From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 17 21:00:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBECB12125 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D12E517B1 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3HL01L1043394 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:00:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201604172100.u3HL01L1043394@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:00:29 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:00:30 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc In Progress | 203422 | mpd/ppoe not working with re(4) with revision 285 New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 206053 | kqueue support code of netmap causes panic Open | 148807 | [panic] 8.1-RELEASE/10.1-STABLE "panic: sbdrop" a Open | 194515 | Fatal Trap 12 Kernel with vimage Open | 199136 | [if_tap] Added down_on_close sysctl variable to t Open | 201694 | 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jail Open | 206544 | sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; 10 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 00:42:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09511AEEE26 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE2251E4D for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3I0gvKh061385 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:42:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208803] ixgbe(4) reports wrong IPv4 checksum when txcsum is enabled Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:42:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:42:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208803 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |IntelNetworking --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 01:29:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42950B11425 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0AC14B7 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id A3144C8CF; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:29:50 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <459204f7f9764a233ea85a1ae21680da@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcUOI4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:29:51 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#127063, @jtl wrote: > Doesn't tp->t_rxtshift get updated on a successful send? If not, I think that is what we should be fixing. > > Personally, I think a connection should drop if we aren't able to send any ACKs for 350 seconds. It's t_shift >= 12 killing the connection, since no one actually stops the timer/performs RTT update for ACK if ENOBUFS happens on a receiving only connections. So intermittent (not continuous) failures to transmit ACK due to ENOBUFS will kill a long living receiving only connection eventually. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, lstewart, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren Cc: mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 01:33:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BECB115E2 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C107D197F for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 6AA50CAB5; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:33:08 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcUOVQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:33:09 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#127243, @hiren wrote: > In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#127123, @jtl wrote: > > > > > > > > > The key feature that makes the retransmit timer inappropriate for an ACK-only case is that it is only stopped when we receive input; however, in the ACK-only case, we really want to stop it as soon as we transmit a successful ACK. > > Indeed. I guess we want to treat internal insufficient memory error with retransmit timer remedy. One would also argue that do you really want to go on when you failed to respond (with the ACK) for these many times. Don't you have bigger problems by now? As I said, it's _not_ continuous loosing of ACK due to ENOBUFS, but _intermittent_ (e.g. you lost 12 ACKs due to ENOBUFS in 2~3 hours) losing ACKs due to ENOBUFS is sufficient to kill a a long living receiving only connection. >> Of course, we could just drop the ACK and everything would "just work". But, it //probably// is still a good idea to try to re-transmit the ACK. > > I am not opposed to the suggested patch but its just...weird. (Also if its not obvious, I don't have a better solution to present. :-)) REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, lstewart, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren Cc: mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 01:39:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859AB117B1 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C7A1AD4 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 7D206CD58; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:39:13 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcUOsE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:39:14 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#127372, @mike-karels.net wrote: > Setting a retransmission timer on an ACK makes no sense; I don't think tcp_output will send an ACK on a retransmission timeout. > > Setting timers in the ENOBUFS case is at best a partial fix. If the ACK is lost locally, we know; if it is lost elsewhere, we don't. We need timers in any case. > > Setting a local timer for the ACK case is no better for latency than having the other end run a retransmit timer.. > > If there is a problem with setting the retransmit timer for a FIN, let's fix that. Otherwise, I stand by my recommendation of deleting the code to set a timer. Yeah, delete the retransmission timeout is fine w/ me. Do we reach consensus here? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, lstewart, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren Cc: mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 11:31:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C9B1149F; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralsaadi@swin.edu.au) Received: from iport2.cc.swin.edu.au (iport2.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.0.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F261D63; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralsaadi@swin.edu.au) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,502,1454936400"; d="scan'208";a="19047243" Received: from gsp-ex01.ds.swin.edu.au (HELO outlook.swin.edu.au) ([136.186.126.17]) by iport2.cc.swin.edu.au with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2016 21:29:57 +1000 Received: from GSP-EX02.ds.swin.edu.au ([169.254.2.170]) by gsp-ex01.ds.swin.edu.au ([169.254.1.160]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:29:56 +1000 From: Rasool Al-Saadi To: "aqm@ietf.org" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" CC: Grenville Armitage Subject: Dummynet AQM v0.2- CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet Thread-Topic: Dummynet AQM v0.2- CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet Thread-Index: AdGZZMR7qylo1SZqRpSWlM5D+/m1Cw== Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:29:55 +0000 Message-ID: <6545444AE21C2749939E637E56594CEA3C206A7B@gsp-ex02.ds.swin.edu.au> Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [136.186.126.11] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:31:07 -0000 Dear all, I would like to announce that we (myself and Grenville Armitage) released D= ummynet AQM v0.2, which is an independent implementation of CoDel, FQ-CoDel= PIE and FQ-PIE* for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet framework, based on the IETF = CoDel [1], FQ-CoDel [2] and PIE [3] Internet-Drafts. * "FlowQueue-PIE" (FQ-PIE) implementation combines FQ-CoDel's FlowQueuing w= ith PIE's individual queue management. In addition to PIE and FQ-PIE, this version includes bugs fixing and improv= ements to CoDel and FQ-CoDel code. We prepared patches for FreeBSD11-CURRENT-r297692 and FreeBSD 10.x-RELEASE= (10.0, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3), and a technical report of our implementation. Patches and documentation can be found in: http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm Technical report: http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/160418A/CAIA-TR-160418A.pdf [1] "Controlled Delay Active Queue Management", https://tools.ietf.org/htm= l/draft-ietf-aqm-codel-03 [2] "FlowQueue-Codel" , https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel= -06 [3] "PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme To Address the Bufferbloat Problem",= https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-pie-06 Regards, Rasool Al-Saadi From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 13:32:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CE8B13E92 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darfil_972@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB004-OMC2S20.hotmail.com (dub004-omc2s20.hotmail.com [157.55.1.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC80219F7 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darfil_972@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB128-W16 ([157.55.1.137]) by DUB004-OMC2S20.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 06:30:50 -0700 X-TMN: [YBp/55gF+u/ugzV3zM60HAbalq6WPON+] X-Originating-Email: [darfil_972@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Marko Markovic To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: netmap question Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:30:49 +0100 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2016 13:30:50.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[85D5FF80:01D19976] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:32:00 -0000 Hello Luigi=2C first of all i have to say you have done great work. I had some fun with ne= tmap but i have a question: How can we fill in the transmit ring buffers of a network card from differe= nt CPUs/threads? Or to clarify i am able to fill the send ring on the threa= d that does the poll=2C but what if i want to fill the packets on a differ= ent thread and send on another? Any help is welcome=2C and if you have a si= mple example that would be great. Thank you in advance. Regards=2CMarko = From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 15:30:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B9CB13C8A for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589F816CF for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3IFUDBn056833 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:30:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208653] PCN driver will not handle all PC net pro cards Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:30:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:30:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208653 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sbruno@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Sean Bruno --- The best thing I can suggest, is to post a "pciconf -lvbc" from the system = and lets see if just adding pci-ids helps. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 15:36:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D824B13ED8 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272AC1B34 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 8A2BFD047; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:12 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sbruno (Sean Bruno)" Reply-to: D5853+325+47f73f6fef2a530d@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D5853: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options Message-ID: <43f298c97d2ee90da56b534771152361@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , Thread-Topic: D5853: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NzcwN2IzZDEwOWQ3OGQ5NTIxYzJjMDI3ZmM0IFcU/uw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:13 -0000 sbruno added reviewers: pkelsey, jhb, gnn. sbruno added a comment. spam a few more reviewers who have poked at dhclient in the past. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5853 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, secteam, delphij, glebius, adrian, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, decui_microsoft.com, freebsd-net-list, pkelsey, jhb, gnn Cc: sbruno From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 18:43:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420D3B12AE7 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDF213AD for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 83BEAF45D; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:42:59 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "jhb (John Baldwin)" Reply-to: D5853+325+47f73f6fef2a530d@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Accepted] D5853: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options Message-ID: <78c35df776c22476aa44a9311839bf00@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D5853: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NzcwN2IzZDEwOWQ3OGQ5NTIxYzJjMDI3ZmM0IFcVKrM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:43:00 -0000 jhb accepted this revision. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5853 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, secteam, delphij, glebius, adrian, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, decui_microsoft.com, freebsd-net-list, pkelsey, gnn, jhb Cc: sbruno From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 02:36:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BF7B139FA for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C40911E4 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id A11D1C411; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:36:46 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "lstewart (Lawrence Stewart)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <22bf4278b8e5dec2fabcaa1f6e79e91b@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcVmb4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:36:47 -0000 lstewart added a comment. I agree with Mike's proposal (although FYI, I do belive tcp_output() will send an ACK on RTO). TCP ACKs are intentionally unreliable by design and setting the retransmit timer there is nonsense - either there is a bug elsewhere which needs to be fixed, or it is trying to paper over local ACK loss in a dubious manner. The ENOBUFS case should also become a thing of the past when the back pressure work goes in any way. For the immediate change, perhaps replacing with a macro that expands to a KASSERT to double check the appropriate conditions for the retransmit or persist timers being set would be a good idea. The macro should be used elsewhere in tcp_output() and tcp_intput() as well but that can be done in follow up commit(s). REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 04:06:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C6DB14885 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D291822 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id o126so6792252iod.0 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=KNY44VJH4HWYfbCL23vUXPs9iwyrZgAFWXj9SGYBIX8=; b=Jtwa1UyLkykV5lbGCyDfcWQ9gJ46S8F8ddotK9OOxNuGigHZScKSP0Qy7uRX4ruBQF Cdxz0pnqtAbhlcSvge3rvJ3JnNn15QRwyv5ehNazFQk1fD3F+kfrAXlSJfp58dnBPyki dDajQydz7rivc6mfBcoXonO4RXp+BkYII+ui06M4PTXKrptSllvR2ZRTbmtKqFQBSkOC HE7ZjvvfjLRePWvj3uXBhEp1dIs/dSwfl7+2pQRyKWSWYREHyNKgjnzDN5p2H16S5H9c 6e649mryqjbCovxDfYN5MZD8bg9rUFYDYtyVPOCLvnnKargtFfVbFYjUqrMbUgDWKJv/ Es4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=KNY44VJH4HWYfbCL23vUXPs9iwyrZgAFWXj9SGYBIX8=; b=Z3i7XAKr34DtuDkirgT2ItWy8MvJIle2KXSwJgmuY0JmLN+ujoYBxZP1rhfOYQesFs Mju6+Ht7SAbMFXB7W4IKHKFo1AApr/ro5VzEuMCyIgBvOJgXEgGZCxy1YXApPV4Gud6+ LktXLXkur05LmjNYsXzQvT79FDeYUCkdC4ySnpjQ2IT5B+ZpDm8lO2HkYr/LlVFaeAr5 y44WccSA6y6AMhe9GouxoRVyXhT4h7iGLZ+4gWRZC+JDSqmiNASBApCvUxrMo6VI5Sz2 97okpFbe1px+iQMthJfm3kUIDG3rCAKP9rbSBe4gbChoEVwXMI36c4+x0kZuCVp30Ry8 UtZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVyMv5UgG3/jnOBnt3xAQmTzNodki4qOJsvA/1wBX+3sGwqhq7gVdGdr/p7YcWdGU+JMDhZkTn777N1Qw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.46.158 with SMTP id u30mr1337430iou.162.1461038788335; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.156.132 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:06:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Issues with ixl(4) From: Dustin Marquess To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:06:29 -0000 I'm having some strange issues with ixl(4) and a X710-DA4 card in a new-ish Intel-based server. I'm pretty much replicating an existing setup from an older AMD machine that used 2 x X520-DA2 cards and ixgbe(4). This is all on -CURRENT. It's meant to be a bhyve server, so the 4x10GE ports are put into a LACP-based lagg(4), then vlan(4) interfaces are bound to the lagg, and then if_bridge(4) interfaces are created to bind the vlan and tap interfaces together. The X710-DA4 is running the latest NVM from Intel (5.02): dev.ixl.3.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 dev.ixl.2.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 dev.ixl.1.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 dev.ixl.0.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 I've tried both the ixl driver that comes with -CURRENT (1.4.3?) and the 1.4.27 driver from Intel and am having the same problem. The problem is this exactly (sorry it's taken me so long to get to it!): Using just one interface, one interface + VLANs, the lagg without VLANs, etc, everything works perfectly fine. As soon as I combine lagg+vlan+bridge, all hell breaks loose. One machine can ping one alias on the server but not the other while other machines can. The server itself can't ping the DNS server nor the default route, but can ping things through the default route, etc. The behavior is very unpredictable. ssh can take a few times to get in, and then once it, "svn update" will work for a few seconds and then bomb out, etc. He is the working config from the X520-DA2 system: ifconfig_ix0="-lro -tso -txcsum up" ifconfig_ix1="-lro -tso -txcsum up" ifconfig_ix2="-lro -tso -txcsum up" ifconfig_ix3="-lro -tso -txcsum up" cloned_interfaces="lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport ix0 laggport ix1 laggport ix2 laggport ix3" ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" ifconfig_bridge1="addm vlan2 addm tap1" defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" Here is the "broken" config from the X710-DA4 system: ifconfig_ixl0="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" ifconfig_ixl1="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" ifconfig_ixl2="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" ifconfig_ixl3="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" cloned_interfaces="lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport ixl0 laggport ixl1 laggport ixl2 laggport ixl3" ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.101/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" ifconfig_bridge1="addm vlan2 addm tap1" defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" I've changed the various flags in the ifconfig_ixl# lines without any obvious differences. Both machines are connected to the same HPe 5820X switch with the same exact config, so I don't believe it's a switch issue. Any ideas? Has anybody seen something like this before? Thanks! -Dustin From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 05:47:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06370B02D80 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@netapp.com) Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mx141.netapp.com", Issuer "Symantec Class 3 Secure Server CA - G4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB769136E for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@netapp.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,505,1455004800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="111191908" Received: from hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.40]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2016 22:45:23 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:45:21 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::c07c:8fcd:f7e4:f32b%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:45:21 -0700 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: Dustin Marquess CC: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Issues with ixl(4) Thread-Topic: Issues with ixl(4) Thread-Index: AQHRmfDiNfycsBH8CEW32UntV96nZp+RPsUA Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:45:19 +0000 Message-ID: <2C78DBCF-26F2-44D0-A45E-6EE8918648EA@netapp.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.35] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E29563A1-48A5-410C-A19F-5F15BA3125E7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:47:17 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E29563A1-48A5-410C-A19F-5F15BA3125E7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I haven't played with lagg+vlan+bridge, but I briefly evaluated XL710 = boards last year = (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-October/043584.html)= and saw very poor throughputs and latencies even in very simple setups. = As far as I could figure it out, TSO/LRO wasn't being performed = (although enabled) and so I ran into packet-rate issues. I basically gave up and went with a different vendor. FWIW, the XL710 = boards in the same machines booted into Linux performed fine. Lars > On 2016-04-19, at 6:06, Dustin Marquess wrote: >=20 > I'm having some strange issues with ixl(4) and a X710-DA4 card in a = new-ish > Intel-based server. I'm pretty much replicating an existing setup = from an > older AMD machine that used 2 x X520-DA2 cards and ixgbe(4). This is = all > on -CURRENT. >=20 > It's meant to be a bhyve server, so the 4x10GE ports are put into a > LACP-based lagg(4), then vlan(4) interfaces are bound to the lagg, and = then > if_bridge(4) interfaces are created to bind the vlan and tap = interfaces > together. >=20 > The X710-DA4 is running the latest NVM from Intel (5.02): >=20 > dev.ixl.3.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > dev.ixl.2.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > dev.ixl.1.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > dev.ixl.0.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 >=20 > I've tried both the ixl driver that comes with -CURRENT (1.4.3?) and = the > 1.4.27 driver from Intel and am having the same problem. The problem = is > this exactly (sorry it's taken me so long to get to it!): >=20 > Using just one interface, one interface + VLANs, the lagg without = VLANs, > etc, everything works perfectly fine. As soon as I combine > lagg+vlan+bridge, all hell breaks loose. One machine can ping one = alias on > the server but not the other while other machines can. The server = itself > can't ping the DNS server nor the default route, but can ping things > through the default route, etc. The behavior is very unpredictable. = ssh > can take a few times to get in, and then once it, "svn update" will = work > for a few seconds and then bomb out, etc. >=20 > He is the working config from the X520-DA2 system: >=20 > ifconfig_ix0=3D"-lro -tso -txcsum up" > ifconfig_ix1=3D"-lro -tso -txcsum up" > ifconfig_ix2=3D"-lro -tso -txcsum up" > ifconfig_ix3=3D"-lro -tso -txcsum up" > cloned_interfaces=3D"lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" > ifconfig_lagg0=3D"laggproto lacp laggport ix0 laggport ix1 laggport = ix2 > laggport ix3" > ifconfig_vlan1=3D"vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_vlan2=3D"vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_bridge0=3D"inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" > ifconfig_bridge1=3D"addm vlan2 addm tap1" > defaultrouter=3D"192.168.1.1" >=20 > Here is the "broken" config from the X710-DA4 system: >=20 > ifconfig_ixl0=3D"-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag = -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > ifconfig_ixl1=3D"-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag = -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > ifconfig_ixl2=3D"-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag = -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > ifconfig_ixl3=3D"-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag = -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > cloned_interfaces=3D"lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" > ifconfig_lagg0=3D"laggproto lacp laggport ixl0 laggport ixl1 laggport = ixl2 > laggport ixl3" > ifconfig_vlan1=3D"vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_vlan2=3D"vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_bridge0=3D"inet 192.168.1.101/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" > ifconfig_bridge1=3D"addm vlan2 addm tap1" > defaultrouter=3D"192.168.1.1" >=20 > I've changed the various flags in the ifconfig_ixl# lines without any > obvious differences. Both machines are connected to the same HPe = 5820X > switch with the same exact config, so I don't believe it's a switch = issue. >=20 > Any ideas? Has anybody seen something like this before? >=20 > Thanks! > -Dustin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Apple-Mail=_E29563A1-48A5-410C-A19F-5F15BA3125E7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXFcXuAAoJEFS1wwm/cMFXKusQAMlS/HUcRwWmE+PZhtrohMCe W2BkMqrTjsvjQf25pS6BOhsC1q42mXWpUgw3JvfPTgbKMm4aEFTrUcyeBECc8gt4 oZ5mwtWy+5rdWt+8hep+LXW64He3jQjGaC3e2SAA/GmkLtwCQlSSAtrrD2acxlJF yv810XaIz5sg8lQ768oxk/Ks6hJep3UIhwAD+d/lEpuCBvmwrixbyV0OwIatcdnG dNNoI14qx54z8E+cs0Y1dDd0CpeB27JGBA7t9NSTrrWu04F8JOz1RqNZEeuQw/2h Y04zYkgs9ZQqEuIvnCsjGPajeMAlP+lEVTp1wqgWW4bNVaKjbxGnIecAboTw2ELN Ud4dj4Yij2yIYQuRKCOD9Mj/gcXTv2nKQfz2zz3Nqm7tSvHDmzuP0ikf3tlrYMKs 7tewBT0CBsz6W5Kn7AywOD7tbBMvIAn+3Vdz16j8Qn40wEfbobhMsp2gUwj2Gg76 pmKztq6knkcTCfvmgb5uNXFZKfEFr/wjwIUkO+2bs8HnfqxUYts+PPMXuXYvR57t E2iLbkjBM+ksug/5BvxTcfA0Snw1d926oamjg66Fp5hzKl5rdTUa/SuQmRKW4y25 QbEoPWBIJxCke40/jloZFD1tCIue8ZJrSUfnZFq8tTMScmDB84+9vf0HzpGzEyNM ET8SoSghDgdvaNYQ+rIE =4q1w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E29563A1-48A5-410C-A19F-5F15BA3125E7-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 17:04:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1D1B14065 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FEA514B7 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3JH4VBw066426 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:04:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208566] Ipnat (10.1-10.2) does not work properly after 1-2 days Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:04:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: andywhite@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:04:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208566 andywhite@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andywhite@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from andywhite@gmail.com --- I have similar problems, very hard to debug. reboot fixes it though. there are reports=20 https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/50432/=20 https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/50618/ there is a report here of other ipnat issues that I can't replicate https://sourceforge.net/p/ipfilter/bugs/560/ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 21:52:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76116B136AC for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B4E1F3F for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id m9so21528887ige.1 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:52:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=vb927hfXcsKhV+YnSKvGd0QWD/Z4qOq1igjblf7JBpE=; b=kjzTyC1EDnugSaslKD9fm247tMpkVCd6Ne1D2q0jTeb5BirSnlY24No2zEEnahI9vW 1VcpfGF+cY20CHRCGuahpWX44XqLkfD+j/WetFvM9MZkJVjen62f1zUD7GAPksX2/UuI yUwlUabxO3SuaosFWzWZ3rkaBnMBejdqJo9KJNUZU1kDBubUF4IhBNiFA0L9vd+/R7oq A9eCznwyhC+I4xU969GYaVngNKph14GMCMAXGlcJRa8PmATAsOSmFkLt5oWho5+Dot1i ufBsaabUPVjCSF9sX02ME2buUqYYjTcgXP96xBgQq7qACkQC9gwNe/uodwioOg+4uhdX zl8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=vb927hfXcsKhV+YnSKvGd0QWD/Z4qOq1igjblf7JBpE=; b=ekZI/miZ+uvjg+NbBF7n7FT+UUeZG1lxQHeA88GPrfqbbunN7OtN5Waip+Zh4PqlMU Wo5ErKzFNOpZSIJX0Q+/y54Z+rOmLjEWg3l9JTG8k8jhK566iWiXMq+a8bIAdYikYvh9 o9PV4wplqcED0LKhDDDM1/AyXlvZeqGNpkw6eYF7enrso3FYu+HKzrgDp4t2uUJR6z/r 85rW7ZtlIK/sCWWqSxmzx5oyDPO4CjtO0ehj99RWglqlh347v04PCKLDeVouvHAttR6K +wevoHYTM92T42zplEPZxSPl1M1gUyL7YBbWvLU/x7xQ4Rpp1iExESbEk45MUuysOMlM 0kpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUBITH2hVrowezprSeG/Bs0N9ET4g7F8AW/q7FCzShE2Vni+r0ZtJ2ACxHHOjI48GohpAlHQAYFIgv+7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.92.41 with SMTP id cj9mr6557782igb.38.1461102720513; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.156.132 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:52:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: aliases & netmasks, WAS: Issues with ixl(4) From: Dustin Marquess To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:52:01 -0000 Okay, interestingly, I just updated the AMD machine (the ix one) to the latest version of -CURRENT last night, and now it's acting strangeish also. So maybe it's not ixl(4) afterall. What's obviously "broken" is that the config that is supposed to work: ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" ifconfig_bridge0_aliases="inet 192.168.1.11/32" The alias doesn't work from outside that subnet at least. However the config that shouldn't work: ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" ifconfig_bridge0_aliases="inet 192.168.1.11/24" Does. Eg, changing the subnet mask on the alias from /32 (which the docs say it should be) to /24 (which the docs say it shouldn't be), seems to "fix" it. Although I did seem to lose SSH connectivity to the main IP sometime after this change. I have a bad feeling that changing the network mask on the alias is causing other issues. Was there some recent change in -CURRENT that would have caused this? Thanks! -Dustin On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Dustin Marquess wrote: > I'm having some strange issues with ixl(4) and a X710-DA4 card in a > new-ish Intel-based server. I'm pretty much replicating an existing setup > from an older AMD machine that used 2 x X520-DA2 cards and ixgbe(4). This > is all on -CURRENT. > > It's meant to be a bhyve server, so the 4x10GE ports are put into a > LACP-based lagg(4), then vlan(4) interfaces are bound to the lagg, and then > if_bridge(4) interfaces are created to bind the vlan and tap interfaces > together. > > The X710-DA4 is running the latest NVM from Intel (5.02): > > dev.ixl.3.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > dev.ixl.2.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > dev.ixl.1.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > dev.ixl.0.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 > > I've tried both the ixl driver that comes with -CURRENT (1.4.3?) and the > 1.4.27 driver from Intel and am having the same problem. The problem is > this exactly (sorry it's taken me so long to get to it!): > > Using just one interface, one interface + VLANs, the lagg without VLANs, > etc, everything works perfectly fine. As soon as I combine > lagg+vlan+bridge, all hell breaks loose. One machine can ping one alias on > the server but not the other while other machines can. The server itself > can't ping the DNS server nor the default route, but can ping things > through the default route, etc. The behavior is very unpredictable. ssh > can take a few times to get in, and then once it, "svn update" will work > for a few seconds and then bomb out, etc. > > He is the working config from the X520-DA2 system: > > ifconfig_ix0="-lro -tso -txcsum up" > ifconfig_ix1="-lro -tso -txcsum up" > ifconfig_ix2="-lro -tso -txcsum up" > ifconfig_ix3="-lro -tso -txcsum up" > cloned_interfaces="lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" > ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport ix0 laggport ix1 laggport ix2 > laggport ix3" > ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" > ifconfig_bridge1="addm vlan2 addm tap1" > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > > Here is the "broken" config from the X710-DA4 system: > > ifconfig_ixl0="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > ifconfig_ixl1="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > ifconfig_ixl2="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > ifconfig_ixl3="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter > -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" > cloned_interfaces="lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" > ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport ixl0 laggport ixl1 laggport ixl2 > laggport ixl3" > ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" > ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.101/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" > ifconfig_bridge1="addm vlan2 addm tap1" > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > > I've changed the various flags in the ifconfig_ixl# lines without any > obvious differences. Both machines are connected to the same HPe 5820X > switch with the same exact config, so I don't believe it's a switch issue. > > Any ideas? Has anybody seen something like this before? > > Thanks! > -Dustin > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 23:15:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F3EB15581 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x241.google.com (mail-io0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E79E1F38 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x241.google.com with SMTP id u185so4723934iod.2 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:15:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r5rHsltTEVz5o1FXOPwboEre8Ohkpwne7rs5S0yndWk=; b=qA9KWVmETaIYTc7xk2uNF8AhHE1dgDY5/wmlmWeO8viAeOJQV8jEmk4xqsmIw6fUuc x09ADz40WvJb5WoeeVOvfZN72HclT6tsltU4SFRlDcXNICp9N/KJN+9/R9+JhEFaGSm3 FzKCv7Zm4IhW1LkipzvHMlVC8ImIv6MryMVXVYLimMu27ioxyjubgczWChDiV8JQlEkw c5ImxetC+0RUmJ3ER68QT8tZF5Lqlu9ibmIQKgCQ8uUDiyXUSG1JIMt/XeKjdpecxsys DfoRWcba8jMn9DZe6IRQGr5IkaCOjnEyh+hRbm34czSnA5nEcshrogduNWb++PkqoEAa hz7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r5rHsltTEVz5o1FXOPwboEre8Ohkpwne7rs5S0yndWk=; b=Tm/USFxUqlAQG/vYLhB/m8udmOXsFuXkXi4rmH3+IA6CWDY7jShZg6ebQQeptaAFPN my4PvyOakk6T747CGbwfXkY19f0svoX6TAtZ/vjYY/SQ6bD1VepEdU8r7P2kosDy1m5b u7u0PwvpocwDtpJmrZA0xPS0uYx0Yz9qysib7q0Q6k/IOqozW7w+ERHcIJNlOqzBOfwJ vM5g77OZXGUKzOyIrVih36o1qRSqPj4CiAW7iR6yRfCyIlJTzCp3V/z4WxTGFVjHqbRE UvvwUn3cYMmjvlgEj/d+Mt+yfpKQCv7O+QD/prEJoHfAeWggcRt2fkqsBVumMive/33D wS/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWmt9EKs/i+QEWUf0VdAfX0HcdurTATXEB63WuVnVcMEbI2bjA62EJDxKetuaDgUqhd/8rXkD/ABYnzEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.162.17 with SMTP id l17mr7487264ioe.42.1461107713920; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kmacybsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.6.166 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2C78DBCF-26F2-44D0-A45E-6EE8918648EA@netapp.com> References: <2C78DBCF-26F2-44D0-A45E-6EE8918648EA@netapp.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:15:13 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rQ_hhoZQqZDpyKpHC1Byzivjci8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issues with ixl(4) From: "K. Macy" To: "Eggert, Lars" Cc: Dustin Marquess , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:15:14 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > I haven't played with lagg+vlan+bridge, but I briefly evaluated XL710 boa= rds last year (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-October= /043584.html) and saw very poor throughputs and latencies even in very simp= le setups. As far as I could figure it out, TSO/LRO wasn't being performed = (although enabled) and so I ran into packet-rate issues. > > I basically gave up and went with a different vendor. FWIW, the XL710 boa= rds in the same machines booted into Linux performed fine. > FWIW, NFLX sees performance close to that of cxgbe (by far the best maintained, best performing FreeBSD 40G driver) with an iflib converted driver. The iflib updated driver will be imported by 11 but won't become the default driver until 11.1 for wont of QA resources at Intel. -M From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 00:56:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2CEB13E80 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF3A12FD for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u185so37229485iod.3 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=9mr5df1nm5el98UwQdF7VqtQD1FSobaRG25RLTBXuZo=; b=S0Qy8Bjgke8as9cL6uw7kpvSi9S4TUvsWKe3GTZBFxos1hvrHtf4fq2ElnvE9Qb7oM DZEjR0G8zPGMNKC9w8vmrK20iKpMD7+Lmel8nybIx0NsCXz79JUW7pDC9J20f2AQalkr 5vSX9GzZFL08BdS4npJwpD4egZKGIa8VXziDWrs7z75+HbijT9QwIg1ZgWY8Rk/QToOq 6IbuW0RF9god0uamwFxwGArdZ4E3niXEWzSPJ+A70ntNn+i+3/uO8kdM1ZNrvqT3UXVT 4T4iCn/Ig4Okw/XwKOVKi4UdotlEn2V4C9+U9HN6tcppDgWEZbrVaD7ekz8SSyhUM3cO uGEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9mr5df1nm5el98UwQdF7VqtQD1FSobaRG25RLTBXuZo=; b=RN7aNHe4WdH7y6pYrzHce4jEPF8L9OvvUExf4VEUKLmqC++jDzHJbQC1H1IbN3oAUt PawuodGdBG7u+m51cWK6kPNLLyK3S0GHQnke2IsCuTNLbn6MdQxYe32sHkQuv69cwL/7 EkXm+FM7mGHGMQt1MtXJ9rkMftuga1e12VeWSdDffGzTzc/q5KjRaSVc5q3HmHcEUMGo 2h42AqzX9oQ89rndCAxShAfoitBtxo30a5eWHK6gV2vWcOAMmr/p+7NnPtbYfFUjW7lC EWnsWJmcP3h+DKUsCjhfUg0PxQMXUQ0sPt6lmHG6ZjqAEeVKpvZsDC4mnhb1Qj+jsNp0 RT2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUyweSvI/zc9cFMspEOCn/7I4bjT/ypFilIpFoxgLkIxCIGNRvHpQYaLSj9CEtt/N5G1neqpoxtn1bsNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.37.12 with SMTP id l12mr6324106iol.138.1461113817336; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kmacybsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.6.166 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:56:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gJZoPYdjQ2J-WrXPmZsI0uc4vTQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: aliases & netmasks, WAS: Issues with ixl(4) From: "K. Macy" To: Dustin Marquess Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:56:58 -0000 On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Dustin Marquess wrote: > Okay, interestingly, I just updated the AMD machine (the ix one) to the > latest version of -CURRENT last night, and now it's acting strangeish > also. So maybe it's not ixl(4) afterall. > > What's obviously "broken" is that the config that is supposed to work: > > ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" > ifconfig_bridge0_aliases="inet 192.168.1.11/32" > > The alias doesn't work from outside that subnet at least. However the > config that shouldn't work: > > ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" > ifconfig_bridge0_aliases="inet 192.168.1.11/24" > > Does. Eg, changing the subnet mask on the alias from /32 (which the docs > say it should be) to /24 (which the docs say it shouldn't be), seems to > "fix" it. Although I did seem to lose SSH connectivity to the main IP > sometime after this change. I have a bad feeling that changing the network > mask on the alias is causing other issues. > > Was there some recent change in -CURRENT that would have caused this? Try disabling inpcb route caching.I was afraid that this would happen. -M > > Thanks! > -Dustin > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Dustin Marquess > wrote: > >> I'm having some strange issues with ixl(4) and a X710-DA4 card in a >> new-ish Intel-based server. I'm pretty much replicating an existing setup >> from an older AMD machine that used 2 x X520-DA2 cards and ixgbe(4). This >> is all on -CURRENT. >> >> It's meant to be a bhyve server, so the 4x10GE ports are put into a >> LACP-based lagg(4), then vlan(4) interfaces are bound to the lagg, and then >> if_bridge(4) interfaces are created to bind the vlan and tap interfaces >> together. >> >> The X710-DA4 is running the latest NVM from Intel (5.02): >> >> dev.ixl.3.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 >> dev.ixl.2.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 >> dev.ixl.1.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 >> dev.ixl.0.fw_version: nvm 5.02 etid 80002284 oem 0.0.0 >> >> I've tried both the ixl driver that comes with -CURRENT (1.4.3?) and the >> 1.4.27 driver from Intel and am having the same problem. The problem is >> this exactly (sorry it's taken me so long to get to it!): >> >> Using just one interface, one interface + VLANs, the lagg without VLANs, >> etc, everything works perfectly fine. As soon as I combine >> lagg+vlan+bridge, all hell breaks loose. One machine can ping one alias on >> the server but not the other while other machines can. The server itself >> can't ping the DNS server nor the default route, but can ping things >> through the default route, etc. The behavior is very unpredictable. ssh >> can take a few times to get in, and then once it, "svn update" will work >> for a few seconds and then bomb out, etc. >> >> He is the working config from the X520-DA2 system: >> >> ifconfig_ix0="-lro -tso -txcsum up" >> ifconfig_ix1="-lro -tso -txcsum up" >> ifconfig_ix2="-lro -tso -txcsum up" >> ifconfig_ix3="-lro -tso -txcsum up" >> cloned_interfaces="lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" >> ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport ix0 laggport ix1 laggport ix2 >> laggport ix3" >> ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" >> ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" >> ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.100/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" >> ifconfig_bridge1="addm vlan2 addm tap1" >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >> >> Here is the "broken" config from the X710-DA4 system: >> >> ifconfig_ixl0="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter >> -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" >> ifconfig_ixl1="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter >> -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" >> ifconfig_ixl2="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter >> -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" >> ifconfig_ixl3="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwfilter >> -vlanhwtso -vlanhwcsum up" >> cloned_interfaces="lagg0 tap0 tap1 bridge0 bridge1 vlan1 vlan2" >> ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport ixl0 laggport ixl1 laggport ixl2 >> laggport ixl3" >> ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev lagg0" >> ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev lagg0" >> ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.101/24 addm vlan1 addm tap0" >> ifconfig_bridge1="addm vlan2 addm tap1" >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >> >> I've changed the various flags in the ifconfig_ixl# lines without any >> obvious differences. Both machines are connected to the same HPe 5820X >> switch with the same exact config, so I don't believe it's a switch issue. >> >> Any ideas? Has anybody seen something like this before? >> >> Thanks! >> -Dustin >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 01:48:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61AEB15407 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC70E1C78 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3K1mEKA085689 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:48:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208910] if_bridge does not work properly with vlans and VIMAGE Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:48:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:48:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208910 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 05:15:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DBFB14E25 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jounijl@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from nm42-vm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm42-vm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.120.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14FBB1079 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jounijl@yahoo.co.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1461129323; bh=bHaC2a8tL1o13+nwtN1lg+/VVCN46S6KjkfhFtuJBKs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=AdHjts0ZX3QcegvsRijNV3BkSXKZx5LWNgDkc3eMuWDSmpNWTb/2shegLjbH5QN5KgDvz3neGx0UeSBSzmwM2XEwYUxRZ7rUJqHFVPFWQlcm5BRKekt6ECx8gml+opx/fR3XOHbxjJhbHP4hLv5rneYpiHYiWMsp1G3/XT/JIiilV4EigeZ/fVnT/l4KFtp8VhxX7Aascw25R7H2fPycqnc1slw+EHxUfInpLPARKs9pagAiUGTc1ilLkU5VkC3g9ObaLocQdn62pzc+m7h6jo2gRM7OPwgX56v2d4tjOTudLxMCHcv3/a00qhgpk25YszxKIQ3o3gLg/hvUIOLM8w== Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm42.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 05:15:23 -0000 Received: from [98.138.100.116] by nm42.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 05:12:26 -0000 Received: from [66.196.81.170] by tm107.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 05:12:26 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.215] by tm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 05:12:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 05:12:26 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 563415.66715.bm@omp1024.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: LrzwZF8VM1krdgsn.92qgg1JrptzQlpEgALdxnolsUAJAR2uPDAoF4akSrOfa7Y Q.Df0qAPvN0BjbqQDkSyP6oFeMXgXf5Rt8CHIuHe2G7U2BeVx1k.Bh5QXMgm3DA02cfqEVXWfjLH wdndQPzcqtbtFx853Tc91tTHV3EeX7DefDksOK4x78hD0IW5Wsw226tqwro1lkxMt8CJ4iAg5ysm vMhZWr0C3n2GGFVe5.aa9FpHt455s9ZzRTr3iLS29aasWb1B91XYwQzPhGIIg59xgGCgqeynyf4s 3VvDd04hMHco7APjoN6Xl94kT0FOTjYkubonwtcwdvbO0QHN3_hKXVUSIq93jI6nCasUrIa1n7J2 CglX5kO9SJxzteVPnpEXz_XwJeDDO5WiztWf1TpIVlBc5AnI6_vqpzLN1Fy8F.11LEzEo4oPfVH3 q3yLXFXoLNZOgamShif_4oHK9Bf67SXGrKT7IGjvGC93f64SWRnqOAEZMHW5YlWsaVoGBV_R67Yv mNP2scKY0GDdCgyw- Received: by 66.196.81.105; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:12:26 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:12:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Jouni Laakso Reply-To: Jouni Laakso To: Message-ID: <1474511574.3898272.1461129145774.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Recommendations for routing in a WAN-link MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1474511574.3898272.1461129145774.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:15:31 -0000 I would need some recommendations for best practises in a WAN-link. I do not have many IP-addresses or public subnets. Is it still important to add for example RIP, BGP or OSPF to the WAN link? Is it possible to use my IP-address and route my IP-traffic to a foreign server? How common it is that the ISP has not given proper subnets to the outside world to use or it routes my IP-traffic not to me but to an another server using the same IP? Is it too ridiculous to add just an address and a routing protocol just for it? How do I configure this? I do not have an own AS. Do I have to know of the ISP:s routing protocols to choose the protocol, can I determine the protocol from something? What is the best router software? wkr Jouni L. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 09:33:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE877B140E5 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@netapp.com) Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mx141.netapp.com", Issuer "Symantec Class 3 Secure Server CA - G4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA81718CF; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@netapp.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,509,1455004800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="111459939" Received: from hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2016 02:33:02 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:32:57 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::c07c:8fcd:f7e4:f32b%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:32:57 -0700 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: "K. Macy" CC: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Dustin Marquess Subject: Re: Issues with ixl(4) Thread-Topic: Issues with ixl(4) Thread-Index: AQHRmfDiNfycsBH8CEW32UntV96nZp+RPsUAgAElWICAAKyZAA== Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:32:56 +0000 Message-ID: <5C003FF0-09AF-4206-BF06-23E48C713826@netapp.com> References: <2C78DBCF-26F2-44D0-A45E-6EE8918648EA@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.35] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5DD2EFEB-0C06-434F-849D-D1F144C8B33F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:33:28 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_5DD2EFEB-0C06-434F-849D-D1F144C8B33F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 2016-04-20, at 1:15, K. Macy wrote: > FWIW, NFLX sees performance close to that of cxgbe (by far the best > maintained, best performing FreeBSD 40G driver) with an iflib > converted driver. The iflib updated driver will be imported by 11 but > won't become the default driver until 11.1 for wont of QA resources at > Intel. Nice! I still have the cards, so will be sure to test. Lars --Apple-Mail=_5DD2EFEB-0C06-434F-849D-D1F144C8B33F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXF0zLAAoJEFS1wwm/cMFX+UoQAK75WGhNeAg86DzM5mVkAOMQ sE0bae7XfQ5Ym5CR53WT//Bh6dTbGycx6yqMCWMKxy7pIdMsB3b0kTgJzJshv9la cqXZQRcYhKoQgZ2p07emNdNu7v1yKvsG+E+aohrQzLM1dASe+2YDgjh6TqduiQ/L elTZwFywjrvMSCcHc/xVviOnpB1KoqVMg7DnWlX7M6h1oSmOvTAFFIe7S/pIRD6f XGGUlulWdPgb/iJAsHGxBzXsY576zNPcf/PCmPhS7b+Ha+KyPCPaonk5NWDZ/2h9 6iNDLUoyoeDLzrIBNe255HJpBxqLBoXN8QoKQGf3f7kTPGSC9rlVcAYWG/LN2opR CJRLukwEWmM6DDiI3aWcWZHddjt8cu8gmVyiEfA3F0vjSwCe/8jYAx4GULufmzPt 06343D+0oUQCYsP5YFEkz8T9Uw3nswjdeO2cDN7jlayjqPnHwY8GarkyEZFk48nl /bz7LY2/xmFLbxoGLh12B7XFCblzGQPxc6Ns/iUlLhFJpz0s7TSrot3lAtmjessL fObFg5+1UuqsQOcXrSpLGn+DVZdaGaZyfQaHlTNKWYImyRCWheyq84itgzzeHk90 TWUlDM8KGgHQiIJoNW74jSXEbsH2lG3xbzN1GgN3G1uI7JswlhY4+bGmBS4FCWJa /61kAkA54AUHPSsMl+YB =htWn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_5DD2EFEB-0C06-434F-849D-D1F144C8B33F-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 09:58:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC3CB15198 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bored_to_death85@yahoo.com) Received: from nm21.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm21.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36E9C1C90 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bored_to_death85@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1461146304; bh=dG7964ibvm3kFraO1U6HRzSXlqZQpc5G/aLd9SdMD2w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=Qu1oAB5AWISY2T8VdF4EGCVe5nAnx0KKoH1hTP68VkIcJi+2zWb6xqKg/nRygOkQTYN3i7UWmOXD1VgT6XswjEc7XGQDAyz64yC6WsDByU2OH22H3+Pk6U0WCDPlSmbzmy4B0GWUW9utTW8+llydZwpwTJ6BFkxHjZat/bcabt+z9i7lH9OanywitWMDBlyF7LNKNZr6VNbE2okrdjpcdUsNCfTEQ3+1Oxn2RPk+62eVP19QopXGxeUPz34KQ2YclNmj83FxUW1LDAqoj5keEoFZH99W0eSUjWxLz50FfO5ag19ILpjZsLBMCtAKzgdo0NEwN4wZ1XG7lACCTbW/ng== Received: from [66.196.81.174] by nm21.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 09:58:24 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.227] by tm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 09:58:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2016 09:58:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 683556.54474.bm@omp1036.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: mq3UyagVM1kywJzGUXk3mfzZVFggiNaGByZUElex_g_08633egLTX3oVMJTa53M bAgbf9CSTd9WOkaLUT5sKiJxMEoI9CgDHN.uyZfAbT..lT.H8B618nlwmmDr3ZsUuWA_ZEhXF.AK bxlCefKR6diaofvFB9DmNfzE5BiOStLi4tLdYICni7PUcFVXAgkq6c3JJrb90F5Hlq12hD4bYDWJ 7ywxL0aSGUWmdpsk2zzfJAsnwnsLOxoKskx3QWQazVlwEEoU4K18lVVxl3z3f3hPSQOMiOIdiyFq Z4AAmAt0gVDWvZW8g7wBJHl07jojDNv5VgMNI40cQNYDcxpFCwSv7_3kMbib0FYY08YVnoLMGh5R AzFrUiPko7i6fqnzlbeQpT11Iuf9IYYrmyOAWfpW9QYjbTnjZBHAcvLPskuE8ZCDDsp9wD6x43Rw 8Ab5BGti6LDwwVSicaydt4TKfc4plKC9NdLXzP20DcR1H6Q1y1WY_LtmwpEKn5wlubaWsowbYgn7 2lGapkng.zQaZx2ly.kIQ Received: by 66.196.80.151; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:58:24 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:58:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "M. V." Reply-To: "M. V." To: FreeBSD Net Message-ID: <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Assigning same ip address to different interfaces with different FIBs MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:58:31 -0000 Hello guys, I have a problem with having multiple FIBs in FreeBSD-9.2. I've already setup 4 FIBs in kernel, and everything is OK. I assigned each interface to one FIB and I can add routes to any of FIBs I want, and everything works fine.But my problem is, I want to assign same IP address to multiple interfaces. for example: interface em1 (in FIB-1) : 100.100.100.1/24interface em2 (in FIB-2) : 100.100.100.1/24 this should work, bacause I want each FIB's interfaces and routes to be completely separate from other FIBs' interfaces and routes. for this I do:# sysctl net.add_addr_allfibs = 0 # ifconfig em1 fib 1# ifconfig em2 fib 2# setfib 1 ifconfig em1 100.100.100.1/24# setfib 2 ifconfig em2 100.100.100.1/24 but this doesn't work as expected, and 100.100.100.0/24 route is only being added to FIB-1 (second IP assignment command doesn't work, though it returns no error).# setfib 1 netstat -rn ==> this fib has 100.100.100.0/24 entry added in it# setfib 2 netstat -rn ==> nothing is added here. Is there any way I can do this in FreeBSD? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 10:19:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49A0B15C17 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8791217A4 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-252-92.lns20.per4.internode.on.net [121.45.252.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u3KAJQ7S022760 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 03:19:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Assigning same ip address to different interfaces with different FIBs To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <571757A8.8030007@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:19:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:19:31 -0000 On 20/04/2016 5:58 PM, M. V. via freebsd-net wrote: > Hello guys, > I have a problem with having multiple FIBs in FreeBSD-9.2. I've already setup 4 FIBs in kernel, and everything is OK. I assigned each interface to one FIB and I can add routes to any of FIBs I want, and everything works fine.But my problem is, I want to assign same IP address to multiple interfaces. for example: > interface em1 (in FIB-1) : 100.100.100.1/24interface em2 (in FIB-2) : 100.100.100.1/24 > this should work, bacause I want each FIB's interfaces and routes to be completely separate from other FIBs' interfaces and routes. for this I do:# sysctl net.add_addr_allfibs = 0 I think you are using the wrong tool to do this job. Fibs will "kind-of" allow you to do some of this but all fibs still 'see' all interfaces, Even if you don't set routes to them. What you want is VIMAGE/VNET Even though we've made vnet a characteristic of a jail (it wasn't always), you can still use it in the way you want if done right. Write a "how-to" when you've got it worked out :-) > # ifconfig em1 fib 1# ifconfig em2 fib 2# setfib 1 ifconfig em1 100.100.100.1/24# setfib 2 ifconfig em2 100.100.100.1/24 > but this doesn't work as expected, and 100.100.100.0/24 route is only being added to FIB-1 (second IP assignment command doesn't work, though it returns no error).# setfib 1 netstat -rn ==> this fib has 100.100.100.0/24 entry added in it# setfib 2 netstat -rn ==> nothing is added here. there are some sysctls that control some of this. have you investigated them? Though, as I say, you really want to structure your problem around using vimage. Each vimage instance can have identical interfaces etc, becasue they are effectively separate machines. You can route between them internally to the machine and at one stage you could have a process with sockets on each net but I"m not sure if you can still do that easily. > > Is there any way I can do this in FreeBSD? > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 14:12:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56571B1637C for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2101D13D5; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 2so53397563ioy.1; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:12:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=d7QlhltwtollWJTky3hWiPzh2hV2zsDKn9hZeJssCys=; b=LWZ21ZEYFMgHq9pc3+JWLCyG6GsL7c8QaJvvQP43kH9xANR/S38HmX9AM0032qVgfi To9TbcgP7xptzUnEFYI3yHXVOptyCV8yS7TBgQtweYy6STnKtd1evUmhHwjGXi/Xxl6K euH7NS4EHn6FXezIZUNgcOYLg/uPocVmBSj4ozcLPZ1v1csq91B05YeQ1/Kiwxm2kG1i 1cYT9BX8T7/peryjyQBu0CODSRy5uysuU/NqWV6c7wuPjPVQQ/VKK85CuYl2fLor8lju Y8bqLED0RkSnhI9rrJrFJO1gpyyiLtwdcR69qA8IeKa1p00zAyWql9pJ1AtypkWv4Pxg 6fbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=d7QlhltwtollWJTky3hWiPzh2hV2zsDKn9hZeJssCys=; b=dzVZ45c6ukaw8ZoMQpUDNWU1U5TnSXvS8HC/VDw1/Z26vjVEIjhVa5it6YnkPHKzCG +4j0jjMQTIo3T2Dv64XQe0NEvKalpST0bLfjuKxXSqUiLhq5Rc580JPsWjXr3tufP9LX G4arvTkiEvlFNuISm3eWI3W6Z8sDS5Ia1MMokem1tTFLdE4M+zkQEDHPnPmtV4GDIHtL nl7Uh7Yxx1q6goICpG8xpcU657H7nr1D+cqCerWI7JVaOIf+M1bZ080vWJxQKZ7Kyiv6 nGLjToguo6RJtHxiTjUoPrI9WvROE/EWvRkq72MhATqLtwkgBN/djQfZ+IumnHnFljA3 7X0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXBZUkiGY5hVKuSJagepR85hO1EC8XwrxNQ1JyKKdbJk6st35Wu+57eOuG6KQWDbXdCE0dNtggQihv9AA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.198.69 with SMTP id w66mr4710327iof.178.1461161578524; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.156.132 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:12:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2C78DBCF-26F2-44D0-A45E-6EE8918648EA@netapp.com> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:12:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issues with ixl(4) From: Dustin Marquess To: "K. Macy" Cc: "Eggert, Lars" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:12:59 -0000 I tried backing out that change and everything worked for a few minutes and then started acting up again. Then I notice Sean Bruno's "TCP Packets Drop!!!" email about LACP. I disabled LACP on the switch side and then changed the lagg config from "lacp" to "roundrobin", and so far so good. On the switch side it looks like member ports were randomly bounding in the LACP bundle, and when I'd tcpdump an interface I wouldn't see anything until another LACP&LLDP packet came in. So something seems to be broken with lagg's LACP support recently. The good news is I don't think the route caching is causing this problem. I'll put it back in and retest to make sure though. Thanks for the help! -Dustin On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:15 PM, K. Macy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > > I haven't played with lagg+vlan+bridge, but I briefly evaluated XL710 > boards last year ( > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-October/043584.html) > and saw very poor throughputs and latencies even in very simple setups. As > far as I could figure it out, TSO/LRO wasn't being performed (although > enabled) and so I ran into packet-rate issues. > > > > I basically gave up and went with a different vendor. FWIW, the XL710 > boards in the same machines booted into Linux performed fine. > > > > FWIW, NFLX sees performance close to that of cxgbe (by far the best > maintained, best performing FreeBSD 40G driver) with an iflib > converted driver. The iflib updated driver will be imported by 11 but > won't become the default driver until 11.1 for wont of QA resources at > Intel. > > -M > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 14:18:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F86B16516 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B49C1703; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n10so28765519obb.2; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=JJRABNkGY7FvlJo8W7KIJlIA+0xAMu77bZn34qS2A7A=; b=SHhiUGDsOU8AjVztmxIvcFroTBC3+0EKuDouCaekVhdwDAVRkzodQ2QBSkRiXDJ8ct WNIAGoJMzfCTgdvp7bNKaZygSar5jfQpOmtGuV+Hpow6tpCf7cwzU/jS9QxlaDektuYD z00O9aC4XMrVKpgUSfjnUMFQ4ZFDzRningUa2Ndsf92G0lFmDMtqbxPMdh7oIFEOyzJG sNv1qzy1lTjbbxTXAI/bPbiprZe/AhgkQAjqtmmrZrBv4JVs5H2EtVUIChOmlUhUKZ1Z PSleDf2X7zqSb649N0Ja0jIB7O8wZUJPaiSlwdw0RRWE/oGY+oshvM75TSswtwUZxonm hxhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=JJRABNkGY7FvlJo8W7KIJlIA+0xAMu77bZn34qS2A7A=; b=CTp1z3u77MnILJ5qInV0S/HG9k1fOzMiYXgz1yfNaWJKai+dMCwTYam8i3u/EUCcN7 eKr054bmxiU8xlaw4pOzF8wQ0bVcV9DatnG3OgyrGBTtrtzyFGQodAPKMKoTT898YcYf u/HtMa/v7UUYGa3uzYs45F7Du+LRm2AyGkLAH1qTTVNfZ72tR0kJhE7K7cCwPKDH9TKP Z+Mr29pF8cpblDILaytDvGKFjiLsMEVn4U2a5RweRc9VbrMH0kZwbqAW/aUNzn/zMHiG ZcZOO505zQ3eX75WizB67YXKita/VEK0SwhFe2/VoAAFXZK9zuRXALxSF2iiieeAhQ/G Qxzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWcxY8gbagtO2azdD8ETftKYouYRfGGUmelQyZLKVzm7OA8QzE7YWXEixjhS/rw84UEpqKvTVnmZK6GyA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.28.168 with SMTP id c8mr4113739obh.49.1461161892290; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.64.138 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <571757A8.8030007@freebsd.org> References: <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <118390227.3958522.1461146303528.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <571757A8.8030007@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:18:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Assigning same ip address to different interfaces with different FIBs From: alan somers To: Julian Elischer Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:18:13 -0000 What you described doesn't work in FreeBSD, and there's even an open bug for it. But as Julian described, you should see if VIMAGE will work for you. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 -Alan On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 20/04/2016 5:58 PM, M. V. via freebsd-net wrote: > >> Hello guys, >> I have a problem with having multiple FIBs in FreeBSD-9.2. I've already >> setup 4 FIBs in kernel, and everything is OK. I assigned each interface to >> one FIB and I can add routes to any of FIBs I want, and everything works >> fine.But my problem is, I want to assign same IP address to multiple >> interfaces. for example: >> interface em1 (in FIB-1) : 100.100.100.1/24interface em2 (in FIB-2) : >> 100.100.100.1/24 >> this should work, bacause I want each FIB's interfaces and routes to be >> completely separate from other FIBs' interfaces and routes. for this I do:# >> sysctl net.add_addr_allfibs = 0 >> > I think you are using the wrong tool to do this job. > Fibs will "kind-of" allow you to do some of this but all fibs still 'see' > all interfaces, Even if you don't set routes to them. > What you want is VIMAGE/VNET > Even though we've made vnet a characteristic of a jail (it wasn't always), > you can still use it in the way you want if done right. > Write a "how-to" when you've got it worked out :-) > > > # ifconfig em1 fib 1# ifconfig em2 fib 2# setfib 1 ifconfig em1 >> 100.100.100.1/24# setfib 2 ifconfig em2 100.100.100.1/24 >> but this doesn't work as expected, and 100.100.100.0/24 route is only >> being added to FIB-1 (second IP assignment command doesn't work, though it >> returns no error).# setfib 1 netstat -rn ==> this fib has >> 100.100.100.0/24 entry added in it# setfib 2 netstat -rn ==> nothing is >> added here. >> > > there are some sysctls that control some of this. have you investigated > them? > > Though, as I say, you really want to structure your problem around using > vimage. Each vimage instance can have identical interfaces etc, becasue > they are effectively separate machines. You can route between them > internally to the machine and at one stage you could have a process with > sockets on each net but I"m not sure if you can still do that easily. > > > > >> Is there any way I can do this in FreeBSD? >> Thank you. >> _____________________________________________ >> > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 16:15:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9070B16427 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80D411EB for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KGF5nD038759 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:15:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208653] PCN driver will not handle all PC net pro cards Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:15:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mats42@home.se X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:15:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208653 --- Comment #3 from Mats --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #2) hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=3D0x060000 card=3D0x82761043 chip=3D0x29c0808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller' class =3D bridge subclass =3D HOST-PCI cap 09[e0] =3D vendor (length 11) Intel cap 0 version 1 pcib1@pci0:0:1:0: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x82761043 chip=3D0x29c1808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express PCI Express Root Port' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI cap 0d[88] =3D PCI Bridge card=3D0x82761043 cap 01[80] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 05[90] =3D MSI supports 1 message=20 cap 10[a0] =3D PCI-Express 1 root port slot max data 128(128) link x16(= x16) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s) ecap 0002[100] =3D VC 1 max VC0 ecap 0005[140] =3D Root Complex Link Declaration 1 uhci0@pci0:0:26:0: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2937808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb800, size 32, enabled cap 09[50] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 uhci1@pci0:0:26:1: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2938808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb880, size 32, enabled cap 09[50] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 uhci2@pci0:0:26:2: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2939808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xbc00, size 32, enabled cap 09[50] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 ehci0@pci0:0:26:7: class=3D0x0c0320 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x293c808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfcfffc00, size 1024, enabl= ed cap 01[50] =3D powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 0a[58] =3D EHCI Debug Port at offset 0xa0 in map 0x14 cap 09[98] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 pcib2@pci0:0:28:0: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2940808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI cap 10[40] =3D PCI-Express 1 root port slot max data 128(128) link x4(x= 4) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) cap 05[80] =3D MSI supports 1 message=20 cap 0d[90] =3D PCI Bridge card=3D0x82771043 cap 01[a0] =3D powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 ecap 0002[100] =3D VC 1 max VC0 ecap 0005[180] =3D Root Complex Link Declaration 1 uhci3@pci0:0:29:0: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2934808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb080, size 32, enabled cap 09[50] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 uhci4@pci0:0:29:1: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2935808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb400, size 32, enabled cap 09[50] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 uhci5@pci0:0:29:2: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2936808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb480, size 32, enabled cap 09[50] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 ehci1@pci0:0:29:7: class=3D0x0c0320 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x293a808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfcfff800, size 1024, enabl= ed cap 01[50] =3D powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 0a[58] =3D EHCI Debug Port at offset 0xa0 in map 0x14 cap 09[98] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 pcib3@pci0:0:30:0: class=3D0x060401 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x244e808= 6 rev=3D0x92 hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801 PCI Bridge' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI cap 0d[50] =3D PCI Bridge card=3D0x82771043 isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=3D0x060100 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2918808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801IB (ICH9) LPC Interface Controller' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-ISA cap 09[e0] =3D vendor (length 12) Intel cap 1 version 0 features: Quick Resume, SATA RAID-5, 4 PCI-e x1 slots, SATA RAID-0/1/10 atapci0@pci0:0:31:2: class=3D0x01018f card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2921808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801IB (ICH9) 2 port SATA Controller [IDE mode]' class =3D mass storage subclass =3D ATA bar [10] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa000, size 8, enabled bar [14] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x9c00, size 4, enabled bar [18] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x9880, size 8, enabled bar [1c] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x9800, size 4, enabled bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x9480, size 16, enabled bar [24] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x9400, size 16, enabled cap 01[70] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 09[b0] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 none0@pci0:0:31:3: class=3D0x0c0500 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2930808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D SMBus bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xfcfff400, size 256, enabled bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x400, size 32, enabled atapci1@pci0:0:31:5: class=3D0x010185 card=3D0x82771043 chip=3D0x2926808= 6 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82801I (ICH9 Family) 2 port SATA Controller [IDE mode]' class =3D mass storage subclass =3D ATA bar [10] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb000, size 8, enabled bar [14] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xac00, size 4, enabled bar [18] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa880, size 8, enabled bar [1c] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa800, size 4, enabled bar [20] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa480, size 16, enabled bar [24] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa400, size 16, enabled cap 01[70] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 09[b0] =3D vendor (length 6) Intel cap 2 version 0 vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x847c1043 chip=3D0x104a10d= e rev=3D0xa1 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'NVIDIA Corporation' device =3D 'GF119 [GeForce GT 610]' class =3D display subclass =3D VGA bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfd000000, size 16777216, e= nabled bar [14] =3D type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xf0000000, size 134217728, enabled bar [1c] =3D type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xf8000000, size 33554432, enabled bar [24] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xcc00, size 128, enabled cap 01[60] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 05[68] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit=20 cap 10[78] =3D PCI-Express 1 endpoint max data 128(128) RO NS link x16(= x16) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) cap 09[b4] =3D vendor (length 20) ecap 0002[100] =3D VC 1 max VC0 ecap 0004[128] =3D Power Budgeting 1 ecap 000b[600] =3D Vendor 1 ID 1 hdac0@pci0:1:0:1: class=3D0x040300 card=3D0x847c1043 chip=3D0x0e0810d= e rev=3D0xa1 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'NVIDIA Corporation' device =3D 'GF119 HDMI Audio Controller' class =3D multimedia subclass =3D HDA bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfe7fc000, size 16384, enab= led cap 01[60] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 05[68] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit enabled with 1 message cap 10[78] =3D PCI-Express 1 endpoint max data 128(128) RO NS link x16(= x16) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) em0@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x115f108e chip=3D0x105f8086 rev=3D= 0x06 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfe880000, size 131072, ena= bled bar [14] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfe860000, size 131072, ena= bled bar [18] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xd880, size 32, enabled cap 01[c8] =3D powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit enabled with 1 message cap 10[e0] =3D PCI-Express 1 endpoint max data 128(256) RO NS link x4(x= 4) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s) ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 1 0 fatal 1 non-fatal 0 corrected ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 001517ffff38a242 em1@pci0:2:0:1: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x115f108e chip=3D0x105f8086 rev=3D= 0x06 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfe8e0000, size 131072, ena= bled bar [14] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfe8c0000, size 131072, ena= bled bar [18] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xdc00, size 32, enabled cap 01[c8] =3D powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit enabled with 1 message cap 10[e0] =3D PCI-Express 1 endpoint max data 128(256) RO NS link x4(x= 4) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s) ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 1 0 fatal 1 non-fatal 0 corrected ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 001517ffff38a242 pcn0@pci0:3:1:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x27031259 chip=3D0x2000102= 2 rev=3D0x54 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD]' device =3D '79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet bar [10] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xec00, size 32, enabled bar [14] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfebff000, size 4096, enabl= ed cap 01[44] =3D powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 fxp0@pci0:3:2:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x00098086 chip=3D0x1229808= 6 rev=3D0x05 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet bar [10] =3D type Prefetchable Memory, range 32, base 0xfbfff000, size 4096, enabled bar [14] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xe880, size 32, enabled bar [18] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfea00000, size 1048576, en= abled cap 01[dc] =3D powerspec 1 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 Since we see a pcn0 it seems (in my eyes at least, the may be wrong) that t= he driver detects the card.=20 It just wont handle it right. If I understand the linux code, this nic must= be set to 100FDX since a fibre adapter can't support anything else. I did try ifconfig pcn0 media 100baseTX -mediaopt full-duplex That gave an SIOCSIFMEDIA (media): Device not configured --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 16:27:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8216B1691B for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9DE1A50 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KGRtU9065771 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:27:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208653] PCN driver will not handle all PC net pro cards Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:27:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:27:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208653 --- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno --- (In reply to Mats from comment #3) Hrm ... fiber eh? what about using 100baseFX in the media type when you use ifconfig? List the media types with an "ifconfig -m pcn0" Maybe that will help us move forward. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 16:55:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB01B153A3 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raitech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E261CB4 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raitech@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id bg3so35161557obb.1 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:55:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KrpQ7NWgSvZhWKEy1g82vN5uSOAEodjTxMO6VEz0Z4E=; b=ZD/1JohwbzHqlj7Eclmo/d9ZFFjtx8m/ujD7TSAPziGcv2Y5Jy3AoaqST32JGboEX8 YqNfmj4bBZu2iP2IB3gBvK0mYqsnQxz8J98zm87iZkeNcLljuYVeVjL7YgS9Sa3NsikG XIv7C8SpLgN80WZPMcZa9e/dfka2h4hprv5+JvUhpGD/82ep+7DOg8N8L8F8nL00mSO4 W9CxGdhPidlKQcXRSLNpCLSzJMCXA8gpm39L4Ysk92JfMQV7KEJbp27Su4etHAU1ny41 BQ/65YM6Q2YoH7Gia97Cxoa79hGuteKhTSGSebCfFWn3U7KG2bfTucJbNQdefjky21hS 4mNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KrpQ7NWgSvZhWKEy1g82vN5uSOAEodjTxMO6VEz0Z4E=; b=ejbI/b96q/X/S2qAFWuqN+23+NygYOodHJk6GptafgaCDDpAZF0BNAwyCGhrma92Si 8XK8G0isGU8rE1kybJNI5Qnb1SIa6rNobgolx+WT7b4WxQ0sIMN1wkuYrwSHRfOze/mt EidWiLeOBBGaOUXjkbAAADIGw1EurZcuwBs3d8fzqF5b1xewcCOiGMtKxwXqsiU73hXC Vx3vy8dn6JQ6V/cAHAp9GyL/YqshQsclIksqE0qlUNYRti+DkOudl7zIeUKJX0CcdZHN Q38Hme97DFRJ6QR4McEpDJLA6Ppo4z5cFcT9tKYW3/9j0Y76j35ufhO4gSi8552aFark rhSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW2WyX6AUj03kHD/pNerWrMu6Pj+YvV9rDbnd51hEnPa0NXvE3G3YzvgNi2PZljH03amv8/0fhhS1yazw== X-Received: by 10.182.24.104 with SMTP id t8mr4167061obf.1.1461171317018; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:55:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.57.131 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Raimundo Santos Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:54:57 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: HZ kernel configuration still needed nowadays? To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:55:18 -0000 Hello, folks! I have a FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE taking care of the bandwidth limitation of a small WISP. There are around 1400 dynamic queues and dynamic schedulers, and a big queue for a better QoS. Every scheduler and the big one for QoS have GRED configured. In this scenario, it's needed to compile my kernel with HZ=1000? And, in general, is it still needed to compile a custom kernel for dummynet to work more precisely? Thank you, Raimundo Santos From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 16:57:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69666B1549B for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3AF1D72 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KGvAk0030660 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:57:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208653] PCN driver will not handle all PC net pro cards Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:57:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mats42@home.se X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:57:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208653 --- Comment #5 from Mats --- Brown paper bag in head-size ordered :) I must have done something wrong yesterday then i tested ifconfig pcn0 media 100baseTX -mediaopt full-duplex because it worked today. Big thanks to you Sean Bruno for the help.=20 I'm very happy right now to get the card working. I do live far out on the countryside. My internet connection is DSL over arial wires so I do have so= me lightning problems. By Connecting my DSL modem to a fibre connector and the= n a Fibre cable to the now WORKING card I got a very effective protection. Sure= , I may still loose the modem and the converter but I can buy that second hand = for about $30. Thats a lot better than loosing a $2000 computer. PS. Sorry for reporting a non bug. Ds --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 17:11:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F21B15C61 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639351661 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KHBQfp096945 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:11:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208653] PCN driver will not handle all PC net pro cards Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:11:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:11:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208653 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #6 from Sean Bruno --- Groovy. I'll close this out then. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 17:17:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6DBB15E9E for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3E71B06 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KHH22V009534 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:17:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208653] PCN driver will not handle all PC net pro cards Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:17:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mats42@home.se X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:17:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208653 --- Comment #7 from Mats --- Yes Please. The only improvement I can see is that it would be nice if the driver would= set "media 100baseTX -mediaopt full-duplex" by default if it detects a fibre on= ly card since a fibre card only can be full duplex and the don't support autos= peed either. But that's just a small improvement. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 18:23:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB653B15AA0 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE23B1293 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qqqxv5D2CzZqp; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:23:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1461176594; x=1462990995; bh=UuwvSas8C4/XfS4Hu9dF55ijFHcNuu2mfxt tcppaWgo=; b=hcXnXjF+SU6oi4U47k68JrRE8oZzLGPTnv/NmsAA1SSCam+hHDF D4NqplCovo+qHtkBkw86dbK8gnnj53trtxAOzDHiaQGieOc1AKKlCqjmNEdZ3Qc4 f5GwMKk64WppAno0gGiBsyqHCwvBejQl+GaE9Me3dJzYL/Q5wXo6zpmk= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcmVrl71-QtD; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: HZ kernel configuration still needed nowadays? To: Raimundo Santos , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <9c618d17-c9da-5952-86a6-90b54e2e0d5c@madpilot.net> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:23:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:23:26 -0000 On 04/20/16 18:54, Raimundo Santos wrote: > Hello, folks! > > I have a FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE taking care of the bandwidth limitation of a > small WISP. There are around 1400 dynamic queues and dynamic schedulers, > and a big queue for a better QoS. > > Every scheduler and the big one for QoS have GRED configured. > > In this scenario, it's needed to compile my kernel with HZ=1000? AFAIK HZ=1000 has been the default since 6.0. The only tuning suggestion relative to HZ its to lower it on less powerful systems where such granularity isn't needed. BTW HZ setting can be done in loader.conf at boot time, no need for recompilation. > > And, in general, is it still needed to compile a custom kernel for dummynet > to work more precisely? I think at present it can work fine with the HZ=1000 default. To know if that's ok for your workload can only be verified with testing. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 18:30:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA50B15E02 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF91219BC for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KIUIeI066789 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203735] Transparent interception of ipv6 with squid and pf causes panic Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: timp87@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203735 timp87@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |timp87@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from timp87@gmail.com --- (In reply to kraduk from comment #1) please, try squid from ports tree. We included patch for similar crash from squid-3.5.15_2 version --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 18:38:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AFFB1615B for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978201DE6 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KIcHBF085250 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:38:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208566] Ipnat (10.1-10.2) does not work properly after 1-2 days Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:38:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: andywhite@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:38:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208566 --- Comment #2 from andywhite@gmail.com --- Aleks can you post output of ipnat -s ? for me I see "bucket max in" increasing w= hen things are not working right --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 18:51:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47FB1672C for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D28F31BFB for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ABA28426; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:51:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22F9728422; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:51:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5717CFB5.6080806@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:51:33 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raimundo Santos , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: HZ kernel configuration still needed nowadays? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:51:38 -0000 Raimundo Santos wrote on 04/20/2016 18:54: > In this scenario, it's needed to compile my kernel with HZ=1000? > > And, in general, is it still needed to compile a custom kernel for dummynet > to work more precisely? hz=1000 is the default value. You can check it by sysctl: # sysctl kern.hz kern.hz: 1000 And you can change it in /boot/loader.conf if you need. echo 'kern.hz="999"' >> /boot/loader.conf shutdown -r now Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 19:29:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A703DB15665 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A51D114B for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e128so21161737pfe.3 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:29:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H/HLJ04WA67/e9/aAm7fKAN5ratMCadOfJrGyed+Nb4=; b=oP2D1WdZinE0WNP+wkxqMmQ859eHJ3D6BUYR/1CqvpT5zATUFhxk+HcHCrPFGORt2W bLuVc+NTLS6iD9grf+RUg/GHi2EvfhtfF9+xvV9GfOWkkfkPNVypoLitP59m73AgpJju N8DHQqU+S7UJL0jBspvpNFpbG3GFF7jbuq9xhN+ZrvUiQZ2IMcZ+mzmfBqT8bLWje0Cr j9Lb/YdqSz0zpbEMZC6p32+4ED72qc9vk+ZDe98b7dvFJWqlWigcV3KR9bxY6ddKQxey +0anfukzekVmvj2GZexhplsIiTcnrDRgsVliUZEE08x/MrJmQllUzkd1EofcwDoWt7bJ 0eYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H/HLJ04WA67/e9/aAm7fKAN5ratMCadOfJrGyed+Nb4=; b=K5FlIzZOS2Fct3c0/YpPbmJHd018VLoDu/umhyGtuEW4Ehqh7OvwFgBsq1BEpdx7Us K9Sj/mFDf5QlOWj0GD9YwUWs0salszdfhmvkQNH3FzKmPPCGrcGGijsMnWHXHENlsf+H 7zYxKQTwDIuctUNGu4a3ZTedhAJfEsVXdo5xC0x1tJ9tSHhZcrmUoDnF4bPL3ocXSs5/ t+hFqbzoosxf1KrW/faNh1yyXQJ/cB4xM3lN46UTkCKVY0EmT1jkWrb6+KfAvvYC4o5o zquNQ3cUq0RSA2M1qClehRKTXK0NlEn51zvJk0J2VMYUz7Zt1Nm5IDYUQ/zVQ/juSj4G VZ5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVHO78hb3SROE6AyGG29ObeUmMgJH0kWuZNmLTOGtVoSDCWSaPBonPzrf04CkDBsg== X-Received: by 10.98.102.195 with SMTP id s64mr14862666pfj.89.1461180593878; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.192.166.0] (stargate.chelsio.com. [12.32.117.8]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 88sm100179282pfj.20.2016.04.20.12.29.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Tracing dropped UDP packets To: bazzoola , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <5711CFF1.60708@gmail.com> From: Navdeep Parhar Message-ID: <1c18eb03-7520-7653-275c-073305203213@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:29:51 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5711CFF1.60708@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:29:54 -0000 On 04/15/2016 22:38, bazzoola wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to know where (in the kernel) UDP packets are dropped. Have you tried netstat -sp udp ? If the drops show up in some counter there then you can look at the kernel code to see where the counter is incremented. Regards, Navdeep > > I looked at udp_usrreq.c but is overwhelming for the 1st time. Is it > possible to use DTrace to locate where the packets are being dropped? or > is there a tool similar to 'dropwatch' which can tell me where in the > kernel my packets are getting dropped? > > On Linux, I used dropwatch and they were dropped packets were at > udp_queue_rcv_skb(). > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 19:48:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA39B15CDE for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E1B1A69 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v188so217309205wme.1 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:48:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e/o0n14uRrjQ2LHRxCihN3i48UPw8jkab68Fh9Ko40A=; b=hfSTwhm5Dh4UEAguOCal8VsrwKSChQ86tEWTFRBc1XvXSfMkEcrQhqo4rzhHcPG0nH rZtflSpHwRivUMR11liXulXi/xRW2U/mjwBORWRgUVFv/1fTtjYT8usszZlmchnMcg9e ishAf+SYXdYaMHbxb0DCaiGL5BdT44NckV7FDjVaGs0UeM5cA6atUlMlF3HqG9HHgq0z O9WMCfTafnJ9hwANWn9ZrLlG15TSStDCsACbjPtvZC5V7M3PzYX77S2KmzgNushcO5Kh xr6eX0vc7h2CvEQABIu3kQEKpV9Vt9hHrJjUc0pbghPdet8OL07HrHwbT0vWGqw88I9a F0xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e/o0n14uRrjQ2LHRxCihN3i48UPw8jkab68Fh9Ko40A=; b=aTFX4LN4mW3QlpwG+UsUyRLQZJzqJ/TEppvBT8XeprgjpR3e/fR41ZRNf4wYsikf0r zcrzqU0mg55RJ84WMShPrmlosOvXyYDXPUT2t1MGq6gefv4TteLMZ2VNsKafuL7VjHag 2kePsN1lFruf8si9fqgxBG4PuqR+37dKIoHJu+Fy8nTn5KT4XaDa0Cw55a8wmEZfEqxf 3f+q6mQzJPYNdk3R98S7c5IoR/HcwlwzRCEScIj3Q4sAQmd0+i8rfY3aSEpjJSKExufc obHAkvb+NBfGzmT6rmdKsB/k6Y6YwuACS2ckH8jc6nitRHByAZeRqG28slMZ8ZeMakQN 44Yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVKuhminXX2wbjmhUq6d79M+N74GNGKr8KprMI3Aq57MXso05rsa+NQ2oYG4rPDDw== X-Received: by 10.194.69.106 with SMTP id d10mr10504760wju.165.1461181707826; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.192.166.0] (stargate.chelsio.com. [12.32.117.8]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t206sm9975639wmt.21.2016.04.20.12.48.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Netmap seems to randomly cause Kernel panic on shutdown To: Steven Crangle , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: From: Navdeep Parhar Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:48:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:48:30 -0000 On 04/05/2016 01:30, Steven Crangle wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'm looking for a bit of help to track down the reason behind this > kernel panic, it seems like netmap works fine for the majority of the > time, but occasionally it will cause the box to kernel panic. > > > The machine is running FreeBSD Current from a few weeks ago (Rev > 296937) Doesn't seem to be the case. The uname -a in the attachment indicates it's FreeBSD 10.2-R-p10. The stack also shows netmap_do_regif calling netmap_do_unregif and only 10.x's netmap_do_regif does that. As to the actual failure, it appears that netmap_do_regif on the cxl interface failed and something on the error path caused panic. Please try with HEAD, or try to figure out why netmap_do_regif failed. Regards, Navdeep From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 21:32:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1F4B159B3 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEBF1680 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3KLWlXV081544 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:32:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208566] Ipnat (10.1-10.2) does not work properly after 1-2 days Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:32:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:32:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208566 Cy Schubert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |cy@FreeBSD.org CC| |cy@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 23:56:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8D1B16DEB for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB1A1A64 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id A57C5C43B; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:56:44 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Phabricator Reply-to: D5853+325+47f73f6fef2a530d@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5853: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D5853: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NzcwN2IzZDEwOWQ3OGQ5NTIxYzJjMDI3ZmM0IFcYFzw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b1_f8e61a04e9e2478512267ca6bdd03acf" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:56:45 -0000 --b1_f8e61a04e9e2478512267ca6bdd03acf Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rS298385: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon "illegal" options (authored by sephe). CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5853?vs=14915&id=15413#toc REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5853?vs=14915&id=15413 REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5853 AFFECTED FILES head/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c CHANGE DETAILS diff --git a/head/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c b/head/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c --- a/head/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c +++ b/head/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c @@ -2275,6 +2275,17 @@ { int i, j, namelen; + /* No `` or $() command substitution allowed in environment values! */ + for (j=0; j < strlen(value); j++) + switch (value[j]) { + case '`': + case '$': + warning("illegal character (%c) in value '%s'", + value[j], value); + /* Ignore this option */ + return; + } + namelen = strlen(name); for (i = 0; client->scriptEnv[i]; i++) @@ -2311,16 +2322,6 @@ strlen(value) + 1); if (client->scriptEnv[i] == NULL) error("script_set_env: no memory for variable assignment"); - - /* No `` or $() command substitution allowed in environment values! */ - for (j=0; j < strlen(value); j++) - switch (value[j]) { - case '`': - case '$': - error("illegal character (%c) in value '%s'", value[j], - value); - /* not reached */ - } snprintf(client->scriptEnv[i], strlen(prefix) + strlen(name) + 1 + strlen(value) + 1, "%s%s=%s", prefix, name, value); } EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, secteam, delphij, glebius, adrian, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, decui_microsoft.com, freebsd-net-list, pkelsey, gnn, jhb Cc: sbruno --b1_f8e61a04e9e2478512267ca6bdd03acf Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8; name="D5853.15413.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="D5853.15413.patch" ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2hlYWQvc2Jpbi9kaGNsaWVudC9kaGNsaWVudC5jIGIvaGVhZC9zYmluL2Ro Y2xpZW50L2RoY2xpZW50LmMKLS0tIGEvaGVhZC9zYmluL2RoY2xpZW50L2RoY2xpZW50LmMKKysr IGIvaGVhZC9zYmluL2RoY2xpZW50L2RoY2xpZW50LmMKQEAgLTIyNzUsNiArMjI3NSwxNyBAQAog ewogCWludCBpLCBqLCBuYW1lbGVuOwogCisJLyogTm8gYGAgb3IgJCgpIGNvbW1hbmQgc3Vic3Rp dHV0aW9uIGFsbG93ZWQgaW4gZW52aXJvbm1lbnQgdmFsdWVzISAqLworCWZvciAoaj0wOyBqIDwg c3RybGVuKHZhbHVlKTsgaisrKQorCQlzd2l0Y2ggKHZhbHVlW2pdKSB7CisJCWNhc2UgJ2AnOgor CQljYXNlICckJzoKKwkJCXdhcm5pbmcoImlsbGVnYWwgY2hhcmFjdGVyICglYykgaW4gdmFsdWUg JyVzJyIsCisJCQkgICAgdmFsdWVbal0sIHZhbHVlKTsKKwkJCS8qIElnbm9yZSB0aGlzIG9wdGlv biAqLworCQkJcmV0dXJuOworCQl9CisKIAluYW1lbGVuID0gc3RybGVuKG5hbWUpOwogCiAJZm9y IChpID0gMDsgY2xpZW50LT5zY3JpcHRFbnZbaV07IGkrKykKQEAgLTIzMTEsMTYgKzIzMjIsNiBA QAogCSAgICBzdHJsZW4odmFsdWUpICsgMSk7CiAJaWYgKGNsaWVudC0+c2NyaXB0RW52W2ldID09 IE5VTEwpCiAJCWVycm9yKCJzY3JpcHRfc2V0X2Vudjogbm8gbWVtb3J5IGZvciB2YXJpYWJsZSBh c3NpZ25tZW50Iik7Ci0KLQkvKiBObyBgYCBvciAkKCkgY29tbWFuZCBzdWJzdGl0dXRpb24gYWxs b3dlZCBpbiBlbnZpcm9ubWVudCB2YWx1ZXMhICovCi0JZm9yIChqPTA7IGogPCBzdHJsZW4odmFs dWUpOyBqKyspCi0JCXN3aXRjaCAodmFsdWVbal0pIHsKLQkJY2FzZSAnYCc6Ci0JCWNhc2UgJyQn OgotCQkJZXJyb3IoImlsbGVnYWwgY2hhcmFjdGVyICglYykgaW4gdmFsdWUgJyVzJyIsIHZhbHVl W2pdLAotCQkJICAgIHZhbHVlKTsKLQkJCS8qIG5vdCByZWFjaGVkICovCi0JCX0KIAlzbnByaW50 ZihjbGllbnQtPnNjcmlwdEVudltpXSwgc3RybGVuKHByZWZpeCkgKyBzdHJsZW4obmFtZSkgKwog CSAgICAxICsgc3RybGVuKHZhbHVlKSArIDEsICIlcyVzPSVzIiwgcHJlZml4LCBuYW1lLCB2YWx1 ZSk7CiB9Cgo= --b1_f8e61a04e9e2478512267ca6bdd03acf-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:09:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02500B166BF for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:09:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C691417C6 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:09:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 3083FC80F; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:09:08 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "gnn (George Neville-Neil)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <9b6c58a307b8345d38af9a83d04da50e@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYKDQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:09:09 -0000 gnn added a comment. Let's keep this moving along. Mike isn't (yet) a committer but if someone can commit this once everyone agrees that would be great. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:25:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E100B16C64 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524EE108F for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id D4819CE80; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:25:28 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <266e2176942a69619cea4a94b582f5fd@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYLAg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:25:29 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128530, @gnn wrote: > Let's keep this moving along. Mike isn't (yet) a committer but if someone can commit this once everyone agrees that would be great. OK, I will do it. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:27:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F43B16D4A for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B6111D5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id DD243D08E; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:27:52 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "gnn (George Neville-Neil)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <4cc84f86852f97086cdddedc7f66fab2@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYLJg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:27:53 -0000 gnn added a comment. Not my comment "once everyone agrees" :-) REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:30:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AC5B16E65 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF4A12FC for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 059D9D208; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:30:31 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <4c82c64a82251254e0538f286cce7a59@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYLTc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:30:31 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128535, @gnn wrote: > Not my comment "once everyone agrees" :-) heh, just read the first part of the comment :P REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:31:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC624B16FE1 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD38416F8 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 3CDFFD2BA; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:31:54 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "jtl (Jonathan T. Looney)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <55b62d6148ad907e8c6775eeb27ad7cb@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYLYo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:31:55 -0000 jtl added a comment. FWIW, I agree with deleting the ENOBUFs special-case. If we haven't already set the right timers by here, we have another bug which needs to be fixed. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:45:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109BEB16504 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8CB1D64 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 77A10DB5E; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:45:25 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hiren (hiren panchasara)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <9a6aa2afcc5b73615e1ca216d3c1f05c@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYMLU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:45:26 -0000 hiren added a comment. Ack for removing ENOBUFs case. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:53:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688A2B16B09 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC351269 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id A42EDF474; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:53:38 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "lstewart (Lawrence Stewart)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYMqI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:53:39 -0000 lstewart added a comment. ... but replace with a macro to check that the rexmit/persist timer is armed if appropriate! REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 01:57:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4697B16D2B for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8E11471 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 2F11EFC20; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:57:09 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hiren (hiren panchasara)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYM3U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:57:09 -0000 hiren added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128539, @lstewart wrote: > ... but replace with a macro to check that the rexmit/persist timer is armed if appropriate! Yes, that would be useful! REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 02:26:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E558B1798A for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EF21793 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id D02B5CADB; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:26:09 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "mike-karels.net (Mike Karels)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <5a9e35fcbab518d5f6ae33ceacbd8486@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYOkE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:26:10 -0000 mike-karels.net added a comment. btw, I think the line to set the snd_cwnd should remain for now, until something replaces it. ENOBUFS signals local congestion. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 02:30:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98801B17AC7 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735B41962 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id ACEC6CCB0; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:30:52 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <94d55982ea5e5df0a923eba7062dd061@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYO1w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:30:53 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128542, @mike-karels.net wrote: > btw, I think the line to set the snd_cwnd should remain for now, until something replaces it. ENOBUFS signals local congestion. ok. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 03:10:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A32BB157B5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761D61D57 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id B0C93FC7B; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:10:26 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "lstewart (Lawrence Stewart)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYRKI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:10:27 -0000 lstewart added a comment. I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops. It should be calling cc_cong_signal() with a new congestion type. Just leave that line as is for the moment though as Mike says. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 04:42:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D92DB166F1 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5E71655 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 2C6ABC4E8; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:42:08 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hiren (hiren panchasara)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYWiA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:42:09 -0000 hiren added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128555, @lstewart wrote: > I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops. Fixed? i.e. doing something other than setting cwnd to 1 seg? > It should be calling cc_cong_signal() with a new congestion type. Hum... tcp_quench() used to be there which essentially had this 1 line to set cwnd to 1 seg. Is there any (RFC) guidance for what to do in this situation? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 04:52:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACB4B16B40 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6E91D21 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3L4qLN3029255 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:52:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206581] bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:52:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch, security X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:52:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206581 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 05:12:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64917B16151 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F82514E3 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 6A062D1F9; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:12:01 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <47345357f5c615fc29b42043217f7709@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYYSE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:12:02 -0000 sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128556, @hiren wrote: > In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128555, @lstewart wrote: > > > I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops. > > > Fixed? i.e. doing something other than setting cwnd to 1 seg? > > > It should be calling cc_cong_signal() with a new congestion type. > > Hum... tcp_quench() used to be there which essentially had this 1 line to set cwnd to 1 seg. > > Is there any (RFC) guidance for what to do in this situation? I don't think there are any. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 05:16:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD1AB16290 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779BF17F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id AFDECD3C2; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:51 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "lstewart (Lawrence Stewart)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFcYYkM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:52 -0000 lstewart added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128556, @hiren wrote: > In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128555, @lstewart wrote: > > > I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops. > > > Fixed? i.e. doing something other than setting cwnd to 1 seg? Yes, but turns out it was a discussion I had privately with a colleague who never got around to creating the patch we discussed. >> It should be calling cc_cong_signal() with a new congestion type. > > Hum... tcp_quench() used to be there which essentially had this 1 line to set cwnd to 1 seg. > > Is there any (RFC) guidance for what to do in this situation? No, and it's an implementation detail that RFCs have no real business being concerned with either. Setting cwnd==maxseg is completely inappropriate though and I would argue that whatever reasoning was used to justify the original choice is as wrong today as it was back then. At any rate, that's something to follow up separately. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren, lstewart Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 12:02:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8BAB17BDB for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8C811BD for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LC2fpV062826 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:02:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203735] Transparent interception of ipv6 with squid and pf causes panic Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:02:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: timp87@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:02:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203735 --- Comment #3 from timp87@gmail.com --- (In reply to timp87 from comment #2) I meant '... starting from squid-3.5.15_2 version' --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 16:36:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA03AB170CC for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAB3F1AFE for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LGa30f005127 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:36:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:36:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:36:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:48:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684F8B16483 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5900018D5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHmbt5023963 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:48:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:48:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:48:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #2 from Justin Clift --- Hmmm, ddd seems to be showing more/better information about the crash. Attaching screenshots, as they seem to show the exact code at the crash poi= nt. ;) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:49:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4645EB1651F for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C6719F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHnB8c024820 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:49:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:49:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:49:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #3 from Justin Clift --- Created attachment 169532 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169532&action= =3Dedit Screenshot --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:50:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C23B16628 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16DB1AC3 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHo1gd026174 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.description Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 Justin Clift changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #169532|Screenshot |ipoib_ib_completion description| | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:50:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2F1B166DE for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC3A1C05 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHonjZ027967 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:50:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #4 from Justin Clift --- Created attachment 169533 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169533&action= =3Dedit ipoib_cm_handle_rx_wc() --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:51:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAAEB1674A for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B4461D0C for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHp4mH028436 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.description Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 Justin Clift changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #169532|ipoib_ib_completion |ipoib_ib_completion() description| | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:51:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992B1B168E2 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D7C1F13 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHppI5034986 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:51:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #5 from Justin Clift --- Created attachment 169534 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169534&action= =3Dedit netisr_dispatch_src() --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:52:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65D2B169A1 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F5B1042 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHqNaO037636 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #6 from Justin Clift --- Created attachment 169535 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169535&action= =3Dedit ip_input() --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 17:52:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36692B16A05 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270E01113 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LHqjvk038604 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:52:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #7 from Justin Clift --- Created attachment 169536 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169536&action= =3Dedit calltrap() --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 18:03:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984F6B16ECB for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F17182C for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LI3IbV095455 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:03:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:03:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:03:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 Hans Petter Selasky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hselasky@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #8 from Hans Petter Selasky --- In this context, can you type: print *dev Or: print dev->if_vnet (kgdb) list *0xffffffff808f89fa 0xffffffff808f89fa is in ipoib_cm_handle_rx_wc (/usr/src/sys/ofed/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c:565). 560 mb->m_pkthdr.rcvif =3D dev; 561 proto =3D *mtod(mb, uint16_t *); 562 m_adj(mb, IPOIB_ENCAP_LEN); 563=20=20=20=20=20 564 IPOIB_MTAP_PROTO(dev, mb, proto); 565 ipoib_demux(dev, mb, ntohs(proto)); 566=20=20=20=20=20 567 repost: --HPS --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 18:13:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D540BB1785A for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1321381 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LID9uP081132 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:13:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:13:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:13:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #9 from Justin Clift --- Created attachment 169537 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169537&action= =3Dedit ipoib_cm_handle_rx_wc() - print *dev --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 18:14:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D7AB1795B for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57D2164E for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LIEfbH083789 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:14:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:14:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: justin@postgresql.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:14:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #10 from Justin Clift --- Ahhh, cut-n-paste works too. That'll be easier. :) (gdb) print dev->if_vnet $3 =3D (struct vnet *) 0xfffff8000318aa80 (gdb) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 18:22:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD251B17D39 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB541CB7 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LIMMSS005552 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 --- Comment #11 from Hans Petter Selasky --- Created attachment 169538 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169538&action= =3Dedit VIMAGE + ipoib fix Can you try this patch? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 18:22:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADDAB17DBA for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8A61D4B for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3LIMVnl005834 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208957] Kernel panic (page fault) on 10.3-STABLE with VIMAGE & Infiniband modules Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:22:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208957 Hans Petter Selasky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |hselasky@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 21:52:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CBCB17450 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF9D10B6 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g8so95205606igr.0 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:52:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=k7ewCC38SyIabY0Qv5NG9wJrBfrZ9puLblhoQzMbZ3Q=; b=uBIs/MG+xmeQDxmBYoiX8LTmykhiRu5sYz1L/iJUCW719ShjLo6dwFgiKvGAyVaBvV E5vfRKK87p8TnTGwDKL6z+4B6lysOcSvan1kJSadPiL05Z5+gHyjIapH5z6YR5EPXOUo iJdqXLrU5EkP94j0y7NyVyhkCnTSS7dh3kFbFDHqi9CuqJXKlAUxx3JPnB724SfnWvgm 5fczjwnoAx2TJ3KTwvjCW4/T26AIBKx9aU4Z0Tn0faQIwTG9XhI4leGwSRs/SRuLxz75 UeNDc0RY5XAXTNNvIfbvLLSf1w2v9Vav2yzM2zboQxTSdoxTGGf4dD9IEdNE/yy4vPrN jIKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=k7ewCC38SyIabY0Qv5NG9wJrBfrZ9puLblhoQzMbZ3Q=; b=MboMrfcwEPE5thoO6Nd4i3SsSAXbT8cAT9prq+4PvPqKaaNkIYbnltsbiki/gGL7J3 isiJltWKGRJ54c8onZKJeJzzQexBD3yx2IbhHjVM5C5MzeYJuQRdaHB/eeep6dSNYvmi J+kQYwCHkOzroKJcGXdRMuAmjxhiXE6X45JHL5iTmiaMBK21p8R99xUbmBDgF/k+0Sx4 sHJaJLzAx70C/vUyIDM/98sNE6CAi/6JysJsZYxY58v03Mw8fOQzxDUbHCiWx7RfZCZJ UC/oFYzI3Yn/4jr0NYgcaKQyIkD4P5Uvmh/0hudOGZKMCB5FkMAUAhoBIfPJqF7YyyCL /iXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXet2DSIr7LIZTn6oohPCDwFYzz3gPWprPYOI5h8rp0sdz5apXn8rRHIT1Pd7VlNWulra7xB0y0KvZpOg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.111.163 with SMTP id ij3mr335333igb.76.1461275577627; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kmacybsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.140.8 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:52:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2C78DBCF-26F2-44D0-A45E-6EE8918648EA@netapp.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:52:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e75QOI7W5dhe1uvaPoOdcXwDvMg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issues with ixl(4) From: "K. Macy" To: Dustin Marquess Cc: "Eggert, Lars" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:52:58 -0000 On Wednesday, April 20, 2016, Dustin Marquess wrote: > I tried backing out that change and everything worked for a few minutes > and then started acting up again. Then I notice Sean Bruno's "TCP Packets > Drop!!!" email about LACP. I disabled LACP on the switch side and then > changed the lagg config from "lacp" to "roundrobin", and so far so good. > On the switch side it looks like member ports were randomly bounding in the > LACP bundle, and when I'd tcpdump an interface I wouldn't see anything > until another LACP&LLDP packet came in. > > So something seems to be broken with lagg's LACP support recently. The > good news is I don't think the route caching is causing this problem. I'll > put it back in and retest to make sure though. > > Glad to hear I was in error. -M > Thanks for the help! > -Dustin > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:15 PM, K. Macy > wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Eggert, Lars > > wrote: >> > I haven't played with lagg+vlan+bridge, but I briefly evaluated XL710 >> boards last year ( >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-October/043584.html) >> and saw very poor throughputs and latencies even in very simple setups. As >> far as I could figure it out, TSO/LRO wasn't being performed (although >> enabled) and so I ran into packet-rate issues. >> > >> > I basically gave up and went with a different vendor. FWIW, the XL710 >> boards in the same machines booted into Linux performed fine. >> > >> >> FWIW, NFLX sees performance close to that of cxgbe (by far the best >> maintained, best performing FreeBSD 40G driver) with an iflib >> converted driver. The iflib updated driver will be imported by 11 but >> won't become the default driver until 11.1 for wont of QA resources at >> Intel. >> >> -M >> > > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 22 15:57:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AED7B18D5C for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maaattss@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C251EB4 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maaattss@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o66so126964994ywc.3 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=eAmwHGC2jW9o41yy39euFPmaDZpLLwSFJW/ycWcNJRw=; b=xg+kxQaIUD/okA2ylSPKz1miKIiykAq3SZSNWgiLItIo0IS51PebBHxUlymdUlI7mD v92v20BUigMfXNQnyWpTY/Ygwb/2/EGmLPTxtI/r5vrqfcuzoiSY9awO77T4xwZgfx+t b2VgVADH3RG4z7LFf78QXeeDBiLoMZn8hd3Ov/022tjL0Ni+d454YggWkhVgtTwj/g2y BiwBO8bfbd/LdVoMHqVtYxhrL9Y6zD8VsL5KKDZf3O4AfDR4VUGsHRjuu7ldfmRcQPFo bLjzwzgzoZqlBJ4PF1mVZpapZtWW1STN1j+T3VgJRiKF9oT45nZ/P/LklGO4tk+5ppAH 2fBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=eAmwHGC2jW9o41yy39euFPmaDZpLLwSFJW/ycWcNJRw=; b=SbvaWYsODe6x8B4Dhr5dW70PXTAOwx0GvRRO3MQeRbhOGMfOL/Jh5bhhJAgFmrRSUP 00RXnWEGfOjCC4pcqNFSGa0l8X8QY8SXmKq5IJimWlygHoj5b6xeoaomBwcg1fRTMRLZ csuOQ/wjxu4Ewfd4KwyQlsUI9j9W8xrDCgIKEDbBP4lwuxxHSmKjWzr22y9rOp9YMTnu fwhTkhQAHWppBM3vqUGvzPejrqGdjSNgnMJvV8mcz1b3DSmgPvPeBaV0aT4FsRQRqIuS qRgQVZ8zxJSOzAaoIsSKjBztm6R7mPIKsEqH4G4dbId0NL28hlWqhpCcJxYrTR1RxTe7 edVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUPgIK4lAXslOYANyIwsDiArz6YGL9m7P0MtwWIxyVxwynkPxzE7/+unsrP6AI6h52f53HEGQmNnzlobg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.75.215 with SMTP id y206mr14462535ywa.32.1461340623138; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.59.141 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:57:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Persist ifconfig aliases after disconnect From: Matthew Smith To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:57:04 -0000 Hi all, on my FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE server I have a few jails running. To assign them IP addresses, I set aliases on the interface: ifconfig_re0_alias0="inet 192.168.1.200 netmask 0xffffffff" This works great until the connection drops and comes back up again, the alias goes away. If I run ifconfig in the jail, there's no inet line and I can not access the web server. However if I run the following and restart the jail, it works again: ifconfig re0 192.168.1.200 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias Obviously this is not ideal because there would be a lot of downtime. Any help would be greatly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 22 21:03:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86FB19C74 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raitech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 170A11782 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raitech@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k142so128442973oib.1 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6AC9qeiZa+3EOPa2wcZKR30GmmjNFpCsyG5inxCGBM8=; b=fz0hSQ+wAPfAIrka21rZ474jVq/toRg4AMD+0orTWlZhWBGJvZGT3JUutT4bYubfIq K6nY+n+uk0Xt9tV71jSXtlKo63DSabbG8nAxpqeeUp/mVgB1J5RTQspDZyc2No1SD+xf cgMtr/ppi9L+ZpPQcRFagiupjxi489M5RdPJ8vJ8CprBeBsorIex0HAhOWPUwa3D0Hbz A3M+tve89kKKnuTLIl/Xo08Lfgmm+FSyVm292LpAd1ufXJSh04BH3DshvWKNwhehcIHc IketJNqBJufXsNeDaOsuxbj2TGdUMHC+UTvrb0AdsDYg01oFm9ll25taczOuL8NThpwF qDKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6AC9qeiZa+3EOPa2wcZKR30GmmjNFpCsyG5inxCGBM8=; b=EtCSN1VdgCJ3SXpwX/hdsTWAzaD+zmSlKJldNMhZxUQkjMs4Wyh33D33PW+GxZwRv5 ptp5IdCj+dHbIiE7JUyMXiPcIfbK4n0EKtKBflrH18JDUXoENJqUDW//yjmBSmQ9SN8b Jf7aw4+VJT/8nnAgODyoDFScDyR0LeHSLbMCcdTu8OYnIr4Vb3baS330giqvlBlNIc00 D+46egFzqnyiAKYG1zgSpcNF5QU+3SDM7l8havq4KZmrlt9h7neJM8w24V1M9XYunFXN eAHkiQ66DV5MBFWtVXquBmmcohiknzu0EFI06rvY5TPiD32kc1Ndf8pklfBV3JzYgyb5 k31w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUGaJnAxh07PTlqTMdV6Vd5sJFVhW6zEJDe8Y2zT9+Cxuc6HTF0Z8pesed3b0M8JZBa/IIet5zf2DYEpw== X-Received: by 10.157.59.137 with SMTP id k9mr8789792otc.167.1461359014208; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:03:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.57.227 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Raimundo Santos Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:03:14 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Directions needed to implement original addresses log with PF and pflog To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:03:35 -0000 Hello, folks! I need some directions to implement a more refined NAT log with PF and pflog. Anyone can help me with that? Thank you, Raimundo Santos From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 22 22:23:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA43B19809 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B2071A5D for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g8so29058904igr.0 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=u+RY7C2W7NUWGgsODzQQTtNVQDdVtbHYtSyk5HZQ1kM=; b=q3v3J7sEKIiZZvxjOfQj+FhSh53Qm+kVmTvL3/8XMQArK59fPKcm5Hd3zap8TiYHOD V8vO/PBMptGZUg4gwIrSK5gLY05HcsMnLcXoErnXNzYBCrorqnYfnq6UYDxdywjV/9sn z3T4H7oZj0ELWq5VP41dF53d/MWoFkESgFujPhNi09EKsXe7qTe7hweuKmJJu/ybqemO AK98/IfVbBSvIv0aaIOQbwt1MzdG3D2yk/FfeBzmU5KF+jYmvKbCg1elCGlnApFiaJM7 38dZKAFbiFpVdPPtwzt8DQZBeTb10ygZSVI6tB/mO/g6TngIKxnhZGCGvEoHcXjr/dpe 5qtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=u+RY7C2W7NUWGgsODzQQTtNVQDdVtbHYtSyk5HZQ1kM=; b=Cmi++vhhNKPeCSdKIu8fyScQ0/rBUoNhZh/7j2qhEAcppiLhr7xtRfgNlVlE9IXhpO GudmWlIwthaDUu1CKwTnxYWNMl3aJ14BhC05upK5GDrlz3qmhVygXRbviGDSpGzyPyng SE/ispuCr4IubiDtLPAXK/fybGeRt2FpBsWwUC1SQRkQJqRxwH4k2O1Tf0dhjb/rnq+/ vd0PfhfV0BVeqPW7rfxuV39wvo2qGYKuxo6/jfjucnC3MXKJeBrdYGsuwcdWAvwMTN5B eM1wBRA9giGS5uGogQFHlIAn7kxtM1psLG5mZf45XOnI9/gzH7FWR6BZCnmxtqrF7gKG /5pA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FViTdJMt3lV+9eH2aQ7r6DFHuj5I3GafgxAji0ymCokY8BVFslWSQovg4PfCr9w/bP0hfvdbm5MFUAiNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.38.129 with SMTP id g1mr742357igk.34.1461363790611; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.133.65 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:23:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:23:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Persist ifconfig aliases after disconnect From: Ryan Stone To: Matthew Smith Cc: freebsd-net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:23:11 -0000 When you say the "connection drops", do you mean that the NIC loses link and then has it comes back? Are you using DHCP to get the main address? It sounds like perhaps dhclient is running and clearing the addresses it doesn't know about. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 01:56:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF14B19463 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.somayajulu@qlogic.com) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0134.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AACDA1160 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.somayajulu@qlogic.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qlgc.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-qlogic-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YH7as1J0VChpGDvezPaqTMrssoRuTG6Q0XR1rDwhlUQ=; b=UOxb+ngB4BuBUreWRKQHylEMDp3u+I6BD65Ua+oIYe/Y5KgVPJIubdNpP+Wjxuqlv/nTtpcNT8l7MN2BDYA/FqzIBD/6AK5DNeouTeazdw+qs8BClkj4gQQ8eA231RnWNCArsFZFEkwhj3jApO9GBbf5SHvz/NJjfrLIiEwdvr8= Received: from DM2PR11MB0222.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.160.132.25) by DM2PR11MB0224.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.160.132.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.466.19; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:55:53 +0000 Received: from DM2PR11MB0222.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.132.25]) by DM2PR11MB0222.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.132.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0466.023; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:55:53 +0000 From: David Somayajulu To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: [Bug 206581] bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty Thread-Topic: [Bug 206581] bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty Thread-Index: AQHRm4mi715yr00Nekqq9sf1yQ6Fpp+Wzqiw Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:55:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: FreeBSD.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;FreeBSD.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=qlogic.com; x-originating-ip: [198.186.0.2] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fc3449ba-890d-4ef2-b95b-08d36b1a676d x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR11MB0224; 5:yIq9I6Wb5ZjnqzL+miuP+o48zuRfQL9s9SHGU2tfzGFpxIZoF+lHxNmNP3qIOZdyxTDFDcJv1Bp46zuM58joOwFwef4l5dbThA9HyxdeORPiqxsD13CmcQl+ohpMaFpDEIukYfN8LYBQFsNR5a0b0efGFpK8drHv42ZVdem0QTtWt1XEUuAjDjw7zMvvGzyU; 24:JYX8HUD+BDrINFezXsLPUcLQb2uoKf4bpJpmXBVQ4LHMrQ4ngPE9H9m/7YZIs312ukcB9Vc69TZNLjPcKZwCg0ReOMtg49h1LrszBkeM8OU=; 7:1ReDlZVAKcjF3rrRcccbX9xA2WEiKmFhosU029yuLr5vkFnm+YYGvndXO5bL8n5sP10rI8A77FUILmLdpf1JxWLo5+Wd33fya7n5T5pIb5CwuM9aQbhKvbLu0FRTZ8po/Glp659DLPVHKId00YeiaRFgHRqoOXTvxSslKR+Hdq/iPQRB18+CoaJ3RhiLxHQ3WJAFZNpuK+uHMf9+Uy3kPDAwyUm6SXBU2pAmg5m72lE=; 20:2PY04eTi0i8BUP/7m7ZU2uADki4y9YPETAB+B+/SE1egtieXmhje4IZJNp8gV9tO6Qt9xy7B2c4ZC9iYpWB8f3bJaN45NEk3oVY7mBjfKXE2Qy1HcTrbfSCOU0XI+97UjoDRftlp3cCqNuDUgg5TEc9HQ1djumeQnuPhShQJ4cA= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR11MB0224; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(9101521062)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR11MB0224; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR11MB0224; x-forefront-prvs: 0921D55E4F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(76576001)(1220700001)(106116001)(558084003)(1096002)(5003600100002)(3846002)(6116002)(10400500002)(87936001)(5004730100002)(81166005)(2501003)(5002640100001)(586003)(2351001)(19580395003)(102836003)(19580405001)(5640700001)(86362001)(110136002)(9686002)(2906002)(66066001)(107886002)(5008740100001)(99286002)(77096005)(92566002)(74316001)(3660700001)(122556002)(15975445007)(189998001)(450100001)(76176999)(50986999)(33656002)(54356999)(3280700002)(2950100001)(11100500001)(2900100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR11MB0224; H:DM2PR11MB0222.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: qlogic.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Apr 2016 01:55:53.5437 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0d68a1f9-1490-4d0e-8767-a87dab3ef2ba X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR11MB0224 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:56:02 -0000 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206581 This happens to be dead/unused code. I have made a commit https://reviews.= freebsd.org/rS298496 to delete it. Thanks David S (davidcs@freebsd.org) From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 03:18:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6123DB19D78 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B6214C3 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3N3I0jf037022 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208985] DoS / heap overflow in bpf_stats_sysctl Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208985 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 03:18:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE98B19DF7 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09D116DF for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3N3IQ5j064200 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208977] bxe driver causes packet corruption with RLO activated Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:18:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208977 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 08:38:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8530B1A157 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 08:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maaattss@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com (mail-yw0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B86E1E05 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 08:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maaattss@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id u62so17311744ywe.3 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:38:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=RvUlmW9T/Kgldtt3JDpnq4CLhloY445OiwLyTOjTzOw=; b=xnJtclhVnsM2o2AJpsY/NldGD9u7Thscsqfi3A4/3XVoqQQY158hxRATxmeG+XDhKq 2aztNgFvs//TnKDiKpe0suMxNIsr+GACI+BpT4GTomlo+GalTjVPVBb5eDjWHYv+4lyF MB0AINgv7fKPtXPKcWLcVgxQ3DK1M+Fy83v7hwxiGgsn1WNN+3jK7ZceydKRGWJjJAQk Wr5iY1EsvEuY5DSdVaEjDmp0h1gqlhTWjAUUstLy5EiM5Dcn0iKupQeROQ4pbtwY3GrT xiy+mC9H+dmEFz8ZuWJZZeW/MZpPsubkrmIwR2GtQgvfEIhG6n3FIp1mnhzp9u/fgZW9 uXRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=RvUlmW9T/Kgldtt3JDpnq4CLhloY445OiwLyTOjTzOw=; b=SNTA7/CRZdmsLjAU+rMyg3cC4ZegrTvkqWNlcgXsG5YrOFR6cQMuirN5ZrqTzLTKpI rhV2wG6Z99mDAE43uweiCiX2JGSnDMdRDRp78rfLRftDlnrZmpwXT3mmHD0rVT1Rt3PZ FMjgz1Y8xMoNprvt1naPVamaNkAGvpiOLxhlfccZ9S17ds6MskBtVsCT6+Y0Qk2gdpYA CAvI+7UyyL3ph8MTe7UB91QKClleU+4PwX1KkPpa12inl+xkyx2DbUhmbDymBLJ1Oaga hc+03Hz5NWARekF1oyuzVqQsAP5rTZdzvH6bzYC9Gk34y9bYpZlTOJUulSktvIQwnJpp 9jpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXCh07VXcJkCQfOKXrLLOokEa8BKJewyhSPdu/IbH4awk0C9SR0H+KxMJowo7FDhSvtHo64rpowBpj08Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.206.65 with SMTP id q62mr16769721ywd.25.1461400687206; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.59.141 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:38:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:38:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Persist ifconfig aliases after disconnect From: Matthew Smith To: Ryan Stone , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 08:38:08 -0000 Assigning a static address and not using DHCP seems to have fixed the problem Thank you for the help. On 22 April 2016 at 23:23, Ryan Stone wrote: > When you say the "connection drops", do you mean that the NIC loses link and > then has it comes back? Are you using DHCP to get the main address? It > sounds like perhaps dhclient is running and clearing the addresses it > doesn't know about.