From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 06:25:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1D655F for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8581DE7D for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t186PUo2054830 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:25:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 197406] emulators/linux_base-c6: `expr` command fallback to FreeBSD expr Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:25:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:25:30 -0000 lichray@gmail.com has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to emulation@FreeBSD.org: Bug 197406: emulators/linux_base-c6: `expr` command fallback to FreeBSD expr https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197406 --- Description --- `expr` is resolved to /bin/expr in FreeBSD, also in Linux emulation layer, but linux_base-c6 only has [/compat/linux]/usr/bin/expr installed, result in the FreeBSD version of `expr` being invoked. Some software breaks. Linking [/compat/linux]/usr/bin/expr to [/compat/linux]/bin/expr solves the problem. --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer emulation@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 06:25:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFC0560 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4868E7E for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t186PUNI054834 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:25:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197406] emulators/linux_base-c6: `expr` command fallback to FreeBSD expr Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:25:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lichray@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:25:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197406 Bug ID: 197406 Summary: emulators/linux_base-c6: `expr` command fallback to FreeBSD expr Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: emulation@FreeBSD.org Reporter: lichray@gmail.com CC: dchagin@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org, kib@FreeBSD.org Assignee: emulation@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(emulation@FreeBSD.org) `expr` is resolved to /bin/expr in FreeBSD, also in Linux emulation layer, but linux_base-c6 only has [/compat/linux]/usr/bin/expr installed, result in the FreeBSD version of `expr` being invoked. Some software breaks. Linking [/compat/linux]/usr/bin/expr to [/compat/linux]/bin/expr solves the problem. --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer emulation@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 10:10:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F484434 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E4B66C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi2so5432295wib.1 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 02:10:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VYmJjEaETJggvXCSDF50xt0o4SOwz07W04GuaSxtCdQ=; b=NjwmRPq9dNMC1GuDAxFMMfMKGyolsT4/s3rL1l0f7Tqv3rNq8PrxCGStfYdnP9P+1t 321xMBN41Ka8MZpXhJHfzeWZD+q1LifD6kVG3+9CpKh32ibkG73SQkfEVOrGEiB+Z1vZ RVeuY0hZkWcpHyQIRG17wJIwWSk5fh/DOortuXGWZaah8FWQ7kelXrilwo/ufduHDeck va3rfwOssbPa6PMi+Y7nik/Ft03oMfb21w32U1sAFAWqKcjxRVEbA9wyeU5KnQO3iB8V rZxa1969k36uV5T2V671m6wd1dZE/WcU6f1JBtSgS+emzbchKmKCZkCSmGwIYKvohcFi eJNw== X-Received: by 10.180.73.40 with SMTP id i8mr22656677wiv.4.1423390224824; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 02:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ernst.home (p578E3724.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.142.55.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa3sm9279067wib.17.2015.02.08.02.10.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Feb 2015 02:10:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:10:22 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Patrick Powell Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux Message-ID: <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:10:27 -0000 On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 Patrick Powell wrote: > The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than > /usr/compat > > However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to > /usr/compat. > > Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take > place (just out of curiosity)? > > Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or /usr/compat/linux/proc? > Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be > added to the > libraries for linux emulation? > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) but in my /etc/fstab I have linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's used. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 10:34:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9293BAE4 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795AE8FC for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t18AYggm059182 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:34:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197406] emulators/linux_base-c6: `expr` command fallback to FreeBSD expr Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:34:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:34:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197406 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: tijl Date: Sun Feb 8 10:34:15 UTC 2015 New revision: 378639 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/378639 Log: - White space fixes - Like r315899 did for linux_base-f10, add some symlinks to linux_base-c6 for executables that exist in /usr/bin on Linux but /bin on FreeBSD. This guarantees that Linux shell scripts run the Linux executables and not the FreeBSD ones. PR: 197406 Changes: head/emulators/linux_base-c6/Makefile head/emulators/linux_base-c6/pkg-plist -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 10:38:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE24B40 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017DB912 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t18Acjmv060747 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 10:38:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197406] emulators/linux_base-c6: `expr` command fallback to FreeBSD expr Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:38:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tijl@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197406 Tijl Coosemans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED CC| |tijl@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 21:00:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D58904 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3525A0F for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t18L0F67072390 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:00:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502082100.t18L0F67072390@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org that need special attention X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 21:00:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 21:00:16 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 180790 | devel/linux_kdump prints BSD descriptions of errn 1 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 01:58:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE87B16 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 01:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B932EE7 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 01:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t191wTQM024219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:58:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <54D81444.4070302@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:58:28 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: [BUG REPORT] Guests crash with assert when additions CD is inserted Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:58:36 -0000 Host is amd64 10.1, guests I tried are several linuxes and windows. Insertion of additions CD worked the first time, when it was also downloaded. But the subsequent attempts all cause assertion, see log below. Yuri virtualbox-ose-4.3.20_4 --- error message --- 00:10:59.217392 !!Assertion Failed!! 00:10:59.217393 Expression: !m_mediums.contains(strMediumID) 00:10:59.217395 Location : /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-4.3.20/src/VBox/Frontends/VirtualBox/src/medium/UIMediumEnumerator.cpp(118) void UIMediumEnumerator::createMedium(const UIMedium &) /mnt/external/VirtualBox VMs/Arch/Logs/VBox.log 1166,1 Bot From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 03:29:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E59130C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A26A7D0 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1A3TmrM006700 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197505] emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for use of legacy Nvidia drivers. Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: blahblah.1981@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197505 Bug ID: 197505 Summary: emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for use of legacy Nvidia drivers. Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: emulation@FreeBSD.org Reporter: blahblah.1981@gmail.com Assignee: emulation@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(emulation@FreeBSD.org) emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for use of legacy Nvidia drivers. If I am using the legacy Nvidia port, x11/nvidia-driver-340, setting the "Use GL driver from nvidia-driver" option in the emulators/linux-c6 port causes it to pull in the newest Nvidia driver, x11/nvidia-driver, instead of using my installed legacy driver, x11/nvidia-driver-340. >From the emulators/linux-c6 Makefile: OPTIONS_DEFINE= NVIDIA_GL NVIDIA_GL_DESC= Use GL driver from nvidia-driver NVIDIA_GL_RUN_DEPENDS= ${LINUXBASE}/usr/lib/libGL.so.1:${PORTSDIR}/x11/nvidia-driver \ linux-c6-libGLU>0:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/linux-c6-libGLU NVIDIA_GL_RUN_DEPENDS_OFF= linux-c6-dri>0:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/linux-c6-dri Is it possible to allow this to use legacy Nvidia drivers? --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer emulation@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 03:29:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF1130B for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ACE17CF for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1A3Tlhu006696 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 197505] emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for use of legacy Nvidia drivers. Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:29:48 -0000 blahblah.1981@gmail.com has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to emulation@FreeBSD.org: Bug 197505: emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for u= se of legacy Nvidia drivers. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197505 --- Description --- emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for use of legacy Nvidia drivers. If I am using the legacy Nvidia port, x11/nvidia-driver-340, setting the "U= se GL driver from nvidia-driver" option in the emulators/linux-c6 port causes = it to pull in the newest Nvidia driver, x11/nvidia-driver, instead of using my installed legacy driver, x11/nvidia-driver-340. >From the emulators/linux-c6 Makefile: OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D NVIDIA_GL NVIDIA_GL_DESC=3D Use GL driver from nvidia-driver NVIDIA_GL_RUN_DEPENDS=3D=20 ${LINUXBASE}/usr/lib/libGL.so.1:${PORTSDIR}/x11/nvidia-driver \ linux-c6-libGLU>0:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/linux-c6-libGLU NVIDIA_GL_RUN_DEPENDS_OFF=3D=20=20=20=20=20 linux-c6-dri>0:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/linux-c6-dri Is it possible to allow this to use legacy Nvidia drivers? --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer emulation@FreeBSD.org= From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 20:47:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB265F0D for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76662670 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AKYJK0007285; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gljennjohn@gmail.com Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:47:30 -0000 On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 > Patrick Powell wrote: > >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than >> /usr/compat >> >> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to >> /usr/compat. >> >> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take >> place (just out of curiosity)? >> >> Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or /usr/compat/linux/proc? >> Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be >> added to the >> libraries for linux emulation? >> > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat > > linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > but in my /etc/fstab I have > linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 > > Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's > used. > # uname -a FreeBSD astart2.astart.com 9.3-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue Jan 27 10:43:40 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # ls -l / |grep compat drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 3 14:41 compat # ls -l /usr |grep compat drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Nov 21 21:06 compat Note that neither /compat or /usr/compat are symbolic links. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:54:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C55248A for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8C2754 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AMseqV054563; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:54:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: gljennjohn@gmail.com, Patrick Powell In-Reply-To: <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home>, <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:54:40 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:54:11 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell wrote > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 > > Patrick Powell wrote: > > > >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than > >> /usr/compat > >> > >> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to > >> /usr/compat. > >> > >> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take > >> place (just out of curiosity)? > >> > >> Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or /usr/compat/linux/proc? > >> Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be > >> added to the > >> libraries for linux emulation? > >> > > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat > > > > linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > > but in my /etc/fstab I have > > linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 > > > > Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's > > used. > > > # uname -a > FreeBSD astart2.astart.com 9.3-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue > Jan 27 10:43:40 UTC 2015 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > # ls -l / |grep compat > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 3 14:41 compat > > # ls -l /usr |grep compat > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Nov 21 21:06 compat > > Note that neither /compat or /usr/compat are symbolic links. Interesting. On a RELENG_9 (9.3-STABLE); I only return /compat no linux, or compat available in /usr So what's the *real* story behind all this? --Chris > > > -- > Patrick Powell Astart Technologies > papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X > Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 > Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 > Web: www.astart.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 02:12:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43081306 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C06FD4D for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id eu11so938241pac.7 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m8L010MvAFKt7i285lcaP5IxS1LBcC2jq0Qmsk1gNR8=; b=Lpz35U612MFcRqlmR+Fo6uaq+KfMK0TyWj42RPuZAhLlLdt7YKe0DNL7G3RW7lhej9 /OhvamPFvFhOj4ObRLrf3xcUrLE1jPFK6Gn7CaAzttmBKAqFzuO/i2TpafzhOZb2N0aC +maoBYCnWBw88pHZvejse1kf92DCcPNDgSDDpjeZJXD9/2mu1zYmd/hULUwoDinNsfCI YWNiWB1n4tlxGFS0C91Isfki9nf8k1sbDswvk78UV+Q7U1e88EQZF9UVh9gW5PdNLHa8 /kxylbfja/Wkb7joIZrK1rtq5EGi8oCnAPXuV1B/wvPVYkwbzp9PNpVeaoAaNhc5Rl/i j49A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.45.9 with SMTP id i9mr43136738pdm.132.1423620763600; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.67.22.231 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6UxKVNkXbv2XQXhyJxzdA-0_OOI Message-ID: Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux From: Kevin Oberman To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: gljennjohn@gmail.com, "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:12:44 -0000 On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell > wrote > > > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 > > > Patrick Powell wrote: > > > > > >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than > > >> /usr/compat > > >> > > >> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to > > >> /usr/compat. > > >> > > >> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take > > >> place (just out of curiosity)? > > >> > > >> Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or > /usr/compat/linux/proc? > > >> Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be > > >> added to the > > >> libraries for linux emulation? > > >> > > > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: > > > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat > > > > > > linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > > > but in my /etc/fstab I have > > > linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 > 0 > > > > > > Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's > > > used. > > > > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD astart2.astart.com 9.3-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue > > Jan 27 10:43:40 UTC 2015 > > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > # ls -l / |grep compat > > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 3 14:41 compat > > > > # ls -l /usr |grep compat > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Nov 21 21:06 compat > > > > Note that neither /compat or /usr/compat are symbolic links. > Interesting. On a RELENG_9 (9.3-STABLE); I only return > /compat > no linux, or compat available in /usr > So what's the *real* story behind all this? > > > ls -ld /compat lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Feb 8 09:18 /compat@ -> /usr/compat It is NOT created by the OS or any port, as far as I know. By default the installation of an emulators/linux_base-* port will create /compat. Because it can become fairly large and is in root, it was recommended some time ago that /usr/compat be created and the contents of /compat be moved there, /compat be deleted, and a symlink be created. Unless something was changed, his is up to the user. If you have both and neither is a symlink, something was not done right at some point. Once the symlink is in place, neither an upgrade or install of a linux_base-* port will affect it at all. It can significantly reduce the space required in root. I suppose it is possible that some linux ports may be installing stuff in /usr/compat/linux instead of /compat/linux so that both show up if /compat/linux is still in use. I hope this is not the case. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 05:01:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F394CC06 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF168D9 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1B52LSs022832; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:02:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Kevin Oberman In-Reply-To: References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> , From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:02:21 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <0cd6ea56dadf9a02877417c2a7e3b1f6@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: gljennjohn@gmail.com, "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:01:52 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell > > wrote > > > > > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 > > > > Patrick Powell wrote: > > > > > > > >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than > > > >> /usr/compat > > > >> > > > >> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to > > > >> /usr/compat. > > > >> > > > >> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take > > > >> place (just out of curiosity)? > > > >> > > > >> Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or > > /usr/compat/linux/proc? > > > >> Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be > > > >> added to the > > > >> libraries for linux emulation? > > > >> > > > > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: > > > > > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat > > > > > > > > linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > > > > but in my /etc/fstab I have > > > > linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 > > 0 > > > > > > > > Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's > > > > used. > > > > > > > # uname -a > > > FreeBSD astart2.astart.com 9.3-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue > > > Jan 27 10:43:40 UTC 2015 > > > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > # ls -l / |grep compat > > > > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 3 14:41 compat > > > > > > # ls -l /usr |grep compat > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Nov 21 21:06 compat > > > > > > Note that neither /compat or /usr/compat are symbolic links. > > Interesting. On a RELENG_9 (9.3-STABLE); I only return > > /compat > > no linux, or compat available in /usr > > So what's the *real* story behind all this? > > > > > ls -ld /compat > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Feb 8 09:18 /compat@ -> /usr/compat > > It is NOT created by the OS or any port, as far as I know. By default the > installation of an emulators/linux_base-* port will create /compat. Because > it can become fairly large and is in root, it was recommended some time ago > that /usr/compat be created and the contents of /compat be moved there, > /compat be deleted, and a symlink be created. Unless something was changed, > his is up to the user. > > If you have both and neither is a symlink, something was not done right at > some point. Once the symlink is in place, neither an upgrade or install of > a linux_base-* port will affect it at all. It can significantly reduce the > space required in root. > > I suppose it is possible that some linux ports may be installing stuff in > /usr/compat/linux instead of /compat/linux so that both show up if > /compat/linux is still in use. I hope this is not the case. Thanks for the informative response, Kevin. FWIW as most of the servers I manage use nVidia video; in anticipation of installing the nvidia drivers, I always install the emulators/linux_base-* port prior to the [nvidia] video driver, knowing it's a prereq. Under the circumstances (linux-base-* v [linux]ports); I wonder what, or if some "standard" should be determined || applied? Assuming one isn't already in place. Thanks again, Kevin. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com --Chris -- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 14:54:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735F0237 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312F2B06 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1BEsAkL011112; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:54:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54DB6D12.2080802@astart.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:54:10 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris H , Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> , <0cd6ea56dadf9a02877417c2a7e3b1f6@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <0cd6ea56dadf9a02877417c2a7e3b1f6@ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gljennjohn@gmail.com, "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:54:21 -0000 On 02/10/15 21:02, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote > >> > Thanks for the informative response, Kevin. > FWIW as most of the servers I manage use nVidia video; in anticipation > of installing the nvidia drivers, I always install the > emulators/linux_base-* port prior to the [nvidia] video driver, knowing > it's a prereq. > Under the circumstances (linux-base-* v [linux]ports); I wonder > what, or if some "standard" should be determined || applied? > Assuming one isn't already in place. > > Thanks again, Kevin. > >> -- >> Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired >> E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > --Chris > > -- > > > On my system /usr/compat/ was created by adding linproc and linsys to /etc/fstab so that some Linux executables could run. I believe that this was mentioned in the postinstall for a port that I was installing (cirra FreeBSD 9.0). When I was installing a new version of the same utility on 9.3 I saw the note for adding linproc and checked /etc/fstab and found I had /usr/compat/linux/proc as the path. I changed the path to /compat and then started wondering when the change occurred and if it was going to effect anything else, such as the location of libraries that I needed to add/modify for various linux utilities. Note that the only thing in /usr/compat was /usr/compat/linux/proc. Everything else seemed to get installed in /compat. I just had a quick look at the current Ports files and it looks like they all reference/use /compat/linux/proc linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 linsys /compat/linux/sys linsysfs rw 0 0 Note: just as a side note on this, shouldn't the location actually be /usr/local/compat? But I digress... -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 18:34:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFD9D24 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [46.17.166.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809BB86E for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson.cam.lispworks.com [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1BINYWb045931; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:23:34 GMT (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id t1BINXHB009348; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:23:33 GMT Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id t1BINXdp009344; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:23:33 GMT Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:23:33 GMT Message-Id: <201502111823.t1BINXdp009344@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: Kevin Oberman In-reply-to: (message from Kevin Oberman on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800) Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> Cc: gljennjohn@gmail.com, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:34:01 -0000 >>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800, Kevin Oberman said: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell > > wrote > > > > > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800 > > > > Patrick Powell wrote: > > > > > > > >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than > > > >> /usr/compat > > > >> > > > >> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to > > > >> /usr/compat. > > > >> > > > >> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take > > > >> place (just out of curiosity)? > > > >> > > > >> Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or > > /usr/compat/linux/proc? > > > >> Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be > > > >> added to the > > > >> libraries for linux emulation? > > > >> > > > > /compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat: > > > > > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat > > > > > > > > linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > > > > but in my /etc/fstab I have > > > > linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 > > 0 > > > > > > > > Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's > > > > used. > > > > > > > # uname -a > > > FreeBSD astart2.astart.com 9.3-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue > > > Jan 27 10:43:40 UTC 2015 > > > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > # ls -l / |grep compat > > > > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 3 14:41 compat > > > > > > # ls -l /usr |grep compat > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Nov 21 21:06 compat > > > > > > Note that neither /compat or /usr/compat are symbolic links. > > Interesting. On a RELENG_9 (9.3-STABLE); I only return > > /compat > > no linux, or compat available in /usr > > So what's the *real* story behind all this? > > > > > ls -ld /compat > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Feb 8 09:18 /compat@ -> /usr/compat > > It is NOT created by the OS or any port, as far as I know. FWIW, the pre-9.0 installer (sysinstall) creates /usr/compat with /compat linked to it, but it bsdinstall doesn't. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-December/009339.html __Martin From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 13:34:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0159F7 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCA7115 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CDY2eO010032 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:34:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197505] emulators/linux-c6 option to use NVIDIAL_GL doesn't allow for use of legacy Nvidia drivers. Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:34:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:34:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197505 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xmj@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #2 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- Not really: we don't yet have the "provides" syntax required for it, and adding multiple options for the various nvidia builds isn't justifiable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 14:58:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135BCDE3 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0DE6CDB for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CEwmPB014740 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:58:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54DCBFA8.4050302@astart.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:58:48 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> , <0cd6ea56dadf9a02877417c2a7e3b1f6@ultimatedns.net> <54DB6D12.2080802@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <54DB6D12.2080802@astart.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:58:56 -0000 On 02/11/15 06:54, Patrick Powell wrote: > > > Note: just as a side note on this, shouldn't the location actually be > /usr/local/compat? But I digress... > Murphy's Law Strikes Again. I wanted to see what the latest port/package did: # pkg install linux_base-c6 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 1 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: linux_base-c6: 6.6_2 The process will require 0 GiB more space. 21 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:9:amd64/latest/All/linux_base-c6-6.6_2.txz: Not Found -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 15:11:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7AD38C; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10EE9EAC; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CFBoMk014787; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:11:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54DCC2B6.1090003@astart.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:11:50 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> , <0cd6ea56dadf9a02877417c2a7e3b1f6@ultimatedns.net> <54DB6D12.2080802@astart.com> <54DCBFA8.4050302@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <54DCBFA8.4050302@astart.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:52 -0000 On 02/12/15 06:58, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 02/11/15 06:54, Patrick Powell wrote: >> >> >> Note: just as a side note on this, shouldn't the location actually >> be /usr/local/compat? But I digress... >> > Murphy's Law Strikes Again. I wanted to see what the latest > port/package did: > > # pkg install linux_base-c6 > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 1 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > linux_base-c6: 6.6_2 > > The process will require 0 GiB more space. > 21 MiB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > pkg: > http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:9:amd64/latest/All/linux_base-c6-6.6_2.txz: > Not Found > > This is interesting. I have: d11rmi7: {120} # pkg search linux_base-c6 linux_base-c6-6.6_2 But when I checked the URL http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:9:amd64/latest/All/ I found linux_base-c6-6.6_3.txz Is the repository index out of step with the repository contents? Note that I did a port upgrade before trying the install. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 15:19:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D043861A; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8ED0F12; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CFJBZK014810; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:19:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54DCC46F.5030301@astart.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:19:11 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: /compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux References: <54D4EF23.7050604@astart.com> <20150208111022.4094218f@ernst.home> <54DA6B4B.6080708@astart.com> <201502111823.t1BINXdp009344@higson.cam.lispworks.com> In-Reply-To: <201502111823.t1BINXdp009344@higson.cam.lispworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:19:12 -0000 On 02/11/15 10:23, Martin Simmons wrote: >> > FWIW, the pre-9.0 installer (sysinstall) creates /usr/compat with /compat > linked to it, but it bsdinstall doesn't. See > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-December/009339.html > > __Martin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > This is what I was wondering about. So it happened wayback... I suspect that creating a symbolic link from /compat to (say) /usr/compat or /usr/local/compat would cause problems with ports and PKGng. Not on installation but on deletion and/or update. Any comments from the freebsd-ports? -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:27:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E40BFF8 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm24-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm24-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9249E60 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1423848451; bh=bN6KLCafea0332rOIMouqAX+PJcAn5qNOnI/Yq1N4ls=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=RUOtzZJMBYXto6gi/glIbIZBa7syJWnH4BnDLrb1XpONjn0lYBxy5HsnIkJltGKDleXWvYCO4H66/2fgUPboN7+EDp2/F+MW3Nc3yB1FImQU57bHyQ07QoSFN9FOGON9+laQasAiX9lD6uA74XUV5COp5OoZ6vZ8Z7EKujKNb3LgHw6Wb1FBKbAdcYV4EQwsnspFqXudxkIWOEGfThcXsL1z3h9WRd7Sq5azHFItPMsxIhK0k06cCI6SnqPbsqGT1rUaJRTtXIZ2hqLF97n4S9LRf9iGJWhISIievJ6TofUvhgX2hNgnCeZ5le6GC0DI58+ahnlIIJYZgiEvgdTYHA== Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm24.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Feb 2015 17:27:31 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.14] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Feb 2015 17:27:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Feb 2015 17:27:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 285707.94733.bm@smtp114.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: lwYLTYgVM1l9UmzsphlSsY2FFELlTVYuBRISbWH2NQKzmeg bPy8pU8Z1ZZ68M8TK4RLgmaMjaTkXnJ.H4oxTt2_Yz5raae4khL_3Rnqh.wd 5Uyvw1NwNhvahpLfsalBRARcDNTfdbHXOYeersTGo0FmjVqvx2lVJprcbWsQ TFzFOfkQzlxWgSgg7IVSfyFNvK.qnT1xf39WSqxH3.GjnFIGetF290Jn7g0w DXQokzTIIFfMImRDszOqQh9OKT72vwEfkGI_BK4.wT.VKP6ZFtmg3p_20fKJ Qne8lhFY7MM.cfr2Bo47H3ARSbZPhxoVLlmYh7cBe2HMqDNrIr9vJKJe96iI eRALQ0ullOuNvZ1_xL7sMj5nCoG7C8N_HLSr4w8KP3NDYwnsCgbLzWKI53oS 3pT0wU_9DJ5HhtVVN4dby8LekrKx8Q0MB2JXcqfz4NeUIibBIZEqc5N50c3G fWpx1tQ4tMiSPZtWIoZ5V.i6QUVMwHRw0.VlKPLAn_20w8VqH1D.PWG3Z820 GLwvirM7iRkHXSvbV2xxPH9Aq9DNhMx0X.ecze_Eo_tiv.bmvtJECGa1jtES 4yzhpXLUx.9mFGr6Qs49sV5zQ7kQIMwUdM38uTlJF.9DKUlUea6rL0smSF7a w9Cl8OZehAcc1Z_Cc9TkwZmayBUD6FuPhtgRDu4q_XPRu9G8RN8GpnNMFgUj t4KcwSWE8Ot0u3Lv7Gi5MMgrdnwk3onuB69MaZ1rEAMmgr2Nsz1tDMVj_T04 0EQH8ZEEA540XowfID1fcjg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xcjD0guswBAZaPPIbxpWwLcp9Unf Message-ID: <54DE340E.2050509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:27:42 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: SmartOS testing of their linux-branded zones Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:33 -0000 Just FYI/fun; I found this interesting test matrix used by the Illumos/SmartOS guys: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YeL_ZLTmrGJDYtI5LNif6Y9SITBFP7DNirYfsPfjBDM/edit#gid=385135179 It is probably outdated though, apparently the last program they have used to test it is this: https://github.com/mame/quine-relay Oh, and they also run docker. Enjoy! Pedro. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 11:09:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CB7659 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dchagin.static.corbina.net (dchagin.static.corbina.ru [78.107.232.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dchagin.static.corbina.net", Issuer "dchagin.static.corbina.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37BEA1CA for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dchagin.static.corbina.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dchagin.static.corbina.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EAvVb4033797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:57:31 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from dchagin@dchagin.static.corbina.net) Received: (from dchagin@localhost) by dchagin.static.corbina.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1EAvUlr033796; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:57:30 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from dchagin) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:57:30 +0300 From: Chagin Dmitry To: Piotr Kubaj Subject: Re: Panic on lemul Message-ID: <20150214105730.GA33789@dchagin.static.corbina.net> References: <54CE8A06.7060801@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CE8A06.7060801@riseup.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:09:10 -0000 On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 09:18:14PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > Hi. I've tried to install Steam using lemul branch. I've used c6 ports, > installed x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs and x11/nvidia-driver (I have NVidia > GPU). I've also loaded linux, linux64 and linprocfs modules and mounted > linproc, proc and fdesc. When I try to install Steam, screen freezes > (having run 'brandelf -t linux steam' before) and some artifacts appear. > Mouse cursor disappears and I can't switch windows (using alt+tab) nor > can I switch to tty. After a hard reboot, I can see following lines in > /var/log/messages: hi, please, try with r278750. -- Have fun! chd From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 14:28:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B76DCE for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5D67A7 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF8C40C09 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:28:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1423924112; bh=cPaIjAMQcG9TsO0/o2gbo6E/KenbZzdpFCY0ykfO58I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=bwhP71O8mauZ5gvLyV67lcCpXRENW/Kxu3r+DyusiaNYzkiMTfYxXkP0yatRSunEd rRq9tRmE0NJm77ws1f/5Q1q+NiKu1AKO3jHqoEcZkO7a2+AdbKVi8gOcAUKzApBObq LO+LhNrOSBVNhf4f14JzzZIkQb8PPDtJMPh40IIU= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id 3C1243FB4D Message-ID: <54DF5B8A.9080002@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:28:26 +0100 From: Piotr Kubaj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: No graphics/linux-c6-glew port Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KGte0NavHIADes0JTUBStTFtj3CQJpk4w" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:28:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KGte0NavHIADes0JTUBStTFtj3CQJpk4w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, as I can see there is graphics/linux-f10-glew port, but there's no graphics/linux-c6-glew. Right now I'm using lemul to run some Linux applications and they complain about lack of glew. Can it be added to por= ts? --KGte0NavHIADes0JTUBStTFtj3CQJpk4w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU31uKAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+OQEQALKADOmX3CNY1R8UnhY1Uc12 q8obPxD+8uUxncniuU6GN0+u2lvlwQ0K8Tif5m+mkjmaID1qJKYpIb66ReD2TwvU OrWLcaONSNjW9XtuQRJdi4rmGx5bRjduM+YtgQAHwnmCGP1PiVs+prqIxzpYBfZT uJmSvBEEbR0fPx45t8JaW6LaKBcyaucDw27TjB1WHRWv6wtUquVVKDsALPSGHCsR tvapAk2dYxkVTLs1ylWaWMsJhEE+NfOp25Wp59smz3v8JTw1hzAJi5Zh6PwUNE/8 UgRO6QBVMYvdZwL0vudflvwJ88op1eeJTy7LJ6fZLAwFyWTC023sEzEsct5QJXGh aIqXW/eVstnN5cXePOKnk4H1tHZhTHbxlM87jHtd7oyVFCSPizQ2XE8cQiyC0KpJ fBAbCGn76u6PuJQ3gX19qrMYPVFHTvMNVwWrY4vhrjztXz03rWPRHnzD4Zu+KX9G Bha+/VFxS7Heq0kDYfsnLgHGIU3TfJSpB8g8GhPwFzqo/ne3i1OaCDTxEX0aiGd2 EqxaXmsv1Uxa9H6vxhWIV7GzfiGvm2aFATA0ysXIXsMz1dVhR0GTwIu25e02YeWM argwj+PoSdK1eYC4ngeOUzQ8cYI6A7Oms6ekrrwhveJPQ7zMvZ0Y3UYQkklubEd3 vRg23KPvLhX2dk42eDyX =YpQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KGte0NavHIADes0JTUBStTFtj3CQJpk4w-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 16:30:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12BE66FD for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3500235 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CF42BACD4 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:19:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from tur1ng.pinlabs.b2n.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D26115F7C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:20:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from 10.0.0.107 ([10.0.0.107]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:20:38 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:20:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20150214172038.Horde.M41WLY1KB2DrBugNTuhVfg1@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: problem after upgrading to 'virtualbox-ose-4.3.22' User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:30:16 -0000 After upgrading emulators/virtualbox-ose up to 4.3.22 using portmaster, without QT4 and X11 (headless box), I get: [....] #/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vboxheadless start XXX Starting Virtual Machines: XXX Unknown machine [....] and if I try VBoxManage: [....] % VBoxManage list vms Could not find VirtualBox installation. Please reinstall. [....] Anyone seeing the same behaviour. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 16:41:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068C0A51 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from abinet.ru (abinet.ru [95.211.88.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD843E1 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.5] (unknown [10.0.0.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03D73950C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:38:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1423931883; bh=tRTpggFZePyKLK5bH3v2MMKysZerlL+y1kksSsJn5nA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=D5UX8qwxTixIcdRBvgezLVcVTH3tO8LQ3l2YSM5SvNl12jDsayd+wvpisMx5mzMD+ Q5nwPoHJMK6aJRKTE3Kdn6qTB1Vd5dlzydFjQEnO83vGIi4aHHhX3ON6WFSTQYgj4N QK/eBIF5Kv1GqCNieJLnOwOOT7oKYIxBypDsyGQA= Message-ID: <54DF7AB4.5000809@abinet.ru> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:41:24 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem after upgrading to 'virtualbox-ose-4.3.22' References: <20150214172038.Horde.M41WLY1KB2DrBugNTuhVfg1@turing.b2n.org> In-Reply-To: <20150214172038.Horde.M41WLY1KB2DrBugNTuhVfg1@turing.b2n.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:41:26 -0000 The same for QT4 and X11 options. Rolled back to previous version. On 14/02/2015 19:20, Raul wrote: > After upgrading emulators/virtualbox-ose up to 4.3.22 > using portmaster, without QT4 and X11 (headless box), I get: > > [....] > #/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vboxheadless start XXX > Starting Virtual Machines: > XXX Unknown machine > [....] > > and if I try VBoxManage: > > [....] > % VBoxManage list vms > Could not find VirtualBox installation. Please reinstall. > [....] > > Anyone seeing the same behaviour. > > Thanks in advance. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 19:11:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3837E66 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82C51EB2; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54DF9DDF.4050900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:11:27 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: abi Subject: Re: problem after upgrading to 'virtualbox-ose-4.3.22' References: <20150214172038.Horde.M41WLY1KB2DrBugNTuhVfg1@turing.b2n.org> <54DF7AB4.5000809@abinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <54DF7AB4.5000809@abinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:11:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/14/2015 11:41, abi wrote: > The same for QT4 and X11 options. Rolled back to previous version. You should be in vboxusers group to run these commands. Jung-uk Kim > On 14/02/2015 19:20, Raul wrote: >> After upgrading emulators/virtualbox-ose up to 4.3.22 using >> portmaster, without QT4 and X11 (headless box), I get: >> >> [....] #/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vboxheadless start XXX Starting >> Virtual Machines: XXX Unknown machine [....] >> >> and if I try VBoxManage: >> >> [....] % VBoxManage list vms Could not find VirtualBox >> installation. Please reinstall. [....] >> >> Anyone seeing the same behaviour. >> >> Thanks in advance. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJU353ZAAoJEHyflib82/FGj6wH/2PgFBZS30BDw9NVv03RllKY w2SqYhpHGDF8V5hFP7odkVOK+iFjoL1VFFTP7pswXKCZKu6rltSMo1Q7jB4iyiaZ aF13Uga7HTYaiWVTxCWETQeDAgo3EtSW5uCX7kY8htrsFi6igz9VKn7Fhpp6z9aP SxZD5LyV/3+Ux9o+CTXXAETzsmBz5Pts5/i3sbR8WRjb4WXYLrAypk+YuwJ9rRki NfndMdEiSIPmFel3GbBwJRihuV1ouhGoQfZm+dxFbWz5FygZgLvByIintjJY1mSo 7kCrfflrNWh6OA1Jh5o93zxVz/2cwM7lcoKWU7MTC2xLr6+OAlb4BoDUgcS/JkA= =mlPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 20:01:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7C19EE; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5680BEE8; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4122A40F6E; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:01:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1423944097; bh=RffEwcPPWNUIW2LrgI27otOTfxbA3OGjBAeMi+9W4eA=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WPHG3/WJItKZPqX8fVB4k30xM+mYXre2ajA4T8t33PCXBjtwS189Us4O0pnGWUcy9 //83Zzrh1BEJWTx7OQy7umf6xVmXaNY2UfXMNWdTt0EZ/w8qaT4WF3Klgnj68MeD7F vq2E/5wFqeGsHARUz6b2Kp2rtjcC8G9TOrMF4Bo0= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id 7B5B322756 Message-ID: <54DFA99A.6030304@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:01:30 +0100 From: Piotr Kubaj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No graphics/linux-c6-glew port References: <54DF5B8A.9080002@riseup.net> <20150214175252.GA10012@mx12.chaot.net> In-Reply-To: <20150214175252.GA10012@mx12.chaot.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xEbkn3vumepJU6stJm2ikjFNxCewlCv33" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:01:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xEbkn3vumepJU6stJm2ikjFNxCewlCv33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/14/15 18:52, Johannes Meixner wrote: > Hi Piotr, >=20 > could you list one/two applications that need glew for me in order to t= est it > with? >=20 > -Johannes >=20 > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 03:28:26PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as I can see there is graphics/linux-f10-glew port, but there's no >> graphics/linux-c6-glew. Right now I'm using lemul to run some Linux >> applications and they complain about lack of glew. Can it be added to = ports? >> >=20 >=20 >=20 Hi, I'm not sure if you want to spend some money but it's http://www.gog.com/game/mount_blade_warband :) If you don't want, I can upload it on my FTP but I have painfully slow upload (512kbps). --xEbkn3vumepJU6stJm2ikjFNxCewlCv33 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU36maAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+xKUQALuc5tx9bNXvd/TmwgUQnJVW tmH187lfMSdhm+LEukMcjocGOZk4ZF4EddigOKYbdEfdUD4E3ru4VqlTYPnIW4AM BBQ19T0nExG+3sKYIIbm+0nDSlbPze1hddfTqy4juQzcvEgN1lWjqGVhAgpb2Mcq AX0il4Mv8MYcEwVV7WiOnTxOe2yRlT4lcGWML/oLtEdIBPLRn8xt8jbEamG6TM4g sQG8MGUJ0ubhkUQHfphktUXalP9MvK/wi8R7DEFS6ZxA5VoSvgOQLTTF8shErDMx sj7QbulBjHpregDanHhcqZBYnNxpVV8ubEiaABPQGxLzPBXBsirZg5Yybhw/Ls3Y wE7MHq28GYkMvDqNeMtsqbhmuvVCJ3q74cV7LlAGimWm72mHxQlRI/AT9VHxVsHM DtIWoksykQQXSqHMKAMZ4jee92yeQmFyqyXY1s5qvlD07aXTGYnyREk1EzDX+Z3M MInsBmDlJdlEI9Ahht9uby9PrRAZNOuICkwE3Sm+Vm/OKNtfE39Ievp6XZF/B7y5 wfL++jWOLEflbMAkLhvDvQZFrIRdQ9OuqlCLeQB4ZSr743t6nd5X6bMK1EGVKwDS Czm8NwbHQqZ2yE+V1iTkxe3+XQ7g27ALikVC3OjHo8cX14RWWNsBs23x0GroPna4 81ztI0E/TRDNTUAtkxBD =Xqjh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xEbkn3vumepJU6stJm2ikjFNxCewlCv33-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 20:20:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A0332E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F308E12D for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3678331A315 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:19:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from tur1ng.pinlabs.b2n.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74BB115F7C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:20:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from ram-ws.pinlabs.b2n.org (ram-ws.pinlabs.b2n.org [10.10.10.15]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:20:47 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20150214212047.Horde.yYcnQV20nC4yA66Iskx13Q9@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem after upgrading to 'virtualbox-ose-4.3.22' References: <20150214172038.Horde.M41WLY1KB2DrBugNTuhVfg1@turing.b2n.org> <54DF7AB4.5000809@abinet.ru> <54DF9DDF.4050900@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54DF9DDF.4050900@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:20:50 -0000 Jung-uk Kim escribió: >>> [....] % VBoxManage list vms Could not find VirtualBox >>> installation. Please reinstall. [....] > You should be in vboxusers group to run these commands. Thank you for your suggestion. The user that run VBoxManage is on vboxusers group. Portdowngrade didn't help me this time. No backup from portmaster, as the upgrade went fine. No clue from search engines. any help? :)