From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 10:25:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281B5AC6 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57B7775 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3B46A601A; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:25:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t1FAPfpJ025948; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:25:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id t1FAPfrf024643; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:25:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:25:41 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: george ember Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20150215102540.GX65009@e-new.0x20.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:25:45 -0000 --QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:38:12PM +0200, george ember wrote: > Sorry about the multiple postings. Posting so much information via email, > is quite mess sometimes. > I am not doing it everyday. The last mail was double send because I was n= ot > sure if I sent it! >=20 > So. We made everything we could make. Right? At least on power management. > I guess with lid close etc, I could get some more minutes of power. >=20 > Now I must solve the acpi_ibm and the brightness problem. My brightness is > just not working. You have a Lenovo Ideapad which is the Lenovo's consumer line. It's probably completely different from the business Thinkpads and incompatible with the acpi_ibm kernel module It might me worth looking at how the Linux guys talk to Ideapad hardware. --QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU4HQkXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1t9ycH/jm9/d8USAIOvTb/7Rnnw82C vBXRngdboIseNnxjysl4JDGr5aTdQcb8xWyPT78cfborhJsEGObGBKhm/51bcEy8 QSMVklKY0DVw4kxnqnhGEiWIFUUod//ka+SdvpeB6QFGtaEFFzN46g/dotufn+ew 0Wu1Zk4S3kn9tYuVuP4nhlAG3zoC6kWPfsG4JKj2N4QKPP5zI3/SLvIcDwP/6vMX mXcIMiVfIdE/MVUA90Z55x11/lYBQXuuGykZZEG2T4YcZWWCY0SZ39WUvW4DeWoz /hxb+E7+OU4i8KYjvhW0kk7pBVdSIlpaLClVO6GG67+zpVHXtGZ83ATLymntqxc= =VfEX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD-- From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 17 17:17:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379EF37A for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E74A22A for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5152CB915; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:17:10 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Activating Suspend/Resume on FreeBSD 10.1 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:40:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <54CA9529.1060903@att.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201502171040.35416.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:17:12 -0500 (EST) Cc: Anthony Jenkins , Mohammad Najafi X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:17:14 -0000 On Friday, January 30, 2015 12:37:10 pm Kevin Oberman wrote: > My experience is the opposite. With KMS I could run with VESA and without > it I needed to pull VESA from my kernel. > > As of today I am running fine with KMS, i915, and vt(4) with a standard > GENERIC 10-STABLE kernel. I was running KMS and vt(4) well before they were > MFCed, so I don't remember when I stopped adding "nooptions VESA", but I > definitely used to need it to make suspect/resume work and don't any longer. > > In any case, trying kernel without VESA is a good idea. FYI, VESA only applies to sc(4). It is ignored for vt(4). That is why it "works" with vt(4). -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 03:49:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D728E1CD; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AD2260; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by padfa1 with SMTP id fa1so11392830pad.2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:49:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D8kzYOOSWv3UkIGK8eQU6dWzcx1MtMa4jaKMzcMDPE4=; b=bXA8+kXvvPdJO6Sk+32NdjsNZo1eniHC6fV+K6dmOrXUGObhFjdZn/u7tc2ObhGnJs EMec8lB1TXQaJeJCTXuiSn2ME4CVuErPboGha5CPJ73qzTglTS2j5LN+29OnZcYS1jg2 stgb/QtXVp29IUQPs3UCfqN2k1rx/hzX5mS/qEgFp8Uk66JvNu8xoV6dGsu1GNykbJyS e0Z1hc7cV0bPnUNZaiehM61gCGDY+tHYsD4FoEzuhiJs6h40pjH8SdiIbktMiTEj/VKI +WRXsoe/s/1DAyvVMxkhX83H/XZ33hjH6hRatsAjwLYPsneYICjxBvih/ZJon11VVqjK 7EBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.124.202 with SMTP id mk10mr44669269pdb.159.1424230922532; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:42:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.67.30.198 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:42:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201502171040.35416.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <54CA9529.1060903@att.net> <201502171040.35416.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:42:02 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5Jy3AQt3kHrtKvYBhwse8Gegqvo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Activating Suspend/Resume on FreeBSD 10.1 From: Kevin Oberman To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Anthony Jenkins , Mohammad Najafi , "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:49:50 -0000 On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, January 30, 2015 12:37:10 pm Kevin Oberman wrote: > > My experience is the opposite. With KMS I could run with VESA and > without > > it I needed to pull VESA from my kernel. > > > > As of today I am running fine with KMS, i915, and vt(4) with a standard > > GENERIC 10-STABLE kernel. I was running KMS and vt(4) well before they > were > > MFCed, so I don't remember when I stopped adding "nooptions VESA", but I > > definitely used to need it to make suspect/resume work and don't any > longer. > > > > In any case, trying kernel without VESA is a good idea. > > FYI, VESA only applies to sc(4). It is ignored for vt(4). That is why it > "works" with vt(4). > > -- > John Baldwin > I suspected that was the case, but did not recall for sure. Thanks for the confirmation, though it does not help with the problem reported. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com