From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 01:43:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A64F1065670 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD6E8FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so1931159wgb.1 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gKIQONqL93RJXHGOfan/Ebw/v89OwNX1x5LA9A0lVNg=; b=c0r3iq3RvSxykG3UPo+9Uhgnbrxf74bm2V6CKzS7NboGZwhE463ZAtU7m+Bu8fKhLo qP9S36M3RCdm8tk62UfYoRe4MT/1GYnN20YQ/nHZ9P++kUuTPpcC60LmlN0QO3wDs1us zWmuGAMCwqtQWyjXVpijT6L+KKdn9Z80HI7SqxN+JlRbxNlf29DvsNJD0S09kiZgYExg Il0oiEfLZcuZe9Snq27QENiFzuGEWvfEDSUfL0Lcp4bEQ0gfnXLO45QBlhSWu0V0hUwc yB7o5L3LGXkBxLB2W9XUtaA4mi9Zvf5qRAO7Fz2Z7XO7W6OECnHgWq7DvbJ6efQM39oy +y6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.96.3 with SMTP id do3mr5816403wib.5.1348364614328; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.183.2 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <505E462E.2090200@a1poweruser.com> References: <505E462E.2090200@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: wifi drivers support for "n" standard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:43:42 -0000 On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > I have 3 usb wifi sticks. > One supports b/g standard only and it configures with no problems. > The other 2 support the "n" standard for faster connection speed between > the usb stick and the network AP. > These 2 usb wifi sticks do not configure no mater what I do. > Thinking the Freebsd wifi drivers have not been updated for "n" standard > yet. My Cisco Linksys AE2500 USB wifi stick does not work with the bwi > driver. Has any body gotten this device to work? > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > Hi, According to this page: http://wikidevi.com/wiki/Linksys_AE2500 the AE2500, which was first released about one year ago, uses the BCM4323 chipset. I do not see support for this chipset listed in http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/bwn/ or http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/usb/wlan/ If you want a USB dongle that works with FreeBSD I recommend finding one with an RALINK chipset, these seem to be well supported (however I have not tried it with version 8). AFAIK 'wireless n' is not supported w/ the RALINK driver (usb is rum driver at http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rum.c?revision=234063&view=markup). Older D-Link dongles use RALINK chipsets, but it seems that newer ones use the BC chipsets and are not supported. You should be able to chose from a selection of RALINK based devices on ebay for around $10 US. If you want to connect to 'wireless n' I recommend finding a device with an Atheros chipset (however I do not believe there is presently a driver for Atheros based USB dongles, there is one in the OpenBSD source which could be ported.) One thing to note, you may need to run FreeBSD 9 or 10.0-CURRENT to use the newer Atheros drivers. Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 11:39:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA51106564A for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8648B8FC08 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenm5 with SMTP id m5so965330yen.13 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8/aNLfcBx6TL7ZmoaK3GFMoY3To0Xv+NHpLG8N569uU=; b=fzAb5JTdROj/9nmswG7RRZnkOCRqNFVsLakfCTGRg/BcSEe9hJBN+Lp84nJpEpaaKh 0/OMcQjFocxkwUC2FmlVy1BtyxokuHoTHRvQFaaaTQX+D5oNQb+q7u8Ml2x7B40sG2OG yRGDh2xtaxuhJ5OevYeVDdhArKyBS4fh6E66s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=8/aNLfcBx6TL7ZmoaK3GFMoY3To0Xv+NHpLG8N569uU=; b=fXGyrmR21YKSdt3kNfUkdWAqTwt8qZ47VzcCGRyIqYTef3zZHITZXzvHX1uHqtE687 BJ7+6OhddFjvrFkT9TGIGDZrtXcHMQTyHdS2XPHepq6ZyRUqHxJYEqb9k5GWKBa3ylYY OdBv/heTxgZp7zNHzcUbbOxQLcBFv4Rk4piMMZ786BeahDt4QdBRBnapL0cDQnpYh3zo 0xSushUvpk33+HATDXCe3hxnM0sRrLpAIoo9VgaeFzd0IFd+KwqWR1nPixXJg44+XK4m vQ0rtvob6V6+vFvlWy9t9M5Qyjchth/J73pVfnahcqRifp9lBLr9OezUgqYFBerdPI87 61Sw== Received: by 10.236.85.97 with SMTP id t61mr6621270yhe.53.1348400362310; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d66sm20589215yhe.1.2012.09.23.04.39.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XPmm75XQzz2CG5p for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:39:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:39:19 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120923073919.7534f747@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <505E462E.2090200@a1poweruser.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnTX0+lc/eqQpolKGStbdF1MdHJNtp6TeVFXE7mTQLxKmFpS7Ah/5i3VdjClgsYpZ+0BUBs Subject: Re: wifi drivers support for "n" standard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:39:24 -0000 On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0700 Waitman Gobble articulated: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > > I have 3 usb wifi sticks. > > One supports b/g standard only and it configures with no problems. > > The other 2 support the "n" standard for faster connection speed > > between the usb stick and the network AP. > > These 2 usb wifi sticks do not configure no mater what I do. > > Thinking the Freebsd wifi drivers have not been updated for "n" > > standard yet. My Cisco Linksys AE2500 USB wifi stick does not work > > with the bwi driver. Has any body gotten this device to work? > > According to this page: http://wikidevi.com/wiki/Linksys_AE2500 the > AE2500, which was first released about one year ago, uses the BCM4323 > chipset. I do not see support for this chipset listed in > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/bwn/ or > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/usb/wlan/ > > If you want a USB dongle that works with FreeBSD I recommend finding > one with an RALINK chipset, these seem to be well supported (however > I have not tried it with version 8). AFAIK 'wireless n' is not > supported w/ the RALINK driver (usb is rum driver at > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rum.c?revision=234063&view=markup). > Older D-Link dongles use RALINK chipsets, but it seems that newer > ones use the BC chipsets and are not supported. You should be able to > chose from a selection of RALINK based devices on ebay for around $10 > US. > > If you want to connect to 'wireless n' I recommend finding a device > with an Atheros chipset (however I do not believe there is presently > a driver for Atheros based USB dongles, there is one in the OpenBSD > source which could be ported.) One thing to note, you may need to run > FreeBSD 9 or 10.0-CURRENT to use the newer Atheros drivers. Welcome to the wonderful world of wireless support in FreeBSD. Rather that wasting your time hoping in vain that FreeBSD will actually provide suitable drivers for high grade wireless devices, might I suggest the following. 1) Install a good quality NIC card -- obviously one supported by FreeBSD. 2) Connect that card to a suitable wireless N router. I use the Linksys E4200 with excellent results. You will now be able to use all of your wireless devices, such as printer or connect to other wireless networked PCs. I might add, whenever possible, keep FreeBSD and USB devices as far away from each other as possible. DO NOT attempt to connect a router via USB to FreeBSD. Connect it via cable. Otherwise, you are just look for trouble and pain. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 12:11:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E0D106564A for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063A08FC19 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.217.68.87] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TFl2G-0007GS-2g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:11:44 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q8NCBg7o003375 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:11:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q8NCBgJl003374 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:11:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:11:42 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120923121142.GA3347@tinyCurrent> References: <505E462E.2090200@a1poweruser.com> <20120923073919.7534f747@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120923073919.7534f747@scorpio> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.68.87 Subject: Re: wifi drivers support for "n" standard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:11:47 -0000 El día Sunday, September 23, 2012 a las 07:39:19AM -0400, Jerry escribió: > Waitman Gobble articulated: > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > > > > > I have 3 usb wifi sticks. > > > One supports b/g standard only and it configures with no problems. > > > The other 2 support the "n" standard for faster connection speed > > > ... > Welcome to the wonderful world of wireless support in FreeBSD. Rather > that wasting your time hoping in vain that FreeBSD will actually > provide suitable drivers for high grade wireless devices, might I > suggest the following.... A few remarks: I have USB UMTS dongle and sticks which work fine with FreeBSD. The OP, as he says, has an USB wifi stick which works fine too with FreeBSD and only wanted (for whatever "important" reason) a new "n" one. He bought it without checking the man pages before, not even after having problems he checked the man pages by his own to see if the chip is supported or not. I someone, including me, wants to have better or more recent drivers, he should help in development or testing. HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 12:33:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDB6106564A for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761C28FC08 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1402637ghr.13 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 05:33:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jDnHDsM1GkM/0Uv0UqWDUrfhOZiYNvz6igKkmzrh3ng=; b=CMJg2FUcU6iXDGJuPHO2elrzJ2FiPSs7RplBXjgtySX9y8zCTHYQhSoOc0UW1TethD BeUVpY0QVjuxsHdYbxiHzVI1Qa1mqMYPJfClFrY8gQ08QIpEkPSdoIzScZC+VHrxapcC DmEtaKYsAW1Hn0YIkw4eB53bqwsEL5mgvthvU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=jDnHDsM1GkM/0Uv0UqWDUrfhOZiYNvz6igKkmzrh3ng=; b=aY38mR2qyHpw3BkIu8vM506Bj3rINUrKnKzwIdgbB0Hn/28W1ZV9laMHLKQnXSfaqP 8lprkgACmhO5razIcK0RY57edRCMtZCZUiG1EEdAS9lqjfO7z1u0EybrcSzhkPcsTnv7 4/XAzPnN8c6XrSiyYG8MZxgzWWMJBesBQHsJGaoI6L7o+vZXpkDcFmr7IquCqd+vvQN4 yYE1vlkO1PsOqJAsAHV+vc5kd+DNHCSzYRg3L2kbYEYOEYebhTd/LnJ9n9oCUyB4DTID 2Ga4557QBJ5YjxHd5pF2/+IRHcCaSQWv0qoEGvOaB18kdLfIr7AjibrI5ayuaYKqnNvl Ji8g== Received: by 10.236.200.167 with SMTP id z27mr9623432yhn.131.1348403597481; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 05:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1sm20677772yhm.19.2012.09.23.05.33.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 05:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XPnyL4HTVz2CG5p for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 08:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 08:33:14 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120923083314.54405e95@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120923121142.GA3347@tinyCurrent> References: <505E462E.2090200@a1poweruser.com> <20120923073919.7534f747@scorpio> <20120923121142.GA3347@tinyCurrent> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYN5GcOEj56AcWyuZWsFCEj/yl7Mc0lm7JfFX8HzasMaAV6FxmKsdEwxva6DnXZQ2BvZPh Subject: Re: wifi drivers support for "n" standard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:24 -0000 On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:11:42 +0200 Matthias Apitz articulated: > I have USB UMTS dongle and sticks which work fine with FreeBSD. > > The OP, as he says, has an USB wifi stick which works fine too with > FreeBSD and only wanted (for whatever "important" reason) a new "n" > one. Speed and transmitting distance would be two factors that come readily to mind. I love the fact that I can take my laptop out to my hammock which is situated near the back of my lawn and still be able to send a document to my printer without having to relocate or set up repeaters. Or, for that matter, stream a movie to watch. > He bought it without checking the man pages before, not even after > having problems he checked the man pages by his own to see if the > chip is supported or not. The problem is that he actually HAS to check to see if the device is supported. > I someone, including me, wants to have better or more recent drivers, > he should help in development or testing. Either use an OS that fully supports the device, or find a suitable work around, such as the one I described, to circumvent the OS's short comings. I have suggested before and offered to contribute to a fund to be used to hire competent coders to write fully compatible drivers for devices used on FreeBSD. As usual, as soon as I mentioned monetary contributions from prospective users the idea was met with total disdain. Interestingly enough, it would appear that other OSs are doing it with positive results. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 14:23:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EED106566B; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d4rksilver@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3016A8FC0C; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so8323634iea.13 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:23:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=50DZP86xU1N3LV3uPr5BDgVx99EBAQ160sxYxPKC63M=; b=Lze3FR4w4uDmvxtkUXB/mczL3ZP91TPgSKNwUBUqJh4/zzixflRXGymj7H9nELiraU khRBwdeLuFzmoZ48uAqvk9sQ/fl/Js3uX8wF2Q+9K0GDLnL+Hlcvq79SdNjGmjUxWGQb 8tUhcTDaq+bTyVJwT5+czSBjI6GBy+XruLIIewC14nUMEy6QtBtLXwStJcAB7RCLm7Fg E0eViHFXSjfo7Wm6VJjfawO6l+dFRnpaOEhtkxUFx+2cQb5J9fiF+FHmEXrF9CEIU/Me 2CAj729BpGtmUs8RINYEdrNFo3BHoa3M/IqeyHrWv4WDUTWULRsjdTnV/dNlqyMeGq+f F7qA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.7.135 with SMTP id j7mr3053693iga.34.1348410230290; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.14.169 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:23:50 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bob Silver To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD, Wine and Borderlands 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:23:51 -0000 Hi, I was wondering if there were any gamers out there and if anyone of you had tried and had any luck with the game Borderlands 2 on Wine. I've been trying all day with informations from there: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=26674&iTestingId=73988 But nothing seems to do I get passed the launcher (bypassing it because dotNet stuff don't work well in Wine) I get company video logos but just before what I believe should be the intro cinematic, I get a black screen and nothing happens after that) So if anyone tried and had any luck it would be great to share your experience :D P.S. I was using wine 1.5.12 on FreeBSD-9 STABLE amd64 with latest nvidia drivers from pkgng repo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 14:28:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE7C1065675 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E218FC12 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TFnAY-0000PM-A0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:28:26 +0200 Received: from pool-100-1-118-58.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net ([100.1.118.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:28:26 +0200 Received: from rvclayton by pool-100-1-118-58.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:28:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: rvclayton@verizon.net (R. Clayton) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:28:11 -0400 Lines: 91 Message-ID: <87fw68g6f8.fsf@UlanBator.myhome.westell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-100-1-118-58.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:k4K8/3quZHxxyrB1HtAGh/MoZVc= Subject: Haskell platform install problem in ghc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:28:24 -0000 I'm on this $ uname -a FreeBSD BurkinaFaso 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun 12 01:47:53 UTC 2012 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ and go here $ cd /usr/ports/devel/hs-haskell-platform/ $ grep -i version Makefile PORTVERSION= 2012.2.0.0 $ and do this # make install clean and fail in lang/ghc with this (see the whole sad story at the end of this message) gmake -r --no-print-directory -f ghc.mk phase=final all "inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -H32m -O -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -package-name ghc-prim-0.2.0.0 -hide-all-packages -i -ilibraries/ghc-prim/. -ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/. -optP-include -optPlibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen/cabal_macros.h -package rts-1.0 -split-objs -package-name ghc-prim -XHaskell98 -XCPP -XMagicHash -XForeignFunctionInterface -XUnliftedFFITypes -XUnboxedTuples -XEmptyDataDecls -XNoImplicitPrelude -O2 -no-user-package-conf -rtsopts -odir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -hidir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -stubdir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -hisuf hi -osuf o -hcsuf hc -c libraries/ghc-prim/./GHC/Types.hs -o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Types.o /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '--build-id=none' How do I fix this? The whole make: # make install clean ===> hs-haskell-platform-2012.2.0.0_1 depends on executable: ghc - not found ===> Verifying install for ghc in /usr/ports/lang/ghc ===> Building for ghc-7.4.1 Makefile:62: target `all' given more than once in the same rule. ===--- building phase 0 gmake -r --no-print-directory -f ghc.mk phase=0 phase_0_builds gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `phase_0_builds'. ===--- building phase 1 gmake -r --no-print-directory -f ghc.mk phase=1 phase_1_builds gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `phase_1_builds'. ===--- building final phase gmake -r --no-print-directory -f ghc.mk phase=final all "inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -H32m -O -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -package-name ghc-prim-0.2.0.0 -hide-all-packages -i -ilibraries/ghc-prim/. -ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen -Ilibraries/ghc-prim/. -optP-include -optPlibraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/autogen/cabal_macros.h -package rts-1.0 -split-objs -package-name ghc-prim -XHaskell98 -XCPP -XMagicHash -XForeignFunctionInterface -XUnliftedFFITypes -XUnboxedTuples -XEmptyDataDecls -XNoImplicitPrelude -O2 -no-user-package-conf -rtsopts -odir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -hidir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -stubdir libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build -hisuf hi -osuf o -hcsuf hc -c libraries/ghc-prim/./GHC/Types.hs -o libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Types.o /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '--build-id=none' /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage information gmake[1]: *** [libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/GHC/Types.o] Error 1 gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ghc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ghc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/hs-haskell-platform. # From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 18:02:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0328F106566C for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE178FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.198.112]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:02:12 -0700 Message-ID: <505F4EA4.5060305@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:02:12 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2012 18:02:12.0148 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E707F40:01CD99B5] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Subject: ndis build for syslink AE2500 usb wifi stick failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:02:17 -0000 Followed the instructions from here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html#CONFIG-NETWORK-NDIS But when I rebooted got these dmesg messages. no match for ZwQueryInformationFile no match for ZwReadFile no match for ZwCreateFile no match for ExfInterlockedRemoveHeadList no match for ExfInterlockedInsertTailList ugen3.2: at usbus3 ndis0: on usbus3 ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1 ndis0: init handler failed device_attach: ndis0 attach returned 6 How do I get those missing 5 files included into the ndis build? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 20:55:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBB3106566B for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alkc_75@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc4-s13.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc4-s13.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.190.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972058FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BAY152-W9 ([65.54.190.201]) by bay0-omc4-s13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:54:29 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [78.171.137.194] From: ali koca To: Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:54:29 +0300 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2012 20:54:29.0517 (UTC) FILETIME=[9FFDD3D0:01CD99CD] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: installation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:55:34 -0000 Hello, I have tried to install freebsd 9.0 into my laptop from usb flash memory(4GB). I can only reach the first installation screen but the installation cannot start and keeps rebooting. I have read the documents in your website and downloaded FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img and burned it flash memory with imagewrite (linux mint)I have tried all options at the start screen of the installation. But results are the same. Laptop is Acer Aspire 5520 AMD Athlon 64 dual core, 1gb ram, 120gb hdd, nvidia geforce 7000M There is no problem with the usb flash memory because I have used it to intall linux mint which is already I am using. The DVD of the laptop is not functional so I am using flash memory for installation. Boot sequence of the bios is correct. (usb flash memory) Is there any advice to solve the problem. Thank a lot... ALKC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 05:35:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6611F106566C for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wolkayang@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250398FC08 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagm1 with SMTP id m1so6473554oag.13 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:35:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UkXlL6vEFPafeYnHsrCEP7yIso+WRjavW0ECFHFEg8o=; b=Aq1uzAs/68NXt4f1UEZRodPLZzSwNeCirtfG+hSJJSrWgffjPtSEfIDMHuDruxi9Am beIsApbQOIf5OKSf3NEK/sZ8WPxhHbtzbcRGw96gYGfunQ62OYffIspqua2zi1gSU4r0 1v+1xdxZKuhDp3oA6weuCABqVZ7lBexDkLJgP+Cw9VL0iGS1L6mraolm+4mPXF0tFxnJ 14VyveufMAkIdki06JMN0NWF5tt6eE2FLbrewviMW5UjIEJwD4+atuLwEyD1pj2bZPsr bSn/tuFaL3alV5PIoUx8xXh8Noedn0fxVWAk7SyL0/syprKiAvrVD7pmSRNjmBI1m+ZW wGSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.144.104 with SMTP id sl8mr8925821obb.74.1348464930071; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.38.104 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:35:29 +0800 Message-ID: From: =?Big5?B?t6ip1LS1s82mTg==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Question about tunnelling Ethernet traffic over IPv6 using EtherIP protocol X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:35:31 -0000 Hi, everyone: I am trying to set up a EtherIP tunnel device to tunnel Ethernet traffic over IPv6 using EtherIP protocol. I have Freebsd 8.3 runs on a i386 machine, and ipv6 enabled. I tried the commands below but no one works... ifconfig gif0 create ifconfig gif0 tunnel 2001:1111::1 2001:1111::10 up ifconfig: SIOCSIFPHYADDR: Address family not supported by protocol family ifconfig gif0 tunnel 2001:1111::1/64 2001:1111::10/64 up ifconfig: error in parsing address string: host name nor servname provided, or not known Could anyone please teach me why it is? I will be very grateful for any help you can provide. P.S.1 Both 2001:1111::1 and 2001:1111::10 are faked, I just use them in my local testing environment. P.S.2 I have assigned 2001:1111::1/64 on one of ethernet network interface on Freebsd machine, and there is another PC assigned 2001:1111::10/64. P.S.3 According to the link(http://www.daemon-systems.org/man/etherip.4.html), Freebsd should be able to provide this feature. Best regards, Yang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 06:17:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B774106566C for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alisha@linkbuildingservicesindia.in) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8258FC15 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so9791473iea.13 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:17:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=X/2Bc6+6xfETqKD8ReZwN69K/1/J3SZ9+smY8qX6Ygk=; b=dg4ivboGV350LjMg0412XKz7W1JytWB31CBN6xp3THO/4ybUBk+QJG/CJ6NNPH/M2g OFkrVv2ObxvLr9caYq3W7H4O3XPMzoBGV2gBIOaZPYyKw0FAOQPq7Yo3NTGmaJfPlIcT NA0ZPUy+l7G4pZqLhUFC7G2iuAKHdg3ztDoJa8UE/H6xbGhl8mVYBmTS56jUTu2vP0TS +AjeCZliF+nsWZi1sAl7DK7cinKGmxKgL+kpbzIOR0VLyxeLuaL2xbcSwmbGo7zq+qBq VS5Z3stPQxzYK+Jrcg552MVQInmkiSoIe7Vv6zOM81I138syt7VV4/mjkU47zuM6rpeF 0RMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.132 with SMTP id fk4mr4381923igc.41.1348467455873; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.99.165 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:17:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [122.177.215.26] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:47:35 +0530 Message-ID: From: Alisha Linkbuildingservices To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmsLzikBqNnP0BcIzBJgneTL1nalRi+0lqL/oUyDc4EHercIbawL9i3Lv7DtipqdvgWL48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Affordable Link Building Services!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:17:37 -0000 Hello, Hope you are doing fine. This is just a follow up mail to touch base with you. Haven=92t heard back from you, just wondering if you are interested for outsource some of your projects to us. By Outsourcing, you can save money by hiring professionals from countries with a lower cost of living that typically provide their service at lower cost. Please let us know your response. Warm Regards, On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Alisha Linkbuildingservices < alisha@linkbuildingservicesindia.in> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Greetings of the day! > > > > My name is Alisha and I work as a *Business Development Executive* at *= BPT > SOLUTIONS* *Pvt. Ltd* I would like to discuss a business opportunity > with you. > > * > BPT SOLUTIONS *is a *SEO & Web Design, Development** * firm based in > India, with over 9 years of experience. We have been partnering with > various digital agencies over *U.S.A. and UK* > > > We are offering unique *Affordable package for SEO: 299 USD* the > following package. > > *Monthly Task and responsibilities:-* > 20 Search Engine Submission > 200 Manually Directory Submissions > 90 Article Submissions (1 Articles Submit in Top 30 Directories) > 10 Press Release Distributions (1 Press Release submit in 10 Sites) > 5 Web2.0/Blog postings(Using pre-written articles) > 30 Social Bookmarking Submissions > 5 Forum postings > 3 Unique Article writing (400+ words) > 1 Press Release writing (350+ words) > Keywords Mapping > New pages suggestions > Keywords research > Competitor Analysis > Title Tag changes suggestions > Meta tags changes suggestions > Alt tag changes suggestions > HTML Site Map > XML site map setup > Anchor text optimization > Google webmaster setup > Google analytics setup > Weekly Work Report > Monthly Ranking Report > Monthly Full Detailed SEO Work Report in Excel. > > > > We use only white hat SEO techniques for each website. > > > Kindly revert back if you are interested. I would be happy to share our > Work Portfolio, Client testimonials and Service Packages. > > *Our Company Website:** **www.businesspromotiontechnologies.com* > > > If this is something you are interested, please respond to this email. > > > Kind Regards, > > *Alisha* > Business Development Executive > > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 08:59:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8BE106564A; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BC08FC14; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=SN0y4L312Gd1K2fKc+QwkPMTiSvT7U2pGIrrBwAsDAs=; b=WaHa0AaMqZkc03RniF/i0EBCbgMbBopA7GrqcemfnkPJtbMuxqZLSRvn+6NIMHKB/yNlNjHNWRyHtBT/bJC66lgZYGNeTS/x5xW3GIHSS9NI6LzY/aoPiAzDvAnMJQbbSYO/LyEJ0ZstaUoYqpff9FGcevjoyKLANMK2iBDD2rY=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1TG49b-000AFc-Tn ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:36:35 +0300 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:36:34 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120924113634.33b908c1@nonamehost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Watson Subject: praudit after work leaves /dev/auditpipeX files. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:59:15 -0000 Hi all. I run command and watch its output to the console, and i stop the praudit, but /dev/auditpipeX files remain. I have not found a way how to remove the files /dev/auditpipeX - only to rebooted. Is it a bug? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 13:03:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC19106566C for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A2E8FC12 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so8162349lbb.13 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:03:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Sx9XZJBCh/EOKMpVcUsyakEBmpTrdrT3WA12OOihJsw=; b=FOufnrXhELc3t9yMN0y7M91uzLhDUt70pkod3dgKLsZ+wLoL/rZsRtTycAGp7pKQbl Gmmjx8BvnJxRN75STXNjv2QJdpzhkLA8F9PYbQLx8I/9tarN28l87Kqz9IIWcoOPF+vd P+ftuauin2KSGiO9hpYpN+ab2F4hM3U+XeU1+ldxVluChXGVPV1p3MJDpFy0y0x51BYE iH5WL1pUt7Y7eRZr+LuAV8+s36+X/wTn5yW49awBOioDgDz/sNGcuKGsd2g64DpzD+Rs upTzKhE2itlojYTBgPEmNyfxIXG7IVb4WyFiFmDwivZ031LRmg72ye9g+IYYXPp25zR1 z0VA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.132.133 with SMTP id ou5mr10589333lab.45.1348491837581; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.69.39 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:03:57 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N5VORrcSgBIfQ4eUEYLakL0_alA Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Creating kernel distribution from sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:03:59 -0000 Hi All, I've generated a DVD iso and imported it into a provisioning platform. After this integration, a decision was made to rebuild the kernel with an option enabled. As opposed to executing a full `make release`, I just want to build the kernel distribution. In reading the manpage, it looks like I can just run `make release.3 && make release.5 && make release.6` to accomplish this. Is this correct? Would the resulting files be installed in ${CHROOTDIR}/R? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 16:53:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7900106564A for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5E48FC0A for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8OGr45R022373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:53:05 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.100] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:53:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:53:01 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: To: Rick Miller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-24_04:2012-09-24, 2012-09-24, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Creating kernel distribution from sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:53:06 -0000 On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:03 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi All, >=20 > I've generated a DVD iso and imported it into a provisioning platform. > After this integration, a decision was made to rebuild the kernel > with an option enabled. As opposed to executing a full `make > release`, I just want to build the kernel distribution. In reading > the manpage, it looks like I can just run `make release.3 && make > release.5 && make release.6` to accomplish this. Is this correct? > Would the resulting files be installed in ${CHROOTDIR}/R? >=20 Almost! Don't forget you need to first remove the target files created by e= ach of those targets. In example: rm -f /usr/release/usr/obj/usr/src/release/release.{3,5,6} make release.{3,5,6} Yes, the resulting files will be in (by default) /usr/release/R --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 19:35:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4C9106566B for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807168FC0A for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:35:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=O8bLr4vWI7alLNYY8iztMptNctlUofUDjcJFUuzzApU=; b=A6Vhvj7vc8OBXU2Z/OvO5juWXaoIw73L6Pqvi6+yYFVaCfuHpBtGZqMBNqJDjelW8iNSCBAZWHQEPhdAQxNF8/HEONPB/63cgUMYpeiCs9kFUJnL84CfabjzoldO6IfDqX2oyQTGJGIq5mrz1esKLY5QyDvwFvsSZRiHR5UlUMw=; Received: from iglou1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.3]:41843 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1TGERb-0006Dp-4S by authid with igloumta_auth for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:35:51 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:62908 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1TGERa-0000qp-NZ for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:35:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:35:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Subject: question for ipfw2 experts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:35:57 -0000 Hello, I have removed all references of OpenBSD Packet Filter from my kernel and have just completed my first (excluding some experimentation back a decade ago) configuration of ipfw2. At the moment, FreeBSD -current is building world and the applicable /etc/rc.conf entries are like this: firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall.myFile" firewall_quiet="NO" firewall_logging="YES" firewall_nat_enable="NO" The kernel modifications are as follows: options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=5 options DUMMYNET - my configuration file for ipfw2: // BEGIN #!/bin/sh ipfw -q flush // MACROS block_tcp_in="2869,5355,commplex\\-main,loc\\-srv" block_udp_in="1900,3544,5355,dhcp6\\-client,dhcp6\\-server,netbios\\-ns" block_tcp_out="2869,bootpc,commplex\\-main,loc\\-srv" block_udp_out="1900,3544,netbios\\-ns" eif="anyIF" cmd="ipfw -q add" ks="keep-state" icmp6_types="1,2,128,129,135,136" local4="this4address" local6="this6address" localnet="thisNet/mask" localnet6="prefix::/prefixlen" tcp4_svcs""2628,ident" tcp6_svcs="ident,ssh" udp4_svcs="ntp,radacct,radius" udp6_svcs="ntp,radacct,radius" out_tcp4="49152-65535,domain,ftp,http,ident,smtp,smtps,ssh,svn" out_udp4="33433-33636,49152-65535,domain,ntp" out_udp6="33433-33636,49152-65535,domain,ntp" out_tcp6="49152-65535,domain,ftp,http,ident,smtp,smtps,ssh,svn" // TABLES // ipfw table 1 add 192.168.2.0/24 10.23.2.1 someNet.org // PASS EARLY, ANTISPOOF,CHECK-STATE, and FRAG REASSEMBLE $cmd 27 check-state $cmd 28 reass all from any to $local4 recv $eif $cmd 29 drop ip from any to $local4 not verrevpath recv $eif $cmd 30 drop ip from $local4 to any not versrcreach xmit $eif $cmd 31 pass all from any to any via lo0 $cmd 32 drop all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 recv $eif $cmd 33 drop all from 127.0.0.0/8 to any xmit $eif $cmd 34 drop all from any to ::1 recv $eif $cmd 35 drop all from ::1 to any xmit $eif $cmd 36 drop tcp from any to $local4 in recv $eif frag // $cmd 38 pass log ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16 xmit $eif $cmd 39 pass log ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 $cmd 40 pass log ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 $cmd 41 pass log ipv6-icmp from any to any icmp6types $icmp6_types $cmd 42 unreach6 admin-prohib log ipv6-icmp // BLOCK EARLY # rfc 1918 private address $cmd 45 drop all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any xmit $eif $cmd 46 drop all to 192.168.0.0/16 from any recv $eif # rfc 1918 private address $cmd 48 drop all from 172.16.0.0/12 to any xmit $eif $cmd 49 drop all to 172.16.0.0/12 from any recv $eif # rfc 1918 private address $cmd 51 drop all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any xmit $eif $cmd 52 drop all to 10.0.0.0/8 from any recv $eif #dhcp auto-config $cmd 54 drop all from 169.254.0.0/16 to $local4 recv $eif $cmd 55 drop all to 169.254.0.0/16 from $local4 xmit $eif #reserved for docs $cmd 57 drop all from 192.0.2.0/24 to $local4 recv $eif $cmd 58 drop all from $local4 to 192.0.2.0/24 xmit $eif # sun cluster interconnect $cmd 60 drop all from 204.152.64.0/23 to $local4 recv $eif $cmd 61 drop all from $local4 to 204.152.64.0/23 xmit $eif # class d and e multicast $cmd 63 drop all from 224.0.0.0/3 to $local4 recv $eif $cmd 64 drop all from $local4 to 224.0.0.0/3 xmit $eif // PROTOCOLS DROPPED EARLY $cmd 66 drop udp from any to $local4 $block_udp_in $cmd 67 reset tcp from any to $local4 $block_tcp_in setup // PUBLIC INTERFACE ICMP $cmd 69 pass log icmp from $local4 to any out xmit $eif $ks $cmd 70 pass log icmp from any to $local4 in recv $eif icmptypes \ 8,3 $ks $cmd 71 drop log icmp from any to any // PUBLIC INTERFACE UDP $cmd 73 pass udp from $local4 to any $out_upd4 out xmit $eif $ks $cmd 74 pass udp from $localnet to $local4 $udp4_svcs in recv $eif // PUBLIC INTERFACE TCP $cmd 78 pass tcp from $local4 to any $out_tpc4 out xmit $eif setup \ $ks $cmd 79 pass tcp from $localnet6 to $local6 $tcp6_svcs recv $eif \ setup $ks $cmd 2000 allow ip6 from $localnet6 to $local6 ssh in recv $eif \ setup $ks #$cmd 4 allow tcp from any to $local4 80 in recv $eif setup limit \ src-addr 3 $cmd 5000 drop log tcp from any to any // DROP STATEMENT $cmd 65000 drop all // END Advice, hints, and criticism of my setup and ruleset are welcomed. - also: Can someone please send an exmaple of how to properly use tables? Can someone please expound about using IPv6 in the ruleset? An effort for potentially constructive criticism regarding the documentation- I noticed these points: - file that does not exist: /etc/rc.firewall6 Good that it does not exist, please remove it from the handbook. - statement about internal interfaces: "In cases where one or more than one NICs are connected to a private LAN behind the firewall, those interfaces must have rules coded to allow free unmolested movement of packets originating from those LAN interfaces." Is this a fact? Today I am only dealing with one interface. If I wrote rules for both interfaces of a router would it actually not work? Kind regards, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 20:20:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A469106564A for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E0D8FC12 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (host86-161-139-150.range86-161.btcentralplus.com [86.161.139.150]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18F5E46B0D; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:20:30 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Robert N. M. Watson" In-Reply-To: <20120924113634.33b908c1@nonamehost> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:20:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <917FE2F6-F7D2-4260-A711-1FB88BAD2445@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120924113634.33b908c1@nonamehost> To: Ivan Klymenko X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: praudit after work leaves /dev/auditpipeX files. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:20:32 -0000 On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:36, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > I run command and watch its output to the > console, and i stop the praudit, but /dev/auditpipeX files remain. >=20 > I have not found a way how to remove the files /dev/auditpipeX - only > to rebooted. Hi Ivan: Cloning device nodes will garbage collect as a result of pressure from = other device nodes being created, or possibly if system memory gets low. = At some point we may transition to using a single device nodes with = per-session state, supported as of FreeBSD 8.x if I recall, and patches = have been circulated -- however, it should make no practical difference = from a user perspective. So, in conclusion, no, not a bug, just a = feature that might be surprising. Robert= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 20:30:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0741065672; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163248FC12; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so1850678wib.13 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:30:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=bZ21ntn6zfGcbHtarbIzPdTC4Bw2OmfsFodXNg7RIo0=; b=UlePrJ22MHfslkiPDFa0WV/w9jn280dsM3haQMcH7LQaht999d+o443qUQjIOUAqPy QYc5sYTiTc+qR0LXUHiU9ZjqVDnyP3Ih8Vaoxk9ykvFDAVC1ozmwkAy/8vizmvZJ2Kx2 xQBklH7dDOvijigIkdCw1TEPiRQMGM10F6t87648eEUavBHyO9gqFZHgqQCt4+mzjNVv hGETVlPSlIY6jflXPtplo+AgOrXDS3rV4ZOqDuphgQ2b0jk/26M5Mpy3dr0wzb9jBJ3x kJC45wID6obVz7e9u9DuUcYsBU//A+g3NFlu0itBznKXKusFKQgMAspJh1SNg4gxUBPp iytA== Received: by 10.216.134.218 with SMTP id s68mr7111854wei.72.1348518600952; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-135-0-219.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.135.0.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm18664849wiz.7.2012.09.24.13.29.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:30:00 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:29:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4609935.GM09Phd4y3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209242229.36933.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.13 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:30:02 -0000 --nextPart4609935.GM09Phd4y3 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, NOTICE: - fix: CUPS support should now work - fix: GNUTLS support should now work - CFT: with FreeBSD(-current) planning on switching to clang as default=20 compiler (for world/kernel) could you please check if wine runs with a clan= g=20 compiled world. Previous reports indicate wine (and libreoffice) didn't wo= rk=20 with a clang libc however that may have been fixed. Please report for both= =20 success or failure and include `uname -a` and `clang --version`. Thanks Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.13 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. T= he=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. =20 Please read the installation messages, if you use the nVidia graphics drive= r,=20 for further information. =20 Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.13,1.tbz) =3D=20 fa31279a464b3ddb0074467899c3b57d MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.13,1.txz) =3D=20 ff19bfbc987560fd8685879210c0bb5c MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.13,1.txz) =3D=20 6752cf8b20956e29910b2cf1fa3e3509 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng --nextPart4609935.GM09Phd4y3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlBgwrAACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKWdgCfUM6eWQht2iXFVMDR4vPOO28R f28An0FOVU2BZqV0SozIj7Ixm1IfuFIb =/oVP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4609935.GM09Phd4y3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 21:29:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32066106566C for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BD98FC08 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1772812ghr.13 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2QmslR/rIBxQniqt6vgFYNAazjGlWXTIpwqjOssgQQo=; b=mmOU+OGYV0WTwPcVyNebIuPvCR13z92e63m6Vt8uxko+mUoxXnBhXVcrSguBaa7A9X oXbt69tI4voZWJjZjwZQJBWBRBtvzheRk9D1Of4+QcadoA9zAsfLaN2IUDnSqbK7wQg2 +asN14OemNY9sVX14p4kcjF+FWvH4ja0SkCfM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=2QmslR/rIBxQniqt6vgFYNAazjGlWXTIpwqjOssgQQo=; b=X5eo+hHlXsuEnGQwJ7j13++eIpBRzQhxWqCavrQv4Ru3ZMiUQbV6b1K9GGxoAJ4o3l qzR296l1XU+wbWOgsgeWSEVO6rpwdm9r+4hu9ZvE4VuMgWXpmR+F5mTJ0LbaLIQGkFSJ s9k3kO9kJrDWirSphwQI/VVWUU8EFUZpkwV364SWigUiU8edaV7zRQsv5g7jgk46dSaB t2mV/Vl2PR1rQYQnqdUInOCu7l95CoqPFCtR9HMO6BNCmgLpBQ4wW3tjZLPivDevVCMF ClKONjm2Bw1PrhPVf1zQcT1OOsPfQoS1Rn+kAPlb4GPWVnjn5XOEqN0Go5lmPk5MJmSw bw0w== Received: by 10.236.117.33 with SMTP id i21mr14044962yhh.81.1348522154737; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a6sm14471829anm.22.2012.09.24.14.29.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XQdpH6g5Fz2CG5p for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:29:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:29:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljVlvAREUAUGzLh7bne6fwJyfjdyze2RcoJBJb5jwHWKoALg9NCR9XrX2HYIhxIhKIq3hm Subject: PR 161548 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:29:16 -0000 Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as open? o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of IPv6 host data -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 21:48:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51354106566C for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87138FC08 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so1915941wib.13 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:47:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=YUGxRKmpzOl9FrfAwDZpNsdrh+85GYcdu7qaIcgm03o=; b=IPzp03D72i8GX+/y1PpZmmlcE2GwOpgVrlVJvCSc/IthRFRP/Ct/qH7YmN8/gLkgSq HUMc8n6tPw2Ju4JhMd3HLot6Bdh8I7eODYT16Wf4+fH9jlLMyW/i2u8BDTHLyDWT2uwe vXRusqKixxGxpDVOeVr+5xqLKduC0PVLBjEfNPqPiyKjIkMBQNnSPG+kNwUGqGtguGFV wCNd8+siyKFp/pmKY2NSYCYZAGGt8AC6kJr2WXUuC+5KF5hjgsWY7L8t4ae4SREOugTQ T8OC0ZmeVoVzgKGltz15JlfdUpSNPjciqNWgwNjthWdLuBO40IFQEoWiWVG30TUGKsYh 9+bw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.109.199 with SMTP id hu7mr9017077wib.21.1348523278798; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.129.3 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:47:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:47:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYVoqlYGw6jjjbAZXBgd14k1mp2VnkLqtVIutnCkJ4U6ZiGh1pfqvOYoLS0Xp3OzEXui3t Cc: Subject: Re: question for ipfw2 experts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:48:00 -0000 On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Darrel wrote: > Can someone please send an exmaple of how to properly use tables? Quick, trivial example - this doesn't help you understand tableargs, this is just efficiently to handle a very large list of sparse nets. PEERS="/etc/ipfw/permitted_hosts.txt" cat $PEERS | awk '/^[1-9][0-9\.][0-9\.]*/ { print "ipfw table 1 add", $1 }' | sh $FW add 01000 check-state [ a bunch of rules ] $FW add 05000 allow tcp from table\(1\) to me 7514 in recv $OUTSIDE_IF setup keep-state $FW add 06000 deny tcp from any to me in recv $OUTSIDE_IF Now, if you want to atomically change tables without altering instantiated dynamic rules, you can use separate tables and swap rulesets. You can use tableargs (the second parameter when adding an entry to the table) as a rule number to skipto, or as a tag in logging, etc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 04:48:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434A1106564A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13AB8FC14 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BC13A3876 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:39:38 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1348547977; x=1350362377; bh=71yEges3D L/Fw/V/In7XAXHL3TPo0ZIPnbHzIyyID14=; b=Sq2h3wdbcI0I7kWRWjnBadJaH grt6dFDyL4JxDz9uNtB2ic/+BjqrRqincbctp0qXWDLnNwrcQoeRUCJkm5o3wUTX z7Qi3tTxsleJ4gSrwz5HYbY+DplaWLWkMzOBdIy77zE1Kohyb7918CwV/6sVuB+o lNBewkQCNZ5X7dVOW8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Qe1-rDo0gkpj for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:39:37 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60A43A3836 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:39:37 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q8P4dbPE041007; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:39:37 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:39:37 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201209250439.q8P4dbPE041007@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Change in /etc/rc.d/namend script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:48:44 -0000 Hi, Yesterday I upgraded my DNS server from 7.2 to 8.3 and has the unpleasant suprise to find that named would not restart after the upgrade. I think I traced it back to the new /etc/rc.d/named script. I am runing in named in a chrooted environment and it seems that with the new script the configuration file must exist in /etc/namedb as well as in /chroot/etc/namedb. Having to duplicate the configuration files to the not chrooted environment is something new. With the /etc/rc.d/named script 1.22.2.3.4.1 2008/10/02 that was not needed, and I don't see why it would be needed now. Is there a way to run the new startup script without duplicating (not even symlinking) the configuration? Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 05:27:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19F9106564A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitriy.postolov@yandex.ru) Received: from forward11.mail.yandex.net (forward11.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD0B8FC12 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web17f.yandex.ru (web17f.yandex.ru [95.108.130.34]) by forward11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DBC94E81425 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:27:27 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web17f.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 915EF3C50001; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:27:27 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1348550847; bh=vLnB+khfUyou9KoEXBNfRmw+Qmdy75Q73EmTLES7opg=; h=From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=J2mZ/0VWLXl6CZONdR8s6Eilc9gInY7M3nEUlSOoslOqgXmefNkgeFearJjAT23go Mk8wfB5B1QqkDK35g63WM1KTYS75pugFzbnTdHq72Frg+58pgSS21zWzdhOR9rBSzB DLLZfyT6CeSYpFenguhL8HUpgwTkNwxL8Sjnz/QY= Received: from [217.118.83.166] ([217.118.83.166]) by web17f.yandex.ru with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:27:26 +0400 From: Postolov Dmitriy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <510401348550846@web17f.yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:27:26 +0600 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Subject: misc/171937: Notebook Toshiba Satellite C850-B1K and problem with sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:27:29 -0000 Hi! Sorry for my bad English... Please help me to solve problem with sound in notebook Toshiba Satellite C850-B1K (with latest pre-installed BIOS) and FreeBSD 9.1-RC1-i386. Works only beeper in console (if mixer igain > 0), when I am press Backspace key at beginning of line, and works beep in XFCE 4.10 Exit menu. Music files are not played (zero time counter in xmms, when press File Play button ). May be incorrect sound system configured. I am try to use sysctl hw.snd.default_unit=1 but it did not help. On Win 7 & Linux Mint 13 sound play fine out the box. Please, help me! PR N 171937 % dmesg | grep hda hdac0: mem 0x92510000-0x92513fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0 hdacc0: at cad 0 on hdac0 hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 pcm0: at nid 20,21 and 24 on hdaa0 pcm1: at nid 18 on hdaa0 hdacc1: at cad 3 on hdac0 hdaa1: at nid 1 on hdacc1 pcm2: at nid 7 on hdaa1 % mixer Mixer vol is currently set to 85:85 Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 Mixer speaker is currently set to 74:74 Mixer mic is currently set to 67:67 Mixer mix is currently set to 74:74 Mixer rec is currently set to 37:37 Mixer igain is currently set to 1:1 Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 Recording source: mic # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 1 0xc0400000 fd24dc kernel # cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default pcm1: (rec) pcm2: (play) # pciconf -lv | grep hda hdac0@pci0:0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0xfb321179 chip=0x1e208086 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 # sysctl hw.snd hw.snd.vpc_reset: 0 hw.snd.vpc_0db: 45 hw.snd.vpc_autoreset: 1 hw.snd.latency_profile: 1 hw.snd.latency: 5 hw.snd.report_soft_matrix: 1 hw.snd.report_soft_formats: 1 hw.snd.compat_linux_mmap: 0 hw.snd.feeder_eq_exact_rate: 0 hw.snd.feeder_eq_presets: PEQ:16000,0.2500,62,0.2500:-9,9,1.0:44100,48000,88200,96000,176400,192000 hw.snd.feeder_rate_quality: 1 hw.snd.feeder_rate_round: 25 hw.snd.feeder_rate_max: 2016000 hw.snd.feeder_rate_min: 1 hw.snd.feeder_rate_polyphase_max: 183040 hw.snd.feeder_rate_presets: 100:8:0.85 100:36:0.92 100:164:0.97 hw.snd.vpc_mixer_bypass: 1 hw.snd.verbose: 0 hw.snd.maxautovchans: 16 hw.snd.default_unit: 0 hw.snd.version: 2009061500/i386 hw.snd.default_auto: 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 06:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF391065670 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFA88FC0A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcwo10 with SMTP id wo10so2094403obc.13 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:00:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Z6xNMiJmSlL9gywM4x2p4rnQAel8bEQjfUxbtt/jrtU=; b=DcbeOCfk7iH/e4SBv+RdNC99Z2RprLFXN2peFpXqB++ElNtjr7926xJO2LJ50I+ZfY cdip0D+G6iuZmNSas52QqKG3JBV9o2ceywLIIqrF3apSTMUmnOtbkv3hK7/1nLsHwWPC 6MUMIh/+Qs4Kzhizo2Nip1paXLJbKj72NQ/byRaZRM4RsSQzshu9r6zKFeaYjtFLil34 XyBtHoAm01suwGClS/3T07oEaxuNTihmWlIW4sIBPSxzI0vPARukwAz0Ydc2jqTh3A2d 0JPzGrrIqfjhB3pQgdR1qEhQ1Bhwet4owYYJEhuzzBKkFGFXMrzhj25PLzqVKTZnyRUq p0OQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.225.100 with SMTP id rj4mr11898228obc.64.1348552825702; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.138 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:00:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44a9xd3juc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <44a9xd3juc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:30:25 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Duvvuru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Inbox driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:00:26 -0000 Thanks for the reply. Emulex's OCE driver is present in Freebsd-8.3 http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.3.0/sys/dev/ but it is not present in http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/9.0.0/sys/dev/, is there a way to get this driver into 9.0.0 branch? And the same driver is present in 9.1-RC1 so can I assume that it is going to be part of 9.1-RELEASE? Please clarify. On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Venkat Duvvuru writes: > > > If a driver module misses the deadline to make it inbox , I think that > it's > > gonna be part of the next Freebsd release. The sources show up in the svn > > repository, probably this is one confirmation that it's gonna be part of > > the next release..Is my understanding correct? Please clarify. > > I don't know what you mean about "inbox," but basically you're > right. It's a bit more complicated, though, because the svn repository > has several "branches" -- and a feature introduced to 10.x, for example, > may or not show up in 9.x. If a feature is introduced into HEAD, you can > be pretty sure it will make it into some release eventually. > > Does that help? I tried to keep it brief... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 06:04:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B81065670 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B60F8FC0A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-181-78-159.range86-181.btcentralplus.com [86.181.78.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8P63vdZ078847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:03:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q8P63vdZ078847 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q8P63vdZ078847; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-181-78-159.range86-181.btcentralplus.com [86.181.78.159] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:03:57 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3C1493BBE6F50DCBEA3E4780" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT, RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Jerry Subject: Re: PR 161548 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:04:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3C1493BBE6F50DCBEA3E4780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: > Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as > open? >=20 > o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of IPv= 6 host data It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit bit. Yet. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig3C1493BBE6F50DCBEA3E4780 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBhSU0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw4VgCfeiKalzkaY5ivC0AmouXKG+q2 9WkAnj9dq2uIoBLSv63bASh5phzaC4RB =256D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3C1493BBE6F50DCBEA3E4780-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 10:30:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10817106566B for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC678FC0C for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenm5 with SMTP id m5so1457620yen.13 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type; bh=mqQLcJt/lmF4w2grjK04XZPGF0IYJLCazKX1Own5Sho=; b=k0Y+pOtontiDy3029d9WHxNg/WAUu0mrGLUzypOLPg+g33ogCbefWbSbX89p4kenYt 2jRQzTwVguM0ua2nD1kIaNaOngn3YphzMMnSLmDgE8NUFckhgSHGx5+3jREhKRunhwlJ zt68/aw4pktO7K3ppr7j+ehh9i1eyhVudLdhY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=mqQLcJt/lmF4w2grjK04XZPGF0IYJLCazKX1Own5Sho=; b=TBoabHRYKlt1QbGh+FOEbAiCO26MNwJDM10uGDSRvuGRxxWWCRMW9BKakphCYqM1O7 +Ro2u26bJbPdIg+4/WXBNLliRZXV+irv6x+wuZ0s/ZOMV9OniI4FaPb74XvMV4UrNH7V so4JuwiBkPynTTR2djhYqKCnBOgioE4DgjKWLVECeem1+2M6Zr4/CIseHjawL2tPXKpV 9HvfoE5Es33eaACFY+yCZkRXTWAqtdDsNRtQIHWzJwIWkfm3QWZzwyhmyuKIX/f2eaxY e+68bBbVwrcQpED3AwNnC3+D2YbD7B6TWG23eWgHsmX7efcd3ZYa2ZOwprZ0Hcr/bya7 htKg== Received: by 10.101.105.23 with SMTP id h23mr1803901anm.19.1348569021570; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l7sm28665293yhk.22.2012.09.25.03.30.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XQz7Z3zHHz2CG5p for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:30:05 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120925063005.65f29243@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/vtYhdMr64/FPUKGUIq.fYx7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKatTuvhvSftuxS8EbjeMi4x+hCScHehyP3o9kilUFyOMRyZHctDOonISB9o64dXTkb9rz Subject: Re: PR 161548 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:30:28 -0000 --Sig_/vtYhdMr64/FPUKGUIq.fYx7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:03:57 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: > On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: > > Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as > > open? > >=20 > > o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of > > IPv6 host data >=20 > It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit > bit. Yet. This deficiency was mentioned on the Postfix forum recently. The PR was filed nearly a year ago. I would have thought that by now someone would have given some thought to committing it BEFORE they continue to pump out new versions of FreeBSD. Just my take on the matter. --=20 Jerry =E2=99=94 Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Forbes Thought Of The Day =E2=80=9CWhen a man tells you he got rich through hard work, ask him: Who= se?=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94 Don Marquis=20 --Sig_/vtYhdMr64/FPUKGUIq.fYx7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQYYe5AAoJEF2rWD2do7dNg0oH/22kaMo45oHjeWTIJmu+bZM0 wmR3G3XrQkDcRNEWuPFVB2qvra2NUKVjPrhLVDpBcXlqBbLMPZYii2TJQw0fTaIN HIrGo1R3kVPhpZWP2QdAUucxFz4kSkdavvndpmegnrtuER7c+ZE6Wk1s1fgwhhTg 10D8PinwlT3UjU2p3T1xbOBcrr9v0vftTE2mfjDAFs3swiZy0lmlDHMGCA1ImCPl SnqCS94IfEjHVgIiI9irR0bqX8zSAioJCscPgCXs9KNSqov9vOpqB5wpHhN0FMCE abPIlQhpXE7f/qR9S/t2OW1mP3VxU8V6xhC6C/cbZZNs7bfKYVCWjAHa39a/gXU= =51vh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vtYhdMr64/FPUKGUIq.fYx7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 10:49:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18A21065670 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DC38FC08 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8PAnlkb037956 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:49:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8PAnlcY037955 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:49:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:49:47 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120925104947.GA6954@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201209250439.q8P4dbPE041007@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201209250439.q8P4dbPE041007@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Change in /etc/rc.d/namend script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:49:55 -0000 [ Olivier Nicole wrote on Tue 25.Sep'12 at 11:39:37 +0700 ] > Hi, > > Yesterday I upgraded my DNS server from 7.2 to 8.3 and has the > unpleasant suprise to find that named would not restart after the > upgrade. > > I think I traced it back to the new /etc/rc.d/named script. > > I am runing in named in a chrooted environment and it seems that with > the new script the configuration file must exist in /etc/namedb as > well as in /chroot/etc/namedb. > > Having to duplicate the configuration files to the not chrooted > environment is something new. With the /etc/rc.d/named script > 1.22.2.3.4.1 2008/10/02 that was not needed, and I don't see why it > would be needed now. > > Is there a way to run the new startup script without duplicating (not > even symlinking) the configuration? In you /etc/namedb/named.conf have you specified your zone files using full path names, such as: zone "kode5.net" { type master; file "/etc/namedb/master/kode5.net.db"; }; Using relative paths for your zone files will not work any more. Perhaps this could help? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 17:53:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1856E1065672 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@a-berg.se) Received: from panda.unixsh.net (panda.unixsh.net [78.47.216.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832768FC14 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([85.24.169.185]) (AUTH: PLAIN andy, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,CAMELLIA256-SHA) by panda.unixsh.net with ESMTPSA; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:48:25 +0200 id 000CF021.000000005061EE69.0000038A Message-ID: <5061EE6B.7070903@a-berg.se> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:48:27 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9as_Berg?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Problems with xhci driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:53:34 -0000 Greetings, I seem to have encountered a problem with the xhci driver on my new computer (FreeBSD 9.0). I noticed that I had a 15% interrupt cpu usage when the machine wasn't doing anything so I looked into it and it turns out that the xhci driver is going nuts on me. A vmstat -i shows me this: interrupt total rate irq16: xhci0 16747312710 101948 I tried setting hw.usb.xhci.debug to 1 and then I got repeated logs saying "xhci_set_hw_power:". Any help on how to track the issue behind this down would be greatly appreciated. Since reboot I have had a usb disk plugged in and removed again. I also unplugged the keyboard for a while. Regards, Andréas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 18:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDFD1065670 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248428FC14 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q8PI0HcF064414 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:00:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5061F12C.3030304@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:00:12 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:00:17 -0600 (MDT) Subject: /var overflow and named pipes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:00:26 -0000 Hi all, After running for a whopping 10 days or so, during which the use of my /var as shown by df stayed at 62%, my system hung in X. I was able to exit to a vty using fn At that point I killed X using kill -SIGHUP I then attempted to restart X. It came up, but in a clobbered condition with some icons under xfwm4 not showing, and some of the top menu bar text hosed (showing the square box char which usually indicates bad character data). I was able to shut it down by exiting the controlling xterm. Somewhere in there I'm pretty sure I saw a message something like "Too many named pipes" When trying to start X again, there were a boatload of messages: Fatal IO Error 35 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server :0.0 Messages showed up for programs being started in the startx script (xfwm4, xterm) and some spawned by those (thunar...) Then the message: XIO: Fatal IO error 35 (...) after 518 requests (388 known processed) with 0 events remaining At that point, /var was at 109% Examining /var, there was one huge file, Xorg.0.log. Neither head nor tail nor the portions of the interior I've looked at of that file shows anything particularly interesting; however, what is interesting is it seems to contain a never-ending repeat of reinitialization of the graphics card for monitor configuration. I copied the offending Xorg.0.log file to save it in a place with more space so I could examine it later, then deleted it. Portion appended below. However, when I restarted X I was still getting the fatal io errors, so I shutdown the system and rebooted. Also, since I was editing several (small) text files using vi, upon rebooting I got the usual messages about recovery. One of those files, when I attempted recovery, indicated it was huge. The file itself was small, ~180 lines, and had been saved already so the huge recovery file was somehow corrupt. I interrupted the recovery attempt (^C, took a *long* time to respond), checked /var size with du, and it was still only 62% so I may have averted another overflow there. /var/log/messages shows nothing for 16 hrs and then: Sep 24 16:22:01 breakaway kernel: pid 59110 (dd), uid 2 inumber 113248 on /var: filesystem full Sep 24 16:33:00 breakaway kernel: pid 79946 (dd), uid 2 inumber 113453 on /var: filesystem full Sep 24 17:33:00 breakaway last message repeated 501 times etc... I *think* all of the above is true; unfortunately, I didn't write notes until some things had passed and some notes were incomplete as to where in the process they occurred. Questions: 1. Can anyone shed light on the "too many named pipes" message? Is this likely caused by xfwm4 / thunar ipc? 2. Is the XIO error 35 (Resource temporarily unavailable) probably referring to the unavailability of named pipes? Or the unavailability of space in the Xorg.0.log file? Or does a pipe require space on /var and therefore when /var fills, no pipes are available? Are the X log files supposed to cycle the way system logs do? 3. Is there a way to see which processes have named pipes opened? After killing X and restarting, /usr/local/libexec/gam_server was still running and showing a runtime of 6472:54.82, very large compared to everything else. It's my understanding gam_server is used to detect changes in a file or directory; and might be using pipes for this purpose. Is this likely holding onto pipes? Is there an easy way to cause it to exit when X exits? 4. I've noticed the growing Xorg.0.log file in the past, but since /var was staying small it seemed like I had plenty of room. Then it seemed to suddenly explode when the system hung. Is this a known issue with resetting the graphics card? (In this case an unsupported Visiontek 900331 which used Radeon HD 5550) There is a redhat bug which may be relevant: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820731 Would getting a different graphics card likely solve this issue? 5. This *feels* like a sudden runaway condition. Shouldn't I normally get mail indicating /var is full before reaching 109%? There's 10 min between the first two full messages, and I didn't get *any* file sys full messages. Minor Issue: /var/tmp contains a number of empty directories with names "virtual-[user].xxxxxx" and "gvfs-[user]-xxxxxx" "cleanvar_enable" is set in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, I have not overridden it; but these dirs are obviously not being removed. Do I need to specifically turn on daily_clean_tmps_enable daily_clean_disks_enable Are there any reasons *not* to turn these on? In particular, if things are still running using some files in those places which were created early enough to be candidates for deletion? Thanks for any insights, Gary ================ Xorg.0.log repeated sequence ================= (II) RADEON(0): Monitor name: LCD1970NX (II) RADEON(0): Serial No: 57302818YA (II) RADEON(0): EDID (in hex): (II) RADEON(0): 00ffffffffffff0038a3626601010101 (II) RADEON(0): 1e0f010380261e78eacb05a3584c9b25 (II) RADEON(0): 135054bfef80714f8140818001010101 (II) RADEON(0): 010101010101302a009851002a403070 (II) RADEON(0): 1300782d1100001e000000fd00384b1f (II) RADEON(0): 510e000a202020202020000000fc004c (II) RADEON(0): 4344313937304e580a202020000000ff (II) RADEON(0): 00353733303238313859410a2020008f (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "NEC", prod id 26210 Dac detection success (II) RADEON(0): Output: VGA-0, Detected Monitor Type: 0 (II) RADEON(0): Output: HDMI-0, Detected Monitor Type: 0 (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "NEC", prod id 26210 (II) RADEON(0): Using hsync ranges from config file (II) RADEON(0): Using vrefresh ranges from config file (II) RADEON(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines: (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x1024"x0.0 108.00 1280 1328 1440 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync (64.0 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0 40.00 800 840 968 1056 600 601 605 628 +hsync +vsync (37.9 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0 36.00 800 824 896 1024 600 601 603 625 +hsync +vsync (35.2 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0 31.50 640 656 720 840 480 481 484 500 -hsync -vsync (37.5 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0 31.50 640 664 704 832 480 489 492 520 -hsync -vsync (37.9 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0 30.24 640 704 768 864 480 483 486 525 -hsync -vsync (35.0 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0 25.18 640 656 752 800 480 490 492 525 -hsync -vsync (31.5 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "720x400"x0.0 28.32 720 738 846 900 400 412 414 449 -hsync +vsync (31.5 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x1024"x0.0 135.00 1280 1296 1440 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync (80.0 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x0.0 78.75 1024 1040 1136 1312 768 769 772 800 +hsync +vsync (60.0 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x0.0 75.00 1024 1048 1184 1328 768 771 777 806 -hsync -vsync (56.5 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x0.0 65.00 1024 1048 1184 1344 768 771 777 806 -hsync -vsync (48.4 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "832x624"x0.0 57.28 832 864 928 1152 624 625 628 667 -hsync -vsync (49.7 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0 49.50 800 816 896 1056 600 601 604 625 +hsync +vsync (46.9 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0 50.00 800 856 976 1040 600 637 643 666 +hsync +vsync (48.1 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1152x864"x0.0 108.00 1152 1216 1344 1600 864 865 868 900 +hsync +vsync (67.5 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x960"x0.0 108.00 1280 1376 1488 1800 960 961 964 1000 +hsync +vsync (60.0 kHz) (II) RADEON(0): Output: DVI-0, Detected Monitor Type: 3 (II) RADEON(0): EDID data from the display on output: DVI-0 ---------------------- (II) RADEON(0): Manufacturer: NEC Model: 6662 Serial#: 16843009 (II) RADEON(0): Year: 2005 Week: 30 (II) RADEON(0): EDID Version: 1.3 (II) RADEON(0): Digital Display Input (II) RADEON(0): Max Image Size [cm]: horiz.: 38 vert.: 30 (II) RADEON(0): Gamma: 2.20 (II) RADEON(0): DPMS capabilities: StandBy Suspend Off (II) RADEON(0): Supported color encodings: RGB 4:4:4 YCrCb 4:4:4 (II) RADEON(0): First detailed timing is preferred mode (II) RADEON(0): redX: 0.640 redY: 0.344 greenX: 0.299 greenY: 0.608 (II) RADEON(0): blueX: 0.145 blueY: 0.074 whiteX: 0.313 whiteY: 0.329 (II) RADEON(0): Supported established timings: (II) RADEON(0): 720x400@70Hz (II) RADEON(0): 640x480@60Hz (II) RADEON(0): 640x480@67Hz (II) RADEON(0): 640x480@72Hz (II) RADEON(0): 640x480@75Hz (II) RADEON(0): 800x600@56Hz (II) RADEON(0): 800x600@60Hz (II) RADEON(0): 800x600@60Hz (II) RADEON(0): 800x600@72Hz (II) RADEON(0): 800x600@75Hz (II) RADEON(0): 832x624@75Hz (II) RADEON(0): 1024x768@60Hz (II) RADEON(0): 1024x768@70Hz (II) RADEON(0): 1024x768@75Hz (II) RADEON(0): 1280x1024@75Hz (II) RADEON(0): 1152x864@75Hz (II) RADEON(0): Manufacturer's mask: 0 (II) RADEON(0): Supported standard timings: (II) RADEON(0): #0: hsize: 1152 vsize 864 refresh: 75 vid: 20337 (II) RADEON(0): #1: hsize: 1280 vsize 960 refresh: 60 vid: 16513 (II) RADEON(0): #2: hsize: 1280 vsize 1024 refresh: 60 vid: 32897 (II) RADEON(0): Supported detailed timing: (II) RADEON(0): clock: 108.0 MHz Image Size: 376 x 301 mm (II) RADEON(0): h_active: 1280 h_sync: 1328 h_sync_end 1440 h_blank_end 1688 h_border: 0 (II) RADEON(0): v_active: 1024 v_sync: 1025 v_sync_end 1028 v_blanking: 1066 v_border: 0 (II) RADEON(0): Ranges: V min: 56 V max: 75 Hz, H min: 31 H max: 81 kHz, PixClock max 140 MHz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 06:27:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F261065673; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021CF8FC1B; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srg.kevlo.org (git.kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8Q6Qwd2019965; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:26:58 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <5062A037.7080306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:27:03 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120829 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jerry , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Re: PR 161548 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:27:07 -0000 On 2012/09/25 14:03, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: >> Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as >> open? >> >> o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of IPv6 host data > It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit > bit. Yet. There's no need to declare he4 and he6 as struct hostent, the original declaration of he is fine. So here is patch. Index: usr.bin/getent/getent.c =================================================================== --- usr.bin/getent/getent.c (revision 240947) +++ usr.bin/getent/getent.c (working copy) @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ hosts(int argc, char *argv[]) assert(argv != NULL); sethostent(1); + he = NULL; rv = RV_OK; if (argc == 2) { while ((he = gethostent()) != NULL) @@ -295,8 +296,9 @@ hosts(int argc, char *argv[]) he = gethostbyaddr(addr, IN6ADDRSZ, AF_INET6); else if (inet_pton(AF_INET, argv[i], (void *)addr) > 0) he = gethostbyaddr(addr, INADDRSZ, AF_INET); - else - he = gethostbyname(argv[i]); + else if ((he = gethostbyname2(argv[i], AF_INET6)) == + NULL) + he = gethostbyname2(argv[i], AF_INET); if (he != NULL) hostsprint(he); else { > > Cheers, > > Matthew > Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 08:44:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7A81065673; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF19A8FC1E; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8Q8iLPu010780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:44:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q8Q8iLPu010780 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q8Q8iLPu010780; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <5062C065.2040603@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:44:21 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Lo References: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> <5062A037.7080306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5062A037.7080306@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Jerry , FreeBSD Subject: Re: PR 161548 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:44:26 -0000 On 26/09/2012 07:27, Kevin Lo wrote: > On 2012/09/25 14:03, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: >>> Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as >>> open? >>> >>> o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of >>> IPv6 host data >> It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit >> bit. Yet. > > There's no need to declare he4 and he6 as struct hostent, > the original declaration of he is fine. So here is patch. > > Index: usr.bin/getent/getent.c > =================================================================== > --- usr.bin/getent/getent.c (revision 240947) > +++ usr.bin/getent/getent.c (working copy) > @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ hosts(int argc, char *argv[]) > assert(argv != NULL); > > sethostent(1); > + he = NULL; > rv = RV_OK; > if (argc == 2) { > while ((he = gethostent()) != NULL) > @@ -295,8 +296,9 @@ hosts(int argc, char *argv[]) > he = gethostbyaddr(addr, IN6ADDRSZ, > AF_INET6); > else if (inet_pton(AF_INET, argv[i], (void > *)addr) > 0) > he = gethostbyaddr(addr, INADDRSZ, > AF_INET); > - else > - he = gethostbyname(argv[i]); > + else if ((he = gethostbyname2(argv[i], > AF_INET6)) == > + NULL) > + he = gethostbyname2(argv[i], AF_INET); > if (he != NULL) > hostsprint(he); > else { Not so. Hosts frequently have both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses: your patch would print only the IPv6 address in that case. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 09:32:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C715106564A; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7D88FC0C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srg.kevlo.org (git.kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8Q9W5L7021030; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:32:06 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <5062CB9A.80301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:32:10 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120829 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <20120924172911.0839be5d@scorpio> <5061494D.1000203@FreeBSD.org> <5062A037.7080306@FreeBSD.org> <5062C065.2040603@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5062C065.2040603@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jerry , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Re: PR 161548 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:32:14 -0000 On 2012/09/26 16:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 26/09/2012 07:27, Kevin Lo wrote: >> On 2012/09/25 14:03, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: >>>> Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as >>>> open? >>>> >>>> o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of >>>> IPv6 host data >>> It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit >>> bit. Yet. >> There's no need to declare he4 and he6 as struct hostent, >> the original declaration of he is fine. So here is patch. >> >> Index: usr.bin/getent/getent.c >> =================================================================== >> --- usr.bin/getent/getent.c (revision 240947) >> +++ usr.bin/getent/getent.c (working copy) >> @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ hosts(int argc, char *argv[]) >> assert(argv != NULL); >> >> sethostent(1); >> + he = NULL; >> rv = RV_OK; >> if (argc == 2) { >> while ((he = gethostent()) != NULL) >> @@ -295,8 +296,9 @@ hosts(int argc, char *argv[]) >> he = gethostbyaddr(addr, IN6ADDRSZ, >> AF_INET6); >> else if (inet_pton(AF_INET, argv[i], (void >> *)addr) > 0) >> he = gethostbyaddr(addr, INADDRSZ, >> AF_INET); >> - else >> - he = gethostbyname(argv[i]); >> + else if ((he = gethostbyname2(argv[i], >> AF_INET6)) == >> + NULL) >> + he = gethostbyname2(argv[i], AF_INET); >> if (he != NULL) >> hostsprint(he); >> else { > > Not so. Hosts frequently have both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses: your patch > would print only the IPv6 address in that case. Err, right. I committed your patch, thanks. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 18:29:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB2C106566B for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722498FC15 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbdb5 with SMTP id b5so2696366lbd.13 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=0f1D3QL2CzdFX0D18wkO7sIpurnWVtSnUWvDsAy183g=; b=nWfE1SblNEUCK8puY2mq2gFw0rCCIGGEOC6t4VGmQNSs5ca0hr/lmdXDnUPVbGVh6L 1JibzaX2oRUzMQne7PyZD+coyeW0hCKHM5OJ2j+kplbJGHrALtpgNa0isJT50WoCtw6N FhG5CNiBzNv9sK87RzCACnsdaYYGrSbOY5yE+zY2gUxsRjB4eYbRj1as5aCjLxOKuzHD zsSq70YdDijO4Ko5oXV/Cv9QwkgYvNmxHlph7QW6QygEqKXjPLKcnbRukDWYct7cjqLk LE4LQWTU1Xy8XkrTcYTpkxMZB827xvUrN2sVV5CpeWrPv9dtUQV7/tRiT9S2XlOWhpm+ FQZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.24.74 with SMTP id s10mr715078lbf.122.1348684141324; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.69.39 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:29:01 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6NTND-Ujrny_vieb25BC4CNM2NM Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:29:03 -0000 Hi All, I performed a `make release` with FreeBSD 8.3p4 sources that built a secondary kernel (called DEBUG). It ended up in the release inside kernels/ as expected. The install.cfg file includes the line: dists=base kernels GENERIC SMP DEBUG doc catpages DEBUG was added to the above along with the new release build. All distributions get installed with the exception of DEBUG. In looking through sysinstall sources (I am not much of a C programmer to begin with) and it appears as though the sources need to be modified to support a new DEBUG distribution. I wonder if you might be able to confirm or refute this... -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 18:34:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F78106566B for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC1D8FC17 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa06.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QIYm7Y022547 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:34:51 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:34:34 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Rick Miller'" , "'FreeBSD Questions'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:34:41 -0700 Message-ID: <1d1301cd9c15$98743010$c95c9030$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKyGT6I68+Y1x/T8TqO36WeUKZpNpXT+Jog Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:34:54 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rick Miller > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:29 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > Hi All, > > I performed a `make release` with FreeBSD 8.3p4 sources that built a > secondary kernel (called DEBUG). It ended up in the release inside > kernels/ as expected. The install.cfg file includes the line: > > dists=base kernels GENERIC SMP DEBUG doc catpages > > DEBUG was added to the above along with the new release build. All > distributions get installed with the exception of DEBUG. In looking > through sysinstall sources (I am not much of a C programmer to begin > with) and it appears as though the sources need to be modified to > support a new DEBUG distribution. > > I wonder if you might be able to confirm or refute this... > I'll take this. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 18:41:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C989106566B for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520558FC16 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa01.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QIfA9r026033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:41:12 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:40:23 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Rick Miller'" , "'FreeBSD Questions'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:40:31 -0700 Message-ID: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKyGT6I68+Y1x/T8TqO36WeUKZpNpXT+d/Q Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:41:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rick Miller > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:29 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > Hi All, > > I performed a `make release` with FreeBSD 8.3p4 sources that built a > secondary kernel (called DEBUG). It ended up in the release inside > kernels/ as expected. The install.cfg file includes the line: > > dists=base kernels GENERIC SMP DEBUG doc catpages > > DEBUG was added to the above along with the new release build. All > distributions get installed with the exception of DEBUG. In looking > through sysinstall sources (I am not much of a C programmer to begin > with) and it appears as though the sources need to be modified to > support a new DEBUG distribution. > > I wonder if you might be able to confirm or refute this... > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 18:46:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6941E1065670; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC9E8FC1F; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbdb5 with SMTP id b5so2724191lbd.13 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:46:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=buk1VIB3yUZ+51xX5zS49cekOgTK54Jx+pKXuyrL5c4=; b=MaHhv1gEFq11WaOW1FJnDt7qU9DQmZ6+87a/Znz5YKCtYNLHPDfI4lsr/GUEyaNYAQ hXjZwKjTA67p5QGGrWiTjXC405Ar2vSv2hF622iJwqxJsdTSwRbf+iMv34xB5oBu0MVB 1NCoUxw0eb2FM1HZYDkWTpNGz+cnB/yTcDecc05eZDy4YCATl/AdOULcFhMvq5yJl52U Md1x5iudaGzZzBWw7CKo8oHYBe87AJn2Z3YH4QN6llsLz+IFclussMBpmdsTfKGxMcYh RE/sW8zXwQmFeEreECIBUZlIGGr48hJ+Bx0/s0qaAatju8zprg9ZkmvNstpyi0ICbK5z KQcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.132.133 with SMTP id ou5mr1288763lab.45.1348685202309; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.69.39 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:46:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:46:42 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iZLIKnjctvGIFX0QPeSGTFnr1Q0 Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: dteske@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:46:44 -0000 >> dists=base kernels GENERIC SMP DEBUG doc catpages >> >> DEBUG was added to the above along with the new release build. All >> distributions get installed with the exception of DEBUG. In looking >> through sysinstall sources (I am not much of a C programmer to begin >> with) and it appears as though the sources need to be modified to >> support a new DEBUG distribution. >> >> I wonder if you might be able to confirm or refute this... >> > > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply, Devin! If you don't mind, will you pass on the PR so I can track it? I am also considering approaching one of our developers to ask if they can write a patch, would that be helpful? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 19:05:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44757106566B; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0756B8FC19; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QJ44Rq020941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:05:35 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:04:04 -0500 From: Devin Teske To: "'Rick Miller'" , References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKyGT6I68+Y1x/T8TqO36WeUKZpNgFMeMrzAl8xbbaVtqKW4A== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:05:57 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: vrwmiller@gmail.com [mailto:vrwmiller@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rick > Miller > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:47 AM > To: dteske@freebsd.org > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > >> dists=base kernels GENERIC SMP DEBUG doc catpages > >> > >> DEBUG was added to the above along with the new release build. All > >> distributions get installed with the exception of DEBUG. In looking > >> through sysinstall sources (I am not much of a C programmer to begin > >> with) and it appears as though the sources need to be modified to > >> support a new DEBUG distribution. > >> > >> I wonder if you might be able to confirm or refute this... > >> > > > > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. > > Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply, Devin! If you don't mind, will > you pass on the PR so I can track it? Sure, no prob. It should appear in GNATS within 15-20 minutes. I'll get you the PR number when I get my response from GNATS. > I am also considering > approaching one of our developers to ask if they can write a patch, > would that be helpful? > No need. Patch is already written. I'll be submitting it to my mentor for review/approval shortly. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 19:28:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1331106566C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FF28FC12; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QJSEbL026312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:28:22 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:28:15 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Rick Miller'" References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:28:23 -0700 Message-ID: <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKyGT6I68+Y1x/T8TqO36WeUKZpNgFMeMrzAl8xbbYBcjmq7pWrFyUg Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: dteske@freebsd.org, 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:28:25 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.teske@fisglobal.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:04 PM > To: 'Rick Miller'; dteske@freebsd.org > Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' > Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: vrwmiller@gmail.com [mailto:vrwmiller@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rick > > Miller > > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:47 AM > > To: dteske@freebsd.org > > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > > > >> dists=base kernels GENERIC SMP DEBUG doc catpages > > >> > > >> DEBUG was added to the above along with the new release build. All > > >> distributions get installed with the exception of DEBUG. In looking > > >> through sysinstall sources (I am not much of a C programmer to begin > > >> with) and it appears as though the sources need to be modified to > > >> support a new DEBUG distribution. > > >> > > >> I wonder if you might be able to confirm or refute this... > > >> > > > > > > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. > > > > Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply, Devin! If you don't mind, will > > you pass on the PR so I can track it? > > Sure, no prob. It should appear in GNATS within 15-20 minutes. I'll get you the > PR number when I get my response from GNATS. > bin/172096: sysinstall does not support new DEBUG kernel distribution in 8.x > > I am also considering > > approaching one of our developers to ask if they can write a patch, > > would that be helpful? > > > > No need. Patch is already written. > > I'll be submitting it to my mentor for review/approval shortly. Submitted. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 20:06:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F35C106566C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44798FC18; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbdb5 with SMTP id b5so2849623lbd.13 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hsc3oaWZnUawhCthhKxJ15eFV+QbfE0eb0gTtHaBjTo=; b=oQUVzmBIB6zM+3IKjxjoi8RWneD+YKsJLCmg417vMjO/MOjiugPE6hVCYKjxuhE+u3 qZE1JNUwB0YODbHC6lXYCjqBFKu64mtzohtC3idOHtBLk3IssU8smqFLY8fWCCoJunVs Q9T1fH9aq9CaI7ZUUtWfwTrQFQasXxnb+Ch883v4bcGSKeQ4+MJOwifpCiXLG2fVqdPc yP4iKwjJshFCpVee3dyJmFoBnEhEyQOVx+4mkqHK5CUbo6FX8pmB0A/RJ5XQo2KHK0gz tbKKLbGrEC7nbZ7xpsCev7I17WwKBYO1duW0mTx0Tg2hhMo0uyXvzu/l0oNl9nSdSAmh WwsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.132.133 with SMTP id ou5mr1457642lab.45.1348689977333; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.69.39 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:06:17 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0d-fCOJaYI4Ex2ZOI8UJbXzEbeU Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: dteske@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:06:19 -0000 >> > > >> > > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. >> > >> > Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply, Devin! If you don't mind, will >> > you pass on the PR so I can track it? >> >> Sure, no prob. It should appear in GNATS within 15-20 minutes. I'll get you > the >> PR number when I get my response from GNATS. >> > > bin/172096: sysinstall does not support new DEBUG kernel distribution in 8.x > > >> > I am also considering >> > approaching one of our developers to ask if they can write a patch, >> > would that be helpful? >> > >> >> No need. Patch is already written. >> >> I'll be submitting it to my mentor for review/approval shortly. > > Submitted. Excellent, thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 20:10:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FB4106566C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDFA8FC0A; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QKAKP1020375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:10:28 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:10:03 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Rick Miller'" , References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:10:12 -0700 Message-ID: <003001cd9c22$efe55e20$cfb01a60$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-index: AQKyGT6I68+Y1x/T8TqO36WeUKZpNgFMeMrzAl8xbbYBcjmq7gKpxTDbAk0PCYaVg20+oA== X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:10:31 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: vrwmiller@gmail.com [mailto:vrwmiller@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rick > Miller > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:06 PM > To: dteske@freebsd.org > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > >> > > > >> > > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. > >> > > >> > Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply, Devin! If you don't mind, will > >> > you pass on the PR so I can track it? > >> > >> Sure, no prob. It should appear in GNATS within 15-20 minutes. I'll get you > > the > >> PR number when I get my response from GNATS. > >> > > > > bin/172096: sysinstall does not support new DEBUG kernel distribution in 8.x > > > > > >> > I am also considering > >> > approaching one of our developers to ask if they can write a patch, > >> > would that be helpful? > >> > > >> > >> No need. Patch is already written. > >> > >> I'll be submitting it to my mentor for review/approval shortly. > > > > Submitted. > > Excellent, thanks! Patch was approved. PR should be closed within the hour. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 20:19:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F32106566C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368F18FC0C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QKJ83b002001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:19:10 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:19:07 -0500 From: Devin Teske To: "'Rick Miller'" References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> <003001cd9c22$efe55e20$cfb01a60$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <003001cd9c22$efe55e20$cfb01a60$@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:19:16 -0700 Message-ID: <004a01cd9c24$34309fd0$9c91df70$@fisglobal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-index: AQKyGT6I68+Y1x/T8TqO36WeUKZpNgFMeMrzAl8xbbYBcjmq7gKpxTDbAk0PCYYCgmuA7pVvW83g X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: dteske@freebsd.org, 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:19:12 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of dteske@freebsd.org > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:10 PM > To: 'Rick Miller'; dteske@freebsd.org > Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' > Subject: RE: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: vrwmiller@gmail.com [mailto:vrwmiller@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rick > > Miller > > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:06 PM > > To: dteske@freebsd.org > > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Confirmed. I'll raise a PR with a patch to correct this. > > >> > > > >> > Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply, Devin! If you don't mind, will > > >> > you pass on the PR so I can track it? > > >> > > >> Sure, no prob. It should appear in GNATS within 15-20 minutes. I'll get you > > > the > > >> PR number when I get my response from GNATS. > > >> > > > > > > bin/172096: sysinstall does not support new DEBUG kernel distribution in 8.x > > > > > > > > >> > I am also considering > > >> > approaching one of our developers to ask if they can write a patch, > > >> > would that be helpful? > > >> > > > >> > > >> No need. Patch is already written. > > >> > > >> I'll be submitting it to my mentor for review/approval shortly. > > > > > > Submitted. > > > > Excellent, thanks! > > Patch was approved. PR should be closed within the hour. All patched. http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240972 Can you test? I'll close the PR upon success. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 21:12:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C19106564A for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC07E8FC15 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so110236obb.13 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lj5ckzGQvutl90ZmJqfe0pD9SURehijW4Dl4b5d4re0=; b=loGUbrybd+NKNo+oo4taXuOls1DROSNrtjowxOU47hEJ720YmAhkMBzzYay/ctBz5f EKX4WEOFggVUS4L9YyKJgCaKYjeGU1TVzU0/hOb3Tcv/X4h5UUORXORilgU9OXOBaWxD GiHXIc/TIj8uV9loYTJzwB0svgaqfPuZHzIE44Bnc/evlnR2E/h8JoHH0lyti+kuVMFn D+DfFnWHwdSa1JlCudgmeO3vfBKzZ3ZgGILzjzo+mnnIBhOk42DCGFtKTVmbj6LRefW0 WL5Mgh0LMgA7jVwaYLE2lnqu5duWEzvXiRaHA61zXIJJlU2o/hO10g9pk8eAeXuYeYlG q04Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.22.71 with SMTP id b7mr1524026oef.6.1348693954870; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:12:36 -0000 I see that CVS is being phased out in favor of subversion. I follow the documentation to keep my system up to date by doing: # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel # shutdown -r now and then... # mount -u / # mount -a -t ufs # adjkerntz -i # mergemaster -p # cd /usr/src # make installworld # mergemaster # reboot I've "pre-populated" my /usr/ports, /usr/src and /usr/src/sys directories when I installed my system. I've installed subversion from package, I want to follow the Stable (same as "Patch", right?) branch, and I'm struggling how to best use subversion to update my kernel source, system files, documentation, etc., so I can keep my system up to date. Can someone tell me how to use subversion to keep my /usr/ports, /usr/src and /usr/src/sys directories up to date? Thank you, Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 22:11:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F771065674 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FF88FC23 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5072E3CC4F; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:11:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8QMBZEI001900; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:11:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:11:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Ed Flecko Message-Id: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:11:44 -0000 On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12:34 -0700, Ed Flecko wrote: > I see that CVS is being phased out in favor of subversion. > > I follow the documentation to keep my system up to date by doing: > > # cd /usr/src > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel > # shutdown -r now > > and then... > > # mount -u / > # mount -a -t ufs > # adjkerntz -i > # mergemaster -p > # cd /usr/src > # make installworld > # mergemaster > # reboot Compare this again to the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile, but looks valid (even though few "cleanup steps" are missing). > I've installed subversion from package, I want to follow the Stable > (same as "Patch", right?) branch, and I'm struggling how to best use > subversion to update my kernel source, system files, documentation, > etc., so I can keep my system up to date. No, -STABLE and -RELEASE-p are different things. While -STABLE is a development branch that has incorporated things that have been considered "stable" on the continuous work toward a new version (that's from -CURRENT), -RELEASE-p only contains security patches for that release: this is what you get when using the binary method of updating, using freebsd-update. The -CURRENT (or -HEAD) is the active devlopment branch from which "good" things are passed to -STABLE. That branch is considered "experimental". If you want to follow the -RELEASE-p way, why not simply use freebsd-update, especially if you're _not_ running a custom kernel (as concluded from your commands example shown above)? > Can someone tell me how to use subversion to keep my /usr/ports, > /usr/src and /usr/src/sys directories up to date? /usr/src and /usr/src/sys are no distinct subtrees, i. e. /usr/src/sys is a component of /usr/src. It's only different from /usr/ports. Using the "old" CVS approach, both can be updated with the same program (csup). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 22:23:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606681065670 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dg@pki2.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162548FC08 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [192.168.23.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8QMNRnL034969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:23:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@pki2.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:23:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@btw.pki2.com To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: q8QMNRnL034969 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: dg@pki2.com Cc: Subject: 10Gb SFP+ recomendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:23:35 -0000 I'm looking for a reasonable 10Gb SFP+ capable board supported under RELENG_9. All I need is one port that will be plugged into a Cisco C3KX-NM-10G. It's going into a Supermicro chassis. Any recomendations? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 22:27:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C05106566C for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D728FC0A for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so1630207vbm.13 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:27:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1brsmCTKXZNbLRxjPiI7BBxgtgljyS5kd6siEjjvaok=; b=ZjNgqVOcxMTAkzb4JcuBjVa5yQ+ojcEbKFJBVIstzJLOr8bpPSrFBDUa86/iHS9XB3 dFNskIYal+w6Bp8A54ZWO7fVOl5GtSBQ1KzbwJ6AViyB0CA9Y9TM98fbr1NOIQ+5cgvQ 4SpLcZCj21HRo1Q/JgQW+lSLlhflXjVUgoCsTf0wBi+KUb/wL3JDNt7Tr2shLMka3DR3 Wu5hPFide/3IMJRxzwKOn+ppomfOZHtoVrx5FLk19R6Wh04MevHI9ARBsGGzOMtNTUOg B8J4Kb6XK4O062UgWyDk6gbX4CG9plfB+KHuvPJkOSKUV9K/jaZikKICOnNNL29kI00+ 0sDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.155.132 with SMTP id s4mr1086282vcw.15.1348698435212; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.203.4 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:27:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:27:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: pete wright To: Dennis Glatting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10Gb SFP+ recomendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:27:16 -0000 On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dennis Glatting wrote: > > I'm looking for a reasonable 10Gb SFP+ capable board supported under > RELENG_9. All I need is one port that will be plugged into a Cisco > C3KX-NM-10G. It's going into a Supermicro chassis. > > Any recomendations? > I have had good success running Intel 10gig NICs supported by ixgbe(1) on 8.x systems. I see no reason as to why they would not work on 9.x as well. -pete -- pete wright www.nycbug.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 22:44:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9C1065676 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6C98FC22 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagm1 with SMTP id m1so1527865oag.13 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:44:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uMzlvTb/C0aB0Un10UzrOo3w6jI1Qq9Z4/nRrrjtxOc=; b=o2FQK2d8fkyfzqbnYwdCd+qelfAr+h8Loe2tx57/uHdlNARW5BHrz7ESAhpdlHty5i nB5AtwFRkkUgmLuMRdl2zGlB9RQmLr13I7FInsjw0LFfx10t8PgUNWxojWV1ndoINrzw EXxqWaQwe5EQuUePklseushTWw03WP7go37tx+kR+TUszeUpaB2MX7qzLRAUzAFVwRzE DduwHiYOlVBbi+IjSi/cBnHbg6yndSdGuI4yRz9gnk/oxKG6pigqR8fj1/veMVkvAuqv 8AWkLO4B/bcctnbb7o5uymTZMZ64fXtdxnkg7l7TXKJrxGB0rdsaXbXNsPENLwyWhjRN sfuw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.22.71 with SMTP id b7mr1687252oef.6.1348699472591; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:44:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:44:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:44:34 -0000 Thank you. I am using a custom kernel, but you're right - I should have said so. :-) Do you have any feedback using subversion? I know I can still use csup; I'm basically trying to figure out how to subversion to achieve the same result. Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 22:55:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE650106564A for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF548FC0C for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QMtGdA010433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:55:16 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.52) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:55:16 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Dennis Glatting'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:55:24 -0700 Message-ID: <007b01cd9c3a$03e3a820$0baaf860$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-index: AQJL03DggyS+VrgBtRFns1IZIkdK+pagzJqA X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.52] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Subject: RE: 10Gb SFP+ recomendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:55:17 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Glatting > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:23 PM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: 10Gb SFP+ recomendations? > > > I'm looking for a reasonable 10Gb SFP+ capable board supported under > RELENG_9. All I need is one port that will be plugged into a Cisco > C3KX-NM-10G. It's going into a Supermicro chassis. > > Any recomendations? > Broadcom NetXtreme 10G FC HBA with vendor ID 14e4 and model ID 164f governed by the bxe(4) driver. Support is in 9.0-R and later. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 00:52:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21D5106566B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave-lists-freebsd-questions@weller-fahy.com) Received: from tigger.weller-fahy.com (sinecure.xen.prgmr.com [71.19.148.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8544A8FC15 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13279 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2012 17:50:55 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO weller-fahy.com) (dave@weller-fahy.com@24.209.97.39) by tigger.weller-fahy.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Sep 2012 17:50:55 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:45:54 -0400 From: "David J. Weller-Fahy" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120927004554.GD933@weller-fahy.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+66 (70810a88ce9f) (2011-07-01) Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:52:39 -0000 --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable While I track CURRENT, not STABLE, the process should not be significantly different. Here is what I do. * Ed Flecko [2012-09-26 17:18 -0400]: > I follow the documentation to keep my system up to date by doing: Here I update the src tree. # svn update /usr/src/ > # cd /usr/src > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel > # shutdown -r now >=20 > and then... >=20 > # mount -u / Here, instead of "# mount -a -t ufs" I use "# zfs mount -a". > # adjkerntz -i > [...] > # reboot * Ed Flecko [2012-09-26 18:50 -0400]: > Do you have any feedback using subversion? I know I can still use > csup; I'm basically trying to figure out how to subversion to achieve > the same result. For ports, I do the following. # svn update /usr/ports/ # cd /usr/ports # make fetchindex # pkg_version -l '<' Then update any ports which need updating. There is, AFAICT, minimal difference between what I used to do with csup, and what I do now with svn. Of course, the first time I used subversion was doing this... so I may be doing it wrong. ;) HTH, --=20 dave [ please don't CC me ] --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFQY6HCzahokXOb2UwRApIPAJ42ETqSCHXyEX3HEVVLYL9EEthMXgCePj0N dIybM5Pua4fEAJm5j5s/Z44= =mNHx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 01:06:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30AE106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC6A8FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q8R16NKl069509 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:06:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:06:18 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:06:24 -0600 (MDT) Subject: bad root shell in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:06:24 -0000 I mistakenly changed the root shell to something which doesn't exist. Was trying to make it bash and used /bin/bash instead of /usr/local/bin/bash. As a consequence, all login attempts fail because the shell can't be found. Unfortunatley, I shut down the session in which I modified /etc/passwd and I don't have a root shell running anywhere, so I can't fix it. I'm concerned that booting single user will have the same problem. Or will it fall back to /bin/sh? guidance? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 01:15:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CCA106568F for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A678FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8R1FZba022852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:15:36 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.100] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:15:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:15:33 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-26_04:2012-09-26, 2012-09-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: bad root shell in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:15:42 -0000 On Sep 26, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > I mistakenly changed the root shell to something which doesn't exist. > Was trying to make it bash and used /bin/bash instead of /usr/local/bin/b= ash. > As a consequence, all login attempts fail because the shell can't be foun= d. >=20 > Unfortunatley, I shut down the session in which I modified /etc/passwd and > I don't have a root shell running anywhere, so I can't fix it. >=20 > I'm concerned that booting single user will have the same problem. > Or will it fall back to /bin/sh? >=20 > guidance? Single-user mode will prompt you. The default is /bin/sh but you can change= it. You should be able to solve the problem by entering single-user mode. --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 01:18:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37C1106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834768FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415C827D8D; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:18:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8R1InrN003009; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:18:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:18:49 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120927031849.f3496a43.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> References: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: bad root shell in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:18:57 -0000 On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:06:18 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > I mistakenly changed the root shell to something which doesn't exist. > Was trying to make it bash and used /bin/bash instead of /usr/local/bin/bash. A typical Linuxism. :-) > As a consequence, all login attempts fail because the shell can't be found. That's why you should be using the "toor" account and leave "root" unchanged. Some may say that as soon as you're changing the root shell because you're doing much work as root, you're obvuously doing something wrong. :-) Also note that tools like su ("su -m", "su -") and super are in many cases better suited for making the CLI environment more comfortable than changing the shell of the root account. > Unfortunatley, I shut down the session in which I modified /etc/passwd and > I don't have a root shell running anywhere, so I can't fix it. Maybe without rebooting you can do this: Enter "su -m" (if your non-root user is allowed to su root, then enter "chsh" and set the root shell back to the default. > I'm concerned that booting single user will have the same problem. When you can successfully boot into SUM, you will be prompted for the shell to start. /bin/sh is the default shell (even though it is a quite ugly dialog shell -- still it's considered a "maintenance and emergency use only shell" at this point. It will be powerful enough to call the "chsh" command to get root back into normal condition. > Or will it fall back to /bin/sh? No, you will be prompted for the shell to be executed. > guidance? Try the "su -m" trick first. If it doesn't work: Reboot into SUM, and at the Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: prompt, press RETURN. In worst case (e. g. if you have accidentally damaged /bin/sh, maybe by overwriting it with a dynamically linked bash), you could type "/rescue/sh" instead. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 01:20:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA11C1065670 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@probikesllc.com) Received: from mail1.g3.pair.com (mail1.g3.pair.com [66.39.3.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E87C8FC27 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.g3.pair.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 47A8D33E6D; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.55.102] (c-67-165-95-233.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [67.165.95.233]) by mail1.g3.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E016733D23; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:15:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5063A890.5070507@probikesllc.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:14:56 -0400 From: Brian Seklecki Organization: CE-Pro Bikes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org References: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: bad root shell in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: seklecki@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:20:01 -0000 >>> On 9/26/2012 9:06 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: Probably not. Just boot a livecd that supports your HBA and FS, mount your Root FS, and: # vipwd -d /mnt/rootfs or mount /usr as well and: # chroot /mnt/rootfs usermod -s /usr/local/bin/bash root > guidance? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Brian A. Seklecki CE-Pro Bikes, LLC 412-378-3823 (m) PGP Key Available Upon Request From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 04:07:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA101065687 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375758FC1B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q8R47W5L069956; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:07:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5063D0FE.1080102@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:07:26 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> <20120927031849.f3496a43.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120927031849.f3496a43.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:07:32 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: bad root shell in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:07:35 -0000 Thanks, all. On 09/26/12 19:18, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:06:18 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: >> I mistakenly changed the root shell to something which doesn't exist. >> Was trying to make it bash and used /bin/bash instead of /usr/local/bin/bash. > > A typical Linuxism. :-) Never run on one enough to learn any of those. It's a dumbism, too-fast-with-the-fingersism, slow-functioning-brainism... > That's why you should be using the "toor" account and leave "root" > unchanged. I realized that about the time I learned I had given root to a bad shell path; at which time I also realized I hadn't given toor a pw. > Some may say that as soon as you're changing the root > shell because you're doing much work as root, you're obvuously > doing something wrong. :-) A (too) faint voice in the back of my head was saying that... > Also note that tools like su ("su -m", "su -") and super are > in many cases better suited for making the CLI environment more > comfortable than changing the shell of the root account. That's what I usually do, but I was (am) having trouble getting .shrc to actually take. Was modifying passwd to fix my own account, and decided to "fix" root at the same time -- I had changed it to csh and didn't think that was a good idea. At first changed it back to /bin/sh, and then decided to try bash as it should be a super-set. Although I think that is probably unwise. > Maybe without rebooting you can do this: Enter "su -m" (if your > non-root user is allowed to su root, then enter "chsh" and set > the root shell back to the default. su -m won't work because of the bad shell "As a security precaution, if the target user's shell is a non-standard shell (as defined by getusershell(3)) and the caller's real uid is non- zero, su will fail." > When you can successfully boot into SUM, you will be prompted for > the shell to start. /bin/sh is the default shell (even though it > is a quite ugly dialog shell -- still it's considered a "maintenance > and emergency use only shell" at this point. It will be powerful > enough to call the "chsh" command to get root back into normal > condition. chsh and vipw won't work from SUM until you mount /usr, which fortunately was all intact. back on the road again, thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 04:18:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE8F106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46518FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88E43CFDB; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:18:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8R4ItM8003891; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:18:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:18:55 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120927061855.dce89280.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5063D0FE.1080102@dreamchaser.org> References: <5063A68A.8090107@dreamchaser.org> <20120927031849.f3496a43.freebsd@edvax.de> <5063D0FE.1080102@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: bad root shell in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:18:59 -0000 On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:07:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > Thanks, all. > > On 09/26/12 19:18, Polytropon wrote: > > That's why you should be using the "toor" account and leave "root" > > unchanged. > > I realized that about the time I learned I had given root to a bad shell path; > at which time I also realized I hadn't given toor a pw. The toor account will be locked until put into use, so no security risk. > > Maybe without rebooting you can do this: Enter "su -m" (if your > > non-root user is allowed to su root, then enter "chsh" and set > > the root shell back to the default. > > su -m won't work because of the bad shell > "As a security precaution, if the target user's shell is a non-standard > shell (as defined by getusershell(3)) and the caller's real uid is non- > zero, su will fail." Ah okay, I didn't check that security feature in particular. As "su -m" usually "continues" the current user shell, as described for the -m option: Leave the environment unmodified. The invoked shell is your login shell, and no directory changes are made. Immediately followed by the restriction you quoted. :-) > > When you can successfully boot into SUM, you will be prompted for > > the shell to start. /bin/sh is the default shell (even though it > > is a quite ugly dialog shell -- still it's considered a "maintenance > > and emergency use only shell" at this point. It will be powerful > > enough to call the "chsh" command to get root back into normal > > condition. > > chsh and vipw won't work from SUM until you mount /usr, > which fortunately was all intact. That's correct, those are located in /usr/bin (which _may_ be on a separate partition that requires mounting before use). Depending on how $EDITOR is set (_if_ it should be set somehow), the availability of this editor (default: /usr/bin/vi) will decide about the functionality of the vipw or chsh commands. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 05:08:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06FD106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716558FC15 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q8R58XEp070114 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:08:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5063DF4B.1060904@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:08:27 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:08:34 -0600 (MDT) Subject: trouble getting .shrc to take X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:08:29 -0000 Having set my shell to either sh or bash, I can't seem to get .shrc to take. If I have a .shrc that looks like: PROMPT_DIRTRIM=3; export PROMPT_DIRTRIM PS1=\\w$ ; export PS1 PS1 is not defined when I log in, and the prompt is set to the default instead. If I do ./.shrc nothing seems to change; although executing the above commands from the shell itself works. What am I missing? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 05:22:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C468010656D1 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8413B8FC14 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4953A3D068; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8R5MRTo004236; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120927072227.9f57fff0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5063DF4B.1060904@dreamchaser.org> References: <5063DF4B.1060904@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: trouble getting .shrc to take X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:22:31 -0000 On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:08:27 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > Having set my shell to either sh or bash, > I can't seem to get .shrc to take. > If I have a .shrc that looks like: > > PROMPT_DIRTRIM=3; export PROMPT_DIRTRIM > PS1=\\w$ ; export PS1 > > PS1 is not defined when I log in, and the prompt is set to the default instead. > > If I do > ./.shrc > nothing seems to change; > although executing the above commands from the shell itself works. > > What am I missing? As far as I see from "man sh", the system's shell does not support PROMPT_DIRTRIM, so it's a bash feature. According to "man bash", its initialisation file is called ~/.bashrc. For example, if I put export PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ " into ~/.bashrc and execute bash, I get a standard prompt. So it should only be a matter of the correct file name. Note that bash has several files it can process at startup time, such as .bash_login, .profile and .bashrc. Their order is described in the manual, e. g. When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-inter- active shell with the --login option, it first reads and executes com- mands from the file /etc/profile, if that file exists. After reading that file, it looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile, in that order, and reads and executes commands from the first one that exists and is readable. When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists. This may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of ~/.bashrc. You can find more information in the "INVOCATION" section of the manual at "man bash". There are files for per-user configuration as well as system-wide files. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 06:25:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF333106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601688FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8R6P6hF084848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:25:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8R6P5BX084845; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:25:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:25:05 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Ed Flecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-864707079-1348727106=:60743" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:25:13 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-864707079-1348727106=:60743 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12-0700, Ed Flecko wrote: > I see that CVS is being phased out in favor of subversion. > > I follow the documentation to keep my system up to date by doing: > > # cd /usr/src > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel > # shutdown -r now > > and then... > > # mount -u / > # mount -a -t ufs > # adjkerntz -i > # mergemaster -p > # cd /usr/src > # make installworld > # mergemaster > # reboot > > I've "pre-populated" my /usr/ports, /usr/src and /usr/src/sys > directories when I installed my system. > > I've installed subversion from package, I want to follow the Stable > (same as "Patch", right?) branch, and I'm struggling how to best use > subversion to update my kernel source, system files, documentation, > etc., so I can keep my system up to date. > > Can someone tell me how to use subversion to keep my /usr/ports, > /usr/src and /usr/src/sys directories up to date? This isn't really an answer to your question. I switched from CVSup to Subversion for tracking base/stable/9 and ports/head on one of my computers not long ago. I still use local CVS for tracking my local changes. It works quite well without interfering with each other. Also, CVS is very lightweight, in more than one sense, compared to Subversion. Make sure your /usr/src and /usr/ports directories does not contain files and directories served by Subversion, they will hinder extraction/updating when checking out a Subversion working copy on top of the existing hierarchy. Simply delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your local files back into place. Depending on your needs, you might wanna set up a local Subversion repo mirror. Here's my writeup on the subject: http://ximalas.info/2012/09/09/making-your-own-freebsd-subversion-repository-mirror/ -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-864707079-1348727106=:60743-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 06:34:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D854106566C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp3.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0898C8FC14 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:34:54 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Wk6Z91xtQ5S+i6xVIoh7xmVyVvQ9mj8etLt5kWkJX+s= c=1 sm=0 a=FJQJNeKfBPIA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=sOrlU28OAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=EvrYkPo9AAAA:8 a=U7ntvY_eIwZWxYo_i6oA:9 a=zaZpSGuFtyAA:10 a=cZ52Q3kRk8IA:10 a=AcdsImxJPJ9Yo6Ye3TGm+Q==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.34.76 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.34.76] ([74.134.34.76:50748] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 65/DF-15595-783F3605; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:34:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:34:47 -0400 Message-ID: <65.DF.15595.783F3605@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:34:55 -0000 from "David J. Weller-Fahy" : > svn update /usr/src/ When you use svn the first time, svn doesn't know where the repository is, and svn repository is not fully in sync with cvs or csup repository. So you might need, in a fresh directory, svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src This is for 9-stable. To update, svn up /usr/src To find paths for other repositories, http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base Web site reference is http://mebsd.com/configure-freebsd-servers/update-freebsd-source-tree-using-subversion-svn.html Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 06:41:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14295106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72728FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E089278F3 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8R6fZtW004897 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:41:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:41:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120927084135.135c7c0d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <65.DF.15595.783F3605@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> References: <65.DF.15595.783F3605@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:41:38 -0000 On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:34:47 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > from "David J. Weller-Fahy" : > > > svn update /usr/src/ > > When you use svn the first time, svn doesn't know where the repository is, > and svn repository is not fully in sync with cvs or csup repository. > > So you might need, in a fresh directory, > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src > > This is for 9-stable. > > To update, > > svn up /usr/src > > To find paths for other repositories, > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base > > Web site reference is > http://mebsd.com/configure-freebsd-servers/update-freebsd-source-tree-using-subversion-svn.html Does anyone know if there are already plans to make svn part of the base system and integrate it with make, so that one can use "make update" (in /usr/src and/or /usr/ports) with control files or options (e. g. in /etc/make.conf) to have influence on the updating behaviour (if to track RELEASE, RELEASE-p, STABLE or HEAD / CURRENT)? In the past, the additional package cvsup-without-gui had to be installed (like Subversion today) before csup was created and incorporated to the OS... I'm currently using csup with this approach and would be interested if Subversion can provide the same easy interface to that kind of functionality. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 06:52:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4663C106566B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E283F8FC12 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q8R6qZM2070376; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:52:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5063F7AD.6000705@dreamchaser.org> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:52:29 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <5063DF4B.1060904@dreamchaser.org> <20120927072227.9f57fff0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120927072227.9f57fff0.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:52:35 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: trouble getting .shrc to take X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:52:36 -0000 On 09/26/12 23:22, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:08:27 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: >> Having set my shell to either sh or bash, >> I can't seem to get .shrc to take. >> If I have a .shrc that looks like: >> >> PROMPT_DIRTRIM=3; export PROMPT_DIRTRIM >> PS1=\\w$ ; export PS1 >> >> PS1 is not defined when I log in, and the prompt is set to the default instead. >> >> If I do >> ./.shrc >> nothing seems to change; >> although executing the above commands from the shell itself works. >> >> What am I missing? > > As far as I see from "man sh", the system's shell does not > support PROMPT_DIRTRIM, so it's a bash feature. Didn't realize that, thanks. And apparently I lied; using sh does cause .shrc to be used, but not when bash is used. > According to "man bash", its initialisation file is called > ~/.bashrc. For example, if I put > > export PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ " > > into ~/.bashrc and execute bash, I get a standard prompt. So > it should only be a matter of the correct file name. > Note that bash has several files it can process at startup > time, such as .bash_login, .profile and .bashrc. Their order > is described in the manual, e. g. > > When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-inter- > active shell with the --login option, it first reads and executes com- > mands from the file /etc/profile, if that file exists. After reading > that file, it looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile, > in that order, and reads and executes commands from the first one that > exists and is readable. > > When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash > reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists. This > may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option > will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of > ~/.bashrc. > > You can find more information in the "INVOCATION" section of the > manual at "man bash". There are files for per-user configuration > as well as system-wide files. I thought .shrc was used by bash as well, but looking further I see it only uses .shrc, via ENV, that when it is invoked as sh; which it's not when it's the startup shell and /bin/sh isn't a link to it. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 07:26:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B5A106566B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ACF8FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8R7PwJr082490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:26:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q8R7PwJr082490 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1348730766; bh=Y2Ocl/lcb7xB+Ex6Xa/VRxQEgrxedG0SszcspgRGVpA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=gkhM5kPDloRmSw6qGwTT9s80Mr8/l59jvNa9eTVyPUb0M/jWVnAfEezGUjl2KvGqJ +QqKbmuDNkCVFFF9U/d58rzQCPrWO7YyOOHHt03O0Y6dzoNerK+PQQ60xDaGRq/zUu 7cYpDhgEV3ZsZm3ub3c1uACkqtKhwPMj9tEYoVjw= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <5063FF86.7070406@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:25:58 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <65.DF.15595.783F3605@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> <20120927084135.135c7c0d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120927084135.135c7c0d.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, DKIM_SIGNED,SPF_FAIL,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:26:14 -0000 On 27/09/2012 07:41, Polytropon wrote: > Does anyone know if there are already plans to make svn part > of the base system and integrate it with make, so that one > can use "make update" (in /usr/src and/or /usr/ports) with > control files or options (e. g. in /etc/make.conf) to have > influence on the updating behaviour (if to track RELEASE, > RELEASE-p, STABLE or HEAD / CURRENT)? In the past, > the additional package cvsup-without-gui had to be installed > (like Subversion today) before csup was created and incorporated > to the OS... > > I'm currently using csup with this approach and would be > interested if Subversion can provide the same easy interface > to that kind of functionality. You can already use subversion with 'make update' -- unless you override it with settings in /etc/make.conf, the ports or src Makefiles will detect the presence of a .svn directory and from that automatically deduce it should use svn to update the respective trees. Whether svn will ever be incorporated in the base system is a different question. As far as I know, there aren't any plans to bring it in at the moment (BICBW). Maintaining vendor imports of software from actively developed projects like SVN in two or more release branches and head is quite a burden and the tendency recently is to prefer to use the ports instead. (Especially considering that SVN has a reasonably large dependency tree.) There has been talk of "svnsup" analogous to "csup" and I believe some work has been done, but no idea what state that project is in, nor if that would be added to base once it achieves sufficient maturity. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 09:14:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964DB106566C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 071588FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.215] by nm19.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 09:14:44 -0000 Received: from [77.238.184.52] by tm8.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 09:14:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp121.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 09:14:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1348737284; bh=w6yE1FIj4r4UVIbHaJaCK6wtfFtRGmSqoRtPR7Y+oho=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=MVxykkP49C3VEy3ksxg0cKnKDNjlbRUkDEVXXBc89wP1JoTc3VclC0+XwcESQVtl6rCz5q3cGPkAqCxWJ+9dJiopTR4rN4v26nd9mwNwF9iZkIr1gDOh1AvPNw+IK5juOs4Kouaw/6CMDeXKZA9qDq1shM4f221tuvVLY5OnSBU= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 167935.16014.bm@smtp121.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Dm6fnlEVM1n7TEm4QEwLDUkp_T0OKsylzWgIuHTj378vNWt _qjdVMu_VsUhR7hLQchOy_T.c6j7wkx1jG3weQYQAI57ngEo_sljZIP.5rEd Y_VYsz.dSKV5jgxI7hysZVvs9IaEpY3JQevtsML91WoQqz2..hn_TNzSnJDQ lD6j9algXMu0_7zyqr6dOcRFdlz35Amwc8iYI1.p0Tt02cHwx47qs4Gx8WTt pWR60v5DwM75kW12Cet9nHMdU4g9XnivJyaX.lSBlvaS3jk.A_HcWtuU1J04 kAfDpKBwpsHaI3urGNbuS_AvTjcXJ.IAQt7NMVft5.00uRClgfFAxwaythaR OdnZy1rSTeyC3bqmx5KmUgdUv6iXb6fTM5t4vRlAAudkTb.e9qZbVmyszXHf _hbKWCqupnFFGKJd6zjrI9M5YEWOIASWw1RcYTqPVN2HvL9IKZg4.YJx7FyX oinSIXVh_7v1pumPP.XRrj0L2eotaKlYz_WXTzSoeG3arE2yOKgM316N_ldM hZ6pZus.a2OH_56HgEouDJ4NBX4USD5hSVwzvq904SuW3EjA- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.214.54 with plain) by smtp121.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2012 09:14:44 +0000 GMT Received: by bkcjf20 with SMTP id jf20so277614bkc.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.38.134 with SMTP id g6mr1415524lbk.39.1348737283697; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:14:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.26.65 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:14:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Alexandre Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:14:23 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ed Flecko , Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:14:51 -0000 On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Ed Flecko wrote: > > Thank you. > > I am using a custom kernel, but you're right - I should have said so. > > :-) > > Do you have any feedback using subversion? I know I can still use > csup; I'm basically trying to figure out how to subversion to achieve > the same result. > > Ed Hi Ed and Polytropon, Using "freebsd-update" tool does not mean you cannot use a custom kernel on this machine. These lines taken from the Handbook confirm this : [...] The default is to update the source code, the entire base system, and the kernel. [...] The freebsd-update utility can automatically update the GENERIC kernel only. If a custom kernel is in use, it will have to be rebuilt and reinstalled after freebsd-update finishes installing the rest of the updates. However,freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running) kernel of the system. [...] Sources : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html "freebsd-update" tool works only with -RELEASE, you are right. Best Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 11:05:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8C4106566B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@noos.larseighner.com) Received: from emailserver2.asdf456.com (emailserver2.asdf456.com [72.18.207.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A7388FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8640 invoked by uid 0); 27 Sep 2012 10:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO noos.larseighner.com) (71.20.75.102) by emailserver2.asdf456.com with SMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:58:23 -0700 Received: by noos.larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@noos.larseighner.com; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:56:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:56:17 -0500 (CDT) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@noos.larseighnerhome.com To: freebsd-questions@Freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:05:46 -0000 If only subversion had some scripts similar to the *-supfile s with cvsup, including some "first time scripts." -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 12:52:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A580106564A; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B51B8FC0A; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjf20 with SMTP id jf20so659022bkc.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eZshetd29ZQ29uUljS/VePfBCMR2WZE0drWScNlrLDA=; b=RD7W4Ju6PryxzYwEFhrJN8rhaUBTd74q9Sm8gpyryd3k34g2Xmdi2dXWFQaxpdbI22 l01L4M/o6afkGf0wXvleWnq8XitsoY5Dh54i3E20m5gPNUQHAqwjThIo1BZDue1K5UbK l1YRWnPI2rxtsn+58uvS1hTb6VtxnBdJnNRumXr6CrKQOp72xosFqgtMN26Br6jMbueL ma2AwbJi258pTVSfZSM4BRs7Qzo9Ru9sfLyfi6xb6iD/TcMyjPpuxeps8kXYfxZIBkzZ E2iKrm+az/j2BPwRxvsayqhVXbpe1rbCg7CPyPavfWjNPgfqqkr+RJCjA0vXW4rtH4UT 0Khg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.49.202 with SMTP id w10mr1556939lbn.109.1348750350277; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.69.39 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <004a01cd9c24$34309fd0$9c91df70$@fisglobal.com> References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> <003001cd9c22$efe55e20$cfb01a60$@freebsd.org> <004a01cd9c24$34309fd0$9c91df70$@fisglobal.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:52:30 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7z46ZpSQrCsfaSetpERNnB9XT4Q Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: Devin Teske Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: dteske@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:52:33 -0000 On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > > > All patched. > > http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240972 > > Can you test? I'll close the PR upon success. Success! Thanks! -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 14:20:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A083E1065670 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@gefreeman.com) Received: from p3plsmtpa06-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C888FC15 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.7] ([98.17.167.219]) by p3plsmtpa06-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id 4EJ71k0034kLvM601EJ7Mf; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:18:07 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Greg Freeman Message-Id: <776A1706-4A59-4F44-BCEE-5D4BF69CF3A0@gefreeman.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:18:06 -0400 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A403) Cc: Subject: BSD on IOS hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:20:44 -0000 Is it possible to load FreeBSD on an Apple Mobile device designed to run IOS= ? There are a lot of old iPads out there. If we could repurpose them to st= raight Unix pads that might be cool. =46rom there shells and then maybe an o= pen source alternative to IOS or Android. Maybe a way for people to get fre= e of the info pirates.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 15:05:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C5E1065679 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086998FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9so613970oag.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:05:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=338tzjfs/iXK1gO+1fKjZJEazIp2CHV+K+Horsz9KSk=; b=fjO00JTKP7q6DolBNtXYI72uCbl7gq/Pple+9Ri3v3GGiYCFT3PqJBhuaa3yofgGVF 9TD4CPt1dqlG1QBjQhQj5yiP2AUEhhnge43yz3AcH9dUcnjTtS77M10B8fXRIpipCL3C kr94duZ5sijMYf+Z8jlpKwAgjLDbU6SD8dPP+lNBAcPtmzs774e9cqW4w1FfzBohtNch 3MhpxqGAIJMlMu6T1pQ7EA3jGxz4jksmengTcnTNNZ7aYflQ0H6+WyuEFjaPgoYtxDN3 /CrYye6w4X+PwRARpUa1f9Fbe3OGvatjgNu3dgX+RPUanpYNc+9/nDzT7B0cH+x4Dqyo gX9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.169.75 with SMTP id ac11mr3399388oec.12.1348758329636; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:05:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Subversion output: Node remains in conflict ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:05:31 -0000 When I ran the following command using subversion, here's what I get: fbsd# svn up /usr/src Updating '.': Skipped 'lib' -- Node remains in conflict Skipped 'sys' -- Node remains in conflict At revision 240997. Summary of conflicts: Skipped paths: 2 fbsd# svn up /usr/ports Skipped '/usr/ports' Summary of conflicts: Skipped paths: 1 fbsd# cd /usr/ports fbsd# make fetchindex /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2 100% of 1623 kB 4569 kBps fbsd# pkg_version -l '<' subversion < fbsd# Can someone tell me what "Node remains in conflict" means and how to I correct this...or do I need to worry about it at all??? Thank you! Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 15:07:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE69E1065673 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED878FC1E for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RF7aI5032817 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:07:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <50646BAE.20102@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:07:26 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <5050E2EC.8070309@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5050E2EC.8070309@sentex.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 64.7.153.18 Subject: Re: LSI 9750-4i (tws based cards) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:07:37 -0000 On 9/12/2012 3:30 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Does anyone have any experience with these cards ? We are looking for a > controller that has a little more gas than the twa based cards which > have been very reliable and stable for us on FreeBSD. I dont have any > experience with 3ware/LSI's cards that use the tws driver. Has anyone > used them yet ? For the archives... I ordered a 3ware 9750 4i card to test with and its quite fast! There is a small bug in the driver fixed now in HEAD as well as some cosmetic changes. But other than that it seems pretty solid. The same management interface as the twa and twe based cards. I ran a test box using a kernel with INVARIANTS and WITNESS with the card and 4 10k disks in raid 10. The card seems pretty zippy for the price. RW performance does seem to take advantage of the faster disk speeds 0{3w9750}# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test bs=1024k count=9000 9000+0 records in 9000+0 records out 9437184000 bytes transferred in 39.859600 secs (236760629 bytes/sec) 0{3w9750}# 0{3w9750}# umount /mnt 0{3w9750}# mount /dev/da0 /mnt 0{3w9750}# dd if=/mnt/test of=/dev/null bs=1024k 9000+0 records in 9000+0 records out 9437184000 bytes transferred in 27.887930 secs (338396720 bytes/sec) 0{3w9750}# For stress testing, I ran the disk.cfg component of http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/index.html as well as random copies of dbench and bonnie as well as periodically accessing the disk while the stress scripts ran for 72hrs. The OS was netbooted, RELENG9 AMD64 0{3w9750}# tw_cli "/c0 show" Unit UnitType Status %RCmpl %V/I/M Stripe Size(GB) Cache AVrfy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ u0 RAID-10 OK - - 256K 931.303 RiW ON VPort Status Unit Size Type Phy Encl-Slot Model ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ p0 OK u0 465.76 GB SATA 0 - WDC WD5002AALX-00J3 p1 OK u0 465.76 GB SATA 1 - WDC WD5002AALX-00J3 p2 OK u0 465.76 GB SATA 2 - WDC WD5002AALX-00J3 p3 OK u0 465.76 GB SATA 3 - WDC WD5002AALX-00J3 0{3w9750}# For some reason the card defaults legacy interrupts. Adding hw.tws.enable_msi=1 to /boot/loader.conf fixes that LSI 3ware device driver for SAS/SATA storage controllers, version: 10.80.00.003 tws0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xc2460000-0xc2463fff,0xc2400000-0xc243ffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 tws0: Using MSI tws0: Controller details: Model 9750-4i, 8 Phys, Firmware FH9X 5.12.00.007, BIOS BE9X 5.11.00.006 (probe65:tws0:0:65:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 (probe65:tws0:0:65:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID (probe65:tws0:0:65:0): Error 22, Unretryable error da0 at tws0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 6000.000MB/s transfers da0: 953654MB (1953083392 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 121573C) tws0@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x010400 card=0x000113c1 chip=0x101013c1 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3ware Inc' device = '9750 SAS2/SATA-II RAID PCIe' class = mass storage subclass = RAID bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x4000, size 256, enabled bar [14] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xc2460000, size 16384, enabled bar [1c] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xc2400000, size 262144, enabled cap 01[50] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 cap 10[68] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(4096) link x4(x8) cap 03[d0] = VPD cap 05[a8] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit enabled with 1 message ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 1 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected ecap 0004[138] = unknown 1 In summary, we like the card on FreeBSD. We make heavy use of the older 3ware cards in our company on various platforms, so our staff are comfortable using the management tools to swap out dead drives. We will probably start to use these cards for customer builds in the future where they need faster IO. ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 15:18:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0E9106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493528FC15 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so1202266obb.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:18:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EccULqoGl+pVqxV1utfTeDK3tvW+UXDpBb7j2NNgfbM=; b=Uyo/o/C0r5Mv87DYhEgH1Lmg8v7nhCinOIofY3NtFgs90HsgStELXYFafbkgtpuIo6 sG8+EEK3vT2Z2j6TvyuJyQ8U1jXvscYwRrnffFBq0ocFDcyerj3eqbr175RJDUU8E2gJ aYyYXXstW0eG4BZfF2ygaSN0D7XMocaBISVd/UvByu/a+BNijzSrmppLVmUygdT1DyG4 xWivDlby20F9SolAYQP2GP5Wy9DfTXte12V2fipMbZmTDqOh84c053Q+F5bKgo6lwWra H2Xn/CYFNGBCT/Mkhx1FloCMdPiR1DSEr5bTEEvGZs8FOys+QdWS9SF3kunsAJI+tA1N iU5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.32.136 with SMTP id j8mr3545141oei.0.1348759103554; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:18:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:18:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:18:24 -0000 Thank you all! I'm a little confused by Trond's reply, "Make sure your /usr/src and /usr/ports directories does not contain files and directories served by Subversion, they will hinder extraction/updating when checking out a Subversion working copy on top of the existing hierarchy. Simply delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your local files back into place." 1.) What is meant by deleting all non-local files? What files is he referring to? 2.) If I rename /usr/src/sys to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your local files back into place, won't that be replacing new files with the older files? 3.) These steps are just meant for the initial check out, aren't they??? Once I've checked out (i.e., "downloaded", right?) the current files, I'll only need to: svn update /usr/ports..., etc. from that point forward and not "delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your local files back into place"...Is that right? Thank you again, Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 16:22:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE447106564A; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF198FC0C; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa04.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8RGMWRR010257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:22:33 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.100] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:22:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:22:30 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <6AF90982-4EAA-4B73-BF89-4FC29EAA803F@fisglobal.com> References: <1d1501cd9c16$6908a440$3b19ecc0$@freebsd.org> <1d3b01cd9c19$b7ae95c0$270bc140$@fisglobal.com> <1d5301cd9c1d$18d99630$4a8cc290$@freebsd.org> <003001cd9c22$efe55e20$cfb01a60$@freebsd.org> <004a01cd9c24$34309fd0$9c91df70$@fisglobal.com> To: Rick Miller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-27_06:2012-09-27, 2012-09-27, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: dteske@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x sysisntall dists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:22:35 -0000 On Sep 27, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Devin Teske = wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> All patched. >>=20 >> http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240972 >>=20 >> Can you test? I'll close the PR upon success. >=20 > Success! Thanks! >=20 Excellent! Thank you for bringing this to my attention. --=20 Devin P.S. Closed PR (no releases to MFS) _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 16:24:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F13106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EBB8FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RGO4S4090532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:24:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8RGO463090529; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:24:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:24:04 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Ed Flecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-408008236-1348763044=:60743" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:24:11 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-408008236-1348763044=:60743 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:18-0700, Ed Flecko wrote: > Thank you all! > > I'm a little confused by Trond's reply, > > "Make sure your /usr/src and /usr/ports directories does not contain > files and directories served by Subversion, they will hinder > extraction/updating when checking out a Subversion working copy on top > of the existing hierarchy. > > Simply delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys to, say > /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your local files > back into place." > > 1.) What is meant by deleting all non-local files? What files is he > referring to? First, I may have misread your question. Others have provided far better answers to your exact question. I use my local CVS repo to track changes I make to files I create or edit myself, like /etc/rc.conf, /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/SOMECUSTOMKERNEL, etc. When I switched from CVSup to Subversion, I let the directory /usr/src/sys exist, but only with my own files stored within this hierarchy, e.g. my custom kernel configuration file, /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/ENTERPRISE. The very existence of the directory /usr/src/sys prohibited Subversion from populating the directory /usr/src/sys with the desired contents. Thus, I had to delete all files and directories made during the intial svn co operation, including the special .svn directory, rename sys to sys0 as described in my previous email, redo the svn co operation, and finally move my own (custom) files back into place. Afterwards, it's simply a matter of running svn update to update source files from the chosen svn repo, and in my case, check in any local changes made to the local CVS repo I use for my configuration management. Maybe me adding CVS to the mix caused or still cause confusion. > 2.) If I rename /usr/src/sys to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion > check out, and move your local files back into place, won't that be > replacing new files with the older files? I was indirectly referring to local edited files, such as custom kernel configuration files. My bad for not making this clearer. > 3.) These steps are just meant for the initial check out, aren't > they??? Once I've checked out (i.e., "downloaded", right?) the current > files, I'll only need to: svn update /usr/ports..., etc. from that > point forward and not "delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys > to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your > local files back into place"...Is that right? True. I had to do the rename and move files dance only once. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-408008236-1348763044=:60743-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 17:54:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8EC106566B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C9CD8FC1D for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [72.30.22.78] by nm12.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 17:54:34 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.11] by tm12.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 17:54:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1011.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 17:54:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 892480.84875.bm@omp1011.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 93439 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Sep 2012 17:54:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1348768474; bh=Ij3wqCnj3k82T+f9pgIxfpWLx0mEWeYY75tQdNci/LU=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iI4MdfKqWSFH5G+X8Pn7jirlynbowCj1h1cZ9HPln1JVEhpGvt5QjaHybNsEQboz/s5sz/M06goQZyCeHaW6myE0umK2q8dRtvvLqvMmcyE7cwc92/vL7OMbsJ8LWcSCfxtx9IgPPgdRleBJe+KUqU66XzDn93r7beFHtbKUk24= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y04kxCMRP0Y/53hpE4R9X9Hpma8vNwJE2YHeb9aE9qf4KoT8lO7hwl2lAkblOEuYfbQ+79M/gXbHQrNd40NYMC5GZGY7qvBxEwQ1K5h1dRzywMMGRNxAQkIAzCZbA+iJNfmZirNEktv0I2VkPTNSPWxU8AHsuJceVD0EZtypMVE=; X-YMail-OSG: eLT7yGQVM1l9O3ztJt1iBbEYYGsdspWgVbyJwL7UHBcAtt7 nO2eyJWPX.ZtRdumRCiP77FmCll3DlTlNLWX85OEdiDP0W3v5QpsKk1Zm_U4 v36CR3yGja8G67LltjiRXxzHaz3oESTRbk2GhBj1_u_KhWPsNLALoUydbuM4 TGRiBzG9ZDBxITQA.oVOFfLZi0.b63jLWfHoYxWIpVu159i_I0c3LKJ_SIuc du_PmU9HYoV0i8fgCYTcEUqiLuzeyib88xPBcB5RqDq0eYF1r8Y1adya0SUI ivFL8E1CRPa8dPGTHbh.lDl4So7xI0UKkWf62A6xATsEiYFhyRn1DfB1t0cq dKqQrIxAChw0K5j55iz.iAAfG0YJ0AlAJwwTKv7tSXwGqoWNYnUpb8AQv5Gk Md5LpyVijn4hcDfNFBwBJWXHntkjEStDLr3QwS3y63fD6jfcJ6xlvFbLzyfe mtjTIYN6m6GEogoYalkRQtQjHrIPC2flBQvkyhZNWTaaipUAlztmcCzBA4XF ZkEwqNDO_jOg5FAT4vYyd0I9SyukWg8AmBNcLwAyPSytz685nXvoc7QJiLrb gfgJbcOGc6JRr6zcrHKu2YwlPFA77QhDjxfQ4wJlRVkviy.Ok5.YTUNYSvQd CqQvhsj6kXiR1rrrgtPUFZRZUlpW4B2tHZGj6TYI- Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:54:34 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.434 Message-ID: <1348768474.73545.YahooMailNeo@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:54:34 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: FreeBSD on IBM Power 560 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:54:40 -0000 Hi, does anyone knows if FreeBSD can be installed on this machine:=0A=0Ahtt= p://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/560/=0A=0AIt's=0A an PPC (Power6)= based machine. Currently it uses OpenSuse 10, but as it=0A is a discontinu= ed version, I would like to know if I can replace it =0Awith a newer versio= n of FreeBSD.=0A=A0=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 17:53:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BF3106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97EF68FC17 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [72.30.22.93] by nm15.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 17:53:04 -0000 Received: from [72.30.22.38] by tm15.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 17:53:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1068.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 17:53:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 254423.36143.bm@omp1068.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 70057 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Sep 2012 17:53:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1348768384; bh=dh/F2uoqZvy+vJ/DQ9LeuBiVUKc1U5FMB6znr1Yq/cE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=l4QDKbdSt/72caAlfcb4H46RMADDUyNVjTOelpXpWKONyZyYrfg48MQeA+UFlARfLgYDH3qSoxb26Ka9M5uM7itrNqPwN5tPvLDLQb2Pjzb/tp9SAb5GqR3vTJsPt61VjauPrDT1cHz4zaYCZ/KZYnW1vgf2XLhON1PFMLofSDs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YmoJhrDdx6bZrd/7w0asCeQG4ZDlQEuvB5EEb0ISxDyFYz5P923ZQcWHq9+BBIHf9HeEgnbrwTBHOYTGd9sQnqhIjyDJilNrluhj2eldgvrJKB5H/Rr+FK6ZLakmeN62q0Q4dnEGqp+MNKZxEuegD6Uq1yM7k2mx7EN0B+kzYYI=; X-YMail-OSG: X2e1oKkVM1nYviAIohwDeg_2GedmdcMrvYF1rASTcyMb4Am NHMl.XPyP_3cH0n39DmwHVFSk5qvpabjska6CKEBSczijn3xRjEgi6g0314X ziX60fClMRMx6TaijLq_HdLFs4ItHcbGOd48Lq273itFKPF1fBj7XbNP._BP QsdxdIBBHbUnOyzZraMYZ4pCzh8PY4016w8J_s3rneeUUuC2123cd5vTPUkx Sxt0IDF3RZFYDLuP7z6qhbrMvJgwCommcSL9uoDyx2VWjxcukEdNp4g0np62 fWo..iEqNd3G1piTj_fqF1IwhN7Y9ALOAOB9ZweVMHFHQx5zjX2aMilw1auy qM1X9MjpX4opJh_278HxkT5p8EWeMoFIcFU5rfwJb3yIOaoj2cyxtpeSl_Bv 2zErx33JPj1yA.dERsc2COVpeueO9orAZAfJ8OkSeKNbKAaJZgHIRm0ZTm2y ua1TFhrs9yUxrDyRKLNn8dS.scdeyDgL9_bl0g5NiHivPPdcrOV6U2PFTS2B QqNoSnF82TbtUMIbJaXHg7CmUdXGPFu_dVSDEF73DZnOxlHs_n.ogLAkACnz E8wrpYiLGXXKRtIp3DKRNa5B8y_xU3THo7.RggknFfkBm7rum72Skv9xIp8e 6AXafWG5Ak25CwUc0MZO2X.rVHQsVjs7GusbjVpE- Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:53:03 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.434 Message-ID: <1348768383.69709.YahooMailNeo@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:53:03 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:38:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD on IBM Power 560 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:53:05 -0000 Hi, does anyone knows if FreeBSD can be installed on this machine:=0A=0Ahtt= p://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/560/=0A=0AIt's an PPC (Power6) ba= sed machine. Currently it uses OpenSuse 10, but as it is a discontinued ver= sion, I would like to know if I can replace it with a newer version of Free= BSD.=0A=A0=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 20:07:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8520A106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stuart@islogistics.com) Received: from pub2.fourmajor.com (fourmajor.com [69.55.234.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC478FC16 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.133] (ip68-228-85-63.oc.oc.cox.net [68.228.85.63]) (Authenticated sender: stu) by pub2.fourmajor.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF28D115F0 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5064B00B.7030900@islogistics.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:59:07 -0700 From: Stuart Matthews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: contributing to the ports collection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:07:38 -0000 Hi everyone, After several years of using FreeBSD, I have decided it is time to start contributing my time to the project. I have read through the relevant page on freebsd.org and intend to look into contributing in a couple of the ways listed there. However, my main interest is contributing a port to the ports collection. Specifically, I want to add WordShell (http://wordshell.net/) to the FreeBSD ports collection. I want to install it for myself, and I generally don't like using software outside of some sort of software manager wherein I can keep everything neatly up-to-date. How would I get started in adding something to the ports collection? Thanks, Stu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 20:18:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA957106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772188FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RKIMb1090882; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:18:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8RKIMlv090879; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:18:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:18:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ed Flecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:18:23 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion output: Node remains in conflict ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:18:23 -0000 On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Ed Flecko wrote: > When I ran the following command using subversion, here's what I get: > > fbsd# svn up /usr/src > Updating '.': > Skipped 'lib' -- Node remains in conflict > Skipped 'sys' -- Node remains in conflict > At revision 240997. > Summary of conflicts: > Skipped paths: 2 > > fbsd# svn up /usr/ports > Skipped '/usr/ports' > Summary of conflicts: > Skipped paths: 1 > > fbsd# cd /usr/ports > > fbsd# make fetchindex > /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2 100% of 1623 kB 4569 kBps > > fbsd# pkg_version -l '<' > subversion < > > fbsd# > > Can someone tell me what "Node remains in conflict" means and how to I > correct this...or do I need to worry about it at all??? Usually it means you are trying to run svn on a directory that was not created by an svn checkout. These directories are called working copies. So, after having backed up /usr/src and /usr/ports (if you have local changes), remove them and check out from the repository: svn checkout svn://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src svn checkout svn://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports Edit the URL for the first to match whatever version of FreeBSD is desired. After that checkout, merge any local changes back to those directories. After that, update them when desired: svn up /usr/src svn up /usr/ports From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 20:23:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E90106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1C68FC16 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RKBdpc090848; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:11:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8RKBdKs090845; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:11:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:11:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ed Flecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:11:40 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:23:36 -0000 On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Ed Flecko wrote: > Thank you all! > > I'm a little confused by Trond's reply, > > "Make sure your /usr/src and /usr/ports directories does not contain > files and directories served by Subversion, they will hinder > extraction/updating when checking out a Subversion working copy on top > of the existing hierarchy. > > Simply delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys to, say > /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your local files > back into place." > > 1.) What is meant by deleting all non-local files? What files is he > referring to? If you have made any local changes to files in /usr/src or /usr/ports, those changes will conflict with the versions svn will bring in. > 2.) If I rename /usr/src/sys to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion > check out, and move your local files back into place, won't that be > replacing new files with the older files? Yes, although svn will only care if those files differ from the files in the repository. Most people won't have any local changes anyway. > 3.) These steps are just meant for the initial check out, aren't > they??? Once I've checked out (i.e., "downloaded", right?) the current > files, I'll only need to: svn update /usr/ports..., etc. from that > point forward and not "delete all non-local files, rename /usr/src/sys > to, say /usr/src/sys0, do the Subversion check out, and move your > local files back into place"...Is that right? Yes. If a new version of a file conflicts with your local changes, svn will complain and try to help resolve those conflicts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 20:33:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BCB106566B for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D928FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjf20 with SMTP id jf20so1565608bkc.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:33:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jVQ/phVJvGOBnsOSq3nnz7JEqjvT3K+oyDxD4xWihv4=; b=nlG+6v20uR60cEagsurFy+87WmlGh1kfIU7GU4m5bvNVwf4ghnXqv+OofoqHA75Apo X8kMb1ngvxqK3xcdX1UUJnmBma26zxPmyCgJf9iwfzS5+P9bxuYh5r26vkTTBblBgFIh RNDohh1NHGG4dcVtVblsMChjl5um2H1m8eMzMAEnD03R0srvbPWreU3Ys7OLHlCgseSJ /dxJ9dRVCHFcFpiZ14tG5uSqAKYQqXJDrJfUfXgt6bzERX0MlyB855wfrq0IFSUMX3t6 jldTSwVXGG9L7X26HYUamejRK/EmZB1fSpIadLDyXVif7MAzVppSSgo5MvKtXSZk1Tzj YXaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.113.165 with SMTP id iz5mr4104687lab.48.1348778031094; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.21.103 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:33:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5064B00B.7030900@islogistics.com> References: <5064B00B.7030900@islogistics.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:33:51 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Stuart Matthews Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: contributing to the ports collection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:33:53 -0000 On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Stuart Matthews wrote: > Hi everyone, > > After several years of using FreeBSD, I have decided it is time to start > contributing my time to the project. I have read through the relevant page > on freebsd.org and intend to look into contributing in a couple of the ways > listed there. However, my main interest is contributing a port to the ports > collection. > > Specifically, I want to add WordShell (http://wordshell.net/) to the FreeBSD > ports collection. I want to install it for myself, and I generally don't > like using software outside of some sort of software manager wherein I can > keep everything neatly up-to-date. > > How would I get started in adding something to the ports collection? The porter's manual[1] is the place to start learning ;) [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html Cheers. > > Thanks, > Stu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 22:03:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3817E1065673 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01888FC15 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9so1193018oag.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+kZ54Eru838UXQ0SAcDf4kH5PMECpZ1bPhV1spuQlVg=; b=y/mQRIWxVvVgoaP6pQHOBCKtZoRowps0A91PFzpsMtwyYaH5mGNDwgH6wS1vJsKKlf cE3T81lQpWhvsfI1t9V2J1cGgJggb7T1QnHHxauipcN4DJVRNhW6bzS+79r63Qzzvl6O 9PcaUzVWqvbzPEUpvT8Pzt8OkV28RH1sSGQelkex7OTHSsI0qN/nGFp4J+29LOPH+CTC phPiG4tig7TjBfwAfXgTUpKnVomVQgXClOotKeC4AvV0YGz7+Z3i9x88EF3pe59sWgM/ FWVwW7JzaorPEdocIos6eift4Dlm2ze7Via0On00idp+NhFYZkJ8nY9U43vdptGlpRbl GMFg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.14.101 with SMTP id o5mr4405525obc.1.1348783427412; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:03:47 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:03:48 -0000 My goal is to simply have a production server that's fully patched, but I will be running custom kernels (which is why I'm not using freebsd-update). I've seen a lot of subversion references to checking out the "head" branch and the "stable" branch. I understand the "head" branch is the most current, so that's the same as the "current" branch, right? If I understand correctly, "most" people will not follow the "current" branch for production servers. My goal is to have all of the files I need to rebuild my kernel and my system after security updates have been released, therefore I should do something like: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/stable/9 /usr/doc This will give me everything I need to recompile and have a fully patched system, right? I do not make changes to the src, ports, or doc directories. From that point forward, as new security patches are released, I can simply: svn up /usr/src svn up /usr/ports svn up /usr/doc and once again rebuild my kernel and system. Does this sound correct? Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 22:19:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209AD106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CCE8FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RMJnbs002724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:19:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8RMJnMs002721; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:19:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:19:49 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Ed Flecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-641855074-1348784389=:2700" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:19:54 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-641855074-1348784389=:2700 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:03-0700, Ed Flecko wrote: > My goal is to simply have a production server that's fully patched, > but I will be running custom kernels (which is why I'm not using > freebsd-update). I've seen a lot of subversion references to checking > out the "head" branch and the "stable" branch. > > I understand the "head" branch is the most current, so that's the same > as the "current" branch, right? > > If I understand correctly, "most" people will not follow the "current" > branch for production servers. > > My goal is to have all of the files I need to rebuild my kernel and my > system after security updates have been released, therefore I should > do something like: > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports The ports tree resides in ports/head no matter what branch from the main source tree you check out, i.e.: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/stable/9 /usr/doc > > This will give me everything I need to recompile and have a fully > patched system, right? > > I do not make changes to the src, ports, or doc directories. From that > point forward, as new security patches are released, I can simply: > > svn up /usr/src > > svn up /usr/ports > > svn up /usr/doc > > and once again rebuild my kernel and system. > > Does this sound correct? Yes. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-641855074-1348784389=:2700-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 22:39:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ECB106566C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2808FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so1776512obb.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iCLE3gN0+5zjUkvjFnZAGWUY8vHpOwnwljarVfPCONY=; b=bgDwYBkxK6/bGsu/GB+w/0WkXfXOjiD2OAd/DMj8EjwPB2PlyzsP0n+Fx7lNYGQQ1r xWkLc/ikK0ZHVGeou8Nn3s1tc8INktUmYLa7le94VazZW8+U7rzoFZUVBYZa0bqRL8Mx hM7urpH6UKJSnTAb5lyNWdJ97No+oUjXFOZieqNGHad4pK5pkuGzok61RXJTjky56xNT oG36rW0tN7Xf7CJVxJequEIF2LNsglSFFNS3tsC1Xx6Yr9jaFtqwqHDAq/JjwMb8QMk6 mKt08NDCC5f+X0og2o9uAyL14AaiSl84n6Pjh0uDmYsh8hxitkc6HXXa6ovNAsO4IZTR zByQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.169.75 with SMTP id ac11mr4439129oec.12.1348785553000; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:39:14 -0000 Cool...thank you Trond. Is that true of the "docs" branch as well, in other words... svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head /usr/doc works just fine? Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 23:08:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99986106564A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014FC8FC16 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RN7v1S002971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:07:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8RN7vvo002968; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:07:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:07:57 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Ed Flecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-1496514992-1348787277=:2700" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:08:01 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-1496514992-1348787277=:2700 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39-0700, Ed Flecko wrote: > Cool...thank you Trond. NP. > Is that true of the "docs" branch as well, in other words... > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head /usr/doc > > works just fine? Browsing through http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/, indicates http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/ being the current branch of the documentation, with release branches located at http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/release/ and below. E.g. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/, or svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0, for the upcoming 9.1-RELEASE. I've never CVSup'ed nor done any svn co/up ops on doc/head, but you seem to have got it right. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-1496514992-1348787277=:2700-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 01:28:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC971065670 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAA38FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so935330iea.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:28:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Gz6aYrgznI/y6pzCVfWbPqyoIm8NVBuM0CDycm8cUqc=; b=l7hRK9/OoeADgiKWUOegneQLZqjvsvPsI061aUmLAz28jmioEjjV3wnAYoE8fj3Zof 1sLKBtjPDdKg1numNBE9eOfRDFQx5VwIqyWfSUtyovpKygJucQ3N34dS912yn5uvjUwq ofcg0cvKyXxaBU+8rpDhk/59+zG64P1KMKlfBNBBsaqTdIOt4LJELLnWr5mLRG0AOO0R eCKQrSKT/sTIuegN9GtxY1kBVgPBSCxbkvwJGMMNJFdwx6RA/h5RF5B/EyTC6h1jXzUK slTxE4oBjXjyLTN39Nyi6A0D82mfQuH4hgpAJXTu2bvv22HIVlvk5s509nFPLyj/5/AE +l9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.160.165 with SMTP id xl5mr283289igb.0.1348795683575; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.25.200 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:28:03 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Anyone working on tablet configuration? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:28:09 -0000 Been awhile since I've posted here. Last thing I was working on was getting the digitizer recognized by X on a Fujitsu T-1010 tablet PC. Had some success in Linux, non in FreeBSD. But I still prefer our OS. Now that tablets have become mainstream I am hoping to connect with people already having some success in this endeavor. Looking for folks who have FreeBSD with a GUI running on an ARM single board computer that would be suitable for tablet use. If you are working on this, or are interested, please contact me at the address below. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ openslateproj@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 02:56:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE946106566C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from nm31-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm31-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 773958FC0A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.147] by nm31.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2012 02:56:43 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.64] by tm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2012 02:56:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp101.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2012 02:56:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1348801003; bh=xtMmpeU/j5Sj64geAnI2KSOndU6d1A6m2IQpPfWyRKc=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cXHKFa8lz3OpNy/zA0/1BN6x5co8EtdNq9+JIhVBwIlmCjAvPE2rXtqZJYKJUsyEtwZx8u6kIeSTR/6EslN+r9H40n7pPFDHb0kWxQYdxeolEPltOGMRzVDWsJ/RJL0b/njARk5e3tBccE27TJXGv2ojbC28RdU+4n630pHrmlc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 233834.28419.bm@smtp101.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: BOSeKLIVM1kIdY4DxqgffV4aZoK_2jPuWlhoB5FORSWyxzQ BzOZNtq7Rq.FzBWX7jHH3bxZELGQycLtPkOPlP2kaIh5.Me6yIoUygLiMat. SVLeykA6itudhMDU55dLjcjeVPtyPM8WKxBcay1P_x4eMvv79Z8691W8PFfu .qg7deu3LL9AD6vZn805M_td66N6SU1c6MdAQ.Be6UhVBSqig_95_og_0GNl w087M8qy6i.ISVA2rV3dxrfcdHe3YaaDIcvmVw4hfd.UQjqChTbryXIUyVAy DGaQZAmyqlcItEUjZT9YyXdF1o3Ihe16fF3O4zfsPOz.HwjbH953Y76L8qVc iGzbD_xXb1cXckgQA7cxBHMr1yFBey6ocePrdw0CeklNvXAz5gKcP69_pxSi KXEbthsuNn6m_r7jDuhu1_O8KQTX5KBWPDdIOT_vV1LwS3jNDjKFBErRPmTB EEDZcWaHKpqYMmL4xeofkGfsssxRx9Q-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- Received: from europa (mike.jeays@174.114.4.163 with login) by smtp101.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2012 19:56:43 -0700 PDT Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:56:51 -0000 I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 07:50:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9483106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BD68FC16 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so1402962eek.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:50:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkj2gIM2jPaKI+mrWe5f7NR5Y++kB2VNIZr20iR08Z0=; b=jxDNuL+Mol6nOsjx+MY103hES2JAF8T+gIqdu6JrDzxu61wVbH4chO4ziw6XewMqKT BxWtzeFDE2ycnhV/2HNSX0gIvOSgCw8wGyJPBzfRrTwujCtJ5hGUYkq47QVdJlOjLTBX OllKb9sdGHGKsfjq4xCZcDHC4yQosbMHMr7jZYIdCzKrHxXdctijxeewqnqqaVVfhjo5 +Qd9t17fYFNvMX2yCR74t86KqYCkrESn7jZ7xWjJ9lAMH+bb7j2trDYcUEe7bXE/cDij 68CvMOlhwPTpNXRMF6enV4u4wYGfoXUyEoGppqtbaYxVsQm1Tt5VIQIvLXjDxPWUvAdU qgcw== Received: by 10.14.178.6 with SMTP id e6mr8802027eem.36.1348818637987; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.105] (double-l.xs4all.nl. [80.126.205.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm23841277eep.2.2012.09.28.00.50.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <506556CC.5020608@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:50:36 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Flecko References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> FreeBSD" Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:50:39 -0000 Ed Flecko schreef: > My goal is to simply have a production server that's fully patched, > but I will be running custom kernels (which is why I'm not using > freebsd-update). I've seen a lot of subversion references to checking > out the "head" branch and the "stable" branch. > > I understand the "head" branch is the most current, so that's the same > as the "current" branch, right? > > If I understand correctly, "most" people will not follow the "current" > branch for production servers. > > My goal is to have all of the files I need to rebuild my kernel and my > system after security updates have been released, therefore I should > do something like: > > > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/stable/9 /usr/doc > > This will give me everything I need to recompile and have a fully > patched system, right? > > > > I do not make changes to the src, ports, or doc directories. From that > point forward, as new security patches are released, I can simply: > > svn up /usr/src > > svn up /usr/ports > > svn up /usr/doc > > and once again rebuild my kernel and system. > > > > Does this sound correct? > > > Ed > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It sounds correct but is not :D If you use svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src then you are tracking stable. Stable is a not a release that receives patches. Stable receives code from head(current) that has been tested in Current(head), but did not get real exposure in the stable branch which is now 9. Stable is the code that is altered between releases. So Stable might contain some bugs from head that are only exposed in the current code base. So if you want a production system which only receive patches you need to track release. svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src To sum it up: (please correct me if i am wrong) So for the latest and greatest use head which is FreeBSD 10 Current svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src If you want the stable branch use svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 /usr/src This will give you FreeBSD 9 Stable If you want to track release with patches use svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src This will give you FreeBSD 9.1-px where px is the patch level if any. I hope this clearify things a little bit regards Johan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 10:28:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A77106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44908FC0C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SASNCe009913 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:28:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8SASNZ9009912 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:28:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:28:23 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:28:26 -0000 [ Trond Endrestøl wrote on Fri 28.Sep'12 at 1:07:57 +0200 ] > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:39-0700, Ed Flecko wrote: > > > Cool...thank you Trond. > > NP. > > > Is that true of the "docs" branch as well, in other words... > > > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head /usr/doc > > > > works just fine? > > Browsing through http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/, indicates > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/ being the current branch of the > documentation, with release branches located at > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/release/ and below. > > E.g. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/, or > svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0, for the upcoming 9.1-RELEASE. > > I've never CVSup'ed nor done any svn co/up ops on doc/head, but you > seem to have got it right. Sorry to jump in on the thread, but I wondered about pulling in the docs using svn. I use svn for base updates and ports, but haven't yet don so the docs. My question is, does it pull in docs for all languages or can I exclude docs in languages that I don't need - I only need en docs. Cheers, Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 10:44:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91B81065670 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694028FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SAiAc0012893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:44:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8SAiAvA012890; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:44:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:44:10 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Jamie Paul Griffin In-Reply-To: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Message-ID: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-2032902075-1348829050=:2700" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:44:18 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-2032902075-1348829050=:2700 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:28+0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > My question is, does it pull in docs for all languages or can I > exclude docs in languages that I don't need - I only need en docs. Yes, you can check out a subset/subdirectory, e.g.: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1 /path/to/local/working/copy svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /path/to/local/working/copy -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-2032902075-1348829050=:2700-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 11:25:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0173E1065686 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounceothers1@carproperty.com) Received: from server2.carproperty.com (server2.carproperty.com [69.174.246.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53A98FC18 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:25:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=carproperty.com; s=default; h=Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:From:Subject:To; bh=nO8HyIM+8/C/8gOonsUhG6EF/y2hFvQWcCWM1MJXqkI=; b=ixAk6cegtEXlz076QCaOoja2Q5Yqx/dC5wRXd/ROslcDVFdzSXHr82bvtmKBFpyD9aIo1eUSJ4QA02FmGI10WwEHF72wsOg01H3myInlpiG/cZLI9apMK3F3fA3ZI140; Received: from cpgcar by server2.carproperty.com with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TGo6F-0004nF-Ba for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:40:11 -0500 To: Valued Member From: CarProperty.com Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:20:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-mid: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgLCBjNTAzICwgbTM4MjcgLCBzMTI3Mw X-Mailer: ACEM X-Sender: Message-ID: <20120926094011.2911.1449642147.swift@server2.carproperty.com> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.carproperty.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [500 500] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - carproperty.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Everythings bigger and I love Lucy special X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:25:24 -0000 Click here to forward this email to a friend (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8946&l=-http--carproperty.com/letters/p_f.php--Q-nl--E-4--A-c--E-503--A-m--E-3827--A-s--E-958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21)   (Vol 4 Issue 20 - October 2012 Edition)   Click here to see a web copy of this email (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8947&l=-http--carproperty.com/letters/p_v.php--Q-l--E-4--A-c--E-503--A-m--E-3827--A-s--E-958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21) **the Incredible Garage** **a worldwide publication of ** **Testimonials** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt/t_go.php?i=473&e=MzI0NDQ4Ng==&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/page.php--Q-id--E-24)     **Login** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt/t_go.php?i=473&e=MzI0NDQ4Ng==&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/member_login.php)     **Register** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt/t_go.php?i=473&e=MzI0NDQ4Ng==&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/join-agent-network.htm)     **Place AD** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt/t_go.php?i=473&e=MzI0NDQ4Ng==&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/choose_cat.php)     **Articles and Blog Posts** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt/t_go.php?i=473&e=MzI0NDQ4Ng==&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/page.php--Q-id--E-18) ______________________________________________________________________ Articles: - Fantastic property in Erie, Colorado has become available for those car collectors who know a good thing when they see it. It's a **Luxury Home and 6100 sq ft Garage (Denver CO area)** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8978&l=-http--carproperty.com/luxury-home-and-6100-sq-ft-garage-denver-co-area-ad64452366.htm) that has a 20 car garage. The Denver Colorado area was recently given Gold Award by Grubb & Ellis in their research of areas that have recovered lost jobs during the post recession era. - As we've all heard before, Everything is bigger in Texas. I tend to believe that especially during the Fall, when weather is nice and car racing and sport racing for you enthusiasts is really great. Texas also has a  penchant for big real estate and this place really fits the bill. The great thing is that you can live here if you choose to and it's less than 10 miles to Texas Motor Speedway and only 45 minutes to the Eagle Canyon Road Racing Circuit for you sports racers. If you're a car guy who loves racing this is a great opportunity. The house is nice, but you also get a 5 car garage that can park an RV or boat, plus 3 additional cars and there's a 30 AMP RV plug as part of the deal. What are you waiting for?**** .... CarProperty.com loves Lucy and we're pretty sure you do too. **For a limited time during our FALL SALE you can save 25% off any AD you place on CarProperty.com**. **Click on Lucy** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8980&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/add.php) and she'll take you to our ****Easy AD Order Form**** to get it done. To get your 25% discount use the coupon code: **FALLSALE**.. with this savings you really should add some AD extras with your order! (this offer expires October 15, 2012) ______________________________________________________________________ Checkout these really "Cool Car Property Searches"    **                So Cal Region:** * 5 car + garage homes in So Cal for UNDER $800,000 USD (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8962&l=-http--carproperty.com/unbelievable-list-of-5-plus-car-garage-houses-in-socal-for-under-800k-incredible-opportunities-ad94882299.htm) * 4 car garage homes (only 4 car garages) in So Cal for UNDER $800,000 USD (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8963&l=-http--carproperty.com/list-of-4-car-garage-homes-in-socal-for-under-800k-ad92762311.htm) * 5 car + garage homes in So Cal for OVER $2 Million Dollars (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8964&l=-http--carproperty.com/list-of-5-plus-car-garage-homes-in-socal-for-over-801k-ad93142313.htm) * 4 car garage homes in So Cal for OVER $1 Million Dollars (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8965&l=-http--carproperty.com/list-of-4-car-garage-homes-in-socal-for-over-801k-ad92952312.htm) **** **Arizona Phoenix and Scottsdale Region:** * 4 car + garage homes for sale that are bank owned REO properties. These can be diamond in the rough properties for you to discover (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8966&l=-http--carproperty.com/search.php--Q-do_search--E-Search--A-searchword--E---A-catid_search--E-6--A-e_36_from--E---A-e_36_to--E---A-e_9_from--E---A-e_9_to--E---A-e_280_from--E---A-e_280_to--E---A-e_281_from--E---A-e_281_to--E---A-e_282_from--E---A-e_282_to--E---A-e_164_from--E---A-e_164_to--E---A-e_247--E---A-e_38_from--E---A-e_38_to--E---A-e_41_from--E---A-e_41_to--E---A-e_42_from--E---A-e_42_to--E---A-e_47_from--E---A-e_47_to--E---A-e_48_from--E---A-e_48_to--E---A-e_117%5B%5D--E-311--A-e_22--E---A-e_24--E---A-e_25--E-AZ--A-e_33--E---A-e_26--E---A-do_search--E-Search) * 5 car + garage homes in all price ranges (includes Tucson) (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8967&l=-http--carproperty.com/search.php--Q-do_search--E-Search--A-searchword--E---A-catid_search--E-6--A-e_36_from--E---A-e_36_to--E---A-e_9_from--E---A-e_9_to--E---A-e_280_from--E---A-e_280_to--E---A-e_281_from--E---A-e_281_to--E---A-e_282_from--E---A-e_282_to--E---A-e_164_from--E---A-e_164_to--E---A-e_247--E---A-e_38_from--E---A-e_38_to--E---A-e_41_from--E---A-e_41_to--E---A-e_42_from--E---A-e_42_to--E---A-e_47_from--E---A-e_47_to--E---A-e_48_from--E---A-e_48_to--E---A-e_22--E---A-e_24--E---A-e_25--E-AZ--A-e_33--E---A-e_26--E---A-do_search--E-Search) "Cool Searches" on CarProperty.com were brought to you by Rare Realty (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8961&l=-http--carproperty.com/car-property-pro-member5412.htm) .... 5 Star Service and "the Rolls Royce of Representation"  Do you need a Car Property Search or are you selling a Car Property? If YES, then RARE REALTY is the company you need to call or email today.  ****Featured Properties and Collector Vehicles**** **Car Collector Garage Homes for sale** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8952&l=-http--carproperty.com/car-collector-garage-homes-for-sale-category6.htm) Houses with BIG garages for the neighborhood they're in and homes with custom or remodeled garages of any size; Houses with Boat or RV parking also qualify and can be posted. **Car Collector Garage Houses for rent** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8953&l=-http--carproperty.com/car-collector-garage-houses-for-rent-category146.htm) Brand new category! Now you can post your "for rent" BIG garage house ads here. This is a one-of-a-kind marketing opportunity. **Car Enthusiast and Racing Fan Vacation Rentals** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8954&l=-http--carproperty.com/car-enthusiast-and-racing-fan-vacation-rentals-category64.htm) You should target your vacation properties to vacationing car collectors & racing fans. Car events and races in your area increase demand ... advertise here. **Car Shows and Auctions** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8955&l=-http--carproperty.com/car-shows-and-auctions-post-events-and-auction-vehicles-here-category145.htm) Collector Cars being Auctioned... (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8956&l=-http--carproperty.com/collector-cars-being-auctioned-category130.htm) Collector Motorcycles being Auctioned... (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8957&l=-http--carproperty.com/collector-motorcycles-being-auctioned-category131.htm) **Collector Cars and more for sale** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8958&l=-http--carproperty.com/collector-cars-and-more-for-sale-post-yours-category18.htm) **(post yours)** **Commercial Real Estate** (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8959&l=-http--carproperty.com/commercial-real-estate-auto-use-ok-category7.htm) **(Auto Use OK)** ______________________________________________________________________ **Now open to the public every day from 10AM to 5PM** .. checkout America's Car Museum (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8969&l=-http--www.lemaymuseum.org/) to get information on their upcoming events and general admission ticket prices ______________________________________________________________________ **Club Auto Sport** is worth experiencing and it's a great place to hold an event or locate a business in Silicon Valley. Click here (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8968&l=-http--www.clubautosport.net/--Q-utm_source--E-CarProperty--A-utm_medium--E-banner--A-utm_campaign--E-CarPropertyEmail) or on the banner to get the details   ______________________________________________________________________ Celebrity Real Estate News and their Celebrity Cars can be found on CarProperty.com (click here to view our celebrity stuff (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8970&l=-http--www.carproperty.com/celebrities.php)) Media companies and news groups  have been covering CarProperty.com for over 3 years now click here to read the stories and coverage (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8971&l=-http--carproperty.com/press-coverage.htm) Jobs, Jobs, Jobs .. we have them .. Click here to apply (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8972&l=-http--carproperty.com/jobs.htm) **Save 15%** on all Advertisements you place on CarProperty.com (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8977&l=-http--carproperty.com/add.php) by using the coupon code: **NEWAD** ______________________________________________________________________ **Back Yard Buddy is m****ade in America with American Steel** .. You can't go wrong buying car lifts and accessories from **Back Yard Buddy** ... Click here (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8960&l=-http--backyardbuddy.com/) for all the details Best Regards, CarProperty.com ______________________________________________________________________ CarProperty.com sent this newsletter to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org based on your CarProperty.com optional user preferences. Click here to update your info (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8973&l=-http--carproperty.com/letters/p_m.php--Q-nl--E-4--A-c--E-503--A-m--E-3827--A-s--E-958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21). If you no longer wish to receive our non-system messages, remove yourself from our mailing list by clicking here to unsubscribe (http://carproperty.com/letters/box.php?nl=4&c=503&m=3827&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&funcml=unsub2) .. or mail your request to Car Property Group, LLC. 1620 Central Ave., Suite 202, Cheyenne, WY 82201 (in some cases please allow 2 to 3 weeks for your un-subscription to take full effect). Toll Free: 1-888-628-3683. If you received a forwarded copy of the Car Property News, you can subscribe by registering on CarProperty.com (http://carproperty.com). Car Property News is sent from time to time but not on a set schedule. Click here to forward this email to a friend (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8946&l=-http--carproperty.com/letters/p_f.php--Q-nl--E-4--A-c--E-503--A-m--E-3827--A-s--E-958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21) To get accurate delivery add CarProperty.com to your email programs address book or safe senders list that monitors your inbox. You may have to forward this information to a systems administrator who runs your email systems so they can put us on your safe list. Please give them our domain address of @carproperty.com. If you need help putting our domain address in your email programs address book or safe senders list, please click on this link: How to Add an Address to Your Address Book or Safe Senders List http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8974&l=-http--memberlandingpages.com/address_book/address_book_add.htm (http://carproperty.com/letters/lt.php?c=503&m=3827&nl=4&s=958b01cb1c22d6f2de6f3db2c3b4ad21&lid=8974&l=-http--memberlandingpages.com/address_book/address_book_add.htm) CarProperty.com is a registered Trademark as are the phrases Car Property and Car Properties, by the Car Property Group. This notice is compliant with the US Governments regulations regarding emails. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 11:57:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B234E106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8C18FC12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SBv16U010361 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:57:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8SBv1dc010360 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:57:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:57:00 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:57:03 -0000 [ Trond Endrestøl wrote on Fri 28.Sep'12 at 12:44:10 +0200 ] > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:28+0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > > > My question is, does it pull in docs for all languages or can I > > exclude docs in languages that I don't need - I only need en docs. > > Yes, you can check out a subset/subdirectory, e.g.: > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1 /path/to/local/working/copy > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /path/to/local/working/copy Great, thanks for that Trond. Very helpful. Cheers mate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 12:03:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD3C1065687 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5BB8FC19 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SC3WmI010436 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:03:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8SC3WKP010435 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:03:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:03:32 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120928120332.GF2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:35 -0000 [ Mike Jeays wrote on Thu 27.Sep'12 at 22:56:42 -0400 ] > I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected? Purefuly a guess, but I would imagine that's KDE for you. From what i've read on forums and such-like, KDE is very memory intensive in terms of using it all up! I tried PC-BSD on my current machine, I found it to be slow because of the Desktop. I've only ever used BSD on this machine and have never experienced that problem when using my preferred minimal window manager. The machine in question is a 2 core Pentium K8 class, with 2G of ram. So not as high spec as yours, but still I went straight back to my standard FreeBSD install and ZFS root FS and much happier with the set-up now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 12:03:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6AA1065687 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdlisten@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70218FC0C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjf20 with SMTP id jf20so2406943bkc.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:03:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bZAHdWn8qOLA9pgCFwMKfNl/Y+zUdXFrEwj7qmnHX90=; b=zkxZow2D9MbgKguCnl47dx4ycEZ5l12Sy7WTVSP0D51a9nM+ZB9u71XsKc1+GW1mI+ S+1xGXzMz5C4k7T45zz/z9eOIs7NW+F8ZCVjuxfFsQjUQlb3ej7ayC43Kdr/Q/S7V83e zp0zGl7LkYizRYItIki7oNn0mwVjP45MymUKxVFZAXhywjo1UwS0RMdoomJ6c8SXtnpb b+xOPLd3YA6yfwHMeFZR4TgbUubMby4Gw15wqhGuu8ahvi/DZS1gqB3aGbQ8UgFD2Wk7 UZH8XlTT1UI9bWTgX5oG4+2YLZlq2JTsyDTP7UwOaPwUBodICCW5DT0llnQcdwfYEj9J U3cw== Received: by 10.204.4.129 with SMTP id 1mr3632497bkr.58.1348833829343; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hplap.localdom.ain ([89.47.83.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy18sm6469355bkc.4.2012.09.28.05.03.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:03:41 +0300 From: Rares Aioanei To: Mike Jeays Message-ID: <20120928150341.15f13a4b@hplap.localdom.ain> In-Reply-To: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> References: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:51 -0000 On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400 Mike Jeays wrote: > I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox > VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my > CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is > an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Yes. -- Rares Aioanei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 12:11:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686B1106566C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E0A8FC19 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SCB7ZJ010494 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:11:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8SCB61G010493 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:11:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:11:06 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120928121106.GG2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:11:09 -0000 [ Warren Block wrote on Thu 27.Sep'12 at 14:11:39 -0600 ] > Yes. If a new version of a file conflicts with your local changes, svn > will complain and try to help resolve those conflicts. When I changed to svn, I completely remove or moved (mv(1)) the /usr/ports tree. Created a new /usr/ports and then used svn to pull in the collection. The same for the base course tree in /usr/src. It's my understanding you need to do that first. You can't use a mixed file system tree comprising cvs/csup and svn files. I'm sure Some will correct that if i'm wrong, but that's what I did and i've experienced no problems with it. The only noticeable difference is when updating my ports collection with svn, it's slower to update than say portsnap or cvs/csup. But it's not a major issue for me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 12:16:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A611065670 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399308FC18 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THZUx-0007XY-Kz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:16:51 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:16:51 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:16:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 182 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1) Subject: boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:16:50 -0000 Hi, the boot of my notebook Lenovo TP r61i stops (sometimes) after usbus6. $ dmesg ... atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 ...skipping... hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 pcm0: at nid 16,17 and 20 on hdaa0 unknown: at nid 2 on hdacc0 (no driver attached) usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus2: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus4: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus5: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus6: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 < IT STOPS HERE <========================================================= > ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ugen2.1: at usbus2 uhub2: on usbus2 ugen3.1: at usbus3 uhub3: on usbus3 ugen4.1: at usbus4 uhub4: on usbus4 ugen5.1: at usbus5 uhub5: on usbus5 ugen6.1: at usbus6 uhub6: on usbus6 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub5: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered uhub6: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered ... $ pciconf -lv hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x20b317aa chip=0x2a008086 rev=0x0c hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory Controller Hub' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0x20b517aa chip=0x2a028086 rev=0x0c hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary)' class = display subclass = VGA vgapci1@pci0:0:2:1: class=0x038000 card=0x20b517aa chip=0x2a038086 rev=0x0c hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (secondary)' class = display uhci0@pci0:0:26:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28348086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci1@pci0:0:26:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28358086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci0@pci0:0:26:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x20ab17aa chip=0x283a8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB hdac0@pci0:0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0x20ac17aa chip=0x284b8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller' class = multimedia subclass = HDA pcib1@pci0:0:28:0: class=0x060400 card=0x20ad17aa chip=0x283f8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib2@pci0:0:28:1: class=0x060400 card=0x20ad17aa chip=0x28418086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 2' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib3@pci0:0:28:2: class=0x060400 card=0x20ad17aa chip=0x28438086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 3' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI uhci2@pci0:0:29:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28308086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci3@pci0:0:29:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28318086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci4@pci0:0:29:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28328086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci1@pci0:0:29:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x20ab17aa chip=0x28368086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB pcib4@pci0:0:30:0: class=0x060401 card=0x20ae17aa chip=0x24488086 rev=0xf3 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801 Mobile PCI Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x20a517aa chip=0x28158086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801HEM (ICH8M) LPC Interface Controller' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA atapci0@pci0:0:31:1: class=0x01018a card=0x20a617aa chip=0x28508086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) IDE Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA ahci0@pci0:0:31:2: class=0x010601 card=0x20a717aa chip=0x28298086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA AHCI Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SATA none0@pci0:0:31:3: class=0x0c0500 card=0x20a917aa chip=0x283e8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) SMBus Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus wpi0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10118086 chip=0x42278086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection' class = network bge0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x20d517aa chip=0x169314e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express' class = network subclass = ethernet cbb0@pci0:21:0:0: class=0x060700 card=0x20c417aa chip=0x04761180 rev=0xb6 hdr=0x02 vendor = 'Ricoh Co Ltd' device = 'RL5c476 II' class = bridge subclass = PCI-CardBus Looks like a timeout problem. Anything else I can provide / help debug ? jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 12:25:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F11106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.213.67.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391648FC0A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.16.100.24]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC52D9B9 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:06:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([172.16.100.24]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [172.16.100.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I65w95EEA+UK for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (a89-152-79-67.cpe.netcabo.pt [89.152.79.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 449429B1 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50659279.5010901@barafranca.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:05:13 +0100 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: percona xtradb server & cluster for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:25:02 -0000 Hello everyone, A couple of days ago I contacted percona (http://www.percona.com/software/percona-server) about the possibility of them maintaining a port of the XtraDB server & cluster software. Their reply was that they didn't see too many downloads for *BSD platforms and they've taken this to mean that there's a lack of interest in seeing the software running on *BSD. If you would like to see their software conveniently available as FreeBSD ports, I encorage you to contact them @ http://form.percona.com/ContactMe.html As long as there's user/customer interest, they appear to be receptive to the idea. Thank you, Hugo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 13:01:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DDE106566C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE5E8FC12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.net [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SCqnfI083287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:52:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:52:49 -0500 From: dweimer To: Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20120928150341.15f13a4b@hplap.localdom.ain> References: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> <20120928150341.15f13a4b@hplap.localdom.ain> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 Subject: Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:01:25 -0000 On 2012-09-28 07:03, Rares Aioanei wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400 > Mike Jeays wrote: > >> I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a >> VirtualBox >> VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my >> CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It >> is >> an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Yes. Any chance the CPU load actually drops when you are doing something? I remember some issues a while back with FreeBSD in VMware consuming 100% CPU when idle. Possible this could be related. The other thought would be screen savers, if you are running one in the VM, the VM has to use CPU to process the graphics, and that could be cause. KDE itsefl does use a decent amount of memory, but while idle it shouldn't be stressing the CPU. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 13:34:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1361065675 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5918FC1A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:34:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <5065A533.1030103@intersonic.se> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:25:07 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120811 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jb References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:34:39 -0000 On 2012-09-28 14:16, jb wrote: > Hi, > > the boot of my notebook Lenovo TP r61i stops (sometimes) after usbus6. > $ dmesg > ... > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > ...skipping... > hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 > pcm0: at nid 16,17 and 20 on > hdaa0 > unknown: at nid 2 > on hdacc0 (no driver attached) > usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > usbus2: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 > usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > usbus4: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > usbus5: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > usbus6: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 > < IT STOPS HERE <========================================================= > > ugen0.1: at usbus0 > uhub0: on usbus0 > ugen1.1: at usbus1 > uhub1: on usbus1 > ugen2.1: at usbus2 > uhub2: on usbus2 > ugen3.1: at usbus3 > uhub3: on usbus3 > ugen4.1: at usbus4 > uhub4: on usbus4 > ugen5.1: at usbus5 > uhub5: on usbus5 > ugen6.1: at usbus6 > uhub6: on usbus6 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub5: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > uhub6: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered > ... > > $ pciconf -lv > hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x20b317aa chip=0x2a008086 rev=0x0c > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory Controller Hub' > class = bridge > subclass = HOST-PCI > vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0x20b517aa chip=0x2a028086 rev=0x0c > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary)' > class = display > subclass = VGA > vgapci1@pci0:0:2:1: class=0x038000 card=0x20b517aa chip=0x2a038086 rev=0x0c > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller > (secondary)' > class = display > uhci0@pci0:0:26:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28348086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > uhci1@pci0:0:26:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28358086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > ehci0@pci0:0:26:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x20ab17aa chip=0x283a8086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > hdac0@pci0:0:27:0: class=0x040300 card=0x20ac17aa chip=0x284b8086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller' > class = multimedia > subclass = HDA > pcib1@pci0:0:28:0: class=0x060400 card=0x20ad17aa chip=0x283f8086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x01 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-PCI > pcib2@pci0:0:28:1: class=0x060400 card=0x20ad17aa chip=0x28418086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x01 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 2' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-PCI > pcib3@pci0:0:28:2: class=0x060400 card=0x20ad17aa chip=0x28438086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x01 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 3' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-PCI > uhci2@pci0:0:29:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28308086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > uhci3@pci0:0:29:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28318086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > uhci4@pci0:0:29:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x20aa17aa chip=0x28328086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > ehci1@pci0:0:29:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x20ab17aa chip=0x28368086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > pcib4@pci0:0:30:0: class=0x060401 card=0x20ae17aa chip=0x24488086 rev=0xf3 > hdr=0x01 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801 Mobile PCI Bridge' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-PCI > isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x20a517aa chip=0x28158086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801HEM (ICH8M) LPC Interface Controller' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-ISA > atapci0@pci0:0:31:1: class=0x01018a card=0x20a617aa chip=0x28508086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) IDE Controller' > class = mass storage > subclass = ATA > ahci0@pci0:0:31:2: class=0x010601 card=0x20a717aa chip=0x28298086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA AHCI Controller' > class = mass storage > subclass = SATA > none0@pci0:0:31:3: class=0x0c0500 card=0x20a917aa chip=0x283e8086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) SMBus Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = SMBus > wpi0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10118086 chip=0x42278086 rev=0x02 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection' > class = network > bge0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x20d517aa chip=0x169314e4 rev=0x02 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > cbb0@pci0:21:0:0: class=0x060700 card=0x20c417aa chip=0x04761180 rev=0xb6 > hdr=0x02 > vendor = 'Ricoh Co Ltd' > device = 'RL5c476 II' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-CardBus > > Looks like a timeout problem. > Anything else I can provide / help debug ? > jb Could it be something similar to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/170487 ? Try a verbose boot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 14:38:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695DC106566B for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E5B8FC15 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THbhW-0006uB-66 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:37:58 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:37:58 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:37:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <5065A533.1030103@intersonic.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1) Subject: Re: boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:38:02 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes: > ... > Try a verbose boot. I forgot to mention: $ uname -a FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 03:56:40 UTC 2012 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I set Verbose ON and put hw.usb.ugen.debug="1" in /boot/loader.conf as originally ugen(4) driver followed the point of lockup. This time the log sequence was a little different - the ata(4) driver followed the point of lockup. If I understand it correctly, these log messages may be recorded in somewhat random sequence, so the dmesg output sequence in not 100% reliable. Anyway, here it is: $ dmesg -a ... usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus2: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus4: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus5: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus6: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 < HERE THE BOOT LOCKUP HAPPENED <===================================== ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 ata0: stat0=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb ata0: stat1=0x00 err=0x00 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0: reset tp2 stat0=00 stat1=00 devices=0x10000 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ugen2.1: at usbus2 uhub2: on usbus2 ugen3.1: at usbus3 uhub3: on usbus3 ugen4.1: at usbus4 uhub4: on usbus4 ugen5.1: at usbus5 uhub5: on usbus5 ugen6.1: at usbus6 uhub6: on usbus6 ahcich0: AHCI reset... ... More ideas what to look for or catch ? jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 15:33:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EF91065687 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676EA8FC0A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:33:45 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlAJAFPCZVDLevdH/2dsb2JhbABFvHsDghiCIAEBBTIBBToHEAsYCRMDDwkDAgECAUUGDQEFAgEBiAC4M4sYWYVOA4hWjiiPFoJ3 Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2012 01:03:43 +0930 Message-ID: <5065C1BA.4040207@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 00:56:50 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120918 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= References: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> <20120816122927.ff452986.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Polytropon , Questions FreeBSD , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: Blender port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:33:46 -0000 On 17/08/2012 04:47, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:22 +0200, Peter Boosten wrote: >>> So I did a ktrace, and it seems to stumble on a library it cannot find: libirml.so >>> This library however is nowhere to be found on my system, nor in the ports repository. >>> >>> Does anyone know what this library is for, and where would I find that library? > > No port seems to install that library (at least according to pkg-plist files). > Maybe you could file a PR > >> >> IRML - it seems to be the "Intel Resource Management Layer library. >> It is a work dispatcher used by Threading Building Blocks (TBB)." >> The tbb port (devel/tbb) however does not contain it. No port >> seems to mention it in its pkg-plist file. The google search >> results are very disillusioning, even more than the "typical >> Linuxisms" that sometimes hits a FreeBSD port... ;-) >> >> I'm not the blender maintainer but I compile the svn versions regularly and I'm the maintainer for openimageio which is a recent addition that blender uses for the cycles render engine. I use 9.0 amd64. I've just dusted off the old P4 and installed a clean version of 8.2, updated the ports tree and started compiling everything, I'll see if I can get the same issue tomorrow. I'll assume you have your ports tree up to date and are building the latest version. Have you had an earlier version of blender running? The only reference to libirml I can find is as part of Intels compiler package and it doesn't appear to be a part that the freebsd ports version of icc installs. One guess is that you may be using icc or have in the past leaving a dependency that was built with icc. While libirml seems to have some relation to tbb I don't see any reference within devel/tbb. graphics/openimageio brings in the dependency for tbb so you could try turning off the CYCLES option in blender to turn off that dependency. libirml may also be related to openmp so try turning off OPENMP as well. Maybe try turning off some other options to help pinpoint where it comes from. CAMERATRACK CARVE CYCLES OCEANSIM are the newest additions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 15:51:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370471065672 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63368FC12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9so2211984oag.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:51:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sfdqmIHA61Qn14DDnmvdsT56Y/dpL2IOkuNNVRlM6xA=; b=yNH+4v59R0fKVIEBV9pQTCoPA/f+fVPXMEM3tucMaQlDtfM6zECFVX2/z63kxgfu4C v94ktAiXjYneAZ6dKyhVe0ReDjH9h5I7DF1zJDmLBsalOeGQtgHmRfniINW6VfTGoarD IluTzNrwIzGgaZ3sJ/UZ/qpkvdXdq4ZVt6VNruOpoACq5gWyiNDZ+pisy0QLs8UCijhG M9a9GD1yQB7o57rHPLqvI6Rk/EDBr6DAemH5p70HkTlPfcwnmIyo+NmeOe/GA0dQGvNq +eVEU2M/AO0LsXjhvwu3ZDkUwkdnCL6ScIk+8XF+zMCqIhZsneoLtBaWJGEOyT4Z0DMy w4RQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.169.75 with SMTP id ac11mr6177921oec.12.1348847515297; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:51:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:51:55 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:51:56 -0000 Excellent! Thank you all. :-) So, for ME...does this look right? This will track the latest release that has the patches applied? svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 /usr/ports svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/doc (I too, only need English docs) Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 16:33:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7C21065674 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm18.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm18.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.192]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 648EB8FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.12.10.89] by nm18.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2012 16:33:45 -0000 Received: from [217.146.182.88] by tm19.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2012 16:33:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp151.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2012 16:33:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1348850025; bh=u8zuThL4tcTOQ/BO335BcORQ07Feni3PfDMHib05CwI=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=k5WF2KzyTKgmByrEAjfCCZHPHNmhNNsjMyk/6LJjapKs5u9ZO2HrEMcYRTLcmL+GQr6z/3hzOuki1vaUmZundyx9/BWDCZYlGt1Z8CetUp/vCHT5TC+ZMilxjZhTLdbuOlLIM0UglRtnZKiAybhcbK04p+piC2BJbGiLv8c57SM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 754697.27578.bm@smtp151.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 2YHCJ9gVM1mVbv0GuFHVuzneHy19FlpvocPNM_TOceQiiMm UN.FqitcY9B8GNrGgIDQAMDIKKFtV3OLN8wePbPLT2eFqyqowgwmwZcH0tFh UiXSAoe1EClEADNJwpn4X56ZGvgxH8vtDyqSm5q2dg8LLGIySy4ft1Va9Fwx kmgwfTYXm0QwCF0ukjnemnAfMVJe.fzYGY9J671U7RqKwxK6ppb2x6k_y85G ZvsHOvd6stf7KYEM01QXC_PNiMG1YuraZWuKGGSn0lCXD6CRkz.35xqf3dcP TliAD_K94ONVzop7jR3sFiSKqb2xUZ.34XYROtLi1rzK55DrPcn_RPn5FMGR xbDMVA.IOHWIHAZ7E0gSfjsiWkMp_bGZ9CBODHsMSo8SsbSmDCXxqiEbanbl XUknMQ9VPCkqsWQNOxqE81vYyCshi5EiFzDdR_Ir.poPbisaq.9xaiMg30y1 ui0J1QdHd4jbO9MM16eJ2HMJk43pqpDfqClYwuo.3 X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.215.54 with plain) by smtp151.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2012 09:33:45 -0700 PDT Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so1431169lag.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:33:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.103.146 with SMTP id fw18mr6311626lab.30.1348850025241; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:33:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.26.65 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:33:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> From: Alexandre Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:33:25 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ed Flecko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:33:54 -0000 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Ed Flecko wrote: > Excellent! Thank you all. > > :-) > > So, for ME...does this look right? This will track the latest release > that has the patches applied? > > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 /usr/ports > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/doc > > (I too, only need English docs) > > > > Ed Hi Ed, For ports you are wrong. Use this one : svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports You can check here http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/ Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 16:51:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A802E106566B for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F678FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru NEW Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28926536 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:51:00 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SFp0pA060441 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:51:00 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8SFoxoN060440 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:50:59 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:50:59 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120928155059.GA60368@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: a wireless network freezes the machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:51:10 -0000 Dear Colleagues, Running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE, ath0: mem 0xfe400000-0xfe40ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci7 ath0: AR2413 mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5 I have run this box for a long time as a WiFi access point for my home laptops and smartphones and never had a problem, the config was: # Wi-Fi setup wlans_ath0="wlan0" create_args_wlan0="wlanmode hostap" hostapd_enable="YES" However several days ago I had to run the box as a WiFi client, with ifconfig_wlan0="DHCP WPA" hostapd_enable="NO" and it began to freeze frequently. It freezes very hard, only the reset button helps. Is it possible that wpa_supplicant or some other part of the WiFi setup causes the hangs? Nothing else has changed in the system besides its role from the access point to a WiFi client. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 17:06:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A993C106566C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9F78FC15 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SH6RDB001498; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:06:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8SH6RhX001495; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:06:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:06:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Mike Jeays In-Reply-To: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> Message-ID: References: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:06:27 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:06:28 -0000 On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Mike Jeays wrote: > I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox > VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU > temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an > Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected? It may help to add kern.hz="100" to /boot/loader.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 17:14:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2471106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BA78FC19 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SHEwgU018100; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8SHEw0N018097; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Alexandre In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Ed Flecko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:14:59 -0000 On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Alexandre wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Ed Flecko wrote: >> Excellent! Thank you all. >> >> :-) >> >> So, for ME...does this look right? This will track the latest release >> that has the patches applied? >> >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 /usr/ports >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/doc >> >> (I too, only need English docs) >> >> >> > For ports you are wrong. Use this one : svn co > svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports > > You can check here http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/ Another way to put this is: "ports are not branched". There is no separate ports tree to go with a release, there is just the same one everybody uses. For doc, I'm not sure I'd go with the branched version. Many of our docs apply to multiple releases, so going with the trunk seems better. Might not make a lot of difference, depending. svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 I think that directory will put them in their normal locations. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 17:19:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0883A106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979948FC12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SHJJ9p018123; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:19:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8SHJJcx018120; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:19:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:19:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jamie Paul Griffin In-Reply-To: <20120928121106.GG2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Message-ID: References: <20120927001135.8e893552.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120928121106.GG2389@kontrol.kode5.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:19:19 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use subversion to keep source, system and doc files up to date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:19:21 -0000 On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > [ Warren Block wrote on Thu 27.Sep'12 at 14:11:39 -0600 ] > > >> Yes. If a new version of a file conflicts with your local changes, svn >> will complain and try to help resolve those conflicts. > > When I changed to svn, I completely remove or moved (mv(1)) the > /usr/ports tree. Created a new /usr/ports and then used svn to pull in > the collection. The same for the base course tree in /usr/src. It's my > understanding you need to do that first. You can't use a mixed file > system tree comprising cvs/csup and svn files. I'm sure Some will > correct that if i'm wrong, but that's what I did and i've experienced > no problems with it. Right, but conflicts are what happen if you change files after the checkout. For example, I have a couple of custom patches to source. If new versions of the source are checked in to the FreeBSD svn repository, and they conflict with my local changes, svn will give a warning and help try to resolve them. > The only noticeable difference is when updating my ports collection > with svn, it's slower to update than say portsnap or cvs/csup. But > it's not a major issue for me. This seems to be highly variable, possibly depending on how often you update. For me, svn is at least as fast as cvs, and it feels faster. Might just be a lot of fast screen output. portsnap is easily the slowest on my systems. But I update very often. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 17:38:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D310E106566C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D018FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.138] (helo=smtp7.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THeAX-00026h-T0; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:16:05 +0200 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp7.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THeAX-0008Py-Ai; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:16:05 +0200 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFCD73988D; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:16:04 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\)) From: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: <5065C1BA.4040207@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:16:04 +0200 Message-Id: <11414FC3-408E-4A99-A21A-50292902223F@boosten.org> References: <84ED3B95-5A7D-4C2A-AC35-B54DFA8BFDF1@boosten.org> <20120816122927.ff452986.freebsd@edvax.de> <5065C1BA.4040207@ShaneWare.Biz> To: Shane Ambler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498) X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.5 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, CM_SLOPPY_BRK1=0.3, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_SV=0.077 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Polytropon , Questions FreeBSD , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: Blender port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:38:15 -0000 On 28 sep. 2012, at 17:26, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 17/08/2012 04:47, Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Polytropon = wrote: >>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:22 +0200, Peter Boosten wrote: >>>> So I did a ktrace, and it seems to stumble on a library it cannot = find: libirml.so >>>> This library however is nowhere to be found on my system, nor in = the ports repository. >>>>=20 >>>> Does anyone know what this library is for, and where would I find = that library? >>=20 >> No port seems to install that library (at least according to = pkg-plist files). >> Maybe you could file a PR >>=20 >>>=20 >>> IRML - it seems to be the "Intel Resource Management Layer library. >>> It is a work dispatcher used by Threading Building Blocks (TBB)." >>> The tbb port (devel/tbb) however does not contain it. No port >>> seems to mention it in its pkg-plist file. The google search >>> results are very disillusioning, even more than the "typical >>> Linuxisms" that sometimes hits a FreeBSD port... ;-) >>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 > I'm not the blender maintainer but I compile the svn versions = regularly and I'm the maintainer for openimageio which is a recent = addition that blender uses for the cycles render engine. I use 9.0 = amd64. I've just dusted off the old P4 and installed a clean version of = 8.2, updated the ports tree and started compiling everything, I'll see = if I can get the same issue tomorrow. >=20 > I'll assume you have your ports tree up to date and are building the = latest version. >=20 > Have you had an earlier version of blender running? >=20 > The only reference to libirml I can find is as part of Intels compiler = package and it doesn't appear to be a part that the freebsd ports = version of icc installs. One guess is that you may be using icc or have = in the past leaving a dependency that was built with icc. >=20 > While libirml seems to have some relation to tbb I don't see any = reference within devel/tbb. graphics/openimageio brings in the = dependency for tbb so you could try turning off the CYCLES option in = blender to turn off that dependency. libirml may also be related to = openmp so try turning off OPENMP as well. >=20 > Maybe try turning off some other options to help pinpoint where it = comes from. CAMERATRACK CARVE CYCLES OCEANSIM are the newest additions. >=20 >=20 >=20 Hi Shane, Actually, compiling without Cycles did the trick, as instructed by the = maintainer. --=20 Peter Boosten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 18:01:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67356106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA1F8FC0C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.net [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SI15q9032147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:01:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:01:05 -0500 From: dweimer To: Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: <20120927225642.09f69458@europa> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 Subject: Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:01:07 -0000 On 2012-09-28 12:06, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Mike Jeays wrote: > >> I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a >> VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, >> driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle >> machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected? > > It may help to add > > kern.hz="100" > > to /boot/loader.conf. Ah yes, that was the fix I was vaguely remembering when I mentioned the old VMware issue, oddly enough I haven't seen it recently. But then, maybe not so odd, just checked with sysctl kern | grep hz on two machines, one running on physical hardware the other on vmware workstation 9. Both were compiled from source, running 9.0-RELEASE-p4, the physical system lists kern.hz: 1000, while the virtual lists ker.hz: 100. No value is set in /boot/loader.conf on either system, however the detection mechanism (whatever that might happen to be) that is setting this to the lower value on the VMware virtual machine might not be working in a Virtual Box virtual machine. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 18:38:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C251065670 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743348FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so3694315iea.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gJ9Iw/Gy+olzfLsW3to26iIf6ZhH8wzi15B8umBnHBg=; b=CVHYY4qufha9PmO0V1g7Cdvd083W+cFcDQTrTyHKAUbM9KSX8OSUV+UOOItmkoFBdQ BS0xAYA0mt6XZTTi+KT3QulfJMdLXSxohRSYjNRs3bLCKkWuUL/gUQC/8KjUk/ocwAiY 3b3L1rYr0XZUuCSSAyh2sB48DzGzAkUJqxbnygrKKPJk8LwpYLQFcjb5Mv7l7UIgYsSb 7BcYTfJvF3wWQSAkHVSTf9IANNiIZrXKW+7IGLeHEEI2RDGv4vXhsFMVNMpt1iU4TC2c O9MRJRKP1oFM5VBCcQPDA8hUNTbdEf+smVnTBy9OkskdH91aaCbX6lenMZN+D+tHXLCr c3IQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.202.8 with SMTP id ke8mr2538584igc.6.1348857531584; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.25.130 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:38:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:38:51 -0500 Message-ID: From: David Noel To: Ed Flecko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:38:52 -0000 On 9/28/12, Ed Flecko wrote: > Excellent! Thank you all. > > :-) > > So, for ME...does this look right? This will track the latest release > that has the patches applied? > > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 /usr/ports > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/doc > > (I too, only need English docs) > > > > Ed > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > For something as fundamental as source and ports tree updates I'd suggest taking advantage of the available SSH2-wrapper for subversion and securing your line of communication with the repository: svn co svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src etc.. -David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 19:41:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7DE106566B for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA63F8FC19 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so3035517obb.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:41:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DWhtNXlbWHFJ66EexwaizxtCny3qGpg6Ma0FSwVfAiQ=; b=LOOcRZSs5eqE4jWTWz6NJJW1upUzfkL8gr8R0uSUZBK9qdbVTjSjTHeJA3DHd/Fy6g KWa2dl9BtH3JekinZf6HFhz/nJAwoXJGVIiE7ZRDV9F7FX7utq9yPePH31mkodzQAMAa vqLOctJdGgb4Prvvelpzvg5dECwjTi9rc+xtIUT6td3B0UzHC1GEbY4sE9aK8UE6pzrU 8GLdz+GuslFUV5hhMYa22z5OwBHcRqXfj05agS78/4q2iDlVAXIdFAN1Tq1ifZDQ77Kd 93LF/NWz5L8i9oZZZ6z2PvOYWulvHWD92ygcp/UvGc2IH+OgZ4qvZ648HyacD2PJsu53 DvXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.32.136 with SMTP id j8mr6859619oei.0.1348861269015; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:41:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:41:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:41:10 -0000 David - I'd like to, but every time I try that it prompts me for a password...and I don't know what password it wants??? Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 20:18:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BEF1065672 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94B8FC0C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SK7uFt005921 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:07:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21] claimed to be [192.168.1.67] Message-ID: <506603BC.8000202@sage-american.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:08:28 -0500 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:07:57 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: Rewrite redirects X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:18:20 -0000 I thought I had this figured out but discovered I have a BIG flaw with my .htaccess redirects After days of searching and experimenting, I still can't get this to do what I intended. I have moved all of the content on a web site from the web root to a different directory. Now I need toredirect the URL requests from the old location to the new one. Instead of issuing a 301 error, I want to first redirect to an info page, let's call it "info.htm." Here's what I have now in the web root's .htaccess. Here's the way it was/is: ~webroot/lots_of.html ....and now changed to this: ~webroot/content/lots_of.html Using the apache mod_rewritein .htaccess RewriteEngine on RewriteRule /~webroot/(.*\.html) /^info.htm [PT] ....which is supposed to redirect any page with the extension ".html" to the info.htm page. BUT, alas any "*.html page in any directory will redirect back to the info.htm page!! What I wanted is that only the "*.html pages in the ~webroot to be redirected to the info page. I hope this make sense and I hope someone can give me a tip on how to limit the redirects to only the webroot pages. Thanks in advance..... -- -- All the best, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 20:22:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7650C106566B for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340108FC18 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so4009606iea.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:22:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=erZtHGfHW4ehGrRlfhzQ9/EVmpfaMJt7hjhrWICazk4=; b=YDNy0d3E4eV9ZsGtQ6e4Cvr9lY8VVJ5nHO4tjxULmBewqMgZ8AAeIeZX+NmFhyAUGa BdzcK6Jj8bXXbGohtBAX8X9UaL9PgMQFz+I/2fxKi6O/hdYOFx8HCmWWvzz3PL8p72qO f6SRpv8s7Ml6GMsVnFP2sj4SGUTwzMtXvHa3MEJbiz0rzARAXUD37jPbdAmFKjMI0uOQ ozH7WX8+zAuDmUw+2xT6TK7fQkwskNFxY0JB2sxEKaYJvtAQHUkxAPr+JAd3VmtTRbZm MjSeiDsSXau5Q2+ECpiYFFCU3Tcgxv5vTJp4gNjNBnDU/qG9FwyAy0lzIuk+raM3GMXs df+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.201.140 with SMTP id fa12mr6409637icb.12.1348863339734; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.25.130 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:15:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:15:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: David Noel To: Ed Flecko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:22:56 -0000 On 9/28/12, Ed Flecko wrote: > David - I'd like to, but every time I try that it prompts me for a > password...and I don't know what password it wants??? > > Ed Great question. I'm running into the same issue. I guessed around a bit with no luck: svn/anonsvn... Would anyone on the list be able to set up anonymous svn+ssh access for us? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 20:27:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA571065670 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AE48FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9so2568893oag.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Mw0uhDUO/ZSSPToilhpU5io+LQEA45gj/HxR4zeKm1c=; b=g7Vo4L8/odHObBvfpwaq5kMz8D32nEp67gbODpPYfjU2y5NE6HjQNKtFjvaY12Xg+0 tD4Bjea8TtriUHELpZ6yF2g9OcYuz2l0/7jZab1RcXkuHZhjSZIoQakDv4TVJakvyC1W nAGjf4FuhLMqTZhKVCc31V3+dgLPsjKpm1GibD8LCntMob4d0iVWVROvmY5oMf67EEdM Y+QjkYTz80853WYegTwuOwqm0yDMZj9bKUxykwq53qZkJNzizVqtEgXSh+ut+Ks7Bzq0 WloIjO8xno/wHTknLsIRpfBdlLFNNbvwiDIvPj64etcx8GlR5N+Y97qZYHWeury+aYBZ SWQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.47.66 with SMTP id b2mr6632414obn.34.1348864029442; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.1 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:27:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: make print-index error: Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..perl: not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:27:10 -0000 I've done a clean install of FBSD 9, installed subversion from package, and then I have: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/ /usr/ports svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/release/9.1.0/en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/doc which all went just fine. Then I: cd /usr/ports make print-index and this is my result: Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..perl: not found "Makefile", line 31: warning: "perl -V:archname" returned non-zero status perl: not found Done. O.K., I'm stumped...what's wrong? Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 20:39:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B0A1065670 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F1F8FC12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-143-179-50.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.179.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SKdKaJ021474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:39:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q8SKdKaJ021474 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q8SKdKaJ021474; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-143-179-50.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.179.50] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <50660AEF.2010301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:39:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Flecko References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFF40796CB93DE82FDAE78BC9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:39:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFF40796CB93DE82FDAE78BC9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/09/2012 20:41, Ed Flecko wrote: > David - I'd like to, but every time I try that it prompts me for a > password...and I don't know what password it wants??? That would be the password to a freebsd.org account, which isn't going to work for most people on two counts: * freebsd.org uses SSH keys for authentication, not passwords. * even if you've got a SSH key, not being a FreeBSD committer you probably don't have a freebsd.org account. For anonymous access, you can use http or svn. Given that anonymous access is read-only, there's really not much to be gained from SSH or other means of encrypting the connection, either for you, or for the FreeBSD servers. It's anonymous, so you don't care about authentication. FreeBSD sources are publicly available, so you don't care about anyone eavesdropping on the traffic. About the only thing you're still exposed to is a man-in-the-middle attack, where someone could pose as a FreeBSD server and feed you a trojanned set of sources -- but then, you'ld still be exposed in exactly the same way even using svn+ssh. In practice, attacks of this type are very (pretty much vanishingly) rare. If they do concern you, then use portsnap(8) / freebsd-update(8) which has specific cryptographic protection against such things. The portsnap and freebsd-update build systems also have special access to the master FreeBSD repositories to minimize the chances that they themselves could be fed trojanned sources. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigFF40796CB93DE82FDAE78BC9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBmCvcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw94wCdFfY1TIHrPZvTZb1xb4KelM8u G3IAnjl1Xf3m6EU6Z8V6BgkiEyg7AfmV =+60g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFF40796CB93DE82FDAE78BC9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 20:51:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF45E106566C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D408FC16 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-143-179-50.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.179.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SKpI7F021670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:51:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q8SKpI7F021670 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q8SKpI7F021670; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-143-179-50.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.179.50] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <50660DC6.4090008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:51:18 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig096D03577196F1BC644D7C04" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: make print-index error: Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..perl: not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:51:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig096D03577196F1BC644D7C04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/09/2012 21:27, Ed Flecko wrote: > Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..perl: not found > "Makefile", line 31: warning: "perl -V:archname" returned non-zero stat= us > perl: not found > Done. >=20 > O.K., I'm stumped...what's wrong? You need to install perl in order to build an INDEX from scratch. That's true if you use the default 'make index' target or my p5-FreeBSD-Portindex code. Building an INDEX is a fairly time consuming task, and honestly, most people don't need to do it. You can download a pre-built INDEX by 'make fetchindex' which will be perfectly adequate for the vast majority of use= rs. What you don't get by using the pre-built INDEX is the effect of any local customizations or options settings. This means that the INDEX may disagree in detail about exactly what dependencies some ports have. However, the INDEX is not used as part of actually building anything, so those discrepancies are mere annoyances rather than real obstacles. And, indeed, you can build and install ports very happily without any sort of INDEX on your system at all. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig096D03577196F1BC644D7C04 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBmDcYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzmFwCfVbVLRbzhWyUe9OcBrqx1Ta2J QLkAoIO4+vRCbQ4UcBu8H8oOEaNhhFYV =qhaG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig096D03577196F1BC644D7C04-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 21:01:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9AC106566C; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2154D8FC0C; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so4116339iea.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fbpExQqe9m4NPTP9VkhlQG1Hwb44sX0+le346XngY7I=; b=q45cWXLqqi8D9O69UtcJZacyyy8QZLVuRLiY2XCHnfUj7B7Uzg3b8fsjvElu99JDU5 5cWzJbGkutwOd+I5eLMgEg/pxTsBIqjcztv+REbuC334JVVYh8be/unY+ou5jU2Yrgeq ptpJ4rxtgW6APZjQVU75SqQrNWC/5FfFTxXOwvvH7HqQxa+LwVcJpA9/EsjaGDrEx93W R2IdnbdiDZ5wPAlC5zF+ZlP3xoxhpqSCXzJAh7nsO9qjyvjd9YWMfA39v0DfifP6G4p6 B7Hm+KdBzHbdlaQ9wp1ZfMlbeZPfpoUrx9lM4LWc8c5N5rbdfwiohBgMyN2oX9v25dMA w0AQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.57.130 with SMTP id i2mr2819024igq.56.1348866104311; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.25.130 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:01:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50660AEF.2010301@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <50660AEF.2010301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:01:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: David Noel To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ed Flecko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:01:46 -0000 On 9/28/12, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 28/09/2012 20:41, Ed Flecko wrote: >> David - I'd like to, but every time I try that it prompts me for a >> password...and I don't know what password it wants??? > > That would be the password to a freebsd.org account, which isn't going > to work for most people on two counts: > > * freebsd.org uses SSH keys for authentication, not passwords. > > * even if you've got a SSH key, not being a FreeBSD committer you > probably don't have a freebsd.org account. > > For anonymous access, you can use http or svn. Given that anonymous > access is read-only, there's really not much to be gained from SSH or > other means of encrypting the connection, either for you, or for the > FreeBSD servers. It's anonymous, so you don't care about > authentication. FreeBSD sources are publicly available, so you don't > care about anyone eavesdropping on the traffic. About the only thing > you're still exposed to is a man-in-the-middle attack, where someone > could pose as a FreeBSD server and feed you a trojanned set of sources > -- but then, you'ld still be exposed in exactly the same way even using > svn+ssh. In practice, attacks of this type are very (pretty much > vanishingly) rare. If they do concern you, then use portsnap(8) / > freebsd-update(8) which has specific cryptographic protection against > such things. The portsnap and freebsd-update build systems also have > special access to the master FreeBSD repositories to minimize the > chances that they themselves could be fed trojanned sources. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey MITM-based attacks--and subsequent corrupted sources--are my concern. It was my understanding that anonymous svn+ssh would prevent this assuming the host key was properly verified against http://www.freebsd.org/internal/ssh-keys.asc. Recently I've installed from an iso and then manually updated with pgp-signed security patches. It would certainly be nice to have some secure source update mechanism though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 21:26:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1F8106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F84A8FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SLQcB9007603 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:26:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21] claimed to be [192.168.1.67] Message-ID: <5066162E.5000108@sage-american.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:27:10 -0500 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <506603BC.8000202@sage-american.com> In-Reply-To: <506603BC.8000202@sage-american.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:26:38 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: Re: Rewrite redirects X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:26:39 -0000 On 9/28/2012 3:08 PM, Jack Stone wrote: > I thought I had this figured out but discovered I have a BIG flaw > with my .htaccess redirects After days of searching and > experimenting, I still can't get this to do what I intended. > > I have moved all of the content on a web site from the web root to a > different directory. Now I need toredirect the URL requests from the > old location to the new one. Instead of issuing a 301 error, I want > to first redirect to an info page, let's call it "info.htm." Here's > what I have now in the web root's .htaccess. > > Here's the way it was/is: > > ~webroot/lots_of.html > ....and now changed to this: > ~webroot/content/lots_of.html > > Using the apache mod_rewritein .htaccess > RewriteEngine on > RewriteRule /~webroot/(.*\.html) /^info.htm [PT] > > ....which is supposed to redirect any page with the extension > ".html" to the info.htm page. BUT, alas any "*.html page in any > directory will redirect back to the info.htm page!! What I wanted is > that only the "*.html pages in the ~webroot to be redirected to the > info page. > > I hope this make sense and I hope someone can give me a tip on how > to limit the redirects to only the webroot pages. > > Thanks in advance..... > For the above, now this works if I use the following: RewriteBase /~webroot/ RewriteRule ^radio\.html$ /^info.htm [PT] RewriteRule ^v20\.html$ /^info.htm [PT] So, now if the above are requested: http://www.webroot/content/radio.html it doesn't redirect to the info page. That's what I want, but there are 100s of "html" files in webroot/content and I figured there MUST be a way to wildcard the syntax, something like ^.*\.html$ so I don't need to list every specific html file. I believe I'll have it if I can figure that out now. Any thoughts? -- -- All the best, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 21:53:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5582A106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay02.alfahosting-server.de (relay02.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ACA8FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay01.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FB3632C0096; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:22:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay01.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A7232C008D for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:22:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B33CCA.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.60.202]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90BDC515C958 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:22:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5066152E.5050709@martinlaabs.de> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:22:54 +0200 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120729 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/15411/Fri Sep 28 01:42:16 2012 Subject: Kernel asks only for the first GELI passphrase X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:53:44 -0000 Hello, I have two partitions encrypted with GELI: ada0s2 and ada0s3. The loader (located at an unencrypted part of the harddisk) loads the kernel and the kernel asks me for the passphrase for ada0s2 to attach it afterwards. However - my root file system is not at ada0s2.elia but on ada0s3.elia. Since the kernel did no attach ada0s3 (but the ada0s2 partition) it is also unable to mount the root filesystem which is somewhat bad. So - is there a way (i.e. a loader.conf entry) how I can tell the loader which partition I wanna have attached with a passphrase? I tried to look at the code from the loader but did not find the source file where the attaching is done. Thank you, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 22:24:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F9F106566B for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF398FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so4312410iea.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=J3DzOj7AJrRGIpwt26oaYK9UdqCF7CXH7L59ks6cjfE=; b=G+RfG41bvHChSLYPytTh3E+ydoNhGenv3YOr2Kwx66Hu3jocqWgR+WOpUEO3iCV8aq i3fy+fhPYjXRRYawjnX/YEPfuBNl/KnLGn0fxKO38dwxCAq5RQ46vFRYofiK5TKlfe3o wd9NcNwHMwhd1B7utBgbIrQzyRoke4K3HcvOkq5KBKkqNXMuaGeeB3HKEi2UGu+9akt5 fxWtK7qSM7uYrgBHDO80j7d+QfaL649jhc/QUVvIVf4DAWJJ0nJSeg4z/gj87+yCBVC7 g4k6pPdxZJl4pjYR0l+IiR3TIQJCYxpjeKgnECGGNORownVVGZWAIA/20K52OW6t2wKm +yiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.194.163 with SMTP id hx3mr97710igc.37.1348871073081; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.37.212 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5066162E.5000108@sage-american.com> References: <506603BC.8000202@sage-american.com> <5066162E.5000108@sage-american.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:24:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Patrick To: Jack Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rewrite redirects X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:24:34 -0000 You can probably do something like: RewriteRule ^([^/])\.html /content/$1.html [PT] ^ inside the square brackets means "not", so a pattern matching anything but /. Or you could be go the other way: RewriteRule ^([a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)\.html /content/$1.html [PT] Where you explicitly include the characters that are used in your html filenames... Patrick On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Jack Stone wrote: > On 9/28/2012 3:08 PM, Jack Stone wrote: >> >> I thought I had this figured out but discovered I have a BIG flaw with my >> .htaccess redirects After days of searching and experimenting, I still can't >> get this to do what I intended. >> >> I have moved all of the content on a web site from the web root to a >> different directory. Now I need toredirect the URL requests from the old >> location to the new one. Instead of issuing a 301 error, I want to first >> redirect to an info page, let's call it "info.htm." Here's what I have now >> in the web root's .htaccess. >> >> Here's the way it was/is: >> >> ~webroot/lots_of.html >> ....and now changed to this: >> ~webroot/content/lots_of.html >> >> Using the apache mod_rewritein .htaccess >> RewriteEngine on >> RewriteRule /~webroot/(.*\.html) /^info.htm [PT] >> >> ....which is supposed to redirect any page with the extension ".html" to >> the info.htm page. BUT, alas any "*.html page in any directory will redirect >> back to the info.htm page!! What I wanted is that only the "*.html pages in >> the ~webroot to be redirected to the info page. >> >> I hope this make sense and I hope someone can give me a tip on how to >> limit the redirects to only the webroot pages. >> >> Thanks in advance..... >> > For the above, now this works if I use the following: > RewriteBase /~webroot/ > RewriteRule ^radio\.html$ /^info.htm [PT] > RewriteRule ^v20\.html$ /^info.htm [PT] > > So, now if the above are requested: > > http://www.webroot/content/radio.html it doesn't redirect to the info page. > That's what I want, but there are 100s of "html" files in webroot/content > and I figured there MUST be a way to wildcard the syntax, something like > ^.*\.html$ so I don't need to list every specific html file. > > I believe I'll have it if I can figure that out now. > > Any thoughts? > > > -- > -- > All the best, > Jack > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 23:38:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0557D1065670; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96118FC0C; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so4451293iea.13 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:38:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NcBmqdxEKph4/H0ImVA/NHJAZITB1fcl62qcWrjdZh0=; b=gkk83fBTyEyO3IUBayE8CuHPzjomgaSM+C7DJFZtUqFDvqaSCKNJ2QU3k1D+5eOY3I PC4yPYDcOSKTmTYly9PGe6xjPE2FHOVq97Er0eBlwnU72TSq8kTbSmq+hFApO1JgvYiR BzthOh/JZjKd126hq/hZe2DW5zGYg+ugG1MAKqY69lr4h/WPMzZQ3F66w3h2cymo9slT Oeixaomd0gcTBCdxuulYaZZautuTY415uA9LJJtlE6G13DtceDofcYGBJRu9oWi4wwgv hs5YQmnbtsLa0ddPTcpdicPaAOKHizIj7NPogYkYWIwK7CvOTjOFhs1TMMTiK6G/Ffc2 j8dg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.10.131 with SMTP id i3mr255226igb.10.1348875507391; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.25.130 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:38:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <50660AEF.2010301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:38:27 -0500 Message-ID: From: David Noel To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ed Flecko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:38:30 -0000 On 9/28/12, David Noel wrote: > On 9/28/12, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 28/09/2012 20:41, Ed Flecko wrote: >>> David - I'd like to, but every time I try that it prompts me for a >>> password...and I don't know what password it wants??? >> >> That would be the password to a freebsd.org account, which isn't going >> to work for most people on two counts: >> >> * freebsd.org uses SSH keys for authentication, not passwords. >> >> * even if you've got a SSH key, not being a FreeBSD committer you >> probably don't have a freebsd.org account. >> >> For anonymous access, you can use http or svn. Given that anonymous >> access is read-only, there's really not much to be gained from SSH or >> other means of encrypting the connection, either for you, or for the >> FreeBSD servers. It's anonymous, so you don't care about >> authentication. FreeBSD sources are publicly available, so you don't >> care about anyone eavesdropping on the traffic. About the only thing >> you're still exposed to is a man-in-the-middle attack, where someone >> could pose as a FreeBSD server and feed you a trojanned set of sources >> -- but then, you'ld still be exposed in exactly the same way even using >> svn+ssh. In practice, attacks of this type are very (pretty much >> vanishingly) rare. If they do concern you, then use portsnap(8) / >> freebsd-update(8) which has specific cryptographic protection against >> such things. The portsnap and freebsd-update build systems also have >> special access to the master FreeBSD repositories to minimize the >> chances that they themselves could be fed trojanned sources. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > > > MITM-based attacks--and subsequent corrupted sources--are my concern. > It was my understanding that anonymous svn+ssh would prevent this > assuming the host key was properly verified against > http://www.freebsd.org/internal/ssh-keys.asc. > > Recently I've installed from an iso and then manually updated with > pgp-signed security patches. It would certainly be nice to have some > secure source update mechanism though. > Apologies for the spam and the hastily written closing paragraph. I was hoping to end with a heartwarming anecdote that would leave the reader with no choice but to agree that anonymous ssh+svn access would benefit us all. AnonCVS is still of course an option, but with its eventual retirement the addition of an anonymous svn+ssh account would seem fitting, or at least consistent. -David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 08:11:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C872B10656D2 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CDA8FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfw7 with SMTP id fw7so5418458vcb.13 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:11:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=e/4+uMrsfB7k+AuSWcUQ91/IxCNEz+snBAlhfU6uVj8=; b=aPyVU0IGghJG2TOQ2KeyjJomjTYiiNM7iSHPjjpqumkGh97Y7EEjNwvmdiXBy0dZ/h /+gRi1DVcLHUjeab44pCkLmJkELe92Uvwt14LXjzRVdxajYHp8FJqlIphaSjVrTXRrsy U6h4yYCq/o1+hSUmoXQUq1lDG6Qe9RYfrVd/cXKfe9Y/xI5tHYBnf92DnMWg6SXXbd13 yz3/7V+mGXJWwaL/80R7jGecCT4IWqbi+qwrluneCSkQr0TyFK47F5Y4MMyYABm78s38 L7f5gtoay3pdzSllxBzjYrh70HoTGTP7+V38CKlXMuBZCppVo51Ams9DuvVpsvm4sHVD DjzA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.116.175 with SMTP id jx15mr5522212veb.6.1348906282601; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.239.167 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:41:22 +0330 Message-ID: From: s m To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: how restore an unencrypted dump on an encrypted file system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:11:23 -0000 hello guys, I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my file system) but do not know how to do that. is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an encrypted file system? i tried to restore my dump file as when file system is unencrypted. this is what i've doe: I decrypted my encrypted file system by "geli attach" command, then mount it and restore dumps. but when i restart my system, FreeBSD doesn't start up correctly (PXE boot menu is shown and when i select freeBSD, boot.config runs but nothing happend). please let me know how i can fix it or if i do something wrong. yours, sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 11:03:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669AB106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228518FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.79.195.195] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1THupN-0007BX-At; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:03:21 +0200 Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:02:26 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Martin Laabs Message-ID: <20120929130226.7df196d2@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <5066152E.5050709@martinlaabs.de> References: <5066152E.5050709@martinlaabs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Cw4SPlx0rhaoLbl6fnZ6GvJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel asks only for the first GELI passphrase X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:03:29 -0000 --Sig_/Cw4SPlx0rhaoLbl6fnZ6GvJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Martin Laabs wrote: > I have two partitions encrypted with GELI: ada0s2 and ada0s3. The loader= =20 > (located at an unencrypted part of the harddisk) loads the kernel and the= =20 > kernel asks me for the passphrase for ada0s2 to attach it afterwards. > However - my root file system is not at ada0s2.elia but on ada0s3.elia.=20 > Since the kernel did no attach ada0s3 (but the ada0s2 partition) it is al= so=20 > unable to mount the root filesystem which is somewhat bad. > So - is there a way (i.e. a loader.conf entry) how I can tell the loader= =20 > which partition I wanna have attached with a passphrase? Whether or not the kernel requests the passphrase depends on whether or not the BOOT flag (0x2) on the provider is set. You can check with "geli dump" if the flag is already set, and if it isn't, set it with "geli configure -b". For details see geli(8). > I tried to look at the code from the loader but did not find the source=20 > file where the attaching is done. The passphrase is requested by g_eli_taste() in sys/geom/eli/g_eli.c. Fabian --Sig_/Cw4SPlx0rhaoLbl6fnZ6GvJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBm1UQACgkQBYqIVf93VJ2cbQCgzUltr8UY3ZRNgJLmKS78kcC4 zVcAoMbRt7C4eBIyGH0Kiviq0OSoNdvU =oeUk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Cw4SPlx0rhaoLbl6fnZ6GvJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 11:08:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5761065670 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from suseuser04@lajt.hu) Received: from mailout2.bwave.pl (mailout2.bwave.pl [37.233.100.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB918FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=drone-mailout2) by mailout2.bwave.pl with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1THubl-0003bZ-4o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:49:17 +0200 Received: from [10.2.1.187] by drone-mailout2 with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1THubk-0003bN-B8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:49:16 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Istvan_Gabor?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <193d871b.3cdf8ff3.5066d211.d2434@lajt.hu> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:48:49 +0200 X-Originator: 195.228.160.38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: older version of programs in freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:08:15 -0000 Hello: I=20am=20a=20freebsd=20beginner. As=20I=20understood=20correctly=20there=20is=20only=20one=20ports=20tree=20= which=20contains the=20most=20up=20to=20date=20(and=20stable)=20versions=20of=20programs. And=20there=20are=20compiled=20packages=20for=20the=20different=20release= s,=20which=20 reflect=20the=20version=20at=20the=20time=20of=20the=20release. For=20example=20the=20ports=20tree=20currently=20has=20libreoffice=203.5.= 6=20version. I=20guess=20when=20FreeBSD=20RELEASE-9.1=20will=20be=20final=20it=20will=20= also have=20libreoffice=203.5.x=20(or=203.6).=20 But=20I=20would=20like=20to=20use/keep=20with=20libreoffice=203.4=20(sinc= e=20I=20don't=20like=20the interface=20changes=20they=20made=20in=20version=203.5=20and=203.6). How=20can=20I=20do=20it=20in=20FreeBSD? Do=20I=20have=20to=20build=20it=20independently=20from=20the=20ports=20tr= ee? Or=20is=20there=20an=20older=20package=20that=20can=20be=20installed=20on= =20newer=20system? Thanks, Istvan=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 11:17:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFAC106566C for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE3E8FC14 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF9127DA4; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:16:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8TBGqH3003377; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:16:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:16:52 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Istvan Gabor Message-Id: <20120929131652.04d846a2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <193d871b.3cdf8ff3.5066d211.d2434@lajt.hu> References: <193d871b.3cdf8ff3.5066d211.d2434@lajt.hu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: older version of programs in freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:17:00 -0000 On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:48:49 +0200, Istvan Gabor wrote: > Hello: > > I am a freebsd beginner. > > As I understood correctly there is only one ports tree which contains > the most up to date (and stable) versions of programs. > And there are compiled packages for the different releases, which > reflect the version at the time of the release. Yes. There are both the RELEASE packages (as found on the installation CDs and DVDs) as well as the STABLE packages, regularly created from a snapshot of the continuously developing ports tree. > But I would like to use/keep with libreoffice 3.4 (since I don't like the > interface changes they made in version 3.5 and 3.6). > > How can I do it in FreeBSD? Easily. :-) > Do I have to build it independently from the ports tree? Use portdowngrade. This tool is excellent in obtaining older versions of a specific port, for example to make it functional again (like the xzgv image viewer where the last usable version has been xzgv-0.8_9). > Or is there an older package that can be installed on newer system? If you find the version you want has been distributed with RELEASE, you can use that ports tree or binary packages. You can set PACKAGEROOT (see "man pkg_add") in order to install from the RELEASE precompiled package collection instead of from the one updated to reflect the current ports tree. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 11:26:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DE3106564A; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0898FC14; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8TBQa7c024725; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:26:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8TBQa0n024722; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:26:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:26:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: David Noel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120928102822.GD2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <20120928115700.GE2389@kontrol.kode5.net> <50660AEF.2010301@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:26:36 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Ed Flecko , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn checkout "head" or "stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:26:38 -0000 On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, David Noel wrote: > Apologies for the spam and the hastily written closing paragraph. I > was hoping to end with a heartwarming anecdote that would leave the > reader with no choice but to agree that anonymous ssh+svn access would > benefit us all. > > AnonCVS is still of course an option, but with its eventual retirement > the addition of an anonymous svn+ssh account would seem fitting, or at > least consistent. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors-svn.html shows https mirrors. Check out from the https site instead of svn, and you'll be asked to verify the certificate fingerprint the first time: svn co https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 11:53:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA826106566B for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862358FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.79.195.195] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1THvbx-0001MU-Vc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:53:34 +0200 Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:53:00 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120929135300.03aae386@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/vLJC5TzMPVboiPM5j.kravj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Subject: Re: how restore an unencrypted dump on an encrypted file system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:53:59 -0000 --Sig_/vLJC5TzMPVboiPM5j.kravj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable s m wrote: > I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore > this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my > file system) but do not know how to do that. >=20 > is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an > encrypted file system? i tried to restore my dump file as when file > system is unencrypted. Can you read the files after attaching the provider manually? > this is what i've doe: I decrypted my encrypted file system by "geli > attach" command, then mount it and restore dumps. but when i restart > my system, FreeBSD doesn't start up correctly (PXE boot menu is shown > and when i select freeBSD, boot.config runs but nothing happend). You do not provide enough information to give a meaningful answer. One possible mistake would be putting the kernel itself on the encrypted file system, but the list of things one can do wrong is pretty long. Fabian --Sig_/vLJC5TzMPVboiPM5j.kravj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBm4R8ACgkQBYqIVf93VJ01eQCglA6y6hA00M5UEchwp3wIdeP6 +gUAmgMH/muyUrBKbk7sU68NRJyHFzrt =fx0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vLJC5TzMPVboiPM5j.kravj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 12:20:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4E7106566B for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20868FC40 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420985E1BC for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:09:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.583 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bsGTaTGUjwcZ for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:09:45 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-043-059.ekt.thalamus.net [195.216.43.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4FC85E160 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:09:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5066E509.9090906@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:09:45 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Considering purchase off SSD! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:20:03 -0000 Hello list. I'm considering to purchase a SSD. The one I have in mind for the moment is this one. Samsung 830 Series MZ-7PC512D 512GB I'm not going for a top of the line disk but I would like to ask if anyone has experience with SSD's and FreeBSD (9.1 is my plan). Just to complicate things a little, I'll make a dual boot install with W7. I have this set up today on an ordinary SATA disk. I just your view on if it's a good idea ;-) Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 13:06:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3757F106566B for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE98D8FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so5245054vbm.13 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Sw2x3EajaPPFRPck/SNxGiQnWkdKefy2oMl5/oP+JtM=; b=ZYTRBBHzEb2Bu+iq9VJhBW2OuvCRxsKrVS/yKY1tzD9AEQuECtY2bqwjRoChIBdk+V Kr3PjZ9HmAKzSlkW5eO+WN3Uq/njaKly0mqGYbHmujhI/N9fERigFDE3XxdAiellK86r 5RvhXOf4w8JFMHBmEPpGuPJtNxFyHy6ihguTGotUbHGAjy+8hn66R2ELYTijvn5WXHPY TiuHFK7sq8ehrx8HRsZFqpL60gn7fughGYR8RrFVVgRjIpzhyi8xcyFsciNCekXljLhx YLVW4qY0wZ9PsX3dRc+CuqCN5IUHupzS4aJ5MTJBl4LuCVi0YR/fTleKPbUsopgXzd7z VmiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.11 with SMTP id ci11mr4565005vdb.7.1348923969911; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.239.167 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:06:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120929135300.03aae386@fabiankeil.de> References: <20120929135300.03aae386@fabiankeil.de> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:36:09 +0330 Message-ID: From: s m To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: how restore an unencrypted dump on an encrypted file system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:06:11 -0000 thanks Fabian for your answer. i don't know what exactly information is needed but i tell what i did up to now. i have two partition, one is encrypted and the other one is not. the unencrypted partition has boot folder. when i copy FreeBSD base system files, FreeBSD start up correctly but when i restore dump files, FreeBSD doesn't start up correctly. i hope this information help to understand what is wrong. thanks On 9/29/12, Fabian Keil wrote: > s m wrote: > >> I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore >> this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my >> file system) but do not know how to do that. >> >> is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an >> encrypted file system? i tried to restore my dump file as when file >> system is unencrypted. > > Can you read the files after attaching the provider manually? > >> this is what i've doe: I decrypted my encrypted file system by "geli >> attach" command, then mount it and restore dumps. but when i restart >> my system, FreeBSD doesn't start up correctly (PXE boot menu is shown >> and when i select freeBSD, boot.config runs but nothing happend). > > You do not provide enough information to give a meaningful answer. > > One possible mistake would be putting the kernel itself on > the encrypted file system, but the list of things one can > do wrong is pretty long. > > Fabian > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 13:48:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5521065672 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3578FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8TDmUws025540; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:48:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8TDmUSU025537; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:48:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:48:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Leslie Jensen In-Reply-To: <5066E509.9090906@eskk.nu> Message-ID: References: <5066E509.9090906@eskk.nu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:48:30 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Considering purchase off SSD! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:48:34 -0000 On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote: > I'm considering to purchase a SSD. > > The one I have in mind for the moment is this one. > > Samsung 830 Series MZ-7PC512D 512GB > > I'm not going for a top of the line disk but I would like to ask if anyone > has experience with SSD's and FreeBSD (9.1 is my plan). SSDs work. Be sure to align partitions to 4K, and enable TRIM support on the filesystems. Use AHCI if available. > Just to complicate things a little, I'll make a dual boot install with W7. I > have this set up today on an ordinary SATA disk. In that case, the same as above, but if Windows was installed without AHCI enabled in the BIOS, it may not work if AHCI is enabled for FreeBSD. Two of those Samsungs in 256G actually cost less than one 512G, and would make partitioning and multibooting simpler. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 13:54:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448B7106567A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95BF8FC1F for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D17F5E15F; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:54:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.583 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aysUD9J3GaFs; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:54:00 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from [172.17.0.139] (c-195-216-043-059.ekt.thalamus.net [195.216.43.59]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001415E160; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:53:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5066FD77.9080806@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:53:59 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <5066E509.9090906@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Considering purchase off SSD! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:54:04 -0000 Warren Block skrev 2012-09-29 15:48: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> I'm considering to purchase a SSD. >> >> The one I have in mind for the moment is this one. >> >> Samsung 830 Series MZ-7PC512D 512GB >> >> I'm not going for a top of the line disk but I would like to ask if >> anyone has experience with SSD's and FreeBSD (9.1 is my plan). > > SSDs work. Be sure to align partitions to 4K, and enable TRIM support > on the filesystems. Use AHCI if available. > >> Just to complicate things a little, I'll make a dual boot install with >> W7. I have this set up today on an ordinary SATA disk. > > In that case, the same as above, but if Windows was installed without > AHCI enabled in the BIOS, it may not work if AHCI is enabled for FreeBSD. > > Two of those Samsungs in 256G actually cost less than one 512G, and > would make partitioning and multibooting simpler. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks Warren! I have read about the alignment, TRIM and AHCI. I just needed a confirmation that it will work. My machine is a laptop so I only have room for one disk ;-) /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 14:38:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076A7106566C for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saeedeh.motlagh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24098FC19 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsl39 with SMTP id l39so3706610qcs.13 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ef20nAERh2F++zPvWJVcbZ2VyAbHVDEACYMo7ZRqFJE=; b=WiR2kpQMfiMhh/lDFAG9gf4yDjCIDdFQG+2PC9RipxUTo3uryGaO4CMufk6P+24uXF FDA9qOFNPOkQGFDCEXyD1f9z7u+VzCWoiOoCiv+tcynqt/4/Ra5HFxRYBVpnk65FqLk9 Dcnrl12DgYOD268wLZe1cdilnX1/IGVzw/vv1sprUqmukdviUo1D9sh8oj/YsFANMaOU VACms9UO6C7UZ7CYW5MWD8944QL9RWl+LmZY2Uy9zP9mChV+r9Wl7wKJxO/RJszvNz4B L6mtPI1EwMGbQmi5HvuRgwQKBLxZw6IZ4HBdxxzaGgzdNem4g2nsoduv5z0a2VxSN93V rkMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.135.8 with SMTP id l8mr6679422qct.126.1348929476844; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.40.196 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:07:56 +0330 Message-ID: From: saeedeh motlagh To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: find slot number and number of ports for each card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:38:04 -0000 hello all i want to have statistics about my hardware specially the type of card that are installed on my system, the number of ports that each card has and the slot number which cards are installed. i can find the slot number by tracing the output of dmesg but it's time consuming job. more over, i don't know how to find the number of ports that each card has. please let me know if there is any command to give these information to me directly. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 15:16:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118221065670 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B437F8FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q8TFHm9x093003; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:17:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:17:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201209291517.q8TFHm9x093003@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, saeedeh.motlagh@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: find slot number and number of ports for each card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:16:56 -0000 > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:07:56 +0330 > From: saeedeh motlagh > Subject: find slot number and number of ports for each card > > hello all > > i want to have statistics about my hardware specially the type of card > that are installed on my system, the number of ports that each card > has and the slot number which cards are installed. i can find the > slot number by tracing the output of dmesg but it's time consuming > job. more over, i don't know how to find the number of ports that each > card has. > > please let me know if there is any command to give these information > to me directly. No, there is no such command that will provide "everything" about every card in every slot in any system. Unless you have an EISA (obselete) motherboard, that is. In which case, the EISA config utility WILL provide all that information. The only authoritative way -- that works in _all_ cases, is to open up the box and =look=. And then dig up the specs on the boards you find present. However, you can find a lot of things by running 'pciconf', *IF* your machine has PCI slots. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 18:54:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90A2106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987888FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-214-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.214.70]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0E827898; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q8TIs188002605; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:54:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:54:01 +0200 From: Polytropon To: saeedeh motlagh Message-Id: <20120929205401.ac331836.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: find slot number and number of ports for each card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:54:04 -0000 On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:07:56 +0330, saeedeh motlagh wrote: > hello all > > i want to have statistics about my hardware specially the type of card > that are installed on my system, the number of ports that each card > has and the slot number which cards are installed. i can find the > slot number by tracing the output of dmesg but it's time consuming > job. You can use "pciconf -lv" to get a beter output for PCI cards. Note that this list does also contain "integrated components". Sadly, there is no direct relation to which "hardware slots" are occupied, because there is no real standard for communcating the physical layout of the machine to the OS, either through the BIOS, ACPI, or "more directly" by the OS itself. See "man pciconf" for details. Some non-PC systems (such as EISA-based computers, some Sun hardware, or the AS/400, or nearly anything from the mainframe sector) have means to "directly query" hardware resources. Today's cheap commodity consumer crap (sorry) doesn't have this feature. > more over, i don't know how to find the number of ports that each > card has. A lot of this data can be obtained by using "pciconf -lv". Here's an example output for a graphics card: vgapci0@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x030000 card=0x06201462 chip=0x039210de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS (G73)' class = display subclass = VGA Of course, _what_ "pci0:2:0:0" is, depends on the mainboard in use. This particular machine also has a TV tuner card at "pci0:0:9:0" and "pci0:0:9:1", and a network card at "pci0:0:10:0". _Where_ those are located (which "hardware slots") is not obvious, as there aren't even _5_ of them on the mainboard! It cannot easily be concluded, especially considering the common lack of lower-level documentation. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 19:35:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9860E106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0CC8FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8TJZah0008550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:35:39 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.103] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:32:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:32:04 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: To: saeedeh motlagh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-29_06:2012-09-28, 2012-09-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: find slot number and number of ports for each card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:35:41 -0000 On Sep 29, 2012, at 7:37 AM, saeedeh motlagh wrote: > hello all >=20 > i want to have statistics about my hardware specially the type of card > that are installed on my system, Card characteristics are provided by "pciconf -l". ("pciconf -lv" for verbose listing). Two important notes about "pciconf -l"=85 1. It lists more than just "cards" 2. The "type" can't always be determined by FreeBSD When looking at the output of "pciconf -l", each line represents a component (this can be an integrated component on the mother- board, such as USB port, not necessarily a PCI add-in card). If the line begins with "none@" then a driver has not attached to this device (and FreeBSD therefore doesn't know what "type" it is). In this case, you'll want to look at the "chip=3D" portion of the line. The "chip=3D" portion of the line gives you two very important pieces of information when it comes to identifying your hardware: a. The 4-digit hexadecimal identifier for the Model of the device b. The 4-digit hexadecimal identifier for the Vendor of the device (in that order from left-to-right) Let's look at a sample line: vgapci0@pci0:2:9:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x00081002 chip=3D0x47521002 re= v=3D0x27 hdr=3D0x00 NOTE: That's my graphics card on an ASUSTek P4B533 motherboard In the above line, see "chip=3D0x47521002". In this case, "4752" is the Model identifier and "1002" is the Vendor identifier. If you're a human and you want to know what these numbers are, you hop on over to pcidatabase.com and punch in the numbers to find out that this is a [particularly ancient] ATI Rage XL graphics card. If you're not a human (i.e., a script), you'll instead reference a local copy of the "pci.ids" (/usr/local/share/pciids/pci.ids for example): $ grep '1002 4752' /usr/local/share/pciids/pci.ids 1002 4752 Proliant Rage XL > the number of ports that each card has That one is near impossible. Since every add-in card is going function differently, you really need a device-specific enumeration method to (for example) count things like PHYs provided by a single NIC. Imagine if you will, the case of the card for which there is no driver loaded in the kernel (where "pciconf -l" shows a "none@" prefix). There really is no way to enumerate the number of "ports" a card offers in that circumstance. However! You can build logic into your code (if you are scripting something) that takes the description from the pci.ids file (or just the raw hex IDs) and extrapolates based on prior-knowledge how many ports a particular device has. > and the slot number which cards are installed. That's provided by pciconf. Also, it's worth mentioning the excellent "dmidecode" tool from the ports tree. This too can enumerate the slots themselves (and tell you whether they are PCI, PCI-X, PCIe, etc. including voltage. Search for "System Slot Information" in the dmidecode output for this info. --=20 Devin > i can find the > slot number by tracing the output of dmesg but it's time consuming > job. more over, i don't know how to find the number of ports that each > card has. >=20 > please let me know if there is any command to give these information > to me directly. >=20 > thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 21:41:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ABA106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2AD8FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:41:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=IuCcgcDg c=1 sm=0 a=+L5dYfeubEW4PLvjDgtIXQ==:17 a=WAZfUmVf-EkA:10 a=rZCFakjYmwAA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=fM8A_wlSj5gA:10 a=UdvEN9gbqWsBAELrqE0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=+L5dYfeubEW4PLvjDgtIXQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 76.184.157.127 Received: from [76.184.157.127] ([76.184.157.127:59671] helo=[10.0.0.240]) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 0F/06-17657-3FA67605; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:41:08 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:41:07 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <6B256EAE618B4A87F4D57217@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: File permissions - how to "lock" a directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:41:15 -0000 I have a particularly thorny problem I'm trying to solve, but I'll bet FreeBSD has a solution. I'm running a webserver using suphp. It's very picky about permissions. It wants the web server user (www) to be the owner of all directories and files. Meanwhile, the site owners want to be able to update and add files to the site. When they update files everything is fine. When they upload new files, the ownership of the file is user:user instead of www:user, so apache can't display them. Is there a way to "lock" a directory such that all files created in that directory are owned by the directory owner? If not, I'll have to script something to change perms after uploads. Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 21:59:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC569106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790328FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9so3399892oag.13 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=U1dCguT/lJUdN5mg850ZH+w/7OD77OYSiVEk8FTt8YM=; b=iHOutJKq5yzODC9UG6C9KzuS4FcNVAV3xSqAOMR6sW00d54SIi58/ie4S6rvSt7Jjf gqKwuCC11CRiWSL0z0mb19/tK+xMeLFyqswUxMe6EPU+Z3id2QgIeFVNP4AgOXFaPLES o95qsO+eY9vh+zLKyQ49zrhV+kPQ8jD9gA7o+KLouUJ00TNo2LIff+yBnI5/ObhIx38y 4KmrXVaWLwa7ZciaKLjnQXmPbEtzUjRGUZdSSg6Rnc7KynazEHZi0t/0KqVkBunPxkuB Z2HrsBxpgHcxZBU8m+I2agG90eHZBtlzxMLovHRdl8n2/0xsZKJr7ISPcFvMnw2W0Dwy oonA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.19.195 with SMTP id h3mr8570957oee.102.1348955990653; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.172.67 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6B256EAE618B4A87F4D57217@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <6B256EAE618B4A87F4D57217@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:59:50 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Paul Schmehl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: File permissions - how to "lock" a directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:59:51 -0000 On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I have a particularly thorny problem I'm trying to solve, but I'll bet > FreeBSD has a solution. > > I'm running a webserver using suphp. It's very picky about permissions. > It wants the web server user (www) to be the owner of all directories and > files. > > Meanwhile, the site owners want to be able to update and add files to the > site. When they update files everything is fine. When they upload new > files, the ownership of the file is user:user instead of www:user, so > apache can't display them. > > Is there a way to "lock" a directory such that all files created in that > directory are owned by the directory owner? If not, I'll have to script > something to change perms after uploads. > There is the suiddir option, see mount(8) and chmod(2). -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 22:13:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8316106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988988FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:13:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H+ZZMpki c=1 sm=0 a=+L5dYfeubEW4PLvjDgtIXQ==:17 a=WAZfUmVf-EkA:10 a=BT3UhpxYSDkA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=D5EblfWhqe8A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=t-qvIqfNAAAA:8 a=UdvEN9gbqWsBAELrqE0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ZXZb1VRfrxsA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=us3QuJEASGkA:10 a=+L5dYfeubEW4PLvjDgtIXQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 76.184.157.127 Received: from [76.184.157.127] ([76.184.157.127:60096] helo=[10.0.0.240]) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 4D/FC-15382-89277605; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:13:45 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:13:44 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: Adam Vande More Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <6B256EAE618B4A87F4D57217@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: File permissions - how to "lock" a directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:13:46 -0000 --On September 29, 2012 4:59:50 PM -0500 Adam Vande More=20 wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Paul Schmehl > wrote: > > > I have a particularly thorny problem I'm trying to solve, but I'll bet > FreeBSD has a solution. > > I'm running a webserver using suphp. =C2=A0It's very picky about = permissions. > It wants the web server user (www) to be the owner of all directories and > files. > > Meanwhile, the site owners want to be able to update and add files to the > site. =C2=A0When they update files everything is fine. =C2=A0When they = upload new > files, the ownership of the file is user:user instead of www:user, so > apache can't display them. > > Is there a way to "lock" a directory such that all files created in that > directory are owned by the directory owner? =C2=A0If not, I'll have to = script > something to change perms after uploads. > > > There is the suiddir option, see mount(8) and=C2=A0chmod(2). > Thanks, Adam. I see now I didn't read chmod(1) closely enough. I'm now=20 using 4770 for directories, and I hope this will solve the problem. Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell