From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 23 01:42:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB1DC87 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A146FF59 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22148 invoked by uid 0); 23 Nov 2014 01:42:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2014 01:42:09 -0000 Received: from box980.bluehost.com ([69.195.124.180]) by cmgw4 with id Jpi61p00Q3tes2D01pi9o7; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:42:09 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=B+wqjodM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=aO2g769lL36lK8uJoi8raA==:117 a=aO2g769lL36lK8uJoi8raA==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=D8lAJvhAxfwA:10 a=d7fFV9WRAAAA:8 a=tl74oiaXzWoA:10 a=5y4faFyK3SkA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=9iDbn-4jx3cA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=gZbpxnkM3yUA:10 a=oVnjf-YPXc4Y7QseogQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=dPSXiPV6bp8A:10 a=VFjJiXQjuvwA:10 a=tiAVJI5OJiQA:10 a=najBGV1B8EGn4yrGrMAA:9 a=kv5u6_cdlzdX_KVf:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=r0lJ5fQESDKEl3TDos0A:9 a=IKIoO-ieCDEA:10 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44617 helo=box980.bluehost.com) by box980.bluehost.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XsMBi-0005aV-Md for freebsd-apache@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:42:06 -0700 To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Subject: APACHE, Shipment Status ID#000190185 X-PHP-Script: regalproductions.com/post.php for 87.106.28.133 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: regalpr1@box980.bluehost.com Reply-To: "FedEx International Economy" Message-Id: Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 05:42:09 +0400 X-Identified-User: {:box980.bluehost.com:regalpr1:regalproductions.com} {sentby:program running on server} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:42:11 -0000 Dear Apache, =20 We could not deliver your item. You can review complete details of your order in the find attached. =20 Yours faithfully, Ralph Welsh, Operation Manager. =20 (c) 1995-2014 FedEx. The content of this message is protected by copyright = and trademark laws under U.S. and international law. From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 00:40:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BBC2E9 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCFE2BC4 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAR0etUs083638 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:40:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193905] Upgrade of devel/apr1 to apr-1.5.1.1.5.4 causes devel/subversion to break Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:40:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:40:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193905 Dimitry Andric changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dim@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Dimitry Andric --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #6) > I'm having similar issue with devel/apr1 built by lang/clang35. It appears > any optimization level above -O0 breaks apr_stat() in > file_io/unix/filestat.c. It's a bug in one of the llvm optimizers, introduced in llvm r210006. I reported this upstream, and they have reverted the change for now: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222856&view=rev I will ensure this is fixed in the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import in base, and I hope upstream will accept it for 3.5.1 too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 12:41:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077BC2F8 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (virtual1.potentialtech.com [69.25.178.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D952BE46 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from working.home (c-67-165-86-201.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [67.165.86.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FADB2383C0 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:51:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:47:34 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: apache@freebsd.org Subject: prefork MPM still the default for apache24? Message-Id: <20141126064734.5347ed3a5a163cf4d0c44324@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:41:13 -0000 I was recently doing some load testing on a new tomcat application I'm working on. Long story short: I found that a performance issue I was hitting was the result of Apache being built with the prefork MPM. Rebuilding with the event MPM increased performace to the same speed as connecting to tomcat directly, which was 20x faster than communicating through Apache using the (default) prefork MPM. This is a tomcat 8 app running on FreeBSD 10.0 with Apache 2.4 This leads me to a few questions: Is there some reason the event MPM is not the default? The Apache community seems to think that it should be (at least, the people I talked to). Is there some obscure issue with it on FreeBSD? Luckily the ports system makes it easy to rebuild Apache with a different MPM, but I'm worried that since the prebuilt version installed by pkg still uses prefork, that a lot of people are getting an underperforming server for no reason. -- Bill Moran I need your help to succeed: http://gamesbybill.com From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 17:21:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6573E836 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382A2D3 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E89207B2 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:21:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:21:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=xy9eqgRwSNjNlZ048zCo0NPq Bno=; b=hAfa9cKdRReuE4zjJLpZHYuTtYg8oBsvocLHs4GNeZwgRz/kzA0+IAuH 351GDkRKNxC18WBuEsxPEHA2H2jB/LYbCC0p2YdHH/Zm8n1WUQBJrRsIqX4jfCkw idc1agLsfdbATZL2NJiAJ8Hv5wXo4mQ6eFriGL+YjJBJhJy3KFE= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 4B52F118312; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:21:54 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1417108914.25537.196133397.26D48C5A@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: A8451iuI0H5v1+2BJv4oiXHIUrsdFSBOeemmnFfnOTVq 1417108914 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-53201334 In-Reply-To: <20141126064734.5347ed3a5a163cf4d0c44324@potentialtech.com> References: <20141126064734.5347ed3a5a163cf4d0c44324@potentialtech.com> Subject: Re: prefork MPM still the default for apache24? Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:21:54 -0600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:21:55 -0000 On Wed, Nov 26, 2014, at 05:47, Bill Moran wrote: > > I was recently doing some load testing on a new tomcat application I'm > working on. > > Long story short: I found that a performance issue I was hitting was the > result of > Apache being built with the prefork MPM. Rebuilding with the event MPM > increased > performace to the same speed as connecting to tomcat directly, which was > 20x > faster than communicating through Apache using the (default) prefork MPM. > > This is a tomcat 8 app running on FreeBSD 10.0 with Apache 2.4 > > This leads me to a few questions: > > Is there some reason the event MPM is not the default? The Apache > community seems to > think that it should be (at least, the people I talked to). Is there some > obscure > issue with it on FreeBSD? > > Luckily the ports system makes it easy to rebuild Apache with a different > MPM, but > I'm worried that since the prebuilt version installed by pkg still uses > prefork, > that a lot of people are getting an underperforming server for no reason. > Interesting. I think the event model is new in 2.4 I wonder if it's what upstream recommends by default in 2.4...