From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Apr 25 22:39:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C97B1C3B7 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from server@secureC10.ezhostingserver.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2E31481 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from server@secureC10.ezhostingserver.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6D76AB1C3B5; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0E7B1C3B4 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from server@secureC10.ezhostingserver.com) Received: from mailout3.ezhostingserver.com (mailout3.ezhostingserver.com [216.198.218.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208221480 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from server@secureC10.ezhostingserver.com) Received: from mailout5.ezhostingserver.com (unknown [10.10.15.105]) by mailout3.ezhostingserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2FD18204B for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:08:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailout5.ezhostingserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6592830098 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:06:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailout5.ezhostingserver.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailout5.ezhostingserver.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NTZDnSgk3Qaf for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:06:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from securec10.ezhostingserver.com (unknown [10.10.1.110]) by mailout5.ezhostingserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F1D300B2 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:06:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from NTC10-STL ([74.127.47.249]) by securec10.ezhostingserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:08:29 -0500 Subject: ARCH, Notice of appearance in Court #0000147406 To: arch@freebsd.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:post.php(4) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code(17) : eval()'d code Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:08:29 -0500 From: "District Court" Reply-To: "District Court" Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2016 22:08:29.0340 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF798DC0:01D19F3E] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:39 -0000 Dear Arch, You have to appear in the Court on the May 02. You are kindly asked to prepare and bring the documents relating to the case to Court on the specified date. Note: The case may be heard by the judge in your absence if you do not come. The Court Notice is attached to this email. Kind regards, Ricky Hester, Clerk of Court. From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Tue Apr 26 23:22:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D07B1DC0F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dayanidhi.sreenivasan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD501D9F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dayanidhi.sreenivasan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r5so12238718pag.1 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=f/lIvY17zD4yx9LkhlRCvlJc52s6i5VCjp3BmAxm1MI=; b=gABbyutSd1IbVuaCMszPVV65p1rzzLN0WOCGMbGrtXQRp5b195eF0LBm+28/QRJxMI xu0QLjNv0VjNIxydxEokSx9wkhegdY1rV1o5R9cStbk5l7DiSrg3XIJiwLFSu3xMrd+Z V7MP6tuNkcMes2LQFtATCKnEwoRURJGAIUdcWjzx02q8nKy/2AluU4SXrbrrdB8h5HNs LSwPO/ZFvyl8ksEUsFXiVNSnN9BYN2foGNbL/zkIOJAjOPm1t970UiYV3PS4ezvyFcFO JoPJM6SaZhwIZOARGaZCXtfgZ6LBgJMhUe+a7G00/pY22g8fq7W5AOIhiGwpTBx+TnME QIeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=f/lIvY17zD4yx9LkhlRCvlJc52s6i5VCjp3BmAxm1MI=; b=VmdIxvH7bD2KV/uHRl6g3BLfIOjYfn+gvvcL7Exe4XQAMDIQWPkEqGWS6tU8GE5N6F nRsr+qGRj6QcScYKYKE3IwkXn5T9pQnnrXZeRxyfefLH3NOMDnPmtgmDf0LyXKErI3+C /Vqcc5gg070A2vU8h+vJSFcOWHFxR/DeUgxlnW8cxbQ4XlH8JyPCJTgrQhJiv1vJ9A99 Yg1l/43+0MsB23wdn/uCXt7TvUSf324OTmZKRAJwKo9n9o6G+UIaeP2Vj3EdIqj9Timr oQYM45K8WZNVshvP4FEuoSKNrbJmOlhs2vUz2DiZo/j0KG2xQbJ8Jnfcv3l1qlZ9Xt0w QQUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWT+mAusa6c7033osrmg4VIl+uS593jb7K3eKx6k5ILi9YNLvS1CvZmrj32xZlxT4IGjQE6dOjdLdjvOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.172.165 with SMTP id bd5mr7516907pac.128.1461712940815; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.49.39 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:22:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: FIONBIO support in freebsd for bpf From: dayanidhi sreenivasan To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:22:21 -0000 Hi Guys, Can somebody tell me why there is no support for non blocking IO for bpf yet? static int bpfioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t addr, int flags, struct thread *td) { ...... case FIONBIO: /* Non-blocking I/O */ break; } Thanks Daya From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Apr 27 01:37:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A389DB1D754 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csjp@sqrt.ca) Received: from mx01.sqrt.ca (i4hg.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808BB1759 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csjp@sqrt.ca) Received: by mx01.sqrt.ca (Postfix, from userid 58) id 495D2233802; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:30:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on ion X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from xor.gateway.mts.net (wnpgmb1316w-ds01-111-250.dynamic.mtsallstream.net [142.161.111.250]) by mx01.sqrt.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F4AB233800; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:30:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:31:55 -0500 From: Christian Peron To: dayanidhi sreenivasan Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FIONBIO support in freebsd for bpf Message-ID: <20160427013155.GA3880@xor.gateway.mts.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:37:45 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It is supported. If you want to put the descriptor into non-blocking mode, = open it up with the device with the O_NONBLOCK flag specified. It probably wouldn't be too= difficult to implement this via ioctl(FIONBIO) but I would need to look at it. Not certain why it= can't be done using this method. Hope this helps. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:22:20PM -0400, dayanidhi sreenivasan wrote: > Hi Guys, > Can somebody tell me why there is no support for non blocking IO for bpf = yet? >=20 > static int > bpfioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t addr, int flags, > struct thread *td) > { >=20 > ...... >=20 > case FIONBIO: /* Non-blocking I/O */ > break; >=20 > } >=20 > Thanks > Daya > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlcgFosACgkQzHFpVAM/ozzrkACeO/qAWs9MDYW/nzOKDLdfEZuL LbkAnj/7A/Y2RmCCc20aJBaBycQ5mMwq =2oqO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Apr 27 01:49:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A671B1D8D9 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csjp@sqrt.ca) Received: from mx01.sqrt.ca (i4hg.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0341B12 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csjp@sqrt.ca) Received: by mx01.sqrt.ca (Postfix, from userid 58) id 2E875233802; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:48:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on ion X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [192.168.100.103] (wnpgmb1316w-ds01-111-250.dynamic.mtsallstream.net [142.161.111.250]) by mx01.sqrt.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6A74233800; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:48:33 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: FIONBIO support in freebsd for bpf From: Christian Peron In-Reply-To: <20160427013155.GA3880@xor.gateway.mts.net> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:49:50 -0500 Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5DCCBADE-B367-46DA-9B48-9393F7A3C2AD@sqrt.ca> References: <20160427013155.GA3880@xor.gateway.mts.net> To: dayanidhi sreenivasan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:49:57 -0000 Actually, upon inspection of the code, it appears that ioctl(fd, = FIONBIO, ..); works as expected. This ioctl cmd appears to be handled = further up the stack=E2=80=A6 > On Apr 26, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Christian Peron wrote: >=20 > It is supported. If you want to put the descriptor into non-blocking = mode, open it up with > the device with the O_NONBLOCK flag specified. It probably wouldn't = be too difficult to implement > this via ioctl(FIONBIO) but I would need to look at it. Not certain = why it can't be done using this > method. >=20 > Hope this helps. >=20 > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:22:20PM -0400, dayanidhi sreenivasan wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> Can somebody tell me why there is no support for non blocking IO for = bpf yet? >>=20 >> static int >> bpfioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t addr, int flags, >> struct thread *td) >> { >>=20 >> ...... >>=20 >> case FIONBIO: /* Non-blocking I/O */ >> break; >>=20 >> } >>=20 >> Thanks >> Daya >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Apr 27 17:59:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C15B1E1A8 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A21E1F35 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EA97B93A; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:18 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Christian Peron , dayanidhi sreenivasan Subject: Re: FIONBIO support in freebsd for bpf Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:59:04 -0700 Message-ID: <2277475.FAchkNOHDZ@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5DCCBADE-B367-46DA-9B48-9393F7A3C2AD@sqrt.ca> References: <20160427013155.GA3880@xor.gateway.mts.net> <5DCCBADE-B367-46DA-9B48-9393F7A3C2AD@sqrt.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:18 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:59:19 -0000 On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 08:49:50 PM Christian Peron wrote: > Actually, upon inspection of the code, it appears that ioctl(fd, FION= BIO, ..); works as expected. This ioctl cmd appears to be handled furth= er up the stack=E2=80=A6 Yes, it's a bit odd, but when F_SETFL tries to set O_NONBLOCK, the kern= el passes FIONBIO down to the device to "ask" if it's ok to use the desire= d setting (in *(int *)data) of non-blocking. In this case bpf is just sa= ying it supports either setting by returning 0 regardless of the value in da= ta. > > On Apr 26, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Christian Peron wrote: > >=20 > > It is supported. If you want to put the descriptor into non-blockin= g mode, open it up with > > the device with the O_NONBLOCK flag specified. It probably wouldn'= t be too difficult to implement > > this via ioctl(FIONBIO) but I would need to look at it. Not certai= n why it can't be done using this > > method. > >=20 > > Hope this helps. > >=20 > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:22:20PM -0400, dayanidhi sreenivasan wro= te: > >> Hi Guys, > >> Can somebody tell me why there is no support for non blocking IO f= or bpf yet? > >>=20 > >> static int > >> bpfioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t addr, int flags, > >> struct thread *td) > >> { > >>=20 > >> ...... > >>=20 > >> case FIONBIO: /* Non-blocking I/O */ > >> break; > >>=20 > >> } > >>=20 > >> Thanks > >> Daya > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" --=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Apr 28 14:26:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E45B1FEB3; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from superbisquit@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A935168E; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from superbisquit@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a5so33280130vkg.0; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:26:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=kOEsk3knbYVlnW1gXE0PUnhAEn32XPQE7DH3ZJNDn1Y=; b=JuAB3ZcWWg/FobLL8QP+y+qluXJYQlYG1CVyPeAr/BRNkmrdXW8BdgebetWHkg/hQT 9ElqJfHLB2DvM9C8FH1Zxi7oV3hl6K0nqSkr3OZt8nQzIOmYL2O83Xm8dowg3UgzdkaO w8DD9ete8GPLRANdUX3necMPIfJBIEDIl/GFyMWksh2NA00MaUtcnLhCkw84msfqoKy/ nh7kg+OO+ri4wRO/BjPXQ2kxyNBHvwxd7fqEIePcQfe6823bobixidCOdYKkSbbAUHoZ O+qAOFV3QmWLNhNV2Q5w1qT7BeK+AOlgoOofBHhgUq3zDkI9mfEkF6CyWXFmnRNnIMX0 jxCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=kOEsk3knbYVlnW1gXE0PUnhAEn32XPQE7DH3ZJNDn1Y=; b=JR4NwE+bpBmLJdThtU3ozPJ+DSCj/o+jgtYTcpELCbCahd3daCq7jSl2emlBtiL80Q 4xgbSxWLWNiGO8X4Y/Pohc79Ai0mfRv7vHrbOY6Kp4HttoSH23VgSew2OYFz53VDYlEY RerItc0HkILzoj5Xqc1dbUqrdsgu1CLHk6uXHjXNSY4NbLMx39gWsni8uBhgjGSOeIiT fdCTkVoyMCiQjroJi4H5ODcl4VhdzD47TNm2FBENtzBoNPv9Rn/DT6U9OHq5QuQU/0s9 yc6w//+wUfx2b3hLd9WAzaxnIR/SUJDR0Y25nO1tce06Iz2GUfe45aoFi2epaqj3x13z fbGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUcUSMhT70Z7J7iGK9wwWOuF6bAAp1jNAwTeZ9NvqleH+jmrX2N5pOx0vFUoM1mBqVDobK9ybHWJQkSYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.231.68 with SMTP id e65mr2505309vkh.58.1461853599357; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.21.135 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:26:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Has this ever been considered for video on raspberry devices and for other architectures? From: Joe Nosay To: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Hackers , freebsd-current , freebsd-arch , Dru Lavigne Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:26:40 -0000 Is it possible to use https://github.com/raspberrypi/userland along with TinyX/XBMC to create an accelerated graphics driver?