From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 6 10:11:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA3D395 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 10:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@3dr.org) Received: from futurehost.futurehost.pl (futurehost.futurehost.pl [91.200.185.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF78E223F for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 10:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agdf129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl ([178.43.83.129]:62821 helo=LukaszKomputer) by futurehost.futurehost.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VSkfS-000DrE-SL for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 11:30:27 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Piecuch?= To: Subject: Fusefs-kmod ustable Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 11:30:22 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac7CdExr+rUuc4ZVT62OGWUZAB6KfA== Content-Language: pl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 10:11:37 -0000 Hello, There is a problem with fusefs-kmod and FreeBSD 9.2 and rsync. While starting rsync on fuse share, one encounters kernel panic with: fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.19 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read instruction, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0x0 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff811b71bac0 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff811b71bb10 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 16502 (rsync) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80920bb6 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 #1 0xffffffff808eabce at panic+0x1ce #2 0xffffffff80bd8640 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80bd897d at trap_pfault+0x1ed #4 0xffffffff80bd8f9e at trap+0x3ce #5 0xffffffff80bc355f at calltrap+0x8 #6 0xffffffff80bd7ee6 at amd64_syscall+0x546 #7 0xffffffff80bc3847 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7 Uptime: 21h22m6s Dumping 847 out of 4043 MB:..2%..12%..21%..31%..42%..51%..61%..72%..82%..91% Same result can be obtained on FreeBSD 9.1 Any patches, advices ? Thank you, Luke From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 6 19:26:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C559B9; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pali.gabor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C122B4F; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ar20so14018835iec.32 for ; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RzVULWIPIobqqS7Av5No7zALvJOMfptbl22Hz3Tes+w=; b=QS1NeAjjmUMFEQzn+cXlmNiVlja4JB2iDVYhTFO7foVUS//nxwBjziJoNEppOqdav0 OcgK4I7ORV5xR2z80bpqlac0VQgRQNJNq8RpQ9SkUvjHQBGSkPTvru2oBQyjMXhhjwsb SLEiHwBgV1LLRE9Tt0iJvNlOSJz/vkqP/LRywXUmf0ruVrO5uhZcnXuUX0JTjQWuiWIL 5F49YLho6lAZ9rShBsdUGJvgkjBExjhgW73IT+dIfPqKAqZgjw2ou1tDMFmFyhgy2D0F ZjrrpmJwN8aOjPnfyLo1i5yRFt57id2CnLCb6rZF5lzi8WvLHbermJ0TYgvmjupyf0qo A/wg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.45.100 with SMTP id l4mr14110990igm.60.1381087574830; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: pali.gabor@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.27.105 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 21:26:14 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L1jQTvfLxuSh8bc30BKa8hSdZ_A Message-ID: Subject: Re: Call for FreeBSD 2013Q3 (July-September) Status Reports From: Gabor Pali To: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:26:15 -0000 Dear FreeBSD Community, This is another gentle reminder that the deadline for submissions for the third Quarterly Status Report is tomorrow! Please find the details quoted below. On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Gabor Pali wrote: > Dear FreeBSD Community, > > Please note that the next submission date for the July to September > Quarterly Status Reports is October 7th, 2013, bit more than a week > away. Please consult my previous message for the details: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Gabor Pali wrote: >> They do not have to be very long -- basically they may be about >> anything that lets people know what is going on around the FreeBSD >> Project. Submission of reports is not restricted to committers: >> Anyone who is doing anything interesting and FreeBSD-related can (and >> therefore encouraged to) write one! >> >> The preferred and easiest submission method is to use the XML >> generator [1] with the result emailed as an attachment to us, that is, >> monthly@FreeBSD.org [2]. There is also an XML template [3] which can >> be filled out manually and attached if preferred. >> >> To enable compilation and publication of the Q3 report as soon as >> possible for the October 7th deadline, please be prompt with any >> report submissions you may have. >> >> We are looking forward to all of your 2013Q3 reports! >> >> Cheers, >> Gabor >> >> >> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/monthly.cgi >> [2] mailto:monthly@freebsd.org >> [3] http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 07:57:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D3CBF3 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 07:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail3.transactionware.com (mail3.transactionware.com [202.68.173.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B4AD2B3C for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 07:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85950 invoked by uid 907); 7 Oct 2013 07:57:12 -0000 Received: from eth222.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.53]) (150.101.196.221) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by mail3.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:57:12 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE From: Jan Mikkelsen In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC2F488@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:57:10 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2F782A12-C6C0-46F0-849E-935ED4B007BA@transactionware.com> References: <20131003194704.GG41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20131004052457.GN41229@kib.kiev.ua> <24C7E2F8EDAF40439C076C03B8A0E203@multiplay.co.uk> <1380902373.2621.12.camel@localhost> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC2F488@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> To: "Teske, Devin" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) Cc: Konstantin Belousov , Steven Hartland , Ryan Stone , "" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 07:57:21 -0000 On 5 Oct 2013, at 2:32 am, Teske, Devin = wrote: >=20 > On Oct 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:27 +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: >>>> mfi0: 14299 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version = 3.190.05-1669 >>>> mfi0: 14300 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 23.7.0-0029 >>>> mfi0: 14301 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision=20 >>=20 >> Does it make sense then, to take a survey and add a recommended = minium >> f/w for cards that we know about to the man page? >>=20 >=20 > Sounds like a great idea. >=20 > I can provide the following *good* firmware infos: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D >=20 > In order: >=20 > 1. (as root) mfiutil show adapter | grep Name > 2. grep 'mfi[[:digit:]]\{1,\}:.*\(vers\|Board\)' /var/run/dmesg.boot > 3. (as root) mfiutil show firmware | grep Pack # only required on = older cards >=20 > =3D=3D=3D The mfiutils instructions only work for the first card in the system. I just went through a few running systems and found these combinations. = Some of these are looking a bit old and should be upgraded. All are = running fine. Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i mfi0: 21552 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.383-2315 mfi0: 21554 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.13.0-0154 mfi0: 21555 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-4i mfi1: 15228 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.384-2291 mfi1: 15229 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.11.1-0137 mfi1: 15230 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 03A Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i mfi0: 62632 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.243-1482 mfi0: 62634 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0090 mfi0: 62635 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i mfi0: 6559 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.374-2023 mfi0: 6560 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0126 mfi0: 6561 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 04A Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i mfi0: 74819 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.183-1415 mfi0: 74822 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0073 mfi0: 74823 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i mfi0: 72049 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.63-1242 mfi0: 72051 (boot + 6s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0048 mfi0: 72052 (boot + 6s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i mfi0: 2463 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.354-1664 mfi0: 2464 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0107 mfi0: 2465 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 04A Regards, Jan. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 08:30:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E64F0B for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1992733903=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E6C2E0D for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50006312047.msg for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 09:30:23 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 07 Oct 2013 09:30:23 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1992733903=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0370DB3A3A804CB48C862133FC053836@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Jan Mikkelsen" , "Teske, Devin" References: <20131003194704.GG41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20131004052457.GN41229@kib.kiev.ua> <24C7E2F8EDAF40439C076C03B8A0E203@multiplay.co.uk> <1380902373.2621.12.camel@localhost> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC2F488@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> <2F782A12-C6C0-46F0-849E-935ED4B007BA@transactionware.com> Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:30:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ryan Stone X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 08:30:32 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Mikkelsen" To: "Teske, Devin" Cc: "Konstantin Belousov" ; "Steven Hartland" ; "Ryan Stone" ; Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 8:57 AM Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE > > On 5 Oct 2013, at 2:32 am, Teske, Devin wrote: > >> >> On Oct 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:27 +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: >>>>> mfi0: 14299 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 3.190.05-1669 >>>>> mfi0: 14300 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 23.7.0-0029 >>>>> mfi0: 14301 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision >>> >>> Does it make sense then, to take a survey and add a recommended minium >>> f/w for cards that we know about to the man page? >>> >> >> Sounds like a great idea. >> >> I can provide the following *good* firmware infos: >> >> === >> >> In order: >> >> 1. (as root) mfiutil show adapter | grep Name >> 2. grep 'mfi[[:digit:]]\{1,\}:.*\(vers\|Board\)' /var/run/dmesg.boot >> 3. (as root) mfiutil show firmware | grep Pack # only required on older cards >> >> === > > The mfiutils instructions only work for the first card in the system. > > I just went through a few running systems and found these combinations. Some of these are looking a bit old and should be > upgraded. All are running fine. > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i > mfi0: 21552 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.383-2315 > mfi0: 21554 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.13.0-0154 > mfi0: 21555 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-4i > mfi1: 15228 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.384-2291 > mfi1: 15229 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.11.1-0137 > mfi1: 15230 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 03A > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i > mfi0: 62632 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.243-1482 > mfi0: 62634 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0090 > mfi0: 62635 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i > mfi0: 6559 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.374-2023 > mfi0: 6560 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0126 > mfi0: 6561 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 04A > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i > mfi0: 74819 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.183-1415 > mfi0: 74822 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0073 > mfi0: 74823 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i > mfi0: 72049 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.63-1242 > mfi0: 72051 (boot + 6s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0048 > mfi0: 72052 (boot + 6s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A > > Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i > mfi0: 2463 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.354-1664 > mfi0: 2464 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0107 > mfi0: 2465 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 04A Just to confirm when you say fine, have you checked to ensure none are reporting timeouts? Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 08:39:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DE21CF for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail3.transactionware.com (mail3.transactionware.com [202.68.173.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 358652EAA for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4935 invoked by uid 907); 7 Oct 2013 08:39:35 -0000 Received: from eth222.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.53]) (150.101.196.221) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by mail3.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:39:35 +1100 Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Jan Mikkelsen X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <0370DB3A3A804CB48C862133FC053836@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 19:39:33 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <79021054-40E5-40C6-89E1-4483709A8574@transactionware.com> References: <20131003194704.GG41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20131004052457.GN41229@kib.kiev.ua> <24C7E2F8EDAF40439C076C03B8A0E203@multiplay.co.uk> <1380902373.2621.12.camel@localhost> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC2F488@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> <2F782A12-C6C0-46F0-849E-935ED4B007BA@transactionware.com> <0370DB3A3A804CB48C862133FC053836@multiplay.co.uk> To: Steven Hartland X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) Cc: Konstantin Belousov , "" , Ryan Stone , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 08:39:38 -0000 On 7 Oct 2013, at 7:30 pm, Steven Hartland = wrote: >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Mikkelsen" = > To: "Teske, Devin" > Cc: "Konstantin Belousov" ; "Steven Hartland" = ; "Ryan Stone" ; = > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 8:57 AM > Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> On 5 Oct 2013, at 2:32 am, Teske, Devin = wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:27 +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: >>>>>> mfi0: 14299 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version = 3.190.05-1669 >>>>>> mfi0: 14300 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 23.7.0-0029 >>>>>> mfi0: 14301 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision >>>>=20 >>>> Does it make sense then, to take a survey and add a recommended = minium >>>> f/w for cards that we know about to the man page? >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Sounds like a great idea. >>>=20 >>> I can provide the following *good* firmware infos: >>>=20 >>> =3D=3D=3D >>>=20 >>> In order: >>>=20 >>> 1. (as root) mfiutil show adapter | grep Name >>> 2. grep 'mfi[[:digit:]]\{1,\}:.*\(vers\|Board\)' /var/run/dmesg.boot >>> 3. (as root) mfiutil show firmware | grep Pack # only required on = older cards >>>=20 >>> =3D=3D=3D >>=20 >> The mfiutils instructions only work for the first card in the system. >>=20 >> I just went through a few running systems and found these = combinations. Some of these are looking a bit old and should be = upgraded. All are running fine. >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i >> mfi0: 21552 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.383-2315 >> mfi0: 21554 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.13.0-0154 >> mfi0: 21555 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-4i >> mfi1: 15228 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.384-2291 >> mfi1: 15229 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.11.1-0137 >> mfi1: 15230 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 03A >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i >> mfi0: 62632 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.243-1482 >> mfi0: 62634 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0090 >> mfi0: 62635 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i >> mfi0: 6559 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.374-2023 >> mfi0: 6560 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0126 >> mfi0: 6561 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 04A >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i >> mfi0: 74819 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.183-1415 >> mfi0: 74822 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0073 >> mfi0: 74823 (boot + 9s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i >> mfi0: 72049 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.63-1242 >> mfi0: 72051 (boot + 6s/0x0020/info) - Package version 12.12.0-0048 >> mfi0: 72052 (boot + 6s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 15A >>=20 >> Product Name: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i >> mfi0: 2463 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.130.354-1664 >> mfi0: 2464 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0107 >> mfi0: 2465 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision 04A >=20 > Just to confirm when you say fine, have you checked to ensure none > are reporting timeouts? Yes. Only the first two of these are from a 9.2 era system (also the ones = with the most recent firmware). We did have timeout issues while testing this platform which were = resolved by taking the mfi driver from -HEAD at the time and setting = hw.mfi.msi=3D1. The oldest ones have been running for over two years. I can go through our Perforce depot to tell you exactly what mfi driver = they=92re running, if you care. Regards, Jan. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 09:07:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78010901 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1992733903=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CEF12024 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50006312662.msg for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:06:58 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:06:58 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1992733903=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5A58E4C49C3D42B0AFADC2B7C4D4B013@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Jan Mikkelsen" References: <20131003194704.GG41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20131004052457.GN41229@kib.kiev.ua> <24C7E2F8EDAF40439C076C03B8A0E203@multiplay.co.uk> <1380902373.2621.12.camel@localhost> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC2F488@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> <2F782A12-C6C0-46F0-849E-935ED4B007BA@transactionware.com> <0370DB3A3A804CB48C862133FC053836@multiplay.co.uk> <79021054-40E5-40C6-89E1-4483709A8574@transactionware.com> Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:06:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: Konstantin Belousov , Ryan Stone , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 09:07:00 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Mikkelsen" .. > Just to confirm when you say fine, have you checked to ensure none > are reporting timeouts? > Yes. > > Only the first two of these are from a 9.2 era system (also the ones > with the most recent firmware). > > We did have timeout issues while testing this platform which were > resolved by taking the mfi driver from -HEAD at the time and setting > hw.mfi.msi=1. The oldest ones have been running for over two years. Thats curious, hw.mfi.msi=1 is the default so you shouldn't need to change this. Also heads mfi is almost identical to 9.2 so not sure why you would need to update, could you clarify? Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 10:02:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D382D877 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail3.transactionware.com (mail3.transactionware.com [202.68.173.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06C6E2395 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24912 invoked by uid 907); 7 Oct 2013 10:02:03 -0000 Received: from eth222.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.53]) (150.101.196.221) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by mail3.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:02:03 +1100 Subject: Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Jan Mikkelsen X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <5A58E4C49C3D42B0AFADC2B7C4D4B013@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 21:02:01 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3A102078-B6D7-4404-9BC7-934772D326D7@transactionware.com> References: <20131003194704.GG41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20131004052457.GN41229@kib.kiev.ua> <24C7E2F8EDAF40439C076C03B8A0E203@multiplay.co.uk> <1380902373.2621.12.camel@localhost> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC2F488@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> <2F782A12-C6C0-46F0-849E-935ED4B007BA@transactionware.com> <0370DB3A3A804CB48C862133FC053836@multiplay.co.uk> <79021054-40E5-40C6-89E1-4483709A8574@transactionware.com> <5A58E4C49C3D42B0AFADC2B7C4D4B013@multiplay.co.uk> To: Steven Hartland X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) Cc: Konstantin Belousov , Ryan Stone , "" , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:02:08 -0000 On 7 Oct 2013, at 8:06 pm, Steven Hartland = wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Mikkelsen" = > .. >=20 >> Just to confirm when you say fine, have you checked to ensure none >> are reporting timeouts? >=20 >> Yes. >> Only the first two of these are from a 9.2 era system (also the ones >> with the most recent firmware). >> We did have timeout issues while testing this platform which were >> resolved by taking the mfi driver from -HEAD at the time and setting >> hw.mfi.msi=3D1. The oldest ones have been running for over two years. >=20 > Thats curious, hw.mfi.msi=3D1 is the default so you shouldn't need to > change this. >=20 > Also heads mfi is almost identical to 9.2 so not sure why you would > need to update, could you clarify? The 9.2 system has the 9.2 driver and was not updated. It is a test = system with a 9261-8i and a 9240-4i. The other machines are running 9.0 or 9.1 with a modified driver. The = 9.0 systems have a patch that added the hw.mfi.msi sysctl with a default = of zero. I just went back to our Perforce depot and checked the timing; = that patch was applied to our local copy on 2011-12-08. My =93running = for over two years=94 was wrong, it is actually about a year and a half. = At that point the 9261-8i was stable and we saw no further timeout = errors even with the old firmware versions in my email. (looking through = svn, this change was in rev 227562 to mfi_pci.c.) The loader.conf entry has been in our standard builds ever since, and = even after the default value changed. Probably time to remove it. We started using the 9240-4i/8i in May 2012. We brought in changes from = head mfi to support them. I=92d need to go digging deeper to see exactly = what the changes were. A quick look shows that this is when the = hw.mfi.msi default changed in our copy of the code. In any case: These system are running and we don=92t see timeout errors = with the firmware versions I listed. There were also your later changes that improved the reliability of mfi. = We brought those back into our 9.1 based systems, but the cards were = working before those changes. Regards, Jan. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 11:33:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F09ABC for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7B92BD6 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r97BXY1N014568; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:33:34 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r97BXYMP014567; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:33:34 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:33:34 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Pete French Subject: Re: pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2 Message-ID: <20131007113334.GR8860@FreeBSD.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, kron24@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:33:37 -0000 On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Pete French wrote: P> Just to follow this up for anyuone finding the thread, after upgrading P> the other firewall to 9.2 as well, pfsync works fine agai. The failover P> actually seems a lot faster in fact, so it looks like a big improvements. Btw, pfsync between 9.x and 10.x is compatible, so provided you have a failover, you are encouraged to try 10-ALPHA4, where pf(4) has got performance improvements comparing to 9.x. More on pf(4) in 10.x: http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2012-10-2012-12.html#SMP-Friendly-pf%284%29 Where to get latest 10.0-ALPHA4 release: http://www.freebsd.org/where.html#helptest -- Totus tuus, Glebius. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 11:47:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEA71B7 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail1.riverwillow.net.au (mail1.riverwillow.net.au [IPv6:2001:8000:1000:1801::36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3658A2CD9 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au (rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au [IPv6:2001:8000:1000:18e1:20c:76ff:fe0a:2117]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail1.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r97BkqEx072204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:46:55 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=riverwillow.com.au; s=m1001; t=1381146416; bh=jCEtFAIGc/dAPB7PHSegJ1dzNaobGkuTui7zO80XJPE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=PHaY+6BH5lLsaOWor0JlmldCqk068W8IXO5fn8QaBszDSzrDo+Q75fY8+xvCFBmn4 UNmefsnSGlREcAR6AY+3TRveilC9o6xTtFeq0odnrwWIOWwFjMj+7GxObnFHs3gQB0 PphCyRJZ+USWNOGwf6+3CjR9px37ilDjzj7mI05k= Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:46:52 +1100 From: John Marshall To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: 9.2-RC4 amd64 panic: vm_page_unwire Message-ID: <20131007114652.GF1510@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> References: <20130927000728.GB19167@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20130927081221.GK41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20130928023046.GA1428@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20130929212104.GB1370@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20130930095507.GD2813@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20131004132900.GC20752@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20131005071607.GA24797@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20131005075720.GF41229@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131005075720.GF41229@kib.kiev.ua> OpenPGP: id=A29A84A2; url=http://pki.riverwillow.com.au/pgp/johnmarshall.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:47:09 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Oct 2013, 10:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Since you have a will to play with this, please try to bisect the > stable to see which commit introduced the regression (you said that 9.1 > does not panic). stable/9@r244654 is where the panic is introduced. So I am guessing that nullfs is an unanticipated necessary ingredient? I run jails on both systems and use nullfs to mount the host system's /usr /sbin /bin /lib /libexec read-only in the jails. The jails are managed with jail.conf(5) and the nullfs mounts are created and deleted with the jails via a per-jail mount.fstab directive in jail.conf. The panics I see (when ntpd or watchdogd exit during shutdown) happen after the jails have been removed (and their nullfs mounts deleted) FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0 r244654: Mon Oct 7 20:48:44 AEST 2013 ns4: removed Stopping ntpd. Waiting for PIDS: 1900 panic: vm_page_unwire: page 0xfffffe0236f7eb60's wire count is zero cpuid =3D 5 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff804834a8 at kdb_backtrace+0x68 #1 0xffffffff8044a7fa at panic+0x21a #2 0xffffffff80679382 at vm_page_unwire+0x102 #3 0xffffffff806662c2 at vm_fault_unwire+0xd2 #4 0xffffffff8066e421 at vm_map_delete+0x171 #5 0xffffffff8066e69f at vm_map_remove+0x5f #6 0xffffffff80671969 at vmspace_exit+0xc9 #7 0xffffffff80413c7d at exit1+0x71d #8 0xffffffff80414c7e at sys_sys_exit+0xe #9 0xffffffff8069d0df at amd64_syscall+0x3bf #10 0xffffffff80687d67 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7 Additional information is in core.txt.31 in the same location indicated in my OP. --=20 John Marshall --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlJSnywACgkQw/tAaKKahKJWIQCeLnr60SvFtABzM3huZ/fE9vA8 JYkAn2E87SkX5ZHiP6VXPTzNpoJAJuHq =ytKJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 13:11:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7045D64 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803202265 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-127-6.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.127.6]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2013 23:41:09 +1030 Message-ID: <5252B2EB.9010603@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:41:07 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Continuous timeout messages from 10.0 alpha4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 13:11:11 -0000 This is a regression between alpha2 and alpha4. I first setup a disk to boot 10 just after alpha2 was tagged. A few days ago I updated to alpha4 and started getting timeout messages, I have just built alpha5 r256098 and still get them. I just had 10 running for a few hours and 3 of the messages log archives which syslog rotates each hour due to size contain 3370 2508 and 3162 timeout messages over 3 hours uptime. each entry is similar to -- Oct 7 19:00:02 leader kernel: ahcich1: Timeout on slot 15 port 0 Oct 7 19:00:02 leader kernel: ahcich1: is 40000001 cs 00008000 ss 00000000 rs 00008000 tfd 2451 serr 00000000 cmd 00004f17 With slot x cycling from 0-31 but not always in sequence. MB is ASUS P8H61M LE/USB3 - corei5 - 8MB - nvidia GT520 ahci0: port 0xf070-0xf077,0xf060-0xf063,0xf050-0xf057,0xf040-0xf043,0xf020-0xf03f mem 0xfb305000-0xfb3057ff irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 ahci0: AHCI v1.30 with 4 3Gbps ports, Port Multiplier not supported With the following connected to ahcich1 (LG blu-ray burner) cd0 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device Most relevant dmesg info would be (full dmesg/logs available) -- ahci0: port 0xf070-0xf077,0xf060-0xf063,0xf050-0xf057,0xf040-0xf043,0xf020-0xf03f mem 0xfb305000-0xfb3057ff irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 ahci0: AHCI v1.30 with 4 3Gbps ports, Port Multiplier not supported ahcich0: at channel 0 on ahci0 ahcich1: at channel 1 on ahci0 ahcich4: at channel 4 on ahci0 ahcich5: at channel 5 on ahci0 ahciem0: on ahci0 ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-8 SATA 3.x device ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 1907729MB (3907029168 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: quirks=0x1<4K> ada0: Previously was known as ad4 ada1 at ahcich4 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 ada1: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device ada1: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: Command Queueing enabled ada1: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: quirks=0x1<4K> ada1: Previously was known as ad8 ada2 at ahcich5 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0 ada2: ATA-6 SATA 2.x device ada2: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA6, PIO 512bytes) ada2: 76324MB (156312576 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada2: Previously was known as ad10 ses0 at ahciem0 bus 0 scbus4 target 0 lun 0 ses0: SEMB S-E-S 2.00 device ses0: SEMB SES Device From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 13:20:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FF829C for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B593122F9 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r97DKQY2050768; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:20:27 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Message-ID: <5252B51A.5090400@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:20:26 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130415 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Listen queue overflow References: <51FA750C.50502@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <51FA750C.50502@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eg.sd.rdtc.ru Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 13:20:36 -0000 On 01.08.2013 21:47, Mike Tancsa wrote: > After upgrading from a RELENG9 kernel from June 18th to July 27th, I am > seeing this odd new message. Is this a new bug, or just a new > diagnostic message ? I am guessing it happened after r253035 ? > > > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe001ac76930: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in > queue awaiting acceptance > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe001ac76930: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in > queue awaiting acceptance > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe001ac76930: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in > queue awaiting acceptance > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe001ac76930: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in > queue awaiting acceptance > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe001ac76930: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in > queue awaiting acceptance > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffffe001ac76930: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in > queue awaiting acceptance Try "netstat -Lan". From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 13:51:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97E0E8F for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@potato.growveg.org) Received: from potato.growveg.org (growveg-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:3d2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5F1253F for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VTBDY-000E1A-F3 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:51:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:51:24 +0100 From: John To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: buildworld fails 9.1-STABLE -> 9.2.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <20131007135124.GA53830@potato.growveg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 13:51:30 -0000 Hello freebsd-stable, I have a buildworld failure upgrading 9.1-stable (r250633) to 9.2.0-release. I take these steps: 1. rm -rf /usr/obj 2. rm -rf /usr/src 3. mkdir /usr/obj 4. mkdir /usr/src 5. svn co https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base/release/9.2.0/ /usr/src (this results in Revision: 256108) 6. cd /usr/src 7. make clean && make clean (just to be sure) 8. make buildworld This fails at the following point: ./contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/FileSystemStatCache.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic /IdentifierTable.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/ tools/clang/lib/Basic/LangOptions.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../.. /../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/Module.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/ libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/ObjCRuntime.cpp /usr /src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic /OpenMPKinds.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools /clang/lib/Basic/OperatorPrecedence.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../.. /../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/SourceLocation.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/ libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp /usr /src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/ TargetInfo.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/ clang/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/ llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/TokenKinds.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/.. /../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/Version.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/ libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/VersionTuple.cpp /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/ SourceManager.cpp:1100:10: fatal error: 'emmintrin.h' file not found #include ^ 1 error generated. mkdep: compile failed *** [.depend] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic. *** [depend] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/clang. *** [cross-tools] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [_cross-tools] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [buildworld] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. ==================================================== I have no src.conf in /etc. make.conf looks like this: CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPP=clang-cpp # added by use.perl 2013-05-14 02:01:08 PERL_VERSION=5.14.2 Can anyone help? thanks, -- John From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 22:39:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97559D1F for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@serv1.energyefficency-dr.biz) Received: from serv1.energyefficency-dr.biz (serv1.energyefficency-dr.biz [64.71.158.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CA12ABC for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 76-233-30-151.lightspeed.snantx.sbcglobal.net (76-233-30-151.lightspeed.snantx.sbcglobal.net [76.233.30.151]) by serv1.energyefficency-dr.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C384187F61 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:39:53 +0400 (MSD) From: "Dennis Roberts" Subject: Solar Windows Webinar - US AIR FORCE APPROVED - See thru radiant barrier To: "freebsd-stable" MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://www.inflectorglobal.com Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:39:54 -0500 Message-Id: <20131007223954.0C384187F61@serv1.energyefficency-dr.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:39:55 -0000 =EF=BB=BFA Billion Dollar Company just joined us from the middle east = - droberts43@sbcglobal.net What is an Inflector Window Insulator? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D= 21DiKS5mt4k =20 =20 Energy Efficiency Done Right presents information on the In'Flector Se= e Through Radiant Barrier Window and Skylight Insulator and the Energy= Efficiency Industry. We will examine the growth of the energy efficie= ncy, conservation, energy independence, and carbon emmission industrie= s and explain opportunities to represent or purchase our Insulator pro= ducts. Register for a session now by clicking a date below: Tue, Oct 15, 2013 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CDT Once registered you will receive an email confirming your registration= with information you need to join the Webinar. System Requirements PC-based attendees Required: Windows=C2=AE 8, 7, Vista, XP or 2003 Server Mac=C2=AE-based attendees Required: Mac OS=C2=AE X 10.6 or newer Mobile attendees Required: iPhone=C2=AE, iPad=C2=AE, Android=E2=84=A2 phone or Android = tablet Unsubscribe by email Keith Roberts 10854 Lake Path San Antonio, TX 78217 Inflector Window Insulators - See Thru Radiant Barrier droberts43@sbcglobal.net This is an advetisement for a webinar! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 06:35:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CF51E4 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADECE2723 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id tp5so18789142ieb.12 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:35:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ePuxQBKp6y+xAB52xsUyeGnDnHDUPdJUzYTGOmXDSRY=; b=fpYfcbmWl3yecVzjxE6bx8dx1RfMOx3i2y4HfdtHgZjihSfBbU473rUBcXwWBbvnbA 2fwsEYZkN4BTQckGkDOWTsjaoFakXtgshydpkhmRntvYoHP3Evjpt4HqqCd1/LnhlMLl 67PuQXH3Tdi94ZNbmV7K9FofxKxN9Sen8G/z5k+pcoVTyCAdPea13fEbxcWI99YM5Khp lWHGKVbd6QGo9zihJ4l0ADC49gE6e0ObtofNvzjFE4O03ph93XHR0eWATgHQ27M8L57m OH5J6gXf6p/iy7/fVnuR2l4dfCph0EImz8hXszlT9JZkGZoucHD/bxUsW/FejLamrW0X yRZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.114.168 with SMTP id jh8mr47630igb.6.1381214130124; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.8.244 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 23:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:35:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Installing packages from 9.2 Release DVD From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:35:31 -0000 Dear All , In sysinstall , there are menu items to install packages from release DVD . In bsdinstall , there is NO such package installation menu items . Another problem is there is no any available information about this subject in the Handbook installation pages ( at least I could not find any one one ) . Is there any such available information link , and is there any possibility to include such information into Handbook pages and Release Notes templates ? When there is no such information , people will use pkg_add -r ... statement although many packages are already in the release DVD which means a large waste of band width . ( Please consider less experienced people : Each year , many persons are entering into an age to try FreeBSD without prior experience about FreeBSD . Lack of necessary information about install is an important obstacle for such new entries . ) Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 09:29:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CDB121 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7575C2201 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa04.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r989T8g5026943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 04:29:08 -0500 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([169.254.1.103]) by LTCFISWMSGHT03.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.31]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 04:29:07 -0500 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Subject: Re: Installing packages from 9.2 Release DVD Thread-Topic: Installing packages from 9.2 Release DVD Thread-Index: AQHOxAjVUHcFqe/N3EO4+ZWh63EEtw== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:29:06 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC424D5@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.121] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-08_05:2013-10-08,2013-10-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: freebsd-stable , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:29:09 -0000 On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > Dear All , >=20 > In sysinstall , there are menu items to install packages from release DVD= . >=20 > In bsdinstall , there is NO such package installation menu items . >=20 You've got the wrong tool. s/bsdinstall/bsdconfig/ > Another problem is there is no any available information about this subje= ct > in the Handbook installation pages ( at least I could not find any one one > ) . >=20 bsdconfig was just born in 9.2-R. Nobody has gotten around to documenting i= t. I'll be doing the first presentation on it at the vBSDcon [un]Conference co= ming up in a couple weeks (Oct 25-27th in Reston, VA; hosted by Verisign). > Is there any such available information link , and is there any possibili= ty > to include such information into Handbook pages and Release Notes templat= es > ? >=20 bsdconfig(8) was announced in the quarterly announcements and release highlights for FreeBSD 9.2-R. As for the handbook... it will take time for doc folks to assimilate it. > When there is no such information , people will use >=20 > pkg_add -r ... >=20 > statement although many packages are already in the release DVD which mea= ns > a large waste of band width . >=20 Only media type that bsdconfig(8) doesn't support is TAPE. However, bsdconf= ig supports a couple new types of media for accessing packages. Other than tha= t, your old friends of CD/DVD, FTP, HTTP, FTP via Proxy, NFS, and some new ones are all there. > ( Please consider less experienced people : Each year , many persons are > entering into an age to try FreeBSD without prior experience about FreeBSD > . Lack of necessary information about install is an important obstacle for > such new entries . ) >=20 I appreciate your feedback. Rest assured, less experienced peoples *were* considered. That's why I started work on bsdconfig(8) 3 years ago shortly after the dep= recation of sysinstall in base. The curses-UI-loving folks were not forgotten (less experienced or otherwis= e; a fancy TUI/GUI doesn't necessarily mean it has to be only usable to less ski= lled folks... take "bsdconfig startup" for example -- something not normally pos= sible with any other tool regardless of your skill level). --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 11:32:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14299C4 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEEF32AC4 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ro12so8562422pbb.27 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 04:32:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Pi/wnjkQfowc3yBKJHbK0VZ8K16zX4Q6reHVh2fEcOs=; b=QaRxYy6XXZuUUbkNmMiAxOKc+X+z8OdQ4n/XVo4YENW4k4xEixtsGlcZAka9OKtUGv nJti3Q5UrmajBTUMlcQNWOOmfgKF3nIhDsvbaqkr7RAJHKfgRe6oyo7n6p6g2glKB+Pm AbPCvzsPKJ3m4hc+SM7YAnXd3WE0ejo7IiEfBoipQO2xyLnQgZZft+VaI6vmUMuB0sln YuTYPrF4nkZSBh/4L9a8IixmYtPhyc61lfatzYgqviKYWIl4oUu0csrLg2Fg8bGxn6R8 dFNBSd9m8WLUx/LY63pYQLzAJGdMQu1vEVXS6w6hjjgPY1Yscy6B14bPzIEWurB1CQnT aWgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.129.163 with SMTP id nx3mr1407323pbb.84.1381231958302; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 04:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.98 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 04:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:32:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: after freebsd-update: /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout From: Sami Halabi To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:32:38 -0000 Hi, i have a box with FreeBSD-9.1-Release. I did freebsd-update and since then i get: root@6:/root # jexec 1 /bin/csh /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout root@6:/root # i see /lib/libc.so.7 was updated as i read in some forums, i did: root@6:/root # ldconfig /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib root@6:/root # any hints to fix that? i did once again freebsd-update fetch install, and that didn't help. maybe i can rollback? Thanksin advance, -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert FreeBSD SysAdmin Expert Network Admin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 11:57:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF1B6BC for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7F42C96 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fb1so8767238pad.9 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 04:57:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zgFuRJkUDkq3SYKp/hxeKv+Dm2orI56SLEzamDV/yhQ=; b=qYbzRN6MAQQl64BPymKhP6WYVzjmO/7gNLfi5v9yTuHycJBPybDqMvokkaEBQyno9A uHyplI/JYzV39zZmvR5AI5vfVqZcLVrf7vUJuAwenZ2AhLOQI3bKFDwxCEh47ZxXXPZr m2hevBKnpePrcA02kyhXYvr1ehUTNmSwHP3wDpw1fTVNtT3DxdWTD1xyX7/tvmYTBKIC TUxpkep6qCwcN3I9a/y7X9R7ZkXBRT70T07USpt9oVAWFEFC2kkVbe59Nr6D9k1L9Aae b797Dislt6fa9uJ/B1B/LiassL9bxZE7GtshNfv/v8oBDGsc0kMeE0i9WNip5SifbCVK DYcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.219.233 with SMTP id pr9mr3092596pac.45.1381233452184; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 04:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.98 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 04:57:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:57:32 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: after freebsd-update: /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout From: Sami Halabi To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:57:32 -0000 Hi, heads up: i did freebsd-update rollback on the specific jail and its working again.. it uninstalled the libc.so.7. whats strange is that this jail almost a clean jail nothing is running but cron, sshd and some shoutcat processes, in parallel i have 2 jails that have sshd/crond and much more processes (apache, dns, mysql....) that work after the update without a problem. Sami On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > i have a box with FreeBSD-9.1-Release. > I did freebsd-update and since then i get: > > root@6:/root # jexec 1 /bin/csh > /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout > root@6:/root # > > i see /lib/libc.so.7 was updated > > as i read in some forums, i did: > root@6:/root # ldconfig /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib > root@6:/root # > > any hints to fix that? > i did once again freebsd-update fetch install, and that didn't help. > maybe i can rollback? > > Thanksin advance, > > > -- > Sami Halabi > Information Systems Engineer > NMS Projects Expert > FreeBSD SysAdmin Expert > Network Admin > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert FreeBSD SysAdmin Expert From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 12:53:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15E9280 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2959D211D for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r98Cr10m063593 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:53:01 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Message-ID: <5254002D.4020406@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 19:53:01 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130415 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Overrated if_obytes accounting in 8.4-STABLE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eg.sd.rdtc.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:53:08 -0000 Hi! Right now outgoint network interface accounting is broken in stable/8 due to incomplete MFC (r247430) of r241037. That MFC was meant to move if_obytes computation from drbr to distinct drivers. In fact, it did not remove if_obytes computation drom drbr so it is overrated. The patch for stable/8 is presented here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182828 Please fix. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 13:11:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC05B29 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:11:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x232.google.com (mail-qe0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3CF2269 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a11so6538083qen.23 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:11:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rIeFw8hA5203g8Ab+SjBj/7Pwzk4uodeU9OKeN+MM1E=; b=vrghfo+af0XQitPqPV2gSRg7EUYqfxP8wTVCB2R6yM1F0l93CeWOLg9i/qHneppq/n zKNh+NDwKd4e+4IPEvXPlGA2bZi2+YDc4lJ7sSjYa+7kMKZEqimGl877d+cxGi/5/tt1 QiRXvtnKcbXb3gog4IrMUrxlPB2e5ZpbXnOi1NC1W11mfPlQe5vS0Yj0yE1r+a7hnChP Gn8RS0kZA/liDfGV4zMllxMBdawk30rc20zFwFsaH/j9RDQXPyDXhJd3M8H5TM0lygYY CdFRgfdicLu0SsZfbtr2/Mm2jXk0pdrI7pg+2PPXBWNys9t1wWFbujjAenOWDZwUTlDa l48Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.120.6 with SMTP id b6mr3653620qar.11.1381237904432; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.55.77 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:11:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <58E65D87-C41C-4777-9EAA-005CE3506B6A@mac.com> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:11:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running a script via PHP From: krad To: Ronald Klop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:11:45 -0000 and just to be safe wrap it all up in a VIMAGE jail On 1 October 2013 14:39, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 23:50:02 +0200, Charles Swiger > wrote: > > Hi-- >> >> On Sep 27, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Michael BlackHeart >> wrote: >> >>> Hello there, >>> It's quite off-topic, but I'm using freebsd-stable,so >>> >>> The priblem is - running a script that requires root privileges via PHP >>> (or >>> probably CGI - I do not care, just want it to be secure and working). >>> >> >> Unfortunately the combination of PHP, doing something which needs root, >> and >> security are inherently contradictory. >> >> The least risky approach would be to invoke the needed command via sudo, >> or >> possibly a small setuid-root C wrapper program which launches only the >> needed script >> with root permissions. Use sudo unless your C wrapper is careful enough >> to use >> exec() and not system(), sanitizes $PATH and other env variables, and >> guards against >> games with $IFS, shell metachars, and such. >> >> Regards, >> > > Use sudo, because your home grown C wrapper will make all the mistakes > which are already solved in sudo. Or will be spotted in the future in sudo > and will never be spotted in your program. > Chances are high that future requirements of your C wrapper will turn it > in a little sudo. > > Ronald. > > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org > " > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 15:16:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258E9932; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@1command.com) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA2DC29B0; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r98F0JOP091474; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:00:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@1command.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r98F0Exe091473; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:00:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@1command.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net ([209.180.214.225]) (UDNSMS authenticated user chrish) by ultimatedns.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Who hacked the FreeBSD website? From: "Chris H" To: "freebsd-stable" User-Agent: UDNSMS/2.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:16:50 -0000 Greetings, I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23; The link to it is: http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace the "Long description" link is: http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace/pkg-descr?revision=HEAD Both of which return: Page not found. Oh no. :( Any chance FreeBSD has a backup of the web site? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 15:22:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A660CBE; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [208.86.227.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0E02A48; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (c-71-224-221-174.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40E9F8D2A; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:22:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us 40E9F8D2A Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:22:48 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Chris H Subject: No, the FreeBSD website was not hacked.... (Re: Who hacked the FreeBSD website?) Message-ID: <20131008152248.GJ24985@glenbarber.us> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:22:51 -0000 --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please don't use subject lines like that for broken links... On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:00:14AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links > providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD > 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23; > The link to it is: > http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace > the "Long description" link is: > http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace/pk= g-descr?revision=3DHEAD >=20 It looks like the paths are messed up somehow. I'll take a look asap. Glen > Both of which return: >=20 > Page not found. > Oh no. :( >=20 > Any chance FreeBSD has a backup of the web site? >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-www@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-www > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-www-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSVCNIAAoJELls3eqvi17QNVkQAMSI06beWndPcBoOIHs1mTII Al46jo66XyIN8nHDdnKmCYq9BnhxIqv/ieps7NOCEO6XlrpJwFfzdfwa2yztZHEl YgwBWwEjLdXJzY2IjNl8tnW7o74NtLuz9FWs8yq9UXpl9fVSP7GKvYKoAWhGo4P3 bzS/mTXzB3mhgGMyCnZxLLE7eFXqEn1LHFDR6Pez03ZaOejcEBVw9esNmuM6HkSF dOXcsUh8VsqlwqP0S2jlGxqN3Ant+/bBHJoEq7ysiG/eTzH7+YwZM1HeyIkrPYfv k5zL25+/D66iud9Zwkb+9FyCSUOaOFL0lnwm6/MXuhOnlVt8Q7VtU+8s87KplzNC YkWFTQcT1Wsl2GhwwyvzyCbGKzCMB2G/L59mElI76Oq8tbSniYvgWRNh6Xl7tVlH /43v3zGAcBBCcdpnjiYS/zF/8a/Mpi1r9tJV2sb3+lcehhlSOlINP62pyY1vbrbz V0ANEB4SoatjLHd0X0JreJMBsumChUjzDfwrdVhtYMzbR3ggUI1gw/5JbZssbSj9 0OvfMp29WHenfKuX6XUAnA60cio50e0g4eD461FK1VWRz7MPufIzmkvmoOCNctqO ZOHnw/JAbYCRsqbMSsQjGjhzf8+NirS/V4WbiTiKivvlrYRQE4IfYHOshdx+yqqK CkMkXxJICdntrlxR3ejP =Hx5r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 15:32:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F47157; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@1command.com) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EAF2AF9; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r98FWXDY093790; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:32:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@1command.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r98FWSWw093784; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@1command.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net ([209.180.214.225]) (UDNSMS authenticated user chrish) by ultimatedns.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6effd252686d854b01b13ee0d2e7bc40.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20131008152248.GJ24985@glenbarber.us> References: <20131008152248.GJ24985@glenbarber.us> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: No, the FreeBSD website was not hacked.... (Re: Who hacked the FreeBSD website?) From: "Chris H" To: "Glen Barber" User-Agent: UDNSMS/2.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:32:17 -0000 > Please don't use subject lines like that for broken links... Sorry. I was sure that the ports page was rendered as an automated process. Making it unlikely that such a dramatic change in pathing would be highly unlikely, if not impossible. > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:00:14AM -0700, Chris H wrote: >> Greetings, >> I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links >> providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD >> 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23; >> The link to it is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace >> the "Long description" link is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace/pkg-descr?revision=HEAD >> > > It looks like the paths are messed up somehow. I'll take a look asap. Aren't changes like this verified before roll out? --Chris > > Glen > >> Both of which return: >> >> Page not found. >> Oh no. :( >> >> Any chance FreeBSD has a backup of the web site? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-www@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-www >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-www-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 16:23:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F1D6E4 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D6CF2EB9 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6D021D92 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:23:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=tGWdg/HUU6GGEVhHTHgaSgQZ1g0=; b=Nczv4 lAFfDAQEZZ73ZDo4mcIk+g+VeJwF3aKoPDdGGPstGW1WDPLFoQHnck+UH7lxf/U9 UcF6NjL5fe1lliwRP5ej731ZQFstww7igp1quXHjMI9Qi7thm54eD/3SngJfHsyC i2tVH5sfgjvOD2c+FmAmvQHZT8H3syXZUBxV5c= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9FE4B117473; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1381249390.5710.31517309.3EA07F25@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: bPXaW/ZSKu/PvbeaT/mntZjKQjyFM9Ki480gmTAhNPk7 1381249390 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-ce174988 Subject: Re: Who hacked the FreeBSD website? Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:23:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:23:12 -0000 On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:00, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links > providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD > 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23; > The link to it is: > http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace > the "Long description" link is: > http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace/pkg-descr?revision=HEAD > > Both of which return: > > Page not found. > Oh no. :( > > Any chance FreeBSD has a backup of the web site? > Not sure what's going on with that, but you can use freshports.org as a backup From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 20:50:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D846FC for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37432FFA for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id va2so886764obc.26 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:50:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tk2O2PFcUQRVglfs0DloaTbIFPAuYNm4bu0B7IfO828=; b=Oh/kAGyDgYaTXKEyj+t/rlj53CMfGC0rJjWR2swG2+z23ErpQ1S6KKOzHFuW+2e7BD pcWOa94yGwQxyFNnWU+XRTA2LvXP0q4jNnZoDlLFrp0IfFfWKjBUX4KsIDE/rAAHAaFz eDHHNUitB+aHX09WCWmswDpBYb2xRcFTqkCxQUpoZ9V/mSXcJ7w6m2HBT1/IjyrjadQ9 aRfSPLXmB2ublKq3VXSsw/HGbABI+t3ioioM9XkS3o6XINGKPgJbRvenKQ9ouiE2oeEl D9cvslS542UDC62skfbvD/cB3181Xr5+LDTgigtNhp99owjloeRtHuGipZZ9EA+5GDHd xvAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.52.244 with SMTP id w20mr2749093oeo.30.1381265412943; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:50:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.69.1 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:50:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:50:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: after freebsd-update: /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout From: Ryan Stone To: Sami Halabi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:50:14 -0000 On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > i have a box with FreeBSD-9.1-Release. > I did freebsd-update and since then i get: > > root@6:/root # jexec 1 /bin/csh > /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout > root@6:/root # > > i see /lib/libc.so.7 was updated > > as i read in some forums, i did: > root@6:/root # ldconfig /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib > root@6:/root # > > any hints to fix that? > i did once again freebsd-update fetch install, and that didn't help. > maybe i can rollback? > > Thanksin advance, Does the jail host have a 32-bit (i386) kernel and userland? You would get that error if you tried to run 64-bit software on a 32-bit host. Perhaps you accidentally upgraded your jail to an amd64 image? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 23:39:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B481DDE for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D79D22AF7 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTgsT-00079r-Se for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:39:45 +0200 Received: from 149.241.22.55 ([149.241.22.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:39:45 +0200 Received: from johannes by 149.241.22.55 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:39:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Johannes Totz Subject: Trouble building/upgrading 9-stable Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:39:38 +0100 Lines: 126 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.241.22.55 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:03:18 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 23:39:48 -0000 Hi, I'm having trouble upgrading a system running 9-stable to a new revision. buildworld always dies with an "internal compiler error" during lib/clang/libllvminstcombine. The machine is currently running: FreeBSD fred 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251914: Tue Jun 18 20:30:07 BST 2013 root@fred:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FRED amd64 I'm trying to upgrade to svn stable/9 r256049. I tried switching off compiler optimisations in make.conf but that didn't work. The very same error happens since August, different revisions. Bits from the script(1)-ed output are: ===> lib/clang/libllvminstcombine (all) c++ -O -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mtune=native -march=native -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" -fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp -o InstCombineAddSub.o c++ -O -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mtune=native -march=native -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" -fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp -o InstCombineAndOrXor.o c++ -O -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mtune=native -march=native -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" -fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCalls.cpp -o InstCombineCalls.o c++ -O -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mtune=native -march=native -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" -fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp -o InstCombineCasts.o c++ -O -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mtune=native -march=native -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" -fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp -o InstCombineCompares.o /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp: In member function 'llvm::Instruction* llvm::InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(llvm::ICmpInst&, llvm::Instruction*, llvm::ConstantInt*)': /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp:1649: internal compiler error: in memory_address_length, at config/i386/i386.c:13897 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. *** [InstCombineCompares.o] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/clang. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib. *** [lib__L] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [libraries] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [_libraries] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [buildworld] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Any idea how to work around this? Or what to do about it? Thanks! Johannes From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 02:49:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49114270 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFDE2343 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ro12so215594pbb.27 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 19:49:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UH/E82qXcjVyptu/YwnKR+uICOaSRXDpwpnhck/PaFg=; b=AS9yxbnSq/LMRO4VqC+/m1T1ORewx3DPRG/o85HEiRXItgrUA55+bXOnXSwBWRU18M CumjU5ZtDCa16ZUPC62L/W8JPO6HQ+O3RcSVgZI6rFT/LzBAj/qmbmiJAksVCGoFpdn0 3MFuDiMc7P5ziJAK9EA3itNH6+//lC7BW1k4ecYh9XGERl3bWMhfwWOkaBQy2lzjTrCl 5tC8QDh+GXaJdBH42AjuAWHCWxf5NtVm+S/k0zWDp1c7252nmCrx8WGcQnvYqPikXX/4 n0Z/XF08O/lq0meZDi2sz2V0hKet0EAm6G80teBszt+MK70Prv9Jmtc5/tCJR4mSebrZ oj/g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.241.132 with SMTP id wi4mr5234273pbc.45.1381286954763; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 19:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.98 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.98 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:49:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 05:49:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: after freebsd-update: /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout From: Sami Halabi To: Ryan Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 02:49:15 -0000 Hi, Your right... Cheeeeee. Forgot about it totally... This is my only 32 bit jail used for shoutcast v1. Apparently freebsd-update from host(with -b) grabbed amd64 binarries... Any way to safly update the 32bit jail.. The host is64 however... Sami =D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 8 =D7=91=D7=90=D7=95=D7=A7 2013 23:50,= "Ryan Stone" =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: > > Hi, > > i have a box with FreeBSD-9.1-Release. > > I did freebsd-update and since then i get: > > > > root@6:/root # jexec 1 /bin/csh > > /lib/libc.so.7: unsupported file layout > > root@6:/root # > > > > i see /lib/libc.so.7 was updated > > > > as i read in some forums, i did: > > root@6:/root # ldconfig /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib > > root@6:/root # > > > > any hints to fix that? > > i did once again freebsd-update fetch install, and that didn't help. > > maybe i can rollback? > > > > Thanksin advance, > > Does the jail host have a 32-bit (i386) kernel and userland? You > would get that error if you tried to run 64-bit software on a 32-bit > host. Perhaps you accidentally upgraded your jail to an amd64 image? > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 09:44:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA145ED for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DC428CA for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from coleburn.avinity.tv (host-229-161-243.77.avinity.tv [77.243.161.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 620A95C5A; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:43:59 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E49A7A3C-16FC-4658-A103-C3CB781DBE14"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Trouble building/upgrading 9-stable From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:44:00 +0200 Message-Id: References: To: Johannes Totz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 09:44:01 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E49A7A3C-16FC-4658-A103-C3CB781DBE14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 9, 2013, at 01:39, Johannes Totz wrote: > I'm having trouble upgrading a system running 9-stable to a new = revision. buildworld always dies with an "internal compiler error" = during lib/clang/libllvminstcombine. ... > = /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms= /InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp:1649: internal compiler error: in = memory_address_length, at config/i386/i386.c:13897 Since the tinderboxes for stable/9 are green, it is most likely your = machine has a hardware problem. You should at least run two or three = full passes of memtest on your machine: this type of error typically = occurs when data in RAM gets corrupted. If you can't find any hardware problems, you could try to switch off = building clang, using WITHOUT_CLANG in your src.conf. However, if your = hardware cannot be trusted, all bets are off... :) -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_E49A7A3C-16FC-4658-A103-C3CB781DBE14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlJVJWAACgkQsF6jCi4glqNUYACgjzrwU2G/CjyiYPajY8sMItTB KHYAmgL6pW/smPafiHskwAYthOEcMZMH =Nm+1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E49A7A3C-16FC-4658-A103-C3CB781DBE14-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 10:25:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC16FEB for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CC4E2B38 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTqx5-0008BV-Di for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:25:11 +0200 Received: from jtotz2.cs.ucl.ac.uk ([128.16.6.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:25:11 +0200 Received: from johannes by jtotz2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:25:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Johannes Totz Subject: Re: Trouble building/upgrading 9-stable Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:25:02 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jtotz2.cs.ucl.ac.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:25:20 -0000 On 09/10/2013 10:44, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Oct 9, 2013, at 01:39, Johannes Totz wrote: >> I'm having trouble upgrading a system running 9-stable to a new >> revision. buildworld always dies with an "internal compiler error" >> during lib/clang/libllvminstcombine. > ... >> /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp:1649: >> internal compiler error: in memory_address_length, at >> config/i386/i386.c:13897 > > Since the tinderboxes for stable/9 are green, it is most likely your > machine has a hardware problem. You should at least run two or three > full passes of memtest on your machine: this type of error typically > occurs when data in RAM gets corrupted. The box has ECC RAM, and runs pure zfs. I don't know what to look out for regarding ECC errors though. There's nothing in the console log that looks suspicious. Also, trying to compile this many times will always trigger the same error, that'd make RAM fault unlikely I would have thought (think random crashes, the box is rock solid otherwise). > If you can't find any hardware problems, you could try to switch off > building clang, using WITHOUT_CLANG in your src.conf. Thanks, will try that! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 14:16:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770879E5 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477A02A16 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u16so1864133iet.39 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=egXKE6uZ8ai65P4zudigoD40wRE51tHKulf1emlKxLc=; b=eKfhQ0pbmaCNjs5IWhdtRlCkRq7MeqglKZFz2URyz5HUUZMfoeH2gr6vPmV7GQ0h1B NCLtNO7XsSddKv/MZVlmkWjb6PN6AVCG103jfKEjChRXuOVfjVv59Vq6fdbaB+Sj5ohs SdBGruQXGAnc87TupcfcTUqq4EYoFIHXu4+pJ8HMkNhKomJhCAZxKZGyLSmxoU52waYp ztWWjq7Gi49XLOKnb5eBTi6hpiz+mebQ9rludwP85jSqCLYvRONsEE8cFPmBPAfeqwqA K5V8efvx2EynCS+YtaTQ4HPwVbKbpM99FOZ2wVO3exezlXKm5rTLP5FbzkQKJKn6z/cN Sg4Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.120.10 with SMTP id ky10mr2162921igb.29.1381328193675; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.9.39 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC424D5@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> References: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC424D5@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:16:33 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zg6o6ksai3iUYiP9qItcjCiukbw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Installing packages from 9.2 Release DVD From: Rick Miller To: "Teske, Devin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:16:36 -0000 On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: [ snip ] > > > Another problem is there is no any available information about this > subject > > in the Handbook installation pages ( at least I could not find any one > one > > ) . > > > > bsdconfig was just born in 9.2-R. Nobody has gotten around to documenting > it. > I'll be doing the first presentation on it at the vBSDcon [un]Conference > coming > up in a couple weeks (Oct 25-27th in Reston, VA; hosted by Verisign). Looking forward to this presentation, Devin! Devin's spot will be from 2PM - 3PM on October 26th. More information on vBSDcon can be found at http://www.vbsdcon.com/. Online registrations are available through October 23 and on-site registrations will be available through the entirety of the conference. The registration fee is USD$75. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 14:25:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C811B12C for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECB6D2B0B for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:25:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingresso.co.uk; s=x; h=Date:From:Message-Id:Subject:To; bh=j29saduiph4H5/3LueSBFFjz7/WJwSl24tOIHBA4nkc=; b=M+mOqkm9tvgrEEaRSM3K8+tqGjS0innSqLT5q84pT3dsFJLT465dD90y7CL635WGQlUMISQ2LGkt3I4jx6OHTvc9dUD8VVS+P9cN620CkqkDX1BjpnYf7Fvfr8Xe/5hCgY86PnQmF2nqLhyMwbx7VhLeuP4ncIr12Mox9mb6Wbw=; Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VTuhN-000OBo-Pp for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:25:14 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VTuhN-0006UM-73 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:25:13 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:25:13 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:25:19 -0000 I just had a machine fall over on my for the first time in ages - one of a pair of machine we have running hast with zfs on top. I havent got any concrete evidence of what made it die as yet, but I did notice the logifles filling up with thoursands of lines like this just prior to the crash: serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847744000, 1536). so I am guessing taht is ZFS trying to send a trim command to hast, and hast does not support it. Have disabled zfs trim now, but thought it was worth mentioning - I would have not expected zfs to be trying to issue a trim command to an underlying device which doesnt support it. These machines were rock solid under 8, and the only chnage I can see with 9 is the trim support being added. cheers, -pete. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 14:47:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848EF728 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1994e5d1ea=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E842C79 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50006340110.msg for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:47:37 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:47:37 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1994e5d1ea=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: , "Pete French" References: Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:47:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:47:47 -0000 ZFS will try to send DELETE requests to the underlying storage to support TRIM. If that fails then it will disable TRIM support for that vdev. My guess would be you're just seeing hast being a bit verbose when these initial batch failures happen. Regards Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete French" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:25 PM Subject: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 >I just had a machine fall over on my for the first time in ages - one > of a pair of machine we have running hast with zfs on top. I havent > got any concrete evidence of what made it die as yet, but I > did notice the logifles filling up with thoursands of lines like this > just prior to the crash: > > serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847744000, 1536). > > so I am guessing taht is ZFS trying to send a trim command to hast, and hast > does not support it. Have disabled zfs trim now, but thought it was > worth mentioning - I would have not expected zfs to be trying to issue > a trim command to an underlying device which doesnt support it. These > machines were rock solid under 8, and the only chnage I can see with 9 is > the trim support being added. > > cheers, > > -pete. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 22:02:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867FBB5A for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 22:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44EFF29F2 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 22:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VU1pn-0004C7-Te for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:02:23 +0200 Received: from 149.241.22.55 ([149.241.22.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:02:23 +0200 Received: from johannes by 149.241.22.55 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:02:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Johannes Totz Subject: Re: Trouble building/upgrading 9-stable Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:02:12 +0100 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.241.22.55 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:03:21 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:02:27 -0000 On 09/10/2013 11:25, Johannes Totz wrote: > On 09/10/2013 10:44, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On Oct 9, 2013, at 01:39, Johannes Totz wrote: >>> I'm having trouble upgrading a system running 9-stable to a new >>> revision. buildworld always dies with an "internal compiler error" >>> during lib/clang/libllvminstcombine. >> ... >>> /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvminstcombine/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp:1649: >>> >>> internal compiler error: in memory_address_length, at >>> config/i386/i386.c:13897 >> >> Since the tinderboxes for stable/9 are green, it is most likely your >> machine has a hardware problem. You should at least run two or three >> full passes of memtest on your machine: this type of error typically >> occurs when data in RAM gets corrupted. > > The box has ECC RAM, and runs pure zfs. > I don't know what to look out for regarding ECC errors though. There's > nothing in the console log that looks suspicious. > Also, trying to compile this many times will always trigger the same > error, that'd make RAM fault unlikely I would have thought (think random > crashes, the box is rock solid otherwise). > >> If you can't find any hardware problems, you could try to switch off >> building clang, using WITHOUT_CLANG in your src.conf. > > Thanks, will try that! Yeay, WITHOUT_CLANG has buildworld (and subsequent buildkernel) finish successfully. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 10 12:40:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FREEBSD-STABLE@FREEBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528C136 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 388800772-bounced@newzapp.co.uk) Received: from mta1-03.newzapp.co.uk (mta1-03.newzapp.co.uk [89.234.29.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF78B285A for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 408959-mta1-05.lon.intensive.int (127.0.0.1) by mta1-03.newzapp.co.uk id haqg2g0ig5c8 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:39:55 +0100 (envelope-from <388800772-bounced@newzapp.co.uk>) From: "mobilephonesdirect" To: "FREEBSD-STABLE@FREEBSD.ORG" Subject: Awards Shortlist 2013 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:39:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20131010-13395535-31d4@408959-mta1-05.lon.intensive.int> X-Abuse-Info: Sent using NewZapp, www.NewZapp.co.uk, support@DestiNet.co.uk X-Abuse-Info: Sent by info@mobilephonesdirect.co.uk X-Orig-message-ID: 388800772 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--=EA0C4145487145B18CA0_2D32_9A5B_1262" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:40:09 -0000 ----=EA0C4145487145B18CA0_2D32_9A5B_1262 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable To view a graphical version of this newsletter Click https://s5.newzapp.co.uk/t/gtp_pg.aspx?LID=3DOSwzODg4MDA3NzIsMw=3D= =3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Follow this link to Unsubscribe: [ http://system.newzapp.co.uk/Remove.= asp?CID=3D19429 ]. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ----=EA0C4145487145B18CA0_2D32_9A5B_1262-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 10 18:09:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D03A857 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x22d.google.com (mail-ee0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A0F2094 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id c50so1356275eek.32 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:09:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MV/O/5Vb24sfdig3t5Hhjk13AYq+w3c4kGRGrRR+RuQ=; b=nFIhCBeOOAhRSViAmYYn3nqNeqK/wvzQl3A1JA8cUriqIBqFdUMPr9EOFAgoazmNbT ijo2xtRHUr+UttL2FTnw+DXQXzOmcMf9V03Q5SBn3Mm7Oz6rxIw3Lmkl1Ifwp2wp8KaJ co/v1gAgaXzCFawuZ9m4TpAw+H6Ys/+AVl+hLYNn01CmMmF2kIa/0o/JKXgVUS4aAy9m d+i18Dy3Wb32Hgnu5vixi3frZOa68C53MhGjDYdAZ0Xd2f/P8MN84TXExrxNIrlzmn8+ EjW4gz/FG0IFFHvikFRYcNNaOiUpXtMetblLGsC2tWFvVH0GkwICAtI//uxYSK8IOwu2 ftDg== X-Received: by 10.14.29.67 with SMTP id h43mr22506898eea.7.1381428580145; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([178.150.115.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m54sm104360168eex.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mikolaj Golub Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:09:37 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub To: Steven Hartland Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Message-ID: <20131010180936.GP44942@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:09:42 -0000 On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:47:29PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > ZFS will try to send DELETE requests to the underlying storage to > support TRIM. If that fails then it will disable TRIM support for > that vdev. > > My guess would be you're just seeing hast being a bit verbose > when these initial batch failures happen. If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? > From: "Pete French" > > >I just had a machine fall over on my for the first time in ages - one > > of a pair of machine we have running hast with zfs on top. I havent > > got any concrete evidence of what made it die as yet, but I > > did notice the logifles filling up with thoursands of lines like this > > just prior to the crash: > > > > serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847744000, 1536). > > > > so I am guessing taht is ZFS trying to send a trim command to hast, and hast > > does not support it. Have disabled zfs trim now, but thought it was > > worth mentioning - I would have not expected zfs to be trying to issue > > a trim command to an underlying device which doesnt support it. These > > machines were rock solid under 8, and the only chnage I can see with 9 is > > the trim support being added. Another important change that comes to mind is the default replication mode, changed from fullsync to memsync. Do you have the replication mode explicitly set in your config? -- Mikolaj Golub From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 10:27:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895E4549; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6E72737; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:27:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingresso.co.uk; s=x; h=Date:From:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:To; bh=T1GljKX6vejRsMNzf6bKUugOzI46uB9RZnhdsNSqAPk=; b=ePtL5xAhvKRRpWZm/fi4PTUF+SYH33b1jMNvWF47j4Ox9gs9XJ94N8TVnPksMGvOGnL5PQ/mCv/YWwlOqfN+0V8T3PTEFRB+sJ7yvO4UqOYiuk4B3+6JFw7twxkOiIDWI0zdTfDXBxsT+3OcUJko4PeysYeF7qa45SbsVE5BK78=; Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUZwW-000Ls8-I7; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:27:36 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUZwW-0002TR-Br; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:27:36 +0100 To: killing@multiplay.co.uk, trociny@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 In-Reply-To: <20131010180936.GP44942@gmail.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:27:36 +0100 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@ingresso.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:27:44 -0000 > If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the > device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE > succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not > disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? Afraid not, both machines are running normal "spinning rust" hard drives as the actual storage layer, so there is nothing TRIM capable anywhere. I didnt get much chnace to look at this yesterday, but am looking at the logs again now, and I see these messages right up to the time the machine fell over. That machine had been up for a long time, and it was still logging these messages, so it looks very much as if ZFS did not stop trying to issue the TRIM. -pete. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 10:42:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D85490E for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com (mail-ee0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF502882 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b45so1782963eek.29 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:42:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k+8H5KcQPKASwssQEE5L1rnsr8x+HHHmSQJbcLsWw+E=; b=FTd6IcS4JYtm7gs2ZUtpIdX8FKY+IRgPooOeYi/LBAZrXqP8mm0cUw2MhpWrG+7tsQ Riid1cTQICoDz3Z31ynKdgnpl13kiPBH5WEb6MfPOdTBDxUGBC7KRZzjUpwhcqWEHrbV Nq71slRuuwjZSgTFlH7wXpKo1wD669iXjGZsZ3xohbSZDxyGx8VnRPYE/CBxd0mPIJbd AtOb1Vj7WMoDghl1iH+QIu6MK1h0hg87uNlqZaWUnYIhBtfB1aDx3xjmf8x7ugAWt+ko NQkJ4eH3rd2AdOdhz+HzMlarFpFbVyNOWNTMas52DTz7w1vn10nCe+7BugN/ZmXKDb+S Rv7Q== X-Received: by 10.14.3.9 with SMTP id 9mr1334084eeg.72.1381488162221; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([178.150.115.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm113204865eev.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mikolaj Golub Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:42:39 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub To: Pete French Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Message-ID: <20131011104238.GQ44942@gmail.com> References: <20131010180936.GP44942@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:42:44 -0000 On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:27:36AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the > > device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE > > succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not > > disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? > > Afraid not, both machines are running normal "spinning rust" hard > drives as the actual storage layer, so there is nothing TRIM capable > anywhere. > > I didnt get much chnace to look at this yesterday, but am looking at the logs > again now, and I see these messages right up to the time the machine > fell over. That machine had been up for a long time, and it was still logging > these messages, so it looks very much as if ZFS did not stop trying to > issue the TRIM. You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you have "Local request failed" errors too? -- Mikolaj Golub From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 10:48:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C526DB51 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x230.google.com (mail-ea0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB6A292D for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q16so1776259ead.35 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TfHl0Bz8lcBcEXc3dQEvbyAMFvhQ3el/PP+XKwC25lI=; b=UUu+yCxGfq1Zx9jok/Oo5NOixKza39O3HemNQRc90AxpDiq9kIjB14tMEIMQ6h/5Wz LWErJxqpWEuTiDYAXGRE5F9akIMuCNUon+6xsaamH/Ve3uW9O7UtcQ6t+4oWKSt69uC5 6pQlDVcER0BlZlv+w5ZcYfbTrJVaOfZmtyI85zV5Fof5xlfFxf9uX/36IMsqbeWZUozC PQIwD9L53z/DWU65yDu2mFchNKbDjh8rXERu553CZzFrXcBV/GjG+82YlIhAXtioD5dN zxXGSbukB68cswl0LMLOsvVw84zXvwRBmmPQaJxSfjzqk39MGx+hsBCZchO4vp5jkQV6 ibLw== X-Received: by 10.15.75.73 with SMTP id k49mr28027314eey.36.1381488486832; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([178.150.115.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm113178903eev.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mikolaj Golub Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:48:04 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub To: Pete French Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Message-ID: <20131011104803.GR44942@gmail.com> References: <20131010180936.GP44942@gmail.com> <20131011104238.GQ44942@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131011104238.GQ44942@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:48:08 -0000 On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 01:42:39PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you > have "Local request failed" errors too? You should also see them in "local errors" statistics from `hastctl list' output. -- Mikolaj Golub From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 11:15:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0393B2E2; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E462B5D; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:15:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingresso.co.uk; s=x; h=Date:From:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:To; bh=pibtSmU6M8xEnaYXdXRynHmwsEXIzJjw847OgoA8slE=; b=DYIfJ7FWTK56RNRe34jXYolPKSxC5ATX2HS6RD438f73rVSKWWY2suLwEoscCP2uImhjXSXMZxK6jFteJlv1iVqnkU0BoKRtNTGyjdo/F2q4CoF8LQ+S10rimAeX1iUH6FXGUV47iUap6ssvXGWdR3HGVyXQV2E7pDEN9QHIQMo=; Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUagX-000OOj-C9; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:15:09 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUagX-00073w-43; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:15:09 +0100 To: petefrench@ingresso.co.uk, trociny@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 In-Reply-To: <20131011104238.GQ44942@gmail.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:15:09 +0100 Cc: killing@multiplay.co.uk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:15:15 -0000 > You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you > have "Local request failed" errors too? Yes, I have both - heres a fragment of the log: Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594203648, 26112). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594263040, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847744000, 1536). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847850496, 2048). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594203648, 26112). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101424640, 26112). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847850496, 2048). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594263040, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847850496, 2048). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847817728, 31232). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101424640, 26112). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847817728, 31232). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101484032, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101424640, 26112). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101484032, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594263040, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594263040, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847817728, 31232). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(26847817728, 31232). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101484032, 4608). Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1522]: [serp1] (primary) Local request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(45101484032, 4608). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 11:16:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87985501; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452E72B82; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:16:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingresso.co.uk; s=x; h=Date:From:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:To; bh=iv+aEdvjfhCDB+CHMaEJnfpQ3IPV0I3fYYCmTFCFLJI=; b=sbrkQUxrDkIC5TPAP98oyVUYV4GqN7BozXPtiSTFhykMLY01Ny3FlWuKjMyy1LVR3Dsbbsdx8wCGIeD7h7bUG77S1BZnlJ/bg3jRdHBT1LRrgO/aHd5bogaOrX1SGoeAOtfZn7SUTDLX2EGcmM88np3ZQUZpgYkv+R5EHHVyIEc=; Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUahS-000OZH-Md; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:16:06 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUahS-00078Q-GG; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:16:06 +0100 To: petefrench@ingresso.co.uk, trociny@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 In-Reply-To: <20131011104803.GR44942@gmail.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:16:06 +0100 Cc: killing@multiplay.co.uk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:16:10 -0000 > You should also see them in "local errors" statistics from `hastctl > list' output. Unfortunately I think those couters were reset when the machine panicd - they are all showing as zero. -pete. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 11:23:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB2C9E0; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1996a1817d=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBB3D2C5A; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50006360058.msg; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:23:16 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:23:16 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1996a1817d=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: , "Pete French" References: Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:23:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@ingresso.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:23:25 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete French" >> If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the >> device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE >> succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not >> disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? > > Afraid not, both machines are running normal "spinning rust" hard > drives as the actual storage layer, so there is nothing TRIM capable > anywhere. > > I didnt get much chnace to look at this yesterday, but am looking at the logs > again now, and I see these messages right up to the time the machine > fell over. That machine had been up for a long time, and it was still logging > these messages, so it looks very much as if ZFS did not stop trying to > issue the TRIM. What do you see from: sysctl kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim You should be seeing none zero unsupported and zero failed. If this is not the case its likely hast isnt setting bio_error to ENOTSUP. Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 12:30:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829EA2C4; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4618321A5; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:30:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingresso.co.uk; s=x; h=Date:From:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:To; bh=8xghqtJed6l1g5ecq//CVEEHEM6CGar9ou//jgne7V4=; b=dLNkCyQnFm1QCpPjdxTPf/nX0EohQxWKXvcuQf8yrxNBbVToMK7CXTSa1pTrRkMtNRzQVUKdcAkoo3cU6IoFcmV83ryHsNsoNekHnyZKr8ye7nyp4yzCcGPxppN7gpvFYguvWdIE3NVhLZe3eqC4j+Nv3CP9CwVEmohMY8OX2T0=; Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUbrI-0002bD-2L; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:30:20 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VUbrH-000DeU-SN; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:30:19 +0100 To: killing@multiplay.co.uk, petefrench@ingresso.co.uk, trociny@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:30:19 +0100 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:30:25 -0000 > What do you see from: > sysctl kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim > > You should be seeing none zero unsupported and zero failed. If this is > not the case its likely hast isnt setting bio_error to ENOTSUP. Again, unfortunately, the systems are now running with trim diisabled so these statsitcs have all been zeroed. I do have a test hast setup I could re-enable this on to try lkater today or next week though. I will try and find some time to do that and let you know what the results are. -pete. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 17:47:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7E7C47 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ihyang@umbc.edu) Received: from mx1.umbc.edu (mx1.umbc.edu [130.85.25.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9637426BC for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx1.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id r9BGX38X025026 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from umbc.edu (plesk.web5.webhostbox.net [174.122.92.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx1-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id r9BGX24Z024994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:34:47 +0100 From: "=?utf-8?Q?Jordan_Stange?=" Organization: hmluj X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <431794214.20131011173447@umbc.edu> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=D1=B5=E1=BC=B2=C3=80=C9=A1=E1=B9=9C=C3=80?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Milter-Key: 1381638783:d7ca5dc5eda579039a92b21706ae9145 X-ClamAV: OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:47:19 -0000 http://schyzo.com/logs/explore/index.html?page=615742 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 00:51:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0777CB51 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 00:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C9B2EA2 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 00:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ur.dons.net.au (ppp14-2-18-229.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net [14.2.18.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9C0pKpJ079633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 11:21:28 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D51906EE-F2B9-4963-8434-324603BB814F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 11:21:19 +1030 Subject: ZFS devd messages To: freebsd-stable stable Message-Id: <85290551-4239-495E-ACCD-9F03C20D40EF@gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Spam-Score: 0.163 () BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 203.31.81.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 00:51:40 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D51906EE-F2B9-4963-8434-324603BB814F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, It seems that the ZFS messages no longer match entries in devd.conf, = eg.. notify 10 { match "system" "ZFS"; match "type" "vdev"; action "logger -p kern.err 'ZFS: vdev failure, zpool=3D$pool = type=3D$type'"; }; Doesn't match anything because messages now look like.. Processing event '!system=3DZFS subsystem=3DZFS = type=3Dresource.fs.zfs.removed version=3D0 = class=3Dresource.fs.zfs.removed pool_guid=3D469710819 = vdev_guid=3D215223839' Does anyone have an updated set of rules handy? -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --Apple-Mail=_D51906EE-F2B9-4963-8434-324603BB814F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFSWJ0H5ZPcIHs/zowRAkMhAJ4xRqEfmnmnmBbbpnMIuDgHoiYaBwCglv7V +s7js2YB8a0/0k2KgQ2pMJo= =1svp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D51906EE-F2B9-4963-8434-324603BB814F-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 02:38:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A92584B for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 02:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B880D22C5 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 02:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ur.dons.net.au (ppp14-2-18-229.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net [14.2.18.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9C2blbq087394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:07:53 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F0D4CA4D-85B7-4730-BEB7-51B9523B1404"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: ZFS devd messages From: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <85290551-4239-495E-ACCD-9F03C20D40EF@gsoft.com.au> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:07:47 +1030 Message-Id: References: <85290551-4239-495E-ACCD-9F03C20D40EF@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-stable stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Spam-Score: 0.163 () BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 203.31.81.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 02:38:04 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F0D4CA4D-85B7-4730-BEB7-51B9523B1404 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 12/10/2013, at 11:21, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Doesn't match anything because messages now look like.. > Processing event '!system=3DZFS subsystem=3DZFS = type=3Dresource.fs.zfs.removed version=3D0 = class=3Dresource.fs.zfs.removed pool_guid=3D469710819 = vdev_guid=3D215223839' >=20 > Does anyone have an updated set of rules handy? For now I nuked the entries out of /etc/devd.conf and made some in = /etc/devd/zfs.conf (where they should have been to start with IMO..) = like so.. notify 10 { match "system" "ZFS"; action "logger -p kern.err 'ZFS notice: type=3D$type = version=3D$version class=3D$class pool_guid=3D$pool_guid = vdev_guid=3D$vdev_guid'"; action "echo 'ZFS notice: type=3D$type version=3D$version = class=3D$class pool_guid=3D$pool_guid vdev_guid=3D$vdev_guid' | mail -s = 'ZFS Event' zfs"; }; And added an alias for zfs@. It would be nice if this was the default, yes it is a bit noisy and not = very user friendly but at least you get notice something weird is = happening out of the box. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --Apple-Mail=_F0D4CA4D-85B7-4730-BEB7-51B9523B1404 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFSWLX75ZPcIHs/zowRAl+NAJ4/FjB//V5zDenwmtL4dOwRcO0BfwCeJ3tY FttSJjC78yGDV+p+W1+8vJE= =5E4Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_F0D4CA4D-85B7-4730-BEB7-51B9523B1404-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 12:59:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725F321B for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B302C58 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FF720C0A for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 08:59:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 08:59:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=+ZR5I+MP7YcxqrfO3hYmX/QN+X8=; b=SVB YrjI9uWtGrVGoHaNPQOI8S+Wsndoozuz3ezVdW9wkdvLiLT5XR69l9YYYMpwHXs7 y/ztr4g01Rt9AhI8GaJz9CO0DEO9bIMINVfsw76h/H10LKoYdJnWrJp7cIMlM1F+ laSr9IoUeK+MzrxWhjeObiyyEgf8B3UrnJbpDVnk= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 35BB911669B; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 08:59:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1381582740.22847.33156113.3132AF9C@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: h2asXRM1TYMt+SPKuDjk+wdlocr5BKNdPiGw6gk23v/o 1381582740 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-ce174988 In-Reply-To: <85290551-4239-495E-ACCD-9F03C20D40EF@gsoft.com.au> References: <85290551-4239-495E-ACCD-9F03C20D40EF@gsoft.com.au> Subject: Re: ZFS devd messages Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 07:59:00 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:59:02 -0000 On Fri, Oct 11, 2013, at 19:51, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Hi, > It seems that the ZFS messages no longer match entries in devd.conf, eg.. > notify 10 { > match "system" "ZFS"; > match "type" "vdev"; > action "logger -p kern.err 'ZFS: vdev failure, zpool=$pool > type=$type'"; > }; > > Doesn't match anything because messages now look like.. > Processing event '!system=ZFS subsystem=ZFS type=resource.fs.zfs.removed > version=0 class=resource.fs.zfs.removed pool_guid=469710819 > vdev_guid=215223839' > > Does anyone have an updated set of rules handy? > This seems like something we should make sure is fixed before the 10.0 release. Thanks for reporting it. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 17:04:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281CC3CE for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp4.sbb.rs (smtp4.sbb.rs [89.216.2.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913B26F9 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from faust.localdomain (cable-178-148-112-218.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.112.218]) by smtp4.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r9CGbkgH016068 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:37:52 +0200 Received: by faust.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AE1C8A41EE6; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:36:59 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: pkg problem Message-ID: <20131012163659.GA1443@faust.sbb.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:04:24 -0000 I binary upgraded to 9.2 and installed pkg, made pkg2ng. Finally I did "pkg update" and "pkg upgrade". Now, I have old binaries, instead of new ones. I tried to issue "freebsd-update install" the last time and it refused to do anything, since there is nothing to install. What I missed in this upgrade process? I set server to 96.47.72.120, if it matters. Best regards Zoran From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 18:46:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16602F81 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp4.sbb.rs (smtp4.sbb.rs [89.216.2.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EFB2B6C for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from faust.localdomain (cable-178-148-112-218.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.112.218]) by smtp4.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r9CIkUvs010321 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:46:35 +0200 Received: by faust.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BFA61A41EB2; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:46:27 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg problem Message-ID: <20131012184627.GA4587@faust.sbb.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:46:38 -0000 Sorry to post twice, but I found txz files on my local filesystem in /var/cache/pkg/All. So far, I see no way to upgrade from there. I assume I could remove some db, make new one and point pkg to packagesite? Best regards Zoran From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 21:37:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BAA9A0 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0138521F0 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9CLbEDm055118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 22:37:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r9CLbEDm055118 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r9CLbEDm055118; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <5259C104.5020505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 22:37:08 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zoran Kolic , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg problem References: <20131012163659.GA1443@faust.sbb.rs> In-Reply-To: <20131012163659.GA1443@faust.sbb.rs> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G365wVUoWuApwDDMWDGVPwVht6lUeQ00g" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:37:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --G365wVUoWuApwDDMWDGVPwVht6lUeQ00g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/10/2013 17:36, Zoran Kolic wrote: > I binary upgraded to 9.2 and installed pkg, made pkg2ng. > Finally I did "pkg update" and "pkg upgrade". Now, I have > old binaries, instead of new ones. I tried to issue > "freebsd-update install" the last time and it refused to > do anything, since there is nothing to install. > What I missed in this upgrade process? > I set server to 96.47.72.120, if it matters. Upgraded to FreeBSD 9.2 from what version? If it was anything 9.x then you would not necessarily have replaced any of the ports previously installed. If you were upgrading from some earlier version of FreeBSD then you'ld need to reinstall all your ports with stuff compiled for 9.x. You can do that by: pkg install -f Why does freebsd-update come into this? That's for updating the base system. It won't do anything to affect your ports directly. While 96.47.72.120 is the IP number of the pkgrepo test server, the recommended way to use it is via this PACKAGESITE URL: http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --G365wVUoWuApwDDMWDGVPwVht6lUeQ00g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSWcEJXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATfl0P/3CZOSc01BjlmGhjIUp1HRvH KOqBZIvzQVMCT8nlcgvBBjdmvxBzYQclB8ibHNAbDnBhNgOCDfvbED1lr6wTUliJ Kt4gNVS2e3TnNLl2PJJ736lS6j55ONYm0SuFfJyj+chhYG3Zt+0q28U+5n79skoZ D52qFE1U5BzHESFhKYPp20R3hn3g62ZuUf5s0AMjDluOWRFfPKMpkyNCkxJSQQxz U3dwDsjZ0sIPOTJLbG+rzW9u81csmILWH+33XaCpJyxoMbVnhVjMo/oeJp5g1L/u GsYcrnaW+GVPrXTvJvfBOx2YaH2YQ9cLmp0rHcWuwNDVaIPwWXUv6xca0KVJoZjj QVHbP9Za7Byu47lqCqiR2RP7/P3MR3sdioSHcnjMq0DgMpDij0wkQvTxhIzRQJaA 1M8W/hgQZX9sgCZX9Opc/wMZPMEBdl2eWweIPGVXjsDVcIb88M08mWaKQcye9jrb JvLNQVqUGKypeyuZqXIxo6W0yQEELBOsrhwDWzhaq+vzOlvpZEiGn0PBnIhLAtLX ysCbs1HehFXZmrXl6vI6g24JArBttij0azl1Dx8O/ygoTKz/DTBpZq7FmEDlqnkQ 1TuGU6CJHUYHKhvkzIMQr3KeRL5u1foFwbymR1vHTTDBhSYo/KaUpe5ekwNdOxN+ wGwxWYm1hbwC57sQy0UH =qkXl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G365wVUoWuApwDDMWDGVPwVht6lUeQ00g--