Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:11:56 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org Subject: Re: math/cmlib port - PR submitted, want to discuss Message-ID: <20150104141156.GA81698@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20141225222156.GA35967@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201412242116.sBOLGs66067857@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> <20141225060257.GA32765@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20141225144608.GA1239@graf.pompo.net> <20141225164143.GA34817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20141225220810.GC31170@graf.pompo.net> <20141225222156.GA35967@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le jeu 25 déc 14 à 23:21:56 +0100, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
écrivait :
[Sorry for the delay]
> The original authors of the blas and lapack are the individuals
> who wrote and maintain the netlib implementations. "trending"
> lib suggests to me new code with bugs. The netlib libraries are
> well-known and have been debugged for years. The netlib libraries
> are also quite portable.
OK, I'll change it.
> > I'm not sure about a symlink: would'nt it imply conflicts between
> > these different ports? How do you see it?
>
> My only concern is if I do
>
> gfortran -o myprog myprog.f90 -L/usr/local/lib -llapack -lblas
>
> I get myprog. If openblas or gotoblas or atlas is installed in
> preference to the netlib libraries, I would like the above to
> magically work. But, I suppose that this is just me.
If "myprog" uses the ports framework (including the ports Makefiles), it
will be possible to write something like:
$FC -o myprog myprog.f90 -L${LOCALBASE}/lib $LAPACKLIB $BLASLIB
and pick the default ones.
But if you develop your programs out of the ports mechanism, nothing
will change.
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150104141156.GA81698>