Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:24:41 +0900 From: Yamaya Takashi <yamayan@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, "free >> Current FreeBSD" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Ports FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports include /etc/src.conf? i.e. graphics/libfpx Message-ID: <5120BDF9.7030300@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <511D4FD3.2070605@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <511B662C.7030602@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <511B874A.7080901@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> <CAFHbX1Lg4w8g30DrcEbvm%2B6sFvTDpRAt7OouBBBUs1iiMaEL5g@mail.gmail.com> <511CE470.4070003@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> <511D4FD3.2070605@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013/02/15 05:57, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am 02/14/13 14:19, schrieb Yamaya Takashi: >> On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi >>> <yamayan@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote: >>>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>>> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for >>>>> instance >>>>> >>>>> # >>>>> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++ >>>>> CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port >>>>> grahpics/libfpx complaining about unrecognized compiler options. >>>>> >>>>> As far a sI know, /etc/src.conf is ONLY for building the source tree of >>>>> the operating system and make.conf is supposed to contain all stuff >>>>> necessary for compiling both world and ports, but /etc/src.conf is world >>>>> only. >>>>> >>>>> Am I wrong? >>>>> >>>>> Oliver >>>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> Because files/Makefile.bsd includes <bsd.lib.mk>, >>>> /etc/src.conf is included. >>>> >>>> >>> src.conf(5) says: >>> >>> The only purpose of src.conf is to control the compilation of the FreeBSD >>> source code, which is usually located in /usr/src. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >> src.conf(5) says: >> The values of variables are ignored regardless of their setting; >> even if >> they would be set to ``FALSE'' or ``NO''. Just the existence of an >> option will cause it to be honoured by make(1). >> >> The following list provides a name and short description for variables >> that can be used for source builds. >> >> Does it mean ONLY WITH_* and WITHOUT_* variables are allowed in >> /etc/src.conf? >> >> > > Shortly, there was a discussion about a fully installed LLVM/CLANG and > the portion of LLVM/CLANG, that is only needed to compile the system's > source. In this case, a strict separartion was intended. Not about llvm/clang. Including /etc/src.conf has problem of conflicting world knob and port knob. Skipping to include /etc/src.conf by <bsd.own.mk> is needed. It's difficult for base system. Then <bsd.port.mk> define _WITHOUT_SRCCONF and skip including /etc/src.conf. But some ports include <bsd.*.mk> (exclude <bsd.port*.mk>) has bug, because they don't define _WITHOUT_SRCCONF. > If the manpage of /etc/src.conf says that only bool knobs are allowed > like WITH_XXX or WITHOUT_XXX, then: where to put the options? NOT bool, the variable is defined or not. The options are written in /etc/make.conf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5120BDF9.7030300>