPVyCTlbEFlSI8=; b=nNAlRpi+TZAKiNOL5BBmh3swdGPRbASyMfi0xYNE2AfVRpjaFPSuZraslgMN1ppNWT X+s6AtpOUKp0hXvlLf2CgIGfEYgELEMfA50pIAxZQoaRpivXpZadYkmZJrEnf3849QNk jy50vQ4euIz+o1wP6nYKPc5rabOPB9f3jsIHo= Received: by 10.52.89.194 with SMTP id bq2mr4805557vdb.374.1311626766502; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:46:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.166.161 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:45:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E2CE885.1090206@stringsutils.com> <4E2DA026.3020606@stringsutils.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:45:33 -0400 Message-ID: To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Francisco Reyes Subject: Re: Sponsoring ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:46:07 -0000 > Anyone in ContributorsGroup (basically any verified human) has write access > to the Wiki. The only developer perks are the ability to add contributors > and a small select number of pages. Per the wiki """"Note that as a general rule only FreeBSD developers get access to edit this wiki. This is done since the wiki was set up for FreeBSD developers, and the wiki administrator(s) don't have time to deal with "normal" user issues.""" Most people should *not* be getting access without good reason. Anyways - let us not continue this here as I am *sure* it will turn into a flamewar. > > Chris -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:57:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115B71065673 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46398FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so4370749vxg.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3J15M/PNyTrPshi07cCaDTenmQ0zQtuPu219VieXt1s=; b=EMqFcRySn5dTFWEDdhatdv4Hwsv6sYH4jRY2wYSgwkzkphqm/uLMfE5L0vC7iDnkXH ddrTSukdrozH07TBGLDwBlPBCPWA+jgFxyxksw1fz5MSHg8UQfL4jnHowwWoaff4HLrq H9HCHefR8fkNYG28O5to+wWN0HekYlSrbN6ys= Received: by 10.52.21.194 with SMTP id x2mr4884695vde.39.1311627442073; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.166.161 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110712225615.GA91283@heechee.tobez.org> References: <20110712225615.GA91283@heechee.tobez.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:56:52 -0400 Message-ID: To: Anton Berezin , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: find-packages-using-libs: request for feedback X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:57:23 -0000 This looks useful - any chance you could make a port out of this? On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Anton Berezin wrote: > Hi, > > After the recent icu and libgcrypt updates I decided to try and find a > way to avoid rebuilding everything which depends on a particular > port when its shared library version is bumped. > > Previously I was profitably using sysutils/libchk, producing in the end > the list of packages which *have* to be rebuilt. =C2=A0Its use, however, > requires some substantial massaging of the output it produces. > > So I wrote a little tool which automates such tasks. =C2=A0As a side effe= ct, > it can also be used to simply list all packages using a shared library > (or libraries). > > Fetch it at https://github.com/tobez/find-packages-using-libs . > > Usage examples: > > Finding every installed package using libgcrypt: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0./find-packages-using-libs libgcrypt.so\* > > Finding every installed package using libgcrypt OR libicu*: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0./find-packages-using-libs libgcrypt.so\* libicu* > > Finding every installed package which uses libraries that do > not exist (or exist in non-standard paths without any RPATH): > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0./find-packages-using-libs -b > > Finding every installed package which uses a non-existing libgcrypt: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0./find-packages-using-libs -b libgcrypt.so\* > > There are a couple of minor options as well, > but for now, this about covers it. > > I am interested in you feedback: > > - would you use it? =C2=A0does it solve a problem for you, or do you fore= see > =C2=A0it will solve a problem for you in the future? > - does it work for you? =C2=A0any bugs? > - any wishes with regard to missing features? > > Most of the package-walking code shamelessly (for a good reason) stolen > from the perl-after-upgrade script. > > The code is in public domain. > > Cheers, > \Anton. > -- > Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation. > =C2=A0-- John McCarthy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:59:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48A0106566B; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E458FC27; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.10.131] (207.47.0.28.static.nextweb.net [207.47.0.28]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37FD08FC2D; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:59:18 +0400 (MSD) References: <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> <201107251115.00049.beech@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201107251115.00049.beech@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8J3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8J3) From: Stanislav Sedov Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:59:09 -0700 To: Beech Rintoul Cc: Eitan Adler , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , "ruby@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:59:20 -0000 > Why pick portupgrade when a lot of people (including myself) use it? There= are=20 > probably 100's of ports more worthy of deprecation. Maybe there should be a= =20 > policy to deprecate all unmaintained ports if nobody steps up. You can alw= ays=20 > drag it out of the attic if enough people squak and probably find someone t= o=20 > maintain it in the process. >=20 Personally, I don't see any reason at all to deprecate it. It works, it's maintained (by ruby@ and me personally) and it's generally useful. If someone feels that there's lack of maintainership here he's always welcome to step in and contribute time/resources. -- ST4096-RIPE= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:06:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D512106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ahurt@anbcs.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7BF8FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so4010958wyg.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.202.79 with SMTP id c57mr910580weo.21.1311627994732; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.51.3 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.107.93.2] Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:06:34 -0500 Message-ID: From: Aaron Hurt To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: audio/umurmur needs updating X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:06:36 -0000 This port was added but has not been updated. When I created the following PR ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/**query-pr.cgi?pr=157100 ) ... this port wasn't in the repository yet. Please commit the newer version of this port found at the link provided. I'd also be glad to takeover ownership of this port as I already maintain it's dependency devel/protobuf-c Thank You From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:25:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98E9106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6137D8FC1B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so4388893vws.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:25:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3CjNJKJjO3uucV0V5XMnLF9apqvlEdI2VO/uNhDuHUU=; b=pVe3ozb4QPkCkwieZ6v4knSMazIo0qZuuq1ua2jUDWbmZ5YDQ4Ka8tIkNiuBwfpEJJ GtdgNRgpTAeWbHm2Y1wwrc3HQZnF06MEP1V7rJb+SX8cqtiHn8gjDuPBc21Tnb9uS3vI 5DuECZmza5V3lVcXGcFznYiBQIM/VJumWTtZE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.182.165 with SMTP id ef5mr950477vdc.346.1311629122511; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.194 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:25:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E0AE6C9.4050405@cineca.it> References: <4E0AE6C9.4050405@cineca.it> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:25:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML , Oliver Lehmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: sylpheed, gnash, seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:25:23 -0000 Hello, On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Marco Alberoni wrote: > Hello everybody, I usually use the applications Sylpheed, Gnash and > Seamonkey, and for all of them there the FreeBSD port is not "synchronized" > with the latest available version: are there any problems for their upgrade? Sylpheed 3.1.1 was released on May 6th, 2011. And on July 1st, 2011 Sylpheed 3.2beta1 was released. What are the current plans for upgrading the Sylpheed port (if any)? Have a nice day. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:05:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAC71065672; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lichray@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCF58FC22; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so6997269iyb.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:05:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HOjcJ8ifYqAAyBxGo8BjRXepcDMPMd4npJ8wVZWs0pE=; b=IUSMY1e+8LDOgtNKvcNQamV0L01EgYYGHQKz44Ir+xFW1qxd/I7B7ll84cXMRP6ptV fzzxuKc/wrO75OKRm3BVZjCux9im4MiUFravqLFyYNw4IVqkSZhME59N6P/pjMGpLzii I++njaB7TLSmWPQhbRO3xEBRWtfHhaDA9PZl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.119.216 with SMTP id a24mr5247194ibr.58.1311629947925; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.31.205 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E0AE6C9.4050405@cineca.it> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:39:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: Zhihao Yuan To: Torfinn Ingolfsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Oliver Lehmann , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: sylpheed, gnash, seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:05:35 -0000 It's updating to 3.1.1 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158798 I guess this will be committed soon. Or you can just patch and try it earlier. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Marco Alberoni wrote: >> Hello everybody, I usually use the applications Sylpheed, Gnash and >> Seamonkey, and for all of them there the FreeBSD port is not "synchronized" >> with the latest available version: are there any problems for their upgrade? > > Sylpheed 3.1.1 was released on May 6th, 2011. And on July 1st, 2011 > Sylpheed 3.2beta1 was released. > What are the current plans for upgrading the Sylpheed port (if any)? > > Have a nice day. > -- > Regards, > Torfinn Ingolfsen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 23:21:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A78106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C7914EA19; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E2DFA72.6030102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:21:22 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110723 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" References: <4E2D1C36.7060400@FreeBSD.org> <1311583851.1812.81.camel@xenon> <4E2D3A84.7020909@FreeBSD.org> <1311588859.1812.104.camel@xenon> <20110725104219.GC2369@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20110725104219.GC2369@over-yonder.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:21:22 -0000 On 07/25/2011 03:42, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:14:19PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Michal Varga, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> I have no objections in [portmaster's] promotion to new users as the >> new, one and only "approved" way of managing ports, but this in no >> way cuts it for currently deployed portupgrade setups, where >> portupgrade works 'just fine' (and can work the same for years to >> come). > > +1 > > For all its troubles (and certainly they are legion), portupgrade gets > along with what I try to do. portmaster does 90%, and I fight it > tooth and nail on the last 10% (or would, if I didn't just use > portmaster instead), because what it's trying to do just doesn't quite > match what I'm trying to do. It would be interesting to hear what 10% of stuff you are fighting with portmaster to accomplish. > (also, it's really nice having portupgrade around for upgrading > portmaster, and portmaster for upgrading portupgrade or ruby*. Even > if neither is strictly necessary, it's still very comfortable and > comforting ;) portmaster can update itself just fine, FYI. hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 23:31:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3024106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616638FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlUcP-0001H6-FF for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:31:25 +0200 Received: from 201.82.188.118 ([201.82.188.118]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:31:25 +0200 Received: from kubito by 201.82.188.118 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:31:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:31:13 -0300 Lines: 12 Message-ID: <87r55eos3i.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.82.188.118 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:k7g5JjFX3EZYmHpPn487KTanMuQ= Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:31:26 -0000 Roman Divacky writes: > Hi! > > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be > seen here: > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/ qt4-webkit seems to trigger a clang bug, but the description for clang bug only says "See (TBA) for further information". Is there anything we (as in kde@) should do? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 23:39:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D3106564A; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030038FC13; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so4089030wyg.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:39:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Nkj0ozmWJJoDcAMFl0Y/Rup5GH3nhxktR2s40hjH4LQ=; b=xkK/QoefCyz4hckZknkBQQeEAHP5lfzDqc/u9EgUD06OZwSObLisgdNnr9nWIh6T5X uSIse8lTP/Skn++5lZHDFnIgwlxK8SpW3olwsgMzSZJh9/ukx0pYUOxocaB+Q5Ymg/1r YyQj2OH9gqeCDUm+j+qVbc+wTUf/htePrx/A0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.141.166 with SMTP id g38mr4717117wej.54.1311635707125; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.83 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:15:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E2ADE72.8080106@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110723131613.GF17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> <4E2ADE72.8080106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:15:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Koop Mast , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Intel GPU driver and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:39:07 -0000 On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/07/2011 16:51 Koop Mast said the following: >> svn co http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/ports/browser/branches/xorg-dev > > svn: The OPTIONS response did not include the requested activity-collection-set; > this often means that the URL is not WebDAV-enabled > > I am not an svn power user - is there anything I am doing wrong? > > -- > Andriy Gapon I think the repository is located here: svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/ports/branches/xorg-dev -Brandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 23:59:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1A51065677 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5658E8FC14 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:59:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LOW008MTYMYT160@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:59:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-07-25_07:2011-07-25, 2011-07-25, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1107250245 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <87r55eos3i.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:59:22 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <73BA5D45-BE57-4206-9118-AEA2F421FBA2@mac.com> References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> <87r55eos3i.fsf@gmail.com> To: Raphael Kubo da Costa X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:59:56 -0000 Hi-- On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> = http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205= 754/ >=20 > qt4-webkit seems to trigger a clang bug, but the description for clang > bug only says "See (TBA) for further information". Is there anything = we > (as in kde@) should do? From: = http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205= 754/qt4-webkit-4.7.3.log Clang is failing with an internal assertion failure, seems like it's not = parsing something correctly in RenderSlider.cpp, and hitting EOF: Assertion failed: (FieldNo < FieldCount && "Invalid Field No"), function = getFieldOffset, file = /a/portbuild/amd64/9-exp/builds/20110616185105/src/lib/clang/libclangast/.= ./../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/RecordLayout.h, line = 121. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /usr/bin/clang++ -cc1 -triple = x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0 -emit-obj -disable-free -main-file-name = RenderSlider.cpp -pic-level 2 -mdisable-fp-elim -relaxed-aliasing = -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu x86-64 = -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -coverage-file = .obj/release-shared/RenderSlider.o -resource-dir = /usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.0 -D QT_SHARED -D BUILDING_QT__=3D1 -D = WTF_USE_ACCELERATED_COMPOSITING -D NDEBUG -D QT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D = QT_ASCII_CAST_WARNINGS -D QT3_SUPPORT -D QT_MOC_COMPAT -D = QT_USE_FAST_OPERATOR_PLUS -D QT_USE_FAST_CONCATENATION -D = HAVE_PTHREAD_NP_H -D BUILD_WEBKIT -D BUILDING_QT__ -D = BUILDING_JavaScriptCore -D BUILDING_WTF -D ENABLE_VIDEO=3D1 -D = ENABLE_JAVASCRIPT_DEBUGGER=3D1 -D ENABLE_DATABASE=3D1 -D = ENABLE_EVENTSOURCE=3D1 -D ENABLE_OFFLINE_WEB_APPLICATIONS=3D1 -D = ENABLE_DOM_STORAGE=3D1 -D ENABLE_ICONDATABASE=3D1 -D = ENABLE_CHANNEL_MESSAGING=3D1 -D ENABLE_ORIENTATION_EVENTS=3D0 -D = ENABLE_SQLITE=3D1 -D ENABLE_DASHBOARD_SUPPORT=3D0 -D ENABLE_FILTERS=3D1 = -D ENABLE_XPATH=3D1 -D ENABLE_WCSS=3D0 -D ENABLE_WML=3D0 -D = ENABLE_SHARED_WORKERS=3D1 -D ENABLE_WORKERS=3D1 -D ENABLE_XHTMLMP=3D0 -D = ENABLE_DATAGRID=3D0 -D ENABLE_RUBY=3D1 -D ENABLE_SANDBOX=3D1 -D = ENABLE_PROGRESS_TAG=3D1 -D ENABLE_BLOB_SLICE=3D0 -D = ENABLE_3D_RENDERING=3D1 -D ENABLE_SVG=3D1 -D ENABLE_SVG_FONTS=3D1 -D = ENABLE_SVG_FOREIGN_OBJECT=3D1 -D ENABLE_SVG_ANIMATION=3D1 -D = ENABLE_SVG_AS_IMAGE=3D1 -D ENABLE_SVG_USE=3D1 -D ENABLE_DATALIST=3D1 -D = ENABLE_TILED_BACKING_STORE=3D1 -D ENABLE_NETSCAPE_PLUGIN_API=3D1 -D = ENABLE_WEB_SOCKETS=3D1 -D ENABLE_XSLT=3D0 -D ENABLE_QT_BEARER=3D1 -D = ENABLE_TOUCH_EVENTS=3D1 -D XP_UNIX -D SQLITE_CORE -D = SQLITE_OMIT_LOAD_EXTENSION -D SQLITE_OMIT_COMPLETE -D QT_NO_DEBUG -D = QT_GUI_LIB -D QT_NETWORK_LIB -D QT_CORE_LIB -D QT_HAVE_AVX -D = _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D _LARGEFILE_SOURCE -I ../../../../include/Qt -I = ../../../../include -I /usr/local/include/freetype2 -I = /usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-clang -I . -I = ../../../../include/QtCore -I ../../../../include/QtNetwork -I = ../../../../include/QtGui -I ../../../../include -I bridge/qt -I page/qt = -I platform/graphics/qt -I platform/network/qt -I platform/qt -I = ../WebKit/qt/Api -I ../WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport -I . -I accessibility -I = bindings/js -I bridge -I bridge/c -I bridge/jsc -I css -I dom -I = dom/default -I editing -I history -I html -I html/canvas -I inspector -I = loader -I loader/appcache -I loader/archive -I loader/icon -I = notifications -I page -I page/animation -I platform -I = platform/animation -I platform/graphics -I platform/graphics/filters -I = platform/graphics/transforms -I platform/image-decoders -I platform/mock = -I platform/network -I platform/sql -I platform/text -I plugins -I = rendering -I rendering/style -I storage -I svg -I svg/animation -I = svg/graphics -I svg/graphics/filters -I websockets -I wml -I workers -I = xml -I generated -I ../JavaScriptCore -I ../../webkit -I = ../JavaScriptCore/assembler -I ../JavaScriptCore/bytecode -I = ../JavaScriptCore/bytecompiler -I ../JavaScriptCore/debugger -I = ../JavaScriptCore/interpreter -I ../JavaScriptCore/jit -I = ../JavaScriptCore/parser -I ../JavaScriptCore/pcre -I = ../JavaScriptCore/profiler -I ../JavaScriptCore/runtime -I = ../JavaScriptCore/wtf -I ../JavaScriptCore/wtf/symbian -I = ../JavaScriptCore/wtf/unicode -I ../JavaScriptCore/yarr -I = ../JavaScriptCore/API -I ../JavaScriptCore/ForwardingHeaders -I = ../JavaScriptCore/generated -I ../include/QtWebKit -I = ../../../../include/QtWebKit -I .rcc/release-shared -I ../../sqlite -I = ../../../../include/phonon -I /usr/local/include -I .moc/release-shared = -I /usr/local/include -O2 -Wall -W -fdeprecated-macro -ferror-limit 19 = -fmessage-length 0 -fvisibility hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden = -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fdiagnostics-show-option -o = .obj/release-shared/RenderSlider.o -x c++ rendering/RenderSlider.cpp=20 1. parser at end of file 2. rendering/RenderSlider.cpp:43:11: LLVM IR generation of = declaration 'WebCore' 3. rendering/RenderSlider.cpp:81:26: Generating code for = declaration 'WebCore::SliderThumbElement::defaultEventHandler' 4. rendering/RenderSlider.cpp:82:1: LLVM IR generation of compound = statement ('{}') In file included from rendering/RenderTable.cpp:27: In file included from rendering/RenderTable.h:28: clang++: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap: 6 clang++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal 2 (use -v to = see invocation) *** Error code 254 I don't see any potentially related bugs in llvm.org's bugtracker, so = this might be a new one. :-) Regards, --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:05:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C389106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9A88FC16 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so190790vxg.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/KGninCj5N+BsDFZba8JGJWbntg+Ydig8QMzcdi2VQU=; b=RnrxTARJwKvredghd1AySotYIwledFHsllLNwThMZn9Iu7hP7hGiDdAzvz7AkhqL04 3okEmOGKFI8wGVfH7iGUYgdcBiNuW16i7WJQSGUmBzEN7eoXV4QLsaE9xPj5EQEU4V9N CaNWFcfGg4LydRP+cdH9kD2bmPLagCWImXq4w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.96.226 with SMTP id dv2mr4923989vdb.480.1311667540330; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.194 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:05:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110726091416.79632x7xh7mdmxs0@avocado.salatschuessel.net> References: <4E0AE6C9.4050405@cineca.it> <20110726091416.79632x7xh7mdmxs0@avocado.salatschuessel.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: Oliver Lehmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: sylpheed, gnash, seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:05:41 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on it. Thank you. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:21:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBB2106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655768FC19 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qlcta-0007Vi-08 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:21:42 +0200 Received: from 93-139-112-49.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.112.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:21:41 +0200 Received: from gour by 93-139-112-49.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:21:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Gour-Gadadhara Dasa Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:21:29 +0200 Lines: 56 Message-ID: <20110726102129.35ebf58d@atmarama.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/zuyC29Ldn5bBOwSvwIHVwqc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-112-49.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:21:43 -0000 --Sig_/zuyC29Ldn5bBOwSvwIHVwqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:00:33 +0200 Olivier Duchateau wrote: Hello, > In tarball, you can find also x11-fm/thunar-devel (v1.3.0 instead of > v1.2.x), and patches for audio/thunar-media-tags-plugin [2]. Is there any solution on the horizon in regard to Thunar & auto-mounting? I tried KDE 2 days ago...automount works, but I'm back to Xfce and would li= ke to continues using it on (Free)PCBSD desktop...just curious if something mi= ght change for 4.10? Sincerely, Gour --=20 =E2=80=9CIn the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations=E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 --Sig_/zuyC29Ldn5bBOwSvwIHVwqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOLnkJAAoJELhxXPVStcgQ7IIP/25fXLt01BuUB4ORyFGkZBxK Rc1Tdgpg0EHENWm9aq8uG547uocFjfdGT3JaDxJ+4UnX9HUel4WabUn2vo/LXcuT CFMkBkT+rTot+W3nl96yA05MEVXg1YGSkkBjfuMmpKXIOYBlZcXgQ+YxWcp8O+BS j0UuV3WgyHUM9LIW+5/+rT9k10J4Hls+AhRHrAgnaAO0pnRjmNh5RDhXIQu8PxWb c6J6vurpLSotBpiIA4Sv7gsjKfWo1pCctLtn16HgvczFZBh3/Of27onS4ZhnZDsW 9Jvr30a7DVncdLrlYk6muh/m8FEVax6zcy1BkcrmvYivDXkmhMheWwvSvijgzPXa YgI70yy7dZY65VV1/KZdOAE6M8Ooa3kysPzCYVfmiGgXzqHk16KSayhBev37NAxr VKH3y2ly4CfPdY8+fxobyhXulJrQgiM2JBh3XYQACwO1054dKdMwzWenc/vEeTsr e//id+e4RbSNYuUfpP232N2ir+936Y8K2gLkKgSRklZWxa5YeUR1chDg+cs0IHe9 sZlgAWKc6qHBs37okAL2TXSH6gGmXUyrEnTYc7W8o2q/PjWZ4+DpF1L6qMjQKEIw dLof9loTCF1MwLebP/fv7RTu/vIT+2V2eMYJy0QEs/BiVBv6Vn16cO7tXP0haAv8 Bu5j9S0FQZhVgH+tuqAu =7Ubo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zuyC29Ldn5bBOwSvwIHVwqc-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:24:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFB4106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47AF8FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so115041gwb.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1eRP6dnodlcGkYlrhY0afmi8g60j5ZgnxDjyb2Z090E=; b=PFnY3IZ6zPBemVPyF6WwbDk7DX+lONQLT1tKtue68DF6ayNIE9IHZUkEdjtFKVq9L0 KeoClHHBogkztscuYVYOcCHs6Q7VY6xUGqPAhpxyBz5S6noDmUb4/hrR1NQrMVciyXDb 3fM9hSvLsGaoSJhoAwGWTaQi/ycgseQy8yaWE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.154.22 with SMTP id g22mr4921667ano.58.1311668674959; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: florent.thoumie@gmail.com Received: by 10.101.15.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:24:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:24:34 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LvCOPlGqSF8rqgw4TB_ZyQ7xIBw Message-ID: From: Florent Thoumie To: George Liaskos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:24:36 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:06 PM, George Liaskos wrote: > Hello! > > I added some jquery for sorting / searching at the latest clang exp run. > http://cybertron.gr/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/index.html > > I hope you 'll find it useful. The table should be sortable already, just click on the column name. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 09:46:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D452106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B208FC08 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p6Q9RJd0061451 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AB320429 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 9B3364CDA; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E2E889D.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E2E889D.003/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:46:42 -0000 Jerry wrote: > While we are on the subject of port management tools, I still use > "portmanager" when a version bump on a port requires that a massive > number of dependencies be rebuild. I have had all too many instances > when both "portupgrade" and "portmaster" simply bombed out and left me > with only a partially updated system, and in many cases, a virtually > useless one. Portmanager would simple get the job done right the first > time. It might be overkill for one or two port upgrades; however, it > works fine on massive projects that seem to bewilder the other two > competing contenders. The "p5-libwww-5*" example in the case of > "portmaster" being a perfect example. This subject of port management tools is a subject i have been much interested in some years ago, and i must say that the problems which seem to surface now in the general consensus, i had discussed them without any echo at the time. Having a system partially updated hence requiring a lot of work to fix with portupgrade happened to me several times. Horrific slowness of portupgrade was perfectly obvious years ago. I think most of the problems come from errors in the ports themselves so are unfixable through ameliorations in the upgrade tools. I think only a more rigorous management of the ports, i mean something like the separation between unstable, testing, stable in Debian, with rigorous procedures for going from one state to the better one could cure this problem, but at the expense of slowing the development. More importantly, only a procedure centered around *binary* packages could possibly lead to a guaranteed decent state of the ports. Centering things around source code can only lead to confusion, incessant messing by both developers and users with various options etc. which can only destabilize the system. Anyways, to come back to port management tools i don't know how portmanager works, but i think that both portupgrade and portmaster have a fundamental flaw in that they both work locally, upgrading one port after another until the job is finished, which means that the state of the machine is constantly modified, possibly into a broken state, without any possibility for the user to know beforehand that he is headed to failure. A proper tool should do a first pass describing exactly the initial state and the final state so that the end user can choose to upgrade or not. This is what Debian apt-get (or aptitude) does, it describes before any destructive action begins what will be removed, what will be installed. This can only work reliably if you have binary packages, otherwise you can never be sure that a source port will compile. The only *BSD i am aware of that has moved in that direction is OpenBSD. From what i hear, people are happy with the management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are very unhappy with FreeBSD ports. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 10:38:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BA01065673 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B168FC1B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so501360eya.21 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:38:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=idgzDVqzsxDbJa17ADWf9Fa4vmIMxXinBH4WWL5jj5I=; b=LX2CgN4PAMHdDHKYQUXnyXgGhoTR+Hnu33AHiHvHgy1HyzfRkahAX1ehDtpwDPiLH0 m6H92RzWtkNKCtGOErqd9m3rniUetG2zmw02q/hPvtk9pp3Yv65MeTJDmRqIET7PJyyR 0D1Qngii/XTUh4iTfCTAsGP1aXyXo0xAZSTNQ= Received: by 10.14.98.77 with SMTP id u53mr2022678eef.166.1311676718950; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (254.166.broadband10.iol.cz [90.177.166.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n41sm261159eeh.23.2011.07.26.03.38.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:38:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Varga To: Michel Talon In-Reply-To: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:38:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1311676715.1799.27.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:38:40 -0000 On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:27 +0200, Michel Talon wrote: [ Stuff about how we should move to binary packages because Debian. ] Sure, why not kill one of the biggest strengths FreeBSD is known for while we're at it... Two questions: Who will provide the infrastructure to build me all of my packages the day/hour/moment moment I need them and constantly build me the i386, amd64, athlon-tbird optimized, k8-sse3 optimized, -O2 and -O3 optimized, intel-core optimized, and intel-p3 optimized batches for all of my machines? Who will constantly build and maintain my custom set of binary packages and all their dependencies built with the exact specific OPTIONS that I need and without the components that I don't want? Because I'm in no mood for experiencing the hell of Linux users that can't even remove ALSA from their systems and fully switch to 4Front OSS, as all of their distro's packages are built against ALSA anyway, in some cases even exclusively, with OSS support completely removed, because why not. So no, thanks, I'm one of those that are perfectly happy with my fundamentally flawed source-based ports. Take that away and you might as well as kill FreeBSD for me, and probably anyone else I know. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:24:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3441065672 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31478FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p6QBNxHf093762 ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:24:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD13020429; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (localhost.lpthe.jussieu.fr [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBC5406A; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:24:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Michel Talon Organization: LPTHE To: Michal Varga , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:24:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.4.5; i386; ; ) References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <1311676715.1799.27.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <1311676715.1799.27.camel@xenon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201107261324.35657.talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E2EA3F5.00E by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E2EA3F5.00E/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Cc: Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:24:40 -0000 Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 12:38:35, vous avez =C3=A9crit : > Sure, why not kill one of the biggest strengths FreeBSD is known for > while we're at it... Or most obvious weakness ... The biggest strength was a good kernel, better= =20 than Linux, but this was years ago. >=20 > Two questions: >=20 > Who will provide the infrastructure to build me all of my packages the > day/hour/moment moment I need them and constantly build me the i386, > amd64, athlon-tbird optimized, k8-sse3 optimized, -O2 and -O3 optimized, > intel-core optimized, and intel-p3 optimized batches for all of my > machines? >=20 > Who will constantly build and maintain my custom set of binary packages > and all their dependencies built with the exact specific OPTIONS that I > need and without the components that I don't want? This stuff you are mentioning is the precise reason why people have problem= s=20 with the ports system. By the way, all your optimisations have next to zero= =20 impact on performance, and introduce a sizable probability of bugs. And the components you don't want use an infinitesimal part of your hard disk a= nd=20 nothing in your memory. At the end of the day this sort of feature buys no= =20 benefit at all and introduces an infinite combinatoric complexity for people wanting to test the ports system. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:25:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C640C1065672; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F308FC13; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6QBPfQh022366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:25:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E2EA435.9090506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:25:41 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?VGlsbWFuIEtlc2tpbsO2eg==?= References: <4E2D60BC.50908@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E2D60BC.50908@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:25:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Stanislav Sedov , ruby@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:25:44 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/11 08:25, Tilman Keskinöz wrote: > > I shortly went through the list. > > There are currently 22 PRs filed against portupgrade > > Of these: > > 4 are general problems of the ports collection/pkg_tools. > (architecture-specific INDEX, Detecting of OPTIONs set, > Overriding/removing files changed by the user etc.) > > 2 are documentation bugs > > 1 wishlist item > > 4 contain patches > > 1 i believed is already fixed, i set to feedback. > > So this leaves the following, which need someone (a maintainer?) to > investigate/write a patch: > > IMHO the situation is not that bad, that we need to DEPRECATE it. > Many thanks for going through them, that helps a great deal. I submitted some changes which should help with Ruby 1.9 compatibility, which Stanislav has pushed out to portupgrade-devel. I did some minimal testing with them, but they need more testing. If folks could test the updated portupgrade-devel, with both Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9, I'd appreciate it. That would help us get past the Ruby 1.9 compatibility issue. Thanks, Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOLqQ1AAoJEPXPYrMgexuhI0oH/RtLURpZgsANqGVs9QrQPn5W Haf9wt6sHnWa/1pXL9EoIUmEy8LPvRS9P4kFMwr8zNLtXjjK7ChhSALWApxoLgcE YsJND4ATcQun4mYCMxVECvvRM6egl1u/UmJGO3jOXJz6Dv0Ik5GB8y+3Ssepx5ls QIkEbXU+oXyq2pIsDajWLGBGEAPAOEaVphdLY9Hhvv+tQJDqlZHOkISVa6pqG4zM Kh7upMftP4ce53kC4CPupqXxK9m5OIo4/v+jbNzqmEkySk/CDZvN6qTSWGNVSH5r 20k6ggykmvqS6A7vmaYHxTdwtq1bn+J+YzryIOAyK9+VWVPLxbCMG8URRB8C2GY= =08aD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:29:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09EF106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bw@exodus.desync.com) Received: from exodus.desync.com (exodus.desync.com [208.83.20.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F18E8FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from exodus.desync.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exodus.desync.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6QAtGLp073162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:55:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bw@exodus.desync.com) Received: (from bw@localhost) by exodus.desync.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p6QAtGTf073161 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:55:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bw) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:55:16 -0400 From: ben wilber To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110726105516.GA72591@exodus.desync.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Angst-Level: High Cc: Subject: multimedia/handbrake 0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:29:48 -0000 Hi, I was unhappy that the HandBrake port was outdated and didn't work on amd64, so I updated it to the best of my ability. Hopefully it's acceptable, or will at least give someone a head start. http://desync.com/~bw/handbrake.tar.gz Only tested on -CURRENT amd64 and RELENG_8 i386. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:30:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB6E1065679 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717718FC24 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Cb3P1h0021zF43QA6bHXnt; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:17:31 +0000 Received: from hanssachs.home ([24.61.85.144]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CbGo1h00l36qgMk8kbGpLF; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:16:50 +0000 Received: from algo by hanssachs.home with local (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Qlfdi-000Pc4-S0; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:17:30 -0400 From: Alex Goncharov To: Michel Talon In-reply-to: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> (message from Michel Talon on Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200) References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:17:30 -0400 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:45 -0000 ,--- You/Michel (Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200) ----* | while most of people i hear are very unhappy with FreeBSD ports. Nuts. -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:37:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EC1106564A; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:37:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-8.zrh-02.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1620:f00:7::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15988FC1A; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wiggles.bwns.ch (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4/tits or GTFO!!!1!!) with SMTP id p6QBb06P093633; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:37:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:37:00 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Torfinn Ingolfsen Message-Id: <20110726133700.59e359b2.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <4E0AE6C9.4050405@cineca.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Oliver Lehmann , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: sylpheed, gnash, seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:37:03 -0000 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Marco Alberoni > wrote: > > Hello everybody, I usually use the applications Sylpheed, Gnash and > > Seamonkey, and for all of them there the FreeBSD port is not > > "synchronized" with the latest available version: are there any > > problems for their upgrade? > > Sylpheed 3.1.1 was released on May 6th, 2011. And on July 1st, 2011 > Sylpheed 3.2beta1 was released. > What are the current plans for upgrading the Sylpheed port (if any)? I've just updated the port after a 15 day maintainer timeout. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158798 Emanuel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:43:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590DC1065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DA88FC12 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qlg38-0007Rg-M3; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:43:46 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qlg38-0004L6-Ed; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:43:46 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6QBhkOG045768; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:43:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6QBhkaX045767; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:43:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:43:46 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Michel Talon Message-ID: <20110726114346.GA45750@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <1311676715.1799.27.camel@xenon> <201107261324.35657.talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201107261324.35657.talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Michal Varga Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:43:49 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Michel Talon wrote: > Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 12:38:35, vous avez ??crit : > > > > Sure, why not kill one of the biggest strengths FreeBSD is known for > > while we're at it... > > Or most obvious weakness ... The biggest strength was a good kernel, better > than Linux, but this was years ago. > > > > > Two questions: > > > > Who will provide the infrastructure to build me all of my packages the > > day/hour/moment moment I need them and constantly build me the i386, > > amd64, athlon-tbird optimized, k8-sse3 optimized, -O2 and -O3 optimized, > > intel-core optimized, and intel-p3 optimized batches for all of my > > machines? > > > > Who will constantly build and maintain my custom set of binary packages > > and all their dependencies built with the exact specific OPTIONS that I > > need and without the components that I don't want? > > This stuff you are mentioning is the precise reason why people have problems > with the ports system. By the way, all your optimisations have next to zero > impact on performance, and introduce a sizable probability of bugs. And > the components you don't want use an infinitesimal part of your hard disk and > nothing in your memory. At the end of the day this sort of feature buys no > benefit at all and introduces an infinite combinatoric complexity for people > wanting to test the ports system. Ports, manuals and the people. This is why I use FreeBSD. Don't mess with ports. Have no opinion on portupgrade, never used it, portmaster does most of what I need, except for massive updates, e.g. recent icu update. portmaster -r fails for me most of the time (sometimes this is nothing to do with the update tool, but simply because I'm on ia64 and sparc64). I guess one has to accept that manual intervention is required for complex updates. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:56:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E99106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097DE8FC1B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so317504vws.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:56:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BnsotAf/2DuJQuCEBYLDZ8yQKuJfWTmUoUhJgrJ8T/w=; b=wbaB7mvx0VaE/QPGXEXid5SRXEq3E1fN96LH9LLPIExirwvPKm8RgmQlQC2uQkYPyu gxVSNJ2aLSpvBUt9/Nh0PaLNYAJyrd/M7FZOTyF8ku54OBQFIIygPf7kdUTytB7MqHlD q+XY70R9C2Dip7fdP6dC++6itOo8+IKKxx1E4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.174.104 with SMTP id br8mr5057490vdc.145.1311681374962; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.194 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:56:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:56:14 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:56:16 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Michel Talon wrote: > Jerry wrote: > >> While we are on the subject of port management tools, I still use >> "portmanager" when a version bump on a port requires that a massive >> number of dependencies be rebuild. I have had all too many instances >> when both "portupgrade" and "portmaster" simply bombed out and left me >> with only a partially updated system, and in many cases, a virtually >> useless one. Portmanager would simple get the job done right the first >> time. It might be overkill for one or two port upgrades; however, it >> works fine on massive projects that seem to bewilder the other two >> competing contenders. The "p5-libwww-5*" example in the case of >> "portmaster" being a perfect example. > > This subject of port management tools is a subject i have been much The subject we were discussing was portupgrade; if you want to discuss something else, please start a new thread. Thank you. > interested in some years ago, and i must say that the problems which > seem to surface now in the general consensus, i had discussed them > without any echo at the time. Having a system partially updated hence > requiring a lot of work to fix with portupgrade happened to me several > times. Horrific slowness of portupgrade was perfectly obvious years ago. > I think most of the problems come from errors in the ports themselves > so are unfixable through ameliorations in the upgrade tools. I think > only a more rigorous management of the ports, i mean something like the > separation between unstable, testing, stable in Debian, with rigorous > procedures for going from one state to the better one could cure this > problem, but at the expense of slowing the development. More > importantly, only a procedure centered around *binary* packages could > possibly lead to a guaranteed decent state of the ports. Centering > things around source code can only lead to confusion, incessant messing > by both developers and users with various options etc. which can only > destabilize the system. Anyways, to come back to port management tools > i don't know how portmanager works, but i think that both portupgrade > and portmaster have a fundamental flaw in that they both work locally, > upgrading one port after another until the job is finished, which means > that the state of the machine is constantly modified, possibly into > a broken state, without any possibility for the user to know beforehand > that he is headed to failure. A proper tool should do a first pass > describing exactly the initial state and the final state so that the end > user can choose to upgrade or not. This is what Debian apt-get (or > aptitude) does, it describes before any destructive action begins what > will be removed, what will be installed. This can only work reliably if > you have binary packages, otherwise you can never be sure that a source > port will compile. The only *BSD i am aware of that has moved in that > direction is OpenBSD. From what i hear, people are happy with the > management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are very > unhappy with FreeBSD ports. I would say that "most people your hear" isn't a representative subset of all the people who use ports. In my experience anyway. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 12:39:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883271065673 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3BA38FC18 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2011 12:39:24 -0000 Received: from g226250248.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO apollo.emma.line.org) [92.226.250.248] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2011 14:39:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/dpHpxi4jd2BQgUQ9Ms0QzToH/Q9BG13/ApRpmNc FoPodPZsnF9O28 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A266723CE5A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2EB57A.9040305@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:39:22 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:39:27 -0000 Am 26.07.2011 13:17, schrieb Alex Goncharov: > ,--- You/Michel (Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200) ----* > | while most of people i hear are very unhappy with FreeBSD ports. > > Nuts. People who are unhappy with FreeBSD ports can either help improve, or use pkgsrc, or use Debian/kFreeBSD, or they can switch. Nothing worth of discussion in this thread. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:12:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC79106564A; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC8123CE50; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2DE60C.8030902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:20 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , Edwin Groothuis Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:12:48 -0000 Am 25.07.2011 17:59, schrieb Roman Divacky: > Hi! > > > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be > seen here: > > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/ > > > Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that > uncovered others that need fixing. The "Reason" column was extended and now > shows "assumes_gcc" which is the lowest hanging fruit :) > > A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. assumes_gcc reason) and prevent > a lot of other ports from building. > > It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports > you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction into > the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang. > > Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other > ports from building). Greetings, there is one serious issue that spoilt (as discussed with kwm and rene on IRC) a major part of this -exp run. Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC. I think the bug is in ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are newer clang-based 9-CURRENT systems without gcc. I hope we can have another -exp run soon that addresses this. Thanks. Best regards, Matthias From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:33:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA0E106568B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BD48FC20 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so365171qyk.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.61.94 with SMTP id s30mr4416199qch.86.1311694378817; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o4sm353348qct.25.2011.07.26.08.32.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seibercom.net (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3RNk3q4hQnz2CG44 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:32:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:32:55 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110726113255.3b4c01ef@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:33:01 -0000 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:56:14 +0200 Torfinn Ingolfsen articulated: > I would say that "most people your hear" isn't a representative subset > of all the people who use ports. > In my experience anyway. And that would be based on what, people you interact with which may or may not be a fully represented cross section of the entire FreeBSD community. Michel Talon simple made a statement based on a qualitative analysis of the individuals he had come into contact with or had reason to otherwise receive or access input from. Your statement is of no more value as a definitive assertion than his, so why belittle his remarks? -- Jerry ✌ jerry+ports@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Famous last words of Davy Crockett, "So what are all those gardeners doing here?" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 16:13:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5636D106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh1.interactivevillages.com (ca.2e.7bae.static.theplanet.com [174.123.46.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1BC8FC17 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 184-78-197-203.war.clearwire-wmx.net ([184.78.197.203] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh1.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlkG2-0001G4-JU for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:12:59 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:20 -0700 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:20 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Ports ML Message-ID: <20110726161320.GC80142@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Ports ML References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh1.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:13:26 -0000 --p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Torfinn Ingolfsen on Tuesday, 26 July 2011: > > From what i hear, people are happy with the > > management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are very > > unhappy with FreeBSD ports. >=20 > I would say that "most people your hear" isn't a representative subset > of all the people who use ports. > In my experience anyway. Right. Don't say "most people" unless you can back it up with a statistically significant sampling. I expect the experiences of FreeBSD users vary much more than "most people" imagine. Those who have serious difficulties with the ports system may wrongly imagine that all FreeBSD users have the same less than delightful experience. Personally, even though I've run into a few issues with ports, I prefer the current system of building from source. Of course I welcome improvements, but not at the expense of the flexibility we enjoy. --=20 =2EO. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com =2E.O | sterling@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91 | http://chipstips.com --p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOLuegAAoJEIpckszW26+RjhIH/2amyDGwZLIK9jdzA6HdKrtJ q2j1n52nnEogKsukTyn7pa4GtrlXI1wujlb5fnLt1knecGeBSeCsN83HbNUN0XhX 5x/VpnJPiUSwh+yFFocZ6enuTp88/Pfju8osnWTC6bsjQCqjZK1dMyVsaTKRxe67 bZ5R9bWWf0kiOSf+gHsJTqS1OkaHnT2dD3Y4lqhN3NokMQEzf0Lq6/N0p3CM9N10 4kBDlIO35Fym7wGApE8JCYfDpbwdHn7XpZEpd2iFH0Ojyuo8NKrWrCBoyqEZ3+ro m64Qn9+Ia6FhgDo5ft4WibOdvtIddwfy1Gb0vKW5bYYfRcYx3VnwPTbuKRti/tc= =yplG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:08:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD279106564A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786B68FC08 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qll6m-0005g7-R9; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:08:03 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qll6J-0007gr-BD; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:07:23 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6QH7NCI051345; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:07:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6QH7MOD051344; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:07:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:07:22 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Message-ID: <20110726170722.GA47901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110720124017.GA94898@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26D05F.908@yandex.ru> <20110720134404.GA96487@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26E4A7.50207@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E26E4A7.50207@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , python@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:08:11 -0000 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:22:31PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 17:44: > >On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:55:59PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > >>As far i understand PYTHON_VERSION hold value like 'python2.7', so you > >>should correct this in your Makefile. Or just use USE_PYTHON = 2.6 > > > >No, PYTHON_VERSION seems to be overwritten by something else. > >I removed all but the PYTHON parts from the Makefile, > >and get this: > > > Yes, i see this in bsd.python.mk: > # Define PYTHON_VERSION to override the > # defaults that USE_PYTHON would give you. > > But it seems not true. Here is my test Makefile: > mrk@smeshariki2$ cat Makefile > PORTNAME= blah > DISTVERSION= 1.0 > CATEGORIES= misc > COMMENT= Some dumb port for testing > > USE_PYTHON= yes > > .include > > .if ${ARCH} == "i386" > PYTHON_VERSION= "python2.6" > .endif > > .include > > mrk@smeshariki2$ make depends > ===> blah-1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > ===> blah-1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > > mrk@smeshariki2$ uname -p > i386 > > I added python@ to cc, since it seems like bsd.python.mk bug to me (or > documentation bug). > > -- > Regards, > Ruslan I've heard nothing back within a week. Shall I submit a pr? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 18:09:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A268106564A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEA08FC08 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qlm4K-0000Lu-Mp for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:09:34 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qlm4A-0000iW-Ec for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:09:14 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6QI9EgS058704 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:09:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6QI9ESs058703 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:09:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:09:14 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110726180914.GA58696@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: distfile status - do I have to do something about it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:09:38 -0000 I maintain these 2 ports: http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/mexas@bristol.ac.uk-bad.html Do I have to do something about it? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:16:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83995106564A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D246E8FC08 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1260977eya.21 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iSfirsnmVKdvLBw2O81sIb7CR5+ZRD18p0jHn4X8OqM=; b=T0fzXURnwDYZsYcWjxVVw0H76wYSPvMOw+9F8KQFZbxtKjWiV43gSkmQw+njxNuNfn K+bPzRkBxw1UUvXRDVG5LpfXB7zb4AATQkkHjYDT6/u/hgBV8JYej8sSV+1Nq3kfeUfz Vp6pXP/DoX7asAdlHAjZeqRGmFYfO/C67hxkA= Received: by 10.14.100.13 with SMTP id y13mr2215705eef.11.1311706119520; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (ip18-43-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl [87.209.43.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y9sm553913eeh.34.2011.07.26.11.48.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2F0C03.5000405@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:48:35 +0200 From: Rene Ladan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20110726180914.GA58696@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110726180914.GA58696@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: distfile status - do I have to do something about it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:16:44 -0000 Op 26-07-2011 20:09, Anton Shterenlikht schreef: > I maintain these 2 ports: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/mexas@bristol.ac.uk-bad.html > > Do I have to do something about it? > The 500s should be transient errors, if they persist you might try to contact the server admins. The NXDOMAIN might be more persistent, but I also see them sometimes and sometimes not for my own server (which is always-on). Ren -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl:8080/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:24:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644591065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6QJOQAu079082 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:24:26 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p6QJOQWq079081 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:24:26 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:24:26 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201107261924.p6QJOQWq079081@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:24:26 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu Committers on the hook: lev Most recent CVS update was: U UPDATING U devel/msp430-binutils/Makefile U devel/msp430-binutils/distinfo U devel/msp430-binutils/pkg-descr U devel/msp430-binutils/pkg-plist U devel/msp430-binutils/files/patch-Makefile.in U devel/msp430-gcc/Makefile U devel/msp430-gcc/distinfo U devel/msp430-gcc/pkg-descr U devel/msp430-gcc/pkg-plist U devel/msp430-gcc/files/patch-Makefile.in U devel/msp430-gcc/files/patch-gcc-Makefile.in U devel/msp430-gcc3/Makefile U devel/msp430-gcc3/pkg-plist U devel/msp430-gdb/Makefile U devel/msp430-gdb/distinfo U devel/msp430-gdb/pkg-plist U devel/msp430-libc/Makefile U devel/msp430-libc/distinfo U devel/msp430-libc/pkg-descr U devel/msp430-libc/pkg-plist U devel/msp430mcu/Makefile U devel/msp430mcu/distinfo U devel/msp430mcu/pkg-descr From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:46:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FC81065676; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward8.mail.yandex.net (forward8.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F192B8FC18; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (smtp8.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.54]) by forward8.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id F2781F63A14; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:46:21 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1311709582; bh=KBgkWYq0PKlXMplmeyDxPfCsfpnNV3Vzp7ouGID/+x0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AqEf07rBTydNKnBPO158kNw0L8yOJffZ+Yf6gpXieUTxG3W9jquaR3ERoWl7buRnC m1le/qQQyvM6w1Lo88oG9ZpK/8yTUaG7YYJoo+AjGYznZArn/Q8YoClFEN1lOv36X2 Hq10oN1iZlVnCjee8eONmTX5twy4yw6YRQcJ6zEY= Received: from smeshariki2.local (unknown [178.76.212.172]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 995E44190078; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:46:21 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4E2F1989.5010109@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:46:17 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20110720124017.GA94898@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26D05F.908@yandex.ru> <20110720134404.GA96487@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26E4A7.50207@yandex.ru> <20110726170722.GA47901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110726170722.GA47901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Cc: python@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:46:24 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 26.07.2011 21:07: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:22:31PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 17:44: >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:55:59PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> >>>> As far i understand PYTHON_VERSION hold value like 'python2.7', so you >>>> should correct this in your Makefile. Or just use USE_PYTHON = 2.6 >>> >>> No, PYTHON_VERSION seems to be overwritten by something else. >>> I removed all but the PYTHON parts from the Makefile, >>> and get this: >> >> >> Yes, i see this in bsd.python.mk: >> # Define PYTHON_VERSION to override the >> # defaults that USE_PYTHON would give you. >> >> But it seems not true. Here is my test Makefile: >> mrk@smeshariki2$ cat Makefile >> PORTNAME= blah >> DISTVERSION= 1.0 >> CATEGORIES= misc >> COMMENT= Some dumb port for testing >> >> USE_PYTHON= yes >> >> .include >> >> .if ${ARCH} == "i386" >> PYTHON_VERSION= "python2.6" >> .endif >> >> .include >> >> mrk@smeshariki2$ make depends >> ===> blah-1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found >> ===> blah-1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found >> >> mrk@smeshariki2$ uname -p >> i386 >> >> I added python@ to cc, since it seems like bsd.python.mk bug to me (or >> documentation bug). >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Ruslan > > I've heard nothing back within a week. > Shall I submit a pr? I think so. Add Mk/bsd.python.mk to description field so it will be assigned to portmgr@. -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:47:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D448D106564A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9291E8FC1D for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 3E9A8C943E; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:47:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54207C9424 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:47:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:47:37 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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==== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2 Subject: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:47:40 -0000 Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to change a distfile location. It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to change (if any). From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:50:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D051065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACA08FC14 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so606255wyg.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:50:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G/oK+KBrL6dbT3rkmCa3+4F3W/x8E8wOJlQhLn+Q4AQ=; b=pV6FW+bX98re30hhiLSDeH2EmoZmhMrs20hCg6KKc5Iwc/1aN037N/AGdK5Fu74EXv UNvP1Z3V1kp3Vii0kC71QHpssJ+woaJeVB4KeyPog0w3TNVOBjtS8NGK+0w1G9Z8hcKy /BgmpI27bSdmCzLj9ISHS0f1olnFh/DpZqL34= Received: by 10.227.62.194 with SMTP id y2mr5312475wbh.43.1311708486690; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fo2sm692317wbb.48.2011.07.26.12.28.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:28:02 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110726202802.614853c8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110726161320.GC80142@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20110726161320.GC80142@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:50:12 -0000 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:20 -0700 Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Torfinn Ingolfsen on Tuesday, 26 July 2011: > > > > From what i hear, people are happy with the > > > management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are > > > very unhappy with FreeBSD ports. > > > > I would say that "most people your hear" isn't a representative > > subset of all the people who use ports. > > In my experience anyway. > > Right. Don't say "most people" unless you can back it up with a > statistically significant sampling. I expect the experiences of > FreeBSD users vary much more than "most people" imagine. It seems more reasonable than the idea that most people using FreeBSD are doing so despite being "very unhappy with FreeBSD ports". If that's really true then we should give Beastie nipple-clamps and a ball-gag to better appeal to our key demographic. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:51:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6791065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout026.mac.com (asmtpout026.mac.com [17.148.16.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C538FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:51:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LOY002ARHT12S20@asmtp026.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-07-26_06:2011-07-26, 2011-07-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1107260180 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:51:01 -0700 Message-id: <2C5239B1-6D06-4CAE-B3F1-6E288247DBD0@mac.com> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> To: Bob Eager X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:51:02 -0000 On Jul 26, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Bob Eager wrote: > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > change a distfile location. > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > change (if any). Probably nothing-- if someone already has a copy of the distfile, and there are no other changes, then there is no need to force them to rebuild the port by bumping PORTREVISION. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:08:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B43C1065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB67B8FC1E for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so1253637iyb.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3x/ma85+vKge9uyopz/DKg7q1NCoRrD12+bdc7T5TSI=; b=Wt4RkEdkXMVJT+UthavHnCjfNaCR72tmBOYLl2k1HJgKjCVQtxnKh0wa8o4XsvtgQh y8ka/W+5rOVycB8D7DCEIgVDph1AbnwA4qd8m7/OY3Q7wTHWYDtoAsq97piM0tERTfEL NQyHKUkgFBVyPZBGWIK6BLsFl93LEnZaPB8a8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.0.234 with SMTP id 42mr6018986ibc.110.1311710893042; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:08:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Bob Eager Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:08:14 -0000 On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote: > > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > change a distfile location. > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > change (if any). > No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:32:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881B91065674; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366D28FC08; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so729204gxk.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:32:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zHEH/3vScXCNhfBGNi3DJV9XlR1US0LDo7m1JDvThOI=; b=uT0z2leJ/PTGZkGPEIyfcVMg65hajJHFr9VKAvF2Wu2pz+ajlNt+rFC3TnbPIeTay9 +q7akxEb58Rrgl41AiXaLeU2QTrltFtCoCa3GOsmrxL61tTwY+gqvshS73NRNBo8gogl nhElmzNj82q9yRtlGA1FuMpHNqVhJ8T9BZ4/U= Received: by 10.231.112.98 with SMTP id v34mr6017515ibp.85.1311712352110; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:32:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:32:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201107261924.p6QJOQWq079081@pointyhat.freebsd.org> References: <201107261924.p6QJOQWq079081@pointyhat.freebsd.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:32:02 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: A9A4LGKYCqagCTj-Cnbjuct_qmQ Message-ID: To: Erwin Lansing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:32:33 -0000 Fixed -- attached msp430mcu to build. Chris On 26 July 2011 20:24, Erwin Lansing wrote: > INDEX build failed with errors: > Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. > make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu > make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu > > Committers on the hook: > lev > > Most recent CVS update was: > U UPDATING > U devel/msp430-binutils/Makefile > U devel/msp430-binutils/distinfo > U devel/msp430-binutils/pkg-descr > U devel/msp430-binutils/pkg-plist > U devel/msp430-binutils/files/patch-Makefile.in > U devel/msp430-gcc/Makefile > U devel/msp430-gcc/distinfo > U devel/msp430-gcc/pkg-descr > U devel/msp430-gcc/pkg-plist > U devel/msp430-gcc/files/patch-Makefile.in > U devel/msp430-gcc/files/patch-gcc-Makefile.in > U devel/msp430-gcc3/Makefile > U devel/msp430-gcc3/pkg-plist > U devel/msp430-gdb/Makefile > U devel/msp430-gdb/distinfo > U devel/msp430-gdb/pkg-plist > U devel/msp430-libc/Makefile > U devel/msp430-libc/distinfo > U devel/msp430-libc/pkg-descr > U devel/msp430-libc/pkg-plist > U devel/msp430mcu/Makefile > U devel/msp430mcu/distinfo > U devel/msp430mcu/pkg-descr > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:43:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476B106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1CE8FC13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so664012qyk.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.195.74 with SMTP id eb10mr4197026qab.99.1311711614653; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (ool-44c59c15.dyn.optonline.net [68.197.156.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e10sm529968qcq.16.2011.07.26.13.20.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2F216F.8000403@xaerolimit.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:19:59 -0400 From: Chris Brennan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20110726092756.GA90978@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20110726161320.GC80142@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20110726202802.614853c8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110726202802.614853c8@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 OpenPGP: id=D5B20C0C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig721E3EE29A7BF1B4A6086C14" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:43:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig721E3EE29A7BF1B4A6086C14 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050901050804000504050401" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050901050804000504050401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/26/2011 3:28 PM, RW wrote: > It seems more reasonable than the idea that most people using FreeBSD > are doing so despite being "very unhappy with FreeBSD ports". If that's= > really true then we should give Beastie nipple-clamps and a ball-gag to= > better appeal to our key demographic. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " +1 just because the thought of that is funny as hell! --=20 > Chris Brennan > -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/ > GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8 9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------050901050804000504050401-- --------------enig721E3EE29A7BF1B4A6086C14 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOLyF1AAoJEO7NmoTVsgwMs00H/3cT0wKGFkw3EVEnmYNTH88P xg3K+8+f1scxseu4hEVye/+mYuX8qtOjfKvIVkARhbYGwMZqv4Q99QXw9IUqOEgE UX0Qp9LLm+IsjRvR3XztHHLjr+iOP/HY9sbODsvUUa8MqbZGQuZ8Q+fRWPZwXJv2 i2j6Qv68jk4tivfZdnznwbdcevSnONx3C0HlIv72wVCXWGBhIYh4WGBJ2GRg429j pCkofBKo7keH2Yacpg5QeR00ZR1GckqMkYIQFUUrZvlQm9zjA3FvDRqJpZVuFNaT DlWNZ8I7zc3aZTiOWkIlBcbl0UDH0d8+C5vWLYsZC8p4iUZFSKiX7eRwOEpuKA0= =1zVU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig721E3EE29A7BF1B4A6086C14-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:20:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22818106564A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C1F8FC14 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AC77F5C44; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:03:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:03:24 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20110726210324.GA18262@atarininja.org> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Bob Eager , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:20:16 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote: > > > > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > > change a distfile location. > > > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > > change (if any). > > > > No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is the only time to bump PORTREVISION. While the "default package change" rule of thumb is always a good one there is more to it than just that when deciding to bump PORTREVISION or not. Here's the rough questions I go through in my head when I'm facing this kind of decision: If the default package changes, bump it. Only caveat here is if it's a minor change (say a typo in a man page or something). If it's chasing a shlib bump of another port and this port defaults to off, bump it anyways as some people may be bit by this. If it's a change to an option that defaults to off, and one can expect a reasonable number of people to benefit from it, bump it. I'm sure there are others and I'm sure some people will disagree with some of these. But those are the rough guidelines I follow. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:52:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9120C106564A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6QMqHML087396 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:52:17 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p6QMqHLO087389 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:52:17 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:52:17 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201107262252.p6QMqHLO087389@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:52:17 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:14:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CAA1065672 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D90868FC15 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85608 invoked by uid 80); 26 Jul 2011 07:14:16 -0000 Received: from 164.61.223.12 ([164.61.223.12]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:14:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20110726091416.79632x7xh7mdmxs0@avocado.salatschuessel.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:14:16 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: Zhihao Yuan References: <4E0AE6C9.4050405@cineca.it> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9) / FreeBSD-7.3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:07 +0000 Cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: sylpheed, gnash, seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:14:19 -0000 Hi, I'm working on it. Zhihao Yuan wrote: > It's updating to 3.1.1 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158798 > I guess this will be committed soon. Or you can just patch and try > it earlier. > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Marco Alberoni >> wrote: >>> Hello everybody, I usually use the applications Sylpheed, Gnash and >>> Seamonkey, and for all of them there the FreeBSD port is not "synchronized" >>> with the latest available version: are there any problems for >>> their upgrade? >> >> Sylpheed 3.1.1 was released on May 6th, 2011. And on July 1st, 2011 >> Sylpheed 3.2beta1 was released. >> What are the current plans for upgrading the Sylpheed port (if any)? >> >> Have a nice day. >> -- >> Regards, >> Torfinn Ingolfsen >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray > The best way to predict the future is to invent it. > ___________________________________________________ > 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 02:44:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE719106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1D98FC16 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3FAEC56203; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:44:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:44:07 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Message-ID: <20110727024407.GA4594@lonesome.com> References: <20110720124017.GA94898@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26D05F.908@yandex.ru> <20110720134404.GA96487@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26E4A7.50207@yandex.ru> <20110726170722.GA47901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E2F1989.5010109@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E2F1989.5010109@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , python@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:44:07 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:46:17PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Add Mk/bsd.python.mk to description field a good idea, but ... > so it will be assigned to portmgr@. portmgr@ doesn't own all the bsd.*.mk files; bsd.python.mk is owned by python@. We're happy to put an -exp run in the queue for large changes, but it's not necessary for something small. (Note: I only scanned this email quickly so don't know which one it is :-) ) mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:18:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D38106566B; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward6.mail.yandex.net (forward6.mail.yandex.net [77.88.60.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9578FC0C; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (smtp8.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.54]) by forward6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0190EF850B6; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:18:36 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1311740317; bh=G+QND/buJMXPBZCcRIQu3wTWiLEjvCYSVvKC2fsF5bE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iKv+EvEqSDeunZePtrEm5hwRvFSMQ0c+tor14c5rTaG8Y+87478fIqJ9X5Kb7TVmE fX+UkPf9LB8BWcHeGguECeihQWXh2plXIPzvk0fvv0pMn/LGaAKAnF4EcMcKM+U3xt vdyTo5aDMdkJl30cTFn7gq8oRdwUnbjG3XAjrUYk= Received: from smeshariki2.local (unknown [178.76.212.172]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 8C0CB419006B; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:18:35 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4E2F9196.7030003@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:18:30 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20110720124017.GA94898@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26D05F.908@yandex.ru> <20110720134404.GA96487@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E26E4A7.50207@yandex.ru> <20110726170722.GA47901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4E2F1989.5010109@yandex.ru> <20110727024407.GA4594@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110727024407.GA4594@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , python@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:18:39 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote on 27.07.2011 06:44: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:46:17PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> Add Mk/bsd.python.mk to description field > > a good idea, but ... > >> so it will be assigned to portmgr@. > > portmgr@ doesn't own all the bsd.*.mk files; bsd.python.mk is owned by > python@. We're happy to put an -exp run in the queue for large changes, > but it's not necessary for something small. (Note: I only scanned this > email quickly so don't know which one it is :-) ) > > mcl Ok, i was confused. -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:09:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FBB106564A; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@claws-mail.org) Received: from paperstreet.colino.net (paperstreet.colino.net [IPv6:2001:7a8:b4ec::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6986F8FC0A; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by paperstreet.colino.net (Postfix, from userid 1015) id 839222038E; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:09:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on paperstreet.colino.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from thewildbeast (5ad1377a.bb.sky.com [90.209.55.122]) by paperstreet.colino.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 726C420079; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:09:15 +0100 From: Paul To: pawel@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20110727080915.2f9e71ca@thewildbeast> Organization: theWildBeast X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs37 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: claws-mail-3.7.9_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:09:20 -0000 Hi Pawel, I noticed that the FreeBSD port is marked as BROKEN 'does not compile'. I don't know what the policy is regarding patching, but this bug is fixed in CVS and the patch is available here: http://www.colino.net/claws-mail/getpatchset.php?ver=3.7.9cvs29 HTH regards Paul -- Thanks to his Green Candle the 'Pataphysician can lighten our darkness. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:19:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ED7106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skirge84@o2.pl) Received: from moh2-ve1.go2.pl (moh2-ve1.go2.pl [193.17.41.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C608FC15 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moh2-ve1.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.186]) by moh2-ve1.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D84200184 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:57:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by moh2-ve1.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:57:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id MYXMrh; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:57:55 +0200 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so1051208gxk.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.142.16 with SMTP id p16mr6359077ybd.142.1311749874181; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.217.17 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> References: <20110723131613.GF17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:57:54 +0200 Message-ID: From: Sebastian Chmielewski To: Koop Mast X-O2-Trust: 2, 63 X-O2-SPF: neutral Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Kostik Belousov , ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Intel GPU driver and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:19:00 -0000 I've installed this ports tree and basic video is working fine, except 3D - glxgears window is empty. I'll investigate this problem later. 2011/7/23 Koop Mast > On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 16:16 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Hello, > > after the initial code drop, I have fixed some amount of bugs and got > > several positive reports from users. If KMS worked on your machine, you > > probably can use the driver with 3D acceleration on regular basis. > > > > As I see the state of the effort right now, there are two most > > impeding issues that prevent wider testing of the driver. First is > > the non-working display port code, causing failure in KMS for some > > configurations. This will be eventually fixed. > > > > Second is the very laborous procedure to install the required usermode > > components. The http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU lists the > requirements. > > > > The port provided ddx and mesa cannot be simply updated, because kernel > > driver is not yet in src/ head, not mentioning the stable branches. > > Also, new libdrm and mesa may be non-functional on our old non-intel DRI > > drivers. Additional quirk is that in-tree Xorg server is old, and git > > head for intel ddx cannot be built against old Xorg API. > > We ( freebsd x11@ team) are already working on a update, instructions > below. > > Keep in mind that this update isn't complete yet. Not all xorg ports are > updated yet. And there is the issue, that the old intel driver doesn't > work with the new xorg-server. If you using this driver and don't want > to update to current for the new intel driver, please don't use this > repo. > > I'm currently working on a update for the mesa ports (libGL*, dri etc) > to a version that works with the sandybridge. > > Also note that currently only the xf86-video-intel-kms driver is > currently tested. (since my ati card seem to have died) > > svn co http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/ports/browser/branches/xorg-dev > > A basic merge script can be found here > http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/xorg/xorgmerge > > just run portmaster -a, keep in mind to rebuild your xf86-* ports after > the server update. > > -Koop > > > For wide testing, the easy way to install fresh usermode graphics stack > > is neededi, while still allowing the most installations to use present > > outdated versions. > > > > Could ports/x11 people help me there ? Thanks. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:22:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A8F106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9528FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QlzNd-0000II-2B for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:22:13 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QlzNc-0004rK-Vo for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:22:13 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6R8MCsN069982 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:22:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6R8MCm7069981 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:22:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:22:12 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: is %%GECKO%% defined anywhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:22:14 -0000 # cat /usr/ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in #! /bin/sh # $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ # Launch %%GECKO%% for urlview URL=$@ %%GECKO%% -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || %%GECKO%% $URL # which on installation turns into # cat /usr/local/bin/gecko.sh #! /bin/sh # $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ # Launch for urlview URL=$@ -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || $URL # I cannot find any reference to %%GECKO%% in Mk/* Please advise -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:55:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDB01065673 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttsestt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC318FC14 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg11 with SMTP id 11so2903413wwg.1 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Wo1XQQlznKFwzWSnZG5bCzB+Gd0vcB5vcUIjEbRHm2M=; b=tmN6amNBYIHSuUi/AzzGLXXbCUpqRto1/fZJhnOu+zxyJECzmdKAlxAymMo6T3xSl/ Q6O0w4kkaAcLmhEteiUZHfgYzbW1/Lmvj/ogahI6RS4Cqx/Q/8BHhgdfXuvEjvbWBs12 DTad6rR4gUxlPswwus3rjdYTsQ8ZoDhQ1r7Io= Received: by 10.216.74.7 with SMTP id w7mr2369460wed.37.1311760557394; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([208.110.65.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r48sm929049weq.2.2011.07.27.02.55.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:55:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Test Rat To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:55:48 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:22:12 +0100") Message-ID: <86zkk0dp3v.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is %%GECKO%% defined anywhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:55:59 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht writes: > # cat /usr/ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in > #! /bin/sh > # $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ > # Launch %%GECKO%% for urlview > URL=$@ > %%GECKO%% -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || %%GECKO%% $URL > # > > which on installation turns into > > # cat /usr/local/bin/gecko.sh > #! /bin/sh > # $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ > # Launch for urlview > URL=$@ > -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || $URL > # > > I cannot find any reference to %%GECKO%% in Mk/* It's pre-processed by sed(1) before being installed, see SUB_LIST. $ make -V SUB_LIST:MGECKO\* GECKO= $ make -V SUB_LIST:MGECKO\* WITH_FIREFOX= GECKO=firefox3 $ make -V SUB_LIST:MGECKO\* WITH_SEAMONKEY= GECKO=seamonkey Here is a bandaid that uses firefox by default. A proper fix would probably involve relying on an environment variable and doing away with gecko.sh to also address ports/152453. %% Index: textproc/urlview/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /a/.cvsup/ports/textproc/urlview/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -r1.33 Makefile --- textproc/urlview/Makefile 2 May 2011 22:05:18 -0000 1.33 +++ textproc/urlview/Makefile 27 Jul 2011 09:32:54 -0000 @@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ MAN1= urlview.1 SUB_FILES= gecko.sh SUB_LIST= GECKO=${GECKO} -.if defined(WITH_FIREFOX) -USE_FIREFOX= 36 -GECKO= firefox3 -.elif defined(WITH_SEAMONKEY) +.if defined(WITH_SEAMONKEY) USE_SEAMONKEY= 20 GECKO= seamonkey +.else +USE_FIREFOX= yes +GECKO= firefox .endif .include %% From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:23:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEAB106566B; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB778FC12; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA00627; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:23:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Qm1Gi-000NZr-HX; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:23:12 +0300 Message-ID: <4E2FE70F.4080001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:23:11 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koop Mast References: <20110723131613.GF17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kernel Intel GPU driver and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:23:15 -0000 on 23/07/2011 16:51 Koop Mast said the following: > We ( freebsd x11@ team) are already working on a update, instructions > below. > > Keep in mind that this update isn't complete yet. Not all xorg ports are > updated yet. And there is the issue, that the old intel driver doesn't > work with the new xorg-server. If you using this driver and don't want > to update to current for the new intel driver, please don't use this > repo. > > I'm currently working on a update for the mesa ports (libGL*, dri etc) > to a version that works with the sandybridge. > > Also note that currently only the xf86-video-intel-kms driver is > currently tested. (since my ati card seem to have died) > > svn co http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/ports/browser/branches/xorg-dev Used svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/ports/branches/xorg-dev here - thanks to all for the help. BTW, information on http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/ports/wiki needs to be updated with the correct URL as well. > A basic merge script can be found here > http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/xorg/xorgmerge > > just run portmaster -a, keep in mind to rebuild your xf86-* ports after > the server update. Something strange happened for me in x11/libX11 port. I use amd64 CURRENT, r223759, about ~1 month old. Here's an output of the second make run: ===> Building for libX11-1.4.3,1 Making all in include Making all in modules Making all in im Making all in ximcp Making all in lc Making all in Utf8 Making all in def Making all in gen Making all in xlocale Making all in om Making all in generic Making all in src cd util && make ../src/util/makekeys /usr/local/include/X11/keysymdef.h /usr/local/include/X11/XF86keysym.h /usr/local/include/X11/Sunkeysym.h /usr/local/include/X11/DECkeysym.h /usr/local/include/X11/HPkeysym.h > ks_tables_h mv ks_tables_h ks_tables.h make all-recursive Making all in util Making all in xcms Making all in xlibi18n Making all in xkb cd util && make CC KeysymStr.lo CC StrKeysym.lo CCLD libX11.la CCLD libX11-xcb.la Making all in nls make: don't know how to make Compose/index.html. Stop *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/ports/x11/libX11/work/libX11-1.4.3. *** Error code 1 If I add USE_GMAKE to the port's Makefile then everything builds fine. Not sure if this is a general problem with FreeBSD make, or only on CURRENT or something local to my environment. Can you please double-check if this port builds OK for you? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:38:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4C1106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7CF8FC0A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm1V6-0002ol-1b; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:38:14 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm1Uf-0006ha-JH; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:37:37 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RAbbGC073098; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:37:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6RAbbHv073097; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:37:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:37:37 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Test Rat Message-ID: <20110727103737.GA71837@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86zkk0dp3v.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86zkk0dp3v.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is %%GECKO%% defined anywhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:24 -0000 On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:55:48PM +0400, Test Rat wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht writes: > > > # cat /usr/ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in > > #! /bin/sh > > # $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ > > # Launch %%GECKO%% for urlview > > URL=$@ > > %%GECKO%% -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || %%GECKO%% $URL > > # > > > > which on installation turns into > > > > # cat /usr/local/bin/gecko.sh > > #! /bin/sh > > # $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ > > # Launch for urlview > > URL=$@ > > -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || $URL > > # > > > > I cannot find any reference to %%GECKO%% in Mk/* > > It's pre-processed by sed(1) before being installed, see SUB_LIST. > > $ make -V SUB_LIST:MGECKO\* > GECKO= > $ make -V SUB_LIST:MGECKO\* WITH_FIREFOX= > GECKO=firefox3 > $ make -V SUB_LIST:MGECKO\* WITH_SEAMONKEY= > GECKO=seamonkey > > Here is a bandaid that uses firefox by default. A proper fix would > probably involve relying on an environment variable and doing > away with gecko.sh to also address ports/152453. > > %% > Index: textproc/urlview/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /a/.cvsup/ports/textproc/urlview/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.33 > diff -u -p -r1.33 Makefile > --- textproc/urlview/Makefile 2 May 2011 22:05:18 -0000 1.33 > +++ textproc/urlview/Makefile 27 Jul 2011 09:32:54 -0000 > @@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ MAN1= urlview.1 > SUB_FILES= gecko.sh > SUB_LIST= GECKO=${GECKO} > > -.if defined(WITH_FIREFOX) > -USE_FIREFOX= 36 > -GECKO= firefox3 > -.elif defined(WITH_SEAMONKEY) > +.if defined(WITH_SEAMONKEY) > USE_SEAMONKEY= 20 > GECKO= seamonkey > +.else > +USE_FIREFOX= yes > +GECKO= firefox > .endif > > .include > %% Sorry, but I don't like this solution. This will force the user to build firefox always, even if they never want to use urlview with anything but e.g. lynx. I don't like the idea of gecko.sh either. There can be other browsers installed instead of the above 2, e.g. midori, kazehakase, etc. It adds unnecessary complexity to this very simple port. HOw about doing away with gecko.sh completely, and letting the user specify what they want directly in $HOME/.urlview: % cat $HOME/.urlview COMMAND lynx %s #COMMAND firefox3 %s #COMMAND midori %s -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:42:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09615106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhail.kupchik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8928FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so1400986vxg.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:42:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mZY1lwBr4Ha2iblbc7qVkP+eYykEY7P+AXMLSxsJdqA=; b=mvxI4G3rHUWPtODuPw6WQSOoeTO4xmGurSabP+iSjqItXUqNhMl25RkNGODJsZext+ 1HG3yPBZVai0iNb6p78uPQQx9ns74kiWnmj9j+25reXL7NQWygFJctHddSWKj4ZNP7tl qj5PXXyFoA5rgx4l80J0VQakLomtXUFfrlqtk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.68.103 with SMTP id v7mr3778366vdt.470.1311761913259; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.115.196 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:18:33 +0300 Message-ID: From: Mikhail Kupchik To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Writing large files on fusefs-ntfs mounted partition returns random errors EIO, ENOENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:42:07 -0000 Hello All, Recently I've encountered the following problem: writing large (200MB+) files into ntfs partition managed by fuse + ntfs-3g + libublio (on umass device) yields random write errors, usually EIO or ENOENT. Versions of the software: 1) Kernel: FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE, i386, generic 2) NTFS-3G: 2011.4.12 external FUSE 27 3) FUSE kernel module: fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_7 4) FUSE userspace libs: fusefs-libs-2.7.4 5) UBLIO library (userspace cache for block devices): libublio-20070103 How To Repeat: 1) Get USB flash thumbdrive (1Gb in my case) 2) Quickformat it in Windows ("format I: /FS:NTFS /Q") and unplug via tray icon as usually 3) Plug USB flash thumbdrive to FreeBSD box 4) kldload /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko 5) ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usb 6) dd if=/dev/random of=/usr/rndfile.bin bs=1M count=300 7) cp /usr/rndfile.bin /mnt/usb/rndfile.bin 8) After some time, cp exits with error message cp: /mnt/usb/rndfile.bin: No such file or directory USB subsystem is probably fine, because kernel-mode msdosfs and direct write with dd(1) works without any problems. I've tried to enable ntfs-3g debugging, and ntfs-3g works fine when it's spends additional CPU cycles printing debug info. Looks like some race condition. Writing into NTFS partition also works fine with ublio disabled, when I/O rate is low. IMO it looks like a problem in the fusefs-kmod or fusefs-libs, because ntfs-3g code is well-tested on Linux and ublio code is well-tested on Mac. Also I tried to hack ublio - add pthread locks, syncs after each write, replace pwritev(2) with series of pwrites, add assertion checks. None of these really helped, but ENOENT/EIO errors were relatively rarer, due to I/O rate slowdown I suspect. Right now I need someone who can confirm this problem in his/her environment and look into fusefs-kmod code for race conditions, as I'm not good in kernel hacking. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:49:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB42106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773BA8FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DEE5E190; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:49:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.452 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id z-AvZsSomtu5; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:49:09 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1295E176; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:49:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E2FED23.3040104@eskk.nu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:49:07 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110711 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: oliver@FreeBSD.org Subject: sysutils/xfce4-utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:49:01 -0000 Error during upgrade => xfce-utils-4.8.2.tar.bz2 is not in /usr/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/distinfo. => Either /usr/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/distinfo is out of date, or => xfce-utils-4.8.2.tar.bz2 is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils. ===>>> make failed for sysutils/xfce4-utils Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:15:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B621065677 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttsestt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C238A8FC1E for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so218133fxe.17 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Vpn1ta4OaGJdieCHsUR5FWwcLhmZKOCIg2XvHRC5VQY=; b=VU6OK8N4qaZQo4LsB8bOARCrvToWcAiL/MRzZRkHdR1dhx2HgEqnqbPH94g3Sux7ac cWuhi8g86Eak8G4pMHxwpgwnxZPZVC/03aknSG2xT6nmkuWKbUMM464L0411yGomIrYX 3bW0zUaeXJbmoni9UQOVK09MiR7vg6BeNijxg= Received: by 10.223.158.130 with SMTP id f2mr8292666fax.61.1311765304456; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tor-exit-router35-readme.formlessnetworking.net [199.48.147.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o17sm4208fal.26.2011.07.27.04.15.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:15:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Test Rat To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86zkk0dp3v.fsf@gmail.com> <20110727103737.GA71837@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:14:57 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20110727103737.GA71837@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:37:37 +0100") Message-ID: <864o28c6vi.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is %%GECKO%% defined anywhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:15:09 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht writes: [...] > HOw about doing away with gecko.sh > completely, and letting the user > specify what they want directly in > $HOME/.urlview: > > % cat $HOME/.urlview > COMMAND lynx %s > #COMMAND firefox3 %s > #COMMAND midori %s Then we don't need url_handler.sh as well. But I don't use the port... it's redundant when one has browse-url-at-point. ;) %% Makefile | 29 +++++++++-------------------- files/gecko.sh.in | 5 ----- (removed) files/patch-sample.urlview | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ files/patch-url_handler.sh | 35 ----------------------------------- (removed) pkg-plist | 4 ---- (removed) 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) Index: textproc/urlview/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /a/.cvsup/ports/textproc/urlview/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -r1.33 Makefile --- textproc/urlview/Makefile 2 May 2011 22:05:18 -0000 1.33 +++ textproc/urlview/Makefile 27 Jul 2011 11:09:45 -0000 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ PORTNAME= urlview PORTVERSION= 0.9 -PORTREVISION= 6 +PORTREVISION= 7 CATEGORIES= textproc www MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/contrib/ \ ftp://ftp.sunsite.auc.dk/pub/mail/mutt/contrib/ \ @@ -22,27 +22,16 @@ COMMENT= URL extractor/launcher GNU_CONFIGURE= yes MAN1= urlview.1 -SUB_FILES= gecko.sh -SUB_LIST= GECKO=${GECKO} - -.if defined(WITH_FIREFOX) -USE_FIREFOX= 36 -GECKO= firefox3 -.elif defined(WITH_SEAMONKEY) -USE_SEAMONKEY= 20 -GECKO= seamonkey -.endif - -.include +PLIST_FILES= bin/urlview \ + etc/urlview.conf.sample post-patch: - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e "s,!!PREFIX!!,${PREFIX},g" \ - -e "s,/usr/X11R6,${X11BASE},g" ${WRKSRC}/url_handler.sh - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e \ - "s,/etc/urlview.conf,${PREFIX}/etc/urlview.conf,g" ${WRKSRC}/* + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,/etc,${PREFIX}&,' \ + -e 's/url_handler.sh/firefox/' \ + ${WRKSRC}/* post-install: - ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/url_handler.sh ${WRKDIR}/gecko.sh \ - ${PREFIX}/bin + ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/sample.urlview \ + ${PREFIX}/etc/urlview.conf.sample -.include +.include Index: textproc/urlview/pkg-plist =================================================================== RCS file: textproc/urlview/pkg-plist diff -N textproc/urlview/pkg-plist --- textproc/urlview/pkg-plist 29 Nov 2009 08:24:49 -0000 1.5 +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -@comment $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/pkg-plist,v 1.5 2009/11/29 08:24:49 obrien Exp $ -bin/gecko.sh -bin/url_handler.sh -bin/urlview Index: textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in =================================================================== RCS file: textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in diff -N textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in --- textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in 29 Nov 2009 08:24:50 -0000 1.1 +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -#! /bin/sh -# $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ -# Launch %%GECKO%% for urlview -URL=$@ -%%GECKO%% -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || %%GECKO%% $URL Index: textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview =================================================================== RCS file: textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview diff -N textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview 27 Jul 2011 11:11:08 -0000 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +--- sample.urlview~ ++++ sample.urlview +@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ + # man urlview + # + # Put this file in: $HOME/.urlview +-# Put url_handler.sh in: /usr/bin + # + # You can call 'urlview' while in 'mutt' by pressing the Ctrl b keys. + # Put these macros in your $HOME/.muttrc file. +@@ -19,10 +18,7 @@ + #REGEXP (((http|https|ftp|gopher)|mailto):(//)?[^ >"\t]*|www\.[-a-z0-9.]+)[^ .,;\t>">\):] + REGEXP (((http|https|ftp|gopher)|mailto)[.:][^ >"\t]*|www\.[-a-z0-9.]+)[^ .,;\t>">\):] + +-# Command to invoke for selected URL. Use lynx, netscape, or url_handler.sh +-# shell script. ++# Command to invoke for selected URL. + + #COMMAND lynx %s +-#COMMAND netscape -remote 'openURL(%s)' +-COMMAND url_handler.sh +- ++COMMAND url_handler.sh %s Index: textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh =================================================================== RCS file: textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh diff -N textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh --- textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh 29 Nov 2009 08:24:50 -0000 1.2 +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 @@ -1,35 +0,0 @@ -$FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh,v 1.2 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ ---- url_handler.sh.orig Tue Jul 4 03:14:30 2000 -+++ url_handler.sh Wed Aug 22 10:42:49 2001 -@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ --#! /bin/bash -+#! /bin/sh - - # Copyright (c) 1998 Martin Schulze - # Slightly modified by Luis Francisco Gonzalez -@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ - # VT: Launch in the same terminal - - # The lists of programs to be executed are --https_prgs="/usr/X11R6/bin/netscape:XW /usr/bin/lynx:XT" --http_prgs="/usr/bin/lynx:XT /usr/X11R6/bin/netscape:XW" --mailto_prgs="/usr/bin/mutt:VT /usr/bin/elm:VT /usr/bin/pine:VT /usr/bin/mail:VT" --gopher_prgs="/usr/bin/lynx:XT /usr/bin/gopher:XT" --ftp_prgs="/usr/bin/lynx:XT /usr/bin/ncftp:XT" -+https_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/gecko.sh:XW !!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/w3m:XT" -+http_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/gecko.sh:XW !!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/w3m:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/links:XT" -+mailto_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/mutt:VT !!PREFIX!!/bin/elm:VT !!PREFIX!!/bin/pine:VT /usr/bin/mail:VT" -+gopher_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/gopher:XT" -+ftp_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/ncftp2:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/ncftp3:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/ncftp:XT" - - # Program used as an xterm (if it doesn't support -T you'll need to change - # the command line in getprg) -@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ - ########################################################################### - # Change bellow this at your own risk - ########################################################################### --function getprg() -+getprg() - { - local ele tag prog - %% From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:52:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812E1106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 142948FC19 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96769 invoked by uid 80); 27 Jul 2011 11:25:35 -0000 Received: from 164.61.223.12 ([164.61.223.12]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:25:35 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20110727132535.Horde.nXECZaQd9PdOL-WvQcohZTk@avocado.salatschuessel.net> From: Oliver Lehmann To: Leslie Jensen References: <4E2FED23.3040104@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4E2FED23.3040104@eskk.nu> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/xfce4-utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:52:17 -0000 Leslie Jensen wrote: > Error during upgrade > yeah - already fixed ;) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 12:03:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B66A106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EDB8FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2pk-0001M6-Mi; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:03:43 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2pK-0002Wc-7e; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:03:02 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RC31hW073473; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:03:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6RC31k6073472; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:03:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:03:01 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Test Rat Message-ID: <20110727120301.GA73424@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86zkk0dp3v.fsf@gmail.com> <20110727103737.GA71837@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <864o28c6vi.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <864o28c6vi.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is %%GECKO%% defined anywhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:03:54 -0000 On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:14:57PM +0400, Test Rat wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht writes: > > [...] > > HOw about doing away with gecko.sh > > completely, and letting the user > > specify what they want directly in > > $HOME/.urlview: > > > > % cat $HOME/.urlview > > COMMAND lynx %s > > #COMMAND firefox3 %s > > #COMMAND midori %s > > Then we don't need url_handler.sh as well. But I don't use > the port... it's redundant when one has browse-url-at-point. ;) Thanks for the patch. I like it. But this seems like a major change. What's the usual consultation procedure and period for changes like this? > > %% > Makefile | 29 +++++++++-------------------- > files/gecko.sh.in | 5 ----- (removed) > files/patch-sample.urlview | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > files/patch-url_handler.sh | 35 ----------------------------------- (removed) > pkg-plist | 4 ---- (removed) > 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > Index: textproc/urlview/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /a/.cvsup/ports/textproc/urlview/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.33 > diff -u -p -r1.33 Makefile > --- textproc/urlview/Makefile 2 May 2011 22:05:18 -0000 1.33 > +++ textproc/urlview/Makefile 27 Jul 2011 11:09:45 -0000 > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > PORTNAME= urlview > PORTVERSION= 0.9 > -PORTREVISION= 6 > +PORTREVISION= 7 > CATEGORIES= textproc www > MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/contrib/ \ > ftp://ftp.sunsite.auc.dk/pub/mail/mutt/contrib/ \ > @@ -22,27 +22,16 @@ COMMENT= URL extractor/launcher > > GNU_CONFIGURE= yes > MAN1= urlview.1 > -SUB_FILES= gecko.sh > -SUB_LIST= GECKO=${GECKO} > - > -.if defined(WITH_FIREFOX) > -USE_FIREFOX= 36 > -GECKO= firefox3 > -.elif defined(WITH_SEAMONKEY) > -USE_SEAMONKEY= 20 > -GECKO= seamonkey > -.endif > - > -.include > +PLIST_FILES= bin/urlview \ > + etc/urlview.conf.sample > > post-patch: > - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e "s,!!PREFIX!!,${PREFIX},g" \ > - -e "s,/usr/X11R6,${X11BASE},g" ${WRKSRC}/url_handler.sh > - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e \ > - "s,/etc/urlview.conf,${PREFIX}/etc/urlview.conf,g" ${WRKSRC}/* > + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,/etc,${PREFIX}&,' \ > + -e 's/url_handler.sh/firefox/' \ > + ${WRKSRC}/* > > post-install: > - ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/url_handler.sh ${WRKDIR}/gecko.sh \ > - ${PREFIX}/bin > + ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/sample.urlview \ > + ${PREFIX}/etc/urlview.conf.sample > > -.include > +.include > Index: textproc/urlview/pkg-plist > =================================================================== > RCS file: textproc/urlview/pkg-plist > diff -N textproc/urlview/pkg-plist > --- textproc/urlview/pkg-plist 29 Nov 2009 08:24:49 -0000 1.5 > +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 > @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ > -@comment $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/pkg-plist,v 1.5 2009/11/29 08:24:49 obrien Exp $ > -bin/gecko.sh > -bin/url_handler.sh > -bin/urlview > Index: textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in > =================================================================== > RCS file: textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in > diff -N textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in > --- textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in 29 Nov 2009 08:24:50 -0000 1.1 > +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 > @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ > -#! /bin/sh > -# $FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/gecko.sh.in,v 1.1 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ > -# Launch %%GECKO%% for urlview > -URL=$@ > -%%GECKO%% -remote "openurl($URL, new-tab)" || %%GECKO%% $URL > Index: textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview > =================================================================== > RCS file: textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview > diff -N textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 > +++ textproc/urlview/files/patch-sample.urlview 27 Jul 2011 11:11:08 -0000 > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +--- sample.urlview~ > ++++ sample.urlview > +@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ > + # man urlview > + # > + # Put this file in: $HOME/.urlview > +-# Put url_handler.sh in: /usr/bin > + # > + # You can call 'urlview' while in 'mutt' by pressing the Ctrl b keys. > + # Put these macros in your $HOME/.muttrc file. > +@@ -19,10 +18,7 @@ > + #REGEXP (((http|https|ftp|gopher)|mailto):(//)?[^ >"\t]*|www\.[-a-z0-9.]+)[^ .,;\t>">\):] > + REGEXP (((http|https|ftp|gopher)|mailto)[.:][^ >"\t]*|www\.[-a-z0-9.]+)[^ .,;\t>">\):] > + > +-# Command to invoke for selected URL. Use lynx, netscape, or url_handler.sh > +-# shell script. > ++# Command to invoke for selected URL. > + > + #COMMAND lynx %s > +-#COMMAND netscape -remote 'openURL(%s)' > +-COMMAND url_handler.sh > +- > ++COMMAND url_handler.sh %s > Index: textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh > =================================================================== > RCS file: textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh > diff -N textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh > --- textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh 29 Nov 2009 08:24:50 -0000 1.2 > +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 > @@ -1,35 +0,0 @@ > -$FreeBSD: ports/textproc/urlview/files/patch-url_handler.sh,v 1.2 2009/11/29 08:24:50 obrien Exp $ > ---- url_handler.sh.orig Tue Jul 4 03:14:30 2000 > -+++ url_handler.sh Wed Aug 22 10:42:49 2001 > -@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > --#! /bin/bash > -+#! /bin/sh > - > - # Copyright (c) 1998 Martin Schulze > - # Slightly modified by Luis Francisco Gonzalez > -@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ > - # VT: Launch in the same terminal > - > - # The lists of programs to be executed are > --https_prgs="/usr/X11R6/bin/netscape:XW /usr/bin/lynx:XT" > --http_prgs="/usr/bin/lynx:XT /usr/X11R6/bin/netscape:XW" > --mailto_prgs="/usr/bin/mutt:VT /usr/bin/elm:VT /usr/bin/pine:VT /usr/bin/mail:VT" > --gopher_prgs="/usr/bin/lynx:XT /usr/bin/gopher:XT" > --ftp_prgs="/usr/bin/lynx:XT /usr/bin/ncftp:XT" > -+https_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/gecko.sh:XW !!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/w3m:XT" > -+http_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/gecko.sh:XW !!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/w3m:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/links:XT" > -+mailto_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/mutt:VT !!PREFIX!!/bin/elm:VT !!PREFIX!!/bin/pine:VT /usr/bin/mail:VT" > -+gopher_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/gopher:XT" > -+ftp_prgs="!!PREFIX!!/bin/lynx:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/ncftp2:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/ncftp3:XT !!PREFIX!!/bin/ncftp:XT" > - > - # Program used as an xterm (if it doesn't support -T you'll need to change > - # the command line in getprg) > -@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ > - ########################################################################### > - # Change bellow this at your own risk > - ########################################################################### > --function getprg() > -+getprg() > - { > - local ele tag prog > - > %% -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 12:50:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915081065672 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497CB8FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1264286gwb.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8/2O9dJKkFunJ+TLaIDmdoff4tCftGocye1c+cuHl50=; b=CDpU7QefO0GCmjjsL5ssxap+cTzJqLD6qt2gGWxQlZn/Oy1aDxId9pAg0nZ9YvJ965 Q0nm6ru9ZqJV1tw4BGSjvg2P+io9FFZJV9By26FhuAxxGQOslVsfYK1DEDX369p5Jm0Y EsXOmfZ/kSXuMONrLCo24bqGB6ghAZGU5fLug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.150.27 with SMTP id x27mr13699wfd.72.1311771004128; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.199.16 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:50:04 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QkRbTz2kyqemHzauxa0mtpHa9ag Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= To: freebsd ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: clang chokes on machine-specific code in astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:50:05 -0000 Hi, while fixing my ports to support clang I found out that clang chokes badly = on astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced . Relevant parts of the build log are avail= able at ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/seti-clang.txt (using clang r135360 from HEAD) It looks to me like the missing machine modes need to be added to clang/llvm, and that for now the port needs an USE_GCC line? Regards, Ren=E9 --=20 http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:06:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486EB106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttsestt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09A48FC0A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so436493fxe.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:06:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=L250wsx0GK6ANpFIhVOWIuAXxhmvohcQLeQZ7RrblKk=; b=yEIGsNDdbg8BzSPwlh+14Q6NiK0VaOWt/w53eCK1h9bwkDaCAae9DPPzApfnkQXdfW qGIh3VS9NWa46eVR2MmACPmTXzXuDtftvBlyb9ebjh3WYOcwtyllhjzqMOHILY0JeA7w l3O4gGhK987jyNH/HI6L11J2Nv2VGJDyoOlRM= Received: by 10.223.88.92 with SMTP id z28mr834263fal.144.1311771968185; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.80.28.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w11sm57386faj.14.2011.07.27.06.06.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:06:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Test Rat To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20110727082212.GA68537@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86zkk0dp3v.fsf@gmail.com> <20110727103737.GA71837@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <864o28c6vi.fsf@gmail.com> <20110727120301.GA73424@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:05:54 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20110727120301.GA73424@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:03:01 +0100") Message-ID: <864o277u19.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is %%GECKO%% defined anywhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:06:10 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht writes: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:14:57PM +0400, Test Rat wrote: >> Anton Shterenlikht writes: >> >> [...] >> > HOw about doing away with gecko.sh >> > completely, and letting the user >> > specify what they want directly in >> > $HOME/.urlview: >> > >> > % cat $HOME/.urlview >> > COMMAND lynx %s >> > #COMMAND firefox3 %s >> > #COMMAND midori %s >> >> Then we don't need url_handler.sh as well. But I don't use >> the port... it's redundant when one has browse-url-at-point. ;) > > Thanks for the patch. I like it. > But this seems like a major change. > What's the usual consultation > procedure and period for changes like this? This is usually done at the discretion of maintainer with a note in UPDATING. As for the patch it probably needs more examples (and exposure), e.g. COMMAND lynx %s # :VT COMMAND u=%s; xterm -e lynx $u || lynx $u # :XT COMMAND firefox %s 2>/dev/null & # :XW when 2nd one shows how to cycle between multiple commands. As system(3) invokes sh(1) the syntax is same except %s can only appear once (at least without patching urlview.c). FWIW, some unreachable cruft can probably pruned while here. I'm not sure if any FreeBSD mirrors still have that urlview.diff but the file doesn't appear on archive.org. %% Index: textproc/urlview/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /a/.cvsup/ports/textproc/urlview/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -r1.33 Makefile --- textproc/urlview/Makefile 2 May 2011 22:05:18 -0000 1.33 +++ textproc/urlview/Makefile 27 Jul 2011 12:44:01 -0000 @@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ ftp://ftp.sunsite.auc.dk/pub/mail/mutt/contrib/ \ ftp://ftp.cs.tu-berlin.de/pub/net/mail/mutt/contrib/ -#PATCH_SITES= http://feeding.frenzy.com/~rainking/ -#PATCHFILES= urlview.diff - MAINTAINER= mexas@bristol.ac.uk COMMENT= URL extractor/launcher %% From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:12:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20A1106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawelbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F178FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so512029fxe.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:12:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zLbOfVk64bX+2yYkICfM19O1udpjJgI0zlI83DI8EtM=; b=a9h0S0VR4ih84Oz8k5FezH3clDfAXSf+ouiu1wtlt8SAsIS7t4m/tuLo3NOTSVN1jv 5qL7xla+3SYpVuVIuiTuhjmIM3zt+Y9DDgQ83EFVgVwHBT0E+O36uqOBgdJun+4/fKaF XG/texANo1PWjxPntANXLiU7tnTZTSA16lvb8= Received: by 10.223.17.141 with SMTP id s13mr100245faa.7.1311774103743; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (aejv249.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [79.186.255.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e10sm67803fak.42.2011.07.27.06.41.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFDEmWthbGE=?= Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:41:11 +0200 From: Pawel Pekala To: Paul Message-ID: <20110727154111.4cd4d853@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110727080915.2f9e71ca@thewildbeast> References: <20110727080915.2f9e71ca@thewildbeast> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: claws-mail-3.7.9_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:12:46 -0000 Dnia 2011-07-27, o godz. 08:09:15 Paul napisa=B3(a): >Hi Pawel, > >I noticed that the FreeBSD port is marked as BROKEN 'does not >compile'. I don't know what the policy is regarding patching, but >this bug is fixed in CVS and the patch is available here: > >http://www.colino.net/claws-mail/getpatchset.php?ver=3D3.7.9cvs29 > Yes I`m on it, just lacking time to work on ports lately ... --=20 pozdrawiam / with regards Pawe=B3 P=EAkala From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 16:40:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED295106564A; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEA28FC17; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA06952; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:40:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Qm79e-000Nt1-PJ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:40:18 +0300 Message-ID: <4E303F71.9050508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:40:17 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koop Mast References: <20110723131613.GF17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1311429114.1960.39.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> <4E2FE70F.4080001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E2FE70F.4080001@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kernel Intel GPU driver and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:40:22 -0000 on 27/07/2011 13:23 Andriy Gapon said the following: [snip] > Making all in nls > make: don't know how to make Compose/index.html. Stop > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/ports/x11/libX11/work/libX11-1.4.3. > *** Error code 1 > > If I add USE_GMAKE to the port's Makefile then everything builds fine. > Not sure if this is a general problem with FreeBSD make, or only on CURRENT or > something local to my environment. > Can you please double-check if this port builds OK for you? > Per our IRC chat, the problem was that configure detected presence of xmlto program in my environment and enabled additional actions which used syntax specific to GNU make. Adding --without-xmlto option to configure args resolved the problem. Thank you and Eitan for the help! -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 16:51:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCC2106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CEE8FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm7KD-0007Dt-KS for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:51:13 +0200 Received: from 208.85.208.53 ([208.85.208.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:51:13 +0200 Received: from atkin901 by 208.85.208.53 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:51:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mark Atkinson Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:51:00 -0700 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.85.208.53 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Subject: Re: Writing large files on fusefs-ntfs mounted partition returns random errors EIO, ENOENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:51:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/27/2011 03:18, Mikhail Kupchik wrote: > Right now I need someone who can confirm this problem in his/her > environment FWIW I get corruption and errors with ntfs-3g trying to rsync several gigs to a 16G thumbdrive. Doesn't matter if it's a directory structure or one big file. So yes, I had issues with it for a while (running -current and latest rebuilt kmod). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4wQfQACgkQrDN5kXnx8ybPMACbB2iUDm6iUxFb1KVouX8jEWX6 5FsAn01ZPFLqz7YaN2kgz16ae7HfGQ8O =zFOJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:35:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC42106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1565D8FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:28:140:11c1:1016:bdbf:959f] ([IPv6:2001:470:28:140:11c1:1016:bdbf:959f]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RJZQXL098469 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:35:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Message-ID: <4E306870.9080507@ukr.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:35:12 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FSL_RU_URL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (otrada.od.ua [IPv6:2001:470:28:140::5]); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:35:29 +0300 (EEST) Cc: Subject: Error build pecl-memcache X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:35:31 -0000 Requires autoconf-2.68, in spite of its presence in the system. make clean does not help. => SHA256 Checksum OK for PECL/memcache-3.0.6.tgz. ===> Patching for pecl-memcache-3.0.6 ===> Converting DOS text files to UNIX text files ===> pecl-memcache-3.0.6 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pecl-memcache-3.0.6 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found ===> pecl-memcache-3.0.6 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626-debug/zlib.so - found ===> pecl-memcache-3.0.6 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626-debug/session.so - found ===> pecl-memcache-3.0.6 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.68 - found ===> PHPizing for pecl-memcache-3.0.6 Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20090626 Zend Module Api No: 20090626 Zend Extension Api No: 220090626 autoconf: required version 2.68 not found *** Error code 1 # pkg_info | grep auto autoconf-2.13.000227_6 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.68 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-wrapper-20071109 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf automake-1.11.1 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator (1.11) automake-wrapper-20101119 Wrapper script for GNU automake # php -v PHP 5.3.5 (cli) (built: Apr 7 2011 19:32:34) (DEBUG) Copyright (c) 1997-2010 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies with XCache v1.3.0, Copyright (c) 2005-2009, by mOo with Xdebug v2.1.0, Copyright (c) 2002-2010, by Derick Rethans Thank you in advance for your help. -- Vladislav V. Prodan VVP24-UANIC +380[67]4584408 +380[99]4060508 vlad11@jabber.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:36:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667201065672 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC0A8FC1A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:28:140:11c1:1016:bdbf:959f] ([IPv6:2001:470:28:140:11c1:1016:bdbf:959f]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RJaCxc098891 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:36:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Message-ID: <4E30689F.4070208@ukr.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:35:59 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020909050703040906020207" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FSL_RU_URL, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (otrada.od.ua [IPv6:2001:470:28:140::5]); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:36:15 +0300 (EEST) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Error build security/sudo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:36:17 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020909050703040906020207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ports before it updated via csup ... ./utmp.c:151: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:151: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:156: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:160: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_login': ./utmp.c:279: error: storage size of 'utbuf' isn't known ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_logout': ./utmp.c:326: error: storage size of 'utbuf' isn't known *** Error code 1 libtool: compile: cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=nocona -fno-strict-aliasing -D_PATH_SUDO_CONF=\"/usr/local/etc/sudo.conf\" ./sudo_noexec.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/sudo_noexec.o 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. # cat /var/db/ports/sudo/options # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # No user-servicable parts inside! # Options for sudo-1.8.1_5 _OPTIONS_READ=sudo-1.8.1_5 WITHOUT_LDAP=true WITHOUT_INSULTS=true WITHOUT_DISABLE_ROOT_SUDO=true WITHOUT_DISABLE_AUTH=true WITHOUT_NOARGS_SHELL=true WITHOUT_AUDIT=true # uname -a FreeBSD solo.XXXXX 8.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Wed Apr 27 03:39:35 EEST 2011 root@solo.XXXXX:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/solo.6 amd64 -- Vladislav V. Prodan VVP24-UANIC +380[67]4584408 +380[99]4060508 vlad11@jabber.ru --------------020909050703040906020207-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 20:47:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF87106564A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:47:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from mail17.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail17.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CE48FC1A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-116-103.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.116.103]) by mail17.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p6RKlaFA016942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:47:37 +1000 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RKlZ3F047099 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:47:35 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6RKlZfX047098 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:47:35 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:47:35 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110727204735.GA47031@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> <20110726210324.GA18262@atarininja.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110726210324.GA18262@atarininja.org> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:47:39 -0000 --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Jul-26 17:03:24 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >> No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. > >Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is >the only time to bump PORTREVISION. Another way of looking at it is: Should a user who has the port successfully installed rebuild the port, even though the distfile version hasn't changed. --=20 Peter Jeremy --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4weWcACgkQ/opHv/APuIckRACgsHdoTob9CpQ5FOT+QTaEk4vW Hl8An3FHcAsaOPoMAkmmcvGTW/6eW8WC =SRgS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:53:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0891065672 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EF98FC14 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so3053551iyb.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:53:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=lNo6CzTg8akOdPdsmaGx1s/hWj7Oyw0z4Vl6Pluuo8c=; b=lsVHCSG5immBxSC9HsgZtFIh3z1wy+tsjYFQLk5P9aRYVIaO/nR9oSAHtH62unsogp 2UadekZZI2yf0RRdBuiB28I7t0btJekRNfdjn0APptpsWWYfMwgl1+n96Dx+dw3Rb/ER vrA+4Lt/G9hO9h7/Yh7tuylmb9VChDzRspiy8= Received: by 10.42.29.198 with SMTP id s6mr323875icc.296.1311810821432; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athena.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id er13sm253043ibb.36.2011.07.27.16.53.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:53:40 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:53:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE-p1; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: net-snmp 5.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:53:42 -0000 Today I updtaed net-snmp from the version fro subject and I t srew my printing. I have hplip install and printing throug jet port. I tried to reinstall hplip but it need it netsnmp.20 .... depends on shared library: netsnmp.20 - not found. Thanks. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 07:59:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04931106567C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D701B8FC27 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLVA-0007Y9-6v for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:59:28 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:59:28 -0700 (PDT) From: timp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1311839968208-4641640.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: net-snmp 5.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:59:29 -0000 similar problem Starting zabbix_server. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libnetsnmp.so.20" not found, required by "zabbix_server" /etc/rc: WARNING: failed to start zabbix_server I think we need to add to /usr/ports/UPDATING something about portmaster -r net-snmp -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/net-snmp-5-7-tp4640684p4641640.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:24:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F43106564A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CD28FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNli-0002Iy-Vr for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:42 +0200 Received: from 93-139-217-171.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.217.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:42 +0200 Received: from gour by 93-139-217-171.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Gour-Gadadhara Dasa Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:30 +0200 Lines: 57 Message-ID: <20110728122430.2f79fcfb@atmarama.net> References: <4D767B3A.9010006@gmail.com> <4D767E37.3020403@yandex.ru> <4D79F832.9050102@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199."; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-217-171.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:45 -0000 --Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:28:28 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > No, the problem is people not following [1]. I'll fix qemu in the > morning to cover this. We were hit with the strange problem in Weechat after updating my OS yester= day (PCBSD-9.0) due to weechat & urxvt pulling devel/ncurses. (See http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=3D142192 thread:) I'm still quite new with FreeBSD and I'm not sure whether the above sentence means that weechat/urxvt port maintainers should be informed about it in or= der to fix the port to use ncurses from the base? Sincerely, Gour --=20 =E2=80=9CIn the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations=E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 --Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOMTjeAAoJELhxXPVStcgQUIgQAMnQjC9zJd/LncaLcch1pVGv /2FdeGWEv83357JY04B0GdJHOD4WMlzYC9pQM6/EiJVlRZ9w8y/xsn83if8ZXtk4 JTdqzStInER+GWwikl4P4K/ajnIy5LCFYDrRR+EBngt0nsSbQ9sDOpvBtn9zt+/O IxHtslKPHOEx26XMJjs1FsUaeTJk5qdoCH3/8BcwoTQV7PFebqr8xk5udKsHO3o+ cqCGL192yzqvbIW2MQy0Ou6X1BZ+PmzJs3dBP6dp3G8ZoC0RJUfXaBPnbiK0qWza +Vzbb9fethwQZHlYjnOTSeUwFhWqPOgVOGZIN8spcH5DOmWw1ThZ6MTWkHCw9eaX ydEDsnD0B+miwgqI4XxBpYr4tLvliXdSw5Y5dFPxWVkkFJK1bqD2YdAP2GKBXzUj YWZIFY5sumGsGFDg0qXwu1npT+lSv2JNpUJe/RhfJ92XD2M/NkeW5bmeGY5SaWpQ f4UUGcxx2B8aTCBaTD2T6q7RC01EwWhQdjl0gRpCMVqgGJ9VxwVg95b3Slg23UEb HpGvVN3Y4HEF1N4njR96jMpV4a5kUb5DiVSEommEk4n8MLI8DmNcGLiX52ygZCfs ZAxzQEUob3cd996y6TC3inIBZukxhA53L91ebBsffiUHYGze8FnEvhAcLCDEmzea NhwEk81RJSJ8Sxg6AeWx =1MT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199.-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 12:46:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F58106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5158FC19 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so1856450yxl.13 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:46:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+mDcu1S8ZK5vnllIN6QbYC1v3L/VxGQJfWI5SUiKCfo=; b=Z9KAg7QPwf56e6EXlN/MrQpT1+ohI0gUgqE9iGWMtDYvjWM4IQGTEVCdwvg3Q3nJ0I 8ZRYjpPrgCVIoq+YbQ1wpeKctI821UmvDBwDtJlz7vJCAN+iGTxF9zo0DmOtTY5WXXGc bSao3w0uedJxRJ3CEBei2Bt/PsP5sEgW8jMxE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.185.228 with SMTP id u64mr979463yhm.239.1311855695744; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.164 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: Aryeh Friedman To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: taking maintainership X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:56 -0000 If all I am doing is taking maintainership of devel/aegis and the list of ports that need maintainers says it should the newest version 4.24.3 and the make file has 4.24 in it and the second is the correct version number and the one in the listing is wrong do I just send in the new makefile that has me as the maintainer and nothing else? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:44:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB131065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0668FC1D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6SDiqrt002293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:44:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p6SDiqrt002293 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1311860692; bh=htLoXb1uOOvqvQ3iom1OR9XDEqUaBARiuyhhRhAuK4w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E3167CD.8090805@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T hu,=2028=20Jul=202011=2014:44:45=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:5.0)=20Gecko/201 10624=20Thunderbird/5.0|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-ports@fr eebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20taking=20maintainership|References:=20< CAGBxaXmfi7+qb-q8CwO-QVEwJF3wH+gvfQCNNcPpDGuDEGVqtw@mail.gmail.com >|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.2|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE 908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D =0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3 D"------------enig5BDF5C614BC744F0EF8ABBDF"; b=nNbSO+TlgJ8saBnd8949Je8nvyiNut1dT+YAfvkgvuWMmv4pnjZtmEiyl/EPyZnXt sxiD5YMx9yga8z7XD9Ab9u6sO7AcWwKx/TwkRyNs6dxJUFq7E1KOIx6aIoZ2s262jt HF1tXk9u38BKNlxiH0JM2wZcG/jDI6z8i7b/R4gM= Message-ID: <4E3167CD.8090805@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:44:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5BDF5C614BC744F0EF8ABBDF" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: taking maintainership X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:44:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5BDF5C614BC744F0EF8ABBDF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/07/2011 13:21, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > If all I am doing is taking maintainership of devel/aegis and the list = of > ports that need maintainers says it should the newest version 4.24.3 a= nd > the make file has 4.24 in it and the second is the correct version numb= er > and the one in the listing is wrong do I just send in the new makefile = that > has me as the maintainer and nothing else? It's traditional to send in a PR both setting the MAINTAINER to your own e-mail address and fixing whatever needs fixing. On the other hand, simply volunteering to maintain a previously unmaintained port via a message on this or various other lists has been deemed sufficient in many cases. If portscout is picking up apparently more advanced versions which aren't actually suitable to use, then you can set the PORTSCOUT variable in the Makefile to help it out. Something like: PORTSCOUT=3D skipv:4.24.3 (depends on what else is available in the download area) There are also 'limit' 'limitw' and 'ignore' plus a few other verbs. Docco is available by installing ports-mgmt/portscout Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5BDF5C614BC744F0EF8ABBDF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4xZ9QACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy78gCfTLxpALLeQri9kZM5RcBx8X1I 9gwAn18qwhPBaPCWj/ABvdA+Mrp0B2+X =CQB0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5BDF5C614BC744F0EF8ABBDF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:30:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAA71065677 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A27A8FC17 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:28:140:ad13:71c0:a01b:1169] ([IPv6:2001:470:28:140:ad13:71c0:a01b:1169]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6SEU9sI023633 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:30:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Message-ID: <4E317262.4070309@ukr.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:29:54 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FSL_RU_URL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (otrada.od.ua [IPv6:2001:470:28:140::5]); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:30:11 +0300 (EEST) Cc: Subject: Error build www/apache22 with THREADS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:30:14 -0000 *** Error code 1 /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_post@FBSD_1.2' /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_trywait@FBSD_1.2' /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_wait@FBSD_1.2' /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_unlink@FBSD_1.2' /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_close@FBSD_1.2' /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_open@FBSD_1.2' *** Error code 1 4 errors *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. -- Vladislav V. Prodan VVP24-UANIC +380[67]4584408 +380[99]4060508 vlad11@jabber.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:41:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B7D106564A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1C628FC16 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2011 14:41:17 -0000 Received: from f055151047.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO apollo.emma.line.org) [78.55.151.47] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 28 Jul 2011 16:41:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19KIWscEHZK6b4on5ODT3WWm+NB1+/lzdf5fhGLvc 8G+Wz9vW594+s0 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1417E23CF42 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:41:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E31750C.3070204@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:41:16 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4E317262.4070309@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <4E317262.4070309@ukr.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Error build www/apache22 with THREADS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:41:19 -0000 Am 28.07.2011 16:29, schrieb Vladislav V. Prodan: > > *** Error code 1 > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_post@FBSD_1.2' > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_trywait@FBSD_1.2' > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_wait@FBSD_1.2' > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_unlink@FBSD_1.2' > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_close@FBSD_1.2' > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `sem_open@FBSD_1.2' > *** Error code 1 > 4 errors > *** Error code 1 > 1 error > *** Error code 1 > 1 error > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. Can you rebuild and reinstall apr witch settings matched to your desired apache configuration, and then retry building www/apache22? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:26:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FCB106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEC68FC15 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so1824607fxe.13 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:25:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A0aJybiAeb0lMpyBFKd4yyuizGEY6dCpAjgff7mxHc8=; b=gAn8Y58HqPOQ5Z540EbBk+q4awbcazzG8FTBXoVpGTvWlbpoOScPPU2Dp9RY+xkc5f ntzGOZxQOcVz4V6i+jhRSUZmJSXfF1C0ypJmDeEeBmhMZLTTtEseTK4qEnqiO8MTG/dE Q4I7RLicbxmqroWMYvAWGqT9T3/NGiMXpCKps= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.142.26 with SMTP id o26mr52214bku.215.1311866758458; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.42.78 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:25:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1311839968208-4641640.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1311839968208-4641640.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:25:58 -0300 Message-ID: From: sergio lenzi To: timp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net-snmp 5.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:26:00 -0000 Besides, net-snmp breaks with IPV6 not select there is an error in the pkg-plist file line 135 that is missing ipv6 condition and it tries to add ipv6 even if not select in the options, so make package breaks.... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:52:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004211065689; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eadler@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC10F8FC25; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6SFqQbd017315; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:26 GMT (envelope-from eadler@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from eadler@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6SFqQx9017311; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:26 GMT (envelope-from eadler) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:26 GMT Message-Id: <201107281552.p6SFqQx9017311@freefall.freebsd.org> To: milki@rescomp.berkeley.du, milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu, eadler@FreeBSD.org, ruby@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: eadler@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/159259: [MAINTAINER] devel/rubygem-edavis10-object_daddy: Update license, MAINTAINER typo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:27 -0000 Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] devel/rubygem-edavis10-object_daddy: Update license, MAINTAINER typo State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: eadler State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 28 15:52:24 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: maintainer is submitter. Responsible-Changed-From-To: ruby->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: eadler Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jul 28 15:52:24 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: maintainer is submitter. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159259 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:45:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD46D106564A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622488FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmYO5-0004Ra-Hm for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:45:01 +0200 Received: from p5dcd781e.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.120.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:45:01 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd781e.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:45:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 10 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd781e.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000204 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110728-0, 28.07.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: net-snmpd56 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:45:03 -0000 Hi, seems I'm not the only one with problems with net-snmpd 5.7. I created a new PR a few seconds ago because snmpd core dumps and there are still a few PRs in the pipe. While it is only human that errors happen may I suggest to have a net-snmpd56 port in addition to the most recent one? Thanks, Helmut From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:56:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACC0106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379B78FC23 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmYZO-0002aM-0p for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:56:42 +0200 Received: from p5dcd781e.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.120.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:56:42 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd781e.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:56:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd781e.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000205 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110728-0, 28.07.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: net-snmpd56 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:56:46 -0000 Helmut Schneider wrote: > seems I'm not the only one with problems with net-snmpd 5.7. I created > a new PR a few seconds ago because snmpd core dumps and there are > still a few PRs in the pipe. > > While it is only human that errors happen may I suggest to have a > net-snmpd56 port in addition to the most recent one? net-snmpd55 of course... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:47:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0CC106564A for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B48FC18 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so2727158yxl.13 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:47:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=LIslHCMW6g4NwBZS4zZk47R5TGwHTSikUJNOaIpK1rU=; b=Jwqt4JAb8IjtD5fuW62J/iLeS1LcZv59lMNZ1qrjxTlWg4wSzr7+Z345m5Szhi6jU3 ypNd5ts6tvVK3/gTWX7qKahyEh+lMjWmAxRdbyeX9xtvfXsK1+4NyF2798+c8sBycmjr AL33o12KB3y9YSbF0/IKuG2CyBeIS3uw892ow= Received: by 10.142.49.6 with SMTP id w6mr755158wfw.294.1311935058264; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:24:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.90.15 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:23:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> From: arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:23:57 +0400 Message-ID: To: ajtiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net-snmp 5.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:47:23 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 AM, ajtiM wrote: > Today I updtaed net-snmp from the version fro subject and I t srew my > printing. I have hplip install and printing throug jet port. I tried to > reinstall hplip but it need it netsnmp.20 > > .... > depends on shared library: netsnmp.20 - not found. > > Thanks. > > Mitja > -------- > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I've changed netsnmp.20 to netsnmp.30 in print/hplip/Makefile and then the port built successfully. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 11:06:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B411065673 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758A08FC1C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qmktf-00007k-N6 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:06:27 -0700 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:06:27 -0700 (PDT) From: timp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1311937587703-4646543.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <201107271853.30762.lumiwa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: net-snmp 5.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:06:28 -0000 I think it's wrong. Try to change it like this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159253 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/net-snmp-5-7-tp4640684p4646543.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 10:07:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045CB1065673; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD678FC12; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe6 with SMTP id 6so4163059wwe.31 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:07:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5JiBgMBfYaXux/yK1UZ+qZ/nepmbpVzD7T/TMS5onUM=; b=S/8grPRMfFV+9ebj/OSCU+azGvRue/QISBlfIMkhZhCgbBbmuLbjLSGEWHnNBgv3qs 7S+cgvYwvfSTtvW51Yi3NPo0rwiEZFE3tKx6BxXvC4KGzkYihb6ATlnFvGEw/D/nOipc N0j9RaZTZLDT9zfMwkV2w3N+n34UIwEhFy20k= Received: by 10.227.13.77 with SMTP id b13mr2739117wba.54.1312020467080; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:07:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.15.65 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:07:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D74F8D5.50102@foobar.org> References: <4D74F8D5.50102@foobar.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:07:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: Nick Hilliard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, zi@freebsd.org, g_glasson@jimali.dyndns.org, rea@freebsd.org, jeremy@algenta.com Subject: Re: Retirement of drupal5 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:07:50 -0000 On 7 March 2011 15:25, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Hello, > > http://drupal.org/node/880550 > > "Drupal 5 will no longer be maintained when Drupal 7 is released. Upgradi= ng > to Drupal 6 is recommended." > > As drupal5 is now no longer maintained, I would like to schedule the remo= val > of the freebsd drupal5 port from the ports tree at some stage in the near > future. =A0So, unless anyone has any overriding objections, my preference > would be to see it deleted on or around 2011/06/01, i.e. 5 months after > drupal7 is released, and about 2 months from now. > Just for anyone following this, I've deprecated the drupal5* ports and switched to using bsd.drupal.mk in Mk/ rather than drupal5/ [1]. I've also sent in a PR to make a USE_DRUPAL knob to make it easier for ports to use the drupal macros [2]. Chris [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-July/222066.html [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/159288 --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 11:03:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371E0106564A for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810CB8FC17 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p6UB2cqS088200 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:02:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 168 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C011FF65 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 8FD8040A1; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:03:12 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E33E4F1.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E33E4F1.003/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:03:42 -0000 Chris Brennan wrote: > On 7/26/2011 3:28 PM, RW wrote: > > It seems more reasonable than the idea that most people using FreeBSD > > are doing so despite being "very unhappy with FreeBSD ports". If > > that's= > > > really true then we should give Beastie nipple-clamps and a ball-gag > > to= > > > better appeal to our key demographic. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= > " > > +1 just because the thought of that is funny as hell! As a testimonial to the diabolical nature of FreeBSD yesterday i have installed a PC with FreeBSD-8.2 RELEASE, using the distributed packages (pkg_add -r). When installing gimp, something went south. After some checks it was avahi-app which refused to install, the reason being that pw groupadd -n avahi failed, with the message: "group disappeared during update" This from /usr/src/usr.sbin/pw/pw_group.c line 271. How is it that such an error, perhaps due to some concurrent access bug, happens in such an irregular way that it is still present since many years? In my installation, several other packages used pw to add to the group and passwd files (hald, etc.) but the error was triggered only by avahi-app, on the other hand it was 100% reproductible for avahi-app. I have seen this problem many times in the past. The only way i was able to proceed was to run pkg_add -I -r avahi-app after that the other dependencies of gimp and gimp itself installed OK. I don't remember that this error was blocking in this way in the past, but it is very worrisome, i don't see a beginner being able to cope with such problem. Still another problem in my installation i have an inn server which sucks news via newsx. Inn installed OK but newsx doesn't appear on the freebsd repository. I try to compile newsx, of course it fails. The reason? the inn installation lacks all the configuration files under /usr/local/news/etc ! More than that the conf files appear nowhere on the machine! How a user is supposed to figure out how to write such files without the models at hand? I have installed inn several times, i have never seen that. Some maintainer has found judicious to remove the conf files (perhaps to avoid overwriting a preexisting installation, but this is the bad way to solve the problem). Anyways, without etc/inn.conf, newsx cannot compile, since it picks its own configuration from inn.conf. So by doing this change the inn maintainer has broken newsx inadvertently, and of course no one noticed. This is emblematic of many other ports which are mismanaged, introduce tons of unnecessary dependencies which complicate everything, etc. For example, installing the port xorg installed things such as pyton and ruby which have zero relation with the problem at hand. It also installed perl but this is required for autoconfiguration of the server, i think. On the bright side, installing xorg produced a working X11 display without any configuration except running dbusd and hald. I have at least one positive point to report, for the first time i see printing working in wxMaxima, in the past either it didn't work at all or coredumped. So someone has understood the printing problem in the wx toolkit, this is nice. This post is ways too long, but i hope more informative that comments such as "Nuts" ushered by some phd student who apparently value himself at tremendous heights. As to the poster objection, one may very well use FreeBSD for some other qualities, even if one is not happy with the state of the ports system. And to the more general objection that all this is unrelated to the thread subject, portupgrade, it is *extremely* related, because no upgrading tool can work, be it portupgrade, portmaster, or whatever, in the presence of the sorts of bugs i have described above in the basic ports system. An obvious flaw of portupgrade is that it is very slow, other than that i think it is a pretty good program. Similarly portmaster is a brilliant example of shell scripting and works OK as far as i can see. The real problems are in the ports system itself. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 11:25:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854A61065670 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttsestt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F408FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so23590565pzk.17 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:25:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=PSBZkNRoNUzChRFwmYgm1ST5pKlhih5amlJFdBYJ7vc=; b=rgsdVGgNUSQ9ikKu+Ea5kNOGpQRjvsUd0RbE18dvXuDljJF3eVNC7fD+1iQzewse0P FIyZmZ39Z/petMOjUdzMxgMrukW9NXErXjUVylzvffsEcotUeDvLwdeOeXEijTzhFDcA aBJfuqLZqWUSWHk7Zzwew2D+plZvISlfnBty4= Received: by 10.68.2.196 with SMTP id 4mr4176976pbw.112.1312025108024; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (saeed.torservers.net [72.46.129.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k3sm1528066pbj.61.2011.07.30.04.25.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:25:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Test Rat To: Michel Talon References: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:24:56 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> (Michel Talon's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:03:12 +0200") Message-ID: <86zkjwhuyf.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:25:08 -0000 Michel Talon writes: > Chris Brennan wrote: > >> On 7/26/2011 3:28 PM, RW wrote: >> > It seems more reasonable than the idea that most people using FreeBSD >> > are doing so despite being "very unhappy with FreeBSD ports". If >> > that's= >> >> > really true then we should give Beastie nipple-clamps and a ball-gag >> > to= >> >> > better appeal to our key demographic. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= >> " >> >> +1 just because the thought of that is funny as hell! > > As a testimonial to the diabolical nature of FreeBSD yesterday i have > installed a PC with FreeBSD-8.2 RELEASE, using the distributed packages > (pkg_add -r). When installing gimp, something went south. After some > checks it was avahi-app which refused to install, the reason being > that pw groupadd -n avahi failed, with the message: > "group disappeared during update" [...] Did you have nscd(8) running at the time? Try invalidating its cache. %% an ugly hack Index: usr.sbin/pw/pw_group.c =================================================================== --- usr.sbin/pw/pw_group.c (revision 224499) +++ usr.sbin/pw/pw_group.c (working copy) @@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ pw_group(struct userconf * cnf, int mode, struct c warn("group update"); return EX_IOERR; } /* grp may have been invalidated */ + system("nscd -I group 2>/dev/null >&2"); if ((grp = GETGRNAM(a_name->val)) == NULL) errx(EX_SOFTWARE, "group disappeared during update"); Index: usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c =================================================================== --- usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c (revision 224499) +++ usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c (working copy) @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ pw_user(struct userconf * cnf, int mode, struct ca editgroups(pwd->pw_name, cnf->groups); /* go get a current version of pwd */ + system("nscd -I user 2>/dev/null >&2"); pwd = GETPWNAM(a_name->val); if (pwd == NULL) { /* This will fail when we rename, so special case that */ %% From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 12:03:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984851065670 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttsestt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4D58FC15 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so23730854pzk.17 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 05:03:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=92ryFAsWG7qjVRdHWt+E6UlH0krCfjia0diu84UTPtI=; b=uyCEMWKLN8Xjmqmv+V7yv8hUHJdLW5SfrWgHQdImq4lTnG/qVXQ5xFPWmmlw82FWNR Ll5u3Wsde5m4l8DlUTDxyQnmL2PsMohuzhav4peYCk3tX1/hgFJWFUBVievLOZECjGLR I1kSCZ7/I1ALrXcNwvZeHPrYrrCiypMMg7tUY= Received: by 10.68.57.5 with SMTP id e5mr4295961pbq.245.1312027381406; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 05:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tor-exit-router38-readme.formlessnetworking.net [199.48.147.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l7sm1615411pbh.90.2011.07.30.05.02.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 05:03:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Test Rat To: Michel Talon References: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <86zkjwhuyf.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:02:55 +0400 In-Reply-To: <86zkjwhuyf.fsf@gmail.com> (Test Rat's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:24:56 +0400") Message-ID: <86ipqkht74.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: nscd vs. ports that add user/group (Was: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:03:02 -0000 Test Rat writes: >> As a testimonial to the diabolical nature of FreeBSD yesterday i have >> installed a PC with FreeBSD-8.2 RELEASE, using the distributed packages >> (pkg_add -r). When installing gimp, something went south. After some >> checks it was avahi-app which refused to install, the reason being >> that pw groupadd -n avahi failed, with the message: >> "group disappeared during update" > [...] > > Did you have nscd(8) running at the time? Try invalidating its cache. Nevermind previous patch. This one actually works. %% it's still an ugly hack Index: usr.sbin/pw/pwupd.c =================================================================== --- usr.sbin/pw/pwupd.c (revision 224499) +++ usr.sbin/pw/pwupd.c (working copy) @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ pw_update(struct passwd * pwd, char const * user, } } } + system("nscd -I passwd 2>/dev/null >&2"); return rc; } Index: usr.sbin/pw/grupd.c =================================================================== --- usr.sbin/pw/grupd.c (revision 224499) +++ usr.sbin/pw/grupd.c (working copy) @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ gr_update(struct group * grp, char const * group, } if (grbuf != NULL) free(grbuf); + system("nscd -I group 2>/dev/null >&2"); return l; } %% From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 13:00:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078E21065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA298FC13 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p6UCxdfq007040 ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:59:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 168 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B04B1FF65; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 475F240E3; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:00:13 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: Test Rat , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110730130013.GA80475@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <86zkjwhuyf.fsf@gmail.com> <86ipqkht74.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86ipqkht74.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E34005E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E34005E.000/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Cc: Subject: Re: nscd vs. ports that add user/group (Was: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:00:42 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 04:02:55PM +0400, Test Rat wrote: > > Did you have nscd(8) running at the time? Try invalidating its cache. > > Nevermind previous patch. This one actually works. You may be perfectly right, i think i have added nscd to the installation after having added hald, etc. but before adding avahi-app. However i have seen such problems in the past, before the introduction of nscd, as far as i remember. > > %% it's still an ugly hack > Index: usr.sbin/pw/pwupd.c > =================================================================== > --- usr.sbin/pw/pwupd.c (revision 224499) > +++ usr.sbin/pw/pwupd.c (working copy) > @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ pw_update(struct passwd * pwd, char const * user, > } > } > } > + system("nscd -I passwd 2>/dev/null >&2"); > return rc; > } > > Index: usr.sbin/pw/grupd.c > =================================================================== > --- usr.sbin/pw/grupd.c (revision 224499) > +++ usr.sbin/pw/grupd.c (working copy) > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ gr_update(struct group * grp, char const * group, > } > if (grbuf != NULL) > free(grbuf); > + system("nscd -I group 2>/dev/null >&2"); > return l; > } > > %% Many thanks for the suggestion. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 13:20:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364A5106564A; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFAC8FC12; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP115 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:08:23 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [174.109.142.1] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([174.109.142.1]) by BLU0-SMTP115.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:08:22 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3RR6g930gYz2CG4m; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:08:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:08:20 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2011 13:08:22.0195 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2426830:01CC4EB9] Cc: pawel@FreeBSD.org Subject: Claws-Mail marked as BROKEN X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:20:25 -0000 I am in the process of setting up a new PC and wanted to install "claws-mail" as my MUA. I have it all ready installed on another machine I use. This port, unfortunately, is marked: BROKEN= does not compile I sincerely hope that this is not going to be a permanent condition. I presently have "claws-mail version 3.7.9" installed on another machine running FreeBSD-8.2/amd64, so I am not exactly sure why it all of a sudden stopped compiling. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 14:24:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDF9106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawelbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE218FC0C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so4360674fxe.13 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:24:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PksLX1G0Kio0zEtn9ll+hF4EFvMMUYe3ES1nb/xN4sw=; b=pxQvROGpwILDf0IKDRqQ8uZ19hH+k8ArgYk8MloxC9cjOoSyONcsTb7EDx+usSQeQL XdER4ToadixbjrPEzLXlSX/1cr9TEKkXpi6XqsPAnhibWcG5cdl3/fgiTIbLLft6BND0 9MOPiOyz9DMVpolaKA/CgIqTg+eFinB+37sL4= Received: by 10.223.13.69 with SMTP id b5mr3472080faa.1.1312033448777; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (efz101.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.21.63.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm1696910fak.34.2011.07.30.06.44.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFDEmWthbGE=?= Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:44:05 +0200 From: Pawel Pekala To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110730154405.1bfd2d57@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: carmel_ny@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Claws-Mail marked as BROKEN X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:24:11 -0000 Dnia 2011-07-30, o godz. 09:08:20 Carmel napisa=B3(a): >I am in the process of setting up a new PC and wanted to install >"claws-mail" as my MUA. I have it all ready installed on another >machine I use. This port, unfortunately, is marked: > >BROKEN=3D does not compile I`m working on fix right now. If you comment this line it should compile just fine as problem appears to show only in clean tinderbuild environment (software we use to test our ports). >I sincerely hope that this is not going to be a permanent condition. I >presently have "claws-mail version 3.7.9" installed on another machine >running FreeBSD-8.2/amd64, so I am not exactly sure why it all of a >sudden stopped compiling. > Soon I will come up with patch and will commit today or tomorrow after my mentors approve my work. Sorry for delay I was little busy lately. --=20 pozdrawiam / with regards Pawe=B3 P=EAkala From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 15:58:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96159106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout022.mac.com (asmtpout022.mac.com [17.148.16.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD558FC14 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:58:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [17.153.29.29] by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LP500KO1LOODJ80@asmtp022.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-07-30_03:2011-07-29, 2011-07-30, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=4 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1107300120 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:58:00 -0700 Message-id: References: <20110730110312.GA75209@lpthe.jussieu.fr> To: Michel Talon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:58:02 -0000 On Jul 30, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Michel Talon wrote: [ ... ] > The real problems are in the ports system itself. You've said this before. Come to think of it, you've said this so often that I've lost count of the number of times you've repeated the point. However, flogging the same dead horse over and over does not constitute forward progress. Speaking of which, if you'd spent some of this time filing bug reports instead, then it's very likely that at least some of the issues you claim to keep running into would be fixed by now. However, as far as I can tell from a quick search, you've never filed even one FreeBSD PR? Methinks 'tis time to change your approach: "The clock upbraids me with the waste of time." Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:44:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05D5106564A for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CF28FC0A for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:b59b:6350:87ea:8c33]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 071344AC2D for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:44:16 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:44:11 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1851157533.20110730214411@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: portmaster unattended run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:44:18 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-ports. How could I run `portmaster' without ANY questions and confirmations? Simple and obvious `portmaster --no-confirm -y ' doesn't work. It asks: (1) About interactive ports. (2) About removing old distfiles (3) About errors from `tar' when create backup archive with old versions. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:48:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E77F106564A; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAB48FC17; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe6 with SMTP id 6so4363697wwe.31 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7ayteEw/Meo1/fuSFnn/iuFvBVB9T0SLfyhpmPBXcXY=; b=SvIw5s2IfTLjvF+VpiwKA/uw+6/BIpAcQxxJGbubBI0mocwpc1iBR9FIXpk3tjlie1 3EJly+VfpoGw96wbgWMLelUW6+87jROxnFbmZw35j9C6xqd1hJAOtEXmAI4vcgIb1Hl+ ap344DfgPubk5jTz3sdOgp2tNpNG1hYGpvXKc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.36.226 with SMTP id u34mr4237944wbd.9.1312048118791; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.15.65 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.15.65 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1851157533.20110730214411@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1851157533.20110730214411@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:48:38 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster unattended run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:48:40 -0000 On 30 Jul 2011 18:44, "Lev Serebryakov" wrote: > > Hello, Freebsd-ports. > > How could I run `portmaster' without ANY questions and > confirmations? > Simple and obvious `portmaster --no-confirm -y ' > doesn't work. It asks: > > (1) About interactive ports. > (2) About removing old distfiles > (3) About errors from `tar' when create backup archive with old > versions. > -- Grab a sample postmasterrc -- the options are pretty well explained. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:38:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D043C106564A for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2878FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA29675; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:38:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1QnFMt-0008Ln-Ae; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:38:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4E345DBD.1090503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:38:37 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: UPDATING 20110730 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:38:41 -0000 > 20110730: > AFFECTS: users of x11-toolkits/gtk20 > AUTHOR: gnome@FreeBSD.org > > The gtk-update-icon-cache utility has been slipt out of the gtk20 port. A minor typo in the above line - slipt -> split. > Use the following instructions to update your system. > > # pkg_delete -f gtk-2.\* > # portmaster x11-toolkits/gtk20 I would like to warn other users and at the same time ask for alternative instructions. I have a regular (consumer) HDD and not so huge amount of RAM. I also have many (maybe very many) ports depending on gtk20 and some other loosely related ports like glib and gobject-introspection. Execution of the above command already takes more than an hour which is spent inside portmaster. I have hundreds of lines like the following in portmaster output: ===>>> x11-toolkits/gtk20 is listed as a dependency ===>>> but there is no installed version ===>>> Try portmaster --check-depends ===>>> devel/gobject-introspection is listed as a dependency ===>>> but there is no installed version ===>>> Try portmaster --check-depends ===>>> devel/gobject-introspection is listed as a dependency ===>>> but there is no installed version ===>>> Try portmaster --check-depends This carpet of output starts with: ===>>> Updating dependency entry for gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 in each dependent port > # portmaster -a -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 20:14:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA37106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A77A8FC0C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QnFv7-0002sm-GD for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:14:01 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QnFv7-0004Pq-9c for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:14:01 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6UKE1BH038049 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:14:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6UKE1B9038048 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:14:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:14:00 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110730201400.GA38035@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: portmaster ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/xearth-1.1_2/+CONTENTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:14:02 -0000 I maintain astro/xearth. What is the meaning of the above portmaster warning? Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 20:20:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3995106564A for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E2E8FC15 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QnG1O-00034c-Lp; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:20:30 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QnG1O-0000jQ-Ha; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:20:30 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6UKKUpm042887; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:20:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6UKKU3T042886; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:20:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:20:30 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20110730202030.GA42874@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110730201400.GA38035@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110730201400.GA38035@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED: Re: portmaster ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/xearth-1.1_2/+CONTENTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:20:31 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 09:14:00PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I maintain astro/xearth. > What is the meaning of the above portmaster warning? Deinstalled, reinstalled and the ORIGIN appeared. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 23:59:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87974106564A; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F07114E844; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E349AC0.7030705@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:58:56 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110723 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lev@FreeBSD.org References: <1851157533.20110730214411@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1851157533.20110730214411@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster unattended run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:59:00 -0000 On 07/30/2011 10:44, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-ports. > > How could I run `portmaster' without ANY questions and > confirmations? > Simple and obvious `portmaster --no-confirm -y ' > doesn't work. It asks: > > (1) About interactive ports. Portmaster is always going to notify you if a port is marked interactive, this is a feature. Fortunately very few ports are. > (2) About removing old distfiles There is an option in the man page for this. > (3) About errors from `tar' when create backup archive with old > versions. There are options for this too. You really need to read the man page. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 23:59:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DD81065680 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE180152366; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E349AEC.60907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:59:40 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110723 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20110730201400.GA38035@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20110730202030.GA42874@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110730202030.GA42874@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SOLVED: Re: portmaster ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/xearth-1.1_2/+CONTENTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:59:54 -0000 On 07/30/2011 13:20, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 09:14:00PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> I maintain astro/xearth. >> What is the meaning of the above portmaster warning? > > Deinstalled, reinstalled and the ORIGIN appeared. Glad it worked out for you. This is the correct solution, FYI. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/