Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:20:03 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, attilio@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r247710 - projects/calloutng/sys/kern Message-ID: <513D0713.6000801@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130305094819.GI48089@FreeBSD.org> References: <201303031339.r23DdsBU047737@svn.freebsd.org> <201303041521.06557.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndBvLD_fU1ZZ3cGNtChfdtXyuBRt4Z_ci8daS08ZYdOKzg@mail.gmail.com> <201303041620.52100.jhb@freebsd.org> <20130305201211.M902@besplex.bde.org> <20130305094819.GI48089@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/5/13 1:48 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:43:33PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > B> > I think for new code we should prefer C99's bool to boolean_t. > B> > B> Why? There is no existing practice for this in the kernel. There is some > B> in the Linux kernel :-). > > Why? Because it is standard. What for? To make it more easy for newcomers > to start hacking on FreeBSD kernel. > what he said...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?513D0713.6000801>