From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 02:34:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F50B3A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 02:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76CED3FA for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 02:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so8731708wiw.1 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:34:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mcnhealthcare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7QaxPFTbaNGf4obZRL7EIaVH8renmPDNvzvhLE0s+q4=; b=JBjYk3VLEghvsnnol39I5Kb0x67fsafAIRup3An0c0aQDAOfFyi7VWY25T3/mmqXZU oDQN4QJh7imGmCWCnliTcE+VCYEz4jMY461kBK8Sw59uySFJFPve8X4zF+yq42zra77Y 9kOunV5fLzuVmaQ0gnjM10JVK/BfqlQjUZ5FY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7QaxPFTbaNGf4obZRL7EIaVH8renmPDNvzvhLE0s+q4=; b=VeM4be9ir41YIlaCUggveC2civlncKoO5s4UWWYC72IQDcZinKltT/hWrdhuTkIKeH GduCZr0ds733K0NVykbl+cRkp6plTVs6ESfA+I6gN50SdmO09C+Y4dSdOuwOJQwISEln v01rPaXK9ILh0cVbWHxiWWo3GzTjOC+5wZbqnqsSIruOheAwBdbLHXAYwfSoJQlcFJHN Xc7Fka8oNcW7UihNeNYJIH9xfjpjlHDNWJ78LqgQ3XT84pCIErk9b7XUDEuS9Cgj24TH 1U6vGoHKSV4fkXM0F8Kk76kHDEm+XgvcLazZpy0JYD9xQU42mLeO58AlU8AhvTHwqevL 92tA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldhfV+F1UQKBORIiAzdjEaMe5qsOLSAXuIwGHpRIpz4G/QoHlg0hBcFuyszEFtmEcr33gR MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.81 with SMTP id bu17mr45363986wjb.3.1420943673761; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.1.198 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:34:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:34:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: python --with-pydebug and google generate your project build tools From: Fred Woods To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 02:34:36 -0000 The google generate your project build tool used by some ports (chromium, firefox) is not compatible with python built with the debug option (--with-pydebug). https://code.google.com/p/gyp/source/browse/trunk/pylib/gyp/input.py starting at lines 896 to 904. Code looks for non-zero status or any output on stderr. Python built with --with-pydebug will write a references count to stderr upon exit of a python process. If input.py runs a python sub process, the pydebug output will cause input.py to assume there was an error in the sub process. Easy solution: don't build the python port with debugging. Ugly solution: patch input.py in each affected port to not treat stderr output as an error. if p.wiat() != 0 or p_stderr: if p.wait() != 0: From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 03:25:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50076646 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D692B16 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip70-179-132-197.fv.ks.cox.net ([70.179.132.197] helo=zen.lhaven.homeip.net) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YA99f-00005B-HP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:25:31 +0000 Received: from lhaven.homeip.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.lhaven.homeip.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0B3PGvJ042565; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:25:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from beastie@tardisi.com) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 70.179.132.197 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/QHVyLKPhdzvzt/GVSt+5Vp8xleonVW2M= X-Authentication-Warning: zen.lhaven.homeip.net: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be lhaven.homeip.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:25:11 -0600 From: The BSD Dreamer To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND =?UTF-8?Q?REPLACE=5FBASE=20option?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: beastie@tardisi.com User-Agent: Lunatic Haven Mail/1.0.4 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on zen.lhaven.homeip.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at zen.lhaven.homeip.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: dougb@dougbarton.us X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:25:33 -0000 On 2015-01-09 07:42, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 8 janvier 2015 19:44:09 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > | Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in the > | ports for over 13 years, and lots of users utilized it. > | > | I realize that BIND is no longer in the base in 10.x, but that would > | be a reason to make the option conditional, to continue to support the > | substantial user base that is still on 8.x and 9.x. > > I only removed it from bind99, it was never there in bind910. I removed it > because it was a poor design idea to begin with, and it was making the port > harder to maintain. Also, it was overwriting files in the base system, > which is a thing we do not want to do. > > All you need to do is add: > > named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" > > to your rc.conf, like the message says when you install the port. > > It was a bit like the /usr/bin/perl symlink, it was time for it to go. But, it was a huge and sudden pain for it to suddenly disappear and break everything... I can only abandon FreeBSD as our DNS platform as fast as replacement systems appear. Why have we decided that we're going to cease FreeBSD for our DNS servers (after I had made such a strong case for FreeBSD?) Count the PORTREVISIONs to bind before 9.9.4 and after. Plus look at all the other annoying changes in those PORTREVISIONs without that things have been working fine for the rest of us before. I should've been home hours ago...if I haven't been stuck dealing with bizarre problems caused by updating a bunch of packages. Now I have update nagios-plugins, since base nslookup is gone. Does it end? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:10:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034A7A50 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34D1EAC for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0BAAdqD044336 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:10:39 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0BAAdWH044335; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:10:39 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201501111010.t0BAAdWH044335@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:10:39 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:10:40 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/metaf2xml | 1.55 | 1.56 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/groonga | 4.0.6.1 | 4.1.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 11:39:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3162513 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88AA67E3 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x13so14955294wgg.12 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:39:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=XvtVbAUP/4J+izhTDFQb2qNpOkMpvTJd5e4ojof4Em4=; b=D0ipIVfBoaxmEndRga2vwK11eSRLApvbCzmo4GGEUqSuoGcRknPskXgvRQnsiaNFpG SiL5XWrntV9nd1apLPsFICmZ2aUmppNKS9SHAV5k1rzHZLBOa/dvtcMMlLSGi+0WOIgl p46kJ9yyrE5gSWvcpfzlk2LfmJos639qrezRn/K1CDlvj/EzPhF+4S3xM+B0EnUVoqFs WyT3Gk6+65aJgOxxcQG2gjOJtUXgWE+ICI9e/xG+JcPb3SXu3iAgjED8ZxX5Ns59/jbV S+GUogHtgzrDqBITAlYJ18Bku6p3Mxo4EipercT85MoHkgn4rcPSSeBSMvz3y5xu2gBG bc3g== X-Received: by 10.180.21.225 with SMTP id y1mr20808092wie.42.1420976349763; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:39:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([5.135.85.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm5831183wiz.13.2015.01.11.03.39.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:39:08 -0800 (PST) From: Marek Rudnicki To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: biber missing Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:39:04 +0100 Message-ID: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:39:12 -0000 Hi, I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex, with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it. I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages? Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find it? I have those packages installed: texlive-base-20140525_5 texlive-docs-20140525 texlive-full-20140525_1 texlive-infra-34227_1 texlive-texmf-20140525_4 Best regards Marek From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:04:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D79C6B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5526BA3F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAHFj-000261-No; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:04:19 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:04:19 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Marek Rudnicki Subject: Re: biber missing Message-ID: <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:04:21 -0000 Hi! > I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex, > with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it. > > I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages? > Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find it? There are several ports related to bibtex: bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv bibletime-2.10.1 /usr/ports/misc/bibletime biblical-curse-0.02 /usr/ports/misc/biblical-curse bibelot-0.9.4 /usr/ports/palm/bibelot bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed biblio-py-0.6.1 /usr/ports/print/biblio-py bibview-2.2_2 /usr/ports/print/bibview bib2html-5.1.1_1 /usr/ports/textproc/bib2html bibtex2html-1.98_1 /usr/ports/textproc/bibtex2html bibtool-2.48_5 /usr/ports/textproc/bibtool bibutils-5.0 /usr/ports/textproc/bibutils Maybe biber is in one of them ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:07:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19D8D04 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F812A50 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAHIJ-00026Z-R7; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:06:59 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:06:59 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Marek Rudnicki , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: biber missing Message-ID: <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:07:00 -0000 Hi! > There are several ports related to bibtex: Clearly, that was too much: grep ^bib INDEX-10 | tr '|' ' ' | while read p pp j; do echo $p $pp; done So: bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed biblio-py-0.6.1 /usr/ports/print/biblio-py bibview-2.2_2 /usr/ports/print/bibview bib2html-5.1.1_1 /usr/ports/textproc/bib2html bibtex2html-1.98_1 /usr/ports/textproc/bibtex2html bibtool-2.48_5 /usr/ports/textproc/bibtool bibutils-5.0 /usr/ports/textproc/bibutils -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:15:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E300BA1 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1E4B40 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.149] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jan 2015 12:15:06 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.249] by tm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jan 2015 12:15:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1058.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jan 2015 12:14:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 611294.87182.bm@omp1058.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57900 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2015 12:14:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1420978460; bh=LXGmJGJlYznRbjWy+3AxF+Lw3pDWZuMEUe4hk3E/C6I=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FzM6FbepIufq/GCo5R0H//dbeTj0MxVEnBd0WN13BPe1wOb8v9gYgsrkgMl2K1PD0eTmbaYOR2QGZE8XQZKkV6+NsBUlzJW3+zky/dQmb+G24hDaYhDwzJuIyXy0yahhulohgKJOYrlGLnp/QYbtEK6RR9RtNqAvQQGVAhh7Gjk= X-YMail-OSG: smOKTLgVM1ke23mwyE57SNnQdUK3yEY5bTR9Eoe1sV3tKyl JcWRs7UYZ4Dn_VIYCQJxdZkAbgPlp_FMYIpIALVTgvLx_di3VuRe428qhmcR UR.eUTE5DAqOEYkuApjUexpepR5EpcURpWfXvcOjmvoCggB5eks0w.RHMJxC BpSDwzGNcXEwe_i_MpSF9qTT9wYI9cNp_MByMtt85jYbfcPh6dlbdEOeiAZT BxfMPekZZYD4taiif5ykmef0kTWl1QL3R2ZRxS6sWxHlNcfULVMh846Oe1ci v4Kvayil4zSMAKNvUWpNz2TzT32r9hEwB8qIkuFEgUOpRIGXWFvSRCHSFS7G hq04_WKGrufKakJeEKn.Z_fo4MUVwrRcikgILh_6GTQ.908fPSnrci1MGB6z sXfBwHc9PnsNYSszSG7Uo5oucw8JOFd.X7vNmLtEIJxSFdhe5SQNtQoQdcGl 5XJtcMxLkaFF3ddsCvY4alFH2Z0mvU7Vskynjr2BePHSDVHAnYSmd4GkUeX9 RsNrh59yHwNMl.9nlvaJotyuhh3uQHKVheHZWCyZ0.KQBq0n4udoxRKsqUsP UJ00- Received: from [66.92.43.99] by web140902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 04:14:20 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SUkgY2FuIGJyb3dzZXIgZmluZSB3aXRoIE9wZXJhIHN0aWxsIFttb3N0bHldIGJ1dCBjYW5ub3QgaW50ZXJhY3Qgd2l0aCBpdHMgZGlhbG9nLiBPTkxZIHRoZSBsb3dlcmNhc2UgJ2EnIFthbmQgdXBwZXJjYXNlIEVdIHNob3cuIEZvciBpbnN0YW5jZSwgdGhlICdncmFwaGljcycgYnV0dG9uIChvbiBvZmYgdG9nZ2xlKSBoYXMgWyBhIF0gYW5kIHRoZSAnb3BlbiBpbiBiYWNrZ3JvdW5kIHRhYicgaXMgWyBfIGEgYSBdIC4uLiAgDQoNCiBTbyB0aGUgcHJvbXB0cyBhbmQgYnJvd3NlciBhY3Rpb24gYXJlIG9ubHkBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/905 YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.740 Message-ID: <1420978460.53225.YahooMailBasic@web140902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 04:14:20 -0800 From: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: Opera, still functional, 'one cannot make new configs' etc since v9 > v10 To: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:15:08 -0000 II can browser fine with Opera still [mostly] but cannot interact with its dialog. ONLY the lowercase 'a' [and uppercase E] show. For instance, the 'graphics' button (on off toggle) has [ a ] and the 'open in background tab' is [ _ a a ] ... So the prompts and browser action are only by 'what the 'a' probably resolves to... Even the "about:config" choices are a bunch of 'a' and no other text nor numeric values visibly selected, though the items to choose are in another font and are visible. I rebuilt it with/without qt4, gtk2, and the problem persists. NO menu nor 'preferences' choices to speak of that are a change from what used to be. And also practicaly reinstalled, some multiple times, each of its dependencies that are listed in ports through the make commands. This happened once before,. And was fixed by some random crash and restore... Freeetype2? fontconfig? Some menu option? gtk2? font setup? A new install is missing an so file so cp -iv /usr/local/lib/freetype.so.6 /usr/local/lib/compat/libfreetype.so.9 fixes that... Thanks for anyone knowing any probable fix. J. Bouquet From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:30:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01828B1E for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B28829A4 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id q108so14788051qgd.6 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 06:30:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=4DFeseXTtg56gXxy6USm9xm/968Xp7FSmWESIZq3WmQ=; b=DVGD1AY6XfoxLQs+Myie37x7M73xOSneWefXmAIMj2vVag7gxbJso8atAO200rkzfp yZ/iSusPdbJ6NQJAMYCXuuMl1MbNCuvE2UZpahp/JgIGnu6gmamRvid06Wx2jVW3egJD mYJlpSChfntOsRRmU3YER58ceJ4s/rnBzWzkvBLJnj+/NKhHbtRxNDRU4jyaW0Bmw6FS z7kzIiZfzzfGQ1T0TvI6FXZH+4n4b8y26UksYk48p7pff11+Mk3BRIv6MPydUoNHqwyk a8lWSMRBSzGlGrD8v7nMAV1XAnDXLwSVL0+ucug6ayDeg0WXb/tYss+BAgIQZMA+ztWw hMrg== X-Received: by 10.140.97.245 with SMTP id m108mr40481250qge.89.1420986653820; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 06:30:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumiwa.farms.net (pool-71-168-74-138.cncdnh.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.168.74.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j21sm12307478qgd.36.2015.01.11.06.30.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 06:30:53 -0800 (PST) From: Ajtim To: FreeBSD Ports Reply-To: lumiwa@gmail.com Subject: mypaint Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 09:30:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:30:55 -0000 Hi! I like to install graphics/Mypaint on FreeBSD 10.1, p, amd64 and I got: --- scons: Reading SConscript files ... building for 'python2.7' (use scons python_binary=xxx to change) using 'python2.7-config' (use scons python_config=xxx to change) rm -f libmypaint-tests.so libmypaint.so libmypaintlib.so python2.7 generate.py Writing mypaint-brush-settings-gen.h Writing brushsettings-gen.h You need to have numpy installed. ImportError: /usr/local/lib/libalapack.so.2: Undefined symbol "cblas_zswap": File "/usr/ports/graphics/mypaint/work/mypaint-1.1.0/SConstruct", line 172: application = SConscript('./SConscript') File "/usr/local/lib/scons-2.3.0/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 609: return method(*args, **kw) File "/usr/local/lib/scons-2.3.0/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 546: return _SConscript(self.fs, *files, **subst_kw) File "/usr/local/lib/scons-2.3.0/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 260: exec _file_ in call_stack[-1].globals File "/usr/ports/graphics/mypaint/work/mypaint-1.1.0/SConscript", line 9: mypaintlib = SConscript('lib/SConscript') File "/usr/local/lib/scons-2.3.0/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 609: return method(*args, **kw) File "/usr/local/lib/scons-2.3.0/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 546: return _SConscript(self.fs, *files, **subst_kw) File "/usr/local/lib/scons-2.3.0/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 260: exec _file_ in call_stack[-1].globals File "/usr/ports/graphics/mypaint/work/mypaint-1.1.0/lib/SConscript", line 5: import numpy File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line 170: from . import add_newdocs File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py", line 13: from numpy.lib import add_newdoc File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py", line 18: from .polynomial import * File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/polynomial.py", line 19: from numpy.linalg import eigvals, lstsq, inv File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/__init__.py", line 51: from .linalg import * File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py", line 29: from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite, _umath_linalg ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/mypaint ===>>> make build failed for graphics/mypaint ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster graphics/mypaint Thanks in advance. -- ajtiM -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:35:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B682BD for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FBD5E2 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x13so15617850wgg.12 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 08:35:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=+GNb4MUknfEfYZ2OfbmQGqmB7hdE4HpBhqHaFqV1wes=; b=nXco0Q6Q/BVnubfTHj7EUS6vT/lY2g4waf6rcRpd8IEyH7cHuE9vYOxsD+U8iTrRim kTRMbyvKAjgkl/V3I/0VHgl3SQtaviM1dr//O/Xh3E5Cu0MTDj4Q5I2tvX9053mo/91w Kv5Yyxbncqx8MfasZUx56coWeeyZUM6lEJkr+mhVxHC77HgCmeyhuPaOC7SsY1v5837E NE2iucFHvtgdlsP0lRmjV8djqz7j5CGzkS/fgH2YwQ4eiUJ3pVUN395+QQbWLxlho69N Orx1T4ZSss0FtK/RQuwKEk9KSQeFY19Mb77g9u7NU2cGWNfv2coKNF3wIY/KaOqyeUzD 4G0g== X-Received: by 10.180.108.148 with SMTP id hk20mr23344194wib.5.1420994105929; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 08:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (master.bofh.zone. [82.211.201.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cp4sm18139100wjb.16.2015.01.11.08.35.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 08:35:05 -0800 (PST) From: marekrud@gmail.com To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: biber missing In-Reply-To: <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:34:57 +0100 Message-ID: <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:35:08 -0000 Kurt Jaeger writes: > Hi! > >> There are several ports related to bibtex: > > Clearly, that was too much: > > grep ^bib INDEX-10 | tr '|' ' ' | while read p pp j; do echo $p $pp; done > > So: > > bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv > bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed > biblio-py-0.6.1 /usr/ports/print/biblio-py > bibview-2.2_2 /usr/ports/print/bibview > bib2html-5.1.1_1 /usr/ports/textproc/bib2html > bibtex2html-1.98_1 /usr/ports/textproc/bibtex2html > bibtool-2.48_5 /usr/ports/textproc/bibtool > bibutils-5.0 /usr/ports/textproc/bibutils Thanks you for your reply, Kurt, but it doesn't seem that biber belongs to any of the packages above. The only file on my system that has something to do with biber is biber.pdf, which belongs to texlive-docs: % pkg which /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/biber/biber.pdf /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/biber/biber.pdf was installed by package texlive-docs-20140525 If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is missing from one of the texlive packages? (The documentations says that Biber is provided by TeX distributions such as TeXLive.) Or should it get a port on its own? Cheers Marek From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:54:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311B2652; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Cryptonomicore CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE43B7DE; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 6288D188650; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Bethke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: monitorings-plugin hangs on configure ICMPv6 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:54:52 +0100 Message-Id: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> To: mat@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:54:57 -0000 checking for ps syntax... /bin/ps axwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu = comm args' checking for ping... /sbin/ping checking for ping6... /sbin/ping6 checking for ICMP ping syntax... /sbin/ping -n -c %d %s checking for ICMPv6 ping syntax... ^C=3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" = failed unexpectedly. FreeBSD 9-stable, all ports up to date, inside a jail. Any suggestions? Thanks, Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:59:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77ACC741 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B3E7FA for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YALrM-0002S9-0G; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:28 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: marekrud@gmail.com Subject: Re: biber missing Message-ID: <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:59:42 -0000 Hi! > If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is > missing from one of the texlive packages? Probably, yes. > Or should it get a port on its own? There's an old (2012) discussion at https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html which suggests that this should be done, yes. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 17:14:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2FFB5A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34E2990 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBE065.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.203.224.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0BHDASn019943; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:13:11 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t0BHEME3045797; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:14:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0BHDwvA094684; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:14:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201501111714.t0BHDwvA094684@fire.js.berklix.net> To: The BSD Dreamer Subject: Re: BIND =?UTF-8?Q?REPLACE=5FBASE=20option?= From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:25:11 -0600." Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:13:58 +0100 Cc: dougb@dougbarton.us, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:14:55 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: The BSD Dreamer > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:25:11 -0600 The BSD Dreamer wrote: > > On 2015-01-09 07:42, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > +--On 8 janvier 2015 19:44:09 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > > | Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in the > > | ports for over 13 years, and lots of users utilized it. > > | > > | I realize that BIND is no longer in the base in 10.x, but that would > > | be a reason to make the option conditional, to continue to support the > > | substantial user base that is still on 8.x and 9.x. > > > > I only removed it from bind99, it was never there in bind910. I removed it > > because it was a poor design idea to begin with, and it was making the port > > harder to maintain. Also, it was overwriting files in the base system, > > which is a thing we do not want to do. > > > > All you need to do is add: > > > > named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" > > > > to your rc.conf, like the message says when you install the port. > > > > It was a bit like the /usr/bin/perl symlink, it was time for it to go. > > But, it was a huge and sudden pain for it to suddenly disappear and break > everything... > > I can only abandon FreeBSD as our DNS platform as fast as replacement systems > appear. > > Why have we decided that we're going to cease FreeBSD for our DNS servers > (after I had made such a strong case for FreeBSD?) Count the PORTREVISIONs > to bind before 9.9.4 and after. Plus look at all the other annoying changes > in those PORTREVISIONs without that things have been working fine for the > rest of us before. > > I should've been home hours ago...if I haven't been stuck dealing with > bizarre problems caused by updating a bunch of packages. > > Now I have update nagios-plugins, since base nslookup is gone. Does it end? ( ... As another user/admin of named for years, I've also gnashed teeth as FreeBSD re-arranged var & chroot & rndc paths yet again, per version; Needing more version dependent additions to my multi version wrapper shell. OK, perhaps inevitable, but ... ) The latest FreeBSD named annoyance, ripping named out of src/ (& apparently abandoning the chroot too I've read ?!), caused me & presumably numerous other user admins to _Not_ upgrade FreeBSD boxes until extra free time could be found to deal with FreeBSD gratuitously consuming user time. Years back FreeBSD had too many broken ports, but at least then broken code was still in ports/ even if not enough was marked with Makefile BROKEN="cause", & often we needed numerous setenv DUDS "onemore `printenv DUDS`" . Now FreeBSD ports is in some ways Worse, it regularly loses not just broken but even working ports, for no Good reason (eg demime & majordomo etc). Ports get regularly axed, so user admins know for each FreeBSD upgrade we've first got to stumble over what ports commiters have axed, then discover when axed, then recover back from svn to ports/, then install marked BROKEN=, then develop a fix (if a fix is even necessary!), then store the patch for automatic application by local script, (in case FreeBSD fail to accept it ) then convince FreeBSD that a butchered port thould be restored. FreeBSD ports axe men are damaging FreeBSD, they should just assert BROKEN= on broken ports, & Never removing working ports/ ! Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script. Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. Practice French & support democracy ? Buy on 14 Jan http://www.charliehebdo.fr From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 17:23:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5923FFFC for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11543A6C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l89so15081948qgf.13 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 09:23:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cITK/wH/Uv9xtegPKx5i/sKz3ePECssf0JPWZclN/lQ=; b=tUUZaK3PJpYgFIohaDu22AP00JzLCcrK7cz16Mbnp+NovT3tCZfriBGEALINicZ/hy p4xLNvPnU0MpGWtDgxnGKlRS/8faaQ4kmRrqZdtFyaDp5muO/7N/GszpF8OOpDG68c8H FxR8OCahKsvrVxlDyE3XcETI5O8V9hPNgu8Ii8lpqMtcNuvjJvE7c1Aw8zaHNUSLZPaY FSnmamkMu6Blc72G5YK77WnUWce+QIiEFWhei00g3KPRKZhCR70dlcZSn3AIsO11pGzM PwAAekKpdyAjwkJ6Diw08Dyhou1FDgQSXU60AvQnV7oZAzccW4NaZG+5EiqxILaC4bsx 6xPg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.171.129 with SMTP id h1mr43818816qaz.74.1420997005226; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 09:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.161.65 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 09:23:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201501111714.t0BHDwvA094684@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201501111714.t0BHDwvA094684@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:23:25 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option From: Loganaden Velvindron To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: The BSD Dreamer , dougb@dougbarton.us, FreeBSD ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:23:26 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, Reference: >> From: The BSD Dreamer >> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:25:11 -0600 > > The BSD Dreamer wrote: >> >> On 2015-01-09 07:42, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> > +--On 8 janvier 2015 19:44:09 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: >> > | Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in the >> > | ports for over 13 years, and lots of users utilized it. >> > | >> > | I realize that BIND is no longer in the base in 10.x, but that would >> > | be a reason to make the option conditional, to continue to support the >> > | substantial user base that is still on 8.x and 9.x. >> > >> > I only removed it from bind99, it was never there in bind910. I removed it >> > because it was a poor design idea to begin with, and it was making the port >> > harder to maintain. Also, it was overwriting files in the base system, >> > which is a thing we do not want to do. >> > >> > All you need to do is add: >> > >> > named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" >> > >> > to your rc.conf, like the message says when you install the port. >> > >> > It was a bit like the /usr/bin/perl symlink, it was time for it to go. >> >> But, it was a huge and sudden pain for it to suddenly disappear and break >> everything... >> >> I can only abandon FreeBSD as our DNS platform as fast as replacement systems >> appear. >> >> Why have we decided that we're going to cease FreeBSD for our DNS servers >> (after I had made such a strong case for FreeBSD?) Count the PORTREVISIONs >> to bind before 9.9.4 and after. Plus look at all the other annoying changes >> in those PORTREVISIONs without that things have been working fine for the >> rest of us before. >> >> I should've been home hours ago...if I haven't been stuck dealing with >> bizarre problems caused by updating a bunch of packages. >> >> Now I have update nagios-plugins, since base nslookup is gone. Does it end? > > > ( ... As another user/admin of named for years, I've also gnashed teeth > as FreeBSD re-arranged var & chroot & rndc paths yet again, per > version; Needing more version dependent additions to my multi > version wrapper shell. OK, perhaps inevitable, but ... ) > > The latest FreeBSD named annoyance, ripping named out of src/ (& > apparently abandoning the chroot too I've read ?!), caused me & Is there a rationale behind abandoing chroot() ? Is there a URL for that ? > presumably numerous other user admins to _Not_ upgrade FreeBSD boxes > until extra free time could be found to deal with FreeBSD gratuitously > consuming user time. > > Years back FreeBSD had too many broken ports, but at least then > broken code was still in ports/ even if not enough was marked with > Makefile BROKEN="cause", & often we needed numerous setenv DUDS > "onemore `printenv DUDS`" . > > Now FreeBSD ports is in some ways Worse, it regularly loses not > just broken but even working ports, for no Good reason (eg demime > & majordomo etc). > > Ports get regularly axed, so user admins know for each FreeBSD > upgrade we've first got to stumble over what ports commiters have > axed, then discover when axed, then recover back from svn to ports/, > then install marked BROKEN=, then develop a fix (if a fix is even > necessary!), then store the patch for automatic application by local > script, (in case FreeBSD fail to accept it ) then convince FreeBSD > that a butchered port thould be restored. > > FreeBSD ports axe men are damaging FreeBSD, they should just > assert BROKEN= on broken ports, & Never removing working ports/ ! > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com > Indent previous with "> ". Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script. > Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. > Practice French & support democracy ? Buy on 14 Jan http://www.charliehebdo.fr > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- This message is strictly personal and the opinions expressed do not represent those of my employers, either past or present. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 17:26:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF9E10C; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Cryptonomicore CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB996A7F; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 9ECCE1887A6; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: monitorings-plugin hangs on configure ICMPv6 From: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:26:08 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1D9F2CF4-65B9-4543-9BF9-85EEC6593EA4@lassitu.de> References: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> To: mat@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:26:20 -0000 Am 11.01.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Stefan Bethke : >=20 > checking for ps syntax... /bin/ps axwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu = comm args' > checking for ping... /sbin/ping > checking for ping6... /sbin/ping6 > checking for ICMP ping syntax... /sbin/ping -n -c %d %s > checking for ICMPv6 ping syntax... ^C=3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" = failed unexpectedly. >=20 > FreeBSD 9-stable, all ports up to date, inside a jail. >=20 > Any suggestions? Figured it out myself. My google-foo did not give me any hints to what = the problem is, only Linux related posts, but that led me to checking = for jail-related issues. The help text is a bit terse, I had to look at = the Makefile to understand what=E2=80=99s required. Since I=E2=80=99m using NO_DIALOG, I have all my config option in = /etc/make.conf. I=E2=80=99ve added this: +JAILED!=3D /sbin/sysctl -n security.jail.jailed +.if ${JAILED} =3D=3D 1 +monitoring-plugins_SET+=3D JAIL +nagios-plugins_SET+=3D JAIL +NAGIOSPOLLIP!=3Difconfig em0 | sed -nEe 's/.*inet (.*) netmask.*/\1/p' +NAGIOSPOLLIP6!=3Difconfig em0 | sed -nEe 's/.*inet6 (.*) prefix.*/\1/p' +.endif (em 0 is my outward-facing interface on all the hosts.) May I suggest to use something like this for the help text? > If you are building the port inside a jail, you might need to tell = check_ping which IP address to use as the source address, instead of = 127.0.0.1 and ::1, respectively. Use the config option JAIL, and define = NAGIOSPOLLIP and NAGIOSPOLLIP6 on the command line or in make.conf when = building the port, setting them to the primary IPv4 and IPv6 address of = your jail, respectively. I have no idea what the second paragraph is supposed to tell me. = Irrespective of the first paragraph, you shouldn=E2=80=99t set the JAIL = config option when building the package with poudriere? Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 19:03:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388461FA for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F214A380 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z20so8761707igj.4 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:03:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yePIdz2KEp5xZZ143VJZ8msjlnpfmcYWszGRQCnZbI0=; b=hK+wCHi0TiIKLe4nqtKaCrzoeD+caJvp2YNyJ9sz/vey3/tp7Dd4xJwR0BNJWgMqDm 3NTKpNzMJkJtk0UjuRYxvcXsciljtE1o2lVjh/X1RBzV2jDSpk3nJVyZJDZBDsVZY8OM 2XzEsoUj7ZFwy9g/KH3NUfom/O04giGRgA2lLLQqsKcZ1Pqb855EJPG3ETlr5TXFEfYv izLZ/xWy1oQRGsQZ4B4/rodDlgBgcT9Ai3CsGWLSehg6HTCyBP6ZgCv0d8+A56iXoD8M TIrJWB3Bh8Z6Np66fP0F6w7UE5PGF66/um6jq9Px9C5KHPeU4IWYYI7E1BfFdqlskT5F /HYg== X-Received: by 10.107.41.148 with SMTP id p142mr23431983iop.64.1421003018414; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (tx97.net. [85.198.160.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q10sm2932801iga.12.2015.01.11.11.03.37 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:03:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:03:23 +0200 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lumiwa@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: mypaint References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> In-Reply-To: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:03:39 -0000 On 01/11/15 16:30, Ajtim wrote: > Hi! > > I like to install graphics/Mypaint on FreeBSD 10.1, p, amd64 > and I got: > > --- > scons: Reading SConscript files ... > building for 'python2.7' (use scons python_binary=xxx to change) > using 'python2.7-config' (use scons python_config=xxx to change) > rm -f libmypaint-tests.so libmypaint.so libmypaintlib.so > python2.7 generate.py > Writing mypaint-brush-settings-gen.h > Writing brushsettings-gen.h > You need to have numpy installed. > > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/libalapack.so.2: Undefined symbol > "cblas_zswap": Do you have math/py-numpy with ATLAS option on? If so, try toggling that option, reinstalling numpy and installing mypaint again. I don't know if this is still the case, but there was some interaction between that option and mypaint the last time I tried it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 19:41:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA77198C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763BD935 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x3so15575865qcv.1 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:41:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:reply-to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=2oryi8NriCkA5eCfj9p4NZh70S71IT4E+i/KTPltX+g=; b=d15+6VUfTqvgBHYF8R0ElPkc9JuQd+fumZTyrLatUKMXOpfYa2dzXzjjiuc/iY8Tya QzZbb5uBLQ/lWYbfmmhDRIEHZZTSWJuaABH91qfXK2dYJ/RZsQ9mZtsuKKwu33Kd6F1w +NYg2IcfdLJCxnkQaQtFoPZY3Qlt8P2OcJOGmxr+CADd2kTUghT7/u1IzNxZIE+YIbT+ VjglcEF/F7vaJan/nMp+jabj+ObkUlEFT/PZ1GxfxFyHN/06j4OWQ23GkGb+fnqRZksg 5RMl2epu/jxb9sH/91OPxqP8N2aqtr6aCfdFXpeXcroql0nKYzOE83bNfhqsHEajKNz/ YNdA== X-Received: by 10.140.92.209 with SMTP id b75mr41607290qge.60.1421005309544; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumiwa.farms.net (pool-71-168-74-138.cncdnh.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.168.74.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a4sm12888825qge.24.2015.01.11.11.41.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:41:49 -0800 (PST) From: Ajtim To: Vitaly Magerya Reply-To: lumiwa@gmail.com Subject: Re: mypaint Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:41:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1799385.DexCJMgr9b@lumiwa.farms.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:41:50 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2015 21:03:23 Vitaly Magerya wrote: > On 01/11/15 16:30, Ajtim wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I like to install graphics/Mypaint on FreeBSD 10.1, p, amd64 > > and I got: > > > > --- > > scons: Reading SConscript files ... > > building for 'python2.7' (use scons python_binary=xxx to change) > > using 'python2.7-config' (use scons python_config=xxx to change) > > rm -f libmypaint-tests.so libmypaint.so libmypaintlib.so > > python2.7 generate.py > > Writing mypaint-brush-settings-gen.h > > Writing brushsettings-gen.h > > You need to have numpy installed. > > > > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/libalapack.so.2: Undefined symbol > > > "cblas_zswap": > Do you have math/py-numpy with ATLAS option on? If so, try toggling that > option, reinstalling numpy and installing mypaint again. I don't know if > this is still the case, but there was some interaction between that > option and mypaint the last time I tried it. I didn't have. I did turn on and mypaint compile :) and it works. Thank you. -- ajtiM -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:17:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7127B2C0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60885C18 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AlfredMacbookAir.local (c-76-21-10-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.10.192]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50964341F854; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:17:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B2DAA2.5080901@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:18:42 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marek Rudnicki , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: biber missing References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:17:36 -0000 On 1/11/15 3:39 AM, Marek Rudnicki wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex, > with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it. > > I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages? > Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find it? > > > I have those packages installed: > > texlive-base-20140525_5 > texlive-docs-20140525 > texlive-full-20140525_1 > texlive-infra-34227_1 > texlive-texmf-20140525_4 This subject line had me thinking something else entirely had happened. Anyhow, this is all I could find: ~/git/ports_worktree/textproc % find .. -name pkg-plist | xargs grep -i 'biber' | grep -v libiber grep: ../ports-mgmt/pkg-plist: Is a directory ../print/texlive-docs/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/doc/bibtex/biber/biber.pdf ../print/texlive-docs/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/doc/latex/biblatex-juradiss/biber.conf ../print/texlive-docs/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/doc/latex/dickimaw/src/thesis/pictures/bibertool.png ../print/texlive-docs/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/doc/latex/logreq/examples/05-biblatex+biber.run.xml ../print/texlive-docs/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/doc/latex/logreq/examples/05-biblatex+biber.tex ../print/texlive-texmf/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/scripts/arara/rules/biber.yaml ../print/texlive-texmf-source/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/source/bibtex/biber/Changes ../print/texlive-texmf-source/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/source/bibtex/biber/biblatex-biber.tar.gz ../print/texlive-texmf-source/pkg-plist:%%TEXMFDISTDIR%%/source/bibtex/biber/utf8-macro-map.html Probably not helpful, but hope it is! -Alfred From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:54:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEBEE82 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53AC793 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080ABBDC30; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:54:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E0DD5BDC25; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:54:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2CF2256407; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:54:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:54:33 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Bethke Subject: Re: monitorings-plugin hangs on configure ICMPv6 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> References: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:54:47 -0000 +--On 11 janvier 2015 17:54:52 +0100 Stefan Bethke wrote: | checking for ps syntax... /bin/ps axwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu | comm args' checking for ping... /sbin/ping | checking for ping6... /sbin/ping6 | checking for ICMP ping syntax... /sbin/ping -n -c %d %s | checking for ICMPv6 ping syntax... ^C===> Script "configure" failed | unexpectedly. | | FreeBSD 9-stable, all ports up to date, inside a jail. | | Any suggestions? Yes, wait a bit. It seems something changed between 9.1 and 9.3 that breaks this. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 22:38:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3133E772 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhub.siol.net (mailoutvs3.siol.net [213.250.19.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA469B01 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.siol.net (Zimbra) with ESMTP id 298FA52313B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:28:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at psrvmta01.zcs-production.pri Received: from mailhub.siol.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psrvmta01.zcs-production.pri [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YeXFl0fWF6i for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:28:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate.unitedpeople.net. (BSN-182-87-241.dynamic.siol.net [109.182.87.241]) (Authenticated sender: miklav25) by mailhub.siol.net (Zimbra) with ESMTPSA id A65EF52313D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:28:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.8.149] (tpwi.unitedpeople.net [192.168.8.149]) by gate.unitedpeople.net. (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t0BMSiMe055866 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:28:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from karel@lovetemple.net) Message-ID: <54B2F91C.6060209@lovetemple.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:28:44 +0100 From: Karel Miklav User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:13 -0000 On 04.01.2015 18:24, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: >> I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to >> manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental >> builds don't quite work as I expected. >> >> poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If >> there are only some ports with new versions, possibly hundreds of >> packages are rebuilt. So far it looks like I'll end up rebuilding >> packages like libreoffice/KDE/chromium several times a week. The >> rebuilt packages won't even be installed by 'pkg upgrade' because >> their version number has not changed. > > Here's an actual example from today. > > There are new versions for three ports. poudriere will rebuild 70 > ports, 67 of them will never be installed on the host. > > Checking packages for incremental rebuild needed > Deleting cups-client-1.7.3_3.txz: new version: 1.7.3_4 Same story here. On each ports update Poudriere churns couple of days, mostly wasting time on some version of the damn webkit. Then on pkg update a couple of insignificant ports are updated. It's easy to fix version check in Poudriere, but I haven't decided to dig out the corresponding lines in pkg to match them. Will there be some option in Poudriere for this? Regards, Karel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 23:54:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E13C8EF7 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0CF61C1 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:54:39 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:54:47 -0000 The BSD Dreamer wrote: > +--On 8 janvier 2015 19:44:09 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: >> | Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in the >> | ports for over 13 years, and lots of users utilized it. >> | >> I only removed it from bind99, it was never there in bind910. I removed it >> because it was a poor design idea to begin with, and it was making the port >> harder to maintain. Also, it was overwriting files in the base system, >> which is a thing we do not want to do. That sounds like the crux of the issue. Named shouldn't have been in base in the first place. Removing the port option instead of the base binary, IMO, makes two wrongs not one right. My way or the highway might be ok for Windows, Mac and Linux but port options are a big reason many of us use and spec FreeBSD. >> It was a bit like the /usr/bin/perl symlink, it was time for it to go. "time for it to go", by whose definition? Good code doesn't have a fixed lifespan and the claimed rational doesn't constitute a good business case. On the other hand it should be easy enough to write a bindXX-base wrapper port. Anyone care to quote bind10-base/Makefile? That and fixing openssh-portable's dialog option for overwrite_base which when selected fails with "openssh-portable-6.7.p1_1,1 Overwrite base option is no longer supported.." Have to wonder how that got past the port maintainers. This is not unlike postfix-base and others which, in many cases, are significantly improved by offering a cross-platform compatibility options and not being short-sighted regarding the scope of $PREFIX. Sometimes you really have to wonder whether these feature deprecations are due less to resource shortages than to special interests outside of FreeBSD's user-base. IMO, Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 00:27:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF614213 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733B0679 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCAABDC30; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:27:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A5BFABDC1F; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:27:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7482259639; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:27:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:27:14 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Ehmann , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:27:27 -0000 +--On 4 janvier 2015 18:24:24 +0100 Stefan Ehmann wrote: | On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: |> I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to |> manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds |> don't quite work as I expected. |> |> poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If there |> are only some ports with new versions, possibly hundreds of packages are |> rebuilt. So far it looks like I'll end up rebuilding packages like |> libreoffice/KDE/chromium several times a week. The rebuilt packages |> won't even be installed by 'pkg upgrade' because their version number |> has not changed. | | Here's an actual example from today. | | There are new versions for three ports. poudriere will rebuild 70 ports, | 67 of them will never be installed on the host. You can't know that. Say there is a shlib change in one of the updated packages, its version is bumped, or there is a new dependency, you need to rebuild the 67 ports, and pkg will detect and reinstall them. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:55:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB2E18E5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF85C45 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0C3sdLT052545 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:54:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: References: , <20150110205135.GY44537@home.opsec.eu>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: Who do I contact to send pr(1)'s? [WAS No subject] Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:54:39 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:55:48 -0000 On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:02:19 -0800 "Chris H" wrote > On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:51:35 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote > > > Hi! > > > > > The FreeBSD copy of bugzilla appears to be broken. All attempts > > > to reach it return: > > > Error 503 Service Unavailable > > > > Yes. > > > > mva@, one of the bugzilla admins, reported the cause a few hours ago: > > > > While doing maintenance on bugzilla, the production database > > broke due to operator error and probably loss of some changes. So > > currently some recovery operations are ongoing. > > > > So, I guess bugmeister's very busy right now. > Ahh. I see. Bummer. > > Thanks for taking the time to reply, Kurt. Anyone have an ETA on the availability of FreeBSD's bugzilla? (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/) Thanks > > --Chris > > > > -- > > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to > > go ! _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 04:01:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39FE9B6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B724ED02 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8DBC456083; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:01:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:01:29 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Roger Marquis Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:01:31 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 03:54:39PM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: > "time for it to go", by whose definition? Good code doesn't have a > fixed lifespan and the claimed rationale doesn't constitute a good > business case. It was believed to be a bad design pattern to let ports modify anything in base. There had been a few exceptions that crept in over the years, for one reason or another. Apparently 10.0 seemed like the appropriate time to get rid of the bad pattern. (Note: I was not involved in the decision.) We've been essentially rewriting the entire ports infrastructure in-place for the past 6 or 7 years. IMVHO this was entirely necessary: the old pkg_* tools were buggy, underdocumented, and no longer suited to the task of keeping up with over 20,000 ports. Along the way we've had to throw out a lot of rotten code both in the infrastructure and various ports -- *and* keep the absolute majority of ports working in the meantime. This was no mean feat. > Sometimes you really have to wonder whether these feature deprecations > are due less to resource shortages than to special interests outside of > FreeBSD's user-base. They are mostly due to the idea of not shipping things that do not work consistently, and in the way one "might expect". On rare occasion, yes, that will mean breaking POLA. (Also note I'm not defending the way this change was or was not documented.) As for "special interests", this is specious. AFAIK the companies that embed FreeBSD into their products are primarily interested in the kernel, the networking stack, the file systems, and so on. I do not know of any such company that even _uses_ FreeBSD ports. Thus, they could have no influence on the outcome. tl;dr: the FreeBSD ports community is pretty well self-contained. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 04:50:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D01CE95 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acipenser.esturion.net (acipenser.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F92FA for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by acipenser.esturion.net (Postfix, from userid 112) id BE5B5260203; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:42:44 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on acipenser.esturion.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by acipenser.esturion.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 738FD260033 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:42:40 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54B350C0.4020906@pinyon.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:42:40 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:50:56 -0000 On 01/11/15 21:01, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 03:54:39PM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: >> "time for it to go", by whose definition? Good code doesn't have a >> fixed lifespan and the claimed rationale doesn't constitute a good >> business case. > > It was believed to be a bad design pattern to let ports modify anything > in base. There had been a few exceptions that crept in over the years, > for one reason or another. Apparently 10.0 seemed like the appropriate > time to get rid of the bad pattern. (Note: I was not involved in the > decision.) > > We've been essentially rewriting the entire ports infrastructure in-place > for the past 6 or 7 years. IMVHO this was entirely necessary: the old > pkg_* tools were buggy, underdocumented, and no longer suited to the task > of keeping up with over 20,000 ports. Along the way we've had to throw > out a lot of rotten code both in the infrastructure and various ports -- > *and* keep the absolute majority of ports working in the meantime. This > was no mean feat. > >> Sometimes you really have to wonder whether these feature deprecations >> are due less to resource shortages than to special interests outside of >> FreeBSD's user-base. > > They are mostly due to the idea of not shipping things that do not work > consistently, and in the way one "might expect". On rare occasion, yes, > that will mean breaking POLA. > > (Also note I'm not defending the way this change was or was not documented.) "documented" This is the problem. There is /usr/ports/UPDATING, but those of us who sensibly use cron & poudriere to update our [ports & pkg] tree never see the contents of /usr/ports/UPDATING. Even with systemd cancer spreading all through debian I have only had one system fail, using apt-get dist-upgrade. Because notice is given in the "upgrade" process that incompatible changes are being made. The discussion of recent pinentry related stuff comes to mind. Since I have already ranted at length on why this is a show stopper, on basic human security grounds, I'll stop here. (Nope, as you can see, I'm not using anything that pinentry was intended to facilitate. How could I, on FreeBSD?) Russell > As for "special interests", this is specious. AFAIK the companies that > embed FreeBSD into their products are primarily interested in the kernel, > the networking stack, the file systems, and so on. I do not know of any > such company that even _uses_ FreeBSD ports. > > Thus, they could have no influence on the outcome. > > tl;dr: the FreeBSD ports community is pretty well self-contained. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 06:22:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E4DB0D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59A0B97 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:22:36 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:22:38 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > It was believed to be a bad design pattern to let ports modify anything > in base. Believed by who? Surely not those of us advocating FreeBSD in mixed environments where the Linux and Windows admins are pushing for something closer to a monoculture. > Apparently 10.0 seemed like the appropriate time to get rid of the > bad pattern. "seemed like the appropriate time" isn't a business case and "bad pattern" it likely wasn't considering A) someone requested it, B) someone spent money and/or time writing it and C) many people were using it. > We've been essentially rewriting the entire ports infrastructure in-place > for the past 6 or 7 years. IMVHO this was entirely necessary: the old > pkg_* tools were buggy, underdocumented, and no longer suited to the task Not sure what this has to do with a small number of mission-critical ports that need to write to base to accommodate large, cross-platform, installed bases. Could you elaborate? > They are mostly due to the idea of not shipping things that do not work > consistently, and in the way one "might expect". On rare occasion, yes, > that will mean breaking POLA. Are you saying, then, that bind, postfix and other ports that have overwritten base for years "do not work consistently"? That hasn't been my experience nor that of those who I work with. > AFAIK the companies that embed FreeBSD into their products are primarily > interested in the kernel, the networking stack, the file systems, and so > on. I do not know of any such company that even _uses_ FreeBSD ports. I see your point but it indicates your experience is missing a large portion of FreeBSD users. The financial institution where I work for example, runs hundreds of FreeBSD boxes and uses ports and port options on all of them. > Thus, they could have no influence on the outcome. If large numbers of BSD servers and engineers with decades of BSD advocacy really have no influence, and it appears we don't, at least the reason for our favorite OS' shrinking user-base is clear. Statements like "buggy, underdocumented, and no longer suited to the task" and "could have no influence on the outcome" are perhaps a downside of exclusively developer-driven ecosystems. Redhat's understands this, which is why they involve sales, sysadmins and management in similar decisions, not just devs who are looking to spend less time maintaining "old" code. (They're also paying people to maintain code, something I wish we could find a way to do.) > tl;dr: the FreeBSD ports community is pretty well self-contained. Do you mean in contrast with, for example, the Debian community? Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 06:38:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF54DDC for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B62C7A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id pn19so22822409lab.9 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KwSJh0viTIrsQZ3VLRx8lsLWBStOLDTvrtwdnIHDY0o=; b=HJBXw+SRTpbQifCaFFd510dIYeBlEHu/Fu2xk2/mSHhZccIl9DQsbCm98h3YYdyz7I NdZSWa80GjEBQdkeXuQdQGSwuLy0LjY8uSRiXT7hcpeORkDGD98WllZqU66vxdU4owHv a3mirOHWQt0/Dpm7H/HAic9+7D4Vw7BjCC9M6jDBiyfE8ln11aANmh6ydLKiJauqY+jK 5QLFWvdY6t1Usw+dgiVK9WMhGjwqkau5BTVb5lcpQvT0gIZ0ceDZem/7v/F0xX7neVu8 mRIJHUihYJm6catOgou0dkRAJ/NLZv49AJy408zdiKXxZRd2gcWn0GSLdFkQcE43jSux uUqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.12.65 with SMTP id w1mr34611755lbb.68.1421044730724; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.141.5 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.141.5 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:38:50 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jlC0k9bSm2MUdttSzZDKyf1ELVk Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option From: Craig Rodrigues To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:38:53 -0000 On Jan 11, 2015 8:01 PM, "Mark Linimon" wrote: > > AFAIK the companies that > embed FreeBSD into their products are primarily interested in the kernel, > the networking stack, the file systems, and so on. I do not know of any > such company that even _uses_ FreeBSD ports. > Wrong. I've worked at 3 companies over the years that make direct use of the ports tree when creating an embedded product based on FreeBSD. In 2015, it is my experience that the stuff in /usr/src is only the bare minimum to get going for a product. ports are extremely important for a modern embedded product based on FreeBSD. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 06:59:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACDC1F60 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com (mail-we0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C33DE0E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k48so17317391wev.5 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:59:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mcnhealthcare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=52rO5roe75K3DUpCCwbmsKwcEKqjPb0OWZdPJWKmipU=; b=ZBdfi8Jzz0BSKfTmnNKrGrD8tElGj3Gs9iGMB9E3i7CR8U+seEJeAAfs1ps3rUPWin wS/tIUJDRZMi0A3E6NhPusRyqoXF04CXyqAU7JF21DRZoqkkQ0xMlYt0jXVDR1xtVI62 g4uHhseXiHUHAFiJfD0r1ucfNq2QopU7H9ZiE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=52rO5roe75K3DUpCCwbmsKwcEKqjPb0OWZdPJWKmipU=; b=X4G1AoGKfr3nhHBCnNwIxAB48Hygip6C6tVfpEg6hEs9pFccwNM05PlGZHfUCzqZCO p/y4sCUNY5ow6t0nNJXJdowClOnxuZnppTsbbinFxG4PKoDpcLvuBZMGG/D/TTxO3mHu y+FX0/aevFmfH8m0pZKv4haHy1ABpEbXoOKJjeQFknzgHMS/H07A4qpvpzwQGTkgjnp5 C36CzCevyDb6Srqz+vNHBk66Xw+6bvjpHtqzdOLZflNoBwLCmkcqLdcXg2zmzAV0xO2g RRNueu9hqdX/r2BVPXm0ZbbkV8PcMirhd1eqKq6Mj5hRbx9PPclM2gl/cGNQg6ALXRYm OB6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlMYg80eeqKhMiI6lLDaujhVhHDCvcjwlmCGpRKgoFube1GbeEP9Xwmq93p1JsXIa3sxhxL MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.176 with SMTP id bx16mr27797351wib.0.1421045968234; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.1.198 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:59:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:59:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Opera, still functional, 'one cannot make new configs' etc since v9 > v10 From: Fred Woods To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:59:30 -0000 If you run opera from a terminal window, do you get something like the problem described in: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2568408/pango-warning-failed-to-choose-a-font-expect-ugly-output If yes, then a possible work-around is: Move any pango compliant fonts to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts mv /usr/loocal/share/fonts/* /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts Create a symlink to make /usr/loocal/share/fonts point to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts. ln -sF /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts /usr/loocal/share/fonts From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 08:55:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FAA85F; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E8BB83; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kLTJT35ZhzZrR; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:55:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1IRTUZ7TZk6; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:54:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:54:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54B38BCF.6070902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:54:39 +0100 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multimedia/libva fails in configure stage, missing file? References: <117977.42002.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <117977.42002.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: autotools@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:55:24 -0000 On 01/09/15 18:29, Thomas Mueller wrote: > You pointed to libtoolize, which is installed as part of devel/libtool, and I found something strange. > > Running > ls -l /usr/local/bin/lib* > produced > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1952 Jul 16 00:31 /usr/local/bin/libIDL-config-2 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2528 Jul 4 2014 /usr/local/bin/libassuan-config > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3988 Dec 27 13:50 /usr/local/bin/libgcrypt-config > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15731 Dec 30 08:47 /usr/local/bin/libnetcfg > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Dec 26 08:40 /usr/local/bin/libpng-config -> libpng16-config > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2320 Dec 26 08:39 /usr/local/bin/libpng16-config > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 356578 Dec 30 08:34 /usr/local/bin/libtool > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Dec 30 08:34 /usr/local/bin/libtoolize > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2485 Jul 16 00:48 /usr/local/bin/libwmf-config > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13101 Jul 16 00:48 /usr/local/bin/libwmf-fontmap > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1448 Jul 18 22:10 /usr/local/bin/libwww-config > > So the scripts involved in building libva-1.5.0 found libtoolize but couldn't see if it was functional. > > I wonder what happened, how /usr/local/bin/libtoolize was truncated. > > So I guess that's why I got the message > > configure.ac:166: error: required file './ltmain.sh' not found > > Also, pkg gives no hint of files being corrupted. > > I also ran, from /usr/ports directory, > > tar tvf ../packages/All/libtool-2.4.2.418.txz > > and /usr/local/bin/libtoolize showed as 0 bytes. > > pkg-plist didn't show sizes of package files. For some reason that package has a truncated file. It looks definitely as a local problem on your system, if it was a general problems this list would be flooded by problem reports about this by now. You can mail a build log for devel/libtool to me and I can have a look and see what's wrong. You should try having a look yourself first though. You also have the option of grabbing the official package fro the FreeBSD mirrors, which are not showing this problem. > > I see libtool is now at v2.4.4. upstream (www.gnu.org/software/libtool) as of 29-Nov-2014. > > I could try to rebuild devel/libtool, but that won't improve anything if the port or package is defective. > As I said if the port was defective we would be getting floods of reports about this by users, since this is not happening, the ports build cluster is building it successfully and I have not been able to reproduce the problem I guess it's a problem caused by something on your system. You should investigate why libtoolize is being created as an empty file. The ports, for example, depends on gm4 from devel/m4, have you tried also rebuilding that? > I just tried, same result, no joy. I can try to help you, but please move further followups to private mail to me. I could have a look at a build log for libtool from your system. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 10:37:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 783C0FA4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646B1873 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CAb6IF049066 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:37:06 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0CAb6M6049065; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:37:06 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201501121037.t0CAb6M6049065@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:37:06 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:37:06 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs | 0.5.3b | 0.6.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 11:22:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DB17C05 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77786D1E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:22:47 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NI2009AQAHMMN00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:27:24 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <54B3AE7E.2070306@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:22:38 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Roger Marquis Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112062240.0B2C1B1A@hub.freebsd.org> In-reply-to: <20150112062240.0B2C1B1A@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:22:48 -0000 I'm going to wade in with a +1 at the top for your original message, and add some thoughts of my own inline. Roger Marquis wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: >> It was believed to be a bad design pattern to let ports modify anything >> in base. > > Believed by who? Surely not those of us advocating FreeBSD in mixed > environments where the Linux and Windows admins are pushing for something > closer to a monoculture. Dunno about who believed what, however it has always struck me as odd that servers are installed in the base and then only patched with the OS. The notable exceptions are things like BIND where you could select a later BIND from the ports tree and install over the base version. This initially I found confusing and likely to cause more security issues than it resolved... However, I then thought about it, and realised that what should really have been considered is this (in my opinion): *NO* servers installed in Base (no sendmail, no NTPD, no BIND etc) then in the ports tree a "dns/bind-base" port where it would install a bind server into the base OS, a 'mail/postfix-base', a 'mail/sendmail-base' etc... or better still a /usr/ports/base where you can find postfix, sendmail, bind etc... This way there are no base ports installed by default, base packages are available with the OS and the specific '-base' port can always be patched as part of freebsd-update, it can be built as part of a /usr/src building/patching process and therefore it can be patched as the user needs in short order (particularly important when you have issues such as the latest root exploit for ntpd... not saying the way that security moved and patched it in a few days wasn't good, it was awesome... however the problem is I had servers ranging from 6.0 -> 9.3 at various patch levels - I now have most of my servers either 6.x or 9.2+ (the 6.x servers are all behind firewalls with only specific services (apache and/or postfix) exposed where necessary so the exploit is mitigated)... BUT the patching from 7.3, 8.4 and 9.0 of 27 of the servers 15 of them became unbootable for a variety of reasons... Corrupt loader on 2 occasions, unable to initiate network interface or RAID card on several occasions and changing of critical permissions in others (9.3-RELEASE -> 9.3-p5 broke sudo-1.8(latest) on 3 of the machines by changing permissions on 'something')... having /usr/ports/base where one could find 'ntpd' and install it in base would be an excellent solution as one could update/patch oneself if security@ didn't consider the priority as high as the user. It would also mean that the base source code is not polluted and one can install what one needs as and when needed. > >> Apparently 10.0 seemed like the appropriate time to get rid of the >> bad pattern. > > "seemed like the appropriate time" isn't a business case and "bad > pattern" it likely wasn't considering A) someone requested it, B) someone > spent money and/or time writing it and C) many people were using it. Roger, you can forget arguing that, I've tried it falls on deaf ears and people just put you on ignore like they have with me... doesn't matter if you're right or not.. Some at the top have a mark to make and being right or wrong won't get in the way of that mark. > >> We've been essentially rewriting the entire ports infrastructure >> in-place >> for the past 6 or 7 years. IMVHO this was entirely necessary: the old >> pkg_* tools were buggy, underdocumented, and no longer suited to the >> task Which is why pkg_* tools are now removed when you 'delete-old' and all the *.mk keep changing to remove pkg_* support even though those of us that have spent the time to put it back have found that it still works with little changes... Everything in the source seems to point to someone making their mark to remove the pkg_ tools rather than any specific need... Why it couldn't have been left for pre 10.x and then make 10.x pkgng only I don't know... oh wait I do.. it didn't have many people using it so it was decided to force people to change... Lets think of that for a moment... people tried it decided it wasn't "ready" and didn't migrate, so Bapt wrote patches and deployed on 1/9/2014 not to EOL pkg_* but specifically to break pkg_* then discouraged anyone from back patching (including security fixes) to the quarterly to force the upgrade on production systems. > > Not sure what this has to do with a small number of mission-critical > ports that need to write to base to accommodate large, cross-platform, > installed bases. Could you elaborate? Breaking out the servers from /usr/src is good idea, removing -base functionality (IMHO) is not... but it is a good idea to make it simpler because the -base options (especially when not always translated in version changes) did cause me a few issues in the past. > >> They are mostly due to the idea of not shipping things that do not work >> consistently, and in the way one "might expect". On rare occasion, yes, >> that will mean breaking POLA. > > Are you saying, then, that bind, postfix and other ports that have > overwritten base for years "do not work consistently"? That hasn't been > my experience nor that of those who I work with. No, nor mine (everything worked fine for me - except when there was a major version bump and I forgot to add the -base option) > >> AFAIK the companies that embed FreeBSD into their products are primarily >> interested in the kernel, the networking stack, the file systems, and so >> on. I do not know of any such company that even _uses_ FreeBSD ports. > > I see your point but it indicates your experience is missing a large > portion of FreeBSD users. The financial institution where I work for > example, runs hundreds of FreeBSD boxes and uses ports and port options > on all of them. > >> Thus, they could have no influence on the outcome. > > If large numbers of BSD servers and engineers with decades of BSD > advocacy really have no influence, and it appears we don't, at least > the reason for our favorite OS' shrinking user-base is clear. +1 (I'm on that list) > > Statements like "buggy, underdocumented, and no longer suited to the > task" and "could have no influence on the outcome" are perhaps a downside > of exclusively developer-driven ecosystems. Perhaps someone should have looked at fixing bugs and fixing documentation. Classic example, about a year ago I started writing ports. Took me some time (a lot longer than getting my first C ever program written) to get a working port of my own creation... took longer to get it committed (though I can thank people on #freebsd (for doc help) and Koobs (committer) for their time and patience that I was actually successful.) > Redhat's understands this, > which is why they involve sales, sysadmins and management in similar > decisions, not just devs who are looking to spend less time maintaining > "old" code. (They're also paying people to maintain code, something I > wish we could find a way to do.) Which is why $employer are now planning on moving all my servers to Redhat.. > >> tl;dr: the FreeBSD ports community is pretty well self-contained. > > Do you mean in contrast with, for example, the Debian community? > I'd more call 'relevance' than argue that... ;-) Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:26:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C735E2; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8E0654; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B291456083; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:26:52 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:26:52 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:26:54 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:38:50PM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Wrong. I've worked at 3 companies over the years that make direct use of > the ports tree when creating an embedded product based on FreeBSD. OK, then this is the first I've heard of it. My mistake. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:29:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618E96B1; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1E1670; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:29:36 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NI2009B8DL4MN00@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:34:18 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:29:32 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> In-reply-to: <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> Cc: Craig Rodrigues , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:29:36 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:38:50PM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > >> Wrong. I've worked at 3 companies over the years that make direct use of >> the ports tree when creating an embedded product based on FreeBSD. >> > > OK, then this is the first I've heard of it. My mistake. > Just a thought: "FreeNAS" .. I know it uses ports, would one consider any (home NAS) device that ships with FreeNAS as it's OS as an embedded device? (Don't know if there are any, but it was the first thing that came to mind.) -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:31:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B9E775 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1A476F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:31:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1421065908; bh=NMzYG9BV8wPm+RQETZVTULs2nDWoDvSswUpeAhrNWPA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=m3+smxFOFsy1ywuh0doZI71+zhksVgh1I+w3/ZjYuM689oLFUTW4TEeM3QxHhpP+4rc3vafh6iua3/KM4qf9wc2uENYy+4uHJHQwLjYr4/3haoN3D6tkm00Leva82KruHTmsWtxlvuWhRAtShgiRigCJMB2E6pLTX9lDZa4yM/1LY9X5bRr8qewKrLO5+TbDdu5dcZIbF/XgsrLLpnozc8pv/KSN138CrZ0+sicCBKrQtWEgNjpHB/G73ZGvzfcM6Sxd64bNLNd1BjwV9pRbzPAdcKUaZ/aQ8D5lEF9RPNXLJRCsmf3zI5PFoC7dN9OwKnX2duhE7y2mIfzJxLhTBQ== Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2015 12:31:48 -0000 Received: from [68.142.230.69] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2015 12:31:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp226.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2015 12:31:47 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 901068.56476.bm@smtp226.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: YvBvRekVM1lsHvgm5n4IGC5MIO_wPilBLleP9HDvx4Lziwe G7vAawadz8bVV2KN1tCXja6JTjpA8a0LidqvlCWFmx6yVhp5R5nx2.Y2YYNU bxaUumDhSgWS_3gRsCYP8gbJjQkPXerZhCRclR8tKNUvwGEIOphNMwH_Fub8 pwsrE3xMIwkFs1sQQS3NzIaefAEySow6L.7h4EBs.sEYQeeuh5y0.nvwE_bn sRmNMC6pFRcoVOUW9Hy56mne6zJbopg8aVPjWr_yu38aya8.gwXewWAnXyL8 u3vWQiCSBz1lr1LSBXDvMVobC8If0OKzi2fbp659olJ0CFMufIPze2ZZJmO8 5N9M3Gh69SGmCTuTuxPLkSLv1.0X23C0FFmzdIZEPLPAGVHJ1NkvZ9vPE_yX GC4Z.prWYk2hLevFFbyMQQMMp9l.xafc8wroFknbvJHZ2pOOgNbCrmOn6Y5V nTmrMgByZltbn6GjnK8L_PfSTRMfxoSu.R1fcobzIQ61gPHhPsq6_tJrm4x4 itRcFzPqiiH276AsbC.nFlCuXJ82Y_h8qww0cbFv0.4XSx7YQBH2yVtxDquM 3re2uT8mZ5CNWmiVLHC2knDw1SVAkneVaSSkaEdLCaMAr2n3.vgDARWCjvL7 ZTHh3QWYCQJcUuOpaJCmDjlRrer4Y7.NjAaQ9RcRAGnHZuVdKeNECO01ERdN UJY1PpEcgD9jyspI0VTu4q8Z6_OQ- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn Message-ID: <54B3BF0F.1050902@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:33:19 -0800 From: Jeffrey Bouquet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fred Woods , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera, still functional, 'one cannot make new configs' etc since v9 > v10 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:31:50 -0000 On 01/11/15 22:59, Fred Woods wrote: > If you run opera from a terminal window, do you get something like the > problem described in: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2568408/pango-warning-failed-to-choose-a-font-expect-ugly-output > > If yes, then a possible work-around is: > > Move any pango compliant fonts to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts > mv /usr/loocal/share/fonts/* /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts > > Create a symlink to make /usr/loocal/share/fonts point to > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts. > ln -sF /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts /usr/loocal/share/fonts > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Did not help, unfortunately. I've exactly two other ideas, but neither is certain to fix it, and a few others for which I am still clueless. Additionally, it seems few (openbsd? debian?) ship by default with opera... One of the more readable screenshots attached (email, may not make it to the list...) and inline... in the email. if that make sense. Newbie here with thunderbird terms. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:32:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B412818; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B342781; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BDF1056083; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:32:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:32:41 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Craig Rodrigues , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:32:42 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 01:29:32PM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Just a thought: "FreeNAS" FreeNAS uses ports ... in their own way. Yes, they do contribute back changes as well. The point that I was trying to make, even though I used bad data, was that Ports aren't being driven by external influence. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:36:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721859FE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog126.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog126.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C83BA7BA for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob126.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVLO/qpcu5cM9LALXtYy3aaQgcLzWbtdo@postini.com; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:36:27 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id y19so2872203wgg.3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:35:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=x7O4BREjKYP5oZW1wF8X04MXnlB84V0aIAFySwsk5h0=; b=hXoMjaQIVy66sCNKHtQNNaRmWYR1RM3roWwYoBs9XQukIOr4FPcv+Tvt4aCsFryhIJ YyRZro1ADdLz3WrSkYsHLUMj0HaQ1ZhlA5E9s8KE4Xd67WDv77cQ0Dt0w+zP/1uAhFIA JJTxZB/NRLXCznrq+D+eBxP1ZXgBuLBya+2HpNO0lqKnw6otTvWbJyyppbmMDPG8h++u ikjQ9LcGWQIj0BlXKpH/E5A6SVNcKBrN2B/9vnTIRntyMnwXfg5ZxJ/6g677SmS0m9PC +wVT2jta9kIIxnjeG6iU/XNsRnzsEaORiwQ4kxiNmXTILXivEGlgRejm5zM22a7BRL6Z +2Pg== X-Received: by 10.180.73.206 with SMTP id n14mr30210086wiv.60.1421066154038; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:35:54 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnCqmY4CwAcvhShTAEfFXC4w7uOd9AjrprkGwPG3VTwzmMReTyUCvncsQfVq6zvn2Pt50k3eEWdrNkc4Zi51CmIsfVCzpzHtucHIGTN0evYIXeKCzh/fh1ceUIFCMX6JDgXn1EvW584NVc99rHaJTRpVDfa0w== X-Received: by 10.180.73.206 with SMTP id n14mr30210067wiv.60.1421066153896; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:35:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a14sm10023821wib.22.2015.01.12.04.35.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:35:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:35:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:35:52 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CCZqpu084487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:35:52 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0CCZqKN084486; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:35:52 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: bugzilla Error 503 Service Unavailable Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:36:28 -0000 Not sure who to alert to this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Error 503 Service Unavailable Backend status: Service Unavailable Anton From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:48:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5690FCEB; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405918EA; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:48:16 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NI2009BIEG9MN00@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:52:59 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:48:12 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> In-reply-to: <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> Cc: Craig Rodrigues , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:48:17 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 01:29:32PM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> Just a thought: "FreeNAS" >> > > FreeNAS uses ports ... in their own way. Yes, they do contribute back > changes as well. > > The point that I was trying to make, even though I used bad data, was > that Ports aren't being driven by external influence. > No disputing that, just thinking, is FreeBSD being driven by user need, financial contributer need, developer need, security need, making things 'better' or just by people wanting to make their mark in a warped sense of "it'll all get better"...? Questions people should ask are: Do we want to make things easier for existing users. Do we want to make things easier for users to convert from other OSes Do we want to develop for anyone paying for changes regardless of the cost (to users) Do we want people to develop what they want for their own purpose My thoughts on all those questions: We should not make anything harder for existing users, and make things easier if possible - however if they are existing users the chances are they already know how to make things work so we should not break stuff already working. We should make things easier for people to migrate to us, and that may mean the work should concentrate on fixing bugs and updating docs as a priority over new features (Microsoft for years went down the route of new features over security or docs, look where it got them) Develop for anyone? Yes and No, what is requested should be evaluated for benefit to the community as a whole and prioritized based on cost and contributions, and rejected out right if it is considered detrimental to the community as a whole (and we should listen to minorities when evaluating, because sometimes the smaller voices can provide saner/long term paths to the same goal.) People develop for their own purpose... well that's what the ports tree is therefore isn't it? ;-) Probably more questions and answers can be added, but they are the first to come to mind. Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:05:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15D5EF8; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1D5AD0; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAegH-0003r9-Tl; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:05:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:05:17 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: bugzilla Error 503 Service Unavailable Message-ID: <20150112130517.GC44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:05:22 -0000 Hi! > Not sure who to alert to this: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > Error 503 Service Unavailable > > Backend status: Service Unavailable See https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-January/097488.html During maintenance on bugzilla, the production database broke due to operator error and it's still broken 8-( No ETA for the fix. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:08:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF714A3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A831DAF7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAeiy-0003s4-Tm; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:04 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> Cc: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:07 -0000 Hi! > No disputing that, just thinking, is FreeBSD being driven by user need, > financial contributer need, developer need, security need, making things > 'better' or just by people wanting to make their mark in a warped sense > of "it'll all get better"...? Probably by developer *capacity* (not need) and fire-fighting, like most IT stuff 8-( -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:08:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090CF13D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B03B2B02 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 200so9098444ykr.1 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:08:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=LGNKHD5Lj+L7t0Dsl+7as8epy58lcOkeNzTgDmcsLbo=; b=fHD/xjvlzTGRK2tbRDJS/KYQ6mILWVx2f5/lkGzzh5zhvEMK3kWX8u5yWl9KQoNNpz kGjKWXYR0Ip/ZuukVS1L2N5llLb2jsFr1COQEFNUHhgO56mbl2Fu5kgaQ3Omx2/I3DCb O7hcUEshqibZZihndxXqOQ2/BAYGnQqoNgvoU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=LGNKHD5Lj+L7t0Dsl+7as8epy58lcOkeNzTgDmcsLbo=; b=ma3n6saAocqVoN1bV9tHayBHM10v6Tv2tSsmdlmSdWAvpyD4rVU4TlZQmMMUQqlzNV S60u6Fu+bQ9D8Pk5Lo0mehKz9+A7q9ncnSdZ+qCGFPadj2xBBVLZI49Oh2rQeTZ7ubo6 h6rRwDTkpV73XhAh3MKtz9MAtiJ+7tlGcisCSvW4K61lNrZphPExPO0FFtPh3K4hbW5/ N/tx6FkM7ioOhNDJljqL2UuRs+HtUR74hEpeosQTKXDG2Q6Qb/xTmVqoE4Yy8Vnjpgyy 3mNObPnQkUfnBLgGY3M09spMCx7LPiakuk0O4lv5Fe6zP7/18rXiWgZsdS6TMhW15FGD EpmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfs3djPY7QDzHTgBWkaBFDkFr++ztaMHDgCbXzSA0dR4LLhGAxnJWt4pNp4dEqkirI/Xvo X-Received: by 10.236.105.180 with SMTP id k40mr22178839yhg.85.1421068125733; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:08:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i99sm10468722yhq.46.2015.01.12.05.08.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:08:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kLZx83CZZz3DlTj; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:08:44 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:08:36 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugzilla Error 503 Service Unavailable Message-ID: <20150112080836.66f3629b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/VHo5AD1R0WEhzNj6bv4JWw_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:47 -0000 --Sig_/VHo5AD1R0WEhzNj6bv4JWw_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:35:53 -0800 (PST), Anton Shterenlikht stated: >Not sure who to alert to this: > >https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > >Error 503 Service Unavailable > >Backend status: Service Unavailable It has been down for something like 48 hours now. You would have thought th= at someone would have posted a notice on the FreeBSD home page regarding that though. --=20 Jerry --Sig_/VHo5AD1R0WEhzNj6bv4JWw_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUs8dVAAoJEElTsHIJnX8erJUH/jGVAQr05MHLq15t6Itfal9F mcDU+PIPZ1qjumjA5uKPsHQWo+xOH3NYkikTtvjyNsB8pVRQS5QXWOuddTX4fJyO 06W3v+Q5BDyJXna59M65xFLWr6uas3wU2myq6mv3Wgz8FHY+iYgC3/3/MrDSVtDa 4MSBIfyuPQBPckKa5WfRCnSKtQTHiSMasaP9SUMgHxsBOriguL9BUme52Nea12+f LvxFSJ2qO9IWBlaHlRj7+PiJza+Tof7/UB24kh3O+QdAYDRfZ3Y0E8hcQZaNlsqa vBNEFoInhh12JTC+UYEuETE6TMj1cnDlWW6XD8FCDG96zVDnfYomCsHuM70bp+Q= =hVcP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VHo5AD1R0WEhzNj6bv4JWw_-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:14:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8964524C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181AFBD9 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l2so19222734wgh.7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:14:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=XdtHH28p0yMsjOKrUMU22VqRKaukWVh77JN1L/bCluk=; b=LS1KWsRDYCsMfRUUQDfIvfFMy08fiFXudIMbLBHO1ANFHYcUyUeIItUTNJvL2cXB74 KxKE7l/JI9Xw9M/F8EKc4x18Zws5ktH1daW5ulZf88rfrKhrMtDaHtSaO5vqlZr4TnFY 4Ob+TBcLLV4aYHgDEba1gsaZOfVRwA85TrBtGHE4jjXjQiEOXMV6yKZ8tdY+O+ik4TJb 3Ryv5O/b9VRx3Y2XfdGW+LdN5uZYOjcKF6A9faXgw54Gr826DERoQQJoCEPcVcgYCS9b Tjkl1qswbdSElq66R1N0C6gLK+G4n1OeH3n63qNSG+ka7C6JKyRMWrcFf6NGhTK0Ony8 JZwQ== X-Received: by 10.180.218.39 with SMTP id pd7mr30550934wic.21.1421068465121; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (191.ip-37-187-239.eu. [37.187.239.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm10215046wie.1.2015.01.12.05.14.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:14:24 -0800 (PST) From: marekrud@gmail.com To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: biber missing In-Reply-To: <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:14:21 +0100 Message-ID: <86a91o16qa.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:14:27 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kurt Jaeger writes: > Hi! > >> If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is >> missing from one of the texlive packages? > > Probably, yes. > >> Or should it get a port on its own? > > There's an old (2012) discussion at > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html > > which suggests that this should be done, yes. Thanks for the very useful link! Marek --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUs8itAAoJEJCuhmH9YEALYIUP/3w/3o7BCdtZyfGSSgQB8Jac kEAEMr2PPd1OfrtcurPuawCT4KERdbLmqUYWmJ0EL0epiTO12QFJa0xE6uD7sVfG bwbDnq6bvljUVpPN/64KqnTigwAp3kgumdwxjX+KYzgEhPWEA+kZfpomMUI8xTqa CwUGLvR+oNish0sZGDibObuRF8P1x9bKGVjT1LLRTFKgnmBj5njKc8Yq/ClXcpdq XoXwgMTjvAVKmNl9SczAtDavTwKpjIhzFu/A7VBz+0pu1shZKYnFsuUdJrGLZb9V fambeEdMqkXjcfpBhYQFfkI3nDlIaCeJoWL9WtJff8GYa3LeKz63G/SOekwzL2yT GVkr120KojxP/q31+7bKGmKDGhFeZfmPLx716UWYqoPv1X21JWz0c0vcJb793NRi RL2JW2a4KRCF7yxkLB+BK8kXxVKrktqGkfJH47+yZLKnaE1Fqbt90wXzt3rocOTZ n1urG9qbImA3Miw1TvkHCcNTwaa953GaOXBqxrJgPUOKYXJ8izAz/s+iUjpI+Leo wQZDqnZrFnB9otw4ybmlFMS4pN8I9UTugsQPGVnNV6Czfhi7+vXaJPG5mG+llKVD sq6JuStP4yvpUOhbkCT3updUUOzlwFrOJesZNtvf3rY41/QRi6y6kFaYff5fKoLn XbdBVXbdaTlqGQtYCdrb =IDOy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:42:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 370EF86B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E00C4E88 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id m20so17940640qcx.12 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:42:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:reply-to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=XhX+UW/6K2eawDuGOqGqMHpIOCz/S98jqumGg4t35Ro=; b=aZ+afMCC7C1nstc2ue5iatSJ9YrgrlMdbavLibI/69EtNLec+e0wR7psLDXA8Aholw qXuXK2mGDmdzcsZ0rcPNy1w9p6H2578/gkNlUksJc8l0EypgdgbGYzUFtnj6jxkH6r9Y 8sIf2yGCPoT55C7j1C2iTxsxBk10CviE5Y6/QTADaawpGms2v3o63S1UdWYDMKeI3N50 Wl/CooIkvS7mD1rceKNOTMLpaQYMgOaOv2Z9Ja5LkdQAI8Isai16s8IMbXhqctD5fJiW gaT6/fkgRnzTtJfierRkHRmEP1BLDhEZWxVYVcjvu5n29lBHiXmpgFujtGYZ+Z3jVTKV UmEw== X-Received: by 10.140.90.112 with SMTP id w103mr46108096qgd.65.1421070145038; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:42:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumiwa.farms.net (pool-71-168-74-138.cncdnh.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.168.74.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm14769306qgk.8.2015.01.12.05.42.24 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:42:24 -0800 (PST) From: lumiwa@gmail.com To: Vitaly Magerya Reply-To: lumiwa@gmail.com Subject: Re: mypaint Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:42:22 -0500 Message-ID: <3335351.IokthlFiqL@lumiwa.farms.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1799385.DexCJMgr9b@lumiwa.farms.net> References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> <1799385.DexCJMgr9b@lumiwa.farms.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:42:26 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2015 14:41:47 Ajtim wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2015 21:03:23 Vitaly Magerya wrote: > > On 01/11/15 16:30, Ajtim wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I like to install graphics/Mypaint on FreeBSD 10.1, p, amd64 > > > and I got: > > > > > > --- > > > scons: Reading SConscript files ... > > > building for 'python2.7' (use scons python_binary=xxx to change) > > > using 'python2.7-config' (use scons python_config=xxx to change) > > > rm -f libmypaint-tests.so libmypaint.so libmypaintlib.so > > > python2.7 generate.py > > > Writing mypaint-brush-settings-gen.h > > > Writing brushsettings-gen.h > > > You need to have numpy installed. > > > > > > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/libalapack.so.2: Undefined symbol > > > > > "cblas_zswap": > > Do you have math/py-numpy with ATLAS option on? If so, try toggling that > > option, reinstalling numpy and installing mypaint again. I don't know if > > this is still the case, but there was some interaction between that > > option and mypaint the last time I tried it. > > I didn't have. I did turn on and mypaint compile :) and it works. > Thank you. It works but application doesn't start: We are not correctly installed or compiled! script: "/usr/local/bin/mypaint" deduced prefix: "/usr/local" lib_shared: "/usr/local/share/mypaint/" lib_compiled: "/usr/local/lib/mypaint/" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 170, in datapath, extradata, confpath, localepath, localepath_brushlib = get_paths() File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 111, in get_paths from lib import mypaintlib File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 25, in _mypaintlib = swig_import_helper() File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 17, in swig_import_helper import _mypaintlib ImportError: /usr/local/lib/mypaint/_mypaintlib.so: Undefined symbol "_ZN10BufferCompIL20BufferCompOutputType1ELj16384E12HueBlendModeE9blendfuncE" Thank you. -- ajtiM -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:01:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B606470 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F77FE0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id hz20so24142408lab.6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:01:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J8eZK0dZ4dfjWAadeqU0owdo1IISe30pGIUdMtPBr3Y=; b=m/HPEepEuadvVp7hmo4sWicVpPOxvZync9tvyTMBTo7xSQ9hLYGVy4Sx7BGb3dE2LX qRDvMlFz57hj+QtHa3rnv1nBbXNYYjesxH4589hb8ptUdUPMN2ujitfjudbQTS/k/TCl uBCOMsKExm7JRD4PVMH+Qu1v1a+8AkbgBMmQTfi12mxMuAo4lS3S0ZlTIrXt/zUSXOQ6 fzSclW5Sp72Iq5+t4GKieb4RXpKdUoaPVLFoYsSFR/m/wDF8tsMognPc51cusvrNU3aZ l4+RbZPZwIPf8WWFGXECVjpzKPXTlCYJ7RlR1eAE3bvMB/QUjs0BXCaLPV6+r1ZmsmNQ XgIA== X-Received: by 10.152.37.168 with SMTP id z8mr36817089laj.63.1421071299043; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.29.2.131] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pn7sm4143034lbb.6.2015.01.12.06.01.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:01:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B3D3B8.9060309@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:01:28 +0200 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lumiwa@gmail.com Subject: Re: mypaint References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> <1799385.DexCJMgr9b@lumiwa.farms.net> <3335351.IokthlFiqL@lumiwa.farms.net> In-Reply-To: <3335351.IokthlFiqL@lumiwa.farms.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:01:41 -0000 On 2015-01-12 15:42, lumiwa@gmail.com wrote: > It works but application doesn't start: > > We are not correctly installed or compiled! > script: "/usr/local/bin/mypaint" > deduced prefix: "/usr/local" > lib_shared: "/usr/local/share/mypaint/" > lib_compiled: "/usr/local/lib/mypaint/" > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 170, in > datapath, extradata, confpath, localepath, localepath_brushlib = > get_paths() > File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 111, in get_paths > from lib import mypaintlib > File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 25, in > _mypaintlib = swig_import_helper() > File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 17, in > swig_import_helper > import _mypaintlib > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/mypaint/_mypaintlib.so: Undefined symbol > "_ZN10BufferCompIL20BufferCompOutputType1ELj16384E12HueBlendModeE9blendfuncE" Yeah, I'm actually getting the same error myself now. There's even a bug report about this problem (PR 193429; bugzilla is down at the moment though). I'm currently updating my ports to see if the problem remains with the latest everything... (this will take a day or two on my hardware). From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:02:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF261120 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com (mail-yh0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3EA2103 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a41so9595461yho.10 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:02:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:mime-version :content-type; bh=uAFPx9VJSvPc8K7oiQXjeYURC+HbgfhqF8SGgIHdxSE=; b=E09a8OjK3IuGn/CNB8TdJ2XanjgCPUB57+jLhvTBFHJeh8OkbFix5CVkobonbC8+K8 BSet+eV6B+R8/uVC/gX/yb0z1JyaRXsrXwh2eE/ABQ11+Ol3kYeVJRcgx+c+MdkxkVlc ZSmDJXfObJ7M35nYsxRMLiFkJGX7MBri965U4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=uAFPx9VJSvPc8K7oiQXjeYURC+HbgfhqF8SGgIHdxSE=; b=gAAQwu0zdI4++yTzXrA4vdO2N/Qe4P1S0QdItEZBqRYePHBt2rpQQIwfkK5T3ZsKWA 3tZ2FAgCmLvsJU5VWC1Hygb0RsMuBCVY6UDF6wVt8MPadNhFuX1o202IznOKlpQ1x/gt Anvh1hUNbuG+PRLPaeyl8HipfM+wXW2yawZBTEvU7dj9qs0+JufEJZUXpONMaDiF2mTR DizuzvQD+7obIHXP7uzwXanibs4iXHN//89Z4JuYwgnpVX20QE/GkrFduaAWJw802p0A tMK5SlrCiTkRysDgmkwoZTGRuA3WiTjo1UgzvHyrE2pmo9MjF1qowBSXkAmun5NHPYmy uLJw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndZbZuZvX7Cgqa64xGnqbxi11LykcTaV7cQG/sed7kIyg5PNh5xIUI+jd63tu+pv7Zh1XE X-Received: by 10.170.86.5 with SMTP id d5mr25370835yka.86.1421071340529; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l70sm10579628yha.18.2015.01.12.06.02.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kLc6z3GSdz3DlTj for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:19 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:12 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 Message-ID: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/h_xF/Cz/ykQt3uki=ec=nW+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:02:22 -0000 --Sig_/h_xF/Cz/ykQt3uki=ec=nW+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FreeBSD 10.1 amd64 Is anyone besides me having a problem building "webkit-gtk2"? It fails with this error message: CXXLD libWTF.la CXXLD Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a: file format not recognized; treating as linke= r script /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a:1: syntax error c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocatio= n) GNUmakefile:40539: recipe for target 'Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor' failed gmake[1]: *** [Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2/work/webkitgtk-2.4.= 8' *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2 The entire build log is available here: http://seibercom.net/logs/webkit-gtk2.txt --=20 Jerry --Sig_/h_xF/Cz/ykQt3uki=ec=nW+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUs9PkAAoJEElTsHIJnX8eiHYIAK9LQ0Hc7v4eFkbh0y90XFyC 6h0c+qMOc71caGbapegMLR9VEonhxLQVg8PhtZTmvZTUajfZj0VhML/UrafvFX8S orjAFXadIo08O7a8jtG1i/uF2C/w2UKkr5FDIDO8WijI9WF2dEisCAqkDsMF54ne W4nSa5GGUVH/3+H4IXmtJlTtt40RfVGGTILXWhCrtOgzhOgDOUmbKyfayMPRpAZZ Q6zhYqvxAfG9Ef8HjNXk2CwHYrt9sVGat5BYAAyJv3+bu42W3i0aF/wNFd4gTRrk HrcEtHQ3bfsu9YIJDz65j6+UOEmLxPy/17tLjKv/6uOfXqpuc1PckrlzfO8SHsE= =Xy4W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/h_xF/Cz/ykQt3uki=ec=nW+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:20:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D1DA531 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0D2315 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAfqx-00041j-Nu for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:20:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:20:23 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 Message-ID: <20150112142023.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:20:24 -0000 Hi! > Is anyone besides me having a problem building "webkit-gtk2"? It fails with > this error message: > > CXXLD libWTF.la > CXXLD Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor > /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a: file format not recognized; treating as linker script > /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a:1: syntax error The webkit-gtk2 build fails if the ports 'ar' is found before the system 'ar'. Check $PATH and put /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:05:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41092D1 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3EC0968 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71873BDC2E; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:04:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56233BDC24; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:04:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7271614F; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:04:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C3D7B08491; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:04:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:04:53 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Bethke Subject: Re: monitorings-plugin hangs on configure ICMPv6 Message-ID: <435323AAE9D716F1223CA2D4@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> References: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:05:01 -0000 +--On 11 janvier 2015 17:54:52 +0100 Stefan Bethke wrote: | checking for ps syntax... /bin/ps axwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu | comm args' checking for ping... /sbin/ping | checking for ping6... /sbin/ping6 | checking for ICMP ping syntax... /sbin/ping -n -c %d %s | checking for ICMPv6 ping syntax... ^C===> Script "configure" failed | unexpectedly. | | FreeBSD 9-stable, all ports up to date, inside a jail. | | Any suggestions? Could you test the patch there: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1502 and tell me how good, or bad, it goes ? -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:10:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116996A6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DBE9A9 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f12so15638394qad.4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:10:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:reply-to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=rBuMO/JHU2hcJ6SW4l0p20x4b0Kz4n6QX6kUbyR9hNE=; b=BBgbSsw+cF8t3Cj0oJB3vMQuS4GaeR/153HCmHpEFSqwGosSF6vwa0x222BKztwFEJ l+VwHElW7oyLJk/i89+WNaqxZYMWx97mMJwgmOGjZ4uxD5AdYEVRA7gE5C9ndK4lKYyS YmOw/lkZNOnel6ALN7LHtMx/KTuGwB+l6sX4kEhL4s8C8BEpm/oT4dNBCYZ7KV2MuiID fJra4bT5Sa+8jtbv+p/16VZWjmpJtQBAs330QjVuaV9Hp67SDslWy1VmRpsG8Djq8xmy bHcF7mzwpcUoimN615YQXnnySOIzfM3G0P/rdx3yfVKkyM47sLLeAeWeRaX7K3sBF4uq uM3g== X-Received: by 10.224.15.78 with SMTP id j14mr32245794qaa.0.1421075413811; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumiwa.farms.net (pool-71-168-74-138.cncdnh.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.168.74.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b109sm14931650qgf.40.2015.01.12.07.10.13 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:10:13 -0800 (PST) From: lumiwa@gmail.com To: Vitaly Magerya Reply-To: lumiwa@gmail.com Subject: Re: mypaint Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:10:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4754722.5X5WTuzP2R@lumiwa.farms.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54B3D3B8.9060309@gmail.com> References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> <3335351.IokthlFiqL@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B3D3B8.9060309@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:15 -0000 On Monday 12 January 2015 16:01:28 Vitaly Magerya wrote: > On 2015-01-12 15:42, lumiwa@gmail.com wrote: > > It works but application doesn't start: > > > > We are not correctly installed or compiled! > > script: "/usr/local/bin/mypaint" > > deduced prefix: "/usr/local" > > lib_shared: "/usr/local/share/mypaint/" > > lib_compiled: "/usr/local/lib/mypaint/" > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 170, in > > > > datapath, extradata, confpath, localepath, localepath_brushlib = > > > > get_paths() > > > > File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 111, in get_paths > > > > from lib import mypaintlib > > > > File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 25, in > > > > _mypaintlib = swig_import_helper() > > > > File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 17, in > > > > swig_import_helper > > > > import _mypaintlib > > > > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/mypaint/_mypaintlib.so: Undefined symbol > > "_ZN10BufferCompIL20BufferCompOutputType1ELj16384E12HueBlendModeE9blendfun > > cE" > Yeah, I'm actually getting the same error myself now. There's even a bug > report about this problem (PR 193429; bugzilla is down at the moment > though). > > I'm currently updating my ports to see if the problem remains with the > latest everything... (this will take a day or two on my hardware). Thank you very much. -- ajtiM -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:18:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034EF905 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.as41113.net (mail.as41113.net [91.208.177.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BDAA8E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.21.87.41] (193.98.9.212.in-addr.arpa [212.9.98.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by mail.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kLdf06Kfhz1N1yZ for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <54B3E3D4.7040509@rewt.org.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:12 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: powerdns meta packages? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:18:27 -0000 Hi guys, What is the process for adding/submitting "meta" packages for ports for example powerdns that have multiple backend options and the default isn't suitable, or failing that have the ability to install powerdns with default backend but allow the installation of others? Currently the port defaults to postgres, in this case I'd like sqlite backend for some servers (slaves), at the moment I'm just building that manually but it does mean I can't just do 'pkg upgrade' Cheers, J From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:52:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F9B1F2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E278DE4B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:26122] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by dnvrco-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 82/C3-03951-4CDE3B45; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:52:37 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 247DA5CA4; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:57:11 -1000 (HST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:57:11 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: bugzilla Error 503 Service Unavailable Message-ID: <20150112155711.GA42064@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.142:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=LcKy61vi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=0BYqzdKNAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=wcwMMSYi8VltstHgG50A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=mNPwpyctwJAA:10 a=9VeSKZvIuSQA:10 a=3kcJdth--sAA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:52:38 -0000 in message <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk>, wrote Anton Shterenlikht thusly... > > Not sure who to alert to this: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > Error 503 Service Unavailable > > Backend status: Service Unavailable Mercifully now a message shows that people are apparently aware of the problem & to try later. Thanks to whoever did that. - parv -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:06:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFF2687 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8686F86 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CG5hUj033822; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:05:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Joe Holden In-Reply-To: <54B3E3D4.7040509@rewt.org.uk> References: <54B3E3D4.7040509@rewt.org.uk> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: powerdns meta packages? Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:05:45 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:47 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:12 +0000 Joe Holden wrote > Hi guys, > > What is the process for adding/submitting "meta" packages for ports for > example powerdns that have multiple backend options and the default > isn't suitable, or failing that have the ability to install powerdns > with default backend but allow the installation of others? > > Currently the port defaults to postgres, in this case I'd like sqlite > backend for some servers (slaves), at the moment I'm just building that > manually but it does mean I can't just do 'pkg upgrade' As I understand it, you want to create a custom "meta-port". You might do well to have a look at some of the other meta-ports available, for the best way to accomplish it for your needs; x11/xorg x11/xorg-minimal x11/xorg-apps lang/php5-extensions are some that come to mind. Best wishes. --Chris > > Cheers, > J > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:11:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3601A51 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BEEFD9 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id vb8so22905626obc.0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:11:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=NrqotMJiFGX1kcJKgzcjeHlvnteUEeUGJZC/TnwL+xM=; b=d6abo10JZVhFAHz1PPsv2qdA1WY7ktEu1hKbxpHT9oE5UMv4FfY/Pquc/rhKTNuNMA 5bBoeiGVxKQQNWaMWdTLM2H1wVk3/OqkOPERRiBJGE7/CY0Ld/tFPb3QMQTcL4/RuC1v IT8L7dfLUWqGskSVrbsCS/4kxv714o8l6R6Zxkv40oUPQpNq7oR0GzPDxygOAVnSmy+z psgGbqHb/KiCIK4uKrWDw8j3RcDzzWCS+s3NNWgGm6eVkltkqlYkqO3AXQ5T2QUw3On0 5CRokBdCpuAfRM92zxb++dHihDHlIfAocg2XlrLA5Nrkk/RP15wrKxfZakNo1vWl5WXD 6amw== X-Received: by 10.182.125.72 with SMTP id mo8mr17963236obb.61.1421079067476; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:11:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: royce.williams@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.89.132 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:10:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> From: Royce Williams Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:10:46 -0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8ByxQQSJA348PbIQX74Les9GEoE Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option To: ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Deb Goodkin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:11:08 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> No disputing that, just thinking, is FreeBSD being driven by user need, >> financial contributer need, developer need, security need, making things >> 'better' or just by people wanting to make their mark in a warped sense >> of "it'll all get better"...? > > Probably by developer *capacity* (not need) and fire-fighting, > like most IT stuff 8-( But like most IT stuff, resources are being asymmetrically applied to the root causes of the fires. Read the list of projects from last quarter: - Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) - amd64 Xen Paravirtualization - bhyve - Chelsio iSCSI Offload Support - Debian GNU/kFreeBSD - FreeBSD Preseed Installation (PXE) - Jenkins Continuous Integration for FreeBSD - New Automounter - QEMU bsd-user-Enabled Ports Building - VMWare VAAI and Microsoft ODX Acceleration in CTL - ZFSguru - Intel GPU Driver Update - SDIO Driver - UEFI Boot - Updated vt(4) System Console - Updating OpenCrypto - FreeBSD on Newer ARM Boards - FreeBSD/arm64 - LLDB Debugger Port - LLVM Address Sanitizer (Asan) - SSE Variants of libc Routines for amd64 - FreeBSD Python Ports - GNOME/FreeBSD - KDE on FreeBSD - The Graphics Stack on FreeBSD - Xfce The Foundation section also lists these items not overlapping with the above: - FreeBSD Journal - PostgreSQL performance improvements - Ongoing release process - Development snapshots - VM images for releases - Secure Boot planning - Infrastructure hardware - Java licensing - Summits and summit sponsorship - Travel grants, tutorials, and talks - New Design and Implementation book - Recruitment flyers Are there long-term improvement projects that aren't being listed? If so, they should be. At face value, the main project list is heavily weighted towards relatively esoteric OS features. The Foundation list is heavily weighted towards advocacy and communication (as it should be). What is missing are high-level projects to help sysadmins maintain and use FreeBSD on an ongoing basis. Here are some projects that would help to close the sysadmin gap: - Automatic error reporting and analysis - OS and port debugging tools for sysadmins - Independent project-wide usability analysis - Ports dependency isolation and reduction framework - Ports system reliability parity with Linuxes - Searchable, taggable project FAQ - Searchable hardware support matrix integrated with bug tracker - Wiki curation and platform improvements These projects decentralize and improve support for sysadmins and new adopters. As a business case for the Foundation, these projects should also deeply free up developer resources to focus on other major projects. In the past, when I have pointed out this "sysadmin gap", I receive one of two answers: 1. Sounds great. Let us know when you have it finished. 2. We're too busy to do any of those things. ... to which I answer: 1. These projects require technical skill and political capital within the project. They are ideally suited for well-established independent FreeBSD consultants with large blocks of time sponsored by the FreeBSD Foundation. I can help (especially with the wiki work), but cannot tackle these deeper problems in the way that others can. 2. The reason you're busy is that you don't have these things. I applaud recent work on Jenkins and cluster infrastructure. I also appreciate Colin Percivals's automated error reporting work, because it directly attacks the sysadmin gap. And I know that getting releases out the door is time-consuming and keeps the lights on. But the overall project list needed to be rebalanced towards system administration. I request that the Foundation consider this when calling for proposals for the next round of funded projects. Royce From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:39:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C60C32 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763FA5FB for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CGcI9s041743; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:38:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: ports , Royce Williams In-Reply-To: References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:38:18 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Deb Goodkin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:39:27 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:10:46 -0900 Royce Williams wrote > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > >> No disputing that, just thinking, is FreeBSD being driven by user need, > >> financial contributer need, developer need, security need, making things > >> 'better' or just by people wanting to make their mark in a warped sense > >> of "it'll all get better"...? > > > > Probably by developer *capacity* (not need) and fire-fighting, > > like most IT stuff 8-( > > But like most IT stuff, resources are being asymmetrically applied to > the root causes of the fires. > > Read the list of projects from last quarter: > > - Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) > - amd64 Xen Paravirtualization > - bhyve > - Chelsio iSCSI Offload Support > - Debian GNU/kFreeBSD > - FreeBSD Preseed Installation (PXE) > - Jenkins Continuous Integration for FreeBSD > - New Automounter > - QEMU bsd-user-Enabled Ports Building > - VMWare VAAI and Microsoft ODX Acceleration in CTL > - ZFSguru > - Intel GPU Driver Update > - SDIO Driver > - UEFI Boot > - Updated vt(4) System Console > - Updating OpenCrypto > - FreeBSD on Newer ARM Boards > - FreeBSD/arm64 > - LLDB Debugger Port > - LLVM Address Sanitizer (Asan) > - SSE Variants of libc Routines for amd64 > - FreeBSD Python Ports > - GNOME/FreeBSD > - KDE on FreeBSD > - The Graphics Stack on FreeBSD > - Xfce > > The Foundation section also lists these items not overlapping with the above: > > - FreeBSD Journal > - PostgreSQL performance improvements > - Ongoing release process > - Development snapshots > - VM images for releases > - Secure Boot planning > - Infrastructure hardware > - Java licensing > - Summits and summit sponsorship > - Travel grants, tutorials, and talks > - New Design and Implementation book > - Recruitment flyers > > Are there long-term improvement projects that aren't being listed? If > so, they should be. > > At face value, the main project list is heavily weighted towards > relatively esoteric OS features. The Foundation list is heavily > weighted towards advocacy and communication (as it should be). > > What is missing are high-level projects to help sysadmins maintain and > use FreeBSD on an ongoing basis. > > Here are some projects that would help to close the sysadmin gap: > > - Automatic error reporting and analysis > - OS and port debugging tools for sysadmins > - Independent project-wide usability analysis > - Ports dependency isolation and reduction framework > - Ports system reliability parity with Linuxes > - Searchable, taggable project FAQ > - Searchable hardware support matrix integrated with bug tracker > - Wiki curation and platform improvements > > These projects decentralize and improve support for sysadmins and new > adopters. As a business case for the Foundation, these projects > should also deeply free up developer resources to focus on other major > projects. > > In the past, when I have pointed out this "sysadmin gap", I receive > one of two answers: > > 1. Sounds great. Let us know when you have it finished. > > 2. We're too busy to do any of those things. > > ... to which I answer: > > 1. These projects require technical skill and political capital within > the project. They are ideally suited for well-established independent > FreeBSD consultants with large blocks of time sponsored by the FreeBSD > Foundation. I can help (especially with the wiki work), but cannot > tackle these deeper problems in the way that others can. FWIW I'm already in the process of creating a wiki that will serve as a FreeBSD Documentation Factory. I've created the wiki, and am currently plugging in all the necessary "bits". This will permit "live" documentation creation, and editing -- including man(1) pages. It's currently backed by git(1), but conversions to other RCS, SCM, VCS, {...} are all possible. In fact, I already have the conversion methods available. This all makes it possible to import any revision of any doc/man page as an "official" doc set. Point being; as FreeBSD is Open Source, it heavily depends on user-contribution. I'm not attempting to discount your previous points, however. Just saying. As to the "sysadmin gap" a look to the ports tree seems to indicate quite a volume of "sysadmin" related ports. Are some missing? All the best. --Chris > > 2. The reason you're busy is that you don't have these things. > > I applaud recent work on Jenkins and cluster infrastructure. I also > appreciate Colin Percivals's automated error reporting work, because > it directly attacks the sysadmin gap. And I know that getting > releases out the door is time-consuming and keeps the lights on. > > But the overall project list needed to be rebalanced towards system > administration. I request that the Foundation consider this when > calling for proposals for the next round of funded projects. > > Royce > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:43:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F71EDFD for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.as41113.net (mail.as41113.net [91.208.177.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FC96D4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.21.87.41] (193.98.9.212.in-addr.arpa [212.9.98.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by mail.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kLghp2XKzz1N1yZ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:43:22 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <54B3F985.5060409@rewt.org.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:42:45 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris H , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: powerdns meta packages? References: <54B3E3D4.7040509@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:43:25 -0000 On 12/01/2015 16:05, Chris H wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:12 +0000 Joe Holden wrote > >> Hi guys, >> >> What is the process for adding/submitting "meta" packages for ports for >> example powerdns that have multiple backend options and the default >> isn't suitable, or failing that have the ability to install powerdns >> with default backend but allow the installation of others? >> >> Currently the port defaults to postgres, in this case I'd like sqlite >> backend for some servers (slaves), at the moment I'm just building that >> manually but it does mean I can't just do 'pkg upgrade' > As I understand it, you want to create a custom "meta-port". > You might do well to have a look at some of the other meta-ports > available, for the best way to accomplish it for your needs; > > x11/xorg > x11/xorg-minimal > x11/xorg-apps > lang/php5-extensions > > are some that come to mind. > Best wishes. > This is what I'd normally do but I was hoping with the new pkg stuff we could have some sort of virtual packages but this will do I guess! Will need to read up on package building now - seems a bit silly to have my own repo just for -mysql, -sqlite type packages though Cheers > --Chris >> >> Cheers, >> J >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:54:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB54205 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D2686F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CGrPxd043673; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:53:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Joe Holden In-Reply-To: <54B3F985.5060409@rewt.org.uk> References: <54B3E3D4.7040509@rewt.org.uk> , <54B3F985.5060409@rewt.org.uk> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: powerdns meta packages? Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:53:25 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <892623d04091975c961021b46049243c@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:54:34 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:42:45 +0000 Joe Holden wrote > On 12/01/2015 16:05, Chris H wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:10:12 +0000 Joe Holden wrote > > > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> What is the process for adding/submitting "meta" packages for ports for > >> example powerdns that have multiple backend options and the default > >> isn't suitable, or failing that have the ability to install powerdns > >> with default backend but allow the installation of others? > >> > >> Currently the port defaults to postgres, in this case I'd like sqlite > >> backend for some servers (slaves), at the moment I'm just building that > >> manually but it does mean I can't just do 'pkg upgrade' > > As I understand it, you want to create a custom "meta-port". > > You might do well to have a look at some of the other meta-ports > > available, for the best way to accomplish it for your needs; > > > > x11/xorg > > x11/xorg-minimal > > x11/xorg-apps > > lang/php5-extensions > > > > are some that come to mind. > > Best wishes. > > > This is what I'd normally do but I was hoping with the new pkg stuff we > could have some sort of virtual packages but this will do I guess! > > Will need to read up on package building now - seems a bit silly to have > my own repo just for -mysql, -sqlite type packages though Well, I thought you might want to make the (meta)port, and submit it. Then other like-minded people could also benefit from your contribution. :) If you submit it as a port, the pkg(8) business takes care of itself. All the best. --Chris > > Cheers > > > --Chris > >> > >> Cheers, > >> J > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:56:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9217402 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C528A2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so23117771obc.1 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:56:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nq1ddVQCxxsedxFhq8KLlrtaqxxw2gJta7E69+TMhJE=; b=OUF6wVfuudaxImD1ORU7Bh9/WZnNKTxiZmPgG/yKd1AvcN6xPU8bITs2l7S4FxgstZ nV86oi4UULvEv9WSboELbTCYMrma0eJFv7MNTWkTLjUAzuhXmA5kijw/m/wpuXYfnF5C KmA8urLvzUARXXl70B3eMEVPOoP5Mpkjh727yf97I6TfqHhCD8B2ZnyZO5MJXd5aIqnW jK5u2nj/27B073+pahIaxFE3SIq55jN+Ld0Hlv0bWywL6q6IObsL4OzalAEgqb10Vfy1 E3v1JOQ3R37Y73NJ3O062utoeJ/JK6AtiBQLnkuV0v6osEBYM1KGYzDskVSMZtMRVGyQ JC1Q== X-Received: by 10.60.141.33 with SMTP id rl1mr17856038oeb.49.1421081766856; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:56:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: royce.williams@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.89.132 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:55:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> From: Royce Williams Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:55:45 -0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N7IY4iQAzcNPHSUf9qmLv_E4M7w Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Deb Goodkin , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:56:07 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Chris H wrote: > As to the "sysadmin gap" a look to > the ports tree seems to indicate quite a volume of "sysadmin" > related ports. Are some missing? To the contrary -- there are too many. A good project would be to survey which ones people actually use, and why -- and then bring their best features into base. This would be difficult to do as a independent skunkworks project, and would be better suited as a high-level, Foundation-sponsored one. (For example, in the Debian ecosystem, for most people, there is no reason to use something other than apt-get, because it does what it should and does it well. Every time I upgrade a port, I have to study /usr/ports/UPDATING, read multiple mailing lists, and hold my breath. I cannot remember the last time I worried about running apt-get. Arguments about flexibility and diversity ecosystem don't hold up well when the basics fail on a regular basis.) Royce From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:59:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5F7695 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A478D6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVN0w-1YHjSI44Eg-00YeIf; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:59:37 +0100 Message-ID: <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:59:36 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xeakJZMBpA48CF+E8Zy7LVHsGmCLRxw+pEoX4XVQYHgPxUUIgwb z9mR3lpx09gSqbdxqJRg0Crcpl4goqOz8Jj+fGkFwW0xdQgOIC8FjUB31kvqzrfGOnDxE2d QY5tqI6B9OJIn7HMYG6aqq5C+5YhQLXz7SPtnSgLpKiG3245AY9gTr7S0LhuTDFLQoF+318 MBJDRJ+ADp40pj3cHRv7A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:59:46 -0000 On 12.01.2015 01:27, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 4 janvier 2015 18:24:24 +0100 Stefan Ehmann wrote: > | On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > |> I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to > |> manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds > |> don't quite work as I expected. > |> > |> poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If there > |> are only some ports with new versions, possibly hundreds of packages are > |> rebuilt. So far it looks like I'll end up rebuilding packages like > |> libreoffice/KDE/chromium several times a week. The rebuilt packages > |> won't even be installed by 'pkg upgrade' because their version number > |> has not changed. > | > | Here's an actual example from today. > | > | There are new versions for three ports. poudriere will rebuild 70 ports, > | 67 of them will never be installed on the host. > > You can't know that. > > Say there is a shlib change in one of the updated packages, its version is > bumped, or there is a new dependency, you need to rebuild the 67 ports, and > pkg will detect and reinstall them. I remember one instance where a library change was detected (Can't remember which package was affected). The package was re-installed although the version number did not change. But like 99% of the time packages without version bump will not be installed. One could argue that the version number should have been bumped in the other case. I understand that conservative rebuilding is important for the official pkg repo. But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild behavior. I think it should be possibly provided that port versions are bumped correctly. But maybe I'm wrong. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:08:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76FCB9D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BC99EC for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25DABDC30; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:08:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98FEFBDC1D; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:08:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726E060DA; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:08:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578C87B0A161; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:08:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:08:51 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Ehmann , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:08:57 -0000 +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann wrote: | | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every | now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild behavior. | | I think it should be possibly provided that port versions are bumped | correctly. But maybe I'm wrong. Like someone else said, you can use bulk -S, but don't complain if you end up with something that's horribly broken :-) -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:25:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996E0A3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59098BDD for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CHOLdE049793; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:24:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Royce Williams In-Reply-To: References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> , From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:24:25 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Deb Goodkin , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:25:27 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:55:45 -0900 Royce Williams wrote > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Chris H wrote: > > > As to the "sysadmin gap" a look to > > the ports tree seems to indicate quite a volume of "sysadmin" > > related ports. Are some missing? > > To the contrary -- there are too many. > > A good project would be to survey which ones people actually use, and > why -- and then bring their best features into base. I agree something like thishas value. But obtaining access to the usage matrix is the key. > > This would be difficult to do as a independent skunkworks project, and > would be better suited as a high-level, Foundation-sponsored one. see above. > > (For example, in the Debian ecosystem, for most people, there is no > reason to use something other than apt-get, because it does what it > should and does it well. Every time I upgrade a port, I have to study > /usr/ports/UPDATING, read multiple mailing lists, and hold my breath. > I cannot remember the last time I worried about running apt-get. > Arguments about flexibility and diversity ecosystem don't hold up well > when the basics fail on a regular basis.) Here is where we will clash; I've been riding *BSD for over 20yrs. It's *biggest* asset has been in it's flexibility -- it wasn't another Linux "dist", that required me to essentially become a "clone" of every other Linux install. The Ports system, and /src allowed one to tailor my build/install to meet *my* needs. I wasn't required, in fact I was *encouraged*, to have a unique system. Frankly the new pkg(8) *requirement* was a complete 180 on this philosophy. It's implementation was also flawed in many respects (which speaks to your point). I have no objection to pkg(8), per se; But it *should* have been optional, it *should* have been better (longer) tested, *before* pushed into the ecosystem, and should *not* have been implemented with a backend with single-point-of-failue (sqlite3(1). Honestly; why did pkg(8) have to be *required*? Is FreeBSD simply hoping to become a new "distro"? But, given it's there, and how it's there. You have/bring up some valid, points; it *is* a bit of a game of roulette. I *too* get a knot in my stomach even at the *thought* of an upgrade. Sure there are plenty of choices in an upgrade path/implementation. But, as it sits now, I'm not sure I can say it's gotten any easier, or "trouble free", as a result of pkg(8). --Chris > > Royce > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:36:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 125A13A4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12CCCFA for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id vb8so23369708obc.0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7BeLjNVGfAKxFFGEo6qcYb13d/BtJigP4b8ZIpKDGUw=; b=ILZ/F26Axwv9ORXQ2/QYzm+XEetqmYwmXWEvJ/VbhxBwiZSsvb059lx9c7AoBoPjzb OrV0sq489g/bBL2XWhiAHXE5vPdB6Xu9euVzt60VTiJziao+aUiU6VR51lXhauYtB8rQ u7juUYMS4K9nmDhjs0vJOiwBfa7HZ9tKS1ETx5DBhGSuN78fvYngVaJh71Lu9z8dhxdt vFl0T6H0i7HX+mawvO672+HFlDqcunrDPx9/MC46kEO22+bW47XDU8iFWNDzu/FWsUsO he9mOUK61PaOVqzxP3EV+dLzJvOoFqnW6NoTI2mNrLzM/7m2+U14AH/pfCMWzQi2WZV7 pJ2w== X-Received: by 10.182.50.163 with SMTP id d3mr17792076obo.37.1421084160179; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: royce.williams@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.89.132 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:35:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> From: Royce Williams Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:35:40 -0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: X-eKySzVGI4GGhn-dcw4ATMCXDk Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Deb Goodkin , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:36:01 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Chris H wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:55:45 -0900 Royce Williams wrote > >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Chris H wrote: >> >> > As to the "sysadmin gap" a look to >> > the ports tree seems to indicate quite a volume of "sysadmin" >> > related ports. Are some missing? >> >> To the contrary -- there are too many. >> >> A good project would be to survey which ones people actually use, and >> why -- and then bring their best features into base. > I agree something like thishas value. But obtaining access to the > usage matrix is the key. A fair point. Instrumenting the OS now to make this usage possible later would be a good idea. IIRC, PC-BSD integrated BSDstats a while back. If FreeBSD did the same, and prompted at install for "Would you like to help the project by reporting anonymous hardware and software inventory information?", we could start to build that matrix. >> This would be difficult to do as a independent skunkworks project, and >> would be better suited as a high-level, Foundation-sponsored one. > see above. >> >> (For example, in the Debian ecosystem, for most people, there is no >> reason to use something other than apt-get, because it does what it >> should and does it well. Every time I upgrade a port, I have to study >> /usr/ports/UPDATING, read multiple mailing lists, and hold my breath. >> I cannot remember the last time I worried about running apt-get. >> Arguments about flexibility and diversity ecosystem don't hold up well >> when the basics fail on a regular basis.) > Here is where we will clash; I've been riding *BSD for over 20yrs. > It's *biggest* asset has been in it's flexibility -- it wasn't another > Linux "dist", that required me to essentially become a "clone" of > every other Linux install. The Ports system, and /src allowed one to > tailor my build/install to meet *my* needs. I wasn't required, in fact > I was *encouraged*, to have a unique system. Frankly the new pkg(8) > *requirement* was a complete 180 on this philosophy. It's implementation > was also flawed in many respects (which speaks to your point). I have no > objection to pkg(8), per se; But it *should* have been optional, it > *should* have been better (longer) tested, *before* pushed into the > ecosystem, and should *not* have been implemented with a backend with > single-point-of-failue (sqlite3(1). Honestly; why did pkg(8) have to > be *required*? Is FreeBSD simply hoping to become a new "distro"? > But, given it's there, and how it's there. You have/bring up some valid, > points; it *is* a bit of a game of roulette. I *too* get a knot in my > stomach even at the *thought* of an upgrade. Sure there are plenty of > choices in an upgrade path/implementation. But, as it sits now, I'm > not sure I can say it's gotten any easier, or "trouble free", as a > result of pkg(8). I basically agree. pkg(8)'s heart is in the right place, but it was not baked long enough. I like the idea of being flexible as a proving ground, and then selecting best of breed as the baseline. Royce From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:38:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06C6509; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Cryptonomicore CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F9CD2F; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id B26C8124ACD; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: monitorings-plugin hangs on configure ICMPv6 From: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: <435323AAE9D716F1223CA2D4@ogg.in.absolight.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:38:55 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6BD12A50-3226-4CF5-8789-14069F7908A6@lassitu.de> <435323AAE9D716F1223CA2D4@ogg.in.absolight.net> To: Mathieu Arnold X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:38:59 -0000 Am 12.01.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Mathieu Arnold : >=20 > Could you test the patch there: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1502 >=20 > and tell me how good, or bad, it goes ? Builds just fine. And I see you=E2=80=99ve already commit it. Thanks for = the quick help! Regards, Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:40:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A99D5FB for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12BD1D46 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAiyM-0004Ot-33 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:40:14 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:40:14 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ports Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112174014.GF44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:40:15 -0000 Hi! > Honestly; why did pkg(8) have to be *required*? Because those that are really active in maintaining it had the choice of either - keeping the old system running, and breaking down on the burden of doing so or - migrating to the pkgng setup which allows to cope with the rate of change in the non-freebsd-base software world It's an economics question: Those players in the open-source OS market that have the resources to keep going will stay afloat. FreeBSD had the choice to loose more active maintainers trying to keep the old state or attract new ones with the new state. It's a gamble, and if enough people like the old style more, they probably have to fork. I've used both styles for a while and yes, the switchover takes time and patience, but it's not the end-of-the-world. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:45:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 393ED8F2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C24E0E22 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2LZc-1XsEpK3nPA-00s5LK; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:06 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mPFMV+Ikt85QKhPjQWZI0IcpwT+V6NUg04NhFFWe87Up+UtywYD m2Ll89CzWec9hr8plNTqVLOMdKWq/jdAn6Wo1iLicGFoMW9UWapaLihNjUKpJSMEdFkokXf kMw6aECeYZ3DM1b/lUQGqPmWPg5TlZLVcR59r7aUr3DyLknE7dXeif5h8cbbLlDFwIFoHlp mYQU60eOpi6q+lwUIhfBQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:12 -0000 On 12.01.2015 18:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann wrote: > | > | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of > | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every > | now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild behavior. > | > | I think it should be possibly provided that port versions are bumped > | correctly. But maybe I'm wrong. > > Like someone else said, you can use bulk -S, but don't complain if you end > up with something that's horribly broken :-) bulk -S didn't really work well for me (see original post). But I think I my original question is answered by now: There's no supported way of avoiding excessive rebuilds with poudriere. What I'm now doing is: * Dry run of poudriere bulk with normal list of ports * make a list of ports that will be rebuilt because of new version * Run poudriere bulk with new list There are still some ports without version bump rebuilt, but it's a much smaller number. Especially libreoffice/KDE, etc. rebuilds are avoided. This procedure probably has some issues. But in case of problems I'll just do a normal incremental build. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:45:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A17B982 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C72E2A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAj3V-0004Pz-7c; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:33 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Stefan Ehmann Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? Message-ID: <20150112174533.GG44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:33 -0000 Hi! > The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other > packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automatic > packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build > problems. I'll try this option now and would appreciate if you could describe the problems you had with it. Details help. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:55:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 014BCBE5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3619F23 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07092BDC56; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E15B0BDC4C; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535C860DA; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A0E7B0A884; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:25 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Ehmann , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? Message-ID: <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:55:29 -0000 +--On 12 janvier 2015 18:45:06 +0100 Stefan Ehmann wrote: | On 12.01.2015 18:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> |> |> +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann |> wrote: |> | |> | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of |> | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong |> | every now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild |> | behavior. |> | |> | I think it should be possibly provided that port versions are bumped |> | correctly. But maybe I'm wrong. |> |> Like someone else said, you can use bulk -S, but don't complain if you |> end up with something that's horribly broken :-) | | bulk -S didn't really work well for me (see original post). | | But I think I my original question is answered by now: | There's no supported way of avoiding excessive rebuilds with poudriere. Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do it, and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, that is, one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for it :-) Now, there's a good chance that it will be slower than rebuilding all the dependencies. | What I'm now doing is: | * Dry run of poudriere bulk with normal list of ports | * make a list of ports that will be rebuilt because of new version | * Run poudriere bulk with new list | | There are still some ports without version bump rebuilt, but it's a much | smaller number. Especially libreoffice/KDE, etc. rebuilds are avoided. | | This procedure probably has some issues. But in case of problems I'll | just do a normal incremental build. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:17:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE5E731 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vfemail.net (nine.vfemail.net [108.76.175.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32753250 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37691 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2015 18:17:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Jan 2015 18:17:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 37600 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2015 18:16:52 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 37594, pid: 37597, t: 0.0217s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO smtp102-2.vfemail.net) (172.16.100.62) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 12 Jan 2015 18:16:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 21658 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2015 18:16:52 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 21642, pid: 21653, t: 0.9437s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO nil) (amJlaWNoQHZmZW1haWwubmV0@172.16.100.27) by 172.16.100.62 with ESMTPA; 12 Jan 2015 18:16:51 -0000 From: Jan Beich To: Vitaly Magerya Subject: Re: mypaint References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> <1799385.DexCJMgr9b@lumiwa.farms.net> <3335351.IokthlFiqL@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B3D3B8.9060309@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:16:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54B3D3B8.9060309@gmail.com> (Vitaly Magerya's message of "Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:01:28 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: lumiwa@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:17:18 -0000 Vitaly Magerya writes: >> It works but application doesn't start: >> >> We are not correctly installed or compiled! >> script: "/usr/local/bin/mypaint" >> deduced prefix: "/usr/local" >> lib_shared: "/usr/local/share/mypaint/" >> lib_compiled: "/usr/local/lib/mypaint/" >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 170, in >> datapath, extradata, confpath, localepath, localepath_brushlib = >> get_paths() >> File "/usr/local/bin/mypaint", line 111, in get_paths >> from lib import mypaintlib >> File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 25, in >> _mypaintlib = swig_import_helper() >> File "/usr/local/share/mypaint/lib/mypaintlib.py", line 17, in >> swig_import_helper >> import _mypaintlib >> ImportError: /usr/local/lib/mypaint/_mypaintlib.so: Undefined symbol >> "_ZN10BufferCompIL20BufferCompOutputType1ELj16384E12HueBlendModeE9blendfuncE" > > Yeah, I'm actually getting the same error myself now. There's even a > bug report about this problem (PR 193429; bugzilla is down at the > moment though). Or maybe https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?21981 > > I'm currently updating my ports to see if the problem remains with the > latest everything... (this will take a day or two on my hardware). I think the following are relevant patches from bugzilla. Index: Mk/Uses/scons.mk =================================================================== --- Mk/Uses/scons.mk (revision 376385) +++ Mk/Uses/scons.mk (working copy) @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ IGNORE= Incorrect 'USES+= scons:${scons_ARGS}' sco MAKEFILE= # MAKE_FLAGS= # ALL_TARGET= # +CCFLAGS?= ${CFLAGS} +LINKFLAGS?= ${LDFLAGS} LIBPATH?= ${LOCALBASE}/lib CPPPATH?= ${LOCALBASE}/include SCONS= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/scons Index: graphics/mypaint/Makefile =================================================================== --- graphics/mypaint/Makefile (revision 376385) +++ graphics/mypaint/Makefile (working copy) @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS} \ USE_GNOME= glib20 pygtk2 MAKE_ARGS= prefix="${PREFIX}" -USES= gettext pkgconfig scons tar:bzip2 python +USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib gettext pkgconfig scons tar:bzip2 python INSTALLS_ICONS= yes SUB_FILES= pkg-install ------------------------------------------------- VFEmail.net - http://www.vfemail.net ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:19:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA75991 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321F2278 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYP57-1YFUp41Iwb-00V4rD; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:19:27 +0100 Message-ID: <54B4102E.7010603@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:19:26 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <20150112174533.GG44537@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150112174533.GG44537@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:FP32TAJUNYRwq2XwAL9Ny5yndaVfK8VdI2HP3oNojDhaqvgi9ZX a/GSTmiYWd/GOjmtVrZngTGiX+zm5U7fuxkEBeKeE/K3xY3gH2zljdIwQaeP6VyQr+ZgwLW 8isDZJMYiDRcBUddfZbXzmhwEK1h0ItGnf7dawO9I/fJbVGFZbTCDMUw9Vd9GSU/oLSlppg Ap6ebwa8pgDtaVjfu8Z8A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:19:36 -0000 On 12.01.2015 18:45, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other >> packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automatic >> packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build >> problems. > > I'll try this option now and would appreciate if you could describe > the problems you had with it. Details help. > Not all ports with new versions were rebuilt. That is kind of expected if there's no recursive rebuild. As a workaround I simply passed the output of "pkg query %o" to poudriere bulk -f. Now poudriere tried to build only the packages with newer versions - just as desired. But then there were build errors for some packages. Unfortunately, I no longer have the log files. But I think the problem was something like this: A --depends on--> B --depends on--> C * B was built depending on C version x * C is upgraded from version x to version y * rebuild of A is requested * poudriere tries to install B version x during build * installation of B fails because version x of C is not longer available From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:41:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C302623 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DD286D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CIfMSH050547 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:41:22 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0CIfMEH050545 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:41:22 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 72480 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2015 12:41:18 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 12 Jan 2015 12:41:18 -0600 Message-ID: <54B41548.1080904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:41:12 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger , Stefan Ehmann Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <20150112174533.GG44537@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150112174533.GG44537@home.opsec.eu> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5FNrdFUBCNn4QA8C8aUFqh7kjq6wPprPo" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:41:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5FNrdFUBCNn4QA8C8aUFqh7kjq6wPprPo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/12/2015 11:45 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 >> The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other=20 >> packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automati= c=20 >> packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build=20 >> problems. >=20 > I'll try this option now and would appreciate if you could describe > the problems you had with it. Details help. >=20 This option was added for an intent that never panned out. I should remove it. It's dangerous and will create a broken repository. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --5FNrdFUBCNn4QA8C8aUFqh7kjq6wPprPo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUtBVOAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPbvMIAJcpLG+8qUeNqgXeaos9utCA XqMUDq3UhjjgPq5RkLJei5PMMfIWHesOif2oapW1NjiuZ9CcVK5DqboZMQ7Dmlut 1f68EjSeBU1FXCjVz0mBz3E7W552Wg4cA/DqUtocOR1tWIhxJkPckaAicd68HjQG XdPyUKDcR1W3+dnQ8YeO+SR0PB3MCu22qMdY9VnGxetGfERBrHAD+b3jWCmPK1mf qHJ6HJRnstL+hmINjGXUx6b0+K84I6iR+u5BHcnCTnr3g8hlivbVOxD9zNZatauX zXEuYpqgl6S7N8Z3FW8Qie90xm7cCiuxCYHqS5elc5qqtgjACoD+xSjizl83cEI= =sQLd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5FNrdFUBCNn4QA8C8aUFqh7kjq6wPprPo-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:55:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84AEE825 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x22a.google.com (mail-yh0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3727DABB for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f42.google.com with SMTP id v1so10416989yhn.1 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:55:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=WGjgCbQlphBx+z8D/jrQOnscxNIeYfh91nYRBwtLab4=; b=q6EYe+DVkPUjfehNgmdCbPMCt8gXObKyQe1QxpikxH8vxNgQvcwJL0d4lbg11FKa25 zXJmFctoz5jPo+jyzMFjXKBrX58dEIuvPjG+ogCr7N8ysgpw7yuBEwL0Jln4glC5MgMe p+aVqrxJy9PeihABXPJ+M8Njdl8m7iU5CmckM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=WGjgCbQlphBx+z8D/jrQOnscxNIeYfh91nYRBwtLab4=; b=TMWo5wQ3hiL0ZipoeEn02ZfKw9D4RcVg3M6DCW9wCzZPW0ZW6hCOQTMzqhPL8RuYQ9 r6mbq/tDm+etdSWFovZG9FgXlR7Yr4tH9qSovG243uByFyFapA3E/DrIyl7vU1AkTXoQ BCpE4EnHxgk9/4bkCZ8UbCf7c7QrFo40Wnbhk5/FnMz5TKhomhvq6Ix0vBMu/7mWLQCs wt/Y7wlpmwg6yzeRdt1rFtjlYefD9AqJuUjLqnJ/k0C6wJrboHnTZh47RVeVgp81bIZY TZG6KJ84KzZIQpLxM5WLy46TiggaXWqUxpPxq0HnYakMwcXkamQGzUAsWKK4pU4Ajtdt ysrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9togoLjcI/si+ogWVaPXinfr2iex0rK43GAF2AKsn37m2ZTC71Z80nDiZjLdq692VNE+I X-Received: by 10.236.53.98 with SMTP id f62mr24066192yhc.75.1421088913114; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm11109149yhb.4.2015.01.12.10.55.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kLkcv5hcsz3DlTj for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:55:11 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:55:03 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 Message-ID: <20150112135503.591d487d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20150112142023.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> <20150112142023.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_//AVZ2JVA=b4bHIhAENfTsoy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:55:14 -0000 --Sig_//AVZ2JVA=b4bHIhAENfTsoy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:20:23 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: >> Is anyone besides me having a problem building "webkit-gtk2"? It fails w= ith >> this error message: >>=20 >> CXXLD libWTF.la >> CXXLD Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor >> /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a: file format not recognized; treating as >> linker script /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a:1: syntax error =20 > >The webkit-gtk2 build fails if the ports 'ar' is found before the system >'ar'. > >Check $PATH and put /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin. Okay, that fixed the problem. While it may not be technically a "BUG", it i= s a serious annoyance never-the-less. --=20 Jerry --Sig_//AVZ2JVA=b4bHIhAENfTsoy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUtBiHAAoJEElTsHIJnX8e+ZcH/0FCdnbmemfz559e2zaabRxZ zRQBOm3ZCza++p4/jQu/GsAVIjDpiC0SwstDoizun2bjFdtQ7qpzVUW49nmA8qf3 nFUHT3is4+miZk1O8JY4DTF0MuCbxIRMOz3ASgFioNMhDDPPFO1hGknQj6hTOecA /b074hNBaeScWtR6KoVLzgH4cuUWStUnUIMMF8CI5rKBgL5sHRiuf+MOOWup8Mtv vyBw7lJw7R8J78WheY3u2QXn2rh1ndBxKmqHiNKF0SSW09wZCR6ZvK9FZywNQT61 xWXwjpccPE8/3aew7Xcl45Vjouu1WSb63JT6CgGJ3PPU0BJNJ4iL+leSA71PxRw= =e5aT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//AVZ2JVA=b4bHIhAENfTsoy-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:57:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280A7A52 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7097AFF for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CIvRsJ092778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:57:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0CIvQPL092775; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:57:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:57:26 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris H Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> Message-ID: References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> , <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:57:27 -0700 (MST) Cc: Royce Williams , Deb Goodkin , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:57:45 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Chris H wrote: > Here is where we will clash; I've been riding *BSD for over 20yrs. > It's *biggest* asset has been in it's flexibility -- it wasn't another > Linux "dist", that required me to essentially become a "clone" of > every other Linux install. The Ports system, and /src allowed one to > tailor my build/install to meet *my* needs. I wasn't required, in fact > I was *encouraged*, to have a unique system. Frankly the new pkg(8) > *requirement* was a complete 180 on this philosophy. Huh? It is the same as the old package system, required if you want to use ports or packages. The difference is that pkg is not in base, so it can be easily upgraded without doing an OS upgrade. Ports continue to work as they did with the old package system, only package operations are faster and more reliable. My main complaint with pkg is the persistent misunderstanding that binary packages are a direct replacement for ports. http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pkg.html As for the original topic, BIND in base had the same upgrade problems as the old package system. The port overwriting the base was a convenient but nasty hack. Not even that convenient, because all that changes with the port is the config files are in /usr/local/etc rather than /etc. A chroot adds little security or isolation, and if you want that it should be in a jail or other type of VM anyway. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-ezjail.html#jails-ezjail-example-bind From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:25:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AAAC55 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AED1ED1 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntcmgw07p ([61.9.169.167]) by nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150112192038.XBXT19653.nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw07p> for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:20:38 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nskntcmgw07p with BigPond Outbound id f7Le1p0090KTh74017Leqb; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:20:38 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=JN65Qr2b c=1 sm=1 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=IPki1kwjZaUA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=jl1WCCbAAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=aLd3sdknpERIIQ0rtFEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pmqj3h7ALBAA:10 a=oRGrlLRogwYA:10 a=TgBSecseNJQA:10 a=p51C_0p6NqQA:10 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CJKagS007950 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 06:20:38 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0CJKX3U007947 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 06:20:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 06:20:32 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 In-Reply-To: <20150112142023.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> Message-ID: References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> <20150112142023.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:25:50 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > The webkit-gtk2 build fails if the ports 'ar' is found before the system > 'ar'. > > Check $PATH and put /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin. Only temporarily, I would hope... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server." http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:48:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66D058C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 715531D2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0CJko6b027862; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:46:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Warren Block In-Reply-To: References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> , <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:46:52 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Royce Williams , Deb Goodkin , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:48:10 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:57:26 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Chris H wrote: > > > Here is where we will clash; I've been riding *BSD for over 20yrs. > > It's *biggest* asset has been in it's flexibility -- it wasn't another > > Linux "dist", that required me to essentially become a "clone" of > > every other Linux install. The Ports system, and /src allowed one to > > tailor my build/install to meet *my* needs. I wasn't required, in fact > > I was *encouraged*, to have a unique system. Frankly the new pkg(8) > > *requirement* was a complete 180 on this philosophy. > > Huh? It is the same as the old package system, required if you want to > use ports or packages. The difference is that pkg is not in base, so it > can be easily upgraded without doing an OS upgrade. Ports continue to > work as they did with the old package system, only package operations > are faster and more reliable. Sure, it's intended to *feel* like pkg_, but the (way) it's implemented bears little resemblance to pkg_, and it's implementation also *abruptly* pulled the rug out from under many years of development work, carefully crafted work by development shops to keep their stream flowing smoothly and more efficiently. [I'm kicking a dead horse here] > > My main complaint with pkg is the persistent misunderstanding that > binary packages are a direct replacement for ports. > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pkg.html I'd be inclined to agree here. > > As for the original topic, BIND in base had the same upgrade problems as > the old package system. The port overwriting the base was a convenient > but nasty hack. Not even that convenient, because all that changes with > the port is the config files are in /usr/local/etc rather than /etc. A > chroot adds little security or isolation, and if you want that it should > be in a jail or other type of VM anyway. > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-ezjail.html# Speaking of kicking "dead horses"; I'm still amazed that this topic still continues. I remember the initial discussion on this about 9mos ago, and thought; OK. That seems to make sense. I'd better see if I can cobble up something that mimic's the old setup, so I can keep things going, until I find a suitable replacement for the BIND. Took me less than 2hrs. Point being; there was a fair amount of time before the BIND got yanked (unlike the pkg change). So I'm amazed so many people are, well, amazed. --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:12:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5035EDE; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703BF75A; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAlLw-0004gd-5c; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:12:44 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:12:44 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugzilla Error 503 Service Unavailable Message-ID: <20150112201244.GI44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:12:44 -0000 Hi! > Not sure who to alert to this: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > Error 503 Service Unavailable > > Backend status: Service Unavailable Bugzilla is back -- 53 lost PRs have been re-created as best as can be done. There are updates to PRs missing, both to those 53, and to others. gavin@ is trying to fix those he finds more info about, but if you are aware of a PR you have updated since 2015-01-07 16:07:14 UTC it would be greatly appreciated if you could make the update again. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:23:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969444CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DBB8AF for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:23:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <54B42D38.6010109@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:23:20 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:23:35 -0000 On 2015-01-12 15:02, Jerry wrote: > FreeBSD 10.1 amd64 > > Is anyone besides me having a problem building "webkit-gtk2"? It fails with > this error message: > > CXXLD libWTF.la > CXXLD Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor > /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a: file format not recognized; treating as linker script > /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a:1: syntax error > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > GNUmakefile:40539: recipe for target 'Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor' failed > gmake[1]: *** [Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2/work/webkitgtk-2.4.8' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2 There is a Bugzilla entry concerning this https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196296 However: Due to a maintenance issue, changes to bugs between 2015-01-07 and 2015-01-10 were lost. Please resubmit any updates as appropriate. We apologize for the inconvenience. Anyway, to reliably build webkit-gtk you must enable BOTH WEBGL and WEBAUDIO, otherwise the build will fail. Cheers, //per From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:50:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445A5F50 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x22f.google.com (mail-yh0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F28EBBF2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f73so10738501yha.6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:50:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dpdtech.com; s=google; h=from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=b8/g7HLz6PBfFcpsh9ureW5uF8JCOSDoZ0TwIXyObEA=; b=bwA0lRoTOgElFpr/AQ1G4e708STEnweqVfxDtAderaxRFzeOARyxK4SrONs1nPzwr8 AI4/wjrjKRXcumpUcDWkUS/g6UCPl27VtXWuKZLhBRVLdifp9dNOxGBZkjCxfA7tpgL1 6F4aNC9DGmbURiyz0cEbJa86fPf+lTD8yz2Xo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=b8/g7HLz6PBfFcpsh9ureW5uF8JCOSDoZ0TwIXyObEA=; b=DmpuMeCep/Ttmwtc9qKBKc59fUaJqCLRHWiU1ikKtAu42kXlL6S1zbCLlD9K2D7z6N KuGx52C17PpOVZGzS4NRtul1aeaIvchcKLKNxETfL4pb3S5z0/sGYA30LWM4U7xWEZvu Ti4wAUWmVscizon18J2G3OzbNKrIxqABCb9eZQ2ZaMziy0e13N5+g4LHbzpCri2zYPZF ffvfO2zsSgnv2/33gUDraJ3fqPkwXyTr29SaeYj3X3jkHEawZEIrjQKfTpZUWTAK/Y1G 1lS1TNiO0YbD/8UJWjNQt4zLWqRXyj1TJKktUE96ER7/t8iNLuuOIGngRwxcHrpOHOXC Hzmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPoi/Vw9+xrMKo/u6Uh3CGdV+upiSKiakRV6FrhLjkt987OBg6Qcl2rD677kFTi01dosWf X-Received: by 10.170.134.77 with SMTP id a74mr27256538ykc.6.1421095830937; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:50:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:9:2503:2900:a8ff:383b:e30d:5325? ([2601:9:2503:2900:a8ff:383b:e30d:5325]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m15sm11268572yhm.45.2015.01.12.12.50.29 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:50:30 -0800 (PST) From: "David P. Discher" X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_639DDACF-6C6D-4B59-A226-6B046426AFF3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Subject: FreeBSD Port: poudriere-3.1.1 - issues with incremental sanity checks Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:50:27 -0800 Message-Id: <86396309-64C7-46CB-A1D4-7122A0CAE8BB@dpdtech.com> To: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:50:32 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_639DDACF-6C6D-4B59-A226-6B046426AFF3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hey Bryan - Not sure where else to report this, but for awhile now, I=E2=80=99ve = been having trouble doing incremental builds - the sanity checks are = failing anytime the ports tree is updated. It=E2=80=99s unclear to me why the dependancies aren=E2=80=99t being = found correctly, as they are all present in the port trees. I can = manually do multiple passes with sanity checks off, adding the missing = ports to my build lists, and eventually can get everything built. Once = there, I can run a pass with sanity checks on, of course nothing to = build, but the sanity checks then pass. Please let me know what kind of debugging information to provide or what = I might be doing wrong. Thanks ! - David P. Discher http://davidpdischer.com/ AIM: DavidDPD | Y!M: daviddpdz Mobile: 408.368.3725 --Apple-Mail=_639DDACF-6C6D-4B59-A226-6B046426AFF3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUtDOUAAoJEEmwU6XuhYWOnSYH/iBOkIIk10z8NgtdFHrlFI9M Cz4ywKKB2LWhzeyBNt1yc5hAgmYzvYUxe5p37gDa45IdwgfoY+DqePTWC0Gzm0hw 1wRIsXM4HxS7Pa2hOkQYvYbf+dPwwF3HGgULa8YOmsizoNeL3mv2pHDJYR0boRD2 fgADBIW7fDFsJXLe4/yTpjcKmbrcmr1YZd5TFhNpcRTgpXtBWDAeVefNbPtvA98R /5JLY0jhnWuuFrgekyxgtmuOls1QS13nTl6EdGEVeVdtZTV2NtVPCfDWUepfQOrJ rQgamFjqWWg9pA86DBuSB3vPg81Cy7uXUl4KdJLv+lpjxoPOk82B7unaMUquPUo= =xrLR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_639DDACF-6C6D-4B59-A226-6B046426AFF3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 21:05:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7AC7A2; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhub.siol.net (mailoutvs3.siol.net [213.250.19.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE43D4D; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.siol.net (Zimbra) with ESMTP id 80FC152258C; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at psrvmta01.zcs-production.pri Received: from mailhub.siol.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psrvmta01.zcs-production.pri [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BG2Gg4wsBy7e; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate.unitedpeople.net. (BSN-143-58-33.dynamic.siol.net [89.143.58.33]) (Authenticated sender: miklav25) by mailhub.siol.net (Zimbra) with ESMTPSA id 2339F52237E; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.8.149] (tpwi.unitedpeople.net [192.168.8.149]) by gate.unitedpeople.net. (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t0CL5mnn084500; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from karel.miklav@siol.net) Message-ID: <54B4372C.9040803@siol.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:48 +0100 From: Karel Miklav User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , Stefan Ehmann , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:05:57 -0000 On 12.01.2015 18:55, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do it, > and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, that is, > one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for it :-) > Now, there's a good chance that it will be slower than rebuilding all the > dependencies. What about the logic in pkg, aren't both programs solving the same problem? Regards, Karel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 22:10:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7935CCF3; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09ED46AF; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q59so21624903wes.8; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:10:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FA/seNCejjvMmipIj44YSgiWvwDUGFoz0xGeg/7xARI=; b=rWfdA51vTm+U9iSyQSiySmq0+V4lC7zJdFQQgrWzIIMkHYAS5w4T6HFXvAxK+dkkQi YQ1/9HTOlqwpuY39KsNTepwP+Wzb+n336wqDLwYfXuEZ0jL8QYOTyeKcCqe6q5fDpmiA d86F0JTE5zwr5dGptfgLwM3P+oFTta8jGfBECmzjxWulaYogANyJ+hZkNaz3ceedheDh 7jN203f5mE9HGgxgYAcG3qWj6zWnqRFl5GloThKoc9rJA71ATV0q/pnyBNYrfjgmN1Q6 V9NOaHKHab8ZRf33C2/+zPmnsk7CApkBNTdfTLB1SN5ogGbFotKWO43LzuuuHWTrzKCy TYhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.143 with SMTP id l15mr34004949wiv.24.1421100648505; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.198.52 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.198.52 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:10:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150112201244.GI44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <201501121235.t0CCZqKN084486@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> <20150112201244.GI44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 23:10:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bugzilla Error 503 Service Unavailable From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:10:50 -0000 El 12/01/2015 21:12, "Kurt Jaeger" escribi=C3=B3: > > Hi! > > > Not sure who to alert to this: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > > > Error 503 Service Unavailable > > > > Backend status: Service Unavailable > > Bugzilla is back -- 53 lost PRs have been re-created as best as can be > done. > > There are updates to PRs missing, both to those 53, and to others. > > gavin@ is trying to fix those he finds more info about, but if you are > aware of a PR you have updated since 2015-01-07 16:07:14 UTC it would be > greatly appreciated if you could make the update again. Thanks for taking bugzilla back online! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 22:37:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ADA9629 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A713995 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D7610F00; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:29:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424C81C29F; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:29:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 050D21C29E; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:29:37 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:29:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20150113.072921.144888678.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Please commit Bug 195956 From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:37:41 -0000 Dear Committers, Would someone please commit Bug 195956 with maintainer timeout? Because this is security fix it should be committed ASAP. Bug 195956 - textproc/libyaml: Fix CVE-2014-9130 and Add LICENSE https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195956 Best Regards --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:14:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DCDAB7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B46AB75 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 189BC56083; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:14:40 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:14:40 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Roger Marquis Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150113011439.GA16766@lonesome.com> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:14:41 -0000 Thanks to the various folks in this thread for reminding me why I stepped down from portmgr. I really don't have the heart these days to argue with people. Y'all have fun. I won't be contributing any more to this thread. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:41:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 695744C5 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8EE3EB for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0D7es7j035194 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:40:55 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0D7es7j035194 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t0D7es7j035194; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54B4CBF6.70001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:40:38 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net> <54B4372C.9040803@siol.net> In-Reply-To: <54B4372C.9040803@siol.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cDbEKkQ0qX8wNtvcwfnX4dbiMbpoG2QAB" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:41:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cDbEKkQ0qX8wNtvcwfnX4dbiMbpoG2QAB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/01/2015 21:05, Karel Miklav wrote: > On 12.01.2015 18:55, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> > Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do= it, >> > and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, t= hat is, >> > one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for it :-) >> > Now, there's a good chance that it will be slower than rebuilding al= l the >> > dependencies. > What about the logic in pkg, aren't both programs solving the same prob= lem? No, the problems solved by pkg and poudriere are very different. pkg(8) has the massive advantage that it already has access to the built packages, including analysis of the dynamic linkage of all the binaries included there. That makes it relatively simple for pkg to work out if a change in some dependency has had a material effect on the package being considered. poudriere only knows that the dependency changed. In effect, to find out if the package of interest would be changed because of that, it has no other recourse than to build the package. Now, if you can come up with some heuristics whereby you can examine the changes to a port and determine that they will not cause significant downstream changes, and do that reliably and faster than just rebuilding the package, then I'm sure the poudriere developers would be eager to incorporate them. Failing that, poudriere re-building everything that might be affected is the sensible choice. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --cDbEKkQ0qX8wNtvcwfnX4dbiMbpoG2QAB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUtMwFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATaScP/jVIjyDti9ejXuwUB+hZVwzp 4CbFfc3d1xaphkP4nwJWTMUtlO/CzZNcQqdRpoCbn17CyQsDrItdVyWUQoE4OM2a ioqYKZUgEkIHGuELE+FuqmwAsJdov6QUoJvMOLjaUuTiXZ0KF85b32OqQAct43vi egWCJWRuoiW2E+YDGAXrjvi0h6n7eBTo/2XxEm+Am8dZN+6v/+g/n9cSKjXk2ZwX 7FBjsyJiXAdq/FzFpa18A+lfonUemSATKiDKw/EtBQKzW2Kc4rKpUcWKHPSxd7Iz tm4y3uS3Qfqs10EZM1ZxFn5SY8E0er51a7fYu4AKyoYCmPQcW00uPaDLVbVE2qij Tur9W208cW/Kw9zJl7gZQcr0nXyzvl2dsnTQbGOmTB2dzE2Bn3n76oVjoaGVDG0L 6ZBsKltamn0tw2wBZYHRSrEAZHi9yDjZiV7522m6a62hnbAVLKOnIoR7DWF+99r2 xpfvUH04IBkC7nRqDzwuPuVELQ2tW0aq0CnJzgQw5Chhv64XI18XCp/Qnj6rB+1/ mLSMy0BvKuEy3vaBEZc6ENMBqpP+Bb2C0saJIzEevD9dYiZS2IysPAAt8Z2nrAx1 +xKQYCN6uCKHsc63dTi0v9ahz94J40usPT586Q46KSy2VBUazRtvwE5JsOuvotxz fWnhTAxdX9s62Q2PTGe2 =B+6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cDbEKkQ0qX8wNtvcwfnX4dbiMbpoG2QAB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:39:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BB8599 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406B3AC6 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so18611571wib.1 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iqxw2N/yWmOgeLbxMbX/xWqgRPT2U/h2hN+b8y9F6S4=; b=veGLXwOjdcHbiCeYbsGOUgWFkLgM2rQ0v+hS+I5v96AO2TwWBM8Ark6RipfrS6TFEp 821oUw7VaURK7cwegQ6DijE621u/BDhUEb3uBg/L5diNrZRdqal0ueDMrVD1FDUHy0Dw xYzPMzYnwngxO3JayYNKTT11FSomFxH9Xn6dRnUFGjhc2dW/93zG6/72XeQVqPpkrmzE wOoyYBQH5r9QQRloaA0gkAONhGxCto41GiFlWadgvFsQC+5olpVVzldKc3ODKQqiIVHy H9mgqSXtL+gbRt5Z+UKXUwJ92Fo9qhduTSkhnGWTlfbLve5vNAZF+owXf9z9N6FK5CaI gj8g== X-Received: by 10.180.11.140 with SMTP id q12mr38138116wib.45.1421138355285; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm24764003wjx.9.2015.01.13.00.39.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:39:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:39:12 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Stefan Ehmann Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? Message-ID: <20150113083911.GG17273@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ulDeV4rPMk/y39in" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:39:17 -0000 --ulDeV4rPMk/y39in Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 12:03:54PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to=20 > manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds= =20 > don't quite work as I expected. >=20 > poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If there= =20 > are only some ports with new versions, possibly hundreds of packages are= =20 > rebuilt. So far it looks like I'll end up rebuilding packages like=20 > libreoffice/KDE/chromium several times a week. The rebuilt packages=20 > won't even be installed by 'pkg upgrade' because their version number=20 > has not changed. >=20 > That's a huge waste of resources. With portmaster only ports with=20 > increased version numbers are rebuilt. >=20 > Can I use poudriere to rebuild only packages where the version number=20 > changed? >=20 The problem here in consistency while in theory we can cherry-pick what we really want to rebuild based on libraries provided/required in binary packa= ges poudriere has to deal with the ports tree and compatibility. The ports tree was a heavy user of pkg_add which became pkg add, this tool = was relying on the version of dependencies as registered in the package creatio= n: - A-v1 was depending on B-v2 if B-v2 is bumped to B-v3 then A-v1 dependency chain is broken in regard pkg_add. Just for that we have no choices but rebuilding everything that depends on B This can now be "easily" fixed because pkg_install is gone and we do not ha= ve to rely on compatiblity with it anymore, the problem is people willing to work= on that (flexible dependencies and smart dependencies) have been mostly killed= by the nightmare this compatibility has introduced into pkg. Lots of scripts still rely on the pkg_add behaviour and until all of them a= re killed I'm afraid we won't be able to prevent those massive rebuilds. That is if you are doing the things correctly. Now there is an alternative. Introduce a new repository format for file:// kind of url (like Zypper) whi= ch will not need all the metadata and be blazing fast to produce. Use pkg inst= all instead of pkg add in ports and then we can reduce the massive rebuilds to = only rebuild things that really requires a library and only a library being removed/upgraded. Any volunteers? regards, Bapt --ulDeV4rPMk/y39in Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlS02a0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyU5QCfR9JlnMtjZe/kOOVhUh/2SPWL /tsAn1QmvtBmwHwEHfguO11/KG7g+hTF =Hjbk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ulDeV4rPMk/y39in-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:46:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3820794 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9D7BB0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y19so1527564wgg.4 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:46:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mcnhealthcare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uQ3cNOiUUx11ChloTSeZDpOCu9AD8MUF0MyRmIkt8PY=; b=ouVtCVK5tMAHV1pFUFMGsp6RngK87JdbwejozPZzpKkUiK3YfzR5JIAfM1GHBzrFxc l1bP6LfLLwaDWF+PSWQ4MCohmtfAWFTnTVovNYXTph3NB5LE65RQ5zQ6XJHYlhqhVU+1 1rOIaL1byBJJ+XCd6k0sokJW33M1r+eE7bocg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uQ3cNOiUUx11ChloTSeZDpOCu9AD8MUF0MyRmIkt8PY=; b=LrLinYNmsgjimCg/3PfJQm2xj+DaidfkUmFh0w2wSVVUXhEjsjAsccrOgri0jg8cOf 06fDtJuozpfyskz6IvIe9lo5lZ568vuhlT8mM0fknSZfZcuwekaCqgf410flbTyF3B88 Lxhvu3qweSv2TTaqI++2PpR9/knBV0dzB8Wksi9ONO/ftjIQEkp3jnewMgu9jViA0K9T Vliv5L9P+8NusnL0O3w7HK2NbXisznQSjnwExTw6QU9AgaKpPdEstJIc1QSV7S8PxC+g xrCe2ZU+tTp85WpURoZSrGBfkxgKGsRWL/2U17Y6EzBpbgSOYdRd+d+pRXENU51GoPSB vqZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHXK/MvN6tggSNXf7M1poWmxfHbnpnPtQlPsNr3REZA8HlRASOKBfmYcJYaj+4/KJDThSu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.2.34 with SMTP id 2mr9742470wjr.58.1421138783146; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.1.198 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:46:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:46:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Opera, still functional, 'one cannot make new configs' etc since v9 > v10 From: Fred Woods To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:46:25 -0000 I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 adm64 p5, with gtk2 off. KDE4 Plasma X server. Radeon xorg driver (ATI 7750 card). Got an error about missing libfreetype.so.9, but the browser seemed to work fine. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:02:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8490C38 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D74613 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DA2jFo028446 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:02:45 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0DA2jIH028445; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:02:45 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201501131002.t0DA2jIH028445@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:02:45 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:02:45 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/py-s3cmd | 1.5.0-rc1 | 1.5.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/trac | 1.0.1 | 1.1.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-clocks/wmclock | 1.0.14 | 1.0.15 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:53:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3496C326 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5E5116 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell.bebik.local (unknown [78.194.61.125]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1682D9400ED for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:51:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from shell.bebik.local ([192.168.1.101]) by shell.bebik.local (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0DDnWHC034469 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:49:32 GMT (envelope-from rodrigo@shell.bebik.local) Received: (from rodrigo@localhost) by shell.bebik.local (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t0DDnVeG034468 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:49:32 GMT (envelope-from rodrigo) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:49:31 +0000 From: Rodrigo Osorio To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: getpatch scripit rewroted in plain shell Message-ID: <20150113134931.GA27220@shell.bebik.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:53:02 -0000 Hi ports :) For a long time, I was missing some features in the exising getpatch script ( svn repo Tools/scripts/getpatch) and since I'm not a py fan boy, I rewrote the tool in plain shell. This is its storry.... The new features are : - use the bug id as a directory to store the attachements inside (can be turned off) - decide if you want or not obsolete patches (by default is no) - an env variable to define where attachements are stored (by default ./) - be verbose - only uses tools from base example : rodrigo@scotty % printenv GETPATCH_DIR /home/rodrigo/patches/ rodrigo@scotty % getpatch 191840 Bug ID: 191840 + att-144615: pidgin-gnome-keyring.tar.gz is obsolete, skip + att-144641: pidgin-gnome-keyring.tar.gz download success + att-144642: pidgin-gnome-keyring-1.20_1.txz download success >> Patches stored in /usr/home/rodrigo/patches/191840 The code is here : http://files.bebik.net/code/getpatch Suggestions and comments are wellcomed Regards, - rodrigo PS: There are room for improvements, I know. Bugzilla request can be reduced to a single one but this leads to xml and b64 management in shell, and it sounds a little bit insane to me... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:55:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9E37542 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F54FA91 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14F033C1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:54:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D98D13983C; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:54:53 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net> <54B4372C.9040803@siol.net> <54B4CBF6.70001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:54:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54B4CBF6.70001@FreeBSD.org> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:40:38 +0000") Message-ID: <44vbkabuiq.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:55:06 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > poudriere only knows that the dependency changed. In effect, to find > out if the package of interest would be changed because of that, it has > no other recourse than to build the package. Now, if you can come up > with some heuristics whereby you can examine the changes to a port and > determine that they will not cause significant downstream changes, and > do that reliably and faster than just rebuilding the package, then I'm > sure the poudriere developers would be eager to incorporate them. > > Failing that, poudriere re-building everything that might be affected is > the sensible choice. If I know that only the actually changed ports need to be rebuilt, I go into my jail but instead of running poudriere, I use "portmaster -g". Unfortunately, it's really easy to be wrong about "knowing" that. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:12:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70B71957 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E720C72 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7534BDC5C; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:12:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BEA5BDC3E; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:12:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5D56115; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:12:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9235A7B13244; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:12:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:12:32 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: The BSD Dreamer , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: dougb@dougbarton.us X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:12:39 -0000 I'm only going to answer that part, the rest of the thread being, I feel, mostly FUD. +--On 10 janvier 2015 21:25:11 -0600 The BSD Dreamer wrote: | Count the | PORTREVISIONs to bind before 9.9.4 and after. Plus look at all the other | annoying changes in those PORTREVISIONs without that things have been | working fine for the rest of us before. Yes, let's say there are two kinds of maintainers, those who keep the bugs they find in the port until there is a new release to an absolute minimum so that people are not scared of the number of changes, and there are those, like me, that would rather have a dozen updates between releases, each addressing a bug when it arises. The BIND ports were in such a miserable way, with kludges everywhere, when I took over that it took me some time to get them right. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:13:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF609E7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23F2CC78 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DFBijH035413; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:11:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Rodrigo Osorio In-Reply-To: <20150113134931.GA27220@shell.bebik.local> References: <20150113134931.GA27220@shell.bebik.local> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: getpatch scripit rewroted in plain shell Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:11:44 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <31b09270cbbd866005dca3e1584f3f9c@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:13:06 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:49:31 +0000 Rodrigo Osorio wrote > Hi ports :) > > For a long time, I was missing some features in the exising getpatch script > ( svn repo Tools/scripts/getpatch) and since I'm not a py fan boy, I rewrote > the tool in plain shell. This is its storry.... > > The new features are : > - use the bug id as a directory to store the attachements inside (can be > turned off) - decide if you want or not obsolete patches (by default is no) > - an env variable to define where attachements are stored (by default ./) > - be verbose > - only uses tools from base > > example : > rodrigo@scotty % printenv GETPATCH_DIR > /home/rodrigo/patches/ > > rodrigo@scotty % getpatch 191840 > Bug ID: 191840 > + att-144615: pidgin-gnome-keyring.tar.gz is obsolete, skip > + att-144641: pidgin-gnome-keyring.tar.gz download success > + att-144642: pidgin-gnome-keyring-1.20_1.txz download success > >> Patches stored in /usr/home/rodrigo/patches/191840 > > The code is here : http://files.bebik.net/code/getpatch > > Suggestions and comments are wellcomed Looks good. Your native language appears to be français. :) I would only offer grammatical changes: s/a dedicate/the dedicated/g s/dedicate/dedicated/g # I try to avoid contractions because some shells trip on the apostrophe. s/Can\'t/Unable to/g s/catched/caught/g Bon travail! --Chris > > Regards, > - rodrigo > > PS: There are room for improvements, I know. Bugzilla request can be reduced > to a single one but this leads to xml and b64 management in shell, and it > sounds a little bit insane to me... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:23:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29032F81; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C1FD9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DFKuq1041579; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:20:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: The BSD Dreamer , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold In-Reply-To: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: , <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:20:56 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dougb@dougbarton.us X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:23:26 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:12:32 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote > I'm only going to answer that part, the rest of the thread being, I feel, > mostly FUD. Apologies for any contribution(s) I might have made in that area. > > +--On 10 janvier 2015 21:25:11 -0600 The BSD Dreamer > wrote: > | Count the > | PORTREVISIONs to bind before 9.9.4 and after. Plus look at all the other > | annoying changes in those PORTREVISIONs without that things have been > | working fine for the rest of us before. > > Yes, let's say there are two kinds of maintainers, those who keep the bugs > they find in the port until there is a new release to an absolute minimum > so that people are not scared of the number of changes, and there are > those, like me, that would rather have a dozen updates between releases, > each addressing a bug when it arises. > > The BIND ports were in such a miserable way, with kludges everywhere, when > I took over that it took me some time to get them right. I saw that mess -- more than once. Thank you for taking that on! --Chris > > -- > Mathieu Arnold > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:24:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7872F8F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (108-248-95-193.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [108.248.95.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FC1DA7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0DFODrN025093 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:24:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:24:13 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> , <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net>, <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:24:15 -0000 On 01/12/15 11:46, Chris H wrote: > >> My main complaint with pkg is the persistent misunderstanding that >> binary packages are a direct replacement for ports. >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pkg.html > I'd be inclined to agree here. > > There are some ports that almost demand a local version - apr (Apache Portability Library) being one of them. Currently, I am locking 'apr' so that pkg upgrade does not clobber apr, and this has worked so far. Just an observation. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:32:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758E1690 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38787EAC for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell.bebik.local (unknown [78.194.61.125]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606FB940128; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:31:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from shell.bebik.local ([192.168.1.101]) by shell.bebik.local (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0DFTP9t036889; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:29:25 GMT (envelope-from rodrigo@shell.bebik.local) Received: (from rodrigo@localhost) by shell.bebik.local (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t0DFTPiQ036888; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:29:25 GMT (envelope-from rodrigo) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:29:24 +0000 From: Rodrigo Osorio To: Chris H Subject: Re: getpatch scripit rewroted in plain shell Message-ID: <20150113152914.GA34923@shell.bebik.local> References: <20150113134931.GA27220@shell.bebik.local> <31b09270cbbd866005dca3e1584f3f9c@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <31b09270cbbd866005dca3e1584f3f9c@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:32:51 -0000 On 13/01/15 07:11 -0800, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:49:31 +0000 Rodrigo Osorio wrote > > > Hi ports :) > > > > For a long time, I was missing some features in the exising getpatch script > > ( svn repo Tools/scripts/getpatch) and since I'm not a py fan boy, I rewrote > > the tool in plain shell. This is its storry.... > > > > The new features are : > > - use the bug id as a directory to store the attachements inside (can be > > turned off) - decide if you want or not obsolete patches (by default is no) > > - an env variable to define where attachements are stored (by default ./) > > - be verbose > > - only uses tools from base > > > > example : > > rodrigo@scotty % printenv GETPATCH_DIR > > /home/rodrigo/patches/ > > > > rodrigo@scotty % getpatch 191840 > > Bug ID: 191840 > > + att-144615: pidgin-gnome-keyring.tar.gz is obsolete, skip > > + att-144641: pidgin-gnome-keyring.tar.gz download success > > + att-144642: pidgin-gnome-keyring-1.20_1.txz download success > > >> Patches stored in /usr/home/rodrigo/patches/191840 > > > > The code is here : http://files.bebik.net/code/getpatch > > > > Suggestions and comments are wellcomed > Looks good. > Your native language appears to be français. :) > I would only offer grammatical changes: > > s/a dedicate/the dedicated/g > > s/dedicate/dedicated/g > > # I try to avoid contractions because some shells trip on the apostrophe. > s/Can\'t/Unable to/g > > s/catched/caught/g > > Bon travail! > > --Chris > > > > Regards, > > - rodrigo > > > > PS: There are room for improvements, I know. Bugzilla request can be reduced > > to a single one but this leads to xml and b64 management in shell, and it > > sounds a little bit insane to me... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Chris, Thanks for your feedback, I really appreciate your contribution. The file now includes the suggested changes. - rodrigo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:46:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54BCD1CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A43FE7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0DFkGbh045591 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:46:17 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0DFkGbh045591 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1421163978; bh=AeuJhhtx5/nzLrLsoW1638ro0JRtmg+h0gfnqaySkFI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Tue,=2013=20Jan=202015=2015:46:16=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-ports@ freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20BIND=20REPLACE_BASE=20option|Referenc es:=20=20<20 150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org>=20<20150112040129.GA16097@l onesome.com>=20=20<20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com>=20<54B3 BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net>=20<20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com>=20< 54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net>=20<20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> =20=20,= 20=20<9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net>,=20=20<9f016d9eec43a047bc fbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net>=20<54B5389D.2020708@astart.com>|In -Reply-To:=20<54B5389D.2020708@astart.com>; b=BqYYpczqXoProQJNxFHzpLZequKBIwdB1sS5Y9gxWDrnaSaSWN+MkyRwoHR7tYUkx woFIcxvNT5ZivkGhhxhMJfKwJFwnL/hHgXCmp7BTv4npY9pgRNK4C6N2Ve1YpQkqIo 0XT1yTR3cJ6Qavh7WGPftTYgec5l1neyxxXUC8KY= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:46:16 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> , <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net>, <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T5LwUu7K8cj9BQAkjot9SPAlgVMnP7bX5" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:46:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --T5LwUu7K8cj9BQAkjot9SPAlgVMnP7bX5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/13/15 15:24, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 01/12/15 11:46, Chris H wrote: >> >>> My main complaint with pkg is the persistent misunderstanding that >>> binary packages are a direct replacement for ports. >>> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pkg.html >> I'd be inclined to agree here. The aim with pkg(8) in this regard was to make it possible to maintain a machine using only binary packages. Something that it has succeeded at, given the proviso that you have access to a repo with all the customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing several machines / jails etc. You don't need a ports tree on every single machine, and the length of your intervention on a production server is pretty much as long as 'pkg upgrade' takes to run, which is much quicker and less intrusive than running builds locally. However, while pkg(8) now has the right mechanics to maintain a machine with binaries only, the ports tree is still (despite all the work that has been going into it recently) not yet set up to support doing that very effectively. In essence, we'd need to be building several different 'flavours' for certain packages, along with various other enhancements like sub-packages and PROVIDES/REQUIRES style dependencies. Note that *none* of this is going to impede building stuff straight out of ports in the time honoured fashion. That simply is not on the pkg(8) agenda. > There are some ports that almost demand a local version - apr (Apache > Portability Library) being one of them. > Currently, I am locking 'apr' so that pkg upgrade does not clobber > apr, and this has worked so far. >=20 > Just an observation. Yes, absolutely. The configurability with the ports tree is one of it's major benefits, and yet also a significant hindrance in many circumstance= s. Cheers, Matthew --T5LwUu7K8cj9BQAkjot9SPAlgVMnP7bX5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUtT3IXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnO/4P/A57NXYgJbJkVKjLMEsLei85 EwyOgsLQeeY0ngCCA158xMIysUEVGy7jGpk7V+G+M7L5tPBZs8a/76vrZ20M2M2+ FEGzHzbecxij1j76C0tJ8sb6NllexVqGqaROJZ9p/5HGr3Y1nqoXlVsXnD871DlX YRjMZOyhdmx72F0A6uIdz12u6QFPSop9K7cpw2wJGNC4JhKyDMyoh7BUYAIWp+/t XxiubOfQo2VK85ZAeUkhJRNwcbQtzcLmKeHUPRv4uZTcA+zbCRaX653v+io8kyKM Y5UgQXIMw6KH85h70fhS48L98oAE4/TtkmAKXYsD8BcKE0V8+FMKP/AS4bymE4vr 3HsO/FGESnyu49PuNlqfXeM0E5IJ/ECaq8H2g2feSH1JK5X1tAwj4Xa7UYOf1Rzn lYbwCjEIdv2y/ROPgiNz9ekkXkM5vwY+hwS2Jh3tMvmJ6AflgYRGuTFESYYLK+LW sYyg0/gaN8xN5mew9SsYB37VU7nxMS45lkqDQSxHOkbCZ31zUjbUDNvDk8QCR4qK tIWDbQSFgDr77I13+q1emUs1AjyqJtKDTpQ1u74X1f1d+Q8aZE9/RR6DIhGJ4ive nsND9mqIqKqk6/ItETIllddkKQ48D20rG/tAL3J0MhNnYzubQbgIOAKZ8uZytGv7 WWeZRtdtoTlKGWN/yins =pKzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T5LwUu7K8cj9BQAkjot9SPAlgVMnP7bX5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:55:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA785B0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED8818D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YB3ov-0006WL-GN; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:55:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:55:53 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:55:55 -0000 Hi! > customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it > for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run > your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing > several machines / jails etc. poudriere allows you to manage several seperate pkg trees with different options, so you can: - build a default tree (and pkg repo), provide it to all generic hosts - build a seperate tree (and pkg repo) with modified options, and provide it to the special hosts It helps to keep the poudriere build tree on fast flash/SSD drives 8-} This all works and is very, very good! Thanks for the work! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:24:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67960237 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1BFF768 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DGNLtv080202; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:23:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Matthew Seaman , Kurt Jaeger In-Reply-To: <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk>, <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:23:21 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <53dae4ee235698d94a35f1fd9cd33065@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:24:35 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:55:53 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote > Hi! > > > customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it > > for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run > > your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing > > several machines / jails etc. > > poudriere allows you to manage several seperate pkg trees with different > options, so you can: > > - build a default tree (and pkg repo), provide it to all generic hosts > - build a seperate tree (and pkg repo) with modified options, and > provide it to the special hosts I use a similar, but somewhat different strategy. Which works nice if you have any spare hardware available. I simply use a fresh install of whatever RELEASE/RELENG I'm chasing. * create a dump(8) to external storage * build/install (custom) world/kernel * (batch) build install clean ports with desired options * dump to external storage * restore to target host/machine and as Kurt mentioned; flash/SSD media *is* the way to go! :) I ended up going this route because I found the builds ran quicker, and it all ended up being a bit "tidier". Also makes it trivial to "rollback" to any chosen revision. --Chris > > It helps to keep the poudriere build tree on fast flash/SSD drives 8-} > > This all works and is very, very good! Thanks for the work! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go > ! _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:33:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E38E7B5; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C101865; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:33:13 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: The BSD Dreamer , dougb@dougbarton.us, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:33:20 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > I'm only going to answer that part, the rest of the thread being, I feel, > mostly FUD. > ... > The BIND ports were in such a miserable way, with kludges everywhere, when > I took over that it took me some time to get them right. I wish people wouldn't make statements like this. The thread has been informative in many ways and clearly not FUD. I also wish people would not insult previous base and port maintainers by labelling their work buggy or kludgy. All code has bugs. Even having a REPLACE_BASE that only prints "REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported" can be considered a bug. Having two identically named binaries on a system that differ only by path and version can also be considered a kludge (not to mention a security issue). While I'm not personally impacted by the bind port's deprecation of REPLACE_BASE clearly others are. As Doug pointed out this option has been around for well over a decade and like other ports with a REPLACE_BASE option has saved FreeBSD admins a lot of work in cross-platform environments. One question while we're on the topic of deprecations, has 'make pkg || make package' been deprecated in favor of poudriere? Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:45:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB1CF8E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B65A9AE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84E521B22126; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:45:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54B54BB8.2080606@toco-domains.de> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:45:44 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Woods Subject: Re: games/wesnoth: How to cope with "invalid DSO for symbol `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'" References: <54AFB90B.2070209@toco-domains.de> <54AFD249.7090001@toco-domains.de> <54B0DD38.8080503@toco-domains.de> In-Reply-To: <54B0DD38.8080503@toco-domains.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:45:54 -0000 On 10.01.2015 09:05, Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote: >>> What is the output of the following command on both computers (the one >>> it works on and the one it doesn't)? >>> # pkg info boost-libs >> >> At the moment i just have access to the *not* working one. I try to find >> time at the weekend to look up the information at the other one. >> >> Because i don't know if you can already see something, i post the >> requested info for the *not* working one directly: >> >> === start === >> >> [output] > === end === > > As you can see they just differ in Architecture. After some searching and trying i can confirm, that adding this line fix the problem: LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lboost_system I don't understand why, but that's a huge step forward :) Next step: cleaning the pkg-plist :) Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:08:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32657D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F05CF355 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wp4so3896917obc.6 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4dz/wSj4Vvr9/xfRNdLt2PuwpmwLjlNiagVxsl/pY7o=; b=er0xOk4IOQQ6wYYdO3/t9rfpaAxARUkg3TJIV3WghNi4ZPHkxsZvIrk6hpFd/XtT37 b0u5Roj1enfaNvVHinH3Zagqj1G5b/PkHQZqjjT8kZCBMQ4t+LO7oJ0QB/HWNESeAVy9 t286/vQE60b57m5koyleScrlKuaP0PsdelytKNu5i64FtsI7StdrbgxNUC/Susl/8SeY GSjTAz12OZJvIlcPB2AK9Irw7VUmFoXnfQmp/3qf8XWCgIGqnD3xZmVdQZEDSQyxKTdI PTOC2u/3B8PSAxV8jUCXN8Kgjz+LgDwUJc4BhB5+MMSGrilcLE0/dNm80dZwtQPJSQbY R48Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.54.86 with SMTP id d83mr20561366oia.55.1421172485159; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.76.71 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? From: Freddie Cash To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:08:06 -0000 Good morning, With the requirement for the NONE cipher in OpenSSH requiring a custom compile of the world or a custom compile of the openssh-portable port (all my production servers are binary-package-only now), I've started using bbcp instead of "zfs send" over SSH. And looking at using bbcp instead of rsync over SSH for another system (transfer speed is more important than encrypting the data as the transfer is done over a very local LAN link). The bbcp port is version 20120520; the latest version available is 20140902. There have been several new features added over the past 2 years that make it (at least on paper) a decent rsync replacement for our uses. Is there anyone interested in bringing this port up-to-date. I had a quick look, but it requires some C hacking that's beyond my skills. :( I've only tried compiling it with clang, which gives lots of errors. Haven't tried with gcc, though. I have 3 FreeBSD 9.3 systems that transfer data to a 4th FreeBSD 9.3 system using "zfs send" over bbcp that can be used for testing things. As well as a Debian 7.0 box that can be tested for pulling data off a FreeBSD system. I'd prefer to not install the ports tree on any of the production systems, but I could spin up a KVM-based VM if needed. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:18:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67AB8FA0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3829B671 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DIHaHZ053790; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:17:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash In-Reply-To: References: From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:17:36 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:18:49 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote > Good morning, > > With the requirement for the NONE cipher in OpenSSH requiring a custom > compile of the world or a custom compile of the openssh-portable port (all > my production servers are binary-package-only now), I've started using bbcp > instead of "zfs send" over SSH. And looking at using bbcp instead of rsync > over SSH for another system (transfer speed is more important than > encrypting the data as the transfer is done over a very local LAN link). > > The bbcp port is version 20120520; the latest version available is > 20140902. There have been several new features added over the past 2 years > that make it (at least on paper) a decent rsync replacement for our uses. > > Is there anyone interested in bringing this port up-to-date. I had a quick > look, but it requires some C hacking that's beyond my skills. :( I've > only tried compiling it with clang, which gives lots of errors. Haven't > tried with gcc, though. I just had a look. Looks interesting. I can't foresee any issue moving it ahead. But before I step up, and say "I'll take it". Have you contacted the maintainer? I don't want to step on any toes. :) --Chris > > I have 3 FreeBSD 9.3 systems that transfer data to a 4th FreeBSD 9.3 system > using "zfs send" over bbcp that can be used for testing things. As well as > a Debian 7.0 box that can be tested for pulling data off a FreeBSD system. > > I'd prefer to not install the ports tree on any of the production systems, > but I could spin up a KVM-based VM if needed. > > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:43:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40355887 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41E4A1C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so4091168obc.1 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:43:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jcEcDK4lSDtu17wwwph70VBvraCBo0U3Bgc5NFGbqTU=; b=Hfm3vnA8OafJKHR8VUhMlgChORcg5w9y55h1t4anIg0DYhY1lylV3JJR4yxjx+vym4 YLt2KAAkZDhkZZI+KgPKR028NBhYkdGqgrcLZnXlcvuJmDc1iHxUi+5eiVkJkUygYvUP TZz0rgcqppernr1tsCjLVrUyKkIXPR+F8nt6dNfcubG9Gv6amJ3tFpk6lgSFXyEPezTL ZF7NYMkZhb43S/aAw06f7blPPSu1pZUiFhzkUGBMD6Ib2P35uIHYKL4QGqZx+EAgeXSu kZSFidDGEo3eryhchy43a2pVuP+Skx9l++ZjGb43M0vIHojwhlGkOI+x+RK2xXdsNSxn FFWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.226.70 with SMTP id z67mr20803042oig.95.1421174595341; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.76.71 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:43:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:43:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? From: Freddie Cash To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , jhein@symmetricom.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:43:16 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote > > > Good morning, > > > > With the requirement for the NONE cipher in OpenSSH requiring a custom > > compile of the world or a custom compile of the openssh-portable port > (all > > my production servers are binary-package-only now), I've started using > bbcp > > instead of "zfs send" over SSH. And looking at using bbcp instead of > rsync > > over SSH for another system (transfer speed is more important than > > encrypting the data as the transfer is done over a very local LAN link)= . > > > > The bbcp port is version 20120520; the latest version available is > > 20140902. There have been several new features added over the past 2 > years > > that make it (at least on paper) a decent rsync replacement for our use= s. > > > > Is there anyone interested in bringing this port up-to-date. I had a > quick > > look, but it requires some C hacking that's beyond my skills. :( I've > > only tried compiling it with clang, which gives lots of errors. Haven'= t > > tried with gcc, though. > > I just had a look. Looks interesting. I can't foresee any issue > moving it ahead. But before I step up, and say "I'll take it". > Have you contacted the maintainer? I don't want to step on any toes. :) > > =E2=80=8BWell, now I feel sheepish. I was looking at the freshports.org page for it and just saw portmgr-related commits to the port and assumed it was maintained by "freebsd-ports" (aka not maintained). I completely missed the little "Maintainer" line at the top. :( I've CC'd the port Maintainer to bring them into the loop.=E2=80=8B =E2=80=8B[Being a past port maintainer, I really should know better.]=E2=80= =8B --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:11:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0489E205 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 917A0CB7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DJAIiB070184; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:10:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Freddie Cash In-Reply-To: References: , From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:10:22 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , jhein@symmetricom.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:36 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:43:15 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Chris H wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:08:05 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote > > > > > Good morning, > > > > > > With the requirement for the NONE cipher in OpenSSH requiring a custom > > > compile of the world or a custom compile of the openssh-portable port > > (all > > > my production servers are binary-package-only now), I've started using > > bbcp > > > instead of "zfs send" over SSH. And looking at using bbcp instead of > > rsync > > > over SSH for another system (transfer speed is more important than > > > encrypting the data as the transfer is done over a very local LAN link). > > > > > > The bbcp port is version 20120520; the latest version available is > > > 20140902. There have been several new features added over the past 2 > > years > > > that make it (at least on paper) a decent rsync replacement for our uses. > > > > > > Is there anyone interested in bringing this port up-to-date. I had a > > quick > > > look, but it requires some C hacking that's beyond my skills. :( I've > > > only tried compiling it with clang, which gives lots of errors. Haven't > > > tried with gcc, though. > > > > > > I just had a look. Looks interesting. I can't foresee any issue > > moving it ahead. But before I step up, and say "I'll take it". > > Have you contacted the maintainer? I don't want to step on any toes. :) > > > > ​Well, now I feel sheepish. > > I was looking at the freshports.org page for it and just saw > portmgr-related commits to the port and assumed it was maintained by > "freebsd-ports" (aka not maintained). I completely missed the little > "Maintainer" line at the top. :( > > I've CC'd the port Maintainer to bring them into the loop.​ > > > ​[Being a past port maintainer, I really should know better.]​ LOL No worries. :) I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) All the best! > > > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:23:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487D8709 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC32BE9B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amavis-proxy-ori.ijs.si (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kMMBn32fmzWC for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; h= user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to:organization :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:mime-version:received:received :received:received; s=jakla4; t=1421176990; x=1423768991; bh=ILd lT/92Qb0b+4xAp2u6T8bs4fqLTU0brkU/ERSblYI=; b=h64Qsv2elIvEKAqwHPD +OL4wb8K7m17RpR8HhntejlWLIGvoLpiE8ExV4ipPdo3qN+64yA3w4wfdjOMnm7I G84RZWOCsfSp9w2x96LiFWs1I3ORdGpXU718sS/6TSS0hhsCengvp8VZ5mzb5RV9 P7Pd/FuiwkW7SuWmbYucjjDU= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([IPv6:::1]) by amavis-proxy-ori.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10012) with ESMTP id VgVM5IGPcewB for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mildred.ijs.si (mailbox.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::143:1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from neli.ijs.si (neli.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80:88:21c:c0ff:feb1:8c91]) by mildred.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kMMBk0GCkzmd for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from neli.ijs.si ([2001:1470:ff80:88:21c:c0ff:feb1:8c91]) by neli.ijs.si with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:09 +0100 From: Mark Martinec To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this =?UTF-8?Q?port=3F?= Organization: J. Stefan Institute In-Reply-To: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> References: , <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> Message-ID: <0bfbb4f1cf86450accd429ccac6b89d1@mailbox.ijs.si> X-Sender: Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:23:17 -0000 Chris H wrote: > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) I had an open request to upgrade sysutils/bbcp since August 2014, apparently the maintainer is absent or not interested. [Bug 192405] Please upgrade sysutils/bbcp, current version does not support IPv6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192405 It would be very nice to bring it up-to-date. Mark From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:29:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA89A2B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB424F0B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YB79g-0006yc-R6; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:29:32 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:29:32 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Chris H Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Message-ID: <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash , jhein@symmetricom.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:29:49 -0000 Hi! > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) I don't think he will (as can be seen from PR 192405). Provide a PR with the patch and I'll commit it after testing the build. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:35:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F060B5D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1683FFCE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DJXasf087161; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:33:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Martinec In-Reply-To: <0bfbb4f1cf86450accd429ccac6b89d1@mailbox.ijs.si> References: , <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net>, <0bfbb4f1cf86450accd429ccac6b89d1@mailbox.ijs.si> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:33:36 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:35:03 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:09 +0100 Mark Martinec wrote > Chris H wrote: > > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) > > I had an open request to upgrade sysutils/bbcp since August 2014, > apparently the maintainer is absent or not interested. > > [Bug 192405] Please upgrade sysutils/bbcp, current version does not > support IPv6 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192405 Ouch! Since *August*? Looks like the maintainer's otherwise occupied. I'm on it. I'll submit a new pr(1) when I'm done, and append a note to your previous one, as well. --Chris > > > It would be very nice to bring it up-to-date. > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:02:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9BD7F4B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E090BD5 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gromit.timing.com (gromit.timing.com [206.168.13.209]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id t0DKt4NV082202; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:55:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jhein@microsemi.com) Received: from gromit.timing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gromit.timing.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0DKsv1P004114; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:54:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jhein@gromit.timing.com) Received: (from jhein@localhost) by gromit.timing.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0DKsuFs004113; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:54:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jhein) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:54:56 -0700 From: John Hein To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? In-Reply-To: <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b-trunk-1500 under 24.4.1 (i386-portbld-freebsd9.3) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash , Chris H X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:17 -0000 Kurt Jaeger wrote at 20:29 +0100 on Jan 13, 2015: > > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) > > I don't think he will (as can be seen from PR 192405). > > Provide a PR with the patch and I'll commit it after testing the build. I'll update it if no one else gets to it this week or review a PR. Willing to hand it over if someone wants it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:04:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0959A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A489ABEE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DL4fEG093223 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:04:41 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0DL4fN8093222 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:04:41 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 39172 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2015 15:04:36 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 13 Jan 2015 15:04:36 -0600 Message-ID: <54B58862.6050704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:04:34 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: games/wesnoth: How to cope with "invalid DSO for symbol `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'" References: <54AFB90B.2070209@toco-domains.de> In-Reply-To: <54AFB90B.2070209@toco-domains.de> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0aMS1LMPP2LrngtB509VSndlnlA5HLQ52" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:04:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0aMS1LMPP2LrngtB509VSndlnlA5HLQ52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/9/2015 5:18 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > [ 3%] mo-update [wesnoth-dw-ar]: Creating mo file. > /usr/bin/ld: g: invalid DSO for symbol > `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' definition > /usr/local/lib/libboost_system.so.1.55.0: could not read symbols: Bad v= alue > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > --- cutter --- Usually this means -lboost_system is missing from the linker line. Recent binutils in recent FreeBSD head has been patched to be more clear about it. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --0aMS1LMPP2LrngtB509VSndlnlA5HLQ52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUtYhmAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfP970IALR8VqXDfKzrLEbfBIkz3ubq ymTjFTpb4MwoWjaP1vpqnmXUe7BniMKfwaBNUR28Q2+9LQxkLhBZOM29UTF6UXlQ fi+tagJGIvRTFOygahE2NayBTuOCmeK/cIMIOEfFqkDdAfxqt52Zr7LnKa9+oaHj SjvSvUljsGBo8VdByjA2Wjcu0g779sQHJnq0vQEHUtmenYmxsqdYG3kUmTYzJ+tI P7JhFjKn6d5NKY+UiBgIgH4lZxGjdv4LWHVawXdvG+JjqQztkdc2EHpzneSDyuha 7qPhioZi20Uzp6kEykyXydj9DrYKTfFbhthURxfi3o8tPfaIu92ffZU01PtYsaY= =AZFg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0aMS1LMPP2LrngtB509VSndlnlA5HLQ52-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:13:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26274341 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7B27CE3 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49986003D0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:13:10 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGwNC-hRHfBY for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7b43:1:922b:34ff:fe56:321]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFA973C; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:13:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:13:09 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 Message-ID: <20150113211309.GA1478@elch.exwg.net> References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> <54B42D38.6010109@intersonic.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B42D38.6010109@intersonic.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:13:14 -0000 ## Per olof Ljungmark (peo@intersonic.se): > > > > CXXLD libWTF.la > > CXXLD Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor > > /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a: file format not recognized; treating as linker script > > /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a:1: syntax error > > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196296 That, and the related/duplicate 196333 and 195500 (webkit-gtk3). > Due to a maintenance issue, changes to bugs between 2015-01-07 and > 2015-01-10 were lost. Please resubmit any updates as appropriate. We > apologize for the inconvenience. Great for those who do not check bugzilla on a daily basis :) > Anyway, to reliably build webkit-gtk you must enable BOTH WEBGL and > WEBAUDIO, otherwise the build will fail. Those options are gone with the update to webkit-gtk 2.4.8 (in both the -gtk2 and the -gtk3 port). There had been two problems, one related to GNU ar and the other one when building with non-default OPTIONS. The latter one has been resolved in r376609, the former one has not been fixed yet - despite rather distinct error messages, the problems have been mixed up in the PRs. Is any gnome@ committer around to commit the rest of the fixes? Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:22:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E84F538 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.revenge.kr0k3n.net (mail.revenge.kr0k3n.net [176.56.237.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A6CDD5 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (ip25053ee9.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [37.5.62.233]) (Authenticated sender: post@filias.name) by mail.revenge.kr0k3n.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3A3A1D6449 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:12:25 +0100 (CET) From: Filias Heidt X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_47B7F20F-2F7B-4331-84EC-B20D1CD4AE51"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Subject: sysutils/logstash leaves me without working file input Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:12:24 +0100 Message-Id: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:22:12 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_47B7F20F-2F7B-4331-84EC-B20D1CD4AE51 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Ports, I installed the latest sysutils/logstash port in a fresh 10.1 jail and = tried the following: # /usr/local/logstash/bin/logstash -f /home/user/src/conf/logstash.conf which gave the following output: Using milestone 2 input plugin 'file'. This plugin should be stable, but = if you see strange behavior, please let us know! For more information on = plugin milestones, see http://logstash.net/docs/1.4.2/plugin-milestones = {:level=3D>:warn} NotImplementedError: stat.st_dev unsupported or native support failed to = load dev_major at org/jruby/RubyFileStat.java:190 _discover_file at = /usr/local/logstash/vendor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/filewatch-0.5.1/lib/filew= atch/watch.rb:140 each at org/jruby/RubyArray.java:1613 _discover_file at = /usr/local/logstash/vendor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/filewatch-0.5.1/lib/filew= atch/watch.rb:122 watch at = /usr/local/logstash/vendor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/filewatch-0.5.1/lib/filew= atch/watch.rb:34 tail at = /usr/local/logstash/vendor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/filewatch-0.5.1/lib/filew= atch/tail.rb:58 run at /usr/local/logstash/lib/logstash/inputs/file.rb:130 each at org/jruby/RubyArray.java:1613 run at /usr/local/logstash/lib/logstash/inputs/file.rb:130 inputworker at /usr/local/logstash/lib/logstash/pipeline.rb:163 start_input at /usr/local/logstash/lib/logstash/pipeline.rb:157 So it seems, that the file {} input is not working, which seems to be = related to this Bug: https://logstash.jira.com/browse/LOGSTASH-1819. However, unlike mentioned in the Bugreport, the Port is not working for = me. In case its of interest, the logstash.conf looks like the following: input { file { path =3D> "/tmp/test.log" start_position =3D> beginning } } filter { grok { match =3D> { "message" =3D> "%{COMBINEDAPACHELOG}" } } date { match =3D> [ "timestamp" , "dd/MMM/yyyy:HH:mm:ss Z" ] } } output { elasticsearch { host =3D> localhost } stdout { codec =3D> rubydebug } } Am I missing something? Is something wrong with the port? In case, there = is: Is there something I can help with to get that resolved? Thanks, Filias --Apple-Mail=_47B7F20F-2F7B-4331-84EC-B20D1CD4AE51 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUtYo4AAoJEGvCWp6gb8LRNloIALR8Pa25oFBDPEz4lPX5mVP0 Ieb9Aew9/AuWDqhSKSqslSH51w+JjDCTkCyKFOgbT2qlBE1BMKl/8pki1aTi0bWV atyNZt46AVhNAZKNGSFKyFL7HrwGB/IC/5Eb5s/sZWi0q4vrZjJ2uv4X9CjFArbw duDBD5l40RLQoI0P2PoVTVz0i7TrngETX1dtVbLxKHkAYU7vPCBwS9U/Jr0/o1NZ L0DoVb542hSXr0l8NC4mimuiRpjPB568qFJyMU8C7aHtCZE7ltJ6WK4UBzKhubEW ja4RVJwiclQLt5rtL5c8Lc6DUWXJJuSymvGSwDGGIiwG6bYKA193pS9J1j6xOp8= =3WjV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_47B7F20F-2F7B-4331-84EC-B20D1CD4AE51-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:35:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8484ADC for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fep15.mx.upcmail.net (fep15.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAC2EFF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.13 201-2260-151-135-20130320) with ESMTP id <20150113213459.LNXL10023.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:34:59 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.23] ([178.84.134.112]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id fZaw1p00U2Rg3Ey01Zaw4P; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:34:57 +0100 X-SourceIP: 178.84.134.112 Message-ID: <54B58F83.4080003@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:34:59 +0100 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> <54B42D38.6010109@intersonic.se> <20150113211309.GA1478@elch.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: <20150113211309.GA1478@elch.exwg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:35:02 -0000 On 13-1-2015 22:13, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Per olof Ljungmark (peo@intersonic.se): >>> CXXLD libWTF.la >>> CXXLD Programs/LLIntOffsetsExtractor >>> /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a: file format not recognized; treating as linker script >>> /usr/bin/ld:./.libs/libWTF.a:1: syntax error >>> c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196296 > That, and the related/duplicate 196333 and 195500 (webkit-gtk3). > >> Due to a maintenance issue, changes to bugs between 2015-01-07 and >> 2015-01-10 were lost. Please resubmit any updates as appropriate. We >> apologize for the inconvenience. > Great for those who do not check bugzilla on a daily basis :) > >> Anyway, to reliably build webkit-gtk you must enable BOTH WEBGL and >> WEBAUDIO, otherwise the build will fail. > Those options are gone with the update to webkit-gtk 2.4.8 (in both > the -gtk2 and the -gtk3 port). > There had been two problems, one related to GNU ar and the other one > when building with non-default OPTIONS. The latter one has been resolved > in r376609, the former one has not been fixed yet - despite rather > distinct error messages, the problems have been mixed up in the PRs. > > Is any gnome@ committer around to commit the rest of the fixes? > > Regards, > Christoph That would be me. Hardcoding AR=/usr/bin/ar isn't a fix I like. Like Kurt mentioned earlier: ---- The webkit-gtk2 build fails if the ports 'ar' is found before the system 'ar'. Check $PATH and put /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin. ----- What I would like to know is why people are changing PATH? -Koop From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:39:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA761BE9 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6CAF31 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YB9Bb-0007do-Ce for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:39:39 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:39:39 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 Message-ID: <20150113213939.GN44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> <54B42D38.6010109@intersonic.se> <20150113211309.GA1478@elch.exwg.net> <54B58F83.4080003@rainbow-runner.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B58F83.4080003@rainbow-runner.nl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:39:38 -0000 Hi! > What I would like to know is why people are changing PATH? Because we can (most of the time), and sometimes it helps. And sometimes we detect broken things 8-} If a port needs a specific version of ar, can't that be made part of the build ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:48:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C86E80 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B78C8 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1644BDC24; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:48:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84479BDC1D; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:48:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F808229806F; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:48:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:48:43 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Roger Marquis Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:48:46 -0000 +--On 13 janvier 2015 08:33:13 -0800 Roger Marquis wrote: | Even having a REPLACE_BASE that | only prints "REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported" can be considered a | bug. Would you rather the port installing BIND in /usr/local without telling you anything, silently breaking your installation completely ? I thought people would rather have the port telling them the option is no longer supported so that they can fix their installation before it blows up. But maybe it's just me. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:56:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CC40D2 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177201A4 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B2D6003D0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:55:58 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQ1zNnQdXQHZ for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from elch.exwg.net (dslb-088-066-045-018.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.66.45.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E3513C; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:55:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:55:56 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build Failure: webkit-gtk2 Message-ID: <20150113215556.GB1478@elch.exwg.net> References: <20150112090212.2efaa349@scorpio> <54B42D38.6010109@intersonic.se> <20150113211309.GA1478@elch.exwg.net> <54B58F83.4080003@rainbow-runner.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B58F83.4080003@rainbow-runner.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:56:00 -0000 ## Koop Mast (kwm@rainbow-runner.nl): > Hardcoding AR=/usr/bin/ar isn't a fix I like. Well, webkit-gtk (and www/chromium earlier, we have the same problem/fix there) use base system's ld (that's because it's called by your compiler of-the-day) but "some" ar (which is found by configure). AFAIK there's no "real official" way to force use of one toolchain (instead of mix and match). > What I would like to know is why people are changing PATH? Because sometimes we like to use the things we installed in LOCALBASE :) Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:13:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6DCAB8 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD56C04 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w62so5731955wes.11 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:13:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XvwXrNlNfGR4wFwdM0y/sm+Cg0c+t89UW8Mv4HvFLy0=; b=NsKzoL+Z7dtHHSoNeeYGRANgUENWN3X+/Tpi8kAspv5f0qYPBe3YTdanXr0POid644 xK8CybaT12cNgEnWq2caRWkZuZr78DMG8qL7bT6OsBjiwl4VYUqCw3brsFYzxpQao7uh vO08QkvOZmfpHtSoME7emjm7nEFxM/8eSY/V6wcQ9PasIQEyW+LEYXrJC8p0Dn+y7RXU GBLhFppho/rmF0fK/0JmP4B7HNYH8/pKPe7SybWCssqoIRrKKDK+4/PQXy5GKqdcMy2P TDRfTHa5niLhv6Q9NYib1t9O27YNQwH2/rIfwmuRRhiQxzWGTeeHHCVizgmwsjBJaTin zwoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.157.4 with SMTP id wi4mr1577699wjb.54.1421190816869; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:13:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:13:36 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? From: Ben Woods To: Freddie Cash Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:13:39 -0000 > > With the requirement for the NONE cipher in OpenSSH requiring a custom > compile of the world or a custom compile of the openssh-portable port > Note that there are 2 open PRs on freebsd base to turn the NONE cipher option on by default in the build process of ssh in freebsd base (as was agreed in the freebsd current mailing list): https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163127 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163095 -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:39:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7AED229; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D0AE1D; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secure.postconf.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B9368084; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:39:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:39:47 -0800 Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option From: "Roger Marquis" To: "Mathieu Arnold" Reply-To: marquis@roble.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:39:48 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Would you rather the port installing BIND in /usr/local without telling you > anything, silently breaking your installation completely ? Certainly not but it's unprofessional to present the end-user with a dialog option that can be selected only to subsequently inform them that the option is deprecated. It might take a little programming but the error message printed when one port would overwrite files installed by another would, IMO, be better i.e., recommending removal of the conflict before installation. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 00:33:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB23A1E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A9F615 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D094BDC25; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D984BDC1D; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E711229ABEC; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:33:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:33:42 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: marquis@roble.com Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:33:46 -0000 +--On 13 janvier 2015 15:39:47 -0800 Roger Marquis wrote: | Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> Would you rather the port installing BIND in /usr/local without telling |> you anything, silently breaking your installation completely ? | | Certainly not but it's unprofessional to present the end-user with a | dialog option that can be selected only to subsequently inform them that | the option is deprecated. It might take a little programming but the | error message printed when one port would overwrite files installed by | another would, IMO, be better i.e., recommending removal of the conflict | before installation. The dialog option you talk about says: [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected it, he will get: ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. Regards, -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:35:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34447C2A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0133715F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0E2Yi2t049238; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:34:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Kurt Jaeger , John Hein In-Reply-To: <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu>, <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:34:45 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:35:56 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:54:56 -0700 John Hein wrote > Kurt Jaeger wrote at 20:29 +0100 on Jan 13, 2015: > > > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > > > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > > > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) > > > > I don't think he will (as can be seen from PR 192405). > > > > Provide a PR with the patch and I'll commit it after testing the build. > > I'll update it if no one else gets to it this week or review a PR. Thanks for the offer, and reply, John. So far I've squashed ~20 errors. I'm now at the IPv6 specific ones. > Willing to hand it over if someone wants it. Thanks, John. I might just take you up on that. :) Thanks again, John. --Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 03:11:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBA84CE; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9CD86F; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:50 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:11:52 -0000 > The dialog option you talk about says: > [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported > I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, > and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected it, he > will get: > ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. > The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 03:41:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34A1EBFA for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acipenser.esturion.net (acipenser.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B81B69 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by acipenser.esturion.net (Postfix, from userid 112) id CE4A4260203; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:41:47 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on acipenser.esturion.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by acipenser.esturion.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8351260033 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:41:43 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54B5E575.30301@pinyon.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:41:41 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031154.F0B954E7@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20150114031154.F0B954E7@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:41:55 -0000 On 01/13/15 20:11, Roger Marquis wrote: >> The dialog option you talk about says: >> [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported >> I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, >> and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected >> it, he >> will get: >> ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. >> The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. > > Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would > never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. I agree but lets back out just a bit. This fundamentally sound pkg infrastructure is very new to FreeBSD, and it completely rocks. As much as I grit my teeth over certain road bumps I have to acknowledge that local customizable binary repos... well that's fantastic. But that's the infrastructure. People take time to learn what having such an infrastructure really means in terms of the expectations of developers looking toward users, and users looking into packages (and not necessarily caring if a developer even exists). It took a very long time for those linux distros to get their pkg upgrade process as smooth as it is now, and a large part of that time was spent acculterating the individual pkg maintainers (an evolving population) into the idea that an installed pkg should continue to "just work" if it already does. If it can't continue to "just work", then there are lots of handholding instructions suitable for very stupid people generally provided, as barriers, during the upgrade process. All that extra packaging effort is devoted by far to the clueless (sometimes willfully clueless) fraction of the luser base. It's apparent that the FreeBSD community in the main does not have that mentality now. It's part of the attraction, to be clear, myself included. But now with superb package management capabilities in place, I think we will see, over a decade or so, the same sort of smoothness that the best linux distros display gradually emerge in FreeBSD. Craig R is a hero here. In the meantime I'm going to be trying harder to cut the pkg maintainers more slack. It's a sometimes hard, mostly thankless job that is absolutely crucial. 2c, Russell > Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:16:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E142433A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF357E5F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0E4FdpD083972 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:15:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <20150114031155.572A5529@hub.freebsd.org> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> , <20150114031155.572A5529@hub.freebsd.org> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:15:40 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <11d7a317963ba0a1a0223a24bcde55e1@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:16:51 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:50 -0800 (PST) Roger Marquis wrote > > The dialog option you talk about says: > > [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported > > I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, > > and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected it, he > > will get: > > ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. > > The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. > > Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would > never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. Honestly. Need I remind you, this is FreeBSD, *not* Linux? In all honesty, I am *not* pleased with the current efforts to turn the FreeBSD motto "The Power to Serve" into "FreeBSD, it's the new Linux". But I [begrudgingly] understand the inclination to do so. That said. While I understand your inclination to think FreeBSD must somehow be broken, when it doesn't operate as you're accustomed with Linux. This is FreeBSD, after all, and as hard as everyone works to eliminate the element of surprise, this is still FreeBSD. So celebrate the difference. Don't curse it, or more importantly; it's hard working developers. :) --Chris > > Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:23:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E93596 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F77F25 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id g201so5660029oib.12 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AYp3Nz5lSoD/atwCe6T0beY9EUUaClcXj2aS10SWY/0=; b=wEyv70mGSddzu5/SKBWgkG4LrTVSz2ZoVO0b+P8+q56Xzc9zZVvCQeeAw/f2ZrJVyY mKBpAwCFm9ssthguB7vBNqV4cmpyRqLYDWKmJ2pJGQ53MLXtpGDgdnlccyxH/Ph055QV E//JmHGAFFVE63SxECU9QyfYU7Mi1pe4jzEEMCyyT6te/6OBhuYIeGiiqEHFgOwYQfJE n7gqJbH9hk/LPpqJrWbJ9CLbgXfJ0kFgZV3K+F4KKUJvHDwv/LzfrOF2IpbiMgTDKyKw P/c0kn0F5Hbm8adqBJIc8F+9hOjn2SkTL6pbdlz+OGG8x1yYlcdxw/B+REPpMaF/0rHK kLVg== X-Received: by 10.182.247.99 with SMTP id yd3mr1263878obc.24.1421209434415; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: royce.williams@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.89.132 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:23:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <11d7a317963ba0a1a0223a24bcde55e1@ultimatedns.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031155.572A5529@hub.freebsd.org> <11d7a317963ba0a1a0223a24bcde55e1@ultimatedns.net> From: Royce Williams Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:23:34 -0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FkxDsn40ilcnBYwDRQxZLQMT2ic Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:23:55 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:50 -0800 (PST) Roger Marquis > wrote > >> > The dialog option you talk about says: >> > [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported >> > I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, >> > and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected it, he >> > will get: >> > ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. >> > The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. >> >> Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would >> never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. > Honestly. Need I remind you, this is FreeBSD, *not* Linux? > In all honesty, I am *not* pleased with the current efforts to > turn the FreeBSD motto "The Power to Serve" into > "FreeBSD, it's the new Linux". But I [begrudgingly] understand the > inclination to do so. The Power to Serve can only be brought to bear if a small-shop sysadmin isn't afraid to touch their ports. > That said. While I understand your inclination to think FreeBSD > must somehow be broken, when it doesn't operate as you're accustomed > with Linux. This is FreeBSD, after all, and as hard as everyone works > to eliminate the element of surprise, this is still FreeBSD. > So celebrate the difference. Don't curse it, or more importantly; > it's hard working developers. :) None of this is intended to disparage the teams. Royce From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:51:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BBD2766 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276A1FA6 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0E6o7Ot027007; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:50:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Kurt Jaeger , John Hein In-Reply-To: <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu>, <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com>, <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:50:09 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:51:19 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:34:45 -0800 "Chris H" wrote > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:54:56 -0700 John Hein wrote > > > Kurt Jaeger wrote at 20:29 +0100 on Jan 13, 2015: > > > > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > > > > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > > > > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) > > > > > > I don't think he will (as can be seen from PR 192405). > > > > > > Provide a PR with the patch and I'll commit it after testing the build. > > > > I'll update it if no one else gets to it this week or review a PR. > Thanks for the offer, and reply, John. > So far I've squashed ~20 errors. I'm now at the IPv6 specific ones. > > Willing to hand it over if someone wants it. > Thanks, John. I might just take you up on that. :) > > Thanks again, John. OK. All the errors have been chased, and crushed. But it's now late. So I won't be submitting the pr(1) until tomorrow. --Chris > > --Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:00:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE8BC41E; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7163::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A04768DA; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B9086708A; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:00:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:00:33 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Roger Marquis Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> Mail-Followup-To: Roger Marquis , Mathieu Arnold , The BSD Dreamer , dougb@dougbarton.us, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.3-RELEASE-p5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , The BSD Dreamer , dougb@dougbarton.us, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:00:39 -0000 --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:33:13AM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: >=20 > One question while we're on the topic of deprecations, has 'make pkg || > make package' been deprecated in favor of poudriere? >=20 No, they serve to completely different purposes, though there is some overlap. Poudriere is a self-contained build system that can be used to bulk build any number of packages that can be used on any number of other systems. This is very useful if you need different features or options than the packages provided by the FreeBSD project. "make package" will build a single package of one port from the system it is run from. That means that the port, and all of its dependencies, will be installed on the host. Depending on your needs, this can be a good or a bad thing. They're two completely different beasts and neither can replace the other. Erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBVLYiIVF75hSlwe7HAQpZUgf/bTqsilQ7j/RpiPsuyGkljhv1dJouQlCj YZmdUwpnIBwLOXRmUm3lXnVbSVZRueeS2l6qBcIFXtd1I6VY8cdHsvjfMwUq3TjI dYgdgBHojpLkD4UrXsXj8lF1qoefmabZAteY+N77y0tumORy/0i41sOnstQHDimw Cs2lk4vfhZsh9JuXxDUWibtbf74bIeey83WBAbxt6HQ1jLu9T8bf7l1pIRnyG5eO ZrgrMHZR1KxdM4ivpHfxuqLvXul+dO/nymK6YoYLLwl2ThySD7RMZtkgbksSy2N6 smJARqhbrAjUk1ZKp031K1hIET7xuigiFq1eZegALirQYrxZJseKFw== =d5XR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:34:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA50BC7; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2447CB7; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 93E0D1B22178; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:34:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54B62A03.2090003@toco-domains.de> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:34:11 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: games/wesnoth: How to cope with "invalid DSO for symbol `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'" References: <54AFB90B.2070209@toco-domains.de> <54B58862.6050704@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54B58862.6050704@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:34:15 -0000 On 13.01.2015 22:04, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 1/9/2015 5:18 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >> [ 3%] mo-update [wesnoth-dw-ar]: Creating mo file. >> /usr/bin/ld: g: invalid DSO for symbol >> `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' definition >> /usr/local/lib/libboost_system.so.1.55.0: could not read symbols: Bad value >> c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see >> invocation) >> --- cutter --- > > Usually this means -lboost_system is missing from the linker line. > Recent binutils in recent FreeBSD head has been patched to be more clear > about it. As you can see from the output of "pkg info" i have the most recent binutils installed. At an FreeBSD 10.1 - also the most recent released version. Therefore i don't understand your comment. Can you explain it further? Whats your advice? Remove this line because it should work? Or keep the line for compatibility reasons? Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:39:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A08C27 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F078A38E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0E9dOQX078144 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:39:24 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0E9dOYx078143; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:39:24 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201501140939.t0E9dOYx078143@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:39:24 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:39:25 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/execline | 1.08 | 2.0.1.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ mail/mpop | 1.2.0 | 1.2.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 11:15:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DAA41D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B09125 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B47BDC4C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:15:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 72880BDC3E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:15:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C16C22A3D14 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:15:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:15:08 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:15:12 -0000 +--On 13 janvier 2015 19:11:50 -0800 Roger Marquis wrote: |> The dialog option you talk about says: |> [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported |> I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, |> and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected it, |> he will get: |> ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. |> The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. | | Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would | never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never have existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never see it again. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 11:36:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3A8E7C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F71380 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l4so7389892lbv.11 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:36:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vJa2rY/apxcUgFSFnfrBG36mlM3ZuWNLgGX1MKYQmKM=; b=N+L4FeRn9O126YjMtWIrUA0Gs3NSzD1r5LT0OcqKXWEJbxk658pGzwMPlqOtOFeCFz GLgTApPwfKzkwzxLPqoSlpCAs13aXhwuDA7/G9Qc0vGDkn2DR4yEa9J6avJA5Y2Uoa/h OxRnn2dnKhQXF1vBOvYPubppfNGi+sJ0n+xsX4RIXc4+cjitTEPGlNJu6ymb3p+NAE/4 wY9KFnheX9OkYyDRRylH0i7EzuJinJvGCKdZDMjwfBLAmaZGh6SsECq4F3L8rafkb+Ka /vdwcntm13IJVDEJDaPv5MdNUE0oP7SK7VRHPrap5ebLfxngnh21zQsXai2dxZpw6hpR y/Jg== X-Received: by 10.152.23.38 with SMTP id j6mr3367990laf.81.1421235386973; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.29.2.131] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm5800688lbl.41.2015.01.14.03.36.25 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:36:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B654B0.6020508@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:36:16 +0200 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich Subject: Re: mypaint References: <4332122.R2hTBFfxOS@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B2C8FB.2040601@gmail.com> <1799385.DexCJMgr9b@lumiwa.farms.net> <3335351.IokthlFiqL@lumiwa.farms.net> <54B3D3B8.9060309@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lumiwa@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:36:29 -0000 On 2015-01-12 20:16, Jan Beich wrote: > I think the following are relevant patches from bugzilla. > > Index: Mk/Uses/scons.mk > =================================================================== > --- Mk/Uses/scons.mk (revision 376385) > +++ Mk/Uses/scons.mk (working copy) > @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ IGNORE= Incorrect 'USES+= scons:${scons_ARGS}' sco > MAKEFILE= # > MAKE_FLAGS= # > ALL_TARGET= # > +CCFLAGS?= ${CFLAGS} > +LINKFLAGS?= ${LDFLAGS} > LIBPATH?= ${LOCALBASE}/lib > CPPPATH?= ${LOCALBASE}/include > SCONS= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/scons > Index: graphics/mypaint/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- graphics/mypaint/Makefile (revision 376385) > +++ graphics/mypaint/Makefile (working copy) > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS} \ > > USE_GNOME= glib20 pygtk2 > MAKE_ARGS= prefix="${PREFIX}" > -USES= gettext pkgconfig scons tar:bzip2 python > +USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib gettext pkgconfig scons tar:bzip2 python > INSTALLS_ICONS= yes > > SUB_FILES= pkg-install > > ------------------------------------------------- Yup, this fixes the problem. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:08:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFEC5BC; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:202::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D209C8D8; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D2877209AF12; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:08:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:08:52 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:08:57 -0000 On Jan 14 12:15, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never have >existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never see it >again. > Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the port used to always say that the version in the base system was only designed to be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was used as a proper DNS server the port version was meant to be used instead. Based on this it makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced with local Unbound in the base, and the ports system still has BIND for people that were using it. It should have been a very small minor change. If people didn't want to have two versions installed then the solution would have been to use WITHOUT_NAMED or WITHOUT_BIND whatever the knob was in src.conf so that those files were deleted or not installed in the first place. I do exactly this for NTPd, OpenSSH, and Unbound all of which I use the port versions for so don't need them in the base system. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:27:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27E4585B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm35-vm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm35-vm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.238.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18F4AC4 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1421238362; bh=mFVRicgySMtUZdepTxThC7mawyP62gbMRJ7WKxubW6w=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=fbla1okTzyShE3FnOVW/dAseOjXBFWnjwl3iTpNYtwIAhW/sTSVX4fUa6zFVzGvWvr27EyShOlfPNnt1Jx65FObBJtLzKiFOzLl0JxRlrbT0eug2Q/3BO7xo+Kd33a0xA8oWYcgFGUJ698rfDjfWNdqYq5e7ENwvENw5dzio5L4C9l4g1I+1Q5mEchBNY1Pin+blUThyKhgmC/Qc2du6n9hHbnubosLhy5k7zYUgdeiDjWnjzu4KXpVrJFQCH0sCktBLQcGXpZLR4vU8zxUrAGf1XerguJUA3ChN2YGsiNpk48xqm7fjBmF8BWEAvuwaOaM8vHvVCcmDmvi8jX1tJA== Received: from [66.196.81.174] by nm35.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2015 12:26:02 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.161] by tm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2015 12:26:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp218.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2015 12:26:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 933908.18579.bm@smtp218.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Wu_kCi4VM1m2n07WgYrbneI.gajT7PQrEpRHmN25dZUi1ih MDzm5Wx1Y3OTyKMouQbPsdUXpJBDFTtVxk2SeESlbwqyshreh_0W8_96UJLi 5izTTu5ycCdrfvSf5RlexFDGfkpu2Xbr2IBe9M2oiQst0r94jS7S7IR1PkF8 e1VUa2ORUOvRXoFMesM7U.Gw9OtJtMpymN7.OV.h7yJMevDuu4YFAB501ir2 Y7SUREPlDKyMNoK1UC6g.rGUBZqV7vs8YiPSJgYgTfv0ddZnLosIoLqg2Rs6 qpuT91fb8ji4ImnPU_Bo0DjMPioMSevKK2UY8prM6qe5aKyz.eKjSNj9KTWZ RiriMU7MnzibjgUd8JH1sioxdZYujI2aUzTvZPnToxfvSZXEkTjf7GKyEbZB 4EmuhGeM3kg6L6jHTfmQqOzITu4QbqLF1lpR2GGK9cypPCnvJvdSvfqnAcIy Mpnf5_gsSJTKpuuU24yo5AhTQvwKE3yjkq5rv1eBlBP7cebCrjlB2e3eCU7j 8_A8Fho9I8_8Sg4Mc60lkMr_.0fkMPCQmDPlXzSX4HSLmalZB32FTi0HtPZ2 2RNVNqjLK4VeDVtqo0XwwU4TvK11sNw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn Message-ID: <54B660BE.1020404@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:27:42 -0800 From: Jeffrey Bouquet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:27:54 -0000 On 01/13/15 07:55, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it >> for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run >> your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing >> several machines / jails etc. > poudriere allows you to manage several seperate pkg trees with different > options, so you can: > > - build a default tree (and pkg repo), provide it to all generic hosts > - build a seperate tree (and pkg repo) with modified options, and > provide it to the special hosts > > It helps to keep the poudriere build tree on fast flash/SSD drives 8-} > > This all works and is very, very good! Thanks for the work! > As I probably won't ever know enough from experience, if one wants a local lan build tool is there any flowchart with use cases 1... foo foo bar use case >> tinderbox 2... foo foo bar use case >> build jail 3... foo foo bar use case >> bhyve 4... foo foo bar use case >> poudriere 5... foo foo bar use case >> csbd OR qjail OR ezjail OR man jail OR bastille script 6... foo foo bar use case >> server on lan serving packages And where they may overlap, which takes the least setup time, which takes the least maintenance time, which can be most easily migrated version > version ... Not to mention the wiki, but if that information was "[some term ] use cases" like virtualization or multi-machine or... on the freebsd.org page prominently, it may result in a larger userbase... more coders onboard. Recognizing that a lot of this is emerging technology. Apologies. I've a slight interest in reading any such document, having read an hour or so yesterday not a few htm explaining jails, (10 pages of threads linked from a search 'ezjail' in the forums, for example) to know that acquiring the expertise of a quickstart group of terms to focus on in any particular scenario is something I don't easily expect to acquire. On the other hand, to include the wiki... vs links from it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:31:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58DF925; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD54EB73; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:31:08 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NI600F9Z2ZKNJ00@hades.sorbs.net>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:35:46 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <54B66183.8040403@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:30:59 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Matt Smith , Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> In-reply-to: <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:31:08 -0000 Matt Smith wrote: > On Jan 14 12:15, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> >> Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never >> have >> existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never >> see it >> again. >> > > Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the > port used to always say that the version in the base system was only > designed to be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was > used as a proper DNS server the port version was meant to be used > instead. Based on this it makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced > with local Unbound in the base, and the ports system still has BIND > for people that were using it. Was this ever documented? (I've been using bind in base for servers for many years and this is the first time I've heard of it - and it is unlikely I'm the only one.) > > It should have been a very small minor change. If people didn't want > to have two versions installed then the solution would have been to > use WITHOUT_NAMED or WITHOUT_BIND whatever the knob was in src.conf so > that those files were deleted or not installed in the first place. I > do exactly this for NTPd, OpenSSH, and Unbound all of which I use the > port versions for so don't need them in the base system. > ..and for those using freebsd-update? Oh and on setting up named after installing from ports it gets chrooted and it has 'problems' seems the chroot mechanism chroots/links in /etc/namedb rather than /usr/local/etc/namedb ... haven't fully gotten to the bottom of it yet, but currently on all machines after freebsd-update (and possibly new installs of 9.3) I ended up creating links between /var/named/usr/local/etc/namedb/named.conf and /usr/local/etc/namedb/named.conf and /etc/namedb/named.conf to get it working.. so something is 'odd' in the mean time my deployment script has been modified to create all the links to get it working so stopped looking at it for the moment. Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:41:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54185A32 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:202::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 114E9C3E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 794FA209AF12; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:41:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:41:39 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150114124139.GB17865@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Michelle Sullivan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> <54B66183.8040403@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B66183.8040403@sorbs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:41:42 -0000 On Jan 14 13:30, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >Matt Smith wrote: >> Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the >> port used to always say that the version in the base system was only >> designed to be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was >> used as a proper DNS server the port version was meant to be used >> instead. Based on this it makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced >> with local Unbound in the base, and the ports system still has BIND >> for people that were using it. > >Was this ever documented? (I've been using bind in base for servers for >many years and this is the first time I've heard of it - and it is >unlikely I'm the only one.) > I'm not sure if it was documented anywhere in particular. I've just seen it mentioned lots of times on these mailing lists in the past. Specifically around the time he was experimenting with slaving the root and arpa zones and there were a few configuration changes to named.conf at that time. The main reasoning is that the versions of things in the base system are usually old and rarely get updated. They occasionally get patches if there's a serious security vulnerability but for minor bugs it's unlikely you'll see any patch. And to patch it you quite often need to do a full O/S upgrade which is very time consuming and probably needs a reboot. The port versions are updated straight away, even for minor bugs and because you've not also updated half the O/S in the process you don't need to do anything other than restart named. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 13:31:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39EFF64A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213C2C0 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:31:13 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NI600FAT5RUNJ00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:35:55 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <54B66F9D.4030005@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:31:09 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Matt Smith , Michelle Sullivan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> <54B66183.8040403@sorbs.net> <20150114124139.GB17865@xtaz.uk> In-reply-to: <20150114124139.GB17865@xtaz.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:31:14 -0000 Matt Smith wrote: > On Jan 14 13:30, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> Matt Smith wrote: >>> Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the >>> port used to always say that the version in the base system was only >>> designed to be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was >>> used as a proper DNS server the port version was meant to be used >>> instead. Based on this it makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced >>> with local Unbound in the base, and the ports system still has BIND >>> for people that were using it. >> >> Was this ever documented? (I've been using bind in base for servers for >> many years and this is the first time I've heard of it - and it is >> unlikely I'm the only one.) >> > > I'm not sure if it was documented anywhere in particular. I've just > seen it mentioned lots of times on these mailing lists in the past. > Specifically around the time he was experimenting with slaving the > root and arpa zones and there were a few configuration changes to > named.conf at that time. > > The main reasoning is that the versions of things in the base system > are usually old and rarely get updated. They occasionally get patches > if there's a serious security vulnerability but for minor bugs it's > unlikely you'll see any patch. And to patch it you quite often need to > do a full O/S upgrade which is very time consuming and probably needs > a reboot. The port versions are updated straight away, even for minor > bugs and because you've not also updated half the O/S in the process > you don't need to do anything other than restart named. > And that is precisely the reason I used the 'REPLACE_BASE' option... BTW, what happens if you /usr/local/etc/rc.d/named start and /etc/rc.d/named start now (particularly the latter) ? ... I'm assuming some thought of this and removed /etc/rc.d/named as part of a freebsd-update ...? (note: some of use cannot 'freebsd-update' the 'delete-old' stuff because some got it also to delete the pkg_* tools - which some of us have to use currently - despite that same attempting to force production systems into untested configurations... even when patching exploits. Regards, -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:43:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6B9D23 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail.mimar.rs [193.53.106.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9B8B38 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B621AF43B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:35:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1421246112; x=1423060513; bh=t+XWkTw0JEVDCV2pWFy22oi7w+DZfcxIiaBJ9qNJu34=; b=m6WeKd8kfYtq MkXdcNDgTHD7VXBTyWMqpQA8vQS58yXUP0Bx+YlZGb2C3j9Jh8vIMvtQK/Ix+ReE I65bxX516m0zdozTfP4xOHoU4PgxRjKETdXzTQ6hrO1wPx54gDwieon+a2h5Utie 42pY8s09k4gmVm0UNQo7H3ImBivOHaU= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.mimar.rs (mail.mimar.rs [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id z5nXYxPgah80 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:35:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from efreet (178-222-75-125.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs [178.222.75.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BB111AF330 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:35:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:35:11 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: net-mgmt/rancid and cisco ssh kexagorhitms Message-Id: <20150114153511.8ed616814cfc49ed21826e28@mimar.rs> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:43:31 -0000 Hi, as of FreeBSD 9.3, it is not possible to ssh into some cisco routers (namely 1921 and 3925 in my case), unless option -o KexAlgorithms=3D diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 is specified. Probably, as a consequence, rancid stopped working for these routers since I upgraded OS on which it is installed to 9.3. How can I make this work again? Thank you in advance, --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:23:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7172B796; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD18F2D; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:23:01 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Matt Smith Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:23:02 -0000 Thank you Matt. It is refreshing to hear an actual business case for the reasons REPLACE_BASE was created. Thank you also for the pointers to a way of avoid dulpicate binaries. Do you know of more detailed documentation on how to prevent installworld and freebsd-update from installing these binaries in the first place? That leaves the issue of cross-platform compatibility, which is still broken without REPLACE_BASE. What about those of us who support environments that aren't BSD monocultures? Roger Marquis >> Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never have >> existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never see it >> again. > > Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the port > used to always say that the version in the base system was only designed to > be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was used as a proper > DNS server the port version was meant to be used instead. Based on this it > makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced with local Unbound in the base, and > the ports system still has BIND for people that were using it. > > It should have been a very small minor change. If people didn't want to have > two versions installed then the solution would have been to use WITHOUT_NAMED > or WITHOUT_BIND whatever the knob was in src.conf so that those files were > deleted or not installed in the first place. I do exactly this for NTPd, > OpenSSH, and Unbound all of which I use the port versions for so don't need > them in the base system. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:27:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A70B962 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82E9F54 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04C8BDC5D; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:27:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAAA9BDC5C; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:27:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C870960E8; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:27:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D857B1D411; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:27:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:27:35 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Roger Marquis , Matt Smith Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150114152306.535ADBDC25@prod2.absolight.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> <20150114152306.535ADBDC25@prod2.absolight.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:27:43 -0000 +--On 14 janvier 2015 07:23:01 -0800 Roger Marquis wrote: | That leaves the issue of cross-platform compatibility, which is still | broken without REPLACE_BASE. What about those of us who support | environments that aren't BSD monocultures? By using the named_conf variable in /etc/rc.conf ? -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:34:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092FCB86; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC216AD; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:34:23 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Erwin Lansing Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:34:24 -0000 > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:33:13AM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: > ... Poudriere is a self-contained build system that can be used to > bulk build any number of packages that can be used on any number of > other systems. This is very useful if you need different features or > options than the packages provided by the FreeBSD project. "make > package" will build a single package of one port from the system it is > run from. The packages built by "make package" can also be used on any number of other systems, like those built by Poudriere. That means that the port, and all of its dependencies, will > be installed on the host. Depending on your needs, this can be a good > or a bad thing. They're two completely different beasts and neither can > replace the other. So one difference then would be that Poudriere determines which dependencies are run-time vs build-time and creates packages for those by default, is that correct? I can see how that might be convenient for packages with a large number of dependencies (like sssd) but it also seems like a lot of additional infrastructure simply to build binaries on one host to be used by many. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:11:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E52151F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9316BF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:11:39 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Chris H Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <11d7a317963ba0a1a0223a24bcde55e1@ultimatedns.net> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> , <20150114031155.572A5529@hub.freebsd.org> <11d7a317963ba0a1a0223a24bcde55e1@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:11:40 -0000 >> Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would >> never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. > > Honestly. Need I remind you, this is FreeBSD, *not* Linux? > In all honesty, I am *not* pleased with the current efforts to > turn the FreeBSD motto "The Power to Serve" into > "FreeBSD, it's the new Linux". But I [begrudgingly] understand the > inclination to do so. Amen to that. I also think a lot of people expect that emulating Linux' binary package systems will stop our favorite OS' declining market share. Unfortunately, there's a lot more to it. FreeBSD has had binary packages for years and they haven't had the desired effect. What's missing is perhaps an understanding of what Linux differences account for its success over FreeBSD. Clearly the topic of this thread, deprecating REPLACE_BASE, isn't going to help in this regards. Portsng and pkgng aren't helping yet either though their improvements have laid the foundation for easier coding of new features (like better dependency tracking, a non-cli menu, ad-hoc queries, ...). > That said. While I understand your inclination to think FreeBSD > must somehow be broken, when it doesn't operate as you're accustomed > with Linux. Not my inclination :-) Please take care with those attributes. > This is FreeBSD, after all, and as hard as everyone works > to eliminate the element of surprise, this is still FreeBSD. > So celebrate the difference. Don't curse it, or more importantly; > it's hard working developers. :) I trust we are _all_ grateful to the developers who are doing a good job, at least when not deprecating popular features and responding to the resulting end-user frustration with statements like "REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never have existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never see it again". The hard work that goes into so many ports _is_ BSD's primary advantage over Linux backed-up by ZFS, jails, security and the BSD license. Personally I believe that a lot of this differential is due to the GPL which doesn't allow Linux deltas to propagate back to BSD but nobody seems to be discussing way of addressing this (like a CDDL BSD perhaps). But getting back to the meta-topic i.e., where BSDs are at a disadvantage, has anyone here used kickstart, satellite, sssd, IPA, gparted, synaptic, a "live desktop" DVD or the Ubuntu GUI installer? Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:18:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518C7632 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B592C763 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host-4-75.office.adestra.com (vpn-1.adestra.com [46.236.37.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0EGI7Kj076608 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:18:08 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0EGI7Kj076608 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t0EGI7Kj076608; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host vpn-1.adestra.com [46.236.37.122] claimed to be host-4-75.office.adestra.com Message-ID: <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:18:07 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:18:16 -0000 On 2015/01/14 15:34, Roger Marquis wrote: > So one difference then would be that Poudriere determines which > dependencies are run-time vs build-time and creates packages for those by > default, is that correct? I can see how that might be convenient for > packages with a large number of dependencies (like sssd) but it also > seems like a lot of additional infrastructure simply to build binaries on > one host to be used by many. Poudriere by definition will create packages for all of the build- and run-depends, as it needs the build-depends packages itself in order to build everything. It builds everything in temporary jails which it installs all the needed dependencies to, and then destroys after that package has been built. However, when you go to install a package from the repo, pkg(8) will only pull down the run-time dependencies of whatever you choose to install. That means there are a good chunk of packages you simply don't need to have on your production servers any more. Yes, poudriere does a lot of stuff, but if you didn't use a central builder, you'ld end up replicating all of that stuff onto every machine you wanted to manage. Poudriere itself can run on a fairly modest machine -- it depends on how many packages you need to build and how quickly you want them. It's quite feasible to use poudriere for a small-ish repo on a machine at night, when it is otherwise quiet, and then use the same machine for something else during the day. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:31:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE0BD01; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB13909; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:31:16 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk> <20150114152306.535ADBDC25@prod2.absolight.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matt Smith X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:31:17 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > | That leaves the issue of cross-platform compatibility, which is still > | broken without REPLACE_BASE. What about those of us who support > | environments that aren't BSD monocultures? > > By using the named_conf variable in /etc/rc.conf ? That enables configuration compatibility but doesn't address binaries or their PATHs. Named perhaps isn't the best example of a port with cross-platform issues. Postfix, OTOH, is a different animal. I spent countless hours trying to accommodate the default BSD PREFIX, usually just installing from source without using ports, before paying Doug to write a patch for postfix' INST_BASE option. That investment has paid of manyfold over the years. Even more effort was put into porting freepbx but that effort failed specifically due to cross-platform (PREFIX) issues, resulting in several RH servers in an otherwise BSD shop. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:34:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06436E0F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A1A9BE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.6.25.100] ([213.61.170.110]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqV4f-1XXxP91IQ5-00e4V7; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:34:02 +0100 Message-ID: <54B69A79.3020409@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:34:01 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFya28gQ3VwYcSH?= , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net-mgmt/rancid and cisco ssh kexagorhitms References: <20150114153511.8ed616814cfc49ed21826e28@mimar.rs> In-Reply-To: <20150114153511.8ed616814cfc49ed21826e28@mimar.rs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mKHl0jQLjfzxpyv+vo68H0P7KtYtS6bQ7OdsFXU022ZRBXe2dUG twahWPxLZRoJJ9sF5pqlTuLEDMxfhW/Td0H3pwyE7pnK/MymgmaWY2iHMfHnLiHOaeJuMSI OE7GZhNN6p4GOHK2RnKUN3TyXHIlbPq0RO+pnWtYjEBg4e7iIaUsY+AGXb7QeAn8ZgvO7+a ziYDvIg00EFMEsvqhxnOg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:34:12 -0000 On 2015-01-14 15:35, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > as of FreeBSD 9.3, it is not possible to ssh into some cisco routers > (namely 1921 and 3925 in my case), unless option -o KexAlgorithms= > diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 is specified. Probably, as a consequence, > rancid stopped working for these routers since I upgraded OS on which > it is installed to 9.3. > > How can I make this work again? > > Thank you in advance, > I had the same issue but there is a simple solution: $ cat ~rancid/.ssh/config host host1 host2 host3 IP1 IP2 ... KexAlgorithms diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 -- HTH, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:34:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CEB6EA8; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC669C8; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:34:35 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:34:41 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Yes, poudriere does a lot of stuff, but if you didn't use a central > builder, you'ld end up replicating all of that stuff onto every machine > you wanted to manage. What stuff would you end up replicating? I ask because our "make package" host don't replicate anything other than the required binaries, libraries and configs. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:49:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E014F0 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0902EB05 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id b16so7829216igk.3 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SF3m5T1zsoZwYjDK4Fpm67pyiS0rhw7/fbKZc1bamOo=; b=yy+fpvjFjF2KQBDUZQgF20/VsZsIG/0atd6LR5SPMuuaTAC1mKtML81p1TpGYjfWss ce0wkplcBXTytPKMk4cXhE5VpGuTLUM9vVTm18ONWkqXS4JSL3QbJzGul7DqS9XlAl1E u5Xy3XXOrteYq/pax5ZJG4/ZwqhUmTVZAboCP6EvOo2Ldm2lgFnbW3FifiklT2PGIz+N 9IIQ/1T1vl8FtjGa9iiqG3KMM1pVbgs4fZ67MEYyvt715pAD3z6i/EjDa0TXKswyZYR/ P7tYKp8T/pb78CXPgBcy8LX9zmW+yudat4iRiBeo7szdI7/hfeXLHXCWrF8pEspMTDj2 Tlyg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.168.18 with SMTP id r18mr5160470ioe.76.1421254195425; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:49:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.52.19 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:49:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150114153511.8ed616814cfc49ed21826e28@mimar.rs> References: <20150114153511.8ed616814cfc49ed21826e28@mimar.rs> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:49:55 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xl_QZ94PGzX98aEhCdBlcDWvBLU Message-ID: Subject: Re: net-mgmt/rancid and cisco ssh kexagorhitms From: Kevin Oberman To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFya28gQ3VwYcSH?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:49:56 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Marko Cupa=C4=87 wr= ote: > Hi, > > as of FreeBSD 9.3, it is not possible to ssh into some cisco routers > (namely 1921 and 3925 in my case), unless option -o KexAlgorithms=3D > diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 is specified. Probably, as a consequence, > rancid stopped working for these routers since I upgraded OS on which > it is installed to 9.3. > > How can I make this work again? > > Thank you in advance, > -- > Marko Cupa=C4=87 > https://www.mimar.rs This looks like an issue that should go to the RANCiD developers upstream. It's a rather trivial thing to adjust the expect script for clogin to deal with this, though it probably should be more than just adding the option to the ssh command to make it specific to the routers that actually require it. I suspect that OpenSSH portable has removed this key exchange mechanism as a default due to concerns with SHA1, but that is just a guess as I have not been following either RANCiD or OpenSSH since I retired. I do suspect that adding this option to clogin is all that is required to get it working for you, though. Just look through clogin for 'ssh' to find the commands. (Note that there are probably at least two cases and you probably want to change all of them. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:06:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E294921; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vm.unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F7CE8; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) by vm.unsane.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C18D03000E; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:06:38 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <54B6A21D.4000301@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:06:37 +0000 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Marquis , Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.ACFF1F2A@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20150114163443.ACFF1F2A@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:06:47 -0000 On 14/01/2015 16:34, Roger Marquis wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Yes, poudriere does a lot of stuff, but if you didn't use a central >> builder, you'ld end up replicating all of that stuff onto every machine >> you wanted to manage. > > What stuff would you end up replicating? I ask because our "make > package" host don't replicate anything other than the required binaries, > libraries and configs. This implies you are already using a central build host? Matthew's reply was talking about replicating build-depends packages if you build on each host separately. The advantage for me for using poudriere has been I use one machine to build 8.x 9.x and 10.x packages with a few flavours of each, its in a nice easy to use form and builds the repos (which I serve via nginx) and it handles all the jails/updating etc for me. Nothing I couldnt do manually sure but saves me time and effort. I just need to remember to check for new ports options from time to time. Vince > > Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:31:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C8DD7C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9739CF29 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0EHUYQF070097 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:30:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <54B660BE.1020404@yahoo.com> References: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net> <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> <54B53DC8.6000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20150113155553.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu>, <54B660BE.1020404@yahoo.com> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:30:34 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <34c67e5e59cd70457872c05ced69c776@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:31:49 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:27:42 -0800 Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote > On 01/13/15 07:55, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it > >> for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run > >> your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing > >> several machines / jails etc. > > poudriere allows you to manage several seperate pkg trees with different > > options, so you can: > > > > - build a default tree (and pkg repo), provide it to all generic hosts > > - build a seperate tree (and pkg repo) with modified options, and > > provide it to the special hosts > > > > It helps to keep the poudriere build tree on fast flash/SSD drives 8-} > > > > This all works and is very, very good! Thanks for the work! > > > As I probably won't ever know enough from experience, if one wants a > local lan > build tool is there any flowchart with use cases > > 1... foo foo bar use case >> tinderbox > 2... foo foo bar use case >> build jail > 3... foo foo bar use case >> bhyve > 4... foo foo bar use case >> poudriere > 5... foo foo bar use case >> csbd OR qjail OR ezjail OR man jail OR > bastille script > 6... foo foo bar use case >> server on lan serving packages > > And where they may overlap, which takes the least setup time, which > takes the > least maintenance time, which can be most easily migrated version > > version ... Excellent observation. These look like prime "install candidates". A sort of meta-install, much like a Server, or Desktop install is already. Maybe someone with good install-foo could easily cobble up appropriate scripts to accommodate such a thing. Thanks for bringing it up, Jeffrey! --Chris > > > > Not to mention the wiki, but if that information was "[some term ] use > cases" like > virtualization or multi-machine or... on the freebsd.org page > prominently, it may > result in a larger userbase... more coders onboard. > > Recognizing that a lot of this is emerging technology. Apologies. I've > a slight > interest in reading any such document, having read an hour or so > yesterday not > a few htm explaining jails, (10 pages of threads linked from > a search 'ezjail' in the forums, for example) to know that acquiring the > expertise of > a quickstart group of terms to focus on in any particular scenario is > something I don't > easily expect to acquire. > > On the other hand, to include the wiki... vs links from it. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:09:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF91B69 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 222EE609 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0EI8IsU077935; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:08:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Roger Marquis In-Reply-To: <20150114161143.EBD4F57C@hub.freebsd.org> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> , <20150114031155.572A5529@hub.freebsd.org> <11d7a317963ba0a1a0223a24bcde55e1@ultimatedns.net>, <20150114161143.EBD4F57C@hub.freebsd.org> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:08:18 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <3aa26f9fe1705e9a48b37051595a590d@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:09:37 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:11:39 -0800 (PST) Roger Marquis wrote > >> Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would > >> never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. > > > > Honestly. Need I remind you, this is FreeBSD, *not* Linux? > > In all honesty, I am *not* pleased with the current efforts to > > turn the FreeBSD motto "The Power to Serve" into > > "FreeBSD, it's the new Linux". But I [begrudgingly] understand the > > inclination to do so. > > Amen to that. I also think a lot of people expect that emulating Linux' > binary package systems will stop our favorite OS' declining market share. > Unfortunately, there's a lot more to it. FreeBSD has had binary packages > for years and they haven't had the desired effect. > > What's missing is perhaps an understanding of what Linux differences > account for its success over FreeBSD. Clearly the topic of this thread, > deprecating REPLACE_BASE, isn't going to help in this regards. Portsng > and pkgng aren't helping yet either though their improvements have laid > the foundation for easier coding of new features (like better dependency > tracking, a non-cli menu, ad-hoc queries, ...). > > > That said. While I understand your inclination to think FreeBSD > > must somehow be broken, when it doesn't operate as you're accustomed > > with Linux. > > Not my inclination :-) Please take care with those attributes. Fair enough. My entire reply was *intended* to be light hearted. But like you, I *too* have some issues with some of the decisions made. I'm afraid I let that influence my reply. Sorry. > > > This is FreeBSD, after all, and as hard as everyone works > > to eliminate the element of surprise, this is still FreeBSD. > > So celebrate the difference. Don't curse it, or more importantly; > > it's hard working developers. :) > > I trust we are _all_ grateful to the developers who are doing a good job, > at least when not deprecating popular features and responding to the > resulting end-user frustration with statements like "REPLACE_BASE was an > abomination that should never have existed, now that it's gone, it'll > never get back, and you'll never see it again". The hard work that goes > into so many ports _is_ BSD's primary advantage over Linux backed-up by > ZFS, jails, security and the BSD license. Personally I believe that a > lot of this differential is due to the GPL which doesn't allow Linux > deltas to propagate back to BSD but nobody seems to be discussing way of > addressing this (like a CDDL BSD perhaps). IMHO it's still too early to tell whether all the big changes made during 2014 will, or have had, the positive, or desired affect intended. But for sure, it's been a *wild* ride for many of us. > > But getting back to the meta-topic i.e., where BSDs are at a > disadvantage, has anyone here used kickstart, satellite, sssd, IPA, > gparted, synaptic, a "live desktop" DVD or the Ubuntu GUI installer? Thanks for your *thoughtful* reply, Roger. --Chris > > Roger Marquis > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:17:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D69CF1 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B001768 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0EIGTVn078418 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:16:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org>, <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:16:29 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:17:37 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:18:07 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote > On 2015/01/14 15:34, Roger Marquis wrote: > > So one difference then would be that Poudriere determines which > > dependencies are run-time vs build-time and creates packages for those by > > default, is that correct? I can see how that might be convenient for > > packages with a large number of dependencies (like sssd) but it also > > seems like a lot of additional infrastructure simply to build binaries on > > one host to be used by many. > > Poudriere by definition will create packages for all of the build- and > run-depends, as it needs the build-depends packages itself in order to > build everything. It builds everything in temporary jails which it > installs all the needed dependencies to, and then destroys after that > package has been built. > > However, when you go to install a package from the repo, pkg(8) will > only pull down the run-time dependencies of whatever you choose to > install. That means there are a good chunk of packages you simply don't > need to have on your production servers any more. > > Yes, poudriere does a lot of stuff, but if you didn't use a central > builder, you'ld end up replicating all of that stuff onto every machine > you wanted to manage. Poudriere itself can run on a fairly modest > machine -- it depends on how many packages you need to build and how > quickly you want them. It's quite feasible to use poudriere for a > small-ish repo on a machine at night, when it is otherwise quiet, and > then use the same machine for something else during the day. This might be a good place to put some links to how-to's for common use-cases for poudriere. I see questions like this quite often on the lists, and in the forums. Anyone have one? --Chris > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:39:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216B3498 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 649C198D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14679 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2015 18:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.66) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2015 18:33:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:33:06 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Subject: Re: games/wesnoth: How to cope with "invalid DSO for symbol `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'" Message-ID: <20150114193306.75213690@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <54B62A03.2090003@toco-domains.de> References: <54AFB90B.2070209@toco-domains.de> <54B58862.6050704@FreeBSD.org> <54B62A03.2090003@toco-domains.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD ports , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:39:52 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:34:11 +0100 Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > On 13.01.2015 22:04, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > On 1/9/2015 5:18 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > >> [ 3%] mo-update [wesnoth-dw-ar]: Creating mo file. > >> /usr/bin/ld: g: invalid DSO for symbol > >> `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' definition > >> /usr/local/lib/libboost_system.so.1.55.0: could not read symbols: > >> Bad value c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use > >> -v to see invocation) > >> --- cutter --- > > > > Usually this means -lboost_system is missing from the linker line. > > Recent binutils in recent FreeBSD head has been patched to be more > > clear about it. > > As you can see from the output of "pkg info" i have the most recent > binutils installed. At an FreeBSD 10.1 - also the most recent > released version. > > Therefore i don't understand your comment. Can you explain it > further? Whats your advice? Remove this line because it should work? > Or keep the line for compatibility reasons? > Basically it comes down to this (too lazy to search for a better source/explanation): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:47:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C86C69F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71153A68 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0EIlohw040296 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:47:50 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0EIloQj040295 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:47:50 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 92644 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2015 12:47:46 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2015 12:47:46 -0600 Message-ID: <54B6B9D5.1030803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:47:49 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: games/wesnoth: How to cope with "invalid DSO for symbol `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'" References: <54AFB90B.2070209@toco-domains.de> <54B58862.6050704@FreeBSD.org> <54B62A03.2090003@toco-domains.de> In-Reply-To: <54B62A03.2090003@toco-domains.de> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:47:50 -0000 On 1/14/2015 2:34 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > On 13.01.2015 22:04, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 1/9/2015 5:18 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >>> [ 3%] mo-update [wesnoth-dw-ar]: Creating mo file. >>> /usr/bin/ld: g: invalid DSO for symbol >>> `_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' definition >>> /usr/local/lib/libboost_system.so.1.55.0: could not read symbols: Bad >>> value >>> c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see >>> invocation) >>> --- cutter --- >> >> Usually this means -lboost_system is missing from the linker line. >> Recent binutils in recent FreeBSD head has been patched to be more clear >> about it. > > As you can see from the output of "pkg info" i have the most recent > binutils installed. At an FreeBSD 10.1 - also the most recent released > version. > > Therefore i don't understand your comment. Can you explain it further? > Whats your advice? Remove this line because it should work? Or keep the > line for compatibility reasons? > > Greetings, > Torsten "recent head" means the development version of FreeBSD, aka FreeBSD 11. Not 10.1. The binutils I speak of is not from ports, it is in the base system. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 00:08:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B641299 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kirk-ext.obspm.fr (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02646E2 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by kirk-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id t0F08eDI014467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:08:41 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:09:23 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: libxul build problem Message-ID: <20150115000923.GA953@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:08:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at kirk-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:08:45 -0000 Hi everyone, I've already fill a bug report on freebsd bugzilla but I would like to known If this problem affect only me or not. I'm runnig 3 freebsd-box, all running 10-Stable (FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #10 r275839), all ports is up2date. When I try to build the libxul ports just after it's begin the build stop (in fact not even really started) with this message ===> Configuring for libxul-31.4.0 (cd /usr/ports/www/libxul/work/mozilla-esr31 && /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.13) (cd /usr/ports/www/libxul/work/mozilla-esr31/js/src/ && /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.13) gmake[1]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/www/libxul' /usr/ports/www/libxul/work/mozilla-esr31/client.mk:114: *** missing separator. Stop. gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/libxul' ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to gecko@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/www/libxul/work/mozilla-esr31/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/libxul Does anyone have this problem ? Regards. NB: The bug report : https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196737 -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: jeu 15 jan 2015 01:03:53 CET From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 06:27:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAA7DE3 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57446E28 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k11so12753398wes.6 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:27:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ht1Tiae+ynE5fAkSK1tYjWGNVg0GzZO7hhEZcI2jZb0=; b=tklHCGJXkkq5oCnW27d18+9bsPA/y+Iouku9x0ud5Z2W5nd1lNWr9QtvRZ2S1zJBxN dv3S+0YavkKTR0yu921Zf292+eKMfyO5ZQBLAav1PEEj1RvBs4mEjzwtI3eYLZVjiK9l 12gZk1+PniuyMCQk9RKCqREG5C3dGjgLQ+rlFeejUMknjvVQROhDrX/8EwZT+yZWmGET tsJtS5ar+/caxGTDEQxbTGZTjGsNlZcttmC4LIX5fHCd/A+FqECm3/eB/v3gB/0+F1cM vbEFun2VD94wQfehrGQH0UAzQDEKED0vbIj1UE1sqiJqwJaRUwqGaxu8V8G986U8rx8s m7pA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.175.7 with SMTP id bw7mr3904230wjc.107.1421303234749; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:27:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:27:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:27:16 -0000 Hi, I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPLv3. When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, ... .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-libedit-preferred It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: # ldd /usr/local/bin/psql /usr/local/bin/psql: libpq.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpq.so.5 (0x800885000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x800ab3000) libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x800cbe000) libedit.so.7 => /lib/libedit.so.7 (0x800f2a000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801161000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801385000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x80171e000) libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x801b16000) .. there's a link to gettext libintl but that's LGPL (2.1) Anyhow I haven't done testing with psql linked to libedit instead of readline.. There's some noise about this a few years back but I don't see anything recent. Anyone have any 'bad' recent experience with libedit? pitfalls? It might be good to have libedit added as an option. I'm working on an appliance and the readline dependency kinda messes things up a bit for me. Obviously other remedies beyond ports but I think it could be a nice option. Comments appreciated. Thanks, -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 07:11:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8730A702 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2798A350 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0F7A4o9067594; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:10:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Kurt Jaeger , John Hein In-Reply-To: References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu>, <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com>, <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:10:07 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:11:14 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:50:09 -0800 "Chris H" wrote > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:34:45 -0800 "Chris H" wrote > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:54:56 -0700 John Hein > > wrote > > > Kurt Jaeger wrote at 20:29 +0100 on Jan 13, 2015: > > > > > I checked out (cloned) the master branch, and looked it over. > > > > > This will be an easy upgrade, and I'll be happy to do it. > > > > > Should the maintainer not mind, that is. ;) > > > > > > > > I don't think he will (as can be seen from PR 192405). > > > > > > > > Provide a PR with the patch and I'll commit it after testing the > > > build. > > > > > I'll update it if no one else gets to it this week or review a PR. > > Thanks for the offer, and reply, John. > > So far I've squashed ~20 errors. I'm now at the IPv6 specific ones. > > > Willing to hand it over if someone wants it. > > Thanks, John. I might just take you up on that. :) > > > > Thanks again, John. > OK. All the errors have been chased, and crushed. But it's now late. > So I won't be submitting the pr(1) until tomorrow. OK killed all the errors, rolled up a release, and submitted an svn diff. Please see the pr(1): https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196746 The build still emits a fair amount of warnings. but none are show stoppers. The source wants an earlier GCC, and really isn't well suited for clang. This was all built, tested on 11-CURRENT. I'll eliminate all the warnings, for the next version. All the best. --Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 08:27:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DB65487 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49488C20 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YBfm5-000BTw-8H; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:27:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:27:29 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Chris H Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Message-ID: <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , John Hein X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:40 -0000 Hi! > > So I won't be submitting the pr(1) until tomorrow. > OK killed all the errors, rolled up a release, and submitted an > svn diff. Please see the pr(1): > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196746 Testing @work. > The build still emits a fair amount of warnings. but none are > show stoppers. Indeed, very noisy 8-} > I'll eliminate all the warnings, for the next version. Will you report those upstream ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 08:27:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD77512 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6764FC27 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwcmgw06p ([61.9.190.166]) by nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150115082747.MQGT23397.nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw06p> for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:47 +0000 Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([203.41.22.114]) by nschwcmgw06p with BigPond Outbound id g8Tm1p00d2ThMyb018Tnjb; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:47 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NbJkJh/4 c=1 sm=1 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:17 a=XD52yEjQpfAA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=oMrGJ9lLOoZJUtzH0pgA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:117 Received: from [10.0.5.3] (ewsw01.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t0F8QcZI036979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:26:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Message-ID: <54B779BC.1040501@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:26:36 +1100 From: Dewayne Geraghty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:27:55 -0000 On 15/01/2015 5:27 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPLv3. > When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the > bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, > > ... > .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" > > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-libedit-preferred > > > It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: > > > # ldd /usr/local/bin/psql > /usr/local/bin/psql: > libpq.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpq.so.5 (0x800885000) > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x800ab3000) > libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x800cbe000) > libedit.so.7 => /lib/libedit.so.7 (0x800f2a000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801161000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801385000) > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x80171e000) > libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x801b16000) > > > > .. there's a link to gettext libintl but that's LGPL (2.1) > > Anyhow I haven't done testing with psql linked to libedit instead of > readline.. There's some noise about this a few years back but I don't > see anything recent. Anyone have any 'bad' recent experience with > libedit? pitfalls? It might be good to have libedit added as an > option. I'm working on an appliance and the readline dependency kinda > messes things up a bit for me. Obviously other remedies beyond ports > but I think it could be a nice option. Comments appreciated. > > Thanks, > Good catch Waitman. And thanks for sharing an approach to avoid GPLv3 inclusion. Though you've raised an interesting question as to whether the licencing information displayed by "pkg info" is accurate where a port pulls in mandatory dependencies that use a more restrictive open source licence. Of the subset of ports that I use (servers only), the ports [licences] that may be of concern are: python27 [PSFL], mediawiki [GPLv2], mysql56-server [from mysql web GPL], pcre [BSD3CLAUSE] also use readline and aren't tagged as GPLv3 which they probably should as FreeBSD metaports requires readline? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 08:48:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C973D921; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.dk [213.239.220.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8476CE4A; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51A3B7693; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:48:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:48:05 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Roger Marquis Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> Mail-Followup-To: Roger Marquis , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.3-RELEASE-p5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:48:16 -0000 --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Roger, On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 08:34:35AM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Yes, poudriere does a lot of stuff, but if you didn't use a central > > builder, you'ld end up replicating all of that stuff onto every machine > > you wanted to manage. >=20 > What stuff would you end up replicating? I ask because our "make > package" host don't replicate anything other than the required binaries, > libraries and configs. >=20 This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, have built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time, which includes 'make package', but you probably have other tools around it to deal with the distribution. In that case, there's no reason for you to change anything. If you in-house solution works for you, keep using it. Poudriere can provide the same functionality out of the box, and would be my first recommendation for people starting a local package repository, but if you already have a system in place, there's probably no need to spend time to migrate to poudriere. Erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBVLd+w1F75hSlwe7HAQoQlgf9Ey73rGPcSNDrKELQXYhfd6gLWmjFxUlK QpzxRnJDOkkT9GovBtQtqsJq/7X+wQFF7FlGklJVmcjIibn9IQ1HvHVq6KNeyxug jexu8pgq22JYn1oTpxs7gLHlH+YAkLYEGzv64PGOJtAiMl7tWMliL+gu0P0921We 3VlRCn+ZTCwoGFj/FMTlk92wJg1O1c0InlOSOSZh1opbzDr1U2bRCbWy181+x7q9 dKm0rJfT2J/aG0ioU3W7O4Hw6JSW2i2ypPxkToLLeBp2s3vqwcrarwenfjsT0qkR 6hox/VO0ydesKSp998mAdRZa6GBEoF2eConazFoW3pDsGtw8UtkIrw== =ydwA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 08:56:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13294E69 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1B8CF4A for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YBgEB-000BWV-7b; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:56:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:56:31 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Chris H , FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , John Hein Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Message-ID: <20150115085631.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:56:33 -0000 Hi! > > > So I won't be submitting the pr(1) until tomorrow. > > OK killed all the errors, rolled up a release, and submitted an > > svn diff. Please see the pr(1): > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196746 > > Testing @work. Poudriere build on 10.1-amd64, 9.3-amd64, 8.4-i386 went fine. Commited, thanks very much for a smooth patch 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 09:44:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5CFCB33 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C16759 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0F9imJg010692 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0F9imqj010691; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201501150944.t0F9imqj010691@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:48 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:48 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ biology/libsbml | 5.11.0 | 5.11.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/p5-FreeBSD-i386-Ptrace | 0.03 | 0.05 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 14:47:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEEA894B for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89214BAA for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0FEkU5V082004; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:46:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Kurt Jaeger In-Reply-To: <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> , <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:46:31 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <0c18c38876c88a9e21cd7e8fc568d545@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , John Hein X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:47:36 -0000 On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:27:29 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote > Hi! > > > > So I won't be submitting the pr(1) until tomorrow. > > OK killed all the errors, rolled up a release, and submitted an > > svn diff. Please see the pr(1): > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196746 > > Testing @work. > > > The build still emits a fair amount of warnings. but none are > > show stoppers. > > Indeed, very noisy 8-} Linux-isms in/from errno.h && quoting issues in newer GCC's, but mostly CLANG. > > > I'll eliminate all the warnings, for the next version. > > Will you report those upstream ? As previously mentioned; upstream's code is fairly unmaintained (messy). In fact, I removed over 3,000 extraneous new-lines from one source file alone. Committing to maintain a port necessitated performing a mass code cleanup. If they (upstream) will accept a git push. Then we can still draw from upstream. Otherwise, I'll be forced to either 1) cherry-pick from upstream 2) fork/branch && rename the port/project After I squash the remaining warnings emitted, I submit a push request, and see where it goes. But it will involve every file in their source pool. So they may be reluctant. We'll see. :) Thanks for the prompt commit, and attention to this, Kurt! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 15:04:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E72233B for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E219EDC8 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0FF3NGO085720; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:03:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , John Hein , Kurt Jaeger In-Reply-To: <20150115085631.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu>, <20150115085631.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:03:23 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <3a3fa72e44f3a263b26571a0bd1feda4@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:04:28 -0000 On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:56:31 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote > Hi! > > > > > So I won't be submitting the pr(1) until tomorrow. > > > OK killed all the errors, rolled up a release, and submitted an > > > svn diff. Please see the pr(1): > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196746 > > > > Testing @work. > > Poudriere build on 10.1-amd64, 9.3-amd64, 8.4-i386 went fine. Commited, > thanks very much for a smooth patch 8-) Wouldn't have it any other way. :-) Thank *you*, Kurt, for all your time, and attention to this! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 15:37:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF8AF79 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937511DC for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so18639647wiv.1 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:37:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KnWJvENFYxE0w/QyovNmO0b4zs95+/EStpoxDPivF2o=; b=QtkoHxrt88GrPzCZC7K3tHoRVSyRb7MXF+f6gSORhEJE1/bHhETqkAQwskIKMdIuOb HG/rTK3QHnbyETWabW4hBInoSLIZhRm4Nv72jmKwYyHn7dLuwAU4N5cVk8MSX0nLVEK0 50LPx6w+X+ee/Tc2WDGLZFbUy3XjVfB7jRAoTWDduYig2Ithk56NVOQHF0h8YCcjNJfl sxfAkZVLQYUc+SZLjIOvt1MRJY7uWYynnskn3dcqfcKtZXNqRuzFvo0tprDuFbm302CR oGCoLa2CWmPiySCCBtoiih/0f6OJwOFO8baWBSD9jYyIdIRsgKrPJA2C7zy1W5uNGUTb zR4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.202 with SMTP id hm10mr19943423wjb.72.1421336267661; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:37:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:37:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54B779BC.1040501@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <54B779BC.1040501@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:37:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Waitman Gobble To: Dewayne Geraghty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:37:50 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > > On 15/01/2015 5:27 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPLv3. >> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the >> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >> >> ... >> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >> >> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-libedit-preferred >> >> >> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >> >> >> # ldd /usr/local/bin/psql >> /usr/local/bin/psql: >> libpq.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpq.so.5 (0x800885000) >> libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x800ab3000) >> libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x800cbe000) >> libedit.so.7 => /lib/libedit.so.7 (0x800f2a000) >> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801161000) >> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801385000) >> libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x80171e000) >> libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x801b16000) >> >> >> >> .. there's a link to gettext libintl but that's LGPL (2.1) >> >> Anyhow I haven't done testing with psql linked to libedit instead of >> readline.. There's some noise about this a few years back but I don't >> see anything recent. Anyone have any 'bad' recent experience with >> libedit? pitfalls? It might be good to have libedit added as an >> option. I'm working on an appliance and the readline dependency kinda >> messes things up a bit for me. Obviously other remedies beyond ports >> but I think it could be a nice option. Comments appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> > > Good catch Waitman. And thanks for sharing an approach to avoid GPLv3 > inclusion. > > Though you've raised an interesting question as to whether the licencing > information displayed by "pkg info" is accurate where a port pulls in > mandatory dependencies that use a more restrictive open source licence. > > Of the subset of ports that I use (servers only), the ports [licences] > that may be of concern are: python27 [PSFL], mediawiki [GPLv2], > mysql56-server [from mysql web GPL], pcre [BSD3CLAUSE] also use readline > and aren't tagged as GPLv3 which they probably should as FreeBSD > metaports requires readline? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" There seems to be an issue that makes this problem more complicated, could be worked out. I tried building in poudiere without any readline, configure fails. Adding readline back to USES in client Makefile gets a build, but --with-libedit-preferred links to base libedit. In postgresql configure script, still looks for readline even if it uses libedit. So the package built by poudiere still pulls in readline. ie, if test "$with_readline" = yes; then { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for library containing readline" >&5 $as_echo_n "checking for library containing readline... " >&6; } if test "${pgac_cv_check_readline+set}" = set; then $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 else pgac_cv_check_readline=no pgac_save_LIBS=$LIBS if test x"$with_libedit_preferred" != x"yes" then READLINE_ORDER="-lreadline -ledit" else READLINE_ORDER="-ledit -lreadline" fi so basically it's setting the READLINE_ORDER with both libedit and libreadline but in alternate order depending on 'preferred' after a build using 'preferred' the client is linked to libedit, but pkg still pulls in readline as dependency. # pkg install postgresql93-server ... New packages to be INSTALLED: postgresql93-server: 9.3.5 postgresql93-client: 9.3.5 readline: 6.3.8 ... # ldd /usr/local/bin/psql /usr/local/bin/psql: libpq.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpq.so.5 (0x2009a000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x200c9000) libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x200db000) libedit.so.7 => /lib/libedit.so.7 (0x2013e000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x20173000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20200000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x20400000) libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2019e000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x20384000) Apparently this behavior is because libedit doesn't work properly on some (non BSD) platforms. (?) ...reference: the notes in the configure script. So some work would need to be done to alter the configure script and pull out the readline stuff, (but should probably be an option). This makes for a more complicated port, but it's doable. For my own project I can make a custom port with readline stripped out, but for everyone with an 'optionally really remove readline' option that would be a bigger challenge I think. -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 15:52:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5178DF for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFB2613 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.106]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id gFsF1p0042JGN3p01FsSgA; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:52:26 +0000 Received: from kirby.cyberbotx.com ([107.5.48.95]) by resomta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id gFsR1p00Z23DSHF01FsSH0; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:52:26 +0000 Message-ID: <54B7E239.2080704@cyberbotx.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:52:25 -0500 From: Naram Qashat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Fwd: [package - 84amd64-default][graphics/libspiro] Failed for libspiro-0.2.20131203, 1 in build References: <201501111845.t0BIjW9o083676@beefy2.isc.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201501111845.t0BIjW9o083676@beefy2.isc.freebsd.org> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <201501111845.t0BIjW9o083676@beefy2.isc.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1421337146; bh=R/XAtpd95sEl89GEeGTQhTCxRWRNLOKtVqdkJjF+S4g=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=toeRXsTt3vH5e58Mc/Zoyp/gpp6zgscPbbET2cttaYlimBPa8EYjNykl6Qb3r4xU2 4NHCzJdElxtNRtafYZD9J8LxDEql0/fHkdnl7tZmpv9GkZATU3l/Bc4YoZoIekzkMI /rbRRTvwg+kZd4YchhXz37D98dpWyOOxdAXWj/y0ruxJFSExEum1nphZFwk0aUCkN5 ozAPAXddNmW8EpaIuaqlAgBZ7d8h4ooLrqk5jtzBdRFefQosFTYR8XCXWYnENZkjmS 2QxumkM2Sc8We+siAXZGtpVRyIMW74w+/SRZirFWU1YRhxTuQGsbgR29EZkix55Zwr BwikRrK3ib6tg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:52:29 -0000 I'm looking to see if someone who is more knowledgeable about perl or libtool or whatever to help me solve the below problem. Basically, libspiro's internal version number is 0.2.20130930. Under FreeBSD 9.X and up, config.log shows LIBSPIRO_VERSION as being 0:2:0 and libtool completes as expected. However, under 8.X, LIBSPIRO_VERSION instead becomes $0:2:0, and libtool gets :2:0 instead of 0:2:0, and thus fails to build, as shown below. I'd tried manually having autoreconf and automake run (as libspiro's README.md explains), but that didn't help at all. I'm not familiar enough with the build process of applications that utilize libtool to know why this is the case. If anyone has any insights into this, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, Naram Qashat -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [package - 84amd64-default][graphics/libspiro] Failed for libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 in build Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:45:32 GMT From: pkg-fallout@FreeBSD.org To: cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com CC: pkg-fallout@FreeBSD.org You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com Last committer: wen@FreeBSD.org Ident: $FreeBSD: head/graphics/libspiro/Makefile 375727 2014-12-28 14:53:29Z wen $ Log URL: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/data/84amd64-default/2015-01-11_18h28m14s/logs/libspiro-0.2.20131203,1.log Build URL: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=84amd64-default&build=2015-01-11_18h28m14s Log: ====>> Building graphics/libspiro build started at Sun Jan 11 18:45:07 UTC 2015 port directory: /usr/ports/graphics/libspiro building for: FreeBSD 84amd64-default-job-12 8.4-RELEASE-p16 FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p16 amd64 maintained by: cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: head/graphics/libspiro/Makefile 375727 2014-12-28 14:53:29Z wen $ Poudriere version: 3.1.1 Host OSVERSION: 1100050 Jail OSVERSION: 804000 ---Begin Environment--- OSVERSION=804000 UNAME_v=FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p16 UNAME_r=8.4-RELEASE-p16 FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES BLOCKSIZE=K MAIL=/var/mail/root STATUS=1 SAVED_TERM= MASTERMNT=/usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/84amd64-default/ref PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin POUDRIERE_BUILD_TYPE=bulk PKGNAME=libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 OLDPWD=/ PWD=/usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/84amd64-default/ref/.p/pool MASTERNAME=84amd64-default USER=root HOME=/root POUDRIERE_VERSION=3.1.1 LOCALBASE=/usr/local PACKAGE_BUILDING=yes ---End Environment--- ---Begin OPTIONS List--- ---End OPTIONS List--- --CONFIGURE_ARGS-- --prefix=/usr/local ${_LATE_CONFIGURE_ARGS} --End CONFIGURE_ARGS-- --CONFIGURE_ENV-- XDG_DATA_HOME=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work HOME=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work TMPDIR="/tmp" MAKE=gmake SHELL=/bin/sh CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh CONFIG_SITE=/usr/ports/Templates/config.site lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=262144 --End CONFIGURE_ENV-- --MAKE_ENV-- XDG_DATA_HOME=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work HOME=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work TMPDIR="/tmp" NO_PIE=yes SHELL=/bin/sh NO_LINT=YES PREFIX=/usr/local LOCALBASE=/usr/local LIBDIR="/usr/lib" CC="cc" CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing" CPP="cpp" CPPFLAGS="" LDFLAGS=" -fstack-protector" LIBS="" CXX="c++" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing" MANPREFIX="/usr/local" BSD_INSTALL_PROGRAM="install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555" BSD_INSTALL_LIB="install -s -o root -g wheel -m 444" BSD_INSTALL_SCRIPT="install -o root -g wheel -m 555" BSD_INSTALL_DATA="install -o root -g wheel -m 0644" BSD_INSTALL_MAN="install -o root -g wheel -m 444" --End MAKE_ENV-- --PLIST_SUB-- OSREL=8.4 PREFIX=%D LOCALBASE=/usr/local RESETPREFIX=/usr/local PORTDOCS="" PORTEXAMPLES="" LIB32DIR=lib DOCSDIR="share/doc/libspiro" EXAMPLESDIR="share/examples/libspiro" DATADIR="share/libspiro" WWWDIR="www/libspiro" ETCDIR="etc/libspiro" --End PLIST_SUB-- --SUB_LIST-- PREFIX=/usr/local LOCALBASE=/usr/local DATADIR=/usr/local/share/libspiro DOCSDIR=/usr/local/share/doc/libspiro EXAMPLESDIR=/usr/local/share/examples/libspiro WWWDIR=/usr/local/www/libspiro ETCDIR=/usr/local/etc/libspiro --End SUB_LIST-- ---Begin make.conf--- USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS=yes BATCH=yes WRKDIRPREFIX=/wrkdirs USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS=yes BATCH=yes WRKDIRPREFIX=/wrkdirs PORTSDIR=/usr/ports PACKAGES=/packages DISTDIR=/distfiles #### /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf #### WITH_PKGNG=yes #WITH_PKGNG=devel # clean-restricted ran via poudriere.conf NO_RESTRICTED #NO_RESTRICTED=yes DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=poudriere ---End make.conf--- =================================================== =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/sbin/pkg in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/pkg-1.4.4.txz [84amd64-default-job-12] Installing pkg-1.4.4... [84amd64-default-job-12] Extracting pkg-1.4.4... done Message for pkg-1.4.4: If you are upgrading from the old package format, first run: # pkg2ng ===> Returning to build of libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 =========================================================================== =================================================== =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 for building =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for libspiro-0.2.20131203.tar.gz. =========================================================================== =================================================== =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 for building ===> Extracting for libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for libspiro-0.2.20131203.tar.gz. =========================================================================== =================================================== =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Patching for libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: gmake - not found ===> Verifying install for gmake in /usr/ports/devel/gmake ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/gmake-4.1_1.txz [84amd64-default-job-12] Installing gmake-4.1_1... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Installing gettext-runtime-0.19.3... [84amd64-default-job-12] | `-- Installing indexinfo-0.2.2... [84amd64-default-job-12] | `-- Extracting indexinfo-0.2.2... done [84amd64-default-job-12] | `-- Installing libiconv-1.14_6... [84amd64-default-job-12] | `-- Extracting libiconv-1.14_6... done [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Extracting gettext-runtime-0.19.3... done [84amd64-default-job-12] Extracting gmake-4.1_1... done ===> Returning to build of libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: autoconf-2.69 - not found ===> Verifying install for autoconf-2.69 in /usr/ports/devel/autoconf ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/autoconf-2.69.txz [84amd64-default-job-12] Installing autoconf-2.69... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Installing autoconf-wrapper-20131203... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Extracting autoconf-wrapper-20131203... done [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Installing m4-1.4.17_1,1... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Extracting m4-1.4.17_1,1... done [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Installing perl5-5.18.4_11... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Extracting perl5-5.18.4_11... done [84amd64-default-job-12] Extracting autoconf-2.69... done ===> Returning to build of libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: autoheader-2.69 - found ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: autoreconf-2.69 - found ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: aclocal-1.14 - not found ===> Verifying install for aclocal-1.14 in /usr/ports/devel/automake ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/automake-1.14_1.txz [84amd64-default-job-12] Installing automake-1.14_1... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Installing automake-wrapper-20131203... [84amd64-default-job-12] `-- Extracting automake-wrapper-20131203... done [84amd64-default-job-12] Extracting automake-1.14_1... done ===> Returning to build of libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: automake-1.14 - found ===> libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 depends on executable: libtoolize - not found ===> Verifying install for libtoolize in /usr/ports/devel/libtool ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/libtool-2.4.2.418.txz [84amd64-default-job-12] Installing libtool-2.4.2.418... [84amd64-default-job-12] Extracting libtool-2.4.2.418... done ===> Returning to build of libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 =========================================================================== =================================================== =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Configuring for libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in '.'. libtoolize: copying file './ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS, 'm4'. libtoolize: copying file 'm4/libtool.m4' libtoolize: copying file 'm4/ltoptions.m4' libtoolize: copying file 'm4/ltsugar.m4' libtoolize: copying file 'm4/ltversion.m4' libtoolize: copying file 'm4/lt~obsolete.m4' configure.ac:43: installing './ar-lib' configure.ac:43: installing './compile' configure.ac:35: installing './install-sh' configure.ac:35: installing './missing' Makefile.am: installing './depcomp' parallel-tests: installing './test-driver' configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... (cached) /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... (cached) /usr/bin/awk checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether gmake supports nested variables... yes checking for style of include used by gmake... GNU checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking for ar... ar checking the archiver (ar) interface... ar checking build system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd8.4 checking host system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd8.4 checking how to print strings... printf checking for a sed that does not truncate output... (cached) /usr/bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... (cached) /usr/bin/egrep checking for fgrep... (cached) /usr/bin/fgrep checking for ld used by cc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144 checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd8.4 file names to amd64-portbld-freebsd8.4 format... func_convert_file_noop checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd8.4 file names to toolchain format... func_convert_file_noop checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for objdump... objdump checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking for dlltool... no checking how to associate runtime and link libraries... printf %s\n checking for archiver @FILE support... no checking for strip... strip checking for ranlib... ranlib checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from cc object... ok checking for sysroot... no checking for mt... mt checking if mt is a manifest tool... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking for memory.h... (cached) yes checking for strings.h... (cached) yes checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes checking for objdir... .libs checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if cc static flag -static works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd8.4 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking for gcc... (cached) cc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether cc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... (cached) yes checking dependency style of cc... (cached) gcc3 checking whether ln -s works... yes checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes checking for a sed that does not truncate output... (cached) /usr/bin/sed checking whether gmake supports nested variables... (cached) yes checking for library containing cos... -lm checking for finite... yes checking pthread.h usability... yes checking pthread.h presence... yes checking for pthread.h... yes checking whether C compiler accepts -Wall... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wall: not found checking whether C compiler accepts -Wextra... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wextra: not found checking whether C compiler accepts -Wcast-align... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wcast-align: not found checking whether C compiler accepts -Wbad-function-cast... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wbad-function-cast: not found checking whether C compiler accepts -Wc++-compat... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wc++-compat: not found checking whether C compiler accepts -Wmissing-prototypes... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wmissing-prototypes: not found checking whether C compiler accepts -Wunused... yes WCFLAGS+= -Wunused: not found checking that generated files are newer than configure... done configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating tests/Makefile config.status: creating libspiro.pc config.status: creating spiro-config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing libtool commands =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Building for libspiro-0.2.20131203,1 gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work/fontforge-libspiro-15fdb23' Making all in . gmake[2]: Entering directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work/fontforge-libspiro-15fdb23' CC spiro.lo CC bezctx.lo CC spiroentrypoints.lo CCLD libspiro.la libtool: error: CURRENT '' must be a nonnegative integer libtool: error: ':2:0' is not valid version information Makefile:495: recipe for target 'libspiro.la' failed gmake[2]: *** [libspiro.la] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work/fontforge-libspiro-15fdb23' Makefile:565: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libspiro/work/fontforge-libspiro-15fdb23' Makefile:403: recipe for target 'all' failed gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/libspiro. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 16:01:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCA2FA8 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A2C27BD for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n12so15797604wgh.6 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:01:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=F8zvRRDI4xdqWuCMGjLuBgrgZxlyzTkliNeMO/dPT6s=; b=sFG2CWsl0/gOJRReFez42nddy2CjVUpmQLzf7cmYYpv9c/zJPDeMpl0r2RmRERtPQX SfDANjUMW38ZPLuIruzVJltYMzcj8jIo443vLlcrV3gSIJ2HBQyW2G2Ab1cHuToe5CJS SEiHkjmKPG6Y4k6ZzLVZjHdWIwqzYoaLDJ9fhlzJBl4Fj7+d1yZ32BVudBop0G6hEYKZ GQS9PQH9qIOyPAiuNzw2duG6ubeHO2MSxCeSGxX9t13q/cVv99G5SvDBaNdcQ2HhBAS0 ZULexpkU2mToLVcVVTWID2v8ruHN/UNHzmfw9l70qZbn77JxNANgkQuTrqTzGQwbBA3l 6zjA== X-Received: by 10.180.73.170 with SMTP id m10mr20676513wiv.72.1421337676900; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:01:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hl1sm2607019wjc.18.2015.01.15.08.01.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:01:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:01:14 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Message-ID: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AjmyJqqohANyBN/e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:01:19 -0000 --AjmyJqqohANyBN/e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPLv3. > When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the > bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >=20 > ... > .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >=20 > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred >=20 >=20 > It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >=20 except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not supprot uni= code (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the editline = port which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it works. Best regards, Bapt --AjmyJqqohANyBN/e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlS35EcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eyr7wCgk6P54/VfB2hXuLoMIVZ4Mb3U 6fQAn2We12yGKverKzMjH9ZZEPsnQFXr =xURf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AjmyJqqohANyBN/e-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 16:42:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40CCEB4C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20B8C91 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id gq15so14630548lab.4 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:42:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pnJ1FVW4kZo1T2vr30XkGncgXBFT/brTaqa6xuYn09Y=; b=TbuzLsUmjPFqfs3h+2S+U9/jvpxiH/gL5DFSMN6R3AET7r9a7Y3qvxlJB+dqvBxkVh F+6LVqyC43W2JSgIqBHB8BSXEd0PMxYii6Wpg9mj1csflkUIdF+FKqA6LFLqSwhaVO6R +nMH2XtJfasCNneltAAbp5+tes8lR9SBJJas1XJNZEyXPfXduAf1ZIiuDrjNYlIJKGqr FfMforhRN4WgRUfZ9c0qOxXsj+XG8iRtPbt93SXmoRwIwilvDHCt/ypiV4tu3Qy9O3Ec GXjYQYL221ouvTVtGpFvOj9wDpZXYcufYBOId5JN1OOPStzcxNyKlsjPwrPbnQaRBz7v +1xQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.132.67 with SMTP id os3mr10804452lbb.90.1421340141700; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:42:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.21.139 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:42:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <727e7b743177b720d1d19bdf0e387166@ultimatedns.net> References: <20141021093930.512251194d972a238e27e45a@mimar.rs> <727e7b743177b720d1d19bdf0e387166@ultimatedns.net> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:42:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/dansguardian revival? From: Nick Rogers To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:42:24 -0000 On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Chris H wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:55:47 -0700 Nick Rogers wrote > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Chris H wrote= : > > > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:39:30 +0200 Marko Cupa=C4=87 > > > wrote > > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:47:19 -0700 > > > > "Chris H" wrote: > > > > > > > > > Unless theirs any objection. I'll take it. I'll open a pr(1) > > > > > with a shar(1) ready, in about an hour. > > > > > > > > > > --Chris > > > > > > > > Nice to hear that dansguardian will be back in ports. I also used i= t > > > > for years in combination with www/squid33 without problem. I was > > > > compiling it from ports, and the trick was to compile squid33 first= , > > > > and dansguardian only after, as dansguardian would only check > existence > > > > of /use/local/bin/squid, and if it was already there, no matter whi= ch > > > > version, it would happily compile, install and work. > > > > > > Right. But there's ${STAGE} to deal with, as well. I may > > > make sqid34 the DEPENDS (I'm still testing). > > > I'm also working with the -devel version, and will likely > > > convert it to the (un)devel version, as there is less user > > > overhead involved -- RESTRICTED/COPYRIGHT/LICENSE/{...} > > > > > > Should be able to post a complete version, sometime > > > tomorrow. > > > > > > > Hey Chris. Any luck getting your new dansguardian port to work? I can't > > find a PR for it. Just wondering if theres anything I can do to help te= st > > or if it would be worth my while to just submit a PR with the last-know= n > > www/dansguardian for the time being. Thanks. > > > > -Nick > Sorry for the delay, and thank you for your generous offer, Nick. > There were some issues with www/squid(34), and decided to wait > to see if they would be addressed soonish. I see that there was > a [partial] resolution just submitted. I'll see if they made it > into the ports tree. If so, I'll see where things are with > regard to their (e|a)ffect on www/dansguardian. If there's still > issues, I'll take you up on your generous offer. :) > Any luck with the squid issues and getting a new www/dansguardian going? I'm still having success with www/squid and the old www/dansguardian, albeit www/squid version needs to be bumped to the latest. > > FWIW I run my dev box on 11 (CURRENT). > > Thanks, again. > > --Chris > > > > > > > > --Chris > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Marko Cupa=C4=87 > > > > https://www.mimar.rs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 17:00:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B21A21 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72064EE1 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:00:08 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:00:14 -0000 > This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, have > built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time, > which includes 'make package' I wouldn't call it an in-house solution since the package target is a feature of the ports infrastructure. We simply 'make package' and install other systems from the resulting package. This does not, however, appear to be as well supported by portsng/pkgng as it was in the previous versions. Now it just exits with no message and a 0 exit-code without creating the package unless you've created /usr/ports/packages and/or specified one or more of WRKDIRPREFIX, PACKAGES and PKGREPOSITORY. What documentation there is seems to be based on older versions (like much of the FreeBSD website) and I haven't found anything on the differences between 'make package' and Poudriere. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 17:46:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B68BC7BB for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA626A5 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so36816832wiw.1 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:46:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iL7NKKId9npq2elr0wCstyCNLio3netDF2pcavyYWNo=; b=uDM/LfIGmc5wbw4Licpph17js+iEdKx7G03NGU6wmNnwmDexQWENWWEm8GT2jxc0yU zX7zYVK8UToeTfTnmAZa/AqqjOwY3htLtcPCaYPr81EdP3l35ski02AqOD9wylhje3rB ZM+Gj28VF38Z6Q75aJ8VdIwfysTtDUefiTPZDc4uHrWgF31CE/CNqgLq5GgrO6WP6mJ+ 3Ac8hw54Auybsd3RmnL2XRdJNll+SNQwta+DN78iTGJuJn5fezwsYYe7N3W4OJQj6ABT I685xozV1BlYSEp1sksFlG2chhSkoa14NFu8dRDXw5wyLR1PvUOGZmFzF/+QxRM2ADZJ e1sQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.143 with SMTP id l15mr62003774wiv.24.1421343963499; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.76.135 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:46:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:46:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Commit needed pkg-fallout related From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:46:05 -0000 Hi, Could someone please commit bug 195752? I keep receiving pkg-fallout related emails. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 17:59:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB738E91 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5924384A for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q59so16135985wes.8 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:59:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=NI5C50tJ808JFpykXJ1sjzJoHdgnNw88I6FvuaawI64=; b=q/jtZjL+ERjTg5iE4jLHpiQJsLBYXNNw6pbepbUREGugTrRJiMpTAQ6+pLBKrpjPXG sMRTjAOUMsfSqZp9CBp+/vMVqIg8Do80OyLJ+fK7KVLOVAIUfoVqA/z7NMRIgzU+38hN 6aKHjoqI/fnNqbhJdWDAzGwL3fbSzNZlvGTZ8RlZYOKlSdrlf4MdT8jJMrUwrYiGG46Q fmtrO0/TWBmUCw0vhhl9xdyzZlFlFBcYvP9Hl7IVIWASUZ7tta1bdHskyrszKsYU5blg c3lZjS9sSum6MwohcIF27kEeq8wTCpqX41C1LCpMJJ4XigdGnX9xmKJDoyEWbcVbuk3Q aWyg== X-Received: by 10.194.89.3 with SMTP id bk3mr21134313wjb.92.1421344785689; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:59:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jp3sm23670628wid.9.2015.01.15.09.59.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:59:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:59:37 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: Commit needed pkg-fallout related Message-ID: <20150115175937.GF98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kbCYTQG2MZjuOjyn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:59:47 -0000 --kbCYTQG2MZjuOjyn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:46:03PM +0100, Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Could someone please commit bug 195752? >=20 > I keep receiving pkg-fallout related emails. >=20 > Thanks in advance. Done sorry for delay. Bapt --kbCYTQG2MZjuOjyn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlS4AAYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExSXQCfbtPlP4BeKaYcYX1a5JtlHLOB l7wAniU2LM7r1k0UeqqxbSxvW4m3vjVv =DdH4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kbCYTQG2MZjuOjyn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 18:09:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286662AA; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3547966; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.137] (helo=smtp6.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YBoLy-0002Jw-8u; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:37:06 +0100 Received: from d47fac43.cm-9-1a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([212.127.172.67] helo=PC01) by smtp6.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YBoLy-0004Y9-62; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:37:06 +0100 From: "Dutchman01" To: Subject: FreeBSD Port: bash-4.3.30_1 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:36:55 +0100 Message-ID: <000001d030e9$df8fc980$9eaf5c80$@quicknet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdAw6ZZJD4CHZHOaTl+kMSHHFVM+xw== Content-Language: nl X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bLW6WqKZ c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=M1C15eV0ApyR7evVf7Vudw==:17 a=cIF5Tx0qAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=Zr7miEi8wWIA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=2oeSqxxVzlsA:10 a=yGR3fp-zFJvBZ-YkDeQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=odbi0h-cGL0A:10 a=L7zYG_wr2OgA:10 a=JwQJgFl_0-wA:10 a=rHH3-K0cdPwA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=XajhwvGKn0KHE2-ifC8A:9 a=NUBNz2Q20fmYr7tR:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 xcat=Undefined/Undefined none X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:09:07 -0000 Please add the latest bash patches to bash port Thank you Regards, Dutchman01 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 18:48:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D40468 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11ADDFF for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0FIldmb032095; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:47:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Nick Rogers In-Reply-To: References: <20141021093930.512251194d972a238e27e45a@mimar.rs> <727e7b743177b720d1d19bdf0e387166@ultimatedns.net>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: www/dansguardian revival? Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:47:39 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <69705840d3bd8cf82b8a0c4b4d72f30f@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:48:50 -0000 On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:42:21 -0800 Nick Rogers wrote > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:55:47 -0700 Nick Rogers wrote > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:39:30 +0200 Marko Cupać > > > > wrote > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:47:19 -0700 > > > > > "Chris H" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Unless theirs any objection. I'll take it. I'll open a pr(1) > > > > > > with a shar(1) ready, in about an hour. > > > > > > > > > > > > --Chris > > > > > > > > > > Nice to hear that dansguardian will be back in ports. I also used it > > > > > for years in combination with www/squid33 without problem. I was > > > > > compiling it from ports, and the trick was to compile squid33 first, > > > > > and dansguardian only after, as dansguardian would only check > > existence > > > > > of /use/local/bin/squid, and if it was already there, no matter which > > > > > version, it would happily compile, install and work. > > > > > > > > Right. But there's ${STAGE} to deal with, as well. I may > > > > make sqid34 the DEPENDS (I'm still testing). > > > > I'm also working with the -devel version, and will likely > > > > convert it to the (un)devel version, as there is less user > > > > overhead involved -- RESTRICTED/COPYRIGHT/LICENSE/{...} > > > > > > > > Should be able to post a complete version, sometime > > > > tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > Hey Chris. Any luck getting your new dansguardian port to work? I can't > > > find a PR for it. Just wondering if theres anything I can do to help test > > > or if it would be worth my while to just submit a PR with the last-known > > > www/dansguardian for the time being. Thanks. > > > > > > -Nick > > Sorry for the delay, and thank you for your generous offer, Nick. > > There were some issues with www/squid(34), and decided to wait > > to see if they would be addressed soonish. I see that there was > > a [partial] resolution just submitted. I'll see if they made it > > into the ports tree. If so, I'll see where things are with > > regard to their (e|a)ffect on www/dansguardian. If there's still > > issues, I'll take you up on your generous offer. :) > > > > Any luck with the squid issues and getting a new www/dansguardian going? > I'm still having success with www/squid and the old www/dansguardian, > albeit www/squid version needs to be bumped to the latest. Sorry for the delay, Nick. There's been a great deal of activity in the squid* department over the past couple months. I wanted to wait for the "dust to settle" before continuing; lest I be required to re-release every couple weeks to work with any new changes. On the up-side, things seem to have settled down. So I'll suck down a copy of HEAD, and renew my efforts to get this back in, over the next couple days. Again, sorry for the delay. Hope you understand. :) --Chris > > > > > > FWIW I run my dev box on 11 (CURRENT). > > > > Thanks, again. > > > > --Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > --Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Marko Cupać > > > > > https://www.mimar.rs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Chris --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 19:07:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F10CF4 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE115B2 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l15so37270082wiw.2 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:07:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=tTWMzjkVYKLEY29moCyx9jLKwlMvr+XX1Cm2tAUoCSY=; b=Vlkw0+8u0Py4JiSlfDw6CEx7zmPYuQY2BZHg9Aas4IhEDOxY3LFxO/bCTM8D1etGwQ N7yTUWyC8zXXox71Wn56mU0CIL9S/Xhvg9s4iUHKADbBzj/lkn7EKWl9rdp1YuggnDRI v348JFlCveu9bi5KdsG5BwxF1B44ib0G5+RHoTQqdAspZyQHc/ZbAYoIuOBf8qrXBQZB 2y4vmR1h4hN4p3XabtwZ7STovAvVDsdXRC+ZJrwwyz3kfVnl9F7YdtwCyy+ij2gB4f6D unRO5iSMeBxxdReExqKxB6R9h3645EqVX7sRCz4kF8oPwxzqBYe5tasXg8+Ppbnc/3iA k64w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkq96C4gApLeXwAN89hnTzDPJWtRa4CN+E9bk+eTFGqyyYKXFe24Y60jzUbVHmWS4FJHFAd X-Received: by 10.180.12.75 with SMTP id w11mr22188091wib.9.1421348850445; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fg9sm130683wib.9.2015.01.15.11.07.29 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:07:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:02:46 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Alan Eldridge Subject: print/cups fails to build on 9.3-STABLE i386 Message-ID: <20150115190246.GE3301@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Eldridge , ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:07:38 -0000 After running this command: "# svn update /usr/ports" I tried to upgrade the print/cups port. As root I then ran this command: # portmaster -K -B -D print/cups Below is the output leading up to the failure and the failure itself. BTW - I did retry the build in /usr/ports/print/cups using this: # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes install and got the same results. =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= ... ... Making all in test... gmake[1]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' echo Linking ippserver... Linking ippserver... cc -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -fPIE -pie -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -o ippserver ippserver.o ../cups/libcups.a \ -lssl -lcrypto -pthread -lm -lcrypt -lssp_nonshared -liconv -lz -lz ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `_httpResolveURI': /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1617: undefined reference to `DNSServiceCreateConnection' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1626: undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1736: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1656: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefSockFD' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1700: undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1722: undefined reference to `DNSServiceProcessResult' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1731: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1733: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `http_resolve_cb': /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2071: undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2058: undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' Makefile:192: recipe for target 'ippserver' failed gmake[1]: *** [ippserver] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' Makefile:31: recipe for target 'all' failed gmake: *** [all] Error 1 *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. *** [install] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 19:37:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 262CF3D6 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward6l.mail.yandex.net (forward6l.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1819::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B166B5E2 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (smtp19.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.19]) by forward6l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 74B4114E1361; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:37:12 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 01780BE0437; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:37:11 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 78.108.206.242.tel.ru (78.108.206.242.tel.ru [78.108.206.242]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id lDU4JHiEkJ-bBkmUvFo; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:37:11 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Message-ID: <54B816E6.8040307@passap.ru> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:37:10 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Eldridge , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: print/cups fails to build on 9.3-STABLE i386 References: <20150115190246.GE3301@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150115190246.GE3301@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:37:17 -0000 15.01.2015 22:02, William Bulley пишет: > After running this command: "# svn update /usr/ports" I tried to > upgrade the print/cups port. > > As root I then ran this command: > > # portmaster -K -B -D print/cups > > Below is the output leading up to the failure and the failure itself. > > BTW - I did retry the build in /usr/ports/print/cups using this: > > # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes install > > and got the same results. > > =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= > > ... > ... > Making all in test... > gmake[1]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' > echo Linking ippserver... > Linking ippserver... > cc -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -fPIE -pie -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -o ippserver ippserver.o ../cups/libcups.a \ > -lssl -lcrypto -pthread -lm -lcrypt -lssp_nonshared -liconv -lz -lz > ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `_httpResolveURI': > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1617: undefined reference to `DNSServiceCreateConnection' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1626: undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1736: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1656: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefSockFD' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1700: undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1722: undefined reference to `DNSServiceProcessResult' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1731: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1733: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' > ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `http_resolve_cb': > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2071: undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2058: undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' > Makefile:192: recipe for target 'ippserver' failed > gmake[1]: *** [ippserver] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' > Makefile:31: recipe for target 'all' failed > gmake: *** [all] Error 1 > *** [do-build] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. > *** [install] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. I think that your cups-client libs are linked against dns libraries. With a fresh portstree (this imho should be fixesd at r376233) rebuild print/cups-client, then print/cups-base. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 19:41:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EABA74DD for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EB269E for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i138so14036689oig.2 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:41:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tkp/MFpbcB66f8Vvjeb5ZgahEYCc/RYUwvi8l+nUEZk=; b=OPiSJXqFUnFx8Qlo0KAjWKaZzYR0nXyBe7ieG7Q/eLq+/Z5S7Wi0wSDNgOYrWCcYMt VG6E9L5jXCOuslNqPT8GemzEpkAWUQJCV7Jsum48fiL0kUnsCxpGNhtY8ZByCI0KmhGi B12wIruLq4BDqYgQlewMN4veHDTs8CYmqevS8/zqRNgyqyk86lqLHCoChyMrHg1/CG05 jfCyztCbE+KIkfdhiSG88U1vtuokJTOLX3QEh+XJj42jntJqGmv03ZxepxgTbD5Xo4DY lIBOXOL8r+iycY0n464Jqs9iUp5IhG90ZUHPt4AUbdaRyVCqOM65lm2dvevsqGFN604P m1Sw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.54.86 with SMTP id d83mr6593894oia.55.1421350899041; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:41:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.76.71 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:41:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3a3fa72e44f3a263b26571a0bd1feda4@ultimatedns.net> References: <3a7891f4c67a054f13f9ba97f7fcd700@ultimatedns.net> <20150113192932.GL44537@home.opsec.eu> <21685.34336.390049.238359@gromit.timing.com> <11d948f20f5fedadc2570d82b6e7ec49@ultimatedns.net> <20150115082729.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150115085631.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <3a3fa72e44f3a263b26571a0bd1feda4@ultimatedns.net> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:41:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sysutils/bbcp: Anyone interesting in helping upgrade this port? From: Freddie Cash To: Chris H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , John Hein , Kurt Jaeger X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:41:40 -0000 Thanks to all who works on this. Muchly appreciated!! I'm guessing this didn't make it into the tree in time for this week's package building? No biggie, I'll pick it up next week. I might spin up a VM and build it from source, if I get impatient. :) Again, thanks! -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 19:51:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6961F6C7; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3827F7; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id q58so16699439wes.4; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:51:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tuJrNmHgm5/6PqfWxgeJx6KesxNtqJDgJyPsd5J8P1Q=; b=VRFjteGRgaLXGEjUpYFYkJTzvVELf8ZT+pvgNpJN4TWPqOI3LuxsQ9b4Q91F39tTpp xTebD1eQHDTcVkzCIXKivu7n2+wnRkDUEjM3/fze5BJlfWBI7SX5KdOCk4j0eUMqRS1x KEdZzHnby/u8wQ7qeNZF5LVHEHNoyCHnFJrSUH3+1T8PM1I4O3cMlMLhneC2fBBck4oD 2WtRepeuzfm7R9ox5m/+iEQrSAwWNwabtE8KZy4TabFENpZJkh2kUkxd6IdgEz60hOY2 3HwlG+2E80IZv28DE66SaR8RmAhI/j4+AXx6MPIj/A/yd8j4xRON0zTUFCGovOKgXDwv ln6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.186.8 with SMTP id fg8mr22457977wic.40.1421351501646; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.76.135 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.76.135 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:51:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150115175937.GF98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115175937.GF98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Commit needed pkg-fallout related From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:51:46 -0000 El 15/01/2015 18:59, "Baptiste Daroussin" escribi=C3=B3: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:46:03PM +0100, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone please commit bug 195752? > > > > I keep receiving pkg-fallout related emails. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Done sorry for delay. No worries. Thanks! > > Bapt From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 19:51:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57F016C3 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F232D7F6 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amavis-proxy-ori.ijs.si (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kNbkj1B7gz85 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; h= user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to:organization :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:mime-version:received:received :received:received; s=jakla4; t=1421351497; x=1423943498; bh=JUQ tgGPTCAmqGdBXmJ/HC7aD3r00WG/c1QVpMLnFHr8=; b=I3sQN/OLv7f4gtTYWzw zHDlxTNx3KrGy2AD+LR37/T3AObDO+iNxkC1FbcmOFYrsqhe4bBzryhi3HcDIY20 CUGU6xKrFqZM44ywW/dkrKgJxr21cacz8Cd8xuckNfHJqHZcApDPJPYP1Tdfn7QK dOe0dlJt7ZIwY+GRFJEwYHl8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([IPv6:::1]) by amavis-proxy-ori.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10012) with ESMTP id CWhXNJ7bzZjD for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mildred.ijs.si (mailbox.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::143:1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from neli.ijs.si (neli.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80:88:21c:c0ff:feb1:8c91]) by mildred.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kNbkc5GFqz11C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from neli.ijs.si ([2001:1470:ff80:88:21c:c0ff:feb1:8c91]) by neli.ijs.si with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:51:36 +0100 From: Mark Martinec To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: print/cups fails to build on 9.3-STABLE i386 Organization: J. Stefan Institute In-Reply-To: <54B816E6.8040307@passap.ru> References: <20150115190246.GE3301@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> <54B816E6.8040307@passap.ru> Message-ID: <766f56956d5a9a77485d0e0a2980d85a@mailbox.ijs.si> X-Sender: Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:51:45 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > I think that your cups-client libs are linked against dns libraries. > With a fresh portstree (this imho should be fixesd at r376233) > rebuild print/cups-client, then print/cups-base. It also fails with the same diagnostics under poudriere on 10.1 using today's ports checkout. Mark > 15.01.2015 22:02, William Bulley =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> After running this command: "# svn update /usr/ports" I tried to >> upgrade the print/cups port. >>=20 >> As root I then ran this command: >>=20 >> # portmaster -K -B -D print/cups >>=20 >> Below is the output leading up to the failure and the failure itself. >>=20 >> BTW - I did retry the build in /usr/ports/print/cups using this: >>=20 >> # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes install >>=20 >> and got the same results. >>=20 >> =3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D= *=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D*=3D >>=20 >> ... >> ... >> Making all in test... >> gmake[1]: Entering directory=20 >> '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' >> echo Linking ippserver... >> Linking ippserver... >> cc -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler=20 >> -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -fPIE= =20 >> -pie -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -o=20 >> ippserver ippserver.o ../cups/libcups.a \ >> -lssl -lcrypto -pthread -lm -lcrypt -lssp_nonshared -liconv = =20 >> -lz -lz >> ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `_httpResolveURI': >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1617:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceCreateConnection' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1626:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1736:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1656:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefSockFD' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1700:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1722:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceProcessResult' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1731:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1733:= =20 >> undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' >> ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `http_resolve_cb': >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2071:= =20 >> undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' >> /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2058:= =20 >> undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' >> Makefile:192: recipe for target 'ippserver' failed >> gmake[1]: *** [ippserver] Error 1 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory=20 >> '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' >> Makefile:31: recipe for target 'all' failed >> gmake: *** [all] Error 1 >> *** [do-build] Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. >> *** [install] Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 20:16:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D3B4DD for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392CFA28 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntcmgw07p ([61.9.169.167]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150115201558.URSU2564.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw07p>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:15:58 +0000 Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([203.41.22.114]) by nskntcmgw07p with BigPond Outbound id gLFx1p00H2ThMyb01LFx8A; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:15:58 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=JN65Qr2b c=1 sm=1 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:17 a=XD52yEjQpfAA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=_7K1TTs8MANq9V_57IkA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:117 Received: from [10.0.5.3] (ewsw01.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t0FKDs3B059848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:14:00 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Message-ID: <54B81F7F.3090805@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:13:51 +1100 From: Dewayne Geraghty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Eldridge , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: print/cups fails to build on 9.3-STABLE i386 References: <20150115190246.GE3301@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150115190246.GE3301@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:16:07 -0000 On 16/01/2015 6:02 AM, William Bulley wrote: > After running this command: "# svn update /usr/ports" I tried to > upgrade the print/cups port. > > As root I then ran this command: > > # portmaster -K -B -D print/cups > > Below is the output leading up to the failure and the failure itself. > > BTW - I did retry the build in /usr/ports/print/cups using this: > > # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes install > > and got the same results. > > =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= > > ... > ... > Making all in test... > gmake[1]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' > echo Linking ippserver... > Linking ippserver... > cc -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -fPIE -pie -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -o ippserver ippserver.o ../cups/libcups.a \ > -lssl -lcrypto -pthread -lm -lcrypt -lssp_nonshared -liconv -lz -lz > ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `_httpResolveURI': > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1617: undefined reference to `DNSServiceCreateConnection' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1626: undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1736: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1656: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefSockFD' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1700: undefined reference to `DNSServiceResolve' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1722: undefined reference to `DNSServiceProcessResult' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1731: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:1733: undefined reference to `DNSServiceRefDeallocate' > ../cups/libcups.a(http-support.o): In function `http_resolve_cb': > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2071: undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' > /usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.7.3/cups/http-support.c:2058: undefined reference to `TXTRecordGetValuePtr' > Makefile:192: recipe for target 'ippserver' failed > gmake[1]: *** [ippserver] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.7.3/test' > Makefile:31: recipe for target 'all' failed > gmake: *** [all] Error 1 > *** [do-build] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. > *** [install] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. > > > > Regards, > > web... > William, I experienced the same issue. Using these enabled a successful build WITHOUT_AVAHI | WITH_MDNSRESPONDER in my custom ports.conf which I think means you need to add print_cups-base_UNSET=AVAHI print_cups-base_SET=MDNSRESPONDER I also set LIBPAPER - though I can't recall if that was a positive. It was a long time ago. Please note: I don't use the additional layer of poudriere. -- For the talkers: “The superior man acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks according to his action.” For everyone else: “Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.” From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 22:52:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6625AF; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9757CC9; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.136] (helo=smtp5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YBtGj-00036I-0i; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:52:01 +0100 Received: from d47fac43.cm-9-1a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([212.127.172.67] helo=PC01) by smtp5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YBtGi-0004Jo-LX; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:52:01 +0100 From: "Dutchman01" To: Subject: FreeBSD Port: samba41-4.1.14_1 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:51:54 +0100 Message-ID: <000001d03115$dba82b10$92f88130$@quicknet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: AdAw6dnaRuuyK+ceTeqXRn5ihhxX8g== Content-Language: nl X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bd3HKr7B c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=M1C15eV0ApyR7evVf7Vudw==:17 a=cIF5Tx0qAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=Zr7miEi8wWIA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=2oeSqxxVzlsA:10 a=PpxLU4l3P7FB98TWHXwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=k3VVnJWE5dAA:10 a=MF9RMSni63QA:10 a=jBcvLWZk1koA:10 a=g4G8n2KdcIwA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Keany6nr0LwmGt0-rrAA:9 a=mowUe65Df5WGuQwR:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 xcat=Undefined/Undefined none X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:52:11 -0000 Please upgrade samba41 to 4.1.15 Thank you Dutchman01 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 00:59:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87514DBD for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CDCB68 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t0G0xHob019723; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:59:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201501160059.t0G0xHob019723@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:59:17 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: Fwd: [package - 84amd64-default][graphics/libspiro] Failed for libspiro-0.2.20131203, 1 in build To: cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com In-Reply-To: <54B7E239.2080704@cyberbotx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:59:27 -0000 On 15 Jan, Naram Qashat wrote: > I'm looking to see if someone who is more knowledgeable about perl or libtool or > whatever to help me solve the below problem. > > Basically, libspiro's internal version number is 0.2.20130930. Under FreeBSD 9.X > and up, config.log shows LIBSPIRO_VERSION as being 0:2:0 and libtool completes > as expected. However, under 8.X, LIBSPIRO_VERSION instead becomes $0:2:0, and > libtool gets :2:0 instead of 0:2:0, and thus fails to build, as shown below. > > I'd tried manually having autoreconf and automake run (as libspiro's README.md > explains), but that didn't help at all. > > I'm not familiar enough with the build process of applications that utilize > libtool to know why this is the case. If anyone has any insights into this, I'd > really appreciate it. See It looks like upstream has already fixed this in their repo after the last release. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 03:35:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C629FB for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 03:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acipenser.esturion.net (acipenser.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DD8CDE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 03:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by acipenser.esturion.net (Postfix, from userid 112) id 17E7E26033B; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:35:41 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on acipenser.esturion.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by acipenser.esturion.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58394260269 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:35:37 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54B88709.3010604@pinyon.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:35:37 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: libfxp fails with poudriere but not as a port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 03:35:48 -0000 Greetings, amd64 stable/10, updated across the failure. I've been watching a poudriere build failure with graphics/libfpx for several days now and investigated, and it is a curious failure. Some advice solicited on the fix. With an updated poudriere world, and an updated outside r277194 stable/10 world, graphics/libfxp fails with: (wrapped, of course) /wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/oless/h/fat.hxx:368:63: error: explicitly assigning a variable of type 'SCODE' (aka 'int') to itself [-Werror,-Wself-assign] do if (((HRESULT)(sc = (FindMaxSect(&_sectMax)))<0)) { sc = sc; goto Err;} while(0); which a little bit of grepping finds this line in fat.hxx: msfChk(FindMaxSect(&_sectMax)); where msfChk is defined in msf.hxx: #define msfErr(l, e) ErrJmp(msf, l, e, sc) #define msfChkTo(l, e) do if (FAILED(sc = (e))) msfErr(l, sc) while(0) #define msfChk(e) msfChkTo(Err, e) and ErrJmp is defined in error.hxx: #define ErrJmp(comp, label, errval, var) \ {\ var = errval;\ goto label;\ } so that clearly, sc = sc, just like the compiler complained about. Now normally I'd experiment with the macros a bit to see if I could fix it but I am hesitant because if I update a ports tree on the same system as the poudriere build system and make reinstall, everything builds installs and works great (including wdm and emacs, the reason that I've dug down this far). If I cd /usr/ports/graphics/build && make build, the compiler is /usr/bin/c++, while poudriere's log says it used c++. Any ideas on what the difference might be would awesome. Once I understand this I would be delighted to provide a patch. Thanks, Russell Late thought: I elided a debug branch on the ErrJmp macro, is there a reason why the ports tree might by default have debugging on while poudriere would not? I don't see anything obvious in a /usr/ports compiler command: /usr/bin/c++ -O2 -pipe -DHAVE_WCHAR_H -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H -DHAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -DHAVE_WCHAR_H -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H -DHAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/oless/h -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/jpeg -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/ole -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/basics -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/ri_image -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/oless -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/fpx -I/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/. -I/usr/local/include -D_UNIX -Wno-c++11-extensions -c /usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-4/ole/oleprops.cpp -o oleprops.o From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 04:02:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29074F90; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B227DF4F; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k14so18450283wgh.2; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:02:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rw4/RNO+BtUlvd9t3poDauxX68d4DoeYRlwO/P8x4uA=; b=Or0qCb2YqcWV6UEhcBftF3MhnVhxb4nFA23MKUdZhcScBNyJ+RijT8Zg4rRxJqA9jd vcT52sz6qkjlfaBIFg5koVHP/C8RL+AxvwKKK+XQDERm/yUdU57urZjtMAvAbecacWcK EhDL7Vjb4q4/fYr9mcSxQnQdhBTxcrm8bSJa4nsmyPOIlIrSuP2NqIe4jXJ2hGGLWZNP 6LtWybmXyWUCdFjsjZUTK4kexL9M2M1PJxKj7a4GKgTT2FGvQRt9tyYxkoNivi0/XQKF M5crS9+8bjUZcQ8N51Q44ZaR4N2FUwfwjqUOVYuu4t7BfvhY2T8h8YeH/PJisG++UwZS AZDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.107.136 with SMTP id hc8mr2163677wib.32.1421380942231; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:02:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:02:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:02:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Waitman Gobble To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:02:24 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPLv3. >> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the >> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >> >> ... >> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >> >> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-libedit-preferred >> >> >> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >> > except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not supprot unicode > (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the editline port > which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it works. > > Best regards, > Bapt Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regarding my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices with a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 05:42:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDA7D978 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm9-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm9-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AACF8AC9 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:42:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1421386715; bh=U/mT/sAhAXiH5ZpD3vm8d6rp2BHMEzWp8Qlid2WXM8E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=ehJ7oI8xpAFX8Qlxn5ONXkxthSeRUVpt4uL9+oGVqwVEQF8PHwewzRdsu+fa8xkMPPZPTZv4joOpVQCEIu7NhsfKIawCxP+SLdkZLg89j/BPH+4AlGYqS5LAufxgWFqNEfFYD6KZxKroz/gf6BBS6SClm6MdeyvQBYpXvp1szC9IJpJs7hoGVyZH10GcG13JD677K/M82LfzTZF8kOYdcaTbbb2T35gIeXAuiSkmDzp6ZPo5i0Y3MuLkY4ujW7nww4whSbMx7IS97sBnjTBCs8Me19In3RBGn5cJ7blg6xvHMhw/9RWGS/Q7RbZouLt8se6rV69sRylmgnYdLR27kg== Received: from [216.39.60.176] by nm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jan 2015 05:38:35 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.98] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jan 2015 05:38:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jan 2015 05:38:35 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 131547.96781.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <131547.96781.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:38:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: GYEct_UVM1lOs6YInDHnRKXEeXWDrvELl1P1udV1ju_GS6W TQ77LAqPrg4vthlUmssOY4zZF5oP...lwLD_dGXPuvocy5mSX4VrP70DrHI0 8NKdIBdQGCyq4ADiXZSNAYuEYgyq2wh87w6s.NbmFwAlDc2BdUIAzHkYt0w1 NPsEYoXXlzUoTwESWr3Wj8aUw2ZLHsEvw3MyWpfDN6jaYPwAjdIF5DyGKmRH RTxVdjmUdVERgg6dLcmgDQVQpNp0cmng2p4ZJAWQ5WuAqEW3YF3XK5JXaO2_ ywg_b01N6NVztqQaAO3GjlN4i2vlH9P1FVNJ46suyvDxUJ6KlyXHkmoDp_Ji 7q7FoHR7jPpaDz4qncN81MWuhHSGzUzYHsbCqjaUAai.gkNezaCndrizlMHy _4wpQleuwJocgpurlQPA8bhl3TnlxnDnFbR3rmxhvuWzB1l.dHR_xm.Xv7Hi H8W9iiIqYCbXda4l5u1dSFTUxqP3hW6FjahARMhQLJBoj7VxZJ6GzjKLCTq4 5_9FM3maCksz41kCXmYMwesNZBjCHk8T9fnTqP4oVVa4TUhB4ISe79pGOPkr M9VftJL86NBpCiYExaca503o2JjLz_OGEfD.rI5ohh1PQwo6mOgFlLp8- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Problems with fusefs-ntfs port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:42:03 -0000 I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard drive, 5 TB, external USB 3.0. It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat) the files one-by-one, very inelegant and quite unworkable for anything other than a small number of files in a simple directory structure. Trying to mount Seagate BackupPlus with ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /media/zip0 fuse: failed to open fuse device: No such file or directory Showing this device really exists with gpart show da0 => 63 1220942582 da0 MBR (4.5T) 63 1985 - free - (7.8M) 2048 1220940597 1 ntfs [active] (4.5T) Now ls /media shows, to prove the mount point exists: zip0 zip1 zip2 But ntfsls proves /dev/da0s1 exists: ntfsls -l /dev/da0s1 produces 40 Jul 1 07:26 2014 Autorun.inf 562718 Jul 1 07:26 2014 BackupPlusDeskIcon.ico 0 Jul 1 07:26 2014 Seagate 131685492 Jul 1 07:26 2014 Seagate Dashboard Installer.dmg 159169664 Jul 1 07:26 2014 Seagate Dashboard Installer.exe 1114848 Jul 1 07:26 2014 Warranty.pdf Then I was able to mount the home directory, mkdir /home/BackupPlus mkdir /home/BackupPlus/Seagate and then ntfscat /dev/da0s1 Autorun.inf > /home/BackupPlus/Autorun.inf and so on with the other files, putting the Dashboard installer files in /home/BackupPlus/Seagate I went to tuxera.com website, but got no further information than I get from the fusefs-ntfs man pages. I believe NTFS is a moving target, subject to updates/improvements by Microsoft that can rock the boat for open-source developers who try to provide access to NTFS. I could see the FreeBSD ports version of fusefs-ntfs is up-to-date with upstream tuxera.com/opensource Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 11:15:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5719554B for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail.mimar.rs [193.53.106.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D3BE4 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A4F1AF3BB for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:15:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:from :from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1421406900; x=1423221301; bh=wy5wUeErB1ZIz2sGaMJ8AXjxTCqfBPH7CwHLsoXoewg=; b= e1tkX6+trPXV0LNDDcLHDy7VvV14SxDWt2lApppfQYMOHAaCX4Mv2HWJH3/hEiQJ 1a1LchuNdDAX/pv5dtT6kScwNWvcQnO/zYv0rSfNJu0udKq3xqcsTVY0EnX14th8 J4r05530bbb7EHCcrue+k6iTmVx92bHpH1R8ZloBVSo= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.mimar.rs (mail.mimar.rs [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id eGqv3ODF8UaH for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:15:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from efreet (nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F4301AF315 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:15:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:14:59 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/dansguardian revival? Message-Id: <20150116121459.b1f7fa6672b6fcbe5c223be3@mimar.rs> In-Reply-To: <69705840d3bd8cf82b8a0c4b4d72f30f@ultimatedns.net> References: <20141021093930.512251194d972a238e27e45a@mimar.rs> <727e7b743177b720d1d19bdf0e387166@ultimatedns.net> <69705840d3bd8cf82b8a0c4b4d72f30f@ultimatedns.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:15:13 -0000 On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:47:39 -0800 "Chris H" wrote: > There's been a great deal of activity in the squid* department over > the past couple months. I wanted to wait for the "dust to settle" > before continuing; lest I be required to re-release every couple > weeks to work with any new changes. On the up-side, things seem > to have settled down. So I'll suck down a copy of HEAD, and renew > my efforts to get this back in, over the next couple days. > Again, sorry for the delay. Hope you understand. :) I'd also like to give dansguardian another try. I've been using it happily for some years before I switched to pure squid with kerberos auth and NTLM/basic failover. I'm not quite satisfied with current setup though, as squidclamav c-icap module crashes, leaving us without on-access av scanning. I'd be glad to do some testing. Regards, --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 14:12:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35BD5C1A for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B857C810 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a1so20721338wgh.9 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:12:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5ZdoOoYfAnR0gpASbGmURVLmkxmkVIZ6VIOwiX4KSlE=; b=xR09PwXKouvqvX9bcGpZhIRc9bx3jJhb/GFHm6o0b8a1bNXSmzaN/JbZ29v0oNVAEa i8J/TcXkXAFXSXqO5hbrbgPXuH76fxmSzk3jQO5DopCZNszAbJrHHXU6lzEOn3cemCMK gWGdPbLV5Jm4bFfNdH3rMIMKNZjIXKmUTNx0+mbZANNut4OMyDa8MQAtRzBn6DN4V2Xk 63k+i+jl4p3ZzkNYcuG+wxYG+6iZiDMEpULbh9o/rKYO7RNzpOFJtBj7vXNBPcLoi+Z7 l+Faz6LB8kw1zTld9u2wDLLOmDOmR2eS7W/WJdYMRxk5r9GMQiLdDsLbx4V137BwOC3F 6F1A== X-Received: by 10.180.90.81 with SMTP id bu17mr6480354wib.23.1421417524143; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:12:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.29.2.131] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vh8sm6237485wjc.12.2015.01.16.06.12.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:12:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B91C24.3090407@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:11:48 +0200 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Could a brave committer apply the fixes for graphics/mypaint? (was: Re: mypaint) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:12:06 -0000 In the original thread Jan Beich wrote: > I think the following are relevant patches from bugzilla. > > Index: Mk/Uses/scons.mk > =================================================================== > --- Mk/Uses/scons.mk (revision 376385) > +++ Mk/Uses/scons.mk (working copy) > @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ IGNORE= Incorrect 'USES+= scons:${scons_ARGS}' sco > MAKEFILE= # > MAKE_FLAGS= # > ALL_TARGET= # > +CCFLAGS?= ${CFLAGS} > +LINKFLAGS?= ${LDFLAGS} > LIBPATH?= ${LOCALBASE}/lib > CPPPATH?= ${LOCALBASE}/include > SCONS= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/scons > Index: graphics/mypaint/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- graphics/mypaint/Makefile (revision 376385) > +++ graphics/mypaint/Makefile (working copy) > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS} \ > > USE_GNOME= glib20 pygtk2 > MAKE_ARGS= prefix="${PREFIX}" > -USES= gettext pkgconfig scons tar:bzip2 python > +USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib gettext pkgconfig scons tar:bzip2 python > INSTALLS_ICONS= yes > > SUB_FILES= pkg-install > > ------------------------------------------------- In short, graphics/mypaint is currently broken, and PRs 193434 [1] and 193429 [2] should be committed to fix it. Both of them are one-line changes, and both have been open for 5 months now. Can someone commit those PRs? Or better yet, give their submitter, Jan Beich, the commit bit so he could do it himself? The guy submitted 300+ PRs, and he's not even mentioned in the "Additional Contributors" list... [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193434 [2] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193429 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 14:33:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2AFD3EB; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.rsle.net (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1D3A4A; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CLASSIFIED (CLASSIFIED [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::3:1415]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.rsle.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0GEXlcO081298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:33:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@rsle.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at antivirus.rsle.net Message-ID: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:33:42 -0500 From: "R. Scott Evans" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: tdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::2]); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:33:48 -0500 (EST) Cc: timur@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:33:50 -0000 Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-) # pkg version -IvL= tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4) -scott From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 14:39:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D25E4F3; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thebighonker.lerctr.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A80A83; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:39:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lerctr.org; s=lerami; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=dQ3vAwbBf5WrHGylfrTFdbO1ULhQsHcE3atGQlXr8iA=; b=XDR7uFBFV25ekEtB5tCkW5iyWy4cziWfpq9dCsdd10VCp57OCFeBApMcAvJ1qkDTi4zTl9jgaDsXpKqFp6CyNPj7p+7WOoDxGe10TS6keatKFpeeNP1porVM8c2L/VO6F62a43KSfTYPJkecLm+nc6eaiThE2FgcQI+w1PHJNSk=; Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org ([2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]:64101 helo=webmail.lerctr.org) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YC83G-000AjJ-Fi; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:39:07 -0600 Received: from host.alcatel.com ([198.205.55.139]) by webmail.lerctr.org with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:39:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:39:06 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman To: "R. Scott Evans" Subject: Re: tdb In-Reply-To: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> References: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> Message-ID: <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org> X-Sender: ler@lerctr.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.3 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-LERCTR-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.9/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-LERCTR-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.9/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 Cc: timur@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:39:10 -0000 On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote: > Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-) > > # pkg version -IvL= > tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4) > > -scott the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparently was changed because of a version number regression. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 14:47:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 881937F5; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.rsle.net (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E2BB7D; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CLASSIFIED (CLASSIFIED [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::3:1415]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.rsle.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0GElird004273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:47:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@rsle.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at antivirus.rsle.net Message-ID: <54B9248B.9080104@rsle.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:47:39 -0500 From: "R. Scott Evans" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: tdb References: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::2]); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:47:45 -0500 (EST) Cc: timur@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:47:52 -0000 On 01/16/15 09:39, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote: >> Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-) >> >> # pkg version -IvL= >> tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4) >> >> -scott > the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparently was changed because of a > version number regression. Well, I mention it because while I use "pkg version -IvL=", I know the FreeBSD Handbook section on updating ports instructs one to use 'pkg version -l "<"' which will cause this ports change to go unseen. Likewise, "portmaster -a" on my box didn't catch this and I had to specifically update/downgrade the port. -scott From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 14:56:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2C691F; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F85EC57; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ho1so4683327wib.4; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:56:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jWMRz/NBsFULZGwssNvBtSlkWbUXCfI2BGmWdGci6zU=; b=VdwI4R0CoHMIvwQg9bSERl83yisyY7L7Z/qw8Ar2J20imb6q8kh+Kqk42iNLiyUs2h AxFiFgiVtP5Ra4v5VYwFlLlepkqN0VuETIDQH7OjVyeGazcNUp9Ijp1KCF6HCA5zccjT AQbmeZ1zbQDU5f7d8Ct7HfEcC8AntRx2GinXc5mzO8Dwbwmur+lP0SfIKRzeQg1alr6K G5gAy+2LQ3PGIfndHiaeTqjfMK+kwaxWcXVKc7YgijTw8MdTc/mtLuiz4doEmJK1UhnE x9HyKI3InEMyG+GD60npqUF3qa1HNL20VBeds1Q6jCH+CGM+idNjiDAxrn/e8BZiLvNT Gx9A== X-Received: by 10.194.192.4 with SMTP id hc4mr24244574wjc.117.1421420161298; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.29.2.131] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm6370601wjx.28.2015.01.16.06.55.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:56:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B92677.4020407@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:55:51 +0200 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "R. Scott Evans" , Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: tdb References: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <54B9248B.9080104@rsle.net> In-Reply-To: <54B9248B.9080104@rsle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: timur@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:56:04 -0000 On 2015-01-16 16:47, R. Scott Evans wrote: > On 01/16/15 09:39, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote: >>> Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-) >>> >>> # pkg version -IvL= >>> tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4) >>> >>> -scott >> the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparently was changed because of a >> version number regression. > > Well, I mention it because while I use "pkg version -IvL=", I know the > FreeBSD Handbook section on updating ports instructs one to use 'pkg > version -l "<"' which will cause this ports change to go unseen. > Likewise, "portmaster -a" on my box didn't catch this and I had to > specifically update/downgrade the port. Folks, the relevant diff here is [1]; it reverted PORTEPOCH from 1 to 0. And you're right, it's a bug, since PORTEPOCH should never ever decrease. [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/databases/tdb/Makefile?r1=377150&r2=377149 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 15:31:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FC35DD for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF986B9 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lm7MT-1Xco7D1Q4f-00Zeib; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:31:18 +0100 Message-ID: <54B92EC5.1070903@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:31:17 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with fusefs-ntfs port References: <131547.96781.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <131547.96781.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4OVJ3MnJMQ5pqunEVwaZO1MOFwl8V27jwV4f8guyK9n4aACQNs4 7x6KElG2zVJwJVeixKTL1fGFs8vgcUWVUfOUUOct79vEVqQTgxbwk0vNIiwOUgL9wrR4+yV 74GyCXt3AJRg4sWr+QKTGCp2IowRCsKbMvarZbB/C7C8Gb1qddJWTkCAtCoiPWhc3ECvjBJ bfybcHQKTaRjjh5xOfPZA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:31:29 -0000 On 16.01.2015 06:38, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard drive, 5 TB, external USB 3.0. > > It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat) the files one-by-one, very inelegant and quite unworkable for anything other than a small number of files in a simple directory structure. > > Trying to mount Seagate BackupPlus with ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /media/zip0 > > fuse: failed to open fuse device: No such file or directory Check dmesg. IIRC this message indicates a missing kernel module (not a missing hard disk device). From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 15:51:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577301A9 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (108-248-95-193.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [108.248.95.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EFD5379 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0GFp9ft038489 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:51:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54B9336D.6090901@astart.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:51:09 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> <20150115170017.3CB64A96@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20150115170017.3CB64A96@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:51:11 -0000 On 01/15/15 09:00, Roger Marquis wrote: >> This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, have >> built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time, >> which includes 'make package' > > I wouldn't call it an in-house solution since the package target is a > feature of the ports infrastructure. We simply 'make package' and > install other systems from the resulting package. > > This does not, however, appear to be as well supported by portsng/pkgng > as it was in the previous versions. Now it just exits with no message > and a 0 exit-code without creating the package unless you've created > /usr/ports/packages and/or specified one or more of WRKDIRPREFIX, > PACKAGES and PKGREPOSITORY. > > What documentation there is seems to be based on older versions (like > much of the FreeBSD website) and I haven't found anything on the > differences between 'make package' and Poudriere. > > Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > This is actually a side effect of the STAGING implementation. The package file is put into the port (created) work sub directory. Now if I could only find the documentation that tells me how to put, say, WORK_DIRECTORY=/var/tmp/work into the /etc/make.conf file or something similar I would be a very (well, not so grumpy) happy camper. I read this somewhere once but I cannot find it again. WRKDIRPREFIX? WORKDIRPREFIX? -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 16:00:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2CB67B for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vm.unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4563634 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) by vm.unsane.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F5DC30197; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:00:24 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <54B93597.9080808@unsane.co.uk> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:00:23 +0000 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: papowell@astart.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> <20150115170017.3CB64A96@hub.freebsd.org> <54B9336D.6090901@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <54B9336D.6090901@astart.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:00:25 -0000 On 16/01/2015 15:51, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 01/15/15 09:00, Roger Marquis wrote: >>> This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, >>> have >>> built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time, >>> which includes 'make package' >> >> I wouldn't call it an in-house solution since the package target is a >> feature of the ports infrastructure. We simply 'make package' and >> install other systems from the resulting package. >> >> This does not, however, appear to be as well supported by portsng/pkgng >> as it was in the previous versions. Now it just exits with no message >> and a 0 exit-code without creating the package unless you've created >> /usr/ports/packages and/or specified one or more of WRKDIRPREFIX, >> PACKAGES and PKGREPOSITORY. >> >> What documentation there is seems to be based on older versions (like >> much of the FreeBSD website) and I haven't found anything on the >> differences between 'make package' and Poudriere. >> >> Roger >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > This is actually a side effect of the STAGING implementation. The > package file is put into the > port (created) work sub directory. Now if I could only find the > documentation that tells me how to put, say, > WORK_DIRECTORY=/var/tmp/work into the /etc/make.conf file or > something similar I would be > a very (well, not so grumpy) happy camper. I read this somewhere once > but I cannot find > it again. WRKDIRPREFIX? WORKDIRPREFIX? > >From looking in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk I think you want to set one of the following in make.conf # WRKDIRPREFIX - The place to root the temporary working directory # hierarchy. # Default: none # WRKDIR - A temporary working directory that gets *clobbered* on clean # Default: ${WRKDIRPREFIX}${.CURDIR}/work not the most intuitive place to look but I guess thats why the BUGS section of PORTS(7) says BUGS Ports documentation is split over four places -- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, The Porter's Handbook, the ``Packages and Ports'' chapter of The FreeBSD Handbook, and this manual page. Vince From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 18:14:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885284B6 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCE3959 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntcmgw06p ([61.9.169.166]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150116181431.LSOO2564.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw06p>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:14:31 +0000 Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([203.41.22.114]) by nskntcmgw06p with BigPond Outbound id giEX1p0052ThMyb01iEXW3; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:14:31 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=RsdH3VaK c=1 sm=1 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:17 a=XD52yEjQpfAA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=91Zby0LSKAuKkccFJVoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:117 Received: from [10.0.5.3] (ewsw01.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t0GIDxiG096926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:14:03 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Message-ID: <54B954E4.8080507@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:13:56 +1100 From: Dewayne Geraghty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: papowell@astart.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> <20150115170017.3CB64A96@hub.freebsd.org> <54B9336D.6090901@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <54B9336D.6090901@astart.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:14:34 -0000 On 17/01/2015 2:51 AM, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 01/15/15 09:00, Roger Marquis wrote: >>> This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, >>> have >>> built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time, >>> which includes 'make package' >> >> I wouldn't call it an in-house solution since the package target is a >> feature of the ports infrastructure. We simply 'make package' and >> install other systems from the resulting package. >> >> This does not, however, appear to be as well supported by portsng/pkgng >> as it was in the previous versions. Now it just exits with no message >> and a 0 exit-code without creating the package unless you've created >> /usr/ports/packages and/or specified one or more of WRKDIRPREFIX, >> PACKAGES and PKGREPOSITORY. >> >> What documentation there is seems to be based on older versions (like >> much of the FreeBSD website) and I haven't found anything on the >> differences between 'make package' and Poudriere. >> >> Roger >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > This is actually a side effect of the STAGING implementation. The > package file is put into the > port (created) work sub directory. Now if I could only find the > documentation that tells me how to put, say, > WORK_DIRECTORY=/var/tmp/work into the /etc/make.conf file or > something similar I would be > a very (well, not so grumpy) happy camper. I read this somewhere once > but I cannot find > it again. WRKDIRPREFIX? WORKDIRPREFIX? > Patrick, We have these in make.conf that may help with your research WRKDIRPREFIX= /var/ports DISTDIR= /usr/distfiles TMPDIR= /tmp PACKAGES= /packages STAGEDIR= /usr/staging which we've used for many years. Only STAGEDIR was recently added. Its a great aid when you commence a rebuild to just rm -R /usr/staging /var/ports/usr Regards, Dewayne. -- For the talkers: “The superior man acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks according to his action.” For everyone else: “Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.” From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 18:20:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DB37FA for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm11-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm11-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C54A9A9 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1421432243; bh=ckJ6ullbs/mZK/CgLJzltQfALNIl+7kTJp5vI7+N5vI=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=XmKTg7xQ81/4zfgSBy/kCOKOT1UpHOSEn+7EcB2DAd0JEXfmra1pr3MhLeVcTxgc/6nRC5uPr9ak7LcQePEj9xElj2LRhFHxqt0sixADlSFzXcYxNXX8havMcPJsglSknQwQZrA0VlhzVbYrGi8h8Cw50FURp0VjQS0Nd0UEhJOUfX/bgZI6dL1qXhXG7WWOfFX0Bx3cfqkLZnWR9jVKgTApHM7IYwLsNg0fEcG63VWnDgQegpMr/fSIPP8hJX6QbgxaAItGM33ZMxYXNPD/0cyEQ577zarOvagHC8CDpvkFGJBV2qhcdVSau/Bdf0oytQhRJTld5Wg8Q5RfC2+QOQ== Received: from [216.39.60.172] by nm11.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jan 2015 18:17:23 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.97] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jan 2015 18:17:23 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Jan 2015 18:17:23 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 609982.64279.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <609982.64279.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:17:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kqPE4ZAVM1mhuQpPTSYLWwZvJQcMxSH1ReOUpMra6A3pwJG iws5h4Kt0ngqn_IdJnPTsH0R.HB0ckTpgU8ud4v1vFV.iVJhdv.6E43f68Gu 4iPjn8zxQicxD20oWPD.5epQFppzuNnISj7iloOc0ljgfkgn3bRNkyxRzZmW CYw3kc2k5nmqd67LgNdT9L5y3juGXblVK5ZeZN7g_3pfbIDh7yZu6ISXuGDm eoI2XIMXPjkDq1sy7V_STJkMXQi0LNoU2w7pblz56gjFnAaHiz0mSXIkXPYl 4xDmuqky3erLwBFwG.GrDKukjgXVcsUmFbU6QRM7i5edm0iUzUf5WAWiWrJ2 B90KkqwJk7CYLu_MVRQN2NPXu4cBY2_lP49T2GV_ZXcWW09UPUTje6adufgE 73Vu2NSZI7j_3afW94nQHGB9bpAvJskwcQ2j_mJDV0uRfZ2vOtG47bEbnorm CbhE1a6kdwd2caDaVM1QuC14HHDzA.EGquXOesNY9rFKctfygnlFP3.GWTm5 lX0m6kRUIszSm.wN7BsVmFbawS616QEYj_RmdARG571ZD.GX_puaatXkHUqQ - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with fusefs-ntfs port References: <131547.96781.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <54B92EC5.1070903@gmx.net> Cc: Stefan Ehmann X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:20:33 -0000 > from Stefan Ehmann: > On 16.01.2015 06:38, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard drive, 5 TB, external USB 3.0. > > It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat) the files one-by-one, very inelegant and quite unworkable for anything other than a small number of files in a simple directory structure. > > Trying to mount Seagate BackupPlus with ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /media/zip0 > > fuse: failed to open fuse device: No such file or directory > Check dmesg. IIRC this message indicates a missing kernel module (not a > missing hard disk device). What module? I built all modules with the kernel, and then why would ntfsls and ntfscat see the device file that ntfs-3g didn't? I checked /var/run/dmesg.boot, biggest thing I noticed was repeated attempts to find USB 3.0 device. After booting, there is enough console spew to make ttyv0 practically unusable. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 18:29:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6911A43 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA38AF4 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwcmgw08p ([61.9.190.168]) by nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150116180630.NYNA11888.nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw08p> for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:06:30 +0000 Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([203.41.22.114]) by nschwcmgw08p with BigPond Outbound id gi6W1p00E2ThMyb01i6WKe; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:06:30 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=F6HVh9dN c=1 sm=1 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:17 a=XD52yEjQpfAA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=l5wOrWOR8c4UPssCTwIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:117 Received: from [10.0.5.3] (ewsw01.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t0GI5p0f096809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:05:55 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Message-ID: <54B952FC.4020807@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:05:48 +1100 From: Dewayne Geraghty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Installing openssl without gcc or binutils dependents Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:30:00 -0000 I would appreciate advise on the best approach to install openssl that has been built with gcc48 without needing to install gcc and binutils into the target machine? Background Attempting to run sshd or openssl resulted in signal 4, illegal instruction. The target systems are i386 boxes running the VIA C3 chipset using 10.1 Stable and packages built from svnlite update of ports from 2014-12-30. The suspect file is libcrypto.so.8. All systems are built using clang and custom compiler directives, in this case, -march=c3-2 -mtune=c3-2 and other attempts of building used CPUTYPE=c3-2 which generated the same signal 4 when run on the target platform; march=pentium3 had same result. The build occurs within an i386 jail on an amd64 FreeBSD 10.1 Stable, base system. Solution Inserted into /usr/ports/security/openssl/Makefile USE_GCC= yes resulted in a successful installation and running of sshd and curl which was the objective. However the openssl now has a dependency on gcc48 and binutils, which wont fit into the embedded image of 64MB (and isn't needed) I would prefer to use pkg tools to install applications rather than the crude workaround of tar -xpPf /kits/openssl-1.0.1_16.txz /usr/local/bin /usr/local/lib I suspect something in /usr/ports/Mk would need a flag ?? Advise appreciated... Kind regards, Dewayne. PS Fortunate aside, geom_eli only requires openssl header files, otherwise the base system would also require gcc48 for these target machines From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 18:32:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAC4B75 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1FFBB9 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTMzb-1YMKi61ZKB-00SLuX; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <54B95927.8000800@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:32:07 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with fusefs-ntfs port References: <131547.96781.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <54B92EC5.1070903@gmx.net> <609982.64279.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <609982.64279.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:N2CSWDHDKiejli0JsBvDUah/uXdgMA0qT2aSaDX9+Hs8uLEN0yR e+KYWkDzeBEXP5Imp0pyDp0dBg6anR8awrUDeJOXJbEaDT8QxW0o+hIRv7Oe+U57EFaeTC+ QiFjjzlKtTPdBrIkzgw7zYPfb7oDxdmEEpTGkdvG7h+bD+6Uh36JKXr7fcgwLIMjCmQYgWr rRlnQuY/dDGk4p0+keoqQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:32:12 -0000 On 16.01.2015 19:17, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> from Stefan Ehmann: > >> On 16.01.2015 06:38, Thomas Mueller wrote: >>> I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard drive, 5 TB, external USB 3.0. > >>> It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat) the files one-by-one, very inelegant and quite unworkable for anything other than a small number of files in a simple directory structure. > >>> Trying to mount Seagate BackupPlus with ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /media/zip0 > >>> fuse: failed to open fuse device: No such file or directory > >> Check dmesg. IIRC this message indicates a missing kernel module (not a >> missing hard disk device). > > What module? I built all modules with the kernel, and then why would ntfsls and ntfscat see the device file that ntfs-3g didn't? > > I checked /var/run/dmesg.boot, biggest thing I noticed was repeated attempts to find USB 3.0 device. After you get the "No such file or directory" error type # dmesg | tail Hopefully this will reveal a more helpful error message. I'm currently not using fuse. But I think something like # kldload fuse might fix this issue. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 21:27:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583F0532; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289D12E; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYGAGaBuVRbsIcT/2dsb2JhbABagwaBKswfAoESRAEBAQEBfYQNAQU6HCMQCxgJJQ8qHgYTG4gVAdITAQEBAQEFAgEfj3kHhCkBBJdagRCKVYJpgz0ig289MYJDAQEB Received: from 19.135-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.135.19]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2015 22:27:06 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0GLR6ID007125; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:27:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:27:06 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dewayne Geraghty Subject: Re: Installing openssl without gcc or binutils dependents Message-ID: <20150116222706.779ebbe1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <54B952FC.4020807@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <54B952FC.4020807@heuristicsystems.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:27:19 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:05:48 +1100 Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > I would appreciate advise on the best approach to install openssl that > has been built with gcc48 without needing to install gcc and binutils > into the target machine? > > Background > Attempting to run sshd or openssl resulted in > signal 4, illegal instruction. > The target systems are i386 boxes running the VIA C3 chipset using 10.1 > Stable and packages built from svnlite update of ports from 2014-12-30. > > The suspect file is libcrypto.so.8. > > All systems are built using clang and custom compiler directives, in > this case, > -march=c3-2 -mtune=c3-2 > and other attempts of building used CPUTYPE=c3-2 which generated the > same signal 4 when run on the target platform; march=pentium3 had same > result. The build occurs within an i386 jail on an amd64 FreeBSD 10.1 > Stable, base system. > > Solution > Inserted into /usr/ports/security/openssl/Makefile > USE_GCC= yes > resulted in a successful installation and running of sshd and curl which > was the objective. However the openssl now has a dependency on gcc48 > and binutils, which wont fit into the embedded image of 64MB (and isn't > needed) > > I would prefer to use pkg tools to install applications rather than the > crude workaround of > tar -xpPf /kits/openssl-1.0.1_16.txz /usr/local/bin /usr/local/lib > > I suspect something in /usr/ports/Mk would need a flag ?? > > Advise appreciated... > > Kind regards, Dewayne. > PS Fortunate aside, geom_eli only requires openssl header files, > otherwise the base system would also require gcc48 for these target machines I'm sure toolchain@ would want to know what the faulting instruction is. Do you have a core dump that you can examine? -march=c3-2 enables SSE instructions. Are you sure your chip supports that? Maybe you need -march=c3. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 00:41:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C71E03; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 00:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A7F914; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 00:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u56so22906531wes.2; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:41:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7vpTwC6pSakjag8tKBTeP03thx+MWF/iDlNRhy3AIiI=; b=n8Ujos7OJZyZ2FcfMQysbOQAiZjaPY8E+jT8kI0bG3SqdwBcBhE+392FOxudugCTir EKBgY2sULOWyVEZH9by8Eg5G32br8vifMqIX2KNDMPa8rDg22Mxf3+kF1URxDc0Yh8+p rVmtkHxP+gV2fpIae1H7EbzGInTVDHco7EQBh6Atr2T3FcuZ4pyGLr7mnzQI0QspBFue i2NEsJvtkNJnrfT8mPwkYhlXCVLz7vr65LMtZoXVrv2DHzPYJrYJg0SyfvdoqgilNg37 o3IduEtRUcx1k3U3tlUav72V1yX+15V8eyXFg+xLFRqh6mrRWMawaVQwLeQ7D0LxaFrG ExRQ== X-Received: by 10.180.101.35 with SMTP id fd3mr10624944wib.6.1421455314793; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:41:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x16sm4899313wia.15.2015.01.16.16.41.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:41:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 01:41:51 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Message-ID: <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2IK6idz0sKKouFF6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pgsql@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 00:41:57 -0000 --2IK6idz0sKKouFF6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wr= ote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GP= Lv3. > >> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the > >> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, > >> > >> ... > >> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" > >> > >> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred > >> > >> > >> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: > >> > > except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not supprot= unicode > > (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the editl= ine port > > which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it works. > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regarding > my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices with > a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using > customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the > problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. >=20 https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other postegresql versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). Best regards, Bapt --2IK6idz0sKKouFF6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlS5r8wACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyVFACgrQQwEYfqiOk86LWxmvpDdSoT EGMAn1h3N5LlOSYYvB5wxUMJ09kPMZYt =M5/Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2IK6idz0sKKouFF6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 07:56:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F71ADAC for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x242.google.com (mail-yh0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DDD66D4 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f66.google.com with SMTP id f10so2858818yha.1 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:56:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jNB2NzRcXCNtaee02XSPv1cHxhH5VHZ/QxDfeWgjPfo=; b=IYjmSjnXAMmmDhiZLx3YOFPzoZ6mMrkXhGHTb58SoEMESEpxr/t1TggSCEKj+i0Ng6 Kbblimp7InrBcGT/kD8KA9G9hXsdymU5p2oIlh1tbAyvkiXX46uE8YxPDWxg2jFz3R/X F1v7varYMlgT5FIh0+TYc45PJVvBIm2UVJQaQOVkrTvr3n0CgyFGFd5Av5FxqFyAYNDb umY3LUHw20nwm2YMORCnooSS4cZMxPbwgNoWyB4vvNCL0OBygcI/PdOopCks0+A+SQId QwP12QIpJpjbLIRak2O7df6B+hyz/LE79fusGiGW5Hmlirmc6+VOlDhsAPx2N3JZXy6a gxIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.191.230 with SMTP id g66mr12122341yhn.57.1421481404292; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:56:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.96.195 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:56:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.96.195 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:56:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:56:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD Port: emulators/cinc From: Ronnie Miller To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:56:45 -0000 ? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 09:44:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8310226A; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail2.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A14F104; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.14] (h-85-24-195-48.na.cust.bahnhof.se [85.24.195.48]) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 16DD75EBD; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:37:52 +0100 (CET) References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) From: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:37:49 +0100 To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:44:50 -0000 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wr= ote: >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPL= v3. >>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the >>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >>>>=20 >>>> ... >>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >>>>=20 >>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >>>>=20 >>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not supprot u= nicode >>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the editli= ne port >>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it works. >>>=20 >>> Best regards, >>> Bapt >>=20 >> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regarding >> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices with >> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using >> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the >> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. >>=20 >=20 > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff >=20 > This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. >=20 > Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other postegresql > versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). >=20 > Best regards, > Bapt Hi, Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the differences be= tween readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How good is li= bedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should really be= an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred.=20 Palle= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 14:09:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5B5C2E; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D979C47; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z12so24860609wgg.13; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:09:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ekKel2rLZE04V0MAgV32llfOQ9hzx25FZ+0aCGNlXrg=; b=jAl+aLI1KaqRfM66erfKiEMZrtGp5/TH/3cr/f6ekMU8qDzdY9oBnqFQ54SXEEUQ8x 4ScbdMwoyOtE7hohEWk/Fw93LCol5x8Vg5j5P3eTs+O0r08yr8/S+oDFZR/c7Zuy7JRo MegNIGzKfIobSqEZSfeKrrDrrqI4i7OxrqGltO7ydrMQKc751beitvN/KYucMHhQPGj6 r8cYLJPs82Z1w4sGTbrfisnFAy3S6Qa9PGnQoYWbqXjPpnDtJP2zQM2QFKLlciytYTh3 xQ8mPM1J/yG2aYuODHylIP2weLFq1FCL4eMkRwpiQP3uhEfclvJyt+SQEBmkRaqhhYwF y9ow== X-Received: by 10.180.72.178 with SMTP id e18mr16034023wiv.23.1421503779622; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vh8sm9917743wjc.12.2015.01.17.06.09.38 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:09:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:09:36 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Message-ID: <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pes7OZCOzfZhFQfq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:09:42 -0000 --Pes7OZCOzfZhFQfq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >=20 >=20 > 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >=20 > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin = wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>>=20 > >>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is = GPLv3. > >>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the > >>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, > >>>>=20 > >>>> ... > >>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" > >>>>=20 > >>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred > >>>>=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: > >>>>=20 > >>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not suppr= ot unicode > >>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the edi= tline port > >>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it works. > >>>=20 > >>> Best regards, > >>> Bapt > >>=20 > >> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regarding > >> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices with > >> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using > >> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the > >> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. > >>=20 > >=20 > > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff > >=20 > > This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. > >=20 > > Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other postegres= ql > > versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the differences= between readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How good i= s libedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should real= ly be an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred.=20 >=20 > Palle It is not 100% compatible but I think it implements all pgsql requirements,= only the version in ports and he head handle correctly unicode. Some of the default settings are a bit different most ^W but that can be ch= anged via .editrc mysql has tips about the differences: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17952_01/refman-5.6-en/mysql-tips.html =46rom what I can read in the code psql only uses compatible interfaces. As the one who have done the latet updates on libedit both base and ports, I would recommand to only use the version from ports on all version of FreeBS= D as I can add quick fixes if needed. Once I'm sure the libedit in base is good enough everywhere we would be abl= e to switch on the base version if people prefers to avoid an external dep. Best regards, Bapt --Pes7OZCOzfZhFQfq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlS6bR0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwAIwCfRLBwBfzzBlxaucaBfUMU0d0f KcgAnjKATPDAJ0szNqQ6FrnOLjixYpbV =rudY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pes7OZCOzfZhFQfq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 14:38:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC08EEF; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2216EA4; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so24677608wes.1; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RRhNVC7eugwfMmMQOydKuYHXoKvNqc0zNR7ZOeTqR9Y=; b=CAj8UL8zGn9bteZzqen7Iec4xH7Pnvz94Wplt5ZJFjCU4NOu3isJg6q92/xNN3bajb w3gPsdyykMAsns21Un6r84jjnaBKd+jTC0IVfbczbxPU4nkhhoG4RHNAH55Efo/KVmBJ SEGUu8VbfwYbJtjneGm5ErEg8cTllxgEx8nL5nk1qz/+P8jS7mczE1VkddWsVP/noS5V uqT4RIyNK1KKkpXQfUxjYvtyicezvF9zFRcSy5nrwohQvfApaMixT+k5ucc3ou8b+3b7 0on7Xv5CpuslQypdZnz7O34s1ggDga/gDbyzAM62OdFGYuuJxQZHQlmCVyroPKRe8nFT oqLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.38.66 with SMTP id e2mr16265360wik.55.1421505490157; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Waitman Gobble To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Palle Girgensohn , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:38:12 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrot= e: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> >> >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >> >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is= GPLv3. >> >>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the >> >>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >> >>>> >> >>>> ... >> >>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >> >>>> >> >>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >> >>>> >> >>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not supp= rot unicode >> >>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the ed= itline port >> >>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it works= . >> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> Bapt >> >> >> >> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regardin= g >> >> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices with >> >> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using >> >> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the >> >> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. >> >> >> > >> > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff >> > >> > This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. >> > >> > Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other postegre= sql >> > versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Bapt >> >> Hi, >> >> Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the difference= s between readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How good = is libedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should rea= lly be an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred. >> >> Palle > It is not 100% compatible but I think it implements all pgsql requirement= s, only > the version in ports and he head handle correctly unicode. > > Some of the default settings are a bit different most ^W but that can be = changed > via .editrc > > mysql has tips about the differences: > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17952_01/refman-5.6-en/mysql-tips.html > > From what I can read in the code psql only uses compatible interfaces. > > As the one who have done the latet updates on libedit both base and ports= , I > would recommand to only use the version from ports on all version of Free= BSD as > I can add quick fixes if needed. > > Once I'm sure the libedit in base is good enough everywhere we would be a= ble to > switch on the base version if people prefers to avoid an external dep. > > Best regards, > Bapt Looks great. The patch looks fine, however there is an issue that the configure script in postgresql93 src still needs readline. If readline is already on the machine then it builds fine, however if it is not then the build fails. adding 'readline' back into USES will fix that problem, and the resulting client is still linked to libedit and not readline.. however the pkg will show a dependency on readline and pull that in. The configure script is based on having readline, if you use the --without-readline switch it won't even use libedit, however if you use --with-libedit-preferred it will check for readline and then switch the library linking order from 'readline libedit' to 'libedit readline'. I think the configure script for postgresql needs some rework so that it only uses libedit, and the option would be --with-readline or --with-libedit. if 'readline' is removed from the Makefile (and readline is already installed on the machine) then the package will build fine without the dependency on readline. It's kind of a tricky predicament that it needs it but not really. As far as a port, I'm not sure how to 'optionally' replace the configure script with what is in 'files' if the libedit option is selected. I'm sure there is an example in the ports tree, just haven't yet taken the time to check. --=20 Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 14:50:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B20A24C; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp207.alice.it (smtp207.alice.it [82.57.200.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB75BF79; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (80.181.51.90) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 547D8BAA078459B7; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:50:42 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.1/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0HEobCP099861; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:50:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <54BA76A4.2070105@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:50:12 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Cannot build FireFox on 9.3/i386 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:50:50 -0000 Hello. Due to the latest vulnerabilities, I'm trying to upgrade FireFox, but it stops on this error: clang++ -o Unified_cpp_content_media2.o -c -I../../dist/stl_wrappers -I../../dist/system_wrappers -include /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/gcc_hidden.h -DOS_POSIX=1 -DOS_FREEBSD=1 -DOS_BSD=1 -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -DMOZ_GLUE_IN_PROGRAM -DAB_CD=en-US -DNO_NSPR_10_SUPPORT -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/content/media -I. -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-freebsd9.3/ipc/ipdl/_ipdlheaders -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/ipc/chromium/src -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/ipc/glue -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/content/base/src -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/layout/generic -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/layout/xul -I/tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/netwerk/base/src -I../../dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -fPIC -Qunused-arguments -isystem/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../mozilla-config.h -MD -MP -MF .deps/Unified_cpp_content_media2.o.pp -Qunused-arguments -isystem/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wempty-body -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsign-compare -Wwrite-strings -Werror=endif-labels -Werror=int-to-pointer-cast -Werror=missing-braces -Werror=pointer-arith -Werror=return-type -Werror=sequence-point -Werror=unused-label -Werror=trigraphs -Werror=type-limits -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-inline-new-delete -Wno-c++0x-extensions -Wno-extended-offsetof -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wno-return-type-c-linkage -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-math-errno -std=gnu++0x -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -fno-omit-frame-pointer -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/opus -I/usr/local/include/soundtouch /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-freebsd9.3/content/media/Unified_cpp_content_media2.cpp In file included from /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-freebsd9.3/content/media/Unified_cpp_content_media1.cpp:29: /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/content/media/MediaDecoderStateMachine.cpp:1315:7: error: call to 'abs' is ambiguous std::abs(aDuration - duration) > ESTIMATED_DURATION_FUZZ_FACTOR_USECS) { ^~~~~~~~ /usr/include/stdlib.h:83:6: note: candidate function int abs(int) __pure2; ^ /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:89:3: note: candidate function abs(double __x) ^ /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:93:3: note: candidate function abs(float __x) ^ /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:97:3: note: candidate function abs(long double __x) ^ /usr/include/c++/4.2/cstdlib:143:3: note: candidate function abs(long __i) { return labs(__i); } ^ 1 error generated. /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/rules.mk:948: recipe for target 'Unified_cpp_content_media1.o' failed Any hint? Is firefox 35 still supported on 9.3 or should I move to ESR? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 14:54:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE003F4; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7411BD; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so7653081wiv.0; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:54:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kLaVl3bwtzENCxB3rFuaBn/XJWEFskhrCae4PzLLtsk=; b=oN446L7OsBsigQS/ew0CL7ZTPR7QqW5qIPhBQivWKW9Yhxh+U8JMqEkZkHA3eN09yw SBroaOKogiAdc+FcyER9utjqpPFjGxbpxwNvQMt8P7AsjL8tfvL1i+9wpTx+tfkPRzOL Q+TNFla38R2F/arYdnJPERU6thCiSIjyJrHpp0+fBqmXEavdsBeqLE0iOCmh1tkRAEIe AuvAly14Vue2CaeSx6Wv3aQIaVwHNw8vbcAq+npK4x6AcEE2VY+xBKiUsd86qhM1rCOK g7mdJoGthq+x/s1P0/Allz2aTLMjrJSFc+gP0pSws42fvxPNa5ql83DUebtTML/FDCIs orgQ== X-Received: by 10.194.143.12 with SMTP id sa12mr40265503wjb.101.1421506469068; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ej10sm6997810wib.2.2015.01.17.06.54.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:54:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:54:26 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Message-ID: <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uLzYCuFow5JXEQYy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Palle Girgensohn , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:54:31 -0000 --uLzYCuFow5JXEQYy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wr= ote: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > >> > >> > >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> >>>> Hi, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which = is GPLv3. > >> >>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the > >> >>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> ... > >> >>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" > >> >>>> > >> >>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: > >> >>>> > >> >>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not su= pprot unicode > >> >>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the = editline port > >> >>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it wor= ks. > >> >>> > >> >>> Best regards, > >> >>> Bapt > >> >> > >> >> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regard= ing > >> >> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices wi= th > >> >> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using > >> >> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the > >> >> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. > >> >> > >> > > >> > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff > >> > > >> > This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. > >> > > >> > Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other posteg= resql > >> > versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Bapt > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the differen= ces between readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How goo= d is libedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should r= eally be an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred. > >> > >> Palle > > It is not 100% compatible but I think it implements all pgsql requireme= nts, only > > the version in ports and he head handle correctly unicode. > > > > Some of the default settings are a bit different most ^W but that can b= e changed > > via .editrc > > > > mysql has tips about the differences: > > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17952_01/refman-5.6-en/mysql-tips.html > > > > From what I can read in the code psql only uses compatible interfaces. > > > > As the one who have done the latet updates on libedit both base and por= ts, I > > would recommand to only use the version from ports on all version of Fr= eeBSD as > > I can add quick fixes if needed. > > > > Once I'm sure the libedit in base is good enough everywhere we would be= able to > > switch on the base version if people prefers to avoid an external dep. > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > Looks great. The patch looks fine, however there is an issue that the > configure script in postgresql93 src still needs readline. If readline > is already on the machine then it builds fine, however if it is not > then the build fails. adding 'readline' back into USES will fix that > problem, and the resulting client is still linked to libedit and not > readline.. however the pkg will show a dependency on readline and pull > that in. The configure script is based on having readline, if you use > the --without-readline switch it won't even use libedit, however if > you use --with-libedit-preferred it will check for readline and then > switch the library linking order from 'readline libedit' to 'libedit > readline'. >=20 > I think the configure script for postgresql needs some rework so that > it only uses libedit, and the option would be --with-readline or > --with-libedit. >=20 > if 'readline' is removed from the Makefile (and readline is already > installed on the machine) then the package will build fine without the > dependency on readline. It's kind of a tricky predicament that it > needs it but not really. >=20 > As far as a port, I'm not sure how to 'optionally' replace the > configure script with what is in 'files' if the libedit option is > selected. I'm sure there is an example in the ports tree, just haven't > yet taken the time to check. >=20 I have no readline installed and I can see: checking for rl_completion_append_character... no checking for rl_completion_matches... yes checking for rl_filename_completion_function... yes checking for append_history... no checking for history_truncate_file... yes Which is what I was expected. With libedit-prefered it checks: READLINE_ORDER=3D"-ledit -lreadline" So from what I can see everything ok :) Bapt --uLzYCuFow5JXEQYy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlS6d6AACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwAjwCcDQlMW/r11HPbYEA6WCLEOe5a UBcAn1hwcuChE7quYO03Fo9hhmFxY6yw =QtJI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uLzYCuFow5JXEQYy-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:00:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B5E567; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2A6F2; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y19so25045390wgg.4; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:00:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LnQcMwIznO2OPMWH8W0SnaXmWasdELKCMnSp3gaSQjY=; b=pjMwRNKD43Ebp0M1VYNDX3LHJOTuyCH/RF76nwbHxieDkjGCQZK3hJwCGROPZcloyj Bs0hZ2h7YO13/i9VeIpnCXTqmzhbEquVloQK27F43Eh5PS+YnkobWMxlVWIZQ3FNQKZK 3AZgLpH6eJ+pu5qUkOcwiR1MVPv1sflv8sCw4GR44jiFhlYikiek5FA3nibM14G9h2Xd kyLTL7WZP04AwQHOSgJkNdr/0jj/VvmU61hcBH40IjBzNY70HUnGKJQcVGYssIrrsACn xyrwdnury/tRoNCcF9RpNwj0L499EKkRnus58VAipEQ8i8+CagHMYqTH/Bixf0Xrt50u U/Jw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr16936759wib.32.1421506824816; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:00:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:00:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Waitman Gobble To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Palle Girgensohn , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:00:26 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrot= e: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: >> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> >>>> Hi, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which= is GPLv3. >> >> >>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change th= e >> >> >>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> ... >> >> >>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not s= upprot unicode >> >> >>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the= editline port >> >> >>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it wo= rks. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Best regards, >> >> >>> Bapt >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regar= ding >> >> >> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices w= ith >> >> >> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using >> >> >> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the >> >> >> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff >> >> > >> >> > This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. >> >> > >> >> > Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other poste= gresql >> >> > versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). >> >> > >> >> > Best regards, >> >> > Bapt >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the differe= nces between readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How go= od is libedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should = really be an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred. >> >> >> >> Palle >> > It is not 100% compatible but I think it implements all pgsql requirem= ents, only >> > the version in ports and he head handle correctly unicode. >> > >> > Some of the default settings are a bit different most ^W but that can = be changed >> > via .editrc >> > >> > mysql has tips about the differences: >> > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17952_01/refman-5.6-en/mysql-tips.html >> > >> > From what I can read in the code psql only uses compatible interfaces. >> > >> > As the one who have done the latet updates on libedit both base and po= rts, I >> > would recommand to only use the version from ports on all version of F= reeBSD as >> > I can add quick fixes if needed. >> > >> > Once I'm sure the libedit in base is good enough everywhere we would b= e able to >> > switch on the base version if people prefers to avoid an external dep. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Bapt >> >> Looks great. The patch looks fine, however there is an issue that the >> configure script in postgresql93 src still needs readline. If readline >> is already on the machine then it builds fine, however if it is not >> then the build fails. adding 'readline' back into USES will fix that >> problem, and the resulting client is still linked to libedit and not >> readline.. however the pkg will show a dependency on readline and pull >> that in. The configure script is based on having readline, if you use >> the --without-readline switch it won't even use libedit, however if >> you use --with-libedit-preferred it will check for readline and then >> switch the library linking order from 'readline libedit' to 'libedit >> readline'. >> >> I think the configure script for postgresql needs some rework so that >> it only uses libedit, and the option would be --with-readline or >> --with-libedit. >> >> if 'readline' is removed from the Makefile (and readline is already >> installed on the machine) then the package will build fine without the >> dependency on readline. It's kind of a tricky predicament that it >> needs it but not really. >> >> As far as a port, I'm not sure how to 'optionally' replace the >> configure script with what is in 'files' if the libedit option is >> selected. I'm sure there is an example in the ports tree, just haven't >> yet taken the time to check. >> > > I have no readline installed and I can see: > checking for rl_completion_append_character... no > checking for rl_completion_matches... yes > checking for rl_filename_completion_function... yes > checking for append_history... no > checking for history_truncate_file... yes > > Which is what I was expected. > > With libedit-prefered it checks: > READLINE_ORDER=3D"-ledit -lreadline" > > So from what I can see everything ok :) > > Bapt Hmmm, I'll check again. The build was failing for me using poudriere. it looks to me like the configure script checks for readline existence and the with-libedit-preferred check block is inside the readline check block.. --=20 Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:09:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2427736; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BF21B1; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id r20so1216992wiv.4; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:08:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7a7NQuXLmw8lTcQ9bh5Ku4tbhMOlRss4rSMMt8f1Te8=; b=YqqxE3GCvv6vvqD5RGaXhyFGJT69UCdm7AM1vPCY143wgai0Qw+94PUO1GtNIYDBsf MQ9qC0ezcWPk0bfXihKiFDVbLoHM9iSF5Er/rth+0nFyrhYQJa5ATF4DfWQFUUPKHk1i AW9U4cguwS/zvh99YXk4Wy3mi1LomfYWYeFAMZF3e6HWViippGHwTxL/OBGtHJDIz77z 6GX/4KJ6Sv1tzJYKoVZjAeWhmeSZ+lU1JKhJbKJ+J3q+PSDAgh/VNNHrhZdjEau1iDt3 c1Y35Kj2xtNgfHuFs5ZKH6TAGC3bafA915cgD0Q6Q9YFAWUYS8W53vO18Cge+EoxkEIJ bv/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.198.51 with SMTP id iz19mr16627904wic.65.1421507338787; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:08:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:08:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Waitman Gobble To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Palle Girgensohn , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:09:00 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote= : > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wr= ote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin = wrote: >>> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >>> >> >>> >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> >> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> >> >>>> Hi, >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, whic= h is GPLv3. >>> >> >>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change t= he >>> >> >>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> ... >>> >> >>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not = supprot unicode >>> >> >>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against th= e editline port >>> >> >>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it w= orks. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >>> >> >>> Bapt >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options rega= rding >>> >> >> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices = with >>> >> >> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using >>> >> >> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the >>> >> >> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff >>> >> > >>> >> > This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. >>> >> > >>> >> > Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other post= egresql >>> >> > versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). >>> >> > >>> >> > Best regards, >>> >> > Bapt >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the differ= ences between readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How g= ood is libedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should= really be an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred. >>> >> >>> >> Palle >>> > It is not 100% compatible but I think it implements all pgsql require= ments, only >>> > the version in ports and he head handle correctly unicode. >>> > >>> > Some of the default settings are a bit different most ^W but that can= be changed >>> > via .editrc >>> > >>> > mysql has tips about the differences: >>> > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17952_01/refman-5.6-en/mysql-tips.html >>> > >>> > From what I can read in the code psql only uses compatible interfaces= . >>> > >>> > As the one who have done the latet updates on libedit both base and p= orts, I >>> > would recommand to only use the version from ports on all version of = FreeBSD as >>> > I can add quick fixes if needed. >>> > >>> > Once I'm sure the libedit in base is good enough everywhere we would = be able to >>> > switch on the base version if people prefers to avoid an external dep= . >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Bapt >>> >>> Looks great. The patch looks fine, however there is an issue that the >>> configure script in postgresql93 src still needs readline. If readline >>> is already on the machine then it builds fine, however if it is not >>> then the build fails. adding 'readline' back into USES will fix that >>> problem, and the resulting client is still linked to libedit and not >>> readline.. however the pkg will show a dependency on readline and pull >>> that in. The configure script is based on having readline, if you use >>> the --without-readline switch it won't even use libedit, however if >>> you use --with-libedit-preferred it will check for readline and then >>> switch the library linking order from 'readline libedit' to 'libedit >>> readline'. >>> >>> I think the configure script for postgresql needs some rework so that >>> it only uses libedit, and the option would be --with-readline or >>> --with-libedit. >>> >>> if 'readline' is removed from the Makefile (and readline is already >>> installed on the machine) then the package will build fine without the >>> dependency on readline. It's kind of a tricky predicament that it >>> needs it but not really. >>> >>> As far as a port, I'm not sure how to 'optionally' replace the >>> configure script with what is in 'files' if the libedit option is >>> selected. I'm sure there is an example in the ports tree, just haven't >>> yet taken the time to check. >>> >> >> I have no readline installed and I can see: >> checking for rl_completion_append_character... no >> checking for rl_completion_matches... yes >> checking for rl_filename_completion_function... yes >> checking for append_history... no >> checking for history_truncate_file... yes >> >> Which is what I was expected. >> >> With libedit-prefered it checks: >> READLINE_ORDER=3D"-ledit -lreadline" >> >> So from what I can see everything ok :) >> >> Bapt > > > Hmmm, I'll check again. The build was failing for me using poudriere. > it looks to me like the configure script checks for readline existence > and the with-libedit-preferred check block is inside the readline > check block.. > > -- > Waitman Gobble > Los Altos California USA > 510-830-7975 ... I think that's why '--without-readline' option help reads 'without readline AND libedit' --=20 Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:37:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138A5F86; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maul.immure.com (104-49-19-137.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [104.49.19.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B2B6BB; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YCV9m-0003Ua-1y; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:19:22 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HFI6n7002154; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:18:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0HFI694002153; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:18:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:18:06 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: FreeBSD Ports Message-ID: <20150117151806.GE91189@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.1.132.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bob@immure.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on maul.immure.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on maul.immure.com) Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:37:22 -0000 Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined linker_load_file: Unsupported file type So, today I updtated my system again today hoping it might be fixed but the problem persists. System info: FreeBSD han.immure.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4 r277299: Sat Jan 17 08:52:41 CST 2015 bob@han.immure.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAN amd64 Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | The Ancient Doctrine of Mind Over Matter: bob@immure.com | I don't mind... and you don't matter. Austin, TX | -- As revealed to reporter G. Rivera by Swami Havabanana From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:44:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4061C210; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BEA7CC; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89F871FE023; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:44:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54BA8380.4060108@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:45:04 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Willcox , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so References: <20150117151806.GE91189@rancor.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <20150117151806.GE91189@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:44:18 -0000 On 01/17/15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: > Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when > attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): > > link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > > So, today I updtated my system again today hoping it might be fixed but the > problem persists. > > System info: > > FreeBSD han.immure.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4 r277299: Sat Jan 17 08:52:41 CST 2015 bob@han.immure.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAN amd64 > > Thanks, > Bob > Hi, The nvidia-driver package needs to be recompiled with the latest FreeBSD-current sources, because of changes in the callout subsystem. If this is not possible, we can temporarily add the "_callout_stop_safe" symbol to the kernel for some transition time. --HPS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:48:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24AC03C3; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D649B7F1; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HFmbtX050877; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:48:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t0HFmbPa050876; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:48:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:48:37 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: Bob Willcox , FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so Message-ID: <20150117154837.GL1151@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: current@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org, Bob Willcox , FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD CURRENT References: <20150117151806.GE91189@rancor.immure.com> <54BA8380.4060108@selasky.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YAtphYyk96k3MMQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54BA8380.4060108@selasky.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:48:40 -0000 --YAtphYyk96k3MMQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 01/17/15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when > > attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): > > > > link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined > > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > > > > So, today I updtated my system again today hoping it might be fixed but= the > > problem persists. > > > > System info: > > > > FreeBSD han.immure.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4 r277299: Sa= t Jan 17 08:52:41 CST 2015 bob@han.immure.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAN = amd64 > > > > Thanks, > > Bob > > >=20 > Hi, >=20 > The nvidia-driver package needs to be recompiled with the latest=20 > FreeBSD-current sources, because of changes in the callout subsystem. >=20 > If this is not possible, we can temporarily add the "_callout_stop_safe"= =20 > symbol to the kernel for some transition time. > ... While I'm running i386 (vs. amd64), I have not encountered the cited issue. Given the above, I suspect that the fact that I have the line: PORTS_MODULES=3Dx11/nvidia-driver in /etc/src.conf has a fair amount of (positive) influence on that. (I track stable/10 & head -- on different slices -- daily on my laptop.) Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --YAtphYyk96k3MMQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUuoRUXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7CbwP/1FloLSXq5eL+XE5MlE7MwM7 7WV3w8WDhAZM1TAOBeRIwT3HbRr2CUTI+nWy8ktOjysUhDzHJ4lRbjjCDf3vg488 C2XPnR83dd52too8e1n0AtkiRTkj+OvqeSAChr+FxPj0Y8I8/n73MlSS07zLQkyO H3uAQPaXYOcuOEPJSt9B4s3gx+sgxYTWGhqkciwvch5Bqu2upH8n5e9r/+0IhV6K ibApJFGcJHgvCMq95Y9R4dBmwWZpxM9OMa6R7ec+zurL42/fO7atbTeilaE/6ED4 2+Ta5zcZijO05YBzDW9GZ8SWzPpVpAYQkTDILaly6VpMnTPloYDf/CWmkFjzppfa Ef9EvCcVL8ZJG5OmJidICXFKkeNWYPQOr5SiFselbylzbkzoJI9WhUJOh/fZqd6w +ipkIgR7soacYfwVQsOAapAT99mQyYKEGdObV894iw6yP/aPz357qnoD0lkTGgoz SYIlZRvxzYTR7nR/M9+1JdWRw7EeSes0annw+UPqRp7bh3ERqJJ4L23vslFT+8k1 aJMgTQHmqPnuGuisZyR14ceQiDF2y69pwD39Po5Ck5kxAjtQXZ6qA07jBt5lBz2z t84o/p1jKPFYSJKudPjAjvv7HAy4T1IruwnKBLwOzoksjRDYbh3/DIhBjChohXCn jHuYGLW9UysPcSN0FePB =SpFu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YAtphYyk96k3MMQU-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 16:03:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E6598B; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BAD98F; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.225.11] (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id t0HFho5a080741; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:43:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <54BA8336.4090807@fgznet.ch> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:43:50 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Willcox , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so References: <20150117151806.GE91189@rancor.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <20150117151806.GE91189@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:03:29 -0000 On 17.01.15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: > Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when > attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): > > link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > > So, today I updtated my system again today hoping it might be fixed but the > problem persists. > > System info: > > FreeBSD han.immure.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4 r277299: Sat Jan 17 08:52:41 CST 2015 bob@han.immure.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAN amd64 I think you have to rebuild the nvidia-driver against your fresh built system. At least I had and my T510 s working again with the nvidia.ko. Gruss, Andreas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 16:19:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5138016E for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vfemail.net (nine.vfemail.net [108.76.175.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58B6ABD for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58404 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jan 2015 16:19:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 Jan 2015 16:19:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 58391 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jan 2015 16:19:16 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 58385, pid: 58388, t: 0.1004s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO smtp102-2.vfemail.net) (172.16.100.62) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 17 Jan 2015 16:19:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 18722 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jan 2015 16:19:16 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 18694, pid: 18716, t: 0.8675s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO nil) (amJlaWNoQHZmZW1haWwubmV0@172.16.100.27) by 172.16.100.62 with ESMTPA; 17 Jan 2015 16:19:15 -0000 From: Jan Beich To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: Cannot build FireFox on 9.3/i386 References: <54BA76A4.2070105__31874.2431737066$1421506260$gmane$org@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:19:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54BA76A4.2070105__31874.2431737066$1421506260$gmane$org@netfence.it> (Andrea Venturoli's message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:50:12 +0100") Message-ID: <3879-9y81-wny@vfemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gecko@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:19:45 -0000 Andrea Venturoli writes: > Due to the latest vulnerabilities, I'm trying to upgrade FireFox, but > it stops on this error: > > In file included from > /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-freebsd9.3/content/media/Unified_cpp_content_media1.cpp:29: > /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/content/media/MediaDecoderStateMachine.cpp:1315:7: > error: call to 'abs' is ambiguous > std::abs(aDuration - duration) > > ESTIMATED_DURATION_FUZZ_FACTOR_USECS) { > ^~~~~~~~ > /usr/include/stdlib.h:83:6: note: candidate function > int abs(int) __pure2; > ^ > /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:89:3: note: candidate function > abs(double __x) > ^ > /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:93:3: note: candidate function > abs(float __x) > ^ > /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:97:3: note: candidate function > abs(long double __x) > ^ > /usr/include/c++/4.2/cstdlib:143:3: note: candidate function > abs(long __i) { return labs(__i); } > ^ > 1 error generated. Already reported. std::abs(int64_t) for 32bit archs or std::llabs are not available in base libstdc++ or before 10.0-RELEASE (r255294) for libstdc++ in lang/gcc47 and earlier (libstdc++/54686). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196772 ------------------------------------------------- VFEmail.net - http://www.vfemail.net ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 16:47:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BA8D6F7 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A95ED4D for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id h4lw1p00G2iF103014lxxB; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:45:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HGjufA026171 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:45:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:45:56 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:47:11 -0000 Hi, I am the port maintainer of the alpine port, nevertheless not a very experienced one. The alpine mailer has recently been updated from 2.11 to 2.20 and I as a maintainer would like to update the port to the new version. According to the porter's handbook I have to use diff to create a patch in order to upgrade the alpine port. Is this correct? I'm hoping to get some pointers from an experienced port maintainer how to deal with upgrades like this. Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Marco From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 16:58:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5E7B39 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D9BFE4D for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YCWhw-000HeF-QG; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:58:44 +0100 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:58:44 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Marco Beishuizen Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) Message-ID: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:58:46 -0000 Hi! > I am the port maintainer of the alpine port, nevertheless not a very > experienced one. > > The alpine mailer has recently been updated from 2.11 to 2.20 and I as a > maintainer would like to update the port to the new version. > > According to the porter's handbook I have to use diff to create a patch in > order to upgrade the alpine port. Is this correct? Yes. Here's how I do updates: I have DEVELOPER=yes in /etc/make.conf. I copy the current port to some temp directory: cd /usr/ports && tar cf - mail/alpine | ( cd ~/myp; tar xf -) Then I modify the copy: cd ~/myp/mail/alpine # change version vi Makefile # fix distinfo, make makesum does this for mw make makesum # then I check the build and stuff on my test system (10.1-amd64) rm -rf work && make check-plist [ some iterations later ] # I then test it with poudriere in three architectures: # copy to the poudriere ports tree (~/pp in my case): cd ~/myp && tar cf - mail/alpine | ( cd ~/pp; tar xf -) # and tests: for i in 10x 93a 84i do name=`echo $port-$i | sed -e 's/\//__/g'` echo -n "$i " poudriere testport -j $i -o $port -n > ~/logs/${name}-${stmp}.txt done # if it works on all plattforms, I compare my changes to the old port: cd /usr/ports && diff -r -u -N mail/alpine ~/myp/mail/alpine This diff can be attached to the problem report in bugzilla. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 17:11:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5939DDC for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mproxygzt2.163.com (mproxygzt2.163.com [113.108.225.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0452F3C for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:11:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=ATNhp KWjB62MY2a7nj3+kk5jd5fy6jP2PZFoVk0QPFA=; b=nlwkooEQ0wpbYyHIREfmd wu42UTD0PGKlev3SjFGI7mAzTvJJS9LGTApUi6fibGRJlNASOnCclfsnJUYx9+8+ A4ibrlwxRquYgOjbsUBW3xxcBetkIF6Fi3Qv4jIb1DKQsZAn+TJawOgEpMb2awp5 hnLJe+i/1prbX9p1YC0ogI= Received: from qxemtai (unknown [163.125.31.143]) by smtp11 (Coremail) with SMTP id D8CowEDJaOQhlLpU836HAA--.275S2; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:56:02 +0800 (CST) X-Coremail-DSSMTP: 163.125.31.143 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:57:26 +0800 From: "Jason" Reply-To: eva@mhgyjs.com To: "ports" Subject: Re:PVC cards supplier Message-ID: <201501180057268754703@163.com> X-Mailer: Foxmail 6, 10, 201, 20 [cn] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-CM-TRANSID: D8CowEDJaOQhlLpU836HAA--.275S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrZr17Kr1fCry5Cw48tFWkZwb_yoW3ZFX_u3 yfZay2gFWDJw1Ut3y3KFsrtrnxWFs2ga4kCrWYqws7Aw15WFWxuw4kt3s5Ka4UZaykXws8 JFn3tan0vrs8ujkaLaAFLSUrUUUU5b8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IUjznQUUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [163.125.31.143] X-CM-SenderInfo: 5orzu0pvwft2rg6rljoofrz/1tbisAKEL1EAL+d5bQAAsU X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:11:31 -0000 RGVhciBTaXIvTWFkYW0sDQpBIFNtaWxlIGRheSBmb3IgeW91ICENCg0KVGhpcyBpcyBldmEgb2Yg YSBwcm9mZXNzaW9uYWwgUkZJRCBjYXJkIG1hbnVmYWN0dXJlciBmcm9tIENoaW5hIC4NClRvIHdl bGNvbWUgeW91ciBDaHJpc3RtYXMgRGF5LHdlIHByZXBhcmUgc29tZSBwcmVzZW50cyBmb3IgeW91 LGFsbCBvZiBwcm9kdWN0cyBhcmUgd2l0aCBhbiBhbWF6aW5nIGRpc2NvdW50ICxzb21lIGFzIGZv bGxvdyBmb3IgeW91ciByZWZlcmVuY2U6DQpNaWZhcmUgRk0xMTA4IDFLIChGVURBTikgYmxhbmsg Y2FyZC0kIDAuMDkzL3BjcyANCk5YUCBNaWZhcmUgMWsgUzUwIGJsYW5rIGNhcmQtJCAwLjI4MS9w Y3MgDQpOWFAgTUlmYXJlIDRrIFM3MCBibGFuayBjYXJkLSQgMC41MjkvcGNzDQpORkMgTlhQIE50 YWcgMjEzIGJsYW5rIGNhcmQtJCAwLjIxL3Bjcw0KTlhQIERlc2ZpcmUgRVYxIDRLIGJsYW5rIGNh cmQtJCAwLjkwOS9wY3MNCk5YUCBQTFVTIFMgMksgYmxhbmsgY2FyZC0kIDAuNTEyL3Bjcw0KDQpX ZWNsY29tZSB5b3VyIG1vcmUga2luZCBpbnF1aXJ5IGFuZCBxdWVzdGlvbnMgLg0KDQpWZXJ5IGFw cHJlY2lhdGUgeW91ciBzb29uIHJlcGx5IC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzICYgQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzLA0KDQpl dmENCg0KU2hlbnpoZW4gTWVpaGUgSW5kdWN0aW9uIFRlY2hub2xvZ3kgQ28uLCBMdGQgDQpUZWw6 Kzg2IDc1NSAyNjU1IDQ2MzYtODAzDQpGYXg6Kzg2IDc1NSA4NjAyIDEyMzkNCkNlbGw6Kzg2IDEz MjY1NzU4Nzk3DQpTa3lwZTpldmE4OTAxMTEyDQpXZWI6d3d3Lm1oZ3lqcy5jb20gd3d3Lm1ocmZp ZC5jb20gd3d3LmNoaW5hbmZjY2FyZC5jb20= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 17:16:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815DCFC7; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp205.alice.it (smtp205.alice.it [82.57.200.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286B4FFA; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (80.181.51.90) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 547D8A4D09FC112C; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:15:54 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.1/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0HHFoTn004658; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:15:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <54BA98AD.4000806@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:15:25 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich Subject: Re: Cannot build FireFox on 9.3/i386 References: <54BA76A4.2070105__31874.2431737066$1421506260$gmane$org@netfence.it> <3879-9y81-wny@vfemail.net> In-Reply-To: <3879-9y81-wny@vfemail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gecko@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:16:04 -0000 On 01/17/15 17:19, Jan Beich wrote: > Already reported. std::abs(int64_t) for 32bit archs or std::llabs are not > available in base libstdc++ or before 10.0-RELEASE (r255294) for libstdc++ > in lang/gcc47 and earlier (libstdc++/54686). > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196772 Thanks. Strangely, I had looked in the bug list, but didn't find this :-O In any case, it solved. bye av. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 17:34:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E373D6 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (108-248-95-193.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [108.248.95.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE5C24E for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0HHYj0C043427 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:34:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54BA9D35.4040704@astart.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:34:45 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: pkg segmentation fault Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:34:47 -0000 This just happened today. Any comments/suggestions? laptop_93: {356} # pkg -v 1.4.4 laptop_93: {357} # pkg delete p5-Archive-Zip Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: p5-Archive-Zip-1.42 The operation will free 226 kB. Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: y [1/1] Deinstalling p5-Archive-Zip-1.42... [1/1] Deleting files for p5-Archive-Zip-1.42: 100% laptop_93: {358} # pkg install p5-Archive-Zip Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. apr-1.5.1.1.5.4 is locked and may not be modified apr-1.5.1.1.5.4 is locked and may not be modified apr-1.5.1.1.5.4 is locked and may not be modified Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The following 1 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: p5-Archive-Zip: 1.42 The process will require 226 kB more space. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/1] Installing p5-Archive-Zip-1.42... [1/1] Extracting p5-Archive-Zip-1.42: 100% Child process pid=50074 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 17:45:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FABBB1 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x242.google.com (mail-qa0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D2139C for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f66.google.com with SMTP id j7so4407606qaq.1 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:45:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LqipZ4cGVdIs4WTQvgE3mWMxHTsAh361WtQH5ksXyDY=; b=FZ2+EVqywl42TH3gRGxd1wuiS699ra+Z3DpbZPleyLBc9zuHYzVI5wwMQqbMrjQZrv TBAcM3AWf3Y0B/Gxr6xzto32Oy6iofCLUbTHPjA40mMaW3Dw4qTC3zSiWr2i8s0wtvXJ T4/+1UieaCsjVIoCGPk2uEy/+A1Z4YfA5XgxBeWIfnfiv4N7BVfgkUtjXW26At++KcgJ 3o96YchPR0DljHS7mofPddH/H9wQSMCK1eDeXPXMMAwDbjAzYVFD8UmsKbWzmlo7ELzD 7DdPx/LL7tMOPgoLu8JIyaE0ErFSDL+laGNNFLOxESeiTX1U+Zk7wC1z2QvNU2JIZw0P RqEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.92.205 with SMTP id s13mr35333021qam.52.1421516756448; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:45:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.234.79 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:45:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.234.79 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:45:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:45:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: From: Ronnie Miller To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:45:57 -0000 ??? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 17:47:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A588C59 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7EB53BB for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id h5nS1p00J2iF103015nUkD; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:47:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HHlQox027414; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:47:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:47:26 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) In-Reply-To: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> Message-ID: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:47:31 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi Kurt, Thanks for helping. Unfortunately not all things went as planned. > # fix distinfo, make makesum does this for mw > make makesum This looked fine. > # then I check the build and stuff on my test system (10.1-amd64) > rm -rf work && make check-plist > [ some iterations later ] When I do the make check-plist I get an error: ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 ===> alpine-2.20 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by alpine-2.20 for building ===> Extracting for alpine-2.20 => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz. ===> Patching for alpine-2.20 ===> Applying distribution patches for alpine-2.20 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for alpine-2.20 Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to ./alpine/alpine.c.rej => Patch patch-alpine__alpine.c failed to apply cleanly. => Patch(es) patch-alpine__Makefile.am patch-alpine__Makefile.in applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 The contents of alpine.c.rej are: @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ #include "init.h" #include "remote.h" #include "pattern.h" -#include "newuser.h" #include "setup.h" #include "adrbkcmd.h" #include "signal.h" @@ -767,7 +766,6 @@ pine_state->mangled_header = 1; show_main_screen(pine_state, 0, FirstMenu, &main_keymenu, 0, (Pos *) NULL); - new_user_or_version(pine_state); ClearScreen(); } Any ideas how to go from here? Regards, Marco -- Woman would be more charming if one could fall into her arms without falling into her hands. -- DeGourmont From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 18:25:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7D7239C for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8832A98B for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YCY3p-000HtE-3Q; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:25:25 +0100 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:25:25 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Marco Beishuizen Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) Message-ID: <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:25:24 -0000 Hi! > > # then I check the build and stuff on my test system (10.1-amd64) > > rm -rf work && make check-plist > > [ some iterations later ] > > When I do the make check-plist I get an error: > > ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user > ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 > ===> alpine-2.20 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by alpine-2.20 for building > ===> Extracting for alpine-2.20 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20.tar.xz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz. > ===> Patching for alpine-2.20 > ===> Applying distribution patches for alpine-2.20 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for alpine-2.20 > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to ./alpine/alpine.c.rej > => Patch patch-alpine__alpine.c failed to apply cleanly. The patch files/patch-alpine__alpine.c no longer applies to the new version of the code. > Any ideas how to go from here? I normally proceed by moving all non-applying patches into a seperate directory and try if the build works: cd ~/myp/mail/alpine mkdir OLD mv files/patch-alpine__alpine.c OLD/ # and retry rm -rf work && make check-plist If the patch is required (but different), one has to dig into the code and find out what needs to change for the code to build. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 19:49:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425F93AD for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE39A98 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id h7oe1p00F2iF103017ogil; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:48:40 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HJmcg0029962; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:48:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:48:38 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) In-Reply-To: <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> Message-ID: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:49:54 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote: > I normally proceed by moving all non-applying patches into a seperate > directory and try if the build works: > > cd ~/myp/mail/alpine mkdir OLD mv files/patch-alpine__alpine.c OLD/ > > # and retry rm -rf work && make check-plist > > If the patch is required (but different), one has to dig into the code > and find out what needs to change for the code to build. After removing 5 patches the make check-plist now hangs at: ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 ===> alpine-2.20 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by alpine-2.20 for building ===> Extracting for alpine-2.20 => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz. ===> Patching for alpine-2.20 ===> Applying distribution patches for alpine-2.20 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for alpine-2.20 cp: /home/marco/tmp/alpine/work/alpine-2.20/doc/tech-notes.txt: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 The file tech-notes.txt is not in /doc/, but in /doc/tech-notes/. Where can I change this? Regards, Marco -- America, how can I write a holy litany in your silly mood? -- Allen Ginsberg From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 20:18:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8D1945 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E065632F for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l61so136728wev.13 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:18:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=I+Bw8mbv1VBRDtJDRSeY9yYlwL/fnOfYh62Q//UKBOM=; b=NFBAUW1vd3FJe4tHg8MOPiUOstZ3P7MrpSPQ1JivIZRkbgQQLtEGPMeiBKaS7TD9cN FsPBakVzHQ7ZT4F9I1RAiNVNTHtoVHkeL78U/uvYDBjbmP3aOUcr93r204vnMsuv6Htf U5ZVhMacNW3HF+vVHmK3WD5NOC5OUtHTzSRgN8fM3rh3eCi/wNbdszcxsHBQD9W4STd1 PqfTjwx8hDEJDHDJHT0bv/rRxJW2MRYgkoMzQoGrwi2NxXRQLdMJaeNrWQLTT0kUo1uB 6Z3KAagGduHCwK+nkbLyKXGUEmVGIORSSGsLKgiIzVNi5HU+igmyEExxs1JKggVKJMHx OpVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.163 with SMTP id s3mr18594011wix.59.1421525917479; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:18:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.131.166 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:18:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:18:37 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) From: Scot Hetzel To: Marco Beishuizen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:18:39 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> I normally proceed by moving all non-applying patches into a seperate >> directory and try if the build works: >> >> cd ~/myp/mail/alpine mkdir OLD mv files/patch-alpine__alpine.c OLD/ >> >> # and retry rm -rf work && make check-plist >> >> If the patch is required (but different), one has to dig into the code and >> find out what needs to change for the code to build. > > > After removing 5 patches the make check-plist now hangs at: > > ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user > ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 > ===> alpine-2.20 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by alpine-2.20 for building > ===> Extracting for alpine-2.20 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20.tar.xz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz. > ===> Patching for alpine-2.20 > ===> Applying distribution patches for alpine-2.20 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for alpine-2.20 > cp: /home/marco/tmp/alpine/work/alpine-2.20/doc/tech-notes.txt: No such file > or directory > *** Error code 1 > > The file tech-notes.txt is not in /doc/, but in /doc/tech-notes/. Where can > I change this? > On line 41 of the current ports Makefile, it shows tech-notes.txt: 41 PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes.txt Then on lines 163-164 in the post-install stage it tries to install them: 163 .for f in ${PORTDOCSdoc} 164 ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/$f ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR} 165 .endfor Change the PORTDOCSdoc variable to: PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes/tech-notes.txt This should install the tech-notes.txt file into the ${DOCSDIR}. The other option is to remove tech-notes.txt from PORTDOCSdoc and added it to PORTDOCShtml. Then update the pkg-plist for the new location. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 20:54:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A32CAB for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6B087C for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id h8ul1p0072iF103018umpM; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:54:46 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HKsiVr035608; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:54:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:54:44 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:54:55 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: > On line 41 of the current ports Makefile, it shows tech-notes.txt: > > 41 PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes.txt > > Then on lines 163-164 in the post-install stage it tries to install them: > > 163 .for f in ${PORTDOCSdoc} > 164 ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/$f ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR} > 165 .endfor > > Change the PORTDOCSdoc variable to: > > PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes/tech-notes.txt > > This should install the tech-notes.txt file into the ${DOCSDIR}. > > The other option is to remove tech-notes.txt from PORTDOCSdoc and > added it to PORTDOCShtml. Then update the pkg-plist for the new > location. Thank you too Scot for your help. After adjusting these lines (and also one in line 145) this part seems to work. Now it gives a compile error and a lot of warnings during compiling. The 2 errors are: maildir.c:1720:66: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1 if (maildir_canonicalize (test, ref, pat) && (s = sm_read (&sdb))) { ~~~~~~~ ^ maildir.c:1722:30: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1 while ((s = sm_read (&sdb)) != NULL); /* until no more subscriptions */ Regards, Marco From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 21:43:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A896FD5 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4FAD05 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u56so25578634wes.2 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:43:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9iuoOS/cOJb/kqpoVQ4ot/zdNbaGW7VDVRscYXLfUbY=; b=Qt2d/lQ2B8FmkDMDMjbqM1Uk/iBvZuWrdpGrzyr3INPInJUwgKmUiw3WBr0bWeCqFG wdm2WdnNNrLyDu5k/PKQLpN1sNYT7yMGQNfHvpiqV3598P81t2XaT3AnSyNXUcGC6URP dLFOChDy2bTBtw2wE91n8bD26LKLSHOpsaOqtu46TOiM9e2vV1Sm8DBxyx3osbCuiBEz aCs5SFEIK6s2adDgO6MbiowkAzdGqEYpcA09k+HJhYtIdVZaaKtRPY8P7hXlhqRJl/Lc m687+4mHYlrp61TmKWHqt8D8B7K+C0ZdBoZV/GQXOfqDm33d8/Qy7gyhDs28gFz4jIQj QStg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.20.6 with SMTP id j6mr19115094wie.59.1421531019464; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:43:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.131.166 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:43:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:43:39 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) From: Scot Hetzel To: Marco Beishuizen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:43:41 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: > >> On line 41 of the current ports Makefile, it shows tech-notes.txt: >> >> 41 PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes.txt >> >> Then on lines 163-164 in the post-install stage it tries to install them: >> >> 163 .for f in ${PORTDOCSdoc} >> 164 ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/$f ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR} >> 165 .endfor >> >> Change the PORTDOCSdoc variable to: >> >> PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes/tech-notes.txt >> >> This should install the tech-notes.txt file into the ${DOCSDIR}. >> >> The other option is to remove tech-notes.txt from PORTDOCSdoc and >> added it to PORTDOCShtml. Then update the pkg-plist for the new >> location. > > > Thank you too Scot for your help. After adjusting these lines (and also one > in line 145) this part seems to work. > > Now it gives a compile error and a lot of warnings during compiling. > > The 2 errors are: > > maildir.c:1720:66: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, > have 1 > if (maildir_canonicalize (test, ref, pat) && (s = sm_read (&sdb))) { > ~~~~~~~ ^ > maildir.c:1722:30: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, > have 1 > while ((s = sm_read (&sdb)) != NULL); /* until no more subscriptions */ > > Are you using the correct version of the maildir.patch.gz. If you look on line 116 of the original Makefile, it shows: 116 PATCH_SITES= http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/patches/alpine-2.11/ 117 PATCHFILES+= maildir.patch.gz You should change that line so that it shows alpine-2.20 or alpine-${PORTVERSION} instead. I checked the alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz and it shows that sm_read requires 2 arguments. Since the patch file isn't versioned, you will have to remove the file from your distfiles and run make checksum to update the checksum for the file. Another option is to change lines 116 and 117 to: 116 PATCH_SITES= http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/patches/ 117 PATCHFILES+= alpine-${PORTVERSION}/maildir.patch.gz This will ensure everyone has the correct version of the maildir.patch.gz file. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 22:03:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240B79EB for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAFBDEBE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id hA3P1p00F2iF10301A3RWL; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:03:25 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HM3NTC053622; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:03:28 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: > Are you using the correct version of the maildir.patch.gz. > > If you look on line 116 of the original Makefile, it shows: > > 116 PATCH_SITES= http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/patches/alpine-2.11/ > 117 PATCHFILES+= maildir.patch.gz > > You should change that line so that it shows alpine-2.20 or > alpine-${PORTVERSION} instead. Yes I already saw this and changed it. > I checked the alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz and it shows that sm_read > requires 2 arguments. > > Since the patch file isn't versioned, you will have to remove the file > from your distfiles and run make checksum to update the checksum for > the file. This didn't work: ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 ===> alpine-2.20 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => alpine-2.20.tar.xz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/alpine-2.20. => Attempting to fetch http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/release/src/alpine-2.20.tar.xz alpine-2.20.tar.xz 100% of 4717 kB 388 kBps 00m12s => maildir.patch.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/alpine-2.20. => Attempting to fetch http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/patches/alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz maildir.patch.gz 100% of 33 kB 5433 kBps 00m00s ===> Fetching all distfiles required by alpine-2.20 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20.tar.xz. => No SHA256 checksum recorded for alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz. => No suitable checksum found for alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz. *** Error code 1 > Another option is to change lines 116 and 117 to: > > 116 PATCH_SITES= http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/patches/ > 117 PATCHFILES+= alpine-${PORTVERSION}/maildir.patch.gz > > This will ensure everyone has the correct version of the maildir.patch.gz file. Errors here too: ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 ===> alpine-2.20 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by alpine-2.20 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20.tar.xz. cannot open alpine-2.20/alpine-2.20/maildir.patch.gz: No such file or directory *** Error code 2 Regards, Marco -- I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter. -- Blaise Pascal From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 22:35:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2B83FE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A051FC for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id hAbc1p0062iF10301AbdKu; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:35:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0HMZaJk064292; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:35:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:35:36 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:35:46 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: Well, problems with the maildir patch seem to have dissappeared, but I'm not there yet. Alpine compiles, but the problems with the plist remain. I'll look further into the Makefile and see if I can solve this. The current error is: ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist Error: Orphaned: %%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/tech-notes.txt ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR Error: Missing: %%DOCSDIR%%/tech-notes/tech-notes.txt ===> Error: Plist issues found. *** Error code 1 Regards, Marco -- I tell ya, drugs never worked out for me. The first time I tried smoking pot I didn't know what I was doing. I smoked half the joint, got the munchies, and ate the other half. Well, the first time I tried coke I was so embarrassed. I kept getting the bottle stuck up my nose. -- Rodney Dangerfield From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 23:07:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F56791D for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC576B2 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q58so25756541wes.12 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:07:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yDChV2WrKErkA5W2QXa2Kc0L+CGjNfa9pXuHCmzwblY=; b=W24k1onTYIykZ4brIZaCDgwCF20im1aGyei9jcuInkJl1E/G0H9KWiCsLzY6k1D+dr UoTy7ID1B1MvyWHsJ4cO08YC6/dOJPS9NjV4yan8OdZntGkcV6XKPWv+TmwEbwEI+TUE Wi08i37lBjPbZza+q2rYhYQ+yKpk8RA1bxInfMDUw1vduPXmZFQmZQ8o6U/F4kXdUfNr 4d4iGQ0RH4S37luRIckyl/Ct5tekfzUSrFXDNDxkvmCF2f6lfpTj4an505S0gjmBGadg abb10pd+mhHavpgCdKiZaR0/xBYTTmzyuky8V/NdHkgtR386A1RKe/dhEZ5RJJW8XRo0 hiJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.193.4 with SMTP id hk4mr43975526wjc.38.1421536077374; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:07:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:07:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150117165844.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150117182525.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:07:57 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer) From: Ben Woods To: Marco Beishuizen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Scot Hetzel , Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:07:59 -0000 Good news - that means the port is now compiling fine, and the last thing you need to do is fix the pkg-plist file to ensure it accurately reflects all the files the port will install: # cd PORTDIR # make clean # make # make makeplist That will dump the new plist to the console standard output, but doesn't actually update the pkg-plist for you (you have to do that by redirecting the output to the file). But note, you need to follow the instructions of the first line (delete the first line, and check the output of the rest of the file looks reasonable). I would redirect the output to a new plist file and compare the difference before overwriting the main plist file: # make makeplist > pkg-plist.new # diff -u pkg-plist pkg-plist.new Then you can make the necessary changes to the pkg-plist file and delete the pkg-plist.new file. On Sunday, January 18, 2015, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: > > Well, problems with the maildir patch seem to have dissappeared, but I'm > not there yet. Alpine compiles, but the problems with the plist remain. > I'll look further into the Makefile and see if I can solve this. > > The current error is: > > ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) > ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) > ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) > ===> Parsing plist > ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist > Error: Orphaned: %%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/tech-notes.txt > ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR > Error: Missing: %%DOCSDIR%%/tech-notes/tech-notes.txt > ===> Error: Plist issues found. > *** Error code 1 > > Regards, > Marco > > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com