From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 09:05:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DAD949 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 09:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4C31B9D for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 09:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (thetys.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.31]) by thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE01716445C9 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 10:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.44] (chimea.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.44]) by thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 93EAA16445C5 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 10:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:03:14 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Access guard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on thetys.cloudzeeland.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 09:05:09 -0000 I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and ssh login) and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts. Currently I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works with ipw too... Thanks, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 11:25:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C94567A for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B63104E for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:25:55 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=IKk7VGfG c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=nVny9ETX7T5uMhI2oTVyRA==:117 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=sIt-5M63AAAA:8 a=JyS64JtrGtgA:10 a=Lc1b-yjChhquJbAp2WkA:9 a=9E8O2fK5SEgVs8X7:21 a=API6fX7hnq-adjls:21 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=YhXyVWdcfggA:10 a=fZi24jRisdUA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.193.164 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.193.164] ([209.6.193.164:49515] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTP id 0F/4A-12322-6AF49D15; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 07:23:19 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20953.20389.777459.872450@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 07:23:17 -0400 To: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Access guard In-Reply-To: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> References: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:25:56 -0000 Jos Chrispijn writes: > I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and > ssh login) and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts. > Currently I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works > with ipw too... Don't know about mail, but security/denyhosts works for SSH. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 13:06:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490F394B for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 13:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A91393 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 13:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r67D6WCm049366; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 07:06:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r67D6W0f049363; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 07:06:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 07:06:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Re: Access guard In-Reply-To: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> Message-ID: References: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 07 Jul 2013 07:06:33 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 13:06:34 -0000 On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and ssh login) > and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts. > Currently I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works with ipw > too... security/sshguard. There are subports for the three stock firewalls, too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 16:39:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE2EE26 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDE21B14 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uvrzb-0007Q7-UE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:39:19 +0200 Received: from p4fc55cc9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.197.92.201]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:39:19 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p4fc55cc9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:39:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Re: Access guard Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 16:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4fc55cc9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000087 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 16:39:23 -0000 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and ssh > login) and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts. Currently > I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works with ipw too... fail2ban From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 16:51:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99B8447 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 16:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@webrz.net) Received: from thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB3E1BB2 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 16:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (thetys.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.31]) by thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9790516445AA; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:42:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.44] (unknown [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5737A164458F; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:42:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51D99CAE.6020805@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:51:58 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 To: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Re: Access guard References: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on thetys.cloudzeeland.nl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 16:51:58 -0000 All, Thanks for the replies, I will check them out! best regards, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 18:41:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B37FC1D for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@uminac.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com (mail-ie0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D721FC3 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so8726620ied.0 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:41:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=BbDOm89N/MQ5118G0yrmvyDpHhgidyo4aKduqs1f0lY=; b=VBImRFoAwDlvOSvPvv3vLFHt9fnV491qR4R/GTc+1Lv3kXVzhqVma4Fzg2vRIo6UFo 4NUPyY8IS1WZGtdhU52CXkR1Efjq3rEGduWfn5VvHW6oFXpI47QaA6ZZl0yKvRnDxzMd SoxSeW7SbTM9TgKH783JJP3B+eJUUsYx787OwVwqERY2j0mMnk2vt1y5ffWWpNr7eic5 XuM0brRZDU6ybaPEKucXBw7cFhXoI4WdNKrLGoyzmVUZhS77+i3sXQ+CdeDjYnIJ7B36 G9MNLnYq5ZyqTI9QI4nhDMR8Bh0K3jKqVNuq5AdQu2/KmAl1tYqyLqKOKiBKJKuxonrL neUA== X-Received: by 10.43.168.67 with SMTP id nh3mr6247014icc.33.1373222498460; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:41:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.19.179 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:41:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [216.93.242.164] In-Reply-To: <51D99CAE.6020805@webrz.net> References: <51D92ED2.4040902@webrz.net> <51D99CAE.6020805@webrz.net> From: "Christopher J. Umina" Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:41:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Access guard To: Jos Chrispijn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2Znz3Gdy1YxK0X70nKK4clalBDZGA3hvl/vuBREmEHP1uVGTtXk9SduYoHNZDnBiOxLy6 Cc: Jos Chrispijn , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:41:45 -0000 You could also use grok (https://code.google.com/p/semicomplete/wiki/Grok also in ports) to watch the logs and perform actions based on them. On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > All, > Thanks for the replies, I will check them out! > best regards, > Jos Chrispijn > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Christopher J. Umina chris@uminac.com 781 354 0535 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 11:25:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7CFC0B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailist@yandex.com) Received: from forward15.mail.yandex.net (forward15.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07251C6F for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web25f.yandex.ru (web25f.yandex.ru [95.108.131.159]) by forward15.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CC3089E0475; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:34:56 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web25f.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 260A6436007C; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:34:56 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1373272496; bh=RJn/hWwA5BiUo1MWwcUYiM+sIAxAPyxP4sYmiitE67w=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=w11cV7+lbO+JAxJ1UcnnfcHsrlY8uHfGkvFrFKEsRQ3BlG5aD1p8qOjHptVo+oG/l SeSqJMV3budqAwmDlzOHv8mgGo9LwGGKJHaSAGLiWL7tNZx7zVCp8LjZ16bMzOfhlw SHivTw8U9rY/fcKFPXQVmPgy0BxLeXUPhq93qHBY= Received: from 85.98.186.174.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr (85.98.186.174.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr [85.98.186.174]) by web25f.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:34:55 +0400 From: =?utf-8?B?RW1yZSDDh2FtYWxhbg==?= Envelope-From: mailist@yandex.com.tr To: Damien Fleuriot , bw.mail.lists In-Reply-To: <78FBB273-9B51-48CC-9050-7503D26EDF30@my.gd> References: <399611372949981@web8f.yandex.ru> <51D5F0A8.1040004@gmail.com> <78FBB273-9B51-48CC-9050-7503D26EDF30@my.gd> Subject: Re: HP ILO FreeBSD 8.3 Installation problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <583801373272495@web25f.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:34:55 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:25:12 -0000 Hi, USB memstick img file is solution for me. I try FreeBSD-8.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img. I downloaded this img file and copy to USB, not burn it to USB. Then attach to Ä°LO such as USB virtual image then sysinstall start, BUT I selected installation from usb install NOT CD/DVD installation. thanks for your answers. 05.07.2013, 02:00, "Damien Fleuriot" : > On 5 Jul 2013, at 00:01, "bw.mail.lists" wrote: > >>  On 7/4/2013 4:59 PM, Emre Çamalan wrote: >>>  Hi, >>>  I'm trying to install FreeBSD with an HP ILO 4 advanced, web interface. I tried to install FreeBSD 8.2, FreeBSD 8.3 and FreeBSD 8.4. I tried to use acd0 and cd0 as media. I got the same result. >>> >>>  ERROR: I'm trying to add freebsd8.3iso from ILO such as virtual drive not from cd or dvd. >>  We had a similar experience with Dell's DRAC and FreeBSD 9.1, after initial boot and kernel load it wasn't able to mount / from (virtual) cd. We ended up using an mfsBSD iso ( http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ ), which doesn't mount from cd, but uses an .img loaded as memory disk. Didn't try the official bootonly iso or the USB image. > > Same here, boot from MFS, gpart manually, install manually, works like a charm. > > I actually do it for all our installs now, the procedure is quite scriptable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 11:28:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DDCF50 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A8B1D52 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 10D9A66144B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:24:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r689OPa5040033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:24:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r689ODcQ041497; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:24:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <51DA853D.4020006@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:24:13 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130626 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: SV: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:24:27 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:28:33 -0000 On 07/06/13 19:51, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Smb is slow by design compared to nfs. Sure. As I said, I was expecting lower performance; not *this* lower, however. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 11:43:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFB2BAC for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog120.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog120.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DAD16D5 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob120.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUdql6dpE7ud6+tbyYMPpznxzAw5ywy+R@postini.com; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:43:44 UTC Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e49so2756346eek.34 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:43:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:x-gm-message-state; bh=zZP/3gYVnHi8xntx2NLOITNmQhaeaKYLMyxv9xhEY+k=; b=jX6q8ad7gaL1x/kEujIAswKIloyufJUlgWKsy7yZ8JDm1cHA08XaDz7dnlsdlInbaO Z8SbNft3WxQinIAUMscQWgNY9nWcs9zFLu/oaKNNRlmYn3w4fn67+oNMkv7BbXHFX//B 6vLRipk65BX1jNQxQ/bfXA/3x538YalDhpw2ki6cFU6bCsRJcfDRhkOuNKpTTodJlQ6P yx9DjZtowSkyulGkAG5clDN1Pt0MWnbTqSydI2ohgxxbIdCaH/pl0gbIeIyjZqoBE1Gp 2ORY8l8OCi/1pVdY7mO31Lw1jnjixOJ9UNpB2UN8vcws45nDHcEziqToZDEHZjDk6TGf 87Fw== X-Received: by 10.15.64.202 with SMTP id o50mr24517975eex.44.1373280508673; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 03:48:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.64.202 with SMTP id o50mr24517970eex.44.1373280508592; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 03:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm41140204eev.10.2013.07.08.03.48.26 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 03:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r68AmPOk015324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:48:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6/Submit) id r68AmOAl015323 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:48:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:48:24 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201307081048.r68AmOAl015323@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: highest nice(1) -n increment value? X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlchRsnrA3NB2jUbb95PvU+MqX4et4iX3SYbaR3Li8/b0YEJuKwgphCBvwp9/x6yrt46nIm00eDXWrLecIlqYbKc1ghx3ruCBiEIlYuxCpDISZKud7Bv3XSCyYGOYdI8LmpPqxgHgLoJosuMiwtOk7gLRjSaoLO8JiYeFAJyEV0Xb35uQKDsq/bVH0rIqS5XFg+esvR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:43:44 -0000 It is not clear from the nice(1) man page, i.e. for /usr/bin/nice, not a shell built-in nice, what is the highest increment value nice will accept. It seems it is limited to 20. I tried $ /usr/bin/nice -n 100 portmaster -a But all processes spawned by the portmaster have the nice value of only 20, as in: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 57586 root 1 52 20 13976K 4720K wait 0:00 0.39% sh 52729 root 1 40 20 13976K 4960K wait 0:02 0.00% sh 58239 root 1 92 20 35632K 8584K RUN 0:00 0.00% pkg 58237 root 1 52 20 9216K 1616K ppwait 0:00 0.00% make The root shell priority was 0. So is 20 the upper increment limit? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 11:47:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC7D7A6 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound1.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21169184A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.68] (cpc2-sgyl30-2-0-cust423.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [80.192.35.168]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r688w1BN079484 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:58:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: outbound.ifdnrg.com: Host cpc2-sgyl30-2-0-cust423.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [80.192.35.168] claimed to be [192.168.100.68] Message-ID: <51DA7F17.1010208@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:57:59 +0100 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: routing issues to freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:47:12 -0000 On doing some updates this morning, am seeing a routing issue beyond bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org... Updating Index fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-9.bz2: No route to host www.freebsd.org. 513 IN CNAME wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. 1690 IN A 8.8.178.110 traceroute to 8.8.178.110 (8.8.178.110), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 ---------------------------------------------------------- 0.528 ms 0.462 ms 0.428 ms 2 490.net2.north.dc5.as20860.net (62.233.127.210) 0.267 ms 0.263 ms 0.263 ms 3 593.core1.thn.as20860.net (62.233.127.173) 111.922 ms 49.373 ms 1.125 ms 4 ae3-309.lon11.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.74.101) 1.080 ms 1.181 ms 1.081 ms 5 xe-9-1-0.sjc10.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.184.53) 145.580 ms 145.746 ms xe-8-1-0.sjc10.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.183.17) 145.216 ms 6 213.200.66.238 (213.200.66.238) 145.702 ms 188.823 ms ge-0-3-9.pat1.sjc.yahoo.com (216.115.96.10) 219.331 ms 7 bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org (216.115.101.227) 146.013 ms 146.385 ms ae-5.pat2.sjc.yahoo.com (216.115.105.19) 145.653 ms 8 * * bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org (216.115.101.227) 146.519 ms 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * Paul. -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ---------------------------------------------------- High Specification Dedicated Servers from £100.00pm ---------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 11:47:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D565D809 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC081853 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so2222063qcz.0 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:47:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=/mrmZae/X2nmMR6/CJCRM8m642Nz3/yL7bCK/ye+9TU=; b=YKWONG/o45iC9JRjWjtm5QmDd8yxk5IRyvjRbNHWMHBJBHvSQM5KWkZNRsGAjGjEkh 2KfAJg09LgLtzGBzCCul+mIGhyinqlXMOcL3RYm+2t4BUVsitUJD97DfEkEGb9oX6REz MVr0oaMrJdesdsJUSxZfEOXF/KORpCKPNtBvbnV+ZjS4/ZDgeDRArLEJf+rI6kuG4IH3 Sug8d8bZar6T5ABkwl5Gk46Dg/ob8SXrUMd3KdSw3kk1wes9zGB8UbpYQ+ezXMszbEHN PgvVfXON4z5PhRYE9M0i8ZtdC8c6pUT1vvLXTYD+Nd6Yl7RJvz1uKPVDnYSvvmeUx90g bRNg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.59.228 with SMTP id c4mr15243265qer.15.1373277592427; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 02:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.35.84 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 02:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:59:52 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1QFNvqJm9_bxJW_EUfPhZFbNP6w Message-ID: Subject: chrome does not refresh screen content From: CeDeROM To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:47:20 -0000 Hello :-) I have noted this nasty and disturbing problem with Chromium that it very often does not refresh screen/display so I get result after few seconds or need to refresh page to see a change. It does not happen with other browsers and/or x-applications. Did anyone notice that problem? I am using public pkgng binaries from http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest. I guess it might be related to some stuff with GTK... % pkg info -Bdo chromium chromium-25.0.1364.172 depends on: ORBit2-2.14.19 alsa-lib-1.0.26 alsa-plugins-1.0.26 atk-2.6.0 binutils-2.23.1 bitstream-vera-1.10_5 cairo-1.10.2_5,2 compositeproto-0.4.2 cups-client-1.5.4_1 damageproto-1.2.1 dbus-glib-0.100.2 dbus-1.6.8 dconf-0.12.1_1 droid-fonts-ttf-20110324 encodings-1.0.4,1 expat-2.0.1_2 fixesproto-5.0 font-bh-ttf-1.0.3 font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.3 font-misc-meltho-1.0.3 font-util-1.3.0 fontconfig-2.9.0,1 freetype2-2.4.12_1 gamin-0.1.10_5 gcc-ecj-4.5 gcc-4.6.3 gconf2-2.32.0_3 gdk-pixbuf2-2.26.5_3 gettext-0.18.1.1_1 gio-fam-backend-2.34.3 glib-2.34.3 gmp-5.1.1 gnome_subr-1.0 gnomehier-3.0 gobject-introspection-1.34.2 gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.18 gtk-2.24.18 hicolor-icon-theme-0.12 inputproto-2.3 jasper-1.900.1_12 jbigkit-1.6 jpeg-8_4 kbproto-1.0.6 libICE-1.0.8,1 libSM-1.2.1,1 libX11-1.6.0,1 libXScrnSaver-1.2.1 libXau-1.0.8 libXcomposite-0.4.4,1 libXcursor-1.1.14 libXdamage-1.1.4 libXdmcp-1.1.1 libXext-1.3.2,1 libXfixes-5.0.1 libXft-2.3.1 libXi-1.7.1_1,1 libXinerama-1.1.3,1 libXrandr-1.4.1 libXrender-0.9.7_1 libXt-1.1.4,1 libXtst-1.2.2 libevent-1.4.14b_2 libexecinfo-1.1_3 libffi-3.0.13 libfontenc-1.1.2 libgcrypt-1.5.2 libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_4 libgpg-error-1.11 libiconv-1.14_1 libpci-3.2.0 libpthread-stubs-0.3_3 libtasn1-2.14 libvpx-1.1.0 libxcb-1.9.1 libxml2-2.8.0_2 libxslt-1.1.28_1 mkfontdir-1.0.7 mkfontscale-1.1.0 mpc-0.9 mpfr-3.1.2 nspr-4.9.6 nss-3.14.3 pango-1.30.1 pciids-20130530 pcre-8.33 perl-5.14.2_3 pixman-0.28.2 pkgconf-0.9.2_1 png-1.5.16 polkit-0.105_1 python27-2.7.5 randrproto-1.4.0 recordproto-1.14.2 renderproto-0.11.1 scrnsaverproto-1.2.1 shared-mime-info-1.1 sqlite3-3.7.17_1 tiff-4.0.3 xcb-util-renderutil-0.3.8 xcb-util-0.3.9_1,1 xextproto-7.2.1 xineramaproto-1.2.1 xorg-fonts-truetype-7.7 xproto-7.0.24 Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 12:01:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2B5CC5 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@staticsafe.ca) Received: from uriel.asininetech.com (uriel.asininetech.com [IPv6:2607:5300:60:e3a::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D979A1B3A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by uriel.asininetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D00BE0B5C for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:01:11 -0400 (EDT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 uriel.asininetech.com 0D00BE0B5C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=staticsafe.ca; s=2012; t=1373284871; bh=IlIr1m1fGD3lD+7JuvMz4T3U5TcC/oHEGWvjc0ZnELI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=rthkO05f5nZs3QYqhj/dbBkeIAS/YgUipzzhcxvYsCaOSRjTwX6y8KR0vSeRmpwpB 8Gwh9Wf89X0B6rPSLamV6TaIgrdPx1vjcbvS1znIaz/Y1bq9Kuf63l1ICmFDX1ueRe WSRo6H6rRUASPhHT1VVCa+NE//Q62WXn0WlZSsuE= Received: from uriel.asininetech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (uriel.asininetech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6Eqy8QAs4cf for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uriel.asininetech.com (uriel.asininetech.com [IPv6:2607:5300:60:e3a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uriel.asininetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 608DDE04C3 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:01:10 -0400 (EDT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 uriel.asininetech.com 608DDE04C3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=staticsafe.ca; s=2012; t=1373284870; bh=IlIr1m1fGD3lD+7JuvMz4T3U5TcC/oHEGWvjc0ZnELI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ocXZoHETqHQJaD1BKe1RzOynk61ABybMwP8RRjWuz5r9AQnMKmxj8BlMNJ69b0/05 NqT0PohZVzmTC+83bO1vj/HxSYATTYYqaocNOf0lirw7cWyD7cz9ryTLii2zq5u8F4 SD8zz28eiWV1NuxMgxTQEh91FnAHaiLA3gMYFYuE= Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:01:09 -0400 From: staticsafe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing issues to freebsd.org Message-ID: <20130708120108.GB8495@uriel.asininetech.com> References: <51DA7F17.1010208@ifdnrg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51DA7F17.1010208@ifdnrg.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:01:19 -0000 On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > On doing some updates this morning, am seeing a routing issue beyond > bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org... > > Updating Index > fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-9.bz2: No route to host > > www.freebsd.org. 513 IN CNAME wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. > wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. 1690 IN A 8.8.178.110 > Perhaps an issue on your end (probably on the reverse route)? Traces look fine from multiple networks: http://sprunge.us/JFeS -- staticsafe O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org Please don't top post. Please don't CC! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 12:18:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE2D701 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-x230.google.com (mail-bk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9349E1D27 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id jf17so1798170bkc.21 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 05:18:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/b2zChG8NVoLSdmdKngQvteEZ4SIyWkN0L3TQ85SSZ0=; b=K1mX8SHjiqE0lygwASe8YohbosSZc0qGe63BKJiGLlm2At+y8krj4ZlRRhXvWTob40 3Psn4cQZkRR4hlJQzrSkHDuvqpJ9I6YyhO2I2qjK+QxIrargQmxKecl5+f+9lwtdJvvf Epzli70LRZgpm4ezdiswnj/bT+P2kYHBGpt2E9+JDtyab4kTxE/cnNwzKmvcMFHedoq3 GMsMLHonhYPCS2d/g5XWlW2/4VtsWq3u9oC/U2R5LTfK7fcJIOTEA1hHtSjo5ySgIAvY Amy0NqWo5xLsh1tbkpq4aNs6Kij/p2j/4ROw7UFpdGHsNnO5x59m2ROlmlR4Ob+x/2Pq V4Fg== X-Received: by 10.204.53.200 with SMTP id n8mr3301709bkg.97.1373285881604; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 05:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.129] (schavemaker.nl. [213.84.84.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lb14sm4365738bkb.6.2013.07.08.05.18.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 05:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DAADF6.5010800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:17:58 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Macdonald Subject: Re: routing issues to freebsd.org References: <51DA7F17.1010208@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <51DA7F17.1010208@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:18:03 -0000 Paul Macdonald schreef: > > On doing some updates this morning, am seeing a routing issue beyond > bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org... > > Updating Index > fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-9.bz2: No route to host > > www.freebsd.org. 513 IN CNAME wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. > wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. 1690 IN A 8.8.178.110 > > traceroute to 8.8.178.110 (8.8.178.110), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets > 1 ---------------------------------------------------------- 0.528 > ms 0.462 ms 0.428 ms > 2 490.net2.north.dc5.as20860.net (62.233.127.210) 0.267 ms 0.263 > ms 0.263 ms > 3 593.core1.thn.as20860.net (62.233.127.173) 111.922 ms 49.373 ms > 1.125 ms > 4 ae3-309.lon11.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.74.101) 1.080 ms 1.181 ms > 1.081 ms > 5 xe-9-1-0.sjc10.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.184.53) 145.580 ms 145.746 ms > xe-8-1-0.sjc10.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.183.17) 145.216 ms > 6 213.200.66.238 (213.200.66.238) 145.702 ms 188.823 ms > ge-0-3-9.pat1.sjc.yahoo.com (216.115.96.10) 219.331 ms > 7 bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org (216.115.101.227) 146.013 ms 146.385 ms > ae-5.pat2.sjc.yahoo.com (216.115.105.19) 145.653 ms > 8 * * bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org (216.115.101.227) 146.519 ms > 9 * * * > 10 * * * > 11 * * * > 12 * * * > 13 * * * > 14 * * * > 15 * * * > > > Paul. > I noticed FreeBSD was not accessable this morning. svnup gives me the following. svnup stable svnup: connect failure: Connection refused earlier i could not even open www.freebsd.org, so something is or was not right. Now www.freebsd.org works again gr Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 12:18:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5D3702 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CD21D28 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:18:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=4xLzwFam+rbRx3fH+vzQISqpJb5sD055weSTtsb5hfA=; b=gOWv93i0YX75V4EZ+BR2k4v6fnFw5mZBji32Sw8XR6fNNuXy1MJNi2QhpA3ctN4VLjvQis50o835Z5G8xVMdh4klGtupDMaHTjyUhohouLqQ0wHQ/+MmgYV1KBDvt+JQZ6VJ0Lnode3Fj5gcpQHmdvB8t0WvGjqsFABWEdkvdP4=; Received: from [39.210.114.110] (port=32579 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1UwAOI-002B9I-GI; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 06:18:04 -0600 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:17:53 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: staticsafe Subject: Re: routing issues to freebsd.org Message-ID: <20130708201753.7adf9444@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20130708120108.GB8495@uriel.asininetech.com> References: <51DA7F17.1010208@ifdnrg.com> <20130708120108.GB8495@uriel.asininetech.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:18:05 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:01:09 -0400 staticsafe wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > > > On doing some updates this morning, am seeing a routing issue beyond > > bgp1-ext.ysv.freebsd.org... > > > > Updating Index > > fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-9.bz2: No route to host > > > > www.freebsd.org. 513 IN CNAME wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. > > wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org. 1690 IN A 8.8.178.110 > > > > Perhaps an issue on your end (probably on the reverse route)? it was the same story in Indonesia. Erich > > Traces look fine from multiple networks: > http://sprunge.us/JFeS > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 13:45:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4766F9F for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D63D11CB for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r68DcHBL085085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:38:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:38:17 -0500 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Problems Installing /usr/ports/devel/pear Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:45:45 -0000 Is anyone else having problems installing pear with PHP 5.5? Or do I just have a misconfiguration on my system that is causing the install process to look at my /tmp directory. My ports tree is updated to svn revision 322502, and the system is running FreeBSD 9.1p4, so everything is up to date prior to this install. root@webmail:/usr/ports/devel/pear # make ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pear-1.9.4_1 for building ===> Extracting for pear-1.9.4_1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for pear-1.9.4.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for pear-1.9.4_1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for pear-1.9.4_1 ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20121212/xml.so - found ===> Configuring for pear-1.9.4_1 root@webmail:/usr/ports/devel/pear # make install ===> Installing for pear-1.9.4_1 ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20121212/xml.so - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if devel/pear already installed Bootstrapping Installer................... Bootstrapping PEAR.php............(local) ok Bootstrapping Archive/Tar.php............(local) ok Bootstrapping Console/Getopt.php............(local) ok Strict Standards: Non-static method PEAR::setErrorHandling() should not be called statically in /var/ports/usr/ports/devel/pear/work/pear-1.9.4/go-pear on line 689 Extracting installer.................. Using local package: PEAR............. Warning: file_exists() expects parameter 1 to be a valid path, string given in /tmp/pear/Archive/Tar.php on line 1582 Error while opening {/tmp/pear/package2.xml} in write binary mode sed: /usr/local/share/pear/peclcmd.php: No such file or directory *** [do-install] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 14:25:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D379C5 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it [62.94.10.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E7D145C for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 7A38B159923 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:25:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r68EPGIw061687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:25:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r68EP7JH011533; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:25:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <51DACBC3.6090403@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:25:07 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130626 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance References: <51D6F1E4.4090001@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:25:18 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:25:25 -0000 On 07/07/13 00:52, Adam Vande More wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-January/038903.html Thanks Adam. However: I'm using UFS, not ZFS, so the first part is not applicable. I have an nfe card, not an em; so again, the second part does not apply. The only tunable in that driver is hw.nfe.msi_disable and hw.nfe.msix_disable, which I never tried; I guess I could when I have physical access to the box, but again, they are enabled by default and I doubt I would get better performance by disabling MSI[-X]. In addition, I don't think I suffer from a NIC bottleneck, given the speed of NFS and a "find" shouldn't read the whole files, so shouldn't require a lot of bandwidth. The third section is interesting: still no change, however. This does not suprise me, since I had extensively tried these (and other settings from several Samba howtos) with different values in the past, the difference being always quite negligible. The last thing I'm considering is slowness due to the LDAP backend. This is what I'm currently investigating. All the literature on Samba seems to be quite Linux-centric; that's why I asked on the FreeBSD mailing list whether this could be normal. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 16:21:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F6DC40 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167A41B20 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEC8-00047x-6u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:21:50 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:21:44 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:21:44 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: UEFI Secure Boot Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 18 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:21:54 -0000 Hi, according to distrowatch.com: "FreeBSD developer Marshall Mickusick told IT Wire that the FreeBSD team would probably follow in the footsteps of cutting-edge Linux distributions. "Indeed we will likely take the Linux shim loader, put our own key in it, and then ask Microsoft to sign it. Since Microsoft will have already vetted the shim loader code, we hope that there will be little trouble getting them to sign our version for us."" http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/open-source/60498-freebsd-begins-process-to-support-secure-boot I am just wondering why Linus Torvald is concerned about Microsoft's role ... http://www.zdnet.com/torvalds-clarifies-linuxs-windows-8-secure-boot-position-7000011918/ I hope FreeBSD (and other OSs) luminaries, devs and users will find a way not to harm themselves. jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 18:33:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00785A2 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21FE1137 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id fb19so5976085obc.9 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ojt9MSOWqRxkgJ3QcjSGT0FLLadAG5x+WZCxJxaiBJc=; b=Tc7Tcbta2LcfaRwd2EIBZF6PZqdsTikdPJbAQ6Fr0JOwtq1sZX5Wc5smv6xbv9Gzt5 Mi6b9F7rETMx7P4ZHcEsePcNCzxtkwHu1MExLYmHQmzxwSZM2ugd68WW2AUa63eHv5WJ Y/UamEi9IWKilT6GNiCs5QkxyelDN713zZhygqVIbUMIzEDSMtk0BTnj4ExE2PvouKb7 LK3oPlgTHwuO2ReeP0R8oaGWM5rPKaZraXUXk/mf4tcLNdcvqREbIx7DeboehnTqxyXY D1FMnceU61qDvQ5qMLzX0pOyGwNIIYbPCgyxlOpz8PrLLB5fWGDhHlmBxNbtF7IHLT8d hDvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.24.131 with SMTP id u3mr21371737obf.29.1373308385156; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.90.197 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:33:05 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Stable/9 from today mpssas_scsiio timeouts From: Outback Dingo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:33:05 -0000 as of stable today im seeing alot of new mps time outs 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r253035M: Mon Jul 8 16:34:28 UTC 2013 root@:/usr/obj/nas/usr/src/sys/ mps1@pci0:130:0:0: class=0x010700 card=0x30201000 chip=0x00721000 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic / Symbios Logic' device = 'SAS2008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 [Falcon]' class = mass storage subclass = SAS mps0: mpssas_scsiio_timeout checking sc 0xffffff8002145000 cm 0xffffff80021a6b78 (probe40:mps0:0:40:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 length 36 SMID 983 command timeout cm 0xffffff80021a6b78 ccb 0xfffffe002bb5f800 mps0: mpssas_alloc_tm freezing simq mps0: timedout cm 0xffffff80021a6b78 allocated tm 0xffffff80021587b0 (probe40:mps0:0:40:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 length 36 SMID 983 completed timedout cm 0xffffff80021a6b78 ccb 0xfffffe002bb5f800 during recovery ioc 8048 scsi 0 state c xfer 0 (noperiph:mps0:0:40:0): SMID 6 abort TaskMID 983 status 0x4a code 0x0 count 1 (noperiph:mps0:0:40:0): SMID 6 finished recovery after aborting TaskMID 983 mps0: mpssas_free_tm releasing simq (probe40:mps0:0:40:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 (probe40:mps0:0:40:0): CAM status: Command timeout (probe40:mps0:0:40:0): Retrying command mps1: mpssas_scsiio_timeout checking sc 0xffffff8002384000 cm 0xffffff80023e5b78 (probe292:mps1:0:37:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 length 36 SMID 983 command timeout cm 0xffffff80023e5b78 ccb 0xfffffe002be14800 mps1: mpssas_alloc_tm freezing simq mps1: timedout cm 0xffffff80023e5b78 allocated tm 0xffffff80023977b0 (probe292:mps1:0:37:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 length 36 SMID 983 completed timedout cm 0xffffff80023e5b78 ccb 0xfffffe002be14800 during recovery ioc 8048 scsi 0 state c xfer 0 (noperiph:mps1:0:37:0): SMID 6 abort TaskMID 983 status 0x4a code 0x0 count 1 (noperiph:mps1:0:37:0): SMID 6 finished recovery after aborting TaskMID 983 mps1: mpssas_free_tm releasing simq (probe292:mps1:0:37:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 (probe292:mps1:0:37:0): CAM status: Command timeout (probe292:mps1:0:37:0): Retrying command From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 21:14:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C047EF8; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from nahkohe.jetcafe.org (nahkohe.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A67D1977; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:14:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from [205.147.26.5] (hokkshideh4.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.5]) by nahkohe.jetcafe.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r68KvqdD050012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DB27D0.7020304@jetcafe.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:57:52 -0700 From: Dave Hayes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121121 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Errors building mysql55-client References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:14:25 -0000 On 06/27/13 03:13, C. L. Martinez wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Trond Endrestøl > wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:55-0000, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> Either the file named distinfo is messed up, or the maintainer has >> access to a different file than the rest of us. Maybe you should wait >> until the MySQL mirrors catches up. I'm going to confirm that this was a recent patch to the ports tree: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/databases/mysql55-server/distinfo?r1=320671&r2=321789 It's pretty clear the versions the port is trying to download -used- to match the distinfo file, but they no longer do. This cryptic comment: Distfile rerolled to make it clearer the license of this community edition (GPLv2). seems to be the source of these errors which are biting me too. It would be nice for some clearer documentation on why distinfo was changed, what the real issue is, and what we can do to build this "correctly". Naively speaking, the version available for download off the mysql site matches the old distinfo SHA checksum so I'm not sure why this was changed at all. I've CC'd the ports list and the responsible committer on this. I'll file a PR too if I get no response to this message. :) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<< Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 22:24:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C1FA0A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B121C8A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ci6so5990344qab.4 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:24:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:disposition-notification-to :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=jgFpyrounKJFfgvEj2cWRPpfHbm5FXYJzbl5qAH1UK0=; b=RKM+QqBerkapWA0ZsYxY6k76eE8wAVudWN7caMKYGVbgCVjh7Na7QutTXycTzoGEvg b6fDw0Yp/OjEEoOuYJgcD8/pfp6j0TccfKxSi2TyGvQrbEfD7Pj1y4FZk4Ktzsmqy9TS z+6cGvmw7YEMlShvNnVdtFUA+E+xvR9+kO8nGt4L+skrBBDMgiv+QszKWznjGe7Fz/yl XMdlV/noz6uAJm7ZU28lpKKes8LBgG47IN8i0xYeab2Dttg+X6eyuSoj7NzrHDCroo3+ I7wspekAmPT6Y/aVlkTTcsHFfLBXQr3wN+9qV5MI3tGazWWk9nl2za6+yfmQXQHHm5fj CGfQ== X-Received: by 10.49.130.8 with SMTP id oa8mr18112176qeb.87.1373322245070; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.99.2] ([177.96.27.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm16936125qay.0.2013.07.08.15.24.03 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:24:38 -0300 Message-ID: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 22:24:06 -0000 Hello, You can call me naive, but until today, I could not find only a one user that wants to use FreeBSD and/or LInux AND windows in any machine I mount/sold, and I have mount it by the dozen, servers running FreeBSD, notebooks running a custom version of Arch Linux... In the freeBSD servers, when a user needs windows for some reason mainly access bank account or enterprise small business I use Virtualbox and I offer him NT2003 server (32 bits), windows 7(64) or windows XP(32). all work fine with a server running FreeBSD 9, 16GB of memory, 500GB of zfs mirrored disks. This small server, running on an AMD FX8120 (8cores) processor costs about U$600 and can hold 40 users running on the virtualbox NT 2003... without problem, and the FreeBSD part can hold gnome 2.32, pf, webserver, firewall, dhcp, printer server, scanner, wireless server, vpn, vlan, asterisk for telephony, even a cloud server running on top of apache using webdav... On the notebooks, the Arch linux runs like a charm, very fast.... integrated with the FreeBSD server. if a user needs access to the company software or bank software(that runs only on IE8) a rdesktop session is used (tsclient). Besides the FreeBSD does "diskless" stations too.. So the question: Why or when will I need an secure UEFI boot??? Thank you for ANY comment... Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 23:28:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190A37B7 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:28:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD281EEE for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r68NSRmm014608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:28:28 -0500 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT05.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:28:27 -0500 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Thread-Topic: UEFI Secure Boot Thread-Index: AQHOe/dJeGhRM0s/PkmACMnjnKyJoJlbr8AAgAAR0wA= Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:28:26 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FB74C7@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> In-Reply-To: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.126] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-07-08_06:2013-07-08,2013-07-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:28:29 -0000 On Jul 8, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: [snip] >=20 > So the question:=20=20 > Why or when will I need an secure UEFI boot??? >=20 >From what I've read of UEFI Secure boot, I've parceled out into these nugge= ts: (correct any nuggets I got wrong) 1. UEFI Secure boot is actually UEFI + Secure boot. You can disable Secure = boot and still have UEFI. 2. Windows 8 requires UEFI Secure boot to ... boot. 3. Any OS can work with UEFI Secure boot... you just have to sign your driv= ers (which puts a burden on development, testing, etc.) 4. FreeBSD today can work on a machine if you disable UEFI (implied disabli= ng of Secure boot sub-feature) 5. FreeBSD could eventually support UEFI. 6. Don't know if we want to support secure-boot... but I think we should. I= t's really up to how the end-user wants FreeBSD to function. If they want F= reeBSD to reject module-loads for custom-compiled modules, secure boot seem= s to be a way to go. But for me at least, I won't be enabling it (even if w= e support it). However, I know customers that might think it's a great idea= (think financial institutions running FreeBSD on bare metal both as workst= ations and servers). Now, I must admit, when the conversation of UEFI and Secure boot starts tur= ning toward involving M$, I get confused. To my understanding, it's a methodology to allow a customer to secure his/h= er box against root-kit. The OS does this by communicating with the UEFI fr= amework the keys of modules to load. That's between the BIOS and the OS (wh= atever OS you may be running). --=20 Devin P.S. Again, correct me if I'm wrong on anything -- I'm still wrapping my he= ad around this stuff too. _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 23:31:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F14927 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x232.google.com (mail-ea0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7F1F20 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l15so3234023eak.37 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:31:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=llDRO2NMj2oqv/do8I7uAodF+3rEKBinDPpajLoFEMI=; b=IbkA3E1VEeEN+sdiiETaoxs+j19pNnCDqriPr8dmcLxsaXyAISS99IiwvEWnVCqam7 7FZbEpzg7ifnWkYP8Q0UWgm0fWl3bznoYNQE22OrLbTuuKwgE8hMkHZB/1MQh8v3ZtL0 sh/p48YKYFFcE4YNWLiGG0LKW+vedO+8TSyx+4r0SQO3vmhgPP1veNluJdtochjdRPed IB9vhO4zYeOXxvlYfONMzoUm4PoFWY0V92YRNSaIaRNSp5YJpBijh2H4DOjcMh9ih48F B+GBt8pfaynkvJQqac0qLQ9VTQeNpqiQtNgmhoKiOiPt39fsXLU1vn8X9pvUftRoLBDj i1hQ== X-Received: by 10.15.49.9 with SMTP id i9mr26835498eew.69.1373326306726; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm46288961eef.5.2013.07.08.16.31.45 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:31:45 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Message-ID: <20130709003145.3bd93269@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> References: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:31:48 -0000 On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:24:38 -0300 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > I could not find only a one user that wants to use FreeBSD and/or > LInux AND windows Some people don't want to delete a preinstalled copy of Windows so they can buy another and install it in a virtual server. There are also fairly obvious reasons why one may want Windows to have direct access to the hardware. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 00:36:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E5B60C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x22f.google.com (mail-yh0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B551882 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f64so2085646yha.20 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=WwLUj9MykCGY7092DlPvmSxSSqrjzFRbb1pGr9Rw2EI=; b=odQxew57EC+Zr+1F7S0/uyv1UoLWn8MinZXFUSfGGVm6XxvfMV3Xp0fnif7IaezFs5 h3vfxl84P4/bDjY8d1hWwEFj6Hhnma5XAZg7I4zrurnuq2FAeelcWrCLalA9QHbLsNW4 vHbJpjIBeSthsyK/N9f/zfDcLspnoV6QipYTs+tzzC3Xg/eZzfi5lHxJDseLspvUiKHY sV0akEpz2aAML81aNCnLqFiBSNlVYnJoC6jtTk7+gP8qtgtfZo3w7b16etwCqmsYcWtm D6HmZarVxAI6BnsqePDfk9QvWN/wyyDeKITe99/520fusNbTozeLVfz793y9OBFNSisk zszg== X-Received: by 10.236.45.66 with SMTP id o42mr13591679yhb.198.1373330194947; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-98-87-167-150.bna.bellsouth.net. [98.87.167.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x52sm40822649yhh.18.2013.07.08.17.36.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DB5B0F.4000307@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:36:31 -0500 From: Noel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot References: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FB74C7@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FB74C7@ltcfiswmsgmb21> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130708-0, 07/08/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:36:36 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/8/2013 6:28 PM, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Jul 8, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > > [snip] > >> >> So the question: >> Why or when will I need an secure UEFI boot??? >> > > From what I've read of UEFI Secure boot, I've parceled out into these nuggets: > > (correct any nuggets I got wrong) > > 1. UEFI Secure boot is actually UEFI + Secure boot. You can disable Secure boot and still have UEFI. > > 2. Windows 8 requires UEFI Secure boot to ... boot. Not entirely correct. Microsoft licensing requires UEFI Secure boot for PCs sold with preinstalled Win8 and the "Windows 8" logo. Win8 itself boots and runs fine on legacy hardware without UEFI (and often outperforms XP or Win7 on the same hardware). But the real-world end result is the vast majority of future computers will be sold with UEFI secure boot enabled as the default. > > > 3. Any OS can work with UEFI Secure boot... you just have to sign your drivers (which puts a burden on development, testing, etc.) > > 4. FreeBSD today can work on a machine if you disable UEFI (implied disabling of Secure boot sub-feature) > > 5. FreeBSD could eventually support UEFI. > > 6. Don't know if we want to support secure-boot... but I think we should. It's really up to how the end-user wants FreeBSD to function. If they want FreeBSD to reject module-loads for custom-compiled modules, secure boot seems to be a way to go. But for me at least, I won't be enabling it (even if we support it). However, I know customers that might think it's a great idea (think financial institutions running FreeBSD on bare metal both as workstations and servers). > > Now, I must admit, when the conversation of UEFI and Secure boot starts turning toward involving M$, I get confused. > > To my understanding, it's a methodology to allow a customer to secure his/her box against root-kit. The OS does this by communicating with the UEFI framework the keys of modules to load. That's between the BIOS and the OS (whatever OS you may be running). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR21sPAAoJEHIluGOd3V4FGmgH/2vcwWP5juy7txU7pS5oTPdA MXc29tAIpPcLuGILyFICKtjlZ3isINX8kwBA9xZKoSjiDSCng/I+90+dIjpukAt2 DwLuek6+7oC9dYaBDxobjhhoogw5txcKnqwVhC4LjpBdQMuTiJSIunQOOzqqEybU kvedi5nlmmso6GYVYEKLRS7NrbgMW9W+2TvwrYOcBJw3yTeN4XRcpk7rQRi/U0+/ oRqxy1W9z51T6sGdO5UrkdxQEcNT6UgJedIo/0QLNUPOPEzGbapqak1QCbDSpxDc G8GOPLZnSrTM/FnM8KMzFaM2C6yoMyJHqsCs4tsbu1sRGxpLbs3HUJF984HTRDw= =vozW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 00:36:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1108E60D for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-x233.google.com (mail-gh0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC5F1883 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f179.google.com with SMTP id f16so1862895ghb.38 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=oAvGcCP7EV68/dWinoamchdkSZPcnIZQoXhmdAtzjyA=; b=Jeqpr1xkEoAvPk8BeTbYKQHGa6neFo38oNnTyWSWU0JS8pmmrl1RMUJK0WeljWLf0A 4jstQZrthx2QXbGdmTlHGshbJezIWr3zl7kDK3sNX0S3LLUBlk9Tilr5DHDA5UYWcbW9 sagb73ESavTavAQOM/CPPkwyk9FDeBCat6LTxkr9QMYGGPwMhErrHUwDRec/owHNNS/Z gNv7vDLJJ73+IxOx/UVCPh9byGW3INxgXu0wkty7FSvXvy0oTVZKcxabG0ochV4CZQrv XHDxFwHM28nf4p8VG15qaBpOhSOlGpvupgxuRyZbwHRPC39dn7275ED9T0pqXgk4KcHt 4RbQ== X-Received: by 10.236.206.13 with SMTP id k13mr13687512yho.205.1373330194767; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-98-87-167-150.bna.bellsouth.net. [98.87.167.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g39sm40848867yhb.13.2013.07.08.17.36.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DB5B0F.70205@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:36:31 -0500 From: Noel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot References: <1373322278.15315.38.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FB74C7@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FB74C7@ltcfiswmsgmb21> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130708-0, 07/08/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:36:36 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/8/2013 6:28 PM, Teske, Devin wrote: Not entirely correct. Microsoft licensing requires UEFI Secure boot for PCs sold with preinstalled Win8 and the "Windows 8" logo. Win8 itself boots and runs fine on legacy hardware without UEFI (and often outperforms XP or Win7 on the same hardware). But the real-world end result is the vast majority of future computers will be sold with UEFI secure boot enabled as the default. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR21sLAAoJEHIluGOd3V4FmG0H/3a8yfrZOs0hhZmD2koIOBks ELNfNqvktBICX+7lhHFVQM9i10LIHWR2Vgb+0BZSYavGQ+TmE6tds3iIprDXzGF9 fKO1OHsD/5rCWPraus9uOBoeLrD9wQMirB3JV9f5p0hNLHqtiWYr1p0wsC9/vDYN q92JINJe80Aqznq746JIbIEibmCDDjVTrTgDB2xidi3ZlkD6nN3RKNJ+DDnj/O19 sHDCmRU/Daw+3OisjaVwmaJpksPJxSmNxIlFqWlbZ8nMgjwbB/2YxkELVaRnLJZG rBSeyxiOA7Y1m9OLGRZXCeraFedk8ccE2JXDbv7OBR/mC7066PZkNq/bpjZjlEA= =ZZRj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 00:39:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC139F9 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E52012C3 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-76-18.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.76.18]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0C93D2D5; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r690VehM001944; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:31:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:31:40 +0200 From: Polytropon To: jb Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Message-Id: <20130709023140.9c7c4f40.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:39:56 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC), jb wrote: > I hope FreeBSD (and other OSs) luminaries, devs and users will find a way not > to harm themselves. A massive problem I (personally) have is that with Restricted Boot (this is what "Secure Boot" basically is) you are no longer able to _ignore_ MICROS~1 and their products. A restrictive boot loader mechanism that requires signed and confirmed keys, handled by a major offender of free decisions and a healthy market - no thanks. What prevents MICROS~1 from revoking keys of a possible competitor? Or from messing with the specs just that things start breaking? Don't get me wrong: I don't even argument that a mechanism where a competitor requires you to pay money to run _your_ software instead of _their_ software sounds horribly wrong. This approach will introduce a philosophical or even legal context to the technical problem. I see interesting chances in UEFI per se. It can be called a kind of "micro-OS" which can be rich on features that could also be useful. But history has shown that if such an infrastructure is provided, it will lead to bloated, insecure and incompatible implementations quickly, and the worst, it will happen at a very low level. This is simly dangerous. Regarding UEFI + Restricted Boot: To obtain MICROS~1's sticker of approval for hardware, vendors need to implement those features. Even worse, on _specific_ platforms, they are not allowed to make it possible to _remove_ those features, so "on by default" is required - if I remember correctly (Intel vs. ARM architectures). As you see, I try to ignore this whole topic as I am not interested in using it. In the past, this has been possible. When building a new system, buying a blank disk and _no_ "Windows" was particularly easy. For systems that already came with some "Windows" preinstalled, simply deleting the partition was a solution; install FreeBSD boot mechanism, initialize disk, and be done. No more dealing with what MICROS~1 seems to insist is "normal". When _their_ product decisions make _me_ invest time to find a way to remove and ignore them, I feel offended. I would like to see a way UEFI hardware, with or without Restricted Boot, can be used with FreeBSD _without_ involving the "good will" of MICROS~1. But as they have already gotten their fingers everywhere, this doesn't seem to happen all too soon... :-( -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 00:45:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8917E2D for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x232.google.com (mail-pb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9554193C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id wz7so4899076pbc.37 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cMCazTjaEHC4yBljvuFsSkN4UwtqSqGFcJak3DBK24s=; b=TQasIQKRaSS5eFgKT+v0A6E1ZqCXOC61eHooye7O8RekiJMbqUUBRM5WnRl90xYHIO lojZfr/N60gl0y2VP44ZXVKRdpctTmq+eCY7eO7ZNgwv9ge77rRq3ZNBeOleN6pwaQ8i Be4DCb2oEj1NVah68clW1rLguZz7IVyXV+rCfjAm5yP7KvCjHjnfa1ofNGki/Isl54gm gLw06dhmw8IjukHzOrjmJeQtzqqV12HuSNdc5kIYCwPDsfgTy64SeOG05OtjTj61rMXE jL8VaeZzoFCCNe4jluE1MPjvhmyaM/3KE4RvX86JNk13zTNHQvo7YEAww7k4wBHdPJGj Dc5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.101.34 with SMTP id fd2mr24087153pbb.137.1373330707611; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.129.99 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:45:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: CeDeROM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:45:08 -0000 On 8 July 2013 05:59, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) > > I have noted this nasty and disturbing problem with Chromium that it > very often does not refresh screen/display so I get result after few > seconds or need to refresh page to see a change. It does not happen > with other browsers and/or x-applications. Did anyone notice that > problem? I am using public pkgng binaries from > http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest. I guess > it might be related to some stuff with GTK... Yes, no idea though what causes it. I build from source. I'm considering pkg delete-ing it, though, as it doesn't seem to offer any advantages (over xombrero, opera, midori, etc) any more. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 01:04:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8973130F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from nm11-vm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm11-vm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A681A03 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.170] by nm11.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2013 01:00:53 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.106] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2013 01:00:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp102.rog.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jul 2013 01:00:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1373331653; bh=LZhEOpqPb9tOtONLyH+NZfnMvPROVsFo4KwKTT9I8vA=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1nk1W7c6UeC3meO3680r5MO2XqOlmywYRvfgC1q9wDyWqOiu43i8rVqTSvWgTwUjxvEUWJMKRR7swigI65MwKuUOt0CITxFlC+RYOEiyddUdxubdRa2/hoE/FbDkrnp+2piVOv9Uwh5YpPJTUmnW9Fm5lOS9ZpvgjDBVYMK8HHw= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 199608.57012.bm@smtp102.rog.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: QSVBJHYVM1mSLM8anXeLFlChPEWYRdZQsMfA3ttYiOLW8nt iXVXQf.FTkaEEMot9C0XE7KhEp6tPyHlYCQmYKSfOROcGmbZEGYDrd4KvFLK x_LCcTI.MS9HsM8R9fEFvQ8o9f9lt8zPQKG1IE6j1aZCllU.QtiRJjrhz3Np 3vh9UY3DegQUw_XdfQY5KEyq.q9bypE8RC.fZiw356NDSodcNYtFSctf9mEX 4MBa3.hXI7ft5KLP4pR0IkYfza4IvWN5Y2Chh8prg4Ek9BstvW4C6yp6DgUY sSe7leZqo61dZw6IIf_pkrqNl4t.9PwzCH_QUIOEKgOV.WqLPZe7Ud2.NJ0n WBQx2hbgHRpnIum2450mfEyz9eJgTTe.u2jduji79qFIdlwlYvjPXJ96aMPH AJKsIo9EEuNY3wQjKNoYgoOEemErj8r7pUIxJqijKaGXsWF3dQjpZ2Y._g1X GGRcmsdbxllieO6FQ0NqhZM_HUAx999NyqDmFnVSYnumJGAg0NdlS139WETY Zy1hd8o6dLTRxILUbyWKyOH1ZWVgLtVB9GpyfMgxv7vmi9KIzSn19FrDwfg- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- X-Rocket-Received: from europa (mike.jeays@173.33.93.170 with login) by smtp102.rog.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 09 Jul 2013 01:00:53 +0000 UTC Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:00:51 -0400 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Message-ID: <20130708210051.1edc028e@europa> In-Reply-To: <20130709023140.9c7c4f40.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130709023140.9c7c4f40.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 01:04:08 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:31:40 +0200 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC), jb wrote: > > I hope FreeBSD (and other OSs) luminaries, devs and users will find a way not > > to harm themselves. > > A massive problem I (personally) have is that with Restricted Boot > (this is what "Secure Boot" basically is) you are no longer able > to _ignore_ MICROS~1 and their products. A restrictive boot loader > mechanism that requires signed and confirmed keys, handled by a > major offender of free decisions and a healthy market - no thanks. > What prevents MICROS~1 from revoking keys of a possible competitor? > Or from messing with the specs just that things start breaking? > > Don't get me wrong: I don't even argument that a mechanism where > a competitor requires you to pay money to run _your_ software > instead of _their_ software sounds horribly wrong. This approach > will introduce a philosophical or even legal context to the > technical problem. > > I see interesting chances in UEFI per se. It can be called a kind > of "micro-OS" which can be rich on features that could also be > useful. But history has shown that if such an infrastructure is > provided, it will lead to bloated, insecure and incompatible > implementations quickly, and the worst, it will happen at a very > low level. This is simly dangerous. > > Regarding UEFI + Restricted Boot: To obtain MICROS~1's sticker of > approval for hardware, vendors need to implement those features. > Even worse, on _specific_ platforms, they are not allowed to make > it possible to _remove_ those features, so "on by default" is > required - if I remember correctly (Intel vs. ARM architectures). > > As you see, I try to ignore this whole topic as I am not interested > in using it. In the past, this has been possible. When building a > new system, buying a blank disk and _no_ "Windows" was particularly > easy. For systems that already came with some "Windows" preinstalled, > simply deleting the partition was a solution; install FreeBSD boot > mechanism, initialize disk, and be done. No more dealing with what > MICROS~1 seems to insist is "normal". When _their_ product decisions > make _me_ invest time to find a way to remove and ignore them, I > feel offended. > > I would like to see a way UEFI hardware, with or without Restricted > Boot, can be used with FreeBSD _without_ involving the "good will" > of MICROS~1. But as they have already gotten their fingers everywhere, > this doesn't seem to happen all too soon... :-( > > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If I have understood correctly, it is quite easy to disable secure boot on most current machines; it is just an option in the UEFI setup. The real danger is machines where it cannot be disabled. This includes some recent HP machines; whether by design or incompetence I cannot say. These are the real danger to non-Microsoft operating systems, and the free software movement needs to fight tooth and nail against them. I can all too easily see them proliferating in the marketplace, perhaps secretly 'encouraged' by Microsoft. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 01:48:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15F6FC9 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E471BFC for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwN26-0000Rd-QZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:47:58 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:47:58 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:47:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <20130709023140.9c7c4f40.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130708210051.1edc028e@europa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 01:48:00 -0000 Mike Jeays rogers.com> writes: > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:31:40 +0200 > Polytropon edvax.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC), jb wrote: > > > I hope FreeBSD (and other OSs) luminaries, devs and users will find > > > a way not to harm themselves. > > > > A massive problem I (personally) have is that with Restricted Boot > > (this is what "Secure Boot" basically is) you are no longer able > > to _ignore_ MICROS~1 and their products. A restrictive boot loader > > mechanism that requires signed and confirmed keys, handled by a > > major offender of free decisions and a healthy market - no thanks. > > What prevents MICROS~1 from revoking keys of a possible competitor? > > Or from messing with the specs just that things start breaking? > > ... > If I have understood correctly, it is quite easy to disable secure boot on > most current machines; it is just an option in the UEFI setup. > > The real danger is machines where it cannot be disabled. This includes > some recent HP machines; whether by design or incompetence I cannot say. As readers on distrowatch.com put it regarding Secure Boot: "Secure Boot can be turned off completely or, custom mode entered and other keys added if so desired thus avoiding the need to deal with Microsoft. Although it does add extra steps to installing a Linux or BSD system it's not that difficult to deal with and Secure Boot is part of the UEFI specifications, not Microsoft's." "In some cases Secure Boot CANNOT be turned off completely, and in other cases Secure Boot may be desired. In theses cases, an independent authority should be signing the key, NOT Microsoft. We shouldn't have to forgo the use of Secure Boot to avoid dealing with Microsoft. "It deeply disturbs me that Linux and BSD projects must grovel before Microsoft to get their key signed to be allowed to install their OS. Why should MS have such power? There should be an independent entity to handle this." jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 01:54:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08381B2 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35711C5C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 01:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b10so4212495vea.16 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:54:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HzASETr5ymhsf/3jB2vwuBAYWA9pa8eSelzSQL0SGWk=; b=x6tTvk8kddXK7n55nHuOxI5ZYYS9TO3OLpAvfe7aITJuJbdX7wXOq0k8BBazhkDR60 CnIqe0iDliANXm1obPFy8IiTyG/5IcyOjjHSJMs1rbVV40LwFbbjyQl4j8P3C9k9VJIH pYDVaKJ0UWb45iQ32tJf53eaTGS9ReoaoGnPlag7jIdzlEKCjATO02L3o6Wig6YEyrOi kOw+NSA5Id3S91l4c13Yvc5lnNMnalszmxWpnPdzHDmfvpZqoFTFjFsNM10yvZHi2I/M 6kCXqKElzVrMpCoruFoIROuUXK9O0jv8D0RCd2vKxYQBDccHZ3+JQWw8hDNipwnw6fcA rd+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.118.200 with SMTP id ko8mr15182170veb.94.1373334889132; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.59.11.225 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:54:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130709023140.9c7c4f40.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130709023140.9c7c4f40.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:54:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: jb , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 01:54:49 -0000 On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC), jb wrote: > > I hope FreeBSD (and other OSs) luminaries, devs and users will find a > way not > > to harm themselves. > > A massive problem I (personally) have is that with Restricted Boot > (this is what "Secure Boot" basically is) you are no longer able > to _ignore_ MICROS~1 and their products. A restrictive boot loader > mechanism that requires signed and confirmed keys, handled by a > major offender of free decisions and a healthy market - no thanks. > What prevents MICROS~1 from revoking keys of a possible competitor? > Or from messing with the specs just that things start breaking? > > Don't get me wrong: I don't even argument that a mechanism where > a competitor requires you to pay money to run _your_ software > instead of _their_ software sounds horribly wrong. This approach > will introduce a philosophical or even legal context to the > technical problem. > > I see interesting chances in UEFI per se. It can be called a kind > of "micro-OS" which can be rich on features that could also be > useful. But history has shown that if such an infrastructure is > provided, it will lead to bloated, insecure and incompatible > implementations quickly, and the worst, it will happen at a very > low level. This is simly dangerous. > > Regarding UEFI + Restricted Boot: To obtain MICROS~1's sticker of > approval for hardware, vendors need to implement those features. > Even worse, on _specific_ platforms, they are not allowed to make > it possible to _remove_ those features, so "on by default" is > required - if I remember correctly (Intel vs. ARM architectures). > > As you see, I try to ignore this whole topic as I am not interested > in using it. In the past, this has been possible. When building a > new system, buying a blank disk and _no_ "Windows" was particularly > easy. For systems that already came with some "Windows" preinstalled, > simply deleting the partition was a solution; install FreeBSD boot > mechanism, initialize disk, and be done. No more dealing with what > MICROS~1 seems to insist is "normal". When _their_ product decisions > make _me_ invest time to find a way to remove and ignore them, I > feel offended. > > I would like to see a way UEFI hardware, with or without Restricted > Boot, can be used with FreeBSD _without_ involving the "good will" > of MICROS~1. But as they have already gotten their fingers everywhere, > this doesn't seem to happen all too soon... :-( > > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > To assume that UEFI with some magic numbers is a security provider with current hardware is only a day dream . Consider stolen security signing keys and other by-passing mechanisms . For me , I think , over time there will exist free , but really free operating systems which they are not enslaved themselves to some companies , and hardware ( mainly main boards ) which will not require such enslaving . Then , to do task is just plainly to switch to such hardware and software . Personally , I will never want to live under a restriction tried to be enforced by a company and blindly accepted by its followers . I think I am not the only one in the world . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 03:38:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B200D4C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 03:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BA013A4 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 03:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD0322736C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:38:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:31:15 +1000 From: R Skinner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130530 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: courier imap - unable to access shared folders: "operation not supported" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:38:36 -0000 I'm really tearing my hair out here, this was working until I had to do a repair on the server hdd and rebuild it, and now I cannot work out why this has been working at all- no amount of googling even hints at what could be wrong. I'm trying to access shared folders on a courier-imap server and the client simply does nothing, the logs are very obscure as well, and it is on these that I have been focusing my searches on and then trying generalisations: Jul 9 12:59:29 server1 imapd: FAMCancelMonitor: Broken pipe Jul 9 12:59:30 server1 imapd: shared-folders//tmp/1373338770.M51083P2034_sync.: Operation not supported Jul 9 12:59:30 server1 imapd: FAMCancelMonitor: Broken pipe Jul 9 12:59:30 server1 imapd: shared-folders//tmp/1373338770.M453207P2034_sync.: Operation not supported Jul 9 12:59:30 server1 imapd: FAMCancelMonitor: Broken pipe Jul 9 12:59:50 server1 imapd: LOGIN, user=, ip=, port=[59585], protocol=IMAP Jul 9 13:00:12 server1 imapd: LOGIN, user=, ip=, port=[30542], protocol=IMAP Jul 9 13:03:44 server1 imapd: end from FAM server connection Jul 9 13:03:59 server1 imapd: FAMPending: timeout Jul 9 13:05:18 server1 imapd: couriertls: read: Connection reset by peer Jul 9 13:05:18 server1 imapd: DISCONNECTED, user=, ip=, headers=0, body=0, rcvd=314, sent=25847, time=306, starttls=1 I cannot find any references anywhere on this at all. The server has a mail store over NFS located on a ZFS fileserver, nothing has changed as such in the transition and it was working before the hdd repair was done. The only change I tried in the past 5 mins was turning the enhancedidle switch in the conf, and all that produced was the FAM errors you can see. Does anyone have any clues to this? Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 05:21:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1D3AAA for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 05:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45ECF185F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 05:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2013 14:51:46 +0930 Message-ID: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:51:31 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 05:21:48 -0000 On 08/07/2013 19:29, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) > > I have noted this nasty and disturbing problem with Chromium that it > very often does not refresh screen/display so I get result after few > seconds or need to refresh page to see a change. It does not happen > with other browsers and/or x-applications. Did anyone notice that > problem? I am using public pkgng binaries from > http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest. I > guess it might be related to some stuff with GTK... > I see this issue while playing videos in vlc, it's not 100% but close, so it may be related to video resolution or codec. As soon as I stop the video (not pause but stop) the windows draw properly again. If your not running vlc at the time could the vlc plugin be running for media on a web page? I have seen this with chrome and a few other apps. Been a while since I started a video while a page was open, but starting chrome while a video is playing leaves only a blank window (the toolbar/bookmarksbar draw but the rest of the window is blank) - the page is loaded but not drawn, I get tooltips and cursor changes as I hover over where links etc should be on the web page. chrome clipgrab(qt) and even vlc(qt) are the ones I can think of now - vlc shows this issue with it's extra windows - eg playlist, preferences. I'm running 9.1 amd64 with nvidia-driver-310.44_1 xorg-7.7 xfce-4.10_5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 09:22:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8489A7 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B3D12ED for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z10so2799650qcx.21 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:22:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ewwynNoLhJ37HmncTYAii98BEbW1ZZdc+5hk7ATPsYc=; b=MjmORW3rSTw/OKym48/D/y96gaQ8bHpPX+WjMuDIEVI9LnbBn9eTfNOQn78jh2UITa 1Wtihv3d9nyRs2i9Ka+iNhIbG4iEJ7KI8lN7r+ko+Az0rdGfegGoZQuA472Zu8P0pNPk 6WoG8vG4KY537jbS+5gbqyBAsl+r/Bb0iYn9w6zF8IfOatgb1upDWn8EW86BX+ARNMnp URuvBlWOSp/b2wA8PM8Q3ZGe+B1gfOWj3QL8H7V6Wo+7fdmAl2LN7a2p9wcrx0LcZZY3 lzNfMfjOBIbp5YDYB/KQxKDJQjvJ1Fd/JK1B3rayHjLjf+ah9CIIt7f/xjOFOmOklI40 VboA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.129.65 with SMTP id n1mr22737690qas.81.1373361763849; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.35.84 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:22:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:22:43 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: w8tuf5cxwcLiauBFD1WIVguKHZU Message-ID: Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content From: CeDeROM To: Shane Ambler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:22:44 -0000 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Shane Ambler wrote: > I see this issue while playing videos in vlc, it's not 100% but close, > so it may be related to video resolution or codec. As soon as I stop the > video (not pause but stop) the windows draw properly again. Hello Shane :-) My problem is not related to videos, as it occurs on standard websites with no multimedia, maybe some more JavaScripts activitiy.. Your VLC/Xorg refresh related problem may be related to invalid Xorg configuration - please search for hald and xorg autodetectinput - if you have frozen screen until you move a mouse this is it and you can solve it relatively easy :-) Best regards! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 09:24:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A021B3F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bw.mail.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1292F131E for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w57so4560522wes.29 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:24:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MLhLzFUx3k5QxPIfAJQkO6UmEMkuCjJAyfgaztHWyAk=; b=LZieiOe9etq7aaKAwpudXWqM0gyz8cIiZgXez+HfBeQc3v2l3pewYMA27P3p8t8KOU qMOIGtOcZNy0nh95RzGady55FfZaIk9mPqyBVnsWBjWUwKN0TqfJUH3RcR/JkZNvw+yT 9GWzK5ZLnjW89tKiG0KnAKLxytkb0iYTwz5eZRi60XqeR6RTm0ku5Pbjt+3T3JZDu4zs GvE+dQ7yVp2El7VNWQKVLq4zX6u/8zfZ+lYjw4S08Lj9klgTe/1q6m2ka0Lwd8lsJJfT 86PbPlyJ31ADx7QK1Gne82pa40D+a9e4WvCucv6lcv/6k11wCYRhZ5ROdl4Z0Z9UvdKJ 5sPA== X-Received: by 10.180.98.231 with SMTP id el7mr31118654wib.33.1373361897211; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([87.213.55.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nb12sm59796030wic.7.2013.07.09.02.24.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DBD6D5.3090505@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:24:37 +0200 From: "bw.mail.lists" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Errors building mysql55-client References: <51DB27D0.7020304@jetcafe.org> In-Reply-To: <51DB27D0.7020304@jetcafe.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:24:58 -0000 I get these in poudriere: ====>> [01] Starting build of databases/mysql56-client ====>> [01] Finished build of databases/mysql56-client: Failed: checksum ====>> [01] Skipping build of databases/mysql56-server: Dependent port databases/mysql56-client failed ====>> Stopping 2 builders ====>> No package built, no need to update the repository ====>> Cleaning up ====>> Umounting file systems ====>> Failed ports: databases/mysql56-client:checksum ====>> Skipped ports: databases/mysql56-server ====>> [] 0 packages built, 1 failures, 0 ignored, 1 skipped This is mysql56, but I think it's related. As far as I know upstream changed the package because of man pages license issues. Didn't look into it any further, using mariadb mainly. On 7/8/2013 10:57 PM, Dave Hayes wrote: > On 06/27/13 03:13, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Trond Endrestøl >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:55-0000, C. L. Martinez wrote: >>> Either the file named distinfo is messed up, or the maintainer has >>> access to a different file than the rest of us. Maybe you should wait >>> until the MySQL mirrors catches up. > > I'm going to confirm that this was a recent patch to the ports tree: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/databases/mysql55-server/distinfo?r1=320671&r2=321789 > > > It's pretty clear the versions the port is trying to download -used- to > match the distinfo file, but they no longer do. This cryptic comment: > > Distfile rerolled to make it clearer the license of this > community edition (GPLv2). > > seems to be the source of these errors which are biting me too. > > It would be nice for some clearer documentation on why distinfo was > changed, what the real issue is, and what we can do to build this > "correctly". Naively speaking, the version available for download off > the mysql site matches the old distinfo SHA checksum so I'm not sure why > this was changed at all. > > I've CC'd the ports list and the responsible committer on this. I'll > file a PR too if I get no response to this message. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 09:30:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587A2C28 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x22c.google.com (mail-ee0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60AE135D for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c13so3453255eek.31 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:30:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vcpioxU2o67ToBmI5PNDn+Q337BCWFdVzWV7+UF/EKA=; b=elZLwBZzi6pXLH2L/q7gjJ2FjPACOjKW7TE+OdA3NK66s0a0e8aTb947cWOasQAfbz vcnI2CGxlicOQfc7DvrJEmzeWOXmBbFHra71gIlV1ZrnoBhA1E+1AwapK33jSrbSAqAJ c9+q1gToBA+CZbv0z8g9RXeiSO0vRTlSsrifat+wC9q7GGzF8fxzjS2fRpKqPOVtGXVS 4i0sqRQOxm9InjcQ0V02bADLLoo46gDad53CPPABJv/oZU2NqzCbgVhM81ppUFEIxg3e kQP/sXv+JgTO4KaeMpB6MoscM1cME/tSEBvSEC3Q9GgnXoIy96iC9lHe4E3Qo/QYm4T+ LanA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.98.3 with SMTP id bi3mr28272390eeb.124.1373362245257; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.127.133 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:30:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:30:45 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content From: George Liaskos To: CeDeROM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:30:47 -0000 Do you have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set? http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/chromium/pkg-message?revision=318200 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 09:35:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939A27C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5957A13AE for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id d13so6247643qak.16 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:35:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4bEm6phUJGUNqojXG3bw5x6Z/9FzJd+dXPJb2uXJOWc=; b=CsLO2UHh81ZxydJiGNRbsUm5p2NLl8snj9WSM2YeZDQx+GeX6Q5tNEnj4ljGVoGGsl VHAm5b5NvEgb1IjCHAZxs4TFjwhz/2lWw0TsTP6mEjIoMq2YNqy82Fr31oqg7WrhIZDg 1npPV8/aYYl1ecQPXM9AuZzRIpX6AIEJO6WS1jYzHMgiGEMmx+QiWS4yk23YdFueAE1W L7u4Gb6Yt4gDYpjIP1NwwluqUZ2JLqhbn6MpD//5DFPPidrb394/cIdMyoznpKHZVo3L fSb+CB4IfthbEMH+irQkhHh9w9udQvNPOCkrRCMP8GFKZHZP4H/UGIE+B01cLXg2oyhN xrXQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.183.142 with SMTP id cg14mr23053835qab.27.1373362535966; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.35.84 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:35:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:35:35 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eqM4pFf0O41So9MIXeI0P_fMEPw Message-ID: Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content From: CeDeROM To: George Liaskos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:35:36 -0000 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, George Liaskos wrote: > Do you have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set? > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/chromium/pkg-message?revision=318200 Thank you George! That was not set on my system, will try and let you know the results! THANKS!! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 10:59:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C4DDF7 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marketing@jmadvocates.com) Received: from outbound-02.safaricombusiness.co.ke (outbound-02.safaricombusiness.co.ke [41.203.208.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA09818FF for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:59:50 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtcZAJfs21Epy9CKYmdsb2JhbABagkU4DDKsejwXQoFPAYE1QYNejBwEAR56FgMYDAoFFihzgRYBUgEDGCMdCmESNAcFEAwEhSgIgjwOmSWgSIgYhhEoAoEnDoNcA4kfhROFDZhwOTKBAw X-IPAS-Result: AtcZAJfs21Epy9CKYmdsb2JhbABagkU4DDKsejwXQoFPAYE1QYNejBwEAR56FgMYDAoFFihzgRYBUgEDGCMdCmESNAcFEAwEhSgIgjwOmSWgSIgYhhEoAoEnDoNcA4kfhROFDZhwOTKBAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,1027,1363122000"; d="scan'208,217";a="148845944" Received: from 3g-relay-01.safaricombusiness.co.ke ([41.203.208.138]) by smtp01.safaricombusiness.co.ke with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2013 13:56:53 +0300 Message-ID: <03235a87-41464-b1875811545486@user-pc> From: "CISSAP Kenya Documents" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: We provide you with business documents of almost every kind Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:56:51 +0300 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:59:51 -0000 A company uses documents to communicate, transact business and analyze its productivity. Since documents provide proof of an organization's dealings and may be referred to for years to come, it is important that they be well written. We provide you with business documents of almost every kind. With over 1200 business documents that are well written, you will find them very useful. To view the complete list of documents that we have, Please go to [1]http://www.cissap.com/document-list.htm The costs for all the 1200 business documents templates is Kshs 2,000.00 For payments please go to [2]http://www.cissap.com/pricing.htm CISSAP portfolio of business document templates contains a wide selection of business contract templates, agreements, forms, policies, statements and letters. Find documents for almost every kind of business such as purchase orders, partnership agreements, loan agreements, applications, and bill of sale. For the price of a single document, you get hundreds business documents templates, 24/7. Professionally drafted and simple to use and edit, these business contracts and legal templates are an essential, quality and affordable resource for any business or organization. Regards, Moses M. Ndivo 0721-351344 Note:- Though this is not an automated email, we keep on sending out these emails to all those people whom we find eligible of using our services. To unsubscribe from future mails (i.e., to ensure that we do not contact you again for this matter), please go to [3]http://www.cissap.com/unsubscribe.htm References 1. http://www.cissap.com/document-list.htm 2. http://www.cissap.com/pricing.htm 3. http://www.cissap.com/unsubscribe.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 11:56:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9487F52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7791B02 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A031D2054D; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 07:56:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:56:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h= content-type:to:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to; s= mesmtp; bh=+vexGOeXko8k6AteOp7ThnqsV0o=; b=R3D5PVNmFpJPGibmJIRbQ BG08lrZPnyOc5CB0srU9xZ8tOPNZ8w+kbAJ2OfXuBXJfR9ve/kYudQ55sB/udW+Z LT1G6G9+NGbfj0d36pWUVn8O8YaHw2ZKCUgGyBV7j9Q/cqyuMS9tH3RWlIKJ14Dt OdpPli6aR/3EBSVNBFTJ0I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:to:subject:references:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=+vexGOeXko8k6AteOp7ThnqsV0o=; b=ZD8B 8L5qVQEzAjAWfQl0kZcotpc1vIAQDIwOnpgxqzCNorY7qHr4YvODrCRFWJbQ7qlz RUr0MJz3YpIOcPLk0Un19FWpmpz5CUIm97lO8uJCqM0l10KOdWfDn2leSyovKzug b+/xtjDH/ISHe0S/5zJNpiTCBzDGHvVdhcIUfv4= X-Sasl-enc: uYsDIpUOipb9q3qFFB8ULLBcv9R7vxMhriq6H/Xa0L85 1373370971 Received: from markf.office.supranet.net (unknown [66.170.8.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 626D1C00E85; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 07:56:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "FreeBSD Questions" , "R Skinner" Subject: Re: courier imap - unable to access shared folders: "operation not supported" References: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:56:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Mark Felder" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:56:13 -0000 The courier documentation says this about using "enhanced idle" over NFS > FAM (but not Gamin) also works with NFS filesystems. On NFS clientsfam > transparently forwards file monitoring requests to a peer famprocess on > the NFS server. Do you have a peer fam process on the NFS server? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 13:00:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD28F06 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825F1E82 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16A032731C; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 23:00:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <51DC0966.6040908@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:00:22 +1000 From: R Skinner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130530 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: courier imap - unable to access shared folders: "operation not supported" References: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:00:25 -0000 On 07/09/13 21:56, Mark Felder wrote: > The courier documentation says this about using "enhanced idle" over NFS > >> FAM (but not Gamin) also works with NFS filesystems. On NFS >> clientsfam transparently forwards file monitoring requests to a peer >> famprocess on the NFS server. > > Do you have a peer fam process on the NFS server? No, I don't. But then it was something I thought might help the situation and another feature to start playing with. Bit of a stretch really... but I was getting desperate. Would that have anything to do with the main problem though? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 13:05:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B3F205 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDD31ECD for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73F020B19; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:05:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h= content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to; s= mesmtp; bh=K/l92T8Mdwruo7dXEL5R2qO8rwE=; b=bv4gigVq8QLBM1qauNKFP hHrHtCv0z2onw+UjW1t15sgRNQj69X4OC3r+Ecsa0RM/Yy/dqbsNfJOddksVFI4+ 1fNKGvqPLuSZwPybxkBR8D7+CRDq7cUaA8A8r82Gv8VJt/A0G1hSRxSp4mx5TZpb 7S0/YP6Ro+3HOQigBMMaNk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:to:cc:subject:references :date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=K/l92T8Mdwruo7dXEL5R2qO8rwE=; b=YfJE ur/BMmcKUL5eKnVeGvzXIMCw/8cBPeOJrSBHwWYa00dD9b6NPflU8no810bnDY0n nHZih3MTftPBoASgH5v6aE6eT8ldO5cMuBgkHy1BP+jkj4TiaObvxwBIQimQZ0tq HmmcmJaU6L3ODqhSK/nW39auEnKWdA1oor4wJY4= X-Sasl-enc: YQWQ4cd4VJgKLMILgrBA9TyNW2QLilauFizE2/A1vlKX 1373375109 Received: from markf.office.supranet.net (unknown [66.170.8.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 600CEC00E83; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "R Skinner" Subject: Re: courier imap - unable to access shared folders: "operation not supported" References: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <51DC0966.6040908@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:05:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Mark Felder" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <51DC0966.6040908@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (FreeBSD) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:05:10 -0000 On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:00:22 -0500, R Skinner wrote: > No, I don't. But then it was something I thought might help the > situation and another feature to start playing with. Bit of a stretch > really... but I was getting desperate. > Would that have anything to do with the main problem though? I'm honestly not sure. The doc seem to indicate that it won't work without a fam daemon on the NFS server, so maybe that's the root of the errors. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 13:23:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45CA781 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F81D1F9E for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74B942731C; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 23:23:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <51DC0EB9.2060604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:23:05 +1000 From: R Skinner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130530 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: courier imap - unable to access shared folders: "operation not supported" References: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <51DC0966.6040908@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:23:07 -0000 On 07/09/13 23:05, Mark Felder wrote: > On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:00:22 -0500, R Skinner > wrote: > >> No, I don't. But then it was something I thought might help the >> situation and another feature to start playing with. Bit of a stretch >> really... but I was getting desperate. >> Would that have anything to do with the main problem though? > > I'm honestly not sure. The doc seem to indicate that it won't work > without a fam daemon on the NFS server, so maybe that's the root of > the errors. Ok. I'll give it a try. But why would it work with the NFS server - before the repair and without FAM - and not now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 13:24:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43B082E for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879EA1FB7 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A220B1B; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:24:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h= content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to; s= mesmtp; bh=9Zm2nE7ZYFL/2BgriPDWZoGO+vE=; b=ZQM2OD7yHKWgdmC80Ce1L VzxKrOt7bj9d/dMyF+pc9cqWdBZBSQjjjEcQZXS89ZzGod0HdeYruqFS/Z7/LZyy qcV3JhKK0KF+LaaSwZrHCIH++sX4emVzOycZ0hUatpHwk3p/A3eN2cgSOC7taCvx RVnZKNcd5StpiaZIstqnPw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:to:cc:subject:references :date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=9Zm2nE7ZYFL/2BgriPDWZoGO+vE=; b=CrUw io8cASJhL1hGookZZsVkEzHzjNwvpebM3q6Km755pFonD0lT2XEelTTuMYiT90LT 78IEmSDh+M+VCuBwqt9cmb9yWBI11bK0UeHd4a6+ynj2IRuXo4GViAsRdD/CUiHn NQKs+BxYhNUia7nJ0qWiij4jS8zrL7BHGzzvbEc= X-Sasl-enc: bL1FrtPaAmkd2dkiG5X2nxWoUOe8CgPm5kkxSx625gWe 1373376271 Received: from markf.office.supranet.net (unknown [66.170.8.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A932B680268; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "R Skinner" Subject: Re: courier imap - unable to access shared folders: "operation not supported" References: <51DB8403.6070000@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <51DC0966.6040908@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <51DC0EB9.2060604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:24:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Mark Felder" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <51DC0EB9.2060604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (FreeBSD) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:24:33 -0000 On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:23:05 -0500, R Skinner wrote: > Ok. I'll give it a try. > But why would it work with the NFS server - before the repair and > without FAM - and not now? Oh, I misunderstood. I thought you weren't having problems until you turned on that enhanced idle feature. I'd start asking in a courier irc channel or on their mailing lists -- this sounds quite odd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 15:18:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952C2FEC for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5C41750 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2013 00:48:36 +0930 Message-ID: <51DC29C9.7050501@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:48:33 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content References: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:18:37 -0000 On 09/07/2013 18:52, CeDeROM wrote: > Your VLC/Xorg refresh related problem may be related to invalid Xorg > configuration - please search for hald and xorg autodetectinput - if > you have frozen screen until you move a mouse this is it and you can > solve it relatively easy :-) A few apps not refreshing their windows while vlc is playing is the only issue I have noticed. I have AutoAddDevices AutoEnableDevices AllowEmptyInput and RandRRotation on and DontZap and Xinerama off in ServerFlags. If I recall right, hald is handling the input devices, which I need to get the wacom tablet working. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 15:21:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDC73A5 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x229.google.com (mail-qe0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3543017A0 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b4so3107217qen.14 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8Dr7WxODHIq2D2FIHo660AsdzliN8xRo2wHlfxac9ng=; b=UAusCPNUmjAAb4OqWzJsRhZ2FNxbPF91GGefPrKKvpWWe99NX5j8JDUdIianCpBiFD CgGeRV8VHpdZSslV5xhueXKyT6LmYJhZsYeFYL6rMnhRYtnJ00Wh60wQ4OLmjIK/yriX ZKSSZiEcul+OIS3f4VriPKevpRcSQGjNjmMJpuRF0yNnvk1D4Sb8K8aOHvg7Sx9iUVZK nKhf1LJzCCJ80IK6L9jr0DFWaeM9LVN5W+1Np1h+iYo0QPWg3B78E2DSHZh1ULTBfJyM jh894jIqMafMSBb0UCweUH85UbEXt/7kwQ+aNs7mSAfEnqTt41uSpTchPs1b4xdivjFF KBbQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.41.147 with SMTP id o19mr23839109qae.65.1373383308755; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.35.84 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:21:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Nk9GTdzwxoD0nHnupIcetyTHgUU Message-ID: Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content From: CeDeROM To: George Liaskos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:21:49 -0000 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:35 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, George Liaskos wrote: >> Do you have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set? >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/chromium/pkg-message?revision=318200 > > Thank you George! That was not set on my system, will try and let you > know the results! Yes, kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 seems to be working! I missed that setting, thank you George! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 15:44:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDEAD77 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from genie@geniechka.ru) Received: from s1.loshmanov.ru (s1.loshmanov.ru [188.40.115.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F7F18F0 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geniepc2011 (0894461339.static.corbina.ru [95.31.5.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by s1.loshmanov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A555ADF2DA4 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:44:09 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <9EC89DA3B0064B5F98D2525E9A7D9E4F@geniepc2011> From: "Eugene" To: References: <201306260222.r5Q2MdJO087350@chilled.skew.org> <251172C98D1E4A058801784F25BD2360@geniepc2011> In-Reply-To: <251172C98D1E4A058801784F25BD2360@geniepc2011> Subject: Re: Should I be able to use mergemaster with freebsd-update? Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:44:02 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:44:11 -0000 Hi all, A small followup: Looks like freebsd-update does try to rebuild the password database but does not quite succeed, leaving binary files in somewhat corrupted state, this leading to some problems when trying to add new users later. This is discussed here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180241 However the master.passwd is fine, thus as a workaround you can simply run vipw to resave master.passwd, then vipw regenerates binary password databases correctly and everything works quite nicely. Best wishes Eugene -----Original Message----- From: Eugene Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 8:37 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I be able to use mergemaster with freebsd-update? Hi all, In case anybody was following this discussion, I have successfully upgraded the system from 8.2 to 8.4 using freebsd-update. The process did have some glitches (in retrospect, minor ones) but mostly they were not related to freebsd-update (like some issues with gmirror and firewall configurations). The data merging phase was quite bearable and reasonable (if a bit tedious) and all the databases got properly updated. Thanks to everyone involved! Eugene -----Original Message----- From: Mike Brown Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 6:22 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I be able to use mergemaster with freebsd-update? On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 15:29, Eugene wrote: > I do not quite understand. Is the freebsd-update upgrade process > completely broken? IMHO it is partially broken; I'm not doing anything special. How broken it is depends on what's getting changed. Most of what the system is designed to do, it indeed does very well. It also overlaps some of the functionality of mergemaster in that it automatically merges as many files as it can, which is nice. Where it is under-designed and under-implemented is in its rudimentary handling of un-mergeable files, and in its total lack of support for the regeneration of /etc/*.db files (like the, uh, rather important password database) and sendmail aliases - things that you would handle via mergemaster in an ordinary, source-based upgrade, but which you must now figure out how to do by hand, without any guidance, and they really don't make it easy for you. <...> _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 19:09:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719E2950 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov.sergey.404@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538AF15E9 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id kx10so5904803pab.27 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=biUZsJChHjMObOAyzjnv1+u6gW0z3c3OCvT7c99NqlA=; b=iQUf/tLmOpmU5khDutlkCe5CiGZ7KK8aRjuOwpPsI4SgPE19etYiFNwBtktuGAkcjL YmkYUHnfBreW5Acxn6htk2HcRUoDYEVn2vyLNz6HNibOrWutXlQsYY8q2Gyh0AR+8kal V9mmJDvFPySNuwOKB+e7QHc7zVVrxEkprLVv8KM9P8lPWAyJ7Id9kMznD+XKVeK4nyIk bFQSJUZc1/dVB/M8SohSzJgAxFlH4yLZWfnoX+nz4U2iUaX5x/5VsRtRSqauEREWMRUi dkO5Aa8iE9QjRm5aN8QpzlwwNVtl4KGfArBDvMtMPEKNcKwDW4zTrDS01YWJfY8NIOit ofYQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.196.231 with SMTP id ip7mr27681904pbc.61.1373396974140; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.193.73 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:09:33 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Redmine rmagick dependencies From: Kozlov Sergey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:09:34 -0000 Hi all. This is my first post. Recently the redmine port was updated to 2.3.1 and when i tried to install it i've noticed that it has two rmagick dependencies - ruby-rmagick(optional) and rubygem-rmagick(non-optional). ruby-rmagic and rubygem-rmagick ports have the same COMMENT and VERSION so i have some questions: 1) What's the difference between ruby-rmagick and rubygem-rmagick? 2) Why does redmine need rubygem-rmagick even if i turn rmagick option off (is it a bug)? Before the port was updated i've installed redmine dependencies using bundler, and i had no rmagick at all while redmine working properly. Best regards, Kozlov Sergey. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 20:02:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54480F4D for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cilentotravelguide@cilentotravelguide.com) Received: from cilentotravelguide.com (cilentotravelguide.com [208.131.137.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297E21938 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from cilentotravelguide@localhost) by cilentotravelguide.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id r69K2KjI005760; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:02:20 -0600 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:02:20 -0600 Message-Id: <201307092002.r69K2KjI005760@cilentotravelguide.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Assalam, From: MO MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: m101ha@rediffmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 20:02:21 -0000 Assalamalaikum Wr Wb I hope in the name of ALLAH that I have the right person who will assist me. I got your contact through a web directory. I want to transfer my family's money into your country/ business for investment purposes and to secure the future of my 3 children because we are uncertain of the future of this country; as such I would like to make contact with you residing in that country for assistance. Note these funds are already in a security company which has branches around the world for safe keeping. I would have done this myself but my present health condition will not warrant me to do so. Kindly help with this because I cannot travel out of libya at the moment due to some certain conditions and great difficulties added to the fact that am disabled on a wheel chair due to a bombing that occurred in Benghazi I will explain more to you when I am certain that I can trust you. The fall of Muammar Gaddafi came with a lot of destruction / Hell to our great country Libya and everything is practically difficult now and opportunities are closing up, the new government is trying to frustrate our life. Please if you accept this offer of assistance you are required to give me your Name, age, occupation, address also enclosing your telephone fax numbers. What I now need from you are as follows: 1. You will help me receive and secure the funds from the security company on my family's behalf and open a Bank account for my children in your country with the credentials i will give you. 2. You will be entitled to 30% of the total sum involved for your assistance. 3. As soon as you confirm to me by e-mail your readiness to assist with this, I will give you more details as regards claiming the funds from the security company. 4. Please note that this project is 100% risk free but you must keep it very secret and confidential with strong assurance that you will not let me down at all. Regards, Mohamad Hassan al-Rida From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 03:03:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F1A2E9 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D65D1EDC for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A70D33C48; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:54:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8FAF83984A; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:54:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: chrome does not refresh screen content References: <51DB9DDB.3010802@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 22:54:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (cederom@tlen.pl's message of "Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:21:48 +0200") Message-ID: <44y59fyvi7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: George Liaskos , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:03:24 -0000 CeDeROM writes: >>> Do you have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set? >>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/chromium/pkg-message?revision=318200 >> >> Thank you George! That was not set on my system, will try and let you >> know the results! That's in the pkg message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 16:14:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84E3777 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE721B28 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uwx1o-0003Ct-0N for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:14:04 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:14:04 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:14:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Wireless Networking Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:14:05 -0000 9.1-RELEASE-p4 on amd64. This is a laptop with an Atheros 9280 wireless chip in a domestic setting with a single router and a cable "modem". I have never had to use wireless before, but am now in another room. I have followed the handbook, and it seems to be working well. One question though: 'ifconfig -a' shows *two* entries apparently relating to wireless: ath0 and wlan0. The wlan0 one shows the IP address (fixed, not DHCP), netmask, ssid and so forth, but the ath0 entry shows only: ath0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 0c:ee:e6:80:ed:52 nd6 options=29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g status: associated Is this how it should be? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 16:42:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1394443A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp204.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp204.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BF11CE1 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7C7E62F00AB for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:35:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from smtp100.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp100.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.100]) by smtp10.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 888E72F00A3 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:35:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B95F11B01BE for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:34:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id D14E01B04A3 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:34:31 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:34:23 -0400 Subject: zfs can't mount /usr after 9.1-release upgrade From: Tom Worster To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: zfs can't mount /usr after 9.1-release upgrade Mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:42:52 -0000 a freebsd box doesn't boot normally since upgrading from 9.1-rc3 to 9.1-release. it boots to the point that /usr is mounted, then errors "mount: /usr: unknown special file or file system" if i boot to single user, zfs mount -a manually, then it comes up fine. what function key do i gotta press to make that not happen again? tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 17:34:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2772CF69 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm7-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm7-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B061FCB for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jul 2013 17:32:18 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.57] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jul 2013 17:32:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jul 2013 17:32:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1373477538; bh=DRCFutu7Mi3Bmz+C/Tatbu6teaNVEaUF0KifUsVt5b4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:X-Received:Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=RV1CMOtvZ24n2KqkJrWXCducACDwDWeXFJXLbyKG0AReCqXZjKwX6T0tTImisvXqVq+qqLYHL//WLX9Qq1HcdCsnfukzvBbTZePsq5E0CRv7S7VK+j3BeMVSrhXhFat70mESQaWabABw8a/WrrgfcZz4vYV4IupxEyfm2n6UXrk= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 720640.58783.bm@smtp208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: iZgJowoVM1nLOQVaXmZM.cGmjqTz.RnuRrPZ_DWCyaEXwCX 5gsPfk_xAkOt0jhsb3Ol8ok2JxoLZLLfw6zUVE4yTcJUeBIxA08tH2II3Gtn CklNqkY0c7X3K4mjorunWMRB_C4zGepcmCFuaQQNIwrAiC3sc5Iuv60mlUpu n1IwJRY23.iOq5lUyIJwI9anXFyeDdu_0_rWIlpsWn7u6fjVi_FMMXy3Gxv9 7FLgaZzK5C.5605PVsd_BviZI6PaRZiWkqI.bWI5jWOKYUFgitB520r2X23e aZ.fXpr3jWnzE2ZDa8vcIZwswP3fa95qg4907MTKY6m4J6.XObvZREgOfUze yGjty9E2ldlqut.vAI09eVf.2eTlvsNhvsKcts1NMwvlwcKpHUCVJQNeoAEF OU0cKKSLIBYL5q3WkHh2IHowAWe7ijuMHTZTwZOcigJCxyDBiFsd6lWDTrrN MwS69aSb4Zat.RvtCwv4MKAIlyTKKzZPKER.IhLu4y_Dvr1wtUObB2chDYB7 nq_l4hzHAx257xVd8o0642MPtI4fDCcfr48NuPjDZcoFUzMvBtBIpr.mw7Jh sw_rdN54xXXgLPxr4eRtImdMKGb95.KQjVelBznko0cwVc6snbme_nMGxj3x oeAzQ9f1PjTQ.2mjdNgKFAklt6QhMx60fqQ1UFmUOAMsA_7_vVYOm8cvW1Lv 6Ycq3 X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u X-Rocket-Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.219.42 with ) by smtp208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2013 10:32:18 -0700 PDT Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j6so10045876oag.1 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DRCFutu7Mi3Bmz+C/Tatbu6teaNVEaUF0KifUsVt5b4=; b=fJVOuDTCy75elSevgA9NuIkAaAMb91yuQ6qDUlGIp1wtBSXxHQmqVCYtflkeYI75oN jnX6CWEcGBPvVvm2mjENx1ZCB6O+HFrIfrZUGsGGyYPYw87yXdr39qjczZIhgJ6C6pzR fN393N5Ne04dONSQMAFxd/iwGidwvCjTQc/P7ouMZIeYGNCwhb9/BGz6Up+k5U9nGVIg khKbHpeQSkUzJ1/eQyrwW2YeCD9vVNOl+riBjKXxdoybNv6UuB7ub8Wcl7tjtrLw7LJ+ MpCRPSpFyGGT7q1GFPjCGAJC/afcGeXfkVriBiEkGzihm20jw7gmM5VqtKFCN+pGK2ku Z8KQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.43.230 with SMTP id z6mr27890236obl.82.1373477538038; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.44.202 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:32:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:32:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Wireless Networking From: Alexandre To: Walter Hurry Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:34:56 -0000 On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Walter Hurry wrote: > 9.1-RELEASE-p4 on amd64. This is a laptop with an Atheros 9280 wireless > chip in a domestic setting with a single router and a cable "modem". > > I have never had to use wireless before, but am now in another room. I > have followed the handbook, and it seems to be working well. One question > though: 'ifconfig -a' shows *two* entries apparently relating to > wireless: ath0 and wlan0. The wlan0 one shows the IP address (fixed, not > DHCP), netmask, ssid and so forth, but the ath0 entry shows only: > > ath0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 > ether 0c:ee:e6:80:ed:52 > nd6 options=29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: associated > > Is this how it should be? > > Hi Walter, Wlan0 is a clone of your wireless network card. So all the IP setup is applied to Wlan0. You will find more information in the handbook http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html and in rhe ifconfig man page. I hope this will help you. Kind regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 18:08:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75B71 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp184.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp184.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C08F11AD for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 676EE8282; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp8.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 5B48E8236; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:21 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:17 -0400 Subject: Re: zfs can't mount /usr after 9.1-release upgrade From: Tom Worster To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: Thread-Topic: zfs can't mount /usr after 9.1-release upgrade In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:08:56 -0000 On 7/10/13 1:50 PM, "Michael Sierchio" wrote: >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Tom Worster wrote: > ># mount -p > /etc/fstab thanks for answering, michael. i have now spotted the problem. the zfs_enable line in rc.conf was fubar. i must have done some bad vi on it around the time i upgraded the base system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 19:55:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0DF631 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msiebel@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351731882 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([84.134.238.198]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGS9o-1V1M4616PI-00DJWt for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <51DDBC30.30103@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:55:28 +0200 From: Martin Siebel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD on Asus F70SL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jI/jSDBsoIcT8QeH7WIrkplH+ScDIuvCKPGjJc4B/a108XMY0qo N22O8jROJtPZbZSO9QeyVGX/5sKRq/PPIgflWLxTIfUL+a+t6wilBLULPex13fFF9PowXIO w7tvDu0n2c2XaAYFXV/j8sYS4zanvz5kDEb1h3A9w+WzLMbsBimWsZl2zsINoCqd4+cdy0T 0uZQkxi//WK8u6oe1rPfw== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:55:27 -0000 Hello! I recently tried (and failed) installing FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE on my Asus F70SL Notebook. I already created a thread in the official FreeBSD boards but so far no one could help me out with my problem. Since I really want to use FreeBSD with my Notebook I am looking forward to get the neccessary information here. The topic in the FreeBSD boards can be found here: https://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=40724 Thanks in advance! Sincerely, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 21:13:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EC837D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-x236.google.com (mail-bk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D5F1C2A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id it16so3056682bkc.27 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:13:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uLBLX0kKB8P7CzzsjH00a99RL7W1Lsjr2t/3OwQ8hR0=; b=WmUGNFX0NBXPaWeIIvwYth4U8RdfC/UUhECwxnC/dNjZmf66JSgD45L99iDR5HBO53 AfwTT9QNU79duemFCOQ0e/1yzos3zHm5KMzrT3VEcsRKcUe0szbv4ChFhklkoizrkprz R9Mobu1ZZRFEfHIXz8nTlUYevVDHUk1DW4eOzR9BHez0RwtCC1rB13v3IjdBwTCJNC3w vAGXQnFcBicxSibnaBjxz6sBC9rI+NztKpAhNu8qwfGLkd0lAXSP1IWvPsF53WDlnqPV OO+t9PFRu2OU8vwV/x2kxtP9cXcnDavmUQQoY/j9ohYVO5CKPup+0FDd73doZDRDkQeS rDXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.57.66 with SMTP id b2mr5192030bkh.148.1373490819321; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.181.195 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.181.195 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:13:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51DDBC30.30103@gmx.de> References: <51DDBC30.30103@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:13:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Asus F70SL From: Waitman Gobble To: Martin Siebel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:13:40 -0000 On Jul 10, 2013 12:55 PM, "Martin Siebel" wrote: > > Hello! > > I recently tried (and failed) installing FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE on my Asus F70SL Notebook. > I already created a thread in the official FreeBSD boards but so far no one could help me out with my problem. Since I really want to use FreeBSD with my Notebook I am looking forward to get the neccessary information here. > > The topic in the FreeBSD boards can be found here: > > https://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=40724 > > Thanks in advance! > > Sincerely, > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi Martin, Since you are creating the usb boot on an MS system, what happens when you plug the dongle into the machine while running MS? If you see the iso file, that could be the problem. Also %always% make sure to use the Safe Eject feature before removing the dongle. Its possible to receive a "Finished" message when a copy operation is still in progress Waitman Gobble San Jose California From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 05:49:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D429FA for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek.krejca@starnet.cz) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2CF11B3 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:47:50 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:47:49 +0200 Subject: How to get file from nfs id Thread-Topic: How to get file from nfs id Thread-Index: Ac59+ic0sQAP3nozQhG90c4Uptx4Gg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:49:00 -0000 Hello, I have problem with heavy load of my nfsd server. There is connected about = 70 diskless machines, but in readonly mode. I catched traffic and get this: 21:00:39.715337 IP diskless-1.3297435097 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A005CD9080000007ABA42000000000000000000570CDB51 21:00:39.716229 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435097: reply ok 112 getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 64944 21:00:39.716463 IP diskless-1.3297435098 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A0043DE080000007CBA42000000000000000000570CDB51 21:00:39.719112 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435098: reply ok 112 getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 82800 21:00:39.719453 IP diskless-1.3297435099 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A0043DE080000007CBA42000000000000000000570CDB51 21:00:39.721636 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435099: reply ok 112 getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 82800 Why is the same machine requesting chmod of the same file and is there any = way to find out name of file from this long id? Thank you Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 08:32:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04B4220 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A15C1AAB for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6B8WOWO063724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:32:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51DE6D86.5010302@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:32:06 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to get file from nfs id References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:32:27 -0000 On 11/07/2013 06:47, Radek Krejc(a wrote: > Hello, > > I have problem with heavy load of my nfsd server. There is connected about 70 diskless machines, but in readonly mode. I catched traffic and get this: > > 21:00:39.715337 IP diskless-1.3297435097 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh > Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A005CD9080000007ABA42000000000000000000570CDB51 > 21:00:39.716229 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435097: reply ok 112 > getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 64944 > 21:00:39.716463 IP diskless-1.3297435098 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh > Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A0043DE080000007CBA42000000000000000000570CDB51 > 21:00:39.719112 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435098: reply ok 112 > getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 82800 > 21:00:39.719453 IP diskless-1.3297435099 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh > Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A0043DE080000007CBA42000000000000000000570CDB51 > 21:00:39.721636 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435099: reply ok 112 > getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 82800 > > Why is the same machine requesting chmod of the same file and is there any way to find out name of file from this long id? > > Thank you > Radek > > Sorry - I don't think there's an easy answer to this but someone who knows more about nfsd may be along soon. However, if no better idea turns up you could try using dtrace to monitor the underlying calls (or hack nfsd?). I have thought about doing this myself, but it is only available in new FreeBSD releases and the DTrace user guide (from Sun) is 60 pages long and gives me a headache. I know Linux people do something similar using SystemTap. Is the attribute caching on the client set correctly? Or even working (bug?) BTW, what you're seeing isn't unusual. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 09:04:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A36EE4 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938A51C1B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hj3so12349414wib.10 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0fONlrO/D2Zep8M1zlepvah4f/NASbWwBN2p2WD2pHU=; b=rkY/SG5dXsC8rWgiwX7SZkNZ+qCR9zH8KN78pG/MsrB30tGiEkmY9Lcnhfi0ST1c+x ziXbVlDDRzTs3+m77jQKK1nNDagY3w6OM0EG8/7xF/7wFY7SV/b0640vgpRk7vSiPvZu lbx6rpCqc2u/9ljNNdeFjOWD+BV02TFjhnPGpiIReafNkBqUxTUxXKtjFm3Orueh/o8h y4j+MHrks6fVUhFaiEqtz7wZVvbjf9gm8wShyukCXpCppEsH5OyHx06/67EdzYpeLu3f tBE0AeE7kIk8oN8uPnkmbLnSAckg/Ffif/ifi4mZXTj4bbW92jMPEiBGVA1no2HYwd1T J84g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.19.130 with SMTP id f2mr20137219wje.22.1373533470652; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.138 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:04:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) From: David Noel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:04:32 -0000 I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and the ones that didn't have a 4-disk ZFS striped mirror configuration (RAID10). They both use the GPT. After installworld && installkernel they made it through boot, but right before the login prompt I'm getting a panic and stack dump. The backtrace looks something like this (roughly): 0 kdb_backtrace 1 panic 2 trap_fatal 3 trap_pfault 4 trap 5 calltrap 6 vdev_mirror_child_select 7 vdev_mirror_io_start 8 zio_vdev_io_start 9 zio_execute 10 arc_read 11 dbuf_read 12 dbuf_findbp 13 dbuf_hold_impl 14 dbuf_hold 15 dnode_hold_impl 16 dmu_buf_hold 17 zap_lockdir Does anyone have any idea what went wrong? Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get past this? Many thanks, -David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 09:33:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573A1AF3 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm42-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm42-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA9D1DBA for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.141] by nm42.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2013 09:33:24 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.15] by tm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2013 09:33:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2013 09:33:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1373535204; bh=Ekm+C8O6/trcaHZFJ5nVdayh6dvlw9jnlo+r1Q1a/m0=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=tg3CdvBLRrBw1kEQCuCvZ/Olt58iCu05JO90axpWNe95LPhi/0kvifBsFIq/Rw1r458iSWbaYJzWW4aEVTO315sIm9kDP5dMZ04JN6EXX7+PMfjQx3kukJAKoFMw1CF/v2XHs5lG7LKz6HtThj+N/5RhWoZD059aFEmb0GbI/CI= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 687275.76143.bm@smtp115.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: RJFS_rwVM1k6Qlt0hWReGDIV6SQH1p7..JoZIBWfImBxDTN yKUYim0IdqzE71HHvqMMqrBf2pFBi1y2QdANHiX7y0PSlchF0XaSHqMRf5.E n.2hmB4xavh3ulyVBLzKfWfkCJ_mNjX5YW3hcTKCVX5lgMu029M1SFaxMqRq LNR1Q4UyzEE43R0Fo534527HQb07GmnXPls.f77agpTmEaN.Ai7rsg.0P7Id ZRdGRVmTwu5PSCcOMuZqDJ93jWDkfBFvHrSXSqCcHJuhGY4d8uvdHMjUnMj9 lIpPuV08OPmFl4ScJm4uTzkRALZ4UhIb7x8Wjtg3dE5ZO3oFiQ2v5.FRg3xS kN31kfmzo8HsrXy.hDmi_zraSz6xeYw2FRU3DdBZC8niovxaiAMnKJVl5J4n gh5j65Q4tvdHshKuyKcaHv0hlulg66nXCWoa_z0bPENQB3kH0g0NWxfiqCIq 0MXCWDYjRSWnzMULBFzMoP2U4rIzupcvld1N45fxdVw3Kr3wgH1i_tiQPb.x Ov_vW1moGQzlHkWfBnyIwNzTNwSyESJ_4whaPiFuz3km3jgAPl_pCFxfI3eM g3657y2.vuw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u X-Rocket-Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.219.44 with ) by smtp115.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2013 02:33:24 -0700 PDT Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l10so10823230oag.17 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:33:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ekm+C8O6/trcaHZFJ5nVdayh6dvlw9jnlo+r1Q1a/m0=; b=UaonhegjJBkOkuUHTFL8rtNZfeO0vCLbFyb1dkSuvtkafqtqjsYNkEm8i78i9zRA1e kEuzwVyU9nvVbpoJfF2HWLvfTTJxFbA2Bv9Ia03vLZtd7cNjWFBAuo1bndyEx9Dweuas reijzqmuvpNQgZh/mlpOQJwi35If+H3hkfC7x+1hcEFQzS5readH7Zeg06MAZvIA/FHz MxBjJVjkufE7wk6zT2slqb3oag1P8ZXILpDCSGiRs9KefwCdTEpdmzqndDnhFTBCooEk L/1WPUlnOGVfWpGovGM5r4iAuSLaSemoqFIxH/VEGvQlioP+O9fzSEaoq1EfhD1KQwPf 9fGw== X-Received: by 10.182.219.166 with SMTP id pp6mr31184702obc.34.1373535204008; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:33:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.44.202 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:33:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alexandre Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:33:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:33:31 -0000 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Noel wrote: > I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went > without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference > between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and > the ones that didn't have a 4-disk ZFS striped mirror configuration > (RAID10). They both use the GPT. > > After installworld && installkernel they made it through boot, but > right before the login prompt I'm getting a panic and stack dump. The > backtrace looks something like this (roughly): > > 0 kdb_backtrace > 1 panic > 2 trap_fatal > 3 trap_pfault > 4 trap > 5 calltrap > 6 vdev_mirror_child_select > 7 vdev_mirror_io_start > 8 zio_vdev_io_start > 9 zio_execute > 10 arc_read > 11 dbuf_read > 12 dbuf_findbp > 13 dbuf_hold_impl > 14 dbuf_hold > 15 dnode_hold_impl > 16 dmu_buf_hold > 17 zap_lockdir > > Does anyone have any idea what went wrong? > > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get past this? > > Many thanks, > > -David Hi David, You wrote you execute the commands "make installworld && make installkernel" but the first command is wrong. You must execute first "make buildworld". All the steps are explained in /usr/src/Makefile Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 09:40:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99192BA for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3147B1E28 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z11so11782706wgg.5 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=d721Y2n6IPsIpvU1wAhzLd+wXY8D69KeYvpkQ2NghBA=; b=MK8RyhPNcrWg3HFAcFm3FQgKDh9vwuX3PDTB3Wfx6J8ydP9jT9OT2XNXIToHBGep8y 5+YSXV/xIxgxdch7NnwaMWv68IDH+xSVu5xV9efVqSWGi4ek1M9fcL903gyXKKhSh3gG z3u+2ZsvQANnzT6EYVMHBYT7SFgL/9KxBmxC1yFClvvG9Y5pgCjHr662ZwiL66DgJ0cW 5q7VhsgnBrBQS8e/HpVPi7m/2fDMjJXphSK1P52M2d5IXXYj+jJpe+DHpDhGPQa/8JEV S4zf3sqHB2E12+3Fjrw1DdKawBdufkL7kGK50DA4cxGuJH4VbklyS+zV4ehcyTuxUR7/ vYeg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.104.74 with SMTP id gc10mr20547848wjb.48.1373535638254; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.138 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) From: David Noel To: Alexandre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:40:39 -0000 On 7/11/13, Alexandre wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Noel > wrote: > >> I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went >> without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference >> between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and >> the ones that didn't have a 4-disk ZFS striped mirror configuration >> (RAID10). They both use the GPT. >> >> After installworld && installkernel they made it through boot, but >> right before the login prompt I'm getting a panic and stack dump. The >> backtrace looks something like this (roughly): >> >> 0 kdb_backtrace >> 1 panic >> 2 trap_fatal >> 3 trap_pfault >> 4 trap >> 5 calltrap >> 6 vdev_mirror_child_select >> 7 vdev_mirror_io_start >> 8 zio_vdev_io_start >> 9 zio_execute >> 10 arc_read >> 11 dbuf_read >> 12 dbuf_findbp >> 13 dbuf_hold_impl >> 14 dbuf_hold >> 15 dnode_hold_impl >> 16 dmu_buf_hold >> 17 zap_lockdir >> >> Does anyone have any idea what went wrong? >> >> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get past this? >> >> Many thanks, >> >> -David > > Hi David, > > You wrote you execute the commands "make installworld && make > installkernel" but the first command is wrong. You must execute first "make > buildworld". > All the steps are explained in /usr/src/Makefile > > Regards, > Alexandre > I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and installkernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 10:00:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ACC4F1 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorrasg@yahoo.es) Received: from nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [212.82.109.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359C41F19 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.233] by nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2013 10:00:37 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.98] by tm14.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2013 10:00:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp135.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2013 10:00:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1373536837; bh=yT3/FqdjjAamzRrWeZD6HWMbEI7Pg16Ss0gINTp0Ehc=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=STaRE3j+vtBBcer0cAf0V5A3S/Xt0U1sObYs/nl6fcTb+lFpemrGlrd8RbJNh6woz1W//1FpO/iaTCvT/hJJeG2SdB2mTL5wM53l/Srt42F96/bEyauSGMREOjMrLmqjiusk07DZUCwsZgFnwa8T3pDDQGvFQLhtiZ2WleoaQw0= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 160884.98304.bm@smtp135.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: dnZs8UAVM1kILBG1z85sFQe6.HAMsbmYI8uA1rUKIg4qeXn HD919TmisH6ztr1iyX33pKyi0Gi3g.n6B6MhQdmcUTuWO4h6IiAr4Kt4tjsF rraWN_TLh1Fl162TaaedFkYVqZosRUR28rkSujCVNXPySC_WjYlPI_T2.d3h DHbMZhGbTvSLBl_VBcM.nK2g.mkYgFkM7IMqiXqyv7kwCgtuBNejZzYHFlzy Y0ClZSSaBt_TOjOWX2gzd.PUqfgwhWg.ngJ4yj0_4JbVBDrI2F1OEQyXZ64Q buMkk3Plr8D.Fo7xtQVkIoeZyMv9UawrqPlDxhh_WRKhzFBsHLKtmnqv8zJl TJsWBl4iVlRAhhK.urBgi3gcKA9cHLHA75swWZy4R0TA66VwY.OWlDVhSXCY M0aMmcPk7TO8WH.nlC5vOgRABOiRWNmio2KDb5ayfEtLIjHDxhRClurG0mPU UlzSSegzR4LY8QREIBW2OC_hRhKRfZdS4qecotPMF0KvlxQ20MR0p3FOX X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR X-Rocket-Received: from camibar.emorras.eu (emorrasg@89.7.216.154 with ) by smtp135.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2013 10:00:37 +0000 UTC Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:00:39 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) Message-Id: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David.I.Noel@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:00:45 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500 David Noel wrote: > > I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake > of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and > installkernel. Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a buggy kernel. Check your make configuration. Adding a -B, like make -B -j N buildkernel may work and is fast if -j is set to number or processors, but it's safer do a make -j 1 buildkernel, same for buildworld. HTH --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 10:16:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882316C0 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244A51FCE for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ey16so7338710wid.16 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7BRNbfYJn6UX7nRTzdJzg5B0W5bt4z0x/SdnydrD3G0=; b=OPgTtMvBXd1ghCC3YGiCmUoooUDYuIKprT3BF3lp9Blzh+vpqEWuYmA7/FQ0sjgeCA zEB6MMfeb2e5NpUH6MYrFMMn6CVKkvx5k3KskFER31NWC1IiF9GbR/X+wWWGpNukgFJ4 t4rvOwU1A9y7ZcjLdnUG+rPT+HRxzYy7OsfXtoIkF8BuHWQkY+EjAlglMFVTEAe5K2RQ k8vAxZG/HfGH4xVKk4/D2VlfOoJWNRN7qZjpWDnt87N3zGEhI70j/EBQnH2W9zrooFkH 2RpHTfydLgjkxLjEWrRqWMY7lVsHSeUxBjA1ExM0X54IqgWwZ+4EuA9RYVmsIQtOVEPY v/vQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.104.74 with SMTP id gc10mr20631386wjb.48.1373537770266; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.138 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> References: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:16:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) From: David Noel To: Eduardo Morras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:16:11 -0000 Ah. That very well might be it. I did call buildkernel with j > 1. I'll boot an 8.4 memstick and replace the kernel. Thanks, -David On 7/11/13, Eduardo Morras wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500 > David Noel wrote: >> >> I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake >> of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and >> installkernel. > > Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a > buggy kernel. Check your make configuration. Adding a -B, like make -B -j N > buildkernel may work and is fast if -j is set to number or processors, but > it's safer do a make -j 1 buildkernel, same for buildworld. > > HTH > > --- --- > Eduardo Morras > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 10:19:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A2B8D9 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:19:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665061006 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fs12so6664421lab.12 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:19:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jf007Aj1wgIj1cdwHdhocMfutCKczIqBpviQ+0CUkDk=; b=yqEGANWBdL1miJmt+zshVkjHClGdEj65PPJRAKsgKtlmnpooKek5ym2DK/6Cat0sBE q8oTMSFioLB10IQAvGtYoM4/0iyVlD1ezKXgN3cR8G+QsuGQY+rEsCARzDwiChPyKd25 xbtP9JBF0Wqh1ddCgxxsz61vsOj2ryztnpW7dfR9qGJETJR0tcoBdBjDcQv/sXNVDXTZ LUhi8qEIa5L5FbmHxj+hObOLQz3COWGmOGRLltjHVK5/WVssEmSZP++bDabAaeq1bnQ/ Sxuiz2tkBLhwAT0oLFhWn7ePl8zPEm0v7uYlztiYaKh5MCzi2ItmQ8UjmlTFm+y/cSVd goDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.4.194 with SMTP id m2mr16954530lam.23.1373537982261; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.67.135 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:49:42 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client From: s m To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:19:43 -0000 hello all i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way to understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned to the interface. i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip address from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there any way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict with others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? any comments or hints are appreciated. thanks in advance SAM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 10:36:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFD2AC7 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from genie@geniechka.ru) Received: from s1.loshmanov.ru (s1.loshmanov.ru [188.40.115.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD8010AA for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geniepc2011 (0894461339.static.corbina.ru [95.31.5.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by s1.loshmanov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B8C1DF2D9A; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:36:41 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> From: "Eugene" To: "s m" , "freebsd-questions" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:36:35 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:36:52 -0000 Hi Sam, Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should change them to use different address block from that used in your provider's network (there are many address blocks for private networks). And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, maybe they can give you a fixed address. Best wishes Eugene -----Original Message----- From: s m Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM To: freebsd-questions Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client hello all i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way to understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned to the interface. i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip address from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there any way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict with others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? any comments or hints are appreciated. thanks in advance SAM _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 11:18:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C94110 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEA61251 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w10so6517474lbi.26 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cptMKN8pqe/rA2Ur7PMsewiJCXcFy1bzHhFba0zacgw=; b=OzcQZOxPbr28oqFoJDV58x3bTRF4bSgHbmztiLiWJHuev0UMZyA18AsSaVgRRnW0yT ZMDuvfpr86qY1AsYyHcJe399pLpa5iQVhO0lAw7neeQPhjwQV2m9LmxhNhg4uVV6JfZU XpU3qjTFuUnmX+xbV5Nj1LIywBIt5HHVRJFYQgewGWqp51H/G+EAtSgmRO+Bu1dUwgs8 0FIITv3IucMBHlBzSILUv/Uup6KezIsCFoE+pb+a3EKvOdjTHtZWRGv4v9zfXpYu0Mdw /CeHNWu7Ho0Dc2bN+mofdXfoCfwS5Yl9Hvcr+CwoX1AbMDB8B8d7KvcxhfUr5zymSlvT +SHg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.4.4 with SMTP id g4mr17199431lbg.64.1373541535003; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.67.135 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:18:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> References: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:48:54 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client From: s m To: Eugene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:18:56 -0000 thanks Eugene, you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i mean none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is conflict for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server whereas all others have ip addresses which are set manually. for this situation, do you have any ideas to avoid ip conflict? thanks again for your attention SAM On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Eugene wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks > should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should > observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an > invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). > Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should > change them to use different address block from that used in your > provider's network (there are many address blocks for private networks). > And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, maybe > they can give you a fixed address. > > Best wishes > Eugene > > > -----Original Message----- From: s m > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client > > > hello all > > i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way to > understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned to > the interface. > i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip address > from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip > address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there any > way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? > i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp > server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict with > others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? > > any comments or hints are appreciated. > thanks in advance > SAM > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 11:41:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2BF8AF for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6DE1685 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2730120EF1; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:41:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:41:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h= content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to; s= mesmtp; bh=8ku6hPhK4EZgMk8gzH0ND3lzpk0=; b=TEWvZI5838TtHBcjE2aCk LnDZOfXlLyxGqJZ2m5ZNVj1h8epz/L+RLp6XLqi8DT5uSJ1sy8JQK7Sit8tu7vzO hfTwccnoSJ9mZkT6jsWL7E5AzXEXdfP1oKraLxRVNMS0I2+tGMaglTCBK6N23NPW aW9J79gbbLUZXBPxMSBRJk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:to:cc:subject:references :date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=8ku6hPhK4EZgMk8gzH0ND3lzpk0=; b=cwUI qU/999JddRvOAjiDucbXN0nDCtZKmgWEmK87vZUt51pK/al+9/eUdrUcaxZNBP2n OSWGn3We7jIxzJRGuMRdBWmKutkkc9W62cgJh+nkayfkssfqUG8lddwpxg0x/y5k bLRChvA3931HMy16J1xgH97FSYZfWGwQOwqJnFM= X-Sasl-enc: xmvdUZ+11q45iAdfRp7LJoiSFSnZrUySGF1OKtozfygk 1373542911 Received: from tech304.office.supranet.net (unknown [66.170.8.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 22BCA680441; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:41:51 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Eduardo Morras" Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) References: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:41:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Mark Felder" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (FreeBSD) Cc: David.I.Noel@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:41:55 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras wrote: > Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a > buggy kernel. This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with -j>1 we'd not allow you to do that without jumping through hoops. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 11:42:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82751A17 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1571693 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m15so6818905wgh.11 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yqCAfteRxgj9zCLKfyTtmKNmDxjzZmIE7rT7YZrPNFs=; b=EtIwgrwjEChc8qz6cekdreAVjd7Y0+Vft3yiiKZmqKrX4R5dKFVgDO7TS8dxVJ5NrM 7lNazOxBEW3um7Ri+8+ZzOdxmAjbYFrwb+xZDiuEk7+op5CMBJhtnB5gQ3uX0hFEzfVJ DXdlgv2jBtoh6NYGKgIcLueoLTcJMt22zakXRk40+FHeUJVAPVDLSjgSNzbn9bTGx3DO 3CWobZOp6oW06YRjjpn4UKHVaSqpf6IDEtZY+XhEfFWWE+gf9tiqfgkvOFfT4MXlkC1h eYTQmFPpxZkd53Dad0me6+3wipAxbUSajHz/CHAStWGgWMGswT1/eKatFAYV5oSXGJHg QtqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.206.70 with SMTP id lm6mr37583064wic.50.1373542952661; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.68.137 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:42:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:42:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client From: krad To: s m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Eugene , freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:42:34 -0000 alter the pool rand on the network to use say, x.x.x.1-199 on a /24, and then allocate your statics >200 but <= 254 or add something similar to your isc-dhcp config host host.intranet { hardware ethernet c8:60:33:1d:f3:57; fixed-address 192.168.210.81; option host-name "host.intranet"; } Alternatively use ipv6 as the automatic ip address configuration tests exactly like you commented on On 11 July 2013 12:18, s m wrote: > thanks Eugene, > you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i mean > none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is conflict > for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or > manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server whereas all > others have ip addresses which are set manually. > for this situation, do you have any ideas to avoid ip conflict? > thanks again for your attention > SAM > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Eugene wrote: > > > Hi Sam, > > > > Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks > > should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should > > observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an > > invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). > > Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should > > change them to use different address block from that used in your > > provider's network (there are many address blocks for private networks). > > And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, > maybe > > they can give you a fixed address. > > > > Best wishes > > Eugene > > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: s m > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM > > To: freebsd-questions > > Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client > > > > > > hello all > > > > i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way > to > > understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned > to > > the interface. > > i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip address > > from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip > > address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there > any > > way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? > > i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp > > server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict > with > > others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? > > > > any comments or hints are appreciated. > > thanks in advance > > SAM > > ______________________________**_________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions< > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 11:43:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD66ABD for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7327316A6 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y10so7081106wgg.32 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:43:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1OYA/IXLFDIw6tT23IjFU4EDFiEzNdyw7t2F6fHNop4=; b=s6yO+VT/V8miWCWVVgxmLOoA/Xw5Y01oOiiW78MUGG+cuK7Ja3lNqSFiFmvO3HX/85 DkHH0JWJY1m34i19qbR8FW+DpNUbKEcwFq6FmlnnA60czUbkWVei7EaMbkQkz5XRNa+f VZKcuM4K+iIkAt5eqIGs23oD6ptsNBXzYKetvoIjxSLSCWJbRv6tyLv++LWoNRZfVkTs Koa7OAm9dx7mKb3/KnH8biwNOfU8JPrhWRSChN/pDS2nW6bfnHhkn6b/TdXMi89RL/Rs b0c87N7Oad8g2HI9k0VcfYnaqQ3WpUNTBbiaj24jQGbvwdl2A4nm0kEn29wp5xuy51/m 8zJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.20.228 with SMTP id q4mr19918491wie.1.1373543013593; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.68.137 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:43:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:43:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client From: krad To: s m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Eugene , freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:43:34 -0000 ops %s/rand/range/ On 11 July 2013 12:42, krad wrote: > alter the pool rand on the network to use say, x.x.x.1-199 on a /24, and > then allocate your statics >200 but <= 254 or add something similar to your > isc-dhcp config > > host host.intranet { > hardware ethernet c8:60:33:1d:f3:57; > fixed-address 192.168.210.81; > option host-name "host.intranet"; > } > > Alternatively use ipv6 as the automatic ip address configuration tests > exactly like you commented on > > > On 11 July 2013 12:18, s m wrote: > >> thanks Eugene, >> you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i mean >> none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is conflict >> for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or >> manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server whereas all >> others have ip addresses which are set manually. >> for this situation, do you have any ideas to avoid ip conflict? >> thanks again for your attention >> SAM >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Eugene wrote: >> >> > Hi Sam, >> > >> > Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks >> > should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should >> > observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an >> > invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). >> > Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should >> > change them to use different address block from that used in your >> > provider's network (there are many address blocks for private networks). >> > And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, >> maybe >> > they can give you a fixed address. >> > >> > Best wishes >> > Eugene >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- From: s m >> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM >> > To: freebsd-questions >> > Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client >> > >> > >> > hello all >> > >> > i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way >> to >> > understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned >> to >> > the interface. >> > i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip >> address >> > from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip >> > address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there >> any >> > way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? >> > i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp >> > server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict >> with >> > others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? >> > >> > any comments or hints are appreciated. >> > thanks in advance >> > SAM >> > ______________________________**_________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions< >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** >> > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 11:45:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D146B81 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:45:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from genie@geniechka.ru) Received: from s1.loshmanov.ru (s1.loshmanov.ru [188.40.115.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF9F16CB for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geniepc2011 (0894461339.static.corbina.ru [95.31.5.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by s1.loshmanov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CD5FDF2D9C; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:45:45 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: From: "Eugene" To: "s m" References: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:45:38 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:45:50 -0000 Hi Sam, The idea that for the internal networks you should use so-called private address space (unless you are a big organization that need and can get a public address block of its own). You can read about it in more detail here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network So, for your upstream interface you use the address obtained via DHCP from your provider. For your internal networks you use private blocks, for example: Network 1: 192.168.0.1 mask 255.255.255.0 Network 2: 192.168.1.1 mask 255.255.255.0 Network 3: 192.168.2.1 mask 255.255.255.0 etc... And you configure NAT on the router to perform address translation for the external connections (See FreeBSD handbook for that). Personally I think ipfilter/ipnat (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipf.html) is more easy and convenient but other people probably will have other opinions =) If you don't have a public IP address (sometimes this is optional service that costs extra money) and it happens that your provider also uses 192.168.x.x block in ITS internal network (that is EXTERNAL for you), just change your internal networks to some other block. Regards, Eugene -----Original Message----- From: s m Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:18 PM To: Eugene Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client thanks Eugene, you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i mean none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is conflict for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server whereas all others have ip addresses which are set manually. for this situation, do you have any ideas to avoid ip conflict? thanks again for your attention SAM On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Eugene wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks > should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should > observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an > invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). > Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should > change them to use different address block from that used in your > provider's network (there are many address blocks for private networks). > And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, maybe > they can give you a fixed address. > > Best wishes > Eugene > > > -----Original Message----- From: s m > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client > > > hello all > > i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way to > understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned to > the interface. > i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip address > from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip > address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there any > way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? > i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp > server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict with > others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? > > any comments or hints are appreciated. > thanks in advance > SAM > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 12:37:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D194A7F for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1661A04 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6BCbjPA087901; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:37:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r6BCbjut087898; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:37:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:37:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Eduardo Morras Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) In-Reply-To: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> Message-ID: References: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:37:46 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David.I.Noel@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:47 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Eduardo Morras wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500 > David Noel wrote: >> >> I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake >> of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and >> installkernel. > > Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a buggy kernel. Check your make configuration. Adding a -B, like make -B -j N buildkernel may work and is fast if -j is set to number or processors, but it's safer do a make -j 1 buildkernel, same for buildworld. Is this version-specific? I've been using -j4 or -j8 for years for buildworld and kernel (buildkernel + installkernel) on FreeBSD 8 and 9 with no problems. Probably on FreeBSD 7 also, but I don't recall. installworld is a different matter, always do that with a single job. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 12:47:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00380106 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C40C1ABA for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6BClJCf009785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:47:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51DEA945.6090706@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:47:01 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client References: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:47:23 -0000 This all sounds like a very strange thing to be doing! But I hate it when people answer my questions with "Why would you want to do that", so I won't. Binding an IPv4 address using a MAC address, which is the answer to a lot of DHCP problems. But your explanation "my client acts like a router" set alarm bells ringing. What exactly are you trying to do, and are you aware that routers aren't (normally) configured using DHCP? If you've got any kind of normal Internet line it will receive it's IP address using LCP (the NCP part, and the IPCP to be precise). Or at least, that's how I think it normally works. Regards, Frank. On 11/07/2013 12:43, krad wrote: > ops %s/rand/range/ > > > On 11 July 2013 12:42, krad wrote: > >> alter the pool rand on the network to use say, x.x.x.1-199 on a /24, and >> then allocate your statics >200 but <= 254 or add something similar to your >> isc-dhcp config >> >> host host.intranet { >> hardware ethernet c8:60:33:1d:f3:57; >> fixed-address 192.168.210.81; >> option host-name "host.intranet"; >> } >> >> Alternatively use ipv6 as the automatic ip address configuration tests >> exactly like you commented on >> >> >> On 11 July 2013 12:18, s m wrote: >> >>> thanks Eugene, >>> you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i mean >>> none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is conflict >>> for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or >>> manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server whereas all >>> others have ip addresses which are set manually. >>> for this situation, do you have any ideas to avoid ip conflict? >>> thanks again for your attention >>> SAM >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Eugene wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sam, >>>> >>>> Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks >>>> should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should >>>> observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an >>>> invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). >>>> Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should >>>> change them to use different address block from that used in your >>>> provider's network (there are many address blocks for private networks). >>>> And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, >>> maybe >>>> they can give you a fixed address. >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> Eugene >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: s m >>>> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM >>>> To: freebsd-questions >>>> Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client >>>> >>>> >>>> hello all >>>> >>>> i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way >>> to >>>> understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned >>> to >>>> the interface. >>>> i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip >>> address >>>> from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their ip >>>> address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there >>> any >>>> way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? >>>> i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp >>>> server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict >>> with >>>> others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? >>>> >>>> any comments or hints are appreciated. >>>> thanks in advance >>>> SAM >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions< >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions> >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** >>>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org " >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 13:24:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6773E442 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AA31CE0 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id t56so6825935wes.7 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:24:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yx2fMzSWTsUXR2XX80tm8scKJyQemX9UjyiOMt0G4tQ=; b=eWtq+TRq/eIWbn+8nJE+Pe8deETHVa9eFYDk1ZDWv3kfW/UdIoR/gFqHcmpIcPEpes sUFFY4RE/MTa39AH7UORYtyG30mcJq3sTKE+rihIeo14A+OGi2Y9HdqrdEn0pTTzpXAk 3H+O7CeAmMvtxtmCPZ3mruANtFEs0DaPTFCtiQH3kDXKT9z54WapJ6G68/6HLAMQjyxl 5N9nJtsRV57bor4YwwJK956ZsyWwIralJMJXNr1jqSBoHhI9NVpvWweK3G9jPpYf7tbD Ob9u/EUOFSXkLElmIx0iia8X+NyBZb23G5gNJLNfRd/CY9y34hdgfqQfF4TNp7wsOWEv Gerw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.21.143 with SMTP id v15mr7632305wie.53.1373549046060; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.68.137 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:24:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51DEA945.6090706@fjl.co.uk> References: <6586E17B555D489B83285236A5C95139@geniepc2011> <51DEA945.6090706@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:24:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client From: krad To: Frank Leonhardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:24:07 -0000 what is normal though these days? A lot of the fibre vhdsl lines do use dhcp on the wan link in the uk as they are just presented as ethernet, whilst other providers pppoe. On 11 July 2013 13:47, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > This all sounds like a very strange thing to be doing! But I hate it when > people answer my questions with "Why would you want to do that", so I won't. > > Binding an IPv4 address using a MAC address, which is the answer to a lot > of DHCP problems. But your explanation "my client acts like a router" set > alarm bells ringing. What exactly are you trying to do, and are you aware > that routers aren't (normally) configured using DHCP? If you've got any > kind of normal Internet line it will receive it's IP address using LCP (the > NCP part, and the IPCP to be precise). Or at least, that's how I think it > normally works. > > Regards, Frank. > > > On 11/07/2013 12:43, krad wrote: > >> ops %s/rand/range/ >> >> >> On 11 July 2013 12:42, krad wrote: >> >> alter the pool rand on the network to use say, x.x.x.1-199 on a /24, and >>> then allocate your statics >200 but <= 254 or add something similar to >>> your >>> isc-dhcp config >>> >>> host host.intranet { >>> hardware ethernet c8:60:33:1d:f3:57; >>> fixed-address 192.168.210.81; >>> option host-name "host.intranet"; >>> } >>> >>> Alternatively use ipv6 as the automatic ip address configuration tests >>> exactly like you commented on >>> >>> >>> On 11 July 2013 12:18, s m wrote: >>> >>> thanks Eugene, >>>> you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i >>>> mean >>>> none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is >>>> conflict >>>> for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or >>>> manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server whereas >>>> all >>>> others have ip addresses which are set manually. >>>> for this situation, do you have any ideas to avoid ip conflict? >>>> thanks again for your attention >>>> SAM >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Eugene wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Sam, >>>>> >>>>> Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks >>>>> should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should >>>>> observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an >>>>> invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal). >>>>> Are the 'other' interfaces in your internal networks? Then you should >>>>> change them to use different address block from that used in your >>>>> provider's network (there are many address blocks for private >>>>> networks). >>>>> And/or you should talk to your admin and discuss the address policy, >>>>> >>>> maybe >>>> >>>>> they can give you a fixed address. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes >>>>> Eugene >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: s m >>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:19 PM >>>>> To: freebsd-questions >>>>> Subject: prevent ip conflict in dhcp client >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> hello all >>>>> >>>>> i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way >>>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>>> understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned >>>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>>> the interface. >>>>> i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip >>>>> >>>> address >>>> >>>>> from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip addresses and their >>>>> ip >>>>> address change many times. so i want to prevent ip conflict. is there >>>>> >>>> any >>>> >>>>> way to prevent ip conflict in this situation? >>>>> i think the best way is to know the ip address which is offered by dhcp >>>>> server before assigning it to interface and check if it has conflict >>>>> >>>> with >>>> >>>>> others or not. is it possible? if yes, how i can do this? >>>>> >>>>> any comments or hints are appreciated. >>>>> thanks in advance >>>>> SAM >>>>> ______________________________****_________________ >>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/****mailman/listinfo/freebsd-****questions >>>>> < >>>>> >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions >>>> > >>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** >>>>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>>>> >" >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org >>>> " >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to"freebsd-questions-** >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org " >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 15:40:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1D3671 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB28B163B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [172.17.17.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6BFWIRu021360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:32:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r6BFWI51016768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:32:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r6BFWHZ2016767; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:32:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:32:17 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Radek Krejca Subject: Re: How to get file from nfs id Message-ID: <20130711153217.GA14910@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (email2.allantgroup.com [172.17.19.78]); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:32:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on email2.allantgroup.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:40:08 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 11), Radek Krejca said: > Hello, > > I have problem with heavy load of my nfsd server. There is connected about 70 diskless machines, but in readonly mode. I catched traffic and get this: > > 21:00:39.715337 IP diskless-1.3297435097 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A005CD9080000007ABA42000000000000000000570CDB51 > 21:00:39.716229 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435097: reply ok 112 getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 64944 > 21:00:39.716463 IP diskless-1.3297435098 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A0043DE080000007CBA42000000000000000000570CDB51 > 21:00:39.719112 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435098: reply ok 112 getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 82800 > 21:00:39.719453 IP diskless-1.3297435099 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA30A0043DE080000007CBA42000000000000000000570CDB51 > 21:00:39.721636 IP storage.nfs > diskless-1.3297435099: reply ok 112 getattr REG 444 ids 0/0 sz 82800 > > Why is the same machine requesting chmod of the same file and is there any > way to find out name of file from this long id? You can't get tcpdump to print it, but the getattr reply does include the inode of the file. If you start up wireshark and capture the same packets (or open a capture file created by tcpdump), the inode is stored in the "nfs->obj_attributes->attributes->fileid" field. You can then use "find / -inum 12345" to locate that inode on disk. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 19:37:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E954A43 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D7810D0 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hq4so7972045wib.14 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DIJpaLJAqcVZ6tHXIaW64a1/u9coYmYgUAMs9ep51EA=; b=n8joMRv+nKJhwioONY5/ETxO13zJt2pahL/p4EtvApDAkpZmK9ULAzWZXHuyFWSh6a Ck1+WAiBW2z+FqNiSShvp5NyBNk2eHVyQ/O4SSJoJ0T4OCljt3JzH7M0WD5zWLjT7XSp PmVi6r/CfzTbjN8kcGjKI8tZDioac8yzpJ6/F653hHFb36/nC/U2Y5fRsyvjhKcZzX/K N+QfztVkOQZJTJgfU0eGMU0rzy2PcxIdVwKXnEbbAoCGNNvTBO3rL6Wdfj713Y6AaJFw 0elY85mdh1FLtFK/nV6qwjJhI9/+DmcUzBZ+sCnnAsAz8rDG1tEl+dWMReZZG26nZ3SB FXkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.183.180 with SMTP id en20mr38006497wic.58.1373571432305; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.138 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:37:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) From: David Noel To: Mark Felder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Eduardo Morras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:13 -0000 On 7/11/13, Mark Felder wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras > wrote: > >> Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a >> >> buggy kernel. > > This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with > > -j>1 we'd not allow you to do that without jumping through hoops. > If this is the case replacing the kernel should have no effect. But what then? Any thoughts? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 19:58:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B828101 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0091191 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1538C20B7C for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:58:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.213]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:58:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh= CZLrtdsvcfihMqLCAi30QPWowzg=; b=RkFIM4LZvI6QKJB+CKb+LdbW4zJUYjhe 7EAf2BMa5YsKZ4Tuc95S0bwwBbXL3vBtQJoLRP6gShm7/udTzqK70UZihRN46uLY Pl3F9liko6N5kaRNzGwc0cr3uru+YzwHICVyt1Qv6ujfsuWvfc47YEsU0bZf0sbr StH0CxIteBA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=CZLrtdsvcfihMqLCAi30QPWowzg=; b=gVa ew2F0nh3V0RVDrhGWtueGwsXuSGbj3tqypxgTFItQFtWe1/N03gOFqx2DWJjmb38 yJDgQXxE344ASZJzYDRrH3lLfRobtVik93SJYH+EfVBS3twJCk+awNdxvLARpkdF ZVkAniOHJCrOZp43veHFEYzzbI7DWFAxrejSJE9U= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id E431CB00005; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1373572700.10524.140661254618662.65CDFB19@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: cNfBX489LhAUyvQNtEHMcdLKo+6H+umHk5gKT+jzm9XZ 1373572700 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-cea5092a In-Reply-To: References: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:58:20 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:58:22 -0000 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 14:37, David Noel wrote: > > If this is the case replacing the kernel should have no effect. But > what then? Any thoughts? I'd contact freebsd-fs@ and see what they have to say From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 01:19:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC669E25 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB760109F for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.1] ([173.88.196.224]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:19:43 -0700 Message-ID: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:19:45 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: jls usage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2013 01:19:43.0274 (UTC) FILETIME=[E389B0A0:01CE7E9D] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:19:47 -0000 In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` The first line output by jls is a title line which the cut command is suppose to cut out so the first field on line 2 gets selected by the awk command. This is not working as I want, I get the first field of the title line. Is the cut command the correct command to us here? This is what the jls command shows # /root >jls -j dir2 JID IP Address Hostname Path 15 10.0.10.24 dir2 /usr/jails/dir2 I am after the number 15 Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 01:34:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A1A4ED; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D2A1124; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6C1XB1J002217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:33:11 -0500 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT05.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:33:11 -0500 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: jls usage Thread-Topic: jls usage Thread-Index: AQHOfp3t7CzmG2bQFUGOk1hY5Ll26Zlglh4A Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:33:10 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.126] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-07-12_01:2013-07-12,2013-07-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Devin Teske , questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:34:14 -0000 On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this co= de >=20 > jid=3D`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` >=20 Looks a little over complicated... why not just.. jls -j jailname jid --=20 Devin > The first line output by jls is a title line which the cut command is sup= pose to cut out so the first field on line 2 gets selected by the awk comma= nd. This is not working as I want, I get the first field of the title line. >=20 > Is the cut command the correct command to us here? >=20 > This is what the jls command shows > # /root >jls -j dir2 > JID IP Address Hostname Path > 15 10.0.10.24 dir2 /usr/jails/dir2 >=20 > I am after the number 15 >=20 > Thanks in advance >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 01:36:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E122D6CC for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin@restecp.com) Received: from max.restecp.com (max.restecp.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d13:e00::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06E81145 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from max.restecp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by max.restecp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD3B2C909E; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:36:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=restecp.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=uqVFypENgFMy D5IncvBcHih+kWk=; b=shwG1kdcJY3g3gMCLKH8rUh2mS4Mb0bUeTf/6TL9iQGA bsyfOWWRWqT4kD/17qzDAXel6pQ7RUInBAvN0HwETF3gqLgoEEEdi7qceJnghs1l GC+6LqltZ1gvxiVm1J9V4KO/NolqZqeYibBiWJEK8QU3QrMSHAQkFyE0fVfz38EM ck/wmy7P18VcwL57K0Aa0svBFP3vF8Vvz9gDFUWXV75iQ9qVvWf0ELEpNpP86gTZ CMbTnZ95clKpSwdMpjwv2qYIDLojwW1l0dPk561N008N5UeZaiAFeLza5DU2RIGi EiipBnt6Q97QksmZYnnpZH4K4Jfe40z3Bl2Bx0YRPA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=restecp.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=dkim; b=b5/g5W m5QWfsZX+x04n6DIY/xBVOW7E+bAj8f1CzV+EQnsULY1kwVJD+naE6eDBuI0ATXt oOexpCH0Dj1FTbjJvT6cy30ucioVH1txToLTAQv0uqANPvMPMmit8C1TTt4m1ECO yyR5jGtI38ZlDmIUJaV3Kph5AUeepo/Vu5NaRoRMiptAGE1i8du1AX+vJ7lG3pFV b/O5PM/tWLI48OgtFfHpIiVwSmcR2/GxrCe5AIcM5FQN0RVKGm/lwjCwucEUox+o iACNop7Uqz0UVsiW8D1JJHFZSp5389vxgJUH7VcsXFm6vxyob13IehDThipcMujP Dw8wJ8mT7zzvlqUA== Received: from [172.30.42.66] (c58-107-26-142.fitzg4.qld.optusnet.com.au [58.107.26.142]) by max.restecp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 470CD2C908E; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51DF5D3C.9050007@restecp.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:34:52 +1000 From: Colin House User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:36:14 -0000 On 12/07/2013 11:19 AM, Fbsd8 wrote: > In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code > > jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` > > The first line output by jls is a title line which the cut command is > suppose to cut out so the first field on line 2 gets selected by the awk > command. This is not working as I want, I get the first field of the > title line. > > Is the cut command the correct command to us here? > > This is what the jls command shows > # /root >jls -j dir2 > JID IP Address Hostname Path > 15 10.0.10.24 dir2 /usr/jails/dir2 > > I am after the number 15 > > Thanks in advance > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" this might do the trick for you: jls -j jailname | tail -1 | awk '{print $1}' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 09:35:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCE7BF5 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CCD195C for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6C9ZYiW012144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:35:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:35:14 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:35:42 -0000 On 12/07/2013 02:33, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code >> >> jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` >> > Looks a little over complicated... why not just.. > > jls -j jailname jid I've never got the -j option to work on jail names, only jail IDs. I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - nothing - and on checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name being the same as the ID. I just put this down to a quirk/bug (it's there in 8.2-9) but it sounds like it's not an issue for anyone else. I'm defining them in rc.conf: jail_enable="yes" jail_list="one two three" jail_agnet_rootdir="/usr/jail/one" jail_agnet_hostname="one.mydomain.com" jail_agnet_ip="123.123.123.123" jail_agnet_devfs_enable="yes" jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" etc... jls -v produces: JID Hostname Path Name State CPUSetID IP Address(es) 1 one.mydomain.com /usr/jail/one 1 ACTIVE 2 123.123.123.123 Everything works just fine, and has done for years, except jls -j jailname. It's zero-impact on me as it's no problem referring to them by number (which doesn't change) but if anyone could tell me what I'm doing wrong I'd be very interested to know. Or at least it'd be good to know I'm not the only one with the problem. Thanks, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 10:13:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87437BCD for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de) Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [178.254.11.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548931B88 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UxZGm-0002fN-RF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:04:04 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:04:04 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sed Guru wanted Message-ID: <20130712090404.GA9263@sh4-5.1blu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:13:14 -0000 Hello, I can delete in a text file with sed '/pattern1/,/pattern2/d' < file all lines between the lines with the given patterns, including themself also; how could I specify that the deletion should exclude the line with /pattern1/, i.e. the addr is something like /pattern1/+1 ? Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 11:35:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59A8A15 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9537E1E81 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01765E535 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:25:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.969 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DnahJ5ZGDmFU for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:25:28 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c224-156-70-80.bjare.net [80.70.156.224]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49375E533 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:25:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51DFE7A6.70505@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:25:26 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130627 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:35:16 -0000 When I run portsnap fetch update pkg version -vIL= It returns pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory The directory is there and I can list the contents. What's going on? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 12:56:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842FCF45 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:56:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msiebel@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2373E135D for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([93.215.231.251]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQyxa-1UkrYf09cM-00UIQ4 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:56:07 +0200 Message-ID: <51DFFCEC.3050008@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:56:12 +0200 From: Martin Siebel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 9.1 fails to boot from CD on Notebook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uE1oOVeex/3HOR6BXe/zKD57DzZqBPIQ7snCHTznFY0gGvuVQp0 ylSGWPjXY89CEPgRL3RDeiEDlcI4pWsjIkJZg50IissLvk82BrCSHVncp2aPDy+PXWKw2Ec gerCl0TVFvCfoyX+rcbti+g1bxyTNhiiNYqY5eMWDnyGKxLISuwPmdNOgxWqVf4Q9LDs8qe UrBnbku0EHGStcKXuOZ3Q== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:56:08 -0000 Hey, after failing to get FreeBSD working with my ASUS F70SL Notebook I tried to get it to work on [I][COLOR="Blue"]Toshiba Tecra A10-M14[/COLOR][/I]. I downloaded the [FILE]FreeBSD-9.1-REALEASE-disc1.iso[/FILE] from the official FreeBSD homepage and burnt it with [I][COLOR="Blue"]Ashampoo Burning Studio 2013[/COLOR][/I]. Now, if I select "Boot from CD-ROM" in my notebooks BIOS it detects the CD, starts to boot from, it but only for about 1 second. After this the screen blackens, the notebook reboots and boots normally from HDD (even tough I still have the CD inserted and the CD-ROM drive is still the first boot device). This happens that fast I don't even have a chance to get a picture of the error that might occur. Any ideas about BIOS settings I may change? I burnt the CD twice by the way, with different burning software, to avoid damaged or incomplete disc. Thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 13:54:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56842D8A for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DD317C9 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:54:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=N50ydZ1XU1mlmy19ex32mBHV8M7hzCA+Ck/YdQZU5hg=; b=iKFmwY9Vfxk2XM2vipRjplRfTTO1ZmQdxZH/PwZA0JRWW/jCav2ig5hXQMIzQclSDFusvcF1cHZtSq4kvwnJ1fPFa7suNICxe/UfYO4fXO6eX8J8rs0l+rY8sBb27p9Ask3Nh/dOXwUoqqZb8m14YSwhE/NL78GdYD710ZrfiWU=; Received: from [182.7.187.27] (port=47978 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1UxdnS-003lRR-NP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:54:08 -0600 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:53:58 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Martin Siebel Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 fails to boot from CD on Notebook Message-ID: <20130712215358.19013b0d@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <51DFFCEC.3050008@gmx.de> References: <51DFFCEC.3050008@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:54:14 -0000 Hi On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:56:12 +0200 Martin Siebel wrote: > > Any ideas about BIOS settings I may change? > find out how how the CD drive is connected and then play with the settings fir this interface Erich > I burnt the CD twice by the way, with different burning software, to > avoid damaged or incomplete disc. > > Thanks in advance! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 14:14:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76074EE for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (mail-yh0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D20C18CF for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b12so3727531yha.16 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :disposition-notification-to:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=sCEnhSvm5xtgmEuDddXcdByRHU+KzGy7VMjs2yANyEc=; b=vls7h/0KbpbVK0+qUwaUxz2nO6dRsoi4nv5wiaGcHPZd9S3UXRgSR6DmXKIVK3p7T9 +635H2ctsiObVoU1VASCqSg/sBbM/DyfyeWskX8waZ+lTpPRUtwgTDYMVYLB4lTCu0lj MlH3fpVO8/j4f4wyHnzh2dLhO/1oGJZJFQSyngswP/F/inYL0SsDJ6tMHfxgSGXKCWfy zPAkzW5eeVtG+klVmWLxSlbb2j8FxH/fiKjuYsotSALHAxdsROIaH5BWxCIWeLx3poy3 j4heykJciv0ZLd9SpNlDmxmxIw7S/u/s2F6OdMngtABO3jVfXrp0dyePESOkA4klCaSc PwqQ== X-Received: by 10.236.207.199 with SMTP id n47mr24184960yho.36.1373638484098; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.99.20] ([177.42.100.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm68291679yhc.26.2013.07.12.07.14.41 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 fails to boot from CD on Notebook From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: Erich Dollansky In-Reply-To: <20130712215358.19013b0d@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <51DFFCEC.3050008@gmx.de> <20130712215358.19013b0d@X220.ovitrap.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:15:18 -0300 Message-ID: <1373638518.2732.11.camel@lenovo.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Martin Siebel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:14:44 -0000 seems that some notebooks the bios loads part of the boot from the HD first before trying to boot from the CD, so when the CD boots, the system expects some windows stuff, when it "sees" FreeBSD, it reboots... Solution I found: 1) get/buy another HD for notebook (here a 320GB costs U$100) 2) make sure the HD is NOT INITIALIZED (blank) 3) install the FreeBSD in the HD in a desktop machine that for sure boots FreeBSD 4) open the notebook, install the FreeBSD HD in the notebook, usually a door under the notebook 5) boot from the HD Here for me it worked.. Beware that some notebooks you may void warranty if you install another OS than windows... that is why I still have the original HD with windows8 inside.. If there is a problem with the notebook, I can always replace the original HD and return it to factory.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 14:20:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDECEA41; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6331918; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa01.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6CEJn1m021413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:20:05 -0500 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT06.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:20:03 -0500 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Frank Leonhardt Subject: Re: jls usage Thread-Topic: jls usage Thread-Index: AQHOfp3t7CzmG2bQFUGOk1hY5Ll26Zlglh4AgACGsACAAE+UgA== Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:20:03 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.126] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1084257FF3C6534EA0F05DB5AAA03842@fisglobal.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-07-12_05:2013-07-12,2013-07-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Devin Teske , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:20:15 -0000 On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > On 12/07/2013 02:33, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >>=20 >>> In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this = code >>>=20 >>> jid=3D`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` >>>=20 >> Looks a little over complicated... why not just.. >>=20 >> jls -j jailname jid >=20 > I've never got the -j option to work on jail names, only jail IDs. Misconfiguration; keep reading. > I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - noth= ing - and on checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name being th= e same as the ID. I just put this down to a quirk/bug (it's there in 8.2-9)= but it sounds like it's not an issue for anyone else. I'm defining them in= rc.conf: >=20 > jail_enable=3D"yes" > jail_list=3D"one two three" >=20 > jail_agnet_rootdir=3D"/usr/jail/one" > jail_agnet_hostname=3D"one.mydomain.com" > jail_agnet_ip=3D"123.123.123.123" > jail_agnet_devfs_enable=3D"yes" > jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset=3D"devfsrules_jail" >=20 You've configured "one" and "two" and "three" in your jail_list, but quite = oddly... You have not defined "jail_one_*" or "jail_two_*" or "jail_three_*". I'm extremely confused as to how your jail even started! --=20 Devin > etc... >=20 > jls -v produces: >=20 > JID Hostname Path > Name State > CPUSetID > IP Address(es) > 1 one.mydomain.com /usr/jail/one > 1 ACTIVE > 2 > 123.123.123.123 >=20 >=20 > Everything works just fine, and has done for years, except jls -j jailnam= e. It's zero-impact on me as it's no problem referring to them by number (w= hich doesn't change) but if anyone could tell me what I'm doing wrong I'd b= e very interested to know. Or at least it'd be good to know I'm not the onl= y one with the problem. >=20 > Thanks, Frank. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 15:01:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D706763 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E131AFF for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6CF1Aav071630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:01:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:00:50 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:01:13 -0000 On 12/07/2013 15:20, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > >> On 12/07/2013 02:33, Teske, Devin wrote: >>> On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> >>>> In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code >>>> >>>> jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` >>>> >>> Looks a little over complicated... why not just.. >>> >>> jls -j jailname jid >> I've never got the -j option to work on jail names, only jail IDs. > Misconfiguration; keep reading. > > >> I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - nothing - and on checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name being the same as the ID. I just put this down to a quirk/bug (it's there in 8.2-9) but it sounds like it's not an issue for anyone else. I'm defining them in rc.conf: >> >> jail_enable="yes" >> jail_list="one two three" >> >> jail_agnet_rootdir="/usr/jail/one" >> jail_agnet_hostname="one.mydomain.com" >> jail_agnet_ip="123.123.123.123" >> jail_agnet_devfs_enable="yes" >> jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" >> > You've configured "one" and "two" and "three" in your jail_list, but quite oddly... > > You have not defined "jail_one_*" or "jail_two_*" or "jail_three_*". > > I'm extremely confused as to how your jail even started! Sorry - should have said I'd obfuscated the IP addresses and hostnames (it's not really "one.mydomain.com" ;-) ) Unfortunately I forgot to obfuscate the jail name as fully as I thought in the startup lines. It should have read jail_one_rootdir &c. As I said, it's been working happily for years on lots of different installations and they're all configured the same. The only weirdness is that the jail name appears in the table as it's number. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 15:33:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F189F62 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0501A1C4C for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6CFXIKD079039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:33:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:32:58 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:33:21 -0000 I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - nothing - and on checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name being the same as the ID. I just put this down to a quirk/bug (it's there in 8.2-9) but it sounds like it's not an issue for anyone else. I'm defining them in rc.conf: >>> >>> jail_enable="yes" >>> jail_list="one two three" >>> >>> jail_agnet_rootdir="/usr/jail/one" >>> jail_agnet_hostname="one.mydomain.com" >>> jail_agnet_ip="123.123.123.123" >>> jail_agnet_devfs_enable="yes" >>> jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" >>> >> You've configured "one" and "two" and "three" in your jail_list, but >> quite oddly... >> >> You have not defined "jail_one_*" or "jail_two_*" or "jail_three_*". >> >> I'm extremely confused as to how your jail even started! > > Sorry - should have said I'd obfuscated the IP addresses and hostnames > (it's not really "one.mydomain.com" ;-) ) Unfortunately I forgot to > obfuscate the jail name as fully as I thought in the startup lines. It > should have read jail_one_rootdir &c. > > As I said, it's been working happily for years on lots of different > installations and they're all configured the same. The only weirdness > is that the jail name appears in the table as it's number. A further clarification - I know using the jail utility defaults the jail name to that of its ID if you don't specify one, and presume this is the mechanism messing it up here. However as I've gone to the trouble of configuring them in rc.conf with names, listing said names in jail_list and when commands like: service jail start one service jail stop one work just fine, I don't see what I'm doing wrong! Incidentally, it doesn't matter if I start them at boot time or start/stop later - the jail name always sets to the jail-iD, and not the name specified. I suspect a bug in the rc.d script, but I can't be the first person to notice, can I??? I'll take a look. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 15:45:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F0940B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A251CFA for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id r6CFi7EH003683; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:44:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:44:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201307121544.r6CFi7EH003683@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: guru@unixarea.de Subject: Re: sed Guru wanted In-Reply-To: <20130712090404.GA9263@sh4-5.1blu.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:45:47 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 12 05:13:11 2013 > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:04:04 +0200 > From: Matthias Apitz > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: sed Guru wanted > > > Hello, > > I can delete in a text file with > > sed '/pattern1/,/pattern2/d' < file > > all lines between the lines with the given patterns, including themself > also; how could I specify that the deletion should exclude the line with > /pattern1/, i.e. the addr is something like /pattern1/+1 ? IF you use ed(1) style commands, then '/pattern1/+1,/pattern2/d' _is_ the answer. See: 'man 1 ed', specifically the LINE ADDRSSING section. That said, it is also trivial with a simple 'state machine' construct in awk(1): /pattern2/ { skipping = 0; next; } skipping { next; } /pattern1/ { skipping = 1; next; } Note: omit the 'next;' from the 'pattern' line if you want that line to be INCLUDED in the output; Note: the order of the lines shown is important. Comment: one _can_ implement something similar to the above state machine in ed (making use of looping and conditional executin commands, and the 'hold' buffer to track state), but it gets (*very*) messy, difficult to maintain, and presents a 'decoding' problem for the =next= person who has to maintain it. _I_ find awk to be generally preferable (more easily maintainable) for any situation involving anything more than trivial line range specifications. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 15:56:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6377A25 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4579D1D78 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6CFujoS085166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:56:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:56:25 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:56:48 -0000 On 12/07/2013 16:32, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - > nothing - and on checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name > being the same as the ID. I just put this down to a quirk/bug (it's > there in 8.2-9) but it sounds like it's not an issue for anyone else. > I'm defining them in rc.conf: >>>> >>>> jail_enable="yes" >>>> jail_list="one two three" >>>> >>>> jail_agnet_rootdir="/usr/jail/one" >>>> jail_agnet_hostname="one.mydomain.com" >>>> jail_agnet_ip="123.123.123.123" >>>> jail_agnet_devfs_enable="yes" >>>> jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" >>>> >>> You've configured "one" and "two" and "three" in your jail_list, but >>> quite oddly... >>> >>> You have not defined "jail_one_*" or "jail_two_*" or "jail_three_*". >>> >>> I'm extremely confused as to how your jail even started! >> >> Sorry - should have said I'd obfuscated the IP addresses and >> hostnames (it's not really "one.mydomain.com" ;-) ) Unfortunately I >> forgot to obfuscate the jail name as fully as I thought in the >> startup lines. It should have read jail_one_rootdir &c. >> >> As I said, it's been working happily for years on lots of different >> installations and they're all configured the same. The only weirdness >> is that the jail name appears in the table as it's number. > > A further clarification - I know using the jail utility defaults the > jail name to that of its ID if you don't specify one, and presume this > is the mechanism messing it up here. However as I've gone to the > trouble of configuring them in rc.conf with names, listing said names > in jail_list and when commands like: > > service jail start one > service jail stop one > > work just fine, I don't see what I'm doing wrong! Incidentally, it > doesn't matter if I start them at boot time or start/stop later - the > jail name always sets to the jail-iD, and not the name specified. I > suspect a bug in the rc.d script, but I can't be the first person to > notice, can I??? I'll take a look. > Okay - answering my own question and solved... It's a bug (or is that a feature?). In /etc/rc.d/jail line 647 it currently reads: eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -i ${_rootdir} ${_hostname} \ \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D44FD2 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markham_breitbach@ssimicro.com) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E291E33 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6CGAdJY099573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:10:40 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <51E02A7F.8090706@ssimicro.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:10:39 -0600 From: markham breitbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:12:35 -0000 On 13-07-12 9:56 AM, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > On 12/07/2013 16:32, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >> I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - nothing - and on >> checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name being the same as the ID. I just >> put this down to a quirk/bug (it's there in 8.2-9) but it sounds like it's not an issue >> for anyone else. I'm defining them in rc.conf: >>>>> >>>>> jail_enable="yes" >>>>> jail_list="one two three" >>>>> >>>>> jail_agnet_rootdir="/usr/jail/one" >>>>> jail_agnet_hostname="one.mydomain.com" >>>>> jail_agnet_ip="123.123.123.123" >>>>> jail_agnet_devfs_enable="yes" >>>>> jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" >>>>> >>>> You've configured "one" and "two" and "three" in your jail_list, but quite oddly... >>>> >>>> You have not defined "jail_one_*" or "jail_two_*" or "jail_three_*". >>>> >>>> I'm extremely confused as to how your jail even started! >>> >>> Sorry - should have said I'd obfuscated the IP addresses and hostnames (it's not >>> really "one.mydomain.com" ;-) ) Unfortunately I forgot to obfuscate the jail name as >>> fully as I thought in the startup lines. It should have read jail_one_rootdir &c. >>> >>> As I said, it's been working happily for years on lots of different installations and >>> they're all configured the same. The only weirdness is that the jail name appears in >>> the table as it's number. >> >> A further clarification - I know using the jail utility defaults the jail name to that >> of its ID if you don't specify one, and presume this is the mechanism messing it up >> here. However as I've gone to the trouble of configuring them in rc.conf with names, >> listing said names in jail_list and when commands like: >> >> service jail start one >> service jail stop one >> >> work just fine, I don't see what I'm doing wrong! Incidentally, it doesn't matter if I >> start them at boot time or start/stop later - the jail name always sets to the jail-iD, >> and not the name specified. I suspect a bug in the rc.d script, but I can't be the >> first person to notice, can I??? I'll take a look. >> > > Okay - answering my own question and solved... It's a bug (or is that a feature?). > > In /etc/rc.d/jail line 647 it currently reads: > > eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -i ${_rootdir} ${_hostname} \ > \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ > > And it should (IMHO) read: > > eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -n ${_jail} -i ${_rootdir} ${_hostname} \ > \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ > > Once changed, everything works find and your jails are named as per the rc.conf file > definitions. Can anyone think of a reason for NOT fixing this? > > Regards, Frank. > > > I see where you are defining a hostname, but not a jail name. Jail name cannot contain the "." character. -Markham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 17:18:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA57CB2 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC771159 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id zVFL1l005516WCc01VFMi1; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:15:22 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=CY8xutbl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=XxjqQFNsEAkA:10 a=HiCrw5XorpwA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=aV1Y-CPVj9AA:10 a=OGnj2_922yCZi82CIl0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1UxgwC-00054D-Bt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:15:20 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Error upgrading sysutils/nepomuk-core - Could not find parser plugin for encoding trig Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:15:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.10.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201307121815.18648.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:18:32 -0000 Could anyone advise how to get round this problem? [ 3%] Generating nie.h, nie.cpp cd /usr/ports/sysutils/nepomuk-core/work/.build/libnepomukcore && /usr/local/bin/onto2vocabularyclass --name NIE --encoding trig --namespace Nepomuk2::Vocabulary --export-module nepomuk /usr/local/share/ontology/nie/nie.trig Could not find parser plugin for encoding trig *** [libnepomukcore/nie.h] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/nepomuk-core/work/.build. *** [libnepomukcore/CMakeFiles/nepomukcore.dir/all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/nepomuk-core/work/.build. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/nepomuk-core/work/.build. *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/nepomuk-core. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 17:49:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458DE94C for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.maness@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x236.google.com (mail-vb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066AC12A1 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q12so1770445vbe.27 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6zoAZjdv9sdYIdsgotgvHRIS/ArHEeJBtoHDNlkjlw4=; b=SENkyV0BrSeX0runjgHUWMyl3yTsKm3Y1hwnMbMUwuDorpavT/3HBQCjfJhA9ABEAw qp5o2C6zSNtEBpgaWwXxyhRrQNhFKcfOt7VaeUy6Yr9V8qtSBT0Y8OCDlVORs8J5T9yI XrGMqaBao0sjwK7DbS4nIkf0jj1rf9Hg7TRojt9IW3oORJubyI3o+eNK4NzjDSukFCRj b6MK/n2MwchPezKrJF39NijMoZXFlhaYuK80um9qjIJeP+TGKMpJ2TbcV8/FVku2H7fg 8ufqp6DECxJXcg4Jfgzd5Xp4WmVqZCmSJl8eYcNaELDuRFPlBbfbCsJs/T+lH9zAy4BK v7iA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.54.70 with SMTP id h6mr24978132vep.36.1373651347489; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.220.105 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <67um8rd2r07ipc.fsf@saturn.laptop> <67um8r61wsei8l.fsf@saturn.laptop> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:49:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: v2AkPRrtbM6z5dNJqeX1dHz7W8M Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX From: Chris Maness To: Giorgos Keramidas , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:49:08 -0000 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > > > > >> Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of >> the file checksums while this is running? >> >> MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums, >> so you should be able to look at a few random samples of these files, >> e.g. by running on the source disk: >> >> shasum -a 256 source_directory/file/path/to/some/file.ext >> >> shasum -a 256 copied_directory/file/path/to/some/file.ext >> >> If these are the same, then the applications look elsewhere, e.g. in the >> 'hidden' .DS_Store stuff some MacOS directories contain. >> >> But if the checksums are different, well, then there's your problem. >> >> > Checksums are the same. All other files still work however the HUGE rendered Final Cut Pro output, so I guess it is something in .DS_Store. Last time I just gave up and recopied everything by a simple cut and paste and that solved the problem. I made a small change on the project today, and I don't want to have to copy the WHOLE thing again just for a small delta. I already synced the directories, but the new rendered files are still un-openable in any application even though the checksums match. Really weird. However, the project will still open and work on FCP. Just the 12Gb rendered movie files will not play on anything even FCP. If I delete .DS_Store will the system regenerate it with the appropriate file associations? I know this is a little off topic, but Mac OSX is based on BSD. You guys are also the smartest around :D Thanks, Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 18:10:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3402E2C9 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A7D15D7 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r6CI9ak6063933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:09:37 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6EC7DF61-0243-4BB3-904B-7289F574B256@lafn.org> References: <67um8rd2r07ipc.fsf@saturn.laptop> <67um8r61wsei8l.fsf@saturn.laptop> To: Chris Maness X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:10:54 -0000 On 12 July 2013, at 10:49, Chris Maness wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at = some of >>> the file checksums while this is running? >>>=20 >>> MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 = checksums, >>> so you should be able to look at a few random samples of these = files, >>> e.g. by running on the source disk: >>>=20 >>> shasum -a 256 source_directory/file/path/to/some/file.ext >>>=20 >>> shasum -a 256 copied_directory/file/path/to/some/file.ext >>>=20 >>> If these are the same, then the applications look elsewhere, e.g. in = the >>> 'hidden' .DS_Store stuff some MacOS directories contain. >>>=20 >>> But if the checksums are different, well, then there's your problem. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 > Checksums are the same. All other files still work however the HUGE > rendered Final Cut Pro output, so I guess it is something in = .DS_Store. > Last time I just gave up and recopied everything by a simple cut and = paste > and that solved the problem. I made a small change on the project = today, > and I don't want to have to copy the WHOLE thing again just for a = small > delta. I already synced the directories, but the new rendered files = are > still un-openable in any application even though the checksums match. > Really weird. However, the project will still open and work on FCP. = Just > the 12Gb rendered movie files will not play on anything even FCP. If = I > delete .DS_Store will the system regenerate it with the appropriate = file > associations? >=20 > I know this is a little off topic, but Mac OSX is based on BSD. You = guys > are also the smartest around :D Rsync on the Mac only opens and copies the data forks. It does not copy = the resource forks. There are still a few applications that use = resource forks. Likewise the checksum apps work on the data forks only. There is a utility that is a modified rsync that does handle resource = forks. I no longer remember what its name is. Its been a number of = years since I last used it. I normally rsync from FreeBSD systems to = Mac systems. I use Minis as off-site backups. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 18:25:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806DF28E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.maness@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEEB1756 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ib11so8009493vcb.3 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hbFEFti935GT0yfxEEmqnR40B2kPwSsYQQeKal1CXmA=; b=MXWrz6Bi7bPqgaJXP12P1ArIAmm3NyXq4j7b6Ff9wWus5VPUgBKk2zbIVlyd30F5q7 NAOKFZS2L227vdbQpB7p16Otu+/5Q43CfKmuEAckyhPcNI3dLcGSChyEuF9fWoLWQn5D aj/kZ9ODyocUWl34LJ9m3LAy18V7g6/8BnX8ExIqGV28/YC2ackSK9lCVqhRfv7iFU0U a3LGDdXzMa9d/VslaSSbxOmMseAGBIyrMHAqDv1Jg/ouh1N1deU+tmrbTQE1aV/Ni53p hSTkdsjycbjNEqQCAh8GkA4v6S/e2sZDeHFf5EZOwIwipKT6vEKwtvbf7khjLS9yraya Y7wA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.118.70 with SMTP id kk6mr25155787veb.1.1373653551664; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.220.105 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:25:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <67um8rd2r07ipc.fsf@saturn.laptop> <67um8r61wsei8l.fsf@saturn.laptop> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:25:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: viodNPFnS9D4w8B5oFPhCy-kbjE Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX From: Chris Maness To: Paul Kraus , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:25:52 -0000 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Kraus wrote: > Dropping the list =85 > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > > > Checksums are the same. All other files still work however the HUGE > > rendered Final Cut Pro output, so I guess it is something in .DS_Store. > > Last time I just gave up and recopied everything by a simple cut and > paste > > and that solved the problem. I made a small change on the project toda= y, > > and I don't want to have to copy the WHOLE thing again just for a small > > delta. I already synced the directories, but the new rendered files ar= e > > still un-openable in any application even though the checksums match. > > Really weird. However, the project will still open and work on FCP. > Just > > the 12Gb rendered movie files will not play on anything even FCP. If I > > delete .DS_Store will the system regenerate it with the appropriate fil= e > > associations? > > The .DS_Store files are created by the Finder when you view a directory. > Are both source and destination on Mac HFS+ volumes ? If so, then you are > probably missing the resource forks. > > Back in the very old days of Mac OS (way before 10.x), Mac OS files had > two parts, the data part that contained the, well, data, and the resource > fork that contained the meta-data that Mac OS used to associate a file wi= th > an application. HFS+ volumes on Mac OS X still include the resource forks= , > but "foreign" filesystems (NFS, UFS, FAT, etc.) do not. The work around > that Apple came up with is to create .DS_Store and ._ files to store > this metadata on non HFS+ volumes. > > You could try using ditto instead of rsync. ditto is a BSD derived copy > utility similar to rysnc, but I know that the Mac OS X version understand= s > resource forks and copies them as necessary. ditto may not be able to jus= t > copy changed blocks within a file, so you may still have to recopy the > entire file. > > But=85. I am also a little puzzled because applications on Mac OS X do no= t > NEED the resource fork to open a file, just to know which application to > use (and what options to hand it) to open a given file. A complete video > file, even without resource forks, should be able to be opened if you > explicitly telly he application to File -> Open =85. With the checksums > matching it is even odder. I expect that the large sizes (over 4 GB) are = a > contributing factor. > > Good luck and let me know what you find. > > -- > Paul Kraus > Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 > Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company > > Thank you for the detailed description of what resource forks are. One more clue in this mystery is that appending .mov extension to it fixes the problem. I have never ran into this before, and I have even used rsync to back up movie projects before. It is not a big deal, but I always try to take the time to understand why things behave the way they do. I also suspect it has something to do with file size since all of the smaller files do not have this issue. Thanks, Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 21:23:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E94E128 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@xerxes.pointyhat.org.uk) Received: from xerxes.pointyhat.org.uk (xerxes.pointyhat.org.uk [213.138.101.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4EC1FDD for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by xerxes.pointyhat.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F79C96538; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:22:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:22:51 +0100 From: Chris Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ab failing with Operation not permitted Message-ID: <20130712212251.GA7258@xerxes.pointyhat.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:23:53 -0000 Hi, I'm having some trouble with ab shipped with apache22 from 9.1 binary packages. I am currently running a trial to replace our Debian kit with FreeBSD as we've had numerous problems. It will be hosting a few web apps, postfix, dovecot virtual, postgres, SVN etc. I'm a little rusty as I'm coming back to FreeBSD from a long holiday in Linux-land since FreeBSD 4.4 :) Anyway, ab is failing as follows: # ab -n 10000 -c 50 http://hostname/ ...usual junk scrolls past.... Completed 4000 requests Test aborted after 10 failures apr_socket_connect(): Operation not permitted (1) Total of 4531 requests completed # I suspect this is a sysctl that needs poking somewhere or a limit somewhere. Any help appreciated on this one. -- Chris Smith http://pointyhat.org.uk/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 04:13:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C828FD8 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611C11F40 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2013 13:43:01 +0930 Message-ID: <51E0D3C9.3020505@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:42:57 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Leonhardt Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:13:03 -0000 On 13/07/2013 01:26, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > Okay - answering my own question and solved... It's a bug (or is that a > feature?). > > In /etc/rc.d/jail line 647 it currently reads: > > eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -i ${_rootdir} > ${_hostname} \ > \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ > > And it should (IMHO) read: > > eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -n ${_jail} -i > ${_rootdir} ${_hostname} \ > \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ > > Once changed, everything works find and your jails are named as per the > rc.conf file definitions. Can anyone think of a reason for NOT fixing this? Go with bug ;-) - fix (improvement?) is working it's way through. You mentioned running 8.2 so I wondered if it has changed. If you look through the source tree you will find in 8.4 that line has the -n ${_jail} addition plus some other extras. Looks like it showed up in stable/8 at r242083 as part of a larger improvement. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 06:52:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C902FFD6 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D50137B for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.217.65.53] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxth7-0001tT-Dw; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:52:37 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.7/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6D6qb3l001693; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:52:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.7/8.14.3/Submit) id r6D6qZta001692; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:52:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:52:35 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: sed Guru wanted Message-ID: <20130713065235.GA1647@La-Habana> References: <20130712090404.GA9263@sh4-5.1blu.de> <201307121544.r6CFi7EH003683@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201307121544.r6CFi7EH003683@mail.r-bonomi.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.65.53 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:52:47 -0000 El día Friday, July 12, 2013 a las 10:44:07AM -0500, Robert Bonomi escribió: > > I can delete in a text file with > > > > sed '/pattern1/,/pattern2/d' < file > > > > all lines between the lines with the given patterns, including themself > > also; how could I specify that the deletion should exclude the line with > > /pattern1/, i.e. the addr is something like /pattern1/+1 ? > > IF you use ed(1) style commands, then '/pattern1/+1,/pattern2/d' _is_ the > answer. > > See: 'man 1 ed', specifically the LINE ADDRSSING section. > ... I know, but I wanted it to be a 'one line command' w/o additional script files; yesterday evening, while sitting in a beergarden, I came up with the idea to first add one line to the file after the line with pattern1 and use this new pattern3 for the start of the deletion: awk -v D=pattern3 '{ print } ; /pattern1/ { print D }' | sed '/pattern3/,/pattern2/d' Thanks for your thoughts in any case matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 08:54:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E3D884 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEB71799 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6D8s4X6059764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:54:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51E115AB.6030004@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:54:03 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> <51E0D3C9.3020505@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <51E0D3C9.3020505@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:54:08 -0000 On 13/07/2013 05:12, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 13/07/2013 01:26, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > >> Okay - answering my own question and solved... It's a bug (or is that a >> feature?). >> >> In /etc/rc.d/jail line 647 it currently reads: >> >> eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -i ${_rootdir} >> ${_hostname} \ >> \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} >> 2>&1 \ >> > >> And it should (IMHO) read: >> >> eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -n ${_jail} -i >> ${_rootdir} ${_hostname} \ >> \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} >> 2>&1 \ >> > >> Once changed, everything works find and your jails are named as per the >> rc.conf file definitions. Can anyone think of a reason for NOT fixing >> this? > > > Go with bug ;-) - fix (improvement?) is working it's way through. > > You mentioned running 8.2 so I wondered if it has changed. > > If you look through the source tree you will find in 8.4 that line has > the -n ${_jail} addition plus some other extras. > > Looks like it showed up in stable/8 at r242083 as part of a larger > improvement. > Yeah, I spotted that but only after I put in a change request :-( Someone did exactly the same change last July but it wasn't a PR. It's in head (revision 238102) and I suspect it's now in 9.1. Next question: How do you kill a PR you've changed your mind about? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 10:17:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC962F6 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02DB199F for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91CA5E452 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:17:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.97 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MBQ61XcWfRyO for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:17:22 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c224-156-70-80.bjare.net [80.70.156.224]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABE25E442 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:17:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51E1292F.7070005@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:17:19 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130627 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory References: <51DFE7A6.70505@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <51DFE7A6.70505@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:17:29 -0000 2013-07-12 13:25, Leslie Jensen skrev: > > When I run > > portsnap fetch update > > pkg version -vIL= > > > It returns > > pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory > > > The directory is there and I can list the contents. > > What's going on? > > Thanks > > /Leslie > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I get this as well gunzip: can't stat: files/30173a70f7852dc247fda74d2d4babaae21067417fc17e67dc388c9ec85a8e8a.gz: No such file or directory gunzip: can't stat: /var/db/portsnap/files/845df3602aa1742b771872ffbe945ee60e0c834ae1540ba0dab02f224cce56f5.gz: No such file or directory pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory I'm a bit lost. Do I have to remove something for this command to succeed? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 13:02:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA23B08 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406021FAE for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6DD2iHc097105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:02:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r6DD2iHc097105 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1373720571; bh=e7GfXG6a2229ZrqGbXhzW2+kWEcmvNKLRHWSyKRwRvQ=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Sat,=2013=20Jul=202013=2014:02:37=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Leslie=20Jense n=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20pkg:=20Unable=20to=20open=20ports= 20directory=20/usr/ports:=20No=20such=20file=0D=0A=20or=20director y|References:=20<51DFE7A6.70505@eskk.nu>=20<51E1292F.7070005@eskk. nu>|In-Reply-To:=20<51E1292F.7070005@eskk.nu>; b=DR/BBPMoTecdg+XjixF6cR6c1KEEM6y0x/JKQvXH0eU3ePe+H9hmf90YYOQpdsZ2z G6/JLksbdqkdPI461J4/ka4X1jWCocXQ+AmhC3coQO7snOolUQeLZ1W2/6AgWaBv1A adlZqo2vXPabkamxfnCdMv6ciifjrHIwlZ7naTk4= Message-ID: <51E14FED.9030708@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:02:37 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory References: <51DFE7A6.70505@eskk.nu> <51E1292F.7070005@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <51E1292F.7070005@eskk.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2CWVBTHRKHRKUUEWKTGIE" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL,SPF_HELO_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:02:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2CWVBTHRKHRKUUEWKTGIE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/07/2013 11:17, Leslie Jensen wrote: > 2013-07-12 13:25, Leslie Jensen skrev: >> >> When I run >> >> portsnap fetch update >> >> pkg version -vIL=3D >> >> >> It returns >> >> pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or direct= ory >> >> >> The directory is there and I can list the contents. >> >> What's going on? >=20 > I get this as well >=20 > gunzip: can't stat: > files/30173a70f7852dc247fda74d2d4babaae21067417fc17e67dc388c9ec85a8e8a.= gz: > No such file or directory > gunzip: can't stat: > /var/db/portsnap/files/845df3602aa1742b771872ffbe945ee60e0c834ae1540ba0= dab02f224cce56f5.gz: > No such file or directory > pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directo= ry >=20 > I'm a bit lost. Do I have to remove something for this command to succe= ed? Let's look at the command line you're using: pkg version -vIL=3D That -I means it's going to try and read the ports INDEX specifically -- ie. /usr/ports/INDEX Does that file exist? Does it have sensible contents? Now, given your further comments, it seems something relatively significant is wrong. There's on obvious (but fairly easy to fix) thing it might be. Have you run out of space on any of your partitions? What goes 'df -h' report? Any real partition reporting 100% full is a problem. (Don't worry about synthetic filesystems like devfs reporting 100% usage: that's normal.) If some filesystem is full, then you need to either delete stuff, or move it onto a filesystem with more space. You also seem to be having problems with portsnap(8) -- be aware there was a problem reported recently. See the thread on freebsd-ports@... subject 'Latest snapshot' starting with this message: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-July/084833.html but to summarize several people saw the problem, and the cure was to delete the files portsnap was using by 'rm -Rf /var/db/portsnap/files' and then re-run 'portsnap fetch' and 'portsnap extract' -- warning: this will wipe out everything you have in /usr/ports and download a complete set of replacements. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk ------enig2CWVBTHRKHRKUUEWKTGIE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlHhT/QACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxPXQCfXWA8uhFb+t990q/gxINgeoeo nI8Ani0wtsu/XCUDa0Ou3bg2NocI7w0l =HLfl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2CWVBTHRKHRKUUEWKTGIE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 13:34:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194E9C64 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lurie.austinser@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A647E10A6 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w59so8669270wes.24 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; bh=P3vLg2PTGpdR5Te9GW0goEi3rHxhA6VTP2Kex4oeo34=; b=hwUxSaegftMBq7XS5peYP02tXnWVS1OaVdhG1CQ4NFtopSGj5kk7es9sMDGDIioxXt zBcFmDR3cIL9n23peu/RTdDXMk/zStmHSyEI6h/C1FRZ/7rQP8ZA+Zf2LNyop6rHBSJL QbDoNZuwVGqDsfUAhDDwZiWUn5qetxfVMAylY8dV+91kX5lAQ2f9NQAgNsHyyEdQrtM+ ciDgdhoHGfgw819CA8LtLnkklh4mMTyFyaZbi9eN7bT2SD7Ih2CEYJwIHknWsEjOBim3 kabUxNofmGSOIa0mmejt0h+67ZLwLw2/IXYGuRoO7jJ+FZdExvJaP1OUyq2vItGUHqT4 pyyQ== X-Received: by 10.180.182.228 with SMTP id eh4mr4209139wic.42.1373722475771; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lurie (105-236-61-58.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.236.61.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w4sm8876400wia.9.2013.07.13.06.34.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lurie Austinser" To: Subject: Updating broken link from your page: http://forum.vstyle.co.il/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-dvds.html Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:34:39 +0200 Message-ID: <51e1576b.2409b40a.6a3a.1494@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac5/zbmE75c4BSfzQkaHsvnl0plC1Q== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:34:37 -0000 Hello, I have bumped into your site while seeking for software and found your website very interesting :) Just a quick note, http://www.dvdrw.com/ is no longer active, and you are linking to it from page - http://forum.vstyle.co.il/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-dvds.h tml I was wondering if you don't mind updating the link to the updated website en.DownloadAstro.com (http://en.downloadastro.com/) - A great download site with more than 300K software and games, including professional reviews and user ratings. We are now in a process of updating the links in websites all around the world and I will appreciate your cooperation. I am sure your users will find it useful. Thanks, Lurie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 13:36:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9F2E32; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE9F10BA; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.1] ([173.88.196.224]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:36:47 -0700 Message-ID: <51E157F1.8090208@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:36:49 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2013 13:36:47.0800 (UTC) FILETIME=[05D29380:01CE7FCE] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:36:52 -0000 Teske, Devin wrote: > On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code >> >> jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'` >> > > Looks a little over complicated... why not just.. > > jls -j jailname jid Thanks Devin. Thats what I was looking for. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 13 16:58:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61019F48 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45231968 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id zsym1l003516WCc01syn8Y; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 17:58:47 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=CY8xutbl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=XxjqQFNsEAkA:10 a=S-_MLFOglI8A:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=5AS6eJKPDGQA:10 a=-hv_gHwx9WKpN3GbJ5AA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Uy39i-000G93-BO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 17:58:46 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [Solved] Error upgrading sysutils/nepomuk-core - Could not find parser plugin for encoding trig Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 17:58:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.10.3; amd64; ; ) References: <201307121815.18648.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201307121815.18648.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201307131758.44493.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:58:50 -0000 On Friday 12 Jul 2013 18:15:18 Mike Clarke wrote: > Could anyone advise how to get round this problem? > > [ 3%] Generating nie.h, nie.cpp > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/nepomuk-core/work/.build/libnepomukcore && > /usr/local/bin/onto2vocabularyclass --name NIE --encoding trig --namespace > Nepomuk2::Vocabulary --export-module nepomuk > /usr/local/share/ontology/nie/nie.trig Could not find parser plugin for > encoding trig The original problem arose when I ran "portmaster -r apr -r kdelibs-4\*". It turned out that raptor is a dependency of kdelibs but for some reason portmaster had not selected it for upgrading. After manually running "portmaster raptor" I was able to build nepomuk-core and continue the mega update with " portmaster -R -r apr -r kdelibs-4\*" -- Mike Clarke