From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 20:44:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EB1ACFA40 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6DF9D7 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 271CFACFA3D; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26688ACFA3B; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C5D9D4; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C38219FC; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B606219E3B; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id o82n5eG-5xZD; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: leaky M_RTABLE r295632 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com 5017E19E34 To: current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org References: <56CB8538.1050003@FreeBSD.org> From: Bryan Drewery Openpgp: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <56E5D122.5080501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:44:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56CB8538.1050003@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IAtUgUdXhCwdc4CnOP7sEPx5C6RmotjnN" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:44:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IAtUgUdXhCwdc4CnOP7sEPx5C6RmotjnN Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0Pf4SEM8K6PuNpUqkV4NJTJFkcSugQpEa" From: Bryan Drewery To: current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <56E5D122.5080501@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: leaky M_RTABLE r295632 References: <56CB8538.1050003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <56CB8538.1050003@FreeBSD.org> --0Pf4SEM8K6PuNpUqkV4NJTJFkcSugQpEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/22/2016 2:01 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Running CURRENT r295632. >=20 > # vmstat -m|grep routetbl > routetbl 103952 51995K - 155861 512,1024 >=20 > This seems quite large for my dev build system. >=20 Now on r296480: # vmstat -m|grep routetbl routetbl 8928 4484K - 13324 512,1024 Still seems too high. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --0Pf4SEM8K6PuNpUqkV4NJTJFkcSugQpEa-- --IAtUgUdXhCwdc4CnOP7sEPx5C6RmotjnN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW5dEjAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPiwIH/0eY1C3wEBw0HFQiJaZ3SCrj oyYq4uud/4wPeYUOXkpilk46+528Hkwy5TTzjirDYJc+97ck5BJNpcMhQk9WmE+X R2Q/y5RfGlWb6aF/Bafa0sqikRho/LdPLrlMcCGUL4KWJDN+6TEgYv4AihxOkagS wnQmPp8M3KjFeTa4vhdd2cs+TfMWLZoXz8P6GfUAjWB/YFdomatsbiQtleWnoZWk xVtWrj7JaufBQ3cOqs4f9dEKQCdJBlpakjibZFyd9fHSIx/QT1KtUTTXbZiE71ay OGvmQp4FndaRDX/5eaKi0jlM5SqkTkyimkCR8+0QtdnwPGLHWMNEXV3H4/+kMFk= =mypr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IAtUgUdXhCwdc4CnOP7sEPx5C6RmotjnN-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 21:00:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C66ACD2AB for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A24B6D4 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2DL01RF032375 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:00:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603132100.u2DL01RF032375@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:00:39 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:00:40 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc In Progress | 203422 | mpd/ppoe not working with re(4) with revision 285 New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 206053 | kqueue support code of netmap causes panic Open | 148807 | [panic] 8.1-RELEASE/10.1-STABLE "panic: sbdrop" a Open | 194485 | Userland cannot add IPv6 prefix routes Open | 194515 | Fatal Trap 12 Kernel with vimage Open | 199136 | [if_tap] Added down_on_close sysctl variable to t Open | 201694 | 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jail Open | 206544 | sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; 11 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 17:04:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DBAAD0A97 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8736FD1E for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2EH4N5N094837 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:04:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 175864] [re] Intel MB D510MO, onboard ethernet not working after update to 9.1 [regression] Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:04:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alo@louko.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:04:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D175864 alo@louko.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alo@louko.com --- Comment #5 from alo@louko.com --- I have the same motherboard and if_re is broken with 9.1-RELEASE and 10.2-RELEASE. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 19:18:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9843DAD1C46 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89C0588 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2EJIjql091621 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:18:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 173137] [lem] em(4) unable to run at gigabit with 9.1-RC2 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:18:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Unable to Reproduce X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:18:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D173137 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Unable to Reproduce Status|In Progress |Closed --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 02:05:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67ECACF134 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmcco@mykolab.com) Received: from mx-out03.mykolab.com (mx01.mykolab.com [95.128.36.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A438FBE4 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmcco@mykolab.com) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-10 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mx04.mykolab.com (mx04.mykolab.com [10.20.7.102]) by mx-out03.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76D723EBF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:55:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 21:55:42 -0400 From: Michael McConville To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Int overflow in dhclient(1) Message-ID: <20160315015542.GA61626@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:05:11 -0000 I sent this a few weeks ago, but it never got applied: https://marc.info/?l=freebsd-net&m=145392057613453&w=2 Here's my explanation for the same fix in OpenBSD: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=145377854103866&w=2 Thanks for your time, Michael Index: sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c =================================================================== --- sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c (revision 296886) +++ sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c (working copy) @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ findproto(char *cp, int n) { struct sockaddr *sa; - int i; + unsigned int i; if (n == 0) return -1; From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 06:18:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE0BAD10AD for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D1C15F6 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id p65so129388490wmp.1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:18:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=MTIOCz+BL7HgVW4Mk9D9J3bfXZcA2p3guYwg49/hjI4=; b=ai8CawYNWS8cE3Juj7E5cXWi5gGdHxZHiXDxEHMGkRfCjMhP+mac5szVTpUtRurgQ7 mO7mtR4DI+M1uqqvudY1jLFKh08CTGAprz48gLsIs+r9fhXnsrFcPRccJ7hRLF0cySQV 0PoPGLDtr+Vz4x9rC8fNeLu0N982NCO5VK3gZPlwu6z6CfDGjH9BHZPt79j8MzFwX8Io prIuIM6NG3mhyFoJXOIY4cL4+wyq+i2pHpg0XW4UMFvEKQDXHD0GIpVwG7N/LVzTcUlH JahJTXMJBfsPSjrc0wasi2/SghBjKljuhTF1ww7dHCXelauKF9wmduHX2afv64hZ/wM6 43bQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=MTIOCz+BL7HgVW4Mk9D9J3bfXZcA2p3guYwg49/hjI4=; b=Tv3sABTBJvib8iiWPIkdSBTcfQNK0heu6XU4Z85wpdqlT0FsCacFayYSsi0Um6Q4P0 RemySwK75HKkZiSEYJ8tGT66cQqWHhdFbeEMzSN57zRfkrXDJ1r6+tBR0d3RDfbjZ8Ef 8gbBXD8Sj42HE2Df5jHeM6Qd+wfmiCB77qV887xKgLRsoIanTAQ6wnpp9AcRAeaQoFZK 8+/aK8QtlaueH0dbP9bxMqiv/Eyr+lEC0/xXzXTJQ4je3x81IgD65I9t4Nnm0h9yYIas mANx37dXzkEoqOCGkn4ZV1MbezUlAlCYR9EoDmBDD+4p9RrQB2SyCq1/GKlhrE896PdC o7HQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ7K6Fu89nvpZ7Yjh/qfBO9ZoU1twenRTF3j3i6pIEhPLSRSdz3FXGi3pyh7OBl89yQnr7NsB5sNwbtNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.214.11 with SMTP id n11mr20484043wmg.31.1458022726822; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.23.104 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:18:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160315015542.GA61626@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> References: <20160315015542.GA61626@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:18:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Int overflow in dhclient(1) From: Ben Woods To: Michael McConville Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:18:48 -0000 On Tuesday, 15 March 2016, Michael McConville wrote: > I sent this a few weeks ago, but it never got applied: > > https://marc.info/?l=freebsd-net&m=145392057613453&w=2 > > Here's my explanation for the same fix in OpenBSD: > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=145377854103866&w=2 > > Thanks for your time, > Michael > > > Index: sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c > =================================================================== > --- sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c (revision 296886) > +++ sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c (working copy) > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ > findproto(char *cp, int n) > { > struct sockaddr *sa; > - int i; > + unsigned int i; > > if (n == 0) > return -1; > Hi Michael, Seems like a bug report should be raised so this one doesn't get lost/ignored. Would you be able to raise one here please? https://bugs.freebsd.org/ Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 06:23:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC127AD131E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmcco@mykolab.com) Received: from mx-out02.mykolab.com (mx01.mykolab.com [95.128.36.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963B81C9A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmcco@mykolab.com) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-10 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mx04.mykolab.com (mx04.mykolab.com [10.20.7.102]) by mx-out02.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 456CB6565E; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:23:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:23:17 -0400 From: Michael McConville To: Ben Woods Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Int overflow in dhclient(1) Message-ID: <20160315062316.GC344@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> References: <20160315015542.GA61626@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:23:26 -0000 Ben Woods wrote: > On Tuesday, 15 March 2016, Michael McConville wrote: > > > I sent this a few weeks ago, but it never got applied: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=freebsd-net&m=145392057613453&w=2 > > > > Here's my explanation for the same fix in OpenBSD: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=145377854103866&w=2 > > > > Thanks for your time, > > Michael > > > > > > Index: sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c > > =================================================================== > > --- sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c (revision 296886) > > +++ sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c (working copy) > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ > > findproto(char *cp, int n) > > { > > struct sockaddr *sa; > > - int i; > > + unsigned int i; > > > > if (n == 0) > > return -1; > > > > Seems like a bug report should be raised so this one doesn't get > lost/ignored. > > Would you be able to raise one here please? > https://bugs.freebsd.org/ I'll wait a day or two to see if a developer picks it up. Opening a bug report is a lot of work for a pretty straight-forward addition of a single token. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 06:29:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4A4AD1531 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9241EEE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2F6TPxd095282 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:29:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208007] [patch] Int overflow in dhclient(1) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:29:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hiren@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:29:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208007 Hiren Panchasara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 06:30:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB51AD15F4 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from mail.strugglingcoder.info (strugglingcoder.info [104.236.146.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF977B for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.1.3]) (Authenticated sender: hiren@strugglingcoder.info) by mail.strugglingcoder.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7BB20171C2; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:30:30 -0700 From: hiren panchasara To: Michael McConville Cc: Ben Woods , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Int overflow in dhclient(1) Message-ID: <20160315063030.GC17629@strugglingcoder.info> References: <20160315015542.GA61626@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> <20160315062316.GC344@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160315062316.GC344@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:30:31 -0000 --6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/15/16 at 02:23P, Michael McConville wrote: > Ben Woods wrote: > >=20 > > Seems like a bug report should be raised so this one doesn't get > > lost/ignored. > >=20 > > Would you be able to raise one here please? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/ >=20 > I'll wait a day or two to see if a developer picks it up. Opening a bug > report is a lot of work for a pretty straight-forward addition of a > single token. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208007 Cheers, Hiren --6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAABCgBmBQJW56wDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/lQ/IIAJxAdYJwZ7m2hRRlGOJFNWbW gffcEkZgpxwJxayi4REWINv/tjgB9DsybIN5SANIX8VpSqKVdBSlWC/yCy2aT+AC jzhfV4YvrR8iuBWwJPY/hbYMjYZFiAfbuTruwbCqoovQDgrMgflDz0bVUNS47TEh U+emLIdmJ0Ic6lE1M/3l+Vo+qwfPoup4Z41Pu2lhhN1n6TEOdrzbfSXcXMBYHCKp aSeMcrqvBPnH6QKrCqdJzsyeY1aNe+ghq3Qpv4/oGD3RkrL+dwkC+NWSa4ydf7ME ogriyakgOIFw1i1/BMTvL+de5cgcpi3pFhb/M0Lt+D/VhiPxH2rRusfgg/WqZ+g= =V2Na -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 01:03:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D5CAD35CE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D514C886 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2H1328a051237 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:03:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203630] [Hyper-V] [nat] [tcp] 10.2 NAT bug in TCP stack or hyperv netsvc driver Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:03:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: decui@microsoft.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: weh@microsoft.com X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:03:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203630 --- Comment #32 from Dexuan Cui --- (In reply to Dexuan Cui from comment #30) Hi Franco and Eddy, The errata is out here: https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-16:05.hv_netvsc.asc The fix for releng/10.2 is on the branch: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commits/releng/10.2 https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/8938078969b7348e3de72f4bc9377ad16= 3e62abf So you can update to 10.2 RELEASE-p14 to get the fix. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 06:31:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2159AD3EE7 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACD26983 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k1so90583373vkb.0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:31:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=21pcswwyYx75kO+IrYe3xXAo/8bPf6WdmCST5LeOc+Q=; b=Im9uGJG3Z1RwmW5bCHrOSq0jtrkDSR0xq6rVJSIFzl2pesLjdojR3NiF+in2jYdojh EvgQyqDAmDsf1njl/CSf/y8N1DTTzD4oHzihEWyqNLAaMafQG/9VYfcbvWR9N1ZZJLhW 092Gyoc6Ej2yZmzGwqrBfN/kHcHLzz+Le7SohHTDncrLUGdlu+/63gmENn7sZ4etMMZ7 pbwuwAggydm/a1EgDBG7QAolFjcm41DABBp9DPpwtuEcalY2o/dAp0S4TdWIrSQ+N686 Mp+GaVdhsbB4av6Z40er4mr5hyfkHiOBmWu93VtowU8j829OyMwVA7hgm0xFh79rnXbb B+Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=21pcswwyYx75kO+IrYe3xXAo/8bPf6WdmCST5LeOc+Q=; b=foIrFRFUejbUqCc6lJsDpjnyO9wRKYsiyLTqNY7nwioNd8OqQgAfTxRUTbxPiSvZQU 0wl/jfH5zUzbBfWkKoLo59CESzhwR03aQWyCQme1MhNF36knW+IlNIkrMQJDEQDobxDn XnFPrbLqtZm57BLlcCjUlJvda3kBR2uKpnXNG4B4c/LymSv+72+TJkKxY/BI9ZT/42jI +32Vi0nAWgq7ncCxZD7sVK3WA5Bz6CnEfVaDdK2WjJSD8svwh4hCEQrwnPUZtohP1wBS /LUZeZ08wHDiAaVsEg+gjw1X9VS5t2BkChbGXKuT2M7hr8ykYaei5E26SRhupcz28j2+ /3qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLCLqPNQd/wGJbxPFIdOUfEsJeohcHf0BB/UQFcHL0cDNIt7M9ZhSfM0dIVUhakc6WJA4HI0AeKIsHHfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.165.76 with SMTP id o73mr8644141vke.67.1458196279922; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.171.85 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:31:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: TSO test From: Jack Vogel To: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:31:21 -0000 Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit more distilled than running netperf or iperf? Thanks, Jack From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 06:57:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CDCAD2A61 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0912869E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2H6vkxC086626 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:57:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203630] [Hyper-V] [nat] [tcp] 10.2 NAT bug in TCP stack or hyperv netsvc driver Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:57:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: franco@opnsense.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: weh@microsoft.com X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:57:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203630 --- Comment #33 from Franco Fichtner --- Brilliant, thank you. All looks fine. :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 14:25:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D504FAD4BC9 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91C1C26 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 07:25:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,350,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="936042187" Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.130]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 07:25:47 -0700 Received: from orsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.9]) by ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.227]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:25:47 -0700 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" To: Jack Vogel , FreeBSD Net Subject: RE: TSO test Thread-Topic: TSO test Thread-Index: AQHRgBauSXpy9jdMJ06DEe94xU/SD59dsUNQ Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:25:46 +0000 Message-ID: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYmY4YjJlNWItYTg3My00MGE2LWJhMmUtYTBkYjk1ZTU2NWJjIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Ik1jemJRYzgySUo4ZTBldThvcVJUNEdQNEdDMVBNdkFcL3NyT1paOUVhT3VrPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.139] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:25:48 -0000 Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes with= TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same sce= nario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] = On Behalf Of Jack Vogel Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM To: FreeBSD Net Subject: TSO test Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit more distilled than running netperf or iperf? Thanks, Jack _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 14:45:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04556AD34DA for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0E61564 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x233.google.com with SMTP id ts10so86075510obc.1 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:45:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=d1E9mAWxaUiqnD9Zs8SRdhdEgcqVCtue/cciBsS56a0=; b=oeiQS2mnuaXdjLxbvYi7yk8oOqwc6ZiHM9IVj/6Ty+/Aj3ihprl4Ezj2E4q4Bb50F3 ACcms/aK1b75NUD5UPY/Q2VqpBflbojGhBegIFJ9BzioHxa4pIx2sr1DKP+0ET9YtPzL 8Y2L1DY5n+C2O7Xnom3P05KhWW+r4+NFGaLiYKsxQETLVYXLd1g1I5gzCel73O9vA9Dk msHNRXQoz61At7TV/BZTXHO/0F2KItofCGfO1tN+YPEkYzCdZGeecRU9HL7FTZul1id6 i6vslliByb9LzcN5S+0vwxMw6ciZj4xslvIceITHR+/F1mvh7Vw1b5dihx1gcrT/xmib JBaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=d1E9mAWxaUiqnD9Zs8SRdhdEgcqVCtue/cciBsS56a0=; b=IVtyR8P3Xp1Nrh/HsVxvXuNAV5wNzjxGxenihoknSoOspfiefClPQ3DYZFiiAGHubQ CcFkqsOK+w8WsbNx6GmWF0ROOddlfeVpMsy7Pmxd5lLydQmiLt2hpnf0xl/lv6lBDZqp O53W2D28bGUco3tmpq8qJd64XkExLeNXS1QnDkS0GHTpmyHc9J3ypGt5e4ZAeq74I82p SnwG2WU0wZzWBKdLn2eYURMxIElG0/hPjDHfMDEhgVYvOF4VOG2WRxPgD+Np/4wndxiz fDOHiRFBWrORutAUrlMJyuWxLVvLDJ0rT3AZVqfDeHnBm+22r5nOXYnBPKdgJAIIm1RU GK6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLpuYxkmDz6KASygQDVBSHqNyMsjhIKgMXPc6cDikzFQKau9u1RXOy86h4siW1erFbdT6M/x/7Ztt54yA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.150.163 with SMTP id uj3mr6312952oeb.67.1458225925100; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: asomers@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.64.138 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:45:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:45:25 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TaaOLlxgbTBL3TWP10uwG8Q9xTo Message-ID: Subject: Re: TSO test From: Alan Somers To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" Cc: Jack Vogel , FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:45:26 -0000 Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i"? On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: > Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes > with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same > scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] > On Behalf Of Jack Vogel > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM > To: FreeBSD Net > Subject: TSO test > > Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit > more distilled than running netperf or iperf? > > Thanks, > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 15:22:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0831AD3FE1 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C02895; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sweettea.beer.town (unknown [76.164.8.130]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DB2956498; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:22:56 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: TSO test To: Alan Somers , "Pieper, Jeffrey E" References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:22:55 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:22:56 -0000 Alan, That does sound useful. As one complication, "vmstat -i" shows the interrupt rate since boot. Either the test would need to reboot between each iteration, or vmstat would need to be improved to show the "recent" rate. The latter would be a much welcome improvement, in my humble opinion. Cheers, Eric On 03/17/2016 09:45, Alan Somers wrote: > Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i"? > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < > jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: > >> Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes >> with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same >> scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. >> >> Jeff >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] >> On Behalf Of Jack Vogel >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM >> To: FreeBSD Net >> Subject: TSO test >> >> Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit >> more distilled than running netperf or iperf? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jack >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 15:28:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48937AD20DF for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5C79B7; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 08:28:19 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,350,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="913089448" Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.7]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 08:28:17 -0700 Received: from orsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.9]) by ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.142]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:28:17 -0700 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" To: Eric van Gyzen , Alan Somers CC: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel Subject: RE: TSO test Thread-Topic: TSO test Thread-Index: AQHRgBauSXpy9jdMJ06DEe94xU/SD59dsUNQgAAQfUOAAAEU8A== Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:28:17 +0000 Message-ID: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953B86@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMTNjNTc1MmEtMmI0Mi00NjY4LTk5OWYtZWY5ZjQwYjVmYjUwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkE5dkh5VjJvTjRuTkQ1MmdDNzFCemFicmZBZzFlbWJoYWc5STRQeCtFK1k9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:28:19 -0000 You can also parse vmstat -i, which we do as well. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangyzen@FreeBSD.org]=20 Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:23 AM To: Alan Somers ; Pieper, Jeffrey E Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel Subject: Re: TSO test Alan, That does sound useful. As one complication, "vmstat -i" shows the interrupt rate since boot. Either the test would need to reboot between each iteration, or vmstat would need to be improved to show the "recent" rate. The latter would be a much welcome improvement, in my humble opinion= . Cheers, Eric On 03/17/2016 09:45, Alan Somers wrote: > Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i"= ? > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < > jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: > >> Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes >> with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the s= ame >> scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. >> >> Jeff >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.or= g] >> On Behalf Of Jack Vogel >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM >> To: FreeBSD Net >> Subject: TSO test >> >> Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit >> more distilled than running netperf or iperf? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jack >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 15:56:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6769BAD2B6A for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAA582B; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sweettea.beer.town (unknown [76.164.8.130]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A181F56498; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:56:18 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: TSO test To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" , Alan Somers References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953B86@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: <56EAD3A2.4020507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:56:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953B86@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:56:19 -0000 Jeff, So, you reboot the DUT between each scenario? Eric On 03/17/2016 10:28, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote: > You can also parse vmstat -i, which we do as well. > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangyzen@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:23 AM > To: Alan Somers ; Pieper, Jeffrey E > Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel > Subject: Re: TSO test > > Alan, > > That does sound useful. As one complication, "vmstat -i" shows the > interrupt rate since boot. Either the test would need to reboot between > each iteration, or vmstat would need to be improved to show the "recent" > rate. The latter would be a much welcome improvement, in my humble opinion. > > Cheers, > > Eric > > On 03/17/2016 09:45, Alan Somers wrote: >> Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i"? >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < >> jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes >>> with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same >>> scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] >>> On Behalf Of Jack Vogel >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM >>> To: FreeBSD Net >>> Subject: TSO test >>> >>> Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit >>> more distilled than running netperf or iperf? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jack >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 15:59:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E499CAD2CDF for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5E3AE1; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 08:59:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,350,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="68356372" Received: from orsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.129]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 08:59:08 -0700 Received: from orsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.13) by ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:58:28 -0700 Received: from orsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.9]) by ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.159]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:58:27 -0700 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" To: Eric van Gyzen , Alan Somers CC: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel Subject: RE: TSO test Thread-Topic: TSO test Thread-Index: AQHRgBauSXpy9jdMJ06DEe94xU/SD59dsUNQgAAQfUOAAAEU8IAAfW0A//+KyfA= Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:58:27 +0000 Message-ID: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953C37@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953B86@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EAD3A2.4020507@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <56EAD3A2.4020507@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjY4NDM2ODktMzkxMi00Mjg2LWEyMmUtNGRiOTUyZmQ4YTQ4IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6ImNJNXpGamlXanlmZEk4N0FIT1lPalhKcGNZNmJUS3RJQWdaYWZnNmFLWGs9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:59:15 -0000 No, we have scripts that parse vmstat -i. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangyzen@FreeBSD.org]=20 Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:56 AM To: Pieper, Jeffrey E ; Alan Somers Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel Subject: Re: TSO test Jeff, So, you reboot the DUT between each scenario? Eric On 03/17/2016 10:28, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote: > You can also parse vmstat -i, which we do as well. >=20 > Jeff >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangyzen@FreeBSD.org]=20 > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:23 AM > To: Alan Somers ; Pieper, Jeffrey E > Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel > Subject: Re: TSO test >=20 > Alan, >=20 > That does sound useful. As one complication, "vmstat -i" shows the > interrupt rate since boot. Either the test would need to reboot between > each iteration, or vmstat would need to be improved to show the "recent" > rate. The latter would be a much welcome improvement, in my humble opini= on. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Eric >=20 > On 03/17/2016 09:45, Alan Somers wrote: >> Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i= "? >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < >> jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes >>> with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the = same >>> scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.o= rg] >>> On Behalf Of Jack Vogel >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM >>> To: FreeBSD Net >>> Subject: TSO test >>> >>> Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit >>> more distilled than running netperf or iperf? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jack >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >=20 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 16:16:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF734AD3329 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FED938E; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sweettea.beer.town (unknown [76.164.8.130]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AC1956498; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:15:55 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: TSO test To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" , Alan Somers References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953B86@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EAD3A2.4020507@FreeBSD.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953C37@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: <56EAD83A.7030903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:15:54 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953C37@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:16:01 -0000 Oh, you compare the "total" column from run to run. Sorry, I was just thinking about the "rate" column. Sorry for the noise. Eric On 03/17/2016 10:58, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote: > No, we have scripts that parse vmstat -i. > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangyzen@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:56 AM > To: Pieper, Jeffrey E ; Alan Somers > Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel > Subject: Re: TSO test > > Jeff, > > So, you reboot the DUT between each scenario? > > Eric > > On 03/17/2016 10:28, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote: >> You can also parse vmstat -i, which we do as well. >> >> Jeff >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangyzen@FreeBSD.org] >> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:23 AM >> To: Alan Somers ; Pieper, Jeffrey E >> Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel >> Subject: Re: TSO test >> >> Alan, >> >> That does sound useful. As one complication, "vmstat -i" shows the >> interrupt rate since boot. Either the test would need to reboot between >> each iteration, or vmstat would need to be improved to show the "recent" >> rate. The latter would be a much welcome improvement, in my humble opinion. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Eric >> >> On 03/17/2016 09:45, Alan Somers wrote: >>> Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i"? >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < >>> jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes >>>> with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same >>>> scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] >>>> On Behalf Of Jack Vogel >>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM >>>> To: FreeBSD Net >>>> Subject: TSO test >>>> >>>> Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit >>>> more distilled than running netperf or iperf? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 16:51:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C1DAD41AA for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0911BB76; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2HGoraD042389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:50:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: vangyzen@FreeBSD.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2HGolar092107 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:50:48 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: TSO test To: Eric van Gyzen , Alan Somers , "Pieper, Jeffrey E" References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <56EAE066.1010108@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:50:46 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56EACBCF.5020109@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:51:04 -0000 17.03.2016 22:22, Eric van Gyzen пишет: > Alan, > > That does sound useful. As one complication, "vmstat -i" shows the > interrupt rate since boot. Either the test would need to reboot between > each iteration, or vmstat would need to be improved to show the "recent" > rate. The latter would be a much welcome improvement, in my humble opinion. vmstat with "-i" option shows interrupts since reboot and without "-i" shows interrupts per interval, look for "in" column under "faults": $ vmstat 1 3 procs memory page disks faults cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 ad1 in sy cs us sy id 0 1 17 9221M 1525M 197 0 0 0 215 119 0 0 1107 106 813 4 3 94 0 1 17 9221M 1525M 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 1078 544 2505 0 2 98 0 1 17 9221M 1525M 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 1082 509 2468 0 2 97 In this example, there were 107, 87 and 82 interrupts per each of last 3 seconds excluding 1000 clock ("HZ") interrupts. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 17:53:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA36CAD34AF for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D678E3D for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2HHrVNd043847 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:53:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208091] net.inet.ipsec.dfbit=2 not working Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:53:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:53:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208091 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |easy, patch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 10:46:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1475AD4FF7 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8083125D for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2IAkgUj018311 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:46:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 178782] [ixgbe] 82599EB SFP does not work with passthrough under KVM. Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:46:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: wl.jarod@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:46:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D178782 jarodwl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wl.jarod@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from jarodwl --- (In reply to Jeff Pieper from comment #9) I still can reproduce the issue using 10.2-RELEASE. My basic environment is below: Hypervisor: KVM Host: Centos 7.0 Could you help share your basic environment like hypervisor and host versio= n? PS, libvirt XML is below: test 7f68743b-d225-4c7d-dc7e-9aa6712584b3 8388608 8388608 4 hvm destroy restart restart /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm
--=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 11:11:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E835AD56D0 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F13B1BBA for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2IBB0in000358 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187094] [nfs] [patch] Support DHCP option for jumbo frames on PXE/BOOTP interface Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: novel@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D187094 Roman Bogorodskiy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |novel@FreeBSD.org Assignee|freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 16:04:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8586DAD432D for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FC3110 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2IG4s3H093450 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:04:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 178782] [ixgbe] 82599EB SFP does not work with passthrough under KVM. Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:04:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:04:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D178782 Eric Joyner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erj@freebsd.org Version|9.1-PRERELEASE |10.2-RELEASE --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 19:39:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E170AD52C6 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22FD5105B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id qe11so40473092lbc.3 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:39:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=p0Gen8A5Troa2lIgsEFrcD01gf0bGs6ZXlCFUVA8MRU=; b=uiavvCAGSmbUWjYdEQjh5Hv++ut+cKy/WVWBTzoxTb8RcgayWIRlvQsNjzPH2Sf9mg 7xWjE46TRnQLJJ8TW/nmV7RR9NqH2CbUy+Igi0DFRARzRFL+ZsbCAa2/SGdAGkt/J7Rp 7qUEBJ+nqyBMur1G+SjZ5kqf6wFc18Sfl/BJpe3IhuDKl6Wae78PxyvPSv/BfEfmXf0B 9nPWC6p/yXjp3S+ms4vb5HBzQyU6L2dXmElTw42VbxH8BYRuKou4BAPWee2kRioEj+aq 7lIUKbY2yhrwAZeXsDu54mlduahNxaHHuy4U5rEm2X6ET3hrVkv35q1jnIcPAxK2JF6A mgDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=p0Gen8A5Troa2lIgsEFrcD01gf0bGs6ZXlCFUVA8MRU=; b=CLaeBkWiJy6T8X5CATNIUfLYhcdR7S1OpH1he7eGVyF9a6EQJ9mFUDgErKZ9x/ti2i QuMDTw+DB3jNpO0HRjOQ1gJloIt4cIhYleXFF49D++QHXMQV+XoB2lDwiAxzp1QQYe3R ygpqOch2hl6yBzgim60hSKnwysJ1S75pPVzMUVOX+PpljGn3wlUkas9qvn+b4JPNt7DC urqRSs+uNAjTSfX8RjImxPJr+OYrMEluJ/+G4FeO317GOFvUZx6KtDnNwtthfNnwMqFC oy41x6hB1iWv01DRZCdB6MIBdA2TC6s8e49E0pgUFqK9qozkHRHbrox8BRDkiHFRbQas eH+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLcY40XB8+ltS8OeP22AR1Z61jo9rDGue5ar3+8Ti3dz8EGkFdE6YwMZ+E2eJ450Xpqbo+aAgRXCWHdXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.72.135 with SMTP id d7mr6793221lbv.126.1458329982200; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.68 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.68 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:39:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Status of MPLS in FreeBSD From: Sami Halabi To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:39:44 -0000 hi , I would like to ask about the status of implementing MPLS in FreeBSD. Are there any progress ? is it going to be implemented soon? Sami From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 14:12:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD15AD6A4B for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A48A1FA2 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id oe12so104239820lbc.0 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:12:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=f3xJKJnuC4+Ef08OqOBNtPCduqZTSS+xeP1yyHFPj+o=; b=YRYbvSjo6eP7dPgSTioOsuN+7qvbo5Mq+CSkiQhapvASONTu959xHsKEimVEmHrlJp tjNPsaHXRQqTlnDAUINhD09AzPuSn4wh8SNowyj/Vc9eaUVZjtGtgZ1r60OwPLRhS0nm /7XvlYfSHKWa9ZR9/WH3gK2SAuzZV320RQ9fLCsBoSQYvMr0YtRHE0pNii3+XSu4ZwbL a22ILG4UDwP46O7t6rg/MHUEEUF66XuzRoT1TerlFcQHdxnkixTzpSCIASgChRPYJMZQ VE07qIivt4Mt5SI99n4nsMV/zr/s7DkG+AoOxWlbUoRghbrnEbOZaPwfZvZ7HQWpRWIY d7Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=f3xJKJnuC4+Ef08OqOBNtPCduqZTSS+xeP1yyHFPj+o=; b=LfYnhQxJodG7V6VHXPnoBuTlh0UFUVdorWhgA1Kl1efPkchwOMvs+RPb3b51fXg0hP 21HV9udslU+vjF1AbAU61PQLWXVZQnRKN/PtBKZVS21xWBuegjK/nhaWUXg+Mu5QrDl0 T539nUNxhgrcoMDywuNvFqij+Yyw2gr3PUffp4U3GUKZ8aHCl+ebljje5C3zN5hqu9rx 5LZUOPne8m3LE2Ar1eK0tyuQP4gcXuqxm3cuuGyG3axG4SE3A9612rUyGo0TMh3dZhi9 JIVEjJJvq9nQ0PToPegzHK5w2uzCBkOOld3N6a2IQ3Sn2PV1IatIOWXuaNYElzfj3Pug WdSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLatpP+KJqbkiuKMovp1eF+LuAygRE2L06p6uLuHQK/CfD93yHeRPLxW/SAh1U9Dc3riL2VUNbeWFRYfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.85.137 with SMTP id h9mr7831148lbz.45.1458396736219; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.68 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.68 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:12:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:12:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade From: Sami Halabi To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:12:20 -0000 hi, are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise scale like: 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg an app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion... 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx... Thanks in advance, Sami From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 16:18:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D04AD6CC6 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from webmail2.jnielsen.NET (webmail2.jnielsen.net [50.114.224.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.jnielsen.net", Issuer "freebsdsolutions.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ABB1BA for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [10.3.74.122] ([107.72.97.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by webmail2.jnielsen.NET (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u2JFtT4K021408 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:55:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail2.jnielsen.NET: Host [107.72.97.244] claimed to be [10.3.74.122] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade From: John Nielsen X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:55:28 -0600 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Sami Halabi X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:18:02 -0000 > On Mar 19, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: >=20 > hi, > are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise scal= e > like: > 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg an > app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion... > 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx... The wiki pages probably the best place for general info on bhyve current and= planned features: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve Live migration is a planned feature. HA rules and other automation and orche= stration are probably beyond the scope of what bhyve itself is aiming to ach= ieve, though such features could easily be provided by additional scripts an= d tools. What specifically are you after in terms of network virtualization? Again, b= hyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD does support m= any networking features which could support network virtualization (and whic= h work fine with bhyve). JN From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 16:55:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAC6AD5904 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414AC3C6 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v123so59505455ioe.0 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:55:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netgate.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=A5LU2LeGtjKhF1R19+Ay27ke2t7l/ya7pqcXDgbTQgk=; b=O1U/x/HS4+MYGSJsRuEpA7xFYFc6pMUlNS+oOYc6bIEgMBOMvwn589EJ2SED6k0n0u Lmh7/dcrKs/1saRaFr5amWzlHVkBG9Y4dHZd7fx/FDXHajNZIlg/x8pwzpAL3sg8414W YuRynhXt5xgIlQCSVnE0wbkNDaksdKvetEBSw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=A5LU2LeGtjKhF1R19+Ay27ke2t7l/ya7pqcXDgbTQgk=; b=h7jxCHCd6aRFpROdd2UnHY6J1J/352qD4ARvIr+ETCQBIrQ+3JtdgOwJ74lV7vvqWE TWEDHKdCQ7DhPPWYwXwZs4kr1AAv3mThkrdEcRa2AcWs/Bs1Gp6Mk54BqLDnfdvfDn0Q V/FodXpNU+fzu/8sH+/bKhiPT3k4v87rVJBPkc88NqU1u/1lTZacbfnWJ+y4H8idiuI1 vpwlwUFJb+ly/W+Syq+mn+FsuAwTyZYhMo4Q47ng3vbj2zPnn/dw37pHHaCS6spCrTJN Ya3XoVF8OCL75crMVevoKNQUSGTLGUiDCc8dOVLkUWuKZoZs9Vdj9gIMDbmp6lhF2W1S HfUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLDGS6AlvM/XGwLTW2WDHFZ4FyRriT0VHhjLq9uF3KfhqtaZQWzPxSVFtpik9nEerKE X-Received: by 10.107.136.156 with SMTP id s28mr21377335ioi.21.1458406550565; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.12.46] (69-71-179-207.mammothnetworks.com. [69.71.179.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm2034565iga.6.2016.03.19.09.55.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade From: Jim Thompson In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:55:49 -0500 Cc: Sami Halabi , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <15AC566F-82AD-4F76-9710-67669D344F4D@netgate.com> References: To: John Nielsen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:55:51 -0000 > On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:55 AM, John Nielsen wrote: >=20 >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: >>=20 >> hi, >> are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise = scale >> like: >> 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg = an >> app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion... >> 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx... >=20 > The wiki pages probably the best place for general info on bhyve = current and planned features: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve >=20 > Live migration is a planned feature. HA rules and other automation and = orchestration are probably beyond the scope of what bhyve itself is = aiming to achieve, though such features could easily be provided by = additional scripts and tools. >=20 > What specifically are you after in terms of network virtualization? = Again, bhyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD = does support many networking features which could support network = virtualization (and which work fine with bhyve). VALE is built-in to FreeBSD, and with the new netmap back-end for bhyve, = serves as a good =E2=80=98base=E2=80=99 for a vswitch. Jim