From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 00:15:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF576B9 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35951006 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4V0Gcnk064213 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 17:16:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: "FreeBSD ports" From: "Chris H" Subject: How to remove Python3 and dependent ports? Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:16:44 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <5128a12c70cb4dbd09abbec37d951156@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 00:15:01 -0000 Well, after a 5 day build session, due to a low resource i386 box. I discovered that I get to start the process all over, after performing a fresh install. Problem is that Python3 was introduced before Python2 was EOL'd, and removed from the [ports] tree. Pity Python couldn't be bothered to find a way to work with both versions. To the point; I received the following FATAL error, after an extremely long build session on a meta-port x11/cinnamon: ===> python3-2_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> Generating temporary packing list /bin/ln -sf python2.7 /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/python2 /bin/ln -sf 2to3-2.7 /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/2to3-2 /bin/ln -sf idle2.7 /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/idle2 /bin/ln -sf pydoc2.7 /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/pydoc2 /bin/ln -sf python2.7-config /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/p ython2-config /bin/ln -sf python-2.7.pc /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/libdata/ pkgconfig/python2.pc ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===> Installing for python3-2_3 ===> Checking if python3 already installed ===> Registering installation for python3-2_3 as automatic Installing python3-2_3... pkg-static: python3-2_3 conflicts with python2-2_3 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/2to3-2 *** Error code 70 Stop. make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/python3 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-desktop Hmm... seems to me, by the error, that the actual culprit was an effort to THWART this exact error. Job well done! :P So, as it appears to me anyway. I'll need to make a choice; either I'm all in on Python2, or Python3, there's no in-between. So I was hoping that someone might suggest a good way, or an already existing port to remove Python3 and every port that includes the "REQUIRES python:>=3" line in it. So as to end up with a successful build. Thank you for any thoughts, or suggestions. --Chris -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 00:25:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F4D1DB for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5271231 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4V0R1uI065775 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 17:27:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <5128a12c70cb4dbd09abbec37d951156@ultimatedns.net> References: <5128a12c70cb4dbd09abbec37d951156@ultimatedns.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: How to remove Python3 and dependent ports? Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:27:07 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <126e891aa6020188b59eb67da04bbb7b@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 00:25:24 -0000 On Sat, 30 May 2015 17:16:44 -0700 "Chris H" wrote > Well, after a 5 day build session, due to a low resource i386 > box. I discovered that I get to start the process all over, > after performing a fresh install. Problem is that Python3 > was introduced before Python2 was EOL'd, and removed from > the [ports] tree. Pity Python couldn't be bothered to find > a way to work with both versions. To the point; I received > the following FATAL error, after an extremely long build > session on a meta-port x11/cinnamon: > ===> python3-2_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > /bin/ln -sf python2.7 > /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/python2 /bin/ln -sf 2to3-2.7 > /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/2to3-2 /bin/ln -sf idle2.7 > /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/idle2 /bin/ln -sf pydoc2.7 > /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/pydoc2 /bin/ln -sf > python2.7-config /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/bin/p > ython2-config > /bin/ln -sf python-2.7.pc > /usr/ports/lang/python3/work/stage/usr/local/libdata/ > pkgconfig/python2.pc > ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) > ===> Installing for python3-2_3 > ===> Checking if python3 already installed > ===> Registering installation for python3-2_3 as automatic > Installing python3-2_3... > pkg-static: python3-2_3 conflicts with python2-2_3 (installs files into the > same > place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/2to3-2 > *** Error code 70 > > Stop. > make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/python3 > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-desktop > > Hmm... seems to me, by the error, that the actual culprit was > an effort to THWART this exact error. Job well done! :P > > So, as it appears to me anyway. I'll need to make a choice; > either I'm all in on Python2, or Python3, there's no in-between. > So I was hoping that someone might suggest a good way, or an > already existing port to remove Python3 and every port that > includes the "REQUIRES python:>=3" line in it. So as to end up > with a successful build. > > Thank you for any thoughts, or suggestions. > > --Chris Apologies; seems I neglected to provide some important info: FreeBSD i386.dev 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r283617: Wed May 27 20:27:48 PDT 2015 root@i386.dev:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/I386 i386 Path: /usr/ports Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 387621 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: bdrewery Last Changed Rev: 387621 Last Changed Date: 2015-05-27 08:17:56 -0700 (Wed, 27 May 2015) > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 04:18:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23FE3C86 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 04:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraileth@elderlinux.org) Received: from mc01.omc.net (mc01.omc.net [212.77.228.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68FA1498 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 04:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraileth@elderlinux.org) Received: from NMS1 (x4d066036.dyn.telefonica.de [77.6.96.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elder2209@elderlinux.org) by mc01.omc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 088159FA43 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 06:11:53 +0200 From: Michael Reim To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Patch for currently broken x11-wm/ede Message-Id: <20150531061153.501a525427c456c28011a416@elderlinux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart=_Sun__31_May_2015_06_11_53_+0200_t40e_s8c1JQSRiJT" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 04:18:06 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Multipart=_Sun__31_May_2015_06_11_53_+0200_t40e_s8c1JQSRiJT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! Coming from a Linux background and just slowly getting used to the FreeBSD world, I hope that I'm doing things right here. If not - please bear with me since this is my first attempt to get involved with FreeBSD... I've noticed that the port x11-wm/ede is currently marked broken. It doesn't build anymore since with the latest version of FLTK some internal symbols that were visible before have been hidden. Edelib may have used them in the past but it does not need them anymore. So any reference to them can be removed from it. This issue has been fixed upstream with commit 3592 (http://sourceforge.net/p/ede/code/3592/) in December. Until a new version is released, it would make sense to simply patch edelib 2.1 to play together with FLTK nicely again. Could anybody please add the patch to the port and remove the broken/ignore tags? See attachment for the patch file that I got from the EDE developer. I've used it to package edelib for Arch Linux and have been using the patched version in a production environment since last December without any issues. Regards, Michael -- --Multipart=_Sun__31_May_2015_06_11_53_+0200_t40e_s8c1JQSRiJT Content-Type: text/x-diff; name="edelib.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="edelib.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Index: src/WindowUtils.cpp =================================================================== --- src/WindowUtils.cpp (revision 3564) +++ src/WindowUtils.cpp (working copy) @@ -33,8 +33,10 @@ * These are defined in FLTK as hidden variables for some internal hacks, but are used here. * XXX: possible changes in future FLTK versions */ +#if 0 extern char fl_show_iconic; extern int fl_disable_transient_for; +#endif EDELIB_NS_BEGIN @@ -165,7 +167,7 @@ XChangeProperty(fl_display, xp->xid, XA_WM_CLASS, XA_STRING, 8, 0, (unsigned char *)buffer, p-buffer-1); } - if(win->non_modal() && xp->next && !fl_disable_transient_for) { + if(win->non_modal() && xp->next /* && !fl_disable_transient_for */) { // find some other window to be "transient for": Fl_Window* wp = xp->next->w; while(wp->parent()) @@ -193,13 +195,14 @@ XWMHints *hints = XAllocWMHints(); hints->input = True; hints->flags = InputHint; - +#if 0 if(fl_show_iconic) { hints->flags |= StateHint; hints->initial_state = IconicState; fl_show_iconic = 0; showit = 0; } +#endif // This is not removed so it can be used with windows inherited from Fl_Window if(win->icon()) { --Multipart=_Sun__31_May_2015_06_11_53_+0200_t40e_s8c1JQSRiJT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 06:35:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C334E7 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63C1122C for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([24.68.119.200]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id ywpwYl3ROImD1ywpxYf1oZ; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:35:10 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AKFJgQ79 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=DtyMuQCYAJf2vvIh/Mv8eA==:117 a=DtyMuQCYAJf2vvIh/Mv8eA==:17 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=VxmjJ2MpAAAA:8 a=h1PgugrvaO0A:10 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=_PJ1OL5WxEfnsqoU_B0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494039BEB for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 23:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4V6Z7Ct055286 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 23:35:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from slippy (cy@localhost) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.9/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id t4V6Z7e7055283 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 23:35:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201505310635.t4V6Z7e7055283@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: slippy.cwsent.com: cy owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Poudriere build... Build crashed: clean_pool Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 23:35:07 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAD6XnPdQ28DDF/0+YmZ33XtV6Lm5ehhCncHwhzbE8Hza8pbi1N/BwtPfP0ZDB8kKMECBvqTBVtBNxNubTsRYqBD9uU4WPNazBc+tlk+I+S3otWG2w1euyZ8cDm8c7QPrbgyuNFBb7+B6xm6S8iFtFvkoX7DoMI6x5+n/LtYohEQzkalVnyNj4N3rSaXFDEO4w== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 06:35:17 -0000 Hi, Has anyone else encountered this poudriere error? ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Building package for py27-qt4-multimedia-4.11.3 =========================================================================== ====>> Cleaning up wrkdir ===> Cleaning for py27-qt4-multimedia-4.11.3 Build crashed: clean_pool build of multimedia/py-qt4-multimedia ended at Sat May 30 19:24:40 PDT 2015 build time: 00:04:30 !!! build failure encountered !!! -- Cheers, Cy Schubert or FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 06:38:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FEBB5B1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AAD41240 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: by obbea2 with SMTP id ea2so83778881obb.3 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 23:38:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Y5rIZmXtpMMj+pVwEhx9f4g6oUXAzZI4G6o9bcwCWog=; b=cc+pYs3f9f8aMb1lyDEo1BtxgKTP344MbDqGDI/LnGU+nhonXg80NinfSC5yoLimSp WJS4hHro2GUxSxdlNjzzaH8B5oP4rDD6KNi2ogfQIHvGV9FX1gj/83vNfq77AVxE9Nw2 2VxDoODBaRzbEJEjMrTClkPIq794B/mNHJhym6uv37q8Nn4d33/ovD+mUjnlN3oRZT9g eCQKhwB8RBvaN27hWUrCfZ13mORXIqpEGnIhx0qbX5Fz2cyiEajpeDAkctODx4JRDIkd cT1lFDp0ljiIQcbF1zRbS7Z2TusHbOYYhK2gs6n6MdzcxtSOKLxX1tZZLaMXMFgX2lY4 oQqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.160.4 with SMTP id xg4mr13511262oeb.44.1433054338685; Sat, 30 May 2015 23:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.80.79 with HTTP; Sat, 30 May 2015 23:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 02:38:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Update to security/libsodium From: Robert Simmons To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 06:38:59 -0000 I just opened a bug that includes a patch to update libsodium. Can someone who uses this port, please QA this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200548 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 07:40:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3559AFEC for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 07:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 033D41F58 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 07:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pdjm12 with SMTP id m12so2069853pdj.3 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:40:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A2NVz3pVgdAjgtWvlwY29zs36+H1q5QLOKcesGKPLYM=; b=Nh/Wnv1oxqw2YRAEZOX28uaNwddzBLivEgGUPW/E5cXzV+O8XLCbRCfPH8KPeXRyFk qorhBknpsHx0F5DAr6JsA+CPVqJ8Fhvi9329ErUROnQtq7nf3R8WgbKRv6dvTOny/ZH1 mO3EqFEtXEv/0ne09S+ddUqrZ0RwZ8KnU9EFOtA9Bo5kDnofRxNXRZpe/sq343FDTbfq SIxVeeYSBkIjLHlnbYN07H9/9zqRTQFaBk3ApBFBcDNRYu/Po3PUFgCz78iUnHshob9J ocABusq7Pj1Rf1BIBay9ufscba4flTrkEbiD5lU/drdBlKx8Hp7H3vhqxBKZkIfECc6P b1rA== X-Received: by 10.68.200.100 with SMTP id jr4mr29469364pbc.168.1433058011495; Sun, 31 May 2015 00:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ppp59-167-128-11.static.internode.on.net. [59.167.128.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bi4sm10565623pbc.56.2015.05.31.00.40.08 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 31 May 2015 00:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Update to security/libsodium References: To: Robert Simmons , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" From: Kubilay Kocak X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <556ABACE.5060908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 17:39:58 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 07:40:12 -0000 On 31/05/2015 4:38 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > I just opened a bug that includes a patch to update libsodium. Can > someone who uses this port, please QA this: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200548 Hi Robert, thanks for your contribution :) The issue has already been assigned to the current maintainer of libsodium and is pending a response. The best way to QA things in advance of patch submission is with the tools we use prior to committing changes to the tree ourselves: These are: - portlint - poudriere You can include the results of these tools as attachments to issues you create in future. The best initial resource for porting, testing and related things is the Porters Handbook: http://www2.au.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html - Specifically Section 9 (Testing) You can also join other porters on IRC here: Efnet: #bsdports Freenode: #freebsd-ports Hope that helps :) -- Koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 10:10:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B93AEB for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A446E1032 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4VAA6E6064175 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:10:06 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t4VAA6fN064172; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:10:06 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201505311010.t4VAA6fN064172@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:10:06 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:10:06 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ucommon | 6.1.11 | 6.3.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 12:47:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C85B2A for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB7212E4 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6141633C1D; Sun, 31 May 2015 08:46:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1EF583980F; Sun, 31 May 2015 08:46:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Chris H" Cc: "FreeBSD ports" Subject: Re: How to remove Python3 and dependent ports? References: <5128a12c70cb4dbd09abbec37d951156@ultimatedns.net> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 08:46:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5128a12c70cb4dbd09abbec37d951156@ultimatedns.net> (Chris H.'s message of "Sat, 30 May 2015 17:16:44 -0700") Message-ID: <44wpzo3oea.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 12:47:08 -0000 "Chris H" writes: > So, as it appears to me anyway. I'll need to make a choice; > either I'm all in on Python2, or Python3, there's no in-between. > So I was hoping that someone might suggest a good way, or an > already existing port to remove Python3 and every port that > includes the "REQUIRES python:>=3" line in it. So as to end up > with a successful build. "man pkg autoremove" will help. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 13:30:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A709D75F for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 13:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (hill.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FBC1CAC for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 13:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from hill (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF10F4A56C for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 09:29:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by hill (hill.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XEmKaqQetkPa for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 09:29:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemon.localdomain (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F824A562 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 09:29:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by daemon.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 21281) id CCD9C2AD7D; Sun, 31 May 2015 09:29:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 09:29:58 -0400 From: Adam McDougall To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files Message-ID: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 13:30:07 -0000 --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my systems. Thanks. --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline BCC: heckendorfc@gmail.com Message-ID: <55629533.9070106@egr.msu.edu> Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 23:21:23 -0400 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Steinmetz Subject: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files References: <201505210213.t4L2D8Fp059579@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201505210213.t4L2D8Fp059579@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/20/2015 22:13, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > Author: zi > Date: Thu May 21 02:13:07 2015 > New Revision: 386904 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/386904 > > Log: > - Generate new DH params during build to mitigate Logjam attack > - Fix deprecated USE_AUTOTOOLS > - Bump PORTREVISION > > With hat: ports-secteam > Obtained from: Winni Neessen > > Added: > head/www/apache22/files/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c (contents, props changed) > Modified: > head/www/apache22/Makefile Hello, When I try to start apache I get: Performing sanity check on apache22 configuration: httpd: Syntax error on line 112 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" I am using libressl but to me it looks like get_dh2048 and get_dh3072 are not in httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c. Is this patch incomplete? Thanks for any help. --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 14:29:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BF649E for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 14:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm135.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189D31A40 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 14:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private (p549B5646.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.155.86.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4VESsxr004264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 16:28:56 +0200 Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 883D34A033B8 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 16:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 16:28:45 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error message when refreshing keys Message-ID: <20150531162845.2c61197a@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <20150528105601.474ec8fe@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> References: <20150528105601.474ec8fe@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.31.141816 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_1099 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 14:29:07 -0000 On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:56:01 +0200 "Dr. Peter Voigt" wrote: > I am on 10.1-RELEASE (amd64) and have installed latest gpg 2.0.27 > from ports. When issuing > > # gpg --refresh-keys > > operation seems to work but I am getting following error messages at > the end: > > ... > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key > gpg: keyserver refresh failed: Bad public key > > On an openSUSE machine I have installed gpg 2.0.22 and I have no such > error message. > > Is this a know error? What does it mean? Is it FreeBSD specific? > > Any hints are appreciated. > > Peter Well, I experimented a bit: I completely deleted my public keyring and re-imported all keys from a keyserver. I had one key not available on a keyserver that caused the error message. After deleting the key in question, no error messages show up any more. GPG 2.0.22, however, does not complain about this key. Peter From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 17:30:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61B9E25 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 17:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD411320 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 17:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so46520547igb.0 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SKAAU8T6NjmCqMpebP3vr0pK4vzrxHW2KMUHYrGy+bU=; b=rR4A/Sw+QmBhtkrUfU7RpKnt7DAI10oMmzV/WB2K6gXI68SbcItYw2kclspQDyVaeN 8IxTxLlcsazG2K1BgFeWouO5JdlI2L/5lIgYpNM+FwlyPXrPC+xEORoMGydt56UgGSlo mt/jrHzKpFu2BzrtH7Woeqf92x6ri6DQ4wGEpH2A38kuBAND609n8uxys+OsWyqqDaYm eqEo2Azuvs0vTg1FZZ8hM+LB0m4+IIq5bwDkvEiwBAzlj+cdv7Gu7kXabnAMKdhd0Cft x9c+q/eLAOOP5MlXaMgTdK46CgPc5hfYldJvXKB+hiP9N3Y6P6vjbXVHsA5sByWAdUQG 7pZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.78.170 with SMTP id c10mr8716696igx.0.1433093435065; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.46.134 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150531061153.501a525427c456c28011a416@elderlinux.org> References: <20150531061153.501a525427c456c28011a416@elderlinux.org> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:30:35 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZwqwOGT6HlX-JSnw0MALmpGv7JA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch for currently broken x11-wm/ede From: Kevin Oberman To: Michael Reim Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 17:30:36 -0000 On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Michael Reim wrote: > Hello! > > Coming from a Linux background and just slowly getting used to the FreeBSD > world, I hope that I'm doing things right here. If not - please bear with > me since this is my first attempt to get involved with FreeBSD... > > I've noticed that the port x11-wm/ede is currently marked broken. It > doesn't build anymore since with the latest version of FLTK some internal > symbols that were visible before have been hidden. > > Edelib may have used them in the past but it does not need them anymore. > So any reference to them can be removed from it. This issue has been fixed > upstream with commit 3592 (http://sourceforge.net/p/ede/code/3592/) in > December. Until a new version is released, it would make sense to simply > patch edelib 2.1 to play together with FLTK nicely again. > > Could anybody please add the patch to the port and remove the > broken/ignore tags? > > See attachment for the patch file that I got from the EDE developer. I've > used it to package edelib for Arch Linux and have been using the patched > version in a production environment since last December without any issues. > > Regards, > Michael > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > First, thanks for noting the issue and for providing a patch, but there are limited resources for dealing with ports problems like this and, while sending mail to ports about an issue is fine, there is a significant possibility that this may be lost and not properly addressed. If you could please open a bug report and include the information in this message, it will assure that the report is not lost and, hopefully, will be addressed shortly. Note the "hopefully". As support is voluntary, there are no commitments, but reports that include fixes have a high probability of being addressed fairly quickly. Reports should go to http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/. If you have not ever submitted a report, you will need to create a bugzilla account. I understand that ti is a few hoops to jump though to just help with fixing broken port, but it's the best way we have found to address the issues. I will also mention that if ports@freebsd.org is listed as the maintainer of a port, that really just means that the port has no maintainer and a group of volunteers will try to make fixes, but it would really help if you could agree to take maintainership of a port in which you have an interest. That makes you a part of the solution and greatly increases the probability of keeping a port running properly. You can see what is required to maintain a port in the Porter's Handbook" at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook. If you are willing,, just send a note requesting maintainership. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 10:02:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F742A05 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F203012EA for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t51A2EUL089672 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:02:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t51A2E5N089671; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:02:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201506011002.t51A2E5N089671@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:02:14 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:02:15 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/pear-FSM | 1.3.1 | 1.4.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/libav | 11.3 | 11.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 11:40:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E878048F for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm32-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm32-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F8A1A7D for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from [98.139.170.179] by nm32.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2015 11:38:12 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.211] by tm22.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2015 11:38:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2015 11:38:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 786439.69887.bm@omp1020.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 35602 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jun 2015 11:38:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1433158692; bh=sakErnm8Jyp3rPNNzBiYsuEDatvNMGl8zSwDVql++Jo=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LKEoapXUG5FE+yVvVxVSZLbwgnMYYxIzqLf0M4edF+1MMbQDVZGR2OCUknAFtLLBD2ELuT32bFbvU+9y74RccTjfyJ3GFOpDNq1AfbMXlljCufNdS0a29LyyQuWHGsqW7r2v2lrMNUKaProSGk5WznmW6lVhSFOvNmtw655Fe2w= X-YMail-OSG: FvnXnPUVM1luvcE6IrJ9ShH_pbaZu9ALXcCm.pyGFBJrjIY 2UUZxbPdQ2pCfAiZ7xx.i.Vm5XycwwsZfx.tCszU8zuZ__uO.3F2sJzKwRiS JHrd6BHtDlspTakVvdV02rSsV9ZvScSlf7mjFY_bNXlkk6MWC0oBK2EvCfP0 qAqtvcvpKXgs4BaX521qHBQCXt9HDa0mkQC6qucFlK.8B6OsPpr.Ubqw2IFO AmO1ftkSyICHD3FjDIEPuC9FXZWde01UUT_HEfvYVuoW.5CECHux406uea3S 4rAfkOjKSaRSTsZ_L06bOHHTSo6b1I5EwQa.pgysh.dUsHGqAx.wjcG1lWMq ufjvfnj21QUZEVwu20aTP35ndZQWONrO3.Yr6uLNX8NaVXAywXMXtKEsnDNZ hBQT.rpLVtERME3dtDGJ3huO6UwkJgj2o2rmYlPZS6.la_9zZd6X7SQeD6sp .QE9ohScOqDLsrygKueUy6_T24MvxFqs8s8WuX5UxplLViUTOZWTHYYufTMx h89zbmPnCITBOEBGpd6qS0n4DrcaJilJXHqqEV9DfuLa.D98hqAZzloCX0Np ReRTImJEgB0c- Received: from [66.92.43.99] by web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 04:38:12 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SSBub3RpY2VkIHRoZSBwb3J0cyB0cmVlIGhlcmUgaGFkIG5ldC91Z2V0IDEuMTAuNF8xIGV2ZW4gYWZ0ZXIgInN2biB1cCIuLi4gd2hpbGUNCnBrZyB1cGdyYWRpbmcgaW5zdGFsbGVkIDIuMC4gICJwa2cgdmVyc2lvbiIgKG9uZSBvZiAzIHdheXMpIHJlcG9ydGVkIA0KInN1Y2NlZWRzIHBvcnQiLi4uIHdhcyBhYm91dCB0byBwb3N0IGEgcXVlc3Rpb24gYWJvdXQgcGtnLCBidXQgaXQgY2FuIGJlIGZpeGVkDQpieSANCg0KY2QgL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9uZXQvdWdldA0Kc3ZuIHJldmVydCAuIC1SIA0KDQpbZm91bmQBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/529 YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.740 Message-ID: <1433158692.84575.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 04:38:12 -0700 From: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: SOLVED: pkg version mismatch [succeeds port...] To: pkg@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:40:50 -0000 I noticed the ports tree here had net/uget 1.10.4_1 even after "svn up"... while pkg upgrading installed 2.0. "pkg version" (one of 3 ways) reported "succeeds port"... was about to post a question about pkg, but it can be fixed by cd /usr/ports/net/uget svn revert . -R [found at stackoverflow] [I've about thirty of so of those directories to fix up, for installed ports... it seems]. Wondering if the fix can be put in CAVEATS or something in the pkg version man page... "for those using subversion..." also if ever a man page with many examples is crafted for subversion on FreeBSD, that could be one of them. Others: cd /usr/ports svn resolve . From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 12:35:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE429170; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from clavin2.langille.org (clavin2.langille.org [199.233.228.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "clavin.langille.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80C21850; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from (clavin2.int.langille.org (clavin2.int.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) with ESMTPSA id 802F260A1 ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:35:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Dan Langille X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_87DD2976-42FE-4DA1-AF5F-787AABB3FDA1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Subject: need a particular version of django Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:35:04 -0400 Message-Id: Cc: wg@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold To: ports Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:35:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_87DD2976-42FE-4DA1-AF5F-787AABB3FDA1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I'm writing about this problem: = http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/93amd64-default/388198/logs/py27-crits-= 3.1.0.log Background: security/py-crits needs www/py-django16 and www/py-django-tastypie However, www/py-django-tastypie wants to install www/py-django (which = is v 1.8). This is the line from www/py-django-tastypie in question: RUN_DEPENDS:=3D ${BUILD_DEPENDS} \ = ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}django>=3D1.5:${PORTSDIR}/www/py-django Is there a nice way to say www/py-django16 is also OK? =E2=80=94 Dan Langille http://langille.org/ --Apple-Mail=_87DD2976-42FE-4DA1-AF5F-787AABB3FDA1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVbFF+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1MTE2RjM0ODIzRDdERDM4OTY0OUJBNzdF QjIxNTlERUU5NzI3MzlGAAoJEOshWd7pcnOfj8YP+gIrNAlDQdKNyLiU0iRjyTkd /hJhR+Zz+jNm4vyOOvhOrnXe00Pl4I35EsMTnyYkQPeVTqRiHqgtCpsVZiK2JaBt v1dim5C5Ipi3BMmgV5EYY7fWBGUAoRwS19FTYxA1BP/BxRftgX3nFYZvB0mA8tNg dTyi8kpt4ysEX3cwmSBewsiT1a/Kq+2exy8TleLvk3jBKVik6kMb5OtsUwcaxY01 fb1JhpwdNZsXvcR1Hw+KDaO4IRVH+zoUWhYHMKOEDpQUZLOQT8FzidHYlNrlcrGq 6XucIVYCvKb/uot/B3l4Z+iF7eFo1uGiWtg5zHjreZRkYC0fHWlr/uWnE47N6osp gyIWOqVCBu5bP/61fFHieLSaKJibYF8uQ8TsGH95Dd87tlQ51G1L+HMVZcCbq6Xm bw47/DdN23hvGMTmY8wyGPsZzRgb1tWSx92jTqMcK4r4S0kX/NTAG2U4oxiCBwiK DZuU4DVpNmW+UTgGfmiZ/oNLI0W9HAoCXy40TPmwUs60mErrI71aywkreR1Vm9vv 4YQGCiE8MO29vZH7rHvDpynk/41VDbl+cRozkAj/gHSqA2W79srrucnPzidlZcDC fMcraiCgJbKzpuNc5P614N7VvqibMpaPyL1TUwhp/t4cbRHZ7wtbIevqI5ylylU5 TgvlW6hQUu8iNqEdE9xX =6BCE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_87DD2976-42FE-4DA1-AF5F-787AABB3FDA1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 13:18:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1FE3C8; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@freebsd.org) Received: from gw3.consol.de (gate3.consol.net [IPv6:2a03:3680:0:1::1:13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.consol.de", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB8C1300; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@freebsd.org) Received: from bsd1.bb.consol.de (bsd1.bb.consol.de [10.250.0.51]) by gw3.consol.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t51DIKNM056503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:18:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from me@freebsd.org) Received: from dude.int.consol.de (dude.int.consol.de [10.0.1.127]) by bsd1.bb.consol.de (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t51DIKKn068172; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:18:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from me@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <556C5B9C.8060102@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:18:20 +0200 From: Michael Elbel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich , "Julian H. Stacey" CC: portmgr-feedback@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, me@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comms/seyon distfile recovered References: <201505070829.t478T3EP008506@portsmon.freebsd.org> <201505071322.t47DM7xk030473@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate-size: 1848 X-purgate-ID: 153102::1433164700-0000045B-54C09CAB/0/0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:18:31 -0000 Sorry for butting in so late, I was on vacation :-| Am 08.05.15 um 04:11 schrieb Jan Beich: > "Julian H. Stacey" writes: > >> linimon@freebsd.org wrote: >> Subject: Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken >> I added cc: me@freebsd.org FYI as creator of Makefile >> >>> As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in >> >>> portname: comms/seyon >>> broken because: Unfetchable >>> build errors: none. >>> overview: >>> http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=comms&portname=seyon >> >> ftp sipb.mit.edu >> ftp: Can't connect to `18.181.0.29:21': Connection refused >> ftp: Can't connect to `sipb.mit.edu:ftp' >> >> I have the necessary distfile: >> -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 224819 Apr 27 1993 9.3-RELEASE/Seyon-2.14b-tar.Z >> MD5 (9.3-RELEASE/Seyon-2.14b-tar.Z) = bc4903422dcedd245cffedd49e923a79 >> >> I put a temporary copy here: >> http://berklix.com/~jhs/ftp/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Seyon-2.14b-tar.Z > > Maybe you can test 2.20c instead? I've also unbroken epdfview. > >> Please copy to >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/ > > Do you mean local-distfiles? That's a privilege of *maintained* ports. ;) > Otherwise, distcache.freebsd.org shouldn't be a primary mirror. > I'm not sure if it is a good idea to keep Seyon as a port around at all. IMO, it has outlived its use for a decade now and also has not been under active development for more than 15 years. No idea what security issues lie lurking in there. Even though I provided the original port, I personally haven't used it for the last fifteen years either and cannot even remember what I was using it for back then :-| Cheers Michael -- Michael Elbel - me@FreeBSD.org Fermentation Fault - Coors Dumped From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 13:28:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F4FBD1; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2672C1600; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D45CBDC44; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37BE7BDC5E; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5D06142; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D937AFDA5; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:27:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:27:57 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Dan Langille , ports cc: wg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need a particular version of django Message-ID: <5FC4CE16D3EFD52570CBEF0A@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========DBF42A228E8516BE9866==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:28:06 -0000 --==========DBF42A228E8516BE9866========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +--On 1 juin 2015 08:35:04 -0400 Dan Langille wrote: | I'm writing about this problem: | http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/93amd64-default/388198/logs/py27-crits | -3.1.0.log | | Background: | | security/py-crits needs www/py-django16 and www/py-django-tastypie | | However, www/py-django-tastypie wants to install www/py-django (which is | v 1.8). | | This is the line from www/py-django-tastypie in question: | | RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} \ | | ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}django>=1.5:${PORTSDIR}/www/py-django You can't use := here because PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX is unset at that time. | Is there a nice way to say www/py-django16 is also OK? No. -- Mathieu Arnold --==========DBF42A228E8516BE9866========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVbF3eXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85ImywP/3DNyF2+u8BDZOR6HS2/w8Kh 3vOs0Xc7mUFcgdTv1gY/vao5k76iwbMzeEJvL+hhHHNrn2/n2gJhvGb6biMM8+at tZWE72r0CVri5/zbVAFJkmYHC8rO22EcPf2CB+c5AWiI9kYucGKZLu+wPHvmpOoi JUBdVo7oWd4FFpBSuag23CYe/2MG40BhBqBIusD2muB2EeJbVlfdH44MRsXcj5jv OZ7fjqTXzgHsDbjwqtAsSVN1i+6bA30ulJL229H3tpy/GeyCwjG9R9+QhZt1hrDr 2UhhzBMT2BWJls0kseZ6ACPQ45JFFjloFAK79mCnj9vUucUXOUiuq/1Mwzp8PQzx RxJoPgvqhUrMPyOkh2Dq5ETmwu7RcY4Wk3SpXcrrliiCXCKkXUl5+tzQKY2nBRtX NIRhv2XXLJC3iZOJ5Fjl2MFq+MIMYlZlaXlxfmE4BrATSwDF5UzKeK6fN2xhne6Q bTYbZjyUwzaA2E1mL6yFgXjw0EjhRj5XoZHnkeMcgzo09NtF/FctZm5uYxgy9dBw Wi007xKhmY0Dt2ZtMy2vAjGgNsy/LkgNeW2XnCd5s6v7SOIR/OWpFb4yJT9rwZbG aEnOizdC7cyW7ckmJFhB6a8ZNd5oNWWGK3n5cpfhntV2XMVScOSYC2HEsNiS63lX UlVYx+fHwfihKCFw0TmX =RCSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========DBF42A228E8516BE9866==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 14:33:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04555ADF; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30C216BA; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by igbyr2 with SMTP id yr2so63030445igb.0; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mWQuh9joQAY5vs6FSjtd2MSxsWslbJ3X0MT4Z/b5/cY=; b=Ck6uSgejHM3PfTf3aNsBGmMPfAWDM2VJnN9fBB53ZgzsWuRoUNCA6wfU+YpPEK0tVt 7J3zxGoz50tI9adUa1QG9wnElzI1fUWeIEttbczKnVhC3uFZ5rzq7eEX/vBhQaGJmz1Q ijJjFXmbhx8fkwxORxHQZc+Akw4t9WFUjUhziVNMhqoQTraAZjs7L2sK26DhOl2YBHNO kjuZ0yZQni8gaSFqrIV4yK3zeVxSOYqNzE5VmmlI7Bm8+qoqR32ZOHYob3QDxFxxKo5D vyIWOJP/0Wsuvj/6Pit089YF5ucW+H5v2h9s3OPZykXK9Xdojg/xsFO7++EHPntLdZAa 65CQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.131.81 with SMTP id f78mr14201334iod.42.1433169207202; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.236.10 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1433158692.84575.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1433158692.84575.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:33:27 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SOLVED: pkg version mismatch [succeeds port...] From: Ben Woods To: Jeffrey Bouquet Cc: "pkg@freebsd.org" , "ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:33:28 -0000 On Monday, June 1, 2015, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > I noticed the ports tree here had net/uget 1.10.4_1 even after "svn up"... > while > pkg upgrading installed 2.0. "pkg version" (one of 3 ways) reported > "succeeds port"... was about to post a question about pkg, but it can be > fixed > by > > cd /usr/ports/net/uget > svn revert . -R > That command will revert any local changes you have made to the port files (if you edited them manually, it reverts them to the official version from FreeBSD ports). I guess it is not documented within pkg(8) as it has nothing to do with pkg. It's purely related to how subversion deals with local modifications to repository files. For more documentation on the subversion command, you can check: $ svn help revert Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 19:19:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AD5A4C1 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobias.kortkamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFE61DB0 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobias.kortkamp@gmail.com) Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so38643028wib.1 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:19:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mblwv4InxNfgIwwXJ78Rsvn4yeYT2YhrizfnP3R/SYM=; b=C0hgHgRpHxWqlOLsQzKzC/Rb8oVPDzzUIi138yfhlCEpgx3QZEqqjjWRavA0/6J9Ac KSmrAy22lKGMGZvHvoBxoJZYyLQxVR+s37J/4Cs4JCcDweMWhxERNnt1ycF2ZUVRcSxC bujr436WK70NHs5vz1Cs422WoQgJTcKC/8O6wnFQijOH1xWTWzSKckCEb45PCIhphDAq spyYeiEWXDMhQzIVeL+7Ftm3ImfC7Uu68KSggCvHFSJaWeRc4TF+NKoImwyDRCmeslcC EQcK8+mwG7WfmlqPlLyVmfNP4lWyKq/TLDegbsdE5/pIhU09Tgcph5DK0CsnGdUIh+X7 LRgQ== X-Received: by 10.194.5.135 with SMTP id s7mr44564853wjs.115.1433186363386; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tobik.me (p5DC7F910.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.199.249.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm23255466wjf.45.2015.06.01.12.19.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.1] (p5DC7F910.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.249.16]); by tobik.me (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2dace1eb; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <556CB037.3050509@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:19:19 +0200 From: Tobias Kortkamp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg upgrade hang on 10.1p8/amd64 with graphviz. References: <20150323115451.GB62590@home.opsec.eu> <20150323120310.GC62590@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150323120310.GC62590@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 19:19:25 -0000 On 03/23/2015 13:03, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I have a strange situation: >> >> Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y >> [1/5] Installing graphviz-2.38.0_6... >> [1/5] Extracting graphviz-2.38.0_6: 100% >> load: 0.10 cmd: dot 46012 [urdlck] 1.56r 0.00u 0.00s 12% 11188k >> >> and there it hangs. Any ideas on how to fix this ? > > I found a workaround: > > cd /usr/local/lib/graphviz/ > # fstat config6 > USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME > root dot 46182 3 / 298326 -rw-r--r-- 0 w config6 > # kill -1 46182 > > There's something strange with graphviz. I had the same problem. Running dot -c would hang forever on my desktop with x11/nvidia-driver installed, but would work fine on other systems. Enabling the NVTHREADS option in graphics/graphviz seems to have solved this problem for me. As there seem to be no side effects with enabling the option on non-NVIDIA systems, I just added this to Poudriere's make.conf: graphviz_SET+=NVTHREADS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 19:35:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1A6ED3; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from clavin1.langille.org (clavin.langille.org [162.208.116.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "clavin.langille.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7234F125F; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from (clavin1.int.langille.org (clavin1.int.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) with ESMTPSA id C0F2245AF ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: need a particular version of django Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DCE3E821-B409-40C0-8658-5043A4DA5B06"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Dan Langille In-Reply-To: <5FC4CE16D3EFD52570CBEF0A@ogg.in.absolight.net> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:35:13 -0400 Cc: ports , wg@freebsd.org Message-Id: <58522EBA-504B-4540-B8CC-843D4C9154AF@langille.org> References: <5FC4CE16D3EFD52570CBEF0A@ogg.in.absolight.net> To: Mathieu Arnold X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 19:35:17 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_DCE3E821-B409-40C0-8658-5043A4DA5B06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Jun 1, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > +--On 1 juin 2015 08:35:04 -0400 Dan Langille = wrote: > | I'm writing about this problem: > | = http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/93amd64-default/388198/logs/py27-crits > | -3.1.0.log > | > | Background: > | > | security/py-crits needs www/py-django16 and www/py-django-tastypie > | > | However, www/py-django-tastypie wants to install www/py-django = (which is > | v 1.8). > | > | This is the line from www/py-django-tastypie in question: > | > | RUN_DEPENDS:=3D ${BUILD_DEPENDS} \ > | > | ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}django>=3D1.5:${PORTSDIR}/www/py-django >=20 > You can't use :=3D here because PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX is unset at that = time. >=20 > | Is there a nice way to say www/py-django16 is also OK? >=20 > No. It seems practical to create a new port, based on = www/py-django-tastypie, which requires www/py-django16 instead of www/py-django. Said port could be a slave of www/py-django-tastypie Agreed? =E2=80=94 Dan Langille http://langille.org/ --Apple-Mail=_DCE3E821-B409-40C0-8658-5043A4DA5B06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVbLPyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1MTE2RjM0ODIzRDdERDM4OTY0OUJBNzdF QjIxNTlERUU5NzI3MzlGAAoJEOshWd7pcnOfYLsP/2zaN9ow9UIFkpuvcpcRb/UK VylHvN1GofG/tIpnDzZzRxSgrcUOcj7BGIULQFOX85aFD2Y/o2kiXxJVykej1wUo 5mbNL9nu50HbvFu5DrUFZEzas0+VKQcfQIbiz+9Fy9W8pTSwfyo6Mitbok3FviX0 HpXkui1YJgEF/EuXOiOYLgqrwRvN4L5M8sxYnr3UkxnpuzHPnemS690aA4OQJQRE lIjUBNB5ZlWmg/V6hDohqmUHn/sU8nBf/wHvpdHgWwH3UsBkPDw9RgfsBIFvmF71 zYG5eNEct96UhuZqxgMJHlF9I7TarFEbfVcIXyNIxXQLbo4v5O5nCE2szV7YzqW6 U6Gs87nRoKSSnBxfQY8MtjqOf3tVTEExqYOnlEr+4pedMsbS3tsvd50jnJLrlhkt A01BFcH0Jx1S3SbvvVAbKscFguZReQ0VtpEXa+K2yepZq+fhUKc4yCbCoeNxDBhZ g0S3J6s/1NgIv+n4WsR+uMLotKys963OA2hHlczPhHNC5uI2LwcIkAIw3dwL9IDj APAiIYULEFlfdgLc6syfhr49eCHaH4k3ApcGpqYLs0E9UL6jrxakaZTxDkzbR4HW DxUQunsiPLkDqz2ugt1jXY+H4XW35df5NdxEs8dw5Eg3R74W095xjdwRKOvNsWTr nFChR7DGrbu4XJEkG3vA =AG6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_DCE3E821-B409-40C0-8658-5043A4DA5B06-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 20:45:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 062819BA for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40F11469 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2213033C1D; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2BC2C3985F; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:44:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: Re: SOLVED: pkg version mismatch [succeeds port...] References: <1433158692.84575.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:44:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1433158692.84575.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports's message of "Mon, 1 Jun 2015 04:38:12 -0700") Message-ID: <44iob7upiu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:45:11 -0000 [pkg@ snipped, because it's irrelevant] Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports writes: > I noticed the ports tree here had net/uget 1.10.4_1 even after "svn up"... while > pkg upgrading installed 2.0. "pkg version" (one of 3 ways) reported > "succeeds port"... was about to post a question about pkg, but it can be fixed > by > > cd /usr/ports/net/uget > svn revert . -R > > [found at stackoverflow] > > [I've about thirty of so of those directories to fix up, for installed ports... it seems]. > > Wondering if the fix can be put in CAVEATS or something in the pkg version > man page... "for those using subversion..." > > also if ever a man page with many examples is crafted for subversion on FreeBSD, > that could be one of them. > > Others: > > cd /usr/ports > svn resolve . These would not be useful to document unless you can document how you got into those situations in the first place. "svn revert" is only necessary if you made local changes to the sources under svn control, and even then usually if svn can't automatically merge upstream changes into yours. "svn resolve" is the way to sort out the merge if svn can't do it. It sounds like you're not intending to make local changes at all. In that case, I'd recommend you use something else (probably portsnap) to maintain your ports tree. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 22:11:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A035C06 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07B61A51 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBEE15.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.251.238.21]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t51MCv7O041041 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:12:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t51MB1Yw034072 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:11:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t51MAmwU042964 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:11:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201506012211.t51MAmwU042964@fire.js.berklix.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: distfile recovered for devel/gettext-msghack From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/cv/ Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:10:48 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:11:19 -0000 Hi ports@freebsd.org as MAINTAINER= of devel/gettext-msghack with BROKEN= No public distfiles I recovered distfile for devel/gettext-msghack & temporarily put it here http://berklix.com/~jhs/ftp/distfiles/msghack-0.2.tar.bz2 Please mark port as no longer broken & copy distfile wherever you want. textproc/translate-tool depends on devel/gettext-msghack Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Reply Below as a play script. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 22:13:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C2FCBF; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C951ADD; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t51MDpOX057082; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:13:51 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C597F8F9A; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:47:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id 1DrWeRDn7EQq; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com 05F958F97 Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:47:20 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam McDougall , ports@freebsd.org, Ryan Steinmetz Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> OpenPGP: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qXUuSamN9XxHvgttAVUPIKsirO6ijleuM" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:13:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qXUuSamN9XxHvgttAVUPIKsirO6ijleuM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: > Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my sy= stems. > Thanks. >=20 Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh512(void= ) > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh1024(voi= d) > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh =3D get_dh2048= (); > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh =3D get_dh3072= (); > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh =3D get_dh3072= (); The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --qXUuSamN9XxHvgttAVUPIKsirO6ijleuM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVbLbIAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPp0YH/0CBzduX2vG1vsP98jKg9VTF V4YHRQ6YXjp0r6pMvi47g9c31WUtOZK3WdB6dutMoU4h/40occZG88u8HYrKDvLN Jilgovcm5XS7v3XQ2YeNtKBhXrn51EzsZFQuy2QBUli9G5iT61+jqa1vFv8iMSo4 +Szu4MmgN/SdmNB7v6kqKNS+bFoTRxN3cNDMg/dPvubBaYljQfqNzNCDO1WkUxRH fRr7PNMIjiAsreocIiHSeLKLg9CIs2viJMXdEQM9X/+dfhv5XRWV//+xN2yhLz1H sx4skVtu6+aOaIZdiH0d9NlDR02pRU5yOrzrzfv9HQfc3PMT90DzFUMBgAuJOro= =Gg63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qXUuSamN9XxHvgttAVUPIKsirO6ijleuM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 23:34:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ABDD8AF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ozzie.tundraware.com", Issuer "ozzie.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434181E04 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t51NXs0l047198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:33:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:33:54 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Port Fetch Failing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:33:55 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: t51NXs0l047198 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:34:08 -0000 Recently, I switched a web server here to to rewriting and force every access to go over https. This is a machine using self-signed certs and a fairly conservative set of protocol support. Apache's cipher suite is set to this: SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:+eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2 These settings were derived from doing some reading and testing with SSL Labs test site and - thus far - I have seen no complaints except from the FreeBSD ports fetch. I am getting grumpy emails from the master ports sites: => tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz 72047:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt.c:593: fetch: http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: Authentication error => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /portdistfiles/ and try again. *** [do-fetch] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/tsshbatch. Interestingly, (and strangely) no other port is reporting this problem, only this one. Ideas, thoughts??? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 23:46:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCC55BC2 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [64.62.153.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anubis.delphij.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51241057 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from zeta.ixsystems.com (c-71-202-112-39.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.112.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 413C74F4E; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1433202362; x=1433216762; bh=QXrKTb31EgB6vOn0f4iqQelxPCodEfZzM9hejk6CYWA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=RBJHEUw4u5P4zCaP+/cpeKO9yINiRjWV4AFAxau7Jf2xcgNVqZWCZr9od7PMknTmT LgMH76Ek4TNFx1NbXqyepCHi3XMT/RNowk+b4bvJKCrPycvmdanqrnLNO8BnarqxTf 2PCtfU9mdJbwASxLFsBK62EPdGy5eH2Ljn9RGLro= Message-ID: <556CEEB8.2090406@delphij.net> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:46:00 -0700 From: Xin Li Reply-To: d@delphij.net Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Daneliuk , FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:46:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 06/01/15 16:33, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Recently, I switched a web server here to to rewriting and force > every access to go over https. This is a machine using > self-signed certs and a fairly conservative set of protocol > support. Apache's cipher suite is set to this: > > SSLCipherSuite > ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:+eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv 2 > > These settings were derived from doing some reading and testing > with SSL Labs test site and - thus far - I have seen no complaints > except from the FreeBSD ports fetch. I am getting grumpy emails > from the master ports sites: > > => tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in > /portdistfiles/. => Attempting to fetch > http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz > > fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: Not Found > => Attempting to fetch > http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz > > 72047:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt. c:593: > fetch: > http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: > Authentication error => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve > this => port manually into /portdistfiles/ and try again. *** > [do-fetch] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/tsshbatch. > > > Interestingly, (and strangely) no other port is reporting this > problem, only this one. You seem to be using FreeBSD 9.x which does not support TLSv1.1 and TLSv1.2. They support up to TLSv1 only and there is no plan to add TLSv1.1+ support for FreeBSD 9.x base system as we can't upgrade OpenSSL there due to ABI change. Disabling SSLv3 ciphers means there would be no cipher available for TLSv1 negotiation: % openssl ciphers 'TLSv1:-SSLv3' Error in cipher list 34379234072:error:1410D0B9:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list:no cipher match:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c:1 294: So, no negotiation would succeed in this case. I find your CipherSuite quite problematic, by the way. Why do you enable eNULL there for instance? Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1.4 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVbO64AAoJEJW2GBstM+nsVEQP+wZrco8vDXzLRcVJ6xVJ/exo PGFJwW6EwllssPvgt7wtayCKtlNY4olnD/r4n6Z80B2VbfXiKtOYXGjv2BNc1Dys /L1+fMV5TcGeO7lcUD19CO/WZf2Bqnmno/frWpV/6uCAwcIYhkY/JCEeist6HgNN wrYInVAxbV062AZiD5GKgifjSSARUg819p3/QiQ00v+uGG5U9xMMQWDnkMCvY4Wu xijiybU+OWI4EWeNQTQzNFXKP76A4ONs5YKeIgrWe4CXtSLgcJO1PE7k/OHxvrca 3IEsfyeXh7Z3yzcsREwAU47E/qfzd+K1Miya2Svt1yRi9oeBg6HpnXEh/WjcqLWe 0fEncBPfegFKvkuADewkDSL4V32+sG0rd2qRWLnsi9BGWzmtQ2pMo/nJkuuWU6Vm H9Am8DGMr3u+In/v/DrwHdk5vQnjzxoseyPf8stttvk9QgEEWZRYSALAb0x1uw8q c/5m3HXsMDe4O9w4iw5QzjFsG7eSXrbCqLkNOnrC34RCTBQiAOAtwa7+Jv9Xcwsp ET+vXdJ76OoSBY9FHNLMKrJC0rfGzC704K90vvMeKlZxCZZzxrf4ZPe64mvuircI 2DJHdN+0TkxarrC+lx2dV8avSjtOvAn1XH/aq++tmX1zsMrsQ4BtHWxjz/phQ3Nf Pn+BrSCIhn4hv0i5vTO8 =oL1C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 23:47:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0490AD3F for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDEDE1078 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.102]) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 57.0F.12430.EFEEC655; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:47:10 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11973e13-f79d56d00000308e-e6-556ceefe7ef6 Received: from [17.149.231.140] (Unknown_Domain [17.149.231.140]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 23.12.14591.50FEC655; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing From: Charles Swiger In-Reply-To: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:47:09 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> To: Tim Daneliuk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCYpvvvXU6owbc/fBabDr9ltJj/TMeB yWPGp/ksHjf/X2EMYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgypj6oJe94Dt/xY6DLxkbGDfxdjFycEgImEic +iLQxcgJZIpJXLi3nq2LkYtDSGAfo8TMz7dYIRImEi0bVrJCJKYzSfx9eYcZJMEsoCVx499L JhCbV0BP4tHTx+wgQ4UF5CXmfLcBMdkE1CQmTOQBqeAEqpjw+zALiM0ioCIx+dFVFogpVhJP Xnxjh7C1JZYtfM0MMdFK4v3DzWAnCAnoSlx6PAmsRkRAQ2LhxpMsEOfLSnzdKgdymYTAV1aJ 75cnsE5gFJqF5LhZSI6bhWTFAkbmVYxCuYmZObqZeaZ6iQUFOal6yfm5mxhBoTvdTngH4+lV VocYBTgYlXh4M7qzQ4VYE8uKK3MPMUpzsCiJ8559mBMqJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJ g1OqgdH3SeFRhjUMZnsj719YvDbVzktQWDfun+nil2F6C/bfXu/3iGfS83u/XzP48EwLmffu WtyCqCTd/XaWDs8VS9STmSJnBUzPKLXz3Je+a1nO0nvfVnDPWR4dyfR2ufbfmn0Ji/Ta/5yY Ljdl8aOLL04LHb2ZKebNktE5z2ZmrkHrX1WTVv0ExztKLMUZiYZazEXFiQAnTeZMPgIAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOPV5jy7r+5xQg7YfZhabDr9ltJj/TMeB yWPGp/ksHjf/X2EMYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgypj6oJe94Dt/xY6DLxkbGDfxdjFyckgImEi0 bFjJCmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgOpPE35d3mEESzAJaEjf+vWQCsXkF9CQePX3M3sXIwSEsIC8x 57sNiMkmoCYxYSIPSAUnUMWE34dZQGwWARWJyY+uskBMsZJ48uIbO4StLbFs4WtmiIlWEu8f bgY7QUhAV+LS40lgNSICGhILN55kARkvISAr8XWr3ARG/llI7pmF5J5ZSKYuYGRexShQlJqT WGmhl1hQkJOql5yfu4kRFGwNhWk7GJuWWx1iFOBgVOLhzejODhViTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwrvs VU6oEG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcd7bW1JChQTSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYxuZkJP 0iLMXBX3V07qeHftjNN96SW/bz4x9VVu/f7uYfyq93MaGQ2/+sTrphgtnvZhUQPDtE8KLnk/ priUrdPlSHmxQ0vrpJvWTt3wn9s/3vI1YM4PDV72c+qlqn7mBaEnmlyirq75qxnex7225uoE jcyQs2dP9rSuPah9e+Xj/QHX3j+eJNiixFKckWioxVxUnAgA0qKjrzICAAA= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:47:17 -0000 On Jun 1, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Recently, I switched a web server here to to rewriting and force every = access > to go over https. This is a machine using self-signed certs and a = fairly > conservative set of protocol support. Apache's cipher suite is set to = this: >=20 > SSLCipherSuite = ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:+eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2 >=20 > These settings were derived from doing some reading and testing with = SSL Labs test site > and - thus far - I have seen no complaints except from the FreeBSD = ports fetch. I am > getting grumpy emails from the master ports sites: >=20 > =3D> tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/. > =3D> Attempting to fetch = http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz > fetch: = http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: Not = Found > =3D> Attempting to fetch = http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz > 72047:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert = handshake = failure:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt.c:= 593: > fetch: = http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: = Authentication error > =3D> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > =3D> port manually into /portdistfiles/ and try again. > *** [do-fetch] Error code 1 The Qualsys scanner is informative: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=3Dtundraware.com You've disabled SSLv2 & v3, TLS 1.0 & 1.1, and enough of the standard = ciphers that only something which supports the newest ECDHE / GCM variants will likely be = able to connect. If you want the majority of clients to be able to connect, you'll need = to offer TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA in addition to = TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 and/or TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA in addition to = TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256. Regards, --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 23:55:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F3DEB4 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ozzie.tundraware.com", Issuer "ozzie.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A5B1303 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t51NtkGx014246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:55:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <556CF102.6030007@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:55:46 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Swiger CC: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:55:46 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: t51NtkGx014246 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:55:52 -0000 On 06/01/2015 06:47 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jun 1, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> Recently, I switched a web server here to to rewriting and force every access >> to go over https. This is a machine using self-signed certs and a fairly >> conservative set of protocol support. Apache's cipher suite is set to this: >> >> SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:+eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2 >> >> These settings were derived from doing some reading and testing with SSL Labs test site >> and - thus far - I have seen no complaints except from the FreeBSD ports fetch. I am >> getting grumpy emails from the master ports sites: >> >> => tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/. >> => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz >> fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: Not Found >> => Attempting to fetch http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz >> 72047:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt.c:593: >> fetch: http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tsshbatch/tsshbatch-1.212.tar.gz: Authentication error >> => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this >> => port manually into /portdistfiles/ and try again. >> *** [do-fetch] Error code 1 > > The Qualsys scanner is informative: > > https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=tundraware.com > > You've disabled SSLv2 & v3, TLS 1.0 & 1.1, and enough of the standard ciphers that only > something which supports the newest ECDHE / GCM variants will likely be able to connect. > > If you want the majority of clients to be able to connect, you'll need to offer > TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA in addition to TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 and/or > TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA in addition to TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256. > > Regards, > Thanks Chuck. I was being ultra paranoid when I did this and lifted this config from somewhere SSL Labs sent me to as I recall. I've added the 256 bit AES ciphers back in. Hopefully, the noise will go away now. I appreciate your prompt response. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 00:03:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0071490 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ozzie.tundraware.com", Issuer "ozzie.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A668E159F for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5202v8D015107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:02:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <556CF2B1.30100@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 19:02:57 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: d@delphij.net, FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> <556CEEB8.2090406@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <556CEEB8.2090406@delphij.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 01 Jun 2015 19:02:57 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: t5202v8D015107 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:03:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/01/2015 06:46 PM, Xin Li wrote: > You seem to be using FreeBSD 9.x which does not support TLSv1.1 and > TLSv1.2. No, it is 10.1-Stable > Disabling SSLv3 ciphers means there would be no cipher available for > TLSv1 negotiation: > > % openssl ciphers 'TLSv1:-SSLv3' > Error in cipher list > 34379234072:error:1410D0B9:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list:no > cipher > match:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c:1 > 294: > > So, no negotiation would succeed in this case. > > I find your CipherSuite quite problematic, by the way. Why do you > enable eNULL there for instance? This is what happens when you are: A) In a hurry and B) Paranoid and C) Willing to copypasta a config without thought :( Thanks to you and Chuck, I have a more reasonable (I think): SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:-eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 Thanks for your prompt response, - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVbPKxAAoJEMLZ2alfelsnB1YP/AhzECzSgJPW6SbcjR4mJiGF dg2ywz36W/BDcxj1jPnLdf99b0NTlGe6FMVtGi9GpcVVO1EpKbZS9jtHx4okPlYH oOAIZnedF0+g/M2HOLLsij4EexQo2vcxyZ+S+DaKJkx4j9J2MQCMfzmDMDV3vr1m 7ErxipWuUq9+uoSJXE+JsvP3U2spmG+LGs/l2gIHwv7E2fvf63Ozb1Eo9e8NgLpf 9VO7jrghJDIGy4MUqWxMV6gqBl04rite0A46OUrJCvz78fB50YIW2tZXGafGpZ+H jd0uAqpTukvvxiVXYHpO+EWhIJpgbI96FgizZ7Zp6jPrAALC+hAfE7JA5OkLAMno CPvTj8jIn7SfF4e27OvhstDrUlJ3xuldKY3zbSebAK7Tee7i7oTU7h/6aKFv3fat o7qB89LUQZfFRMvrReiXVHlUawYUcE2YKSpuu0ZOOux12kb1wc7Yes08xDOj6lkH OTOUw7RWnvgm2exbzfzNBCZI/qa7VFixfB89eavP7Cfc2sYWTdrHky45yroLXABK Ek8w49iQnio3wf/sWuzymCJQ+aMMaA/vGzr/cDampYSBwXkEX6Rql8oh83hQST50 2ZNHGVjwzOgxs+4xUYpQTEzvtzX8DmbMNNUkBk9Bfiv67mTMHn3xV3cayFgA+Aq2 CihAOZ94Oi+UhAT34PKP =vMg0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 00:10:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1312E6 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (thyme.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3809E15FD for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52AE237B54F; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:09:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3m0tzQ5gwKz1lZ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:09:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:09:54 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Tim Daneliuk Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing Message-ID: <20150602000954.GF1733@over-yonder.net> References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> <556CEEB8.2090406@delphij.net> <556CF2B1.30100@tundraware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556CF2B1.30100@tundraware.com> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:10:02 -0000 On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 07:02:57PM -0500 I heard the voice of Tim Daneliuk, and lo! it spake thus: > > This is what happens when you are: A) In a hurry and B) Paranoid and > C) Willing to copypasta a config without thought :( > > Thanks to you and Chuck, I have a more reasonable (I think): > > SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:-eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 That still looks awful weird. Paranoid, and enabling +LOW? If you're having to explicitly list ciphers, you're probably on the wrong path... And I suspect the "-SSLv3:-SSLv2" isn't really what you want. You probably want to disable the _protocols_, not the _ciphers_. e.g., on a 10.x machine, I have SSLCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:!aNULL:!MD5:!RC4 SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3 (I figure every extra character on the CipherSuite line means either I'm way smarter, or way dumber. And there's only so much smarter I can get, so...) -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 01:25:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398B9EBA for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 01:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2980017CF for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 01:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: Tim Daneliuk cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing In-Reply-To: <20150602000954.GF1733@over-yonder.net> References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> <556CEEB8.2090406@delphij.net> <556CF2B1.30100@tundraware.com> <20150602000954.GF1733@over-yonder.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 01:25:16 -0000 >> Thanks to you and Chuck, I have a more reasonable (I think): >> SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:-eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 Reasonable depends on the use case. Though this topic would be better discussed on freebsd-security@, the good advice given on , and tends to recommend: SSLCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:!IDEA:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!RC4:!MD5:!PSK:!aECDH:!EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA:!EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:!KRB5-DES-CBC3-SHA SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 -SSLv3 SSLCompression off SSLHonorCipherOrder on and if you're using httpd 2.3.3 or higher: SSLUseStapling on SSLStaplingResponderTimeout 5 SSLStaplingReturnResponderErrors off SSLStaplingCache shmcb:/var/run/ocsp(128000) If you're processing credit cards SSLProtocol will need to be expanded to "-SSLv2 -SSLv3 -TLSv1" by 2016/07 (for PCI compliance) and if you have good reason to be paranoid and all of your clients are up-to-date, add "-TLSv1.1". Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 01:25:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C6CF43 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 01:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ozzie.tundraware.com", Issuer "ozzie.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20B2617D1 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 01:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t521PWko018253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:25:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <556D060C.3030703@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:25:32 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" CC: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Port Fetch Failing References: <556CEBE2.7030005@tundraware.com> <556CEEB8.2090406@delphij.net> <556CF2B1.30100@tundraware.com> <20150602000954.GF1733@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20150602000954.GF1733@over-yonder.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:25:32 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: t521PWko018253 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 01:25:35 -0000 On 06/01/2015 07:09 PM, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 07:02:57PM -0500 I heard the voice of > Tim Daneliuk, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> This is what happens when you are: A) In a hurry and B) Paranoid and >> C) Willing to copypasta a config without thought :( >> >> Thanks to you and Chuck, I have a more reasonable (I think): >> >> SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+EXP:-eNULL:-SSLv3:-SSLv2:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA:TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 > > That still looks awful weird. Paranoid, and enabling +LOW? If you're > having to explicitly list ciphers, you're probably on the wrong > path... > > And I suspect the "-SSLv3:-SSLv2" isn't really what you want. You > probably want to disable the _protocols_, not the _ciphers_. e.g., on > a 10.x machine, I have > > SSLCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:!aNULL:!MD5:!RC4 > SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3 With your settings the site scores slighly more poorly than with mine as reported by SSL Labs. I will continue to tinker to find the sweet spot of browser compatibility with best protection. (The +LOW should have been -LOW.) > > (I figure every extra character on the CipherSuite line means either > I'm way smarter, or way dumber. And there's only so much smarter I > can get, so...) > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 03:11:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5900F847 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C9211ED for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t523BxB8068056 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:11:59 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t523BxFO068055 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:11:59 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:11:59 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201506020311.t523BxFO068055@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:11:59 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/ports-mgmt/port-maintenance-tools: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/ports-mgmt/porteasy Committers on the hook: amdmi3 jbeich Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': D textproc/hgrep U textproc/Makefile U security/vuxml/vuln.xml D ports-mgmt/porteasy U ports-mgmt/Makefile U MOVED D www/diamanda U www/Makefile U net-mgmt/netams/Makefile U games/wyrmgus/distinfo A games/wyrmgus/files A games/wyrmgus/files/patch-src_unit_script__unittype.cpp U games/wyrmgus/Makefile A games/supertuxkart/files/patch-src_audio_sfx__manager.cpp U games/wyrmsun/Makefile U games/wyrmsun/distinfo U games/tanks-of-freedom/Makefile U games/tanks-of-freedom/distinfo Updated to revision 388300. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 03:44:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34F2E3C for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936B1195E for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1433216660; bh=bFrYIiZwsrDHZ9chq7iUFGCcjQ4zH93RarKZHJXFAqI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=j0Cp+E6qx0QtO4OIwgJ4pY6/oVkyO9JWOCbYlzEof7Uwgjx1AZoP+8qya2BmliOMaSz58adyNScd1HUwZqhLAsRwe2r9TQDNhE66/LNvaSSvTVbUmgjxJzmQDGP+nO/FXLdwJP87pI8BHMyaa/IKPQyLtJf9QMms6LJk15kV7qhUO45uxxO3K+NRBQcXr06zjSOxJ1MVqYHDjjUrh4TgEO7cEgjztfOhM0ggXdu3JAo5gYyv+nywDjJ3jZkKF0LCrakeUb8ZGjaOXc9KT4VVJhchYFkzCUbWVexydns8xBYddvz+kIQPzpDIcdSnkrAtzUmzFeTXEQgOf48IMXSfxQ== Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 03:44:20 -0000 Received: from [68.142.230.75] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 03:44:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp232.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 03:44:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 208790.88365.bm@smtp232.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Zl8HR3kVM1ksC6yawP__Z7.t8_xMXcSQWjhRRv80fOVm9hp sAl4pxBMKdcXf49Tq_Cqp32LNekidHFBkqhx2agxh9HrK9WykteHGYCatOD9 boAu3ypuejz3LxOb_cLBrvkhbmyZ4ZoLKV18EjTP1PsOBQ9qpLeVRjOUQQVK vawfdfv0KNTlnAw_HpbyhAKimutdJBntZnXjvlSdbQyA3tJxYNj3fvuKDTFn PVqeIIYT6kcjnSjKHKY3xQdIa.Hd49LAEHDf9Qh5kxRXnhhlqYKvQAwKxU7f uS.IwJhsfs_01ILc7Psax6cuTXEP7kUhmqXkFY8RtgfGCwUY8BZ94A0T5iOQ 48g1W1IUKMMq5a.KoPlsA_BBWHxrX_9oga7w5f0f2mtSLYG1MLVWiRXXp1dr s1sGYRcFkj4scTF5i0.v21q71tIBPnLrDIX_i0XGD6AfoaK1gSeLHoqG3Vkx pBDSEKLPuBZlgHjlwh1mtXseF69gk.24KgTFxpcADXrlNRrApivoOzK0bTvQ CJUcq9huOd8wnR3cSfzpkghjJ7WyVIAjxoboimA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn Message-ID: <556D264A.7070107@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:43:06 -0700 From: Jeffrey Bouquet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SOLVED: pkg version mismatch [succeeds port...] References: <1433158692.84575.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <44iob7upiu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44iob7upiu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:44:27 -0000 On 06/01/15 13:44, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > [pkg@ snipped, because it's irrelevant] > > Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports writes: > >> I noticed the ports tree here had net/uget 1.10.4_1 even after "svn up"... while >> pkg upgrading installed 2.0. "pkg version" (one of 3 ways) reported >> "succeeds port"... was about to post a question about pkg, but it can be fixed >> by >> >> cd /usr/ports/net/uget >> svn revert . -R >> >> [found at stackoverflow] >> >> [I've about thirty of so of those directories to fix up, for installed ports... it seems]. >> >> Wondering if the fix can be put in CAVEATS or something in the pkg version >> man page... "for those using subversion..." >> >> also if ever a man page with many examples is crafted for subversion on FreeBSD, >> that could be one of them. >> >> Others: >> >> cd /usr/ports >> svn resolve . > These would not be useful to document unless you can document how you > got into those situations in the first place. I think it was disk failure and svn did not like resuming the updates to the directories newly crafted into a everyday install type system from backup. [ I prefer keeping the same tree across years of updates because I am used to saving build logs, .htm and .msg and .txt hint files, etc within the directories. ... for easier reference] > "svn revert" is only > necessary if you made local changes to the sources under svn control, I typically use it to build, ports, say, that are broken due to no fetch possible, for which I already have the sources, so I can "svn revert Makefile" and similar uses. > and even then usually if svn can't automatically merge upstream changes > into yours. "svn resolve" is the way to sort out the merge if svn can't > do it. Just a few days ago I used "svn resolve" to tune the ports tree. Maybe the side effects of that, and/or the response I type to the svn questions (always TC, always r, for those familiar with the two types...text and tree, respetively) are what causes the version mismatches that were present. [ OR the situation in the first paragraph above. ] Part of a daily svn log: ............................................................................ Updating 'usr/ports': ......................... [snipped] Summary of conflicts: Text conflicts: 0 remaining (and 2 already resolved) Tree conflicts: 0 remaining (and 2 already resolved) .................................................................................................................. I tend to annotate uses into hint files (.txt .msg .dat .how .htm) in /usr/src RE svn Has saved a ports tree from newly needing to be downloaded more than once > > It sounds like you're not intending to make local changes at all. In > that case, I'd recommend you use something else (probably portsnap) to > maintain your ports tree. I think, am not sure, that portsnap and svn are the only two. I prefer the more cvs-like workings of svn, and have never used portsnap... I think the former enables one more fine-grained tuning unless one knows the workings of the latter. I could be wrong but... Just information for the list... as a followup. Not wanting to prolong the thread without reason..... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 04:39:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67433ACF for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm6-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm6-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A294151A for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1433219642; bh=ETAPZslBu45i/GQRhqDPauZ6fFyjIC/0hJDut/TOYbY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=pfiGYKKv22SjSWB24NcfhLThowCk75dvSLTedHK1PVEdfJAJ2Zxr9zFY2M3KnN90f/h4HQdBYKMpxP8fZC9j9jKlUBesUPgVJ6TYDZlbsw0s2GbJVbQzZszkb5yQWyF4bcR4N89GN+7pBqouwgj6xlLWVBgbBGfRmyo8cVzaKRJhAUBTbfI7/MRzNXwMZtVWEjNny59wS9QFUHiiTCITOQOXspGTRnY2RStIStsxlr3FYIUoE4d3tDynXP3NHHXYVrlqZT8YVAqX0UH244vMt/8iymGI44dopKWk4u6un1vfAeWrnNyuX4hNdxP03HSKqnmAWr/3x8fFGRPjCmZi1Q== Received: from [66.196.81.166] by nm6.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 04:34:02 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.243] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 04:34:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 04:34:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:34:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: qN7FdUkVM1nQYkYqIEJI_7dcPqo4qO7wjiWbS8CjEFMoxHJ VXudkA1kNxo9mZLXS3pc3pv_VaH9caIqsrfRzlgcDyFfl_ZmvaNQmyHsj30p LllbkYxTFf83tNYR4cXD6Ozx2KjSI7K2DSjYKbvGX.7vxizJNPrj6zBmrlfH IOMgsxzLobmFuLp5XAWDhyJgQ2mLw_MMvypJgUtuaZGHZ4zfj9hi7einAGBo uh2Slq_HDt91Q6CS6DH6pOWcY63c2FCM0_Bh2YSczcwRp3d1L_PgxUSu1Wek 0gzEiKTJrrzp2LGkPZKbm_MiZ6f4f54Qx6dv84MbnM5G7_Wz4gHWQ6nw8QtP sfuRckymL.VEQk3H66f8SR6sCJdovgGuQJyEu7GgWRMa2_QxuZZW9X90_3Wv 0OsKvr22ocQLwM8ytaPIi8v7OTSjsQHEpdnOu62cxb1tT6n8qitusDcZhpDp SB4Io5TIFk_ILn0BUK9C46VQShaT9KX.pk7.rK18CsfpiZvf76NKG3a39.QO Hywiq98OBwII2noi0PNLH09PHP6vM0DNLVl8sMQ_zOwpU7gQKrSqJN6rKKw- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, makc@freebsd.org Subject: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 04:39:35 -0000 I have printer, HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP, seem to have set it up with cups after running hp-setup (not sure about whether hp-setup was successful), but when I run a command to print, get "unknown printer", even though I copy/paste the overlong name with the mouse to avoid a typo. lpoptions shows copies=1 device-uri=socket://192.168.0.103 finishings=3 job-hold-until=no-hold job-priority=50 marker-change-time=0 number-up=1 printer-commands=AutoConfigure,Clean,PrintSelfTestPage printer-info='HP LaserJet Professional M1212nf MFP' printer-is-accepting-jobs=true printer-is-shared=true printer-location=residence printer-make-and-model='HP LaserJet Professional m1212nf MFP, hpcups 3.14.10, requires proprietary plugin' printer-state=3 printer-state-change-time=1433062381 printer-state-reasons=none printer-type=8425484 printer-uri-supported=ipp://localhost:631/printers/HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP lpstat -p -d shows printer HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP is idle. enabled since Sun May 31 08:53:01 2015 system default destination: HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP lp newslet/huberwinerycoupon.ps produces lpr: lp: unknown printer lp -d HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP newslet/huberwinerycoupon.ps also produces lpr: HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP: unknown printer lpr and lp have same effect, using huberwinerycoupon.pdf also fails just the same. huberwinerycoupon.ps was produced from huberwinerycoupon.pdf by xpdf. Is there something I can do to make this work, short of buying a new printer and/or switching to Linux, or buying and installing MS-Windows? Is cups (I have latest version, 1.7.3) broken or just user-hostile? I've long known that cups is not user-friendly. >From NetBSD (current, 7.99.15, i386), on the other computer, I fail the same way. I did build and install emulators/wine-devel on the other computer in NetBSD-current (7.99.15) from pkgsrc for both i386 and amd64; I could try that with the Windows software. I also intend to build and install wine-devel for FreeBSD from ports, both i386 and amd64, not only for printing. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 05:58:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723914F7; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 05:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A90171D; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 05:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [109.42.3.192] by msvc-mesg-gmx015.server.lan (via HTTP); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Olli Hauer" To: "Bryan Drewery" , "Adam McDougall" , ports@freebsd.org, "Ryan Steinmetz" Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:57:52 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:FehovE8qxOGi4czr6GDTowm1KforTPatR48SS3eBFcq NAnojMXPyWJPrtqMzPjR3aJabZ9wlDiIO3vyEKfuvwHzW5usEz 4vS+WoYhrZFEZB61kFWOXhSyVVC/L91L6pOchYrtMxLqyYelRh 7fuj4S7oheUtdaDw1o8tFOWiOZXAq9mcDI3QJIurgfYZocKyyO nMGc1gj4kJgxG/Sm3eUWmNrL03oaR2Lfwxt/cZTxlzTmt0qWM6 LEbhcB493iPQImX6wYxmot7bRWrnosN6RBWVrbtaOnicBzlfgP 6V/z9o= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gZioUXO31uU=:oDBNLsWkVQyrigPrJEMjt2 f0Pbv8kyF5HK3ZK6D8IY34nEf1xIOlwStePxUPOAK/D8hWR+jwM+YTeDyI8uez9LK7mjucSPu Qnf6S4daXtC1ICMdbbFSRQ+ZzXNtYQRV8GINAetm4pUx2Hz25uz0jNcsOAv5J6o/6lN7Of214 q6mgrSfrLib1w/+bOQIdtFB68lKc1pxGKNbCit969H6l+z3+bM91G1AYChWHdDv4SdCRJtzkJ DYTVxbgwSMlfqShiaBIDflyamwXNm+ni46AuyhaKrlmja8O5rzslb/iMeSBRm9BpEe4BEt8/G EoAV06BK7gTndBaR6dLGzykS/zcC5jEyM9CRLBTjFiQUx0pR9y9DaL45/ixG3yZLlHkHH8pwz KUybUjikywAw1F3TjSqdlNJBu7vQfwjZTa/fLb680t+W5aQlZSyU//ZT0eOoJwLWQOIzZdb9A p3q2vEUcgjTYXArH5y3ZqLve7r8Qoh5gaKt2hNrBj0qTVkW18/Om MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 05:58:06 -0000 One case wher this can happen is the dh generation was interrupted during the build. The upcomming apache2.2 will no.longer require such a hack because mod_ssl has undergone a huge rewrite. -- Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Bryan Drewery wrote: On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: > Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my systems. > Thanks. > Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh512(void) > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh1024(void) > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh2048(); > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); > work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 06:10:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323F8680 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082D219B3 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t526AU8Y099060 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:10:30 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t526AUgn099058 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:10:30 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:10:30 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201506020610.t526AUgn099058@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:10:31 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 06:15:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CB3750 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4621B79 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com) Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so125616265pdb.0 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:15:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ah5oSPn/vJ28Fdz39jHvpY+oYwr1y77T86kINREcUf8=; b=Tc7DnfSjcoQVdC+7W2+krmeKjArrE8v8APiN60JqCp6w3E1kmyPIK9XcONeRrlKZLe WpLNjm4IWpr+ZniUDzEmB+7dt2fzHHVFpG95yhvCily4aUiLo6ZxCJt54B+2yUwLwRjT 7V9dYxP3L9BeuXeRjcYh40ThDbb4Mcjd1hC04+6ypwXjjgDJOlWDRPQYgMHQMxkY1+mz yjeNtDBidUyy7meKFTy7j8omeaX/PfMYhsSR1ZQgmX/mP1sZpB/U2+6+KcvStODpxahW sv4dOkgSN+4Sa/Tw+RvsuW2IrL9i+hfGeXWvpwAwnoe3h3i6pQl4vVkY83TH+LlW0TCV 2q5g== X-Received: by 10.68.221.6 with SMTP id qa6mr9668925pbc.62.1433225711932; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:15:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.67.22.162 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:14:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthias Gamsjager Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:14:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: NodeJS on ARM To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:15:12 -0000 Hi, I was wondering what are the missing bits and pieces to get nodejs running on ARM? Still get the error from ports on a RPI2 running CURRENT. - Matthias From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 08:19:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9842500; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E408187C; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE8AD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.251.232.173]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t528LbO8096375; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:21:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t528Jd3F036721; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:19:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t528JMlo086959; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:19:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201506020819.t528JMlo086959@fire.js.berklix.net> To: hrs@freebsd.org cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: distfile recovered for www/linux-libgtkembedmoz From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/cv/ Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:19:22 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:19:54 -0000 Hi hrs@FreeBSD.org as MAINTAINER= of www/linux-libgtkembedmoz with BROKEN= No public distfiles I recovered distfile for devel/gettext-msghack & temporarily put it here http://berklix.com/~jhs/ftp/distfiles/nvu-1.0-pc-linux2.6.10-gnu.tar.bz2 Please mark port as no longer broken & copy distfile wherever you want. BTW www/linux-libgtkembedmoz is a dependency of print/acroreadwrapper (& acroread I need to fix) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Reply Below as a play script. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 08:45:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C038D8 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrickhess@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5962F1FED for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrickhess@gmx.net) Received: from desk8.phess.net ([95.88.11.237]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcnRD-1ZPNaw1wNr-00k9EK; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:45:37 +0200 From: Patrick Hess To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:45:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4321846.9hHPBs9sCR@desk8.phess.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.2; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:j6Ug50XabHrt1VJJn/k00hdtL6rPI8FQTC/SE/Q+VXwDS21AFGE a7j97whvkaEapPcx9srL5DLT/e0IoXL+fDGiTi/2QB0Q800nDnOzKgxTYcMpdjh33b3pbJf 1sczjOw9eOIGsasOPfFTbQJy/GsbmnTYGkBqT20M2HywNi13zfX1aJM7EJY28pJjE2vOdzq a5F794D89ZfpCIaFpUieA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hUDhWpgKqeI=:BB8Ts4NLydhytqymNdzGYH V6SS0vVSlhPr4IKGe78sgUGUuI6ITqiM61zxlZW5sitB32d2wu8ubZXp2pv+4ZIieuaxEZtjx L5UTsDUXQol7l5lkGEcXBWSAxOefX1WcZcsK+ReUbnxdlOTU963goYyHStB3SBUW3UXYj6vDu lUOwrEmLQaJ8cL3MiKBDh3TD2aLDWEaaatBLDQvzYpAfO5a5j13ChzNelhHnpEB+XZQKoO1/g RQznde+/yVsCC91K2QUFleSThmJD0Epg5FQtKDFxl1To8zEq7ZptCp1sIhn1yxXGvavLeOj8+ cUv6/7Usy9ufV6oD+fqM7vtPdxKjoms69AT9RUQ2uuDcfGn/3eloXYTTEaenFok++zzcaZkwI akFJ35Rd0ymsRCxiZRlg6s9tBUAA3rn1tBf06NlZ94NzrYFhPnrchm+tV+O2rKNkHpz+6g2/3 PZIOmBS2RthifJNAWLZGRoZhUia5QPsjHfQ00DY3iawZzRjkmTG+UX4zX2as7NepUAnptip5I 7j/tl8HMONQujo7NQ7ohRXaS3MGnuRtsiAokSgkX+sYccykxZ8KNE8MIG5oVqE3kBIF6BBTjP V8dDImwIh/befBgTgzH+69gekjSrqhVRlof6jBAXMpF/fvuR31mw2PXaH4cKeItgMM0k+RPLS DBO+GDzBDvx2Dq9PSv1XUXg+3M0HpWZOfJZB23xlxyWV3QuFjUtKZPNUitdyjZgJuG8g= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:45:47 -0000 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I have printer, HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP, seem to have set > it up with cups [...] > > lpr: lp: unknown printer Be aware that after installing CUPS you will find two incompatible lpr binaries on your system: /usr/bin/lpr, which belongs to the base system, and /usr/local/bin/lpr, the one that comes with CUPS. Unless you changed your $PATH to include /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin, you are still calling /usr/bin/lpr (use "which lpr" to confirm this). The same goes for /usr/bin/lp vs. /usr/local/bin/lp. So just try using the full path for /usr/local/bin/lpr and see if that does the trick. Patrick From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 09:35:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094506CB for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from teparybean2.exetel.com.au (teparybean2.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1B51CCD for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from phasia.kd.net.au ([220.233.10.47]) by teparybean2.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YziFg-0002ab-6M for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:12:52 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (unknown [120.146.8.15]) by dermis.kd (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A10CDA8 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:12:51 +1000 (EST) Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t529CmHG082214 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:12:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t529Clb3082211 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:12:48 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:12:46 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Conflict with pkgconf/pkg-config Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:35:14 -0000 I can't remember whether I asked this before, and if so whether it was answered, so please bear with me again. FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p13 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Apr 7 02:37:24 UTC 2015 (I use freebsd-update every week, and it obviously picked up a new kernel.) ===> cups-1.7.3_1 depends on executable: espgs - not found ===> Verifying install for espgs in /usr/ports/print/cups-pstoraster ===> cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_8 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_8 depends on shared library: libcupsimage.so - not found ===> Verifying for libcupsimage.so in /usr/ports/print/cups-image ===> cups-image-1.7.3_1 depends on package: cups-client>=1.7.3 - not found ===> Verifying install for cups-client>=1.7.3 in /usr/ports/print/cups-client ===> cups-client-1.7.3_2 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 - found ===> cups-client-1.7.3_2 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> cups-client-1.7.3_2 depends on executable: pkgconf - not found ===> Verifying install for pkgconf in /usr/ports/devel/pkgconf ===> Installing for pkgconf-0.9.7 ===> Checking if pkgconf already installed ===> Registering installation for pkgconf-0.9.7 as automatic pkg-static: pkgconf-0.9.7 conflicts with pkg-config-0.25_1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/pkg-config *** [fake-pkg] Error code 70 I dimly recall having some problem when following an upgrade path from 8.1, but it was so long ago i.e. months that I've forgotten... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 10:08:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99FE614C for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B231488 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by igblz2 with SMTP id lz2so6303212igb.1 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:08:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OPEUXaz2iRQS6kUOp8JeCZGnUwfAaB29SpsgMlcBUpw=; b=Xa2J3tXe5oKS5nCNsipaMLiQLBlVmIBl0PLrBkbJAtA8oKOeAu5qKivfvc2/PMjqov 70jV1qSjXatwlL2RzgnW7XoFSs2/qWYmTmJTr4MjU4SKfEtb84LPqVjT6DMtjYLwZRfu ZuuKDHhxKNEKmMC95hVp5+fxz204U3YYql+fabU+mctYCwM/Q2HR4pKVJJVN1tHzXr9p WP/A5KmIIS7hiTgVCMqelgsX4mnmXjXbf0V854OmoE3Su0NFr2Ukyr5yQAMELCyjVldn eL+ZcnE/3hbIga0jTWuXXZkfwi8H334TyElop3uWJf6penzxsZwo52Ku4IkM7PZ53J4v zXCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.134.1 with SMTP id ia1mr14781445icc.75.1433239708860; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.236.10 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:08:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 18:08:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Conflict with pkgconf/pkg-config From: Ben Woods To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:08:29 -0000 On Tuesday, June 2, 2015, Dave Horsfall wrote: > ===> cups-client-1.7.3_2 depends on executable: pkgconf - not found > ===> Verifying install for pkgconf in /usr/ports/devel/pkgconf > ===> Installing for pkgconf-0.9.7 > ===> Checking if pkgconf already installed > ===> Registering installation for pkgconf-0.9.7 as automatic > pkg-static: pkgconf-0.9.7 conflicts with pkg-config-0.25_1 (installs files > into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/pkg-config > *** [fake-pkg] Error code 70 > This entry from /usr/ports/UPDATING has your answer: 20120726: AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config AUTHOR: bapt@FreeBSD.org devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config or # portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\* pkgng: # pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf # pkg install -f devel/pkgconf Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 10:16:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9A4256 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm13-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm13-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABCE16D7 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1433240004; bh=0d85ylaElgbszSJklgnbfRSkZ5XM7P2ftJ22bR3EXdU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=ouLUmFE903wIvFwnHTSWNsB3+oiFSxve1ly4Bx52XwAmIAPgwllnsgOO2INNNmtaDNEV33PSPHf9pVL+kvvQ4dDQLzBzcdYxE6qFeBn8X223qGJzSPudx9sH6Vmz8HPYGd75ZKp8pnddPzIYHwjcNAwnPm2tV7B5ogyf4b6GGWS2uwkyDzvcWKQMUi8SWJWoAFCBH6SDOPUsfQwlrDbCdnKHGOVcafginWDjX4hoqo5NPTy2lvaT20U+p0v18xAHMNpQaEzXz+l65zm2831sbSe/yznk7zr8XT58Lo2vDk9amhgsHV0hIAs5a1hjIeT96ulXf/NhxtGV60Va4h/QGg== Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 10:13:24 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.242] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 10:13:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2015 10:13:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 9329.71691.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <9329.71691.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Xp2b4fcVM1ldr1aINc7BcXF0jaVjnprp8rperRuuJZnr0AL KH7jfBc0dck93X8ZRL3F4.joM1wT0d.t8AA0VzH4RUbqJRwwWudaLN1kKfs4 hzL27VjSy4d4sHhxmPjPfQB1VWBDlrkZjHci0ZyHpCJsNR6DNzr1uwANB50B Kv5BuB10Q9RasqUbrCzetMz2lhl2QrDSYEnbPAkdZGDX_Z1YIxMAGOxUgIXy 94aQaKr5biUjv_VddROuW.Z1YLVzmt9LuCkIofUK8KArWBWZH5xXcDit.k6p p82eRX7RreDHYRXMNHJ_1C.shFKClZI.87CiTu0uXvGxX98YYK5_5_FJnXGt 7kV009k1_vDi4.PhtZy8.B7QBPnB_YKYX_wfies3XOz5usk4CHKQzhog_5Mf EcVFQDwPTW7xjQlOaJ71565QCYm8htU1_WLVGRQHO7gSniiLdckbZkiwBAjr 58PE7K1gVBD_7bSqBmfeXeeXBMTAYuihoPlipiAdScpsiOGDN55wdDHgBoLk yo4YLcixT43Tk251K5ZoXUxUem3_EfjTgE2KUjQO_MtJfe5zoIPWqg_TtiQ- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:12:47 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4321846.9hHPBs9sCR@desk8.phess.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:16:39 -0000 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I have printer, HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP, seem to have set > it up with cups [...] > > lpr: lp: unknown printer Patrick Hess responded: > Be aware that after installing CUPS you will find two incompatible lpr > binaries on your system: /usr/bin/lpr, which belongs to the base system, > and /usr/local/bin/lpr, the one that comes with CUPS. Unless you changed > your $PATH to include /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin, you are still > calling /usr/bin/lpr (use "which lpr" to confirm this). The same goes > for /usr/bin/lp vs. /usr/local/bin/lp. > So just try using the full path for /usr/local/bin/lpr and see if that > does the trick. > Patrick I tried that, got some more sign of life, but still no joy: But it still seems that /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin in FreeBSD, or /usr/pkg/sbin and /usr/pkg/bin in NetBSD, should properly be at the front of the path, unless one wants to put $HOME/bin or the like in front of that. I get Idle: Filter failed on http://localhost:631 status page. It looks like cups and the printer are finding every silly excuse for refusing to work. I can't really say if Linux would work better. Only other way is seeing if the Windows way works in wine. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 10:26:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A9B6D3 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jens.k.loewe@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x242.google.com (mail-wg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5835192D for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jens.k.loewe@gmail.com) Received: by wggx12 with SMTP id x12so11500824wgg.1 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:26:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=PGC1HKJ6dBCtZVNcTq9P4pchVZbim9oa1hNmimgn+zw=; b=IeZKLt4A/U4HtuP63tp3OtkRr7QHoLdI2l7f6SziEgDXx8RiPtiexYBJEB/0QqbGny z0+5sGSDk6A/FD3riTIaZFN4SteJQPy9ZcTdgSU8YZIrdGnAtcJluIQX5fr1hnZef9uN kTEwvC3krmPziKq6M35pjEF9HENtLhW2aNE90pm5gleGSDkA908zUXw0TvBTDcv2wIkx k4O42Zl+idNlfvC9hQAyDE7YJt+CULsdV3/T0AKVhwo98hlaqtHaGT2aAyTw9IQsO9nC rXp9eoDdw2KyBr+ZG1gghD4GP3EOPTsURcUMsft4LZ4zjRAmmUgsS+rFwThYp3hVayeD 8TBQ== X-Received: by 10.194.249.196 with SMTP id yw4mr48765802wjc.144.1433240785312; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.175.27] ([193.175.26.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm21490728wix.1.2015.06.02.03.26.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:26:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jens K. Loewe" X-Google-Original-From: "Jens K. Loewe" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Requesting Bitbucket support Message-Id: Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:26:22 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:26:27 -0000 Seeing that GitHub found its space in bsd.*.mk, I'd like to suggest = adding support for the "other big" VCS hosting service Bitbucket too. A = lot of really nice projects, including some of mine, are hosted there. = :-) Regards.= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 11:07:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E412FCDA for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.issp.ac.ru", Issuer "relay.issp.ac.ru" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6783E1277 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mercury.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.155:56656] (HELO/EHLO mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with PLAIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTPSA/inet id t52B7ej6012945 (using TLSv1.2, with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits), verified NO) Tue, 2 Jun 2015 14:07:41 +0300 (MSK) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.issp.ac.ru: Host mercury.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.155] claimed to be mercury.ph.man.ac.uk From: Max Brazhnikov To: Thomas Mueller Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:07 +0000 Message-ID: <2166876.6zk2LzEg5t@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:07:14 -0000 On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Thomas Mueller wrote: > I have printer, HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP This printer needs binary plugin to work: http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/laserjet/hp_laserjet_professional_m1212nf_mfp.html You can install print/hplip-plugin and play with it (not sure if it works), or install print/foo2zjs which provides open source driver for this printer. Max From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 11:08:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830B6D90 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446E81287 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E72BDC2E; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:07:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F09AEBDC25; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:07:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D061D6125; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:07:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9867EFAAE; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:07:53 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Jens K. Loewe" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Requesting Bitbucket support Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========D6AB1CBB044BDB2012DC==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:08:00 -0000 --==========D6AB1CBB044BDB2012DC========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +--On 2 juin 2015 12:26:22 +0200 "Jens K. Loewe" wrote: | Seeing that GitHub found its space in bsd.*.mk, I'd like to suggest | adding support for the "other big" VCS hosting service Bitbucket too. A | lot of really nice projects, including some of mine, are hosted there. :-) Github has been here for about three years now, I don't really have an interest in bitbucket, feel free to provide patches. :-) -- Mathieu Arnold --==========D6AB1CBB044BDB2012DC========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVbY6JXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85ICeUP/0xEIQhWPPyricme3B6A0Y+i W8RhIlkbkyaSu/ooG4DAnXeDzbr126CUsoH94iss0MOLyNdk4UwHCvMj4gPhW6NS Nn8nZQru5O6xT6Qj0r40evVP6fY/l2WsLJNre0VemH1RScBIGs9VoMzNfSustPf1 j8zYwNN6c8BXO9Y91b7D6l4rN6uS5ha2j31y48Br9PSO30/u9IfN7G5jQP5SOgEs Rwo7Wvfvtt3ma5lRiqPVzyKYj59OLa7PozCaSGajthVbKRRR5L+uK5S6NgKO0b3m FS0ZjLozTJcLbxTyb+b9rPD53bRczW0RQAtnjVBcVwyfrbNmECmuUv8WNUT4NwyY OVN7htfsicU9aaf5B1a1iQCptHR51nHkJpdzFqgmg2GeTU9QGM3cUPvBDKr8+lw+ bsdMFy/NWZncwrTFIpcxwiiu591Wo06lxK7AFpEQeH3kVunE/PXKBWZqdZJ2HbUs ZCbF4lh1mxpNyFefvHRuF+6xcdGkS2uESjn7n8F9MpwC+bL2WNYK36VdMgbE3R/X KdW/k9Yn+6R6DMLfTw9LA4tAr+1BgfRQJcvVnk4F9eYS7fbKZVYx0cW/QDoC7aOL dYDBtsF7b7RW8WOD4/fu93JnUtOTVssao+XtGUxql4VqnPfSakTXNKHcP3gCRFnP 7RQwkRKuCrnoIuE90hTQ =YPu8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========D6AB1CBB044BDB2012DC==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 11:27:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904BB195 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrickhess@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D2517C5 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrickhess@gmx.net) Received: from desk8.phess.net ([95.88.11.237]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mg3Vt-1YlEBH3Fg5-00NQNB; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:27:42 +0200 From: Patrick Hess To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:27:41 +0200 Message-ID: <2323011.3jCvCUZvQ4@desk8.phess.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.2; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: <9329.71691.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4321846.9hHPBs9sCR@desk8.phess.net> <9329.71691.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:p2oE2AQzj0SRCNGYJWsTVDKCRT7iOC9d8F1O43tpOS3j1R+rZbO xjIacM66YCYYLUq9noS6F6qyJRIWqHn/rrrK1CQ7+Vc+E6A5MZKg8EipYh4Wx19UdDzC5MQ TV3Y+RGLUp7+ziRr4IQEezxAATrtZuYQPKhS/Y8c9Hncp9L9UJNyyWKANn4QxbuP3oLxPq2 xQrlUDlGpAPPtCfrCiD4Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:27:54 -0000 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I get Idle: Filter failed > on http://localhost:631 status page. Just looked up the data sheet and it seems like this "professional" printer doesn't even understand PostScript. Instead, it requires a filter that converts the PostScript used within the printing systems on any *nix box to whatever the printer can handle. I would assume that hplip did install the necessary filter, but either CUPS can't find it or the filter itself has an issue. One of the various log files in /var/log/cups might provide some more detailed information on what exactly is going on in the background. By the way, this is the exact reason why I don't buy printers without PostScript support any more. Getting this whole filter mess set up feels like an unnecessary pain that can easily be avoided by spending a few extra bucks. That's not of much help to you right now, of course, but maybe something to consider the next time you're looking to get a new printer. > But it still seems that /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin in FreeBSD, > or /usr/pkg/sbin and /usr/pkg/bin in NetBSD, should properly be at the > front of the path I just deleted /usr/bin/lpr and /usr/bin/lp on my systems. Certainly not the proper way to handle things, so don't tell anybody... ;-) Patrick From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 11:59:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53FCF65D; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [71.179.14.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exodus.zi0r.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D27D1EF7; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045CAB90E8; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:51:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zi0r.com Received: from exodus.zi0r.com ([127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id ART7FwjAhczA; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:51:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (syn.zi0r.com [71.179.14.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A72B1B90DA; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:51:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:51:17 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz To: Bryan Drewery Cc: Adam McDougall , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files Message-ID: <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:59:08 -0000 Adam, Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files directory and should resolve the error you saw. https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' -r On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my systems. >> Thanks. >> > >Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. > >> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh512(void) >> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh1024(void) >> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh2048(); >> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); >> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); > >The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols. > > >-- >Regards, >Bryan Drewery > -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 15:01:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4A4526; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (hill.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38071E34; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from hill (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A022426E3; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:01:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by hill (hill.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J4U6XgmTkfvg; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:01:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EGR authenticated sender mcdouga9 Message-ID: <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:01:17 -0400 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Steinmetz , Bryan Drewery CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> In-Reply-To: <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:01:28 -0000 It still didn't work. Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes and using them as if they were for much larger dh. When I do google searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers. Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me. On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > Adam, > > Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files > directory and should resolve the error you saw. > > https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c > > You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' > > -r > > On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my >>> systems. >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. >> >>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh512(void) >>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>> *get_dh1024(void) >>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh2048(); >>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); >>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); >> >> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols. >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Bryan Drewery >> > > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 15:07:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BFAE53; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [71.179.14.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exodus.zi0r.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CCD21FCD; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED210B90EA; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:07:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zi0r.com Received: from exodus.zi0r.com ([127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id G-rlO_1pel-E; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:07:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (syn.zi0r.com [71.179.14.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48551B90D8; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:07:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:07:02 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz To: Adam McDougall Cc: Bryan Drewery , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files Message-ID: <20150602150702.GB62387@exodus.zi0r.com> References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:07:06 -0000 Adam, Does this work for you with openssl? I'm unable to re-create this on my side, but I'm also not testing with libressl. It isn't simply renaming them. There's a perl script that gets called at build time that generates everything. During the build phase, you should see a pair of messages indicating that it is generating the two DH param files. It should take a few minutes. The reason for the "rename" is to allow the search/replace magic in the perl to search/replace. Please send me the full build log. -r On (06/02/15 11:01), Adam McDougall wrote: >It still didn't work. Cannot load >/usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: >/usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" > >Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes >and using them as if they were for much larger dh. When I do google >searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers. >Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me. > >On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >> Adam, >> >> Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files >> directory and should resolve the error you saw. >> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c >> >> You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' >> >> -r >> >> On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>>> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my >>>> systems. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >>> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. >>> >>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh512(void) >>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>> *get_dh1024(void) >>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh2048(); >>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); >>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = get_dh3072(); >>> >>> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Bryan Drewery >>> >> >> >> > -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 15:12:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3723243A for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6721220 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: by oihd6 with SMTP id d6so127978985oih.2 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=muNx06Ojz3yHLCg2vLAC2oCf+cdAKf7oVaGMSpG9vR4=; b=RbzogI2/AhBEicBz115atQPmKBKFW8OPR89x0X0InddgYemkB8DE2/oKfl5kWoDr9d lZpPdcYTCJipJB71hMOZAer+amYTXDnCeYc0+W+zFEw9bm3Km/WwtHU+5ttqOoc5+DJH /kBjB4yStJTbQ2rL0S82UDAb51GNMDRUWYUyotD/MFQJsGon2uwgpuhgwyKGeXqVs6Hi ODUnfp9Yldb/RNjYPhRVmrQkGc1HPeAgJLRGMI6liXBOfvcZmeg99gatCZGZbLr/O9bv Kgdhuas28IskhgL7tYvuTlinumwuH7cuWgeXt9JCEuQHOX6EG48fnxWK6wdLHVSqDiHC kpaw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.165.103 with SMTP id yx7mr23001984oeb.28.1433257932116; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.80.79 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:12:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150523153029.B7BD3280@hub.freebsd.org> <1432659389.3130746.278522905.6D1E6549@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150527174037.EF719B11@hub.freebsd.org> <556746A4.4090208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:12:11 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New pkg audit / vuln.xml failures (php55, unzoo) From: Robert Simmons To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:12:13 -0000 On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> I think the VUXML database needs to be simpler to contribute to. Only a >> handful of committers feel comfortable touching the file. We have also >> had the wrong pervasive mentality by committers and users that the vuxml >> database should only have an entry if there is a committed fix. This is >> totally wrong. These CVE are _already public_ in all of these cases. >> Users deserve to know that there is a known issue with a package they >> have installed. I can understand how the mentality grew to what it is >> with some people, but the fact that there is not an update doesn't >> change that the user's system is insecure and needs to be dealt with. If >> the tool can't reliably report issues then it is not worth trusting. >> TL;DR; the file needs to be simpler. I know there is an effort to use >> CPE but I'm not too familiar with where it is going. >> >> As for maintainers tracking upstream mailing lists, this is hard. I'm >> subscribed to a lot of lists and can't keep up with all of the traffic. >> >> The RedHat security team and reporting is very impressive. Don't forget >> that they are a funded company though. Perhaps the FreeBSD Foundation >> needs to fund a fulltime security officer that is devoted to both Ports >> and Src. Just the Ports piece is easily a fulltime job. > > It seems from this thread that we have a group of people who are > passionate enough about fixing this problem. > > How do we find out who the members of the Ports Secteam are? Once we > know that, I'd say that at least some of the people on this thread are > willing to join the Ports Secteam (myself included). How do we join > the team? > > Once the team has new and energized members, I would envision the team > then working through the problems that have been outlined in this > thread and putting together a plan for fixing them. Crickets..... May I ask again: How do we find out who the members of the Ports Secteam are? How do we join the team? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 15:17:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAB0AE8 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sg063015@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC5A512F3 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sg063015@gmail.com) Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so106737369lbb.2 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wrDQuF9Nzq2dK1pnObELN7s2Hv76TQYEIg7C6nrA4HA=; b=HUG+PhpE8NU5gu8TdxcnqTYdSkUX9Ao1yxWpCz19d30OCpen5Gin7PKeujXP2K1X/M zTO7Byk2Q7N4zmXHD0FLqtWomW0Y5NnTy/y+KS/w6CSTNuXsDkZ8ag3m7OXHPsdffF4W l0BrZUaiiZ6dY2th8S1lm+GAOr4e6GNwtmZaklM4p5yHI9AxhQz/YBmq7UIWtFhN3/Ob MZnGDcWwd7YxO6db6C93Zoe003mpdbtVDt4PmKfrzy4GTDH/zKV+zZ5cYxDGAkEauL+L 92XkFnX2gCm26iposolorXx766X377zpeaS6h36WivGWNZoPIRw9XZ9v7neh+BmXrTWZ DCUA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.88.99 with SMTP id bf3mr26152087lab.97.1433258265813; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.29.129 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.29.129 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:17:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Cairo fails to build From: Stan Gammons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:17:48 -0000 While trying to build a port that has Cairo as dependency, Cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz gives a SHA256 checksum error when I try to build it. I tried updating the ports tree and gets the same results. Is this a known problem? Stan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 15:45:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323B2AF1; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zoon01@nas4free.org) Received: from delivery.mailspamprotection.com (se8.mailspamprotection.com [108.163.220.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FDF1DC9; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zoon01@nas4free.org) Received: from ns1.am5.siteground.biz ([181.224.133.24] helo=serv01.am5.siteground.biz) by se8.mailspamprotection.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YznJF-0005YL-1l; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:36:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nas4free.org; s=dkim; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=oU2dTJBM1EIgqy8WJtY5SRxjshB3xI6N4DKskflMgqc=; b=n+pS6XMFGqFKGD4TXv0hhVHTS4Elc9HQ27ZEySGrUCjyDYwrnxlOzU49v4RbMVP6sxs1CKEVoi9OFRDYi6QUr3YSmDeXdPuO7lb2ShblWYkGDU72kQu/b2mOT8Muxsn5vrWuGCRZl8plTuM/BAsXAjjJBMdzgs3wB2wuKgw8s2s=; Received: from [94.211.250.49] (port=49281 helo=PC01) by serv01.am5.siteground.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YznJK-0005pI-BE; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:36:58 -0500 From: "zoon01" To: Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Port: xmlstarlet-1.5.0 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:36:49 +0200 Message-ID: <002801d09d41$8fa191f0$aee4b5d0$@nas4free.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdCdQUuX3KFXMWp5Q4iwaukSOmyhmg== Content-Language: nl X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - serv01.am5.siteground.biz X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nas4free.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: serv01.am5.siteground.biz: none X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIVqa5c0N9B9MQfEPtZGCWS6fNqR1UXuTVU1LTEFBiMjf26IlzXkBXaQC rbm9oXFH0dC62IKrZEI9Em+OwtVn4WGrk/czyPpgjOuBSKUUVeXhko5b8S0PejVa4O108liDh602 KUTyNMgJxALHgMrfQ7BTxt8FK0syZM78Ip6XMJKSpOCZ0akjVWk1Ph76BtTweBxwEiTVJqDh0qKo KsXx5lnVnmFUMCK60ZrYEXX6/T3xAniQg5CosFz86icmw/IUVYs87CAVasyMsk8Q32hMO6iohSRe n0swyEiTd4gL8GGVeA6scZZwpzkCo4WoBCri0ifXl9lIaAjo6H7iBQ0XkVAjeik9zKKpb7fSkp/e CB5zm2iWlNWnHou+mDTspmznPDtHcZarVgqE6GxfUmAf0CevJtFF8Kt14cGRkBg5e2xE1p5nQnG6 A8RKfCGGEuMSqL2iDWzfmbDUT7kbHcV5O6UHjQgFbdBlQwgQvJ2ZkcC8FyrtVW4KaRSURqFyxA+5 h5RcmokoAkENTmnXlNKNyiQFoc8XCvVOr48ZheYvwlBLbeEbjX0NQYDeGANJStK9zUhC0MRqfpsR cu+CJPm/m5mceXZNG0EUbELA0uv9YhdOXHFvnZNrbYwqRgrOIQ5LXCCqyJTUtLbcvHIHPnZeViIE G6ie5yspCvltdWIGn3w+GAP8VURju/iVoh1Mnx34oL4JDWjYNWm86UnZOO133cgbwVX99ABFVwbn 9YX0Sq+5 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine.mailspamprotection.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJb0kolOUiviGeQyDsBgQ6PBA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+Poh38tEMU4IgC4sNz49qn3HHnhRv/ZJ3kEy8bfiAr+Fb/UpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaX2p Mk7LBarWD9Fj4R3eIu5amSKkALoA6KDzkQ8jq89Qglr+eUaqsXi6ilYykBRNmy1w3rhXI7ypWHcC zReLskSoC1jzfYuYzO5TaopJL1l0EkXKTCB9mgAH2nNvM1GFDcH5C2MO7hTENZJE35bUvwA= X-Originating-IP: 181.224.133.24 X-SpamExperts-Domain: am5.siteground.biz X-SpamExperts-Username: 181.224.133.24 Authentication-Results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=181.224.133.24@am5.siteground.biz X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:45:10 -0000 Hi, I see this port is still an old version, Can you please upgrade to upstream release 1.6.1 Regards, zoon01 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 16:13:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0DB398 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E731686 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AA633C1D; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:13:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4EAE53985F; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:13:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Stan Gammons Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cairo fails to build References: Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:13:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stan Gammons's message of "Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:17:45 -0500") Message-ID: <44a8wiozpf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:13:56 -0000 Stan Gammons writes: > While trying to build a port that has Cairo as dependency, > Cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz gives a SHA256 checksum error when I try to build it. > I tried updating the ports tree and gets the same results. Is this a known > problem? No. Checking the obvious: you've refetched the distfile, right? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 16:15:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A524A455 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69D2E16A1 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Yzor6-0001CS-Gv; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:15:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 18:15:56 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: zoon01 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: xmlstarlet-1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150602161556.GO2495@home.opsec.eu> References: <002801d09d41$8fa191f0$aee4b5d0$@nas4free.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002801d09d41$8fa191f0$aee4b5d0$@nas4free.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:15:58 -0000 Hello, > I see this port is still an old version, > > Can you please upgrade to upstream release 1.6.1 Can you provide a patch and submit it to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 16:29:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7524C96C for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sg063015@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC2719D7 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sg063015@gmail.com) Received: by lbcmx3 with SMTP id mx3so108077400lbc.1 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LtjfM1SwwhKKKIRIXpIyLOe0Z47JZTTNAQRoEAU8nPU=; b=XKSsAAUVhbyebKPqR1kWeTx7UL9Ip3jhSWvPJXmOG1Kg+xp1u4NBB67cBE7vjmmGGJ +5orip+NdaVP9tUsGJU+0l2enc9NX90RT9MLGPKswOx2pQYKmaPH9p7uigz8yJYcNkr4 /keyz/d2VwtOTlJVJhBV8VCEgQb7WnWwLbxs5ONPzmWIHgCR/pT1fR8S0DHr6s1xk3O6 VIoo208puLbsQP0J2GLgYf/lssDoTRQpxEbJSHf9uSLimkyFBT9JA/zGlfsXlZ/VVm8Y WjOVqdxIxF8BfT5h93xpQ81HmWTbSm5YakfUjLv8js5WVfGXX2+9TfsxeKMdduo9aAdR hBDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.162 with SMTP id u2mr26440221lag.22.1433262586674; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.29.129 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.29.129 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44a8wiozpf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44a8wiozpf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:29:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cairo fails to build From: Stan Gammons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:29:49 -0000 On Jun 2, 2015 11:13 AM, "Lowell Gilbert" < freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > > Stan Gammons writes: > > > While trying to build a port that has Cairo as dependency, > > Cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz gives a SHA256 checksum error when I try to build it. > > I tried updating the ports tree and gets the same results. Is this a known > > problem? > > No. > > Checking the obvious: you've refetched the distfile, right? I did a portsnap fetch then portsnap update. When I do a make install, fetching cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz takes a really long time for some reason. Is there another source for it besides http://cairographics.org/releases/cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz ? Stan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 19:02:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBAB581C; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61C010CE; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from boomhauer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBCB4F093; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by boomhauer (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K2RbWIXxiO5q; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EGR authenticated sender mcdouga9 Message-ID: <556DFDD1.8030404@egr.msu.edu> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:02:41 -0400 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Steinmetz CC: Bryan Drewery , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> <20150602150702.GB62387@exodus.zi0r.com> In-Reply-To: <20150602150702.GB62387@exodus.zi0r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:02:51 -0000 Thank you for the tip and the explanation. I found out what was causing the difference. With libressl, the openssl gendh command no longer accepts -rand because it assumes your random has sufficient quality to start with: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.18&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18 http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.25&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25 I don't know if there is a worthwhile benefit to using -rand with openssl on supported FreeBSD versions. I took $rand out of these lines and now apache works fine: +system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh2048.pem 2048"); +system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh3072.pem 3072"); On 06/02/2015 11:07, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > Adam, > > Does this work for you with openssl? I'm unable to re-create this on my > side, but I'm also not testing with libressl. > > It isn't simply renaming them. There's a perl script that gets called > at build time that generates everything. During the build phase, you > should see a pair of messages indicating that it is generating the two > DH param files. It should take a few minutes. > > The reason for the "rename" is to allow the search/replace magic in the > perl to search/replace. > > Please send me the full build log. > > -r > > On (06/02/15 11:01), Adam McDougall wrote: >> It still didn't work. Cannot load >> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: >> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" >> >> Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes >> and using them as if they were for much larger dh. When I do google >> searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers. >> Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me. >> >> On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>> Adam, >>> >>> Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files >>> directory and should resolve the error you saw. >>> >>> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c >>> >>> You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' >>> >>> -r >>> >>> On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>>>> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my >>>>> systems. >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. >>>> >>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>> *get_dh512(void) >>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>> *get_dh1024(void) >>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>> get_dh2048(); >>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>> >>>> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 >>>> symbols. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Bryan Drewery >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 19:19:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06CA525B; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [71.179.14.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exodus.zi0r.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4B21474; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6497CB90EA; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:19:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zi0r.com Received: from exodus.zi0r.com ([127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id aOeRO2e9VH6n; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:19:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (syn.zi0r.com [71.179.14.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45FD1B90E8; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:19:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:19:41 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz To: Adam McDougall Cc: Bryan Drewery , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files Message-ID: <20150602191941.GA56844@exodus.zi0r.com> References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> <20150602150702.GB62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DFDD1.8030404@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556DFDD1.8030404@egr.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:19:47 -0000 Adam, I've updated my patch once more. Please confirm. https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c This removes the -rand bits and fixes the search/replace stuff. -r On (06/02/15 15:02), Adam McDougall wrote: >Thank you for the tip and the explanation. I found out what was causing >the difference. With libressl, the openssl gendh command no longer >accepts -rand because it assumes your random has sufficient quality to >start with: > >http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.18&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18 > >http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.25&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25 > >I don't know if there is a worthwhile benefit to using -rand with >openssl on supported FreeBSD versions. I took $rand out of these lines >and now apache works fine: >+system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh2048.pem 2048"); >+system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh3072.pem 3072"); > >On 06/02/2015 11:07, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >> Adam, >> >> Does this work for you with openssl? I'm unable to re-create this on my >> side, but I'm also not testing with libressl. >> >> It isn't simply renaming them. There's a perl script that gets called >> at build time that generates everything. During the build phase, you >> should see a pair of messages indicating that it is generating the two >> DH param files. It should take a few minutes. >> >> The reason for the "rename" is to allow the search/replace magic in the >> perl to search/replace. >> >> Please send me the full build log. >> >> -r >> >> On (06/02/15 11:01), Adam McDougall wrote: >>> It still didn't work. Cannot load >>> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: >>> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" >>> >>> Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes >>> and using them as if they were for much larger dh. When I do google >>> searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers. >>> Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me. >>> >>> On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>>> Adam, >>>> >>>> Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files >>>> directory and should resolve the error you saw. >>>> >>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c >>>> >>>> You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' >>>> >>>> -r >>>> >>>> On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>>> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>>>>> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my >>>>>> systems. >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. >>>>> >>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>>> *get_dh512(void) >>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>>> *get_dh1024(void) >>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>> get_dh2048(); >>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>> >>>>> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 >>>>> symbols. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Bryan Drewery >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 19:45:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDD9C63; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BC51B99; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from boomhauer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545CD4D0A7; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:45:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by boomhauer (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vSuWiKlIvq0m; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EGR authenticated sender mcdouga9 Message-ID: <556E07E1.2070101@egr.msu.edu> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:45:37 -0400 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Steinmetz CC: Bryan Drewery , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> <20150602150702.GB62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DFDD1.8030404@egr.msu.edu> <20150602191941.GA56844@exodus.zi0r.com> In-Reply-To: <20150602191941.GA56844@exodus.zi0r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:45:41 -0000 That is exactly what I am using right now, so it works. Thanks. On 06/02/2015 15:19, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > Adam, > > I've updated my patch once more. Please confirm. > > https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c > > This removes the -rand bits and fixes the search/replace stuff. > > -r > > On (06/02/15 15:02), Adam McDougall wrote: >> Thank you for the tip and the explanation. I found out what was causing >> the difference. With libressl, the openssl gendh command no longer >> accepts -rand because it assumes your random has sufficient quality to >> start with: >> >> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.18&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >> >> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18 >> >> >> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.25&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >> >> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25 >> >> >> I don't know if there is a worthwhile benefit to using -rand with >> openssl on supported FreeBSD versions. I took $rand out of these lines >> and now apache works fine: >> +system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh2048.pem 2048"); >> +system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh3072.pem 3072"); >> >> On 06/02/2015 11:07, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>> Adam, >>> >>> Does this work for you with openssl? I'm unable to re-create this on my >>> side, but I'm also not testing with libressl. >>> >>> It isn't simply renaming them. There's a perl script that gets called >>> at build time that generates everything. During the build phase, you >>> should see a pair of messages indicating that it is generating the two >>> DH param files. It should take a few minutes. >>> >>> The reason for the "rename" is to allow the search/replace magic in the >>> perl to search/replace. >>> >>> Please send me the full build log. >>> >>> -r >>> >>> On (06/02/15 11:01), Adam McDougall wrote: >>>> It still didn't work. Cannot load >>>> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: >>>> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" >>>> >>>> Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes >>>> and using them as if they were for much larger dh. When I do google >>>> searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers. >>>> Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me. >>>> >>>> On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>>>> Adam, >>>>> >>>>> Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files >>>>> directory and should resolve the error you saw. >>>>> >>>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c >>>>> >>>>> You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' >>>>> >>>>> -r >>>>> >>>>> On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>>>> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>>>>>> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my >>>>>>> systems. >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. >>>>>> >>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>>>> *get_dh512(void) >>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>>>> *get_dh1024(void) >>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>>> get_dh2048(); >>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>>> >>>>>> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 >>>>>> symbols. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Bryan Drewery >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 19:55:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67384F44; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [71.179.14.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exodus.zi0r.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5CA1DB8; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zi@freebsd.org) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC00DB90E7; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:55:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zi0r.com Received: from exodus.zi0r.com ([127.0.0.1]) by exodus.zi0r.com (exodus.zi0r.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id ySPaIYuq3jTH; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:55:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from exodus.zi0r.com (syn.zi0r.com [71.179.14.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by exodus.zi0r.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B3B8B90EA; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:55:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:55:20 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz To: Adam McDougall Cc: Bryan Drewery , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files Message-ID: <20150602195520.GB56844@exodus.zi0r.com> References: <20150531132958.GB1034@egr.msu.edu> <556CB6C8.2070103@FreeBSD.org> <20150602115116.GA62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DC53D.8000208@egr.msu.edu> <20150602150702.GB62387@exodus.zi0r.com> <556DFDD1.8030404@egr.msu.edu> <20150602191941.GA56844@exodus.zi0r.com> <556E07E1.2070101@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556E07E1.2070101@egr.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:55:24 -0000 Changes committed. Thanks. -r On (06/02/15 15:45), Adam McDougall wrote: >That is exactly what I am using right now, so it works. Thanks. > >On 06/02/2015 15:19, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >> Adam, >> >> I've updated my patch once more. Please confirm. >> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c >> >> This removes the -rand bits and fixes the search/replace stuff. >> >> -r >> >> On (06/02/15 15:02), Adam McDougall wrote: >>> Thank you for the tip and the explanation. I found out what was causing >>> the difference. With libressl, the openssl gendh command no longer >>> accepts -rand because it assumes your random has sufficient quality to >>> start with: >>> >>> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.18&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >>> >>> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18 >>> >>> >>> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c?rev=1.25&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >>> >>> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/apps/Attic/gendh.c.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25 >>> >>> >>> I don't know if there is a worthwhile benefit to using -rand with >>> openssl on supported FreeBSD versions. I took $rand out of these lines >>> and now apache works fine: >>> +system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh2048.pem 2048"); >>> +system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh3072.pem 3072"); >>> >>> On 06/02/2015 11:07, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>>> Adam, >>>> >>>> Does this work for you with openssl? I'm unable to re-create this on my >>>> side, but I'm also not testing with libressl. >>>> >>>> It isn't simply renaming them. There's a perl script that gets called >>>> at build time that generates everything. During the build phase, you >>>> should see a pair of messages indicating that it is generating the two >>>> DH param files. It should take a few minutes. >>>> >>>> The reason for the "rename" is to allow the search/replace magic in the >>>> perl to search/replace. >>>> >>>> Please send me the full build log. >>>> >>>> -r >>>> >>>> On (06/02/15 11:01), Adam McDougall wrote: >>>>> It still didn't work. Cannot load >>>>> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: >>>>> /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048" >>>>> >>>>> Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes >>>>> and using them as if they were for much larger dh. When I do google >>>>> searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers. >>>>> Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me. >>>>> >>>>> On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>>>>> Adam, >>>>>> >>>>>> Please test the following patch. It should be placed in the files >>>>>> directory and should resolve the error you saw. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c >>>>>> >>>>>> You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' >>>>>> >>>>>> -r >>>>>> >>>>>> On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>>>>>>> Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my >>>>>>>> systems. >>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>>>>> *get_dh512(void) >>>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH >>>>>>>> *get_dh1024(void) >>>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>>>> get_dh2048(); >>>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>>>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c: dh = >>>>>>>> get_dh3072(); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 >>>>>>> symbols. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Bryan Drewery >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 19:56:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFABFF8 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@ignoranthack.me) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0981DCE for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@ignoranthack.me) Received: from [192.168.200.214] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92411193656 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <556E0A7A.5010704@ignoranthack.me> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:56:42 -0700 From: Sean Bruno Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NodeJS on ARM References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:56:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 06/01/15 23:14, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering what are the missing bits and pieces to get nodejs > running on ARM? Still get the error from ports on a RPI2 running > CURRENT. > > - Matthias _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Right now, www/node is marked as i386/amd64 only in ports. So, someone would need to test and implement whatever changes are required to get a functional version on this architecture. sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVbgp6XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kclgIAIs59eEHB3gbsEycTedne6OU IqpmlnCB0Gbduj5oHxjDGFdpUnVKH6zF8HXRzb+cTzyhEt1NINqlKHvQtHhsbKUE q+XUCtLWwu9tdWwiAipsLmhtwvbgsw++DqrPtzBwRYb7iDL0WLOFkBbuBml/fyfO tI7mejPoITAfa4Q829yCHiE8NNylsOpy72l/mDkp/98aVrFhBCAS1v+uZu6B4aI8 YY/Xl0ujsfojdaYproQiJ+6v0wzhAtLvfQbxtCxUES25dtO6ysIOaiGiW70BBZeX GkNGEvf+CbgBSIWTcoQBJeOf0UUAMvdbUMd8V7SaRcv9QN0vODYIeacnhOjMkUs= =bc8b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 20:18:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 079FD484 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from teparybean2.exetel.com.au (teparybean2.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC100127C for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from phasia.kd.net.au ([220.233.10.47]) by teparybean2.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yzsdx-0007XQ-LT for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:18:37 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (unknown [120.146.8.15]) by dermis.kd (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D126CDA8 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:18:37 +1000 (EST) Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t52KIZv1026200 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:18:36 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t52KIYWu026163 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:18:35 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:18:34 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Conflict with pkgconf/pkg-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 20:18:40 -0000 On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Ben Woods wrote: > This entry from /usr/ports/UPDATING has your answer: > > 20120726: AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config AUTHOR: bapt@FreeBSD.org > devel/pkg-config > has been replaced by devel/pkgconf # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf > devel/pkg-config or # portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\* pkgng: # > pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf # pkg install -f devel/pkgconf Whoo-hoo! Thanks; that did the trick. I would've been lying in a hospital bed at the time, with various electrodes and tubes attached to me, very little interest in the world, and my server switched off... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 21:24:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588985D0 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 21:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22FF01355; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 21:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t52LOi7O036596; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 21:24:44 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F418C3E; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 21:24:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id XcCKQloPCM03; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 21:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <556E1F1D.1090308@FreeBSD.org> DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com CC2758C3B Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:24:45 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Horsfall , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Conflict with pkgconf/pkg-config References: In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ccXhS1ARJuGJqOriLB1lbm7Dnew0pl1mw" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 21:24:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ccXhS1ARJuGJqOriLB1lbm7Dnew0pl1mw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/2/2015 3:18 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Ben Woods wrote: >=20 >> This entry from /usr/ports/UPDATING has your answer: >> >> 20120726: AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config AUTHOR: bapt@FreeBSD.org >> devel/pkg-config >> has been replaced by devel/pkgconf # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf >> devel/pkg-config or # portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\* pkgn= g: # >> pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf # pkg install -f devel/pkgco= nf >=20 > Whoo-hoo! Thanks; that did the trick. >=20 > I would've been lying in a hospital bed at the time, with various=20 > electrodes and tubes attached to me, very little interest in the world,= =20 > and my server switched off... >=20 I'm not kidding when I say you should just uninstall all packages, upgrade the base system/kernel and then reinstall packages from scratch. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --ccXhS1ARJuGJqOriLB1lbm7Dnew0pl1mw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVbh8dAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPbJcH/iC1hCNfxcfLvuMz1fR9iv1o OVAMsfnXz5uSgFXaRpEe6nKvFJFKHvZATbWYyJWSe0AUUcOKx916nqvPkP5IAwPe ZytthrQSrUEEpGv1+XrtmlPS42YoX9M15HNgRdYW/d6ImfEn9WWdrtm3zQS4OAGx 1I3B8oJIRpZkxp3f8vRgzDhSNn/kesE+BwjjCN9eL8uwxrPvCNFeP/yXcVS9uqt+ aF2Xon0GYS1mDRXDOIQKrTclFaSlUyw0UhmY0g8M3T+v5ORx/utVIeQTtkcEPZQ5 qCMwOIV9Nty2KDFI+BDccOFleUaQigznEbb/JekCz9hYeEpqNRGDB8ygHmBv/jY= =WPlW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ccXhS1ARJuGJqOriLB1lbm7Dnew0pl1mw-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 22:11:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D955140 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from teparybean2.exetel.com.au (teparybean2.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBEC1E94 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from phasia.kd.net.au ([220.233.10.47]) by teparybean2.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YzuPI-0000KW-TA for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:11:36 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (unknown [120.146.8.15]) by dermis.kd (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C32DCDA8 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:11:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t52MBX1b086714 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:11:36 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t52MBXBh086711 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:11:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:11:33 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Conflict with pkgconf/pkg-config In-Reply-To: <556E1F1D.1090308@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <556E1F1D.1090308@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 22:11:39 -0000 On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Bryan Drewery wrote: > I'm not kidding when I say you should just uninstall all packages, > upgrade the base system/kernel and then reinstall packages from scratch. Yeah, I'm starting to see some subtle problems when upgrading the ports tree, with missing shared libraries etc. I was hoping to stave off that process pending arrival of my new server and 10.1 from scratch, but I really want to get CUPS going; forwarding my mail to Gmail and printing via my browser is the pits... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 03:38:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA8FFF2E for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 03:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm18-vm10.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm10.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B0081A2A for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 03:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1433302519; bh=TOozTaBkxaiovGgMJEpM+3DA6pdW1Mi13ss1qlBLSUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=rbiodQw4Ivzn+NTz92KuMNBpsLoAKM/jztyoOrCt0/3P87ts+N7nK8UflqdwykdkUIMeQfTSyozZVUXbWTlchuF4HVnEX3LZgds5HJEAmGbc3JtSCt+F+yk2lW8PJJzrnHompSC9VpIQWU4ctT7Yo8wJd+9qPFfcSyJCfKnQ8D9hMpRSgVuJRVviLY2q673VDgrLbG1VXap0WqCY1o1fdnqqvJBPNXzUwayLhh+q9Qo4WTlhC7WtYgbrynNEfxZr3i4TL2WVItGP/ARxbSzBbmi5YFlVbGWKUsa/XI0aqWuYY+e9NUdesPQPG2WXVLGmRf6v3zLG9WuQvuyhuQD5mw== Received: from [66.196.81.156] by nm18.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2015 03:35:19 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.99] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2015 03:35:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2015 03:35:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 544000.23949.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <544000.23949.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: INAZ3.oVM1mSyiG8_skIkBajn_gq3puzbX8hJm3Dxd4.6TP Yb_5FwtwKPKmNxIAwDck8DEgwH7YwslIb5fbqCAXFhAf5yGEkiZE6wim5Bbp 9QQ.bOqc25HoJZ22yXWATcDvrKS1CaPe_MGVTpEsTrVYSGgmSjWjatl2be2o KeUaN5ieZuXx63.VgyqO3MR1HLIbduT5seGtJWQ4E8i5mwHcE1GLeveOSmn6 KeE5c4UaSImwFUq81efmhjKq_VJz_z3ki2hv1Pgg1dl5m2Mnz7oPy1MTuRAg 6Pvc1esB4_vNgzDXvSARab6vAOvrwbhxQPAo5XaeTMwy.oYci1aMgzw7EXFX M8K__VSUwJFHgkwRozMlimS28BoJ.eHOZDVFjbkrVncDPnIbYjyqDQoANsOH YhT8pW.joloLJQ4Hx9hkf7YP7hvJzXr8Hnt7f5WllWGw_PuqlkkldUkeUMIi Rm.mggp0kXd.0w9.lO_I3ODGf3vUlhL741N4RFlbpZoAaNzSaRWOPnm0_uT6 WAdOH39mrQ6tHrkYYTPq4rei1fQQVxfRrGJNaQ2H3fRYhNtQ7MRoCSmbsLXo hl1Okrw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 03:34:37 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4321846.9hHPBs9sCR@desk8.phess.net> <2166876.6zk2LzEg5t@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> <2323011.3jCvCUZvQ4@desk8.phess.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 03:38:28 -0000 from Max Brazhnikov: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I have printer, HP_LaserJet_Professional_M1212nf_MFP > This printer needs binary plugin to work: > http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/laserjet/hp_laserjet_professional_m1212nf_mfp.html > You can install print/hplip-plugin and play with it (not sure if it works), or install print/foo2zjs which provides open source driver for this printer. I've been painfully aware of the need for binary plugin. I intend to avoid such a printer in the future, also not buy anything from HP. I installed print/hplip-plugin, which I can no longer find on the web, but could still not get past hpcups filter that failed. I also installed print/foo2zjs, but that only converts the data. hpcups filter would still play Berlin Wall. Now I know not to waste time trying to install print/foo2zjs for NetBSD. from Patrick Hess: > Just looked up the data sheet and it seems like this "professional" > printer doesn't even understand PostScript. Instead, it requires a > filter that converts the PostScript used within the printing systems > on any *nix box to whatever the printer can handle. I would assume > that hplip did install the necessary filter, but either CUPS can't > find it or the filter itself has an issue. One of the various log > files in /var/log/cups might provide some more detailed information > on what exactly is going on in the background. > By the way, this is the exact reason why I don't buy printers without > PostScript support any more. Getting this whole filter mess set up > feels like an unnecessary pain that can easily be avoided by spending > a few extra bucks. That's not of much help to you right now, of course, > but maybe something to consider the next time you're looking to get a > new printer. I need to be more careful when shopping for my next printer. Requirements are working with standard interface, standard pdf or PostScript, no proprietary plugin, no HP. I'd like both USB, Ethernet, and wi-fi, though that won't work if binary plugins or corrupted version of PostScript get in the way. > > But it still seems that /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin in FreeBSD, > > or /usr/pkg/sbin and /usr/pkg/bin in NetBSD, should properly be at the > > front of the path > I just deleted /usr/bin/lpr and /usr/bin/lp on my systems. Certainly not > the proper way to handle things, so don't tell anybody... ;-) You don't have to do that. Just put /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin at the head of the path, or /usr/pkg/sbin:/usr/pkg/bin for NetBSD. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 04:34:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F85F71D for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 04:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C362E1781 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 04:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from dark.mountain2sea.com (cpe-98-122-46-16.sc.res.rr.com [98.122.46.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E1B11142D for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 00:30:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <556E83CE.2020209@bangj.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 00:34:22 -0400 From: Tom Pusateri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Help with new port with multiple downloaded files from github Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 04:34:32 -0000 I'm trying to build a new port (libchromiumcontent) which requires multiple files to be downloaded from github. If I create a Makefile with each individual account and tag, the fetch works fine. But when I try to combine multiple downloads into a single Makefile, I get a "not found" error for the first download. I think the ? is getting passed to the shell and it isn't even trying to do the download. The 2nd Makefile below shows the working version that only contains a single download. root@dark:/home/pusateri/ports/www/libchromiumcontent # make ===> libchromiumcontent-43.0.2357.65 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found _MASTER_SITES_freebsd-chromium=https://codeload.github.com/gliaskos/freebsd-chromium/tar.gz/418e996e3a?dummy=/: not found *** Error code 127 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/home/pusateri/ports/www/libchromiumcontent Here is the Makefile that doesn't work. Any clue what I'm doing wrong? root@dark:/home/pusateri/ports/www/libchromiumcontent # cat Makefile # Created by: "Tom Pusateri" # $FreeBSD$ PORTNAME= libchromiumcontent PORTVERSION= 43.0.2357.65 DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v DISTVERSIONSUFFIX= 1 CATEGORIES= www MAINTAINER= pusateri@bangj.com COMMENT= Shared library build of Chromium's Content module USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= atom:libchromiumcontent \ gliaskos:freebsd-chromium GH_PROJECT= libchromiumcontent:libchromiumcontent \ freebsd-chromium:freebsd-chromium GH_TAGNAME= ${DISTVERSIONPREFIX}${PORTVERSION}-${GH_ACCOUNT}-${DISTVERSIONSUFFIX}:libchromiumcontent \ 418e996e3a:freebsd-chromium CFLAGS+= -isystem${LOCALBASE}/include RUN_DEPENDS= xdg-open:${PORTSDIR}/devel/xdg-utils BUILD_DEPENDS= bash:${PORTSDIR}/shells/bash \ ${LOCALBASE}/share/usbids/usb.ids:${PORTSDIR}/misc/usbids \ yasm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/yasm LIB_DEPENDS= libcups.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups-client \ libevent.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libevent2 \ libexif.so:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/libexif \ libFLAC.so:${PORTSDIR}/audio/flac \ libharfbuzz.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/harfbuzz \ libicuuc.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/icu \ libjpeg.so:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/jpeg \ libjsoncpp.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/jsoncpp \ libnspr4.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/nspr \ libpci.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libpci \ libpng16.so:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/png \ libre2.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/re2 \ libsnappy.so:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/snappy \ libspeechd.so:${PORTSDIR}/accessibility/speech-dispatcher \ libspeex.so:${PORTSDIR}/audio/speex \ libwebp.so:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/webp \ libxml2.so:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/libxml2 \ libxslt.so:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/libxslt USES= python:2 pre-configure: cd ${WRKSRC} && ./autogen.sh .include Here is the individual Makefile that works fine for freebsd-chromium: PORTNAME= chromium PORTVERSION= 418e996e3a CATEGORIES= www MAINTAINER= pusateri@bangj.com COMMENT= Shared library build of Chromium's Content module USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= gliaskos GH_PROJECT= freebsd-chromium GH_TAGNAME= ${PORTVERSION} From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 11:45:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD001AF5 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC3S22.hotmail.com (blu004-omc3s22.hotmail.com [65.55.116.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932AA1C2D for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP251 ([65.55.116.73]) by BLU004-OMC3S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 04:44:20 -0700 X-TMN: [inXPP5b8IJzi198Ls+BInfzMvplBQOQP] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 07:44:17 -0400 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print In-Reply-To: <544000.23949.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4321846.9hHPBs9sCR@desk8.phess.net> <2166876.6zk2LzEg5t@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> <2323011.3jCvCUZvQ4@desk8.phess.net> <544000.23949.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2015 11:44:19.0425 (UTC) FILETIME=[A081C510:01D09DF2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:45:28 -0000 The problem has nothing to do with proprietary drivers, etcetera but rather the extremely fractured system of printing on non MS Windows based systems. I have had extensive conversations with representatives from Brother and while they do include PPD's and other assorted files for some of their printers, they claim it is just not financially feasible to do so for all their products, ie, scanners, copiers, etcetera due to the multiple platforms that they would be required to support. They need only support one when working with MS Windows, If the *nix community would come together and devise one consistent printing system, they would be inclined to support it. They informed me that due to the way FreeBSD likes to due things differently than anyone else, they would never in all likely hood support it directly. This is not a problem with the manufacturers, it is a fundamental flaw in the way *nix handles printers, copiers, FAX machines, scanners, etcetera. You might want to check out this URL: Specifically this portion for starters: PDF is the standard print job format from CUPS 1.6.x on All important desktop applications (GTK/GNOME, Qt/KDE, LibreOffice/OpenOffice.org, Firefox, Thunderbird, ...) send print jobs in PDF and not in PostScript any more by default. In addition, a complete CUPS filter chain to process print jobs in PDF is available and used. -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 13:30:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA343F7 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@vfemail.net) Received: from vfemail.net (ninezero.vfemail.net [96.30.253.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441441606 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@vfemail.net) Received: (qmail 59846 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2015 13:29:57 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 3 Jun 2015 13:29:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 93534 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2015 08:09:09 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 93530, pid: 93532, t: 0.0032s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO smtp102-2.vfemail.net) (172.16.100.62) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 3 Jun 2015 08:09:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 11519 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2015 08:09:09 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 11493, pid: 11513, t: 0.7149s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO nil) (amJlaWNoQHZmZW1haWwubmV0@172.16.100.27) by 172.16.100.62 with ESMTPA; 3 Jun 2015 08:09:09 -0000 From: Jan Beich To: Tom Pusateri Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with new port with multiple downloaded files from github References: <556E83CE.2020209@bangj.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:08:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <556E83CE.2020209@bangj.com> (Tom Pusateri's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2015 00:34:22 -0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:30:10 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making a slave of it? Tom Pusateri writes: > PORTVERSION=3D 43.0.2357.65 > DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3D v > DISTVERSIONSUFFIX=3D 1 According to the project's releases page 43.0.2357.65 ends in either =2Datom or -atom-1, not just 1. > root@dark:/home/pusateri/ports/www/libchromiumcontent # make > =3D=3D=3D> libchromiumcontent-43.0.2357.65 depends on file: > /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > _MASTER_SITES_freebsd-chromium=3Dhttps://codeload.github.com/gliaskos/fre= ebsd-chromium/tar.gz/418e996e3a?dummy=3D/: > not found > *** Error code 127 [...] > USE_GITHUB=3D yes > GH_ACCOUNT=3D atom:libchromiumcontent \ > gliaskos:freebsd-chromium MASTER_SITE_${group} is implemented via sh(1) that supports limited set of characters of in variable names of which - (hyphen) isn't one. So, try replacing :freebsd-chromium with :freebsd_chromium. > GH_PROJECT=3D libchromiumcontent:libchromiumcontent \ > freebsd-chromium:freebsd-chromium > GH_TAGNAME=3D > ${DISTVERSIONPREFIX}${PORTVERSION}-${GH_ACCOUNT}-${DISTVERSIONSUFFIX}:lib= chromiumcontent > \ > 418e996e3a:freebsd-chromium No need to put PORTNAME-derived GH_PROJECT under a separate group as it'd add a duplicate unless USE_GITHUB=3Dnodefault. Try instead GH_ACCOUNT=3D atom gliaskos:freebsd_chromium GH_PROJECT=3D freebsd-chromium:freebsd_chromium GH_TAGNAME=3D 418e996e3a:freebsd_chromium=20=20 $ make fetch-urlall-list MASTER_SITE_BACKUP=3D https://codeload.github.com/atom/libchromiumcontent/tar.gz/v43.0.2357.65-= atom-1?dummy=3D/atom-libchromiumcontent-v43.0.2357.65-atom-1_GH0.tar.gz https://codeload.github.com/gliaskos/freebsd-chromium/tar.gz/418e996e3a?d= ummy=3D/gliaskos-freebsd-chromium-418e996e3a_GH0.tar.gz Hmm, freebsd-chromium-418e996e3a tracks 42.0.2311.135. I don't think mixing patches for different *major* chromium versions is going to work. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVbrYCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREQjQ0MzY3NEM3RDIzNTc4NkUxNDkyQ0VF NEM3Nzg4MzQ3OURCRERCAAoJEOTHeINHnb3bl78IAMSJuRx75mMo7UsrPK+73cQr gYVmQ0oxAzjJm+rvLOXPcC7fyn4ZuK+OGKwLATnDSlRC+uCXgKcfhwmRnPXNfby0 wBEeWS3lARH2iGw3FpeBAxlxBQNl2m62YXAfDyR3CuYtg2STYeWuRAG/I9H7nlOZ VNXOaL8HOgHhEFGeVh8FOLSFIS52NfpktWNimBr3AdLQg3PYTUzmFPTOeQNPz3qy GzaKnqrmmq+qsXaY34Ejff+R//MPQ89OMIKjNCYz2/8L55O+fwynEQ1TvFVk3VEM 28BtjZGF2N7lQpWrd0eT+kqOBHHFgyz3gHKZtw2DzVJ19e23+NrcnOBz1n14hUE= =WwYJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 13:40:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E708C830 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sg063015@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CB5C1889 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sg063015@gmail.com) Received: by labko7 with SMTP id ko7so8358205lab.2 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FnnUWlaW1qjP1piM0zbu4Oefp3NKgznk+N86yVjSgig=; b=qUo5GtSiGAJCTGTRmaWl12BS/w5VliQHf6oXyOVYQzjZXHrSlIsUw5yv7u6vUu1zGs VEPGsZLynB/fakfS5TA8BiDvLnXug4wNWf6j2MINsPAntUJX2sGLLHJYYQRUlcUFmuU1 heuLmVyX5A71fTiz4XQZfo0KL/0/VS2+KvoR/tOFvG1acXciBH9kUsnMzi0u1uhbQH9h /YtDh+CKN2tU7IPzrIgQ5QULiAoWCKI5fQ3WSVJH7ThdZKgHiuO+Q0WHfzyTKWNqLpbL wXvopABEMIqHUvIwVfSRKu5Jp+J5lsBaobV48/CoXapoatacZtQow/k3q19UqWSoc+LV 1YsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.44.166 with SMTP id f6mr32201890lam.86.1433338824310; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.29.129 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.29.129 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:40:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <44a8wiozpf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:40:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cairo fails to build From: Stan Gammons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:40:27 -0000 On Jun 2, 2015 11:29 AM, "Stan Gammons" wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2015 11:13 AM, "Lowell Gilbert" < freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > > > > Stan Gammons writes: > > > > > While trying to build a port that has Cairo as dependency, > > > Cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz gives a SHA256 checksum error when I try to build it. > > > I tried updating the ports tree and gets the same results. Is this a known > > > problem? > > > > No. > > > > Checking the obvious: you've refetched the distfile, right? > > I did a portsnap fetch then portsnap update. > > When I do a make install, fetching cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz takes a really long time for some reason. Is there another source for it besides http://cairographics.org/releases/cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz ? > > Stan > > I think I found the problem. It looks like the download was being corrupted when I tried to fetch the file from home. When I downloaded the file using a browser from work, the SHA256 checksum and filesize match the SHA256 checksum and filesize listed in distinfo. Strange that the download was getting corrupted... Stan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 15:05:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3926864C for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@vapurda.co.uk) Received: from host.icepro.asia (unknown [IPv6:2a00:1838:20:1::6863:bd2e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFD71E92 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:05:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@vapurda.co.uk) Received: from adminPC (unknown [182.68.232.114]) by host.icepro.asia (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 43CCC6B12 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 10:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: From: "Lily Lang" To: Subject: Follow up Email !! Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 20:32:53 +0530 Organization: info@vapurda.co.uk Message-ID: <1efa01d09e0e$c054d460$40fe7d20$@co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdCeCgYePz8Jvd+bRjqw1p+zNbKFmw== Content-Language: en-us x-cr-hashedpuzzle: QEk= AF4p A579 BqGh Ch3k Eb4l E2Nc FBnZ F0yT GMb7 HHE4 H/ZO Jd/X K669 LQW5 LbYU; 1; ZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAtAHAAbwByAHQAcwBAAGYAcgBlAGUAYgBzAGQALgBvAHIAZwA=; Sosha1_v1; 7; {7BDF9C8B-C987-4A36-B18B-53456CB4D3B5}; aQBuAGYAbwBAAHYAYQBwAHUAcgBkAGEALgBjAG8ALgB1AGsA; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:59:25 GMT; RgBvAGwAbABvAHcAIAB1AHAAIABFAG0AYQBpAGwAIAAhACEA x-cr-puzzleid: {7BDF9C8B-C987-4A36-B18B-53456CB4D3B5} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:05:43 -0000 Hi,:- freebsd-ports@freebsd.org My name is Lily Lang and I am Business Development Executive. I would like to inform you that now you can hire dedicated staff from India which would cost you low and increase your bottom line. The staff will work dedicatedly on your projects 8 hours a day, 22 days a month. There are no long term contracts. Minimum is one month. We do offer Paid Trial for 15 days. We offer following staff. You can choose any based on your requirements: 1: PHP Programmers . Core PHP . MySQL . Opensource Platforms like Wordpress, Joomla, Magento, Zend Framework, Code Ignitor, etc. . AJAX . Javascript . Web Services . Phonegap . Content Management System . Website Securities 2: Dot Net Programmers . ASP, C#, Dot Net . MS SQL . Content Management System. Ecommerce Websites on Windows Platform . Travel Portal Development . Payment Gateways Integration . Kentico Programming . Dot Net Nuke Programming . Able Commerce Programming . Third Party APIs Integration . Web Services Programming . MVC Architecture . Sales Force . Quickbooks . ERP Systems The programmers will have more than 2 years of experience in same field and would be available on Skype/Emails for 8 hours a day. You can interview the staff before selecting any staff. Apart from this you can also hire the staff on 15 days a month in which staff will work for 8 hours a day and 15 days a month dedicatedly for you. Kindly let me know if you are interested, i would be happy to provide you further details. Looking forward for a positive response. Thank & Regards, Lily Lang Business Development Executive `In case you are not interested in receiving these emails then you have the option to stop receiving them. To unsubscribe just write "remove" and for report abuse just write "abuse" in mail subject and reply to this email. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 15:54:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116D9CB2; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2B01B84; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by wibdt2 with SMTP id dt2so18440621wib.1; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aXTBDPmJ9qp/UNdGSYdaGewfZgcX7IyOGQMhR1laxkI=; b=cSQFXDAPajRLi0mVzn5T0COefokzZnapMn1BrhHcuCf6Z4RFg1mIHjOSrmNGQY/35+ Wg2IKfAcIea1njfGMdsqlz56FOPrw+siKNIOFmbtREhRNxv6sonEmvO5nV7Y9k4m87Cq 8FPNwwHaTH+8utSYBtQ5Qxz3XNIMEX7t9fiW9E50ai6S4XZ4b/elOQBEWn15U5PyE/hB yYwIy2KwpC39WGgg7cVviTv42TGRgkt8MKw/NoAAFSnNShtqsSMjy8SD2efei8/NI/kS ZPEaciZ/OU+YO1LICicEGsYpQWYPIKPrRlcGdy2GseFT8u/OjKVk0GzJXBzNKNb38Ptp OBOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.198.166 with SMTP id jd6mr41892878wic.48.1433346847158; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.61.215 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 23:54:07 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: net/samba41 4.1.18 fails to build with MAKE_JOBS From: Ben Woods To: FreeBSD ports , timur@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:54:09 -0000 Since net/samba41 was updated to 4.1.18, it has been failing to build in poudriere with MAKE_JOBS (when /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf has ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES=samba*). The issue is a stage-runaway (====>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output). The failing poudriere logs for version 4.1.18 with MAKE_JOBS can be found here: http://woodsb02.no-ip.org/poudriere/data/101amd64-default/2015-06-02_01h00m00s/logs/errors/samba41-4.1.18.log However, if I do not allow MAKE_JOBS, then 4.1.18 builds fine: http://woodsb02.no-ip.org/poudriere/data/11amd64-default/2015-06-03_22h00m32s/logs/samba41-4.1.18.log Version 4.1.17 used to build fine with MAKE_JOBS: http://woodsb02.no-ip.org/poudriere/data/101amd64-default/2015-05-20_01h00m00s/logs/samba41-4.1.17.log Any ideas? If it makes any difference, poudriere will be using 8 parallel jobs when MAKE_JOBS is allowed. Regards, Ben From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 18:42:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167856D for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6817176B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from [172.16.21.112] (cpe-98-122-46-16.sc.res.rr.com [98.122.46.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66AB211503; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Help with new port with multiple downloaded files from github Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9FE074A0-B7BA-4541-9338-24DB6A988DFF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Tom Pusateri In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:42:43 -0400 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: References: <556E83CE.2020209@bangj.com> To: Jan Beich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:42:34 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_9FE074A0-B7BA-4541-9338-24DB6A988DFF Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jan Beich wrote: >=20 > Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making > a slave of it? I didn=E2=80=99t know about slave ports. I don=E2=80=99t see much about = them in the Porter=E2=80=99s handbook. Any docs on them? I=E2=80=99ll = gladly do this whatever is the best way. >=20 > Tom Pusateri writes: >=20 >> PORTVERSION=3D 43.0.2357.65 >> DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3D v >> DISTVERSIONSUFFIX=3D 1 >=20 > According to the project's releases page 43.0.2357.65 ends in either > -atom or -atom-1, not just 1. >=20 Ok, I changed that. >> root@dark:/home/pusateri/ports/www/libchromiumcontent # make >> =3D=3D=3D> libchromiumcontent-43.0.2357.65 depends on file: >> /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> = _MASTER_SITES_freebsd-chromium=3Dhttps://codeload.github.com/gliaskos/free= bsd-chromium/tar.gz/418e996e3a?dummy=3D/: >> not found >> *** Error code 127 > [...] >> USE_GITHUB=3D yes >> GH_ACCOUNT=3D atom:libchromiumcontent \ >> gliaskos:freebsd-chromium >=20 > MASTER_SITE_${group} is implemented via sh(1) that supports limited = set > of characters of in variable names of which - (hyphen) isn't one. So, > try replacing :freebsd-chromium with :freebsd_chromium. Yes, that fixes my download problem. >> GH_PROJECT=3D libchromiumcontent:libchromiumcontent \ >> freebsd-chromium:freebsd-chromium >> GH_TAGNAME=3D >> = ${DISTVERSIONPREFIX}${PORTVERSION}-${GH_ACCOUNT}-${DISTVERSIONSUFFIX}:libc= hromiumcontent >> \ >> 418e996e3a:freebsd-chromium >=20 > No need to put PORTNAME-derived GH_PROJECT under a separate group as > it'd add a duplicate unless USE_GITHUB=3Dnodefault. Try instead >=20 > GH_ACCOUNT=3D atom gliaskos:freebsd_chromium > GH_PROJECT=3D freebsd-chromium:freebsd_chromium > GH_TAGNAME=3D 418e996e3a:freebsd_chromium Yes, that simplifies things. > $ make fetch-urlall-list MASTER_SITE_BACKUP=3D > = https://codeload.github.com/atom/libchromiumcontent/tar.gz/v43.0.2357.65-a= tom-1?dummy=3D/atom-libchromiumcontent-v43.0.2357.65-atom-1_GH0.tar.gz > = https://codeload.github.com/gliaskos/freebsd-chromium/tar.gz/418e996e3a?du= mmy=3D/gliaskos-freebsd-chromium-418e996e3a_GH0.tar.gz >=20 > Hmm, freebsd-chromium-418e996e3a tracks 42.0.2311.135. I don't think > mixing patches for different *major* chromium versions is going to = work. Right. I was grabbing tags from multiple sources and not paying = attention to that yet. Fixed. Thanks for the help. This works now and the versions match. PORTNAME=3D libchromiumcontent PORTVERSION=3D 43.0.2357.65 DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3D v DISTVERSIONSUFFIX=3D -atom-1 CATEGORIES=3D www MAINTAINER=3D pusateri@bangj.com COMMENT=3D Shared library build of Chromium's Content module USE_GITHUB=3D yes GH_ACCOUNT=3D atom gliaskos:freebsd_chromium GH_PROJECT=3D freebsd-chromium:freebsd_chromium GH_TAGNAME=3D b715e82:freebsd_chromium Thanks! Tom --Apple-Mail=_9FE074A0-B7BA-4541-9338-24DB6A988DFF Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVb0qkAAoJEPk0GMVmUuYML9sH/iz+BDqwN9UuqW56It1+0Kgd xPHR863lnhWPJ9dF3QKupXfPUg3/QOF83baocB/lFaFTA6VaW+rguieP5fUSDc1T DOx4Rtl+Rqsss09/Pu5yEioao5yZhBIXs3/DMhPEQamVYjHc8d5QRYictUq31Es9 M8EJOhbhTc5UIzA0M8brit+Ag4haOYlABJmENeHdVIejfRVK2yHxekVtgDe9GRVQ rB7DEXOPknUKa3vn6n+OfY3f2bRzOx8zZbSwwNxx8GD1wP6MEU2OsBBf/CJJKHVp ayl22NWZbsSfAeljxzW5yx09SyEb4Xkz269dwETo1GBolMGCUaViVTyZUtz8Jyk= =rqFr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_9FE074A0-B7BA-4541-9338-24DB6A988DFF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 19:15:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8551F3 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D921E9C for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from [172.16.21.112] (cpe-98-122-46-16.sc.res.rr.com [98.122.46.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81C281150E; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:11:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Help with new port with multiple downloaded files from github Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_997DA820-5CF5-46DD-A436-B154B047BF33"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Tom Pusateri In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:15:54 -0400 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <93645E5D-FA3C-49D0-8D68-08C9EB2D0C7E@bangj.com> References: <556E83CE.2020209@bangj.com> To: Jan Beich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:15:44 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_997DA820-5CF5-46DD-A436-B154B047BF33 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Jun 3, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jan Beich wrote: >>=20 >> Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making >> a slave of it? >=20 > I didn=E2=80=99t know about slave ports. I don=E2=80=99t see much = about them in the Porter=E2=80=99s handbook. Any docs on them? I=E2=80=99l= l gladly do this whatever is the best way. Never mind. I found Chapter 6. Thanks, Tom --Apple-Mail=_997DA820-5CF5-46DD-A436-B154B047BF33 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVb1JqAAoJEPk0GMVmUuYMH3sIAOVn3jXO0bSiP59aJs2tiBkF IT6GyEAyVpRJWoQnJ9n4KXSF8CTdRGHHVzItqiIRkOIFS44KhH6diLn8++MSJBNg kvDyn/fCJOAUDdcePTV02fyHQ448Bj3tpAT/MTbWMu3UT2PyeOj2Cw4H8d+V4Cjo +5L3+mJd5E8QvPwH6OdUI3mGfq2W3SKQlhAsoh9Ux3Xbipl2+PcnMWdlHQLw2YGo Whh2tOqw9RahJq8aC72DcAgmfj+e3qp77dbGW+hbhHz3JlUv188O5Rryw0OOBvYj x4+ISvmbJLATTdY0q9FGBeeTvukJfT7ucI34zPmubV0Zms8MgIgsojncubAhBSc= =s+ay -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_997DA820-5CF5-46DD-A436-B154B047BF33-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 02:39:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE3A0831 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 02:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE10316BB for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 02:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=/VsFlOL44oeCl122IK9u7aKI+6yW6NF05pB9HzoxFtY=; b=Dx8T5QZ5CuDIRvQP386ojhXNNQ6ZGe4tKADTSTDRULGl0bHx5bT2SK9YBA/ohwjAL9Nq63R3PnESkM5pzpyOw0Wm9MPPDlLCrSnQ/PsVNVAGXq1oxkeopWzwCrLteJtKrG/9IfCqFj8L2Q9nFXx/bxm5vILPQRlrAbxWhspB3x4=; Received: from [114.124.35.247] (port=39678 helo=B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0L47-001fkx-42 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 20:39:31 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:39:25 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: make clean differs between machines/jails Message-ID: <20150604103925.72aaff66@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 02:39:33 -0000 Hi, I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results. Here is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using the same ports tree: Outside a jail: =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for libiconv-1.14_8=20 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for gettext-tools-0.19.4=20 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for gettext-runtime-0.19.4 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for indexinfo-0.2.3 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for expat-2.1.0_2 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for joe-4.0,1 =46rom inside a jail: =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for aspell-0.60.6.1_5 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for joe-4.0,1 Does anybody know why it is like this? Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 04:12:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B09A83F7 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 04:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC001DC5 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 04:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t544CZVF062108 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:12:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <20150604103925.72aaff66@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> References: <20150604103925.72aaff66@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: make clean differs between machines/jails Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:41 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <9844a2486fe3e7d75a8f56510916aded@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:12:43 -0000 On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:39:25 +0800 Erich Dollansky wrote > Hi, > > I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results. Here > is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using the same > ports tree: > > Outside a jail: > > ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.14_8 > ===> Cleaning for gettext-tools-0.19.4 > ===> Cleaning for gettext-runtime-0.19.4 > ===> Cleaning for indexinfo-0.2.3 > ===> Cleaning for expat-2.1.0_2 > ===> Cleaning for joe-4.0,1 > > >From inside a jail: > > ===> Cleaning for aspell-0.60.6.1_5 > ===> Cleaning for joe-4.0,1 > > Does anybody know why it is like this? I don't know I can say for sure. But is it possible that the list outside the jail had not been built/installed before. Whereas those listed outside the jail, had already been built/installed before inside the jail? Meaning; if the port had already been built/installed before, it wouldn't show up in the "cleaning" list. --Chris > > Erich > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 05:41:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB07B401 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 05:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A827710F1 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 05:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=/Mt5h24TMM43BTkqt8hJp6A+gWWfiRTHS6BLxeCbLwU=; b=t3I8LHI6plJHN0VBG27TdWeYarjHdtTUr3K3ZBJ6jjC8zMtdrvuNOSdDqfB9LKaDYERaNH1YPiGUBSnHglr44PL2z+Ej9mRHxRIs0spCDQx+Iiw/m2KyPIuqEa3gj5lapO/S0eE+gysnGiYCRTpYH5kDJ0S6OGJo/lMhH5DvU7k=; Received: from [114.124.35.247] (port=62247 helo=B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0NuG-003OkE-6B; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:41:32 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:41:27 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Chris H" Cc: Subject: Re: make clean differs between machines/jails Message-ID: <20150604134127.279f19ab@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <9844a2486fe3e7d75a8f56510916aded@ultimatedns.net> References: <20150604103925.72aaff66@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <9844a2486fe3e7d75a8f56510916aded@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 05:41:34 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:41 -0700 "Chris H" wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:39:25 +0800 Erich Dollansky > wrote > > > I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results. > > Here is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using > > the same ports tree: > > > > > > Does anybody know why it is like this? > I don't know I can say for sure. But is it possible that the > list outside the jail had not been built/installed before. > Whereas those listed outside the jail, had already been > built/installed before inside the jail? > > Meaning; if the port had already been built/installed before, > it wouldn't show up in the "cleaning" list. > makes sense. I assume now that a port shows up when its 'work' directory exists. Do you know more about it? Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 08:36:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69887F60; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:36:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp205.alice.it (smtp205.alice.it [82.57.200.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B16F1BE4; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.27.173) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 5556215305C4C79A; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:29:55 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t548Trqp039132; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:29:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <55700C81.40704@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:29:53 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Portupgrade a jail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:36:00 -0000 Hello. Is it possible to run portupgrade from the base system, while addressing a jail? I see some threads about this, but they all go back to the pre-pkgng era. To me it look like "pkg -r /usr/jail/xxx" works, but I don't see any way to make portupgrade pass this option along. Then again, I think portupgrade, having it's onw databases, needs more than that... In any case I'd like to avoid the need to install N+1 copies of portupgrade and its dependencies on a system with N jails. Is there any way to achieve this? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 09:41:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D22709 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from cargobay.net (cargobay.net [198.178.123.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1170D1C65 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cblmdm72-240-160-19.buckeyecom.net [72.240.160.19]) by cargobay.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47DF42A for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:32:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chad J. Milios" Subject: Would a committer please commit my update to net-p2p/namecoin? Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 05:31:35 -0400 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:41:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193534 = has a txz attachment of my latest version (now at 0.3.80) which contains = directories namecoin and namecoin-daemon (please add namecoin-daemon = port while updating namecoin port.) Be sure the files which no longer = exist in the port get deleted from the ports tree (patches which were = upstreamed). Thank you= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 06:40:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EFD5615 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlndipi@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC3S37.hotmail.com (blu004-omc3s37.hotmail.com [65.55.116.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9C41E90 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlndipi@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP51 ([65.55.116.72]) by BLU004-OMC3S37.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 23:38:59 -0700 X-TMN: [jCKt8WoRqUMvZlBhWsioqlSgKrNkyVVB] X-Originating-Email: [nlndipi@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:08:17 +0430 From: Ali To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2015 06:38:56.0862 (UTC) FILETIME=[21D247E0:01D09E91] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:18:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 06:40:06 -0000 SGVsbG8sIApJJ3ZlIGJlZW4gd29ya2luZyBvbiBmcmVldnJycGQgYW5kIGkgc3VjY2VkZWQgdG8g bWFrZSBpdCBydW5uaW5nLiBCdXQgbm93IGkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyBob3cgdG8gbWFrZSBtYXN0ZXIg YW5kIGJhY2t1cCBzY3JpcHRzLiBJIGNvdWxkbid0IGZpbmQgYW55IHNhbXBsZSBhbnl3aGVyZS4g Q2FuIHlvdSBoZWxwIG1lPyAKClNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBTb255IFhwZXJpYeKEoiBzbWFydHBob25l From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 11:50:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D35636 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04DCC1C58 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0TfM-000Eaf-8K; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:50:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:50:32 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Chad J. Milios" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Would a committer please commit my update to net-p2p/namecoin? Message-ID: <20150604115032.GC49099@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:50:34 -0000 Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193534 I had a look at it. Right now it depends on WANT_BDB_VER= 48 which This port is deprecated; you may wish to reconsider installing it: Please migrate to db5 or db6. It is scheduled to be removed on or after 2015-05-31. Any idea whether 6 would be OK ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 12:00:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4EE7BC3 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE851F38 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so122371720wib.1 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 05:00:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v2rM5gJnATghkIP7Fs9aaMCS+6z12QAdV9HFoWdg1IY=; b=n27FlSh/Ju1+BB7buioillYjSP1mKOhvX/ObuXToVMp/Qm7DmLKvD41okUmjDk/izk UnbjJXie+eahhsxXZdhrJgJaEG4HAE6L1oIcrQaRPcYqNQqYzvqJEqzgrD5Hf/xpuQyP H+n5XyJX6EpdEM2s0b51voPm4Zpm9alumamMKczBjyTIXJETQUlMRrULJbIcu7dv/hUg okecH34BcoY/JcUiE0f4o7i8b50EEp3MAl0RtARsF7irV/bsw7NIWMkw4DfMcnQLGPDz f5SLaZPkU1d+9VuVQCzhYL3FJ8aELxDkf02sLEj2Dh8X3AbdpWZlJcrg2W39DqECQqo1 FpHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.81.194 with SMTP id c2mr7080666wiy.94.1433419227493; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 05:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.178.95 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 05:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:00:27 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Would a committer please have a look at my update to databases/sql-developer? From: Michael Zhilin To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:00:30 -0000 Hi, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200054 has patch to update of SQL Developer to version 4.1. Ticket has been created 1 month ago, and today I've been asked about plans to update port to latest version. Ticket contains portlint & poudriere test, patch is simple. Thank you! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 12:07:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355ADE14 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D814C10A8 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Tvg-000Ecq-Rl; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:07:24 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:07:24 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Chad J. Milios" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Would a committer please commit my update to net-p2p/namecoin? Message-ID: <20150604120724.GD49099@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150604115032.GC49099@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150604115032.GC49099@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:07:25 -0000 Hi! > Any idea whether 6 would be OK ? A test build with db6 on 10.1pX amd64 builds namecoin. I have not tested it. Can you test if it works with db6 ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 13:54:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096C78BF for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel@morante.net) Received: from venus.morante.net (venus.morante.net [63.247.147.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA2D1BF5 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel@morante.net) Received: from saturn.morante.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by venus.morante.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F73E1B008 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:48:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at morante.net Received: from venus.morante.net ([127.0.0.1]) by saturn.morante.com (saturn.morante.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ytg0SESGs0cB for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:48:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (my-room.morante.com [192.168.0.2]) by venus.morante.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85906E1B00D for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:48:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=morante.net; s=default; t=1433425725; bh=QwKKzFqHgmyfxcATjy69dRZEsCgXC64O2e+XlNQqhkw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=rvMNegdW8+wNkHJwsHn92xPI00M11FNMfF1HPhRfzqT38gozPeqcvYMbwTyjahGNV 2yXbZYalexfJZtVyiwW82Eq7dq0RSP/vCMUpfK89I6yYgOjnv5pxFH4yJ9AysuEYB8 vtdgzqi2GF3jMIUuEZG6vsq2oBLp6hBRbaJa7XxE= Message-ID: <557056E5.5010702@morante.net> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:47:17 -0400 From: Daniel Morante User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd ports Subject: FreeBSD net-p2p/digitalcoin port Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030607020305040900090802" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:54:36 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030607020305040900090802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I was looking to use the Digitalcoin and see I has not been updated in a = while. I tried contacting the current maintainer directly with no luck.=20 Now I am attempting via the ports mailing list. The current port is not usuable since the blockchain had a hard fork. I = had to make an updated version of the port and it can bee seen at: https://github.com/tuaris/FreeBSD-Coin-Ports/tree/master/ports/digitalcoi= n I've tested it on FreeBSD 10 and 9.3 http://pkg.morante.net/poudriere/data/93amd64-default-wallets/latest-per-= pkg/digitalcoin-3.0.1.0.log Thank You --------------ms030607020305040900090802 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMYDCC BiQwggUMoAMCAQICAwyOUzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNV BAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRl IFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlh dGUgQ2xpZW50IENBMB4XDTE1MDExMTAzNDM0NVoXDTE2MDExMjE2MDczMVowQDEbMBkGA1UE AwwSZGFuaWVsQG1vcmFudGUubmV0MSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJkYW5pZWxAbW9yYW50ZS5u ZXQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDn180MFxYtK9tkY6LsQ9OoM9mB NHMkBycXD5GBbbc/nHjRGnCJSjQMhnUDpuOlACdWdjikGn5IhxmQnLeU4899gRR+sN1PyZiK 67XQXRPd4QLma4+HsnOqdaEc0DTUrpvGMWaB9o6b+k1ILNZJmSkdtw1LLZHD0Bc9lEYFnAnW OvXRhntgsEZKyIDAT91vomIPr2USoY8Dh67fEkXmQpWiyagQiKRgSn9eqBmKpzgI9uY8G76i A1zkpRcqK7nbpcGYTzQ8RXE+GT65rVgct2kgnIWOaqulyH+YZUT1dfdmHsUFwV5yVLRrT+bl 6WToJn+oo1/n1mbmpWAPdYhdct4NAgMBAAGjggLYMIIC1DAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMAsGA1UdDwQE AwIEsDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFEGp2R9dlVNz gU9+A5ADguVv5lY2MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFFNy7ZKc4NrLAVx8fpY1TvLUuFGCMB0GA1UdEQQW MBSBEmRhbmllbEBtb3JhbnRlLm5ldDCCAUwGA1UdIASCAUMwggE/MIIBOwYLKwYBBAGBtTcB AgMwggEqMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRm MIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAD AgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVkIGFjY29yZGluZyB0byB0aGUgQ2xh c3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRDb20gQ0EgcG9saWN5 LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9zZSBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNl IG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjA2BgNVHR8ELzAtMCugKaAnhiVo dHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEFBQcBAQSBgTB/ MDkGCCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2NsYXNzMS9jbGll bnQvY2EwQgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRzL3N1Yi5j bGFzczEuY2xpZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNv bS8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAFmcddqdzsLv4Rsg4vhuK5daLn+stNYqyCbUEHyKU3zE MDF3wAK3nfWwQNf+pJ9gq7o8Gf5I0wTieJgbGvuwm5XDr3zbfjJXbv9mlzTsIK240mZI+B5W kv4qt6Wus2tn2KXG7rpJiERt5ba50bNxsbiFNMkJQUnRekr1i6/mOf29plwMxt0mrMcVqQkL 8gBL+Xy6TD9Vq2hdtLPRCC3WkuUE33kDpVJl8Te11eiAJxxM+Ye9UHb2VuRrKiVeOUXB03+d SyzN+rlYzlayAg3RTi28X8OZrk0N1KQ6LXnmPoU+P8LCXSNpe7ESN5Pl9JLfNdLWPI73Szev Fz9biAKYnMUwggY0MIIEHKADAgECAgEeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAklM MRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0 aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMSkwJwYDVQQDEyBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhv cml0eTAeFw0wNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaFw0xNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEW MBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlm aWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVy bWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDHCYPM zi3YGrEppC4Tq5a+ijKDjKaIQZZVR63UbxIP6uq/I0fhCu+cQhoUfE6ERKKnu8zPf1Jwuk0t svVCk6U9b+0UjM0dLep3ZdE1gblK/1FwYT5Pipsu2yOMluLqwvsuz9/9f1+1PKHG/FaR/wpb fuIqu54qzHDYeqiUfsYzoVflR80DAC7hmJ+SmZnNTWyUGHJbBpA8Q89lGxahNvuryGaC/o2/ ceD2uYDX9U8Eg5DpIpGQdcbQeGarV04WgAUjjXX5r/2dabmtxWMZwhZna//jdiSyrrSMTGKk DiXm6/3/4ebfeZuCYKzN2P8O2F/Xe2AC/Y7zeEsnR7FOp+uXAgMBAAGjggGtMIIBqTAPBgNV HRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3Ltkpzg2ssBXHx+ljVO 8tS4UYIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvvGqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwZgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEWjBY MCcGCCsGAQUFBzABhhtodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2EwLQYIKwYBBQUHMAKG IWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNydDBbBgNVHR8EVDBSMCegJaAjhiFo dHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuc3Rh cnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNybDCBgAYDVR0gBHkwdzB1BgsrBgEEAYG1NwECATBmMC4GCCsG AQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQGCCsGAQUFBwIB FihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB BQUAA4ICAQAKgwh9eKssBly4Y4xerhy5I3dNoXHYfYa8PlVLL/qtXnkFgdtY1o95CfegFJTw qBBmf8pyTUnFsukDFUI22zF5bVHzuJ+GxhnSqN2sD1qetbYwBYK2iyYA5Pg7Er1A+hKMIzEz cduRkIMmCeUTyMyikfbUFvIBivtvkR8ZFAk22BZy+pJfAoedO61HTz4qSfQoCRcLN5A0t4Dk uVhTMXIzuQ8CnykhExD6x4e6ebIbrjZLb7L+ocR0y4YjCl/Pd4MXU91y0vTipgr/O75CDUHD RHCCKBVmz/Rzkc/b970MEeHt5LC3NiWTgBSvrLEuVzBKM586YoRD9Dy3OHQgWI270g+5MYA8 GfgI/EPT5G7xPbCDz+zjdH89PeR3U4So4lSXur6H6vp+m9TQXPF3a0LwZrp8MQ+Z77U1uL7T elWO5lApsbAonrqASfTpaprFVkL4nyGH+NHST2ZJPWIBk81i6Vw0ny0qZW2Niy/QvVNKbb43 A43ny076khXO7cNbBIRdJ/6qQNq9Bqb5C0Q5nEsFcj75oxQRqlKf6TcvGbjxkJh8BYtv9ePs XklAxtm8J7GCUBthHSQgepbkOexhJ0wP8imUkyiPHQ0GvEnd83129fZjoEhdGwXV27ioRKbj /cIq7JRXun0NbeY+UdMYu9jGfIpDLtUUGSgsg2zMGs5R4jGCA90wggPZAgEBMIGUMIGMMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERp Z2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQ cmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0ECAwyOUzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICHTAYBgkq hkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNTA2MDQxMzQ3MTdaMCMG CSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBS6KHUgQKpX9m+nWRQ/fEFR3tuUbTBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsG CWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0G CCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGlBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgZcw gZQwgYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJT ZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBD bGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDDI5TMIGnBgsqhkiG9w0B CRACCzGBl6CBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzAp BgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0 YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMMjlMwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAO3agt3geRA7B8++3D7Pj7GL2VCsCPvKB9q5geisT7lD5xL7zic+T SGsJfXaPof2ncPONj13Yjjh7T+7CiRf0QSqGpXKuh1eGCI0wysSnnnrCi/yg9XRrnuSYh+da YlegR7MXgJHbe1IJg3xXmCcHANv75XDuCCAfKjHMr/hbelo2Cj24FfETi7xtoDz9rLMl16Ug RSNnUMmy48jAqUjauZ/SmkEtstr1lKsG2T6BYUx1jMHiKFZAGZn0PALRa0EWUqW+PB361cBf QKimOMTcIHTUx9XDe+xHnNzbZsfCqHjldoH+GiGm3cozGbMbPYeyZ19GwzhboVj5g7hk2K5k jgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms030607020305040900090802-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 15:55:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FDBF736 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DA218EB for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XTw-000F1b-3f; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:55:00 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:55:00 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Zhilin Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Would a committer please have a look at my update to databases/sql-developer? Message-ID: <20150604155500.GG49099@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:55:01 -0000 Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200054 has patch to > update of SQL Developer to version 4.1. Ticket has been created 1 month > ago, and today I've been asked about plans to update port to latest > version. > Ticket contains portlint & poudriere test, patch is simple. Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 16:13:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF568B17 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5831D82 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XlZ-000F2t-0T; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:13:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 18:13:12 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Chad J. Milios" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Would a committer please commit my update to net-p2p/namecoin? Message-ID: <20150604161312.GH49099@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150604115032.GC49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150604120724.GD49099@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150604120724.GD49099@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:13:11 -0000 Hi! > > Any idea whether 6 would be OK ? > > A test build with db6 on 10.1pX amd64 builds namecoin. I have not tested it. A testbuild with db6 using poudriere failed 8-( So it needs more care. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 20:18:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D18DBE3 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 20:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159DB190B for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 20:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: by wiwd19 with SMTP id d19so704065wiw.0 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:18:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pbTzpF8SSigt6zpniFNuTaU6JF+yTC8iBzi3bGnUb+U=; b=h9c1F4zRog+HptNkuyJ/aS+lcY2vVq1MfqTSvr6HzJF/ecCE5IhCSGUDlPJXN877Vi NrW1I3ksZLCaY5yYLupLpdwsvnSBkdc1xx8F3nRrCUKPdm9Y3BuZuw+3gZhMK1xh+l5a u8nOiWOcYDUQx2MogcxMgN0YcDJeNL7Q9mgDJvOvZxdxeIg5nC1ELhCkWnHLPTGJzRr8 IQFk7lNaEu7yIGdfdivdn7rqwEvTyTeKum2uvXdkJP2vI4hk4XtCef+9pgVCeKmTlsfW W8VCi9JsipcPdRw3Qh6N3kV3pUi6B/jKASpGpzQLLEG1fx8Fput673q2dfzIPOj2ChDu hkkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.123.4 with SMTP id lw4mr28911223wjb.94.1433449128468; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.178.95 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:18:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150604155500.GG49099@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150604155500.GG49099@home.opsec.eu> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 23:18:48 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Would a committer please have a look at my update to databases/sql-developer? From: Michael Zhilin To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:18:50 -0000 Thank you, Kurt!!! On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200054 has patch to > > update of SQL Developer to version 4.1. Ticket has been created 1 month > > ago, and today I've been asked about plans to update port to latest > > version. > > Ticket contains portlint & poudriere test, patch is simple. > > Done. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to > go ! > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 20:32:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C36BF99 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 20:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18CD01D41 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 20:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0boN-000FNi-40; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:32:23 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 22:32:23 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Chad J. Milios" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Would a committer please commit my update to net-p2p/namecoin? Message-ID: <20150604203223.GJ49099@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150604115032.GC49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150604120724.GD49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150604161312.GH49099@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150604161312.GH49099@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:32:22 -0000 Hi! > > > Any idea whether 6 would be OK ? > > A test build with db6 on 10.1pX amd64 builds namecoin. I have not tested it. > > A testbuild with db6 using poudriere failed 8-( See https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/ net-p2p__namecoin-10x-1433419365.txt net-p2p__namecoin-84i-1433419365.txt net-p2p__namecoin-93a-1433419365.txt -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 21:05:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB0155C2 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from cargobay.net (cargobay.net [198.178.123.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FE01464 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from [10.2.177.92] (mobile-166-176-251-130.mycingular.net [166.176.251.130]) by cargobay.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92B6214C; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Would a committer please commit my update to net-p2p/namecoin? From: "Chad J. Milios" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12F70) In-Reply-To: <20150604203223.GJ49099@home.opsec.eu> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:04:57 -0400 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CE6BE7D-8E9E-4DD3-9782-D8FC1EB55119@ccsys.com> References: <20150604115032.GC49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150604120724.GD49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150604161312.GH49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150604203223.GJ49099@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:05:00 -0000 Thanks for the assistance! Bitcoin core currently also is stuck on db 4.8, and not only on FreeBSD. I'l= l continue researching it further as I too was aware db48 is long in the too= th and has its days numbered. As soon as I can I'll make db ver 4, 5 and 6 w= ork via options but for now can I just stick to db48 if that's alright? This= update to 0.3.80 in ports is long overdue. > On Jun 4, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >>>> Any idea whether 6 would be OK ? >=20 >>> A test build with db6 on 10.1pX amd64 builds namecoin. I have not tested= it. >>=20 >> A testbuild with db6 using poudriere failed 8-( >=20 > See >=20 > https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/ >=20 > net-p2p__namecoin-10x-1433419365.txt > net-p2p__namecoin-84i-1433419365.txt > net-p2p__namecoin-93a-1433419365.txt >=20 > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to g= o ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 21:21:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75A5ED4 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4001923 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1433452776; bh=ll0PnHIdzBviJoyi2KfJOLRKs9czpu73GqSRTzpPzEo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=Gfi/i8b4yuylhBCyL8YedW1fxvOLwZE8HneTAuvVMnHc5VFUR9VyKq3PogQR2h7Pax768k/Bvs1FgVZZd8jlKji4sau/H8AtXAkIl+4iwhg1wOoXi+kohugfwXp36xVHUDysxXpz5wjFzXXDHuyXurE1AVo6PDonRBbEAqczBYH+JS4erKYyqvoYj1yi12KeOvpbBejY9hpZ7q/iq5P9X2W0xy2RA7Zc+lAFBxSwigbt81aLt87dtHRxZ1kHsfGjGQ336MAgtdSo9Vh/Q1O7+ui+BJXi9HSDa+rAYIH/YeCJte5mazvnp36G9JGM9wmy03NjUYOUyXEUYCIB7eo+RQ== Received: from [216.39.60.172] by nm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2015 21:19:36 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.240] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2015 21:19:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2015 21:19:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 367626.70666.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <367626.70666.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 0zp1SX4VM1lEPqd56b8nB.FPG__Y8SE3Tzv_Bs1t41Quyye M1EeCmHO.8qsaj30ZuNFiLNNWdlzZ8rXMGrUHZOkx4evhZnFaizxAwKHOtjW ApRWdPuuiL_zSYr2cG7IbJbhssWWxJBjVuZNJ.SMl_KYWChn3.Etid6ZT1V5 B1szcobYUr1V5nJeRE5wEB._0EgCm7GMAiz4YkO.3L1a95YkCaJLiUw0ogjZ tbt_I5Gh5n6PPb22ovBObc3qy9swrX6vjjetlTQsfUO3fiSpptFfH2tUMtyp gOHKg3RH4cf3QherIZVPMpDgSBJ5vhDoNheTHmFgGZvE8Wt9ghTb4GUOu9bR 44j.lOlvW.6TLqAgh1xVdx0S3j78X_z9nfQ61tS35_x3lmr4C6sMKYHC1KS. kqbA3Xd07Ny88Ji9IM_U2wFqsPZB_LUGU6VX89ykcd4X_8kPHGHfQnebIqFL EUGSbPZb5.vCgbJ2522l4MuKmtV_9WDOdWDUxdxgqDp0Poe6yBvhD9.Mjkwk g7TOAxtSbbvcg8o_kdGNPziYzn.KhqOwy3NMGYJe07cBO8.rGGwAJrO2_o3w Ph5e9iQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:19:45 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print References: <263570.73680.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4321846.9hHPBs9sCR@desk8.phess.net> <2166876.6zk2LzEg5t@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> <2323011.3jCvCUZvQ4@desk8.phess.net> <544000.23949.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:21:57 -0000 > The problem has nothing to do with proprietary drivers, etcetera but rather > the extremely fractured system of printing on non MS Windows based systems. I > have had extensive conversations with representatives from Brother and while > they do include PPD's and other assorted files for some of their printers, > they claim it is just not financially feasible to do so for all their > products, ie, scanners, copiers, etcetera due to the multiple platforms that > they would be required to support. They need only support one when working > with MS Windows, If the *nix community would come together and devise one > consistent printing system, they would be inclined to support it. They > informed me that due to the way FreeBSD likes to due things differently than > anyone else, they would never in all likely hood support it directly. This is > not a problem with the manufacturers, it is a fundamental flaw in the way > *nix handles printers, copiers, FAX machines, scanners, etcetera. > You might want to check out this URL: > > Specifically this portion for starters: > PDF is the standard print job format from CUPS 1.6.x on > All important desktop applications (GTK/GNOME, Qt/KDE, > LibreOffice/OpenOffice.org, Firefox, Thunderbird, ...) send print jobs in PDF > and not in PostScript any more by default. In addition, a complete CUPS > filter chain to process print jobs in PDF is available and used. > Carmel I tried running the MS-Windows executable installer in Wine under NetBSD-current i386, but it did nothing at all. Subsequently I tried mousing through Wine Explorer to get an idea of what it was like. It seemed to get bogged down after a short time, long file names were truncated, and it subsequently went into a reboot (crash), file system not cleanly dismounted. So it looks like this wine is unstable; I could try in FreeBSD-current i386 and amd64 after I get that built. But I really think I need to build/install a Linux system. It would be helpful if a laser printer/all-in-one would support a standard print file format/interface, like PDF, instead of having their own proprietary PCL. Then such a printer might work in Linux and BSD even without a specific driver. Or am I wrong? Then printing would work even without a specific driver, even from Haiku. I looked at the web link, had to remove < at the beginning and > at the end to make it work. Yes, Unix/quasi-Unix is an anarchy regarding printing interface. HP provided hplip, which can be seen either as an indication that they are helpful to Linux, or as a red flag that their printer interfaces are proprietary and that only their software will work. So now I view hplip as a red flag and intend not to buy anything further from HP, printer or otherwise. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 5 07:38:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110F6ADB for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loic.blot@unix-experience.fr) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (195-154-176-227.rev.poneytelecom.eu [195.154.176.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C741B28 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loic.blot@unix-experience.fr) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (unknown [192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6153C313 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:28:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: scanned by unix-experience.fr Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr ([192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (smtp.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.21]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05m3ilzmVoF8 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unix-experience.fr (repo.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.30]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C86C53C2F8 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:28:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unix-experience.fr; s=uxselect; t=1433489330; bh=TpMKqIIYXdW0oEYZzN0Gr2j1ZAM0mACLTulJ6ghBVKA=; h=Date:From:Subject:To; b=eya2qC6uhLAOKnEJcJ+EgeaJWZ5arb2DwyXAVji3NDRhLb/tnhXr4PAjIFs+iS9Dv xYJ8+4qudq/9szwNZ2gb+o96hsv8ulxQcMELywua6ago+22tTtRmjls90/ycAX0rsz w7dtcacc/AIyv03ct0VjWe8eAKgnBiyf8FeA6Vik= Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 07:28:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4758c63043d29c554045fe7766b8bc11@mail.unix-experience.fr> X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.8.2.291 From: loic.blot@unix-experience.fr Subject: Please update siproxd To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 07:38:22 -0000 Hello,=0Asiproxd was updated 1 year ago and there is one good patch poste= d today.=0A=0APlease review and push it.=0A=0AThanks=0A=0Ahttps://bugs.fr= eebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D187113 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 5 16:08:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5851D6 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F0D1639 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pusateri@bangj.com) Received: from dark.mountain2sea.com (cpe-98-122-46-16.sc.res.rr.com [98.122.46.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3CC31176A; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5571C97C.2080903@bangj.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 12:08:28 -0400 From: Tom Pusateri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with new port with multiple downloaded files from github References: <556E83CE.2020209@bangj.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:08:37 -0000 On 06/03/15 14:42, Tom Pusateri wrote: >> On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jan Beich wrote: >> >> Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making >> a slave of it? >> >> Thanks for the help. This works now and the versions match. >> >> PORTNAME= libchromiumcontent >> PORTVERSION= 43.0.2357.65 >> DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v >> DISTVERSIONSUFFIX= -atom-1 >> CATEGORIES= www >> >> MAINTAINER= pusateri@bangj.com >> COMMENT= Shared library build of Chromium's Content module >> >> USE_GITHUB= yes >> GH_ACCOUNT= atom gliaskos:freebsd_chromium >> GH_PROJECT= freebsd-chromium:freebsd_chromium >> GH_TAGNAME= b715e82:freebsd_chromium >> >> Thanks! >> Tom >> >> > Ok, I'm trying to use a slave build now and could use some help. Here's the Makefile PORTNAME= libchromiumcontent MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../chromium PORTVERSION= 43.0.2357.65 DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v DISTVERSIONSUFFIX= -atom-2 MAINTAINER= pusateri@bangj.com COMMENT= Shared library build of Chromium's Content module USE_GITHUB= yes GH_PROJECT= libchromiumcontent:libchromiumcontent GH_ACCOUNT= atom:libchromiumcontent .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile" And here's the fetch list. It seems to be mixing the two which isn't surprising but I'm not sure how to get the distinct downloads. /usr/ports/www/libchromiumcontent # make fetch-urlall-list MASTER_SITE_BACKUP= http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-official/chromium-chromium-v43.0.2357.81-atom-2_GH0.tar.xz https://codeload.github.com/chromium/chromium/tar.gz/v43.0.2357.81-atom-2?dummy=/chromium-chromium-v43.0.2357.81-atom-2_GH0.tar.xz http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-official/chromium-chromium-v43.0.2357.81-atom-2_GH0.tar.gz https://codeload.github.com/chromium/chromium/tar.gz/v43.0.2357.81-atom-2?dummy=/chromium-chromium-v43.0.2357.81-atom-2_GH0.tar.gz https://codeload.github.com/atom/libchromiumcontent/tar.gz/v43.0.2357.81-atom-2?dummy=/atom-libchromiumcontent-v43.0.2357.81-atom-2_GH0.tar.gz Thanks, Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 6 08:40:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDEC20A for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 08:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.rambish@yahoo.com) Received: from nm37-vm9.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm37-vm9.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.217.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA92D1D58 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 08:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.rambish@yahoo.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm37.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2015 08:38:06 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.190] by nm37.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2015 08:35:05 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.143] by tm11.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2015 08:35:05 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.192] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2015 08:35:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2015 08:35:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 839952.89919.bm@omp1001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 63338 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jun 2015 08:35:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1433579704; bh=OQkurjeUsZD45YmYOO8ZZSHCuRgUpME6rbj2UTjNs3g=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CCnndkBJS1w5nM23SMU1wm6vaDSJKgq0zjfKZ2qew4spkQYhCUEEHdfu/L6YBlkDNLAMm0oW86vRWFvvbOUTVVzTwvSkN/tnQA7NZfZIsVcNKrJJirrQL+DpEbFFiK61ncAhwLCDi/kAAMAh+nsVnbCOTQHCTodWt5JItyKD4F4= X-YMail-OSG: rWXGXD8VM1mwSiC9y6GFta8xRJnj5DYkMLjvv8FkrMSUVR3 0SHUcSA53ukCD0y4_2sJchBI8OTq94UIJpz8_RHdOkV2ak2k.BR8ZPHMjKxl NF86lSJYu_C8D73m6E3OnXDeuwDJ5_f355jxS_8TiIIBPhMpT4S3uCCC0YmP 89FxnHzVhpVH3w.Sa6avtPO3l1NqCKs9q1xcd1HFB0q6OHZLETOMq9a4Inhp jsV9.zD_kgb4kinR_5jQEeSF9DiVRS1bVJk2RrbPw0tqITiRwQ28Z1yggo.f HDdTJU8h8MTmPxtij7gzxhJ5V6Zbw.O7GcA9F9PyqCjsisPMW5Zpzq4aYuSs llKL60wDQDxC82IFdsUZbGM2hnoqsj5.6D6G94BMgXha3if28XuzkiXOvGzH 4AqUWIHAyHJTizlxbk4YHl_oDEz_5LLtWjlqAp10DR_.Zs07WnprDTXRNsov iZ9YKqbQQ8on6pSJJqHpDPENCTRqDssFgQirGg0mO7GAasee97aih21xhT73 FprL1pT9NNLY- Received: from [172.56.6.78] by web161504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 01:35:04 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,CgowOy0pLSgtWDAKCgEwAQEBAQ-- X-Mailer: YahooMailAndroidMobile/4.8.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.740 Message-ID: <1433579704.90024.YahooMailAndroidMobile@web161504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:35:04 -0700 From: joey rambish Subject: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/progsreiserfs To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 08:40:17 -0000 0;-)-(-X0 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 6 09:42:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D43A93D for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 09:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB721C57 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 09:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t569gsjc065186 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 09:42:54 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t569gsAK065185; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 09:42:54 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201506060942.t569gsAK065185@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 09:42:54 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:42:55 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/pear-Date_Holidays_Austria | 0.1.4 | 0.1.6 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 6 10:05:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16456BD4 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 10:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64391098 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 10:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3m3c0S1s9RzZs6 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 12:05:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KUgVHXir2glT for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 12:05:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 12:05:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5572C5D3.2010006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 12:05:07 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD ports Subject: [CFT] net/asterisk11 and net/asterisk13 new option to compile using base compiler Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="haVXXkjfHcOt4Pdsajs9beXLOHppn1Jnm" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:05:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --haVXXkjfHcOt4Pdsajs9beXLOHppn1Jnm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Recent versions of asterisk have added support to be compiled using llvm/clang, so, with the last update, I added an experimental option to make the port compile using the base compiler(turned off by default). I'm asking for people using asterisk on 10.1 or head to test it compiled with clang and report back both in case of success or failure. My objective is to make the BASE compiler option the default sometime in the future, if it works correctly. In the tests I have performed it works, but I have also seen some core dumps which don't happen when compiled using gcc 4.8. asterisk 13 seems to be more robust than 11 when compiled with clang. So, if you do test this, please use caution and don't perform the tests on production machines, since it can crash and dump core unexpectedly. Thanks in advance! --=20 Guido Falsi --haVXXkjfHcOt4Pdsajs9beXLOHppn1Jnm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVcsXUAAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTCqQIANwlZjgzd1WP/CULD3ITY7WO l/hQ2SY9lKLUgPQ9RUJb/RI541+j9d45YEq7g+97IlHF/vvIJpi/OwDW15rMYMWU zOTaHshWOHx9YJb9czYs37rotCpz6rKuBDSdi/jS4R3yolj1z0srxmlNfktPzuM8 y2RKDY6xP3vuEldV3/D6Yrltr5qhC0WrTFYinUL0vbZTpbTTJYZffnLutcOUVwjr 7wW0cYi6W93YCWjhzTcWsRwSsAckbeKcvFkR5QTOcuag2hXlPd4NELDsLSyiKRbL G2bF+EMhJuZuQNDKUDRb5KcftFJl2aFDR+7C6DsIgl7j2DaoNQ8xr5nDkP3kI78= =xtju -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --haVXXkjfHcOt4Pdsajs9beXLOHppn1Jnm--