From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 6 01:55:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73A4232 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 01:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x235.google.com (mail-vc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6C7280F for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 01:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id lf12so2896959vcb.40 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2FRqgX1jQUBP0ilR9e1eoVfMouWC43vmRuyiXTe/Ngg=; b=iR9+5fBqT42bBWnPgSg+8cwkmBw3T6DJpW4jVrpopebL5uWsrY1FqsufjWZz6OCfL7 +VCr7RXQgQi/jfSDiHkgcbB4PWsHFRSTsaCsSv0oHgVd3KFvpp/YGTrTdfcXZl4ImCoc OmTu51uouezoSwsa8gIMMocmLU6m7s2sqofQUWDOhmHhmSzWJBuhlgfppam+armkwjYB P7xFC8UUIUnqK87BNXpH7uVQ7aigCyopeKTWSwFofQz2P0m0wHujK334iyfOH56VPAaF F+FKcsnfh8+jIitNukbOMZ5VTJ8o2rsPMAjWywUR0wGZ10x1OEY+O3zRra6NjiJfCW/K 3vrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.253.39 with SMTP id zx7mr6217689vdc.2.1407290146214; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.23.6 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:55:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: PostgreSQL performance on FreeBSD From: m p To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:17:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 01:55:47 -0000 > A followup to the original paper. Most importantly, I identified the cause for > the drop on the graph after the 30 clients, which appeared to be the > debugging version of malloc(3) in libc. Also there are some updates on the > patches. New version of the paper is available at > https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/pgsql_perf_v2.0.pdf > The changes are marked as 'update for version 2.0'. What's the next step? Will these patches be included in the next dot release (10.1)?