Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:06:17 -0500 (EST)
From: (Karl Vogel)
Subject:   Re: where to ask about problems with bsdinstall in 9.0RC2?
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <> (message from Daniel Staal on Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:06:43 -0400)
References:  <> <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:06:43 -0400, 
>> Daniel Staal <> said:

D> xz has only marginal improvements in compressed size over bzip2, and
D> takes a lot more cpu/memory resources to compress.  In most cases, I'd
D> say it's the wrong choice for a compression format.  However, the one
D> place where it is unequivocally the *best* choice is one that will make
D> it well known: Distributing archives.

   Along these same lines, it works well for large mostly-text files.  I have
   a lot of historical data in text form, 60-100 Mb uncompressed per file,
   and I get ~18% smaller files using xz instead of bzip2.  I know disk
   space is cheap, but our rack space is limited.

Karl Vogel                      I don't speak for the USAF or my company

> Sorry I'm taking up your ever so valuable disk space!
  That's okay, /dev/null is pretty big., 14 Feb 2011

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>