Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:29:25 -0600
From:      "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing
Message-ID:  <61C8BD2B-9C1B-4494-A1BA-394752042F23@shire.net>
In-Reply-To: <op.wcp7f4kr34t2sn@cr48.lan>
References:  <BCF3FB8D-7FF0-4CB4-8491-6472EDED96B2@shire.net> <op.wcpyqodb34t2sn@tech304> <FEED68A4-0C10-4057-B37B-EEA780977F25@shire.net> <op.wcp7f4kr34t2sn@cr48.lan>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC =
<chad@shire.net> wrote:
>=20
>> No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they =
share the routing tables.  It works.  Try it.
>=20
> You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6's jails.

It was a documented behavior when I first started using jails ca. 2004 =
in FreeBSD 5.  Which is why I did it that way.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61C8BD2B-9C1B-4494-A1BA-394752042F23>