From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  7 23:33:46 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9BE106564A;
	Sat,  7 Jul 2012 23:33:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu)
Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu
	(wollman-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net
	[IPv6:2001:470:1f06:ccb::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EF88FC08;
	Sat,  7 Jul 2012 23:33:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q67NXhxq029465; 
	Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id q67NXhFi029462;
	Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:33:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:33:43 -0400
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CA+QLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net>
	<4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]);
	Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	hergotha.csail.mit.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 00:32:43 +0000
Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>,
	FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Subject: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1
 code freeze?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:33:47 -0000

<<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> said:

> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver
> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound
> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than that,
> what integration are you concerned about?

The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only
user-visible interfaces I care about.  I don't see any need for there
to be an authoritative name server in the base system.  So long as the
resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation....

-GAWollman