From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 07:55:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AA019EB for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32E4888A for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAG7tLVc088683 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194673] [new port] sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194673 --- Comment #3 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: xmj Date: Sun Nov 16 07:55:09 UTC 2014 New revision: 372624 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/372624 Log: sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh: new port This Hammer CLI plugin contains a set of commands for remote execution of commands on hosts known to Foreman via SSH WWW: https://github.com/theforeman/hammer-cli-foreman-ssh PR: 194673 Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1113 Submitted by: Michael Moll Approved by: swills (mentor) Changes: head/sysutils/Makefile head/sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh/ head/sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh/Makefile head/sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh/distinfo head/sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh/files/ head/sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh/files/foreman_ssh.yml.sample head/sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh/pkg-descr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 07:55:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF278B37 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D49897 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAG7tvwf088967 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194673] [new port] sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:55:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194673 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |Issue Resolved CC| |xmj@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- Committed, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 09:44:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC15C9E4 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E46AEC for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAH9icbR058770 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sAH9icB5058769; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201411170944.sAH9icB5058769@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:38 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/rubygem-whois | 3.5.5 | 3.5.7 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-crass | 0.2.1 | 1.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 10:07:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1D5681 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A530D3F for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAIA7RqT049297 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:07:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sAIA7RnW049296; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:07:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201411181007.sAIA7RnW049296@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:07:27 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:07:27 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activemodel | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activemodel4 | 4.1.6 | 4.1.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activerecord | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter | 1.3.10 | 1.3.12 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activerecord4 | 4.1.6 | 4.1.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/rubygem-actionview | 4.1.6 | 4.1.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/rubygem-activesupport | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ mail/rubygem-actionmailer | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ mail/rubygem-actionmailer4 | 4.1.6 | 4.1.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/rubygem-connection_pool | 2.0.0 | 2.1.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-actionpack | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-activeresource | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-crass | 0.2.1 | 1.0.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-rails | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-rails4 | 4.1.6 | 4.1.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-railties | 3.2.19 | 3.2.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/rubygem-railties4 | 4.1.6 | 4.1.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 23:15:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB581F85 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6751CB for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ex7so3544526wid.15 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:15:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YNF34iMCWdOEr401yFlIRhbHrrC/6XOaaGgE0CHxuXA=; b=DrMHZLdtGXeuIapD7EzBkfFJGRfnFhx7RjYwXXrnCVGolJJnBsTScqKk91JLxcP7BM /IPwRfTAyKDuqE7fu8ZQMtRqKUk/WcgxL8YXkgidzkg2BliVPd8H7R+/ivt6hM5KzcrC 1h6U0HVb0AS9W0kMParV/jVVV6c0iJfJY1stHzvM9o1pSYvdqKBcHsx+M4v9BeuoB5uv GOKVuNea54nuFKmfKQud2Q28bS4HgMGjo9mWmcJ8MIAy4OISa2kZHRzTeSwfFQwobPCO CrQL0+pE5o1BSZ/t55NLfrnMvj+JWv3fLn7cj2tcyatRqJAjeskWpYw1FrelQTQncWBl RjJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.119.193 with SMTP id kw1mr51747729wjb.37.1416352541900; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:15:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.14.162 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:15:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:15:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: What determines whether a rubygem should be ported or not? From: Matthew Closson To: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:15:44 -0000 Greetings! What determines whether a specific ruby gem should have a FreeBSD port created for it or not. I've looked at the list of available packages / ports that start with rubygem-* and its not obvious to me if its because the gem really required some platform specific patching to build and install correctly on FreeBSD or if is another reason or if its just arbitrary that someone decided to create a port for a specific gem at one point in time. Thanks for any information on this. -Matthew- From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 03:13:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45986CE5 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B42E03 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mouf.net (swills@mouf [199.48.129.64]) by mouf.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAJ3DO2A057808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:29 GMT (envelope-from swills@mouf.net) Received: (from swills@localhost) by mouf.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id sAJ3DOHx057807; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:24 GMT (envelope-from swills) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:24 +0000 From: Steve Wills To: Matthew Closson Subject: Re: What determines whether a rubygem should be ported or not? Message-ID: <20141119031318.GS4395@mouf.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.3 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:13:31 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:15:41PM -0800, Matthew Closson wrote: > Greetings! What determines whether a specific ruby gem should have a > FreeBSD port created for it or not. > > I've looked at the list of available packages / ports that start with > rubygem-* and its not obvious to me if its because the gem really required > some platform specific patching to build and install correctly on FreeBSD > or if is another reason or if its just arbitrary that someone decided to > create a port for a specific gem at one point in time. There are two main reasons gem ports are created, as far as I know. The first if anyone needs it and submits a PR or if they are a committer, creates the port. They may need it for something they're writing or might need the gem itself (often times gems include commands as well as libs) The second is that often gems are created because they are needed by something else. For example, redmine, which is a bug tracking system, is written in Ruby and uses a lot of gems, so in order to have redmine in ports we have the gems it needs. Steve From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 10:05:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9811A935 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8544AD7A for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAJA571X052827 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:07 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sAJA57Zx052826; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:07 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201411191005.sAJA57Zx052826@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:07 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:07 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activerecord-jdbc-adapter | 1.3.10 | 1.3.12 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/rubygem-fog | 1.23.0 | 1.25.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/rubygem-paint | 0.8.7 | 0.9.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 08:28:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21357289 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE25EC01 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAL8SALs033658 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:10 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:10 GMT Message-Id: <201411210828.sAL8SALs033658@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:11 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common problem is that recent versions of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions. The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 7.x/8.x/9.x/-current with target architecture'.) (Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not the error still applies to the latest version. The program that generates this report is not yet able to determine this automatically.) portname: archivers/ruby-lha broken because: Does not build with Ruby 2.0 or Ruby 2.1 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=archivers&portname=ruby-lha portname: devel/rubygem-dep_selector broken because: Does not build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=rubygem-dep_selector portname: textproc/ruby-diff broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=ruby-diff If these errors are ones that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Every effort has been made to make sure that these error reports really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate false matches. If one of these errors fits that description, please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the problem in the future. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 08:28:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2762C3A0 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 183F3C2C for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAL8SPmf035846 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:25 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:25 GMT Message-Id: <201411210828.sAL8SPmf035846@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:28:25 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: devel/rubygem-dep_selector description: Find a valid assignment of package versions maintainer: ruby@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: Broken for more than 6 months expiration date: 2014-11-26 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=rubygem-dep_selector portname: textproc/ruby-diff description: Ruby implementation of Perl's Algorithm::Diff maintainer: ruby@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: Broken for more than 6 months expiration date: 2014-11-26 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=ruby-diff If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 09:56:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E733EA80 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D367A2 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAL9u4SU033393 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sAL9u4Cn033392; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201411210956.sAL9u4Cn033392@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:04 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:05 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/rubygem-sidekiq | 3.2.5 | 3.3.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 00:01:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1CD405 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88824F7B for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAM019s2081272 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 -0000 Lawrence Chen has asked ruby@FreeBSD.org for maintainer-feedback: Bug 195268: [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195268 --- Description --- Created attachment 149702 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149702&action=edit patch to build archivers/ruby-lha for ruby 2.0 (or ruby 2.1) Have a backlog of things I've been patching to switch my systems to use a private repo using poudriere. Among them was a patch to get archivers/ruby-lha to build for ruby 2.0. The patch is based on upstream work on this issue. Between the time I first made the patch and today, I see that the port has been updated to show that it doesn't build with ruby 2.1 either. After some adjustments, I also tested this patch with ruby 2.1. --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer ruby@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 00:01:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC22E406 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39E0F7C for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAM019er081461 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195268] New: [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: beastie@tardisi.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195268 Bug ID: 195268 Summary: [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0 Product: Ports Tree Version: Latest Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: Needs Triage Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org Reporter: beastie@tardisi.com Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(ruby@FreeBSD.org) Created attachment 149702 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149702&action=edit patch to build archivers/ruby-lha for ruby 2.0 (or ruby 2.1) Have a backlog of things I've been patching to switch my systems to use a private repo using poudriere. Among them was a patch to get archivers/ruby-lha to build for ruby 2.0. The patch is based on upstream work on this issue. Between the time I first made the patch and today, I see that the port has been updated to show that it doesn't build with ruby 2.1 either. After some adjustments, I also tested this patch with ruby 2.1. --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer ruby@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 00:01:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94B99572 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C3BFF8D for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAM01wmf030322 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: beastie@tardisi.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:01:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195268 --- Comment #2 from Lawrence Chen --- Created attachment 149703 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149703&action=edit poudriere testport log for ruby 2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 00:02:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B82724 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028F8F93 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAM02aUI066021 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:02:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:02:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: beastie@tardisi.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:02:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195268 --- Comment #3 from Lawrence Chen --- Created attachment 149704 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149704&action=edit poudriere testport log for ruby 2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 09:58:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC51572 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08944C31 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAM9wD5I066845 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:58:13 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sAM9wDNE066844; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:58:13 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201411220958.sAM9wDNE066844@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:58:13 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:58:14 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activerecord-jdbc-adapter | 1.3.10 | 1.3.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/rubygem-activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter | 1.3.10 | 1.3.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks.