Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:04:56 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r372654 - in head/editors/vim: . files Message-ID: <20141129200456.675a4b89@kan> In-Reply-To: <201411162255.sAGMtAaW055221@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201411162255.sAGMtAaW055221@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/ud/cFN8mgRL8p_+RXp7ZhTK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Author: alfred (src committer) > Date: Sun Nov 16 22:55:10 2014 > New Revision: 372654 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/372654 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r372654/ >=20 > Log: > Use vimrc from distribution. > =20 > Suggested by: many. >=20 Just in case it was not voiced before: IMHO, this is a change that changes vim into something far less usable than before and rams that down everyone's throat unceremoniously, leaving one with no other sensible recourse other than maintaining own package build with this option disabled. It this really something we should be doing to 'attract young talent and look cool', as this supposedly was the driving force for this commit? Since that talent, evidently, is unable to configure own editor using one-liner in .vimrc, does it warrant the sacrifice?=20 --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/ud/cFN8mgRL8p_+RXp7ZhTK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlR6bTgACgkQQ6z1jMm+XZY8swCgsNlcu8xhNvqT1HBI7Y4HAd6p 2UAAn3H9XldeM0UOBKRfaf6jDsabPmQk =nEZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ud/cFN8mgRL8p_+RXp7ZhTK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141129200456.675a4b89>