Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:03:03 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> To: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Message-ID: <b1cf29ee9a4442df56a718cedd0516e1@intertainservices.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com> References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: >> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about >> config, >> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. >> And they >> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. > > Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and > Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. > > Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. > >> >> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html >> >> Graphs are available as PDF attachments >> >> >> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf >> >> >> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf These numbers show very significant improvements. Any possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too much work? I know many have and still complain about our current scheduler.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1cf29ee9a4442df56a718cedd0516e1>