From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 13:37:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB645F3 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x241.google.com (mail-vc0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD99393B for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f193.google.com with SMTP id ij19so1800533vcb.8 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 06:37:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WGmGlyR5Diilbqa5zmV0uGMt8BUxOWbqujRZQJ3zmDw=; b=U6MyKcXrRbt+k/efnQYYxQukLtok/yG6rspMab9YBfbydfwogsFNAtbsr+GpzkTulT ZZmKB9y1GqPEuheXNs2TfpfXCPU3Xp/QA0hD0XLunnSH4oFgNKC/k3FjoW623VVIpkd5 RqhuH4syCAg1IvYEmHeziV1B/j2oQ4VFaIGt1otC1Ta8UY5nBuRPSVYIUXY8l/P744UQ R3szrey4M/dTJQOZjS6fVerH/ud9I3l5GWtqDMPj/26798bG6GysSm6f6WTSDoyxOGxk x+RQG2aG9kYtDsGXDcgw/ONha1LpzTgKPrGj5nvHTVn391g29yTXdxzNnuQuts853Ptf rybA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.245.101 with SMTP id xn5mr7729982vdc.32.1408369027146; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 06:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.129.225 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 06:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:37:07 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: pkgng and upgrade vars From: Cassiano Peixoto To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:37:08 -0000 Hi, I sent this message to freebsd-ports@ with no answer, maybe i have a better luck here. I was playing with pkgng and making some new ports when I found in bsd.pkgng.mk some features like: KGPREINSTALL?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-pre-install PKGPOSTINSTALL?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-post-install PKGPREDEINSTALL?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-pre-deinstall PKGPOSTDEINSTALL?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-post-deinstall PKGPREUPGRADE?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-pre-upgrade PKGPOSTUPGRADE?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-post-upgrade PKGUPGRADE?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-upgrade Anyone can tell me what can i do with this options? For instance, I can suppose that PKGUPGRADE will only run if i'm upgrading an installed package. Am i right? Anyway, i tried to use that in my port with no success, here is the important piece of my Makefile: SUB_FILES= pkg-install pkg-upgrade upgrade: ${SH} ${PKGUPGRADE} ${PKGNAME} UPGRADE I created files/pkg-upgrade.in with some commands to be ran in an upgrade. But when i upgrade my package on client side it didn't work. Anyone is using that and can explain how it works? Thanks From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 04:01:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF94C81 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8D33A2B for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob117.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKU/LL6xmW2MO8eQZxMoUseEbLJ49Vy+0e@postini.com; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:01:10 UTC Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id q58so5912583wes.32 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:00:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=DUaaSy+kZdxnqQVj9fVW2yJd6AR9+bVnrcdUvS2+HGA=; b=mtX+EUrW9ryt3JtKVvgKcAjO59OtCVbYQBH0Qv89+/yyZojG/7zMJmuDZ+9p+/+AUg C9Uxua1KA3qvcYrE8NqtjJlJEttJ1nVsQEhbH6/c3BcstEmACSfo7AKcdNDNKccBmYPC MooVIkUNly3PJ1K65sYYaHrqT8+EXT3Cj87tmckW9oJUf3GCgb1eUDTMxpJflgb2p/kC 7E7abqVBYfzPnBkioY1VY+1WCHP/dTmtr+K75qsLDOzOXD1dSS8yKnHKbEVKve14gVuf 4t74xeCyBXxlVsNrLsP6l1VCW3zYLIJ9v1WgHFmO5VW/mt9EBT7joARq/JBYQjYLfWgW 69OA== X-Received: by 10.194.119.193 with SMTP id kw1mr40703813wjb.82.1408352443074; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 02:00:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlV4tGTdguFFAOYBgC8SkNli9Su+gYREf4OPuUPiQkQSHNZcul8zZwbjS6iDOi54Kvo/NEP9xkCLvBAz1GFPSR2ka4Pajy67wcx+hd/6DflFVqXk551A7T8MWqZxKpAiykrGW87 X-Received: by 10.194.119.193 with SMTP id kw1mr40703803wjb.82.1408352442973; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 02:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ej10sm35850902wib.12.2014.08.18.02.00.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 02:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s7I90ebo031646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:00:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s7I90ei4031645 for freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:00:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:00:40 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201408180900.s7I90ei4031645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: pkg: graphite2-1.2.4 failed checksum from repository Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:01:11 -0000 Proceed with upgrading packages [y/N]: y graphite2-1.2.4.txz 100% 79KB 79.1KB/s 79.1KB/s 00:00 pkg: graphite2-1.2.4 failed checksum from repository # This is on # uname -a FreeBSD minky 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #16 r267106: Wed Jun 11 11:16:38 BST 2014 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MINKY amd64 with the default # cat /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf # $FreeBSD: head/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf 263937 2014-03-30 15:24:17Z bdrewery $ # # To disable this repository, instead of modifying or removing this file, # create a /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file: # # mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos # echo "FreeBSD: { enabled: no }" > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf # FreeBSD: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", mirror_type: "srv", signature_type: "fingerprints", fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", enabled: yes } # Am I the only one seeing this? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 06:09:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA53872 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D99335E for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7J69Hns031291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:09:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s7J69Hns031291 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1408428557; bh=LUSBx4HYX0j8dSZBYF/4HgvLYmlum/OsG2AtMT7txI4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Tue,=2019=20Aug=202014=2007:09:16=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-pkg@fr eebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20pkg:=20graphite2-1.2.4=20failed=20check sum=20from=20repository|References:=20<201408180900.s7I90ei4031645 @mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<201408180900.s7I9 0ei4031645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>; b=xZKsjdSpmLgTT0BJ330SemWieEBMBHunOpEkjAq9Xwurxf3SX0sR74lfmS2bqIEdd bwdLWdd4N6AmCfJoa+Y5oAj5HSVuHaVaI7I8B7pzEWY4GLAaKQvbRPnF9t+Sn2mpGV VQ9A41d1FupsU3PPPD5wqvMbdcLKicDYHvy9s3UQ= Message-ID: <53F2EA0C.4060600@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:09:16 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg: graphite2-1.2.4 failed checksum from repository References: <201408180900.s7I90ei4031645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201408180900.s7I90ei4031645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R9gRtD9KigHCBgx2TKwSpGBwh4qVNcUA7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:09:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --R9gRtD9KigHCBgx2TKwSpGBwh4qVNcUA7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/08/2014 10:00, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Proceed with upgrading packages [y/N]: y > graphite2-1.2.4.txz 100% 79KB 79= =2E1KB/s 79.1KB/s 00:00 =20 > pkg: graphite2-1.2.4 failed checksum from repository > #=20 What version of pkg(8) are you using? There have been problems with some of the recent releases that result in these sort of messages. Reccommend you upgrade to the latest pkg-1.3.6. Also, try running: pkg update -f and if that doesn't sort things out, pkg clean -a This should clear up any problems due to pkg bugs -- anything left after that is most likely an actual broken package, but we haven't seen any great number of reports of that sort of thing. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --R9gRtD9KigHCBgx2TKwSpGBwh4qVNcUA7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT8uoMXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATHUIP/1k6A0jhcMLW6OPM9usGrGdq dyceOTMYJDF8mZr7sH8vFZ5rNSheXW/8lgdajDajtS81x3SEe8jqZfWoHA6z4jA/ R7NzjVmIamPlB0b/l4z9kUAx0Pxk10lTAETG4yoUVjm3WTQrEOaxX1HKZEbe+ifP 2Xt1+a0bWbxhymf21j/oS1ry5H6AAycjxtAarxE1ukMBGpeGxBfDa3Ac+y0aXDl/ weRiJvdlrwF9jrVXnJp7P1E+ZKC5KnrdZ5AHzEDdYgnNo0l6axk9h2hBrsreL+U+ HgP3dxBOtSQ5lDhon46GVYC9yH/KyDMCiC/ntnytHjCzdEkip8/mldp+SMrwLG05 NYKcjgpWXw/PzGceDDb5YnrkdCblg4wIyOjP/Yh52OilrP18KyyEP4wA45qufi1K P4Gfa5BBlw8ZCXM3eCqy5P076i9m0WdPMn3lUcMCMyQ1wSiKdDssWGN/qDJUbaD4 78v26gHQ/zlG8ywxhPy2iHAkMrd4KBjosmAm9V+LelnIHMJqKdUnPdElJTCwIOVt M1ZxP6TlctfTHwMnPCsM6tUGoGvY0DNRHwHeI6HSHCVx8aBmm/dgyk8bg8uRdCYK 5fDevn9viCKzBFLEXoZK3aF6Z/s14wgJOMi+ExWJw3DXmOTW2gWCxU/TVkGOcJBR nAsu4LMyyvdSLeOwhinP =iC76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R9gRtD9KigHCBgx2TKwSpGBwh4qVNcUA7-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 10:02:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68696EBE for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2261B386F for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id va2so3004319obc.9 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=bKdcWXx6GBxYztvk9E5qpYArtD8aVhwJ1S4ytAqdAHo=; b=cETFcS0zrxDWa2AmQCrO4TcnJhn6OnEAQpLCbfbKMxVPSCyLCx611Oxe4uFjoE+6BX lRCOEO1RgzOvk8gMaUx61HKC2HuTxi/7UwjTCrhmC4bs9uRSFC3uo/Bj4RH87B1FIayK ubN3SSvhLS7m7ZZ9xYKrBcYlxHwkCsZ04IeAkMvCRm6fq2iKzGP5F5hzBhEuVJ0lmaUi 0OiJstflZH5oPP0wG9z1IaCV3r/lzO1zNxgri6Sf+3VELPgYITAlkJyx3iY3zEMKzU+s SMdjdSQIPxTtu6qtVGHWAeLJ2bmVc3gpfb4/hzGELkt2f+brCSIyh0dJ0JYtB56EfShu Nb1A== X-Received: by 10.202.190.8 with SMTP id o8mr268381oif.91.1408442555346; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:02:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.231.203 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:01:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:01:55 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wdl-queSHGSjFWHIfZrA0Qwa8Lc Message-ID: Subject: Upgrading large sets of packages (e.g. php5, p5...)? To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:02:36 -0000 Hello, Can pkg handle the case where it's necessary to upgrade large collections of interdependent packages, e.g. php with many (but not all) modules / extensions installed? The starting situation is that php5-5.3.8 is installed, with 40 extensions. Issuing simply "pkg upgrade php5" results in pkg trying to upgrade ONLY the php5-5.3.8 package to the new version php5-5.4.31, WITHOUT upgrading the 40 packages which depend on it (extensions compiled for the old version are definitely NOT be compatible with the new one; with PHP that happens regularly). I've checked (with pkg info -R) that the extension packages really, actually, depend on the base package. Issuing "pkg upgrade -x 'php5.*'" results in pkg wanting to upgrade existing packages (which is correct), but ALSO install every other package available which matches the regex - which is undesirable. (btw I've noticed that the "-x" argument is not documented in the man page for php-upgrade.8). Looking at available options, the option "-r" doesn't what it does in e.g. portupgrade and there is no -R at all. The "pkg install" command also doesn't have similar options. The man page for pkg-info documents the "-E" switch which is supposed to show package names only, apparently for internal use, but running "pkg info -E" doesn't work at all (invalid switch). On the other hand, "pkg info -q" does that. BUT, running "pkg upgrade `pkg info -q | grep php5`" ALSO doesn't work, as it keeps complaining "no packages available to upgrade matching $pkgname have been found in the repositories." Apparently, giving the full package name together with its version to pkg-upgrade causes that. This is frustrating. So... how do you upgrade packages like php and perl which have a large number of dependencies which must be kept in sync with the base package? My pkg is 1.3.6. From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 10:13:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A167FF7B for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog124.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog124.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3808393A for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob124.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKU/MjMDAOKTaZYqOS5bFoVky9ePzgjIuR@postini.com; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:13:29 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id f8so4936877wiw.1 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=iM9OBTV+ybaTa1sCVtFe4pcEI9PjA0ORU0TVa3g6DNg=; b=aBLIlEwjqplHl3q5Z1fpXdCRBBH9YynB2qoWSl6LPlGCM6tSlyo2wojGoUwr3m96Z5 ocYl9bvpS5bhvl5tZCMsdDlQJBWKP3oYFm/j2HvUFVsqesEGX5R9up7UdyP0iGJx5dAw 332mIj2rMXfWTlCOT4/uYb8gt8Do/wL6ick+4fGecGwdcdYypEe4HszyZdkQWz3hBGt0 k1Rwko3v0XyOGM4QqGULRU6Udwp26nFWim+u5lZQMy2HZJAw+zKd46ldwaCX+zpC3+fL KxsTltZTsjxtlhX7AXJ8UX+SRz5LON7kJlR17lTG/TvECscfUydl2WzUlUC8zGmCEzqY RAhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIwY4vJOtE03cbPeoCtqK7IcDpxEzq4nHE2vgM+ElFHqvY6nbUr+BXR9u+ZHasFeb5UUkBN4gHpDKBgqqN7EzzIdKgCyamE5NAoy/opXfMczZniC3NO4enuD9KAD135N9MlLqS X-Received: by 10.180.88.167 with SMTP id bh7mr5794031wib.12.1408443184103; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.88.167 with SMTP id bh7mr5794023wib.12.1408443184016; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ib2sm44302191wjb.49.2014.08.19.03.13.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s7JAD1W6039840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:13:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s7JAD1LQ039839; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:13:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:13:01 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201408191013.s7JAD1LQ039839@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: pkg: graphite2-1.2.4 failed checksum from repository Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <53F2EA0C.4060600@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:13:29 -0000 >Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:09:16 +0100 >From: Matthew Seaman > >What version of pkg(8) are you using? There have been problems with >some of the recent releases that result in these sort of messages. > >Reccommend you upgrade to the latest pkg-1.3.6. I think this error appeared after I upgraded to 1.3.6. > Also, try running: > > pkg update -f > >and if that doesn't sort things out, > > pkg clean -a After doing this several times with no improvement, I rebuilt pkg 1.3.6 from ports. Then I did update and clean again several times and finally recovered. Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 16:27:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57535E2 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C192834A9 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7KGRgRw071446 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:42 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s7KGRgYm071443 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:42 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 47055 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2014 11:27:41 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 20 Aug 2014 11:27:41 -0500 Message-ID: <53F4CC79.5000607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:27:37 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Reply-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org, pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: HEADS UP: Pkg 1.3.7 will require rebuilding all packages and manual commands on clients recommended OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="goqP9LIaLMvlJuh91T8kFTTU9U6VSeSmR" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --goqP9LIaLMvlJuh91T8kFTTU9U6VSeSmR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are 2 parts to this notice. One is strictly for those who build their own packages with poudriere or other means. The other part is for client-side users of Pkg (including ports users [1]). Regardless of which version of Pkg you are on now (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, ..., 1.3.4, 1.3.6) it is recommended you follow these steps once upgrading to 1.3.7 or later. Note that following these directions should only be followed once 1.3.7 is released in a few days. Impact of doing nothing: 'pkg upgrade' will suggest reinstalling packages due to 'needed shared library changed'. This can result in wasted bandwidth, time and IO on your systems. It should eventually work itself out though, but may cause various 'pkg upgrade' issues. Background: Pkg tracks shared libraries that are both required and provided by packages. It determines these when building or installing the package. This is also true for using ports since it just registers a new package on install. Before 1.3.0 Pkg would often incorrectly register a shared library with the wrong name internally rather than the official SONAME of the library. This could result in a library dependency as libname.so.1.2.3 and the package providing the library advertising libname.so.1. Due to packages built from 1.3.0 onwards registering the proper name, the upgrade solver had difficulty in finding the proper packages for needed shared libraries. A workaround put in place for 1.3.6 was to ignore the shlib versions. This was not adequate though. In 1.3.7 we are removing the workaround from 1.3.6. There is also a fix in 1.3.7 for Pkg sometimes incorrectly registering a package as requiring its own shared libraries. This also causes solver confusion. Package builders: For the sake of your users having proper packages available you should remove all existing packages and rebuild them once 1.3.7 is released. Poudriere can accomplish this with the '-c' flag to bulk. Or you can just remove All/* from your package repository. If your repository is using WITH_PKGNG=3Ddevel then you can do this now as alpha11 has the fixe= s. Pkg users: It is recommended, but not required, to follow these steps once Pkg 1.3.7 is available. 1. Upgrade Pkg to 1.3.7. Only upgrade Pkg, nothing else. 2. As root run 'pkg check -Ba'. This will analyze all of your installed packages and fix their registered required/provided shared library names. It may take anywhere between 1-15 minutes to complete. 3. Proceed with normal upgrade. Example automated script: pkg update pkg_local_ver=3D`pkg query %v ports-mgmt/pkg` pkg_remote_ver=3D`pkg rquery -U %v ports-mgmt/pkg` # Special handling needed for upgrading <=3D1.3.6 to 1.3.7+ if [ "`pkg version -t ${pkg_local_ver} 1.3.7)`" =3D "<" ]; then pkg install -Uy ports-mgmt/pkg pkg check -Ba fi # Normal upgrade can proceed... pkg upgrade -Uy You might wonder why we do not just force the 1.3.7 upgrade to auto run 'pkg check -Ba'. The problem is that 1.3.0-1.3.6 self-upgrade is not properly running the new Pkg as it did in 1.2. Thus after 'pkg upgrade' self-upgrades to 1.3.7 it would still be running 1.3.6 until you reran 'pkg upgrade'. We may still add an automatic check, or periodic scrub script, in future versions. [1] Ports users: If you strictly use ports and not remote packages then it is not required that you do anything. However if you do ever decide to switch to packages you will face the same 'needed shared library changed' message. It is recommend you also run 'pkg check -Ba' after upgrading to 1.3.7. It is possible tools such as portmaster may utilize this information some day, so it is good to ensure it is recorded properly. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --goqP9LIaLMvlJuh91T8kFTTU9U6VSeSmR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT9Mx5AAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPFdsIAKmvl5r8dq29yppU9EqDXGRE 7oj3wyG+5iZdstf46VRTqnpR4jiUUKEAkFsPWtgouRzV4CL08lRfqlY9MQAJn4X0 tW4anbLFWvFCBcMpjqKuW/8p+YztlJQ4ScnM7xT1ZLh5/vtaelBLnT67z1vxgaSk 2+rS14ohY2mAbm0eh94mDKVlDzsHgoCNTYIrvXx/+r4zwfPSevvpb4MyeE0tCxgy bF/ip5/VNtAJ/w2XVQNRydxVl6VPbDOTNHJajezVL80TLTU6D4yzmKJD0PI3aV5K GE2V+Up9OPzZhC1WFi2vYoey3h0R8VJORQ7ln0zRDbH3q70YNPFAWD3pkPdVfts= =FYDF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --goqP9LIaLMvlJuh91T8kFTTU9U6VSeSmR-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 16:34:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE9596A for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87C33575 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7KGYSjM074417 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:34:28 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s7KGYSxW074412 for pkg@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:34:28 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 23391 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2014 11:34:26 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 20 Aug 2014 11:34:26 -0500 Message-ID: <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:34:22 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Reply-To: Ports FreeBSD Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ports FreeBSD , pkg@freebsd.org Subject: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available References: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K5G4LOnFU7x5CMaL6D0wm5KIVLpq9PTjB" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:34:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --K5G4LOnFU7x5CMaL6D0wm5KIVLpq9PTjB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >=20 > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly > respect LDFLAGS. >=20 > To enable, just add WITH_SSP=3Dyes to your make.conf and rebuild all po= rts. >=20 > The default SSP_CLFAGS is -fstack-protector, but -fstack-protector-all > may optionally be set instead. >=20 > Please help test this on your system. We would like to eventually enabl= e > this by default, but need to identify any major ports that have run-tim= e > issues due to it. >=20 > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection >=20 We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by default for ports and packages. We now have a repository that you can use rather than the default to help test. We need your help to identify any issues before switching the default. This repository is available for: head 10.0 9.1,9.2,9.3 It is not available for 8.4. If someone is willing to test on 8.4 I will build a repository for it. Place this in /usr/local/etc/pkgs/repos/FreeBSD_ssp.conf: FreeBSD: { enabled: no } FreeBSD_ssp: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/ssp", mirror_type: "srv", signature_type: "fingerprints", fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", enabled: yes } Once that is done you should force reinstall packages from this repositor= y: pkg update pkg upgrade -f Thanks for your help! Bryan Drewery On behalf of portmgr. --K5G4LOnFU7x5CMaL6D0wm5KIVLpq9PTjB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT9M4OAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPudQH/RV3dAPGOMV+RRC3IGo0l7bB rjr5J5xQK4FuIYenMhkEV+p8Wh/ow9P3GXBQtR4ki/x3Jgk7Xw5YlC4PfJyPdFpM 90wx0IjtT9i5CLTGF+psTgeV5Oh50jWnpy8wggsK+CfFtgqRebdbQvqIWOtKuDdT R5QtxF9U4ZDHCJTEVLsiCeY4SP3N2eqwS4MHX1/92I1xJxbETDQ0CjvoQ5ojfmEi crtNhk4QNUxmmElmxM71iiElbZPfdf3UbqDupQm80eTHNj5Adda8+Mo1ZmUsJYM6 YimDcpNTumctOVLXobpBZEJtOExAsajO1v/aFGWJz4kp2AkGwCLXHowNpHbb/u4= =ElhW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K5G4LOnFU7x5CMaL6D0wm5KIVLpq9PTjB-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 21 13:32:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615B68D3; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lifanov.com (mail.lifanov.com [206.125.175.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4480A36BC; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.lifanov.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 790EC1B2B60; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:32:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.lifanov.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (vnat004.nandomedia.com [166.108.31.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lifanov.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24E571B2B5D; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:32:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53F5F4E6.2010703@mail.lifanov.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:32:22 -0400 From: Nikolai Lifanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ports FreeBSD , pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available References: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:32:36 -0000 On 08/20/14 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >> >> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly >> respect LDFLAGS. >> >> To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all ports. >> >> The default SSP_CLFAGS is -fstack-protector, but -fstack-protector-all >> may optionally be set instead. >> >> Please help test this on your system. We would like to eventually enable >> this by default, but need to identify any major ports that have run-time >> issues due to it. >> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection >> > > We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by > default for ports and packages. > > We now have a repository that you can use rather than the default to > help test. We need your help to identify any issues before switching the > default. > > This repository is available for: > > head > 10.0 > 9.1,9.2,9.3 > > It is not available for 8.4. If someone is willing to test on 8.4 I will > build a repository for it. > > Place this in /usr/local/etc/pkgs/repos/FreeBSD_ssp.conf: > > FreeBSD: { enabled: no } > FreeBSD_ssp: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/ssp", > mirror_type: "srv", > signature_type: "fingerprints", > fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", > enabled: yes > } > > Once that is done you should force reinstall packages from this repository: > > pkg update > pkg upgrade -f > > Thanks for your help! > Bryan Drewery > On behalf of portmgr. > I have been doing a full tree build with WITH_SSP_PORTS enabled and several partial tree builds for different machines since the initial inclusion. I had exactly one problem port with it (I can't remember what it was anymore), but the port was fixed almost immediately. - Nikolai Lifanov From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 21 16:04:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FCE44C5 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9293744 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7LG4aSY052176 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:36 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s7LG4aY4052173 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:36 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 16816 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2014 11:04:34 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 21 Aug 2014 11:04:34 -0500 Message-ID: <53F6188D.7090505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:04:29 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Reply-To: Ports FreeBSD Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Pkg 1.3.7 will require rebuilding all packages and manual commands on clients recommended References: <53F4CC79.5000607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53F4CC79.5000607@FreeBSD.org> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bW0h5JBC3910nRI983d546LfjipXd7SbV" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --bW0h5JBC3910nRI983d546LfjipXd7SbV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To clarify: Only people serving packages for distribution need to rebuild so that their users have fixed packages. If you are running Poudriere/Tinderbox/Custom and are serving packages to other people or machines, you should rebuild them on the build system AFTER 1.3.7 is out. Running pkg check -Ba on the end systems (after upgrading to 1.3.7) will then prevent needing to reinstall anything. If you are building from ports then you do not need to rebuild all. You do not need to reinstall all. The goal of this announcement is to avoid anyone needing to reinstall anything unneeded. Sorry for the inconvenience. On 8/20/2014 11:27 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > There are 2 parts to this notice. One is strictly for those who build > their own packages with poudriere or other means. The other part is for= > client-side users of Pkg (including ports users [1]). >=20 > Regardless of which version of Pkg you are on now (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, ..., > 1.3.4, 1.3.6) it is recommended you follow these steps once upgrading t= o > 1.3.7 or later. >=20 > Note that following these directions should only be followed once 1.3.7= > is released in a few days. >=20 >=20 > Impact of doing nothing: >=20 > 'pkg upgrade' will suggest reinstalling packages due to 'needed shared > library changed'. This can result in wasted bandwidth, time and IO on > your systems. It should eventually work itself out though, but may caus= e > various 'pkg upgrade' issues. >=20 >=20 > Background: >=20 > Pkg tracks shared libraries that are both required and provided by > packages. It determines these when building or installing the package. > This is also true for using ports since it just registers a new package= > on install. >=20 > Before 1.3.0 Pkg would often incorrectly register a shared library with= > the wrong name internally rather than the official SONAME of the > library. This could result in a library dependency as libname.so.1.2.3 > and the package providing the library advertising libname.so.1. Due to > packages built from 1.3.0 onwards registering the proper name, the > upgrade solver had difficulty in finding the proper packages for needed= > shared libraries. A workaround put in place for 1.3.6 was to ignore the= > shlib versions. This was not adequate though. In 1.3.7 we are removing > the workaround from 1.3.6. There is also a fix in 1.3.7 for Pkg > sometimes incorrectly registering a package as requiring its own shared= > libraries. This also causes solver confusion. >=20 >=20 > Package builders: >=20 > For the sake of your users having proper packages available you should > remove all existing packages and rebuild them once 1.3.7 is released. > Poudriere can accomplish this with the '-c' flag to bulk. Or you can > just remove All/* from your package repository. If your repository is > using WITH_PKGNG=3Ddevel then you can do this now as alpha11 has the fi= xes. >=20 >=20 > Pkg users: >=20 > It is recommended, but not required, to follow these steps once Pkg > 1.3.7 is available. >=20 > 1. Upgrade Pkg to 1.3.7. Only upgrade Pkg, nothing else. > 2. As root run 'pkg check -Ba'. This will analyze all of your installed= > packages and fix their registered required/provided shared library > names. It may take anywhere between 1-15 minutes to complete. > 3. Proceed with normal upgrade. >=20 > Example automated script: > pkg update > pkg_local_ver=3D`pkg query %v ports-mgmt/pkg` > pkg_remote_ver=3D`pkg rquery -U %v ports-mgmt/pkg` > # Special handling needed for upgrading <=3D1.3.6 to 1.3.7+ > if [ "`pkg version -t ${pkg_local_ver} 1.3.7)`" =3D "<" ]; then > pkg install -Uy ports-mgmt/pkg > pkg check -Ba > fi >=20 > # Normal upgrade can proceed... > pkg upgrade -Uy >=20 >=20 > You might wonder why we do not just force the 1.3.7 upgrade to auto run= > 'pkg check -Ba'. The problem is that 1.3.0-1.3.6 self-upgrade is not > properly running the new Pkg as it did in 1.2. Thus after 'pkg upgrade'= > self-upgrades to 1.3.7 it would still be running 1.3.6 until you reran > 'pkg upgrade'. We may still add an automatic check, or periodic scrub > script, in future versions. >=20 >=20 > [1] Ports users: >=20 > If you strictly use ports and not remote packages then it is not > required that you do anything. However if you do ever decide to switch > to packages you will face the same 'needed shared library changed' > message. It is recommend you also run 'pkg check -Ba' after upgrading t= o > 1.3.7. It is possible tools such as portmaster may utilize this > information some day, so it is good to ensure it is recorded properly. >=20 --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --bW0h5JBC3910nRI983d546LfjipXd7SbV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT9hiNAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfP9DcH+QGC2FP3kVj1ODFQONaBtJcl 1J/R6oWXqfqkxjBXcwq2LfJJjsxZJuInTqMK1yj8CblACBmf31dOfRqXaPhF7IWk 5QkA7NeNqKzEW1rBUNORedes39EmKUAQ3Q8iyrTKb8cs1wTNPsryegWFZtqojQag d4O+n5SbkGjCaPOhRd1CVmEmFZ30Rsc2wRqu48Y9nshE1iyJNqWIQXmOVjdCloaG 2m2TXA/1tfbzxL28+j257LZuAmhq81kPxk3UqhT3wCWVNMu1rPsrI66qP1US8bIV x6QLC0OC7X8BGds9nQl6ghFaABMNvpXSiKiMi8qa2PPwzdgWxc6Bu+xViYWjvU8= =elxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bW0h5JBC3910nRI983d546LfjipXd7SbV-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 18:17:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67A3D0B; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.paymentallianceintl.com (mx2.paymentallianceintl.com [216.26.158.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.paymentallianceintl.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA56334D; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from firewall.mikej.com (162-238-140-44.lightspeed.lsvlky.sbcglobal.net [162.238.140.44]) by mx2.paymentallianceintl.com (8.14.5/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s7MIH1DT051250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:17:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mikej@mikej.com) Received: from mail.mikej.com ([192.168.6.63]) by firewall.mikej.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7MIGqbt001758; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:16:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mikej@mikej.com) X-Authentication-Warning: firewall.mikej.com: Host [192.168.6.63] claimed to be mail.mikej.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:16:52 -0400 From: mikej To: Ports FreeBSD Subject: SAT resolver problem - [CFT] SSP Package Repository available In-Reply-To: <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> References: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <65f72f283578f9e08cb672928bc441e9@mail.mikej.com> X-Sender: mikej@mikej.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:17:05 -0000 On , Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >> >> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly >> respect LDFLAGS. >> >> To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all >> ports. >> >> The default SSP_CLFAGS is -fstack-protector, but -fstack-protector-all >> may optionally be set instead. >> >> Please help test this on your system. We would like to eventually >> enable >> this by default, but need to identify any major ports that have >> run-time >> issues due to it. >> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection >> > > We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by > default for ports and packages. > > We now have a repository that you can use rather than the default to > help test. We need your help to identify any issues before switching > the > default. > > This repository is available for: > > head > 10.0 > 9.1,9.2,9.3 > > It is not available for 8.4. If someone is willing to test on 8.4 I > will > build a repository for it. > > Place this in /usr/local/etc/pkgs/repos/FreeBSD_ssp.conf: > > FreeBSD: { enabled: no } > FreeBSD_ssp: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/ssp", > mirror_type: "srv", > signature_type: "fingerprints", > fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", > enabled: yes > } > > Once that is done you should force reinstall packages from this > repository: > > pkg update > pkg upgrade -f > > Thanks for your help! > Bryan Drewery > On behalf of portmgr. I have been using this without issue on several machines until today. root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg -v 1.3.6 root@firewall:/usr/ports # Repositories: FreeBSD_ssp: { url : "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ssp", enabled : yes, mirror_type : "SRV", signature_type : "FINGERPRINTS", fingerprints : "/usr/share/keys/pkg" } root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg update -f Updating repository catalogue pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ssp/meta.txz: Not Found pkg: repository FreeBSD_ssp has no meta file, using default settings Fetching digests.txz: 100% of 1 MB Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% of 5 MB Adding new entries: 100% Incremental update completed, 23305 packages processed: 0 packages updated, 0 removed and 23305 added. root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg install mdnsresponder Updating repository catalogue pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ssp/meta.txz: Not Found pkg: repository FreeBSD_ssp has no meta file, using default settings FreeBSD_ssp repository is up-to-date All repositories are up-to-date Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: cannot install package mDNSResponder~net/mDNSResponder, remove it from request [Y/n]: y Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The most recent version of packages are already installed root@firewall:/usr/ports # uname -a FreeBSD firewall 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269366M: Fri Aug 1 00:35:49 EDT 2014 mikej@firewall:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@firewall:/usr/ports # date Fri Aug 22 14:12:30 EDT 2014 root@firewall:/usr/ports # root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg info | grep mdns root@firewall:/usr/ports # Regards, --mikej From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 18:47:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C170D721 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88853638 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7MIlvnx033574 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:47:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192670] pkg upgrade sometimes shows wrong count of packages in progress Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:47:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:47:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192670 Bryan Drewery changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdrewery@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Bryan Drewery --- The problem is much weirder.. [8/38] Upgrading libcdio from 0.83_2 to 0.92: 100% ... [13/38] Deleting libcdio-0.83_2: 0% -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 20:17:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEFD1BBC for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6BDA3F73 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7MKHVDJ024161 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:17:31 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s7MKHVM6024158 for pkg@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:17:31 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 68413 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2014 15:17:29 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 22 Aug 2014 15:17:29 -0500 Message-ID: <53F7A552.5050608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:17:22 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mikej , Ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: SAT resolver problem - [CFT] SSP Package Repository available References: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> <65f72f283578f9e08cb672928bc441e9@mail.mikej.com> In-Reply-To: <65f72f283578f9e08cb672928bc441e9@mail.mikej.com> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XeQpn3cIdkxNowLvtRT0nnXua9L2VkVnb" Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:17:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XeQpn3cIdkxNowLvtRT0nnXua9L2VkVnb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote: > On , Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >>> >>> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properl= y >>> respect LDFLAGS. >>> >>> To enable, just add WITH_SSP=3Dyes to your make.conf and rebuild all >>> ports. >>> >>> The default SSP_CLFAGS is -fstack-protector, but -fstack-protector-al= l >>> may optionally be set instead. >>> >>> Please help test this on your system. We would like to eventually ena= ble >>> this by default, but need to identify any major ports that have run-t= ime >>> issues due to it. >>> >>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection >>> >> >> We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by= >> default for ports and packages. >> >> We now have a repository that you can use rather than the default to >> help test. We need your help to identify any issues before switching t= he >> default. >> >> This repository is available for: >> >> head >> 10.0 >> 9.1,9.2,9.3 >> >> It is not available for 8.4. If someone is willing to test on 8.4 I wi= ll >> build a repository for it. >> >> Place this in /usr/local/etc/pkgs/repos/FreeBSD_ssp.conf: >> >> FreeBSD: { enabled: no } >> FreeBSD_ssp: { >> url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/ssp", >> mirror_type: "srv", >> signature_type: "fingerprints", >> fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", >> enabled: yes >> } >> >> Once that is done you should force reinstall packages from this >> repository: >> >> pkg update >> pkg upgrade -f >> >> Thanks for your help! >> Bryan Drewery >> On behalf of portmgr. >=20 > I have been using this without issue on several machines until today. >=20 > root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg -v > 1.3.6 > root@firewall:/usr/ports # >=20 >=20 > Repositories: > FreeBSD_ssp: { > url : "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ssp= ", > enabled : yes, > mirror_type : "SRV", > signature_type : "FINGERPRINTS", > fingerprints : "/usr/share/keys/pkg" > } >=20 >=20 > root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg update -f > Updating repository catalogue > pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ssp/meta.txz: Not Found > pkg: repository FreeBSD_ssp has no meta file, using default settings > Fetching digests.txz: 100% of 1 MB > Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% of 5 MB >=20 > Adding new entries: 100% > Incremental update completed, 23305 packages processed: > 0 packages updated, 0 removed and 23305 added. > root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg install mdnsresponder > Updating repository catalogue > pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ssp/meta.txz: Not Found > pkg: repository FreeBSD_ssp has no meta file, using default settings > FreeBSD_ssp repository is up-to-date > All repositories are up-to-date > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > cannot install package mDNSResponder~net/mDNSResponder, remove it from > request [Y/n]: y > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > The most recent version of packages are already installed > root@firewall:/usr/ports # uname -a > FreeBSD firewall 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269366M: Fri Aug = 1 > 00:35:49 EDT 2014 mikej@firewall:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd6= 4 > root@firewall:/usr/ports # date > Fri Aug 22 14:12:30 EDT 2014 > root@firewall:/usr/ports # >=20 > root@firewall:/usr/ports # pkg info | grep mdns > root@firewall:/usr/ports # >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --mikej It looks like the (SSP) freebsd:10:x86:64 freebsd:11:x86:32 repositories are stale from a month ago. Looking into why. Sadly this was not noticed and the instructions effectively will downgrade packages. These 2 repositories have pkg-1.2 still as well. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --XeQpn3cIdkxNowLvtRT0nnXua9L2VkVnb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT96VSAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPB0IIAIYLftJd0PK2eyUBX0VuROxr Qq5v9gKmGbGpGhGUiXP204Op0Qp3vtk6HIqnU5KvyaEJGPt9NGq77iiUYH+tgCfg MNch6dzDHnyCjyr+bSz2YCVxoIBFy6yMhS2YLrd2ywJVGwmZMBx9kXRiviFwbpzF W6Z1XCnAzyvBOXdxWiG73bPArxVTWtzEVJPpaU9OSUFemZY+MPAuOuCVhlVaFZUF 66p3+LC/CD+StvVEK+UqsxylQscCuFYbepMpUt/Szm/meoG01dtnV9ptlEjAGGsA U5IXU0pqg8gSg29UevwBKWL02gg6zHOmYIfZpwH2PnGOcgzWkmfgegJ70O/yL9k= =A5JI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XeQpn3cIdkxNowLvtRT0nnXua9L2VkVnb-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 23 11:22:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52231C49 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39EFE3A1B for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7NBMQ6l019410 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:22:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192939] Option -I is not dodumented in the "pkg info" man page Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:22:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:22:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192939 John Marino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |Open Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |pkg@FreeBSD.org |org | --- Comment #1 from John Marino --- over to maintainer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 23 16:20:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29331AB7 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110B232B4 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7NGK0JZ017798 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:20:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192670] pkg upgrade sometimes shows wrong count of packages in progress Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:20:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:20:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192670 --- Comment #3 from Bryan Drewery --- Also logged here https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/980 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 23 17:26:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FBF2EB for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3373974 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so11446708wgh.2 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:26:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=AOdBtl6jENvY4Kh6zcdlZwYWbjOjLBgB9u83JqsoBFw=; b=InJSou+g3YCsw9F6JTsehCIkXr9u7GP2oRjMzMKuzkt501vTsyyY2GjH7yCLVsIaR0 abQvst+RhYV8t4fsw2zSNR28PyTzZ6G2tOmXU4BwxF+CC0hSplM2xgE4lAJfQu3FK+vx kd49g9Fwd9wOOopaIFQYCZE+sYd5EssKr2P1vejH8yFLybYj3+0l6gY0GPTuZLeJgVRE JgwyTAiNBNoPytnxyebwfhPAna2bKKd+ZdWICnFD2JbmOIkkqDJxLr74rti5L2YSAjY/ fzXRbMPD35Ddn1hSWPOUUziaA/i1GO7TqJx+xGQ2LATFYc42DqjgAn7a0GpYG6hBWte2 Ckuw== X-Received: by 10.180.14.74 with SMTP id n10mr336143wic.50.1408814804851; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg ([197.83.193.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fv10sm11198138wic.23.2014.08.23.10.26.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: David Naylor From: David Naylor To: pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Build failure with pkg-devel Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:26:35 +0300 Message-ID: <2716323.4ysXS3gH0c@dragon.dg> Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-STABLE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart10437509.RTptRHIILR"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:26:47 -0000 --nextPart10437509.RTptRHIILR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, I have been getting the following build failure on ports-mgmt/pkg-devel: /usr/bin/strip: '/tmp/build/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg- devel/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.2': No such file *** Error code 1 Doing a s/pkg.so.2/pkg.so.3/ on the Makefile fixes the issue. Regards --nextPart10437509.RTptRHIILR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJT+M7OXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ5NDhFQzUxMUEyN0YwMzAyRTc5OUI1M0FB RDYzRkE4REQ2QjJEQTU1AAoJEK1j+o3WstpVF9gP/1usms+PIxYvjDlCbLMhHXjn XYPg6iKPAHOVqPUnNjMMbXw3ZafWKMG7iVRXz1b0OI0th09xM7Jr6MxxX84uiBgT 9kJZQXXtREN0mffdMzpx0nSnXa4rj+lvJspm10kaPEC+P1tPP8FNWHyJcf4eG9Qx dmtB4cORmsS+JCr+qVwVb0fy0XoSWwApVUPVuImm8CBJidRciPilD2WSQkvusIl7 BOx9bG1amG8VsSWwj+plozkeiWWvAM6KObYdYq2vszSaxdsgCf0TLTYr02gmitu/ CUeT8eRnycl1kyZIofq7+xYQtCFp2qsRjYfjdlraBajN1bFIizMhFUNVXj6xfWfu FoLj33SbNUokjABtIIebFBhD9aAhQ7oDC4a5o5e3KiRgb849Xp0OwBwoI+8q68ID 0LqpE3jNzV4hI+6bHW1A40HJ3hWcwvoMkoPxht2CGqkPcNRWxZyuFFtjbP/2mi/8 Xo+aJsKVl/fz9Egn/qEdD748uz7bPYP6BHWipcArqYiUFvNliPtOVQteQLrKGTgH uxH0ocqadgtpWX3+KHVXfUvbIudjIT5JNDvyuQnQYYHgOvVgeel8z+x7MkhV34Fh wni3A+Wy8T+u/vrXH7Zbv7S5R7h7F47J+ysZPQTare+9n8sgh2w23ZPKiO71Urfp 828lPpXCrwrbnjE4EaUK =OKD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart10437509.RTptRHIILR--