From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 21 08:28:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D462FB for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3A32601 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6L8SM9G011994 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:28:22 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:28:22 GMT Message-Id: <201407210828.s6L8SM9G011994@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:28:22 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common problem is that recent versions of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions. The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 7.x/8.x/9.x/-current with target architecture'.) (Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not the error still applies to the latest version. The program that generates this report is not yet able to determine this automatically.) portname: devel/rubygem-dep_selector broken because: Does not build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=rubygem-dep_selector portname: graphics/ruby-rmagick broken because: not staged build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=ruby-rmagick portname: graphics/ruby-tgif broken because: Does not compile build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=ruby-tgif portname: print/ruby-panda broken because: not staged build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=ruby-panda portname: textproc/ruby-diff broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=ruby-diff If these errors are ones that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Every effort has been made to make sure that these error reports really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate false matches. If one of these errors fits that description, please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the problem in the future. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 21 08:32:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883065F3 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F9E277A for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6L8Wb9L093866 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:32:37 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:32:37 GMT Message-Id: <201407210832.s6L8Wb9L093866@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:32:37 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: graphics/ruby-rmagick description: Ruby binding for ImageMagick maintainer: ruby@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: Not staged. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-announce/2014-May/000080.html expiration date: 2014-08-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=ruby-rmagick portname: print/ruby-panda description: Ruby extension library to access Panda maintainer: ruby@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: Not staged. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-announce/2014-May/000080.html expiration date: 2014-08-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=ruby-panda If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD.