Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:29:58 -0800 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> Cc: "arm@freebsd.org" <arm@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports cross-compilers vs. native toolchain Message-ID: <88338819-70CF-4BA7-92AE-95864F159FF4@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <A68B207A-2754-4222-A30B-FDBD143A03D5@kientzle.com> References: <23CB6C35-9450-40BA-9FA3-37C44B328CA8@freebsd.org> <CABt%2Bj0mB4w==h_SQ4YyDM24_wGOjcdZDK9T1N3DqjSkap0VkQw@mail.gmail.com> <E8A24EBE-967D-44F8-A884-3207B3C6F0FE@bsdimp.com> <8042D895-3B3D-431E-ADCC-A150BDC838ED@kientzle.com> <890D6B89-8031-496C-A5A2-A2836369F765@FreeBSD.org> <A68B207A-2754-4222-A30B-FDBD143A03D5@kientzle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 3, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote: > > 2) Missing div/mod functions in ARM libgcc. > > You can work around this by adding -lc to a couple > of places in the u-boot makefiles. I'm also looking into > a fix for FreeBSD libgcc. (Looks like these functions > were disabled deliberately? Hmm, maybe they are disabled because libc supplies them? IIRC these do exists in cross-gcc -- it builds it with newlib libc, not FreeBSD libc, thus you cannot use it cross-compile FreeBSD userland applications, but it is perfect for standalone stuff. -- ST4096-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88338819-70CF-4BA7-92AE-95864F159FF4>