From owner-freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org Sat Jul 22 20:38:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cloud@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEAADACC75; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 20:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from helen.koike@collabora.com) Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bhuna.collabora.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E03164BF4; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 20:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from helen.koike@collabora.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: koike) with ESMTPSA id 048D626C51A Subject: Re: review of google-compute-engine: better quality of the GCE image From: Helen Koike To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org, swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <7cb3a2dc-7353-9ade-5e70-4538db90083f@collabora.com> Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 17:38:24 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7cb3a2dc-7353-9ade-5e70-4538db90083f@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD on cloud platforms \(EC2, GCE, Azure, etc.\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 20:38:49 -0000 Hi, On 2017-06-28 08:25 PM, Helen Koike wrote: > Hi, > > In order to increase the quality of the FreeBSD image for the Google > Cloud Engine platform, having the package google-compute-engine would > enable several features that allows the machine to be controlled by the > GCE tools (web console or gcloud) and other security features, so > FreeBSD wouldn't stay behind the other distributions on this. > > I would really appreciate if anyone could review this package so it can > be included in the FreeBSD ports, please, see more details in the link > below: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219687 > > Thanks > LN Koike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I just updated the patch to version 2.4.1, I would appreciate if anyone could review it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219687 Thanks a lot Helen