From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 17:44:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADEDBB2ED9; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devin@shxd.cx) Received: from shxd.cx (mail.shxd.cx [64.201.244.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579CF1648; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devin@shxd.cx) Received: from 50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([50.196.156.133]:62686 helo=[10.19.158.225]) by shxd.cx with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bWne2-000J98-3O; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:43:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:44:07 -0700 Cc: Adrian Chadd , Michelle Sullivan , Anna Wilcox , freebsd-arch , Marius Strobl , Sean Bruno , Jordan Hubbard , sparc64@freebsd.org, Warner Losh , Devin Teske Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org> References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com> <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net> <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> To: "K. Macy" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Sender: devin@shxd.cx X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:54:08 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:44:11 -0000 What luck, I was just gifted a Sparc64 1U rackmount Sun server. Not sure what to do with it since we shouldn't care about Sparc64. Is there a "latest version" that this hardware won't run? Admitting here = to not being up-to-date on this [particularly long-lived] thread. --=20 Devin= From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 18:49:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9440FBB3219; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779741D76; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C22F2629; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:40:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:40:02 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Adrian Chadd , Michelle Sullivan , Anna Wilcox , freebsd-arch , Marius Strobl , Sean Bruno , Jordan Hubbard , sparc64@freebsd.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 Message-ID: <20160808184002.GA15252@lonesome.com> References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com> <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net> <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:49:28 -0000 On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:32:36AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > If you care, then give donations to the FreeBSD Foundation, and say > you want/need sparc64 and/or sun4v support... >From what I've been told, the Foundation isn't really interested in putting resources towards sparc64 support. fwiw, I have a stack of machines that I would donate if there were some place to host them. (I was able to acquire them inexpensively from my last employer; more such machines show up now and then). >From time to time I build packages on one of them. If there is interest I will poke at making some for 11.0. Given the electricity cost (figure $25/server/mo) I'm not too interested in leaving them on 24x7. Especially in the Texas summers. mcl From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 18:41:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196ADBB3035; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB78D1A26; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 903A6646; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:41:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:41:07 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Devin Teske Cc: "K. Macy" , Adrian Chadd , sparc64@freebsd.org, Anna Wilcox , freebsd-arch , Sean Bruno , Michelle Sullivan , Marius Strobl , Jordan Hubbard Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 Message-ID: <20160808184107.GB15252@lonesome.com> References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com> <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net> <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:44:19 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:41:10 -0000 On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:44:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > Is there a "latest version" that this hardware won't run? Admitting > here to not being up-to-date on this [particularly long-lived] thread. 10.1 runs fine (and thus probably 10.x). I haven't generated an 11 image yet. mcl From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 20:45:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EACBBB3613 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from iredmail.bsdtec.net (bsdtec.plus.com [84.92.41.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD76F11F6 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from iredmail.bsdtec.net (unknown [172.16.32.11]) by iredmail.bsdtec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784888ADB6 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:38:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iredmail.bsdtec.net Received: from iredmail.bsdtec.net ([172.16.32.11]) by iredmail.bsdtec.net (iredmail.bsdtec.net [172.16.32.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2_CZ5bKOxa6L for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (loki.lerwick.hopto.org [192.168.1.1]) by iredmail.bsdtec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C79628ADA0; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1470688707.3429.6.camel@atlas.lerwick.hopto.org> Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 From: Craig Butler To: Mark Linimon Cc: Adrian Chadd , Anna Wilcox , freebsd-arch , Marius Strobl , Sean Bruno , Jordan Hubbard , sparc64@freebsd.org, Warner Losh Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:38:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160808184002.GA15252@lonesome.com> References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com> <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net> <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> <20160808184002.GA15252@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:45:03 -0000 On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 13:40 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:32:36AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > If you care, then give donations to the FreeBSD Foundation, and say > > you want/need sparc64 and/or sun4v support... > > From what I've been told, the Foundation isn't really interested in > putting resources towards sparc64 support. > > fwiw, I have a stack of machines that I would donate if there were some > place to host them. (I was able to acquire them inexpensively from my > last employer; more such machines show up now and then). > > From time to time I build packages on one of them. If there is interest > I will poke at making some for 11.0. Given the electricity cost (figure > $25/server/mo) I'm not too interested in leaving them on 24x7. > > Especially in the Texas summers. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" A lot of port maintainers are also annoyingly not interested in sparc64 fixes when you submit PR's. I would be willing to put some more time and effort into keeping up with the ports and maybe branching out into the src if I can get a mentor to point a n00b in the right direction and rip the code to bits. Regards Craig Butler From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 22:08:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA053BB383D; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gordonzaft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F2E14EF; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gordonzaft@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f6so95350522ith.0; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F2uZJT+X35lJTIDPcoNZ+4eUiwEf13SejFMeU51Uoh4=; b=HdfseKxU7+CjDODKdV+YGb8WU+uje/CmHdaI7bwvcYG4FJ0Ivgj0f5/niP0r1bRfSt n+nzDdeL60qP8LyB4dpsMgFkpExyEYQl+iHrC+9V67uY5cdeYz/X//MTbilxbljPnMp2 qE2RwG3T+zIgACHG9/KhynO5WMLozii4QL4Qg/0ASDyOZwBKYTOA8MOgX1g4M2knJGCF xGIiLlPErAP1kFvPZ3bsVDDCi7bN1eAjRDLXaUMmXeA7zkTrm+EtOfX3Svv1w9kQod07 2xPHN0Fv5NPdkgcL1mqJ0MiXVOU3IpOkWCKZRGH3usRwJos2tx3Q2zO42aFYSu7Q6eKD mo2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F2uZJT+X35lJTIDPcoNZ+4eUiwEf13SejFMeU51Uoh4=; b=mceaobPwnqyfPzU0Iy6Ru1l1Ebj6g389DsJ1+KfIdCgkku9I5yMBHevz0tgrja1Mo5 46noGkVrqRBQjb3LVCyAqaNFrgMCZXv1he+NwxzXoT5I/QG9NYprY+ib1hosXf+jB8yk LJIj8tEGKjT6332EllhyyUHQikcemDfSZXMayrivCW8zi8ufPG/an8s6iOwfHlhsFRng NMZ/bx956iNkfEN0I8lgWvXsL+23NLrTs8q35I1IG8BI/rYb64rLO+cdikBGCOn/5hwM 2ajmTv0WkumXyLN9ZcSKTGd42yqO3lx//75baooYXsoVCAMGXnqbFT3LtWhS/6iLTmDt k20Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu+TCbNE+R63ogEOpDfTk/J9PZ2a4kx9/X1YHLCMFrn4cy3sMrFPS5nUm9Mr8QHPQboEqhb1Xj2YkmhwQ== X-Received: by 10.36.64.5 with SMTP id n5mr20733124ita.78.1470694115040; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.132.29 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:08:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160808184107.GB15252@lonesome.com> References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com> <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net> <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org> <20160808184107.GB15252@lonesome.com> From: Gordon Zaft Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:08:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 To: Mark Linimon Cc: Devin Teske , Adrian Chadd , Anna Wilcox , "K. Macy" , sparc64@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl , Sean Bruno , freebsd-arch , Jordan Hubbard X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:39:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:08:35 -0000 I'm running 10.3 on an Ultra 5 and it runs just fine. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:44:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > > Is there a "latest version" that this hardware won't run? Admitting > > here to not being up-to-date on this [particularly long-lived] thread. > > 10.1 runs fine (and thus probably 10.x). I haven't generated an 11 image > yet. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Gordon Zaft Province 35 Governor Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia Fraternity gordonzaft@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 22:20:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9B6BB39A6; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devin@shxd.cx) Received: from shxd.cx (mail.shxd.cx [64.201.244.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464FB1815; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devin@shxd.cx) Received: from 50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([50.196.156.133]:50144 helo=[10.19.158.225]) by shxd.cx with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bWrwr-000LMa-2g; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:19:01 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:20:39 -0700 Cc: Mark Linimon , Adrian Chadd , Anna Wilcox , "K. Macy" , sparc64@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl , Sean Bruno , freebsd-arch , Jordan Hubbard , Devin Teske Message-Id: <55D9D8B4-B481-4E1E-9E22-F00EE10EF5A7@freebsd.org> References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com> <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net> <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com> <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org> <20160808184107.GB15252@lonesome.com> To: Gordon Zaft X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Sender: devin@shxd.cx X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:48:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:20:44 -0000 > On Aug 8, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Gordon Zaft wrote: >=20 >=20 > I'm running 10.3 on an Ultra 5 and it runs just fine. >=20 Thanks Gordon -- and everyone else that chimed in. --=20 Cheers, Devin > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Mark Linimon > wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:44:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > > Is there a "latest version" that this hardware won't run? Admitting > > here to not being up-to-date on this [particularly long-lived] = thread. >=20 > 10.1 runs fine (and thus probably 10.x). I haven't generated an 11 = image yet. >=20 > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org = mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 = > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org = " >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Gordon Zaft > Province 35 Governor > Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia Fraternity > gordonzaft@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri Aug 12 15:31:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE3ABB7A19; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232971C04; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from zeppelin.tachypleus.net (75-101-50-44.static.sonic.net [75.101.50.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u7CFV6Nl005721 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:31:07 -0700 Subject: Re: INTRNG (Was: svn commit: r301453....) To: Michal Meloun References: <201606051620.u55GKD5S066398@repo.freebsd.org> <57976867.6080705@FreeBSD.org> <5798E104.5020104@FreeBSD.org> <579A25BB.8070206@FreeBSD.org> <30790e40-58b4-3371-c0f0-b7545571f389@freebsd.org> <579AFFC5.1040005@FreeBSD.org> <579CD355.1050203@FreeBSD.org> <460fa0b3-ddb7-6247-2412-3d75a589d5e7@freebsd.org> <579CF7C8.1040302@FreeBSD.org> <24107713-6d50-c21d-ccf1-7dbdb36cc484@freebsd.org> <579E1BE2.7020500@FreeBSD.org> <7f053bb8-ab03-e46c-1c72-d757348e4e54@freebsd.org> <57A09F34.4050400@FreeBSD.org> <57A30B72.7070809@FreeBSD.org> <1946069a-d0f9-2c19-80a5-0b490682574b@freebsd.org> <57A5F480.20309@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , Svatopluk Kraus , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" From: Nathan Whitehorn Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:31:06 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57A5F480.20309@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVaiUs6D2wWlKVZarfwxumtAQSSDEBOYkS4fFmVN/vA6tcLS+CRI9452pkGSaZ5Mt9mYpZXCtD1hIaw4BfJro9b7pu6rCAStT+Y= X-Sonic-ID: C;GOGTyaFg5hGwvqDx2xNB0g== M;zOjhyaFg5hGwvqDx2xNB0g== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:31:11 -0000 On 08/06/16 07:30, Michal Meloun wrote: [snip] > I have prepared working patch (it's not full, but it works on Tegra), > https://github.com/strejda/tegra/commit/2cf72e248877fb917c4fc618bcb6e46b7c1058a4 > can you, please, take look on it? > > Also, please, take in account: > - we have, currently, 20+ interrupt controllers converted to new INTRNG > PIC API. > - universal format of interrupt resources is generic part of this API. > - I'm not ready to commit any PIC API change together with above patch - > i hope that this is understandable. One other non-urgent question about PCI code: There's a new function ofw_bus_msimap() that does not seem to implement any particular part of any real binding standard. There's a .txt file in the device-tree repo, but many (most?, all?) PCI bridges don't seem to implement MSI that way. This is out-of-scope for the immediate discussion, but it would be good to fix later. If there are indeed only a handful of bridges that do MSI that way, it should probably be moved into the PCI bridge drivers that do use it. Similarly, dev/pci/pci_host_generic.c isn't actually generic and is instead a driver for some particular ARM bridges. It should be moved at some point under sys/arm. Most of the code in it also duplicates dev/ofw/ofwpci.c (but with some added bugs in handling the "ranges" property). > also, > "we must be able to add new interrupt type as simple as possible" rule > is very important for me. Adding new table (with implementation), one > bus method and one PIC method for each new type is not *simple*. > > In any case, can we concentrate to above patch first? I'm ready to > finish it in next few hours, then put it to phabricator for real review. > Have you had a chance to finish this? Is there a way I can help? I think non-MSI PCI interrupts are currently broken on ARM and it would be great to get that fixed before 11.0. -Nathan