From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 02:21:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40A9D5D; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 02:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9128FC08; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 02:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3F25081B; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:20:55 -0700 (PDT) To: Niclas Zeising Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? In-Reply-To: <50958B70.1010605@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:20:55 -0700 Message-ID: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 02:21:03 -0000 In message <50958B70.1010605@freebsd.org>, you wrote: >First of all, I apologize if I came of as slightly annoyed or cranky >before. No no! Not at all. Did I? If anyone did, it was probably me, and I apologize. >I should probably learn to have breakfast before going through my inbox... :) Join the club! :-) >> I can definitely understand how you guys would have your hands full! >> (You could in theory just "freeze" all x11-related stuff at some >> working state/level, but then, obviously, there would be a growing >> outcry, over time, about lack of support for the many _new_ graphics >> cards that seem to arrive on a regular basis.) > >There are usually some more of us, but sometimes we need to do other >things as well. :) What? Do you really mean to tell me that you take time out from your important x11 work to eat, sleep, go to the bathroom, and occasionally do things to actually make a living? How dare you! >The most pressing issue is not manpower from people who knows the ports >system however. What is most needed is testers that can confirm that >things work, or tell us when we break things. I'm trying to do my part. >>> With that said, have you tried the newer xorg distribution, by setting >>> WITH_NEW_XORG=yes in /etc/make.conf and recompile all xorg related >>> ports? Does it work? >> >> No. I didn't know this was an option! (Am I currently using "old" >> xorg??) > >You are using the default xorg in FreeBSD. It is an old version, but >for the most part it works. Most notably it lacks support for more >modern intel based graphics cards. It probably also lacks other >features. The WITH_NEW_XORG knob was added to make it possible for >people to test more recent versions of the xorg distribution. The >ultimate goal is to use this version, but the risk is that support for >much legacy hardware is removed. We need a lot of help testing though, Well, you can always do what Bill Gates does... just ship it and then wait for the user complaints to come rolling in, and then clean up the mess afterwards. :-) >> Question: How can I know which things are and are not "xorg related ports"? >> Will the following command sequence give me a complete list? >> >> pkg_info | fgrep xorg | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 1 pkg_info -r > >That seem to give a fairly complete list. If you have the time and >computing power, the best option is probably to reinstall all ports from >scratch. OK. I think the set of ports works out to almost the same thing either way (i.e. just about everything). >It might also be possible to use a tool such as portmaster or >portupgrade, but I have never tried this myself. That was my plan. I use portupgrade. >> So, um, if I understand correctly "Mesa" currently contains: >> >> 1) code to implement an API called "Mesa3d", and... >> >> 2) code to implement a rather different API called "Gallium3D" >>... >... As far as I know, this API has always been unsupported on >FreeBSD (this might be completely wrong though), so the chances are you >are not using it. By "this API" I assume that you mean "Gallium", correct? >I hope this clears some of the fog around this. Some parts are quite >confusing, and I don't know all the details myself either. Please don't >hesitate to ask if you have more questions! Thank you. That is most generous of you. Before I take up more of your time, I should really go and do the rebuild the ports with WITH_NEW_XORG and then see what happens with my bug. I need to find a clean disk first, or one that I can wipe. (I have a kind of nice setup here with removable drive trays, so I can swap disks on my #2 machine almost as easily as swaping in a fresh roll of toilet paper.) From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 11:13:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A969822; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB128FC08; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k10so4778406iag.13 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:13:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=5/CQKZy4E6tCJfhixXXuRgE9HCYaByYosWAmjQwnU+w=; b=ChaX9R4MiMcKfVF6e7iiQXRWtlBAVHWD0t6/zyCy7397IPTMyPjDcr+MqnaDEp0hf7 3K5XGv9GtrLePPQe7+zRdehs/AMn9Z46jnTcujnkgIVYv/1TpRI2bpTXVpRfipCJJa3w Q3hud1t9FnQ8GlD49oGmsaASg52xPTHH9VCNl8lqNLckWj4hI+kt9w38YCyhwV7g1fU6 aBRtCyRrSqguEau20uMJOXrKhHQoT3Hqa6/tCi701VK/ijRAQrxmuoNShsHuZsiPOs0q KlVt/0gw0F5V4HB5L3BakFS52f6oDeTmPv4TjjQboth1Cn95i1G932AjSrIRPwod0s5U 6uXg== Received: by 10.50.179.36 with SMTP id dd4mr6590289igc.64.1352027621122; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pq3sm3326127igc.8.2012.11.04.03.13.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:13:40 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 05:13:31 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RC3; KDE/4.8.4; i386; ; ) References: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201211040513.32005.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Niclas Zeising , "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:13:48 -0000 On Saturday 03 November 2012 21:20:55 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >You are using the default xorg in FreeBSD. It is an old version, but > >for the most part it works. Most notably it lacks support for more > >modern intel based graphics cards. It probably also lacks other > >features. The WITH_NEW_XORG knob was added to make it possible for > >people to test more recent versions of the xorg distribution. The > >ultimate goal is to use this version, but the risk is that support for !!much legacy hardware is removed. We need a lot of help testing though,!! I have an old ATI Radeon 9000 (r250) and I am usin default xorg in FreeBSD. I didn't try the "new" one because I am not sure if will work because as you wrote "much legacy hardware is remowed". But my Radeon 9000 works very good and fast on Mageia Linux with Xorg 1.13.0. Mitja -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 11:55:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A6342E for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1748FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459EA40010 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:55:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 358F440006; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:55:00 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8B9C40003; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:54:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Xvb6q4mHCz8hVn; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:54:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id 0scJPvQksqNk; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:54:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Xvb6n3ZmQz8hVm; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:54:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [10.32.0.6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Xvb6n2stmz9Ctj; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:54:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFB522AFA; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:54:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50965790.3090200@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:54:56 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtiM Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? References: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> <201211040513.32005.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201211040513.32005.lumiwa@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:55:02 -0000 On 11/04/12 12:13, ajtiM wrote: > On Saturday 03 November 2012 21:20:55 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >>> You are using the default xorg in FreeBSD. It is an old version, but >>> for the most part it works. Most notably it lacks support for more >>> modern intel based graphics cards. It probably also lacks other >>> features. The WITH_NEW_XORG knob was added to make it possible for >>> people to test more recent versions of the xorg distribution. The >>> ultimate goal is to use this version, but the risk is that support for > > !!much legacy hardware is removed. We need a lot of help testing though,!! > > I have an old ATI Radeon 9000 (r250) and I am usin default xorg in FreeBSD. I > didn't try the "new" one because I am not sure if will work because as you > wrote "much legacy hardware is remowed". But my Radeon 9000 works very good > and fast on Mageia Linux with Xorg 1.13.0. It would be very helpful if you are able to test this both with the new xorg that's in ports, and the experimental repository. I don't know exactly where the 'cut' is, and I think even more drivers were axed in mesa 8.0. It might also be that the driver works in X, but you don't get any acceleration, and things like that. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 12:05:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C966D7 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71628FC17 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ACF40010 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E5BBC40006; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:35 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AA3540003; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3XvbM30M4Sz8hVn; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:35 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id nfJqmkd2c7pl; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3XvbM05P3Jz8hVm; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XvbM02TWnz9Ctj; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE3D22AFA; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:05:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50965A0B.3080104@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:05:31 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? References: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:05:37 -0000 On 11/04/12 03:20, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message<50958B70.1010605@freebsd.org>, you wrote: > >> First of all, I apologize if I came of as slightly annoyed or cranky >> before. > > No no! Not at all. Did I? > > If anyone did, it was probably me, and I apologize. You didn't come off as cranky in my eyes, don't worry about it. :) > >>> Question: How can I know which things are and are not "xorg related ports"? >>> Will the following command sequence give me a complete list? >>> >>> pkg_info | fgrep xorg | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 1 pkg_info -r >> >> That seem to give a fairly complete list. If you have the time and >> computing power, the best option is probably to reinstall all ports from >> scratch. > > OK. I think the set of ports works out to almost the same thing either way > (i.e. just about everything). Probably... Xorg related stuff touches a lot of things, and on resonably fast hardware it's usually easier and less time-consuming to just wipe everything and start from scratch rather than hunt down the ports that needs rebuilding. > >> It might also be possible to use a tool such as portmaster or >> portupgrade, but I have never tried this myself. > > That was my plan. I use portupgrade. That can work, allthough I have not tried myself. Make sure to recompile everything that depends on xorg related stuff (such as DEs and Firefox and so on) just in case. There is probably some way to get portmaster to do this recursive build for you. > >>> So, um, if I understand correctly "Mesa" currently contains: >>> >>> 1) code to implement an API called "Mesa3d", and... >>> >>> 2) code to implement a rather different API called "Gallium3D" >>> ... >> ... As far as I know, this API has always been unsupported on >> FreeBSD (this might be completely wrong though), so the chances are you >> are not using it. > > By "this API" I assume that you mean "Gallium", correct? Yes. > > I need to find a clean disk first, or one that I can wipe. > > (I have a kind of nice setup here with removable drive trays, so I can > swap disks on my #2 machine almost as easily as swaping in a fresh roll > of toilet paper.) I have to get one of those... That sounds very convenient, especially when juggling multiple versions of things :) Regards! -- Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 18:48:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5227570; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC488FC0A; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72E6337B4E5; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:48:48 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3XvmJH4vdbzWDn; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:48:47 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:48:47 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Niclas Zeising Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? Message-ID: <20121104184847.GY66994@over-yonder.net> References: <96984.1351975912@tristatelogic.com> <50958B70.1010605@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50958B70.1010605@freebsd.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21-fullermd.4 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:48:55 -0000 On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 10:24:00PM +0100 I heard the voice of Niclas Zeising, and lo! it spake thus: > > As far as I know, this [Gallium3D] API has always been unsupported > on FreeBSD (this might be completely wrong though), so the chances > are you are not using it. TTBOMK Gallium relies on some slice of the KMS/GEM/TTM in-kernel stuff, so it _could_ only apply to Intel stuff in FreeBSD, since everything else is on the UMS stuff X has declared legacy. And I don't think Intel does any Gallium stuff, so it's irrelevant there too. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 19:49:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95265215; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476F88FC08; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k10so5009557iag.13 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:49:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=8aLGBHa1uGIFJAz0zAbcOpqwWpEtpfojOroEb+ykasw=; b=ba58cmq91+47B821ScIDO3CNqDO7EHCXg9kROliso7eMudWB3HLuZmOikf3+oRc0rf U6iJkgdSC/tfNcZYGgZl1v5GycRhAwhjU+Ehr0vGp2SQIJysBXnU6sWKt8STEe135e+l oEei4Ct7plM3e6BFBwqpxGrNK2JqhOqZngLLy1URIDYf9QZFh7RXkV38GtplZ1qIVGuX 1oPJWPvYJAtnCQU4o6f3EBy6cDyAc6OllGq1bsI1cu0akaVAV74gdGoICv86CXLgXj68 88Hf2g3wGFat+THZAZZnY34vrF/KYUhGIrNKbXc6QW/pBRM7bd9NCfP2OOlctmQcOpbL Ijow== Received: by 10.50.178.67 with SMTP id cw3mr7566043igc.53.1352058567547; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:49:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uj6sm4452366igb.4.2012.11.04.11.49.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:49:26 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: Niclas Zeising Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:49:16 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RC3; KDE/4.8.4; i386; ; ) References: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> <201211040513.32005.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50965790.3090200@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <50965790.3090200@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201211041349.16659.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:49:28 -0000 On Sunday 04 November 2012 05:54:56 Niclas Zeising wrote: > > It would be very helpful if you are able to test this both with the new > xorg that's in ports, and the experimental repository. I don't know > exactly where the 'cut' is, and I think even more drivers were axed in > mesa 8.0. It might also be that the driver works in X, but you don't > get any acceleration, and things like that. > Regards! I will do. One question more, please: I did check which ports should be updated and portmaster shows me dri, libdrm, libGL, libGLU and xorg-server. IMO I need to update the other ports related to xorg too? Is it enough just the video drivers? Thank you. Mitja -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 19:59:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00589AEF for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6508F8FC08 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC4E40009 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 2E1FB40006; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:37 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4E2240003; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Xvnt03Z2Pz8hVn; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id k7FjLVbODdoq; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Xvnsy3kCyz8hVm; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Xvnsy2t5Sz9CwX; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800E022AFA; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5096C921.5020900@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 20:59:29 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtiM Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? References: <98725.1351995655@tristatelogic.com> <201211040513.32005.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50965790.3090200@freebsd.org> <201211041349.16659.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201211041349.16659.lumiwa@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:59:39 -0000 On 11/04/12 20:49, ajtiM wrote: > On Sunday 04 November 2012 05:54:56 Niclas Zeising wrote: > >> >> It would be very helpful if you are able to test this both with the new >> xorg that's in ports, and the experimental repository. I don't know >> exactly where the 'cut' is, and I think even more drivers were axed in >> mesa 8.0. It might also be that the driver works in X, but you don't >> get any acceleration, and things like that. >> Regards! > > I will do. > One question more, please: I did check which ports should be updated and > portmaster shows me dri, libdrm, libGL, libGLU and xorg-server. IMO I need to > update the other ports related to xorg too? Is it enough just the video > drivers? It might be enough, but I would rebuild everything that depends on dri, libdrm, mesa and the xorg libraries, just to be on the safe side. There are probably a lot of library version numbers that change, as well as APIs and stuff. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 22:05:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4205F3A for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8388FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35A15081D for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:05:36 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? In-Reply-To: <50965A0B.3080104@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:05:36 -0800 Message-ID: <19753.1352066736@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 22:05:40 -0000 In message <50965A0B.3080104@freebsd.org>, Niclas Zeising wrote: >>>> So, um, if I understand correctly "Mesa" currently contains: >>>> >>>> 1) code to implement an API called "Mesa3d", and... >>>> >>>> 2) code to implement a rather different API called "Gallium3D" >>>> ... >>> ... As far as I know, this API has always been unsupported on >>> FreeBSD (this might be completely wrong though), so the chances are you >>> are not using it. >> >> By "this API" I assume that you mean "Gallium", correct? >Yes. So that has never been supported on FreeBSD?? I'm a little surprised because from what little I read about it, the Gallium approach is rather better. Regards, rfg From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 22:37:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46229D3 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175F08FC08 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDAE4000A for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id D26E340009; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:25 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88AE940003; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3XvsN41SBhz8hVq; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id re01c_Z3xdHa; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [10.1.0.4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3XvsN21Yx8z8hVm; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [10.32.0.6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XvsN21Fn9z9CwX; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FD222AFA; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:37:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5096EE18.2050005@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:37:12 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? References: <19753.1352066736@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <19753.1352066736@tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 22:37:27 -0000 On 11/04/12 23:05, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message<50965A0B.3080104@freebsd.org>, > Niclas Zeising wrote: > >>>>> So, um, if I understand correctly "Mesa" currently contains: >>>>> >>>>> 1) code to implement an API called "Mesa3d", and... >>>>> >>>>> 2) code to implement a rather different API called "Gallium3D" >>>>> ... >>>> ... As far as I know, this API has always been unsupported on >>>> FreeBSD (this might be completely wrong though), so the chances are you >>>> are not using it. >>> >>> By "this API" I assume that you mean "Gallium", correct? >> Yes. > > So that has never been supported on FreeBSD?? > > I'm a little surprised because from what little I read about it, the Gallium > approach is rather better. I think one of the big issues here is that we lack kernel code needed to make gallium work. I haven't looked into the details though. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 22:48:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4D1DC5 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FFA8FC17 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E410E5081D for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:48:33 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? In-Reply-To: <20121104184847.GY66994@over-yonder.net> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:48:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20100.1352069313@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 22:48:34 -0000 In message <20121104184847.GY66994@over-yonder.net>, "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: >On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 10:24:00PM +0100 I heard the voice of >Niclas Zeising, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> As far as I know, this [Gallium3D] API has always been unsupported >> on FreeBSD (this might be completely wrong though), so the chances >> are you are not using it. > >TTBOMK Gallium relies on some slice of the KMS/GEM/TTM in-kernel >stuff, so it _could_ only apply to Intel stuff in FreeBSD, since >everything else is on the UMS stuff X has declared legacy. And I >don't think Intel does any Gallium stuff, so it's irrelevant there >too. So let me see if I understand this... Nowadays, the world (or at any rate, the important part of it, i.e. X.org) thinks that Kernel Mode Switching (KSM) is the Right Way to do this stuff, and that it is preferable to UMS, correct? X.org wants everybody to move to exclusively using KSM (?) FreeBSD has implemented KSM in the kernel, but _only_ for Intel graphics? Gallium requires KSM (?) Nobody has coded any Gallium drivers for any Intel graphics chips (?) (Please excuse me if I say that, as a person who knows nothing really about any of this stuff, it seems to me a most perplexing state of affairs.) Regards, rfg From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 00:02:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338A8824 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 00:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275F8FC15 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 00:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28EEE37B4E0; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:02:14 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3XvvFx2GVnzDDS; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:02:13 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:02:13 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? Message-ID: <20121105000213.GZ66994@over-yonder.net> References: <20121104184847.GY66994@over-yonder.net> <20100.1352069313@tristatelogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100.1352069313@tristatelogic.com> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21-fullermd.4 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:02:16 -0000 On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:48:33PM -0800 I heard the voice of Ronald F. Guilmette, and lo! it spake thus: > > So let me see if I understand this... I'm no eXpert on such matters, but here's my understanding... > Nowadays, the world (or at any rate, the important part of it, i.e. X.org) > thinks that Kernel Mode Switching (KSM) is the Right Way to do this stuff, KMS > and that it is preferable to UMS, correct? > > X.org wants everybody to move to exclusively using KSM (?) Well, more specifically, X.org is moving _themselves_ to KMS, what everyone else does isn't their problem ;) There are actually at least two pieces here. There's KMS itself, which means the part of the drivers dealing with modesetting etc is now no longer part of X proper, but part of the kernel[0]. And there's GEM/TTM/etc which have to do with the memory management (both system and GPU) for the cards, which is also no longer part of X proper, but part of the kernel. The X driver itself now becomes a relatively thin shim that calls into those two for a lot of its magic. Technically, I believe Gallium3D requires the GEM/TTM bits, not the KMS bits. But the whole pile is often referred to in one breath. And AFAIK all the Gallium drivers are also KMS-related drivers; while it may be theoretically possibly, given GEM/TTM, to write a UMS driver that does Gallium, I'm pretty sure none exist or will. FreeBSD 9.x+ has a KMS driver for (some?) Intel chips, and the GEM bits that the Intel driver requires. For Radeon, we're using the (now legacy) UMS drivers, that upstream probably isn't doing much with beyond "make sure it keeps compiling". To get the newer stuff, we'd need to write/port a Radeon KMS driver, and also build the TTM infrastructure (I believe all the KMS drivers other than Intel use TTM; Intel wrote GEM for themselves). [0] One advantage of this is that, hey, writing a new GUI stack is much easier, since you no longer need to write all the drivers over again for every GUI stack. You only need to write them once for every OS. And since "Open Source *nix" is really just a long-winded way of saying Linux, that's no problem. It's portable; it runs on both Red Hat _and_ Ubuntu! One implication is that the kernel "driver" isn't just a one-time shim we write; a lot of the card-specific stuff is now in that. So all the stuff that used to be written for each new GPU family in xf86-video-ati etc by X.org in the UMS world, now needs to be written for each new GPU family in the kernel by us (or ported from the stuff written in the Linux kernel, more like). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 01:06:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F13548 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 01:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6358FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 01:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34045081B for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 17:06:52 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r300-based boards... Are they now officially a lost cause? In-Reply-To: <20121105000213.GZ66994@over-yonder.net> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:06:52 -0800 Message-ID: <20947.1352077612@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 01:06:54 -0000 In message <20121105000213.GZ66994@over-yonder.net>, "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: >[0] One advantage of this is that, hey, writing a new GUI stack is > much easier, since you no longer need to write all the drivers > over again for every GUI stack. You only need to write them once > for every OS. And since "Open Source *nix" is really just a > long-winded way of saying Linux, that's no problem. It's > portable; it runs on both Red Hat _and_ Ubuntu! rofl > One implication is that the kernel "driver" isn't just a one-time > shim we write; a lot of the card-specific stuff is now in that. > So all the stuff that used to be written for each new GPU family > in xf86-video-ati etc by X.org in the UMS world, now needs to be > written for each new GPU family in the kernel by us (or ported > from the stuff written in the Linux kernel, more like). So that begs my next question... Is anybody on the FreeBSD side working as we speak to steal...er... I mean port whatever Linux is currently using in the way of kernel drivers for ATI and/or Nvidia? If not, then that would seem to be a problem, and that over time, FreeBSD will be left sadly behind, particularly when it comes to supporting new graphics chips as they are released in the future. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 03:12:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639C9C00; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 03:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEF78FC0A; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 03:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z9so2591029dad.13 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:12:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CKbrxDCYZYhx3Tv7c8rk/VWSrFDSGH/jWPzPsO+OUoc=; b=lM1hgTMI2nQhsHFemaqdFtNNYy0dNjkP17pz/7mf/TmVCgd+fcqlpd9l40bXlKsvHl UFGOwVjcXvWwDl7rnlkjGlsi//zQvy5dsEf5DHFozLj7BTZX9A35ilHa366kVKzBeTKD iObKogaHS1Yk1KVnFMSQL/EKkrdkgKepgr0DeHzNYNEkYV5sIBEj7ovwrOiUrjK3Ywya q9zsaV87TxBPCZ36Yyz7+idmNtDWXM/ARmBrbWzMyLWovdl3t1ffXwv/7E41ips5qaSR MJNrxSlLFyPXErXEzk8EGeDLAX3m3/sQt0bNPeqJWTmw8EprKYZtryIhcOJvIN9VCNdS +lrw== Received: by 10.68.83.68 with SMTP id o4mr27028281pby.25.1352085174590; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:12:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qc7sm9785862pbc.15.2012.11.04.19.12.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:12:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:12:30 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: PPC DRM graphics testing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 03:12:55 -0000 So I've been plagued by issues on my rv250...the gpu is locking up at times and resulting in a backtrace that seems to indicate the card is no longer responding (drmCommandNone hangs on drmIoctl hangs on ioctl). At this point, I'm not sure if I have bad hardware, something is wrong with mesa for rv250, or something is wrong with drm. I unfortunately only have one PowerPC machine with a radeon card, so I'd love to see if anyone else has had any luck with similar configs (G4 tower with radeon AGP card). If anyone has a working radeon with DRM on powerpc, could you post glxinfo | fgrep 'render' (if you can get mesa-demos to compile...it's a chore). And/or results trying to run a 3d app like minetest, glxgears, whatever uses DRI would be really helpful in ruling out both my hardware and the drm code. I don't want to dig into the mesa mess unless I'm sure that's where the problem lies. By the way, WITH_NEW_XORG does work fine, so long as you already have an xorg.conf. I think previous problems I had with it were the result of module version mismatches or possibly XAA. I also learned a bit about endian-ness and why we don't have a htole8 :). Thanks! ps: steps for working drm on powerpc with radeon (or anything else that can do drm?): 1. Use CURRENT or "#define __BIG_ENDIAN 1" in /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/drmP.h 2. rebuild world+kernel or build just the drm module (cd ../../modules/drm && make clean && make && make install) 3. Remove anything disabling DRM/DRI from Xorg.conf (this would have been a manual addition) 4. Start X 5. Verify drm.ko/radeon.ko are loaded with kldstat and check xorg logs to see if it opened it ok and enabled acceleration. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 05:29:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8158C8B5; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129AF8FC0C; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id qA55Tn7X064246; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:29:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:29:49 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:29:54 -0000 On 05.11.12 04:12, matt wrote: > So I've been plagued by issues on my rv250...the gpu is locking up at > times and resulting in a backtrace that seems to indicate the card is no > longer responding (drmCommandNone hangs on drmIoctl hangs on ioctl). At > this point, I'm not sure if I have bad hardware, something is wrong with > mesa for rv250, or something is wrong with drm. I unfortunately only > have one PowerPC machine with a radeon card, so I'd love to see if > anyone else has had any luck with similar configs (G4 tower with radeon > AGP card). > > If anyone has a working radeon with DRM on powerpc, could you post > glxinfo | fgrep 'render' (if you can get mesa-demos to compile...it's a > chore). And/or results trying to run a 3d app like minetest, glxgears, > whatever uses DRI would be really helpful in ruling out both my hardware > and the drm code. I don't want to dig into the mesa mess unless I'm sure > that's where the problem lies.¨ Both on a G5 in 32-bit mode. And mesa-demos are 'working'. Radeon 9600: direct rendering: Yes OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (RV350 4152) 20090101 TCL Radeon 9800: direct rendering: Yes OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (R350 4E48) 20090101 TCL Andreas From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 11:06:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1182D04 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:06:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C528FC20 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA5B6fsT001365 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:06:41 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA5B6fhB001363 for freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:06:41 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:06:41 GMT Message-Id: <201211051106.qA5B6fhB001363@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:06:41 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/172924 x11 x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-workin o ports/172379 x11 x11/Xorg errors: drmOpenDevice, /dev/dri/, /dev/dri/ca o ports/172102 x11 [PATCH] devel/gccmakedep build error with clang-cpp o ports/172101 x11 [PATCH] devel/imake build error with clang-cpp o ports/171433 x11 x11/xorg: xorg + hal: mouse input devices psm0 and usm o ports/171422 x11 graphics/libGL build error with python3.2 o ports/171242 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse: fail to detect moused(8) o ports/170852 x11 [PATCH] x11-fonts/encodings: encodings.dir includes bo o ports/170690 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server eats memory o ports/170232 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel package building error wi o ports/170108 x11 x11-fonts/libfontenc: library in the package searches o ports/169875 x11 x11/xorg: vesa on 9-BETA1/Xorg 7.7 with radeon 6450 ca o ports/169794 x11 x11/xdm, several /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/ files missing o ports/169561 x11 [patch] x11-toolkits/libXmu: disable specs o ports/169560 x11 [patch] x11/libICE: disable specs o ports/169559 x11 [patch] x11-fonts/fontsproto: disable specs o ports/168901 x11 New port: textproc/xorg-sgml-doctools o ports/168645 x11 [UPDATE] x11/luit to 1.1.1 f ports/167797 x11 graphics/gthumb crashes, dumps core o ports/167654 x11 x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor o ports/167596 x11 [patch] I have rolled back x11-drivers/xf86-video-vmwa o ports/167228 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel : Missing dependency (x1 o ports/167194 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics 1.5.0 trackpoint(LENO o ports/166163 x11 graphics/dri: gthumb port crashes (SIGSEGV) within the o ports/165981 x11 devel/imake doesn't play nice with current xorg o ports/165599 x11 [x11/xkeyboard-config] x11/xkbcomp as a RUN_DEPENDS f power/165585 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server: Both Xorg and Xorg-server por p ports/164349 x11 [PATCH] x11/libXinerama :1 LeftOf or Above :0 mouse is o ports/161480 x11 [patch] x11/luit: don't depend on pty(4), use openpty( o ports/160968 x11 [patch] ports/x11/libXi broken manpages o ports/160963 x11 [patch] x11/bigreqsproto: disable specs o ports/159792 x11 [patch] USB HID devices support for x11-drivers/xf86-i o ports/158529 x11 [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server: conditionalize --with o ports/158513 x11 Broken Xvideo in x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel drivers o ports/156949 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati 6.14.1 produce black blank f ports/156424 x11 8.2R xrandr & xf86-video-intel & xorg-server packages o ports/156405 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati driver: no hardware renderi o ports/156042 x11 x11/xorg hang in combination with KWin-Tiling o ports/155696 x11 [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server: chase AIGLX altered d o ports/155683 x11 x11/xdm [patch] Enabling IPv6 support breaks IPv4 f ports/154510 x11 [patch] x11/xorg: xorg servers have Motif-crippling bu o ports/154502 x11 x11/xdm authorization failure when used with E17 windo o ports/154423 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd: radeon xorg driver ca o ports/153593 x11 graphics/dri: clutter segfault, something to do with i o ports/153495 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati wavy line problem for lenov o ports/153358 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: Intel driver freeze with o ports/152159 x11 [hang] xorg/x11: X11 freezes with Intel Mobile 965 and o ports/151596 x11 x11/xorg: wacom bamboo button 1 no longer works o ports/150633 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server: KVM switching causing X serve o ports/150155 x11 x11/xorg hangs after xrandr(1) usage o ports/149743 x11 x11/xorg: garbled window since Xorg-7.5 o ports/149636 x11 x11/xorg: buffer overflow in pci_device_freebsd_read_r o ports/148591 x11 information note for x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics o ports/148444 x11 [hang] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: intel driver free f ports/148340 x11 x11-drivers/xf86-video-neomagic: unresolved symbol xf8 o ports/146256 x11 x11/xorg does fails to start after upgrade from 7.4 to o ports/145649 x11 x11/xorg: X server crashes when starting opengl compos o ports/142069 x11 x11/xorg: After adding on a laptop Toshiba Sattelite L o ports/141660 x11 x11/xorg: X can't determine amount of video memory on o ports/139011 x11 [patch] Add options to support GLX TLS in x11-servers o ports/135276 x11 x11/xorg: GUI running first time only while using Free o ports/134132 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server: Intel i845 - xorg.conf with U o ports/131930 x11 [PATCH] x11-servers/xorg-server coredumps on exit o ports/131726 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server: xorg server messes with my eh o ports/122830 x11 x11/xorg: Error in I830WaitLpRing() o ports/120947 x11 x11/xsm ignores system.xsm and .xsmstartup 66 problems total. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 14:42:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383F3ACE for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@null.zi0r.com) Received: from null.zi0r.com (null.zi0r.com [71.245.171.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B328FC26 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from null.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA5EgE53088580 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:42:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout@null.zi0r.com) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA5EgEln088557; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:42:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout) Message-Id: <201211051442.qA5EgEln088557@null.zi0r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:42:14 -0500 From: portscout@portscout.zi0r.com To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:42:15 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-drivers/xf86-video-openchrome | 0.2.904 | 0.3.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portscout@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 20:10:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8334D89; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DCE8FC15; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA5KA8s2041606; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:10:08 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA5KA83N041602; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:10:08 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:10:08 GMT Message-Id: <201211052010.qA5KA83N041602@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/173406: [PATCH] Update x11-drivers/xorg-drivers to use optionsng X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:10:08 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] Update x11-drivers/xorg-drivers to use optionsng Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Nov 5 20:10:08 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173406 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 22:48:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BC059D for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 22:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D018FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 22:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120765081B for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:48:42 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:48:42 -0800 Message-ID: <29655.1352155722@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:48:44 -0000 Well, I found a spare drive (or rather a spare partition) and I did the following: 1) Installed FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 (kernel+base) 2) login as root 3) portsnap fetch extract 4) Inserted WITH_NEW_XORG=yes into /etc/make.conf 5) setenv BATCH yes 6) cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade; make install 7) portinstall xorg gthumb x11-wm/fvwm2 8) X -configure It appears to me that that last step failed rather entirely, for reasons that _I_ most certainly do not understand. Can anyone shed some light on this? What did I do wrong? Here is the log of what happened. I really have no idea how to interpret this. ============================================================================= root@blackie-l:/root # X --configure X.Org X Server 1.10.6 Release Date: 2012-02-10 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 amd64 Current Operating System: FreeBSD blackie-l.tristatelogic.com 9.1-RC2 FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 #0 r241106: Mon Oct 1 18:26:44 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Build Date: 05 November 2012 12:14:24AM Current version of pixman: 0.24.2 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Nov 5 13:32:19 2012 List of video drivers: ati radeon nv mach64 radeonhd r128 openchrome vesa (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new" (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. Configuration failed. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 22:56:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03A17A9 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 22:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9945B8FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 22:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rp8so4493657pbb.13 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fQyIybrKW1pc3MH+X8qWGD2MpHfQMPLD1Td0+U/bUV0=; b=zvuFodKp8/H4IPtDhkX1XVQrTnFmk/C49Ce8fD60liSqWh60n0tDqAKp78EgHclQ0c jx6eMMnCXXY7le+H9Qb2gwZnHT2t0maQ0iPnHBPlmp03Ebnf3VwI/7hZrzyXCjVeU+3K +xO3lrcXJTPPbol/YMoCIFnepXO0XUf/oLLwUFXXjtk+174ST2wQ8F9jFyvxunsfzswC Aad5cvLGEsyPX/ULcgBlTBwjpl9aZqSHKyJUamO1iMcReTh+fJuCLZJwzjGkGNlSzP+X ylqQJO/nF0b/Oc8U/ygfHCEEsTIMIsd4x1ya/BLEDv0e05aARFUawk1jphN5+NJhWRaO 5beA== Received: by 10.68.232.195 with SMTP id tq3mr34738979pbc.70.1352156170117; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from bakeneko.local (108-213-216-134.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.213.216.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm11298176pav.26.2012.11.05.14.56.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <509843EF.2070008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:55:43 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.9) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/10.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure References: <29655.1352155722@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <29655.1352155722@tristatelogic.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:56:11 -0000 On 11/05/12 14:48, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Well, I found a spare drive (or rather a spare partition) and I did the > following: > > 1) Installed FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 (kernel+base) > 2) login as root > 3) portsnap fetch extract > 4) Inserted WITH_NEW_XORG=yes into /etc/make.conf > 5) setenv BATCH yes > 6) cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade; make install > 7) portinstall xorg gthumb x11-wm/fvwm2 > 8) X -configure > > > It appears to me that that last step failed rather entirely, for reasons > that _I_ most certainly do not understand. Can anyone shed some light > on this? What did I do wrong? > > Here is the log of what happened. I really have no idea how to interpret this. > > > ============================================================================= > root@blackie-l:/root # X --configure > > X.Org X Server 1.10.6 > Release Date: 2012-02-10 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 amd64 > Current Operating System: FreeBSD blackie-l.tristatelogic.com 9.1-RC2 FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 #0 r241106: Mon Oct 1 18:26:44 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > Build Date: 05 November 2012 12:14:24AM > > Current version of pixman: 0.24.2 > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Nov 5 13:32:19 2012 > List of video drivers: > ati > radeon > nv > mach64 > radeonhd > r128 > openchrome > vesa > (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new" > (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. > Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. > Configuration failed. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Try hand writing your xorg.conf (or using an old one, or using none at all)...WITH_NEW_XORG does apparently use some new methods to probe for video, but in this case it sounds like X -configure is getting confused by a video controller you don't use or there is some other issue probing one device. The error message is vague, it's hard to tell if it's say a device issue or an edid issue (for example) because it doesn't imply whether screens are more numerous or devices. You could try removing all drivers except the ones you intend to use as well. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 23:19:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D215CD1 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645318FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0D35081B for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:19:43 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure In-Reply-To: <509843EF.2070008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:19:43 -0800 Message-ID: <46587.1352157583@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:19:44 -0000 In message <509843EF.2070008@gmail.com>, matt wrote: >Try hand writing your xorg.conf (or using an old one, or using none at >all)... OK. I can fetch a previous known-working xorg.conf and I can (and will) try that, however... Isn't all of this NEW_XORG stuff eventually supposed to be become the new "official" xorg stuff for FreeBSD? If so, is anybody going to work on fixing this, which appears to be a quite serious bug? >WITH_NEW_XORG does apparently use some new methods to probe for >video, but in this case it sounds like X -configure is getting confused >by a video controller you don't use or there is some other issue probing >one device. It would seem so. For the record, the machine in question has motherboard MSI K9VGM-V, which is a micro-ATX with on-board integrated VIA K8M890CE graphics, *and* also I have an ATI X600 PCIe board installed. I do use the latter. I do not use the former. >The error message is vague, Yes. It is. >it's hard to tell if it's say a >device issue or an edid issue (for example) because it doesn't imply >whether screens are more numerous or devices. I only have one monitor, and it is plugged in to the X600 card (via DVI). Perhaps X is unhappy that I have nothing plugged into the on-board graphics. >You could try removing all >drivers except the ones you intend to use as well. Well, I'll see how things go with the xorg.conf file that I was using on this machine before. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 23:27:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72ABF0D for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873AD8FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9DA5081B for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:27:13 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure In-Reply-To: <509843EF.2070008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:27:13 -0800 Message-ID: <46639.1352158033@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:27:15 -0000 In message <509843EF.2070008@gmail.com>, matt wrote: >Try hand writing your xorg.conf (or using an old one, or using none at >all)... OK, I fetched the one I was using previously on this same machine, and that seems to work just fine. That's good news part #1. The other good news is that gthumb now appears to no longer be crashing within any R300-specific DRI code. The bad news is that gthumb _is_ still crashing. Now it is just crashing in a rather different place. (See below.) I am starting to think that perhaps gthumb makes a good test case for X implementation... a kind of "torture test". gdb stack trace included below... Regards, rfg P.S. Please note the new message "failed to create drawable" just before gthumb crashes. I personally have no idea what that means. ========================================================================== blackie-l:rfg> gthumb . failed to create drawable Segmentation fault (core dumped) blackie-l:rfg> gdb gthumb ./gthumb.core GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `gthumb'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgconf-2.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgconf-2.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpng15.so.15...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpng15.so.15 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libthr.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libthr.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libORBit-2.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libdrm.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libdrm.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libjson-glib-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libjson-glib-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-shm.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-shm.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libX11-xcb.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libX11-xcb.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-glx.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-glx.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsupc++.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsupc++.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/dri/r300_dri.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/dri/r300_dri.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x0000000804ae498a in driFetchDrawable () from /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1 [New Thread 809007400 (LWP 100081/gthumb)] (gdb) where #0 0x0000000804ae498a in driFetchDrawable () from /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1 #1 0x0000000804ae525a in dri_bind_context () from /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1 #2 0x0000000804ac1ac2 in glXMakeCurrentReadSGI () from /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1 #3 0x0000000800e13b77 in cogl_pango_glyph_cache_new () from /usr/local/lib/libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0 #4 0x0000000800d9ebab in clutter_feature_available () from /usr/local/lib/libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0 #5 0x0000000800da8ca5 in clutter_get_option_group_without_init () from /usr/local/lib/libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0 #6 0x0000000800da8ecf in clutter_init () from /usr/local/lib/libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0 #7 0x00000000004a4a2a in main () (gdb) From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 04:20:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E1640F; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB2D8FC0A; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so16350pad.13 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:20:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CndljjysssRMGmVpxK0vltf/o5OhZa/S0zq+SmlI1uQ=; b=vFVrvttANfAJJp/KxbKT5NjLJ4w9CcHegSBj+Ke3fpJKkfrhu9RoaBeB2hHtkpF3x5 O2tq3Z/IRVj8XOsbG+9oSh/h0E+LvtX0g1BY+/MCqlWIbtVMZCocbPVPvN7fBMPKmt8P O+jnvshxN3rvF37JbDU1t1+4EEDSGNguAw6/itDZeEJXH9xrGFxGxceq6vyjRaTV3buB /yNJYSbi2t4wZIjYGsMwkBj9kHHKd4jiSkBVbsS233aukuSiSEwc0JkKo6M1S/igbqVn VJQO91PSbrdxlul6SrW/vKImYHmvYaGf6WHG1OqD+Ond5Qa7fex1y7REiVRRRH1aK5KD TwhA== Received: by 10.68.209.230 with SMTP id mp6mr36540808pbc.8.1352175610376; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm11743685pav.20.2012.11.05.20.20.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:20:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:19:44 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:20:11 -0000 On 11/04/12 21:29, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 05.11.12 04:12, matt wrote: >> So I've been plagued by issues on my rv250...the gpu is locking up at >> times and resulting in a backtrace that seems to indicate the card is no >> longer responding (drmCommandNone hangs on drmIoctl hangs on ioctl). At >> this point, I'm not sure if I have bad hardware, something is wrong with >> mesa for rv250, or something is wrong with drm. I unfortunately only >> have one PowerPC machine with a radeon card, so I'd love to see if >> anyone else has had any luck with similar configs (G4 tower with radeon >> AGP card). >> >> If anyone has a working radeon with DRM on powerpc, could you post >> glxinfo | fgrep 'render' (if you can get mesa-demos to compile...it's a >> chore). And/or results trying to run a 3d app like minetest, glxgears, >> whatever uses DRI would be really helpful in ruling out both my hardware >> and the drm code. I don't want to dig into the mesa mess unless I'm sure >> that's where the problem lies.¨ > Both on a G5 in 32-bit mode. And mesa-demos are 'working'. > > Radeon 9600: > direct rendering: Yes > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (RV350 4152) 20090101 TCL > > > Radeon 9800: > direct rendering: Yes > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (R350 4E48) 20090101 TCL > > Andreas > Thanks, it makes me think AGP is fine on powerpc, and that it's probably my hardware or a mesa bug...I have seen a lot of historical discussion of the locking scheme in the r200 drivers, and it makes me wonder if that and/or smp are to blame. Apparently drmCommandNone is one of the few times drm actually waits for the card, so many different bugs that crash the gpu will appear with a similar back trace ending in drmCommandNone calling ioctl. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 04:38:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129DB520 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A858FC0A for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so25391pad.13 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:38:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sr3h14AofjlDBRLk0lKnf46Hlko1c2K9j0bNNYIWQps=; b=FBKOoEE1KizV1788e1dFdr4kd8wDcS1BleZKVIr1fizahISpybnBCIS0gHe3eJE0k3 bzCoI41dtAhSBIoxYhLLv/PpVmM6Xh7vh3oeNl8Pn1HRxYNN1fGQlVZnFVRp/8dUanhh wmDz3dFrmOoH1ziewIs3Rliya6AN2NxUmkcVMQaN8nj0sX5HeI7AmGLNTE6zDslo/DgN I4ZFJEYgscpjqKh4t4LwGvVXX3nillqIXZg2oezR8JQ2S8fhxQBzz1Ey2IGEZtlvt2Rm b0N3CvCZnOAmZiLuMrKxkmOB6guGwX7/LLwVYMptI4WNZZld4enBHrGnDapsgGNC5aJO bOFA== Received: by 10.68.219.163 with SMTP id pp3mr25395pbc.13.1352176700969; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pw2sm11658313pbb.59.2012.11.05.20.38.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:38:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50989423.5020509@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:37:55 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure References: <46587.1352157583@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <46587.1352157583@tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:38:22 -0000 On 11/05/12 15:19, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Isn't all of this NEW_XORG stuff eventually supposed to be become the > new "official" xorg stuff for FreeBSD? If so, is anybody going to work > on fixing this, which appears to be a quite serious bug? > Personally, and with all due internet respect, I think it's not really a bug (in this case)...you do have two video cards with valid drivers. If you had one card and the correct driver, everything would be fine. If you had two cards and only the correct driver for the card you wanted, you would be fine. Since you had two cards and two correct drivers X -configure tried to setup both cards and exited when that failed. I agree the error message is vague. The more elegant solution would be to setup the card which could be configured, and ignore the one which could not, while notifying the user that only one card could be configured due to the lack of an accompanying screen (or whatever reason) on the other. Given the few people working on Xorg for FreeBSD, you may want to either file a bug upstream or start figuring out how to add the functionality with a patch and file a PR. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 05:19:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1A09CA for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA288FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042EF5081B for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:19:19 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure In-Reply-To: <50989423.5020509@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:19:19 -0800 Message-ID: <48772.1352179159@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:19:27 -0000 In message <50989423.5020509@gmail.com>, matt wrote: >On 11/05/12 15:19, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> >> Isn't all of this NEW_XORG stuff eventually supposed to be become the >> new "official" xorg stuff for FreeBSD? If so, is anybody going to work >> on fixing this, which appears to be a quite serious bug? >> >Personally, and with all due internet respect, I think it's not really a >bug (in this case)...you do have two video cards with valid drivers. If >you had one card and the correct driver, everything would be fine. If >you had two cards and only the correct driver for the card you wanted, >you would be fine. Since you had two cards and two correct drivers X >-configure tried to setup both cards and exited when that failed. Personally, and with all due internet respect, why should it have failed? Cannot X run ``two headed''? (I really thought that it could, but perhaps I was mistaken.) It is sometimes said that two heads are better than one, but perhaps not in this case. Regards, rfg From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 05:22:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2291D9; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDCF8FC08; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id qA65MeS3038959; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:22:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:22:40 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030507010805020908070404" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:22:50 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030507010805020908070404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06.11.12 05:19, matt wrote: > On 11/04/12 21:29, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> On 05.11.12 04:12, matt wrote: >>> So I've been plagued by issues on my rv250...the gpu is locking up at >>> times and resulting in a backtrace that seems to indicate the card is no >>> longer responding (drmCommandNone hangs on drmIoctl hangs on ioctl). At >>> this point, I'm not sure if I have bad hardware, something is wrong with >>> mesa for rv250, or something is wrong with drm. I unfortunately only >>> have one PowerPC machine with a radeon card, so I'd love to see if >>> anyone else has had any luck with similar configs (G4 tower with radeon >>> AGP card). >>> >>> If anyone has a working radeon with DRM on powerpc, could you post >>> glxinfo | fgrep 'render' (if you can get mesa-demos to compile...it's a >>> chore). And/or results trying to run a 3d app like minetest, glxgears, >>> whatever uses DRI would be really helpful in ruling out both my hardware >>> and the drm code. I don't want to dig into the mesa mess unless I'm sure >>> that's where the problem lies.¨ >> Both on a G5 in 32-bit mode. And mesa-demos are 'working'. >> >> Radeon 9600: >> direct rendering: Yes >> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (RV350 4152) 20090101 TCL >> >> >> Radeon 9800: >> direct rendering: Yes >> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (R350 4E48) 20090101 TCL >> >> Andreas >> > Thanks, it makes me think AGP is fine on powerpc, and that it's probably > my hardware or a mesa bug...I have seen a lot of historical discussion > of the locking scheme in the r200 drivers, and it makes me wonder if > that and/or smp are to blame. Apparently drmCommandNone is one of the > few times drm actually waits for the card, so many different bugs that > crash the gpu will appear with a similar back trace ending in > drmCommandNone calling ioctl. Hm, I can try to bring the Radeon 9200 PCI up and see how it behaves. It'll take a few moments. But at least we have another config to compare. Oh, and one thing to note, my config works with built-in (not a kernel module) drm/radeondrm. Have you tried this too? Kernel config: # Direct Rendering modules for 3D acceleration. device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers device radeondrm # ATI Radeon Attached the patch to make it compile. Andreas --------------030507010805020908070404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; x-mac-type="0"; x-mac-creator="0"; name="radeon_conf.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="radeon_conf.diff" Index: conf/files =================================================================== --- conf/files (revision 242266) +++ conf/files (working copy) @@ -1175,9 +1175,9 @@ dev/drm/r300_cmdbuf.c optional radeondrm dev/drm/r600_blit.c optional radeondrm dev/drm/r600_cp.c optional radeondrm \ - compile-with "${NORMAL_C} ${NO_WUNUSED_VALUE} ${NO_WCONSTANT_CONVERSION}" + compile-with "${NORMAL_C_NOWERROR} ${NO_WUNUSED_VALUE} ${NO_WCONSTANT_CONVERSION}" dev/drm/radeon_cp.c optional radeondrm \ - compile-with "${NORMAL_C} ${NO_WUNUSED_VALUE} ${NO_WCONSTANT_CONVERSION}" + compile-with "${NORMAL_C_NOWERROR} ${NO_WUNUSED_VALUE} ${NO_WCONSTANT_CONVERSION}" dev/drm/radeon_cs.c optional radeondrm dev/drm/radeon_drv.c optional radeondrm dev/drm/radeon_irq.c optional radeondrm --------------030507010805020908070404-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 05:28:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026AECD0 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4F8FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so51230pad.13 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:28:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gGzoPIug7lJ0sW6a0RRylxRwthHmdbjTygHfeumgl9U=; b=ZGUEKp+7BHEOyigRy3ZkYogaevYo1eYAeUBMUFJi7uZsjNEG9OM+OCQ9Is1bIBKnbf oRlt9pMKgK0YQDqYsL5umvnGoYki06MS+/U4qBo043msQpZEsScdBVNwMZb8te6WXFBe PzrEChyCFqf/BF4vkjftO2w4bf4ewu1waNr63m5vNsiC2yprjSyEJYwblP2+RgstybX0 oYDCJGRjpsLAmsn5cFFAh6NXYeI7iGi5WSyN0YBf9iwcLo0+FA0bIsoVv8sh43qxKhkL tIRwJ7fwrbPaS3VJVhYdU3+joKsv1xyssgGQctmWMpKaOreSRUDkPv8fCcwUfns9Mv2V sdPQ== Received: by 10.69.0.134 with SMTP id ay6mr242051pbd.50.1352179734584; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7sm6607120paz.3.2012.11.05.21.28.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:28:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50989FFD.4070403@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:28:29 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure References: <48772.1352179159@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <48772.1352179159@tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:28:55 -0000 On 11/05/12 21:19, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Cannot X run ``two headed''? (I really thought that it could, but > perhaps I was mistaken.) It can, but it needs two heads (devices + screens) to do so...thus the failure. So I guess we can say X does not like to configure partially-decapitated two headed mode :) Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 06:18:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C6CFB3 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9117E8FC08 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EAC5081B for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 22:18:05 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure In-Reply-To: <50989FFD.4070403@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:18:05 -0800 Message-ID: <49073.1352182685@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:18:05 -0000 In message <50989FFD.4070403@gmail.com>, matt wrote: >On 11/05/12 21:19, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> >> Cannot X run ``two headed''? (I really thought that it could, but >> perhaps I was mistaken.) > >It can, but it needs two heads (devices + screens) to do so...thus the >failure. So I guess we can say X does not like to configure >partially-decapitated two headed mode :) It would appear so. At least *now*. Previously, with this exact same hardware setup, X never complained AT ALL. Ever. (And I've been using this for several years, over multiple revs of X, on both FreeBSD and Linux.) So this is rather a step backwards. I think that it is fair to call it a regression. (The best rule of programming is to expect the unexpected.) And now for a bit of sick humor... http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/picture/krail969/DecapitatedBabe.png Regards, rfg From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 07:01:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584623F2; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D08E8FC12; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rp8so169434pbb.13 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:01:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bdY8xAwSRSobVxS08/J+SuwjkM6VCdph6MAYBUCFYKo=; b=asIUABoBY+4loe6QXiapkOSCpXfk9c1qYs9CWvqsfYdqVvF57SBKGE+cTFOUnRJGLO GSMaWbQIzpfOdyCNqbWvB2VGSLF5ZR7HT+fMsXzsjlIez/NgDlo+D6poZfXeVY340HzX HB1iHmuSMuIkS/1+9bniF+YrUoCCYOAi6N7GC8VDrRxIEBHMzFR674nTYdcLIOp1F5OT AYxh6jWA9c09oQJjP95P96KExYg2rjh+ET6shInvAdXuB/c+HBVLTHGk4TQZ32p5S3FD FiW7n276kmjo29Ho06UXqNorJW1XhFtvnSZEqApVaRXPAs81/4WWPzEogCL7tes3rrWa IroA== Received: by 10.66.79.198 with SMTP id l6mr156149pax.43.1352185284614; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:01:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gv9sm11882701pbc.21.2012.11.05.23.01.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:01:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5098B5AA.4010606@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:00:58 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 07:01:25 -0000 > Hm, I can try to bring the Radeon 9200 PCI up and see how it behaves. > It'll take a few moments. But at least we have another config to compare. > > Oh, and one thing to note, my config works with built-in (not a kernel > module) drm/radeondrm. Have you tried this too? > > Kernel config: > # Direct Rendering modules for 3D acceleration. > device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers > device radeondrm # ATI Radeon > > > Attached the patch to make it compile. > > Andreas > > I will try that, it's worth a shot. Builds are fast on this box surprisingly (well reasonable at least) so I should get to try this tonight. Also, I think that r200 is actually still supported in Mesa 8. I could be wrong,so I'm off to read some more before I end up having to rebuild many ports again :). I'll try adding it to my config and after that upgrading to 7.7 I've tried everything interesting in xorg.conf, but aside from a different backtrace through different code paths in the driver down to an ioctl on a hung gpu, it's been mostly unsuccessful. The option to limit depth moves did change the issue, but didn't fix it...that may point at mesa again. Glxgears looks has some colorful angled polygons that move around once and then the gpu crashes in all cases. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 08:29:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BAA8AC; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA6B8FC14; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rp8so224171pbb.13 for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:29:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ex026dF6CYW3Dr9fCcp4AEN1ff53/8K36sSGaqeKcWI=; b=hGwJTV9IcUah4M63LUzAGaOLUvmUfoz3YNWjkEivk3wV6z+XtWbTxxJxnwFZeTg1nk D049oYsNJrZubZ013LNFTjGAY0p/YgM7ocg3Gzu/uLia2sGe77R/6YNfy3H0j46NGM48 yxoSzxe43ogZgGjDc9OKxSTBodXlHLlxxv9CYnepbEtqmb1TSYkiIRmkTehU8v81C2W5 eW3UACQ0brwC/sxqw/SST78aUjvJHlARjhwvoDurYMD/xaD8cVqHkBQxt2vso/xzD5T5 eAVLo1oX3J8zVsKNs3mwy064RawEsVwr1DjbRhUBSLYakCnNMwsTRO+7XkFhWntriW4Z NolQ== Received: by 10.66.80.133 with SMTP id r5mr710701pax.24.1352190568845; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:29:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kc4sm11999802pbc.23.2012.11.06.00.29.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:29:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:29:03 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:29:29 -0000 On 11/05/12 21:22, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Hm, I can try to bring the Radeon 9200 PCI up and see how it behaves. > It'll take a few moments. But at least we have another config to compare. > > Oh, and one thing to note, my config works with built-in (not a kernel > module) drm/radeondrm. Have you tried this too? > > Kernel config: > # Direct Rendering modules for 3D acceleration. > device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers > device radeondrm # ATI Radeon > > > Attached the patch to make it compile. > > Andreas > > > A good idea, but it didn't help. Backtrace was slightly different, but nothing decisive. exaCopyDirty() seems to be involved quite often. I also found 7.7 will not work, because although they left in r200, they stripped out UMS. So it's back to the drawing board, or at least poking at sources and/or gdb for a while :) Thanks Andreas Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 14:40:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4F5914 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@portscout.zi0r.com) Received: from null.zi0r.com (null.zi0r.com [71.245.171.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C90F8FC21 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from null.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6EeICS036776 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:40:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout@portscout.zi0r.com) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA6EeI4W036670; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:40:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout) Message-Id: <201211061440.qA6EeI4W036670@null.zi0r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:40:18 -0500 From: portscout@portscout.zi0r.com To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:40:19 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/libdrm | 2.4.17 | 2.4.40 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portscout@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 22:45:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71328D8D for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett.mahar@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B820B8FC08 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Nov 2012 22:40:31 -0000 Received: from 124-149-149-115.dyn.iinet.net.au (EHLO emachine.the.domm) [124.149.149.115] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu006) with SMTP; 06 Nov 2012 23:40:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #117972605 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+b3PZUig6bJKTplCfELbYKxRxXeoiPbrylMLgHsZ 5aBdNs+XO76VWE Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:40:25 +1100 From: Brett To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure Message-Id: <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: rfg@tristatelogic.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:45:13 -0000 > Well, I found a spare drive (or rather a spare partition) and I did the > following: > > 1) Installed FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 (kernel+base) > 2) login as root > 3) portsnap fetch extract > 4) Inserted WITH_NEW_XORG=yes into /etc/make.conf > 5) setenv BATCH yes > 6) cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade; make install > 7) portinstall xorg gthumb x11-wm/fvwm2 > 8) X -configure > > (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. > Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. > Configuration failed. Doesn't make.conf also need "WITH_KMS=true"? Brett. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 08:41:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FB38BC; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D1F8FC0C; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA78fI5p027248; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:18 GMT (envelope-from bsam@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bsam@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA78fHlG027244; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:17 GMT (envelope-from bsam) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:17 GMT Message-Id: <201211070841.qA78fHlG027244@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Martin.Birgmeier@aon.at, bsam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: bsam@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/171433: x11/xorg: xorg + hal: mouse input devices psm0 and usm0 not correctly recognized ("No Device specified, looking for one") X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:41:18 -0000 Synopsis: x11/xorg: xorg + hal: mouse input devices psm0 and usm0 not correctly recognized ("No Device specified, looking for one") State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bsam State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 7 08:40:35 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: The patch from upstream was committed. Thanks for the report! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171433 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 08:49:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAD49A0; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16498FC15; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA78nnrQ027726; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:49:49 GMT (envelope-from bsam@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bsam@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA78nlfL027722; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:49:47 GMT (envelope-from bsam) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:49:47 GMT Message-Id: <201211070849.qA78nlfL027722@freefall.freebsd.org> To: rfg@tristatelogic.com, bsam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: bsam@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:49:50 -0000 Synopsis: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bsam State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 7 08:49:31 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Awaiting for a feedback. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172924 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 08:50:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008C69D0 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9B98FC08 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA78o06d027752 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA78o0DT027751; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:50:00 GMT Message-Id: <201211070850.qA78o0DT027751@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Samorodov List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:50:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/172924; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Samorodov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rfg@tristatelogic.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:47:06 +0400 I've just committed a patch to x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse (see PR/171433). Does this commit fixes your problem? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 08:52:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DB2A3A; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B716B8FC0C; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA78q3Xr027880; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:52:03 GMT (envelope-from bsam@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bsam@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA78q3Nu027876; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:52:03 GMT (envelope-from bsam) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:52:03 GMT Message-Id: <201211070852.qA78q3Nu027876@freefall.freebsd.org> To: rfg@tristatelogic.com, bsam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: bsam@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:52:04 -0000 Synopsis: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bsam State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 7 08:52:03 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Awaiting for a feedback. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167654 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 09:00:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4397B56 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932918FC0A for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA7901oT028085 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA7901vE028084; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211070900.qA7901vE028084@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Samorodov List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:00:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/167654; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Samorodov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rfg@tristatelogic.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:50:56 +0400 I've just committed a patch to x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse (see PR/171433). Does this commit fixes your problem? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 14:47:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4975DCD for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@portscout.zi0r.com) Received: from null.zi0r.com (null.zi0r.com [71.245.171.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051098FC14 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from null.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA7Elik5036966 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:47:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout@portscout.zi0r.com) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA7Elihb036903; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:47:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout) Message-Id: <201211071447.qA7Elihb036903@null.zi0r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:47:44 -0500 From: portscout@portscout.zi0r.com To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:47:47 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati | 6.14.3 | 7.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portscout@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 16:24:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635C9F16; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03458FC08; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id qA7GOT4N013088; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:24:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:24:29 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:24:40 -0000 On 06.11.12 09:29, matt wrote: > On 11/05/12 21:22, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> Hm, I can try to bring the Radeon 9200 PCI up and see how it behaves. >> It'll take a few moments. But at least we have another config to compare. >> >> Oh, and one thing to note, my config works with built-in (not a kernel >> module) drm/radeondrm. Have you tried this too? >> >> Kernel config: >> # Direct Rendering modules for 3D acceleration. >> device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers >> device radeondrm # ATI Radeon >> >> >> Attached the patch to make it compile. >> >> Andreas >> >> >> > A good idea, but it didn't help. Backtrace was slightly different, but > nothing decisive. exaCopyDirty() seems to be involved quite often. > > I also found 7.7 will not work, because although they left in r200, they > stripped out UMS. > > So it's back to the drawing board, or at least poking at sources and/or > gdb for a while :) Just a short notice from my side. I finally managed to get the pci radeon 9200 work, means I can startx. I had some issues until I found out how to make Xorg recognize the pci card which is not in the primary pci domain. I needed this string in the xorg.conf, under the section "Device" BusID "PCI:1@1:2:0" Important is ":domain@bus:". Regarding drm, I get hardlocks as soon as I start glxgears or other samples. No more info yet. Here the render string: --- direct rendering: Yes OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 (RV280 5961) 20090101 TCL --- Chipset: "ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5961) Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (128 bit DDR SDRAM) Note, it is a PCI card, not an AGP one. Also, I do run old Xorg (X.Org X Server 1.7.7 and the 6.14.3 ati pkg.). I'll continue playing a bit. Andreas From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 17:41:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38941C6D; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08138FC08; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z9so838370dad.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:41:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=runBndyxAYnwQOc7Macr3m+B99EkbzI5ryE90gtJUr0=; b=vtkHUm92qgszeImLlppEgaOXP3PrU6DgDJ9NoNWPhatrB+jYTdvAIQ+3svOcaQadjR dmryDSsahdqNiSdyR8wJhhqYwrCTs0oJlRszS1m+wWm8IzrBVnYM+t50+apZAswA9iw0 RyrLLWdHNbqPD7/OYguIBDKrUyrF5GqIz83925eFVeL87xJesRCH8WMKIq/N7u9TPeMJ yqCrs3KB/r22Ve5zBEuk0iiliKntDDaygmLjRhZg7VXr+qNWzbSt8LoUk73K1X+nbc0j ge2m3iSIzWbdggHgV20j8kk2T9LoYSrfds2yk+US4uhqJvrFOqOFXMCDDiM9V57JQONJ 4+2w== Received: by 10.66.77.39 with SMTP id p7mr14537672paw.8.1352310062017; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tm5sm8296301pbc.64.2012.11.07.09.40.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:41:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:40:33 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:41:09 -0000 On 11/07/12 08:24, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Just a short notice from my side. I finally managed to get the pci > radeon 9200 work, means I can startx. > I had some issues until I found out how to make Xorg recognize the pci > card which is not in the primary pci domain. > > I needed this string in the xorg.conf, under the section "Device" > > BusID "PCI:1@1:2:0" > > Important is ":domain@bus:". > > Regarding drm, I get hardlocks as soon as I start glxgears or other > samples. No more info yet. > > Here the render string: > --- > direct rendering: Yes > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 (RV280 5961) 20090101 TCL > --- > > Chipset: "ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5961) > Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (128 bit DDR SDRAM) > > Note, it is a PCI card, not an AGP one. > > Also, I do run old Xorg (X.Org X Server 1.7.7 and the 6.14.3 ati pkg.). > > I'll continue playing a bit. > > Andreas > > So it sounds like something wrong with the r200 driver, the radeon specific mesa parts, or the radeon specific drm for this model. I have yet to try disabling one cpu in OF, as many r200 systems (both mac and pc) were single processor perhaps it has issues. The problem is obviously model specific, with my luck it's the only model I have :). I foolishly have WITNESS off, so I may enable that and check for stuff like LORs. I might be able to test a quad g5 with the x1900, assuming the stars align and it's functional and the liquid cooler hasn't given up yet. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 17:45:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE0ADF0 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49ED8FC0A for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rp8so1472257pbb.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:45:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VvUvL29UrI6i+M0u1gXUQXyI7i3AdLi1l+1dTnZrqNI=; b=MW7ITuiJT3DhZrc043VNyiACoO8gb8BEInM8XqFXXd7AdEtSYS3ulsqsjnCSgiFTRy FqwuV/ZXJZfo/O7DsYJ3qzkCtiRzXJ8uazk4dgb3rFKYb6MoTsXgZ9usZNkF/ubpARQ7 uQD8IqZoVnmPFgqQFs3igan1ZXuj7gBlmmmfrmecio4NREwx/SOxfSdGeXTG8VtqAJ2e Od9nqoJi7u571gaeags5TQ8sMuBPffkcj9ACPwfxedHq2+ATxSNnq03m/8iuPcAXYoFA 2ifU/0pVhkLls19uzjYejQ5v20aW5qEMFTSXwqbl23stDq8v+GFMwJcfICSSjqYFBD5C yByQ== Received: by 10.68.253.4 with SMTP id zw4mr15811025pbc.143.1352310316607; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:45:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o10sm14589680paz.37.2012.11.07.09.45.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:45:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <509A9E12.5060405@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:44:50 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure References: <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, rfg@tristatelogic.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:45:17 -0000 On 11/06/12 14:40, Brett wrote: > >> (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. >> Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. >> Configuration failed. > Doesn't make.conf also need "WITH_KMS=true"? > > Brett. > ______________________________________________ I believe that option is only required if KMS is actually being used, or possibly if you want to test the KMS xorg version, but I could be wrong. KMS is only supported on intel at this time. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 17:52:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6482616C; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED26C8FC14; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id qA7HqKm9095650; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:52:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <509A9FD4.4050403@fgznet.ch> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:52:20 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:52:26 -0000 On 07.11.12 18:40, matt wrote: > On 11/07/12 08:24, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> Just a short notice from my side. I finally managed to get the pci >> radeon 9200 work, means I can startx. >> I had some issues until I found out how to make Xorg recognize the pci >> card which is not in the primary pci domain. >> >> I needed this string in the xorg.conf, under the section "Device" >> >> BusID "PCI:1@1:2:0" >> >> Important is ":domain@bus:". >> >> Regarding drm, I get hardlocks as soon as I start glxgears or other >> samples. No more info yet. >> >> Here the render string: >> --- >> direct rendering: Yes >> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 (RV280 5961) 20090101 TCL >> --- >> >> Chipset: "ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5961) >> Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (128 bit DDR SDRAM) >> >> Note, it is a PCI card, not an AGP one. >> >> Also, I do run old Xorg (X.Org X Server 1.7.7 and the 6.14.3 ati pkg.). >> >> I'll continue playing a bit. >> >> Andreas >> >> > So it sounds like something wrong with the r200 driver, the radeon > specific mesa parts, or the radeon specific drm for this model. I have > yet to try disabling one cpu in OF, as many r200 systems (both mac and > pc) were single processor perhaps it has issues. The problem is > obviously model specific, with my luck it's the only model I have :). I > foolishly have WITNESS off, so I may enable that and check for stuff > like LORs. Yeah, a try worth. Here I run the r200 on a UP G5 PowerMac9,1. The AGP's run on dual G5. > I might be able to test a quad g5 with the x1900, assuming the stars > align and it's functional and the liquid cooler hasn't given up yet. :) As long as the UP G5 does not work properly, I do not try it on my quad. I start investigating now with different ati pkg's. Andreas From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 21:16:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A14F73A; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F42088FC08; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id qA7LGRFZ027815; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:16:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <509ACFAA.8050802@fgznet.ch> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:16:26 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> <509A9FD4.4050403@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <509A9FD4.4050403@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:16:30 -0000 On 07.11.12 18:52, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 07.11.12 18:40, matt wrote: >> On 11/07/12 08:24, Andreas Tobler wrote: >>> Just a short notice from my side. I finally managed to get the pci >>> radeon 9200 work, means I can startx. >>> I had some issues until I found out how to make Xorg recognize the pci >>> card which is not in the primary pci domain. >>> >>> I needed this string in the xorg.conf, under the section "Device" >>> >>> BusID "PCI:1@1:2:0" >>> >>> Important is ":domain@bus:". >>> >>> Regarding drm, I get hardlocks as soon as I start glxgears or other >>> samples. No more info yet. >>> >>> Here the render string: >>> --- >>> direct rendering: Yes >>> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 (RV280 5961) 20090101 TCL >>> --- >>> >>> Chipset: "ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5961) >>> Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (128 bit DDR SDRAM) >>> >>> Note, it is a PCI card, not an AGP one. >>> >>> Also, I do run old Xorg (X.Org X Server 1.7.7 and the 6.14.3 ati pkg.). >>> >>> I'll continue playing a bit. >>> >>> Andreas >>> >>> >> So it sounds like something wrong with the r200 driver, the radeon >> specific mesa parts, or the radeon specific drm for this model. I have >> yet to try disabling one cpu in OF, as many r200 systems (both mac and >> pc) were single processor perhaps it has issues. The problem is >> obviously model specific, with my luck it's the only model I have :). I >> foolishly have WITNESS off, so I may enable that and check for stuff >> like LORs. > > Yeah, a try worth. Here I run the r200 on a UP G5 PowerMac9,1. The AGP's > run on dual G5. > >> I might be able to test a quad g5 with the x1900, assuming the stars >> align and it's functional and the liquid cooler hasn't given up yet. > > :) > > As long as the UP G5 does not work properly, I do not try it on my quad. > I start investigating now with different ati pkg's. So. Newer ati packages did not improve. I then decided to start from a clean base, no debug Xorg, no debug radeon driver etc. I cleaned, deinstalled and reinstalled first the xorg-server then the dri and afterwards the same for the xf86-video-ati. The order of dri and ati does not matter I think. Having done this, I was able to run the 3D-demos.... yeah! The kernel has WITTNES and friends commented, also DRM_DEBUG is off. Here the excerpts from the Xorg.log: X.Org X Server 1.7.7 Module radeon: compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 6.14.3 Andreas From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 23:09:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095174E7 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F838FC16 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6CD5081B for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:09:14 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure In-Reply-To: <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:09:14 -0800 Message-ID: <65883.1352329754@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:09:22 -0000 In message <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com>, Brett wrote: >> Well, I found a spare drive (or rather a spare partition) and I did the >> following: >> >> 1) Installed FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 (kernel+base) >> 2) login as root >> 3) portsnap fetch extract >> 4) Inserted WITH_NEW_XORG=yes into /etc/make.conf >> 5) setenv BATCH yes >> 6) cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade; make install >> 7) portinstall xorg gthumb x11-wm/fvwm2 >> 8) X -configure >> > >> (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. >> Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. >> Configuration failed. > >Doesn't make.conf also need "WITH_KMS=true"? If you're asking me, my answer is "I have no idea." Where would I find this information? From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 23:45:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9563D327; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574918FC12; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z9so969263dad.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:45:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VD6Taxe9QCq2H5J+ZAm6oWMKxD4OxqYQXlNC8G6KKxo=; b=Zv0lYHe/6+NCNzMsiOcF+sY6Lq36WahmOwfrV5BXMtiFGcXNG9qCHXcah4uETshSpC KIc7npA8vgAFBjKe0fGjGLB5d3oMp4Q/Fx03/bwyJQEi19I5J6yKcxPlJbltwhm/wKWO aGIRHJQfIQLsq/UUDC6EpTKBfEJOyBykqSbTukn31IRwH4q1WqM8jisgN7vBiLyC7cwh U/9C82X2ZBVhkndb9CTM2A+7qqVzY2MmfuWneOMKzPfMeKV3s1bdhTR0y11Vv2Nfa6u6 MGBBW8JWshZN8+zvM/NoE+plS0+q/LGUTo8HhXVkGDh60n2IRUM5WTELRgPsD67BPfhQ X15g== Received: by 10.68.195.165 with SMTP id if5mr11790013pbc.131.1352331951060; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from bakeneko.local (108-213-216-134.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.213.216.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id un16sm14841140pbc.47.2012.11.07.15.45.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:45:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <509AF2AA.1080900@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:45:46 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121106 Thunderbird/10.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> <509A9FD4.4050403@fgznet.ch> <509ACFAA.8050802@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <509ACFAA.8050802@fgznet.ch> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:45:52 -0000 On 11/07/12 13:16, Andreas Tobler wrote: > > So. Newer ati packages did not improve. > > I then decided to start from a clean base, no debug Xorg, no debug > radeon driver etc. > I cleaned, deinstalled and reinstalled first the xorg-server then the > dri and afterwards the same for the xf86-video-ati. The order of dri and > ati does not matter I think. > > Having done this, I was able to run the 3D-demos.... yeah! > > The kernel has WITTNES and friends commented, also DRM_DEBUG is off. > > Here the excerpts from the Xorg.log: > > X.Org X Server 1.7.7 > > Module radeon: compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 6.14.3 > > Andreas > > > So you uninstalled x11-servers/xorg-server,x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati, and graphics/dri, and reinstalled them? After that it worked? I hope it's that easy on my MDD...I rebuilt almost all ports with portmaster after enabling WITH_NEW_XORG. Hopefully I missed one of those and that is the issue... Thanks for testing, I'll try again later today. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 00:10:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E820AD7 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DC08FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA80A10e086083 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA80A1EG086082; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211080010.qA80A1EG086082@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:10:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/167654; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: Boris Samorodov , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:03:08 -0800 I'm sorry, but at present I have no ability to test fresh patches. In general, I do not try to keep up with -CURRENT on my normal/production machines, so I would need to dedicate a disk to holding just -CURRENT and I do not have any spares at the moment. I will just have to hope that you fix works, and that it will be present in either 9.1-RC4 or else in 9.1-RELEASE. (I am assuming that it did not quite make it into -RC3.) Thank you for your efforts. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 00:10:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C22DAD8 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411B98FC08 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA80A2Wp086089 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA80A2Pm086088; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:10:02 GMT Message-Id: <201211080010.qA80A2Pm086088@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:10:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/172924; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: Boris Samorodov , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:59:54 -0800 I'm sorry, but at present I have no ability to test fresh patches. In general, I do not try to keep up with -CURRENT on my normal/production macchines, so I would need to dedicate a disk to holding just -CURRENT and I do not have any spares at the moment. I will just have to hope that you fix works, and that it will be present in either 9.1-RC4 or else in 9.1-RELEASE. (I am assuming that it did not quite make it into -RC3.) Thank you for your efforts. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 00:26:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDCC4C1 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9548C8FC15 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c10so1082182eaa.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:26:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2wCTmJWnlXUYcExTGo6q2iPyJzWNiXWZqTd53zmdEQE=; b=a4v92ubFbSbMQszjl9aUkhDF4W5t+h90LB22aYrqlRXJBopGuWhW4X4WOtA8gP68VU BMESB0gmQM4sbVo7jJhDWN6kxhvS3Xjg5JtvL4IzZcu+awu9LnxKi3bJtkdpdDm6nMfF SeiuVy8FvxzlYtHoszV50wnnbKY4hbzZ0gyMgmGXYPjwhSbPA97XpExzNanMxa90eWsh 9CDPP4/xDKjdZQ/JyIzG1lKPT11pSm5XIDZLHARLhUaVLgXB7kZ2gArf+jOz2FGsk9P/ cAuJDxtdAzUx/2LqvEbLU4sS2+xPRD2aMTFk5bDsBZq8VJldbGo/oEKs+rPWqF6hV+2x pVgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.221.194 with SMTP id r42mr21139948eep.25.1352334367664; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:26:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.66.194 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:26:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201211080010.qA80A1EG086082@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201211080010.qA80A1EG086082@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:26:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor From: Kevin Oberman To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:26:09 -0000 On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/167654; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" > To: Boris Samorodov , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor > Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:03:08 -0800 > > I'm sorry, but at present I have no ability to test fresh patches. > > In general, I do not try to keep up with -CURRENT on my normal/production > machines, so I would need to dedicate a disk to holding just -CURRENT and > I do not have any spares at the moment. > > I will just have to hope that you fix works, and that it will be present > in either 9.1-RC4 or else in 9.1-RELEASE. (I am assuming that it did not > quite make it into -RC3.) This is a patch to the port, not to FreeBSD, so it is not tied to CURRENT or any particular release. All you should need to do is to build the latest x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse and install it.. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 00:31:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D20F939 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB03F8FC08 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c10so1084143eaa.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:31:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xYmZjmzTqtelEIyXCj1tyiSLSvddf7JCp4fm3zmF+Z8=; b=WwrS9/yREKeirRCm8qJrdb2fmCK2otUdW+upBrCagPO9ByUK/hM9tL+VWQhpCzAcp9 z20jR3NpwLR9Ir9Sc011+MvONdNSZRDuzzuILraebPPToTlE+l0lrKm67Ei8U5Uh/lQ0 OFAQufzoNDrtr5shG8f0sxpcjX5Jny5ozDC9rpVP2W08dSVgVCtwCJNMUig0hTsfPkss ve03NAuKGpNhKQFse2YVUbsDCPcukiNAZJjP/PDflzoiWnhPi41hE7p2CKzclhu7sB6c gwiBuAo3NWHlflIXHb7qH1kkZeFYYYC93728/IOsdzdulgx8VQgg0HriKmAuYWzLqdl0 zZJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.220.71 with SMTP id n47mr21153319eep.26.1352334715789; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.66.194 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:31:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <65883.1352329754@tristatelogic.com> References: <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com> <65883.1352329754@tristatelogic.com> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:31:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure From: Kevin Oberman To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:31:57 -0000 On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <20121107094025.eb6a8a29022113b33605505a@gmx.com>, > Brett wrote: > >>> Well, I found a spare drive (or rather a spare partition) and I did the >>> following: >>> >>> 1) Installed FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 (kernel+base) >>> 2) login as root >>> 3) portsnap fetch extract >>> 4) Inserted WITH_NEW_XORG=yes into /etc/make.conf >>> 5) setenv BATCH yes >>> 6) cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade; make install >>> 7) portinstall xorg gthumb x11-wm/fvwm2 >>> 8) X -configure >>> >> >>> (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. >>> Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. >>> Configuration failed. >> >>Doesn't make.conf also need "WITH_KMS=true"? > > > If you're asking me, my answer is "I have no idea." > > Where would I find this information? What graphics device does the system have? If it is a recent Intel processor (Sandybridge or Ivybridge) with integrated graphics (HD3000), you need WITH_KMS=YES. If it's any other graphics, you do not want WITH_KMS. It should be in /etc/make.conf, it you have it or need it. If you change it, you will need to build the kernel and modules. (Please don't put WITH_KMS=NO if you don't want it. Just remove the line.) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 07:00:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657E6196 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0F28FC0C for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA8701wi013485 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA8701os013484; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211080700.qA8701os013484@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Samorodov List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:00:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/172924; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Samorodov To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:56:40 +0400 This is not a patch to the OS, it'a patch to the port. You may update the ports tree and reinstall one port: x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 07:00:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C6E199 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F388FC14 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA8702Jj013495 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA8702I8013494; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:00:02 GMT Message-Id: <201211080700.qA8702I8013494@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Samorodov List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:00:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/167654; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Samorodov To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/167654: x11-wm/twm - no mouse cursor Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:57:07 +0400 08.11.2012 04:03, Ronald F. Guilmette пишет: This is not a patch to the OS, it'a patch to the port. You may update the ports tree and reinstall one port: x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 12:07:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A521D1A5 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreevmaxim@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABF58FC18 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k10so5243401iea.13 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 04:07:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z5fsBv0jAMb65n9dJ2gnd0G5tJ988T/dMG4VJhkr/OE=; b=oR42os08ufzOAVDPdhVqFAQakH42uU8n8++74dTfqA0z2BRLwr/pYNZolWX5UTCdP0 fgDCYj1fyRQcg4dW1Wo4t3qWwj6VUytXt61QygC0clRns93WXRH0SInATJpgpEYydmx+ KcLp2lYGmYgBi8S5Ojj0SZVgIkhiE9MwQmUG87EHH3Z+dZF4xTAuwQmxC4r9In2oGuTN o8+l8PLwtEGpiT0Py7WW6xPEed5nf/lM4+AWX+YmfghOFTLSw/BpDeZjYa+Ro1VIRtAg W+o3QvgYI71lHh/rnjGWuooKniMUzxnD2MFP8kJFtFQcQgJ30ptVkMO2268PsId63fhI 0C+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.91.75 with SMTP id o11mr6748323icm.57.1352376434925; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.32.133 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:07:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: X.org 1.12 - xorg.conf or hal configuration From: =?KOI8-R?B?7cHL08nNIOHOxNLFxdc=?= To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:07:15 -0000 I'm start using X.org Server 1.12.4 compiled from Development repo ( http://wiki.freebsd.org/Xorg). As i know, x.org starts using HAL since some version and switched to linux udev since other version. What's the "true" way to configure X.org 1.12.4 in FreeBSD - basically, i want to choose video driver (i'm using Intel + KMS) and make keyboard layout settings. Should i use xorg.conf or HAL? From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 12:50:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776CDB37 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett.mahar@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEB6B8FC08 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Nov 2012 12:50:17 -0000 Received: from 124-149-149-115.dyn.iinet.net.au (EHLO emachine.the.domm) [124.149.149.115] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 08 Nov 2012 13:50:17 +0100 X-Authenticated: #117972605 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1819zNzvFY1u+3VMAOeSZcNW4GNsyb5ykhvJVQ4SQ 1X7MAoohmorRdK Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 23:50:13 +1100 From: Brett To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_NEW_XORG=yes -- failure Message-Id: <20121108235013.c6096583486af85d6d1cfd2e@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:50:47 -0000 >>> (II) [KMS] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol, no kernel modesetting. >>Doesn't make.conf also need "WITH_KMS=true"? >If you're asking me, my answer is "I have no idea." >Where would I find this information? A wiki.freebsd.org page that I read when setting up WITH_NEW_XORG said both these lines are required. But as the other person clarifed on this thread, that is for Intel graphics cards. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 06:30:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B7BF0F for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEAB8FC12 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA96U1ci021654 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA96U1ah021653; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211090630.qA96U1ah021653@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:30:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/172924; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Boris Samorodov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:28:55 -0800 I am pleased to report that the recent fix which has been applied to x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse DOES appear to correct this problem. This PR should be closed now. Thank you Boris. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 06:30:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06027F87; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9B98FC08; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z9so1613953dad.13 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:30:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KhH0tOFu4XcH/E0LoVP9Xzba2s4Ue4JVnI/rvpbbn1s=; b=YDHfNIIG5lgNO3cyE8JErYc9+JxgjA1QpZ1/3wlxFMiv+gic0ejHtbVnlWNtO8u54R BxzIeMBeX+eSRSSZyh1a1I1FT4vfYGUiTkc/XZr1cONFMotf0WPwYUYnXdEbYTxZ3Hqj W3n41zmw9JRmSDhSjH1k0SD1mgDJs8VKE6H3EUHykzMYuJtZqW1ekoETwB8SWvmoieCD qO3iycBL1rLFUcNseXVbuFueGKCQ1hfCORPNSpqUa/kRttU5VzmgzkONlk75osUZqcep S6sAO7Zbhlwh5Ga7FHrSOW9PCqfBXKmCgMIzcF6fJq7HXM1hBJARjsm9o8Vj7LNisve5 BBhg== Received: by 10.66.74.40 with SMTP id q8mr29066181pav.29.1352442649237; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ve6sm17229352pbc.58.2012.11.08.22.30.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:30:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <509CA2FF.7070902@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:30:23 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> <509A9FD4.4050403@fgznet.ch> <509ACFAA.8050802@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <509ACFAA.8050802@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:30:50 -0000 On 11/07/12 13:16, Andreas Tobler wrote: > So. Newer ati packages did not improve. I then decided to start from a > clean base, no debug Xorg, no debug radeon driver etc. I cleaned, > deinstalled and reinstalled first the xorg-server then the dri and > afterwards the same for the xf86-video-ati. The order of dri and ati > does not matter I think. Having done this, I was able to run the > 3D-demos.... yeah! The kernel has WITTNES and friends commented, also > DRM_DEBUG is off. Here the excerpts from the Xorg.log: X.Org X Server > 1.7.7 Module radeon: compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 6.14.3 Andreas It did not work here :( I am using WITH_NEW_XORG, could be that It hung with one of the standard backtraces, starting in a polygon fill and ending waiting for the card to respond with ioctl. I can reproduce the hang every time by browsing to youtube.com and clicking on a video or running glxgears. I'm currently thinking I will start fresh with this system to rule out contamination from testing various drivers and versions. First with old Xorg as well, as I'm not sure new xorg is helping much. Do you have anything interesting in xorg.conf or drirc? I've been testing a pretty plain xorg.conf and no drirc. Matt From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 14:24:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4899B12E for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@portscout.zi0r.com) Received: from null.zi0r.com (null.zi0r.com [71.245.171.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0636F8FC15 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from null.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA9EOBmb015373 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:24:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout@portscout.zi0r.com) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by null.zi0r.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA9EOBoG015191; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:24:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from portscout) Message-Id: <201211091424.qA9EOBoG015191@null.zi0r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:24:11 -0500 From: portscout@portscout.zi0r.com To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:24:13 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11/pixman | 0.24.2 | 0.28.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portscout@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 14:51:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DD3B7E; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFF68FC0C; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA9Ep1Y6060749; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:51:01 GMT (envelope-from bsam@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bsam@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA9Ep0OE060745; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:51:00 GMT (envelope-from bsam) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:51:00 GMT Message-Id: <201211091451.qA9Ep0OE060745@freefall.freebsd.org> To: rfg@tristatelogic.com, bsam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: bsam@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/172924: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:51:01 -0000 Synopsis: x11/xorg -- first execution of xinit yields non-working mouse State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: bsam State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 9 14:50:35 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: The problem solved. Thanks for the report! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172924 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 21:55:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2365715B; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 21:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B978FC12; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 21:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id qA9LtHVb046036; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:55:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <509D7BC5.1020301@fgznet.ch> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:55:17 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> <509A8B3D.8030703@fgznet.ch> <509A9D11.6010605@gmail.com> <509A9FD4.4050403@fgznet.ch> <509ACFAA.8050802@fgznet.ch> <509CA2FF.7070902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <509CA2FF.7070902@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:55:27 -0000 On 09.11.12 07:30, matt wrote: > On 11/07/12 13:16, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> So. Newer ati packages did not improve. I then decided to start from a >> clean base, no debug Xorg, no debug radeon driver etc. I cleaned, >> deinstalled and reinstalled first the xorg-server then the dri and >> afterwards the same for the xf86-video-ati. The order of dri and ati >> does not matter I think. Having done this, I was able to run the >> 3D-demos.... yeah! The kernel has WITTNES and friends commented, also >> DRM_DEBUG is off. Here the excerpts from the Xorg.log: X.Org X Server >> 1.7.7 Module radeon: compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 6.14.3 Andreas > It did not work here :( > I am using WITH_NEW_XORG, could be that That is one difference, don't know how big/important. I will try to play with WITH_NEW_XORG. > It hung with one of the standard backtraces, starting in a polygon fill > and ending waiting for the card to respond with ioctl. > I can reproduce the hang every time by browsing to youtube.com and > clicking on a video or running glxgears. > I'm currently thinking I will start fresh with this system to rule out > contamination from testing various drivers and versions. > First with old Xorg as well, as I'm not sure new xorg is helping much. > > Do you have anything interesting in xorg.conf or drirc? I've been > testing a pretty plain xorg.conf and no drirc. xorg.conf is Xorg configured except the pciid setting, "AllowEmptyInput " off and the swiss german keyboard. I have no driconf/drirc at least I didn't find one... Andreas From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 21:39:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11C8843 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryao@gentoo.org) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FC78FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (pool-173-77-245-118.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [173.77.245.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ryao) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A450733D920; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <509EC8DA.4050205@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:36:26 -0500 From: Richard Yao User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121107 Thunderbird/10.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Fix missing ETIME on BSD operating systems References: <1352525096-10345-1-git-send-email-ryao@cs.stonybrook.edu> <87ip9d1al2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> In-Reply-To: <87ip9d1al2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig592A742CB784AFF62B4BA431" Cc: gentoo-bsd@lists.gentoo.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, x11@freebsd.org, David Shao X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:39:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig592A742CB784AFF62B4BA431 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/10/2012 03:12 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > Richard Yao writes: >=20 >> From: David Shao >> >> Originally posted to Free Desktop bug #52549 by David Shao. >> Resolves Gentoo Bug #433403. >> Commit message by Richard Yao. >=20 > Are you really unable to get the same errnos in your port of the kernel= > modules? Having mismatched errno returns from upstream is a great way > to have obscure bugs on your port, given that our kernel guys like to > look for alternative errnos to be able to distinguish failure modes fro= m > userland. >=20 > I don't like the idea of this patch landing. I have added the FreeBSD x11 team alias to CC, which I probably should have done in my original email. They are in a better position to answer this than I am. At present, MySQL also does this. Changing that would require changes to the userland of FreeBSD (and other BSDs). The FreeBSD x11 team is in a position to do that. I am in the process of getting Gentoo's X11 stack working on Gentoo FreeBSD, so I am interested in their answer to your question as well. --------------enig592A742CB784AFF62B4BA431 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQnsjfAAoJECDuEZm+6ExkRq0P/Aq7QSaseRFo2If/WxAmlFNr GSg+0KPYgmPnQgGeYuG+6Pn5gAmiYTPDIkhn18orkWOlTQjav7UaMYF1GNYk9Fzf QSuTfJEHLSURwY9uPzaSMDydSiU4l0kLFYFEyZE4p8FKPmIiaU6bgJ+UqMRGYV4f vS2cdbCXQ8amz6pYs7VyVP5+dOGKAP2oxXCTEzsdexUF2vnDBTP1R6j+DFzUmcVj LyFuaI7iq3H+uL+yajonNxCULoCrtAKZnmQXREKpgm4z3FNaaLzjb/x5O3dhZ3A3 Vi712MwBwDLpqVHnnNagZFRoE3Zenz4o9vseR456/YaSLvUy0RjiImk9WMa8pRS1 p6JQAOaWfRG/YDgP/ERoW0dznGNDkVBD+UW6c4WQEeVVwnq2sBlCFUw4f70HFlDH EeN15xubrRaVHNUZagOQb48ggW02GlvoD7zS+5aJkK/GSP4sZl3VEY7cXIQL0scf U69v3UwTnAYemd6Sgn1Ye+bA9fWzudGD/wm9Vp/wgb5KZ4XegxmSpqyGZV4sWd8j xxI05YC+yAhNkhJJ6gKyjK65Krws08hfpRJUT8b8QuKDcoA4xn20egJ10WWXY0hA hVLYwJ/NUqkc/GWkao7ZN7dOyT8XA5cZYckhcg9z/VuJ+aahgioeZSm0uZlmS71l x+m4Koc8gaglc+XP23Zu =ApZ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig592A742CB784AFF62B4BA431--