From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 11:06:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827B6B02 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE88247E for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9SB6tEC055221 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:06:55 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9SB6sG2055219 for freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:06:54 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:06:54 GMT Message-Id: <201310281106.r9SB6sG2055219@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:06:55 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/179932 scsi [ciss] ciss i/o stall problem with HP Bl Gen8 (and HP o kern/178795 scsi [mps] MSI for mps driver doesn't work under vmware o kern/165982 scsi [mpt] mpt instability, drive resets, and losses on Fre o kern/165740 scsi [cam] SCSI code must drain callbacks before free f kern/162256 scsi [mpt] QUEUE FULL EVENT and 'mpt_cam_event: 0x0' o docs/151336 scsi Missing documentation of scsi_ and ata_ functions in c o kern/148083 scsi [aac] Strange device reporting o kern/144648 scsi [aac] Strange values of speed and bus width in dmesg o kern/142351 scsi [mpt] LSILogic driver performance problems o kern/134488 scsi [mpt] MPT SCSI driver probes max. 8 LUNs per device o kern/130621 scsi [mpt] tranfer rate is inscrutable slow when use lsi213 f kern/129602 scsi [ahd] ahd(4) gets confused and wedges SCSI bus f kern/123674 scsi [ahc] ahc driver dumping o sparc/121676 scsi [iscsi] iscontrol do not connect iscsi-target on sparc 14 problems total. From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 09:11:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BB4D91; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de) Received: from s1.omnilan.de (s1.omnilan.de [217.91.127.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCA22F56; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from titan.inop.wdn.omnilan.net (titan.inop.wdn.omnilan.net [172.21.3.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by s1.omnilan.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9U9Aqne067856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:10:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de) Message-ID: <5270CD10.6080105@omnilan.de> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:10:40 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniLAN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100906 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RWR3YXJkIFRvbWFzeiBOYXBpZXJhxYJh?= Subject: Re: New iSCSI stack. References: <522A1C73.9030402@mu.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig86A0C0E8117BE272E9461F5A" Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:11:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig86A0C0E8117BE272E9461F5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bez=C3=BCglich Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a's Nachricht vom 11.09.2013 2= 3:14 (localtime): > I'm working on last few minor nits to get this into the tree. Give me = few days, > I'll prepare a patch against 9-STABLE. Hello, I was highly interested in testing the new iscsi stack with 9-stable. Could you prepare a patchset? Thanks, -Harry --------------enig86A0C0E8117BE272E9461F5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlJwzRwACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8jS2ACfWYczpJcBFChjaMeGqj1CW/w7 CQYAniMeKp4iReoYpRgzUBJDyBzECGxU =ONwM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig86A0C0E8117BE272E9461F5A-- From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 20:10:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B5E76A for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:10:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean_bruno@yahoo.com) Received: from nm2-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm2-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95F52E6B for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.148] by nm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2013 20:10:06 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.192] by tm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2013 20:10:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2013 20:10:06 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1383250206; bh=wdofs1gS+BpnhQBlIAP3c0H/gwAyTqdguQObECazqDc=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer; b=yAM9dsth8uORcWvrnvqno13+SxvFhYpfWoR9OSCGjhCEgiy/v7effXvK/yeqwcfejZFweZslbUIADxotKeDBWc2U4vvL1wweJUJBAs81jUQr0gnY4LfK1MQXLG0mvbF8skV1O8wZvL9KT/aSjz8He+vXe/21qD8+ZCFq0Sz09AM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 751733.10734.bm@smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ROVrvy4VM1lVoRSX_Hq5T7PqsgjNqGgvw0NGsaikq9_OHbj 3egPzuBDIiwVuD5ZeIrPs7wxg6586LpmSYxwHsw2Q.zuT7iQK_J4Insy6.bF Ib0XZTJC6UnM0yQPlVQJmNrCiPfrQh6omYT42sYtsjjjR_V3g8Gv2z8RhyQK XBfmGiC_ZH6r4Z.Mly9_tS..0Owl.iY1QA7GmYsZvBfAbR4NddyKRelsRV0d xbqgAQ3BhyL4Q8SXhjvTzxLPr0ghAANZQYaSI4qTFlLgkyhVDgqV5ab_OCjJ q9aeSN40I_yoFtT5hzhBuEMUvjq8ImvoYIThV4XWwUqurpGv1Q.o_Cv6iktY v0p11EGNd66zXwIHL5fjeFT3mVYRsiG5hPLDR71DuGYkICZJOyGa8xFUYzah PvrJZOqO0z7su_sSiDieXCNmDWaeVnVfW_XeFMD4V8DxjK07uhdYKiTnwpma 3VmtKWmXeVVeTEG7pLTWRnyNREEDsEqxaI6Gn7ZvpQti2f65ih4BBj579GTY fmSah51K5249IsR10bjrqrFFTTje.8xsLzQm9EC07UZl3JtI._FczCvOmXgD VeK7T_YB40YpfzLHmJRuygMMr.EDhCC53dP7.0wTTBaxf51SnYQsTSOCPVE4 quhfPoWq07m2V4jKmtvrXGND.LowDZ2JbqYNf8olfgmOEfU1JtSEzUTp3dT0 ui4s- X-Yahoo-SMTP: u5BKR6OswBC_iZJVfGRoMkTIpc8pEA4- X-Rocket-Received: from [10.73.160.242] (sean_bruno@209.131.62.116 with ) by smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2013 13:10:06 -0700 PDT Subject: lsi mps(4) vs freebsd mps(4) From: Sean Bruno To: "FreeBSD-scsi@freebsd.org" Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-i4sCe3QfU65moQnDlBuj" Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:10:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1383250205.1773.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:10:14 -0000 --=-i4sCe3QfU65moQnDlBuj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just realized that lsi is offering to download FreeBSD drivers for mps(4) on their website. I also note that the code is substantially different from our version. Is anyone "about to update" mps(4) or should I spend the time and do an audit? sean ref: http://www.lsi.com/products/host-bus-adapters/pages/lsi-sas-9211-8i.aspx#ta= b/tab3 --=-i4sCe3QfU65moQnDlBuj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJScrkdAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaHtXwH/i3nCSxDgqvLozAHUjUvGSj0 CAbofgOUpVKua7iltVKFDBiRlpbeVidNXoWzoOS8fbCU9ikCfzDikcBo46cZ5ed5 MDa/GAY9k+p2Oj9foDMO4laliE6vFe5faILxIuQoZc9HaUliEpJfoB3tDSiZUb1S 2S3wAeJdncS56k+tjI7KUC7Zb9vgsfmm7bPdLtKNFNCvFH5UdRsFtv9Rz0l1hve5 oks0oL1tH5NqG+i0Y37t+jkU4oFPG1NWH73dSXKMM1nALY3dDmKsmigt63ReZdnx TrayOQ6NLyfkN2ab4lUMd4E+inFuBsy29XGCuB3u5JRET1TwLNxyqFybQ8SGCmg= =mxcr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-i4sCe3QfU65moQnDlBuj-- From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 21:03:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EA0762; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@kdm.org) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (nargothrond.kdm.org [70.56.43.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1335E22C2; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r9VKrHDC029624; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:53:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id r9VKrH7H029623; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:53:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:53:17 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: sbruno@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lsi mps(4) vs freebsd mps(4) Message-ID: <20131031205317.GA28812@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <1383250205.1773.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1383250205.1773.11.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: "FreeBSD-scsi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:03:59 -0000 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 13:10:05 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > I just realized that lsi is offering to download FreeBSD drivers for > mps(4) on their website. I also note that the code is substantially > different from our version. > > Is anyone "about to update" mps(4) or should I spend the time and do an > audit? What we have in the tree now is a combination of their Phase 16 driver and our modifications. They have Phase 17 on their web site, and it does have some changes from Phase 16, but not a huge number. I don't know of anyone currently working on integrating their Phase 17 changes into our in-tree driver, so feel free if you have the time. What they need to do at this point is take our changes and integrate them into their driver, so the drivers don't continue to diverge more. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@FreeBSD.ORG